Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney Division Turbofan Engines, 13059-13062 [2017-04627]
Download as PDF
13059
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 82, No. 45
Thursday, March 9, 2017
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–8836; Directorate
Identifier 2016–NE–17–AD; Amendment 39–
18815; AD 2017–05–05]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pratt &
Whitney Division Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all Pratt
& Whitney Division (PW) PW4074,
PW4074D, PW4077, PW4077D,
PW4084D, PW4090, and PW4090–3
turbofan engines. This AD was
prompted by an uncontained failure of
a high-pressure turbine (HPT) hub
during takeoff. This AD requires an
inspection to measure the surface
condition of the aft side web/rim fillet
of HPT 1st stage hubs and removal from
service of hubs that fail inspection. We
are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective April 13,
2017.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of April 13, 2017.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact Pratt
& Whitney Division, 400 Main St., East
Hartford, CT 06118; phone: 800–565–
0140; fax: 860–565–5442. You may view
this service information at the FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
It is also available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
8836.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:49 Mar 08, 2017
Jkt 241001
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
8836; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: JoAnn Theriault, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine
& Propeller Directorate, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:
781–238–7105; fax: 781–238–7199;
email: jo-ann.theriault@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to PW PW4074, PW4074D,
PW4077, PW4077D, PW4084,
PW4084D, PW4090, and PW4090–3
turbofan engines. The NPRM published
in the Federal Register on October 26,
2016 (81 FR 74358). The NPRM was
prompted by an uncontained failure of
an HPT hub during takeoff. The NPRM
proposed to require an inspection to
measure the surface condition of the aft
side web/rim fillet of HPT 1st stage hubs
and removal from service of hubs that
fail inspection. We are issuing this AD
to prevent failure of the HPT 1st stage
hub, uncontained hub release, damage
to the engine, and damage to the
airplane.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. The
following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
Request for Previous Credit
All Nippon Airways (ANA), Japan
Airlines (JAL), PW, and United Airlines
(UAL) requested that we give credit for
hubs inspected per PW Special
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Instruction (SI) No. 250F–16, dated June
22, 2016 or PW SI No. 250F–16,
Revision A, dated July 14, 2016.
We agree. We added a Credit for
Previous Actions paragraph to give
credit for inspections accomplished per
these SIs.
Request To Provide Risk Analysis
ANA requested that information
related to the risk analysis and
likelihood of failure that provided the
basis of this AD be added to the
compliance section of this AD. ANA
noted that the root cause of this event
is a machining anomaly and it would
like to see the FAA’s estimate on how
a machining anomaly could lead to
uncontained failure of the HPT hub.
We disagree. The purpose of the
compliance section of an AD is to
provide the necessary actions needed to
provide an acceptable level of safety.
The FAA does not typically provide risk
assessments in an AD as this
information is often, as is the case with
this AD, considered proprietary. FAA’s
general methodology for risk analysis
can be found in FAA AC 39–8,
‘‘Continued Airworthiness Assessments
of Powerplant and Auxiliary Power Unit
Installations of Transport Category
Airplanes.’’ We did not change this AD.
Request To Confirm Definition
ANA requested that we confirm that
replacement of the main gearbox or
angle gearbox is not defined as a major
flange separation, which is the basis for
an ‘‘engine shop visit,’’ as defined in the
NPRM (81 FR 74358, October 26, 2016).
We agree. Replacement of the main
gearbox or angle gearbox replacement
does not require major flange separation
and does not constitute an ‘‘engine shop
visit.’’ We note, however, that this AD
no longer requires inspections at engine
shop visits and we removed this
definition from this AD.
Request To Remove New HPT Hubs
From Inspection Requirements
ANA, JAL, and PW requested that
paragraph (e) of this AD not require
inspection for new HPT 1st stage hubs.
