Design of Structures, Components, Equipment, and Systems, 13515-13517 [2017-04844]

Download as PDF mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 47 / Monday, March 13, 2017 / Notices system for any proceeding in which it is participating; and (2) advise the Secretary that the participant will be submitting a petition or other adjudicatory document (even in instances in which the participant, or its counsel or representative, already holds an NRC-issued digital ID certificate). Based upon this information, the Secretary will establish an electronic docket for the hearing in this proceeding if the Secretary has not already established an electronic docket. Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is available on the NRC’s public Web site at http:// www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/ getting-started.html. Once a participant has obtained a digital ID certificate and a docket has been created, the participant can then submit adjudicatory documents. Submissions must be in Portable Document Format (PDF). Additional guidance on PDF submissions is available on the NRC’s public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/ site-help/electronic-sub-ref-mat.html. A filing is considered complete at the time the document is submitted through the NRC’s E-Filing system. To be timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Upon receipt of a transmission, the EFiling system time-stamps the document and sends the submitter an email notice confirming receipt of the document. The E-Filing system also distributes an email notice that provides access to the document to the NRC’s Office of the General Counsel and any others who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the document on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for and receive a digital ID certificate before adjudicatory documents are filed so that they can obtain access to the documents via the E-Filing system. A person filing electronically using the NRC’s adjudicatory E-Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC’s Electronic Filing Help Desk through the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link located on the NRC’s public Web site at http:// www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html, by email to MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call at 1–866–672–7640. The NRC Electronic Filing Help Desk is available between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, excluding government holidays. Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not submitting VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:49 Mar 10, 2017 Jkt 241001 documents electronically must file an exemption request, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing stating why there is good cause for not filing electronically and requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper format. Such filings must be submitted by: (1) First class mail addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Participants filing adjudicatory documents in this manner are responsible for serving the document on all other participants. Filing is considered complete by first-class mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing the document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer, having granted an exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a participant or party to use E-Filing if the presiding officer subsequently determines that the reason for granting the exemption from use of E-Filing no longer exists. Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in the NRC’s electronic hearing docket which is available to the public at https:// adams.nrc.gov/ehd, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the Commission or the presiding officer. If you do not have an NRC-issued digital ID certificate as described above, click cancel when the link requests certificates and you will be automatically directed to the NRC’s electronic hearing dockets where you will be able to access any publicly available documents in a particular hearing docket. Participants are requested not to include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers, home addresses, or personal phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC regulation or other law requires submission of such information. For example, in some instances, individuals provide home addresses in order to demonstrate proximity to a facility or site. With respect to copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve the purpose of the adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use application, participants are requested not to include copyrighted materials in their submission. For further details with respect to this action, see the application for license amendment dated February 23, 2017. PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 13515 Attorney for licensee: Jon P. Christinidis, Expert Attorney— Regulatory, DTE Energy, 688 WCB, One Energy Plaza, Detroit, MI 48226. Acting NRC Branch Chief: Kimberly J. Green. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day of March 2017. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Sujata Goetz, Project Manager, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of New Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2017–04874 Filed 3–10–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC–2015–0229] Design of Structures, Components, Equipment, and Systems Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Standard review plan-final section revision; issuance. AGENCY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing a final revision to sections in Chapter 3, ‘‘Design of Structures, Components, Equipment, and Systems Reactor Coolant System and Connected Systems’’ of NUREG–0800, ‘‘Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: LWR Edition.’’ The changes to these Standard Review Plan (SRP) sections reflect responses to public comments and additional guidance based on current NRC staff review methods and practices based on lessons learned from the NRC’s reviews of design certification and combined license applications completed since the last revision of this chapter. DATES: The effective date of this Standard Review Plan (SRP) update is April 12, 2017. ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2015–0229 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this document using any of the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2015–0229. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM 13MRN1 13516 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 47 / Monday, March 13, 2017 / Notices • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html. To begin the search, select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. For the convenience of the reader, the ADAMS accession numbers are provided in a table in the ‘‘Availability of Documents’’ section of this document. • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Notich, Office of New Reactors, telephone: 301–415–3053; email: Mark.Notich@nrc.gov; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES I. Background On September 29, 2015 (80 FR 58512), the NRC published for public comment the proposed revisions to these sections of the SRP. The staff made changes to the proposed revisions after consideration of comments received from one (1) commenter. A summary of the comments and the staff’s disposition of the comments is available in a separate document, ‘‘Response to Public Comments on Draft Standard Review Plan Section from Chapter 3: Design of Structures, Components, Equipment, and Systems’’ (ADAMS Accession No. ML16133A361). The additional guidance for staff reviews includes the following: • Analytical procedures for piping systems • Torsional effects of eccentric masses • Seismic Category I Buried Piping systems • Interaction of other piping with seismic Category I piping • Additional discussion on Rayleigh damping • Comprehensive forcing function lists for all reactor internals • Scale Model Testing (SMT) results and demonstration of model adequacy These sections have been developed to assist the NRC staff review the design of structures, components, equipment, and systems under parts 50 and 52 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR). The revisions to these SRP sections reflect no changes in staff position; rather they clarify the original intent of these SRP sections using plain language throughout in accordance with the NRC’s Plain Writing Action Plan. Additionally, these revisions reflect operating experience, lessons learned, and updated guidance since the last revision, and address the applicability of regulatory treatment of non-safety systems where appropriate. Details of specific changes in the proposed revisions are included at the end of each of the proposed sections. Following the NRC staff’s evaluation of public comments, the NRC intends to finalize the proposed revisions of the subject SRP Sections in ADAMS and post them on the NRC’s public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/nuregs/staff/sr0800/. II. Backfitting and Finality Provisions Issuance of these revised SRP sections does not constitute backfitting as defined in § 50.109 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), ‘‘Backfitting,’’ (the Backfit Rule) or otherwise be inconsistent with the issue finality provisions in 10 CFR part 52. The NRC’s position is based upon the following considerations. 