Environmental Impact Statement-Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, 7913-7915 [2017-01448]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Tollway and CP have presented related
issues that ultimately may be relevant to
future construction plans and activities
for the EOWA Project. Therefore, it is
appropriate to institute a proceeding to
provide guidance on the issues raised by
both the Tollway and CP.
The Board will establish a procedural
schedule for the filing of additional
pleadings. The Tollway’s petition will
serve as its opening statement. CP’s
substantive reply and comments from
other interested persons will be due by
February 23, 2017. In its substantive
reply, CP should provide an analysis
that details the impact of the proposed
construction projects on its rail
operations. The Tollway and other
interested parties may respond to CP’s
reply only on the issue of the potential
crossing of the Bensenville Yard by
March 16, 2017.
CP also requests that the Board allow
for limited discovery on the Tollway’s
alternative alignment options, the
Tollway’s plans regarding the
Bensenville Yard, and the basis of the
Tollway’s expert opinions. CP’s request
for discovery will be denied. The Board
often does not provide for discovery in
declaratory order proceedings.3 Nor is it
apparent that discovery is necessary
here. Alignment options for the tollway
were analyzed and discussed in the
Environmental Impact Statements for
the EOWA Project, which are publicly
available and which CP cites in its
reply. (Tollway Surreply 4; CP Reply 8.)
These Environmental Impact Statements
also provide information regarding the
Tollway’s prospective plans for the
Bensenville Yard.4 To the extent that CP
wishes to challenge the Tollway’s expert
witness’s findings on and observations
of CP’s rail operations, CP possesses the
information on its own operations
needed to call into question the bases
for the expert witness’s conclusions. For
these reasons, the Board will not order
discovery in this proceeding.
It is ordered:
1. A proceeding is instituted.
2. CP and other interested persons
may file substantive replies to the
Tollway’s petition by February 23, 2017.
3. The Tollway and interested persons
may file responses to CP’s reply, limited
to only the issue of the Bensenville
Yard, by March 16, 2017.
3 See, e.g., CSX Transp. Inc.—Pet. for Declaratory
Order, FD 33388 (Sub-No. 101), slip op. at 5 (STB
served Aug. 27, 2008).
4 See Elgin O’Hare-West Bypass Study: Tier Two
Final Environmental Impact Statement (Oct. 2012),
§ 3.4.2. The Final Environmental Impact Statements
are available on the Illinois Department of
Transportation’s Web site at https://
apps.dot.illinois.gov/fileexplorer/
?search=environment/Elgin-Ohare%20final%20EIS.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:02 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
4. CP’s request for limited discovery
is denied.
5. The Tollway’s motion for leave to
file a surreply is granted.
6. CP’s motion for leave to file a reply
to the Tollway’s surreply is granted.
7. Notice of the Board’s action will be
published in the Federal Register.
8. This decision is effective on its
service date.
Decided: January 17, 2017.
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Kenyatta Clay,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2017–01379 Filed 1–19–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Environmental Impact Statement—
Transmission System Vegetation
Management Program
Tennessee Valley Authority.
Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Tennessee Valley
Authority (‘‘TVA’’) intends to prepare
an Environmental Impact Statement
(‘‘EIS’’) to address the management of
vegetation on its transmission system. In
order to ensure that electric service to
the public is not disrupted by outages
on its transmission lines, TVA must
control the vegetation on about 260,000
acres of the rights of way (‘‘ROW’’) for
those lines. This EIS will
programmatically consider the impacts
of vegetation management activities on
approximately 17,000 miles of
transmission line.
DATES: Comments on the scope of the
EIS must be received on or before March
20, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
scope of the EIS should be sent to Anita
E. Masters, Tennessee Valley Authority,
1101 Market Street, BR 4A, Chattanooga,
Tennessee 37402. Comments also may
be submitted online at tva.com/nepa or
by email to aemasters@tva.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further nepa information, contact Anita
Masters, 1101 Market Street BR 4A,
Chattanooga, TN 37402, aemasters@
tva.gov. For information on current row
maintenance practices, see TVA’s
Transmission Web page (https://
www.tva.gov/Energy/TransmissionSystem/Right-of-Way-Maintenance).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is provided in accordance with
the regulations promulgated by the
Council on Environmental Quality (40
CFR parts 1500 to 1508) and TVA’s
procedures implementing the National
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7913
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
(https://www.tva.com/Environment/
Environmental-Stewardship/
Environmental-Reviews/NEPA-at-TVA.)
