Malheur National Forest, Blue Mountain Ranger District and Umatilla National Forest, North Fork John Day Ranger District; Oregon; Ragged Ruby Project, 15020-15021 [2017-05826]
Download as PDF
15020
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 82, No. 56
Friday, March 24, 2017
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Malheur National Forest, Blue
Mountain Ranger District and Umatilla
National Forest, North Fork John Day
Ranger District; Oregon; Ragged Ruby
Project
Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
The Forest Service will
prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to disclose the
environmental effects of upland
restoration activities; watershed,
fisheries, and wildlife restoration; bat
gate installation; prescribed burning;
road activities; and recreation system
changes in the Ragged Ruby planning
area.
SUMMARY:
Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by 30
days from date of publication in the
Federal Register, which initiates the
project’s scoping period. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected January 2018 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected July 2018.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Dave Halemeier, District Ranger, Blue
Mountain Ranger District, c/o Sasha
Fertig, P.O. Box 909, John Day, OR
97845. Comments may also be sent via
email to comments-pacificnorthwestmalheur-bluemountain@fs.fed.us, or via
facsimile to 541–575–3319.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sasha Fertig, NEPA Planner, Blue
Mountain Ranger District, 431 Patterson
Bridge Road, P.O. Box 909, John Day,
OR 97845. Phone: 541–575–3061. Email:
sashafertig@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:56 Mar 23, 2017
Jkt 241001
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Ragged Ruby planning area
encompasses approximately 34,000
acres in the Granite Boulder Creek and
Balance Creek subwatersheds that drain
into the Middle Fork John Day River.
The legal description for the planning
area includes Townships 10 and 11
South, Ranges 33 and 34 East,
Willamette Meridian, Grant County,
Oregon. The full scoping package is
available on the Malheur National
Forest Web site: https://
www.fs.usda.gov/project/
?project=49392.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose and need for the Ragged
Ruby Project was developed by
comparing the management objectives
and desired conditions in the Malheur
and Umatilla Forest Plans to the existing
conditions in the Ragged Ruby planning
area related to forest and watershed
resiliency and function. The purpose
and need is to: Maintain and improve
landscape resiliency and manage for
diverse forest composition, stocking
levels, and pattern to maintain healthy
ecological function and process within
a complex disturbance regime of
wildfire, drought, insects, and diseases;
promote forest conditions that allow for
the reintroduction of fire upon the
landscape, thereby creating conditions
that are conducive for firefighter safety,
resource values, and private lands;
improve aquatic resource conditions;
improve wildlife habitat; improve one
or more of the nine roadless area
characteristics (as defined by the 2001
Roadless Area Conservation Rule)
within the Dixie Butte and Greenhorn
Mountain inventoried roadless areas
and restore the characteristics of
ecosystem composition and structure
within the range of variability that
would be expected to occur under
natural disturbance regimes of the
current climatic period; and contribute
to the social and economic health of
those enjoying multiple uses in the
Ragged Ruby planning area.
Proposed Action
The proposed action includes:
(1) Upland restoration on
approximately 9,030 acres. Activities
types include dry pine restoration,
mixed conifer restoration, aspen
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
restoration, scabland flat bunchgrass
restoration, and whitebark pine and
western white pine restoration. Upland
restoration activities would help restore
forest structure, composition, and
density toward more resilient vegetative
conditions.
(2) Watershed, fisheries, and wildlife
restoration that includes ecological
riparian treatments (variable density
thinning, openings, leave areas, tree
tipping, and potential removal within
riparian habitat conservation areas) and
large wood treatments (placement of
trees within streams and floodplains).
(3) Bat gate installation at 2 mine adits
using an existing road or pack stock.
(4) Prescribed burning on up to 34,000
acres to restore and maintain an
ecosystem that would thrive with the
recurring disturbance of wildfire within
the planning area. Treated stands would
see a combination of burning piled
material and underburning. Those
stands not mechanically treated would
be managed exclusively with the use of
prescribed burning. As conditions and
stand characteristics allow, natural
ignitions within the planning area
would be used to meet the objectives of
prescribed burning.
