Removal of Certain Persons From the Entity List; Addition of a Person to the Entity List; and EAR Conforming Change, 15458-15461 [2017-06227]
Download as PDF
15458
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 59 / Wednesday, March 29, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
amending Q–39 and Q–67 is delayed to
coincide with that date.
Area navigation routes are published
in paragraph 2006 of FAA Order
7400.11A dated August 3, 2016, and
effective September 15, 2016, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The area navigation routes listed
in this document will be subsequently
published in the Order.
Good Cause for No Notice and
Comment
Section 553(b)(3)(B) of Title 5, United
States Code, (the Administrative
Procedure Act) authorizes agencies to
dispense with notice and comment
procedures for rules when the agency
for ‘‘good cause’’ finds that those
procedures are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ Under this section, an agency,
upon finding good cause, may issue a
final rule without seeking comment
prior to the rulemaking. The FAA finds
that prior notice and public comment to
this final rule is unnecessary due to the
brief length of the extension of the
effective date and the fact that there is
no substantive change to the rule.
Delay of Effective Date
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the effective
date of the final rule, Airspace Docket
15–AEA–7, as published in the Federal
Register on February 27, 2017 (82 FR
11804), FR. Doc. 2017–03507, is hereby
delayed until October 12, 2017.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., P. 389.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 22,
2017.
M. Randy Willis,
Acting Manager, Airspace Policy Group.
[FR Doc. 2017–06117 Filed 3–28–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Part 744
[Docket No. 170109042–7255–01]
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
RIN 0694–AH30
Removal of Certain Persons From the
Entity List; Addition of a Person to the
Entity List; and EAR Conforming
Change
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Mar 28, 2017
Jkt 241001
This rule amends the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) by
removing two persons listed under the
destination of China from the Entity
List. The two removals are the result of
a request for removal received by BIS
pursuant to the section of the EAR used
for requesting removal or modification
of an Entity List entry and a review of
information provided in the removal
request in accordance with the
procedure for requesting removal or
modification of an Entity List entity. In
light of the recent settlement of
administrative and criminal
enforcement actions against ZTE
Corporation and ZTE Kangxun, the EndUser Review Committee (ERC) has
determined that these two persons being
removed have performed their
undertakings to the U.S. Government in
a timely manner and have otherwise
cooperated with the U.S. Government in
resolving the matter which led to the
two entities’ listing.
This final rule also adds one person
to the Entity List. This person who is
added to the Entity List has been
determined by the U.S. Government to
be acting contrary to the national
security or foreign policy interests of the
United States. This person will be listed
on the Entity List under the destination
of China.
Lastly, this final rule makes a
conforming change to the EAR as a
result of the removal of these two
persons from the Entity List.
DATES: This rule is effective March 29,
2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chair, End-User Review Committee,
Office of the Assistant Secretary, Export
Administration, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Department of Commerce,
Phone: (202) 482–5991, Email: ERC@
bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
The Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to
part 744) identifies entities and other
persons reasonably believed to be
involved, or to pose a significant risk of
being or becoming involved, in
activities contrary to the national
security or foreign policy interests of the
United States. The EAR imposes
additional license requirements on, and
limits the availability of most license
exceptions for, exports, reexports, and
transfers (in-country) to those listed.
The ‘‘license review policy’’ for each
listed entity or other person is identified
in the License Review Policy column on
the Entity List and the impact on the
availability of license exceptions is
described in the Federal Register notice
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
adding entities or other persons to the
Entity List. BIS places entities and other
persons on the Entity List pursuant to
sections of part 744 (Control Policy:
End-User and End-Use Based) and part
746 (Embargoes and Other Special
Controls) of the EAR.
The End-User Review Committee
(ERC), composed of representatives of
the Departments of Commerce (Chair),
State, Defense, Energy and, where
appropriate, the Treasury, makes all
decisions regarding additions to,
removals from, or other modifications to
the Entity List. The ERC makes all
decisions to add an entry to the Entity
List by majority vote and all decisions
to remove or modify an entry by
unanimous vote.
ERC Entity List Decisions
Removals From the Entity List
This rule implements a decision of
the ERC to remove the following two
entries from the Entity List: Zhongxing
Telecommunications Equipment (ZTE)
Corporation and ZTE Kangxun
Telecommunications Ltd. These two
entities were added to the Entity List on
March 8, 2016 (see 81 FR 12006).
The U.S. Government recently
reached an agreement with ZTE
Corporation and ZTE Kangxun for the
settlement of administrative charges and
entry of a guilty plea in a criminal case
against the companies. On March 7,
2017, Secretary of Commerce Wilbur L.