TVA Power System and ROW
Maintenance
TVA is a federal agency and
instrumentality of the United States
created by and existing pursuant to the
TVA Act of 1933. Its broad mission is
to foster the social and economic
welfare of the people of the Tennessee
Valley region and to promote the proper
use and conservation of the region’s
natural resources. One component of
this mission is the generation,
transmission, and sale of reliable and
affordable electric energy.
TVA operates the nation’s largest
public power system, producing
approximately four percent of all of the
electricity in the nation. TVA provides
electricity to most of Tennessee and
parts of Virginia, North Carolina,
Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and
Kentucky. Currently, it serves more than
nine million people in this seven-state
region. The TVA Act requires the TVA
power system to be self-supporting and
operated on a nonprofit basis and
directs TVA to sell electricity at rates as
low as are feasible. TVA receives no
taxpayer funding, deriving virtually all
of its revenues from sales of electricity.
Most of the electricity is generated on
the TVA system from 3 nuclear plants,
8 coal-fired plants, 9 simple-cycle
combustion turbine plants, 7 combinedcycle combustion turbine plants, 29
hydroelectric dams, a pumped-storage
facility, a methane-gas cofiring facility,
a diesel-fired facility, non-TVA owned
facilities under power purchase
agreements, and various small solar
photovoltaic facilities. The electricity
generated by these resources is
transmitted along high-voltage
transmission lines to TVA business
customers and local power companies.
The local power companies then
distribute the electricity to end users
such as residents, business owners, and
public entities like school systems and
hospitals. Distribution lines are owned
and operated by local power companies
and are the power lines typically seen
along streets in neighborhoods.
TVA transmission lines are highvoltage (46-kilovolts or more, with 161kilovolt most common) and typically
have three conductors (wires)
suspended from large structures (towers
or tall poles) in ROWs that are cleared
of buildings and tall vegetation. In most
cases, transmission line ROWs vary in
width from about 75 feet to 200 feet,
with the width increasing with the
voltage of the line. Most of TVA’s ROWs
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
7914
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
are located on easements that TVA
acquired from property owners who still
can use easement areas in ways
consistent with TVA’s operation and
maintenance of its transmission lines.
These easements give TVA the legal
right to manage vegetation within its
ROWs as well as adjacent to the ROW
if vegetation is tall enough to pass
within ten feet of a conductor or strike
a structure should it fall toward the
transmission line.
TVA manages its transmission system
according to industry-wide standards
established by the North American
Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC).
Those standards state that the TVA
transmission system must be able to
survive single-failure events while
continuing to serve customer loads with
adequate voltage and no overloaded
facilities while maintaining adequate
transmission line clearances as required
by the National Electric Safety Code
(NESC).
In order to meet its goal of providing
the public safe and reliable electricity,
TVA must control the vegetation that
would otherwise grow up on its ROWs.
When trees or branches get too close to
high-voltage transmission lines,
electricity can arc through the air like a
lightning bolt, seeking the nearest path
to the ground, such as a tree. When this
occurs, the electricity can cause a fault
on the transmission line, severely
damaging or destroying nearby property
and structures (e.g., houses), and
injuring nearby people. The cost and
disruption to people’s lives when this
happens can be serious even if people
are not injured from the arc or flash over
itself. In August 2003, a single tree
contacted a transmission line in Ohio
and triggered cascading transmission
line failures and blackouts from Ontario,
Canada to the northeastern United
States. Eleven people died as a result of
these blackouts and the economic
impact was estimated at $6 billion. As
a result of the event, mandatory
reliability standards were developed
and implemented. These standards are
monitored and enforced by NERC.
