Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning a Gearmotor, 14737-14740 [2017-05647]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 22, 2017 / Notices
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892
(Telephone Conference Call).
Contact Person: Jonathan K Ivins, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4040A,
MSC 7806, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594–
1245, ivinsj@csr.nih.gov.
This notice is being published less than 15
days prior to the meeting due to the timing
limitations imposed by the review and
funding cycle.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel.
Member Conflict: Topics in Toxicology.
Date: April 11, 2017.
Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892,
(Telephone Conference Call).
Contact Person: Jonathan K Ivins, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4040A,
MSC 7806, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594–
1245, ivinsj@csr.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine;
93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333,
93.337, 93.393–93.396, 93.837–93.844,
93.846– 93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National
Institutes of Health, HHS)
Emphasis Panel NIAID; Clinical Trial
Planning Grants (R34).
Date: April 17, 2017.
Time: 1:30 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 5601
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892
(Telephone Conference Call).
Contact Person: Nancy VazquezMaldonado, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer,
Scientific Review Program, Division of
Extramural Activities, Room 3F52B, National
Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 Fishers
Lane, MSC 9834, Bethesda, MD 20892–9834,
(240) 669–5044, nvazquez@niaid.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology,
and Transplantation Research; 93.856,
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: March 16, 2017.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning a
Gearmotor
Dated: March 16, 2017.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017–05585 Filed 3–21–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
SUMMARY:
[FR Doc. 2017–05583 Filed 3–21–17; 8:45 am]
National Institutes of Health
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases; Notice of Closed
Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
hereby given of the following meeting.
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Mar 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
AGENCY:
This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of certain gearmotors known as
the R47DRE90M4 gearmotors. Based
upon the facts presented, CBP has
concluded that the country of origin of
the R47DRE90M4 gearmotor is the
United States for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement.
DATES: The final determination was
issued on March 16, 2017. A copy of the
final determination is attached. Any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of
this final determination within April 21,
2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Antonio J. Rivera, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of Trade, at (202) 325–
0226.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that on March 16, 2017,
pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, U.S.
Customs and Border Protection
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14737
Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart
B), CBP issued a final determination
concerning the country of origin of a
certain gearmotor known as the
R47DRE90M4 gearmotor, which may be
offered to the U.S. Government under an
undesignated government procurement
contract. This final determination, HQ
H282391, was issued under procedures
set forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B,
which implements Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511–18). In the final
determination, CBP concluded that
imported components that are used to
manufacture the R47DRE90M4
gearmotor are substantially transformed
as a result of the assembly operations
performed in the United States.
Therefore, for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement, the United
States is the country of origin of the
R47DRE90M4 gearmotor.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19
CFR 177.29), provides that a notice of
final determination shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
(19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a
final determination within 30 days of
publication of such determination in the
Federal Register.
Dated: March 16, 2017.
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of Trade.
Attachment
HQ H282391
March 16, 2017
OT:RR:CTF:VS H282391 AJR
Mr. C. Alexander Cable
SEW-Eurodrive
1275 Old Spartanburg Hwy
Lyman, SC 29365
RE: U.S. Government Procurement;
Final Determination; Country of Origin;
Gearmotors
Dear Mr. Cable:
This is in response to your letter,
dated July 18, 2016, requesting a final
determination on behalf of SEWEurodrive, Inc. (‘‘SEW USA’’), pursuant
to subpart B of Part 177, Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) Regulations
(19 CFR 177.21 et seq.). Under these
regulations, which implement Title III
of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979
(‘‘TAA’’), as amended (19 U.S.C. § 2511
et seq.), CBP issues country of origin
advisory rulings and final
determinations as to whether an article
is or would be a product of a designated
country or instrumentality for the
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
14738
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 22, 2017 / Notices
purposes of granting waivers of certain
‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in U.S. law
or practice for products offered for sale
to the U.S. Government.
This final determination concerns the
country of origin of the R47DRE90M4
gearmotor (‘‘R47DRE90M4’’). We note
that SEW USA is a party-at-interest
within the meaning of 19 CFR
177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request
this final determination.
FACTS:
SEW-Eurodrive is a group of
worldwide companies that provide
drive solutions for various applications
in the automotive, building materials,
and metal processing industry, among
others. SEW-Eurodrive Gmbh & Co. KG
(‘‘SEW Germany’’) is the parent
company of SEW USA and other SEWEurodrive manufacturing plants around
the world. SEW USA produces drive
solution products, such as gearmotors,
in the United States, incorporating
SEW-Eurodrive-produced parts acquired
from SEW Germany and other parts
acquired from third-party vendors.
