Request for Public Comment on the Proposed Adoption of Administration for Native Americans Program Policies and Procedures, 7834-7836 [2017-01418]
Download as PDF
7834
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
Dated: January 17, 2017.
William N. Parham, III,
Director, Paperwork Reduction Staff, Office
of Strategic Operations and Regulatory
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2017–01378 Filed 1–19–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
[CFDA Numbers: 93.581, 93.587, 93.612]
Request for Public Comment on the
Proposed Adoption of Administration
for Native Americans Program Policies
and Procedures
Administration for Native
Americans, ACF, HHS.
ACTION: Notice for public comment.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to Section 814 of the
Native American Programs Act of 1974
(NAPA), as amended, the
Administration for Native Americans
(ANA) is required to provide members
of the public an opportunity to
comment on proposed changes in
interpretive rules and general
statements of policy and to give notice
of the final adoption of such changes no
less than 30 days before such changes
become effective. In accordance with
notice requirements of NAPA, ANA
herein describes proposed interpretive
rules and general statements of policy
that relate to ANA’s funding
opportunities beginning in fiscal year
(FY) 2017 related to the following
programs: Environmental Regulatory
Enhancement (HHS–2017–ACF–ANA–
NR–1221), Sustainable Employment and
Economic Development Strategies
(HHS–2017–ACF–ANA–NE–1225),
Native American Language Preservation
and Maintenance-Esther Martinez
Immersion (HHS–2017–ACF–ANA–NB–
1226), Native American Language
Preservation and Maintenance (HHS–
2017–ACF–ANA–NL–1235), Social and
Economic Development Strategies
(HHS–2017–ACF–ANA–NA–1236), and
Economic Development StrategiesAlaska (HHS–2015–ACF–ANA–NK–
0960), and Native Youth Initiative for
Leadership, Empowerment, and
Development (HHS–2017–ACF–ANA–
NC–1263). This notice of public
comment also provides additional
information about ANA’s plan for
administering grant programs.
DATES: The deadline for receipt of
comments is 30 days from the date of
publication in the Federal Register. No
Funding Opportunity Announcement
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:02 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
(FOA) will be published prior to 30 days
from publication of this Notice.
ADDRESSES: Comments in response to
this notice should be addressed to
Camille Loya, Director of Policy,
Administration for Native Americans,
330 C Street SW., Washington, DC
20201. Delays may occur in mail
delivery to federal offices; therefore, a
copy of comments should be emailed to
ANAComments@acf.hhs.gov. Comments
will be available for inspection by
members of the public at the
Administration for Native Americans,
330 C Street SW., Washington, DC
20201.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Camille Loya, Director, Division of
Policy, Administration for Native
Americans, (877) 922–9262.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
814 of NAPA, as amended, incorporates
provisions of the Administrative
Procedure Act that require ANA to
provide notice of its proposed
interpretive rules and statements of
policy and to seek public comment on
such proposals. ANA has also decided
to provide notice and seek comments on
proposed new rules of agency
organization, procedure, or practice.
The proposed interpretive rules,
statements of policy, and rules of ANA
procedure and practice reflected in
clarifications, modifications, and new
text will appear in the seven FY 2017
FOAs: Environmental Regulatory
Enhancement (ERE), Sustainable
Employment and Economic
Development Strategies (SEEDS), Native
American Language Preservation and
Maintenance-Esther Martinez
Immersion (EMI), Native American
Language Preservation and Maintenance
(P&M), Social and Economic
Development Strategies (SEDS), Social
and Economic Development StrategiesAlaska (SEDS–AK), and Native Youth
Initiative for Leadership, Empowerment,
and Development (I–LEAD). This notice
serves to fulfill the statutory notice and
public comment requirement.
A. Funding Opportunity
Announcements
For information on the types of
projects funded by ANA, please refer to
the following for information on current
and previously funded ANA grants at
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/ana/grants.
B. Interpretive Rules, Statements of
Policy, Procedures, and Practice
1. The following is applicable to all
ANA FOAs published beginning in FY
2017:
a. Pre-application trainings,
teleconferences, or webinars. It is
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
government-wide policy and practice
that each FOA contain all of the detail
needed for an applicant to fully
understand the funding opportunity and
submit a complete and compliant
application. ANA has historically
conducted in-person pre-application
trainings through its Regional Technical
Assistance (TA) Centers and now
proposes possible additional preapplication teleconferences or webinars
related to its FOAs beginning in FY
2017. Joining and participating in any
pre-application in-person training,
teleconference, or webinar is voluntary
and only information provided in
published FOAs will be presented. ACF
policy requires that no additional
information that is not already provided
in the FOA can be disseminated after
FOAs have been published.