TVA uses an integrated approach to
vegetation management on its ROWs
designed to encourage low-growing
plant species and discourage tallgrowing plant species. This includes the
initial clearing of trees and other tallgrowing vegetation from ROWs.
Vegetation re-clearing along ROWs
utilizes various management techniques
including mechanical mowing (using
tractor-mounted rotary mowers), tree
removal by means of chain saws or
other mechanized equipment, and nonrestricted herbicides registered with the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:02 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
when appropriate. TVA’s approach to
vegetation management historically has
taken into account whether the
vegetation is in the ‘‘wire zone,’’ the
area directly under the transmission line
and between the outermost conductors,
or the ‘‘border zone,’’ the areas between
the wire zone and the edge of the ROW,
as well as whether vegetation outside
the ROW is tall enough to pass within
ten feet of a conductor or strike a
structure should it fall toward the
transmission line.
The purpose of this EIS is to examine
at a programmatic level the potential
environmental impacts of vegetation
management practices along the
approximately 17,000 miles of TVA’s
transmission line within its seven-state
power service area and alternative
management approaches.
EIS Scope
Scoping is a process that allows the
public to comment on an agency’s plans
for an EIS. This includes identifying
issues that should be studied and those
that have little significance. The
public’s views on alternative actions
that meet the stated purpose of the EIS
are also helpful in preparing an EIS.
TVA anticipates evaluating several
alternative management approaches, but
these could change as the NEPA EIS
process progresses. As required by
applicable regulations, one of those
alternative approaches is the No Action
Alternative, or no change to TVA’s
current management practices. TVA has
evaluated growth rates, climate,
conductor sag and sway to design a
cyclical, preemptive vegetation
management program that is currently
practiced on TVA’s transmission line
system. TVA’s current management
practices target existing incompatible
vegetation within the ROW as well as
vegetation that will become
incompatible in the future. Under the
No Action Alternative, TVA’s ROW
management personnel have discretion
to manage the risk associated with
vegetation growth that otherwise would
be cleared. This approach allows TVA’s
ROW management personnel to allow
exceptions to having the entire width of
the ROW cleared by TVA. This
approach is subject to the availability of
financial resources. Any ‘‘danger’’ tree
adjacent to the ROW is cleared by TVA.
Danger trees include any trees located
beyond the cleared ROW, but that are
tall enough to pass within ten feet of a
conductor or strike a structure should it
fall toward the transmission line. TVA
would continue to maintain its ROWs
consistent with this approach, or any
different approach that may be
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
mandated during development of the
EIS.
A second alternative approach is
utilizing integrated vegetation
management (IVM) practices with a wire
zone/border zone approach, where TVA
sets objectives, identifies compatible
and incompatible vegetation. TVA
would then consider action thresholds
and evaluate, select and implement the
most appropriate methods to achieve
the established short and long-term
objectives. This vegetation control
method is based on considerations of
environmental impact and anticipated
effectiveness, safety, reliability,
economics, site topography and other
factors. This approach would be subject
to the availability of financial resources.
Any ‘‘danger’’ trees adjacent to the ROW
would be cleared by TVA.
A third alternative approach to be
considered is a border-to-border (BTB)
approach in which TVA would remove
all vegetation except the low-growing
vegetation for the width of the easement
on TVA ROWs (includes both the wire
and border zones as well as danger trees
outside the ROWs). This approach
would be subject to the availability of
financial resources. TVA ROWs would
take on the appearance and
characteristics of natural meadows, as
well as promote inflorescence by
keeping woody stem counts low.
A number of natural resource impacts
would be evaluated in the EIS. These
include potential impacts on air quality,
surface water, groundwater, aquatic
ecology, vegetation, wildlife, threatened
and endangered species, wetlands,
forest resources, and natural areas and
parks. In addition, TVA would evaluate
socioeconomic impacts and impacts on
archaeological and historic resources
and aesthetics (visual, noise, and odors).
Potential impacts from siting lines in
floodplains occur when new lines are
constructed and are usually addressed
in the environmental reviews done for
those lines. Accordingly, TVA does not
plan to address floodplain impacts in
this programmatic EIS unless
circumstances warrant.
