Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision Approval, Mecklenburg County, State of North Carolina, 13338-13339 [2017-04717]
Download as PDF
13338
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 46 / Friday, March 10, 2017 / Notices
transconf/pastsips.htm. The adequate
MVEBs are provided in Table 1 below:
TABLE 1—KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE
1997 ANNUAL PM2.5 MVEBS
[Tons per year or tpy]
2014
PM2.5 ................
NOX ...................
2028
444.78
15,597.73
* 245.00
* 7,171.14
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
* This includes a safety margin of 10.39 tpy
for PM2.5 and 2,613.27 tpy for NOX in 2028.
Transportation conformity is required
by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act.
EPA’s conformity rule, 40 CFR part 93,
requires that transportation plans,
programs, and projects conform to state
air quality implementation plans and
establishes the criteria and procedures
for determining whether or not they do
so. Conformity to a SIP means that
transportation activities will not
produce new air quality violations,
worsen existing violations, or delay
timely attainment of the NAAQS.
The criteria by which EPA determines
whether a SIP’s MVEBs are adequate for
transportation conformity purposes are
outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). We
have also described the process for
determining the adequacy of submitted
SIP budgets in our July 1, 2004 (69 FR
40004), final rulemaking entitled,
‘‘Transportation Conformity Rule
Amendments for the New 8-Hour Ozone
and PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality
Standards and Miscellaneous Revisions
for Existing Areas; Transportation
Conformity Rule Amendments:
Response to Court Decision and
Additional Rule Changes.’’ Please note
that an adequacy review is separate
from EPA’s completeness review, and it
should not be used to prejudge EPA’s
ultimate approval of Tennessee’s 1997
Annual PM2.5 SIP revision for the
Knoxville Area. Even if EPA finds a
budget adequate, the SIP revision could
later be disapproved.
Within 24 months from the effective
date of this notice or until such time
that the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS is revoked
for the Knoxville Area, the
transportation partners will need to
demonstrate conformity to the new
MVEBs, if the demonstration has not
already been made, pursuant to 40 CFR
93.104(e). See 73 FR 4419 (January 24,
2008).
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: February 15, 2017.
Kenneth R. Lapierre,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2017–04681 Filed 3–9–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:37 Mar 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–9032–1]
Environmental Impact Statements;
Notice of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal
Activities, General Information (202)
564–7146 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact
Statements (EISs)
Filed 02/27/2017 Through 03/03/2017
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
Notice
Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act
requires that EPA make public its
comments on EISs issued by other
Federal agencies. EPA’s comment letters
on EISs are available at: https://
www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/
eisdata.html.
EIS No. 20170029, Draft, FERC, WV,
Mountaineer and Gulf XPress
Projects, Comment Period Ends: 04/
24/2017, Contact: Julia Yuan 202–
502–8130 EIS No. 20170030, Final,
BOEM, Other, Gulf of Mexico OCS Oil
and Gas 2017–2022 Multisale, Review
Period Ends: 04/09/2017, Contact:
Greg Kozlowski 504–736–2512
EIS No. 20170031, Draft, USFS, ID, Big
Creek Hot Springs Geothermal
Leasing, Comment Period Ends: 04/
24/2017, Contact: Julie Hopkins 208–
756–5279
Dated: March 6, 2017.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance
Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2017–04760 Filed 3–9–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[9956–84–OEI]
Cross-Media Electronic Reporting:
Authorized Program Revision
Approval, Mecklenburg County, State
of North Carolina
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces EPA’s
approval of Mecklenburg County’s
request to revise/modify certain of its
EPA-authorized programs to allow
electronic reporting.
DATES: EPA’s approval is effective
March 10, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen Seeh, US Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Environmental Information, Mail Stop
2823T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566–1175,
seeh.karen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media
Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR)
was published in the Federal Register
(70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of
title 40 of the CFR. CROMERR
establishes electronic reporting as an
acceptable regulatory alternative to
paper reporting and establishes
requirements to assure that electronic
documents are as legally dependable as
their paper counterparts. Subpart D of
CROMERR requires that state, tribal or
local government agencies that receive,
or wish to begin receiving, electronic
reports under their EPA-authorized
programs must apply to EPA for a
revision or modification of those
programs and obtain EPA approval.
