Safety Zone; United Illuminating Company Housatonic River Crossing Project; Housatonic River; Milford and Stratford, CT, 13572-13575 [2017-04978]
Download as PDF
13572
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 14, 2017 / Proposed Rules
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact International Aero Engines
AG, 400 Main Street, East Hartford, CT
06118; phone: 860–565–0140; email: help24@
pw.utc.com; Internet: https://
fleetcare.pw.utc.com.
(3) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
March 2, 2017.
Thomas A. Boudreau,
Acting Manager, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
This rulemaking proposes to establish
a safety zone for certain waters of the
Housatonic River near Milford and
Stratford, CT. Corresponding regulatory
history is discussed below.
On August 25, 2016, United
Illuminating Company notified the
Coast Guard that it would conduct a
project involving the installation of new
transmission conductors over the
Housatonic River near Stratford and
Milford, CT. On December 13, 2016, the
Coast Guard published a temporary final
rule entitled, ‘‘Safety Zone; United
Illuminating Company Housatonic River
Crossing Project; Housatonic River,
Milford and Stratford, CT’’ in the
Federal Register (81 FR 89862).
The project is scheduled to be
completed in two phases, the first being
the stringing of optical fiber ground
wires on the North circuit from April
26, 2017 to May 4, 2017. The second
phase will include the stringing of
optical fiber ground wires on the South
circuit from July 29, 2017 to August 3,
2017. The proposed work area is
between the eastern and western shores
of the Housatonic River from the
southern boundary of the Metro-North
Rail Bridge. It extends approximately
525 feet upstream for the northern
boundary. Potential hazards from this
project include entanglement of vessels
with the messenger line and falling
equipment from the electrical towers.
The Captain of the Port Long Island
Sound (COTP) has determined that the
potential hazards associated with the
cable crossing project could be a safety
concern for anyone within the proposed
work area.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of vessels and the
navigable waters within the work zone
before, during, and after each messenger
pulling operation. The Coast Guard
proposes this rulemaking under
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C.
191; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and
160.5; and Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard
to define regulatory safety zones.
RIN 1625–AA00
Office of the Secretary
Safety Zone; United Illuminating
Company Housatonic River Crossing
Project; Housatonic River; Milford and
Stratford, CT
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
14 CFR Part 399
ACTION:
[Docket No. DOT–OST–2017–0007]
Transparency of Airline Ancillary
Service Fees
Office of the Secretary (OST),
U.S. Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Suspension of comment period.
AGENCY:
The DOT is suspending the
public comment period for the
supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (SNPRM) on Transparency
of Airline Ancillary Service Fees. The
DOT published the SNPRM on January
19, 2017, and the comment period was
scheduled to close on March 20, 2017.
The suspension of the comment period
will allow the President’s appointees
the opportunity to review and consider
this action.
DATES: The comment period for the
SNPRM published January 19, 2017 (82
FR 7536) is indefinitely suspended
effective March 14, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Docket: For access to the
docket to read background documents
and comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or to the street
address listed above. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kimberly Graber or Blane A. Workie,
Office of the Assistant General Counsel
for Aviation Enforcement and
Proceedings, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave.
SE., Washington, DC 20590, 202–366–
9342 (phone), kimberly.graber@dot.gov
or blane.workie@dot.gov (email).
Jkt 241001
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone for
certain waters of the Housatonic River.
This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on these navigable
waters near Milford and Stratford, CT,
during the United Illuminating
Company Housatonic River Crossing
Project from April 26, 2017 to May 4,
2017, and from July 29, 2017 to August
3, 2017. This proposed rulemaking
would prohibit entry of vessels or
people into the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Long Island Sound or a designated
representative. The safety zone will only
be enforced during cable pulling
operations or other instances which may
create a hazard to navigation. We invite
your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
SUMMARY:
RIN 2105–AE56
SUMMARY:
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive Order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
NAD 83 North American Datum 1983
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0825]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
rmajette on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
I. Table of Abbreviations
33 CFR Part 165
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
15:12 Mar 13, 2017
[FR Doc. 2017–04674 Filed 3–13–17; 8:45 am]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Coast Guard
[FR Doc. 2017–04957 Filed 3–13–17; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Issued this 2nd day of March 2017, in
Washington, DC.
