Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Connecticut River, East Haddam, CT, 12185-12187 [2017-03980]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 39 / Wednesday, March 1, 2017 / Proposed Rules
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2016–D–4120 for ‘‘Fruit Juice and
Vegetable Juice as Color Additives in
Food; Draft Guidance for Industry.’’
Received comments will be placed in
the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ We
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:30 Feb 28, 2017
Jkt 241001
will review this copy, including the
claimed confidential information, in its
consideration of comments. The second
copy, which will have the claimed
confidential information redacted/
blacked out, will be available for public
viewing and posted on https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this
information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any
information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura A. Dye, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–265), Food
and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus
Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240–402–
1275.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Federal Register of December 14, 2016
(81 FR 90267), we published a notice of
availability of a draft guidance for
industry entitled ‘‘Fruit Juice and
Vegetable Juice as Color Additives in
Food.’’ The draft guidance, when
finalized, will help manufacturers
determine whether a color additive
derived from a plant material meets the
specifications for fruit juice under
§ 73.250 (21 CFR 73.250) or vegetable
juice under § 73.260 (21 CFR 73.260).
Although you can comment on any
guidance at any time, to ensure that we
consider comments on this draft
guidance before we begin work on the
final version, interested persons were
originally given until February 13, 2017,
to comment on the draft guidance.
We have received requests to extend
the comment period for the draft
guidance. The requests conveyed
concern that the original 60-day
comment period would not allow
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12185
sufficient time to develop a meaningful
or thoughtful response to various issues
presented in the draft guidance and to
our interpretation of our regulations. We
have considered the requests but were
unable to issue a document extending
the comment period for the draft
guidance before February 13, 2017.
Consequently, we are reopening the
comment period for an additional 60
days. Interested parties have until May
1, 2017. We believe that this action
allows adequate time for interested
persons to submit comments on the
draft guidance without significantly
delaying finalizing the guidance.
Dated: February 23, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017–03929 Filed 2–28–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2016–1006]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Connecticut River, East Haddam, CT
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
modify the operating schedule that
governs the Route 82 Bridge (East
Haddam Swing Bridge) across the
Connecticut River, mile 16.8, at East
Haddam, Connecticut. The bridge owner
submitted a request to reduce scheduled
openings of the span for recreational
vessels in the boating season and to
allow the bridge owner to require six
hours notice for bridge openings at night
in the winter season. It is expected this
change to the regulations will better
serve the needs of the community while
continuing to meet the reasonable needs
of navigation.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
May 1, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2016–1006 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM
01MRP1
12186
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 39 / Wednesday, March 1, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Allowing the bridge owner to require
notice will allow for more efficient and
economical operation of the bridge.
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. James Moore,
Project Officer, First Coast Guard
District, telephone 212–514–4334,
james.m.moore2@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose and Legal
Basis
The Route 82 Bridge (East Haddam
Swing Bridge), mile 16.8, across the
Connecticut River at East Haddam,
Connecticut, offers mariners a vertical
clearance of 22 feet at Mean High Water
and 25 feet at Mean Low Water when
the span is in the closed position.
Vertical clearance is unlimited when the
draw is open. Horizontal clearance is
200 feet. Waterway users include
recreational and commercial vessels
including tugboat/barge combinations as
well as tour/dinner boats.
The existing drawbridge operating
regulation, 33 CFR 117.205 (c), requires
the draw of the Route 82 Bridge to open
as follows:
The bridge will open on signal except
that, from 15 May to 31 October,
between 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., the draw need
open for recreational vessels on the hour
and half-hour only. The draw shall open
on signal for commercial vessels at all
times.
This regulation has been in effect
since March 2, 1998. The owner of the
bridge, the Connecticut Department of
Transportation, requested a change to
the drawbridge operating regulations
because of the increased volume of
vehicular traffic across the bridge during
peak commuting hours. This increased
volume coupled with bridge openings
for recreational vessels on the hour as
well as the half-hour has resulted in
lengthy traffic jams on either side of the
bridge, particularly during the morning
and evening rush hours. By reducing
required openings for recreational
vessels, traffic congestion during the
morning and evening rush hours would
improve.