1. The SRP positions do not constitute backfitting, inasmuch as the SRP is internal guidance directed at the NRC staff with respect to their regulatory responsibilities. The SRP provides guidance to the staff on how to review an application for the NRC’s regulatory approval in the form of licensing. Changes in internal staff guidance are not matters for which either nuclear power plant applicants or licensees are protected under either the Backfit Rule or the issue finality provisions of 10 CFR part 52. 2. The NRC staff has no intention to impose the SRP positions on current licensees and regulatory approvals either now or in the future. The staff does not intend to impose or apply the positions described in the SRP to existing (already issued) licenses and regulatory approvals. Therefore, the issuance of a final SRP—even if considered guidance that is within the purview of the issue finality provisions in 10 CFR part 52—need not be evaluated as if it were a backfit or as being inconsistent with issue finality provisions. If, in the future, the staff seeks to impose a position in the SRP on holders of already issued licenses in a manner which does not provide issue finality as described in the applicable issue finality provision, then the staff must make the showing as set forth in the Backfit Rule or address the criteria for avoiding issue finality as described in the applicable issue finality provision. 3. Backfitting and issue finality do not—with limited exceptions not applicable here—protect current or future applicants. Applicants and potential applicants are not, with certain exceptions, protected by either the Backfit Rule or any issue finality provisions under 10 CFR part 52. This is because neither the Backfit Rule nor the issue finality provisions under 10 CFR part 52—with certain exclusions discussed in the next paragraph—were intended to apply to every NRC action which substantially changes the expectations of current and future applicants. The exceptions to the general principle are applicable whenever an applicant references a 10 CFR part 52 license (e.g., an early site permit) and/ or NRC regulatory approval (e.g., a design certification rule) with specified issue finality provisions. The staff does not, at this time, intend to impose the positions represented in the SRP in a manner that is inconsistent with any issue finality provisions. If, in the future, the staff seeks to impose a position in the SRP in a manner which does not provide issue finality as described in the applicable issue finality provision, then the staff must address the criteria for avoiding issue finality as described in the applicable issue finality provision. III. Congressional Review Act This action is a rule as defined in the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801–808). However, the Office of Management and Budget has not found it to be a major rule as defined in the Congressional Review Act. IV. Availability of Documents The documents identified in the following table are available to interested persons through one or more of the following methods, as indicated. ADAMS Accession No. Document Section 3.9.2, ‘‘Dynamic Testing and Analysis of Systems, Structures, and Components’’ ........................................................... VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:49 Mar 10, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM 13MRN1 ML16133A418 13517 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 47 / Monday, March 13, 2017 / Notices ADAMS Accession No. Document Section 3.9.4, ‘‘Control Rod Drive Systems’’ ................................................................................................................................... Section 3.9.5, ‘‘Reactor Pressure Vessel Internals’’ ........................................................................................................................ Section 3.9.6, ‘‘Functional Design, Qualification, and Inservice Testing Programs for Pumps, Valves, and Dynamic Restraints’’ ML16133A472 ML16134A059 ML16134A116 * No changes resulting from public comments. See documents in the package at ADAMS Accession Number ML16133A148 to see changes made since last revision. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day of March 2017. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Joseph Colaccino, Chief, New Reactor Rulemaking and Guidance Branch, Division of Engineering, Infrastructure and Advanced Reactors, Office of New Reactors. [FR Doc. 2017–04844 Filed 3–10–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Submission for Review: Letter Reply To Request for Information (RI 20–64); Former Spouse Survivor Annuity Election (RI 20–64A); Information on Electing a Survivor Annuity for Your Former Spouse (RI 20–64B) Office of Personnel Management. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Retirement Services, Office of Personnel Management (OPM) offers the general public and other federal agencies the opportunity to comment on an extension, without change, of a currently approved information collection request (ICR), Letter Reply to Request for Information and Information on Electing a Survivor Annuity for Your Former Spouse. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted until April 12, 2017. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for the Office of Personnel Management or sent via electronic mail to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or faxed to (202) 395–6974. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A copy of this ICR, with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by contacting the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for the Office of Personnel Management or sent via mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:49 Mar 10, 2017 Jkt 241001 electronic mail to oira_submission@ omb.eop.gov or faxed to (202) 395–6974. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35) as amended by the ClingerCohen Act (Pub. L. 104–106), OPM is soliciting comments for this collection. The information collection (OMB No. 3206–0235) was previously published in the Federal Register on September 21, 2016 at 81 FR 64957 allowing for a 60day public comment period. No comments were received for this information collection. The purpose of this notice is to allow an additional 30 days for public comments. The Office of Management and Budget is particularly interested in comments that: 1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; 2. Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; 3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and 4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submissions of responses. Form RI 20–64, Letter Reply to Request for Information, is used by the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) to provide information about the amount of annuity payable after a survivor reduction, to explain the annuity reductions required to pay for the survivor benefit, and to give the beginning rate of survivor annuity. Form RI 20–64A, Former Spouse Survivor Annuity Election, is used by the CSRS to obtain a survivor benefit election from annuitants who are eligible to elect to provide survivor benefits for a former spouse. Form RI 20–64B, Information on PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Electing a Survivor Annuity for Your Former Spouse, is a pamphlet that provides important information to retirees under the CSRS who want to provide a survivor annuity for a former spouse. Analysis Agency: Retirement Operations, Retirement Services, Office of Personnel Management. Title: Letter Reply to Request for Information; Former Spouse Survivor Annuity Election. OMB Number: 3206–0235. Frequency: On occasion. Affected Public: Individual or Households. Number of Respondents: 38. Estimated Time per Respondent: 45 minutes for RI 20–64A and 8 minutes for RI 20–64. Total Burden Hours: 24 hours. U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Kathleen McGettigan, Acting Director. [FR Doc. 2017–04896 Filed 3–10–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6325–38–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–80004A; File No. SR– FINRA–2016–047] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend FINRA Rules To Conform to the Commission’s Proposed Amendment to Commission Rule 15c6–1(a) and the Industry-Led Initiative To Shorten the Standard Settlement Cycle for Most BrokerDealer Transactions From T+3 to T+2; Correction March 6, 2017. Securities and Exchange Commission. ACTION: Order; correction. AGENCY: The Securities and Exchange Commission published a document in the Federal Register on February 15, 2017, concerning an Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change to SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM 13MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 47 (Monday, March 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13515-13517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-04844]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[NRC-2015-0229]