These analyses will be conducted at a
programmatic, transmission systemwide level. For new transmission lines,
TVA considers the potential effects of
the initial ROW clearing and of
continuing site-specific vegetation
management. For ongoing vegetation
management of transmission lines
already on the TVA system, TVA
considers potential site-specific impacts
in its NEPA reviews of transmission
sector analyses, including impacts on
identified sensitive areas. TVA divides
its entire transmission system into
discrete ‘‘sectors’’ and conducts
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
environmental analyses within specific
sectors slated for vegetation
maintenance each year. TVA anticipates
that these sector area analyses would
continue in the future, tiering off of the
programmatic EIS when it is completed.
Public Participation
The public is invited to submit
comments on the scope of this EIS no
later than the date identified in the
‘‘Dates’’ section of this notice. After
TVA prepares a draft of the EIS, TVA
will release it for public comment. TVA
anticipates holding public meetings at
various locations throughout TVA’s
seven-state service area after release of
the draft EIS. Meeting details will be
posted on TVA’s Web site at tva.gov/
nepa.
Dated: January 13, 2017.
M. Susan Smelley,
Director, Environmental Permitting &
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–01448 Filed 1–19–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120–08–P
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
Generalized System of Preferences
(GSP): Notice Regarding the 2016/2017
GSP Annual Product Review and
Certain Country Practice Cases
Office of the United States
Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice of hearing and receipt of
public comments.
AGENCY:
This notice announces
petitions submitted in connection with
the 2016/2017 GSP Annual Product
Review that have been accepted for
further review. This notice also sets
forth the schedule for submitting
comments and for a public hearing
associated with the review of these
petitions and products. This notice also
announces the closure of the country
practices review of worker rights in Fiji
and Niger without change to those
countries’ GSP trade benefits.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Naomi Freeman, Director for GSP,
Office of the United States Trade
Representative, 1724 F Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20508. The telephone
number is (202) 395–2974 and the email
address is Naomi_S_Freeman@
ustr.eop.gov.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
The schedule for the 2016/2017
GSP Annual Product Review is set forth
below: February 15, 2017—Due date for
submission of comments, pre-hearing
briefs and requests to appear at the GSP
Subcommittee Public Hearing on the
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:02 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
2016/2017 GSP Annual Product Review.
February 22, 2017—The GSP
Subcommittee of the Trade Policy Staff
Committee (TPSC) will convene a
public hearing on all petitioned product
additions, product removals, and
competitive needs limitation (CNL)
waiver petitions that were accepted for
the 2016/2017 GSP Annual Product
Review. The hearing will be held in
Rooms 1 and 2, 1724 F Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20508, beginning at
9:30 a.m. March 15, 2017—Due date for
submission of post-hearing comments or
briefs in connection with the GSP
Subcommittee Public Hearing.
April 2017—The U.S. International
Trade Commission (USITC) is expected
to publish a public version of its report
providing advice on the probable
economic effect of the prospective
addition and removal of products and
granting of CNL waiver petitions
considered as part of 2016/2017 GSP
Annual Product Review. Comments
from interested parties on the USITC
report on these products should be
posted on www.regulations.gov in
Docket Number USTR–2016–0009
following the instructions provided
below and will be due ten calendar days
after the date of the USITC’s publication
of the public version of the report. July
1, 2017—Effective date for any
modifications that the President
proclaims to the list of articles eligible
for duty-free treatment under the GSP
resulting from the 2016/2017 Annual
Product Review and for determinations
related to CNL waivers.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Certain Country Practice Reviews
The status of country practices
reviews being considered as part of the
2016/2017 GSP Annual Review is
described in the list of Active and
Closed Country Practices Reviews,
which is available on the USTR GSP
Web site at https://ustr.gov/node/6526.
This list includes previously accepted
country practices petitions. The United
States Trade Representative, drawing on
the advice of the TPSC, has decided to
close the country practices review cases
in docket number USTR–2013–0012
regarding worker rights in Fiji, and
docket number USTR–2013–0005
regarding worker rights in Niger, in
view of progress made by the
governments of Fiji and Niger,
respectively, in addressing worker rights
issues in those countries.
