VNT1 Protein in Potato; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance, 11513-11515 [2017-03580]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 36 / Friday, February 24, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
11513
Virginiamycin grams/ton
Combination in grams/ton
Indications for use
Limitations
Sponsor
(ix) 20 .......................................
Semduramicin, 22.7 ................
Feed continuously as the sole
ration. Do not feed to laying
hens. Semduramicin as provided by No. 066104 in
§ 510.600(c) of this chapter.
066104
(x) 20 ........................................
Semduramicin (biomass), 22.7
Broiler chickens: For prevention of necrotic enteritis
caused by Clostridium spp.
susceptible to virginiamycin;
for the prevention of coccidiosis caused by Eimeria
acervulina, E. brunetti, E.
maxima, E mivati/mitis, E.
necatrix, and E. tenella.
Broiler chickens: For prevention of necrotic enteritis
caused by Clostridium spp.
susceptible to virginiamycin;
for the prevention of coccidiosis caused by Eimeria
acervulina, E. brunetti, E.
maxima, E mivati/mitis, E.
necatrix, and E. tenella.
Feed continuously as the sole
ration. Withdraw 1 day before slaughter. Do not feed
to laying hens.
Semduramicin as provided
by No. 066104 in
§ 510.600(c) of this chapter.
066104
(2) Swine—
Virginiamycin grams/ton
Combination in grams/ton
Indications for use
Limitations
Sponsor
(i) 25 .........................................
..................................................
..................................................
066104
(ii) 50 or 100 .............................
..................................................
Feed 100 grams per ton for 2
weeks, 50 grams per ton
thereafter.
066104
(iii) 100 .....................................
..................................................
Growing-finishing swine: As an
aid in control of dysentery in
swine up to 120 pounds in
animals or on premises with
a history of swine dysentery
but where symptoms have
not yet occurred.
Growing-finishing swine: For
treatment and control of
swine dysentery in swine up
to 120 pounds.
Growing-finishing swine: For
treatment of swine dysentery in nonbreeding swine
over 120 pounds.
Feed for 2 weeks ....................
066104
(3) Cattle—
Virginiamycin grams/ton
Combination in grams/ton
Indications for use
Limitations
(i) 13.5 to 16.0 ..........................
..................................................
Cattle fed in confinement for
slaughter: For reduction of
incidence of liver abscesses.
Feed continuously as the sole
ration to provide 85 to 240
milligrams per head per day.
Not for use in animals intended for breeding.
Sponsor
066104
(ii) [Reserved]
Dated: February 17, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017–03596 Filed 2–23–17; 8:45 am]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 174
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0457; FRL–9957–97]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
VNT1 Protein in Potato; Exemption
From the Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of VNT1 protein
in potato when used as a plant-
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:13 Feb 23, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
incorporated protectant. J.R. Simplot
Company submitted a petition to EPA
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting a
permanent exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. This
regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of VNT1 protein in potato
under FFDCA.
This regulation is effective
February 24, 2017. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before April 25, 2017 and must be
filed in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM
24FER1
11514
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 36 / Friday, February 24, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0457, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; main telephone
number: (703) 305–7090; email address:
BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:13 Feb 23, 2017
Jkt 241001
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2014–0457 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before April 25, 2017. Addresses for
mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2014–0457, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting
or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is
available at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
II. Background
In the Federal Register of April 25,
2016 (81 FR 24047) (FRL–9944–86),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide tolerance petition (PP 5F8425)
by J.R. Simplot Co., 5369 W. Irving St.,
Boise, ID 83706. The petition requested
that 40 CFR part 174 be amended by
establishing an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance for residues
of VNT1 protein in potato. That
document referenced a summary of the
petition prepared by the petitioner J.R.
Simplot Company, which is available in
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the docket via https://
www.regulations.gov. There were no
comments received in response to the
notice of filing.
EPA previously established a
temporary exemption from tolerance for
VNT1 protein in potato (40 CFR
174.534; 80 FR 9387) in conjunction
with an Experimental Use Permit (8917–
EUP–2) in 2015. This temporary
exemption was subsequently amended
(extended) on December 17, 2015 and
expires on April 1, 2017.