Subpart D provides standards for such
approvals based on consideration of the
electronic document receiving systems
that the state, tribe, or local government
will use to implement the electronic
reporting. Additionally, § 3.1000(b)
through (e) of 40 CFR part 3, subpart D
provides special procedures for program
revisions and modifications to allow
electronic reporting, to be used at the
option of the state, tribe or local
government in place of procedures
available under existing programspecific authorization regulations. An
application submitted under the subpart
D procedures must show that the state,
tribe or local government has sufficient
legal authority to implement the
electronic reporting components of the
programs covered by the application
and will use electronic document
receiving systems that meet the
applicable subpart D requirements.
Once an authorized program has EPA’s
approval to accept electronic documents
under certain programs, CROMERR
§ 3.1000(a)(4) requires that the program
keep EPA apprised of any changes to
laws, policies, or the electronic
document receiving systems that have
the potential to affect the program’s
compliance with CROMERR § 3.2000.
On June 30, 2016, the Mecklenburg
County Land Use & Environmental
Services Agency (LUESA) submitted an
application titled ‘‘GovOnline System’’
for revisions/modifications to its EPAapproved programs under title 40 CFR
to allow new electronic reporting. EPA
reviewed LUESA’s request to revise/
modify its EPA-authorized programs
and, based on this review, EPA
determined that the application met the
standards for approval of authorized
program revisions/modifications set out
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 46 / Friday, March 10, 2017 / Notices
in 40 CFR part 3, subpart D. In
accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(d), this
notice of EPA’s decision to approve
North Carolina’s request to revise/
modify its following EPA-authorized
programs to allow electronic reporting
under 40 CFR parts 50 through 52, 61,
63, 65, and 70 is being published in the
Federal Register.
LUESA was notified of EPA’s
determination to approve its application
with respect to the authorized programs
listed above.
Matthew Leopard,
Director, Office of Information Management.
[FR Doc. 2017–04717 Filed 3–9–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2016–0697; FRL–9958–32]
Certain New Chemicals; Receipt and
Status Information for December 2016
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
EPA is required under the
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to
publish in the Federal Register a notice
of receipt of a premanufacture notice
(PMN); an application for a test
marketing exemption (TME), both
pending and/or expired; and a periodic
status report on any new chemicals
under EPA review and the receipt of
notices of commencement (NOC) to
manufacture those chemicals. This
document covers the period from
December 1, 2016 to December 30, 2016.
DATES: Comments identified by the
specific case number provided in this
document, must be received on or
before April 10, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2016–0697,
and the specific PMN number or TME
number for the chemical related to your
comment, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: Document Control Office
(7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:37 Mar 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical information contact: Jim
Rahai, IMD 7407M, Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001;
telephone number: (202) 564–8593;
email address: rahai.jim@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; email address: TSCAHotline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public
in general. As such, the Agency has not
attempted to describe the specific
entities that this action may apply to.
Although others may be affected, this
action applies directly to the submitters
of the actions addressed in this
document.
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When preparing and submitting your
comments, see the commenting tips at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
comments.html.
II. What action is the Agency taking?
This document provides receipt and
status reports, which cover the period
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13339
from December 1, 2016 to December 30,
2016, and consists of the PMNs and
TMEs both pending and/or expired, and
the NOCs to manufacture a new
chemical that the Agency has received
under TSCA section 5 during this time
period.
III. What is the Agency’s authority for
taking this action?
Under TSCA, 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.,
EPA classifies a chemical substance as
either an ‘‘existing’’ chemical or a
‘‘new’’ chemical. Any chemical
substance that is not on EPA’s TSCA
Inventory is classified as a ‘‘new
chemical,’’ while those that are on the
TSCA Inventory are classified as an
‘‘existing chemical.’’ For more
information about the TSCA Inventory,
please go to: https://www.epa.gov/
opptintr/newchems/pubs/
inventory.htm.