Ross, Jr., issued a statement regarding
the settlement and guilty plea, which
resulted in a very substantial monetary
penalty, intrusive independent
monitoring, and additional suspended
penalties that will be imposed if ZTE
fails to meet its obligations or further
violates U.S. export controls.
In light of the settlement, the ERC has
determined that ZTE Corporation and
ZTE Kangxun have performed their
undertakings to the U.S. Government in
a timely manner and have otherwise
cooperated with the U.S. Government in
resolving the matter which led to the
two entities’ listing. Therefore, the ERC
has decided to remove these two entities
from the Entity List.
This final rule implements the
decision to remove the following two
entities located in China from the Entity
List:
China
(1) Zhongxing Telecommunications
Equipment (ZTE) Corporation, ZTE
Plaza, Keji Road South, Hi-Tech
Industrial Park, Nanshan District,
Shenzhen, China; and
(2) ZTE Kangxun
Telecommunications Ltd., 2/3 Floor,
E:\FR\FM\29MRR1.SGM
29MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 59 / Wednesday, March 29, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Suite A, ZTE Communication Mansion
Keji (S) Road, Hi-New Shenzhen,
518057 China.
The removal of the persons referenced
above, which was approved by the ERC,
eliminates the existing license
requirements in Supplement No. 4 to
part 744 for exports, reexports and
transfers (in-country) to these entities.
However, the removal of these persons
from the Entity List does not relieve
persons of other obligations under part
744 of the EAR or under other parts of
the EAR. Neither the removal of an
entity from the Entity List nor the
removal of Entity List-based license
requirements relieves persons of their
obligations under General Prohibition 5
in § 736.2(b)(5) of the EAR which
provides that, ‘‘you may not, without a
license, knowingly export or reexport
any item subject to the EAR to an enduser or end-use that is prohibited by
part 744 of the EAR.’’ Additionally, this
removal does not relieve persons of
their obligation to apply for export,
reexport or in-country transfer licenses
required by other provisions of the EAR.
BIS strongly urges the use of
Supplement No. 3 to part 732 of the
EAR, ‘‘BIS’s ‘Know Your Customer’
Guidance and Red Flags,’’ when persons
are involved in transactions that are
subject to the EAR.
Addition to the Entity List
This rule implements the decision of
the ERC to add one person to the Entity
List. This person is being added on the
basis of § 744.11 (License requirements
that apply to entities acting contrary to
the national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States) of the
EAR. The person added to the Entity
List will be listed under the destination
of China.
The ERC reviewed § 744.11(b)
(Criteria for revising the Entity List) in
making the determination to add this
person to the Entity List. Under that
paragraph, persons and those acting on
behalf of such persons may be added to
the Entity List if there is reasonable
cause to believe, based on specific and
articulable facts, that they have been
involved, are involved, or pose a
significant risk of being or becoming
involved in, activities that are contrary
to the national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States.
Paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of § 744.11
include an illustrative list of activities
that could be contrary to the national
security or foreign policy interests of the
United States.
Pursuant to § 744.11(b) of the EAR,
the ERC determined that this person,
Shi Lirong, located in the destination of
China, be added to the Entity List for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Mar 28, 2017
Jkt 241001
actions contrary to the national security
or foreign policy interests of the United
States. The ERC determined that there is
reasonable cause to believe, based on
specific and articulable facts, that Shi
Lirong has been involved in actions
contrary to the national security or
foreign policy interests of the United
States. Specifically, Shi Lirong was the
CEO of ZTE Corporation at the time the
ZTE documents that contributed to
ZTE’s listing were signed. Shi Lirong
signed and approved the document
‘‘Report Regarding Comprehensive
Reorganization and Standardization of
the Company Export Control Related
Matters,’’ which described how ZTE
planned and organized a scheme to
establish, control and use a series of
‘‘detached’’ (i.e., shell) companies to
illicitly reexport controlled items to Iran
in violation of U.S. export control laws.
Pursuant to § 744.11(b) of the EAR,
the ERC determined that the conduct of
this person raises sufficient concern that
prior review of exports, reexports or
transfers (in-country) of items subject to
the EAR involving this person, and the
possible imposition of license
conditions or license denials on
shipments to the person, will enhance
BIS’s ability to prevent violations of the
EAR. Therefore, this person is being
added to the Entity List.
For this person added to the Entity
List, BIS imposes a license requirement
for all items subject to the EAR and a
license review policy of presumption of
denial. The license requirements apply
to any transaction in which items are to
be exported, reexported, or transferred
(in-country) to this person or in which
such person acts as purchaser,
intermediate consignee, ultimate
consignee, or end-user. In addition, no
license exceptions are available for
exports, reexports, or transfers (incountry) to this person being added to
the Entity List in this rule.