III. Final Rule
A. EPA’s Safety Determination
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include
occupational exposure. Pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in
establishing or maintaining in effect an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance, EPA must take into account
the factors set forth in FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give
special consideration to exposure of
infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance or tolerance exemption, and to
‘‘ensure that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to
infants and children from aggregate
exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue . . . .’’ Additionally, FFDCA
section 408(b)(2)(D) requires that EPA
consider ‘‘available information
concerning the cumulative effects of [a
particular pesticide’s] . . . residues and
other substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA evaluated the available toxicity
and exposure data on VNT1 protein and
considered its validity, completeness,
and reliability, as well as the
relationship of this information to
human risk. A full explanation of the
data upon which EPA relied and its risk
assessment based on that data can be
found within the December 6, 2016,
document entitled ‘‘Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
Considerations for VNT1 protein.’’ This
document, as well as other relevant
information, is available in the docket
E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM
24FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 36 / Friday, February 24, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
for this action as described under
ADDRESSES. Based upon its evaluation,
EPA concludes that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to the
U.S. population, including infants and
children, from aggregate exposure to
residues of VNT1 protein. Therefore, an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance is established for residues of
VNT1 protein in potato when used as a
plant-incorporated protectant in
accordance with the terms of
registration.
B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
EPA has determined that an analytical
method is not required for enforcement
purposes since the Agency is
establishing an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance without any
numerical limitation. Nonetheless, an
analytical method was provided by J.R.
Simplot for the detection of VNT1
protein in potato. This method utilizes
a quantitative polymerase chain reaction
(qPCR) to detect the presence of the Rpivntl gene in pSIM1678 transformed
plants (pSIM1678 is the transformation
vector used by the registrant to
incorporate the Rpi-vntl gene into potato
varieties). There are numerous
homologs of Rpi-vnt1 present in potato
and tomato varieties and other wild
Solanum species that may result in nonspecific amplification when using
primers designed to amplify Rpi-vnt1.
To distinguish between plants that
naturally contain homologous
sequences and those transformed with
pSIM1678, a second method amplifies a
unique junction between the Rpi-vnt1
terminator and the AGP promoter
present in the pSIM1678 T–DNA. This
second method is intended to confirm
the presence or absence of pSIM1678 if
there are false positive detection of Rpivnt1 homologs.
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
C. Revisions to Requested Tolerance
Exemption
The current temporary tolerance
exemption for VNT1 protein in potato
(40 CFR 174.534) approved by EPA on
December 17, 2015, will be changed to
a permanent tolerance exemption.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes a tolerance
exemption under FFDCA section 408(d)
in response to a petition submitted to
EPA. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:13 Feb 23, 2017
Jkt 241001
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance exemption in this action,
do not require the issuance of a
proposed rule, the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes. As a result,
this action does not alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such,
EPA has determined that this action will
not have a substantial direct effect on
States or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, EPA has determined that
Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
EPA’s consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
V. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
11515
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 174
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: January 18, 2017.
Jack Housenger,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 174—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 174
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7. U.S.C. 136–136y; 21 U.S.C.
321(q), 346a and 371.
■
2. Revise § 174.534 to read as follows:
§ 174.534 VNT1 protein; exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance.
Residues of VNT1 protein in potato
are exempt from the requirement of a
tolerance when the Rpi-vnt1 gene that
express the VNT1 protein is used as a
plant-incorporated protectant in potato.
[FR Doc. 2017–03580 Filed 2–23–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
49 CFR Part 1250
[Docket No. EP 724 (Sub-No. 4)]
United States Rail Service Issues—
Performance Data Reporting
Correction
In rule document 2017–02492,
appearing on pages 9529–9529, in the
issue of Tuesday, February 7, 2017,
make the following correction:
On page 9529, in the third column,
the signature block should read as
follows:
Decided: January 27, 2017.
By the Board, Acting Chairman Begeman,
Vice Chairman Miller, and Commissioner
Elliott.
Brendetta S. Jones,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. C1–2017–02492 Filed 2–23–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1301–00–D
E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM
24FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 36 (Friday, February 24, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11513-11515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-03580]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 174
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0457; FRL-9957-97]
VNT1 Protein in Potato; Exemption From the Requirement of a
Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of VNT1 protein in potato when used as a
plant-incorporated protectant. J.R. Simplot Company submitted a
petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
requesting a permanent exemption from the requirement of a tolerance.