Participation in any of the preapplication training or informational
opportunities is voluntary and will not
affect award selection. Participants will
remain anonymous and, in the case of
in-person training, names of
participants will not be retained after
the training. Opting not to participate in
a pre-application in-person training,
teleconference, or webinar will not
affect eligibility, application scoring, or
the selection process. Applicants unable
to attend pre-application
teleconferences or webinars will be able
to access materials, recordings, or
transcripts on the ANA Web site at on
the Events section of the ANA Web site
at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/ana/events
after the teleconference or webinar has
concluded and no later than 30 days
prior to the application due date. ANA
has historically posted its PreApplication Guide to Developing and
Writing Your ANA Application that is
used in in-person pre-application
meetings and will continue to do so.
This resource can be found at https://
www.acf.hhs.gov/ana/resource/preapplication-training-manual. For the
dates, times, registration, and other
information for scheduled preapplication in-person trainings
applicants should contact the
appropriate regional Training and
Technical Assistance Provider at https://
www.acf.hhs.gov/ana/t-ta-regions-map.
This proposed policy and practice will
be reflected in Section I. Program
Description—Pre-Application
Teleconferences or Webinars of the
FOAs.
b. Application periods. ANA proposes
to reduce from 90 to 60 days the time
period applicants have to respond to all
FY 2017 FOAs because we have
determined, based on experience and
feedback provided by prior applicants
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
and TA providers, that a 60-day period
to prepare, finalize, and submit
applications responsive to the FOAs is
a sufficient period of time. In addition,
a 60-day application period will help
ANA to ensure grants are awarded
timely given the time required for
competitive panel review, internal
review, award decisions, and
administrative processing of grant
awards. This proposed policy and
practice will be reflected in the
Overview Section of the FOAs.
c. Application Toolkit. ANA proposes
to add a link in all FOAs to allow
applicants to access ANA’s newly
established ANA Application Toolkit.
The purpose of the Application Toolkit
is to provide examples and templates to
assist eligible applicants to navigate the
application requirements detailed in
FOAs. As a collection of otherwise
available tools, use of the ANA
Application Toolkit is voluntary. This
proposed practice will be reflected in
Section VIII. Other Information,
Reference Web sites in the FOAs.
2. The following is applicable to
Social and Economic Development
Strategies (SEDS) FOA (HHS–2017–
ACF–ANA–NA–1236), including Social
and Economic Development Strategies
for Alaska (SEDS–AK) (HHS–2015–
ACF–ANA–NK–0960), beginning in FY
2017:
New Program Area of Interest. In
response to the enactment of the Native
American Tourism and Improving
Visitor Experience Act (NATIVE Act),
Public Law 114–221, in September
2016, ANA proposes to include a new
economic development program area of
interest under the SEDS and SEDS–AK
FOAs. The new program area of interest
is proposed as:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Tourism—Planning or developing
resources, services, and businesses that
promote travel, recreation and tourism, or
branding to tell the story of Native Americans
as the First Peoples of the United States.
Projects may use the arts or other cultural
resources to help revitalize Native
communities, promote economic
development, increase livability, and present
the uniqueness of the Native communities to
visitors in a way that celebrates the diversity
of the United States
Even though ANA has previously
funded economic and social
development projects broadly falling
under tourism, the new program area of
interest is proposed in response to new
specific statutory authority under the
NATIVE Act. This proposed policy will
be reflected in Section I. Program
Description, Program Areas of Interest
in the SEDS and SEDS–AK FOAs.
3. The following is applicable to
Native Youth Initiative for Leadership,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:02 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
Empowerment, and Development (I–
LEAD) (HHS–2017–ACF–ANA–NC–
1263) FOA beginning in FY 2017:
a. Application due dates. ANA
proposes to modify the application due
dates for I–LEAD applications because
ANA anticipates earlier publication
than in FY 2016. In addition, ANA
proposes a 60-day application period for
all FY 2017 FOAs. These two factors
combine to result in earlier I–LEAD
application deadlines.
b. Grants as the instruments of
I–LEAD financial assistance. In 2016,
ANA awarded I–LEAD financial
assistance as cooperative agreements.