These hubs include HPT 1st stage hubs
marked with detail revision number part
number (P/N) 55L901 Rev B or P/N
55L801 Rev E, or subsequent revision
letters. The commenters indicated that
per PW Service Bulletin (SB) PW4G–
112–72–342, dated September 23, 2016,
HPT hubs marked with these detail
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
13060
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 45 / Thursday, March 9, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
revision numbers do not need to be
inspected because of improvements to
PW’s inspection program.
We disagree. The root cause of the
HPT hub failure is a machining anomaly
in the aft web/rim fillet area of the HPT
1st stage hub. Although manufacturing
changes are being made to reduce the
chance of this defect occurring, these
changes have not been fully
implemented. New production parts,
therefore, are still susceptible to this
defect. We did not change this AD.
Request To Revise Compliance Time for
Previously-Inspected Hubs
ANA requested that for hubs that have
been previously inspected, but not
marked, the compliance should be at the
next piece-part exposure rather than at
next engine shop visit. ANA indicated
that PW SI No. 250F–16, dated June 22,
2016, and PW SI No. 250F–16, Revision
A, dated July 14, 2016, do not require
marking of the hubs after inspection.
Part A, paragraph 2.C., and Part B,
paragraph 1.C. of PW SB PW4G–112–
72–342, dated September 23, 2016,
however, require marking the parts after
inspection. ANA indicated that it has
some parts that have been inspected but
not marked. ANA commented that the
inspection interval for HPT 1st stage
hubs that have already been inspected
should be at the next piece-part
exposure.
We disagree. This AD requires a onetime replication inspection of HPT 1st
stage hubs for machining mismatch in
the aft web/rim fillet. Hubs that have
passed this inspection do not require reinspection. For those parts that were
inspected using PW SI No. 250F–16,
dated June 22, 2016, or PW SI No. 250F–
16, Revision A, dated July 14, 2016, we
are providing credit for that inspection
provided the hubs passed the
inspection. We did not change this AD
based on this comment.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Request To Limit Applicability by
Serial Number
UAL requested that a list of affected
serial numbers be added to the
applicability section of this AD. UAL
commented that the part revision letter
markings can wear over time and that
revision numbers are not listed on the
FAA Form 8130.
We disagree. This AD applies to all
PW PW4074, PW4074D, PW4077,
PW4077D, PW4084D, PW4090, and
PW4090–3 turbofan engines. The
applicability of this AD is not limited by
part or serial number. We did not
change this AD.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:49 Mar 08, 2017
Jkt 241001
Request To Mark HPT Hubs That Have
Passed Inspection
PW requested that the PW SB PW4G–
112–72–342, dated September 23, 2016,
be marked on HPT 1st stage hubs that
pass the inspection required by this AD.
This would make the AD consistent
with this SB, which instructs operators
to mark the SB number on the front
turbine hub assembly.
We disagree. This AD requires hub
inspections but does not require specific
part markings or record-keeping
procedures. If operators can show that
hubs have been previously inspected
and passed this inspection, then they
have complied with this AD. Each
operator has the responsibility to
establish its own record-keeping
procedures. We did not change this AD.
expose the HPT module’’ (for PW4074D,
PW4077D, PW4084D, PW4090, and
PW4090–3 models) or the ‘‘next time
the HPT module is disassembled
sufficiently to expose the HPT 1st stage
hub’’ (for PW4074 and PW4077 models).
Request To Define Compliance by
Engine Model
UAL requested that the compliance
section of this AD identify that the
Accomplishment Instructions, Part A, of
PW SB PW4G–112–72–342, dated
September 23, 2016, apply to PW4074D,
PW4077D, PW4084D, PW4090, and
PW4090–3 engine models and the
Accomplishment Instructions, Part B, of
this SB apply only to PW4074 and
PW4077 engine models.
We agree. We determined that
revising the compliance requirements to
make these specific to each group of
engine models will make them clearer to
the operators. We revised the
compliance section of this AD to clarify
that Part A of the Accomplishment
Instructions is used to do the inspection
for PW4074D, PW4077D, PW4084D,
PW4090, and PW4090–3 engine models,
while Part B is used for PW4074 and
PW4077 engine models.
