Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Ventura County Air Pollution Control District; Prevention of Significant Deterioration, 13243-13245 [2017-04680]
Download as PDF
13243
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 46 / Friday, March 10, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED NEVADA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment
area
Name of SIP provision
State submittal
date
EPA approval
date
Explanation
Air Quality Implementation Plan for the State of Nevada 1
*
2012 Revision to the Nevada State Implementation Plan for Carbon
Monoxide, April 2012.
2016 Supplement to Nevada’s 2nd 10-Year
CO Limited Maintenance Plan at Lake
Tahoe, August 26,
2016.
*
*
*
Nevada portion of Lake
Tahoe Basin—portions of Carson City,
Douglas and Washoe
counties.
Nevada portion of Lake
Tahoe Basin—portions of Carson City,
Douglas and Washoe
counties.
*
4/3/2012
8/26/2016
*
*
*
[Insert Federal Register citation] 3/10/
2017).
*
*
Adopted on 4/3/2012. Approval excludes sections 3.2.4 and 4. With 2016 supplement, fulfills requirement for second ten-year maintenance plan.
[Insert Federal Register citation] (3/10/
2017).
Adopted on 8/26/2016. Approval includes revised sections 3.2.4 and 4 (alternative CO
monitoring strategy and contingency plan),
2011 emissions inventory and 2024 projected
emissions inventory (Attachment A), evidence
of public participation (Attachment B) and revised table of contents for 2012 submittal (Attachment F). Excludes Attachments C, D and
E.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
organization of this table generally follows from the organization of the State of Nevada’s original 1972 SIP, which was divided into 12
sections. Nonattainment and maintenance plans, among other types of plans, are listed under Section 5 (Control Strategy). Lead SIPs and Small
Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance SIPs are listed after Section 12 followed by nonregulatory or
quasi-regulatory statutory provisions approved into the SIP. Regulatory statutory provisions are listed in 40 CFR 52.1470(c).
1 The
[FR Doc. 2017–04771 Filed 3–9–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0305; FRL–9956–52–
Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan
Revisions, Ventura County Air
Pollution Control District; Prevention
of Significant Deterioration
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve revisions to the Ventura County
Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD
or District) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). The
State of California (State) is required
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act)
SUMMARY:
to adopt and implement a SIP-approved
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) permit program. We are
approving SIP revisions that would
incorporate a PSD rule for the VCAPCD
into the SIP to establish a PSD permit
program for pre-construction review of
certain new and modified major
stationary sources in attainment and
unclassifiable areas within the District.
DATES: This rule will be effective on
April 10, 2017.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0305. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: YaTing (Sheila) Tsai, EPA Region IX, (415)
972–3328, Tsai.Ya-Ting@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA’s Final Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
Table 1 lists the two VCAPCD rules
addressed by our proposed action and
this final action. On September 23,
2016, the EPA proposed to approve
VCAPCD Rule 26.13 into the California
SIP and to remove VCAPCD Rule 26.10
from the California SIP. (See 81 FR
65595.)
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
TABLE 1
Rule No.
Rule title
26.10 ...............................
26.13 ...............................
New Source Review—Prevention of Significant Deterioration ............................................................................................
New Source Review—Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) .................................................................................
We proposed these actions because
we determined that they complied with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:26 Mar 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
Action
the relevant CAA requirements. Our
proposed action contains more
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Remove.
Approve.
information on the rules and our
evaluation.
E:\FR\FM\10MRR1.SGM
10MRR1
13244
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 46 / Friday, March 10, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received no comments.
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
III. EPA’s Final Action
No comments were submitted on the
EPA’s proposed action. Therefore, as
authorized by section 110(k)(3) of the
Act, the EPA is approving VCAPCD
Rule 26.13 into the California SIP and
removing VCAPCD Rule 26.10 from the
California SIP, consistent with our
proposed action.
