Human Factors Engineering, 8880-8881 [2017-02060]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
8880
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 31, 2017 / Notices
Secretary that the participant will be
submitting a petition or other
adjudicatory document (even in
instances in which the participant, or its
counsel or representative, already holds
an NRC-issued digital ID certificate).
Based upon this information, the
Secretary will establish an electronic
docket for the hearing in this proceeding
if the Secretary has not already
established an electronic docket.
Information about applying for a
digital ID certificate is available on the
NRC’s public Web site at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/
getting-started.html. Once a participant
has obtained a digital ID certificate and
a docket has been created, the
participant can then submit
adjudicatory documents. Submissions
must be in Portable Document Format
(PDF). Additional guidance on PDF
submissions is available on the NRC’s
public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/
site-help/electronic-sub-ref-mat.html. A
filing is considered complete at the time
the document is submitted through the
NRC’s E-Filing system. To be timely, an
electronic filing must be submitted to
the E-Filing system no later than 11:59
p.m. Eastern Time on the due date.
Upon receipt of a transmission, the EFiling system time-stamps the document
and sends the submitter an email notice
confirming receipt of the document. The
E-Filing system also distributes an email
notice that provides access to the
document to the NRC’s Office of the
General Counsel and any others who
have advised the Office of the Secretary
that they wish to participate in the
proceeding, so that the filer need not
serve the document on those
participants separately. Therefore,
applicants and other participants (or
their counsel or representative) must
apply for and receive a digital ID
certificate before adjudicatory
documents are filed so that they can
obtain access to the documents via the
E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using
the NRC’s adjudicatory E-Filing system
may seek assistance by contacting the
NRC’s Electronic Filing Help Desk
through the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link located
on the NRC’s public Web site at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html, by email to
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call at 1–866–672–7640. The NRC
Electronic Filing Help Desk is available
between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday,
excluding government holidays.
Participants who believe that they
have a good cause for not submitting
documents electronically must file an
exemption request, in accordance with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 30, 2017
Jkt 241001
10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper
filing stating why there is good cause for
not filing electronically and requesting
authorization to continue to submit
documents in paper format. Such filings
must be submitted by: (1) First class
mail addressed to the Office of the
Secretary of the Commission, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or
(2) courier, express mail, or expedited
delivery service to the Office of the
Secretary, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland 20852, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff.
Participants filing adjudicatory
documents in this manner are
responsible for serving the document on
all other participants. Filing is
considered complete by first-class mail
as of the time of deposit in the mail, or
by courier, express mail, or expedited
delivery service upon depositing the
document with the provider of the
service. A presiding officer, having
granted an exemption request from
using E-Filing, may require a participant
or party to use E-Filing if the presiding
officer subsequently determines that the
reason for granting the exemption from
use of E-Filing no longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory
proceedings will appear in the NRC’s
electronic hearing docket which is
available to the public at https://
adams.nrc.gov/ehd, unless excluded
pursuant to an order of the Commission
or the presiding officer. If you do not
have an NRC-issued digital ID certificate
as described above, click cancel when
the link requests certificates and you
will be automatically directed to the
NRC’s electronic hearing dockets where
you will be able to access any publicly
available documents in a particular
hearing docket. Participants are
requested not to include personal
privacy information, such as social
security numbers, home addresses, or
personal phone numbers in their filings,
unless an NRC regulation or other law
requires submission of such
information. For example, in some
instances, individuals provide home
addresses in order to demonstrate
proximity to a facility or site.
With respect to copyrighted works,
except for limited excerpts that serve
the purpose of the adjudicatory filings
and would constitute a Fair Use
application, participants are requested
not to include copyrighted materials in
their submission.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day
of January, 2017.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Andrea Kock,
Deputy Director, Division of
Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery and
Waste Programs, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2017–02036 Filed 1–30–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2015–0187]
Human Factors Engineering
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Standard review plan-final
section revision; issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing a final
revision to Section 18.0, ‘‘Human
Factors Engineering,’’ of NUREG–0800,
‘‘Standard Review Plan (SRP) for the
Review of Safety Analysis Reports for
Nuclear Power Plants: LWR Edition.’’
DATES: The effective date of this SRP
revision is March 2, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2015–0187 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may access publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2015–0187. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced in this notice (if
that document is available in ADAMS)
is provided the first time that a
document is referenced. The final
revisions, previously issued draft
revisions for public use and comment,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 31, 2017 / Notices
and redline strikeouts comparing final
revisions with draft revisions are
available in ADAMS under the
following Accession Nos.:
ML16125A114, ML13108A095, and
ML16125A296, respectively.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Notich, Office of New Reactors,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–3053; email: Mark.Notich@
nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On August 10, 2015 (80 FR 47958),
the NRC published for public comment
a proposed revision of Section 18.0,
‘‘Human Factors Engineering,’’ of
NUREG–0800, ‘‘Standard Review Plan
(SRP) for the Review of Safety Analysis
Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: LWR
Edition.’’ On October 8, 2015, the NRC
received a request to extend the
comment period for 30 days. Prior to
granting the request, the NRC received
a request for a public meeting to discuss
industry comments. A public meeting
was held on January 7, 2016, and on
February 24, 2016 (81 FR 9226), the
NRC published an extension of the
public comment period for the SRP. The
public comment period closed on March
11, 2016. A summary of comments
received and the staff’s disposition of
the comments are available in a separate
document, ‘‘Response to Public
Comments on Draft Standard Review
Plan, Section 18.0, ‘‘Human Factors
Engineering,’’ (ADAMS Accession No.