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
with the changes described previously
and minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
correcting the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this AD.
Request To Revise Compliance
Schedule
PW, UAL, and JAL requested that we
revise the compliance schedule to
match the requirements of PW SB
PW4G–112–72–342, dated September
23, 2016. PW indicated that the
compliance schedule in this SB has
been validated by a PW risk assessment.
UAL indicated there are instances when
an engine major mating flange is
separated only to address a different
engine module and the HPT is not
exposed during these times.
We agree. We find that the
compliance intervals suggested by the
commenters still maintain an acceptable
level of safety. We changed this AD by
revising the time to perform the
inspection from at the ‘‘next engine
shop visit’’ to either the ‘‘next time the
engine is disassembled sufficiently to
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Support for the NPRM
The National Transportation Safety
Board commented that it supports the
proposed rule as written.
Revision to Applicability
We revised the applicability section of
this AD by removing the PW4084 model
engine. Although this engine is listed on
Type Certificate Data Sheet No. E46NE,
Revision 8, dated January 23, 2012, it
was never produced.
Conclusion
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed PW SB PW4G–112–72–
342, dated September 23, 2016. This PW
SB provides guidance on performing the
HPT 1st stage hub web/rim fillet
replication inspection and measurement
for the affected HPT hubs. This service
information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
Other Related Service Information
We also reviewed PW SI No. 250F–16,
dated June 22, 2016, and PW SI No.
250F–16, Revision A, dated July 14,
2016. These SIs provide guidance on
performing the replication inspection of
the HPT 1st stage hub.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 119
engines installed on airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this AD:
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 45 / Thursday, March 9, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
13061
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Cost on U.S.
operators
Inspection ................................
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 .........................................
$0
$85
$10,115
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:49 Mar 08, 2017
Jkt 241001
(f) Installation Prohibition
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2017–05–05 Pratt & Whitney Division:
Amendment 39–18815; Docket No.
FAA–2016–8836; Directorate Identifier
2016–NE–17–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective April 13, 2017.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
After the effective date of this AD, do not
install, or re-install into any engine, any HPT
1st stage hub that has not been inspected and
passed the inspection required by paragraph
(e) of this AD.
(g) Credit for Previous Actions
You may take credit for the replication
inspection of the HPT 1st stage hub that is
required by paragraph (e)(1) of this AD, if you
performed the inspection before the effective
date of this AD using PW Special Instruction
(SI) No. 250F–16, dated June 22, 2016, or PW
SI No. 250F–16, Revision A, dated July 14,
2016.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office,
FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to
make your request. You may email your
request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov.
(e) Compliance
(i) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Jo-Ann Theriault, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781–
238–7105; fax: 781–238–7199; email: joann.theriault@faa.gov.
(2) PW SI No. 250F–16, dated June 22,
2016, and PW SI No. 250F–16, Revision A,
dated July 14, 2016, which are not
incorporated by reference, can be obtained
from PW using the contact information in
paragraph (j)(3) of this AD.
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(1) After the effective date of this AD,
perform the HPT 1st stage hub web/rim fillet
replication inspection and measurement as
follows:
(i) For PW4074D, PW4077D, PW4084D,
PW4090, and PW4090–3 engine models, the
next time the engine is disassembled
sufficiently to expose the HPT module, use
the Accomplishment Instructions, Part A,
paragraphs 2.A. and 2.B.(1) through 2.B.(4) of
PW Service Bulletin (SB) PW4G–112–72–
342, dated September 23, 2016, to do the
inspection.
(ii) For PW4074 and PW4077 engine
models, the next time the HPT module is
disassembled sufficiently to expose the HPT
1st stage hub, use the Accomplishment
Instructions Part B, paragraphs 1.A. and
1.B.(1) through 1.B.(4) of PW SB PW4G–112–
72–342, dated September 23, 2016, to do the
inspection.