Judith S. Kaleta,
Deputy General Counsel.
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before April 13, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2016–0825 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
DATES:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Petty Officer
Katherine Linnick, Prevention
Department, Coast Guard Sector Long
Island Sound, telephone (203) 468–
4565, email Katherine.E.Linnick@
uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 14, 2017 / Proposed Rules
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a
safety zone from 8:00 a.m. on April 26,
2017 through 6:00 p.m. on May 4, 2017,
and from 8:00 a.m. on July 29, 2017
through 6:00 p.m. on August 3, 2017.
The safety zone will cover all navigable
waters of the Housatonic River near
Milford and Stratford, CT contained
within the following area: Beginning at
a point on land in position at 41°12′17″
N., 073°06′40″ W. near the Governor
John Davis Lodge Turnpike (I–95)
Bridge; then northeast across the
Housatonic River to a point on land in
position at 41°12′20″ N., 073°06′29″ W.
near the Governor John Davis Lodge
Turnpike (I–95) Bridge; then northwest
along the shoreline to a point on land
in position at 41°12′25″ N., 073°06′31″
W.; then southwest across the
Housatonic River to a point on land in
position at 41°12′22″ N., 073°06′43″ W.;
then southeast along the shoreline back
to point of origin (NAD 83). All
positions are approximate. The duration
of the zone is intended to ensure the
safety of vessels and these navigable
waters within the work zone before,
during, and after each messenger
pulling operation or during any instance
that necessitates a temporary closure of
the Housatonic River at the work site.
No vessel or person will be permitted to
enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. The safety
zone will only be enforced during when
project work causes a potential hazard
to navigation. The Coast Guard will
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16 eight hours
in advance of any scheduled
enforcement period. The regulatory text
we are proposing appears at the end of
this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
rmajette on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance
of quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM
has not been designated a ‘‘significant
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Mar 13, 2017
Jkt 241001
regulatory action,’’ under E.O. 12866.
Accordingly, this NPRM has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, and
duration of the safety zone. Vessel
traffic would be able to safely transit
around this safety zone, which would
affect a small designated area of the
Housatonic River for less than one hour
at a time. It also may be enforced
temporarily during the cable crossing
project if necessitated by an emergency.
Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue
a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the
zone, and the rule would allow vessels
to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13573
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has
a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in E.O. 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, because it
would not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves a safety zone enforced for less
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
13574
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 14, 2017 / Proposed Rules
than one hour at a time that would
prohibit entry within the work zone
during each messenger pulling
operation. It also may be enforced
temporarily during the cable-crossing
project if necessitated by an emergency,
such as equipment falling from the
towers into the Housatonic River.
Normally such actions are categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A
preliminary environmental analysis
checklist is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
rmajette on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
Management System in the March 24,
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Mar 13, 2017
Jkt 241001
and can be viewed by following that
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–0825 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T01–0825 Safety Zone; United
Illuminating Company Housatonic River
Crossing Project; Housatonic River; Milford
and Stratford, CT.
(a) Location: The following area is
included with this safety zone:
(1) All navigable waters of the
Housatonic River near Milford and
Stratford, CT contained within the
following area; beginning at a point on
land in position at 41°12′17″ N.,
073°06′40″ W. near the Governor John
Davis Lodge Turnpike (I–95) Bridge;
then northeast across the Housatonic
River to a point on land in position at
41°12′20″ N., 073°06′29″ W. near the
Governor John Davis Lodge Turnpike (I–
95) Bridge; then northwest along the
shoreline to a point on land in position
at 41°12′25″ N., 073°06′31″ W.; then
southwest across the Housatonic River
to a point on land in position at
41°12′22″ N., 073°06′43″ W.; then
southeast along the shoreline back to
point of origin (NAD 83).
(2) All positions are approximate.
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period:
This rule will be effective from 8:00 a.m.
on April 26, 2017 to 6:00 p.m. on May
4, 2017, and from 8:00 a.m. on July 29,
2017 to 6:00 p.m. on August 3, 2017.
Vessel traffic would be able to safely
transit around this safety zone, which
would affect a small designated area of
the Housatonic River for less than one
hour at a time. It also may be enforced
temporarily during the cable crossing
cable-crossing project if necessitated by
an emergency. The Coast Guard will
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16 eight hours
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
in advance to any scheduled period of
enforcement or as soon as practicable in
response to an emergency.