Gearmotors, such as the
R47DRE90M4, are mainly comprised of
two subassemblies: A gear box and a
motor. Because SEW-Eurodrive applies
a modular design to its products, certain
components are interchangeable and
customizable as necessary to meet
specifications. As a result, SEWEurodrive gearmotors have over 2.1
million configurations, with the average
gearmotor consisting of approximately
100 to 120 individual unique
components, such as gears, shafts,
housings, stators, rotors, and endshields.
SEW USA seeks to sell the
R47DRE90M4 to the U.S. Government.
According to SEW USA, because the
configurations may vary, it provides the
following representative illustration of
the R47DRE90M4 production process.1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Procurement of Materials:
SEW USA uses over 100 separate
parts to assemble the R47DRE90M4.
According to SEW USA, many of these
parts are acquired from SEW Germany
(‘‘SEW Parts’’). These parts include
gears, housings, stators, rotors, shafts,
and end shields that are produced at
SEW-Eurodrive manufacturing plants in
Brazil, China, France, Germany, and the
United States, among other designated
and non-designated countries. SEW
USA states while the majority of the
SEW Parts are produced in countries
designated and approved pursuant to
1 SEW
USA notes that other models and
combinations are assembled similarly to this
representative process.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Mar 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
the TAA, SEW-Eurodrive’s ‘‘current
system of inventory distribution to
assembly centers makes it impossible to
determine with specificity the country
of origin for all component parts.’’ For
this reason, many of these SEW Parts are
shipped to SEW Germany as inventory
and then redistributed according to
need.
Additionally, SEW USA acquires
other parts from third-party vendors
(‘‘Other Parts’’). These parts include
screws, nuts, bolts, shims, and rings.
SEW USA considers the SEW Parts
‘‘essential’’ because they are the parts
that SEW-Eurodrive must produce
themselves, while the Other Parts are
ubiquitous and can be purchased on the
open market.
For the gear box subassembly, SEW
USA procures the following materials:
One pinion; three gears (three types);
two pinion shafts (two types); three
output shafts (three types); six keys (six
types); three oil seals (three types); at
least six deep groove ball bearings (six
types); eight circlips (eight types); two
space tubes (two types); two breather
valves (two types); one gear housing;
one supporting disc; one eye bolt; one
sealing compound; one cylindrical
roller bearing; five screw plugs (one
type); one gearcase cover; six hex head
screws (one type); one gasket; two
closing caps (two types); and, at least
seven shims (seven types).
For the motor subassembly, SEW USA
procures the following materials: One
rotor; one snap ring; five retaining rings
(five types); four keys (four types); seven
flanges (seven types); seven screw plugs
(six types); two deep groove ball
bearings (two types); eight machine
screws (two types); one stator; four hex
head screws (one type); four oil seals
(four types); four fan guards (four types);
two fans (two types); two aluminum
fans (two types); one high inertia
flywheel; one equalizing ring; one Bside bearing end shield; 20 hexagon
nuts (five types); 28 studs (seven types);
one oil flinger; one nameplate; two
grooved pins (one type); one gasket for
lower part; two terminal boxes for lower
part (two types); ten screws (four types);
one terminal block; three terminal clips
(two types); one lock washer; one gasket
for cover; one terminal box cover; one
identification; one gasket; one drain
hole plug; one protection canopy; four
distance supports (one type); four pan
head screws (one type); synthetic grease
(quantity as needed); two bed plate kits
(two types); and, one earth/ground
terminal kit.
Assembly of the Gearmotor
Once SEW USA receives the materials
for the R47DRE90M assembly, the parts
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
are placed into stock locations at the
facility in the United States. From there,
the parts needed to build the motor
subassembly are gathered and taken to
the assembly cell. SEW USA then
assembles the motor subassembly in
accordance with the following standard:
(1) the A-side end shield is heated;
(2) the rotor is cleared and inspected;
(3) two bearings are pressed onto the
rotor shaft, and secured with hardware;
(4) an oil drain is screwed into the Aside end shield;
(5) the rotor is pressed into the A-side
end shield;
(6) the stator is placed on top of the
rotor and into the end shield;
(7) the B-side end shield is added
along with the mounting hardware;
(8) the two end shields and the stator
are bolted together;
(9) an oil seal is installed around the
shaft and into the B-side end shield;
(10) a fan is attached to the rotor shaft
extension on the B-side and secured
with hardware;
(11) a fan cover is placed over the fan
and secured to the stator;
(12) a terminal box is assembled and
attached to the stator with hardware;
(13) an oil seal is placed in the A-side
end shield;
(14) an oil flinger is placed on the Aside shaft extension; and,
(15) a pinion gear is placed onto the
shaft with hardware to hold it in place.