This final rule adds the following
person to the Entity List:
China
(1) Shi Lirong, Yuanzhong Garden
Tower A, Room 26A, Futian, Shenzhen,
China; and Xinghai Mingcheng, 2nd
Floor, Shenzhen, China.
Conforming EAR Change
This final rule removes Supplement
No. 7 to part 744—Temporary General
License, which was originally added to
the EAR in a final rule on March 24,
2016 (81 FR 15633). The March 24 final
rule amended the EAR by adding
Supplement No. 7 to part 744 to create
a temporary general license that
returned, until June 30, 2016, the
licensing and other policies of the EAR
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15459
regarding exports, reexports, and
transfers (in-country) to ZTE
Corporation and ZTE Kangxun to those
which were in effect prior to their
addition to the Entity List on March 8,
2016. BIS subsequently extended the
validity date of the temporary general
license on four occasions (June 28, 2016
(81 FR 41799), August 19, 2016 (81 FR
55372), November 18, 2016 (81 FR
81663), and February 24, 2017 (82 FR
11505)), resulting in the current validity
end-date of March 29, 2017.
As described above under the section
Removals From the Entity List, this final
rule removes the two entities identified
in the temporary general license from
the Entity List. Therefore, this final rule
removes as a conforming change
Supplement No. 7 to part 744 because
it is no longer needed.
Export Administration Act of 1979
Although the Export Administration
Act of 1979 expired on August 20, 2001,
the President, through Executive Order
13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by
Executive Order 13637 of March 8,
2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013) and
as extended by the Notice of August 4,
2016, 81 FR 52587 (August 8, 2016), has
continued the Export Administration
Regulations in effect under the
International Emergency Economic
Powers Act. BIS continues to carry out
the provisions of the Export
Administration Act of 1979, as
appropriate and to the extent permitted
by law, pursuant to Executive Order
13222, as amended by Executive Order
13637.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). This rule has been determined
to be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
2. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
to respond to nor be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with a collection
of information, subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) (PRA), unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Control Number. This regulation
involves collections previously
approved by OMB under control
E:\FR\FM\29MRR1.SGM
29MRR1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
15460
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 59 / Wednesday, March 29, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
number 0694–0088, Simplified Network
Application Processing System, which
includes, among other things, license
applications and carries a burden
estimate of 43.8 minutes for a manual or
electronic submission. Total burden
hours associated with the PRA and
OMB control number 0694–0088 are not
expected to increase as a result of this
rule. You may send comments regarding
the collection of information associated
with this rule, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to Jasmeet K.
Seehra, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), by email to Jasmeet_K._
Seehra@omb.eop.gov, or by fax to (202)
395–7285.
3. This rule does not contain policies
with Federalism implications as that
term is defined in Executive Order
13132.
4. The provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553) requiring notice of proposed
rulemaking, the opportunity for public
comment and a delay in effective date
are inapplicable because this regulation
involves a military or foreign affairs
function of the United States. (See 5
U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). BIS implements this
rule to protect U.S. national security or
foreign policy interests by preventing
items from being exported, reexported,
or transferred (in country) to the person
being added to the Entity List. If the
effective date of this rule were delayed
to allow for notice and comment, then
the person being added to the Entity List
by this action would be able to continue
receiving items subject to the EAR
without a license, to the detriment of
the national security and foreign policy
interests of the United States. In
addition, publishing a proposed rule
would give this party notice of the U.S.
Government’s intention to place him on
the Entity List and would create an
incentive for this person to accelerate
his receipt of items subject to the EAR
in order to conduct activities that are
contrary to the national security or
foreign policy interests of the United
States, to set up additional aliases,
change addresses, and/or to take other
measures to try to limit the impact of
the listing on the Entity List after a final
rule is published.
Further, no other law requires that a
notice of proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment be
given for this rule. Because a notice of
proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment are not
required for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553,
or by any other law, the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., are
not applicable. Accordingly, no
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Mar 28, 2017
Jkt 241001
regulatory flexibility analysis is required
and none has been prepared.
5. For the two persons removed from
the Entity List in this final rule and for
the conforming EAR change to remove
Supplement No. 7 to part 744, BIS finds
good cause, pursuant to the APA, 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B), to waive requirements
that this rule be subject to notice and
the opportunity for public comment
because it would be contrary to the
public interest.
