Order Denying Export Privileges, 14200-14201 [2017-05356]
Download as PDF
14200
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 51 / Friday, March 17, 2017 / Notices
Any party having a substantial
interest in these proceedings may
request a public hearing on the matter.
A written request for a hearing must be
submitted to the Trade Adjustment
Assistance for Firms Division, Room
71030, Economic Development
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no
later than ten (10) calendar days
following publication of this notice.
Please follow the requirements set
forth in EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR
315.9 for procedures to request a public
hearing. The Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance official number
and title for the program under which
these petitions are submitted is 11.313,
Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms.
Miriam Kearse,
Lead Program Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2017–05324 Filed 3–16–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Order Denying Export Privileges
In the Matter of Eyad Farah, Inmate Number:
63001–018, FCI Fort Worth, Federal
Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 15330,
Fort Worth, TX 76119.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
On December 15, 2015, in the U.S.
District Court, Middle District of
Florida, Eyad Farah (‘‘Farah’’), was
convicted of violating Section 38 of the
Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C.
2778 (2012)) (‘‘AECA’’). Specifically,
Farah knowingly and willfully
attempted to export from the United
States a defense article on the U.S.
Munitions List without having first
obtained a license from the Department
of State or written prior authorization
for such export. Farah was sentenced to
37 months in prison, with credit for
time served, 36 months of supervised
release, and a $300 assessment.
Section 766.25 of the Export
Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or
‘‘Regulations’’) 1 provides, in pertinent
part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of
Exporter Services, in consultation with
1 The Regulations are currently codified in the
Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2016). The Regulations issued pursuant to the
Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 4601–4623
(Supp. III 2015) (available at https://
uscode.house.gov)). Since August 21, 2001, the Act
has been in lapse and the President, through
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR,
2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended
by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent
being that of August 4, 2016 (81 FR 52,587 (Aug.
8, 2016)), has continued the Regulations in effect
under the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp.
IV 2010)).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:02 Mar 16, 2017
Jkt 241001
the Director of the Office of Export
Enforcement, may deny the export
privileges of any person who has been
convicted of a violation of the Export
Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’), the EAR,
or any order, license or authorization
issued thereunder; any regulation,
license, or order issued under the
International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. § 1701–1706); 18
U.S.C. §§ 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b)
of the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50
U.S.C. § 783(b)), or section 38 of the
Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C.
§ 2778).’’ 15 CFR § 766.25(a); see also
Section 11(h) of the EAA, 50 U.S.C.
§ 4610(h). The denial of export
privileges under this provision may be
for a period of up to 10 years from the
date of the conviction. 15 CFR
§ 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C. § 4610(h).
In addition, Section 750.8 of the
Regulations states that the Bureau of
Industry and Security’s Office of
Exporter Services may revoke any
Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’)
licenses previously issued in which the
person had an interest in at the time of
his conviction.
BIS has received notice of Farah’s
conviction for violating the AECA, and
has provided notice and an opportunity
for Farah to make a written submission
to BIS, as provided in Section 766.25 of
the Regulations. BIS has not received a
submission from Farah.
Based upon my review and
consultations with BIS’s Office of
Export Enforcement, including its
Director, and the facts available to BIS,
I have decided to deny Farah’s export
privileges under the Regulations for a
period of five years from the date of
Farah’s conviction. I have also decided
to revoke all licenses issued pursuant to
the Act or Regulations in which Farah
had an interest at the time of his
conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby Ordered:
First, from the date of this Order until
December 15, 2020, Eyad Farah, with a
last known address of Inmate Number:
63001–018, FCI Fort Worth, Federal
Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 15330,
Fort Worth, TX 76119, and when acting
for or on his behalf, his successors,
assigns, employees, agents or
representatives (the ‘‘Denied Person’’),
may not, directly or indirectly,
participate in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity,
software or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)
exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the
Regulations, including, but not limited
to:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Second, no person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Third, after notice and opportunity for
comment as provided in Section 766.23
of the Regulations, any other person,
firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Farah by
ownership, control, position of
E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM
17MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 51 / Friday, March 17, 2017 / Notices
responsibility, affiliation, or other
connection in the conduct of trade or
business may also be made subject to
the provisions of this Order in order to
prevent evasion of this Order.
Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of
the Regulations, Farah may file an
appeal of this Order with the Under
Secretary of Commerce for Industry and
Security. The appeal must be filed
within 45 days from the date of this
Order and must comply with the
provisions of Part 756 of the
Regulations.
Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be
delivered to the Farah. This Order shall
be published in the Federal Register.
Sixth, this Order is effective
immediately and shall remain in effect
until December 15, 2020.
Dated: March 13, 2017.
