Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Russian River Estuary Management Activities, 13765-13777 [2017-04944]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 15, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 217
[Docket No. 160929897–7222–02]
RIN 0648–BG37
Taking and Importing Marine
Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Russian River Estuary
Management Activities
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS, upon request from the
Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA),
issues these regulations pursuant to the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) to govern the incidental taking
of marine mammals incidental to
Russian River estuary management
activities in Sonoma County, California,
over the course of five years (2017–
2022). These regulations, which allow
for the issuance of Letters of
Authorization (LOA) for the incidental
take of marine mammals during the
described activities and specified
timeframes, prescribe the permissible
methods of taking and other means of
effecting the least practicable adverse
impact on marine mammal species or
stocks and their habitat, and establish
requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking.
DATES: Effective from April 21, 2017,
through April 20, 2022.
ADDRESSES: A copy of SCWA’s
application and supporting documents,
as well as a list of the references cited
in this document, may be obtained
online at: www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
permits/incidental/construction.htm. In
case of problems accessing these
documents, please call the contact listed
below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT).
SUMMARY:
Ben
Laws, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, (301) 427–8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
rmajette on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
Purpose and Need for Regulatory
Action
These regulations, issued under the
authority of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361
et seq.), establish a framework for
authorizing the take of marine mammals
incidental to SCWA’s estuary
management activities at the mouth of
the Russian River in Sonoma County,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Mar 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
CA. SCWA plans to manage the
naturally-formed barrier beach at the
mouth of the Russian River in order to
minimize potential for flooding adjacent
to the estuary and to enhance habitat for
juvenile salmonids, as well as to
conduct biological and physical
monitoring of the barrier beach and
estuary. Breaching of the naturallyformed barrier beach at the mouth of the
Russian River requires the use of heavy
equipment and increased human
presence, and monitoring in the estuary
requires the use of small boats.
We received an application from
SCWA requesting five-year regulations
and authorization to take multiple
species of marine mammals. Take is
anticipated to occur by Level B
harassment incidental to estuary
management activities due to
disturbance of hauled pinnipeds. The
regulations are valid from 2017 to 2022.
Please see ‘‘Background’’ below for
definitions of harassment.
Legal Authority for the Action
Section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA (16
U.S.C. 1371(a)(5)(A)) directs the
Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon
request, the incidental, but not
intentional taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region for up to five years
if, after notice and public comment, the
agency makes certain findings and
issues regulations that set forth
permissible methods of taking pursuant
to that activity, as well as monitoring
and reporting requirements. Section
101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA and the
implementing regulations at 50 CFR part
216, subpart I provide the legal basis for
issuing this final rule containing fiveyear regulations, and for any subsequent
Letters of Authorization. As directed by
this legal authority, this final rule
contains mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting requirements.
Summary of Major Provisions Within
the Final Rule
The following provides a summary of
some of the major provisions within the
final rulemaking for SCWA estuary
management activities. We have
determined that SCWA’s adherence to
the planned mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting measures listed below will
achieve the least practicable adverse
impact on the affected marine
mammals. They include:
• Measures to minimize the number
and intensity of incidental takes during
sensitive times of year and to minimize
the duration of disturbances.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13765
• Measures designed to eliminate
startling reactions.
• Eliminating or altering management
activities on the beach when pups are
present, and setting limits on the
frequency and duration of events during
pupping season.
Background
Paragraphs 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1371 (a)(5)(A) and
(D)) direct the Secretary of Commerce to
allow, upon request, the incidental, but
not intentional, taking of small numbers
of marine mammals by U.S. citizens
who engage in a specified activity (other
than commercial fishing) within a
specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations
are issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
An authorization for incidental
takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible
impact on the species or stock(s); will
not have an unmitigable adverse impact
on the availability of the species or
stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant); and if the permissible
methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring
and reporting of such takings are set
forth. NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as ‘‘an
impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably
expected to, and is not reasonably likely
to, adversely affect the species or stock
through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.’’
Except with respect to certain
activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ‘‘harassment’’ as: Any act of
pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i)
has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild (Level A harassment); or (ii) has
the potential to disturb a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild by causing disruption of behavioral
patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding,
feeding, or sheltering (Level B
harassment).
Summary of Request
On September 2, 2016, we received an
adequate and complete request from
SCWA for authorization to take marine
mammals incidental to estuary
management activities. On September
20, 2016 (81 FR 64440), we published a
notice of receipt of SCWA’s application
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
rmajette on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
13766
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 15, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
in the Federal Register, requesting
comments and information related to
the request for 30 days. We did not
receive any comments. SCWA provided
a revised draft incorporating minor
revisions on November 1, 2016.
SCWA plans to manage the naturallyformed barrier beach at the mouth of the
Russian River in order to minimize
potential for flooding adjacent to the
estuary and to enhance habitat for
juvenile salmonids, as well as to
conduct biological and physical
monitoring of the barrier beach and
estuary. Flood control-related breaching
of the barrier beach at the mouth of the
river may include artificial breaches, as
well as construction and maintenance of
a lagoon outlet channel. The latter
activity, an alternative management
technique conducted to mitigate
impacts of flood control on rearing
habitat for Endangered Species Act
(ESA)-listed salmonids, occurs only
from May 15 through October 15
(hereafter, the ‘‘lagoon management
period’’). Artificial breaching and
monitoring activities may occur at any
time during the period of validity of the
regulations, which are valid for 5 years,
from April 21, 2017, through April 20,
2022.
Breaching of the naturally-formed
barrier beach at the mouth of the
Russian River requires the use of heavy
equipment (e.g., bulldozer, excavator)
and increased human presence, and
monitoring in the estuary requires the
use of small boats. As a result,
pinnipeds hauled out on the beach or at
peripheral haul-outs in the estuary may
exhibit behavioral responses that
indicate incidental take by Level B
harassment under the MMPA. Species
known from the haul-out at the mouth
of the Russian River or from peripheral
haul-outs, and therefore anticipated to
be taken incidental to the specified
activity, include the harbor seal (Phoca
vitulina richardii), California sea lion
(Zalophus californianus), and northern
elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris).
Prior to this request for incidental
take regulations and a subsequent LOA,
we issued seven consecutive incidental
harassment authorizations (IHAs) to
SCWA for incidental take associated
with the same ongoing activities. SCWA
was first issued an IHA, valid for a
period of one year, effective on April 1,
2010 (75 FR 17382; April 6, 2010), and
was subsequently issued one-year IHAs
for incidental take associated with the
same activities, effective on April 21,
2011 (76 FR 23306; April 26, 2011),
April 21, 2012 (77 FR 24471; April 24,
2012), April 21, 2013 (78 FR 23746;
April 22, 2013), April 21, 2014 (79 FR
20180; April 11, 2014), April 21, 2015
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:21 Mar 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
(80 FR 24237; April 30, 2015), and April
21, 2016 (81 FR 22050; April 14, 2016).
Description of the Specified Activity
Additional detail regarding the
specified activity was provided in our
Federal Register notice of proposed
rulemaking (81 FR 96415; December 30,
2016) and in past notices cited herein;
please see those documents or SCWA’s
application for more information.
Overview
The specified activity involves
management of the estuary to prevent
flooding while preventing adverse
modification to critical habitat for ESAlisted salmonids. Requirements related
to the ESA are described in further
detail below. During the lagoon
management period, this involves
construction and maintenance of a
lagoon outlet channel that would
facilitate formation of a perched lagoon.
A perched lagoon, which is an estuary
closed to tidal influence in which water
surface elevation is above mean high
tide, would reduce flooding while
maintaining beneficial conditions for
juvenile salmonids. Additional breaches
of the barrier beach may be conducted
for the sole purpose of reducing flood
risk. SCWA’s activity was described in
detail in our notice of proposed
authorization prior to the 2011 IHA (76
FR 14924; March 18, 2011); please see
that document for a detailed description
of SCWA’s estuary management
activities. Aside from minor additions to
SCWA’s biological and physical estuary
monitoring measures, the specified
activity remains the same as that
described in the 2011 document.
Dates and Duration
The specified activity may occur at
any time during the five-year period of
validity for these regulations (April 21,
2017 through April 20, 2022), although
construction and maintenance of a
lagoon outlet channel would occur only
during the lagoon management period.
In addition, there are certain restrictions
placed on SCWA during the harbor seal
pupping season. These, as well as
periodicity and frequency of the
specified activities, are described in
further detail below.
Specified Geographical Region
The estuary is located about 97
kilometers (km) (60 miles (mi))
northwest of San Francisco in Sonoma
County, near Jenner, California (see
Figure 1 of SCWA’s application). The
Russian River watershed encompasses
3,847 km2 (1,485 mi2) in Sonoma,
Mendocino, and Lake Counties. The
mouth of the Russian River is located at
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Goat Rock State Beach (see Figure 2 of
SCWA’s application); the estuary
extends from the mouth upstream
approximately 10 to 11 km (6–7 mi)
between Austin Creek and the
community of Duncans Mills (Heckel
and McIver, 1994).
Detailed Description of Activities
Within the Russian River watershed,
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps), SCWA, and the Mendocino
County Russian River Flood Control and
Water Conservation Improvement
District (District) operate and maintain
Federal facilities and conduct activities
in addition to the estuary management,
including flood control, water diversion
and storage, instream flow releases,
hydroelectric power generation, channel
maintenance, and fish hatchery
production. As described in the notice
of proposed rulemaking, NMFS issued a
2008 Biological Opinion (BiOp) for
Water Supply, Flood Control
Operations, and Channel Maintenance
conducted by the Corps, SCWA, and the
District in the Russian River watershed
(NMFS, 2008). This BiOp found that the
activities—including SCWA’s estuary
management activities—authorized by
the Corps and undertaken by SCWA and
the District, if continued in a manner
similar to recent historic practices, were
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of ESA-listed salmonids and
were likely to adversely modify critical
habitat. In part, therefore, the BiOp
requires SCWA to collaborate with
NMFS and modify their estuary water
level management in order to reduce
marine influence (i.e., high salinity and
tidal inflow) and promote a higher water
surface elevation in the estuary in order
to enhance the quality of rearing habitat
for juvenile salmonids. SCWA is also
required to monitor the response of
water quality, invertebrate production,
and salmonids in and near the estuary
to water surface elevation management
in the estuary-lagoon system.
There are three components to
SCWA’s ongoing estuary management
activities: (1) Lagoon outlet channel
management, during the lagoon
management period only, required to
accomplish the dual purposes of flood
risk abatement and maintenance of
juvenile salmonid habitat; (2) traditional
artificial breaching, with the sole
objective of flood risk abatement; and
(3) physical and biological monitoring
in and near the estuary, required under
the terms of the BiOp, to understand
response to water surface elevation
management in the estuary-lagoon
system. The latter category (physical
and biological monitoring) includes all
ancillary beach and/or estuary
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 15, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
monitoring activities and will remain
the same as in past years and as
described in our 2015 notice of
proposed authorization (80 FR 14073;
March 18, 2015). Please see the
previously referenced Federal Register
notice (76 FR 14924; March 18, 2011)
for detailed discussion of lagoon outlet
channel management, artificial
breaching, and other monitoring
activities.
rmajette on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
Comments and Responses
We published a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register on
December 30, 2016 (81 FR 96415).
During the 30-day comment period, we
received a letter from the Marine
Mammal Commission (Commission)
and comments from two private
citizens. The Commission recommends
that we issue the requested
authorization, subject to inclusion of the
proposed mitigation and monitoring
measures as described in our notice of
proposed rulemaking and the
application. All measures proposed in
the initial Federal Register notice are
included within the final rule. The
comments from the two private citizens
are described below.
Comment 1: If a project is found to
jeopardize a species or adversely modify
its critical habitat, NMFS must cease
activity until a non-jeopardizing
Reasonable and Prudent Alternative
(RPA) to the proposed project is in
place, in coordination with the Federal
action agency and any applicant.
Response: Although this is a general
comment not specifically relevant to the
proposed rulemaking that was the
subject of the public comment period,
the commenter’s statement is correct.
We refer readers to NMFS’s 2008 BiOp
for details of the relevant ESA section 7
consultation described previously in
this document.
Comment 2: It is important to leave
our environment and the Russian River
estuary as pristine as possible for future
generations. Please keep takes allowed
from this region to a minimum.
Response: As required by the MMPA,
NMFS has prescribed mitigation
sufficient to satisfy the MMPA’s least
practicable adverse impact standard and
has determined that the level of
incidental taking proposed for
authorization meets the MMPA’s
negligible impact standard.
Description of Marine Mammals in the
Area of the Specified Activity
The marine mammal species that may
be harassed incidental to estuary
management activities are the harbor
seal, California sea lion, and the
northern elephant seal. We presented a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:21 Mar 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
detailed discussion of the status of these
stocks and their occurrence in the action
area in the notice of the proposed
rulemaking (81 FR 96415; December 30,
2016).
Ongoing monthly harbor seal counts
at the Jenner haul-out were begun by J.
Mortenson in January 1987, with
additional nearby haul-outs added to
the counts thereafter. In addition, local
resident E. Twohy began daily
observations of seals and people at the
Jenner haul-out in November 1989.
These datasets note whether the mouth
at the Jenner haul-out was opened or
closed at each observation, as well as
various other daily and annual patterns
of haul-out usage (Mortenson and
Twohy, 1994). Recently, SCWA began
regular baseline monitoring of the haulout as a component of its estuary
management activity. In the notice of
proposed rulemaking, we presented
average daily numbers of seals observed
at the mouth of the Russian River from
1993–2005 and from 2009–2015 (see
Table 1; 81 FR 96415; December 30,
2016).
Potential Effects of the Specified
Activity on Marine Mammals and Their
Habitat
We provided a detailed discussion of
the potential effects of the specified
activity on marine mammals in the
notice of the proposed rulemaking (81
FR 96415; December 30, 2016). A
summary of anticipated effects is
provided below.
A significant body of monitoring data
exists for pinnipeds at the mouth of the
Russian River. In addition, pinnipeds
have co-existed with regular estuary
management activity for decades, as
well as with regular human use activity
at the beach, and are likely habituated
to human presence and activity.
Nevertheless, SCWA’s estuary
management activities have the
potential to disturb pinnipeds present
on the beach or at peripheral haul-outs
in the estuary. During breaching
operations, past monitoring has revealed
that some or all of the seals present
typically move or flush from the beach
in response to the presence of crew and
equipment, although some may remain
hauled-out. No stampeding of seals—a
potentially dangerous occurrence in
which large numbers of animals
succumb to mass panic and rush away
from a stimulus—has been documented
since SCWA developed protocols to
prevent such events in 1999. While it is
likely impossible to conduct required
estuary management activities without
provoking some response in hauled-out
animals, precautionary mitigation
measures, described later in this
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13767
document, ensure that animals are
gradually apprised of human approach.
Under these conditions, seals typically
exhibit a continuum of responses,
beginning with alert movements (e.g.,
raising the head), which may then
escalate to movement away from the
stimulus and possible flushing into the
water. Flushed seals typically re-occupy
the haul-out within minutes to hours of
the stimulus. In addition, eight other
haul-outs exist nearby that may
accommodate flushed seals. In the
absence of appropriate mitigation
measures, it is possible that pinnipeds
could be subject to injury, serious
injury, or mortality, likely through
stampeding or abandonment of pups.
California sea lions and northern
elephant seals, which have been noted
only infrequently in the action area,
have been observed as being less
sensitive to stimulus than harbor seals
during monitoring at numerous other
sites. For example, monitoring of
pinniped disturbance as a result of
abalone research in the Channel Islands
showed that, while harbor seals flushed
at a rate of 69 percent, California sea
lions flushed at a rate of only 21
percent. The rate for elephant seals was
0.1 percent (VanBlaricom, 2010). In the
event that either of these species is
present during management activities,
they would be expected to display a
minimal reaction to maintenance
activities—less than that expected of
harbor seals.
Although the Jenner haul-out is not
known as a primary pupping beach,
pups have been observed during the
pupping season; therefore, we have
evaluated the potential for injury,
serious injury, or mortality to pups.
There is a lack of published data
regarding pupping at the mouth of the
Russian River, but SCWA monitors have
observed pups on the beach. No births
were observed during recent
monitoring, but may be inferred based
on signs indicating pupping (e.g., blood
spots on the sand, birds consuming
possible placental remains). Pup injury
or mortality would be most likely to
occur in the event of extended
separation of a mother and pup, or
trampling in a mass movement. As
discussed previously, no such
movements have been recorded since
development of appropriate protocols in
1999. Any California sea lions or
northern elephant seals present would
be independent juveniles or adults;
therefore, analysis of impacts on pups is
not relevant for those species.