In determining whether to grant a
request for removal from the Entity List,
a committee of U.S. Government
agencies (the End-User Review
Committee (ERC)) evaluates information
about and commitments made by listed
persons requesting removal from the
Entity List, the nature and terms of
which are set forth in 15 CFR part 744,
Supplement No. 5, as noted in 15 CFR
744.16(b). The information,
commitments, and criteria for this
extensive review were all established
through the notice of proposed
rulemaking and public comment
process (72 FR 31005 (June 5, 2007)
(proposed rule), and 73 FR 49311
(August 21, 2008) (final rule)). These
two removals have been made within
the established regulatory framework of
the Entity List. If the rule were to be
delayed to allow for public comment,
U.S. exporters may face unnecessary
economic losses as they turn away
potential sales to the entities removed
by this rule because the customer
remained a listed person on the Entity
List even after the ERC approved the
removal pursuant to the regulatory
process established by the rule
published at 73 FR 49311 on August 21,
2008. By publishing without prior
notice and comment, BIS allows the
applicants to receive U.S. exports
immediately because the applicants
already have received approval by the
ERC pursuant to 15 CFR part 744,
Supplement No. 5, as noted in 15 CFR
744.16(b).
Removals from the Entity List granted
by the ERC involve interagency
deliberation and result from review of
public and non-public sources,
including sensitive law enforcement
information and classified information,
and the measurement of such
information against the Entity List
removal criteria. This information is
extensively reviewed according to the
criteria for evaluating removal requests
from the Entity List, as set out in 15 CFR
part 744, Supplement No. 5 and 15 CFR
744.16(b). For reasons of national
security, BIS is not at liberty to provide
to the public the detailed information
on which the ERC relied to make the
decisions to remove these entities. In
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
addition, the information included in
the removal request is information
exchanged between the applicant and
the ERC, which by law (section 12(c) of
the Export Administration Act of 1979),
BIS is restricted from sharing with the
public. Moreover, removal requests from
the Entity List contain confidential
business information, which is
necessary for the extensive review
conducted by the U.S. Government in
assessing such removal requests.
Additionally, section 553(d) of the
APA generally provides that rules may
not take effect earlier than thirty (30)
days after they are published in the
Federal Register. BIS finds good cause
to waive the 30-day delay in
effectiveness under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1)
because this rule is a substantive rule
which relieves a restriction. This rule’s
removal of two persons from the Entity
List removes requirements (the EntityList-based license requirement and
limitation on use of license exceptions)
related to these two persons.
No other law requires that a notice of
proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment be
given for this final rule. Because a
notice of proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment are not
required under the APA or by any other
law, the analytical requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.) are not applicable. As a result,
no final regulatory flexibility analysis is
required and none has been prepared.
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 744
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Terrorism.
Accordingly, part 744 of the Export
Administration Regulations (15 CFR
parts 730–774) is amended as follows:
PART 744—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 744 is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.; 50 U.S.C.
1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 42 U.S.C.
2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210;
E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp.,
p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR, 1993
Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59 FR 59099, 3
CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 12947, 60 FR
5079, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 356; E.O. 13026,
61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O.
13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 CFR, 1998 Comp., p.
208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13224, 66 FR 49079, 3
CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 786; Notice of August
4, 2016, 81 FR 52587 (August 8, 2016); Notice
of September 15, 2016, 81 FR 64343
(September 19, 2016); Notice of November 8,
2016, 81 FR 79379 (November 10, 2016);
Notice of January 13, 2017, 82 FR 6165
(January 18, 2017).
E:\FR\FM\29MRR1.SGM
29MRR1
15461
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 59 / Wednesday, March 29, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
2. Supplement No. 4 to Part 744 is
amended:
■ a. By removing, under China, two
Chinese entities, ‘‘Zhongxing
Telecommunications Equipment (ZTE)
Corporation, ZTE Plaza, Keji Road
South, Hi-Tech Industrial Park,
Nanshan District, Shenzhen, China’’;
■
Country
Entity
*
CHINA, PEOPLE’S
REPUBLIC OF
*
*
*
*
3. Remove Supplement No. 7 to Part
744.
Dated: March 24, 2017.
Matthew S. Borman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2017–06227 Filed 3–28–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Part 744
[Docket No. 170103009–7300–02]
RIN 0694–AH28
Removal of Certain Persons From the
Entity List
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule amends the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) by
removing seven persons under ten
entries from the Entity List. This rule
removes four persons listed under the
destination of Germany, one person
listed under the destination of Hong
Kong, one person listed under the
destination of India, one person listed
under the destination of Singapore, one
person listed under the destination of
Switzerland, and two persons under the
destination of the United Arab Emirates
from the Entity List. The three
additional entries are being removed to
SUMMARY:
15:57 Mar 28, 2017
Jkt 241001
*
*
Background
The Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to
part 744) identifies entities and other
persons reasonably believed to be
involved, or to pose a significant risk of
being or becoming involved, in
activities contrary to the national
security or foreign policy interests of the
United States. The EAR imposes
additional license requirements on, and
limits the availability of most license
exceptions for, exports, reexports, and
transfers (in-country) to those listed.