(2) If the hub fails the inspection, remove
the hub from service before further flight and
replace with a part eligible for installation.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Pratt & Whitney Division Service
Bulletin PW4G–112–72–342, dated
September 23, 2016.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For PW service information identified
in this AD, contact Pratt & Whitney Division,
400 Main St., East Hartford, CT 06118;
phone: 800–565–0140; fax: 860–565–5442.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
(5) You may view this service information
at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
This AD applies to all Pratt & Whitney
Division (PW) PW4074, PW4074D, PW4077,
PW4077D, PW4084D, PW4090, and PW4090–
3 turbofan engines.
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by an uncontained
failure of a high-pressure turbine (HPT) hub
during takeoff. We are issuing this AD to
prevent failure of the HPT 1st stage hub,
uncontained hub release, damage to the
engine, and damage to the airplane.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
13062
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 45 / Thursday, March 9, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 781–238–
7125. It is also available on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2016–7850.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
February 27, 2017.
Robert J. Ganley,
Acting Manager, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–04627 Filed 3–8–17; 8:45 am]
Examining the AD Docket
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–7850; Directorate
Identifier 2016–NE–16–AD; Amendment 39–
18819; AD 2017–05–08]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Safran
Helicopter Engines, S.A. Turboshaft
Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A. Arriel
2B turboshaft engines. This AD requires
removing any pre-modification (mod)
TU 158 hydro-mechanical metering unit
(HMU) and replacing with a part eligible
for installation. This AD was prompted
by a report of an uncommanded in-flight
shutdown (IFSD) on a single-engine
helicopter, caused by a low returning
spring rate of the needle of the HMU.
We are issuing this AD to correct the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective April
13, 2017.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of April 13, 2017.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A., 40220
Tarnos, France; phone: (33) 05 59 74 40
00; fax: (33) 05 59 74 45 15. You may
view this service information at the
SUMMARY:
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
7850; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI), the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The address for the Docket
Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenneth Steeves, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine
& Propeller Directorate, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:
781–238–7765; fax: 781–238–7199;
email: kenneth.steeves@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
unit (HMU), which enabled needle
oscillation during rapid engine deceleration.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead
to further cases of IFSD, possibly resulting in
an emergency landing on single engine.
To address this potential unsafe condition,
Turbomeca developed modification (Mod)
TU 158, which increases needle return spring
rate to prevent oscillation during rapid
deceleration, thus preventing the risk of uncommanded IFSD. Turbomeca also published
Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) 292 73
3158 for embodiment of this modification in
service.
You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
7850.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM (81
FR 76885, November 4, 2016) or on the
determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
as proposed.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A.,
(formerly Turbomeca, S.A.) has issued
Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) No.
292 73 3158, Version A, dated April 7,
2016. The MSB describes procedures for
removing the pre-mod TU 158 HMU and
replacing it with an HMU that
incorporates mod TU 158. This service
information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to the specified products. The
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on November 4, 2016 (81 FR
76885). The NPRM proposed to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
Costs of Compliance
Following a report of an un-commanded
in-flight shut-down (IFSD), Turbomeca
carried out an engineering investigation. This
investigation concluded that the cause of the
event was a low returning spring rate of the
needle of the hydro-mechanical metering
We estimate that this AD affects 124
engines installed on helicopters of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Cost on U.S.
operators
Removal and replacement of the HMU ..........
2 work-hours × $85 per hour = $170 per ......