Similarly, the period of mother-pup
bonding, critical time needed to ensure
pup survival and maximize pup health,
is not expected to be impacted by
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
13768
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 15, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
estuary management activities. Harbor
seal pups are extremely precocious,
swimming and diving immediately after
birth and throughout the lactation
period, unlike most other phocids
which normally enter the sea only after
weaning (Lawson and Renouf, 1985;
Cottrell et al., 2002; Burns et al., 2005).
Lawson and Renouf (1987) investigated
harbor seal mother-pup bonding in
response to natural and anthropogenic
disturbance. In summary, they found
that the most critical bonding time is
within minutes after birth. Although
pupping season is defined as March 15–
June 30, the peak of pupping season is
typically concluded by mid-May, when
the lagoon management period begins.
As such, it is expected that most
mother-pup bonding would likely be
concluded as well. The number of
management events during the months
of March and April has been relatively
low in the past, and the breaching
activities occur in a single day over
several hours. In addition, mitigation
measures described later in this
document further reduce the likelihood
of any impacts to pups, whether through
injury or mortality or interruption of
mother-pup bonding.
In summary, and based on extensive
monitoring data, we believe that
impacts to hauled-out pinnipeds during
estuary management activities would be
behavioral harassment of limited
duration (i.e., less than one day) and
limited intensity (i.e., temporary
flushing at most). Stampeding, and
therefore injury or mortality, is not
expected—nor has it been
documented—in the years since
appropriate protocols were established
(see ‘‘Mitigation’’ for more details).
Further, the continued, and increasingly
heavy (see SCWA’s monitoring reports),
use of the haul-out despite decades of
breaching events indicates that
abandonment of the haul-out is
unlikely.
Anticipated Effects on Marine Mammal
Habitat
We provided a detailed discussion of
the potential effects of this action on
marine mammal habitat in the notice of
the proposed IHA (81 FR 96415;
December 30, 2016). SCWA’s estuary
management activities will result in
temporary physical alteration of the
Jenner haul-out. With barrier beach
closure, seal usage of the beach haul-out
declines, and the three nearby river
haul-outs may not be available for usage
due to rising water surface elevations.
Breaching of the barrier beach,
subsequent to the temporary habitat
disturbance, will likely increase
suitability and availability of habitat for
pinnipeds. Biological and water quality
monitoring will not physically alter
pinniped habitat.
In summary, there will be temporary
physical alteration of the beach.
However, natural opening and closure
of the beach results in the same impacts
to habitat. Therefore, seals are likely
adapted to this cycle. In addition, the
increase in rearing habitat quality has
the goal of increasing salmonid
abundance, ultimately providing more
food for seals present within the action
area. Thus, any impacts to marine
mammal habitat are not expected to
cause significant or long-term
consequences for individual marine
mammals or their populations.
Estimated Take by Incidental
Harassment
Except with respect to certain
activities not pertinent here, section
3(18) of the MMPA defines
‘‘harassment’’ as: ‘‘ . . . any act of
pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i)
has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild (Level A harassment); or (ii) has
the potential to disturb a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild by causing disruption of behavioral
patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding,
feeding, or sheltering (Level B
harassment).’’
In accordance with the regulations
implemented by this final rule, we plan
to issue an LOA to SCWA to take harbor
seals, California sea lions, and northern
elephant seals, by Level B harassment
only, incidental to estuary management
activities. These activities, involving
increased human presence and the use
of heavy equipment and support
vehicles, are expected to harass
pinnipeds present at the haul-out
through disturbance. In addition,
monitoring activities prescribed in the
BiOp may harass additional animals at
the Jenner haul-out and at the three
haul-outs located in the estuary (Penny
Logs, Patty’s Rock, and Chalanchawi).
Estimates of the number of harbor seals,
California sea lions, and northern
elephant seals that may be harassed by
the planned activities is based upon the
number of potential events associated
with Russian River estuary management
activities and the average number of
individuals of each species that are
present during conditions appropriate to
the activity. Monitoring effort at the
mouth of the Russian River has shown
that the number of seals utilizing the
haul-out declines during bar-closed
conditions. Methodology of take
estimation was discussed in detail in
our notice of proposed rulemaking (81
FR 96415; December 30, 2016). Table 1
details the total number of estimated
takes for harbor seals.
California sea lions and northern
elephant seals are occasional visitors to
the estuary. Based on limited
information regarding occurrence of
these species at the mouth of the
Russian River estuary, we assume there
is the potential to encounter one animal
of each species per month throughout
the year. Lagoon outlet channel
activities could potentially occur over
six months of the year, artificial
breaching activities over eight months,
topographic surveys year-round, and
biological and physical monitoring in
the estuary over eight months.
Therefore, we assume that up to 34
incidents of take could occur per year
for both the California sea lion and
northern elephant seal. Based on past
occurrence records, the take
authorization for these two species is
likely a precautionary overestimate.
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED NUMBER OF HARBOR SEAL TAKES RESULTING FROM RUSSIAN RIVER ESTUARY MANAGEMENT
ACTIVITIES
rmajette on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
Number of animals expected to occur a
Potential total number of
individual animals that may
be taken
Number of events b c
Lagoon Outlet Channel Management (May 15 to October 15)
Implementation: 117 d .......................................................
Maintenance and Monitoring: ...........................................
May: 80 .............................................................................
June: 98 ............................................................................
July: 117 ...........................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:21 Mar 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Implementation: 3 ............................................................
Maintenance: ...................................................................
May: 1
June-Sept: 4/month
Oct: 1
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
Implementation: 702.
Maintenance: 1,156.
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 15, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
13769
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED NUMBER OF HARBOR SEAL TAKES RESULTING FROM RUSSIAN RIVER ESTUARY MANAGEMENT
ACTIVITIES—Continued
Potential total number of
individual animals that may
be taken
Number of animals expected to occur a
Number of events b c
Aug: 17 .............................................................................
Sept: 30 ............................................................................
Oct: 28 ..............................................................................
Monitoring: .......................................................................
June–Sept: 2/month
Oct: 1
Monitoring: 552.
Total: 2,410.
Artificial Breaching
Oct: 28 ..............................................................................
Nov: 32 .............................................................................
Dec: 59 .............................................................................
Jan: 49 ..............................................................................
Feb: 75 .............................................................................
Mar: 133 ...........................................................................
Apr: 99 ..............................................................................
May: 80 .............................................................................
Oct: 2 ...............................................................................
Nov: 2 ..............................................................................
Dec: 2 ..............................................................................
Jan: 1 ...............................................................................
Feb: 1 ..............................................................................
Mar: 1 ..............................................................................
Apr: 1 ...............................................................................
May: 2 ..............................................................................
Oct: 56.
Nov: 64.
Dec: 118.
Jan: 49.
Feb: 75.
Mar: 133.
Apr: 99.
May: 160.
12 events maximum ........................................................
Total: 754.
1 topographic survey/month; 100 percent of animals
present Jun–Feb; 10 percent of animals present Mar–
May.
Jan: 99.
Feb: 131.
Mar: 165.
Apr: 14.
May: 151.
Jun: 164.
Jul: 282.
Aug: 133.
Sep: 62.
Oct: 48.
Nov: 68.
Dec: 98.
Topographic and Geophysical Beach Surveys
Jan: 99 ..............................................................................
Feb: 131 ...........................................................................
Mar: 165 ...........................................................................
Apr: 141 ............................................................................
May: 151 ...........................................................................
Jun: 164 ............................................................................
Jul: 282 .............................................................................
Aug: 133 ...........................................................................
Sep: 62 .............................................................................
Oct: 48 ..............................................................................
Nov: 68 .............................................................................
Dec: 98 .............................................................................
Total: 1,415.
Biological and Physical Habitat Monitoring in the Estuary
1 e .....................................................................................
Total ..................................................................................
113 ...................................................................................
N/A ...................................................................................
113.
4,692.
rmajette on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
a For Lagoon Outlet Channel Management and Artificial Breaching, average daily number of animals corresponds with data from Table 2 in our
notice of proposed rulemaking. For Topographic and Geophysical Beach Surveys, average daily number of animals corresponds with 2011–15
data from Table 1 in our notice of proposed rulemaking.
b For implementation of the lagoon outlet channel, an event is defined as a single, two-day episode. For the remaining activities, an event is
defined as a single day on which an activity occurs. Some events may include multiple activities.
c Number of events for artificial breaching derived from historical data. The average number of events for each month was rounded up to the
nearest whole number; estimated number of events for December was increased from one to two because multiple closures resulting from storm
events have occurred in recent years during that month. The total numbers (12) likely represent an overestimate, as the average annual number
of events is five.
d Although implementation could occur at any time during the lagoon management period, the highest daily average per month from the lagoon
management period was used.
e Based on past experience, SCWA expects that no more than one seal may be present, and thus would have the potential to be disturbed, in
total at the three river haul-outs.
The take numbers described in the
preceding text are annual estimates.
Therefore, over the course of the 5-year
period of validity of the regulations, we
will authorize a total of 23,460 incidents
of take for harbor seals and 170 such
incidents each for the California sea lion
and northern elephant seal.
Analyses and Determinations
Negligible Impact Analysis
NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as ‘‘ . . . an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:21 Mar 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably
expected to, and is not reasonably likely
to, adversely affect the species or stock
through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.’’ A negligible
impact finding is based on the lack of
likely adverse effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival (i.e., populationlevel effects). An estimate of the number
of takes alone is not enough information
on which to base an impact
determination. In addition to
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
considering estimates of the number of
marine mammals that might be ‘‘taken’’
through behavioral harassment, we
consider other factors, such as the likely
nature of any responses (e.g., intensity,
duration), the context of any such
responses (e.g., critical reproductive
time or location, migration), as well as
the number and nature of estimated
Level A harassment takes (if any), and
effects on habitat. We also assess the
number, intensity, and context of
estimated takes by evaluating this
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
rmajette on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
13770
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 15, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
information relative to population
status.
Consistent with the 1989 preamble for
NMFS’s implementing regulations (54
FR 40338; September 29, 1989), the
impacts from other past and ongoing
anthropogenic activities are
incorporated into these analyses via
their impacts on the environmental
baseline (e.g., as reflected in the
regulatory status of the species,
population size and growth rate where
known, sources of human-caused
mortality).
Although SCWA’s estuary
management activities may disturb
pinnipeds hauled out at the mouth of
the Russian River, as well as those
hauled out at several locations in the
estuary during recurring monitoring
activities, impacts are occurring to a
small, localized group of animals. While
these impacts can occur year-round,
they occur sporadically and for limited
duration (e.g., a maximum of two
consecutive days for water level
management events). Seals will likely
become alert or, at most, flush into the
water in reaction to the presence of
crews and equipment on the beach.
While disturbance may occur during a
sensitive time (during the March 15–
June 30 pupping season), mitigation
measures have been specifically
designed to further minimize harm
during this period and eliminate the
possibility of pup injury or mother-pup
separation.
No injury, serious injury, or mortality
is anticipated, nor is the planned action
likely to result in long-term impacts
such as permanent abandonment of the
haul-out. Injury, serious injury, or
mortality to pinnipeds would likely
result from startling animals inhabiting
the haul-out into a mass movement, or
from extended mother-pup separation as
a result of such movement. Long-term
impacts to pinniped usage of the haulout could result from significantly
increased presence of humans and
equipment on the beach. To avoid these
possibilities, we have worked with
SCWA to develop the previously
described mitigation measures. These
are designed to reduce the possibility of
startling pinnipeds, by gradually
apprising them of the presence of
humans and equipment on the beach,
and to reduce the possibility of impacts
to pups by eliminating or altering
management activities on the beach
when pups are present, and by setting
limits on the frequency and duration of
events during pupping season. During
the past 15 years of flood control
management, implementation of similar
mitigation measures has resulted in no
known mass movement or stampede
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:21 Mar 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
events and no known injury, serious
injury, or mortality. Over the course of
that time, management events have
generally been infrequent and of limited
duration.
No pinniped stocks for which
incidental take will be authorized are
listed as threatened or endangered
under the ESA or determined to be
strategic or depleted under the MMPA.
Recent data suggests that harbor seal
populations have reached carrying
capacity; populations of California sea
lions and northern elephant seals in
California are also considered healthy.
In summary, and based on extensive
monitoring data, we believe that
impacts to hauled-out pinnipeds during
estuary management activities would be
behavioral harassment of limited
duration (i.e., less than one day) and
limited intensity (i.e., temporary
flushing at most). Stampeding, and
therefore injury or mortality, is not
expected—nor has it been
documented—in the years since
appropriate protocols were established
(see ‘‘Mitigation’’ for more details).
Further, the continued, and increasingly
heavy use of the haul-out (see figures in
SCWA documents) despite decades of
breaching events indicates that
abandonment of the haul-out is
unlikely. Based on the analysis
contained herein of the likely effects of
the specified activity on marine
mammals and their habitat, and taking
into consideration the implementation
of the planned monitoring and
mitigation measures, we find that the
total marine mammal take from SCWA’s
estuary management activities will have
a negligible impact on the affected
marine mammal species or stocks.
Small Numbers Analysis
The number of animals expected to be
taken for each species of pinniped can
be considered small relative to the
population size. There are an estimated
30,968 harbor seals in the California
stock, 296,750 California sea lions, and
179,000 northern elephant seals in the
California breeding population. Based
on extensive monitoring effort specific
to the affected haul-out and historical
data on the frequency of the specified
activity, we plan to authorize annual
levels of take, by Level B harassment
only, of 4,692 incidents of harassment
for harbor seals, 34 incidents of
harassment for California sea lions, and
34 incidents of harassment for northern
elephant seals, representing 15.2, 0.01,
and 0.02 percent of the populations,
respectively. However, this represents
an overestimate of the number of
individuals harassed annually over the
duration of the regulations, because
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
these totals represent much smaller
numbers of individuals that may be
harassed multiple times. Based on the
analysis contained herein of the likely
effects of the specified activity on
marine mammals and their habitat, and
taking into consideration the
implementation of the mitigation and
monitoring measures, we find that small
numbers of marine mammals will be
taken relative to the populations of the
affected species or stocks.
Mitigation
In order to issue an incidental take
authorization (ITA) under section
101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA, NMFS must
set forth the permissible methods of
taking pursuant to such activity, ‘‘and
other means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact on such
species or stock and its habitat, paying
particular attention to rookeries, mating
grounds, and areas of similar
significance, and on the availability of
such species or stock for subsistence
uses.’’ NMFS’s implementing
regulations require applicants for ITAs
to include information about the
availability and feasibility (economic
and technological) of equipment,
methods, and manner of conducting
such activity or other means of effecting
the least practicable adverse impact
upon the affected species or stocks and
their habitat (50 CFR 216.104(a)(11)).
SCWA will continue the following
mitigation measures, as implemented
during the previous ITAs, which are
designed to minimize impact to affected
species and stocks:
• SCWA crews will cautiously
approach (e.g., walking slowly with
limited arm movement and minimal
sound) the haul-out ahead of heavy
equipment to minimize the potential for
sudden flushes, which may result in a
mass movement—a particular concern
during pupping season.
• SCWA staff will avoid walking or
driving equipment through the seal
haul-out.
• Crews on foot will make an effort to
be seen by seals from a distance, if
possible, rather than appearing
suddenly, in order to prevent sudden
flushes.
• During breaching events, all
monitoring will be conducted from the
overlook on the bluff along Highway 1
adjacent to the haul-out in order to
minimize potential for harassment.
• A water level management event
may not occur for more than two
consecutive days unless flooding threats
cannot be controlled.
In addition, SCWA will continue the
following mitigation measures specific
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
rmajette on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 15, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
to pupping season (March 15–June 30),
as implemented in the previous ITAs:
• SCWA will maintain a one-week
no-work period between water level
management events (unless flooding is
an immediate threat) to allow for an
adequate disturbance recovery period.
During the no-work period, equipment
must be removed from the beach.
• If a pup less than one week old is
on the beach where heavy machinery
would be used or is on the path used to
access the work location, the
management action will be delayed
until the pup has left the site or until
the latest day possible to prevent
flooding while still maintaining suitable
fish rearing habitat. In the event that a
pup remains present on the beach in the
presence of flood risk, SCWA will
consult with NMFS to determine the
appropriate course of action. SCWA will
coordinate with the locally established
seal monitoring program (Stewards’ Seal
Watch) to determine if pups less than
one week old are on the beach prior to
a breaching event.
