Request for Public Comments on Peer Review Candidates for Proposed Modeling Approaches for a Health-Based Benchmark for Lead in Drinking Water, 14361-14362 [2017-05465]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 52 / Monday, March 20, 2017 / Notices
Accession Number: 20170307–5151.
Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Time on Monday, March 20, 2017.
Docket Numbers: RP17–523–000.
Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
Description: ANR Pipeline Company
submits tariff filing per 154.601: 2–1–17
Negotiated Rate Agreements to be
effective 2/1/2017.
Filed Date: 03/07/2017.
Accession Number: 20170307–5209.
Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Time on Monday, March 20, 2017.
The filings are accessible in the
Commission’s eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the
docket number.
Any person desiring to intervene or
protest in any of the above proceedings
must file in accordance with Rules 211
and 214 of the Commission’s
Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and
§ 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified date(s). Protests
may be considered, but intervention is
necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
eFiling is encouraged. More detailed
information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests,
service, and qualifying facilities filings
can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/
docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For
other information, call (866) 208–3676
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.
Dated: March 9, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–05437 Filed 3–17–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Combined Notice of Filings
Take notice that the Commission has
received the following Natural Gas
Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Filings Instituting Proceedings
Docket Number: PR17–35–000.
Applicants: Hope Gas, Inc.
Description: Tariff filing per
284.123(b)(1)+(g): HGI—Certification of
Unchanged State Rate to be effective 3/
9/2017; Filing Type: 1260.
Filed Date: 3/9/17.
Accession Number: 201703095198.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/30/17.
284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/
8/17.
Docket Number: CP17–75–000.
Applicants: American Midstream
(Bamagas Intrastate) LLC.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Mar 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
Description: Application for Limited
Jurisdiction Blanket Certificate and
Request for Expedited Action of
American Midstream(Babagas
Intrastate), LLC.
Filed Date: 03/10/2017.
Accession Number: 20170310–5223.
Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Time on Monday, March 27, 2017.
Docket Number: RP17–524–000.
Applicants: Bear Creek Storage
Company, L.L.C.
Description: Bear Creek Storage
Company, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
154.203: Annual Report on Operational
Transactions.
Filed Date: 03/09/2017.
Accession Number: 20170309–5020.
Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Time on Tuesday, March 21, 2017.
Docket Number: RP17–525–000.
Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
Description: Equitrans, L.P. submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Updated Initial
Retainage 4–1–2017 to be effective 4/1/
2017.
Filed Date: 03/10/2017.
Accession Number: 20170310–5010.
Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Time on Wednesday, March 22, 2017.
Docket Number: RP17–526–000.
Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
Description: Equitrans, L.P. submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Equitrans’
Clean-Up Filing—March 2017 to be
effective 4/10/2017.
Filed Date: 03/10/2017.
Accession Number: 20170310–5011.
Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Time on Wednesday, March 22, 2017.
Docket Number: RP17–527–000.
Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
Description: ANR Pipeline Company
submits tariff filing per 154.203:
Compliance to CP17–25–000 to be
effective 2/28/2017.
Filed Date: 03/10/2017.
Accession Number: 20170310–5012.
Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Time on Wednesday, March 22, 2017.
Docket Number: RP17–528–000.
Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
Description: Equitrans, L.P. submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Negotiated Rate
Service Agreement—Mercuria Energy
America, Inc. to be effective 4/1/2017.
Filed Date: 03/10/2017.
Accession Number: 20170310–5013.
Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Time on Wednesday, March 22, 2017.
The filings are accessible in the
Commission’s eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the
docket number.
Any person desiring to intervene or
protest in any of the above proceedings
must file in accordance with Rules 211
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14361
and 214 of the Commission’s
Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified date(s). Protests
may be considered, but intervention is
necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
eFiling is encouraged. More detailed
information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests,
service, and qualifying facilities filings
can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/
docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For
other information, call (866) 208–3676
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.