Karen H. Nies-Vogel,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2017–05356 Filed 3–16–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–843]
Certain Lined Paper Products From
India: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2014–
2015
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 14, 2016, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the Preliminary
Results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on certain
lined paper products (CLPP) from India.
The period of review (POR) is
September 1, 2014, through August 31,
2015. This review covers two mandatory
respondents, Kokuyo Riddhi Paper
Products Private Limited (Kokuyo
Riddhi) and Navneet Education Limited
(Navneet). For these final results, we
find that neither Kokuyo Riddhi nor
Navneet made sales below normal value
during the POR. See the ‘‘Final Results
of the Review’’ section below.
DATES: Effective March 17, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy Robinson for Navneet and George
McMahon for Kokuyo Riddhi, AD/CVD
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone
(202) 482–3797 or (202) 482–1167,
respectively.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:02 Mar 16, 2017
Jkt 241001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 7, 2016, Petitioner
submitted new factual information
regarding Navneet’s U.S. sales data.1
Given the timing of the submission, the
Department could not address this new
factual information in the Preliminary
Results.2 The Department invited
interested parties to submit comments
no later than October 24, 2016,3 and to
submit follow-up comments as part of
their case and rebuttal briefs no later
than November 14, 2016, and November
21, 2016, respectively.4 On October 24,
2016, Navneet submitted comments on
the new factual information.5 On
November 3, 2016, Petitioner submitted
rebuttal comments regarding the new
factual information.6
On October 14, 2016, the Department
published the Preliminary Results. On
November 14, 2016, Kokuyo Riddhi 7
and Navneet timely submitted their case
briefs.8 On November 21, 2016, Navneet
1 See Petitioner’s letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined
Paper Products from India: General New Factual
Information Submission,’’ dated September 7, 2016.
2 See Certain Lined Paper Products from India:
Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR 71046
(October 14, 2016) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Memorandum to Ronald K.
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian
Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations, titled
‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results
of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review:
Certain Lined Paper Products from India; 2014–
2015,’’ dated October 5, 2016 (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum). The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly at: https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
3 See Letter titled, ‘‘Filings by the Association of
American School Paper Suppliers (Petitioners) and
Navneet Education Ltd. (Navneet) Concerning
Navneet’s Alleged Under Reporting of U.S. Sales,’’
dated September 27, 2016.
4 See Letter titled, ‘‘New Factual Information
Filed by the Association of American School Paper
Suppliers (Petitioner) and Extension of Deadline to
Submit New Factual Information Pertaining to
Navneet Education Ltd.’s (Navneet) Sales
Reporting,’’ dated September 27, 2016.
5 See Navneet’s letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper
Products from India: Response of Navneet
Education Limited to Non-Reported Sales
Allegation,’’ dated October 24, 2016.
6 See Petitioner’s letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined
Paper Products from India: Response Comments to
Navneet’s New Factual Information Related to
Unreported U.S. Sales; Extension Request for the
Case Briefs,’’ dated November 3, 2016.
7 The Department has determined that Kokuyo
Riddhi Paper Products Private Limited (Kokuyo
Riddhi) is the successor-in-interest to Riddhi
Enterprises. See Certain Lined Paper Products from
India: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Changed Circumstances Review, 80 FR 18373 (April
6, 2015) (Final Results of CCR—Kokuyo Riddhi),
and the accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum. Accordingly, we refer to Kokuyo
Riddhi and Riddhi Enterprises as Kokuyo Riddhi in
this review.
8 See Kokuyo Riddhi’s letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined
Paper Products from India: Kokuyo Riddhi Case
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14201
submitted its rebuttal brief.9 On
November 14, 2016, Petitioner
submitted a request for a hearing, which
it subsequently withdrew on December,
15, 2016.10 On February 6, 2017, the
Department postponed the final results
by 30 days, until March 13, 2017.11
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
is certain lined paper products. The
merchandise subject to this order is
currently classified under the following
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) subheadings:
4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080,
4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044,
4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090,
4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020,
4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040,
4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and
4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS
numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
product description remains
dispositive.12
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties to this
administrative review are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
A list of the issues that parties raised
and to which we responded is attached
to this notice as an Appendix. The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
Brief,’’ dated November 14, 2016; see also Navneet’s
letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from
India: Case Brief of Navneet Education Limited,’’
dated November 14, 2016; see also Petitioner’s
letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from
India: Case Brief,’’ dated November 14, 2016.
9 See Navneet’s letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper
Products from India: Rebuttal Brief of Navneet
Education Limited,’’ dated November 21, 2016.
10 See Petitioner’s letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined
Paper Products from India: Hearing Request,’’ dated
November 14, 2016; see also Memorandum to the
File titled, ‘‘Petitioner’s Request for a Meeting in
Lieu of a Hearing,’’ dated December 19, 2016.