• Physical and biological monitoring
will not be conducted if a pup less than
one week old is present at the
monitoring site or on a path to the site.
Equipment will be driven slowly on
the beach and care will be taken to
minimize the number of shut-downs
and start-ups when the equipment is on
the beach. All work will be completed
as efficiently as possible, with the
smallest amount of heavy equipment
possible, to minimize disturbance of
seals at the haul-out. Boats operating
near river haul-outs during monitoring
will be kept within posted speed limits
and driven as far from the haul-outs as
safely possible to minimize flushing
seals.
We have carefully evaluated SCWA’s
planned mitigation measures and
considered their effectiveness in past
implementation to determine whether
they are likely to effect the least
practicable adverse impact on the
affected marine mammal species and
stocks and their habitat. Our evaluation
of potential measures included
consideration of the following factors in
relation to one another: (1) The manner
in which, and the degree to which, the
successful implementation of the
measure is expected to minimize
adverse impacts to marine mammals, (2)
the proven or likely efficacy of the
specific measure to minimize adverse
impacts as planned; and (3) the
practicability of the measure for
applicant implementation.
Any mitigation measure(s) we
prescribe should be able to accomplish,
have a reasonable likelihood of
accomplishing (based on current
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:21 Mar 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
science), or contribute to the
accomplishment of one or more of the
general goals listed below:
(1) Avoidance or minimization of
injury or death of marine mammals
wherever possible (goals 2, 3, and 4 may
contribute to this goal).
(2) A reduction in the number (total
number or number at biologically
important time or location) of
individual marine mammals exposed to
stimuli expected to result in incidental
take (this goal may contribute to goal 1,
above, or to reducing takes by
behavioral harassment only).
(3) A reduction in the number (total
number or number at a biologically
important time or location) of times any
individual marine mammal would be
exposed to stimuli expected to result in
incidental take (this goal may contribute
to goal 1, above, or to reducing takes by
behavioral harassment only).
(4) A reduction in the intensity of
exposure to stimuli expected to result in
incidental take (this goal may contribute
to goal 1, above, or to reducing the
severity of behavioral harassment only).
(5) Avoidance or minimization of
adverse effects to marine mammal
habitat, paying particular attention to
the prey base, blockage or limitation of
passage to or from biologically
important areas, permanent destruction
of habitat, or temporary disturbance of
habitat during a biologically important
time.
(6) For monitoring directly related to
mitigation, an increase in the
probability of detecting marine
mammals, thus allowing for more
effective implementation of the
mitigation.
Based on our evaluation of SCWA’s
planned measures and on SCWA’s
record of management at the mouth of
the Russian River including information
from monitoring of SCWA’s
implementation of the mitigation
measures as prescribed under the
previous ITAs, we have determined that
the planned mitigation measures
provide the means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact on marine
mammal species or stocks and their
habitat, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of
similar significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
In order to issue an ITA for an
activity, section 101(a)(5)(A) of the
MMPA states that NMFS must set forth
‘‘requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such
taking.’’ The MMPA implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 216.104 (a)(13)
indicate that requests for ITAs must
include the suggested means of
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13771
accomplishing the necessary monitoring
and reporting that will result in
increased knowledge of the species and
of the level of taking or impacts on
populations of marine mammals that are
expected to be present in the proposed
action area.
Any monitoring requirement we
prescribe should improve our
understanding of one or more of the
following:
• Occurrence of marine mammal
species in action area (e.g., presence,
abundance, distribution, density).
• Nature, scope, or context of likely
marine mammal exposure to potential
stressors/impacts (individual or
cumulative, acute or chronic), through
better understanding of: (1) Action or
environment (e.g., source
characterization, propagation, ambient
noise); (2) affected species (e.g., life
history, dive patterns); (3) co-occurrence
of marine mammal species with the
action; or (4) biological or behavioral
context of exposure (e.g., age, calving, or
feeding areas).
• Individual responses to acute
stressors, or impacts of chronic
exposures (behavioral or physiological).
• How anticipated responses to
stressors impact either: (1) Long-term
fitness and survival of an individual; or
(2) population, species, or stock.
• Effects on marine mammal habitat
and resultant impacts to marine
mammals.
• Mitigation and monitoring
effectiveness.
SCWA submitted a marine mammal
monitoring plan as part of the ITA
application. It can be found online at
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental/construction.htm. The plan
has been successfully implemented by
SCWA under previous ITAs. The
purpose of this monitoring plan, which
is carried out collaboratively with the
Stewards of the Coasts and Redwoods
(Stewards) organization, is to detect the
response of pinnipeds to estuary
management activities at the Russian
River estuary. SCWA has designed the
plan both to satisfy the requirements of
the ITA, and to address the following
questions of interest:
1. Under what conditions do
pinnipeds haul out at the Russian River
estuary mouth at Jenner?
2. How do seals at the Jenner haul-out
respond to activities associated with the
construction and maintenance of the
lagoon outlet channel and artificial
breaching activities?
3. Does the number of seals at the
Jenner haul-out significantly differ from
historic averages with formation of a
summer (May 15 to October 15) lagoon
in the Russian River estuary?
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
13772
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 15, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
4. Are seals at the Jenner haul-out
displaced to nearby river and coastal
haul-outs when the mouth remains
closed in the summer?
Monitoring Measures
Baseline Monitoring—Seals at the
Jenner haul-out will be counted for four
hours every week, with no more than
four baseline surveys each month. Two
monitoring events each month will
occur in the morning, and two will
occur in the afternoon, with an effort to
schedule a morning survey at low and
high tide each month and an afternoon
survey at low and high tide each month.
This baseline information will provide
SCWA with details that may help to
plan estuary management activities in
the future to minimize pinniped
interaction. Survey protocols are as
follows: All seals hauled out on the
beach are counted every 30 minutes
from the overlook on the bluff along
Highway 1 adjacent to the haul-out
using spotting scopes. Monitoring may
conclude for the day if weather
conditions affect visibility (e.g., heavy
fog in the afternoon). Depending on how
the sandbar is formed, seals may haul
out in multiple groups at the mouth. At
each 30-minute count, the observer
indicates where groups of seals are
hauled out on the sandbar and provides
a total count for each group. If possible,
adults and pups are counted separately.
This primary haul-out is where the
majority of seals are found and where
pupping occurs, and SCWA’s planned
monitoring will allow continued
development in understanding the
physical and biological factors that
influence seal abundance and behavior
at the site. In particular, SCWA notes
that the planned frequency of surveys
will allow them to be able to observe the
influence of physical changes that do
not persist for more than ten days, like
brief periods of barrier beach closures or
other environmental changes, and will
allow for assessment of how seals
respond to barrier beach closures as
well as accurate estimation of the
number of harbor seal pups born at
Jenner each year.
In addition to the census data,
disturbances of the haul-out are
recorded. The method for recording
disturbances follows those in Mortenson
(1996). Disturbances will be recorded on
a three-point scale that represents an
increasing seal response to the
disturbance (Table 2). The time, source,
and duration of the disturbance, as well
as an estimated distance between the
source and haul-out, are recorded. It
should be noted that only responses
falling into Mortenson’s Levels 2 and 3
will be considered as harassment under
the MMPA, under the terms of these
final regulations.
TABLE 2—SEAL RESPONSE TO DISTURBANCE
Type of response
Definition
1 .........
Alert .............................................
2 .........
Movement ...................................
3 .........
rmajette on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
Level
Flight ...........................................
Seal head orientation or brief movement in response to disturbance, which may include turning
head towards the disturbance, craning head and neck while holding the body rigid in a u-shaped
position, changing from a lying to a sitting position, or brief movement of less than twice the animal’s body length.
Movements in response to the source of disturbance, ranging from short withdrawals at least twice
the animal’s body length to longer retreats over the beach, or if already moving a change of direction of greater than 90 degrees.
All retreats (flushes) to the water.
Weather conditions are recorded at
the beginning of each census. These
include temperature, Beaufort sea state,
precipitation/visibility, and wind speed.
Tide levels and estuary water surface
elevations are correlated to the
monitoring start and end times.
In an effort towards understanding
possible relationships between use of
the Jenner haul-out and nearby coastal
and river haul-outs, several other haulouts on the coast and in the Russian
River estuary are monitored as well (see
Figure 1 of SCWA’s application).
Peripheral site monitoring would occur
only in the event of an extended period
of lagoon conditions (i.e., barrier beach
closed with perched outlet channel for
three weeks or more). Abundance at
these sites has been observed to be
generally very low regardless of river
mouth condition. These sites are
generally very small physically, and are
composed of small rocks or outcrops or
logs in the river, and therefore could not
accommodate significant displacement
from the main beach haul-out.
Monitoring of peripheral sites under
extended lagoon conditions will allow
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:21 Mar 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
for possible detection of any changed
use patterns.
Estuary Management Event
Monitoring, Lagoon Outlet Channel—
Should the mouth of the river close
during the lagoon management period,
SCWA would construct a lagoon outlet
channel as required by the BiOp.
Activities associated with the initial
construction of the outlet channel, as
well as the maintenance of the channel
that may be required, would be
monitored for disturbances to the seals
at the Jenner haul-out.
A one-day pre-event channel survey
will be made within one to three days
prior to constructing the outlet channel.
The haul-out will be monitored on the
day the outlet channel is constructed
and daily for up to the maximum two
days allowed for channel excavation
activities. Monitoring will also occur on
each day that the outlet channel is
maintained using heavy equipment for
the duration of the lagoon management
period. Monitoring of outlet channel
construction and maintenance will
correspond with that described above in
the ‘‘Baseline Monitoring’’ section, with
the exception that management activity
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
monitoring duration will be defined by
event duration. On the day of the
management event, pinniped
monitoring will begin at least one hour
prior to the crew and equipment
accessing the beach work area, and will
continue through the duration of the
event, until at least one hour after the
crew and equipment leave the beach.
In an attempt to understand whether
seals from the Jenner haul-out are
displaced to coastal and river haul-outs
nearby when management events occur,
other nearby haul-outs are monitored
concurrently with monitoring of outlet
channel construction and maintenance
activities. This provides an opportunity
to qualitatively assess whether these
haul-outs are being used by seals
displaced from the Jenner haul-out
during lagoon outlet channel excavation
and maintenance. This monitoring will
not provide definitive results regarding
displacement to nearby coastal and river
haul-outs, as individual seals are not
marked or photo-identified, but is useful
in tracking general trends in haul-out
use during lagoon outlet channel
excavation and maintenance. As
volunteers are required to monitor these
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
rmajette on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 15, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
peripheral haul-outs, haul-out locations
may need to be prioritized if there are
not enough volunteers available. In that
case, priority would be assigned to the
nearest haul-outs (North Jenner and
Odin Cove), followed by the Russian
River estuary haul-outs, and finally the
more distant coastal haul-outs.
Estuary Management Event
Monitoring, Artificial Breaching
Events—In accordance with the Russian
River BiOp, SCWA may artificially
breach the barrier beach outside of the
summer lagoon management period,
and may conduct a maximum of two
such breachings during the lagoon
management period, when estuary water
surface elevations rise above seven feet.
In that case, NMFS may be consulted
regarding potential scheduling of an
artificial breaching event to open the
barrier beach and reduce flooding risk.
Pinniped response to artificial
breaching will be monitored at each
such event during the period of validity
of these regulations. Monitoring
methods will follow the census and
disturbance monitoring protocols
described in the ‘‘Baseline Monitoring’’
section, which were also used for the
1996 to 2000 monitoring events (MSC,
1997, 1998, 1999, 2000; SCWA and
MSC, 2001). The exception, as for
lagoon management events, is that the
duration of monitoring is dependent
upon the duration of the event. On the
day of the management event, pinniped
monitoring begins at least one hour
before the crew and equipment accesses
the beach work area, and monitoring
continues through the duration of the
event, until at least one hour after the
crew and equipment leave the beach.
For all counts, the following
information will be recorded in thirtyminute intervals: (1) Pinniped counts by
species; (2) behavior; (3) time, source
and duration of any disturbance; (4)
estimated distances between source of
disturbance and pinnipeds; (5) weather
conditions (e.g., temperature, wind);
and (5) tide levels and estuary water
surface elevation.
Monitoring During Pupping Season—
The pupping season is defined as March
15 to June 30. Baseline, lagoon outlet
channel, and artificial breaching
monitoring during the pupping season
will include records of neonate (pups
less than one week old) observations.
Characteristics of a neonate pup
include: Body weight less than 15 kg;
thin for their body length; an umbilicus
or natal pelage present; wrinkled skin;
and awkward or jerky movements on
land. SCWA will coordinate with the
Stewards’ Seal Watch monitoring
program (Stewards) to determine if pups
less than one week old are on the beach
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:21 Mar 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
prior to a water level management
event.
If, during monitoring, observers sight
any pup that might be abandoned,
SCWA will contact the NMFS stranding
response network immediately, and also
will report the incident to NMFS’s West
Coast Regional Office and Office of
Protected Resources within 48 hours.
Observers will not approach or move
the pup. Potential indications that a pup
may be abandoned are: (1) No observed
contact with adult seals, (2) no
movement of the pup, and (3) the pup’s
attempts to nurse are rebuffed.
Staffing—Monitoring is conducted by
qualified individuals, which may
include professional biologists
employed by NMFS or SCWA or
volunteers trained by the Stewards. All
volunteer monitors are required to
attend classroom-style training and field
site visits to the haul-outs. Training
covers the MMPA and conditions of the
ITA, SCWA’s pinniped monitoring
protocols, pinniped species
identification, age class identification
(including a specific discussion
regarding neonates), recording of count
and disturbance observations (including
completion of datasheets), and use of
equipment. Pinniped identification
includes the harbor seal, California sea
lion, and northern elephant seal, as well
as other pinniped species with potential
to occur in the area. Generally, SCWA
staff and volunteers collect baseline data
on Jenner haul-out use during the twicemonthly monitoring events. A schedule
for this monitoring will be established
with Stewards once volunteers are
available for the monitoring effort.
SCWA staff monitors lagoon outlet
channel excavation and maintenance
activities and artificial breaching events
at the Jenner haul-out, with assistance
from available Stewards volunteers.
Stewards volunteers monitor the coastal
and river haul-out locations during
lagoon outlet channel excavation and
maintenance activities.
Training on the MMPA, pinniped
identification, and the conditions of the
ITA is held for staff and contractors
assigned to estuary management
activities. The training includes
equipment operators, safety crew
members, and surveyors. In addition,
prior to beginning each water surface
elevation management event, the
biologist monitoring the event
participates in the onsite safety meeting
to discuss the location(s) of pinnipeds at
the Jenner haul-out that day and
methods of avoiding and minimizing
disturbances to the haul-out as outlined
in the ITA.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13773
Reporting
SCWA is required to submit an
annual report on all activities and
marine mammal monitoring results to
NMFS within ninety days following the
end of the monitoring period. These
reports must contain the following
information:
• The number of pinnipeds taken, by
species and age class (if possible);
• Behavior prior to and during water
level management events;
• Start and end time of activity;
• Estimated distances between source
and pinnipeds when disturbance
occurs;
• Weather conditions (e.g.,
temperature, wind, etc.);
• Haul-out reoccupation time of any
pinnipeds based on post-activity
monitoring;
• Tide levels and estuary water
surface elevation; and
• Pinniped census from bi-monthly
and nearby haul-out monitoring.
The annual report includes
descriptions of monitoring
methodology, tabulation of estuary
management events, summary of
monitoring results, and discussion of
problems noted and proposed remedial
measures.
SCWA must also submit a
comprehensive summary report that
includes any future application for
renewed regulations and Letters of
Authorization.
Summary of Previous Monitoring
SCWA complied with the mitigation
and monitoring required under previous
authorizations. Prior Federal Register
notices of proposed yearly
authorizations have provided
summaries of the monitoring results
from 2009–2015; please see those
documents for more information.
Previous monitoring reports are
available online at www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/permits/incidental/construction.htm.
We also provided a detailed description
of previous monitoring results in the
proposed rule for this action (81 FR
96415; December 30, 2016).
Adaptive Management
The regulations governing the take of
marine mammals incidental to SCWA
estuary management activities contain
an adaptive management component.
