Release of Risk and Exposure Assessment Planning Document for the Review of the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Oxides, 11356-11357 [2017-03432]
Download as PDF
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
11356
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 22, 2017 / Notices
Filed Date: 2/15/17.
Accession Number: 20170215–5095.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/8/17.
Docket Numbers: ER17–259–002.
Applicants: Darby Power, LLC.
Description: Compliance filing: Darby
Power, LLC Reactive Service
Compliance Filing to be effective
1/30/2017.
Filed Date: 2/14/17.
Accession Number: 20170214–5174.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/7/17.
Docket Numbers: ER17–260–002.
Applicants: Gavin Power, LLC.
Description: Compliance filing: Gavin
Power, LLC Reactive Service
Compliance Filing to be effective
1/30/2017.
Filed Date: 2/14/17.
Accession Number: 20170214–5179.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/7/17.
Docket Numbers: ER17–261–002.
Applicants: Lawrenceburg Power,
LLC.
Description: Compliance filing:
Lawrenceburg Power, LLC Reactive
Service Compliance Filing to be
effective 1/30/2017.
Filed Date: 2/14/17.
Accession Number: 20170214–5185.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/7/17.
Docket Numbers: ER17–262–002.
Applicants: Waterford Power, LLC.
Description: Compliance filing:
Waterford Power, LLC Reactive Service
Compliance Filing to be effective 1/30/
2017.
Filed Date: 2/14/17.
Accession Number: 20170214–5190.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/7/17.
Docket Numbers: ER17–386–001.
Applicants: New York Independent
System Operator, Inc.
Description: Compliance filing:
NYISO compliance: Remove emissions
controls from peaking plant design to be
effective 1/17/2017.
Filed Date: 2/15/17.
Accession Number: 20170215–5011.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/8/17.
Docket Numbers: ER17–549–001.
Applicants: New York Independent
System Operator, Inc.
Description: Compliance filing:
NYISO compliance re: Effective date for
revised fixed block unit pricing logic to
be effective 2/28/2017.
Filed Date: 2/14/17.
Accession Number: 20170214–5138.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/7/17.
Docket Numbers: ER17–884–001.
Applicants: Niagara Mohawk Power
Corporation, New York Independent
System Operator, Inc.
Description: Tariff Amendment:
NMPC amendment filing re: Corrections
to TSC formula rate template to be
effective 4/1/2017.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Feb 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
Filed Date: 2/15/17.
Accession Number: 20170215–5018.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/8/17.
Docket Numbers: ER17–971–000.
Applicants: PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
Original Service Agreement No. 4629;
Queue No. AB2–097 to be effective 1/
23/2017.
Filed Date: 2/15/17.
Accession Number: 20170215–5017.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/8/17.
Docket Numbers: ER17–972–000.
Applicants: PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
Original Service Agreement No. 4622;
Queue No. AB2–045 to be effective 1/
26/2017.
Filed Date: 2/15/17.
Accession Number: 20170215–5038.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/8/17.
Docket Numbers: ER17–973–000.
Applicants: Southwest Power Pool,
Inc.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
Revisions to Attachment O Reflecting
the Current ITPNT Schedule to be
effective 4/16/2017.
Filed Date: 2/15/17.
Accession Number: 20170215–5084.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/8/17.
The filings are accessible in the
Commission’s eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the
docket number.
Any person desiring to intervene or
protest in any of the above proceedings
must file in accordance with Rules 211
and 214 of the Commission’s
Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified comment date.
Protests may be considered, but
intervention is necessary to become a
party to the proceeding.
eFiling is encouraged. More detailed
information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests,
service, and qualifying facilities filings
can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/
docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For
other information, call (866) 208–3676
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.
Dated: February 15, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–03411 Filed 2–21–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–0566; FRL–9959–22–
OAR]
Release of Risk and Exposure
Assessment Planning Document for
the Review of the Primary National
Ambient Air Quality Standards for
Sulfur Oxides
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is conducting a periodic
review of the air quality criteria and the
primary National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) for Sulfur Oxides
(SOX). On or about February 16, 2017,
the EPA will make available for public
review the document titled Review of
the Primary National Ambient Air
Quality Standards for Sulfur Oxides:
Risk and Exposure Assessment Planning
Document (REA Planning Document).
This plan presents considerations and
the proposed approach for conducting
quantitative analyses of sulfur dioxide
(SO2) exposures and health risks in this
NAAQS review. This planning
document is intended to facilitate
consultation with the Clean Air
Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC)
and public comment on plans for such
quantitative analyses.
DATES: Comments should be received on
or before April 13, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2013–0566, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or withdrawn. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e., on the Web,
Cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 22, 2017 / Notices
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets. The REA
Planning Document will be available
primarily via the Internet at https://
www.epa.gov/naaqs/sulfur-dioxide-so2primary-standards-planningdocuments-current-review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Nicole Hagan, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards (Mail Code
C504–06), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NC 27711; telephone number:
919–541–3153; fax number: 919–541–
5315; email: hagan.nicole@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
I. General Information
A. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for the EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through https://
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
part 2.
