Safety Zone; Operational Equipment Test; Bellingham Bay; Bellingham, WA, 9972-9973 [2017-02681]
Download as PDF
9972
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 26 / Thursday, February 9, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0084]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Operational Equipment
Test; Bellingham Bay; Bellingham, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a 500-yard temporary safety
zone around barge Togiak Trader and
tug Rosario within the Bellingham Bay
Explosive Anchorage. The safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of the
maritime public due to an operational
equipment test utilizing compressed air
onboard that vessel. The safety zone
will prohibit any person or vessel from
entering or remaining in the safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port or his Designated Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 5 p.m.
on February 8, 2017, to 5 a.m. on
February 10, 2017. It will only be
enforced during two periods: From 5
p.m. on February 8, 2017, to 5 a.m. on
February 9, 2017, and from 5 p.m. on
February 9, 2017, to 5 a.m. on February
10, 2017.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2016–
0084 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email MST1 Wayne Lau, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 206–217–6051, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:44 Feb 08, 2017
Jkt 241001
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because
publishing an NPRM would be
impracticable as delayed promulgation
may result in injury or damage to the
maritime public from an operational
equipment test in Bellingham Bay prior
to conclusion of a notice and comment
period.
We are issuing this rule, and under 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for making it
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
Delaying the effective date of this rule
would be impracticable because of the
potential maritime hazards associated
with the operational equipment tests
that are the subject of this rule will
occur from February 8 through 10, 2017,
and this rule must be effective during
these tests to protect against those
hazards.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
Captain of the Port, Puget Sound has
determined that potential hazards
associated with operational equipment
tests will be a safety concern for anyone
transiting through the location of the
operation. This rule is needed to ensure
the safety of the maritime public from
hazards associated with operational
equipment tests in Bellingham Bay.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a temporary
safety zone that will be enforced during
two 12-hour periods: From 5 p.m. on
February 8, 2017, to 5 a.m. on February
9, 2017, and on from 5 p.m. on February
9, 2017, to 5 a.m. on February 10, 2017.
The safety zone will cover all navigable
waters within 500 yards of the barge
Togiak Trader (ON:637310) and tug
Rosario (ON:585319), located near
48°42′48″ N. 122°33′37″ W., within the
explosives anchorage in Bellingham
Bay.
The duration of the zone is intended
to protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment in these navigable
waters while operational equipment
testing is being conducted. No vessel or
person will be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative while the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
zone is subject to enforcement. Vessels
wishing to enter the safety zone during
the two enforcement periods must
request permission to do so from the
Captain of the Port, Puget Sound by
contacting the Joint Harbor Operations
Center at 206–217–6001 or the on-scene
patrol craft, if any, via VHF–FM
Channel 16.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance
of quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
has not been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under E.O. 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the limited nature of the size
and duration of the temporary safety
zone. Vessel traffic will be able to safely
transit around this safety zone which
will impact a small designated area of
Bellingham Bay. Moreover, the Coast
Guard will issue a Special Marine
Information Broadcast via VHF–FM
Channel 16 about the safety zone and
the rule allows vessels to seek
permission to enter the safety zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V above, this
rule will not have a significant
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 26 / Thursday, February 9, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator, because the zone
established in this rule is limited in
nature of size and duration.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has
a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the
fundamental federalism principles and
preemption requirements described in
E.O. 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, because it
does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:44 Feb 08, 2017
Jkt 241001
contact the person listed in the FOR
section
above.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
temporary safety zone that is limited in
duration that will prohibit entry within
500 yards of the designated area. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
9973
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T13–0084 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–0084 Safety Zone; Operational
Equipment Test; Bellingham Bay;
Bellingham, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is
designated as a safety zone: All waters
500 yards around barge Togiak Trader
(ON:637310) and tug Rosario
(ON:585319), moored in vicinity of
48°42′48″ N., 122°33′37″ W., within the
Bellingham Bay explosives anchorage.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in subpart C of
this part, no person or vessel may enter
or remain in the safety zone while it is
subject to enforcement as specified in
paragraph (c) of this section unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Puget Sound or his designated
representative. To request permission to
enter the safety zone, contact the Joint
Harbor Operations Center at 206–217–
6001, or the on-scene patrol craft, if any,
via VHF–FM Channel 16.
(c) Enforcement periods. This section
will be enforced from from 5 p.m. on
February 8, 2017, to 5 a.m. on February
9, 2017, and from 5 p.m. on February 9,
2017, to 5 a.m. on February 10, 2017.
Dated: February 2, 2017.