The reporting requirements associated
with this final rule are designed to
provide NMFS with monitoring data
from the previous year to allow
consideration of whether any changes
are appropriate. The use of adaptive
management allows NMFS to consider
new information from different sources
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
13774
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 15, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
to determine (with input from SCWA
regarding practicability) on an annual or
biennial basis if mitigation or
monitoring measures should be
modified (including additions or
deletions). Mitigation measures could be
modified if new data suggests that such
modifications would have a reasonable
likelihood of reducing adverse effects to
marine mammals and if the measures
are practicable.
SCWA’s monitoring program (see
‘‘Monitoring and Reporting’’) will be
managed adaptively. Changes to the
monitoring program may be adopted if
they are reasonably likely to better
accomplish the MMPA monitoring goals
described previously or may better
answer the specific questions associated
with SCWA’s monitoring plan.
The following are some of the
possible sources of applicable data to be
considered through the adaptive
management process: (1) Results from
monitoring reports, as required by
MMPA authorizations; (2) results from
general marine mammal and sound
research; and (3) any information which
reveals that marine mammals may have
been taken in a manner, extent, or
number not authorized by these
regulations or subsequent LOAs.
Impact on Availability of Affected
Species for Taking for Subsistence Uses
There are no relevant subsistence uses
of marine mammals implicated by the
specified activity. Therefore, we have
determined that the total taking of
affected species or stocks would not
have an unmitigable adverse impact on
the availability of such species or stocks
for taking for subsistence purposes.
rmajette on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
No marine mammal species listed
under the ESA are expected to be
affected by these activities. Therefore,
we have determined that section 7
consultation under the ESA is not
required.
National Environmental Policy Act
In compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), as
implemented by the regulations
published by the Council on
Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts
1500–1508), and NOAA Administrative
Order 216–6, we prepared an
Environmental Assessment (EA) to
consider the direct, indirect and
cumulative effects to the human
environment resulting from issuance of
the original IHA to SCWA for the
specified activities and found that it
would not result in any significant
impacts to the human environment. We
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:21 Mar 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
signed a Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) on March 30, 2010. We
have reviewed SWCA’s application for
incidental take regulations and an
associated LOA for ongoing estuary
management activities and the 2016
monitoring report. Based on that review,
we have determined that the action
follows closely the ITAs issued and
implemented in 2010–2016, and does
not present any substantial changes, or
significant new circumstances or
information relevant to environmental
concerns which would require a
supplement to the 2010 EA or
preparation of a new NEPA document.
Therefore, we have determined that a
new or supplemental EA or
Environmental Impact Statement is
unnecessary, and we rely on the existing
EA and FONSI for this action. The 2010
EA and FONSI for this action are
available for review at
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental/construction.htm.
Classification
Pursuant to the procedures
established to implement Executive
Order 12866, the Office of Management
and Budget has determined that this
rule is not significant.
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Chief Counsel for Regulation of the
Department of Commerce certified to
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration at the
proposed rule stage that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for the
certification was published in the
proposed rule and is not repeated here.
No comments were received regarding
this certification. As a result, a
regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required and none has been prepared.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information (COI) subject
to the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) unless that COI
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. These requirements have been
approved by OMB under control
number 0648–0151 and include
applications for regulations, subsequent
LOAs, and reports.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 217
Exports, Fish, Imports, Indians,
Labeling, Marine mammals, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Seafood, Transportation.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dated: March 8, 2017.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
NMFS amends 50 CFR part 217 as
follows:
PART 217—REGULATIONS
GOVERNING THE TAKING AND
IMPORTING OF MARINE MAMMALS
1. The authority citation for part 217
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq., unless
otherwise noted.
2. Add subpart A to part 217 to read
as follows:
■
Subpart A—Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Russian River Estuary
Management Activities
Sec.
217.1 Specified activity and specified
geographical region.
217.2 Effective dates.
217.3 Permissible methods of taking.
217.4 Prohibitions.
217.5 Mitigation requirements.
217.6 Requirements for monitoring and
reporting.
217.7 Letters of Authorization.
217.8 Renewals and modifications of
Letters of Authorization.
217.9–217.10 [Reserved]
Subpart A—Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Russian River Estuary
Management Activities
§ 217.1 Specified activity and specified
geographical region.
(a) Regulations in this subpart apply
only to the Sonoma County Water
Agency (SCWA) and those persons it
authorizes or funds to conduct activities
on its behalf for the taking of marine
mammals that occurs in the area
outlined in paragraph (b) of this section
and that occurs incidental to estuary
management activities.
(b) The taking of marine mammals by
SCWA may be authorized in a Letter of
Authorization (LOA) only if it occurs at
Goat Rock State Beach or in the Russian
River estuary in California.
§ 217.2
Effective dates.
Regulations in this subpart are
effective from April 21, 2017, through
April 20, 2022.
§ 217.3
Permissible methods of taking.
Under LOAs issued pursuant to
§§ 216.106 and 217.7 of this chapter, the
Holder of the LOA (hereinafter
‘‘SCWA’’) may incidentally, but not
intentionally, take marine mammals
within the area described in § 217.1(b)
by Level B harassment associated with
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 15, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
estuary management activities, provided
the activity is in compliance with all
terms, conditions, and requirements of
the regulations in this subpart and the
appropriate LOA.
§ 217.4
Prohibitions.
Notwithstanding takings
contemplated in § 217.1 and authorized
by an LOA issued under §§ 216.106 and
217.7 of this chapter, no person in
connection with the activities described
in § 217.1 may:
(a) Violate, or fail to comply with, the
terms, conditions, and requirements of
this subpart or an LOA issued under
§§ 216.106 and 217.7 of this chapter;
(b) Take any marine mammal not
specified in such LOAs;
(c) Take any marine mammal
specified in such LOAs in any manner
other than as specified;
(d) Take a marine mammal specified
in such LOAs if NMFS determines such
taking results in more than a negligible
impact on the species or stocks of such
marine mammal; or
(e) Take a marine mammal specified
in such LOAs if NMFS determines such
taking results in an unmitigable adverse
impact on the species or stock of such
marine mammal for taking for
subsistence uses.
rmajette on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
§ 217.5
Mitigation requirements.
When conducting the activities
identified in § 217.1(a) of this chapter,
the mitigation measures contained in
any LOA issued under §§ 216.106 and
217.7 of this chapter must be
implemented. These mitigation
measures shall include but are not
limited to:
(a) General conditions. (1) A copy of
any issued LOA must be in the
possession of SCWA, its designees, and
work crew personnel operating under
the authority of the issued LOA; and
(2) If SCWA observes a pup that may
be abandoned, it shall contact the
National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) West Coast Regional Stranding
Coordinator immediately and also
report the incident to NMFS Office of
Protected Resources within 48 hours.
Observers shall not approach or move
the pup.
(b) SCWA crews shall cautiously
approach the haul-out ahead of heavy
equipment.
(c) SCWA staff shall avoid walking or
driving equipment through the seal
haul-out.
(d) Crews on foot shall make an effort
to be seen by seals from a distance.
(e) During breaching events, all
monitoring shall be conducted from the
overlook on the bluff along Highway 1
adjacent to the haul-out.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:21 Mar 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
(f) A water level management event
may not occur for more than two
consecutive days unless flooding threats
cannot be controlled.
(g) All work shall be completed as
efficiently as possible and with the
smallest amount of heavy equipment
possible.
(h) Boats operating near river haulouts during monitoring shall be kept
within posted speed limits and driven
as far from the haul-outs as safely
possible.
(i) SCWA shall implement the
following mitigation measures during
pupping season (March 15–June 30):
(1) SCWA shall maintain a one week
no-work period between water level
management events (unless flooding is
an immediate threat) to allow for an
adequate disturbance recovery period.
During the no-work period, equipment
must be removed from the beach.
(2) If a pup less than one week old is
on the beach where heavy machinery
will be used or on the path used to
access the work location, the
management action shall be delayed
until the pup has left the site or the
latest day possible to prevent flooding
while still maintaining suitable fish
rearing habitat. In the event that a pup
remains present on the beach in the
presence of flood risk, SCWA shall
consult with NMFS and the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife to
determine the appropriate course of
action. SCWA shall coordinate with the
locally established seal monitoring
program (Stewards of the Coast and
Redwoods) to determine if pups less
than one week old are on the beach
prior to a breaching event.
(3) Physical and biological monitoring
shall not be conducted if a pup less than
one week old is present at the
monitoring site or on a path to the site.
§ 217.6 Requirements for monitoring and
reporting.
(a) Monitoring and reporting shall be
conducted in accordance with the
approved Pinniped Monitoring Plan.
(b) Baseline monitoring shall be
conducted each week, with two events
per month occurring in the morning and
two per month in the afternoon. These
censuses shall continue for four hours,
weather permitting; the census days
shall be chosen to ensure that
monitoring encompasses a low and high
tide each in the morning and afternoon.
All seals hauled out on the beach shall
be counted every 30 minutes from the
overlook on the bluff along Highway 1
adjacent to the haul-out using highpowered spotting scopes. Observers
shall indicate where groups of seals are
hauled out on the sandbar and provide
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13775
a total count for each group. If possible,
adults and pups shall be counted
separately.
(c) Peripheral coastal haul-outs shall
be visited concurrently with baseline
monitoring in the event that a lagoon
outlet channel is implemented and
maintained for a prolonged period of
over 21 days.
(d) During estuary management
events, monitoring shall occur on all
days that activity is occurring using the
same protocols as described for baseline
monitoring, with the difference that
monitoring shall begin at least one hour
prior to the crew and equipment
accessing the beach work area and
continue through the duration of the
event, until at least one hour after the
crew and equipment leave the beach. In
addition, a one-day pre-event survey of
the area shall be made within one to
three days of the event and a one-day
post-event survey shall be made after
the event, weather permitting.
(e) For all monitoring, the following
information shall be recorded in 30minute intervals:
(1) Pinniped counts by species;
(2) Behavior;
(3) Time, source and duration of any
disturbance, with takes incidental to
SCWA actions recorded only for
responses involving movement away
from the disturbance or responses of
greater intensity (e.g., not for alerts);
(4) Estimated distances between
source of disturbance and pinnipeds;
(5) Weather conditions (e.g.,
temperature, percent cloud cover, and
wind speed); and
(6) Tide levels and estuary water
surface elevation.
(f) Reporting—(1) Annual reporting.
(i) SCWA shall submit an annual
summary report to NMFS not later than
ninety days following the end of the
reporting period established in any LOA
issued under § 217.7. SCWA shall
provide a final report within thirty days
following resolution of comments on the
draft report.
(ii) These reports shall contain, at
minimum, the following:
(A) The number of seals taken, by
species and age class (if possible);
(B) Behavior prior to and during water
level management events;
(C) Start and end time of activity;
(D) Estimated distances between
source and seals when disturbance
occurs;
(E) Weather conditions (e.g.,
temperature, wind, etc.);
(F) Haul-out reoccupation time of any
seals based on post-activity monitoring;
(G) Tide levels and estuary water
surface elevation;
(H) Seal census from bi-monthly and
nearby haul-out monitoring; and
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
rmajette on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
13776
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 15, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
(I) Specific conclusions that may be
drawn from the data in relation to the
four questions of interest in SCWA’s
Pinniped Monitoring Plan, if possible.
(2) SCWA shall submit a
comprehensive summary report to
NMFS in conjunction with any future
submitted request for incidental take
authorization.
(g) Reporting of injured or dead
marine mammals. (1) In the
unanticipated event that the activity
defined in § 217.1(a) clearly causes the
take of a marine mammal in a
prohibited manner, SCWA shall
immediately cease such activity and
report the incident to the Office of
Protected Resources (OPR), NMFS and
the West Coast Regional Stranding
Coordinator, NMFS. Activities shall not
resume until NMFS is able to review the
circumstances of the prohibited take.
NMFS will work with SCWA to
determine what measures are necessary
to minimize the likelihood of further
prohibited take and ensure MMPA
compliance. SCWA may not resume
their activities until notified by NMFS.
The report must include the following
information:
(i) Time and date of the incident;
(ii) Description of the incident;
(iii) Environmental conditions;
(iv) Description of all marine mammal
observations in the 24 hours preceding
the incident;
(v) Species identification or
description of the animal(s) involved;
(vi) Fate of the animal(s); and
(vii) Photographs or video footage of
the animal(s).
(2) In the event that SCWA discovers
an injured or dead marine mammal and
determines that the cause of the injury
or death is unknown and the death is
relatively recent (e.g., in less than a
moderate state of decomposition),
SCWA shall immediately report the
incident to OPR and the West Coast
Regional Stranding Coordinator, NMFS.
The report must include the information
identified in paragraph (g)(1) of this
section. Activities may continue while
NMFS reviews the circumstances of the
incident. NMFS will work with SCWA
to determine whether additional
mitigation measures or modifications to
the activities are appropriate.
(3) In the event that SCWA discovers
an injured or dead marine mammal and
determines that the injury or death is
not associated with or related to the
activities defined in § 217.1(a) (e.g.,
previously wounded animal, carcass
with moderate to advanced
decomposition, scavenger damage),
SCWA shall report the incident to OPR
and the West Coast Regional Stranding
Coordinator, NMFS, within 24 hours of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:21 Mar 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
the discovery. SCWA shall provide
photographs or video footage or other
documentation of the stranded animal
sighting to NMFS.
(4) Pursuant to paragraphs (g)(2) and
(3) of this section, SCWA may use
discretion in determining what injuries
(i.e., nature and severity) are
appropriate for reporting. At minimum,
SCWA must report those injuries
considered to be serious (i.e., will likely
result in death) or that are likely caused
by human interaction (e.g.,
entanglement, gunshot). Also pursuant
to sections paragraphs (g)(2) and (3) of
this section, SCWA may use discretion
in determining the appropriate vantage
point for obtaining photographs of
injured/dead marine mammals.
§ 217.7
Letters of Authorization.
(a) To incidentally take marine
mammals pursuant to the regulations in
this subpart, SCWA must apply for and
obtain an LOA.
(b) An LOA, unless suspended or
revoked, may be effective for a period of
time not to exceed the expiration date
of the regulations in this subpart.
(c) If an LOA expires prior to the
expiration date of the regulations in this
subpart, SCWA may apply for and
obtain a renewal of the LOA.
(d) In the event of projected changes
to the activity or to mitigation and
monitoring measures required by an
LOA, SCWA must apply for and obtain
a modification of the LOA as described
in § 217.8.
(e) The LOA shall set forth:
(1) Permissible methods of incidental
taking;
(2) Means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact (i.e.,
mitigation) on the species, its habitat,
and on the availability of the species for
subsistence uses; and
(3) Requirements for monitoring and
reporting.
(f) Issuance of the LOA shall be based
on a determination that the level of
taking will be consistent with the
findings made for the total taking
allowable under the regulations in this
subpart.
(g) Notice of issuance or denial of an
LOA shall be published in the Federal
Register within 30 days of a
determination.
§ 217.8 Renewals and modifications of
Letters of Authorization.
(a) An LOA issued under §§ 216.106
and 217.7 of this chapter for the activity
identified in § 217.1(a) shall be renewed
or modified upon request by the
applicant, provided that:
(1) The proposed specified activity
and mitigation, monitoring, and
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
reporting measures, as well as the
anticipated impacts, are the same as
those described and analyzed for the
regulations in this subpart (excluding
changes made pursuant to the adaptive
management provision in paragraph
(c)(1) of this section); and
(2) NMFS determines that the
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
measures required by the previous LOA
under the regulations in this subpart
were implemented.
(b) For an LOA modification or
renewal requests by the applicant that
include changes to the activity or the
mitigation, monitoring, or reporting
(excluding changes made pursuant to
the adaptive management provision in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section) that do
not change the findings made for the
regulations or result in no more than a
minor change in the total estimated
number of takes (or distribution by
species or years), NMFS may publish a
notice of proposed LOA in the Federal
Register, including the associated
analysis of the change, and solicit
public comment before issuing the LOA.
(c) An LOA issued under §§ 216.106
and 217.7 of this chapter for the activity
identified in § 217.1(a) may be modified
by NMFS under the following
circumstances:
(1) Adaptive management. NMFS may
modify (including augment) the existing
mitigation, monitoring, or reporting
measures (after consulting with SCWA
regarding the practicability of the
modifications) if doing so creates a
reasonable likelihood of more
effectively accomplishing the goals of
the mitigation and monitoring.
(i) Possible sources of data that could
contribute to the decision to modify the
mitigation, monitoring, or reporting
measures in an LOA are:
(A) Results from SCWA’s monitoring
from the previous year(s).
(B) Results from other marine
mammal and/or sound research or
studies.
(C) Any information that reveals
marine mammals may have been taken
in a manner, extent or number not
authorized by the regulations in this
subpart or subsequent LOAs.