Background
The GSP program provides for the
duty-free importation of designated
articles when imported from designated
beneficiary developing countries. The
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7915
GSP program is authorized by Title V of
the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2461,
et seq.), as amended (1974 Act), and is
implemented in accordance with
Executive Order 11888 of November 24,
1975, as modified by subsequent
Executive Orders and Presidential
Proclamations.
Petitions Requesting Modifications of
Product Eligibility
In a notice published in the Federal
Register on August 25, 2016 (81 FR
58547), the Office of the U.S. Trade
Representative (USTR) announced the
initiation of the 2016/2017 GSP Annual
Review and indicated that the
interagency GSP Subcommittee of the
TPSC was prepared to receive petitions
to modify the list of products that are
eligible for duty-free treatment under
the GSP program and petitions to waive
CNLs on imports of certain products
from specific beneficiary countries.
The GSP Subcommittee of the TPSC
has reviewed the product and CNL
waiver petitions submitted in response
to these announcements, and has
decided to accept for review five
petitions to add a product to the list of
those eligible for duty-free treatment
under GSP, one petition to remove a
product from GSP eligibility for certain
GSP beneficiary countries, and seven
petitions to waive CNLs.
A list of petitions and products
accepted for review is posted on the
USTR Web site at https://ustr.gov/issueareas/preference-programs/generalizedsystem-preferences-gsp/current-reviews/
gsp-20162017 under the title ‘‘Petitions
Accepted in the 2016/2017 GSP Annual
Product Review.’’ This list also can be
found at www.regulations.gov in Docket
Number USTR–2016–0009. Acceptance
of a petition indicates only that the
TPSC found that the subject petition
warranted further consideration and
that a review of the requested action
will take place.
The GSP Subcommittee of the TPSC
invites comments in support of or in
opposition to any petition that has been
accepted for the 2016/2017 GSP Annual
Product Review. The GSP
Subcommittee of the TPSC will also
convene a public hearing on these
products and petitions. See below for
information on how to submit a request
to testify at this hearing.
Notice of Public Hearing
The GSP Subcommittee of the TPSC
will hold a hearing on Wednesday,
February 22, 2017 beginning at 9:30
a.m., for products and petitions
accepted for the 2016/2017 GSP Annual
Product Review. The hearing will be
held at 1724 F Street NW., Washington,
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 13 (Monday, January 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7913-7915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-01448]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Environmental Impact Statement--Transmission System Vegetation
Management Program
AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Tennessee Valley Authority (``TVA'') intends to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (``EIS'') to address the management of
vegetation on its transmission system. In order to ensure that electric
service to the public is not disrupted by outages on its transmission
lines, TVA must control the vegetation on about 260,000 acres of the
rights of way (``ROW'') for those lines. This EIS will programmatically
consider the impacts of vegetation management activities on
approximately 17,000 miles of transmission line.
DATES: Comments on the scope of the EIS must be received on or before
March 20, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the scope of the EIS should be sent to
Anita E. Masters, Tennessee Valley Authority, 1101 Market Street, BR
4A, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402. Comments also may be submitted online
at tva.com/nepa or by email to aemasters@tva.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further nepa information, contact
Anita Masters, 1101 Market Street BR 4A, Chattanooga, TN 37402,
aemasters@tva.gov. For information on current row maintenance
practices, see TVA's Transmission Web page (https://www.tva.gov/Energy/Transmission-System/Right-of-Way-Maintenance).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is provided in accordance with
the regulations promulgated by the Council on Environmental Quality (40
CFR parts 1500 to 1508) and TVA's procedures implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (https://www.tva.com/Environment/Environmental-Stewardship/Environmental-Reviews/NEPA-at-TVA.)
TVA Power System and ROW Maintenance
TVA is a federal agency and instrumentality of the United States
created by and existing pursuant to the TVA Act of 1933. Its broad
mission is to foster the social and economic welfare of the people of
the Tennessee Valley region and to promote the proper use and
conservation of the region's natural resources. One component of this
mission is the generation, transmission, and sale of reliable and
affordable electric energy.
