Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes, 14837-14839 [2017-05520]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 55 / Thursday, March 23, 2017 / Proposed Rules
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53; Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of
fatigue cracking found in a certain fuselage
frame common to the water tank support
intercostal clip located between certain
stringers. We are issuing this AD to detect
and correct cracking, which could grow in
size and result in a severed frame. Multiple
adjacent severed frames would result in
reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Inspection
Before the accumulation of 34,000 total
flight cycles or within 6,000 flight cycles
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later, do a high frequency eddy
current (HFEC) inspection for any cracking in
the fuselage frame at station (STA) 947.5
common to the water tank support intercostal
clip located between stringer S–24R and S–
25R, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737–53A1357, dated August 9, 2016.
(1) If no cracking is found, repeat the
inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 12,000 flight cycles.
(2) If any cracking is found: Before further
flight, repair in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737–53A1357, dated August
9, 2016.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
(h) Terminating Action
Accomplishing the repair in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1357,
dated August 9, 2016, terminates the
inspection requirements of paragraph (g) of
this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-LAACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Mar 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
ACO, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains
steps that are labeled as Required for
Compliance (RC), the provisions of
paragraphs (i)(4)(i) and (i)(4)(ii) of this AD
apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. If a step or substep is
labeled ‘‘RC Exempt,’’ then the RC
requirement is removed from that step or
substep. An AMOC is required for any
deviations to RC steps, including substeps
and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
SUMMARY:
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
14837
Examining the AD Docket
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model BD–100–1A10
airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by a report that the
equipment racks were not designed to
support the weight of all the equipment
and the secondary direct current power
centers. This proposed AD would
require modifying the equipment racks.
We are proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by May 8, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
(j) Related Information
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
(1) For more information about this AD,
Washington, DC 20590.
contact Galib Abumeri, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120L, FAA, Los
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
Angeles ACO, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
Lakewood, CA 90712–4137; phone: 562–627– p.m., Monday through Friday, except
5324; fax: 562–627–5210; email:
Federal holidays.
galib.abumeri@faa.gov.
For service information identified in
(2) For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Bombardier, Inc.,
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
ˆ
400 Cote-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
´
Quebec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone:
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
514–855–5000; fax: 514–855–7401;
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; Internet https://
email: thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com;
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this
Internet https://www.bombardier.com.
referenced service information at the FAA,
You may view this referenced service
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
information at the FAA, Transport
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
on the availability of this material at the
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
the availability of this material at the
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
14, 2017.
[FR Doc. 2017–05519 Filed 3–22–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–9387; Directorate
Identifier 2016–NM–182–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
9387; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aziz
Ahmed, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE–
171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
14838
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 55 / Thursday, March 23, 2017 / Proposed Rules
11590; telephone: 516–228–7329; fax:
516–794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2016–9387; Directorate Identifier 2016–
NM–182–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2016–26,
dated September 14, 2016 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model BD–
100–1A10 airplanes. The MCAI states:
During a recent design review, a
Bombardier equipment supplier discovered
that the weight of the Secondary Direct
Current (DC) Power Center was incorrectly
reported to the structural partner(s) via their
equipment interface drawing. Consequently,
the left-hand side (LHS) and right-hand side
(RHS) equipment racks were not designed to
support the actual weight of all the
equipment and the Secondary DC Power
Centers under all loading conditions. In the
event of a high energy emergency landing or
runway excursion, the structural failure of
the LHS or RHS equipment racks may result
in the blockage of the emergency escape
route for the pilot(s) and crew if this
condition is not corrected.
Required actions include modifying
the equipment racks. You may examine
the MCAI in the AD docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2016–9387.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed Bombardier Service
Bulletin 100–25–39, dated October 26,
2015; and Bombardier Service Bulletin
350–25–002, dated October 26, 2015.
This service information describes
procedures for modifying the equipment
racks. These documents are distinct
since they apply to airplanes having
different serial numbers. This service
information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 161 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Modify equipment racks ....
Up to 10 work-hours × $85 per hour = $850 ............
According to the manufacturer, some
of the costs of this proposed AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby
reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty
coverage for affected individuals. As a
result, we have included all costs in our
cost estimate.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Mar 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
Cost per
product
Parts cost
$1,755
Up to $2,605 ..
Cost on U.S. operators
Up to $419,405.
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Regulatory Findings
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 55 / Thursday, March 23, 2017 / Proposed Rules
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2016–
9387; Directorate Identifier 2016–NM–
182–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by May 8,
2017.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model
BD–100–1A10 airplanes, certificated in any
category, serial numbers (S/Ns) 20003
through 20532 inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 25, Equipment/Furnishings.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a recent design
review of the equipment racks which
revealed that the left-hand side (LHS) and
right-hand side (RHS) equipment racks were
not designed to support the actual weight of
all the equipment and the secondary direct
current power centers under all loading
conditions. We are issuing this AD to prevent
structural failure of the LHS or RHS
equipment racks in the event of a high energy
emergency landing or runway excursion,
which could result in blockage of the
emergency exit for the flightcrew.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
(g) Modification of the Equipment Racks
Within 90 months after the effective date
of this AD, do the modification required by
paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, as
applicable.
(1) For airplanes having S/Ns 20003
through 20500 inclusive: Modify the
equipment racks having part numbers (P/Ns)
K1000070316–003 (LHS) and K1000070316–
004 (RHS), in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 100–25–39, dated October
26, 2015.