(c) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section: A
‘‘designated representative’’ is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant or petty
officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has
been designated by the COTP, Sector
Long Island Sound, to act on his or her
behalf. The designated representative
may be on an official patrol vessel or
may be on shore and will communicate
with vessels via VHF–FM radio or
loudhailer. ‘‘Official patrol vessels’’ may
consist of any Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, state, or local law
enforcement vessels assigned or
approved by the COTP Sector Long
Island Sound. In addition, members of
the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be
present to inform vessel operators of
this regulation. A ‘‘work vessel’’ is any
vessel provided by United Illuminating
Company for the Housatonic River
Crossing Project and may be hailed via
VHF channel 13 or 16.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23
apply.
(2) In accordance with the general
regulations in 33 CFR 165.23, entry into
or movement within this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Long Island Sound.
(3) Operators of vessels desiring to
enter or operate within the safety zone
should contact the COTP Sector Long
Island Sound at 203–468–4401 (Sector
LIS command center), or the designated
representative via VHF channel 16 to
obtain permission to do so. Request to
enter or operate in the safety zone must
be made 24 hours in advanced of the
planned undertaking.
(4) Mariners are requested to proceed
with caution after passing arrangements
have been made. Mariners are requested
to cooperate with the United
Illuminating Company work vessels for
the safety of all concerned. The United
Illuminating Company work vessels will
be monitoring VHF channels 13 and 16.
Mariners are requested to proceed with
extreme caution and operate at their
slowest safe speed as to not cause a
wake.
(5) Any vessel given permission to
enter or operate in the safety zone must
comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP Sector Long Island
Sound, or the designated on-scene
representative.
(6) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast
Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing
light or other means, the operator of the
vessel shall proceed as directed.
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 14, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Dated: February 24, 2017.
A.E. Tucci,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Long Island Sound.
[FR Doc. 2017–04978 Filed 3–13–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
49 CFR Chapter XII
[Docket No. TSA–2016–0002]
RIN 1652–AA56
Surface Transportation Vulnerability
Assessments and Security Plans
(VASP); Reopening of Comment Period
Transportation Security
Administration, DHS.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking; reopening of comment
period.
AGENCY:
The Transportation Security
Administration is reopening the
comment period for the advance notice
of proposed rulemaking, published in
the Federal Register on December 16,
2016, requesting public comments on
several topics relevant to the
development of surface transportation
vulnerability assessment and security
plan regulations mandated by the
Implementing Recommendations of the
9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (9/11
Act). TSA is reopening the comment
period for an additional 60 days due to
several requests by commenters in the
rulemaking docket.
DATES: The comment period for the
proposed rule published in the Federal
rmajette on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Mar 13, 2017
Jkt 241001
Register on December 16, 2016 (81 FR
91401) is reopened. Comments must be
received by May 15, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by the TSA docket number to
this rulemaking, to the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS), a
government-wide, electronic docket
management system, using any one of
the following methods:
Electronically: You may submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail, In Person, or Fax: Address,
hand-deliver, or fax your written
comments to the Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590–0001; fax (202) 493–2251. The
Department of Transportation (DOT),
which maintains and processes TSA’s
official regulatory dockets, will scan the
submission and post it to FDMS.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Harry Schultz (TSA Office of Security
Policy and Industry Engagement) or
Traci Klemm (TSA Office of the Chief
Counsel) at telephone (571) 227–3531 or
email to VASPPOLICY@tsa.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 16, 2016, TSA published an
advance notice of proposed rulemaking
(ANPRM) in the Federal Register (81 FR
91401), requesting public comments on
several topics relevant to the
development of surface transportation
vulnerability assessment and security
plan regulations mandated by the
Implementing Recommendations of the
9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (9/11
Act). Based on its regular interaction
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
13575
with stakeholders, TSA assumes many
higher-risk railroads (freight and
passenger), public transportation
agencies, and over-the-road buses
(OTRBs) have implemented security
programs with security measures similar
to those identified by the 9/11 Act’s
regulatory requirements. In general,
TSA is requesting information on three
types of issues: (1) Existing practices,
standards, tools, or other resources used
or available for conducting vulnerability
assessments and developing security
plans; (2) information on existing
security measures, including whether
implemented voluntarily or in response
to other regulatory requirements, and
the potential impact of additional
requirements on operations; and (3)
information on the scope/cost of current
security systems and other measures
used to provide security and mitigate
vulnerabilities. This information is
necessary for TSA to establish the
current baseline, estimate cost of
implementing the statutory mandate,
and develop appropriate performance
standards.