We propose, beginning in FY 2017, to
award I–LEAD financial assistance as
grants instead of cooperative agreements
because we do not believe the level of
substantial federal involvement
associated with cooperative agreements
is necessary for successful future
I–LEAD projects. Both cooperative
agreements and grants are legal
instruments of financial assistance, but
cooperative agreements are
distinguished from grants in that
cooperative agreements provide for
substantial federal involvement between
the federal awarding agency (ANA) and
the non-federal entity (I–LEAD awardee)
in carrying out the activity(ies)
contemplated by the federal award. In
general terms, ‘‘substantial federal
involvement’’ refers to the degree to
which federal employees (or technical
assistance providers) are directly
performing, implementing, or directing
parts of the funded program. In a
cooperative agreement, federal
employees and their agents participate
more closely in performance under the
financial assistance award including
mandated collaborations and activities
with other entities. In contrast, with
grants, the federal government is limited
to an oversight and monitoring role but
does not direct grant performance. ANA
has determined that I–LEAD projects do
not require the level of ‘‘substantial
federal involvement’’ contemplated by
cooperative agreements. While ANA
intends to continue to develop and
refine technical assistance resources,
materials, and opportunities for all
recipients of I–LEAD awards and to
encourage and facilitate communities of
practice across funded projects serving
Native youth, we have determined that
the oversight and monitoring role is
sufficient to ensure the purposes of I–
LEAD projects are adequately supported
while, at the same time, allowing I–
LEAD grant recipients to determine how
to implement their grants within the
terms and conditions of their grant
awards.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7835
c. Length of project periods. ANA
proposes to shorten the project period
for I–LEAD awards beginning in FY
2017 from no more than 60 months to
no more than 48 months because we
have determined that project periods of
up to 48 months better position I–LEAD
projects for long-term success. Based on
ANA’s experience with the first
recipients of I–LEAD financial
assistance, we believe slightly more
compressed I–LEAD project periods will
facilitate greater emphasis by I–LEAD
grantees, at the beginning their projects,
on the efficient implementation of
culturally relevant evidence-based
programming as well as a greater
emphasis at end of I–LEAD project
periods on activities to ensure financial
and programmatic sustainability of
project outcomes. We believe there is an
inherent momentum in 48-month
project periods that will carry I–LEAD
projects forward from planning,
implementation, and continuous quality
improvement to long term sustainability
at the end of 48-month I–LEAD project
periods. This proposed policy will be
reflected in the Executive Summary of
the I–LEAD FOA.
d. Project Description—
i. Objective Work Plan. ANA proposes
requiring submission of the Objective
Work Plan (OWP) as part of the initial
application submission and reflecting
the entire project period of up to 48
months. When I–LEAD projects were
funded as cooperative agreements, part
of ANA’s substantial federal
involvement included post-award
development of the OWP in partnership
with I–LEAD recipients. Since ANA
proposes to award I–LEAD financial
assistance as grants, without the
substantial federal involvement entailed
by joint development of OWPs,
submission of the OWP as an
application requirement beginning in
FY 2017 has been determined necessary
to support adequate project planning
and post-award monitoring. This
proposed policy will be reflected in
Section IV.2. Content and Form of
Application Submission—Project
Description—Objective Work Plan in the
I–LEAD FOA.
ii. Outcome oriented project
objectives. ANA proposes outcome
oriented objectives that are Specific,
Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and
Time-bound (S.M.A.R.T.) be included in
funding applications because it is our
experience that objectives that are
S.M.A.R.T. are more likely to be
achieved and are more likely to be
useful to gauge project progress. This
change for I–LEAD projects would also
make the requirements for I–LEAD
applications consistent with the
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
7836
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
application requirements for ANA’s
other funding opportunities. This
proposed policy will be reflected in
Section IV.2. Content and Form of
Application Submission—Project
Description—Expected Outcomes—
Objectives and V.1. Criteria—Outcomes
Expected in the I–LEAD FOA.
iii. Impact Indicator. ANA proposes
applications for I–LEAD financial
assistance include at least one impact
indicator: a qualitative measure that
defines factor(s) the project needs to
benchmark and monitor. Impact
indicators also provide the means for
measuring and evaluating an I–LEAD
project’s progress and impact. This
proposed policy will be reflected in the
Section IV.2. Content and Form of
Application Submission—Project
Description—Expected Outcomes—
Impact in the I–LEAD FOA.
e. Project Budget and Budget
Justification. I–LEAD applicants are
required to attend ANA’s annual grantee
meeting. We propose to add a new
requirement of attendance for an
additional day to convene with I–LEAD
projects funded by ANA and the youth
involved in project implementation.