The completed motor subassembly is
visually inspected, and then it is moved
to the next assembly location in SEW
USA’s facility, along with the remaining
parts needed to build the gear box
subassembly. SEW USA then assembles
the gear box subassembly in accordance
with the following standard:
(1) the pinion shaft has a bearing
pressed onto it and hardware is then
used to ensure accurate placement;
(2) a spacer is added and then a key;
(3) the shaft is placed into the housing
along with the gear wheel that mates to
the motor pinion;
(4) another bearing is added and the
whole input assembly is pressed
together in the gear housing;
(5) the output oil seal is prepared for
further assembly;
(6) the output shaft has a bearing
pressed onto it;
(7) a bearing is pressed into the
housing and the output gear wheel is
placed on top of it, with hardware
holding both parts in place;
(8) the output shaft is slid into the
wheel, bearing, and housing and is then
pressed into place;
(9) hardware and shims are added to
both the pinion and output shafts to
ensure proper placement within the
housing;
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 22, 2017 / Notices
(10) the seals are assembled into the
housing;
(11) the oil plugs are added to the
housing; and,
(12) the inspection cover is placed
onto the housing with an eye for moving
the unit.
The completed gear box subassembly
is then mated together with the motor
subassembly to form the R47DRE90M4
gearmotor. The gearmotor is tested to
ensure that it runs in the proper
manner, and then oil is added per
customer specifications and in
accordance with the mounting position.
Afterwards, the unit is hung and
painted. Once dried, the unit is packed
with any additional accompanying
parts, and shipped to the customer.
According to SEW USA, the entire
assembly requires approximately two
hours. SEW USA states that this
includes several quality checks
throughout the process, and that each
major action, such as the motor
assembly or unit testing, must be signed
off to ensure uniform quality of the
product. SEW USA indicates that the
process requires several skilled workers,
who have previous experience or
training in mechanics or gearing
assembly. Particularly, the workers must
have experience and expertise in
assembly processes, which require
operating presses, proper heating
techniques for various tolerance fits,
and use of assembly tooling. SEW USA
notes the workers are trained until they
reach the required proficiency in the
operations, and this training process can
take several weeks to a few months
depending on the complexity of the
assembly unit and experience of the
worker.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the
R47DRE90M4 for the purpose of U.S.
government procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, 19
CFR 177.21 et seq., which implements
the TAA, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 2511
et seq.), CBP issues country of origin
advisory rulings and final
determinations as to whether an article
is or would be a product of a designated
country or instrumentality for the
purposes of granting waivers of certain
‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in U.S. law
or practice for products offered for sale
to the U.S. Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth
under 19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or
instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly
the growth, product, or manufacture of
that country or instrumentality, or (ii) in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Mar 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
the case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from
another country or instrumentality, it
has been substantially transformed into
a new and different article of commerce
with a name, character, or use distinct
from that of the article or articles from
which it was so transformed.
See also, 19 CFR 177.22(a).
In rendering advisory rulings and
final determinations for purposes of
U.S. government procurement, CBP
applies the provisions of subpart B of
Part 177 consistent with the Federal
Acquisition Regulations. See 19 CFR
177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes
that the Federal Acquisition Regulations
restrict the U.S. Government’s purchase
of products to U.S.-made or designated
country end products for acquisitions
subject to the TAA. See 48 CFR
25.403(c)(1). The Federal Acquisition
Regulations define ‘‘U.S.-made end
product’’ as:
. . . an article that is mined,
produced, or manufactured in the
United States or that is substantially
transformed in the United States into a
new and different article of commerce
with a name, character, or use distinct
from that of the article or articles from
which it was transformed.
48 CFR § 25.003.
In determining whether the
combining of parts or materials
constitutes a substantial transformation,
the determinative issue is the extent of
operations performed and whether the
parts lose their identity and become an
integral part of the new article. Belcrest
Linens v. United States, 573 F. Supp.
1149 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1983), aff’d, 741
F.2d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1984). Assembly
operations that are minimal or simple,
as opposed to complex or meaningful,
will generally not result in a substantial
transformation. Factors which may be
relevant in this evaluation may include
the nature of the operation (including
the number of components assembled),
the number of different operations
involved, and whether a significant
period of time, skill, detail, and quality
control are necessary for the assembly
operation. See C.S.D. 80–111, C.S.D. 85–
25, C.S.D. 89–110, C.S.D. 89–118, C.S.D.
90–51, and C.S.D. 90–97. If the
manufacturing or combining process is
a minor one which leaves the identity
of the article intact, a substantial
transformation has not occurred.
Uniroyal, Inc. v. United States, 3 CIT
220, 542 F. Supp. 1026 (1982), aff’d 702
F. 2d 1022 (Fed. Cir. 1983).
In order to determine whether a
substantial transformation occurs when
components of various origin are
assembled into completed products,
CBP considers the totality of the
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14739
circumstances and makes such
determinations on a case-by-case basis.