ML16112A329). In addition to revising
the text of SRP 18.0 to address public
comments, the staff revised the text to
add a reference to NUREG–1852;
reinserted specific guidance that was in
previous versions of SRP 18.0 but
deleted during the draft phase of
Revision 3; and made editorial changes.
None of these revisions changed the
staff’s approach to reviewing human
factors engineering information in
licensing applications.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Backfitting and Issue Finality
Section 18 of the SRP provides
guidance to the staff for reviewing
applications for a construction permit
and an operating license under part 50
of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) with respect to
systems associated with human factors
engineering. Section 18.0 of the SRP
provides guidance for reviewing an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 30, 2017
Jkt 241001
application for a standard design
approval, a standard design
certification, a combined license, and a
manufacturing license under 10 CFR
part 52 with respect to the same subject
matters.
Issuance of this SRP section revision
does not constitute backfitting as
defined in 10 CFR 50.109 (the Backfit
Rule) nor is it inconsistent with the
issue finality provisions in 10 CFR part
52. The NRC’s position is based upon
the following considerations.
1. The SRP positions would not
constitute backfitting, inasmuch as the
SRP is internal guidance to NRC staff.
The SRP provides internal guidance
to the NRC staff on how to review an
application for NRC regulatory approval
in the form of licensing. Changes in
internal staff guidance are not matters
for which either nuclear power plant
applicants or licensees are protected
under either the Backfit Rule or the
issue finality provisions of 10 CFR part
52.
2. The NRC staff has no intention to
impose the SRP positions on existing
licensees either now or in the future.
The NRC staff does not intend to
impose or apply the positions described
in the SRP to existing licensees and
regulatory approvals. Hence, the
issuance of this SRP does not need to be
evaluated as if it were a backfit or as
being inconsistent with issue finality
provisions. If, in the future, the NRC
staff seeks to impose a position in the
SRP on holders of already issued
licenses in a manner that challenges
issue finality as described in the
applicable part 52 issue finality
provision, then the staff must either
make the requisite showing as set forth
in the Backfit Rule or address the
criteria for avoiding issue finality as
described in the applicable part 52 issue
finality provision.
3. Backfitting and issue finality do
not—with limited exceptions not
applicable here—protect current or
future applicants.
Applicants and potential applicants
are not, with certain exceptions,
protected by either the Backfit Rule or
any issue finality provisions under 10
CFR part 52. Neither the Backfit Rule
nor the issue finality provisions under
10 CFR part 52—with certain
exclusions—were intended to apply to
every NRC action that substantially
changes the expectations of current and
future applicants.
The exceptions to the general
principle are applicable whenever an
applicant references a 10 CFR part 52
license (e.g., an early site permit) or
NRC regulatory approval (e.g., a design
certification rule) with specified issue
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8881
finality provisions. The NRC staff does
not, at this time, intend to impose the
positions represented in the SRP in a
manner that is inconsistent with any
issue finality provisions. If, in the
future, the staff seeks to impose a
position in the SRP section in a manner
that does not provide issue finality as
described in the applicable issue finality
provision, then the staff must address
the criteria for avoiding issue finality as
described in the applicable issue finality
provision.
III. Congressional Review Act
This action is a rule as defined in the
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C.
801–808). However, the Office of
Management and Budget has not found
it to be a major rule as defined in the
Congressional Review Act.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day
of January 2017.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph Colaccino,
Chief, New Reactor Rulemaking and
Guidance Branch, Division of Engineering,
Infrastruture and Advanced Reactors, Office
of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2017–02060 Filed 1–30–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2016–0070]
Information Collection: NRC Form 212,
‘‘Qualifications Investigation
Professional, Technical, and
Administrative Positions’’
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of submission to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB); request for comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has recently
submitted a request for renewal of an
existing collection of information to
OMB for review. The information
collection is entitled, NRC Form 212,
‘‘Qualifications Investigation
Professional, Technical, and
Administrative Positions.’’
DATES: Submit comments by March 2,
2017.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments directly
to the OMB reviewer at: Vlad Dorjets,
Desk Officer, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (3150–0033), NEOB–
10202, Office of Management and
Budget, Washington, DC 20503;
telephone: 202–395–7315, email: oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 31, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8880-8881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-02060]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2015-0187]
Human Factors Engineering
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Standard review plan-final section revision; issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing a
final revision to Section 18.0, ``Human Factors Engineering,'' of
NUREG-0800, ``Standard Review Plan (SRP) for the Review of Safety
Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: LWR Edition.''