11 See Memorandum titled ‘‘Certain Lined Paper
Products from India: Extension of Time Limit for
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2014–2015,’’ dated February 3, 2017.
Postponing the final results by 30 days would place
the deadline on Sunday, March 12, 2017. The
Department’s practice dictates that where a
deadline falls on a weekend or federal holiday, the
appropriate deadline is the next business day. See
Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next
Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative
Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act
of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
12 For a complete description of the Scope of the
Order, see Memorandum from Gary Taverman,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary
for Enforcement and Compliance, titled ‘‘Certain
Lined Paper Products from India: Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–
2015,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted
by this notice (‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum’’).
E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM
17MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 51 (Friday, March 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14200-14201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05356]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Order Denying Export Privileges
In the Matter of Eyad Farah, Inmate Number: 63001-018, FCI Fort
Worth, Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 15330, Fort Worth,
TX 76119.
On December 15, 2015, in the U.S. District Court, Middle District
of Florida, Eyad Farah (``Farah''), was convicted of violating Section
38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778 (2012)) (``AECA'').
Specifically, Farah knowingly and willfully attempted to export from
the United States a defense article on the U.S. Munitions List without
having first obtained a license from the Department of State or written
prior authorization for such export. Farah was sentenced to 37 months
in prison, with credit for time served, 36 months of supervised
release, and a $300 assessment.
Section 766.25 of the Export Administration Regulations (``EAR'' or
``Regulations'') \1\ provides, in pertinent part, that ``[t]he Director
of the Office of Exporter Services, in consultation with the Director
of the Office of Export Enforcement, may deny the export privileges of
any person who has been convicted of a violation of the Export
Administration Act (``EAA''), the EAR, or any order, license or
authorization issued thereunder; any regulation, license, or order
issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C.
Sec. 1701-1706); 18 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of
the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. Sec. 783(b)), or section
38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. Sec. 2778).'' 15 CFR
Sec. 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of the EAA, 50 U.S.C. Sec.
4610(h). The denial of export privileges under this provision may be
for a period of up to 10 years from the date of the conviction. 15 CFR
Sec. 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C. Sec. 4610(h). In addition, Section
750.8 of the Regulations states that the Bureau of Industry and
Security's Office of Exporter Services may revoke any Bureau of
Industry and Security (``BIS'') licenses previously issued in which the
person had an interest in at the time of his conviction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2016). The Regulations
issued pursuant to the Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 4601-
4623 (Supp. III 2015) (available at https://uscode.house.gov)). Since
August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the President,
through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp.
783 (2002)), which has been extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the most recent being that of August 4, 2016 (81 FR 52,587
(Aug. 8, 2016)), has continued the Regulations in effect under the
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq.
(2006 & Supp. IV 2010)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BIS has received notice of Farah's conviction for violating the
AECA, and has provided notice and an opportunity for Farah to make a
written submission to BIS, as provided in Section 766.25 of the
Regulations. BIS has not received a submission from Farah.
Based upon my review and consultations with BIS's Office of Export
Enforcement, including its Director, and the facts available to BIS, I
have decided to deny Farah's export privileges under the Regulations
for a period of five years from the date of Farah's conviction. I have
also decided to revoke all licenses issued pursuant to the Act or
Regulations in which Farah had an interest at the time of his
conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby Ordered:
First, from the date of this Order until December 15, 2020, Eyad
Farah, with a last known address of Inmate Number: 63001-018, FCI Fort
Worth, Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 15330, Fort Worth, TX
76119, and when acting for or on his behalf, his successors, assigns,
employees, agents or representatives (the ``Denied Person''), may not,
directly or indirectly, participate in any way in any transaction
involving any commodity, software or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ``item'') exported or to be exported from
the United States that is subject to the Regulations, including, but
not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License
Exception, or export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other
activity subject to the Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations.
Second, no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item
subject to the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or
control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be
exported from the United States, including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires
or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to
the Regulations that has been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States
and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or
service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any
item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from
the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means
installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
Third, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided in
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any other person, firm, corporation,
or business organization related to Farah by ownership, control,
position of
[[Page 14201]]
responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the conduct of
trade or business may also be made subject to the provisions of this
Order in order to prevent evasion of this Order.
Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of the Regulations, Farah may
file an appeal of this Order with the Under Secretary of Commerce for
Industry and Security. The appeal must be filed within 45 days from the
date of this Order and must comply with the provisions of Part 756 of
the Regulations.
Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be delivered to the Farah. This
Order shall be published in the Federal Register.
Sixth, this Order is effective immediately and shall remain in
effect until December 15, 2020.
Dated: March 13, 2017.
Karen H. Nies-Vogel,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2017-05356 Filed 3-16-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P