2. Tips for Preparing your Comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
• Identify the notice by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
• Follow directions. The agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
CFR part or section number.
• Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternative and substitute
language for your requested changes.
• Describe any assumption and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
• If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
• Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
• Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Feb 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
• Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Information About the Document
Two sections of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) govern the establishment and
revision of the NAAQS. Section 108 (42
U.S.C. 7408) directs the Administrator
to identify and list certain air pollutants
and then to issue air quality criteria for
those pollutants. The Administrator is
to list those air pollutants that in his
‘‘judgment, cause or contribute to air
pollution which may reasonably be
anticipated to endanger public health or
welfare’’; ‘‘the presence of which in the
ambient air results from numerous or
diverse mobile or stationary sources’’;
and ‘‘for which . . . [the Administrator]
plans to issue air quality criteria . . .’’
(42 U.S.C. 7408(a)(1)(A)–(C)). Air
quality criteria are intended to
‘‘accurately reflect the latest scientific
knowledge useful in indicating the kind
and extent of all identifiable effects on
public health or welfare which may be
expected from the presence of [a]
pollutant in the ambient air . . .’’ (42
U.S.C. 7408(a)(2)). Under section 109
(42 U.S.C. 7409), the EPA establishes
primary (health-based) and secondary
(welfare-based) NAAQS for pollutants
for which air quality criteria are issued.
Section 109(d) requires periodic review
and, if appropriate, revision of existing
air quality criteria. The revised air
quality criteria reflect advances in
scientific knowledge on the effects of
the pollutant on public health or
welfare. The EPA is also required to
periodically review and revise the
NAAQS, if appropriate, based on the
revised criteria. Section 109(d)(2)
requires that an independent scientific
review committee ‘‘shall complete a
review of the criteria . . . and the
national primary and secondary ambient
air quality standards . . . and shall
recommend to the Administrator any
new . . . standards and revisions of the
existing criteria and standards as may be
appropriate . . . .’’ Since the early
1980s, this independent review function
has been performed by the CASAC.
Presently, the EPA is reviewing the air
quality criteria and primary NAAQS for
SOx.1 The EPA’s overall plan for this
review is presented in the Integrated
Review Plan for the Primary NAAQS for
Sulfur Dioxide (IRP).2 The REA
Planning Document considers the
degree to which important uncertainties
identified in quantitative analyses from
1 The
indicator for the current standard is SO2.
IRP (EPA–452/R–14–007, October 2014) is
available at https://www.epa.gov/naaqs/sulfurdioxide-so2-primary-standards-planningdocuments-current-review.
2 The
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11357
previous reviews have been addressed
by newly available scientific evidence,
tools, or information, including those in
the second draft Integrated Science
Assessment for Sulfur Oxides—Health
Criteria (ISA).3 Based on these
considerations, the document reaches
preliminary conclusions on the extent to
which updated quantitative analyses of
exposures or health risks are warranted
in the current review. For updated
analyses that are supported, this
planning document presents anticipated
approaches to conducting such
analyses. This document will be
available on or about February 16, 2017,
on the EPA’s Technology Transfer
Network Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/naaqs/sulfur-dioxide-so2primary-standards-planningdocuments-current-review.
The REA Planning Document has
been made available for consultation
with the CASAC at an upcoming public
meeting of the CASAC. A separate
Federal Register notice will provide
details about this meeting and the
process for participation. The EPA will
also consider public comments on the
REA Planning Document that are
submitted to the docket, as described
above.
Dated: February 13, 2017.
Stephen Page,
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards.
[FR Doc. 2017–03432 Filed 2–21–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Notice of Agreements Filed
The Commission hereby gives notice
of the filing of the following agreements
under the Shipping Act of 1984.
Interested parties may submit comments
on the agreements to the Secretary,
Federal Maritime Commission,
Washington, DC 20573, within twelve
days of the date this notice appears in
the Federal Register. Copies of the
agreements are available through the
Commission’s Web site (www.fmc.gov)
or by contacting the Office of
Agreements at (202) 523–5793 or
tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.
Agreement No.: 012461.
Title: Maersk Line/HSDG Space
Charter Agreement.
Parties: Maersk Line A/S and
Hamburg Sud.
3 The second draft ISA was made available to
both CASAC and the public in December 2016 (81
FR 89097) and is available at: https://www.epa.gov/
naaqs/sulfur-dioxide-so2-primary-standardsintegrated-science-assessments-current-review.