The ‘‘license review policy’’ for each
listed entity or other person is identified
in the License Review Policy column on
the Entity List and the impact on the
availability of license exceptions is
described in the Federal Register notice
adding entities or other persons to the
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
*
Federal Register citation
*
*
*
*
82 FR [INSERT FR PAGE
NUMBER]; March 29, 2017.
*
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
*
*
account for two persons listed under
more than one destination on the Entity
List. All seven of the removals are the
result of requests for removal received
by BIS pursuant to the section of the
EAR used for requesting removal or
modification of an Entity List entity and
a review of information provided in the
removal requests in accordance with the
procedure for requesting removal or
modification of an Entity List entity.
DATES: This rule is effective March 29,
2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chair, End-User Review Committee,
Office of the Assistant Secretary, Export
Administration, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Department of Commerce,
Phone: (202) 482–5991, Email: ERC@
bis.doc.gov.
■
*
*
*
For all items subject to the Presumption of
EAR. (See § 744.11 of the
denial.
EAR).
*
Supplement No. 7 to Part 744—
[Removed]
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
*
Supplement No. 4 to Part 744—Entity
List
License
review policy
License requirement
*
*
Shi Lirong, Yuanzhong Garden
Tower A, Room 26A, Futian,
Shenzhen,
China;
and
Xinghai
Mingcheng,
2nd
Floor, Shenzhen, China.
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
and ‘‘ZTE Kangxun
Telecommunications Ltd., 2/3 Floor,
Suite A, ZTE Communication Mansion
Keji (S) Road, Hi-New Shenzhen,
518057 China ’’; and
■ b. By adding, under China, one
Chinese entity.
The addition reads as follows:
*
*
Entity List. BIS places entities and other
persons on the Entity List pursuant to
sections of part 744 (Control Policy:
End-User and End-Use Based) and part
746 (Embargoes and Other Special
Controls) of the EAR.
The ERC, composed of representatives
of the Departments of Commerce
(Chair), State, Defense, Energy and,
where appropriate, the Treasury, makes
all decisions regarding additions to,
removals from, or other modifications to
the Entity List. The ERC makes all
decisions to add an entry to the Entity
List by majority vote and all decisions
to remove or modify an entry by
unanimous vote.
ERC Entity List Decisions
Removal From the Entity List
This rule implements a decision of
the ERC to remove the following ten
entries from the Entity List on the basis
of removal requests received by BIS:
Industrio GmbH, Martin Hess, Peter
Duenker, and Wilhelm ‘‘Bill’’ Holler, all
located in Germany; Frank Genin,
located in Hong Kong and the U.A.E.
(which accounts for two of the entries
this final rule removes); Beaumont
Trading AG, located in India,
Switzerland, and the U.A.E. (which
accounts for three of the entries this
final rule removes); and Amanda Sng,
located in Singapore. These seven
persons under ten entries were added to
the Entity List on March 21, 2016 (see
81 FR 14958). The ERC decided to
remove these seven persons under ten
entries based on information received
by BIS pursuant to § 744.16 of the EAR
E:\FR\FM\29MRR1.SGM
29MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 29, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15458-15461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-06227]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Part 744
[Docket No. 170109042-7255-01]
RIN 0694-AH30
Removal of Certain Persons From the Entity List; Addition of a
Person to the Entity List; and EAR Conforming Change
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule amends the Export Administration Regulations (EAR)
by removing two persons listed under the destination of China from the
Entity List. The two removals are the result of a request for removal
received by BIS pursuant to the section of the EAR used for requesting
removal or modification of an Entity List entry and a review of
information provided in the removal request in accordance with the
procedure for requesting removal or modification of an Entity List
entity. In light of the recent settlement of administrative and
criminal enforcement actions against ZTE Corporation and ZTE Kangxun,
the End-User Review Committee (ERC) has determined that these two
persons being removed have performed their undertakings to the U.S.
Government in a timely manner and have otherwise cooperated with the
U.S. Government in resolving the matter which led to the two entities'
listing.
This final rule also adds one person to the Entity List. This
person who is added to the Entity List has been determined by the U.S.
Government to be acting contrary to the national security or foreign
policy interests of the United States. This person will be listed on
the Entity List under the destination of China.
Lastly, this final rule makes a conforming change to the EAR as a
result of the removal of these two persons from the Entity List.
DATES: This rule is effective March 29, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chair, End-User Review Committee,
Office of the Assistant Secretary, Export Administration, Bureau of
Industry and Security, Department of Commerce, Phone: (202) 482-5991,
Email: ERC@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to part 744) identifies entities
and other persons reasonably believed to be involved, or to pose a
significant risk of being or becoming involved, in activities contrary
to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United
States. The EAR imposes additional license requirements on, and limits
the availability of most license exceptions for, exports, reexports,
and transfers (in-country) to those listed. The ``license review
policy'' for each listed entity or other person is identified in the
License Review Policy column on the Entity List and the impact on the
availability of license exceptions is described in the Federal Register
notice adding entities or other persons to the Entity List. BIS places
entities and other persons on the Entity List pursuant to sections of
part 744 (Control Policy: End-User and End-Use Based) and part 746
(Embargoes and Other Special Controls) of the EAR.