Dated: March 13, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–05438 Filed 3–17–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OW–2016–0686; FRL 9960–12–
OW]
Request for Public Comments on Peer
Review Candidates for Proposed
Modeling Approaches for a HealthBased Benchmark for Lead in Drinking
Water
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public
comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) requests
comments on the candidates being
considered as expert peer reviewers for
the draft modeling report entitled,
‘‘Proposed Modeling Approaches for a
Health-Based Benchmark for Lead in
Drinking Water’’ (lead modeling report).
EPA is seeking comment and
information about the expertise and
qualifications of the candidates. See
section II of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this notice for
the interim list of candidates.
DATES: Comments on the interim list of
potential peer review candidates must
be received on or before April 19, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments on
the interim list of potential peer review
candidates to EPA’s peer review
contractor, ERG, Inc., no later than April
19, 2017 by one of the following
methods:
• Email: peerreview@erg.com (subject
line: Lead in Drinking Water Peer
Review).
• Mail: ERG, Inc., 110 Hartwell
Avenue, Lexington, MA 02421, ATTN:
Laurie Waite (must arrive by the
comment period deadline).
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
14362
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 52 / Monday, March 20, 2017 / Notices
Please be advised that public
comments are subject to release under
the Freedom of Information Act.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions concerning the interim list of
expert peer reviewers should be
directed to ERG, Inc., 110 Hartwell
Avenue, Lexington, MA 02421; by email
peerreview@erg.com (subject line: Lead
in Drinking Water Peer Review); or by
phone: (781) 674–7362 (ask for Laurie
Waite).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
I. Process of Obtaining Candidates for
Consideration
EPA’s contractor, ERG, is assembling
a panel of scientific experts to evaluate
the ‘‘Proposed Modeling Approaches for
a Health-Based Benchmark for Lead in
Drinking Water’’ report. EPA, through
its contractor, is seeking peer reviewers
who possess a strong background and
demonstrated expertise in one or more
of the following areas: (1)
Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic
modeling, particularly with regard to
lead, (2) environmental lead exposure
analyses, particularly with regard to
probabilistic modeling. EPA published a
request for nominations of peer
reviewers in a January 19, 2017, Federal
Register notice (82 FR 6546). The
nomination period closed on February
21,2017. ERG also conducted an
independent search for scientific
experts to augment the list of publicallynominated candidates. In total, ERG
evaluated 26 candidates that were
nominated during the public
nomination period or identified
independently by ERG.
Screening Process
ERG considered and screened all
candidates against the selection criteria,
which include the following: (1)
Demonstrated expertise through
relevant peer reviewed publications; (2)
professional accomplishments and
recognition by professional societies; (3)
demonstrated ability to work
constructively and effectively in a
committee setting; (4) absence of
financial conflicts of interest; (5) no
actual conflicts of interest or appearance
of lack of impartiality; (6) willingness to
commit adequate time for the thorough
review of the draft report; and (7)
availability to participate in-person in a
one-day or two-day peer review meeting
in the Washington, DC, metro area,
projected to occur in the summer of
2017 (exact date will be published in
the Federal Register at least 30 days
prior to the external peer review
meeting). Following the screening
process, the contractor narrowed the list
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Mar 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
of potential reviewers to 13 candidates.
EPA is now soliciting comments on this
interim list. EPA requests that the
public provide relevant information or
documentation on the expertise that the
contractor should consider in evaluating
these candidates. ERG will consider all
comments received in response to this
notice in the selection of the final peer
review panel, which will collectively
provide appropriate expertise spanning
the subject matter areas covered by the
report and, to the extent feasible, best
provide a balance of perspectives. See
section II of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this notice for
the interim list of candidates.
Responsibilities of Peer Reviewers
Peer reviewers will be charged with
evaluating and preparing written
comments on the lead modeling report.
ERG will provide reviewers with a
summary and compilation of public
comments on the report submitted to
EPA’s docket (ID number EPA–HQ–
OW–2016–0686) for consideration.
Reviewers will participate in the public
meeting expected to be held in the
Washington, DC, metro area in the
summer of 2017 (exact date to be
determined), to discuss the scientific
basis supporting these materials.
