Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of FDA-Approved Products of Oral Solutions Containing Dronabinol [(-)-delta-9-trans-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9-THC)] in Schedule II, 14815-14820 [2017-05809]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 55 / Thursday, March 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–344]
Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Placement of FDA-Approved Products
of Oral Solutions Containing
Dronabinol [(-)-delta-9-transtetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9-THC)] in
Schedule II
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Interim final rule, with request
for comments.
AGENCY:
On July 1, 2016, the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA)
approved a new drug application for
Syndros, a drug product consisting of
dronabinol [(-)-delta-9-transtetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9-THC)]
oral solution. Thereafter, the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) provided the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA) with
a scheduling recommendation that
would result in Syndros (and other oral
solutions containing dronabinol) being
placed in schedule II of the Controlled
Substances Act (CSA). In accordance
with the CSA, as revised by the
Improving Regulatory Transparency for
New Medical Therapies Act, DEA is
hereby issuing an interim final rule
placing FDA-approved products of oral
solutions containing dronabinol in
schedule II of the CSA.
DATES: The effective date of this
rulemaking is March 23, 2017.
Interested persons may file written
comments on this rulemaking in
accordance with 21 CFR 1308.43(g).
Electronic comments must be
submitted, and written comments must
be postmarked, on or before April 24,
2017. Commenters should be aware that
the electronic Federal Docket
Management System will not accept
comments after 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time
on the last day of the comment period.
Interested persons, defined at 21 CFR
1300.01 as those ‘‘adversely affected or
aggrieved by any rule or proposed rule
issuable pursuant to section 201 of the
Act (21 U.S.C. 811),’’ may file a request
for hearing or waiver of hearing
pursuant to 21 CFR 1308.44. Requests
for hearing and waivers of an
opportunity for a hearing or to
participate in a hearing must be
received on or before April 24, 2017.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling
of comments, please reference ‘‘Docket
No. DEA–344’’ on all correspondence,
including any attachments.
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:46 Mar 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
• Electronic comments: The Drug
Enforcement Administration encourages
that all comments be submitted
electronically through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, which provides the
ability to type short comments directly
into the comment field on the Web page
or attach a file for lengthier comments.
Please go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the online instructions at
that site for submitting comments. Upon
completion of your submission, you will
receive a Comment Tracking Number for
your comment. Please be aware that
submitted comments are not
instantaneously available for public
view on Regulations.gov. If you have
received a Comment Tracking Number,
your comment has been successfully
submitted and there is no need to
resubmit the same comment.
• Paper comments: Paper comments
that duplicate the electronic submission
are not necessary and are discouraged.
Should you wish to mail a paper
comment in lieu of an electronic
comment, it should be sent via regular
or express mail to: Drug Enforcement
Administration, Attn: DEA Federal
Register Representative/DRW, 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA
22152.
• Hearing requests: All requests for
hearing and waivers of participation
must be sent to: Drug Enforcement
Administration, Attn: Acting
Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive,
Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests
for hearing and waivers of participation
should also be sent to: (1) Drug
Enforcement Administration, Attn:
Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette
Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and
(2) Drug Enforcement Administration,
Attn: DEA Federal Register
Representative/DRW, 8701 Morrissette
Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael J. Lewis, Diversion Control
Division, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152; Telephone: (202) 598–8953.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Posting of Public Comments
Please note that all comments
received are considered part of the
public record. They will, unless
reasonable cause is given, be made
available by the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) for public
inspection online at https://
www.regulations.gov. Such information
includes personal identifying
information (such as your name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter. The Freedom of
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14815
Information Act (FOIA) applies to all
comments received. If you want to
submit personal identifying information
(such as your name, address, etc.) as
part of your comment, but do not want
it to be made publicly available, you
must include the phrase ‘‘PERSONAL
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION’’ in the
first paragraph of your comment. You
must also place all of the personal
identifying information you do not want
made publicly available in the first
paragraph of your comment and identify
what information you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential
business information as part of your
comment, but do not want it to be made
publicly available, you must include the
phrase ‘‘CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also
prominently identify the confidential
business information to be redacted
within the comment.
Comments containing personal
identifying information and confidential
business information identified as
directed above will generally be made
publicly available in redacted form. If a
comment has so much confidential
business information or personal
identifying information that it cannot be
effectively redacted, all or part of that
comment may not be made publicly
available. Comments posted to https://
www.regulations.gov may include any
personal identifying information (such
as name, address, and phone number)
included in the text of your electronic
submission that is not identified as
directed above as confidential.
An electronic copy of this document
and supplemental information,
including the complete Department of
Health and Human Services and Drug
Enforcement Administration eight-factor
analyses, to this interim final rule are
available at https://www.regulations.gov
for easy reference.
Request for Hearing, Notice of
Appearance at Hearing, or Waiver of
Participation in Hearing
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(a), this
action is a formal rulemaking ‘‘on the
record after opportunity for a hearing.’’
Such proceedings are conducted
pursuant to the provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5
U.S.C. 551–559. 21 CFR 1308.41–
1308.45; 21 CFR part 1316, subpart D.
In accordance with 21 CFR 1308.44(a)
through (c), requests for a hearing,
notices of appearance, and waivers of an
opportunity for a hearing or to
participate in a hearing may be
submitted only by interested persons,
defined as those ‘‘adversely affected or
aggrieved by any rule or proposed rule
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
14816
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 55 / Thursday, March 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
issuable pursuant to section 201 of the
Act (21 U.S.C. 811).’’ 21 CFR 1300.01.
Requests for a hearing and notices of
participation must conform to the
requirements of 21 CFR 1308.44(a) or
(b), as applicable, and include a
statement of the interest of the person in
the proceeding and the objections or
issues, if any, concerning which the
person desires to be heard. Any waiver
of an opportunity for a hearing must
conform to the requirements of 21 CFR
1308.44(c) including a written statement
regarding the interested person’s
position on the matters of fact and law
involved in any hearing.
Please note that pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
811(a), the purpose and subject matter
of the hearing are restricted to ‘‘(A)
find[ing] that such drug or other
substance has a potential for abuse, and
(B) mak[ing] with respect to such drug
or other substance the findings
prescribed by subsection (b) of section
812 of this title for the schedule in
which such drug is to be placed * * *.’’
Requests for a hearing and waivers of
participation in the hearing should be
submitted to DEA using the address
information provided above.
Legal Authority
Under the Improving Regulatory
Transparency for New Medical
Therapies Act (Pub. L. 114–89), which
was signed into law on November 25,
2015, DEA is required to commence an
expedited scheduling action with
respect to certain new drugs approved
by the FDA. As provided in 21 U.S.C.
811(j), this expedited scheduling is
required where both of the following
conditions apply: (1) The Secretary of
HHS has advised DEA that a New Drug
Application (NDA) has been submitted
for a drug that has a stimulant,
depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on
the central nervous system, and that it
appears that such drug has an abuse
potential and (2) the Secretary
recommends that DEA control the drug
in schedule II, III, IV, or V pursuant to
21 U.S.C. 811(a) and (b). In these
circumstances, DEA is required to issue
an interim final rule controlling the
drug within 90 days.
The law further states that the 90-day
timeframe starts the later of (1) the date
DEA receives the HHS scientific and
medical evaluation/scheduling
recommendation or (2) the date DEA
receives notice of the NDA approval by
HHS. In addition, the law specifies that
the rulemaking shall become
immediately effective as an interim final
rule without requiring the DEA to
demonstrate good cause therefor. Thus,
the purpose of subsection (j) is to speed
the process by which DEA schedules
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:46 Mar 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
newly approved drugs that are currently
either in schedule I or not controlled
(but which have sufficient abuse
potential to warrant control) so that
such drugs may be marketed without
undue delay following FDA approval.1
Subsection (j) further provides that
the interim final rule shall give
interested persons the opportunity to
comment and to request a hearing. After
the conclusion of such proceedings,
DEA must issue a final rule in
accordance with the scheduling criteria
of subsections 21 U.S.C. 811(b), (c), and
(d) and 21 U.S.C. 812(b).