$0
$170
$21,080
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:49 Mar 08, 2017
Jkt 241001
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 45 (Thursday, March 9, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13059-13062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-04627]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 45 / Thursday, March 9, 2017 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 13059]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2016-8836; Directorate Identifier 2016-NE-17-AD;
Amendment 39-18815; AD 2017-05-05]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney Division Turbofan
Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Pratt & Whitney Division (PW) PW4074, PW4074D, PW4077, PW4077D,
PW4084D, PW4090, and PW4090-3 turbofan engines. This AD was prompted by
an uncontained failure of a high-pressure turbine (HPT) hub during
takeoff. This AD requires an inspection to measure the surface
condition of the aft side web/rim fillet of HPT 1st stage hubs and
removal from service of hubs that fail inspection. We are issuing this
AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective April 13, 2017.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 13,
2017.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Pratt & Whitney Division, 400 Main St., East Hartford, CT
06118; phone: 800-565-0140; fax: 860-565-5442. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 781-238-7125. It is also available on
the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2016-8836.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
8836; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Document Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo-Ann Theriault, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781-238-7105; fax: 781-
238-7199; email: jo-ann.theriault@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to PW PW4074, PW4074D, PW4077,
PW4077D, PW4084, PW4084D, PW4090, and PW4090-3 turbofan engines. The
NPRM published in the Federal Register on October 26, 2016 (81 FR
74358). The NPRM was prompted by an uncontained failure of an HPT hub
during takeoff. The NPRM proposed to require an inspection to measure
the surface condition of the aft side web/rim fillet of HPT 1st stage
hubs and removal from service of hubs that fail inspection. We are
issuing this AD to prevent failure of the HPT 1st stage hub,
uncontained hub release, damage to the engine, and damage to the
airplane.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and
the FAA's response to each comment.
Request for Previous Credit
All Nippon Airways (ANA), Japan Airlines (JAL), PW, and United
Airlines (UAL) requested that we give credit for hubs inspected per PW
Special Instruction (SI) No. 250F-16, dated June 22, 2016 or PW SI No.
250F-16, Revision A, dated July 14, 2016.
We agree. We added a Credit for Previous Actions paragraph to give
credit for inspections accomplished per these SIs.
Request To Provide Risk Analysis
ANA requested that information related to the risk analysis and
likelihood of failure that provided the basis of this AD be added to
the compliance section of this AD. ANA noted that the root cause of
this event is a machining anomaly and it would like to see the FAA's
estimate on how a machining anomaly could lead to uncontained failure
of the HPT hub.
We disagree. The purpose of the compliance section of an AD is to
provide the necessary actions needed to provide an acceptable level of
safety. The FAA does not typically provide risk assessments in an AD as
this information is often, as is the case with this AD, considered
proprietary. FAA's general methodology for risk analysis can be found
in FAA AC 39-8, ``Continued Airworthiness Assessments of Powerplant and
Auxiliary Power Unit Installations of Transport Category Airplanes.''
We did not change this AD.
Request To Confirm Definition
ANA requested that we confirm that replacement of the main gearbox
or angle gearbox is not defined as a major flange separation, which is
the basis for an ``engine shop visit,'' as defined in the NPRM (81 FR
74358, October 26, 2016).
We agree. Replacement of the main gearbox or angle gearbox
replacement does not require major flange separation and does not
constitute an ``engine shop visit.'' We note, however, that this AD no
longer requires inspections at engine shop visits and we removed this
definition from this AD.
Request To Remove New HPT Hubs From Inspection Requirements
ANA, JAL, and PW requested that paragraph (e) of this AD not
require inspection for new HPT 1st stage hubs. These hubs include HPT
1st stage hubs marked with detail revision number part number (P/N)
55L901 Rev B or P/N 55L801 Rev E, or subsequent revision letters. The
commenters indicated that per PW Service Bulletin (SB) PW4G-112-72-342,
dated September 23, 2016, HPT hubs marked with these detail
[[Page 13060]]
revision numbers do not need to be inspected because of improvements to
PW's inspection program.
We disagree. The root cause of the HPT hub failure is a machining
anomaly in the aft web/rim fillet area of the HPT 1st stage hub.
Although manufacturing changes are being made to reduce the chance of
this defect occurring, these changes have not been fully implemented.