(5) Road activities that support
implementing upland restoration and
other project activities as well as road
system changes. Road maintenance and
reconstruction for haul would occur on
open or temporarily opened roads to
provide safe access and adequate
drainage. Temporary roads
(approximately 10 miles) would be
constructed to access some timber
harvest units, which would be
rehabilitated following use. The
following changes to the road system are
proposed: decommissioning 1.9 miles of
road, closing 6.4 miles of currently open
road, confirming the previous
administrative closure of 26.7 miles or
road, opening 2.8 miles of currently
closed road, relocating 0.2 miles of road,
and adding 2.5 miles existing roadbed
onto system as closed road.
(6) Recreation system changes to
improve or maintain quality recreational
opportunities by reducing user conflicts
on the current trail system, improving
access to trail systems, mitigating
resource concerns, and providing family
friendly and Americans with Disability
Act (ADA) accessible trails. Seven trails
and their associated trailheads would be
improved with 3.3 miles of new trail
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 56 / Friday, March 24, 2017 / Notices
construction, 9.1 miles of trail codesignated on existing roads, 5.1 miles
of trails being un-designated, and 18.7
miles of trail remaining on the system.
Preliminary connectivity corridors
have been identified between late and
old structure stands to allow for
movement of old-growth dependent
species. The goal of creating
‘‘connectivity’’ is to manage stands in
corridors at higher canopy densities
when compared to more intensively
managed stands located outside of
corridors.
The Ragged Ruby Project will also
include a variety of project design
criteria that serve to mitigate impacts of
activities to forest resources, including
wildlife, soils, watershed condition,
aquatic species, riparian habitat
conservation areas, heritage resources,
visuals, rangeland, botanical resources,
and invasive plants. The proposed
action may also include amendments to
the Malheur National Forest Land and
Resource Management Plan, as
amended: dedicated old growth unit
changes, reduce satisfactory and/or total
cover, removal of trees greater than or
equal to 21 inches diameter at breast
height, and harvest within late and old
structure stands.
Possible Alternatives
The Forest Service will consider a
range of alternatives. One of these will
be the ‘‘no action’’ alternative in which
none of the proposed action would be
implemented. Additional alternatives
may be included in response to issues
raised by the public during the scoping
process or due to additional concerns
for resource values identified by the
interdisciplinary team.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Responsible Official
The Forest Supervisor of the Malheur
National Forest, 431 Patterson Bridge
Road, John Day, OR 97845, is the
Responsible Official. As the Responsible
Official, I will decide if the proposed
action will be implemented. I will
document the decision and rationale for
the decision in the Record of Decision.
I have delegated the responsibility for
preparing the draft EIS and final EIS to
the District Ranger, Blue Mountain
Ranger District.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
Based on the purpose and need, the
Responsible Official reviews the
proposed action, the other alternatives,
the environmental consequences, and
public comments on the analysis in
order to make the following decision: (1)
Whether to implement the proposed
activities; and if so, how much and at
what specific locations; (2) What, if any,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:56 Mar 23, 2017
Jkt 241001
specific project monitoring
requirements are needed to assure
project design criteria and mitigation
measures are implemented and
effective, and to evaluate the success of
the project objectives.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. The interdisciplinary
team will continue to seek information
and comments from Federal, State, and
local agencies, Tribal governments, and
other individuals or organizations that
may be interested in, or affected by, the
proposed action. There is a collaborative
group in the area that the
interdisciplinary team will interact with
during the analysis process.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the
environmental impact statement.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered, however.
Dated: March 17, 2017.
Jeanne M. Higgins,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest
System.
[FR Doc. 2017–05826 Filed 3–23–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests;
Idaho; Nez Perce-Clearwater National
Forests Clear Creek Integrated
Restoration Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare
a Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (SEIS) for the Clear Creek
Integrated Restoration Project.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The U.S. Forest Service is
giving notice of its intent to prepare a
SEIS for the Clear Creek Integrated
Restoration Project on the Moose Creek
Ranger District of the Nez PerceClearwater National Forests, Idaho.
Cheryl Probert, Forest Supervisor, has
withdrawn the February 2016 Record of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15021
Decision (ROD) for this project.
Supervisor Probert plans to prepare a
SEIS to further review the project
alternatives and analysis, to correct and
update information that was presented
in the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS), and to consider
information that has become available
since the FEIS was published in
September 2015.
Authority: This NOI is being published
pursuant to regulations (40 CFR 1508.22)
implementing the procedural provisions of
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321
et seq.).