Background
Syndros is an oral solution that
contains 5 mg of dronabinol (delta-9THC) per mL of solution. Dronabinol is
the generic name (International
Nonproprietary Name, INN) for the (-)
delta-9-trans isomer of
tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the
primary psychoactive substance in
marijuana. On June 1, 2015, Insys
Therapeutics (Sponsor) submitted an
NDA to the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) for Syndros, an
oral formulation of dronabinol. The
FDA accepted the NDA filing for
Syndros on August 6, 2015 and
approved the NDA on July 5, 2016. On
December 28, 2016, the DEA received
notification that HHS/FDA approved
Syndros for the treatment of anorexia
associated with weight loss in patients
with Acquired Immune Deficiency
Syndrome (AIDS), and for the treatment
of nausea and vomiting resulting from
cancer chemotherapy in patients who
failed to respond to conventional antiemetic therapies.
Determination To Schedule FDAApproved Products Containing
Dronabinol in an Oral Solution
On December 28, 2016, the HHS
provided the DEA with a scientific and
medical evaluation and scheduling
recommendation related to dronabinol.
Because DEA’s authority to issue this
interim final rule under subsection
811(j) is limited to drugs that are the
subject of an approved NDA, and
because the NDA was limited to an oral
solution containing dronabinol, DEA’s
discussion here of the scheduling
criteria is likewise limited to oral
solutions containing dronabinol in FDAapproved drug products.2 HHS’s
1 Given the parameters of subsection (j), in DEA’s
view, it would not apply to a reformulation of a
drug containing a substance currently in schedules
II through V for which an NDA has recently been
approved.
2 To the extent HHS’s submissions to DEA are
outside the scope of this interim final rule (i.e.,
those addressing dronabinol beyond that contained
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
scientific and medical evaluation
contained an eight-factor analysis of the
abuse potential of FDA-approved
products of oral solutions containing
dronabinol and recommended that such
products be placed in schedule II of the
CSA.
In response, the DEA reviewed the
scientific and medical evaluation and
scheduling recommendation provided
by the HHS, along with all other
relevant data, and completed its own
eight-factor review document pursuant
to 21 U.S.C. 811(c). The DEA concluded
that FDA-approved dronabinol oral
solutions met the 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(2)
criteria for placement in schedule II of
the CSA.
Pursuant to subsection 811(j), and
based on the HHS recommendation,
NDA approval by HHS/FDA, and DEA’s
determination, DEA is issuing this
interim final rule to schedule FDAapproved dronabinol oral solution as a
schedule II controlled substance under
the CSA.
Included below is a brief summary of
each factor as analyzed by the HHS and
the DEA, and as considered by the DEA
in its scheduling action. Please note that
both the DEA and HHS analyses are
available in their entirety under
‘‘Supporting Documents’’ in the public
docket for this interim final rule at
https://www.regulations.gov, under
Docket Number ‘‘DEA–344.’’ Full
analysis of, and citations to, the
information referenced in the summary
may also be found in the supporting and
related material.
1. Its Actual or Relative Potential for
Abuse: Dronabinol is a generic name for
the (-) delta-9-trans isomer of
tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). THC is the
primary psychoactive substance in
marijuana. Dronabinol is the active
pharmaceutical ingredient in Syndros.
As stated by HHS, Marinol (synthetic
dronabinol in sesame oil and
encapsulated in a soft gelatin capsule)
was approved by the FDA for medical
use on May 31, 1985 and placed in
schedule II based on its accepted
medical use and high abuse potential.
On July 2, 1999, Marinol was
rescheduled from schedule II to
schedule III because of the findings of
the DEA that the difficulty of separating
dronabinol from the sesame oil
formulation and the delayed onset of
behavioral effects due to oral route
administration supported a lower abuse
potential of Marinol as compared to
substances in Schedule II. 64 FR 35928.
According to HHS, although Syndros
oral solution and Marinol capsules have
in an FDA-approved oral solution), they will not be
addressed in this document.
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 55 / Thursday, March 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
the same pharmacology, these
formulations differ in their physical and
chemical properties. Both these
formulations have abuse potential as
demonstrated by their effects on
subjective scores of ‘‘Drug Liking’’ in
human abuse potential studies. HHS
indicated that the formulation of
Syndros (oral solution) is easier to abuse
than Marinol because this liquid
formulation can be manipulated to
produce concentrated extracts of
dronabinol for abuse by inhalation
(smoking or vaping) or through other
routes of administration. Because of the
large amount of dronabinol in Syndros
oral solution it has a greater potential
for extraction than Marinol and thus has
a greater abuse potential. Based on the
data from in vitro studies conducted by
the Sponsor, the large amount of
dronabinol in the Syndros formulation,
its pharmacokinetics upon oral
administration, and its contribution to
marijuana psychoactivity, HHS stated
that the abuse potential of the
dronabinol oral solution is similar to
that of other THC containing products
such as concentrates, infused edibles
and drinks. Similar to these THC
containing products, Syndros oral
solution can be easily manipulated to
other forms that can be easily abused
through inhalation and oral routes of
administration.
The 2014 and 2015 Monitoring the
Future (MTF) 3 survey indicated that
THC containing products are being
taken orally, smoked, and vaporized
using devices such as e-cigarettes. There
is a lack of evidence pertaining to
diversion of Syndros or Marinol from
legitimate drug channels. Syndros is not
yet available on the market. Marinol and
generic forms that reference it, have low
levels of abuse and diversion according
to the HHS and DEA, and this is
attributed to the formulation of
dronabinol in sesame oil.
2. Scientific Evidence of Its
Pharmacological Effects, if Known:
Dronabinol, also known as THC, is the
primary psychoactive substance in
marijuana and is also the active
pharmaceutical ingredient in Syndros
and Marinol. Dronabinol binds to and
activates the cannabinoid receptors
(CB1 and CB2). HHS states that CB1
receptors activation underlie the
psychotropic effects and many other
pharmacological effects of dronabinol.
Some behavioral and other effects of
dronabinol in humans consist of
3 MTF is a research program conducted at the
University of Michigan’s Institute for Social
Research, under grants from NIDA. MTF tracks drug
use trends among American adolescents in the 8th,
10th, and 12th grades and high school graduates
into adulthood by conducting national surveys.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:46 Mar 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
dizziness, nausea, tachycardia,
euphoria, enhanced sensory perception,
heightened imagination, impaired
judgment, emotional lability, and
increased appetite. Dronabinol has been
reported to be self-administered
intravenously by squirrel monkeys and
intracerebroventricularly by rats.
Discriminative stimulus effects of
dronabinol are specific to CB1
cannabinoids, and unique because
stimulants, hallucinogens, opioids,
benzodiazepines, barbiturates, NMDA
antagonists, and antipsychotics do not
generalize to dronabinol.
3. The State of Current Scientific
Knowledge Regarding the Drug or Other
Substance: Dronabinol is the generic
name for (-)delta-9-transtetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and is
chemically known as (-)-(6aR-trans)6a,7,8,10a-tetrahydro-6,6,9-trimethyl-3pentyl-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-1-ol and
has the chemical formula C21H30O2. At
room temperature (25 °C), dronabinol is
a light-yellow oil and hardens upon
refrigeration (4 °C) and is insoluble in
water. The FDA-approved Syndros
formulation consists of 5 mg
dronabinol/mL of a 50 percent w/w
alcoholic solution. Syndros will be
marketed as 30 mL aliquots in clear,
amber glass bottles and each bottle will
contain 150 mg dronabinol.