The comment period closed on
February 14, 2017. TSA received
multiple requests to extend the
comment period. TSA believes
reopening the comment period is
necessary to meet the intended purpose
of the ANPRM—to obtain information
and perspectives from potentially
regulated entities. Please see the
ANPRM for additional background.
Dated: March 6, 2017.
Huban A. Gowadia,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017–04976 Filed 3–13–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–05–P
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 14, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13572-13575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-04978]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2016-0825]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; United Illuminating Company Housatonic River
Crossing Project; Housatonic River; Milford and Stratford, CT
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
for certain waters of the Housatonic River. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters near Milford
and Stratford, CT, during the United Illuminating Company Housatonic
River Crossing Project from April 26, 2017 to May 4, 2017, and from
July 29, 2017 to August 3, 2017. This proposed rulemaking would
prohibit entry of vessels or people into the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Long Island Sound or a designated
representative. The safety zone will only be enforced during cable
pulling operations or other instances which may create a hazard to
navigation. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before April 13, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2016-0825 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Petty Officer Katherine Linnick,
Prevention Department, Coast Guard Sector Long Island Sound, telephone
(203) 468-4565, email Katherine.E.Linnick@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive Order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
NAD 83 North American Datum 1983
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
This rulemaking proposes to establish a safety zone for certain
waters of the Housatonic River near Milford and Stratford, CT.
Corresponding regulatory history is discussed below.
On August 25, 2016, United Illuminating Company notified the Coast
Guard that it would conduct a project involving the installation of new
transmission conductors over the Housatonic River near Stratford and
Milford, CT. On December 13, 2016, the Coast Guard published a
temporary final rule entitled, ``Safety Zone; United Illuminating
Company Housatonic River Crossing Project; Housatonic River, Milford
and Stratford, CT'' in the Federal Register (81 FR 89862).
The project is scheduled to be completed in two phases, the first
being the stringing of optical fiber ground wires on the North circuit
from April 26, 2017 to May 4, 2017. The second phase will include the
stringing of optical fiber ground wires on the South circuit from July
29, 2017 to August 3, 2017. The proposed work area is between the
eastern and western shores of the Housatonic River from the southern
boundary of the Metro-North Rail Bridge. It extends approximately 525
feet upstream for the northern boundary. Potential hazards from this
project include entanglement of vessels with the messenger line and
falling equipment from the electrical towers. The Captain of the Port
Long Island Sound (COTP) has determined that the potential hazards
associated with the cable crossing project could be a safety concern
for anyone within the proposed work area.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the navigable waters within the work zone before, during, and after
each messenger pulling operation. The Coast Guard proposes this
rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR
1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize the Coast Guard to
define regulatory safety zones.
[[Page 13573]]
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone from 8:00 a.m. on
April 26, 2017 through 6:00 p.m. on May 4, 2017, and from 8:00 a.m. on
July 29, 2017 through 6:00 p.m. on August 3, 2017. The safety zone will
cover all navigable waters of the Housatonic River near Milford and
Stratford, CT contained within the following area: Beginning at a point
on land in position at 41[deg]12'17'' N., 073[deg]06'40'' W. near the
Governor John Davis Lodge Turnpike (I-95) Bridge; then northeast across
the Housatonic River to a point on land in position at 41[deg]12'20''
N., 073[deg]06'29'' W. near the Governor John Davis Lodge Turnpike (I-
95) Bridge; then northwest along the shoreline to a point on land in
position at 41[deg]12'25'' N., 073[deg]06'31'' W.; then southwest
across the Housatonic River to a point on land in position at
41[deg]12'22'' N., 073[deg]06'43'' W.; then southeast along the
shoreline back to point of origin (NAD 83). All positions are
approximate. The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the safety
of vessels and these navigable waters within the work zone before,
during, and after each messenger pulling operation or during any
instance that necessitates a temporary closure of the Housatonic River
at the work site. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative. The safety zone will only be enforced during when
project work causes a potential hazard to navigation. The Coast Guard
will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16
eight hours in advance of any scheduled enforcement period. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and executive orders, and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both
costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of
promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated a
``significant regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, this
NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the safety zone. Vessel traffic would be able
to safely transit around this safety zone, which would affect a small
designated area of the Housatonic River for less than one hour at a
time. It also may be enforced temporarily during the cable crossing
project if necessitated by an emergency. Moreover, the Coast Guard
would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16
about the zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek permission to
enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety
zone enforced for less
[[Page 13574]]
than one hour at a time that would prohibit entry within the work zone
during each messenger pulling operation. It also may be enforced
temporarily during the cable-crossing project if necessitated by an
emergency, such as equipment falling from the towers into the
Housatonic River. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of Commandant
Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist
is available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; and Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T01-0825 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-0825 Safety Zone; United Illuminating Company Housatonic
River Crossing Project; Housatonic River; Milford and Stratford, CT.