M.W. Raymond,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2017–02681 Filed 2–8–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 294
RIN 0596–AD26
Roadless Area Conservation; National
Forest System Lands in Colorado;
Delay of Effective Date
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
AGENCY:
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
ACTION:
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Forest Service, USDA.
Final rule; delay of effective
date.
This document delays the
effective date of a final rule titled,
‘‘Roadless Area Conservation; National
Forest System Lands in Colorado,’’ that
was published in the Federal Register
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 26 (Thursday, February 9, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9972-9973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-02681]
[[Page 9972]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2016-0084]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Operational Equipment Test; Bellingham Bay;
Bellingham, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a 500-yard temporary safety
zone around barge Togiak Trader and tug Rosario within the Bellingham
Bay Explosive Anchorage. The safety zone is necessary to ensure the
safety of the maritime public due to an operational equipment test
utilizing compressed air onboard that vessel. The safety zone will
prohibit any person or vessel from entering or remaining in the safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his Designated
Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 5 p.m. on February 8, 2017, to 5
a.m. on February 10, 2017. It will only be enforced during two periods:
From 5 p.m. on February 8, 2017, to 5 a.m. on February 9, 2017, and
from 5 p.m. on February 9, 2017, to 5 a.m. on February 10, 2017.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0084 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email MST1 Wayne Lau, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 206-217-6051, email SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because publishing an NPRM would be
impracticable as delayed promulgation may result in injury or damage to
the maritime public from an operational equipment test in Bellingham
Bay prior to conclusion of a notice and comment period.
We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective
date of this rule would be impracticable because of the potential
maritime hazards associated with the operational equipment tests that
are the subject of this rule will occur from February 8 through 10,
2017, and this rule must be effective during these tests to protect
against those hazards.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The Captain of the Port, Puget Sound has determined that
potential hazards associated with operational equipment tests will be a
safety concern for anyone transiting through the location of the
operation. This rule is needed to ensure the safety of the maritime
public from hazards associated with operational equipment tests in
Bellingham Bay.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a temporary safety zone that will be enforced
during two 12-hour periods: From 5 p.m. on February 8, 2017, to 5 a.m.
on February 9, 2017, and on from 5 p.m. on February 9, 2017, to 5 a.m.
on February 10, 2017. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters
within 500 yards of the barge Togiak Trader (ON:637310) and tug Rosario
(ON:585319), located near 48[deg]42'48'' N. 122[deg]33'37'' W., within
the explosives anchorage in Bellingham Bay.
The duration of the zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment in these navigable waters while operational
equipment testing is being conducted. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated representative while the zone is subject to
enforcement. Vessels wishing to enter the safety zone during the two
enforcement periods must request permission to do so from the Captain
of the Port, Puget Sound by contacting the Joint Harbor Operations
Center at 206-217-6001 or the on-scene patrol craft, if any, via VHF-FM
Channel 16.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both
costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of
promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated a
``significant regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, it
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
This regulatory action determination is based on the limited nature
of the size and duration of the temporary safety zone. Vessel traffic
will be able to safely transit around this safety zone which will
impact a small designated area of Bellingham Bay. Moreover, the Coast
Guard will issue a Special Marine Information Broadcast via VHF-FM
Channel 16 about the safety zone and the rule allows vessels to seek
permission to enter the safety zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V
above, this rule will not have a significant
[[Page 9973]]
economic impact on any vessel owner or operator, because the zone
established in this rule is limited in nature of size and duration.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because
it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has
implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves a temporary safety zone that is limited in duration that
will prohibit entry within 500 yards of the designated area. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-0084 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-0084 Safety Zone; Operational Equipment Test; Bellingham
Bay; Bellingham, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is designated as a safety zone:
All waters 500 yards around barge Togiak Trader (ON:637310) and tug
Rosario (ON:585319), moored in vicinity of 48[deg]42'48'' N.,
122[deg]33'37'' W., within the Bellingham Bay explosives anchorage.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in
subpart C of this part, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the
safety zone while it is subject to enforcement as specified in
paragraph (c) of this section unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound or his designated representative. To request
permission to enter the safety zone, contact the Joint Harbor
Operations Center at 206-217-6001, or the on-scene patrol craft, if
any, via VHF-FM Channel 16.
(c) Enforcement periods. This section will be enforced from from 5
p.m. on February 8, 2017, to 5 a.m. on February 9, 2017, and from 5
p.m. on February 9, 2017, to 5 a.m. on February 10, 2017.
Dated: February 2, 2017.
M.W. Raymond,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2017-02681 Filed 2-8-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P