In vitro manipulation studies with
Syndros and Marinol (positive control)
were conducted by the Sponsor. It was
found that Syndros oral solution and
Marinol capsules differ in their
physiochemical properties. Specifically,
Syndros, unlike Marinol, can be
manipulated such that the dronabinol
can be evaporated into residues that can
be reconstituted for smoking or abused
intravenously. According to HHS,
Syndros contains a large amount of
dronabinol (150 mg of dronabinol in 30
mL of solution) and would be an easily
accessible source for abuse via the oral
route.
4. Its History and Current Pattern of
Abuse: There is a long history of abuse
of THC in the United States. HHS noted
that dronabinol in Marinol capsules is
difficult to extract and therefore, cannot
be used for smoking, vaping, or as an
edible. The dronabinol in Syndros,
however, is relatively easy to extract
and concentrated forms can be used for
smoking, vaping, or the sweetened
alcoholic dronabinol in Syndros can be
used as a substitute for THC in edibles.
In the 2015 MTF survey, it was reported
that teens were more likely to use ecigarettes (vaping) than regular
cigarettes (smoking). In this survey, 6.1
percent of 12th graders reported
vaporizing marijuana or hash oil in their
last e-cigarette. Additionally, in a recent
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14817
analysis of marijuana users, 12 percent
of users preferred vaping the drug over
any other method and considered it a
safer alternative to smoking. As a result,
these data suggest that if dronabinol
extracts or concentrates are available
from dronabinol sources such as
Syndros, a certain percent of the
population are likely to vape these
substances.
5. The Scope, Duration, and
Significance of Abuse: As noted by
HHS, information on the scope,
duration, and significance of abuse of
dronabinol was considered for both oral
and inhalation routes. Data analyzed
from the 2014 Summer Styles Survey, a
national representative consumer panel
survey of adult marijuana users aged 18
or older, showed that the majority of
current marijuana users prefer smoking
marijuana. In the same survey, it was
reported that 16 percent of the current
users consumed THC containing edibles
or drinks. Individuals who preferred
vaping (using a device to vaporize
liquid THC) believed that vaping is
‘‘healthier, better tasting’’ and resulted
in ‘‘better effects’’ associated with
marijuana and THC.
6. What, if any, Risk There is to the
Public Health: As stated by HHS,
labeling on the Marinol packaging
indicates that Central Nervous System
(CNS) adverse reactions are dose-related
and subject to patient variability. CNS
adverse reactions are more likely to
occur at higher doses of dronabinol.
Following oral Marinol (dronabinol)
doses of 0.4 mg/kg, CNS symptoms such
as amnesia, confusion, delusions,
depression, and hallucinations have
been observed. According to HHS, it is
assumed that Syndros oral solution will
have similar adverse effects to Marinol.
One concern with Syndros is that there
is a large amount of dronabinol present
in the product (150 mg dronabinol per
bottle, 30 mL solution) that can easily be
abused orally and may result in
unintended overdoses.
Oral consumption of dronabinol,
compared to inhaled THC, may result in
psychoactive effects that are delayed
and stronger with an increased risk of
experiencing serious adverse events.
When dronabinol (THC) is smoked, the
drug rapidly reaches the brain and
psychoactive effects are felt within
minutes of inhalation, which allows the
subject to control the dose more readily.
Due to the absorption and metabolism
by the liver following oral ingestion of
dronabinol, it takes longer for an
individual to feel the psychoactive
effects. Therefore, the individual may
underestimate the ingestion amount
needed to feel the psychoactive effects
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
14818
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 55 / Thursday, March 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
which may potentially result in an
overdose.
7. Its Psychic or Physiological
Dependence Liability: As stated in
labeling for Marinol and Syndros,
psychological and physical dependence
has been observed in healthy
individuals following use of dronabinol.
Abrupt discontinuation of dronabinol in
individuals receiving 210 mg/day (25
times the recommended daily dose for
the treatment of anorexia associated
with weight loss in AIDS patients) for
12 to 16 days resulted in undesirable
symptoms including insomnia,
irritability, and restlessness at 12 hours
after discontinuation. These symptoms
worsened to include hot flashes,
anorexia, sweating, rhinorrhea, loose
stools, and hiccoughs at 24 hours after
discontinuation of dronabinol.
8. Whether the Substance is an
Immediate Precursor of a Substance
Already Controlled under the CSA:
Dronabinol oral solution is not an
immediate precursor of any controlled
substance.
Conclusion: After considering the
scientific and medical evaluation
conducted by the HHS, the HHS’
recommendation, and its own eightfactor analysis, the DEA has determined
that these facts and all relevant data
constitute substantial evidence of a
potential for abuse of dronabinol oral
solution. As such, the DEA hereby
schedules FDA-approved products
containing dronabinol oral solution as
controlled substances under the CSA.
Determination of Appropriate Schedule
The CSA lists the findings required to
place a drug or other substance in any
particular Schedule (I, II, III, IV, or V).
21 U.S.C. 812(b). After consideration of
the analysis and recommendation of the
Assistant Secretary for Health of the
HHS and review of all available data,
the Acting Administrator of the DEA,
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(2), finds
that:
1. FDA-approved products containing
dronabinol in an oral solution have a
high potential for abuse. The
physicochemical properties of Syndros
allow extraction of dronabinol for abuse
through oral or inhalation (smoking or
vaping) routes. Dronabinol is not easily
extractable from Marinol. Oral abuse of
dronabinol-containing products is
associated with hallucinations, mood
alterations, and paranoia. The 2015
MTF Survey reported that 6.1 percent of
the 12th graders used e-cigarettes to
vaporize marijuana or cannabinoid
substances. Similarly, the 2014 Summer
Styles Survey, 16 percent of current
marijuana users indicated that they have
consumed dronabinol containing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:46 Mar 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
edibles or drinks. These data
collectively indicate FDA-approved oral
solutions containing dronabinol have
high potential for abuse.
2. FDA-approved products containing
dronabinol in an oral solution have a
currently accepted medical use in
treatment in the United States. The FDA
approved an oral solution containing
dronabinol (Syndros) for the treatment
of anorexia associated with weight loss
in patients with AIDS, and for the
treatment of nausea and vomiting
associated with cancer chemotherapy in
patients who have failed to respond
adequately to conventional antiemetic
treatments.
3. FDA-approved products containing
dronabinol in an oral solution may lead
to severe physical dependence.
Following discontinuation of
dronabinol at a dose 210 mg/day (25
times higher than the recommended
daily dose for anorexia associated with
weight loss in AIDS patients) for 12 to
16 consecutive days, withdrawal
symptoms including irritability,
insomnia, and restlessness were
observed at 12 hours after
discontinuation. These withdrawal
symptoms worsened to include hot
flashes, sweating, rhinorrhea, loose
stools, hiccoughs, and anorexia at 24
hours after discontinuation of
dronabinol. The withdrawal symptoms
decreased gradually over the next 48
hours and patients reported having
disturbed sleep for several weeks after
discontinuation of dronabinol.
Based on these findings, the Acting
Administrator of the DEA concludes
that FDA-approved products containing
dronabinol [(-)-delta-9-trans
tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9-THC)] in
an oral solution warrant control in
schedule II of the CSA. 21 U.S.C.
812(b)(2).
Requirements for Handling FDAApproved Products Containing
Dronabinol in an Oral Solution.
Preliminarily, it should be noted that
any form of dronabinol other than in an
FDA-approved drug product remains a
schedule I controlled substance, and
those who handle such material remain
subject to the regulatory controls, and
administrative, civil, and criminal
sanctions, applicable to schedule I
controlled substances set forth in the
CSA and DEA regulations. However, for
those who handle dronabinol oral
solution exclusively in the form of an
FDA-approved drug product, the
following is a summary of the schedule
II regulatory requirements that apply as
a result of this interim final rule:
1. Registration. Any person who
handles (manufactures, distributes,
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
reverse distributes, dispenses, imports,
exports, engages in research, or
conducts instructional activities or
chemical analysis with, or possesses)
FDA-approved products containing
dronabinol in an oral solution, or who
desires to handle such products, must
be registered with the DEA to conduct
such activities pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
822, 823, 957, and 958 and in
accordance with 21 CFR parts 1301 and
1312. Any person who currently
handles FDA-approved products
containing dronabinol in an oral
solution, and is not registered with the
DEA, must submit an application for
registration and may not continue to
handle such products, unless the DEA
has approved that application for
registration, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 822,
823, 957, and 958, and in accordance
with 21 CFR parts 1301 and 1312.