This SIP revision will be codified in
40 CFR 52.220 by incorporating by
reference Rule 26.13 as listed in Table
1 and deleting without replacement
Rule 26.10 as listed in Table 1. We are
also revising 40 CFR 52.270 to reflect
that upon the effective date of this final
rule, the VCAPCD will have a SIPapproved PSD program and will no
longer be subject to the Federal
Implementation Plan (FIP) at 40 CFR
52.21 for the PSD program. This SIP
revision provides a federally approved
and enforceable mechanism for the
VCAPCD to issue pre-construction PSD
permits for certain new and modified
major stationary sources subject to PSD
review within the District.
As discussed in our proposal, the
VCAPCD requested approval to exercise
its authority to administer the PSD
program with respect to those sources
located in the District that have existing
PSD permits issued by the EPA,
including authority to conduct general
administration of these existing permits,
authority to process and issue any and
all subsequent PSD permit actions
relating to such permits (e.g.,
modifications, amendments, or
revisions of any nature), and authority
to enforce such permits. Pursuant to the
criteria in section 110(a)(2)(E)(i) of the
CAA, we have determined that the
VCAPCD has the authority, personnel,
and funding to implement the PSD
program within the District for existing
EPA-issued PSD permits and therefore
are transferring authority for such
permits to the VCAPCD concurrent with
the effective date of our approval of the
VCAPCD’s PSD program into the SIP.
Our revisions to 40 CFR 52.270 will
reflect this transfer of authority for
existing PSD permits. The EPA intends
to provide a copy of each such permit
to the VCAPCD.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:26 Mar 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
VCAPCD rules described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by May 9, 2017.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Greenhouse gases, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
E:\FR\FM\10MRR1.SGM
10MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 46 / Friday, March 10, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: December 2, 2016.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0539; FRL–9959–19]
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(255)(i)(G)(2) and
(c)(474)(i)(D) to read as follows:
■
Identification of plan—in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(255) * * *
(i) * * *
(G) * * *
(2) Previously approved on December
7, 2000, in paragraph (c)(255)(i)(G)(1) of
this section and now deleted without
replacement Rule 26.10.
*
*
*
*
*
(474) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District.
(1) Rule 26.13, ‘‘New Source
Review—Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD),’’ revised on
November 10, 2015.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 52.270 is amended by
adding paragraph (b)(17) to read as
follows:
Significant deterioration of air
*
Final rule.
This regulation establishes a
time-limited tolerance for residues of
oxytetracycline in or on fruit, citrus,
group 10–10. This action is in response
to EPA’s granting of an emergency
exemption under the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA) authorizing use of the
pesticide in citrus production. This
regulation establishes a maximum
permissible level for residues of
oxytetracycline in or on the
commodities in this crop group. The
time-limited tolerance expires on
December 31, 2019.
SUMMARY:
Subpart F—California
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
40 CFR Part 180
AGENCY:
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
§ 52.270
quality.
I. General Information
Oxytetracycline; Pesticide Tolerances
for Emergency Exemptions
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
§ 52.220
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(17) The PSD program for the Ventura
County Air Pollution Control District
(VCAPCD), as incorporated by reference
in § 52.220(c)(474)(i)(D)(1), is approved
under part C, subpart 1, of the Clean Air
Act. For PSD permits previously issued
by EPA pursuant to § 52.21 to sources
located in the VCAPCD, this approval
includes the authority for the VCAPCD
to conduct general administration of
these existing permits, authority to
process and issue any and all
subsequent permit actions relating to
such permits, and authority to enforce
such permits.
This regulation is effective
March 10, 2017. Objections and requests
for hearings must be received on or
before May 9, 2017, and must be filed
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
DATES:
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0539, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2017–04680 Filed 3–9–17; 8:45 am]
Michael L. Goodis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; main telephone
number: (703) 305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:26 Mar 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
13245
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under section 408(g) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2016–0539 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before May 9, 2017. Addresses for mail
and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2016–0539, by one of the following
methods:
E:\FR\FM\10MRR1.SGM
10MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 46 (Friday, March 10, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13243-13245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-04680]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0305; FRL-9956-52-Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Ventura County Air
Pollution Control District; Prevention of Significant Deterioration
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve revisions to the Ventura County Air Pollution Control
District (VCAPCD or District) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The State of California (State) is required
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) to adopt and implement a SIP-
approved Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit program.