The country of origin of the item’s
components, extent of the processing
that occurs within a country, and
whether such processing renders a
product with a new name, character,
and use are primary considerations in
such cases. Additionally, factors such as
the resources expended on product
design and development, extent and
nature of post-assembly inspection and
testing procedures, and the degree of
skill required during the actual
manufacturing process may be relevant
when determining whether a substantial
transformation has occurred. No one
factor is determinative.
In a number of rulings (e.g.,
Headquarters Ruling Letter (‘‘HRL’’)
735608, dated April 27, 1995, and HRL
559089, dated August 24, 1995), CBP
has stated: ‘‘in our experience these
inquiries are highly fact and product
specific; generalizations are troublesome
and potentially misleading. The
determination is in this instance ‘a
mixed question of technology and
Customs law, mostly the latter.’’’ Texas
Instruments, Inc. v. United States, 681
F.2d 778, 783 (CCPA 1982).
SEW USA contends that the various
components, imported into the United
States for assembly of the R47DRE90M4,
are substantially transformed during the
processing which occurs in the United
States. SEW USA notes that the
assembly process is complex, requiring
skilled workers, and that the various
components cannot function until
assembled into the completed
gearmotor. In support, SEW USA cites
to HRL 563236, dated July 6, 2005; HRL
557208, dated July 24, 1993; HRL
734979, dated September 3, 1993; HRL
73046, dated May 10, 1991; HRL
734560, dated July 20, 1992; HRL
559067, dated September 19, 2995; and,
New York Ruling (‘‘NY’’) 872132, dated
April 9, 1992.
While the cases cited by SEW USA
consider whether imported parts were
substantially transformed due to
assembly operations in the United
States, the assembled products in these
cited cases were telephones, except for
NY 872132 (holding that Japanese gear
boxes were substantially transformed in
the United States when assembled with
electronic motors to create a gearmotor).
Similar to NY 872132, we note the
following rulings, which we find are
more analogous to the situation in this
case.
In HRL 559703, dated August 23,
1996, numerous parts were sourced
from vendors located in the United
States and/or other countries. These
parts were then assembled into various
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
14740
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 22, 2017 / Notices
subassemblies, and then these
subassemblies were assembled into
aircraft engines, ultimately involving
thousands of individual parts and a
complex operation requiring specialized
skill and expertise. It was held that
these parts were substantially
transformed as a result of the operations
performed in the United States, leading
to the production of an aircraft engine.
In HRL H022169, dated May 2, 2008,
a glider (consisting of a frame, finished
cab, axels, and wheels) was imported
into the United States and assembled
with approximately 87 different
component parts (including the
essential parts: A motor, controller, and
charger of Canadian origin; a gear box
and axel of U.S. origin; and brakes of
Indian origin) into an electric minitruck. The process consisted of eight
assembly work stations involving
attachment and installation operations,
as well as quality control and testing of
the product. It was held that the
imported glider and other foreign
components were substantially
transformed into an electric mini-truck
by the assembly operations that took
place in the United States. See also HRL
558919, dated March 20, 1995 (holding
that an extruder subassembly
manufactured in England was
substantially transformed in the United
States when it was wired and combined
with U.S. components (motor, electrical
controls and extruder screw) to create a
vertical extruder, particularly noting
that the imported extruder and U.S.
components were functionally
necessary to the operation of the vertical
extruder); HRL H075667, dated January
21, 2010 (holding that 53 components
were substantially transformed into an
alternator by the assembly operations in
the United States, noting the 169
minute, 31 step process involving
skilled workers and the U.S.-origin of
the regulator component); and, HRL
734292, dated May 26, 1992 (holding
that imported components and
subassemblies were substantially
transformed into electronic motors in
the United States, noting the U.S. origin
of the stator component because of the
extensive experience required for
production of the stator).
In this case, we find that the imported
parts are substantially transformed as a
result of the assembly operations in the
United States. We note that building the
R47DRE90M4 in the United States
consists of assembling together 131
unique parts, and at least a total of 200
parts. Similarly to HRL 559703 and HRL
H022169, production of the
R47DRE90M4 requires importing
numerous parts of various origins,
which are used to first assemble the gear
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Mar 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
box and motor subassemblies, and then
to assemble the complete gearmotor,
through a complex operation with
specialized skill and expertise. As noted
in HRL H075667 and HRL 734292, the
complex operation in this case involves
at least 27 steps that take approximately
two hours. We note that SEW USA’s
workers are hired with previous
experience in mechanical fields, and
undergo additional training by SEW
USA, which may endure several weeks
to a few months, in order to reach the
proficiency in the assembly operations
that is required by the company. Under
the described assembly process, the
foreign components lose their
individual identities and become an
integral part of a new article, the
R47DRE90M4, possessing a new name,
character and use. Based upon the
information before us, we find that the
components that are used to
manufacture the R47DRE90M4 are
substantially transformed as a result of
the assembly operations performed in
the United States, and that the country
of origin of the R47DRE90M4 for
government procurement purposes is
the United States.