2. Quota. Only registered
manufacturers are permitted to
manufacture FDA-approved products
containing dronabinol in an oral
solution in accordance with a quota
assigned pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 826 and
in accordance with 21 CFR part 1303.
3. Disposal of stocks. Upon obtaining
a schedule II registration to handle FDAapproved products containing
dronabinol in an oral solution, any
person who does not desire or is not
able to maintain such registration must
surrender all quantities of such
products, or may transfer all quantities
of such products to a person registered
with the DEA in accordance with 21
CFR part 1317, in addition to all other
applicable federal, state, local, and tribal
laws.
4. Security. FDA-approved products
containing dronabinol in an oral
solution are subject to schedule II
security requirements and must be
handled and stored pursuant to 21
U.S.C. 821, 823, and in accordance with
21 CFR 1301.71–1301.93.
5. Labeling and Packaging. All labels,
labeling, and packaging for commercial
containers of FDA-approved products
containing dronabinol in an oral
solution must comply with 21 U.S.C.
825 and 958(e), and be in accordance
with 21 CFR part 1302.
6. Inventory. Every DEA registrant
who possesses any quantity of FDAapproved products containing
dronabinol in an oral solution must take
an inventory of such products on hand,
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827 and 958, and
in accordance with 21 CFR 1304.03,
1304.04, and 1304.11.
Any person who becomes registered
with the DEA to handle FDA-approved
products containing dronabinol in an
oral solution must take an initial
inventory of all stocks of controlled
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 55 / Thursday, March 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
substances (including FDA-approved
products containing dronabinol in an
oral solution) on hand on the date the
registrant first engages in the handling
of controlled substances, pursuant to 21
U.S.C. 827 and 958, and in accordance
with 21 CFR 1304.03, 1304.04, and
1304.11.
After the initial inventory, every DEA
registrant must take a new inventory of
all stocks of controlled substances
(including FDA-approved products
containing dronabinol in an oral
solution) on hand every two years,
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827 and 958, and
in accordance with 21 CFR 1304.03,
1304.04, and 1304.11.
7. Records and Reports. Every DEA
registrant must maintain records and
submit reports for FDA-approved
products containing dronabinol in an
oral solution, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827
and 958(e), and in accordance with 21
CFR parts 1304, 1312, and 1317.
8. Orders for FDA-approved products
containing dronabinol in an oral
solution. Every DEA registrant who
distributes FDA-approved products
containing dronabinol in an oral
solution is required to comply with
order form requirements, pursuant to 21
U.S.C. 828, and in accordance with 21
CFR part 1305.
9. Prescriptions. All prescriptions for
FDA-approved products containing
dronabinol in an oral solution must
comply with 21 U.S.C. 829, and be
issued in accordance with 21 CFR parts
1306 and 1311, subpart C.
10. Manufacturing and Distributing.
In addition to the general requirements
of the CSA and DEA regulations that are
applicable to manufacturers and
distributors of schedule II controlled
substances, such registrants should be
advised that (consistent with the
foregoing considerations) any
manufacturing or distribution of FDAapproved products containing
dronabinol in an oral solution may only
be for the legitimate purposes
authorized by the FDCA and CSA.
11. Importation and Exportation. All
importation and exportation of FDAapproved products containing
dronabinol in an oral solution must be
in compliance with 21 U.S.C. 952, 953,
957, and 958, and in accordance with 21
CFR part 1312.
12. Liability. Any activity involving
FDA-approved products containing
dronabinol in an oral solution not
authorized by, or in violation of, the
CSA or its implementing regulations, is
unlawful, and may subject the person to
administrative, civil, and/or criminal
sanctions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:46 Mar 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
Regulatory Analyses
Administrative Procedure Act
As explained above, under 21 U.S.C.
811(j), where a new drug is (1) approved
by the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) and (2) HHS
recommends control in CSA schedule
II–V, the DEA is required to issue an
interim final rule scheduling the drug
within 90 days. Additionally, the law
specifies that the rulemaking shall
become immediately effective as an
interim final rule without requiring the
DEA to demonstrate good cause.
Therefore, the standard notice-andcomment requirements of section 553 of
the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553, do not apply to
this scheduling action.
Executive Orders 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and 13563,
Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review
In accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(j),
this scheduling action is subject to
formal rulemaking procedures
performed ‘‘on the record after
opportunity for a hearing,’’ which are
conducted pursuant to the provisions of
5 U.S.C. 556 and 557. The CSA sets
forth the procedures and criteria for
scheduling a drug or other substance.
Such actions are exempt from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) pursuant to section 3(d)(1) of
Executive Order 12866 and the
principles reaffirmed in Executive Order
13563.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
This regulation meets the applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to
eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity,
minimize litigation, provide a clear legal
standard for affected conduct, and
promote simplification and burden
reduction.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
This rulemaking does not have
federalism implications warranting the
application of Executive Order 13132.
The rule does not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications warranting the application
of Executive Order 13175. It does not
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14819
have substantial direct effects on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian tribes.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 603(a),
‘‘[w]henever an agency is required by [5
U.S.C. 553], or any other law, to publish
general notice of proposed rulemaking
for any proposed rule, or publishes a
notice of proposed rulemaking for an
interpretive rule involving the internal
revenue laws of the United States, the
agency shall prepare and make available
for public comment an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.’’ As noted in the
above discussion regarding applicability
of the Administrative Procedure Act, the
notice-and-comment requirements of
section 553 of the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553, do
not apply to this scheduling action.
Consequently, the RFA does not apply
to this interim final rule.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
In accordance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) of 1995,
2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq., the DEA has
determined that this action would not
result in any Federal mandate that may
result ‘‘in the expenditure by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more (adjusted for
inflation) in any one year.’’ Therefore,
neither a Small Government Agency
Plan nor any other action is required
under UMRA of 1995.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This action does not impose a new
collection of information requirement
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521. This action
would not impose recordkeeping or
reporting requirements on State or local
governments, individuals, businesses, or
organizations. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Congressional
Review Act (CRA)). This rule will not
result in: an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries,
Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions; or
significant adverse effects on
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
14820
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 55 / Thursday, March 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of U.S.-based companies to
compete with foreign based companies
in domestic and export markets.
However, pursuant to the CRA, the DEA
has submitted a copy of this interim
final rule to both Houses of Congress
and to the Comptroller General.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and
procedure, Drug traffic control,
2. In § 1308.12, add paragraph (f)(2) to
read as follows:
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
■
For the reasons set out above, the DEA
amends 21 CFR part 1308 as follows:
§ 1308.12
PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
*
Schedule II.
*
*
(f) * * *
*
*
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 1308 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b),
unless otherwise noted.
(2) Dronabinol [(-)-delta-9-trans tetrahydrocannabinol] in an oral solution in a drug product approved for marketing by the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration ....................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
MacDonald, Bridge Management
Specialist, Coast Guard; telephone 504–
671–2128, email Giselle.T.MacDonald@
uscg.mil.
*
Dated: March 20, 2017.
Chuck Rosenberg,
Acting Administrator.
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2017–0100]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Des
Allemands Bayou, Des Allemands, LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of deviation from
drawbridge regulation.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard has issued a
temporary deviation from the operating
schedule that governs the Burlington
Northern Santa Fe Railroad swing span
drawbridge across Des Allemands
Bayou, mile 14.0, at Des Allemands, St.