Design of Structures, Components, Equipment, and Systems

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Standard review plan-final section revision; issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing a 
final revision to sections in Chapter 3, ``Design of Structures, 
Components, Equipment, and Systems Reactor Coolant System and Connected 
Systems'' of NUREG-0800, ``Standard Review Plan for the Review of 
Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: LWR Edition.'' The 
changes to these Standard Review Plan (SRP) sections reflect responses 
to public comments and additional guidance based on current NRC staff 
review methods and practices based on lessons learned from the NRC's 
reviews of design certification and combined license applications 
completed since the last revision of this chapter.

DATES: The effective date of this Standard Review Plan (SRP) update is 
April 12, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2015-0229 when contacting the 
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You 
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document 
using any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0229. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact 
the individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section 
of this document.

[[Page 13516]]

     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and 
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, 
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. For 
the convenience of the reader, the ADAMS accession numbers are provided 
in a table in the ``Availability of Documents'' section of this 
document.
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Notich, Office of New Reactors, 
telephone: 301-415-3053; email: Mark.Notich@nrc.gov; U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On September 29, 2015 (80 FR 58512), the NRC published for public 
comment the proposed revisions to these sections of the SRP. The staff 
made changes to the proposed revisions after consideration of comments 
received from one (1) commenter. A summary of the comments and the 
staff's disposition of the comments is available in a separate 
document, ``Response to Public Comments on Draft Standard Review Plan 
Section from Chapter 3: Design of Structures, Components, Equipment, 
and Systems'' (ADAMS Accession No. ML16133A361). The additional 
guidance for staff reviews includes the following:

 Analytical procedures for piping systems
 Torsional effects of eccentric masses
 Seismic Category I Buried Piping systems
 Interaction of other piping with seismic Category I piping
 Additional discussion on Rayleigh damping
 Comprehensive forcing function lists for all reactor internals
 Scale Model Testing (SMT) results and demonstration of model 
adequacy