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 34 (Wednesday, February 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11356-11357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-03432]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0566; FRL-9959-22-OAR]
Release of Risk and Exposure Assessment Planning Document for the
Review of the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur
Oxides
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is conducting a
periodic review of the air quality criteria and the primary National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Sulfur Oxides
(SOX). On or about February 16, 2017, the EPA will make
available for public review the document titled Review of the Primary
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Oxides: Risk and
Exposure Assessment Planning Document (REA Planning Document). This
plan presents considerations and the proposed approach for conducting
quantitative analyses of sulfur dioxide (SO2) exposures and
health risks in this NAAQS review. This planning document is intended
to facilitate consultation with the Clean Air Scientific Advisory
Committee (CASAC) and public comment on plans for such quantitative
analyses.
DATES: Comments should be received on or before April 13, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2013-0566, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The
EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must
be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered
the official comment and should include discussion of all points you
wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web,
Cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit
[[Page 11357]]
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. The REA Planning
Document will be available primarily via the Internet at https://www.epa.gov/naaqs/sulfur-dioxide-so2-primary-standards-planning-documents-current-review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Nicole Hagan, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards (Mail Code C504-06), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number:
919-541-3153; fax number: 919-541-5315; email: hagan.nicole@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
https://regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 2.
2. Tips for Preparing your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
Identify the notice by docket number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
Follow directions. The agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a CFR part or
section number.
Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternative and
substitute language for your requested changes.
Describe any assumption and provide any technical
information and/or data that you used.
If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the
use of profanity or personal threats.
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Information About the Document
Two sections of the Clean Air Act (CAA) govern the establishment
and revision of the NAAQS. Section 108 (42 U.S.C. 7408) directs the
Administrator to identify and list certain air pollutants and then to
issue air quality criteria for those pollutants. The Administrator is
to list those air pollutants that in his ``judgment, cause or
contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to
endanger public health or welfare''; ``the presence of which in the
ambient air results from numerous or diverse mobile or stationary
sources''; and ``for which . . . [the Administrator] plans to issue air
quality criteria . . .'' (42 U.S.C. 7408(a)(1)(A)-(C)). Air quality
criteria are intended to ``accurately reflect the latest scientific
knowledge useful in indicating the kind and extent of all identifiable
effects on public health or welfare which may be expected from the
presence of [a] pollutant in the ambient air . . .'' (42 U.S.C.
7408(a)(2)). Under section 109 (42 U.S.C. 7409), the EPA establishes
primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) NAAQS for
pollutants for which air quality criteria are issued. Section 109(d)
requires periodic review and, if appropriate, revision of existing air
quality criteria. The revised air quality criteria reflect advances in
scientific knowledge on the effects of the pollutant on public health
or welfare. The EPA is also required to periodically review and revise
the NAAQS, if appropriate, based on the revised criteria. Section
109(d)(2) requires that an independent scientific review committee
``shall complete a review of the criteria . . . and the national
primary and secondary ambient air quality standards . . . and shall
recommend to the Administrator any new . . . standards and revisions of
the existing criteria and standards as may be appropriate . . . .''
Since the early 1980s, this independent review function has been
performed by the CASAC.
Presently, the EPA is reviewing the air quality criteria and
primary NAAQS for SOx.\1\ The EPA's overall plan for this
review is presented in the Integrated Review Plan for the Primary NAAQS
for Sulfur Dioxide (IRP).\2\ The REA Planning Document considers the
degree to which important uncertainties identified in quantitative
analyses from previous reviews have been addressed by newly available
scientific evidence, tools, or information, including those in the
second draft Integrated Science Assessment for Sulfur Oxides--Health
Criteria (ISA).\3\ Based on these considerations, the document reaches
preliminary conclusions on the extent to which updated quantitative
analyses of exposures or health risks are warranted in the current
review. For updated analyses that are supported, this planning document
presents anticipated approaches to conducting such analyses. This
document will be available on or about February 16, 2017, on the EPA's
Technology Transfer Network Web site at https://www.epa.gov/naaqs/sulfur-dioxide-so2-primary-standards-planning-documents-current-review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The indicator for the current standard is SO2.
\2\ The IRP (EPA-452/R-14-007, October 2014) is available at
https://www.epa.gov/naaqs/sulfur-dioxide-so2-primary-standards-planning-documents-current-review.
\3\ The second draft ISA was made available to both CASAC and
the public in December 2016 (81 FR 89097) and is available at:
https://www.epa.gov/naaqs/sulfur-dioxide-so2-primary-standards-integrated-science-assessments-current-review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The REA Planning Document has been made available for consultation
with the CASAC at an upcoming public meeting of the CASAC. A separate
Federal Register notice will provide details about this meeting and the
process for participation. The EPA will also consider public comments
on the REA Planning Document that are submitted to the docket, as
described above.
Dated: February 13, 2017.
Stephen Page,
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2017-03432 Filed 2-21-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P