(a) Location: The following area is included with this safety zone:
(1) All navigable waters of the Housatonic River near Milford and
Stratford, CT contained within the following area; beginning at a point
on land in position at 41[deg]12'17'' N., 073[deg]06'40'' W. near the
Governor John Davis Lodge Turnpike (I-95) Bridge; then northeast across
the Housatonic River to a point on land in position at 41[deg]12'20''
N., 073[deg]06'29'' W. near the Governor John Davis Lodge Turnpike (I-
95) Bridge; then northwest along the shoreline to a point on land in
position at 41[deg]12'25'' N., 073[deg]06'31'' W.; then southwest
across the Housatonic River to a point on land in position at
41[deg]12'22'' N., 073[deg]06'43'' W.; then southeast along the
shoreline back to point of origin (NAD 83).
(2) All positions are approximate.
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period: This rule will be effective
from 8:00 a.m. on April 26, 2017 to 6:00 p.m. on May 4, 2017, and from
8:00 a.m. on July 29, 2017 to 6:00 p.m. on August 3, 2017. Vessel
traffic would be able to safely transit around this safety zone, which
would affect a small designated area of the Housatonic River for less
than one hour at a time. It also may be enforced temporarily during the
cable crossing cable-crossing project if necessitated by an emergency.
The Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM
marine channel 16 eight hours in advance to any scheduled period of
enforcement or as soon as practicable in response to an emergency.
(c) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section: A
``designated representative'' is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant
or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has been designated by the
COTP, Sector Long Island Sound, to act on his or her behalf. The
designated representative may be on an official patrol vessel or may be
on shore and will communicate with vessels via VHF-FM radio or
loudhailer. ``Official patrol vessels'' may consist of any Coast Guard,
Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or local law enforcement vessels assigned
or approved by the COTP Sector Long Island Sound. In addition, members
of the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to inform vessel operators
of this regulation. A ``work vessel'' is any vessel provided by United
Illuminating Company for the Housatonic River Crossing Project and may
be hailed via VHF channel 13 or 16.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR
165.23 apply.
(2) In accordance with the general regulations in 33 CFR 165.23,
entry into or movement within this zone is prohibited unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port, Long Island Sound.
(3) Operators of vessels desiring to enter or operate within the
safety zone should contact the COTP Sector Long Island Sound at 203-
468-4401 (Sector LIS command center), or the designated representative
via VHF channel 16 to obtain permission to do so. Request to enter or
operate in the safety zone must be made 24 hours in advanced of the
planned undertaking.
(4) Mariners are requested to proceed with caution after passing
arrangements have been made. Mariners are requested to cooperate with
the United Illuminating Company work vessels for the safety of all
concerned. The United Illuminating Company work vessels will be
monitoring VHF channels 13 and 16. Mariners are requested to proceed
with extreme caution and operate at their slowest safe speed as to not
cause a wake.
(5) Any vessel given permission to enter or operate in the safety
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the COTP Sector
Long Island Sound, or the designated on-scene representative.
(6) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio,
flashing light or other means, the operator of the vessel shall proceed
as directed.
[[Page 13575]]
Dated: February 24, 2017.
A.E. Tucci,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Long Island
Sound.
[FR Doc. 2017-04978 Filed 3-13-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P