The End-User Review Committee (ERC), composed of representatives of
the Departments of Commerce (Chair), State, Defense, Energy and, where
appropriate, the Treasury, makes all decisions regarding additions to,
removals from, or other modifications to the Entity List. The ERC makes
all decisions to add an entry to the Entity List by majority vote and
all decisions to remove or modify an entry by unanimous vote.
ERC Entity List Decisions
Removals From the Entity List
This rule implements a decision of the ERC to remove the following
two entries from the Entity List: Zhongxing Telecommunications
Equipment (ZTE) Corporation and ZTE Kangxun Telecommunications Ltd.
These two entities were added to the Entity List on March 8, 2016 (see
81 FR 12006).
The U.S. Government recently reached an agreement with ZTE
Corporation and ZTE Kangxun for the settlement of administrative
charges and entry of a guilty plea in a criminal case against the
companies. On March 7, 2017, Secretary of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr.,
issued a statement regarding the settlement and guilty plea, which
resulted in a very substantial monetary penalty, intrusive independent
monitoring, and additional suspended penalties that will be imposed if
ZTE fails to meet its obligations or further violates U.S. export
controls.
In light of the settlement, the ERC has determined that ZTE
Corporation and ZTE Kangxun have performed their undertakings to the
U.S. Government in a timely manner and have otherwise cooperated with
the U.S. Government in resolving the matter which led to the two
entities' listing. Therefore, the ERC has decided to remove these two
entities from the Entity List.
This final rule implements the decision to remove the following two
entities located in China from the Entity List:
China
(1) Zhongxing Telecommunications Equipment (ZTE) Corporation, ZTE
Plaza, Keji Road South, Hi-Tech Industrial Park, Nanshan District,
Shenzhen, China; and
(2) ZTE Kangxun Telecommunications Ltd., 2/3 Floor,
[[Page 15459]]
Suite A, ZTE Communication Mansion Keji (S) Road, Hi-New Shenzhen,
518057 China.
The removal of the persons referenced above, which was approved by
the ERC, eliminates the existing license requirements in Supplement No.
4 to part 744 for exports, reexports and transfers (in-country) to
these entities. However, the removal of these persons from the Entity
List does not relieve persons of other obligations under part 744 of
the EAR or under other parts of the EAR. Neither the removal of an
entity from the Entity List nor the removal of Entity List-based
license requirements relieves persons of their obligations under
General Prohibition 5 in Sec. 736.2(b)(5) of the EAR which provides
that, ``you may not, without a license, knowingly export or reexport
any item subject to the EAR to an end-user or end-use that is
prohibited by part 744 of the EAR.'' Additionally, this removal does
not relieve persons of their obligation to apply for export, reexport
or in-country transfer licenses required by other provisions of the
EAR. BIS strongly urges the use of Supplement No. 3 to part 732 of the
EAR, ``BIS's `Know Your Customer' Guidance and Red Flags,'' when
persons are involved in transactions that are subject to the EAR.
Addition to the Entity List
This rule implements the decision of the ERC to add one person to
the Entity List. This person is being added on the basis of Sec.
744.11 (License requirements that apply to entities acting contrary to
the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States)
of the EAR. The person added to the Entity List will be listed under
the destination of China.
The ERC reviewed Sec. 744.11(b) (Criteria for revising the Entity
List) in making the determination to add this person to the Entity
List. Under that paragraph, persons and those acting on behalf of such
persons may be added to the Entity List if there is reasonable cause to
believe, based on specific and articulable facts, that they have been
involved, are involved, or pose a significant risk of being or becoming
involved in, activities that are contrary to the national security or
foreign policy interests of the United States. Paragraphs (b)(1)
through (5) of Sec. 744.11 include an illustrative list of activities
that could be contrary to the national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States.
Pursuant to Sec. 744.11(b) of the EAR, the ERC determined that
this person, Shi Lirong, located in the destination of China, be added
to the Entity List for actions contrary to the national security or
foreign policy interests of the United States. The ERC determined that
there is reasonable cause to believe, based on specific and articulable
facts, that Shi Lirong has been involved in actions contrary to the
national security or foreign policy interests of the United States.