Anyone who plans to manufacture or
import a new chemical substance for a
non-exempt commercial purpose is
required by TSCA section 5 to provide
EPA with a PMN, before initiating the
activity. Section 5(h)(1) of TSCA
authorizes EPA to allow persons, upon
application, to manufacture (includes
import) or process a new chemical
substance, or a chemical substance
subject to a significant new use rule
(SNUR) issued under TSCA section 5(a),
for ‘‘test marketing’’ purposes, which is
referred to as a test marketing
exemption, or TME. For more
information about the requirements
applicable to a new chemical go to:
https://www.epa.gov/oppt/newchems.
Under TSCA sections 5(d)(2) and
5(d)(3), EPA is required to publish in
the Federal Register a notice of receipt
of a PMN or an application for a TME
and to publish in the Federal Register
periodic reports on the status of new
chemicals under review and the receipt
of NOCs to manufacture those
chemicals.
IV. Receipt and Status Reports
As used in each of the tables in this
unit, (S) indicates that the information
in the table is the specific information
provided by the submitter, and (G)
indicates that the information in the
table is generic information because the
specific information provided by the
submitter was claimed as CBI.
For the 65 PMNs received by EPA
during this period, Table 1 provides the
following information (to the extent that
such information is not claimed as CBI):
The EPA case number assigned to the
PMN; The date the PMN was received
by EPA; the projected end date for
EPA’s review of the PMN; the
submitting manufacturer/importer; the
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 46 (Friday, March 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13338-13339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-04717]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[9956-84-OEI]
Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision
Approval, Mecklenburg County, State of North Carolina
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA's approval of Mecklenburg County's
request to revise/modify certain of its EPA-authorized programs to
allow electronic reporting.
DATES: EPA's approval is effective March 10, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Seeh, US Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Mail Stop
2823T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566-
1175, seeh.karen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media
Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR) was published in the Federal
Register (70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of title 40 of the CFR.
CROMERR establishes electronic reporting as an acceptable regulatory
alternative to paper reporting and establishes requirements to assure
that electronic documents are as legally dependable as their paper
counterparts. Subpart D of CROMERR requires that state, tribal or local
government agencies that receive, or wish to begin receiving,
electronic reports under their EPA-authorized programs must apply to
EPA for a revision or modification of those programs and obtain EPA
approval. Subpart D provides standards for such approvals based on
consideration of the electronic document receiving systems that the
state, tribe, or local government will use to implement the electronic
reporting. Additionally, Sec. 3.1000(b) through (e) of 40 CFR part 3,
subpart D provides special procedures for program revisions and
modifications to allow electronic reporting, to be used at the option
of the state, tribe or local government in place of procedures
available under existing program-specific authorization regulations. An
application submitted under the subpart D procedures must show that the
state, tribe or local government has sufficient legal authority to
implement the electronic reporting components of the programs covered
by the application and will use electronic document receiving systems
that meet the applicable subpart D requirements. Once an authorized
program has EPA's approval to accept electronic documents under certain
programs, CROMERR Sec. 3.1000(a)(4) requires that the program keep EPA
apprised of any changes to laws, policies, or the electronic document
receiving systems that have the potential to affect the program's
compliance with CROMERR Sec. 3.2000.
On June 30, 2016, the Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental
Services Agency (LUESA) submitted an application titled ``GovOnline
System'' for revisions/modifications to its EPA-approved programs under
title 40 CFR to allow new electronic reporting. EPA reviewed LUESA's
request to revise/modify its EPA-authorized programs and, based on this
review, EPA determined that the application met the standards for
approval of authorized program revisions/modifications set out
[[Page 13339]]
in 40 CFR part 3, subpart D. In accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(d), this
notice of EPA's decision to approve North Carolina's request to revise/
modify its following EPA-authorized programs to allow electronic
reporting under 40 CFR parts 50 through 52, 61, 63, 65, and 70 is being
published in the Federal Register.
LUESA was notified of EPA's determination to approve its
application with respect to the authorized programs listed above.
Matthew Leopard,
Director, Office of Information Management.
[FR Doc. 2017-04717 Filed 3-9-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P