(ii) If, through adaptive management,
the modifications to the mitigation,
monitoring, or reporting measures are
substantial, NMFS will publish a notice
of proposed LOA in the Federal
Register and solicit public comment.
(2) Emergencies. If NMFS determines
that an emergency exists that poses a
significant risk to the well-being of the
species or stocks of marine mammals
specified in LOAs issued pursuant to
§§ 216.106 and 217.7 of this chapter, an
LOA may be modified without prior
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 15, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
notice or opportunity for public
comment. Notice would be published in
the Federal Register within thirty days
of the action.
§§ 217.9–217.10
[Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2017–04944 Filed 3–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 160920866–7167–02]
RIN 0648–XF287
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Pollock in Statistical
Area 610 in the Gulf of Alaska
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; closure.
AGENCY:
NMFS is prohibiting directed
fishing for pollock in Statistical Area
610 in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA). This
action is necessary to prevent exceeding
the B season allowance of the 2017 total
allowable catch of pollock for Statistical
Area 610 in the GOA.
DATES: Effective 1200 hrs, Alaska local
time (A.l.t.), March 12, 2017, through
1200 hrs, A.l.t., May 31, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Josh
Keaton, 907–586–7228.
rmajette on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:21 Mar 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
NMFS
manages the groundfish fishery in the
GOA exclusive economic zone
according to the Fishery Management
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of
Alaska (FMP) prepared by the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council
under authority of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act. Regulations governing
fishing by U.S. vessels in accordance
with the FMP appear at subpart H of 50
CFR part 600 and 50 CFR part 679.
The B season allowance of the 2017
total allowable catch (TAC) of pollock in
Statistical Area 610 of the GOA is 2,232
metric tons (mt) as established by the
final 2017 and 2018 harvest
specifications for groundfish in the GOA
(82 FR 12032, February 27, 2017). In
accordance with § 679.20(d)(1)(i), the
Regional Administrator has determined
that the B season allowance of the 2017
TAC of pollock in Statistical Area 610
of the GOA will soon be reached.
Therefore, the Regional Administrator is
establishing a directed fishing
allowance of 2,132 mt and is setting
aside the remaining 100 mt as bycatch
to support other anticipated groundfish
fisheries. In accordance with
§ 679.20(d)(1)(iii), the Regional
Administrator finds that this directed
fishing allowance has been reached.
Consequently, NMFS is prohibiting
directed fishing for pollock in Statistical
Area 610 of the GOA.
After the effective date of this closure
the maximum retainable amounts at
§ 679.20(e) and (f) apply at any time
during a trip.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
13777
Classification
This action responds to the best
available information recently obtained
from the fishery. The Acting Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA
(AA), finds good cause to waive the
requirement to provide prior notice and
opportunity for public comment
pursuant to the authority set forth at 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B) as such requirement is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. This requirement is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest as it would prevent NMFS from
responding to the most recent fisheries
data in a timely fashion and would
delay the closure of directed fishing for
pollock in Statistical Area 610 of the
GOA. NMFS was unable to publish a
notice providing time for public
comment because the most recent,
relevant data only became available as
of March 9, 2017.
The AA also finds good cause to
waive the 30-day delay in the effective
date of this action under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3). This finding is based upon
the reasons provided above for waiver of
prior notice and opportunity for public
comment.
This action is required by § 679.20
and is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: March 10, 2017.
Karen H. Abrams,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–05180 Filed 3–10–17; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 15, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13765-13777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-04944]
[[Page 13765]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 217
[Docket No. 160929897-7222-02]
RIN 0648-BG37
Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Russian River Estuary Management Activities
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS, upon request from the Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA),
issues these regulations pursuant to the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) to govern the incidental taking of marine mammals incidental to
Russian River estuary management activities in Sonoma County,
California, over the course of five years (2017-2022). These
regulations, which allow for the issuance of Letters of Authorization
(LOA) for the incidental take of marine mammals during the described
activities and specified timeframes, prescribe the permissible methods
of taking and other means of effecting the least practicable adverse
impact on marine mammal species or stocks and their habitat, and
establish requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of
such taking.
DATES: Effective from April 21, 2017, through April 20, 2022.
ADDRESSES: A copy of SCWA's application and supporting documents, as
well as a list of the references cited in this document, may be
obtained online at: www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental/construction.htm. In case of problems accessing these documents, please
call the contact listed below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben Laws, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Regulatory Action
These regulations, issued under the authority of the MMPA (16
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), establish a framework for authorizing the take of
marine mammals incidental to SCWA's estuary management activities at
the mouth of the Russian River in Sonoma County, CA. SCWA plans to
manage the naturally-formed barrier beach at the mouth of the Russian
River in order to minimize potential for flooding adjacent to the
estuary and to enhance habitat for juvenile salmonids, as well as to
conduct biological and physical monitoring of the barrier beach and
estuary. Breaching of the naturally-formed barrier beach at the mouth
of the Russian River requires the use of heavy equipment and increased
human presence, and monitoring in the estuary requires the use of small
boats.
We received an application from SCWA requesting five-year
regulations and authorization to take multiple species of marine
mammals. Take is anticipated to occur by Level B harassment incidental
to estuary management activities due to disturbance of hauled
pinnipeds. The regulations are valid from 2017 to 2022. Please see
``Background'' below for definitions of harassment.
Legal Authority for the Action
Section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1371(a)(5)(A)) directs
the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the incidental, but
not intentional taking of small numbers of marine mammals by U.S.
citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial
fishing) within a specified geographical region for up to five years
if, after notice and public comment, the agency makes certain findings
and issues regulations that set forth permissible methods of taking
pursuant to that activity, as well as monitoring and reporting
requirements. Section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA and the implementing
regulations at 50 CFR part 216, subpart I provide the legal basis for
issuing this final rule containing five-year regulations, and for any
subsequent Letters of Authorization. As directed by this legal
authority, this final rule contains mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting requirements.
Summary of Major Provisions Within the Final Rule
The following provides a summary of some of the major provisions
within the final rulemaking for SCWA estuary management activities. We
have determined that SCWA's adherence to the planned mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting measures listed below will achieve the least
practicable adverse impact on the affected marine mammals. They
include:
Measures to minimize the number and intensity of
incidental takes during sensitive times of year and to minimize the
duration of disturbances.
Measures designed to eliminate startling reactions.
Eliminating or altering management activities on the beach
when pups are present, and setting limits on the frequency and duration
of events during pupping season.
Background
Paragraphs 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1371
(a)(5)(A) and (D)) direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon
request, the incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers
of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity
(other than commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region
if certain findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if
the taking is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public for review.
An authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS
finds that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s); will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant); and if the permissible methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such takings
are set forth. NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103
as ``an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.''
Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the
MMPA defines ``harassment'' as: Any act of pursuit, torment, or
annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild (Level A harassment); or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not
limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering (Level B harassment).
Summary of Request
On September 2, 2016, we received an adequate and complete request
from SCWA for authorization to take marine mammals incidental to
estuary management activities. On September 20, 2016 (81 FR 64440), we
published a notice of receipt of SCWA's application
[[Page 13766]]
in the Federal Register, requesting comments and information related to
the request for 30 days. We did not receive any comments. SCWA provided
a revised draft incorporating minor revisions on November 1, 2016.
SCWA plans to manage the naturally-formed barrier beach at the
mouth of the Russian River in order to minimize potential for flooding
adjacent to the estuary and to enhance habitat for juvenile salmonids,
as well as to conduct biological and physical monitoring of the barrier
beach and estuary. Flood control-related breaching of the barrier beach
at the mouth of the river may include artificial breaches, as well as
construction and maintenance of a lagoon outlet channel. The latter
activity, an alternative management technique conducted to mitigate
impacts of flood control on rearing habitat for Endangered Species Act
(ESA)-listed salmonids, occurs only from May 15 through October 15
(hereafter, the ``lagoon management period''). Artificial breaching and
monitoring activities may occur at any time during the period of
validity of the regulations, which are valid for 5 years, from April
21, 2017, through April 20, 2022.
Breaching of the naturally-formed barrier beach at the mouth of the
Russian River requires the use of heavy equipment (e.g., bulldozer,
excavator) and increased human presence, and monitoring in the estuary
requires the use of small boats. As a result, pinnipeds hauled out on
the beach or at peripheral haul-outs in the estuary may exhibit
behavioral responses that indicate incidental take by Level B
harassment under the MMPA. Species known from the haul-out at the mouth
of the Russian River or from peripheral haul-outs, and therefore
anticipated to be taken incidental to the specified activity, include
the harbor seal (Phoca vitulina richardii), California sea lion
(Zalophus californianus), and northern elephant seal (Mirounga
angustirostris).
Prior to this request for incidental take regulations and a
subsequent LOA, we issued seven consecutive incidental harassment
authorizations (IHAs) to SCWA for incidental take associated with the
same ongoing activities. SCWA was first issued an IHA, valid for a
period of one year, effective on April 1, 2010 (75 FR 17382; April 6,
2010), and was subsequently issued one-year IHAs for incidental take
associated with the same activities, effective on April 21, 2011 (76 FR
23306; April 26, 2011), April 21, 2012 (77 FR 24471; April 24, 2012),
April 21, 2013 (78 FR 23746; April 22, 2013), April 21, 2014 (79 FR
20180; April 11, 2014), April 21, 2015 (80 FR 24237; April 30, 2015),
and April 21, 2016 (81 FR 22050; April 14, 2016).
Description of the Specified Activity
Additional detail regarding the specified activity was provided in
our Federal Register notice of proposed rulemaking (81 FR 96415;
December 30, 2016) and in past notices cited herein; please see those
documents or SCWA's application for more information.
Overview
The specified activity involves management of the estuary to
prevent flooding while preventing adverse modification to critical
habitat for ESA-listed salmonids. Requirements related to the ESA are
described in further detail below. During the lagoon management period,
this involves construction and maintenance of a lagoon outlet channel
that would facilitate formation of a perched lagoon. A perched lagoon,
which is an estuary closed to tidal influence in which water surface
elevation is above mean high tide, would reduce flooding while
maintaining beneficial conditions for juvenile salmonids. Additional
breaches of the barrier beach may be conducted for the sole purpose of
reducing flood risk. SCWA's activity was described in detail in our
notice of proposed authorization prior to the 2011 IHA (76 FR 14924;
March 18, 2011); please see that document for a detailed description of
SCWA's estuary management activities. Aside from minor additions to
SCWA's biological and physical estuary monitoring measures, the
specified activity remains the same as that described in the 2011
document.
Dates and Duration
The specified activity may occur at any time during the five-year
period of validity for these regulations (April 21, 2017 through April
20, 2022), although construction and maintenance of a lagoon outlet
channel would occur only during the lagoon management period. In
addition, there are certain restrictions placed on SCWA during the
harbor seal pupping season. These, as well as periodicity and frequency
of the specified activities, are described in further detail below.
Specified Geographical Region
The estuary is located about 97 kilometers (km) (60 miles (mi))
northwest of San Francisco in Sonoma County, near Jenner, California
(see Figure 1 of SCWA's application). The Russian River watershed
encompasses 3,847 km\2\ (1,485 mi\2\) in Sonoma, Mendocino, and Lake
Counties. The mouth of the Russian River is located at Goat Rock State
Beach (see Figure 2 of SCWA's application); the estuary extends from
the mouth upstream approximately 10 to 11 km (6-7 mi) between Austin
Creek and the community of Duncans Mills (Heckel and McIver, 1994).
Detailed Description of Activities
Within the Russian River watershed, the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps), SCWA, and the Mendocino County Russian River Flood
Control and Water Conservation Improvement District (District) operate
and maintain Federal facilities and conduct activities in addition to
the estuary management, including flood control, water diversion and
storage, instream flow releases, hydroelectric power generation,
channel maintenance, and fish hatchery production. As described in the
notice of proposed rulemaking, NMFS issued a 2008 Biological Opinion
(BiOp) for Water Supply, Flood Control Operations, and Channel
Maintenance conducted by the Corps, SCWA, and the District in the
Russian River watershed (NMFS, 2008). This BiOp found that the
activities--including SCWA's estuary management activities--authorized
by the Corps and undertaken by SCWA and the District, if continued in a
manner similar to recent historic practices, were likely to jeopardize
the continued existence of ESA-listed salmonids and were likely to
adversely modify critical habitat. In part, therefore, the BiOp
requires SCWA to collaborate with NMFS and modify their estuary water
level management in order to reduce marine influence (i.e., high
salinity and tidal inflow) and promote a higher water surface elevation
in the estuary in order to enhance the quality of rearing habitat for
juvenile salmonids. SCWA is also required to monitor the response of
water quality, invertebrate production, and salmonids in and near the
estuary to water surface elevation management in the estuary-lagoon
system.
There are three components to SCWA's ongoing estuary management
activities: (1) Lagoon outlet channel management, during the lagoon
management period only, required to accomplish the dual purposes of
flood risk abatement and maintenance of juvenile salmonid habitat; (2)
traditional artificial breaching, with the sole objective of flood risk
abatement; and (3) physical and biological monitoring in and near the
estuary, required under the terms of the BiOp, to understand response
to water surface elevation management in the estuary-lagoon system. The
latter category (physical and biological monitoring) includes all
ancillary beach and/or estuary
[[Page 13767]]
monitoring activities and will remain the same as in past years and as
described in our 2015 notice of proposed authorization (80 FR 14073;
March 18, 2015). Please see the previously referenced Federal Register
notice (76 FR 14924; March 18, 2011) for detailed discussion of lagoon
outlet channel management, artificial breaching, and other monitoring
activities.
Comments and Responses
We published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register on December 30, 2016 (81 FR 96415). During the 30-day comment
period, we received a letter from the Marine Mammal Commission
(Commission) and comments from two private citizens. The Commission
recommends that we issue the requested authorization, subject to
inclusion of the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures as
described in our notice of proposed rulemaking and the application. All
measures proposed in the initial Federal Register notice are included
within the final rule. The comments from the two private citizens are
described below.
Comment 1: If a project is found to jeopardize a species or
adversely modify its critical habitat, NMFS must cease activity until a
non-jeopardizing Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (RPA) to the
proposed project is in place, in coordination with the Federal action
agency and any applicant.
Response: Although this is a general comment not specifically
relevant to the proposed rulemaking that was the subject of the public
comment period, the commenter's statement is correct. We refer readers
to NMFS's 2008 BiOp for details of the relevant ESA section 7
consultation described previously in this document.
Comment 2: It is important to leave our environment and the Russian
River estuary as pristine as possible for future generations. Please
keep takes allowed from this region to a minimum.
Response: As required by the MMPA, NMFS has prescribed mitigation
sufficient to satisfy the MMPA's least practicable adverse impact
standard and has determined that the level of incidental taking
proposed for authorization meets the MMPA's negligible impact standard.
Description of Marine Mammals in the Area of the Specified Activity
The marine mammal species that may be harassed incidental to
estuary management activities are the harbor seal, California sea lion,
and the northern elephant seal. We presented a detailed discussion of
the status of these stocks and their occurrence in the action area in
the notice of the proposed rulemaking (81 FR 96415; December 30, 2016).
Ongoing monthly harbor seal counts at the Jenner haul-out were
begun by J. Mortenson in January 1987, with additional nearby haul-outs
added to the counts thereafter. In addition, local resident E. Twohy
began daily observations of seals and people at the Jenner haul-out in
November 1989. These datasets note whether the mouth at the Jenner
haul-out was opened or closed at each observation, as well as various
other daily and annual patterns of haul-out usage (Mortenson and Twohy,
1994). Recently, SCWA began regular baseline monitoring of the haul-out
as a component of its estuary management activity. In the notice of
proposed rulemaking, we presented average daily numbers of seals
observed at the mouth of the Russian River from 1993-2005 and from
2009-2015 (see Table 1; 81 FR 96415; December 30, 2016).
Potential Effects of the Specified Activity on Marine Mammals and Their
Habitat
We provided a detailed discussion of the potential effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals in the notice of the proposed
rulemaking (81 FR 96415; December 30, 2016). A summary of anticipated
effects is provided below.