This proposed policy will be reflected
in Section IV.2. Content and Form of
Application Submission—Project
Description—Project Budget and Budget
Justification in the I–LEAD FOA and
will also reflect suggested travel costs
increased by $500 per region for
additional estimated lodging and per
diem.
f. Review Criteria—
i. Elimination of Bonus Points. ANA
proposes to remove the bonus points
that were authorized in FY 2016 I–
LEAD FOAs because our experience
with the prior year’s application review
demonstrated the allocation of up to 5
bonus points for letters of support from
youth is not necessary to ensure
applications reflect support from youth
involved in the development of the
project proposal as well as in project
implementation. The proposed
application point allocation reflecting
the discontinued use of bonus points is
found at Section V.1. Criteria of the I–
LEAD FOA.
ii. Allocation of points across I–LEAD
application evaluation criteria. ANA
proposes to modify the point allocation
across I–LEAD application review
criteria to account for the proposed
elimination of bonus points as well as
the proposed OWP application
requirement. We propose, beginning in
FY 2017, the following evaluation
criteria point allocations: Needs for
Assistance up to 10 points; Outcomes
Expected up to 25 points; Approach up
to 35 points; OWP up to 20 points; and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:02 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
the Budget and Budget Justification up
to10 points. The proposed modification
to the point allocation can be found at
Section V.1. Criteria for the I–LEAD
FOA.
Statutory Authority: Section 814 of the
Native American Programs Act of 1974
(NAPA), as amended.
Kimberly Romine,
Deputy Commissioner, Administration for
Native Americans.
[FR Doc. 2017–01418 Filed 1–19–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Proposed Information Collection
Activity; Comment Request
Proposed Project: Performance
Reporting for the Tribal Maternal,
Infant, and Early Childhood Home
Visiting Grant Program.
Title: Tribal Maternal, Infant, and
Early Childhood Home Visiting Program
Performance Reporting Form 2.
OMB No.: New Collection.
Description: Social Security Act, Title
V, Section 511 (42 U.S.C. 711), as added
by § 2951 of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. 111–148),
created the Maternal, Infant, and Early
Childhood Home Visiting Program
(MIECHV) and authorized the Secretary
of HHS (in Section 511(h)(2)(A)) to
award grants to Indian tribes (or a
consortium of Indian tribes), tribal
organizations, or urban Indian
organizations to conduct an early
childhood home visiting program. The
legislation set aside 3 percent of the
total MIECHV program appropriation
(authorized in Section 511(j)) for grants
to tribal entities. The implementation of
the program is a collaborative endeavor
between Health Resources Services
Administration (HRSA) and the
Administration for Children and
Families (ACF). HRSA administers the
State MIECHV program while ACF
administers the Tribal MIECHV
program. The goal of the Tribal MIECHV
program is to support the development
of happy, healthy, and successful
American Indian and Alaska Native
children and families through a
coordinated home visiting system.
Tribal MIECHV grants, to the greatest
extent practicable, are to be consistent
with the requirements of the MIECHV
grants to states and jurisdictions
(authorized in Section 511(c)), and
include conducting a needs assessment
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and establishing quantifiable,
measurable benchmarks.
Specifically, the MIECHV legislation
requires that State and Tribal MIECHV
grantees collect data to measure
improvements for eligible families in six
specified areas (referred to as
‘‘benchmark areas’’) that encompass the
major goals for the program and are
listed below:
1. Improved maternal and newborn
health;
2. Prevention of child injuries, child
abuse, neglect, or maltreatment, and
reduction in emergency department
visits;
3. Improvement in school readiness
and achievement;
4. Reduction in crime or domestic
violence;
5. Improvement in family economic
self-sufficiency;
6. Improvement in the coordination
and referrals for other community
resources and supports.
Tribal Home Visiting (HV) Form 2—
Tribal Grantees Performance Reporting
The proposed Tribal HV Form 2 will
be used by two new cohorts of Tribal
MIECHV grantees that were funded in
FY2016 to report their benchmark
performance measures. As stipulated in
the MIECHV legislation, the Tribal
MIECHV grantees, like their State
counterparts, must meet the required
reporting of benchmark areas. Tribal
MIECHV grantees are required to
propose a plan for meeting the
benchmark requirements specified in
the legislation and must report on
improvement at the end of Year 4 and
Year 5 of their 5-year grants, (i.e. after
3 years of implementation and at the
end of their 5-year grant).
The Tribal HV Form 2 will be used by
Tribal MIECHV grantees beginning in
October 2018 pending OMB approval.
The Tribal HV Form 2 is new to the
MIECHV Program information system
and is remotely similar to the currentlyapproved Tribal HV Form 3 (OMB
#0915–0357). The creation of Tribal HV
Form 2 is due to the added level of
specificity and revised performance
reporting requirements for grantees to
report benchmarks data.