This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible
level for residues of VNT1 protein in potato under FFDCA.
DATES: This regulation is effective February 24, 2017. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before April 25, 2017 and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also
[[Page 11514]]
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0457, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email
address: BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0457 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
April 25, 2017. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0457, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional
instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Background
In the Federal Register of April 25, 2016 (81 FR 24047) (FRL-9944-
86), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance
petition (PP 5F8425) by J.R. Simplot Co., 5369 W. Irving St., Boise, ID
83706. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 174 be amended by
establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of VNT1 protein in potato. That document referenced a summary
of the petition prepared by the petitioner J.R. Simplot Company, which
is available in the docket via https://www.regulations.gov. There were
no comments received in response to the notice of filing.
EPA previously established a temporary exemption from tolerance for
VNT1 protein in potato (40 CFR 174.534; 80 FR 9387) in conjunction with
an Experimental Use Permit (8917-EUP-2) in 2015. This temporary
exemption was subsequently amended (extended) on December 17, 2015 and
expires on April 1, 2017.
III. Final Rule
A. EPA's Safety Determination
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through
drinking water and in residential settings but does not include
occupational exposure. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in
establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance or tolerance exemption,
and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue . . . .'' Additionally, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D)
requires that EPA consider ``available information concerning the
cumulative effects of [a particular pesticide's] . . . residues and
other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA evaluated the available toxicity and exposure data on VNT1
protein and considered its validity, completeness, and reliability, as
well as the relationship of this information to human risk. A full
explanation of the data upon which EPA relied and its risk assessment
based on that data can be found within the December 6, 2016, document
entitled ``Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) Considerations
for VNT1 protein.'' This document, as well as other relevant
information, is available in the docket
[[Page 11515]]
for this action as described under ADDRESSES. Based upon its
evaluation, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result to the U.S. population, including infants and
children, from aggregate exposure to residues of VNT1 protein.
Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is
established for residues of VNT1 protein in potato when used as a
plant-incorporated protectant in accordance with the terms of
registration.
B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
EPA has determined that an analytical method is not required for
enforcement purposes since the Agency is establishing an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance without any numerical limitation.
Nonetheless, an analytical method was provided by J.R. Simplot for the
detection of VNT1 protein in potato. This method utilizes a
quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to detect the presence of
the Rpi-vntl gene in pSIM1678 transformed plants (pSIM1678 is the
transformation vector used by the registrant to incorporate the Rpi-
vntl gene into potato varieties). There are numerous homologs of Rpi-
vnt1 present in potato and tomato varieties and other wild Solanum
species that may result in non-specific amplification when using
primers designed to amplify Rpi-vnt1. To distinguish between plants
that naturally contain homologous sequences and those transformed with
pSIM1678, a second method amplifies a unique junction between the Rpi-
vnt1 terminator and the AGP promoter present in the pSIM1678 T-DNA.
This second method is intended to confirm the presence or absence of
pSIM1678 if there are false positive detection of Rpi-vnt1 homologs.
C. Revisions to Requested Tolerance Exemption
The current temporary tolerance exemption for VNT1 protein in
potato (40 CFR 174.534) approved by EPA on December 17, 2015, will be
changed to a permanent tolerance exemption.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes a tolerance exemption under FFDCA section
408(d) in response to a petition submitted to EPA. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance
exemption in this action, do not require the issuance of a proposed
rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes. As a result, this
action does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, EPA has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal
governments, on the relationship between the national government and
the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, EPA has determined that
Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), and Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not
impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require EPA's consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
V. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 174
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: January 18, 2017.
Jack Housenger,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 174--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 174 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7. U.S.C. 136-136y; 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Revise Sec. 174.534 to read as follows:
Sec. 174.534 VNT1 protein; exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance.
Residues of VNT1 protein in potato are exempt from the requirement
of a tolerance when the Rpi-vnt1 gene that express the VNT1 protein is
used as a plant-incorporated protectant in potato.
[FR Doc. 2017-03580 Filed 2-23-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P