TVA operates the nation's largest public power system, producing
approximately four percent of all of the electricity in the nation. TVA
provides electricity to most of Tennessee and parts of Virginia, North
Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and Kentucky. Currently, it
serves more than nine million people in this seven-state region. The
TVA Act requires the TVA power system to be self-supporting and
operated on a nonprofit basis and directs TVA to sell electricity at
rates as low as are feasible. TVA receives no taxpayer funding,
deriving virtually all of its revenues from sales of electricity.
Most of the electricity is generated on the TVA system from 3
nuclear plants, 8 coal-fired plants, 9 simple-cycle combustion turbine
plants, 7 combined-cycle combustion turbine plants, 29 hydroelectric
dams, a pumped-storage facility, a methane-gas cofiring facility, a
diesel-fired facility, non-TVA owned facilities under power purchase
agreements, and various small solar photovoltaic facilities. The
electricity generated by these resources is transmitted along high-
voltage transmission lines to TVA business customers and local power
companies. The local power companies then distribute the electricity to
end users such as residents, business owners, and public entities like
school systems and hospitals. Distribution lines are owned and operated
by local power companies and are the power lines typically seen along
streets in neighborhoods.
TVA transmission lines are high-voltage (46-kilovolts or more, with
161-kilovolt most common) and typically have three conductors (wires)
suspended from large structures (towers or tall poles) in ROWs that are
cleared of buildings and tall vegetation. In most cases, transmission
line ROWs vary in width from about 75 feet to 200 feet, with the width
increasing with the voltage of the line. Most of TVA's ROWs
[[Page 7914]]
are located on easements that TVA acquired from property owners who
still can use easement areas in ways consistent with TVA's operation
and maintenance of its transmission lines. These easements give TVA the
legal right to manage vegetation within its ROWs as well as adjacent to
the ROW if vegetation is tall enough to pass within ten feet of a
conductor or strike a structure should it fall toward the transmission
line.
TVA manages its transmission system according to industry-wide
standards established by the North American Electric Reliability
Corporation (NERC). Those standards state that the TVA transmission
system must be able to survive single-failure events while continuing
to serve customer loads with adequate voltage and no overloaded
facilities while maintaining adequate transmission line clearances as
required by the National Electric Safety Code (NESC).
In order to meet its goal of providing the public safe and reliable
electricity, TVA must control the vegetation that would otherwise grow
up on its ROWs. When trees or branches get too close to high-voltage
transmission lines, electricity can arc through the air like a
lightning bolt, seeking the nearest path to the ground, such as a tree.
When this occurs, the electricity can cause a fault on the transmission
line, severely damaging or destroying nearby property and structures
(e.g., houses), and injuring nearby people. The cost and disruption to
people's lives when this happens can be serious even if people are not
injured from the arc or flash over itself. In August 2003, a single
tree contacted a transmission line in Ohio and triggered cascading
transmission line failures and blackouts from Ontario, Canada to the
northeastern United States. Eleven people died as a result of these
blackouts and the economic impact was estimated at $6 billion. As a
result of the event, mandatory reliability standards were developed and
implemented. These standards are monitored and enforced by NERC.
TVA uses an integrated approach to vegetation management on its
ROWs designed to encourage low-growing plant species and discourage
tall-growing plant species. This includes the initial clearing of trees
and other tall-growing vegetation from ROWs. Vegetation re-clearing
along ROWs utilizes various management techniques including mechanical
mowing (using tractor-mounted rotary mowers), tree removal by means of
chain saws or other mechanized equipment, and non-restricted herbicides
registered with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency when
appropriate. TVA's approach to vegetation management historically has
taken into account whether the vegetation is in the ``wire zone,'' the
area directly under the transmission line and between the outermost
conductors, or the ``border zone,'' the areas between the wire zone and
the edge of the ROW, as well as whether vegetation outside the ROW is
tall enough to pass within ten feet of a conductor or strike a
structure should it fall toward the transmission line.
The purpose of this EIS is to examine at a programmatic level the
potential environmental impacts of vegetation management practices
along the approximately 17,000 miles of TVA's transmission line within
its seven-state power service area and alternative management
approaches.