Charles and Lafourche Parishes,
Louisiana. The deviation is necessary to
install two open-deck spans for
increased reliability of bridge
operations. This deviation allows the
bridge to remain in the closed-tonavigation position for two (2) separate,
two-day periods.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
6 a.m. on April 20, 2017 through 12
noon on April 28, 2017.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
deviation, [USCG–2017–0100] is
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Type the docket number in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH’’.
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
deviation, call or email Giselle
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
14:46 Mar 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
end of the effective period of this
temporary deviation. This deviation
from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
The
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
Company requested a temporary
deviation from the operating schedule
for the swing span drawbridge across
Des Allemands Bayou, mile 14.0, at Des
Allemands, St. Charles and Lafourche
Parishes, Louisiana. The deviation was
requested to install two open-deck
spans, one on each side of the existing
swing span, to increase the reliability of
bridge opening and closing operations.
The draw currently operates under 33
CFR 117.440(b). The draw of the
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
Bridge, Mile 14.0, shall open on signal
Monday through Friday from 7 a.m. to
3 p.m. At all other times the draw shall
open on signal if at least 4 hours notice
is given.
For purposes of this deviation, the
bridge will remain closed to navigation
for two separate dates, 30 hours each,
from 6 a.m. April 20, 2017 through 12
noon, April 21, 2017 and from 6 a.m.,
April 27, 2017 through 12 noon, April
28, 2017. During this deviation, vessels
will not be allowed to pass through the
bridge. The bridge has a vertical
clearance of 3 feet above mean high
water in the closed-to-navigation
position and unlimited in the open-tonavigation position. Navigation on the
waterway consists of tugs with tows,
fishing vessels and recreational craft.
The Coast Guard will inform the users
of the waterway through our Local and
Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the
change in operating schedule for the
bridge. The bridge will not be able to
open for emergencies and there is no
immediate alternate route for vessels to
pass.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
Dated: March 17, 2017.
Eric A. Washburn,
Bridge Administrator, Eighth Coast Guard
District.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2017–05809 Filed 3–22–17; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
(7365)
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[FR Doc. 2017–05810 Filed 3–22–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AP73
Release of VA Records Relating to HIV
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) is amending its medical
regulations governing the release of VA
medical records. Specifically, VA is
eliminating the restriction on sharing a
negative test result for the human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) with
veterans’ outside providers. HIV testing
is a common practice today in
healthcare and the stigma of testing that
may have been seen in the 1980s when
HIV was first discovered is no longer
prevalent. Continuing to protect
negative HIV tests causes delays and an
unnecessary burden on veterans when
VA tries to share electronic medical
information with the veterans’ outside
providers through electronic health
information exchanges. For this same
reason, VA will also eliminate
restrictions on negative test results of
sickle cell anemia. This final rule
eliminates the current barriers to
electronic medical information
exchange.
DATES: This final rule is effective April
24, 2017.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 55 (Thursday, March 23, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14815-14820]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05809]
[[Page 14815]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA-344]
Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of FDA-Approved
Products of Oral Solutions Containing Dronabinol [(-)-delta-9-trans-
tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9-THC)] in Schedule II
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Interim final rule, with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On July 1, 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
approved a new drug application for Syndros, a drug product consisting
of dronabinol [(-)-delta-9-trans-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9-THC)]
oral solution. Thereafter, the Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS) provided the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) with a
scheduling recommendation that would result in Syndros (and other oral
solutions containing dronabinol) being placed in schedule II of the
Controlled Substances Act (CSA). In accordance with the CSA, as revised
by the Improving Regulatory Transparency for New Medical Therapies Act,
DEA is hereby issuing an interim final rule placing FDA-approved
products of oral solutions containing dronabinol in schedule II of the
CSA.
DATES: The effective date of this rulemaking is March 23, 2017.
Interested persons may file written comments on this rulemaking in
accordance with 21 CFR 1308.43(g). Electronic comments must be
submitted, and written comments must be postmarked, on or before April
24, 2017. Commenters should be aware that the electronic Federal Docket
Management System will not accept comments after 11:59 p.m. Eastern
Time on the last day of the comment period.
Interested persons, defined at 21 CFR 1300.01 as those ``adversely
affected or aggrieved by any rule or proposed rule issuable pursuant to
section 201 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 811),'' may file a request for
hearing or waiver of hearing pursuant to 21 CFR 1308.44. Requests for
hearing and waivers of an opportunity for a hearing or to participate
in a hearing must be received on or before April 24, 2017.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling of comments, please reference
``Docket No. DEA-344'' on all correspondence, including any
attachments.
Electronic comments: The Drug Enforcement Administration
encourages that all comments be submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, which provides the ability to type short
comments directly into the comment field on the Web page or attach a
file for lengthier comments. Please go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the online instructions at that site for submitting
comments. Upon completion of your submission, you will receive a
Comment Tracking Number for your comment. Please be aware that
submitted comments are not instantaneously available for public view on
Regulations.gov. If you have received a Comment Tracking Number, your
comment has been successfully submitted and there is no need to
resubmit the same comment.
Paper comments: Paper comments that duplicate the
electronic submission are not necessary and are discouraged. Should you
wish to mail a paper comment in lieu of an electronic comment, it
should be sent via regular or express mail to: Drug Enforcement
Administration, Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DRW, 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA 22152.
Hearing requests: All requests for hearing and waivers of
participation must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn:
Acting Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152. All requests for hearing and waivers of participation should
also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Hearing
Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2)
Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: DEA Federal Register
Representative/DRW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Lewis, Diversion Control
Division, Drug Enforcement Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; Telephone: (202) 598-
8953.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Posting of Public Comments
Please note that all comments received are considered part of the
public record. They will, unless reasonable cause is given, be made
available by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for public
inspection online at https://www.regulations.gov. Such information
includes personal identifying information (such as your name, address,
etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter. The Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) applies to all comments received. If you want to
submit personal identifying information (such as your name, address,
etc.) as part of your comment, but do not want it to be made publicly
available, you must include the phrase ``PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION'' in the first paragraph of your comment. You must also
place all of the personal identifying information you do not want made
publicly available in the first paragraph of your comment and identify
what information you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential business information as part of
your comment, but do not want it to be made publicly available, you
must include the phrase ``CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION'' in the
first paragraph of your comment. You must also prominently identify the
confidential business information to be redacted within the comment.
Comments containing personal identifying information and
confidential business information identified as directed above will
generally be made publicly available in redacted form. If a comment has
so much confidential business information or personal identifying
information that it cannot be effectively redacted, all or part of that
comment may not be made publicly available. Comments posted to https://www.regulations.gov may include any personal identifying information
(such as name, address, and phone number) included in the text of your
electronic submission that is not identified as directed above as
confidential.
An electronic copy of this document and supplemental information,
including the complete Department of Health and Human Services and Drug
Enforcement Administration eight-factor analyses, to this interim final
rule are available at https://www.regulations.gov for easy reference.
Request for Hearing, Notice of Appearance at Hearing, or Waiver of
Participation in Hearing
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(a), this action is a formal rulemaking
``on the record after opportunity for a hearing.'' Such proceedings are
conducted pursuant to the provisions of the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 551-559. 21 CFR 1308.41-1308.45; 21 CFR part 1316,
subpart D. In accordance with 21 CFR 1308.44(a) through (c), requests
for a hearing, notices of appearance, and waivers of an opportunity for
a hearing or to participate in a hearing may be submitted only by
interested persons, defined as those ``adversely affected or aggrieved
by any rule or proposed rule
[[Page 14816]]
issuable pursuant to section 201 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 811).'' 21 CFR
1300.01. Requests for a hearing and notices of participation must
conform to the requirements of 21 CFR 1308.44(a) or (b), as applicable,
and include a statement of the interest of the person in the proceeding
and the objections or issues, if any, concerning which the person
desires to be heard. Any waiver of an opportunity for a hearing must
conform to the requirements of 21 CFR 1308.44(c) including a written
statement regarding the interested person's position on the matters of
fact and law involved in any hearing.