HOLDING:
The components that are used to
manufacture the R47DRE90M4 are
substantially transformed as a result of
the assembly operations performed in
the United States. Therefore, the
country of origin of the R47DRE90M4
for government procurement purposes is
the United States.
Notice of this final determination will
be given in the Federal Register, as
required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any partyat-interest other than the party which
requested this final determination may
request, pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31, that
CBP reexamine the matter anew and
issue a new final determination.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 177.30, any partyat-interest may, within 30 days of
publication of the Federal Register
Notice referenced above, seek judicial
review of this final determination before
the Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of Trade.
[FR Doc. 2017–05647 Filed 3–21–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
[Docket ID: FEMA–2016–0025; OMB No.
1660–0026]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; State
Administrative Plan for the Hazard
Mitigation Grant Program
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) will
submit the information collection
abstracted below to the Office of
Management and Budget for review and
clearance in accordance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The submission
will describe the nature of the
information collection, the categories of
respondents, the estimated burden (i.e.,
the time, effort and resources used by
respondents to respond) and cost, and
the actual data collection instruments
FEMA will use.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before April 21, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
on the proposed information collection
to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget. Comments
should be addressed to the Desk Officer
for the Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, and sent via
electronic mail to oira.submission@
omb.eop.gov.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
should be made to Director, Records
Management Division, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472–3100, or email
address FEMA-Information-CollectionsManagement@fema.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposed information collection
previously published in the Federal
Register on November 29, 2016, at 81
FR 85995, with a 60 day public
comment period. One comment was
submitted through Regulations.gov that
was not related to this information
collection. FEMA also received requests
for copies of the information collection
and provided the information to the
requesters. This 30 day notice includes
revisions to the estimates provided in
the 60 day notice. FEMA updated the
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 54 (Wednesday, March 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14737-14740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05647]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning a Gearmotor
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') has issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of certain gearmotors known as the R47DRE90M4
gearmotors. Based upon the facts presented, CBP has concluded that the
country of origin of the R47DRE90M4 gearmotor is the United States for
purposes of U.S. Government procurement.
DATES: The final determination was issued on March 16, 2017. A copy of
the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as defined
in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final
determination within April 21, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Antonio J. Rivera, Valuation and
Special Programs Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade, at
(202) 325-0226.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on March 16,
2017, pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart B), CBP issued a final
determination concerning the country of origin of a certain gearmotor
known as the R47DRE90M4 gearmotor, which may be offered to the U.S.
Government under an undesignated government procurement contract. This
final determination, HQ H282391, was issued under procedures set forth
at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B, which implements Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-18). In the final
determination, CBP concluded that imported components that are used to
manufacture the R47DRE90M4 gearmotor are substantially transformed as a
result of the assembly operations performed in the United States.
Therefore, for purposes of U.S. Government procurement, the United
States is the country of origin of the R47DRE90M4 gearmotor.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that a
notice of final determination shall be published in the Federal
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued.
Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such
determination in the Federal Register.
Dated: March 16, 2017.
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade.
Attachment
HQ H282391
March 16, 2017
OT:RR:CTF:VS H282391 AJR
Mr. C. Alexander Cable
SEW-Eurodrive
1275 Old Spartanburg Hwy
Lyman, SC 29365
RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Final Determination; Country of
Origin; Gearmotors
Dear Mr. Cable:
This is in response to your letter, dated July 18, 2016, requesting
a final determination on behalf of SEW-Eurodrive, Inc. (``SEW USA''),
pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, Customs and Border Protection
(``CBP'') Regulations (19 CFR 177.21 et seq.). Under these regulations,
which implement Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979
(``TAA''), as amended (19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues
country of origin advisory rulings and final determinations as to
whether an article is or would be a product of a designated country or
instrumentality for the
[[Page 14738]]
purposes of granting waivers of certain ``Buy American'' restrictions
in U.S. law or practice for products offered for sale to the U.S.
Government.
This final determination concerns the country of origin of the
R47DRE90M4 gearmotor (``R47DRE90M4''). We note that SEW USA is a party-
at-interest within the meaning of 19 CFR 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled
to request this final determination.
FACTS:
SEW-Eurodrive is a group of worldwide companies that provide drive
solutions for various applications in the automotive, building
materials, and metal processing industry, among others. SEW-Eurodrive
Gmbh & Co. KG (``SEW Germany'') is the parent company of SEW USA and
other SEW-Eurodrive manufacturing plants around the world. SEW USA
produces drive solution products, such as gearmotors, in the United
States, incorporating SEW-Eurodrive-produced parts acquired from SEW
Germany and other parts acquired from third-party vendors.