Scoping: A NOI published on January
6, 2012 initiated the scoping period for
the Clear Creek Integrated Restoration
Project. A legal notice advertising the
start of a 30-day scoping period was
advertised in the Lewiston, Idaho
Lewiston Tribune on December 30,
2011. In accordance with 40 CFR
1502.9(c)(4), there will be no scoping
conducted for this SEIS. The scope of
the Clear Creek Integrated Restoration
FEIS established the scope for this SEIS.
The SEIS will be advertised for public
comment as required by 40 CFR 1503.1.
The Draft SEIS will be announced for
public review and comment in the
Federal Register, on the Nez PerceClearwater National Forests’ project
Web site, and in the Lewiston, Idaho
Lewiston Tribune, as well as other local
media.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lois
Hill, Environmental Coordinator, (208)
935–4258.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The US
Forest Service is announcing its intent
to prepare a SEIS for the Clear Creek
Integrated Restoration Project. The SEIS
will supplement the analysis from the
Clear Creek Integrated Restoration FEIS
(2015) by providing an updated analysis
of the environmental effects. The Clear
Creek Integrated Restoration FEIS
evaluated the potential effects of four
alternatives, including No Action and
three action alternatives.
The Nez Perce-Clearwater Forest
Supervisor will issue a new ROD after
evaluating the SEIS and public
comments. An objection period for the
new ROD will be provided, consistent
with 36 CFR part 218.
Responsible Official and Lead Agency
The USDA Forest Service is the lead
agency for this proposal. The Nez PerceClearwater Forest Supervisor is the
responsible official.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
Whether to adopt the proposed action,
in whole or in part, or another
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 56 (Friday, March 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15020-15021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05826]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 56 / Friday, March 24, 2017 /
Notices
[[Page 15020]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Malheur National Forest, Blue Mountain Ranger District and
Umatilla National Forest, North Fork John Day Ranger District; Oregon;
Ragged Ruby Project
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to disclose the environmental effects of upland
restoration activities; watershed, fisheries, and wildlife restoration;
bat gate installation; prescribed burning; road activities; and
recreation system changes in the Ragged Ruby planning area.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by 30 days from date of publication in the Federal Register, which
initiates the project's scoping period. The draft environmental impact
statement is expected January 2018 and the final environmental impact
statement is expected July 2018.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Dave Halemeier, District Ranger,
Blue Mountain Ranger District, c/o Sasha Fertig, P.O. Box 909, John
Day, OR 97845. Comments may also be sent via email to comments-pacificnorthwest-malheur-bluemountain@fs.fed.us, or via facsimile to
541-575-3319.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sasha Fertig, NEPA Planner, Blue
Mountain Ranger District, 431 Patterson Bridge Road, P.O. Box 909, John
Day, OR 97845. Phone: 541-575-3061. Email: sashafertig@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Ragged Ruby planning area encompasses
approximately 34,000 acres in the Granite Boulder Creek and Balance
Creek subwatersheds that drain into the Middle Fork John Day River. The
legal description for the planning area includes Townships 10 and 11
South, Ranges 33 and 34 East, Willamette Meridian, Grant County,
Oregon. The full scoping package is available on the Malheur National
Forest Web site: https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=49392.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose and need for the Ragged Ruby Project was developed by
comparing the management objectives and desired conditions in the
Malheur and Umatilla Forest Plans to the existing conditions in the
Ragged Ruby planning area related to forest and watershed resiliency
and function. The purpose and need is to: Maintain and improve
landscape resiliency and manage for diverse forest composition,
stocking levels, and pattern to maintain healthy ecological function
and process within a complex disturbance regime of wildfire, drought,
insects, and diseases; promote forest conditions that allow for the
reintroduction of fire upon the landscape, thereby creating conditions
that are conducive for firefighter safety, resource values, and private
lands; improve aquatic resource conditions; improve wildlife habitat;
improve one or more of the nine roadless area characteristics (as
defined by the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule) within the Dixie
Butte and Greenhorn Mountain inventoried roadless areas and restore the
characteristics of ecosystem composition and structure within the range
of variability that would be expected to occur under natural
disturbance regimes of the current climatic period; and contribute to
the social and economic health of those enjoying multiple uses in the
Ragged Ruby planning area.