(2) For airplanes having S/Ns 20501
through 20532 inclusive: Modify the
equipment rack having P/N K1000070316–
004 (RHS only), in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 350–25–002, dated October
26, 2015.
(h) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Mar 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the New York ACO, send it to
ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO,
1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; telephone: 516–228–7300; fax:
516–794–5531. Before using any approved
AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards
district office/certificate holding district
office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, New York ACO, ANE–170,
FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA); or Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA Design
Approval Organization (DAO). If approved by
the DAO, the approval must include the
DAO-authorized signature.
(i) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2016–26, dated
September 14, 2016, for related information.
This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2016–9387.
(2) For service information identified in
ˆ
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 Cote´
Vertu Road West, Dorval, Quebec H4S 1Y9,
Canada; telephone: 514–855–5000; fax: 514–
855–7401; email: thd.crj@
aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://
www.bombardier.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
14, 2017.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–05520 Filed 3–22–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2016–9588; Airspace
Docket No. 16–AAL–5]
Proposed Amendment of Class E
Airspace, Soldotna, AK
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
modify Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14839
at Soldotna Airport, Soldotna, AK. After
review of the airspace, the FAA found
redesign is necessary due to procedure
modifications. The FAA also proposes
to remove the reference to the Soldotna
nondirectional radio beacon (NDB) in
the legal description. This action would
enhance the safety and management of
IFR operations at the airport.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 8, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590; telephone: 1–
800–647–5527, or (202) 366–9826. You
must identify FAA Docket No. FAA–
2016–9588; Airspace Docket No. 16–
AAL–5, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit
comments through the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov. You may review
the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and
any final disposition in person in the
Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except federal holidays.
FAA Order 7400.11A, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed
online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/
publications/. For further information,
you can contact the Airspace Policy
Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC, 20591;
telephone: 202–267–8783. The Order is
also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of FAA
Order 7400.11A at NARA, call 202–741–
6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federalregulations/ibr_locations.html.
FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on
September 15.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert LaPlante, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support
Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057;
telephone (425) 203–4566.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 55 (Thursday, March 23, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14837-14839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05520]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2016-9387; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-182-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-100-1A10 airplanes. This proposed AD
was prompted by a report that the equipment racks were not designed to
support the weight of all the equipment and the secondary direct
current power centers. This proposed AD would require modifying the
equipment racks. We are proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 8, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone: 514-855-5000; fax: 514-855-7401; email:
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com. You
may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9387; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aziz Ahmed, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY
[[Page 14838]]
11590; telephone: 516-228-7329; fax: 516-794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-9387;
Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-182-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2016-26, dated September 14, 2016 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-100-
1A10 airplanes. The MCAI states:
During a recent design review, a Bombardier equipment supplier
discovered that the weight of the Secondary Direct Current (DC)
Power Center was incorrectly reported to the structural partner(s)
via their equipment interface drawing. Consequently, the left-hand
side (LHS) and right-hand side (RHS) equipment racks were not
designed to support the actual weight of all the equipment and the
Secondary DC Power Centers under all loading conditions. In the
event of a high energy emergency landing or runway excursion, the
structural failure of the LHS or RHS equipment racks may result in
the blockage of the emergency escape route for the pilot(s) and crew
if this condition is not corrected.
Required actions include modifying the equipment racks. You may
examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9387.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Bombardier Service Bulletin 100-25-39, dated October
26, 2015; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 350-25-002, dated October 26,
2015. This service information describes procedures for modifying the
equipment racks. These documents are distinct since they apply to
airplanes having different serial numbers. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 161 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modify equipment racks......... Up to 10 work-hours x $1,755 Up to $2,605........ Up to $419,405.
$85 per hour = $850.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this proposed
AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[[Page 14839]]
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2016-9387; Directorate Identifier
2016-NM-182-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by May 8, 2017.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-100-1A10 airplanes,
certificated in any category, serial numbers (S/Ns) 20003 through
20532 inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 25, Equipment/
Furnishings.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a recent design review of the equipment
racks which revealed that the left-hand side (LHS) and right-hand
side (RHS) equipment racks were not designed to support the actual
weight of all the equipment and the secondary direct current power
centers under all loading conditions. We are issuing this AD to
prevent structural failure of the LHS or RHS equipment racks in the
event of a high energy emergency landing or runway excursion, which
could result in blockage of the emergency exit for the flightcrew.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Modification of the Equipment Racks
Within 90 months after the effective date of this AD, do the
modification required by paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, as
applicable.
(1) For airplanes having S/Ns 20003 through 20500 inclusive:
Modify the equipment racks having part numbers (P/Ns) K1000070316-
003 (LHS) and K1000070316-004 (RHS), in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 100-25-
39, dated October 26, 2015.
(2) For airplanes having S/Ns 20501 through 20532 inclusive:
Modify the equipment rack having P/N K1000070316-004 (RHS only), in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 350-25-002, dated October 26, 2015.
(h) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the New York ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone: 516-228-7300; fax:
516-794-5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO,
ANE-170, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or
Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If
approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature.
(i) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2016-26, dated September
14, 2016, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-9387.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone: 514-855-5000; fax: 514-
855-7401; email: thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 14, 2017.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-05520 Filed 3-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P