Safety Zone; City of Valdez July 4th Fireworks, Port Valdez; Valdez, AK, 12076-12078 [2017-03851]
Download as PDF
12076
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 38 / Tuesday, February 28, 2017 / Proposed Rules
accordance with Airbus Defense and Space
AOT–CN235–52–0001, dated September 4,
2014; or Airbus Defense and Space AOT–
C295–52–0001, dated September 4, 2014; as
applicable.
(2) Before further flight, repair using a
method approved by the Manager,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus
Defense and Space S.A.’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) Reporting
Submit a report of the findings (both
positive and negative) from the functional
test required by paragraph (g) of this AD and
the inspection required by paragraph (h)(1) of
this AD to Airbus Defense and Space in
accordance with the instructions of Airbus
Defense and Space AOT–CN235–52–0001,
dated September 4, 2014; or Airbus Defense
and Space AOT–C295–52–0001, dated
September 4, 2014; as applicable; at the
applicable time specified in paragraph (i)(1)
or (i)(2) of this AD.
(1) If the functional test or inspection was
done on or after the effective date of this AD:
Submit the report within 30 days after the
functional test or inspection.
(2) If the functional test or inspection was
done before the effective date of this AD:
Submit the report within 30 days after the
effective date of this AD.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone: 425–227–1112; fax: 425–227–
1149. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
EASA; or Airbus Defense and Space S.A.’s
EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA, the
approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.
(3) Reporting Requirements: A federal
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:14 Feb 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
person is not required to respond to, nor
shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of
information subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to
be approximately 5 minutes per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection
of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and
suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
AES–200.
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD
2016–0051, dated March 11, 2016, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the
AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2017–0123.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact EADS–CASA, Military
Transport Aircraft Division (MTAD),
Integrated Customer Services (ICS),
´
Technical Services, Avenida de Aragon 404,
28022 Madrid, Spain; telephone: +34 91 585
55 84; fax: +34 91 585 55 05; email:
MTA.TechnicalService@casa.eads.net;
Internet: https://www.eads.net. You may view
this service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
15, 2017.
Thomas Groves,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–03718 Filed 2–27–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0092]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; City of Valdez July 4th
Fireworks, Port Valdez; Valdez, AK
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a permanent safety zone on the
navigable waters of Port Valdez, Valdez,
Alaska, in the vicinity of the Valdez
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Spit. The proposed safety zone is
necessary to protect persons and vessels
from the hazards associated with the
annual City of Valdez July 4th
Fireworks Display event. This rule is
intended to restrict vessels from a
portion of the navigable waters of Port
Valdez, in the immediate vicinity of the
fireworks launch platforms, before,
during, and immediately after the
fireworks event. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before March 30, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2017–0092 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Commander Walner W. Alvarez, Chief
of Waterways Management Division,
U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit
Valdez; telephone (907) 835–7223,
email Walner.W.Alvarez@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
The Coast Guard began issuing
temporary final rules in 2011 to
establish a safety zone during the
Valdez July 4th Fireworks Display The
Coast Guard received no comments or
concerns from the public when the
temporary safety zones were in place.
This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
proposes to permanently establish a
safety zone of the exact same size and
position as that which were established
under the temporary final rules since
2014. The legal basis for the rule is the
Coast Guard’s authority to establish
limited access areas: 33 U.S.C 1231; 50
U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1,
6.04–6, 160.5; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
The purpose of this rule is to enhance
the safety for spectators and mariners
attending a community event that
involves a relatively large fireworks
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 38 / Tuesday, February 28, 2017 / Proposed Rules
display. The Coast Guard anticipates
that a large number of spectators will
congregate around the launch position
during the display. The Captain of the
Port Prince William Sound has
determined that the fireworks launched
near a gathering of watercrafts may pose
a significant risk to public safety and
property. Such hazards include
premature and accidental detonations,
falling and burning debris, and vessels
operating in close proximity to each
other. The safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of persons and
vessels attending the event in the
navigable waters in the vicinity of the
fireworks launch site.