Following the meeting, ERG will
provide a report to EPA of the peer
reviewer’s evaluation of the scientific
and technical merit of the lead modeling
report and their responses to the charge
questions. EPA will make the final
expert peer review report available to
the public (exact date to be determined).
In preparing the final lead modeling
report, EPA will consider the expert
peer review report as well as the written
public comments submitted to the
docket.
II. Interim List of Peer Reviewers
ERG is considering the following
candidates for the peer review panel.
Biosketches are available through the
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
(Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2016–
0686). After review and consideration of
public comments on the interim list of
candidates being considered, ERG will
select the final peer reviewers from this
interim list, who will, collectively, best
provide expertise spanning the areas of
knowledge and experience described in
the Federal Register notice (82 FR 6546)
and, to the extent feasible, best provide
a balance of perspectives. EPA will
announce the peer review panel meeting
date, location and observer registration
details, along with the final list of peer
reviewers selected by ERG, at least 30
days prior to the meeting.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Name of Nominee, Degree, Place of
Employment
1. Stuart Batterman, Ph.D., University of
Michigan
2. Teresa Bowers, Ph.D., Gradient
Corporation
3. Panos Georgopoulos, Ph.D., Rutgers
University
4. Philip Goodrum, Ph.D., Integral
Consulting, Inc.
5. Bruce Lanphear, Ph.D., Simon Fraser
University
6. France Lemieux, MCE, Government
(Canada)
7. Anne Loccisano, Ph.D., Exponent,
Inc.
8. Allan H. Marcus, Ph.D., Private
Consultant
9. Marc A. Nascarella, Ph.D.,
Massachusetts Department of Public
Health
10. Michele Provost, Ph.D.,
Polytechnique Montreal
11. Barry Ryan, Ph.D., Emory University
12. Ian von Lindern, Ph.D.,
TerraGraphics International
13. Kathleen Vork, Ph.D., California
Office of Environment Health Hazard
Dated: March 7, 2017.
Michael H. Shapiro,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of
Water.
[FR Doc. 2017–05465 Filed 3–17–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[OMB 3060–0674 and 3060–0787]
Information Collections Being
Submitted for Review and Approval to
the Office of Management and Budget
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
As part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork burdens, and as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC or
the Commission) invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on the
following information collection.
Comments are requested concerning:
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; ways to minimize
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 52 (Monday, March 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14361-14362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05465]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OW-2016-0686; FRL 9960-12-OW]
Request for Public Comments on Peer Review Candidates for
Proposed Modeling Approaches for a Health-Based Benchmark for Lead in
Drinking Water
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requests
comments on the candidates being considered as expert peer reviewers
for the draft modeling report entitled, ``Proposed Modeling Approaches
for a Health-Based Benchmark for Lead in Drinking Water'' (lead
modeling report). EPA is seeking comment and information about the
expertise and qualifications of the candidates. See section II of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice for the interim list
of candidates.
DATES: Comments on the interim list of potential peer review candidates
must be received on or before April 19, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments on the interim list of potential peer
review candidates to EPA's peer review contractor, ERG, Inc., no later
than April 19, 2017 by one of the following methods:
Email: peerreview@erg.com (subject line: Lead in Drinking
Water Peer Review).
Mail: ERG, Inc., 110 Hartwell Avenue, Lexington, MA 02421,
ATTN: Laurie Waite (must arrive by the comment period deadline).
[[Page 14362]]
Please be advised that public comments are subject to release under
the Freedom of Information Act.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions concerning the interim list
of expert peer reviewers should be directed to ERG, Inc., 110 Hartwell
Avenue, Lexington, MA 02421; by email peerreview@erg.com (subject line:
Lead in Drinking Water Peer Review); or by phone: (781) 674-7362 (ask
for Laurie Waite).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Process of Obtaining Candidates for Consideration
EPA's contractor, ERG, is assembling a panel of scientific experts
to evaluate the ``Proposed Modeling Approaches for a Health-Based
Benchmark for Lead in Drinking Water'' report. EPA, through its
contractor, is seeking peer reviewers who possess a strong background
and demonstrated expertise in one or more of the following areas: (1)
Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic modeling, particularly with
regard to lead, (2) environmental lead exposure analyses, particularly
with regard to probabilistic modeling. EPA published a request for
nominations of peer reviewers in a January 19, 2017, Federal Register
notice (82 FR 6546). The nomination period closed on February 21,2017.