Gearmotors, such as the R47DRE90M4, are mainly comprised of two
subassemblies: A gear box and a motor. Because SEW-Eurodrive applies a
modular design to its products, certain components are interchangeable
and customizable as necessary to meet specifications. As a result, SEW-
Eurodrive gearmotors have over 2.1 million configurations, with the
average gearmotor consisting of approximately 100 to 120 individual
unique components, such as gears, shafts, housings, stators, rotors,
and end-shields.
SEW USA seeks to sell the R47DRE90M4 to the U.S. Government.
According to SEW USA, because the configurations may vary, it provides
the following representative illustration of the R47DRE90M4 production
process.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ SEW USA notes that other models and combinations are
assembled similarly to this representative process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Procurement of Materials:
SEW USA uses over 100 separate parts to assemble the R47DRE90M4.
According to SEW USA, many of these parts are acquired from SEW Germany
(``SEW Parts''). These parts include gears, housings, stators, rotors,
shafts, and end shields that are produced at SEW-Eurodrive
manufacturing plants in Brazil, China, France, Germany, and the United
States, among other designated and non-designated countries. SEW USA
states while the majority of the SEW Parts are produced in countries
designated and approved pursuant to the TAA, SEW-Eurodrive's ``current
system of inventory distribution to assembly centers makes it
impossible to determine with specificity the country of origin for all
component parts.'' For this reason, many of these SEW Parts are shipped
to SEW Germany as inventory and then redistributed according to need.
Additionally, SEW USA acquires other parts from third-party vendors
(``Other Parts''). These parts include screws, nuts, bolts, shims, and
rings. SEW USA considers the SEW Parts ``essential'' because they are
the parts that SEW-Eurodrive must produce themselves, while the Other
Parts are ubiquitous and can be purchased on the open market.
For the gear box subassembly, SEW USA procures the following
materials: One pinion; three gears (three types); two pinion shafts
(two types); three output shafts (three types); six keys (six types);
three oil seals (three types); at least six deep groove ball bearings
(six types); eight circlips (eight types); two space tubes (two types);
two breather valves (two types); one gear housing; one supporting disc;
one eye bolt; one sealing compound; one cylindrical roller bearing;
five screw plugs (one type); one gearcase cover; six hex head screws
(one type); one gasket; two closing caps (two types); and, at least
seven shims (seven types).
For the motor subassembly, SEW USA procures the following
materials: One rotor; one snap ring; five retaining rings (five types);
four keys (four types); seven flanges (seven types); seven screw plugs
(six types); two deep groove ball bearings (two types); eight machine
screws (two types); one stator; four hex head screws (one type); four
oil seals (four types); four fan guards (four types); two fans (two
types); two aluminum fans (two types); one high inertia flywheel; one
equalizing ring; one B-side bearing end shield; 20 hexagon nuts (five
types); 28 studs (seven types); one oil flinger; one nameplate; two
grooved pins (one type); one gasket for lower part; two terminal boxes
for lower part (two types); ten screws (four types); one terminal
block; three terminal clips (two types); one lock washer; one gasket
for cover; one terminal box cover; one identification; one gasket; one
drain hole plug; one protection canopy; four distance supports (one
type); four pan head screws (one type); synthetic grease (quantity as
needed); two bed plate kits (two types); and, one earth/ground terminal
kit.
Assembly of the Gearmotor
Once SEW USA receives the materials for the R47DRE90M assembly, the
parts are placed into stock locations at the facility in the United
States. From there, the parts needed to build the motor subassembly are
gathered and taken to the assembly cell. SEW USA then assembles the
motor subassembly in accordance with the following standard:
(1) the A-side end shield is heated;
(2) the rotor is cleared and inspected;
(3) two bearings are pressed onto the rotor shaft, and secured with
hardware;
(4) an oil drain is screwed into the A-side end shield;
(5) the rotor is pressed into the A-side end shield;
(6) the stator is placed on top of the rotor and into the end
shield;
(7) the B-side end shield is added along with the mounting
hardware;
(8) the two end shields and the stator are bolted together;
(9) an oil seal is installed around the shaft and into the B-side
end shield;
(10) a fan is attached to the rotor shaft extension on the B-side
and secured with hardware;
(11) a fan cover is placed over the fan and secured to the stator;
(12) a terminal box is assembled and attached to the stator with
hardware;
(13) an oil seal is placed in the A-side end shield;
(14) an oil flinger is placed on the A-side shaft extension; and,
(15) a pinion gear is placed onto the shaft with hardware to hold
it in place.