New production parts, therefore, are still susceptible to this defect.
We did not change this AD.
Request To Revise Compliance Time for Previously-Inspected Hubs
ANA requested that for hubs that have been previously inspected,
but not marked, the compliance should be at the next piece-part
exposure rather than at next engine shop visit. ANA indicated that PW
SI No. 250F-16, dated June 22, 2016, and PW SI No. 250F-16, Revision A,
dated July 14, 2016, do not require marking of the hubs after
inspection. Part A, paragraph 2.C., and Part B, paragraph 1.C. of PW SB
PW4G-112-72-342, dated September 23, 2016, however, require marking the
parts after inspection. ANA indicated that it has some parts that have
been inspected but not marked. ANA commented that the inspection
interval for HPT 1st stage hubs that have already been inspected should
be at the next piece-part exposure.
We disagree. This AD requires a one-time replication inspection of
HPT 1st stage hubs for machining mismatch in the aft web/rim fillet.
Hubs that have passed this inspection do not require re-inspection. For
those parts that were inspected using PW SI No. 250F-16, dated June 22,
2016, or PW SI No. 250F-16, Revision A, dated July 14, 2016, we are
providing credit for that inspection provided the hubs passed the
inspection. We did not change this AD based on this comment.
Request To Limit Applicability by Serial Number
UAL requested that a list of affected serial numbers be added to
the applicability section of this AD. UAL commented that the part
revision letter markings can wear over time and that revision numbers
are not listed on the FAA Form 8130.
We disagree. This AD applies to all PW PW4074, PW4074D, PW4077,
PW4077D, PW4084D, PW4090, and PW4090-3 turbofan engines. The
applicability of this AD is not limited by part or serial number. We
did not change this AD.
Request To Mark HPT Hubs That Have Passed Inspection
PW requested that the PW SB PW4G-112-72-342, dated September 23,
2016, be marked on HPT 1st stage hubs that pass the inspection required
by this AD. This would make the AD consistent with this SB, which
instructs operators to mark the SB number on the front turbine hub
assembly.
We disagree. This AD requires hub inspections but does not require
specific part markings or record-keeping procedures. If operators can
show that hubs have been previously inspected and passed this
inspection, then they have complied with this AD. Each operator has the
responsibility to establish its own record-keeping procedures. We did
not change this AD.
Request To Define Compliance by Engine Model
UAL requested that the compliance section of this AD identify that
the Accomplishment Instructions, Part A, of PW SB PW4G-112-72-342,
dated September 23, 2016, apply to PW4074D, PW4077D, PW4084D, PW4090,
and PW4090-3 engine models and the Accomplishment Instructions, Part B,
of this SB apply only to PW4074 and PW4077 engine models.
We agree. We determined that revising the compliance requirements
to make these specific to each group of engine models will make them
clearer to the operators. We revised the compliance section of this AD
to clarify that Part A of the Accomplishment Instructions is used to do
the inspection for PW4074D, PW4077D, PW4084D, PW4090, and PW4090-3
engine models, while Part B is used for PW4074 and PW4077 engine
models.
Request To Revise Compliance Schedule
PW, UAL, and JAL requested that we revise the compliance schedule
to match the requirements of PW SB PW4G-112-72-342, dated September 23,
2016. PW indicated that the compliance schedule in this SB has been
validated by a PW risk assessment. UAL indicated there are instances
when an engine major mating flange is separated only to address a
different engine module and the HPT is not exposed during these times.
We agree. We find that the compliance intervals suggested by the
commenters still maintain an acceptable level of safety. We changed
this AD by revising the time to perform the inspection from at the
``next engine shop visit'' to either the ``next time the engine is
disassembled sufficiently to expose the HPT module'' (for PW4074D,
PW4077D, PW4084D, PW4090, and PW4090-3 models) or the ``next time the
HPT module is disassembled sufficiently to expose the HPT 1st stage
hub'' (for PW4074 and PW4077 models).