    These sections have been developed to assist the NRC staff review 
the design of structures, components, equipment, and systems under 
parts 50 and 52 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 
CFR). The revisions to these SRP sections reflect no changes in staff 
position; rather they clarify the original intent of these SRP sections 
using plain language throughout in accordance with the NRC's Plain 
Writing Action Plan. Additionally, these revisions reflect operating 
experience, lessons learned, and updated guidance since the last 
revision, and address the applicability of regulatory treatment of non-
safety systems where appropriate. Details of specific changes in the 
proposed revisions are included at the end of each of the proposed 
sections.
    Following the NRC staff's evaluation of public comments, the NRC 
intends to finalize the proposed revisions of the subject SRP Sections 
in ADAMS and post them on the NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr0800/.

II. Backfitting and Finality Provisions

    Issuance of these revised SRP sections does not constitute 
backfitting as defined in Sec.  50.109 of title 10 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), ``Backfitting,'' (the Backfit Rule) or 
otherwise be inconsistent with the issue finality provisions in 10 CFR 
part 52. The NRC's position is based upon the following considerations.
    1. The SRP positions do not constitute backfitting, inasmuch as the 
SRP is internal guidance directed at the NRC staff with respect to 
their regulatory responsibilities.
    The SRP provides guidance to the staff on how to review an 
application for the NRC's regulatory approval in the form of licensing. 
Changes in internal staff guidance are not matters for which either 
nuclear power plant applicants or licensees are protected under either 
the Backfit Rule or the issue finality provisions of 10 CFR part 52.
    2. The NRC staff has no intention to impose the SRP positions on 
current licensees and regulatory approvals either now or in the future.
    The staff does not intend to impose or apply the positions 
described in the SRP to existing (already issued) licenses and 
regulatory approvals. Therefore, the issuance of a final SRP--even if 
considered guidance that is within the purview of the issue finality 
provisions in 10 CFR part 52--need not be evaluated as if it were a 
backfit or as being inconsistent with issue finality provisions. If, in 
the future, the staff seeks to impose a position in the SRP on holders 
of already issued licenses in a manner which does not provide issue 
finality as described in the applicable issue finality provision, then 
the staff must make the showing as set forth in the Backfit Rule or 
address the criteria for avoiding issue finality as described in the 
applicable issue finality provision.
    3. Backfitting and issue finality do not--with limited exceptions 
not applicable here--protect current or future applicants.
    Applicants and potential applicants are not, with certain 
exceptions, protected by either the Backfit Rule or any issue finality 
provisions under 10 CFR part 52. This is because neither the Backfit 
Rule nor the issue finality provisions under 10 CFR part 52--with 
certain exclusions discussed in the next paragraph--were intended to 
apply to every NRC action which substantially changes the expectations 
of current and future applicants.
    The exceptions to the general principle are applicable whenever an 
applicant references a 10 CFR part 52 license (e.g., an early site 
permit) and/or NRC regulatory approval (e.g., a design certification 
rule) with specified issue finality provisions. The staff does not, at 
this time, intend to impose the positions represented in the SRP in a 
manner that is inconsistent with any issue finality provisions. If, in 
the future, the staff seeks to impose a position in the SRP in a manner 
which does not provide issue finality as described in the applicable 
issue finality provision, then the staff must address the criteria for 
avoiding issue finality as described in the applicable issue finality 
provision.

III. Congressional Review Act

    This action is a rule as defined in the Congressional Review Act (5 
U.S.C. 801-808). However, the Office of Management and Budget has not 
found it to be a major rule as defined in the Congressional Review Act.

IV. Availability of Documents

    The documents identified in the following table are available to 
interested persons through one or more of the following methods, as 
indicated.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Document                        ADAMS Accession No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 3.9.2, ``Dynamic Testing and      ML16133A418
 Analysis of Systems, Structures, and
 Components''.

[[Page 13517]]

 
Section 3.9.4, ``Control Rod Drive        ML16133A472
 Systems''.
Section 3.9.5, ``Reactor Pressure Vessel  ML16134A059
 Internals''.
Section 3.9.6, ``Functional Design,       ML16134A116
 Qualification, and Inservice Testing
 Programs for Pumps, Valves, and Dynamic
 Restraints''.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* No changes resulting from public comments. See documents in the
  package at ADAMS Accession Number ML16133A148 to see changes made
  since last revision.


    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day of March 2017.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph Colaccino,
Chief, New Reactor Rulemaking and Guidance Branch, Division of 
Engineering, Infrastructure and Advanced Reactors, Office of New 
Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2017-04844 Filed 3-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7590-01-P