EIS Scope
Scoping is a process that allows the public to comment on an
agency's plans for an EIS. This includes identifying issues that should
be studied and those that have little significance. The public's views
on alternative actions that meet the stated purpose of the EIS are also
helpful in preparing an EIS.
TVA anticipates evaluating several alternative management
approaches, but these could change as the NEPA EIS process progresses.
As required by applicable regulations, one of those alternative
approaches is the No Action Alternative, or no change to TVA's current
management practices. TVA has evaluated growth rates, climate,
conductor sag and sway to design a cyclical, preemptive vegetation
management program that is currently practiced on TVA's transmission
line system. TVA's current management practices target existing
incompatible vegetation within the ROW as well as vegetation that will
become incompatible in the future. Under the No Action Alternative,
TVA's ROW management personnel have discretion to manage the risk
associated with vegetation growth that otherwise would be cleared. This
approach allows TVA's ROW management personnel to allow exceptions to
having the entire width of the ROW cleared by TVA. This approach is
subject to the availability of financial resources. Any ``danger'' tree
adjacent to the ROW is cleared by TVA. Danger trees include any trees
located beyond the cleared ROW, but that are tall enough to pass within
ten feet of a conductor or strike a structure should it fall toward the
transmission line. TVA would continue to maintain its ROWs consistent
with this approach, or any different approach that may be mandated
during development of the EIS.
A second alternative approach is utilizing integrated vegetation
management (IVM) practices with a wire zone/border zone approach, where
TVA sets objectives, identifies compatible and incompatible vegetation.
TVA would then consider action thresholds and evaluate, select and
implement the most appropriate methods to achieve the established short
and long-term objectives. This vegetation control method is based on
considerations of environmental impact and anticipated effectiveness,
safety, reliability, economics, site topography and other factors. This
approach would be subject to the availability of financial resources.
Any ``danger'' trees adjacent to the ROW would be cleared by TVA.
A third alternative approach to be considered is a border-to-border
(BTB) approach in which TVA would remove all vegetation except the low-
growing vegetation for the width of the easement on TVA ROWs (includes
both the wire and border zones as well as danger trees outside the
ROWs). This approach would be subject to the availability of financial
resources. TVA ROWs would take on the appearance and characteristics of
natural meadows, as well as promote inflorescence by keeping woody stem
counts low.
A number of natural resource impacts would be evaluated in the EIS.
These include potential impacts on air quality, surface water,
groundwater, aquatic ecology, vegetation, wildlife, threatened and
endangered species, wetlands, forest resources, and natural areas and
parks. In addition, TVA would evaluate socioeconomic impacts and
impacts on archaeological and historic resources and aesthetics
(visual, noise, and odors). Potential impacts from siting lines in
floodplains occur when new lines are constructed and are usually
addressed in the environmental reviews done for those lines.
Accordingly, TVA does not plan to address floodplain impacts in this
programmatic EIS unless circumstances warrant.
These analyses will be conducted at a programmatic, transmission
system-wide level. For new transmission lines, TVA considers the
potential effects of the initial ROW clearing and of continuing site-
specific vegetation management. For ongoing vegetation management of
transmission lines already on the TVA system, TVA considers potential
site-specific impacts in its NEPA reviews of transmission sector
analyses, including impacts on identified sensitive areas. TVA divides
its entire transmission system into discrete ``sectors'' and conducts
[[Page 7915]]
environmental analyses within specific sectors slated for vegetation
maintenance each year. TVA anticipates that these sector area analyses
would continue in the future, tiering off of the programmatic EIS when
it is completed.
Public Participation
The public is invited to submit comments on the scope of this EIS
no later than the date identified in the ``Dates'' section of this
notice. After TVA prepares a draft of the EIS, TVA will release it for
public comment. TVA anticipates holding public meetings at various
locations throughout TVA's seven-state service area after release of
the draft EIS. Meeting details will be posted on TVA's Web site at
tva.gov/nepa.
Dated: January 13, 2017.
M. Susan Smelley,
Director, Environmental Permitting & Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-01448 Filed 1-19-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P