Proposed Action
The proposed action includes:
(1) Upland restoration on approximately 9,030 acres. Activities
types include dry pine restoration, mixed conifer restoration, aspen
restoration, scabland flat bunchgrass restoration, and whitebark pine
and western white pine restoration. Upland restoration activities would
help restore forest structure, composition, and density toward more
resilient vegetative conditions.
(2) Watershed, fisheries, and wildlife restoration that includes
ecological riparian treatments (variable density thinning, openings,
leave areas, tree tipping, and potential removal within riparian
habitat conservation areas) and large wood treatments (placement of
trees within streams and floodplains).
(3) Bat gate installation at 2 mine adits using an existing road or
pack stock.
(4) Prescribed burning on up to 34,000 acres to restore and
maintain an ecosystem that would thrive with the recurring disturbance
of wildfire within the planning area. Treated stands would see a
combination of burning piled material and underburning. Those stands
not mechanically treated would be managed exclusively with the use of
prescribed burning. As conditions and stand characteristics allow,
natural ignitions within the planning area would be used to meet the
objectives of prescribed burning.
(5) Road activities that support implementing upland restoration
and other project activities as well as road system changes. Road
maintenance and reconstruction for haul would occur on open or
temporarily opened roads to provide safe access and adequate drainage.
Temporary roads (approximately 10 miles) would be constructed to access
some timber harvest units, which would be rehabilitated following use.
The following changes to the road system are proposed: decommissioning
1.9 miles of road, closing 6.4 miles of currently open road, confirming
the previous administrative closure of 26.7 miles or road, opening 2.8
miles of currently closed road, relocating 0.2 miles of road, and
adding 2.5 miles existing roadbed onto system as closed road.
(6) Recreation system changes to improve or maintain quality
recreational opportunities by reducing user conflicts on the current
trail system, improving access to trail systems, mitigating resource
concerns, and providing family friendly and Americans with Disability
Act (ADA) accessible trails. Seven trails and their associated
trailheads would be improved with 3.3 miles of new trail
[[Page 15021]]
construction, 9.1 miles of trail co-designated on existing roads, 5.1
miles of trails being un-designated, and 18.7 miles of trail remaining
on the system.
Preliminary connectivity corridors have been identified between
late and old structure stands to allow for movement of old-growth
dependent species. The goal of creating ``connectivity'' is to manage
stands in corridors at higher canopy densities when compared to more
intensively managed stands located outside of corridors.
The Ragged Ruby Project will also include a variety of project
design criteria that serve to mitigate impacts of activities to forest
resources, including wildlife, soils, watershed condition, aquatic
species, riparian habitat conservation areas, heritage resources,
visuals, rangeland, botanical resources, and invasive plants. The
proposed action may also include amendments to the Malheur National
Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, as amended: dedicated old
growth unit changes, reduce satisfactory and/or total cover, removal of
trees greater than or equal to 21 inches diameter at breast height, and
harvest within late and old structure stands.
Possible Alternatives
The Forest Service will consider a range of alternatives. One of
these will be the ``no action'' alternative in which none of the
proposed action would be implemented. Additional alternatives may be
included in response to issues raised by the public during the scoping
process or due to additional concerns for resource values identified by
the interdisciplinary team.
Responsible Official
The Forest Supervisor of the Malheur National Forest, 431 Patterson
Bridge Road, John Day, OR 97845, is the Responsible Official. As the
Responsible Official, I will decide if the proposed action will be
implemented. I will document the decision and rationale for the
decision in the Record of Decision. I have delegated the responsibility
for preparing the draft EIS and final EIS to the District Ranger, Blue
Mountain Ranger District.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
Based on the purpose and need, the Responsible Official reviews the
proposed action, the other alternatives, the environmental
consequences, and public comments on the analysis in order to make the
following decision: (1) Whether to implement the proposed activities;
and if so, how much and at what specific locations; (2) What, if any,
specific project monitoring requirements are needed to assure project
design criteria and mitigation measures are implemented and effective,
and to evaluate the success of the project objectives.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement. The
interdisciplinary team will continue to seek information and comments
from Federal, State, and local agencies, Tribal governments, and other
individuals or organizations that may be interested in, or affected by,
the proposed action. There is a collaborative group in the area that
the interdisciplinary team will interact with during the analysis
process.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of
the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered, however.
Dated: March 17, 2017.
Jeanne M. Higgins,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2017-05826 Filed 3-23-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P