A significant body of monitoring data exists for pinnipeds at the
mouth of the Russian River. In addition, pinnipeds have co-existed with
regular estuary management activity for decades, as well as with
regular human use activity at the beach, and are likely habituated to
human presence and activity. Nevertheless, SCWA's estuary management
activities have the potential to disturb pinnipeds present on the beach
or at peripheral haul-outs in the estuary. During breaching operations,
past monitoring has revealed that some or all of the seals present
typically move or flush from the beach in response to the presence of
crew and equipment, although some may remain hauled-out. No stampeding
of seals--a potentially dangerous occurrence in which large numbers of
animals succumb to mass panic and rush away from a stimulus--has been
documented since SCWA developed protocols to prevent such events in
1999. While it is likely impossible to conduct required estuary
management activities without provoking some response in hauled-out
animals, precautionary mitigation measures, described later in this
document, ensure that animals are gradually apprised of human approach.
Under these conditions, seals typically exhibit a continuum of
responses, beginning with alert movements (e.g., raising the head),
which may then escalate to movement away from the stimulus and possible
flushing into the water. Flushed seals typically re-occupy the haul-out
within minutes to hours of the stimulus. In addition, eight other haul-
outs exist nearby that may accommodate flushed seals. In the absence of
appropriate mitigation measures, it is possible that pinnipeds could be
subject to injury, serious injury, or mortality, likely through
stampeding or abandonment of pups.
California sea lions and northern elephant seals, which have been
noted only infrequently in the action area, have been observed as being
less sensitive to stimulus than harbor seals during monitoring at
numerous other sites. For example, monitoring of pinniped disturbance
as a result of abalone research in the Channel Islands showed that,
while harbor seals flushed at a rate of 69 percent, California sea
lions flushed at a rate of only 21 percent. The rate for elephant seals
was 0.1 percent (VanBlaricom, 2010). In the event that either of these
species is present during management activities, they would be expected
to display a minimal reaction to maintenance activities--less than that
expected of harbor seals.
Although the Jenner haul-out is not known as a primary pupping
beach, pups have been observed during the pupping season; therefore, we
have evaluated the potential for injury, serious injury, or mortality
to pups. There is a lack of published data regarding pupping at the
mouth of the Russian River, but SCWA monitors have observed pups on the
beach. No births were observed during recent monitoring, but may be
inferred based on signs indicating pupping (e.g., blood spots on the
sand, birds consuming possible placental remains). Pup injury or
mortality would be most likely to occur in the event of extended
separation of a mother and pup, or trampling in a mass movement. As
discussed previously, no such movements have been recorded since
development of appropriate protocols in 1999. Any California sea lions
or northern elephant seals present would be independent juveniles or
adults; therefore, analysis of impacts on pups is not relevant for
those species.
Similarly, the period of mother-pup bonding, critical time needed
to ensure pup survival and maximize pup health, is not expected to be
impacted by
[[Page 13768]]
estuary management activities. Harbor seal pups are extremely
precocious, swimming and diving immediately after birth and throughout
the lactation period, unlike most other phocids which normally enter
the sea only after weaning (Lawson and Renouf, 1985; Cottrell et al.,
2002; Burns et al., 2005). Lawson and Renouf (1987) investigated harbor
seal mother-pup bonding in response to natural and anthropogenic
disturbance. In summary, they found that the most critical bonding time
is within minutes after birth. Although pupping season is defined as
March 15-June 30, the peak of pupping season is typically concluded by
mid-May, when the lagoon management period begins. As such, it is
expected that most mother-pup bonding would likely be concluded as
well. The number of management events during the months of March and
April has been relatively low in the past, and the breaching activities
occur in a single day over several hours. In addition, mitigation
measures described later in this document further reduce the likelihood
of any impacts to pups, whether through injury or mortality or
interruption of mother-pup bonding.
In summary, and based on extensive monitoring data, we believe that
impacts to hauled-out pinnipeds during estuary management activities
would be behavioral harassment of limited duration (i.e., less than one
day) and limited intensity (i.e., temporary flushing at most).
Stampeding, and therefore injury or mortality, is not expected--nor has
it been documented--in the years since appropriate protocols were
established (see ``Mitigation'' for more details). Further, the
continued, and increasingly heavy (see SCWA's monitoring reports), use
of the haul-out despite decades of breaching events indicates that
abandonment of the haul-out is unlikely.
Anticipated Effects on Marine Mammal Habitat
We provided a detailed discussion of the potential effects of this
action on marine mammal habitat in the notice of the proposed IHA (81
FR 96415; December 30, 2016). SCWA's estuary management activities will
result in temporary physical alteration of the Jenner haul-out. With
barrier beach closure, seal usage of the beach haul-out declines, and
the three nearby river haul-outs may not be available for usage due to
rising water surface elevations. Breaching of the barrier beach,
subsequent to the temporary habitat disturbance, will likely increase
suitability and availability of habitat for pinnipeds. Biological and
water quality monitoring will not physically alter pinniped habitat.
In summary, there will be temporary physical alteration of the
beach. However, natural opening and closure of the beach results in the
same impacts to habitat. Therefore, seals are likely adapted to this
cycle. In addition, the increase in rearing habitat quality has the
goal of increasing salmonid abundance, ultimately providing more food
for seals present within the action area. Thus, any impacts to marine
mammal habitat are not expected to cause significant or long-term
consequences for individual marine mammals or their populations.
Estimated Take by Incidental Harassment
Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here,
section 3(18) of the MMPA defines ``harassment'' as: `` . . . any act
of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure
a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild (Level A
harassment); or (ii) has the potential to disturb a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild by causing disruption of behavioral
patterns, including, but not limited to, migration, breathing, nursing,
breeding, feeding, or sheltering (Level B harassment).''
In accordance with the regulations implemented by this final rule,
we plan to issue an LOA to SCWA to take harbor seals, California sea
lions, and northern elephant seals, by Level B harassment only,
incidental to estuary management activities. These activities,
involving increased human presence and the use of heavy equipment and
support vehicles, are expected to harass pinnipeds present at the haul-
out through disturbance. In addition, monitoring activities prescribed
in the BiOp may harass additional animals at the Jenner haul-out and at
the three haul-outs located in the estuary (Penny Logs, Patty's Rock,
and Chalanchawi). Estimates of the number of harbor seals, California
sea lions, and northern elephant seals that may be harassed by the
planned activities is based upon the number of potential events
associated with Russian River estuary management activities and the
average number of individuals of each species that are present during
conditions appropriate to the activity. Monitoring effort at the mouth
of the Russian River has shown that the number of seals utilizing the
haul-out declines during bar-closed conditions. Methodology of take
estimation was discussed in detail in our notice of proposed rulemaking
(81 FR 96415; December 30, 2016). Table 1 details the total number of
estimated takes for harbor seals.
California sea lions and northern elephant seals are occasional
visitors to the estuary. Based on limited information regarding
occurrence of these species at the mouth of the Russian River estuary,
we assume there is the potential to encounter one animal of each
species per month throughout the year. Lagoon outlet channel activities
could potentially occur over six months of the year, artificial
breaching activities over eight months, topographic surveys year-round,
and biological and physical monitoring in the estuary over eight
months. Therefore, we assume that up to 34 incidents of take could
occur per year for both the California sea lion and northern elephant
seal. Based on past occurrence records, the take authorization for
these two species is likely a precautionary overestimate.
Table 1--Estimated Number of Harbor Seal Takes Resulting From Russian River Estuary Management Activities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Potential total number of individual
Number of animals expected to occur \a\ Number of events b c animals that may be taken
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lagoon Outlet Channel Management (May 15 to October 15).........................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Implementation: 117 \d\................ Implementation: 3......... Implementation: 702.
Maintenance and Monitoring:............ Maintenance:.............. Maintenance: 1,156.
May: 80................................ May: 1....................
June: 98............................... June-Sept: 4/month........
July: 117.............................. Oct: 1....................
[[Page 13769]]
Aug: 17................................ Monitoring:............... Monitoring: 552.
Sept: 30............................... June-Sept: 2/month........
Oct: 28................................ Oct: 1....................
--------------------------------------------
Total: 2,410.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Artificial Breaching............................................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oct: 28................................ Oct: 2.................... Oct: 56.
Nov: 32................................ Nov: 2.................... Nov: 64.
Dec: 59................................ Dec: 2.................... Dec: 118.
Jan: 49................................ Jan: 1.................... Jan: 49.
Feb: 75................................ Feb: 1.................... Feb: 75.
Mar: 133............................... Mar: 1.................... Mar: 133.
Apr: 99................................ Apr: 1.................... Apr: 99.
May: 80................................ May: 2.................... May: 160.
--------------------------------------------
12 events maximum......... Total: 754.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Topographic and Geophysical Beach Surveys.......................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan: 99................................ 1 topographic survey/ Jan: 99.
Feb: 131............................... month; 100 percent of Feb: 131.
Mar: 165............................... animals present Jun-Feb; Mar: 165.
Apr: 141............................... 10 percent of animals Apr: 14.
May: 151............................... present Mar-May. May: 151.
Jun: 164............................... Jun: 164.
Jul: 282............................... Jul: 282.
Aug: 133............................... Aug: 133.
Sep: 62................................ Sep: 62.
Oct: 48................................ Oct: 48.
Nov: 68................................ Nov: 68.
Dec: 98................................ Dec: 98.
--------------------------------------------
Total: 1,415.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Biological and Physical Habitat Monitoring in the Estuary.......................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 \e\.................................. 113....................... 113.
Total.................................. N/A....................... 4,692.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ For Lagoon Outlet Channel Management and Artificial Breaching, average daily number of animals corresponds
with data from Table 2 in our notice of proposed rulemaking. For Topographic and Geophysical Beach Surveys,
average daily number of animals corresponds with 2011-15 data from Table 1 in our notice of proposed
rulemaking.
\b\ For implementation of the lagoon outlet channel, an event is defined as a single, two-day episode. For the
remaining activities, an event is defined as a single day on which an activity occurs. Some events may include
multiple activities.
\c\ Number of events for artificial breaching derived from historical data. The average number of events for
each month was rounded up to the nearest whole number; estimated number of events for December was increased
from one to two because multiple closures resulting from storm events have occurred in recent years during
that month. The total numbers (12) likely represent an overestimate, as the average annual number of events is
five.
\d\ Although implementation could occur at any time during the lagoon management period, the highest daily
average per month from the lagoon management period was used.
\e\ Based on past experience, SCWA expects that no more than one seal may be present, and thus would have the
potential to be disturbed, in total at the three river haul-outs.
The take numbers described in the preceding text are annual
estimates. Therefore, over the course of the 5-year period of validity
of the regulations, we will authorize a total of 23,460 incidents of
take for harbor seals and 170 such incidents each for the California
sea lion and northern elephant seal.
Analyses and Determinations
Negligible Impact Analysis
NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as `` . .
. an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.'' A negligible impact finding is based on the
lack of likely adverse effects on annual rates of recruitment or
survival (i.e., population-level effects). An estimate of the number of
takes alone is not enough information on which to base an impact
determination. In addition to considering estimates of the number of
marine mammals that might be ``taken'' through behavioral harassment,
we consider other factors, such as the likely nature of any responses
(e.g., intensity, duration), the context of any such responses (e.g.,
critical reproductive time or location, migration), as well as the
number and nature of estimated Level A harassment takes (if any), and
effects on habitat. We also assess the number, intensity, and context
of estimated takes by evaluating this
[[Page 13770]]
information relative to population status.
Consistent with the 1989 preamble for NMFS's implementing
regulations (54 FR 40338; September 29, 1989), the impacts from other
past and ongoing anthropogenic activities are incorporated into these
analyses via their impacts on the environmental baseline (e.g., as
reflected in the regulatory status of the species, population size and
growth rate where known, sources of human-caused mortality).
Although SCWA's estuary management activities may disturb pinnipeds
hauled out at the mouth of the Russian River, as well as those hauled
out at several locations in the estuary during recurring monitoring
activities, impacts are occurring to a small, localized group of
animals. While these impacts can occur year-round, they occur
sporadically and for limited duration (e.g., a maximum of two
consecutive days for water level management events). Seals will likely
become alert or, at most, flush into the water in reaction to the
presence of crews and equipment on the beach. While disturbance may
occur during a sensitive time (during the March 15-June 30 pupping
season), mitigation measures have been specifically designed to further
minimize harm during this period and eliminate the possibility of pup
injury or mother-pup separation.
No injury, serious injury, or mortality is anticipated, nor is the
planned action likely to result in long-term impacts such as permanent
abandonment of the haul-out. Injury, serious injury, or mortality to
pinnipeds would likely result from startling animals inhabiting the
haul-out into a mass movement, or from extended mother-pup separation
as a result of such movement. Long-term impacts to pinniped usage of
the haul-out could result from significantly increased presence of
humans and equipment on the beach. To avoid these possibilities, we
have worked with SCWA to develop the previously described mitigation
measures. These are designed to reduce the possibility of startling
pinnipeds, by gradually apprising them of the presence of humans and
equipment on the beach, and to reduce the possibility of impacts to
pups by eliminating or altering management activities on the beach when
pups are present, and by setting limits on the frequency and duration
of events during pupping season. During the past 15 years of flood
control management, implementation of similar mitigation measures has
resulted in no known mass movement or stampede events and no known
injury, serious injury, or mortality. Over the course of that time,
management events have generally been infrequent and of limited
duration.
No pinniped stocks for which incidental take will be authorized are
listed as threatened or endangered under the ESA or determined to be
strategic or depleted under the MMPA. Recent data suggests that harbor
seal populations have reached carrying capacity; populations of
California sea lions and northern elephant seals in California are also
considered healthy.
In summary, and based on extensive monitoring data, we believe that
impacts to hauled-out pinnipeds during estuary management activities
would be behavioral harassment of limited duration (i.e., less than one
day) and limited intensity (i.e., temporary flushing at most).
Stampeding, and therefore injury or mortality, is not expected--nor has
it been documented--in the years since appropriate protocols were
established (see ``Mitigation'' for more details). Further, the
continued, and increasingly heavy use of the haul-out (see figures in
SCWA documents) despite decades of breaching events indicates that
abandonment of the haul-out is unlikely. Based on the analysis
contained herein of the likely effects of the specified activity on
marine mammals and their habitat, and taking into consideration the
implementation of the planned monitoring and mitigation measures, we
find that the total marine mammal take from SCWA's estuary management
activities will have a negligible impact on the affected marine mammal
species or stocks.
Small Numbers Analysis
The number of animals expected to be taken for each species of
pinniped can be considered small relative to the population size. There
are an estimated 30,968 harbor seals in the California stock, 296,750
California sea lions, and 179,000 northern elephant seals in the
California breeding population. Based on extensive monitoring effort
specific to the affected haul-out and historical data on the frequency
of the specified activity, we plan to authorize annual levels of take,
by Level B harassment only, of 4,692 incidents of harassment for harbor
seals, 34 incidents of harassment for California sea lions, and 34
incidents of harassment for northern elephant seals, representing 15.2,
0.01, and 0.02 percent of the populations, respectively. However, this
represents an overestimate of the number of individuals harassed
annually over the duration of the regulations, because these totals
represent much smaller numbers of individuals that may be harassed
multiple times. Based on the analysis contained herein of the likely
effects of the specified activity on marine mammals and their habitat,
and taking into consideration the implementation of the mitigation and
monitoring measures, we find that small numbers of marine mammals will
be taken relative to the populations of the affected species or stocks.
Mitigation
In order to issue an incidental take authorization (ITA) under
section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA, NMFS must set forth the permissible
methods of taking pursuant to such activity, ``and other means of
effecting the least practicable adverse impact on such species or stock
and its habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries, mating
grounds, and areas of similar significance, and on the availability of
such species or stock for subsistence uses.'' NMFS's implementing
regulations require applicants for ITAs to include information about
the availability and feasibility (economic and technological) of
equipment, methods, and manner of conducting such activity or other
means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact upon the
affected species or stocks and their habitat (50 CFR 216.104(a)(11)).
SCWA will continue the following mitigation measures, as
implemented during the previous ITAs, which are designed to minimize
impact to affected species and stocks:
SCWA crews will cautiously approach (e.g., walking slowly
with limited arm movement and minimal sound) the haul-out ahead of
heavy equipment to minimize the potential for sudden flushes, which may
result in a mass movement--a particular concern during pupping season.
SCWA staff will avoid walking or driving equipment through
the seal haul-out.
Crews on foot will make an effort to be seen by seals from
a distance, if possible, rather than appearing suddenly, in order to
prevent sudden flushes.
During breaching events, all monitoring will be conducted
from the overlook on the bluff along Highway 1 adjacent to the haul-out
in order to minimize potential for harassment.
A water level management event may not occur for more than
two consecutive days unless flooding threats cannot be controlled.