Support for the NPRM
The National Transportation Safety Board commented that it supports
the proposed rule as written.
Revision to Applicability
We revised the applicability section of this AD by removing the
PW4084 model engine. Although this engine is listed on Type Certificate
Data Sheet No. E46NE, Revision 8, dated January 23, 2012, it was never
produced.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed PW SB PW4G-112-72-342, dated September 23, 2016. This
PW SB provides guidance on performing the HPT 1st stage hub web/rim
fillet replication inspection and measurement for the affected HPT
hubs. This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Other Related Service Information
We also reviewed PW SI No. 250F-16, dated June 22, 2016, and PW SI
No. 250F-16, Revision A, dated July 14, 2016. These SIs provide
guidance on performing the replication inspection of the HPT 1st stage
hub.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 119 engines installed on airplanes
of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
[[Page 13061]]
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection........................ 1 work-hour x $85 per $0 $85 $10,115
hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2017-05-05 Pratt & Whitney Division: Amendment 39-18815; Docket No.
FAA-2016-8836; Directorate Identifier 2016-NE-17-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective April 13, 2017.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Pratt & Whitney Division (PW) PW4074,
PW4074D, PW4077, PW4077D, PW4084D, PW4090, and PW4090-3 turbofan
engines.
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by an uncontained failure of a high-
pressure turbine (HPT) hub during takeoff. We are issuing this AD to
prevent failure of the HPT 1st stage hub, uncontained hub release,
damage to the engine, and damage to the airplane.
(e) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(1) After the effective date of this AD, perform the HPT 1st
stage hub web/rim fillet replication inspection and measurement as
follows:
(i) For PW4074D, PW4077D, PW4084D, PW4090, and PW4090-3 engine
models, the next time the engine is disassembled sufficiently to
expose the HPT module, use the Accomplishment Instructions, Part A,
paragraphs 2.A. and 2.B.(1) through 2.B.(4) of PW Service Bulletin
(SB) PW4G-112-72-342, dated September 23, 2016, to do the
inspection.
(ii) For PW4074 and PW4077 engine models, the next time the HPT
module is disassembled sufficiently to expose the HPT 1st stage hub,
use the Accomplishment Instructions Part B, paragraphs 1.A. and
1.B.(1) through 1.B.(4) of PW SB PW4G-112-72-342, dated September
23, 2016, to do the inspection.
(2) If the hub fails the inspection, remove the hub from service
before further flight and replace with a part eligible for
installation.
(f) Installation Prohibition
After the effective date of this AD, do not install, or re-
install into any engine, any HPT 1st stage hub that has not been
inspected and passed the inspection required by paragraph (e) of
this AD.
(g) Credit for Previous Actions
You may take credit for the replication inspection of the HPT
1st stage hub that is required by paragraph (e)(1) of this AD, if
you performed the inspection before the effective date of this AD
using PW Special Instruction (SI) No. 250F-16, dated June 22, 2016,
or PW SI No. 250F-16, Revision A, dated July 14, 2016.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request. You may email your request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov.
(i) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Jo-Ann
Theriault, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA
01803; phone: 781-238-7105; fax: 781-238-7199; email: jo-ann.theriault@faa.gov.
(2) PW SI No. 250F-16, dated June 22, 2016, and PW SI No. 250F-
16, Revision A, dated July 14, 2016, which are not incorporated by
reference, can be obtained from PW using the contact information in
paragraph (j)(3) of this AD.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Pratt & Whitney Division Service Bulletin PW4G-112-72-342,
dated September 23, 2016.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For PW service information identified in this AD, contact
Pratt & Whitney Division, 400 Main St., East Hartford, CT 06118;
phone: 800-565-0140; fax: 860-565-5442.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
781-238-7125.
(5) You may view this service information at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to:
https://
[[Page 13062]]
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on February 27, 2017.
Robert J. Ganley,
Acting Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-04627 Filed 3-8-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P