Please note that pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(a), the purpose and
subject matter of the hearing are restricted to ``(A) find[ing] that
such drug or other substance has a potential for abuse, and (B)
mak[ing] with respect to such drug or other substance the findings
prescribed by subsection (b) of section 812 of this title for the
schedule in which such drug is to be placed * * *.'' Requests for a
hearing and waivers of participation in the hearing should be submitted
to DEA using the address information provided above.
Legal Authority
Under the Improving Regulatory Transparency for New Medical
Therapies Act (Pub. L. 114-89), which was signed into law on November
25, 2015, DEA is required to commence an expedited scheduling action
with respect to certain new drugs approved by the FDA. As provided in
21 U.S.C. 811(j), this expedited scheduling is required where both of
the following conditions apply: (1) The Secretary of HHS has advised
DEA that a New Drug Application (NDA) has been submitted for a drug
that has a stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on the
central nervous system, and that it appears that such drug has an abuse
potential and (2) the Secretary recommends that DEA control the drug in
schedule II, III, IV, or V pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(a) and (b). In
these circumstances, DEA is required to issue an interim final rule
controlling the drug within 90 days.
The law further states that the 90-day timeframe starts the later
of (1) the date DEA receives the HHS scientific and medical evaluation/
scheduling recommendation or (2) the date DEA receives notice of the
NDA approval by HHS. In addition, the law specifies that the rulemaking
shall become immediately effective as an interim final rule without
requiring the DEA to demonstrate good cause therefor. Thus, the purpose
of subsection (j) is to speed the process by which DEA schedules newly
approved drugs that are currently either in schedule I or not
controlled (but which have sufficient abuse potential to warrant
control) so that such drugs may be marketed without undue delay
following FDA approval.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Given the parameters of subsection (j), in DEA's view, it
would not apply to a reformulation of a drug containing a substance
currently in schedules II through V for which an NDA has recently
been approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsection (j) further provides that the interim final rule shall
give interested persons the opportunity to comment and to request a
hearing. After the conclusion of such proceedings, DEA must issue a
final rule in accordance with the scheduling criteria of subsections 21
U.S.C. 811(b), (c), and (d) and 21 U.S.C. 812(b).
Background
Syndros is an oral solution that contains 5 mg of dronabinol
(delta-9-THC) per mL of solution. Dronabinol is the generic name
(International Nonproprietary Name, INN) for the (-) delta-9-trans
isomer of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the primary psychoactive
substance in marijuana. On June 1, 2015, Insys Therapeutics (Sponsor)
submitted an NDA to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for
Syndros, an oral formulation of dronabinol. The FDA accepted the NDA
filing for Syndros on August 6, 2015 and approved the NDA on July 5,
2016. On December 28, 2016, the DEA received notification that HHS/FDA
approved Syndros for the treatment of anorexia associated with weight
loss in patients with Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), and
for the treatment of nausea and vomiting resulting from cancer
chemotherapy in patients who failed to respond to conventional anti-
emetic therapies.
Determination To Schedule FDA-Approved Products Containing Dronabinol
in an Oral Solution
On December 28, 2016, the HHS provided the DEA with a scientific
and medical evaluation and scheduling recommendation related to
dronabinol. Because DEA's authority to issue this interim final rule
under subsection 811(j) is limited to drugs that are the subject of an
approved NDA, and because the NDA was limited to an oral solution
containing dronabinol, DEA's discussion here of the scheduling criteria
is likewise limited to oral solutions containing dronabinol in FDA-
approved drug products.\2\ HHS's scientific and medical evaluation
contained an eight-factor analysis of the abuse potential of FDA-
approved products of oral solutions containing dronabinol and
recommended that such products be placed in schedule II of the CSA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ To the extent HHS's submissions to DEA are outside the scope
of this interim final rule (i.e., those addressing dronabinol beyond
that contained in an FDA-approved oral solution), they will not be
addressed in this document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In response, the DEA reviewed the scientific and medical evaluation
and scheduling recommendation provided by the HHS, along with all other
relevant data, and completed its own eight-factor review document
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(c). The DEA concluded that FDA-approved
dronabinol oral solutions met the 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(2) criteria for
placement in schedule II of the CSA.
Pursuant to subsection 811(j), and based on the HHS recommendation,
NDA approval by HHS/FDA, and DEA's determination, DEA is issuing this
interim final rule to schedule FDA-approved dronabinol oral solution as
a schedule II controlled substance under the CSA.
Included below is a brief summary of each factor as analyzed by the
HHS and the DEA, and as considered by the DEA in its scheduling action.
Please note that both the DEA and HHS analyses are available in their
entirety under ``Supporting Documents'' in the public docket for this
interim final rule at https://www.regulations.gov, under Docket Number
``DEA-344.'' Full analysis of, and citations to, the information
referenced in the summary may also be found in the supporting and
related material.
1. Its Actual or Relative Potential for Abuse: Dronabinol is a
generic name for the (-) delta-9-trans isomer of tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC). THC is the primary psychoactive substance in marijuana.
Dronabinol is the active pharmaceutical ingredient in Syndros. As
stated by HHS, Marinol (synthetic dronabinol in sesame oil and
encapsulated in a soft gelatin capsule) was approved by the FDA for
medical use on May 31, 1985 and placed in schedule II based on its
accepted medical use and high abuse potential. On July 2, 1999, Marinol
was rescheduled from schedule II to schedule III because of the
findings of the DEA that the difficulty of separating dronabinol from
the sesame oil formulation and the delayed onset of behavioral effects
due to oral route administration supported a lower abuse potential of
Marinol as compared to substances in Schedule II. 64 FR 35928.
According to HHS, although Syndros oral solution and Marinol
capsules have
[[Page 14817]]
the same pharmacology, these formulations differ in their physical and
chemical properties. Both these formulations have abuse potential as
demonstrated by their effects on subjective scores of ``Drug Liking''
in human abuse potential studies. HHS indicated that the formulation of
Syndros (oral solution) is easier to abuse than Marinol because this
liquid formulation can be manipulated to produce concentrated extracts
of dronabinol for abuse by inhalation (smoking or vaping) or through
other routes of administration. Because of the large amount of
dronabinol in Syndros oral solution it has a greater potential for
extraction than Marinol and thus has a greater abuse potential. Based
on the data from in vitro studies conducted by the Sponsor, the large
amount of dronabinol in the Syndros formulation, its pharmacokinetics
upon oral administration, and its contribution to marijuana
psychoactivity, HHS stated that the abuse potential of the dronabinol
oral solution is similar to that of other THC containing products such
as concentrates, infused edibles and drinks. Similar to these THC
containing products, Syndros oral solution can be easily manipulated to
other forms that can be easily abused through inhalation and oral
routes of administration.
The 2014 and 2015 Monitoring the Future (MTF) \3\ survey indicated
that THC containing products are being taken orally, smoked, and
vaporized using devices such as e-cigarettes. There is a lack of
evidence pertaining to diversion of Syndros or Marinol from legitimate
drug channels. Syndros is not yet available on the market. Marinol and
generic forms that reference it, have low levels of abuse and diversion
according to the HHS and DEA, and this is attributed to the formulation
of dronabinol in sesame oil.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ MTF is a research program conducted at the University of
Michigan's Institute for Social Research, under grants from NIDA.
MTF tracks drug use trends among American adolescents in the 8th,
10th, and 12th grades and high school graduates into adulthood by
conducting national surveys.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Scientific Evidence of Its Pharmacological Effects, if Known:
Dronabinol, also known as THC, is the primary psychoactive substance in
marijuana and is also the active pharmaceutical ingredient in Syndros
and Marinol. Dronabinol binds to and activates the cannabinoid
receptors (CB1 and CB2). HHS states that CB1 receptors activation
underlie the psychotropic effects and many other pharmacological
effects of dronabinol. Some behavioral and other effects of dronabinol
in humans consist of dizziness, nausea, tachycardia, euphoria, enhanced
sensory perception, heightened imagination, impaired judgment,
emotional lability, and increased appetite. Dronabinol has been
reported to be self-administered intravenously by squirrel monkeys and
intracerebroventricularly by rats. Discriminative stimulus effects of
dronabinol are specific to CB1 cannabinoids, and unique because
stimulants, hallucinogens, opioids, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, NMDA
antagonists, and antipsychotics do not generalize to dronabinol.