We are approving SIP revisions that would incorporate a PSD rule for
the VCAPCD into the SIP to establish a PSD permit program for pre-
construction review of certain new and modified major stationary
sources in attainment and unclassifiable areas within the District.
DATES: This rule will be effective on April 10, 2017.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0305. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ya-Ting (Sheila) Tsai, EPA Region IX,
(415) 972-3328, Tsai.Ya-Ting@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA's Final Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
Table 1 lists the two VCAPCD rules addressed by our proposed action
and this final action. On September 23, 2016, the EPA proposed to
approve VCAPCD Rule 26.13 into the California SIP and to remove VCAPCD
Rule 26.10 from the California SIP. (See 81 FR 65595.)
Table 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule No. Rule title Action
------------------------------------------------------------------------
26.10........................ New Source Review-- Remove.
Prevention of
Significant
Deterioration.
26.13........................ New Source Review-- Approve.
Prevention of
Significant
Deterioration
(PSD).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed these actions because we determined that they complied
with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action contains more
information on the rules and our evaluation.
[[Page 13244]]
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA's Final Action
No comments were submitted on the EPA's proposed action. Therefore,
as authorized by section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is approving
VCAPCD Rule 26.13 into the California SIP and removing VCAPCD Rule
26.10 from the California SIP, consistent with our proposed action.
This SIP revision will be codified in 40 CFR 52.220 by
incorporating by reference Rule 26.13 as listed in Table 1 and deleting
without replacement Rule 26.10 as listed in Table 1. We are also
revising 40 CFR 52.270 to reflect that upon the effective date of this
final rule, the VCAPCD will have a SIP-approved PSD program and will no
longer be subject to the Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) at 40 CFR
52.21 for the PSD program. This SIP revision provides a federally
approved and enforceable mechanism for the VCAPCD to issue pre-
construction PSD permits for certain new and modified major stationary
sources subject to PSD review within the District.
As discussed in our proposal, the VCAPCD requested approval to
exercise its authority to administer the PSD program with respect to
those sources located in the District that have existing PSD permits
issued by the EPA, including authority to conduct general
administration of these existing permits, authority to process and
issue any and all subsequent PSD permit actions relating to such
permits (e.g., modifications, amendments, or revisions of any nature),
and authority to enforce such permits. Pursuant to the criteria in
section 110(a)(2)(E)(i) of the CAA, we have determined that the VCAPCD
has the authority, personnel, and funding to implement the PSD program
within the District for existing EPA-issued PSD permits and therefore
are transferring authority for such permits to the VCAPCD concurrent
with the effective date of our approval of the VCAPCD's PSD program
into the SIP. Our revisions to 40 CFR 52.270 will reflect this transfer
of authority for existing PSD permits. The EPA intends to provide a
copy of each such permit to the VCAPCD.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
VCAPCD rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office
(please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 9, 2017. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Greenhouse gases, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental
relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic
compounds.
[[Page 13245]]
Dated: December 2, 2016.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(255)(i)(G)(2) and
(c)(474)(i)(D) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan--in part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(255) * * *
(i) * * *
(G) * * *
(2) Previously approved on December 7, 2000, in paragraph
(c)(255)(i)(G)(1) of this section and now deleted without replacement
Rule 26.10.
* * * * *
(474) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) Ventura County Air Pollution Control District.
(1) Rule 26.13, ``New Source Review--Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD),'' revised on November 10, 2015.
* * * * *
0
3. Section 52.270 is amended by adding paragraph (b)(17) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.270 Significant deterioration of air quality.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(17) The PSD program for the Ventura County Air Pollution Control
District (VCAPCD), as incorporated by reference in Sec.
52.220(c)(474)(i)(D)(1), is approved under part C, subpart 1, of the
Clean Air Act. For PSD permits previously issued by EPA pursuant to
Sec. 52.21 to sources located in the VCAPCD, this approval includes
the authority for the VCAPCD to conduct general administration of these
existing permits, authority to process and issue any and all subsequent
permit actions relating to such permits, and authority to enforce such
permits.
[FR Doc. 2017-04680 Filed 3-9-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P