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
a permanent safety zone on the
navigable waters of Port Valdez, within
a 200 yard radius of the location where
the fireworks will be launched on the
Valdez Spit for the City of Valdez July
4th Fireworks Display. The proposed
safety zone is necessary to ensure the
safety of spectators and vessels from
hazards associated with fireworks
displays. The fireworks displays are
expected to occur between 10:00 p.m.
and 11:00 p.m. In order to coordinate
the safe movement of vessels within the
area and to ensure that the area is clear
of unauthorized persons and vessels
before, during, and immediately after
the fireworks launch, this zone will be
enforced from 9:30 p.m. to 11:30 p.m.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Prince William Sound or the
designated representative. Vessels will
be able to transit the surrounding area
and may be authorized to transit
through the proposed safety zone with
the permission of the COTP or the
designated representative. Before
activating the zone the Prince William
Sound COTP will notify mariners by
appropriate means including but not
limited to Local Notice to Mariners and
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
This rule is being proposed to provide
for the safety of life on the navigable
waters during the fireworks display
event, and to give the public the
opportunity to comment on the
proposed safety zone location, size, and
length of time the zone will be
activated.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:14 Feb 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This NPRM has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the safety zone. The
Coast Guard’s enforcement of the
proposed safety zone will be of short
duration, approximately two hours.
Furthermore, vessels may be authorized
to transit through the proposed safety
zones with the permission of the
Captain of the Port Prince William
Sound, Alaska. Moreover, the Coast
Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel
16 about the zone, and the rule would
allow vessels to seek permission to enter
the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator. If you think
that your business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a
small entity and that this rule would
have a significant economic impact on
it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12077
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
12078
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 38 / Tuesday, February 28, 2017 / Proposed Rules
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves the establishment of a
permanent safety zone on the navigable
waters of Port Valdez, in the vicinity of
the Valdez Spit. Normally such actions
are categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
2–1 of Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist and
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:14 Feb 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
Management System in the March 24,
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
■
2. Add § 165.1713 to read as follows:
§ 165.1713 Safety Zone; City of Valdez July
4th Fireworks, Port Valdez; Valdez, AK.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a permanent safety zone: All
navigable waters of Port Valdez within
a 200-yard radius from a position of
61°07′38″ N and 146°21′17″ W. This
includes the entrance to the Valdez
small boat harbor.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
(b) Effective date. This rule will be
effective from 9:30 p.m. until 11:30 p.m.
on July 4th of each year, or during the
same time frame on specified rain dates
of July 5th through July 8th of each year.
(c) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
(1) The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
of the U. S. Coast Guard who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port
(COTP), Prince William Sound, to act on
his or her behalf.
(2) The term ‘‘official patrol vessel’’
may consist of any Coast Guard, Coast
Guard Auxiliary, state, or local law
enforcement vessels assigned or
approved by the COTP, Prince William
Sound.
(d) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained
in 33 CFR 165.23, as well as the
following regulations, apply.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or the
designated representative during
periods of enforcement.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
COTP or the designated representative.
Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast
Guard vessel or other official patrol
vessel by siren, radio, flashing light or
other means, the operator of the vessel
shall proceed as directed.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the regulated area may
request permission from the COTP via
VHF Channel 16 or (907) 835–7205
(Prince William Sound Vessel Traffic
Center) to request permission to do so.
(5) The Coast Guard will issue a
broadcast notice to mariners to advise
mariners of the safety zone before and
during the event.
(6) The COTP may be aided by other
Federal, state, borough and local law
enforcement officials in the enforcement
of this regulation.
Dated: February 21, 2017.
J.T. Lally,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port Prince William Sound, Alaska.
[FR Doc. 2017–03851 Filed 2–27–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 28, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12076-12078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-03851]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2017-0092]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; City of Valdez July 4th Fireworks, Port Valdez;
Valdez, AK
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a permanent safety zone
on the navigable waters of Port Valdez, Valdez, Alaska, in the vicinity
of the Valdez Spit. The proposed safety zone is necessary to protect
persons and vessels from the hazards associated with the annual City of
Valdez July 4th Fireworks Display event. This rule is intended to
restrict vessels from a portion of the navigable waters of Port Valdez,
in the immediate vicinity of the fireworks launch platforms, before,
during, and immediately after the fireworks event. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before March 30, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2017-0092 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Commander Walner W.