ERG also conducted an independent search for scientific experts to
augment the list of publically-nominated candidates. In total, ERG
evaluated 26 candidates that were nominated during the public
nomination period or identified independently by ERG.
Screening Process
ERG considered and screened all candidates against the selection
criteria, which include the following: (1) Demonstrated expertise
through relevant peer reviewed publications; (2) professional
accomplishments and recognition by professional societies; (3)
demonstrated ability to work constructively and effectively in a
committee setting; (4) absence of financial conflicts of interest; (5)
no actual conflicts of interest or appearance of lack of impartiality;
(6) willingness to commit adequate time for the thorough review of the
draft report; and (7) availability to participate in-person in a one-
day or two-day peer review meeting in the Washington, DC, metro area,
projected to occur in the summer of 2017 (exact date will be published
in the Federal Register at least 30 days prior to the external peer
review meeting). Following the screening process, the contractor
narrowed the list of potential reviewers to 13 candidates. EPA is now
soliciting comments on this interim list. EPA requests that the public
provide relevant information or documentation on the expertise that the
contractor should consider in evaluating these candidates. ERG will
consider all comments received in response to this notice in the
selection of the final peer review panel, which will collectively
provide appropriate expertise spanning the subject matter areas covered
by the report and, to the extent feasible, best provide a balance of
perspectives. See section II of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this notice for the interim list of candidates.
Responsibilities of Peer Reviewers
Peer reviewers will be charged with evaluating and preparing
written comments on the lead modeling report. ERG will provide
reviewers with a summary and compilation of public comments on the
report submitted to EPA's docket (ID number EPA-HQ-OW-2016-0686) for
consideration. Reviewers will participate in the public meeting
expected to be held in the Washington, DC, metro area in the summer of
2017 (exact date to be determined), to discuss the scientific basis
supporting these materials. Following the meeting, ERG will provide a
report to EPA of the peer reviewer's evaluation of the scientific and
technical merit of the lead modeling report and their responses to the
charge questions. EPA will make the final expert peer review report
available to the public (exact date to be determined). In preparing the
final lead modeling report, EPA will consider the expert peer review
report as well as the written public comments submitted to the docket.
II. Interim List of Peer Reviewers
ERG is considering the following candidates for the peer review
panel. Biosketches are available through the docket at https://www.regulations.gov (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2016-0686). After review
and consideration of public comments on the interim list of candidates
being considered, ERG will select the final peer reviewers from this
interim list, who will, collectively, best provide expertise spanning
the areas of knowledge and experience described in the Federal Register
notice (82 FR 6546) and, to the extent feasible, best provide a balance
of perspectives. EPA will announce the peer review panel meeting date,
location and observer registration details, along with the final list
of peer reviewers selected by ERG, at least 30 days prior to the
meeting.
Name of Nominee, Degree, Place of Employment
1. Stuart Batterman, Ph.D., University of Michigan
2. Teresa Bowers, Ph.D., Gradient Corporation
3. Panos Georgopoulos, Ph.D., Rutgers University
4. Philip Goodrum, Ph.D., Integral Consulting, Inc.
5. Bruce Lanphear, Ph.D., Simon Fraser University
6. France Lemieux, MCE, Government (Canada)
7. Anne Loccisano, Ph.D., Exponent, Inc.
8. Allan H. Marcus, Ph.D., Private Consultant
9. Marc A. Nascarella, Ph.D., Massachusetts Department of Public Health
10. Michele Provost, Ph.D., Polytechnique Montreal
11. Barry Ryan, Ph.D., Emory University
12. Ian von Lindern, Ph.D., TerraGraphics International
13. Kathleen Vork, Ph.D., California Office of Environment Health
Hazard
Dated: March 7, 2017.
Michael H. Shapiro,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Water.
[FR Doc. 2017-05465 Filed 3-17-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P