In addition, SCWA will continue the following mitigation measures
specific
[[Page 13771]]
to pupping season (March 15-June 30), as implemented in the previous
ITAs:
SCWA will maintain a one-week no-work period between water
level management events (unless flooding is an immediate threat) to
allow for an adequate disturbance recovery period. During the no-work
period, equipment must be removed from the beach.
If a pup less than one week old is on the beach where
heavy machinery would be used or is on the path used to access the work
location, the management action will be delayed until the pup has left
the site or until the latest day possible to prevent flooding while
still maintaining suitable fish rearing habitat. In the event that a
pup remains present on the beach in the presence of flood risk, SCWA
will consult with NMFS to determine the appropriate course of action.
SCWA will coordinate with the locally established seal monitoring
program (Stewards' Seal Watch) to determine if pups less than one week
old are on the beach prior to a breaching event.
Physical and biological monitoring will not be conducted
if a pup less than one week old is present at the monitoring site or on
a path to the site.
Equipment will be driven slowly on the beach and care will be taken
to minimize the number of shut-downs and start-ups when the equipment
is on the beach. All work will be completed as efficiently as possible,
with the smallest amount of heavy equipment possible, to minimize
disturbance of seals at the haul-out. Boats operating near river haul-
outs during monitoring will be kept within posted speed limits and
driven as far from the haul-outs as safely possible to minimize
flushing seals.
We have carefully evaluated SCWA's planned mitigation measures and
considered their effectiveness in past implementation to determine
whether they are likely to effect the least practicable adverse impact
on the affected marine mammal species and stocks and their habitat. Our
evaluation of potential measures included consideration of the
following factors in relation to one another: (1) The manner in which,
and the degree to which, the successful implementation of the measure
is expected to minimize adverse impacts to marine mammals, (2) the
proven or likely efficacy of the specific measure to minimize adverse
impacts as planned; and (3) the practicability of the measure for
applicant implementation.
Any mitigation measure(s) we prescribe should be able to
accomplish, have a reasonable likelihood of accomplishing (based on
current science), or contribute to the accomplishment of one or more of
the general goals listed below:
(1) Avoidance or minimization of injury or death of marine mammals
wherever possible (goals 2, 3, and 4 may contribute to this goal).
(2) A reduction in the number (total number or number at
biologically important time or location) of individual marine mammals
exposed to stimuli expected to result in incidental take (this goal may
contribute to goal 1, above, or to reducing takes by behavioral
harassment only).
(3) A reduction in the number (total number or number at a
biologically important time or location) of times any individual marine
mammal would be exposed to stimuli expected to result in incidental
take (this goal may contribute to goal 1, above, or to reducing takes
by behavioral harassment only).
(4) A reduction in the intensity of exposure to stimuli expected to
result in incidental take (this goal may contribute to goal 1, above,
or to reducing the severity of behavioral harassment only).
(5) Avoidance or minimization of adverse effects to marine mammal
habitat, paying particular attention to the prey base, blockage or
limitation of passage to or from biologically important areas,
permanent destruction of habitat, or temporary disturbance of habitat
during a biologically important time.
(6) For monitoring directly related to mitigation, an increase in
the probability of detecting marine mammals, thus allowing for more
effective implementation of the mitigation.
Based on our evaluation of SCWA's planned measures and on SCWA's
record of management at the mouth of the Russian River including
information from monitoring of SCWA's implementation of the mitigation
measures as prescribed under the previous ITAs, we have determined that
the planned mitigation measures provide the means of effecting the
least practicable adverse impact on marine mammal species or stocks and
their habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries, mating
grounds, and areas of similar significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
In order to issue an ITA for an activity, section 101(a)(5)(A) of
the MMPA states that NMFS must set forth ``requirements pertaining to
the monitoring and reporting of such taking.'' The MMPA implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 216.104 (a)(13) indicate that requests for ITAs
must include the suggested means of accomplishing the necessary
monitoring and reporting that will result in increased knowledge of the
species and of the level of taking or impacts on populations of marine
mammals that are expected to be present in the proposed action area.
Any monitoring requirement we prescribe should improve our
understanding of one or more of the following:
Occurrence of marine mammal species in action area (e.g.,
presence, abundance, distribution, density).
Nature, scope, or context of likely marine mammal exposure
to potential stressors/impacts (individual or cumulative, acute or
chronic), through better understanding of: (1) Action or environment
(e.g., source characterization, propagation, ambient noise); (2)
affected species (e.g., life history, dive patterns); (3) co-occurrence
of marine mammal species with the action; or (4) biological or
behavioral context of exposure (e.g., age, calving, or feeding areas).
Individual responses to acute stressors, or impacts of
chronic exposures (behavioral or physiological).
How anticipated responses to stressors impact either: (1)
Long-term fitness and survival of an individual; or (2) population,
species, or stock.
Effects on marine mammal habitat and resultant impacts to
marine mammals.
Mitigation and monitoring effectiveness.
SCWA submitted a marine mammal monitoring plan as part of the ITA
application. It can be found online at www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental/construction.htm. The plan has been successfully implemented
by SCWA under previous ITAs. The purpose of this monitoring plan, which
is carried out collaboratively with the Stewards of the Coasts and
Redwoods (Stewards) organization, is to detect the response of
pinnipeds to estuary management activities at the Russian River
estuary. SCWA has designed the plan both to satisfy the requirements of
the ITA, and to address the following questions of interest:
1. Under what conditions do pinnipeds haul out at the Russian River
estuary mouth at Jenner?
2. How do seals at the Jenner haul-out respond to activities
associated with the construction and maintenance of the lagoon outlet
channel and artificial breaching activities?
3. Does the number of seals at the Jenner haul-out significantly
differ from historic averages with formation of a summer (May 15 to
October 15) lagoon in the Russian River estuary?
[[Page 13772]]
4. Are seals at the Jenner haul-out displaced to nearby river and
coastal haul-outs when the mouth remains closed in the summer?
Monitoring Measures
Baseline Monitoring--Seals at the Jenner haul-out will be counted
for four hours every week, with no more than four baseline surveys each
month. Two monitoring events each month will occur in the morning, and
two will occur in the afternoon, with an effort to schedule a morning
survey at low and high tide each month and an afternoon survey at low
and high tide each month. This baseline information will provide SCWA
with details that may help to plan estuary management activities in the
future to minimize pinniped interaction. Survey protocols are as
follows: All seals hauled out on the beach are counted every 30 minutes
from the overlook on the bluff along Highway 1 adjacent to the haul-out
using spotting scopes. Monitoring may conclude for the day if weather
conditions affect visibility (e.g., heavy fog in the afternoon).
Depending on how the sandbar is formed, seals may haul out in multiple
groups at the mouth. At each 30-minute count, the observer indicates
where groups of seals are hauled out on the sandbar and provides a
total count for each group. If possible, adults and pups are counted
separately.
This primary haul-out is where the majority of seals are found and
where pupping occurs, and SCWA's planned monitoring will allow
continued development in understanding the physical and biological
factors that influence seal abundance and behavior at the site. In
particular, SCWA notes that the planned frequency of surveys will allow
them to be able to observe the influence of physical changes that do
not persist for more than ten days, like brief periods of barrier beach
closures or other environmental changes, and will allow for assessment
of how seals respond to barrier beach closures as well as accurate
estimation of the number of harbor seal pups born at Jenner each year.
In addition to the census data, disturbances of the haul-out are
recorded. The method for recording disturbances follows those in
Mortenson (1996). Disturbances will be recorded on a three-point scale
that represents an increasing seal response to the disturbance (Table
2). The time, source, and duration of the disturbance, as well as an
estimated distance between the source and haul-out, are recorded. It
should be noted that only responses falling into Mortenson's Levels 2
and 3 will be considered as harassment under the MMPA, under the terms
of these final regulations.
Table 2--Seal Response to Disturbance
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Type of response Definition
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1............ Alert............... Seal head orientation or brief
movement in response to
disturbance, which may include
turning head towards the
disturbance, craning head and neck
while holding the body rigid in a
u-shaped position, changing from a
lying to a sitting position, or
brief movement of less than twice
the animal's body length.
2............ Movement............ Movements in response to the source
of disturbance, ranging from short
withdrawals at least twice the
animal's body length to longer
retreats over the beach, or if
already moving a change of
direction of greater than 90
degrees.
3............ Flight.............. All retreats (flushes) to the
water.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weather conditions are recorded at the beginning of each census.
These include temperature, Beaufort sea state, precipitation/
visibility, and wind speed. Tide levels and estuary water surface
elevations are correlated to the monitoring start and end times.
In an effort towards understanding possible relationships between
use of the Jenner haul-out and nearby coastal and river haul-outs,
several other haul-outs on the coast and in the Russian River estuary
are monitored as well (see Figure 1 of SCWA's application). Peripheral
site monitoring would occur only in the event of an extended period of
lagoon conditions (i.e., barrier beach closed with perched outlet
channel for three weeks or more). Abundance at these sites has been
observed to be generally very low regardless of river mouth condition.
These sites are generally very small physically, and are composed of
small rocks or outcrops or logs in the river, and therefore could not
accommodate significant displacement from the main beach haul-out.
Monitoring of peripheral sites under extended lagoon conditions will
allow for possible detection of any changed use patterns.
Estuary Management Event Monitoring, Lagoon Outlet Channel--Should
the mouth of the river close during the lagoon management period, SCWA
would construct a lagoon outlet channel as required by the BiOp.
Activities associated with the initial construction of the outlet
channel, as well as the maintenance of the channel that may be
required, would be monitored for disturbances to the seals at the
Jenner haul-out.
A one-day pre-event channel survey will be made within one to three
days prior to constructing the outlet channel. The haul-out will be
monitored on the day the outlet channel is constructed and daily for up
to the maximum two days allowed for channel excavation activities.
Monitoring will also occur on each day that the outlet channel is
maintained using heavy equipment for the duration of the lagoon
management period. Monitoring of outlet channel construction and
maintenance will correspond with that described above in the ``Baseline
Monitoring'' section, with the exception that management activity
monitoring duration will be defined by event duration. On the day of
the management event, pinniped monitoring will begin at least one hour
prior to the crew and equipment accessing the beach work area, and will
continue through the duration of the event, until at least one hour
after the crew and equipment leave the beach.
In an attempt to understand whether seals from the Jenner haul-out
are displaced to coastal and river haul-outs nearby when management
events occur, other nearby haul-outs are monitored concurrently with
monitoring of outlet channel construction and maintenance activities.
This provides an opportunity to qualitatively assess whether these
haul-outs are being used by seals displaced from the Jenner haul-out
during lagoon outlet channel excavation and maintenance. This
monitoring will not provide definitive results regarding displacement
to nearby coastal and river haul-outs, as individual seals are not
marked or photo-identified, but is useful in tracking general trends in
haul-out use during lagoon outlet channel excavation and maintenance.
As volunteers are required to monitor these
[[Page 13773]]
peripheral haul-outs, haul-out locations may need to be prioritized if
there are not enough volunteers available. In that case, priority would
be assigned to the nearest haul-outs (North Jenner and Odin Cove),
followed by the Russian River estuary haul-outs, and finally the more
distant coastal haul-outs.
Estuary Management Event Monitoring, Artificial Breaching Events--
In accordance with the Russian River BiOp, SCWA may artificially breach
the barrier beach outside of the summer lagoon management period, and
may conduct a maximum of two such breachings during the lagoon
management period, when estuary water surface elevations rise above
seven feet. In that case, NMFS may be consulted regarding potential
scheduling of an artificial breaching event to open the barrier beach
and reduce flooding risk.
Pinniped response to artificial breaching will be monitored at each
such event during the period of validity of these regulations.
Monitoring methods will follow the census and disturbance monitoring
protocols described in the ``Baseline Monitoring'' section, which were
also used for the 1996 to 2000 monitoring events (MSC, 1997, 1998,
1999, 2000; SCWA and MSC, 2001). The exception, as for lagoon
management events, is that the duration of monitoring is dependent upon
the duration of the event. On the day of the management event, pinniped
monitoring begins at least one hour before the crew and equipment
accesses the beach work area, and monitoring continues through the
duration of the event, until at least one hour after the crew and
equipment leave the beach.
For all counts, the following information will be recorded in
thirty-minute intervals: (1) Pinniped counts by species; (2) behavior;
(3) time, source and duration of any disturbance; (4) estimated
distances between source of disturbance and pinnipeds; (5) weather
conditions (e.g., temperature, wind); and (5) tide levels and estuary
water surface elevation.
Monitoring During Pupping Season--The pupping season is defined as
March 15 to June 30. Baseline, lagoon outlet channel, and artificial
breaching monitoring during the pupping season will include records of
neonate (pups less than one week old) observations. Characteristics of
a neonate pup include: Body weight less than 15 kg; thin for their body
length; an umbilicus or natal pelage present; wrinkled skin; and
awkward or jerky movements on land. SCWA will coordinate with the
Stewards' Seal Watch monitoring program (Stewards) to determine if pups
less than one week old are on the beach prior to a water level
management event.
If, during monitoring, observers sight any pup that might be
abandoned, SCWA will contact the NMFS stranding response network
immediately, and also will report the incident to NMFS's West Coast
Regional Office and Office of Protected Resources within 48 hours.
Observers will not approach or move the pup. Potential indications that
a pup may be abandoned are: (1) No observed contact with adult seals,
(2) no movement of the pup, and (3) the pup's attempts to nurse are
rebuffed.
Staffing--Monitoring is conducted by qualified individuals, which
may include professional biologists employed by NMFS or SCWA or
volunteers trained by the Stewards. All volunteer monitors are required
to attend classroom-style training and field site visits to the haul-
outs. Training covers the MMPA and conditions of the ITA, SCWA's
pinniped monitoring protocols, pinniped species identification, age
class identification (including a specific discussion regarding
neonates), recording of count and disturbance observations (including
completion of datasheets), and use of equipment. Pinniped
identification includes the harbor seal, California sea lion, and
northern elephant seal, as well as other pinniped species with
potential to occur in the area. Generally, SCWA staff and volunteers
collect baseline data on Jenner haul-out use during the twice-monthly
monitoring events. A schedule for this monitoring will be established
with Stewards once volunteers are available for the monitoring effort.
SCWA staff monitors lagoon outlet channel excavation and maintenance
activities and artificial breaching events at the Jenner haul-out, with
assistance from available Stewards volunteers. Stewards volunteers
monitor the coastal and river haul-out locations during lagoon outlet
channel excavation and maintenance activities.
Training on the MMPA, pinniped identification, and the conditions
of the ITA is held for staff and contractors assigned to estuary
management activities. The training includes equipment operators,
safety crew members, and surveyors. In addition, prior to beginning
each water surface elevation management event, the biologist monitoring
the event participates in the onsite safety meeting to discuss the
location(s) of pinnipeds at the Jenner haul-out that day and methods of
avoiding and minimizing disturbances to the haul-out as outlined in the
ITA.
Reporting
SCWA is required to submit an annual report on all activities and
marine mammal monitoring results to NMFS within ninety days following
the end of the monitoring period. These reports must contain the
following information:
The number of pinnipeds taken, by species and age class
(if possible);
Behavior prior to and during water level management
events;
Start and end time of activity;
Estimated distances between source and pinnipeds when
disturbance occurs;
Weather conditions (e.g., temperature, wind, etc.);
Haul-out reoccupation time of any pinnipeds based on post-
activity monitoring;
Tide levels and estuary water surface elevation; and
Pinniped census from bi-monthly and nearby haul-out
monitoring.
The annual report includes descriptions of monitoring methodology,
tabulation of estuary management events, summary of monitoring results,
and discussion of problems noted and proposed remedial measures.
SCWA must also submit a comprehensive summary report that includes
any future application for renewed regulations and Letters of
Authorization.
Summary of Previous Monitoring
SCWA complied with the mitigation and monitoring required under
previous authorizations. Prior Federal Register notices of proposed
yearly authorizations have provided summaries of the monitoring results
from 2009-2015; please see those documents for more information.
Previous monitoring reports are available online at www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental/construction.htm. We also provided a detailed
description of previous monitoring results in the proposed rule for
this action (81 FR 96415; December 30, 2016).
Adaptive Management
The regulations governing the take of marine mammals incidental to
SCWA estuary management activities contain an adaptive management
component.
The reporting requirements associated with this final rule are
designed to provide NMFS with monitoring data from the previous year to
allow consideration of whether any changes are appropriate. The use of
adaptive management allows NMFS to consider new information from
different sources
[[Page 13774]]
to determine (with input from SCWA regarding practicability) on an
annual or biennial basis if mitigation or monitoring measures should be
modified (including additions or deletions). Mitigation measures could
be modified if new data suggests that such modifications would have a
reasonable likelihood of reducing adverse effects to marine mammals and
if the measures are practicable.