3. The State of Current Scientific Knowledge Regarding the Drug or
Other Substance: Dronabinol is the generic name for (-)delta-9-trans-
tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and is chemically known as (-)-(6aR-trans)-
6a,7,8,10a-tetrahydro-6,6,9-trimethyl-3-pentyl-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-1-
ol and has the chemical formula
C21H30O2. At room temperature (25
[deg]C), dronabinol is a light-yellow oil and hardens upon
refrigeration (4 [deg]C) and is insoluble in water. The FDA-approved
Syndros formulation consists of 5 mg dronabinol/mL of a 50 percent w/w
alcoholic solution. Syndros will be marketed as 30 mL aliquots in
clear, amber glass bottles and each bottle will contain 150 mg
dronabinol.
In vitro manipulation studies with Syndros and Marinol (positive
control) were conducted by the Sponsor. It was found that Syndros oral
solution and Marinol capsules differ in their physiochemical
properties. Specifically, Syndros, unlike Marinol, can be manipulated
such that the dronabinol can be evaporated into residues that can be
reconstituted for smoking or abused intravenously. According to HHS,
Syndros contains a large amount of dronabinol (150 mg of dronabinol in
30 mL of solution) and would be an easily accessible source for abuse
via the oral route.
4. Its History and Current Pattern of Abuse: There is a long
history of abuse of THC in the United States. HHS noted that dronabinol
in Marinol capsules is difficult to extract and therefore, cannot be
used for smoking, vaping, or as an edible. The dronabinol in Syndros,
however, is relatively easy to extract and concentrated forms can be
used for smoking, vaping, or the sweetened alcoholic dronabinol in
Syndros can be used as a substitute for THC in edibles. In the 2015 MTF
survey, it was reported that teens were more likely to use e-cigarettes
(vaping) than regular cigarettes (smoking). In this survey, 6.1 percent
of 12th graders reported vaporizing marijuana or hash oil in their last
e-cigarette. Additionally, in a recent analysis of marijuana users, 12
percent of users preferred vaping the drug over any other method and
considered it a safer alternative to smoking. As a result, these data
suggest that if dronabinol extracts or concentrates are available from
dronabinol sources such as Syndros, a certain percent of the population
are likely to vape these substances.
5. The Scope, Duration, and Significance of Abuse: As noted by HHS,
information on the scope, duration, and significance of abuse of
dronabinol was considered for both oral and inhalation routes. Data
analyzed from the 2014 Summer Styles Survey, a national representative
consumer panel survey of adult marijuana users aged 18 or older, showed
that the majority of current marijuana users prefer smoking marijuana.
In the same survey, it was reported that 16 percent of the current
users consumed THC containing edibles or drinks. Individuals who
preferred vaping (using a device to vaporize liquid THC) believed that
vaping is ``healthier, better tasting'' and resulted in ``better
effects'' associated with marijuana and THC.
6. What, if any, Risk There is to the Public Health: As stated by
HHS, labeling on the Marinol packaging indicates that Central Nervous
System (CNS) adverse reactions are dose-related and subject to patient
variability. CNS adverse reactions are more likely to occur at higher
doses of dronabinol. Following oral Marinol (dronabinol) doses of 0.4
mg/kg, CNS symptoms such as amnesia, confusion, delusions, depression,
and hallucinations have been observed. According to HHS, it is assumed
that Syndros oral solution will have similar adverse effects to
Marinol. One concern with Syndros is that there is a large amount of
dronabinol present in the product (150 mg dronabinol per bottle, 30 mL
solution) that can easily be abused orally and may result in unintended
overdoses.
Oral consumption of dronabinol, compared to inhaled THC, may result
in psychoactive effects that are delayed and stronger with an increased
risk of experiencing serious adverse events. When dronabinol (THC) is
smoked, the drug rapidly reaches the brain and psychoactive effects are
felt within minutes of inhalation, which allows the subject to control
the dose more readily. Due to the absorption and metabolism by the
liver following oral ingestion of dronabinol, it takes longer for an
individual to feel the psychoactive effects. Therefore, the individual
may underestimate the ingestion amount needed to feel the psychoactive
effects
[[Page 14818]]
which may potentially result in an overdose.
7. Its Psychic or Physiological Dependence Liability: As stated in
labeling for Marinol and Syndros, psychological and physical dependence
has been observed in healthy individuals following use of dronabinol.
Abrupt discontinuation of dronabinol in individuals receiving 210 mg/
day (25 times the recommended daily dose for the treatment of anorexia
associated with weight loss in AIDS patients) for 12 to 16 days
resulted in undesirable symptoms including insomnia, irritability, and
restlessness at 12 hours after discontinuation. These symptoms worsened
to include hot flashes, anorexia, sweating, rhinorrhea, loose stools,
and hiccoughs at 24 hours after discontinuation of dronabinol.
8. Whether the Substance is an Immediate Precursor of a Substance
Already Controlled under the CSA: Dronabinol oral solution is not an
immediate precursor of any controlled substance.
Conclusion: After considering the scientific and medical evaluation
conducted by the HHS, the HHS' recommendation, and its own eight-factor
analysis, the DEA has determined that these facts and all relevant data
constitute substantial evidence of a potential for abuse of dronabinol
oral solution. As such, the DEA hereby schedules FDA-approved products
containing dronabinol oral solution as controlled substances under the
CSA.
Determination of Appropriate Schedule
The CSA lists the findings required to place a drug or other
substance in any particular Schedule (I, II, III, IV, or V). 21 U.S.C.
812(b). After consideration of the analysis and recommendation of the
Assistant Secretary for Health of the HHS and review of all available
data, the Acting Administrator of the DEA, pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
812(b)(2), finds that:
1. FDA-approved products containing dronabinol in an oral solution
have a high potential for abuse. The physicochemical properties of
Syndros allow extraction of dronabinol for abuse through oral or
inhalation (smoking or vaping) routes. Dronabinol is not easily
extractable from Marinol. Oral abuse of dronabinol-containing products
is associated with hallucinations, mood alterations, and paranoia. The
2015 MTF Survey reported that 6.1 percent of the 12th graders used e-
cigarettes to vaporize marijuana or cannabinoid substances. Similarly,
the 2014 Summer Styles Survey, 16 percent of current marijuana users
indicated that they have consumed dronabinol containing edibles or
drinks. These data collectively indicate FDA-approved oral solutions
containing dronabinol have high potential for abuse.
2. FDA-approved products containing dronabinol in an oral solution
have a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United
States. The FDA approved an oral solution containing dronabinol
(Syndros) for the treatment of anorexia associated with weight loss in
patients with AIDS, and for the treatment of nausea and vomiting
associated with cancer chemotherapy in patients who have failed to
respond adequately to conventional antiemetic treatments.
3. FDA-approved products containing dronabinol in an oral solution
may lead to severe physical dependence. Following discontinuation of
dronabinol at a dose 210 mg/day (25 times higher than the recommended
daily dose for anorexia associated with weight loss in AIDS patients)
for 12 to 16 consecutive days, withdrawal symptoms including
irritability, insomnia, and restlessness were observed at 12 hours
after discontinuation. These withdrawal symptoms worsened to include
hot flashes, sweating, rhinorrhea, loose stools, hiccoughs, and
anorexia at 24 hours after discontinuation of dronabinol. The
withdrawal symptoms decreased gradually over the next 48 hours and
patients reported having disturbed sleep for several weeks after
discontinuation of dronabinol.