Specifically, Shi Lirong was the CEO of ZTE Corporation at the time the
ZTE documents that contributed to ZTE's listing were signed. Shi Lirong
signed and approved the document ``Report Regarding Comprehensive
Reorganization and Standardization of the Company Export Control
Related Matters,'' which described how ZTE planned and organized a
scheme to establish, control and use a series of ``detached'' (i.e.,
shell) companies to illicitly reexport controlled items to Iran in
violation of U.S. export control laws.
Pursuant to Sec. 744.11(b) of the EAR, the ERC determined that the
conduct of this person raises sufficient concern that prior review of
exports, reexports or transfers (in-country) of items subject to the
EAR involving this person, and the possible imposition of license
conditions or license denials on shipments to the person, will enhance
BIS's ability to prevent violations of the EAR. Therefore, this person
is being added to the Entity List.
For this person added to the Entity List, BIS imposes a license
requirement for all items subject to the EAR and a license review
policy of presumption of denial. The license requirements apply to any
transaction in which items are to be exported, reexported, or
transferred (in-country) to this person or in which such person acts as
purchaser, intermediate consignee, ultimate consignee, or end-user. In
addition, no license exceptions are available for exports, reexports,
or transfers (in-country) to this person being added to the Entity List
in this rule.
This final rule adds the following person to the Entity List:
China
(1) Shi Lirong, Yuanzhong Garden Tower A, Room 26A, Futian,
Shenzhen, China; and Xinghai Mingcheng, 2nd Floor, Shenzhen, China.
Conforming EAR Change
This final rule removes Supplement No. 7 to part 744--Temporary
General License, which was originally added to the EAR in a final rule
on March 24, 2016 (81 FR 15633). The March 24 final rule amended the
EAR by adding Supplement No. 7 to part 744 to create a temporary
general license that returned, until June 30, 2016, the licensing and
other policies of the EAR regarding exports, reexports, and transfers
(in-country) to ZTE Corporation and ZTE Kangxun to those which were in
effect prior to their addition to the Entity List on March 8, 2016. BIS
subsequently extended the validity date of the temporary general
license on four occasions (June 28, 2016 (81 FR 41799), August 19, 2016
(81 FR 55372), November 18, 2016 (81 FR 81663), and February 24, 2017
(82 FR 11505)), resulting in the current validity end-date of March 29,
2017.
As described above under the section Removals From the Entity List,
this final rule removes the two entities identified in the temporary
general license from the Entity List. Therefore, this final rule
removes as a conforming change Supplement No. 7 to part 744 because it
is no longer needed.
Export Administration Act of 1979
Although the Export Administration Act of 1979 expired on August
20, 2001, the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17,
2001, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by Executive Order
13637 of March 8, 2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013) and as extended by
the Notice of August 4, 2016, 81 FR 52587 (August 8, 2016), has
continued the Export Administration Regulations in effect under the
International Emergency Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to carry out
the provisions of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as appropriate
and to the extent permitted by law, pursuant to Executive Order 13222,
as amended by Executive Order 13637.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). This rule
has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to nor be subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with a collection of information, subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA),
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This regulation involves
collections previously approved by OMB under control
[[Page 15460]]
number 0694-0088, Simplified Network Application Processing System,
which includes, among other things, license applications and carries a
burden estimate of 43.8 minutes for a manual or electronic submission.
Total burden hours associated with the PRA and OMB control number 0694-
0088 are not expected to increase as a result of this rule. You may
send comments regarding the collection of information associated with
this rule, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Jasmeet K.
Seehra, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), by email to
Jasmeet_K._Seehra@omb.eop.gov, or by fax to (202) 395-7285.
3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined in Executive Order 13132.
4. The provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553) requiring notice of proposed rulemaking, the opportunity
for public comment and a delay in effective date are inapplicable
because this regulation involves a military or foreign affairs function
of the United States. (See 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). BIS implements this
rule to protect U.S. national security or foreign policy interests by
preventing items from being exported, reexported, or transferred (in
country) to the person being added to the Entity List. If the effective
date of this rule were delayed to allow for notice and comment, then
the person being added to the Entity List by this action would be able
to continue receiving items subject to the EAR without a license, to
the detriment of the national security and foreign policy interests of
the United States. In addition, publishing a proposed rule would give
this party notice of the U.S. Government's intention to place him on
the Entity List and would create an incentive for this person to
accelerate his receipt of items subject to the EAR in order to conduct
activities that are contrary to the national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States, to set up additional aliases, change
addresses, and/or to take other measures to try to limit the impact of
the listing on the Entity List after a final rule is published.
Further, no other law requires that a notice of proposed rulemaking
and an opportunity for public comment be given for this rule. Because a
notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment are
not required for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553, or by any other law, the
analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq., are not applicable. Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required and none has been prepared.