The Connecticut Department of
Transportation also requested that from
November 1 to April 30 the bridge
owner be allowed to require at least six
hours notice for bridge openings
between 8 p.m. and 4 a.m. for all
vessels. For the last three years there
have been no requested openings during
these hours during this time of the year.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:30 Feb 28, 2017
Jkt 241001
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
Comments received from the public as
well as various stakeholders during a
meeting held in East Haddam,
Connecticut on 12 May 2016 indicated
no objection to the proposed rule
change from either mariners or
concerned citizens. Based on these
comments as well as further discussion
with the bridge owner, the Coast Guard
proposes to permanently change the
drawbridge operating regulation 33 CFR
117.205(c).
The proposed rule would allow the
Route 82 Swing Bridge, to open as
follows: Between November 1 and April
30, the Route 82 Swing Bridge will
continue to open on signal for all
vessels between 4 a.m. and 8 p.m. and
will open for all vessels with six hours
of advance notice between 8 p.m. and 4
a.m. Between May 1 and October 31, the
bridge will open for recreational vessels
on the hour between 6 a.m. and 8 p.m.
and will open on signal from 8 p.m.
through 6 a.m.. Notice is given by
calling the number posted at the bridge.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and Executive
Orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This NPRM has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
The Coast Guard believes that this
rule is not a significant regulatory
action. The bridge will still open on the
hour from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. for
recreational craft during the boating
season and will open for all vessels with
six hours of advance notice between 8
p.m. and 4 a.m. between November 1
and April 30. The 22 foot vertical
clearance available while the bridge is
in the closed position is sufficient to
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
allow a majority of recreational traffic to
pass through the draw without the
necessity for an opening. Moreover, the
advanced notice requirements will be
during the winter months, which is a
time of year when vessel traffic is at its
lowest.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
For the reasons stated in Section III
and IV.A. above, this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Government
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM
01MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 39 / Wednesday, March 1, 2017 / Proposed Rules
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further
review, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:30 Feb 28, 2017
Jkt 241001
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
Management System in the March 24,
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this notice
and all public comments, are in our
online docket at https://
www.regulations.gov and can be viewed
by following that Web site’s
instructions. Additionally, if you go to
the online docket and sign up for email
alerts, you will be notified when
comments are posted or a final rule is
published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12187
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Amend § 117.205 by revising
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
■
§ 117.205
Connecticut River.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The draw of the Route 82 Bridge,
mile 16.8, at East Haddam, shall operate
as follows:
(1) From May 1 through October 31:
The draw shall open on signal for
commercial vessels. For recreational
vessels, the draw shall open on signal,
except that from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m., the
draw need open for recreational vessels
on the hour only.
(2) From November 1 through April
30: The draw shall open on signal for all
vessels, except that from 8 p.m. to 4
a.m., the draw shall open on signal if at
least six-hours notice is given by calling
the number posted at the bridge.
Dated: 15 February 2017.
S.D. Poulin,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2017–03980 Filed 2–28–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–0–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 161222999–7145–01]
RIN 0648–BG56
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Coastal
Migratory Pelagic Resources in the
Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Region;
Framework Amendment 5
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes to implement
management measures described in
Framework Amendment 5 to the Fishery
Management Plan for the Coastal
Migratory Pelagic Resources of the Gulf
of Mexico and Atlantic Region (FMP) as
prepared and submitted jointly by the
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management
Council and South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council (Councils). If
implemented, this proposed rule would
remove the restriction on fishing for, or
retaining the recreational bag and
possession limits of, king and Spanish
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM
01MRP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 39 (Wednesday, March 1, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12185-12187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-03980]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2016-1006]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Connecticut River, East Haddam,
CT
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to modify the operating schedule that
governs the Route 82 Bridge (East Haddam Swing Bridge) across the
Connecticut River, mile 16.8, at East Haddam, Connecticut. The bridge
owner submitted a request to reduce scheduled openings of the span for
recreational vessels in the boating season and to allow the bridge
owner to require six hours notice for bridge openings at night in the
winter season. It is expected this change to the regulations will
better serve the needs of the community while continuing to meet the
reasonable needs of navigation.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before May 1, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2016-1006 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
[[Page 12186]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. James Moore, Project Officer, First Coast Guard
District, telephone 212-514-4334, james.m.moore2@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis
The Route 82 Bridge (East Haddam Swing Bridge), mile 16.8, across
the Connecticut River at East Haddam, Connecticut, offers mariners a
vertical clearance of 22 feet at Mean High Water and 25 feet at Mean
Low Water when the span is in the closed position. Vertical clearance
is unlimited when the draw is open. Horizontal clearance is 200 feet.