Based on these findings, the Acting Administrator of the DEA
concludes that FDA-approved products containing dronabinol [(-)-delta-
9-trans tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9-THC)] in an oral solution warrant
control in schedule II of the CSA. 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(2).
Requirements for Handling FDA-Approved Products Containing Dronabinol
in an Oral Solution.
Preliminarily, it should be noted that any form of dronabinol other
than in an FDA-approved drug product remains a schedule I controlled
substance, and those who handle such material remain subject to the
regulatory controls, and administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions,
applicable to schedule I controlled substances set forth in the CSA and
DEA regulations. However, for those who handle dronabinol oral solution
exclusively in the form of an FDA-approved drug product, the following
is a summary of the schedule II regulatory requirements that apply as a
result of this interim final rule:
1. Registration. Any person who handles (manufactures, distributes,
reverse distributes, dispenses, imports, exports, engages in research,
or conducts instructional activities or chemical analysis with, or
possesses) FDA-approved products containing dronabinol in an oral
solution, or who desires to handle such products, must be registered
with the DEA to conduct such activities pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 822, 823,
957, and 958 and in accordance with 21 CFR parts 1301 and 1312. Any
person who currently handles FDA-approved products containing
dronabinol in an oral solution, and is not registered with the DEA,
must submit an application for registration and may not continue to
handle such products, unless the DEA has approved that application for
registration, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 822, 823, 957, and 958, and in
accordance with 21 CFR parts 1301 and 1312.
2. Quota. Only registered manufacturers are permitted to
manufacture FDA-approved products containing dronabinol in an oral
solution in accordance with a quota assigned pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 826
and in accordance with 21 CFR part 1303.
3. Disposal of stocks. Upon obtaining a schedule II registration to
handle FDA-approved products containing dronabinol in an oral solution,
any person who does not desire or is not able to maintain such
registration must surrender all quantities of such products, or may
transfer all quantities of such products to a person registered with
the DEA in accordance with 21 CFR part 1317, in addition to all other
applicable federal, state, local, and tribal laws.
4. Security. FDA-approved products containing dronabinol in an oral
solution are subject to schedule II security requirements and must be
handled and stored pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 821, 823, and in accordance
with 21 CFR 1301.71-1301.93.
5. Labeling and Packaging. All labels, labeling, and packaging for
commercial containers of FDA-approved products containing dronabinol in
an oral solution must comply with 21 U.S.C. 825 and 958(e), and be in
accordance with 21 CFR part 1302.
6. Inventory. Every DEA registrant who possesses any quantity of
FDA-approved products containing dronabinol in an oral solution must
take an inventory of such products on hand, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827
and 958, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1304.03, 1304.04, and 1304.11.
Any person who becomes registered with the DEA to handle FDA-
approved products containing dronabinol in an oral solution must take
an initial inventory of all stocks of controlled
[[Page 14819]]
substances (including FDA-approved products containing dronabinol in an
oral solution) on hand on the date the registrant first engages in the
handling of controlled substances, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827 and 958,
and in accordance with 21 CFR 1304.03, 1304.04, and 1304.11.
After the initial inventory, every DEA registrant must take a new
inventory of all stocks of controlled substances (including FDA-
approved products containing dronabinol in an oral solution) on hand
every two years, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827 and 958, and in accordance
with 21 CFR 1304.03, 1304.04, and 1304.11.
7. Records and Reports. Every DEA registrant must maintain records
and submit reports for FDA-approved products containing dronabinol in
an oral solution, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827 and 958(e), and in
accordance with 21 CFR parts 1304, 1312, and 1317.
8. Orders for FDA-approved products containing dronabinol in an
oral solution. Every DEA registrant who distributes FDA-approved
products containing dronabinol in an oral solution is required to
comply with order form requirements, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 828, and in
accordance with 21 CFR part 1305.
9. Prescriptions. All prescriptions for FDA-approved products
containing dronabinol in an oral solution must comply with 21 U.S.C.
829, and be issued in accordance with 21 CFR parts 1306 and 1311,
subpart C.
10. Manufacturing and Distributing. In addition to the general
requirements of the CSA and DEA regulations that are applicable to
manufacturers and distributors of schedule II controlled substances,
such registrants should be advised that (consistent with the foregoing
considerations) any manufacturing or distribution of FDA-approved
products containing dronabinol in an oral solution may only be for the
legitimate purposes authorized by the FDCA and CSA.
11. Importation and Exportation. All importation and exportation of
FDA-approved products containing dronabinol in an oral solution must be
in compliance with 21 U.S.C. 952, 953, 957, and 958, and in accordance
with 21 CFR part 1312.
12. Liability. Any activity involving FDA-approved products
containing dronabinol in an oral solution not authorized by, or in
violation of, the CSA or its implementing regulations, is unlawful, and
may subject the person to administrative, civil, and/or criminal
sanctions.
Regulatory Analyses
Administrative Procedure Act
As explained above, under 21 U.S.C. 811(j), where a new drug is (1)
approved by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and (2)
HHS recommends control in CSA schedule II-V, the DEA is required to
issue an interim final rule scheduling the drug within 90 days.
Additionally, the law specifies that the rulemaking shall become
immediately effective as an interim final rule without requiring the
DEA to demonstrate good cause. Therefore, the standard notice-and-
comment requirements of section 553 of the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553, do not
apply to this scheduling action.
Executive Orders 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and 13563,
Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
In accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(j), this scheduling action is
subject to formal rulemaking procedures performed ``on the record after
opportunity for a hearing,'' which are conducted pursuant to the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557. The CSA sets forth the procedures
and criteria for scheduling a drug or other substance. Such actions are
exempt from review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
pursuant to section 3(d)(1) of Executive Order 12866 and the principles
reaffirmed in Executive Order 13563.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This regulation meets the applicable standards set forth in
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize litigation, provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct, and promote simplification and
burden reduction.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
This rulemaking does not have federalism implications warranting
the application of Executive Order 13132. The rule does not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications warranting the
application of Executive Order 13175. It does not have substantial
direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 603(a), ``[w]henever an agency is
required by [5 U.S.C. 553], or any other law, to publish general notice
of proposed rulemaking for any proposed rule, or publishes a notice of
proposed rulemaking for an interpretive rule involving the internal
revenue laws of the United States, the agency shall prepare and make
available for public comment an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis.'' As noted in the above discussion regarding applicability of
the Administrative Procedure Act, the notice-and-comment requirements
of section 553 of the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553, do not apply to this
scheduling action. Consequently, the RFA does not apply to this interim
final rule.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
In accordance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) of 1995,
2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq., the DEA has determined that this action would
not result in any Federal mandate that may result ``in the expenditure
by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted for inflation) in any
one year.'' Therefore, neither a Small Government Agency Plan nor any
other action is required under UMRA of 1995.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This action does not impose a new collection of information
requirement under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 44 U.S.C. 3501-
3521. This action would not impose recordkeeping or reporting
requirements on State or local governments, individuals, businesses, or
organizations. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(Congressional Review Act (CRA)). This rule will not result in: an
annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase
in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal,
State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; or
significant adverse effects on
[[Page 14820]]
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on
the ability of U.S.-based companies to compete with foreign based
companies in domestic and export markets. However, pursuant to the CRA,
the DEA has submitted a copy of this interim final rule to both Houses
of Congress and to the Comptroller General.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and procedure, Drug traffic control,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set out above, the DEA amends 21 CFR part 1308 as
follows:
PART 1308--SCHEDULES OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 1308 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b), unless otherwise noted.
0
2. In Sec. 1308.12, add paragraph (f)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 1308.12 Schedule II.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(2) Dronabinol [(-)-delta-9-trans tetrahydrocannabinol] in (7365)
an oral solution in a drug product approved for marketing
by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration...................
* * * * *
Dated: March 20, 2017.
Chuck Rosenberg,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017-05809 Filed 3-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P