5. For the two persons removed from the Entity List in this final
rule and for the conforming EAR change to remove Supplement No. 7 to
part 744, BIS finds good cause, pursuant to the APA, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), to waive requirements that this rule be subject to notice
and the opportunity for public comment because it would be contrary to
the public interest.
In determining whether to grant a request for removal from the
Entity List, a committee of U.S. Government agencies (the End-User
Review Committee (ERC)) evaluates information about and commitments
made by listed persons requesting removal from the Entity List, the
nature and terms of which are set forth in 15 CFR part 744, Supplement
No. 5, as noted in 15 CFR 744.16(b). The information, commitments, and
criteria for this extensive review were all established through the
notice of proposed rulemaking and public comment process (72 FR 31005
(June 5, 2007) (proposed rule), and 73 FR 49311 (August 21, 2008)
(final rule)). These two removals have been made within the established
regulatory framework of the Entity List. If the rule were to be delayed
to allow for public comment, U.S. exporters may face unnecessary
economic losses as they turn away potential sales to the entities
removed by this rule because the customer remained a listed person on
the Entity List even after the ERC approved the removal pursuant to the
regulatory process established by the rule published at 73 FR 49311 on
August 21, 2008. By publishing without prior notice and comment, BIS
allows the applicants to receive U.S. exports immediately because the
applicants already have received approval by the ERC pursuant to 15 CFR
part 744, Supplement No. 5, as noted in 15 CFR 744.16(b).
Removals from the Entity List granted by the ERC involve
interagency deliberation and result from review of public and non-
public sources, including sensitive law enforcement information and
classified information, and the measurement of such information against
the Entity List removal criteria. This information is extensively
reviewed according to the criteria for evaluating removal requests from
the Entity List, as set out in 15 CFR part 744, Supplement No. 5 and 15
CFR 744.16(b). For reasons of national security, BIS is not at liberty
to provide to the public the detailed information on which the ERC
relied to make the decisions to remove these entities. In addition, the
information included in the removal request is information exchanged
between the applicant and the ERC, which by law (section 12(c) of the
Export Administration Act of 1979), BIS is restricted from sharing with
the public. Moreover, removal requests from the Entity List contain
confidential business information, which is necessary for the extensive
review conducted by the U.S. Government in assessing such removal
requests.
Additionally, section 553(d) of the APA generally provides that
rules may not take effect earlier than thirty (30) days after they are
published in the Federal Register. BIS finds good cause to waive the
30-day delay in effectiveness under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1) because this
rule is a substantive rule which relieves a restriction. This rule's
removal of two persons from the Entity List removes requirements (the
Entity-List-based license requirement and limitation on use of license
exceptions) related to these two persons.
No other law requires that a notice of proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment be given for this final rule. Because a
notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment are
not required under the APA or by any other law, the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
are not applicable. As a result, no final regulatory flexibility
analysis is required and none has been prepared.
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 744
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Terrorism.
Accordingly, part 744 of the Export Administration Regulations (15
CFR parts 730-774) is amended as follows:
PART 744--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 744 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22
U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22
U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 179;
E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59
FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR,
1995 Comp., p. 356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222,
66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13224, 66 FR 49079, 3
CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 786; Notice of August 4, 2016, 81 FR 52587
(August 8, 2016); Notice of September 15, 2016, 81 FR 64343
(September 19, 2016); Notice of November 8, 2016, 81 FR 79379
(November 10, 2016); Notice of January 13, 2017, 82 FR 6165 (January
18, 2017).
[[Page 15461]]
0
2. Supplement No. 4 to Part 744 is amended:
0
a. By removing, under China, two Chinese entities, ``Zhongxing
Telecommunications Equipment (ZTE) Corporation, ZTE Plaza, Keji Road
South, Hi-Tech Industrial Park, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, China'';
and ``ZTE Kangxun Telecommunications Ltd., 2/3 Floor, Suite A, ZTE
Communication Mansion Keji (S) Road, Hi-New Shenzhen, 518057 China '';
and
0
b. By adding, under China, one Chinese entity.
The addition reads as follows:
Supplement No. 4 to Part 744--Entity List
* * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
License License review Federal Register
Country Entity requirement policy citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
CHINA, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF
* * * * * * *
Shi Lirong, For all items Presumption of 82 FR [INSERT FR
Yuanzhong Garden subject to the denial. PAGE NUMBER];
Tower A, Room EAR. (See Sec. March 29, 2017.
26A, Futian, 744.11 of the
Shenzhen, China; EAR).
and Xinghai
Mingcheng, 2nd
Floor, Shenzhen,
China.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplement No. 7 to Part 744--[Removed]
0
3. Remove Supplement No. 7 to Part 744.
Dated: March 24, 2017.
Matthew S. Borman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2017-06227 Filed 3-28-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P