Waterway users include recreational and commercial vessels including
tugboat/barge combinations as well as tour/dinner boats.
The existing drawbridge operating regulation, 33 CFR 117.205 (c),
requires the draw of the Route 82 Bridge to open as follows:
The bridge will open on signal except that, from 15 May to 31
October, between 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., the draw need open for recreational
vessels on the hour and half-hour only. The draw shall open on signal
for commercial vessels at all times.
This regulation has been in effect since March 2, 1998. The owner
of the bridge, the Connecticut Department of Transportation, requested
a change to the drawbridge operating regulations because of the
increased volume of vehicular traffic across the bridge during peak
commuting hours. This increased volume coupled with bridge openings for
recreational vessels on the hour as well as the half-hour has resulted
in lengthy traffic jams on either side of the bridge, particularly
during the morning and evening rush hours. By reducing required
openings for recreational vessels, traffic congestion during the
morning and evening rush hours would improve.
The Connecticut Department of Transportation also requested that
from November 1 to April 30 the bridge owner be allowed to require at
least six hours notice for bridge openings between 8 p.m. and 4 a.m.
for all vessels. For the last three years there have been no requested
openings during these hours during this time of the year. Allowing the
bridge owner to require notice will allow for more efficient and
economical operation of the bridge.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
Comments received from the public as well as various stakeholders
during a meeting held in East Haddam, Connecticut on 12 May 2016
indicated no objection to the proposed rule change from either mariners
or concerned citizens. Based on these comments as well as further
discussion with the bridge owner, the Coast Guard proposes to
permanently change the drawbridge operating regulation 33 CFR
117.205(c).
The proposed rule would allow the Route 82 Swing Bridge, to open as
follows: Between November 1 and April 30, the Route 82 Swing Bridge
will continue to open on signal for all vessels between 4 a.m. and 8
p.m. and will open for all vessels with six hours of advance notice
between 8 p.m. and 4 a.m. Between May 1 and October 31, the bridge will
open for recreational vessels on the hour between 6 a.m. and 8 p.m. and
will open on signal from 8 p.m. through 6 a.m.. Notice is given by
calling the number posted at the bridge.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes and Executive Orders and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
The Coast Guard believes that this rule is not a significant
regulatory action. The bridge will still open on the hour from 6 a.m.
to 8 p.m. for recreational craft during the boating season and will
open for all vessels with six hours of advance notice between 8 p.m.
and 4 a.m. between November 1 and April 30. The 22 foot vertical
clearance available while the bridge is in the closed position is
sufficient to allow a majority of recreational traffic to pass through
the draw without the necessity for an opening. Moreover, the advanced
notice requirements will be during the winter months, which is a time
of year when vessel traffic is at its lowest.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
For the reasons stated in Section III and IV.A. above, this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the
[[Page 12187]]
various levels of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under
that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the
fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described
in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule simply
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges.
Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review,
under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this notice and all public comments, are in
our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by
following that Web site's instructions. Additionally, if you go to the
online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will be notified when
comments are posted or a final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Amend Sec. 117.205 by revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 117.205 Connecticut River.
* * * * *
(c) The draw of the Route 82 Bridge, mile 16.8, at East Haddam,
shall operate as follows:
(1) From May 1 through October 31: The draw shall open on signal
for commercial vessels. For recreational vessels, the draw shall open
on signal, except that from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m., the draw need open for
recreational vessels on the hour only.
(2) From November 1 through April 30: The draw shall open on signal
for all vessels, except that from 8 p.m. to 4 a.m., the draw shall open
on signal if at least six-hours notice is given by calling the number
posted at the bridge.
Dated: 15 February 2017.
S.D. Poulin,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2017-03980 Filed 2-28-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-0-P