The completed motor subassembly is visually inspected, and then it
is moved to the next assembly location in SEW USA's facility, along
with the remaining parts needed to build the gear box subassembly. SEW
USA then assembles the gear box subassembly in accordance with the
following standard:
(1) the pinion shaft has a bearing pressed onto it and hardware is
then used to ensure accurate placement;
(2) a spacer is added and then a key;
(3) the shaft is placed into the housing along with the gear wheel
that mates to the motor pinion;
(4) another bearing is added and the whole input assembly is
pressed together in the gear housing;
(5) the output oil seal is prepared for further assembly;
(6) the output shaft has a bearing pressed onto it;
(7) a bearing is pressed into the housing and the output gear wheel
is placed on top of it, with hardware holding both parts in place;
(8) the output shaft is slid into the wheel, bearing, and housing
and is then pressed into place;
(9) hardware and shims are added to both the pinion and output
shafts to ensure proper placement within the housing;
[[Page 14739]]
(10) the seals are assembled into the housing;
(11) the oil plugs are added to the housing; and,
(12) the inspection cover is placed onto the housing with an eye
for moving the unit.
The completed gear box subassembly is then mated together with the
motor subassembly to form the R47DRE90M4 gearmotor. The gearmotor is
tested to ensure that it runs in the proper manner, and then oil is
added per customer specifications and in accordance with the mounting
position. Afterwards, the unit is hung and painted. Once dried, the
unit is packed with any additional accompanying parts, and shipped to
the customer.
According to SEW USA, the entire assembly requires approximately
two hours. SEW USA states that this includes several quality checks
throughout the process, and that each major action, such as the motor
assembly or unit testing, must be signed off to ensure uniform quality
of the product. SEW USA indicates that the process requires several
skilled workers, who have previous experience or training in mechanics
or gearing assembly. Particularly, the workers must have experience and
expertise in assembly processes, which require operating presses,
proper heating techniques for various tolerance fits, and use of
assembly tooling. SEW USA notes the workers are trained until they
reach the required proficiency in the operations, and this training
process can take several weeks to a few months depending on the
complexity of the assembly unit and experience of the worker.
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the R47DRE90M4 for the purpose of
U.S. government procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, 19 CFR 177.21 et seq., which
implements the TAA, as amended (19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511 et seq.), CBP
issues country of origin advisory rulings and final determinations as
to whether an article is or would be a product of a designated country
or instrumentality for the purposes of granting waivers of certain
``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products
offered for sale to the U.S. Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if (i)
it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country or
instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from another country or instrumentality,
it has been substantially transformed into a new and different article
of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the
article or articles from which it was so transformed.
See also, 19 CFR 177.22(a).
In rendering advisory rulings and final determinations for purposes
of U.S. government procurement, CBP applies the provisions of subpart B
of Part 177 consistent with the Federal Acquisition Regulations. See 19
CFR 177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes that the Federal Acquisition
Regulations restrict the U.S. Government's purchase of products to
U.S.-made or designated country end products for acquisitions subject
to the TAA. See 48 CFR 25.403(c)(1). The Federal Acquisition
Regulations define ``U.S.-made end product'' as:
. . . an article that is mined, produced, or manufactured in the
United States or that is substantially transformed in the United States
into a new and different article of commerce with a name, character, or
use distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was
transformed.
48 CFR Sec. 25.003.
In determining whether the combining of parts or materials
constitutes a substantial transformation, the determinative issue is
the extent of operations performed and whether the parts lose their
identity and become an integral part of the new article. Belcrest
Linens v. United States, 573 F. Supp. 1149 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1983),
aff'd, 741 F.2d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1984). Assembly operations that are
minimal or simple, as opposed to complex or meaningful, will generally
not result in a substantial transformation. Factors which may be
relevant in this evaluation may include the nature of the operation
(including the number of components assembled), the number of different
operations involved, and whether a significant period of time, skill,
detail, and quality control are necessary for the assembly operation.
See C.S.D. 80-111, C.S.D. 85-25, C.S.D. 89-110, C.S.D. 89-118, C.S.D.
90-51, and C.S.D. 90-97. If the manufacturing or combining process is a
minor one which leaves the identity of the article intact, a
substantial transformation has not occurred. Uniroyal, Inc. v. United
States, 3 CIT 220, 542 F. Supp. 1026 (1982), aff'd 702 F. 2d 1022 (Fed.
Cir. 1983).
In order to determine whether a substantial transformation occurs
when components of various origin are assembled into completed
products, CBP considers the totality of the circumstances and makes
such determinations on a case-by-case basis. The country of origin of
the item's components, extent of the processing that occurs within a
country, and whether such processing renders a product with a new name,
character, and use are primary considerations in such cases.
Additionally, factors such as the resources expended on product design
and development, extent and nature of post-assembly inspection and
testing procedures, and the degree of skill required during the actual
manufacturing process may be relevant when determining whether a
substantial transformation has occurred. No one factor is
determinative.