DATES: The effective date of this SRP revision is March 2, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2015-0187 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may access publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0187. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this notice (if
that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a
document is referenced. The final revisions, previously issued draft
revisions for public use and comment,
[[Page 8881]]
and redline strikeouts comparing final revisions with draft revisions
are available in ADAMS under the following Accession Nos.: ML16125A114,
ML13108A095, and ML16125A296, respectively.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Notich, Office of New Reactors,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001;
telephone: 301-415-3053; email: Mark.Notich@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On August 10, 2015 (80 FR 47958), the NRC published for public
comment a proposed revision of Section 18.0, ``Human Factors
Engineering,'' of NUREG-0800, ``Standard Review Plan (SRP) for the
Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: LWR
Edition.'' On October 8, 2015, the NRC received a request to extend the
comment period for 30 days. Prior to granting the request, the NRC
received a request for a public meeting to discuss industry comments. A
public meeting was held on January 7, 2016, and on February 24, 2016
(81 FR 9226), the NRC published an extension of the public comment
period for the SRP. The public comment period closed on March 11, 2016.
A summary of comments received and the staff's disposition of the
comments are available in a separate document, ``Response to Public
Comments on Draft Standard Review Plan, Section 18.0, ``Human Factors
Engineering,'' (ADAMS Accession No. ML16112A329). In addition to
revising the text of SRP 18.0 to address public comments, the staff
revised the text to add a reference to NUREG-1852; reinserted specific
guidance that was in previous versions of SRP 18.0 but deleted during
the draft phase of Revision 3; and made editorial changes. None of
these revisions changed the staff's approach to reviewing human factors
engineering information in licensing applications.
II. Backfitting and Issue Finality
Section 18 of the SRP provides guidance to the staff for reviewing
applications for a construction permit and an operating license under
part 50 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) with
respect to systems associated with human factors engineering. Section
18.0 of the SRP provides guidance for reviewing an application for a
standard design approval, a standard design certification, a combined
license, and a manufacturing license under 10 CFR part 52 with respect
to the same subject matters.
Issuance of this SRP section revision does not constitute
backfitting as defined in 10 CFR 50.109 (the Backfit Rule) nor is it
inconsistent with the issue finality provisions in 10 CFR part 52. The
NRC's position is based upon the following considerations.
1. The SRP positions would not constitute backfitting, inasmuch as
the SRP is internal guidance to NRC staff.
The SRP provides internal guidance to the NRC staff on how to
review an application for NRC regulatory approval in the form of
licensing. Changes in internal staff guidance are not matters for which
either nuclear power plant applicants or licensees are protected under
either the Backfit Rule or the issue finality provisions of 10 CFR part
52.
2. The NRC staff has no intention to impose the SRP positions on
existing licensees either now or in the future.
The NRC staff does not intend to impose or apply the positions
described in the SRP to existing licensees and regulatory approvals.
Hence, the issuance of this SRP does not need to be evaluated as if it
were a backfit or as being inconsistent with issue finality provisions.
If, in the future, the NRC staff seeks to impose a position in the SRP
on holders of already issued licenses in a manner that challenges issue
finality as described in the applicable part 52 issue finality
provision, then the staff must either make the requisite showing as set
forth in the Backfit Rule or address the criteria for avoiding issue
finality as described in the applicable part 52 issue finality
provision.
3. Backfitting and issue finality do not--with limited exceptions
not applicable here--protect current or future applicants.
Applicants and potential applicants are not, with certain
exceptions, protected by either the Backfit Rule or any issue finality
provisions under 10 CFR part 52. Neither the Backfit Rule nor the issue
finality provisions under 10 CFR part 52--with certain exclusions--were
intended to apply to every NRC action that substantially changes the
expectations of current and future applicants.
The exceptions to the general principle are applicable whenever an
applicant references a 10 CFR part 52 license (e.g., an early site
permit) or NRC regulatory approval (e.g., a design certification rule)
with specified issue finality provisions. The NRC staff does not, at
this time, intend to impose the positions represented in the SRP in a
manner that is inconsistent with any issue finality provisions. If, in
the future, the staff seeks to impose a position in the SRP section in
a manner that does not provide issue finality as described in the
applicable issue finality provision, then the staff must address the
criteria for avoiding issue finality as described in the applicable
issue finality provision.
III. Congressional Review Act
This action is a rule as defined in the Congressional Review Act (5
U.S.C. 801-808). However, the Office of Management and Budget has not
found it to be a major rule as defined in the Congressional Review Act.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day of January 2017.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph Colaccino,
Chief, New Reactor Rulemaking and Guidance Branch, Division of
Engineering, Infrastruture and Advanced Reactors, Office of New
Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2017-02060 Filed 1-30-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P