Alvarez, Chief of Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard
Marine Safety Unit Valdez; telephone (907) 835-7223, email
Walner.W.Alvarez@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
The Coast Guard began issuing temporary final rules in 2011 to
establish a safety zone during the Valdez July 4th Fireworks Display
The Coast Guard received no comments or concerns from the public when
the temporary safety zones were in place. This Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking proposes to permanently establish a safety zone of the exact
same size and position as that which were established under the
temporary final rules since 2014. The legal basis for the rule is the
Coast Guard's authority to establish limited access areas: 33 U.S.C
1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
The purpose of this rule is to enhance the safety for spectators
and mariners attending a community event that involves a relatively
large fireworks
[[Page 12077]]
display. The Coast Guard anticipates that a large number of spectators
will congregate around the launch position during the display. The
Captain of the Port Prince William Sound has determined that the
fireworks launched near a gathering of watercrafts may pose a
significant risk to public safety and property. Such hazards include
premature and accidental detonations, falling and burning debris, and
vessels operating in close proximity to each other. The safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of persons and vessels attending
the event in the navigable waters in the vicinity of the fireworks
launch site.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish a permanent safety zone on
the navigable waters of Port Valdez, within a 200 yard radius of the
location where the fireworks will be launched on the Valdez Spit for
the City of Valdez July 4th Fireworks Display. The proposed safety zone
is necessary to ensure the safety of spectators and vessels from
hazards associated with fireworks displays. The fireworks displays are
expected to occur between 10:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. In order to
coordinate the safe movement of vessels within the area and to ensure
that the area is clear of unauthorized persons and vessels before,
during, and immediately after the fireworks launch, this zone will be
enforced from 9:30 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. Entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within the safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Prince William Sound or the designated
representative. Vessels will be able to transit the surrounding area
and may be authorized to transit through the proposed safety zone with
the permission of the COTP or the designated representative. Before
activating the zone the Prince William Sound COTP will notify mariners
by appropriate means including but not limited to Local Notice to
Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
This rule is being proposed to provide for the safety of life on
the navigable waters during the fireworks display event, and to give
the public the opportunity to comment on the proposed safety zone
location, size, and length of time the zone will be activated.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. The Coast
Guard's enforcement of the proposed safety zone will be of short
duration, approximately two hours. Furthermore, vessels may be
authorized to transit through the proposed safety zones with the
permission of the Captain of the Port Prince William Sound, Alaska.
Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners
via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the rule would allow
vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator. If you think that your
business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a
small entity and that this rule would have a significant economic
impact on it, please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why
you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would
economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the
[[Page 12078]]
effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves the
establishment of a permanent safety zone on the navigable waters of
Port Valdez, in the vicinity of the Valdez Spit. Normally such actions
are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist and Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal e-
Rulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document
for alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.1713 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.1713 Safety Zone; City of Valdez July 4th Fireworks, Port
Valdez; Valdez, AK.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area is a permanent safety zone:
All navigable waters of Port Valdez within a 200-yard radius from a
position of 61[deg]07'38'' N and 146[deg]21'17'' W. This includes the
entrance to the Valdez small boat harbor.
(b) Effective date. This rule will be effective from 9:30 p.m.
until 11:30 p.m. on July 4th of each year, or during the same time
frame on specified rain dates of July 5th through July 8th of each
year.
(c) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
(1) The term ``designated representative'' means any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer of the U. S. Coast Guard who has
been designated by the Captain of the Port (COTP), Prince William
Sound, to act on his or her behalf.
(2) The term ``official patrol vessel'' may consist of any Coast
Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or local law enforcement vessels
assigned or approved by the COTP, Prince William Sound.
(d) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23, as well as
the following regulations, apply.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or the designated representative during
periods of enforcement.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the COTP or the designated representative. Upon being hailed by a U.S.
Coast Guard vessel or other official patrol vessel by siren, radio,
flashing light or other means, the operator of the vessel shall proceed
as directed.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the
regulated area may request permission from the COTP via VHF Channel 16
or (907) 835-7205 (Prince William Sound Vessel Traffic Center) to
request permission to do so.
(5) The Coast Guard will issue a broadcast notice to mariners to
advise mariners of the safety zone before and during the event.
(6) The COTP may be aided by other Federal, state, borough and
local law enforcement officials in the enforcement of this regulation.
Dated: February 21, 2017.
J.T. Lally,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Prince William Sound,
Alaska.
[FR Doc. 2017-03851 Filed 2-27-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P