In a number of rulings (e.g., Headquarters Ruling Letter (``HRL'')
735608, dated April 27, 1995, and HRL 559089, dated August 24, 1995),
CBP has stated: ``in our experience these inquiries are highly fact and
product specific; generalizations are troublesome and potentially
misleading. The determination is in this instance `a mixed question of
technology and Customs law, mostly the latter.''' Texas Instruments,
Inc. v. United States, 681 F.2d 778, 783 (CCPA 1982).
SEW USA contends that the various components, imported into the
United States for assembly of the R47DRE90M4, are substantially
transformed during the processing which occurs in the United States.
SEW USA notes that the assembly process is complex, requiring skilled
workers, and that the various components cannot function until
assembled into the completed gearmotor. In support, SEW USA cites to
HRL 563236, dated July 6, 2005; HRL 557208, dated July 24, 1993; HRL
734979, dated September 3, 1993; HRL 73046, dated May 10, 1991; HRL
734560, dated July 20, 1992; HRL 559067, dated September 19, 2995; and,
New York Ruling (``NY'') 872132, dated April 9, 1992.
While the cases cited by SEW USA consider whether imported parts
were substantially transformed due to assembly operations in the United
States, the assembled products in these cited cases were telephones,
except for NY 872132 (holding that Japanese gear boxes were
substantially transformed in the United States when assembled with
electronic motors to create a gearmotor). Similar to NY 872132, we note
the following rulings, which we find are more analogous to the
situation in this case.
In HRL 559703, dated August 23, 1996, numerous parts were sourced
from vendors located in the United States and/or other countries. These
parts were then assembled into various
[[Page 14740]]
subassemblies, and then these subassemblies were assembled into
aircraft engines, ultimately involving thousands of individual parts
and a complex operation requiring specialized skill and expertise. It
was held that these parts were substantially transformed as a result of
the operations performed in the United States, leading to the
production of an aircraft engine.
In HRL H022169, dated May 2, 2008, a glider (consisting of a frame,
finished cab, axels, and wheels) was imported into the United States
and assembled with approximately 87 different component parts
(including the essential parts: A motor, controller, and charger of
Canadian origin; a gear box and axel of U.S. origin; and brakes of
Indian origin) into an electric mini-truck. The process consisted of
eight assembly work stations involving attachment and installation
operations, as well as quality control and testing of the product. It
was held that the imported glider and other foreign components were
substantially transformed into an electric mini-truck by the assembly
operations that took place in the United States. See also HRL 558919,
dated March 20, 1995 (holding that an extruder subassembly manufactured
in England was substantially transformed in the United States when it
was wired and combined with U.S. components (motor, electrical controls
and extruder screw) to create a vertical extruder, particularly noting
that the imported extruder and U.S. components were functionally
necessary to the operation of the vertical extruder); HRL H075667,
dated January 21, 2010 (holding that 53 components were substantially
transformed into an alternator by the assembly operations in the United
States, noting the 169 minute, 31 step process involving skilled
workers and the U.S.-origin of the regulator component); and, HRL
734292, dated May 26, 1992 (holding that imported components and
subassemblies were substantially transformed into electronic motors in
the United States, noting the U.S. origin of the stator component
because of the extensive experience required for production of the
stator).
In this case, we find that the imported parts are substantially
transformed as a result of the assembly operations in the United
States. We note that building the R47DRE90M4 in the United States
consists of assembling together 131 unique parts, and at least a total
of 200 parts. Similarly to HRL 559703 and HRL H022169, production of
the R47DRE90M4 requires importing numerous parts of various origins,
which are used to first assemble the gear box and motor subassemblies,
and then to assemble the complete gearmotor, through a complex
operation with specialized skill and expertise. As noted in HRL H075667
and HRL 734292, the complex operation in this case involves at least 27
steps that take approximately two hours. We note that SEW USA's workers
are hired with previous experience in mechanical fields, and undergo
additional training by SEW USA, which may endure several weeks to a few
months, in order to reach the proficiency in the assembly operations
that is required by the company. Under the described assembly process,
the foreign components lose their individual identities and become an
integral part of a new article, the R47DRE90M4, possessing a new name,
character and use. Based upon the information before us, we find that
the components that are used to manufacture the R47DRE90M4 are
substantially transformed as a result of the assembly operations
performed in the United States, and that the country of origin of the
R47DRE90M4 for government procurement purposes is the United States.
HOLDING:
The components that are used to manufacture the R47DRE90M4 are
substantially transformed as a result of the assembly operations
performed in the United States. Therefore, the country of origin of the
R47DRE90M4 for government procurement purposes is the United States.
Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal
Register, as required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any party-at-interest other
than the party which requested this final determination may request,
pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31, that CBP reexamine the matter anew and issue
a new final determination. Pursuant to 19 CFR 177.30, any party-at-
interest may, within 30 days of publication of the Federal Register
Notice referenced above, seek judicial review of this final
determination before the Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade.
[FR Doc. 2017-05647 Filed 3-21-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P