SCWA's monitoring program (see ``Monitoring and Reporting'') will
be managed adaptively. Changes to the monitoring program may be adopted
if they are reasonably likely to better accomplish the MMPA monitoring
goals described previously or may better answer the specific questions
associated with SCWA's monitoring plan.
The following are some of the possible sources of applicable data
to be considered through the adaptive management process: (1) Results
from monitoring reports, as required by MMPA authorizations; (2)
results from general marine mammal and sound research; and (3) any
information which reveals that marine mammals may have been taken in a
manner, extent, or number not authorized by these regulations or
subsequent LOAs.
Impact on Availability of Affected Species for Taking for Subsistence
Uses
There are no relevant subsistence uses of marine mammals implicated
by the specified activity. Therefore, we have determined that the total
taking of affected species or stocks would not have an unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of such species or stocks for taking
for subsistence purposes.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
No marine mammal species listed under the ESA are expected to be
affected by these activities. Therefore, we have determined that
section 7 consultation under the ESA is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), as implemented by the regulations
published by the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts 1500-
1508), and NOAA Administrative Order 216-6, we prepared an
Environmental Assessment (EA) to consider the direct, indirect and
cumulative effects to the human environment resulting from issuance of
the original IHA to SCWA for the specified activities and found that it
would not result in any significant impacts to the human environment.
We signed a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) on March 30, 2010.
We have reviewed SWCA's application for incidental take regulations and
an associated LOA for ongoing estuary management activities and the
2016 monitoring report. Based on that review, we have determined that
the action follows closely the ITAs issued and implemented in 2010-
2016, and does not present any substantial changes, or significant new
circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns which
would require a supplement to the 2010 EA or preparation of a new NEPA
document. Therefore, we have determined that a new or supplemental EA
or Environmental Impact Statement is unnecessary, and we rely on the
existing EA and FONSI for this action. The 2010 EA and FONSI for this
action are available for review at www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental/construction.htm.
Classification
Pursuant to the procedures established to implement Executive Order
12866, the Office of Management and Budget has determined that this
rule is not significant.
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
the Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration at the proposed rule stage that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for the certification was published in the
proposed rule and is not repeated here. No comments were received
regarding this certification. As a result, a regulatory flexibility
analysis is not required and none has been prepared.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required
to respond to nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with a collection of information (COI) subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) unless that COI
displays a currently valid OMB control number. These requirements have
been approved by OMB under control number 0648-0151 and include
applications for regulations, subsequent LOAs, and reports.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 217
Exports, Fish, Imports, Indians, Labeling, Marine mammals,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Seafood,
Transportation.
Dated: March 8, 2017.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
For reasons set forth in the preamble, NMFS amends 50 CFR part 217
as follows:
PART 217--REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE TAKING AND IMPORTING OF MARINE
MAMMALS
0
1. The authority citation for part 217 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq., unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Add subpart A to part 217 to read as follows:
Subpart A--Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Russian River Estuary
Management Activities
Sec.
217.1 Specified activity and specified geographical region.
217.2 Effective dates.
217.3 Permissible methods of taking.
217.4 Prohibitions.
217.5 Mitigation requirements.
217.6 Requirements for monitoring and reporting.
217.7 Letters of Authorization.
217.8 Renewals and modifications of Letters of Authorization.
217.9-217.10 [Reserved]
Subpart A--Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Russian River
Estuary Management Activities
Sec. 217.1 Specified activity and specified geographical region.
(a) Regulations in this subpart apply only to the Sonoma County
Water Agency (SCWA) and those persons it authorizes or funds to conduct
activities on its behalf for the taking of marine mammals that occurs
in the area outlined in paragraph (b) of this section and that occurs
incidental to estuary management activities.
(b) The taking of marine mammals by SCWA may be authorized in a
Letter of Authorization (LOA) only if it occurs at Goat Rock State
Beach or in the Russian River estuary in California.
Sec. 217.2 Effective dates.
Regulations in this subpart are effective from April 21, 2017,
through April 20, 2022.
Sec. 217.3 Permissible methods of taking.
Under LOAs issued pursuant to Sec. Sec. 216.106 and 217.7 of this
chapter, the Holder of the LOA (hereinafter ``SCWA'') may incidentally,
but not intentionally, take marine mammals within the area described in
Sec. 217.1(b) by Level B harassment associated with
[[Page 13775]]
estuary management activities, provided the activity is in compliance
with all terms, conditions, and requirements of the regulations in this
subpart and the appropriate LOA.
Sec. 217.4 Prohibitions.
Notwithstanding takings contemplated in Sec. 217.1 and authorized
by an LOA issued under Sec. Sec. 216.106 and 217.7 of this chapter, no
person in connection with the activities described in Sec. 217.1 may:
(a) Violate, or fail to comply with, the terms, conditions, and
requirements of this subpart or an LOA issued under Sec. Sec. 216.106
and 217.7 of this chapter;
(b) Take any marine mammal not specified in such LOAs;
(c) Take any marine mammal specified in such LOAs in any manner
other than as specified;
(d) Take a marine mammal specified in such LOAs if NMFS determines
such taking results in more than a negligible impact on the species or
stocks of such marine mammal; or
(e) Take a marine mammal specified in such LOAs if NMFS determines
such taking results in an unmitigable adverse impact on the species or
stock of such marine mammal for taking for subsistence uses.
Sec. 217.5 Mitigation requirements.
When conducting the activities identified in Sec. 217.1(a) of this
chapter, the mitigation measures contained in any LOA issued under
Sec. Sec. 216.106 and 217.7 of this chapter must be implemented. These
mitigation measures shall include but are not limited to:
(a) General conditions. (1) A copy of any issued LOA must be in the
possession of SCWA, its designees, and work crew personnel operating
under the authority of the issued LOA; and
(2) If SCWA observes a pup that may be abandoned, it shall contact
the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) West Coast Regional
Stranding Coordinator immediately and also report the incident to NMFS
Office of Protected Resources within 48 hours. Observers shall not
approach or move the pup.
(b) SCWA crews shall cautiously approach the haul-out ahead of
heavy equipment.
(c) SCWA staff shall avoid walking or driving equipment through the
seal haul-out.
(d) Crews on foot shall make an effort to be seen by seals from a
distance.
(e) During breaching events, all monitoring shall be conducted from
the overlook on the bluff along Highway 1 adjacent to the haul-out.
(f) A water level management event may not occur for more than two
consecutive days unless flooding threats cannot be controlled.
(g) All work shall be completed as efficiently as possible and with
the smallest amount of heavy equipment possible.
(h) Boats operating near river haul-outs during monitoring shall be
kept within posted speed limits and driven as far from the haul-outs as
safely possible.
(i) SCWA shall implement the following mitigation measures during
pupping season (March 15-June 30):
(1) SCWA shall maintain a one week no-work period between water
level management events (unless flooding is an immediate threat) to
allow for an adequate disturbance recovery period. During the no-work
period, equipment must be removed from the beach.
(2) If a pup less than one week old is on the beach where heavy
machinery will be used or on the path used to access the work location,
the management action shall be delayed until the pup has left the site
or the latest day possible to prevent flooding while still maintaining
suitable fish rearing habitat. In the event that a pup remains present
on the beach in the presence of flood risk, SCWA shall consult with
NMFS and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife to determine
the appropriate course of action. SCWA shall coordinate with the
locally established seal monitoring program (Stewards of the Coast and
Redwoods) to determine if pups less than one week old are on the beach
prior to a breaching event.
(3) Physical and biological monitoring shall not be conducted if a
pup less than one week old is present at the monitoring site or on a
path to the site.
Sec. 217.6 Requirements for monitoring and reporting.
(a) Monitoring and reporting shall be conducted in accordance with
the approved Pinniped Monitoring Plan.
(b) Baseline monitoring shall be conducted each week, with two
events per month occurring in the morning and two per month in the
afternoon. These censuses shall continue for four hours, weather
permitting; the census days shall be chosen to ensure that monitoring
encompasses a low and high tide each in the morning and afternoon. All
seals hauled out on the beach shall be counted every 30 minutes from
the overlook on the bluff along Highway 1 adjacent to the haul-out
using high-powered spotting scopes. Observers shall indicate where
groups of seals are hauled out on the sandbar and provide a total count
for each group. If possible, adults and pups shall be counted
separately.
(c) Peripheral coastal haul-outs shall be visited concurrently with
baseline monitoring in the event that a lagoon outlet channel is
implemented and maintained for a prolonged period of over 21 days.
(d) During estuary management events, monitoring shall occur on all
days that activity is occurring using the same protocols as described
for baseline monitoring, with the difference that monitoring shall
begin at least one hour prior to the crew and equipment accessing the
beach work area and continue through the duration of the event, until
at least one hour after the crew and equipment leave the beach. In
addition, a one-day pre-event survey of the area shall be made within
one to three days of the event and a one-day post-event survey shall be
made after the event, weather permitting.
(e) For all monitoring, the following information shall be recorded
in 30-minute intervals:
(1) Pinniped counts by species;
(2) Behavior;
(3) Time, source and duration of any disturbance, with takes
incidental to SCWA actions recorded only for responses involving
movement away from the disturbance or responses of greater intensity
(e.g., not for alerts);
(4) Estimated distances between source of disturbance and
pinnipeds;
(5) Weather conditions (e.g., temperature, percent cloud cover, and
wind speed); and
(6) Tide levels and estuary water surface elevation.
(f) Reporting--(1) Annual reporting. (i) SCWA shall submit an
annual summary report to NMFS not later than ninety days following the
end of the reporting period established in any LOA issued under Sec.
217.7. SCWA shall provide a final report within thirty days following
resolution of comments on the draft report.
(ii) These reports shall contain, at minimum, the following:
(A) The number of seals taken, by species and age class (if
possible);
(B) Behavior prior to and during water level management events;
(C) Start and end time of activity;
(D) Estimated distances between source and seals when disturbance
occurs;
(E) Weather conditions (e.g., temperature, wind, etc.);
(F) Haul-out reoccupation time of any seals based on post-activity
monitoring;
(G) Tide levels and estuary water surface elevation;
(H) Seal census from bi-monthly and nearby haul-out monitoring; and
[[Page 13776]]
(I) Specific conclusions that may be drawn from the data in
relation to the four questions of interest in SCWA's Pinniped
Monitoring Plan, if possible.
(2) SCWA shall submit a comprehensive summary report to NMFS in
conjunction with any future submitted request for incidental take
authorization.
(g) Reporting of injured or dead marine mammals. (1) In the
unanticipated event that the activity defined in Sec. 217.1(a) clearly
causes the take of a marine mammal in a prohibited manner, SCWA shall
immediately cease such activity and report the incident to the Office
of Protected Resources (OPR), NMFS and the West Coast Regional
Stranding Coordinator, NMFS. Activities shall not resume until NMFS is
able to review the circumstances of the prohibited take. NMFS will work
with SCWA to determine what measures are necessary to minimize the
likelihood of further prohibited take and ensure MMPA compliance. SCWA
may not resume their activities until notified by NMFS. The report must
include the following information:
(i) Time and date of the incident;
(ii) Description of the incident;
(iii) Environmental conditions;
(iv) Description of all marine mammal observations in the 24 hours
preceding the incident;
(v) Species identification or description of the animal(s)
involved;
(vi) Fate of the animal(s); and
(vii) Photographs or video footage of the animal(s).
(2) In the event that SCWA discovers an injured or dead marine
mammal and determines that the cause of the injury or death is unknown
and the death is relatively recent (e.g., in less than a moderate state
of decomposition), SCWA shall immediately report the incident to OPR
and the West Coast Regional Stranding Coordinator, NMFS. The report
must include the information identified in paragraph (g)(1) of this
section. Activities may continue while NMFS reviews the circumstances
of the incident. NMFS will work with SCWA to determine whether
additional mitigation measures or modifications to the activities are
appropriate.
(3) In the event that SCWA discovers an injured or dead marine
mammal and determines that the injury or death is not associated with
or related to the activities defined in Sec. 217.1(a) (e.g.,
previously wounded animal, carcass with moderate to advanced
decomposition, scavenger damage), SCWA shall report the incident to OPR
and the West Coast Regional Stranding Coordinator, NMFS, within 24
hours of the discovery. SCWA shall provide photographs or video footage
or other documentation of the stranded animal sighting to NMFS.
(4) Pursuant to paragraphs (g)(2) and (3) of this section, SCWA may
use discretion in determining what injuries (i.e., nature and severity)
are appropriate for reporting. At minimum, SCWA must report those
injuries considered to be serious (i.e., will likely result in death)
or that are likely caused by human interaction (e.g., entanglement,
gunshot). Also pursuant to sections paragraphs (g)(2) and (3) of this
section, SCWA may use discretion in determining the appropriate vantage
point for obtaining photographs of injured/dead marine mammals.
Sec. 217.7 Letters of Authorization.
(a) To incidentally take marine mammals pursuant to the regulations
in this subpart, SCWA must apply for and obtain an LOA.
(b) An LOA, unless suspended or revoked, may be effective for a
period of time not to exceed the expiration date of the regulations in
this subpart.
(c) If an LOA expires prior to the expiration date of the
regulations in this subpart, SCWA may apply for and obtain a renewal of
the LOA.
(d) In the event of projected changes to the activity or to
mitigation and monitoring measures required by an LOA, SCWA must apply
for and obtain a modification of the LOA as described in Sec. 217.8.
(e) The LOA shall set forth:
(1) Permissible methods of incidental taking;
(2) Means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact (i.e.,
mitigation) on the species, its habitat, and on the availability of the
species for subsistence uses; and
(3) Requirements for monitoring and reporting.
(f) Issuance of the LOA shall be based on a determination that the
level of taking will be consistent with the findings made for the total
taking allowable under the regulations in this subpart.
(g) Notice of issuance or denial of an LOA shall be published in
the Federal Register within 30 days of a determination.
Sec. 217.8 Renewals and modifications of Letters of Authorization.
(a) An LOA issued under Sec. Sec. 216.106 and 217.7 of this
chapter for the activity identified in Sec. 217.1(a) shall be renewed
or modified upon request by the applicant, provided that:
(1) The proposed specified activity and mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting measures, as well as the anticipated impacts, are the same as
those described and analyzed for the regulations in this subpart
(excluding changes made pursuant to the adaptive management provision
in paragraph (c)(1) of this section); and
(2) NMFS determines that the mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
measures required by the previous LOA under the regulations in this
subpart were implemented.
(b) For an LOA modification or renewal requests by the applicant
that include changes to the activity or the mitigation, monitoring, or
reporting (excluding changes made pursuant to the adaptive management
provision in paragraph (c)(1) of this section) that do not change the
findings made for the regulations or result in no more than a minor
change in the total estimated number of takes (or distribution by
species or years), NMFS may publish a notice of proposed LOA in the
Federal Register, including the associated analysis of the change, and
solicit public comment before issuing the LOA.
(c) An LOA issued under Sec. Sec. 216.106 and 217.7 of this
chapter for the activity identified in Sec. 217.1(a) may be modified
by NMFS under the following circumstances:
(1) Adaptive management. NMFS may modify (including augment) the
existing mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures (after
consulting with SCWA regarding the practicability of the modifications)
if doing so creates a reasonable likelihood of more effectively
accomplishing the goals of the mitigation and monitoring.
(i) Possible sources of data that could contribute to the decision
to modify the mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures in an LOA
are:
(A) Results from SCWA's monitoring from the previous year(s).
(B) Results from other marine mammal and/or sound research or
studies.
(C) Any information that reveals marine mammals may have been taken
in a manner, extent or number not authorized by the regulations in this
subpart or subsequent LOAs.
(ii) If, through adaptive management, the modifications to the
mitigation, monitoring, or reporting measures are substantial, NMFS
will publish a notice of proposed LOA in the Federal Register and
solicit public comment.
(2) Emergencies. If NMFS determines that an emergency exists that
poses a significant risk to the well-being of the species or stocks of
marine mammals specified in LOAs issued pursuant to Sec. Sec. 216.106
and 217.7 of this chapter, an LOA may be modified without prior
[[Page 13777]]
notice or opportunity for public comment. Notice would be published in
the Federal Register within thirty days of the action.
Sec. Sec. 217.9-217.10 [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2017-04944 Filed 3-14-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P