Specifically, ACF will use the
proposed Tribal HV Form 2 to:
• Track and improve the quality of
benchmark measure data submitted by
the Tribal grantees;
• Improve program monitoring and
oversight;
• Improve rigorous data analyses that
help to assess the effectiveness of the
programs and enable ACF to better
monitor projects; and
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 13 (Monday, January 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7834-7836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-01418]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
[CFDA Numbers: 93.581, 93.587, 93.612]
Request for Public Comment on the Proposed Adoption of
Administration for Native Americans Program Policies and Procedures
AGENCY: Administration for Native Americans, ACF, HHS.
ACTION: Notice for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 814 of the Native American Programs Act of
1974 (NAPA), as amended, the Administration for Native Americans (ANA)
is required to provide members of the public an opportunity to comment
on proposed changes in interpretive rules and general statements of
policy and to give notice of the final adoption of such changes no less
than 30 days before such changes become effective. In accordance with
notice requirements of NAPA, ANA herein describes proposed interpretive
rules and general statements of policy that relate to ANA's funding
opportunities beginning in fiscal year (FY) 2017 related to the
following programs: Environmental Regulatory Enhancement (HHS-2017-ACF-
ANA-NR-1221), Sustainable Employment and Economic Development
Strategies (HHS-2017-ACF-ANA-NE-1225), Native American Language
Preservation and Maintenance-Esther Martinez Immersion (HHS-2017-ACF-
ANA-NB-1226), Native American Language Preservation and Maintenance
(HHS-2017-ACF-ANA-NL-1235), Social and Economic Development Strategies
(HHS-2017-ACF-ANA-NA-1236), and Economic Development Strategies-Alaska
(HHS-2015-ACF-ANA-NK-0960), and Native Youth Initiative for Leadership,
Empowerment, and Development (HHS-2017-ACF-ANA-NC-1263). This notice of
public comment also provides additional information about ANA's plan
for administering grant programs.
DATES: The deadline for receipt of comments is 30 days from the date of
publication in the Federal Register. No Funding Opportunity
Announcement (FOA) will be published prior to 30 days from publication
of this Notice.
ADDRESSES: Comments in response to this notice should be addressed to
Camille Loya, Director of Policy, Administration for Native Americans,
330 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20201. Delays may occur in mail
delivery to federal offices; therefore, a copy of comments should be
emailed to ANAComments@acf.hhs.gov. Comments will be available for
inspection by members of the public at the Administration for Native
Americans, 330 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20201.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Camille Loya, Director, Division of
Policy, Administration for Native Americans, (877) 922-9262.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 814 of NAPA, as amended,
incorporates provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act that
require ANA to provide notice of its proposed interpretive rules and
statements of policy and to seek public comment on such proposals. ANA
has also decided to provide notice and seek comments on proposed new
rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice. The proposed
interpretive rules, statements of policy, and rules of ANA procedure
and practice reflected in clarifications, modifications, and new text
will appear in the seven FY 2017 FOAs: Environmental Regulatory
Enhancement (ERE), Sustainable Employment and Economic Development
Strategies (SEEDS), Native American Language Preservation and
Maintenance-Esther Martinez Immersion (EMI), Native American Language
Preservation and Maintenance (P&M), Social and Economic Development
Strategies (SEDS), Social and Economic Development Strategies-Alaska
(SEDS-AK), and Native Youth Initiative for Leadership, Empowerment, and
Development (I-LEAD). This notice serves to fulfill the statutory
notice and public comment requirement.
A. Funding Opportunity Announcements
For information on the types of projects funded by ANA, please
refer to the following for information on current and previously funded
ANA grants at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/ana/grants.
B. Interpretive Rules, Statements of Policy, Procedures, and Practice
1. The following is applicable to all ANA FOAs published beginning
in FY 2017:
a. Pre-application trainings, teleconferences, or webinars. It is
government-wide policy and practice that each FOA contain all of the
detail needed for an applicant to fully understand the funding
opportunity and submit a complete and compliant application. ANA has
historically conducted in-person pre-application trainings through its
Regional Technical Assistance (TA) Centers and now proposes possible
additional pre-application teleconferences or webinars related to its
FOAs beginning in FY 2017. Joining and participating in any pre-
application in-person training, teleconference, or webinar is voluntary
and only information provided in published FOAs will be presented. ACF
policy requires that no additional information that is not already
provided in the FOA can be disseminated after FOAs have been published.
Participation in any of the pre-application training or informational
opportunities is voluntary and will not affect award selection.
Participants will remain anonymous and, in the case of in-person
training, names of participants will not be retained after the
training. Opting not to participate in a pre-application in-person
training, teleconference, or webinar will not affect eligibility,
application scoring, or the selection process. Applicants unable to
attend pre-application teleconferences or webinars will be able to
access materials, recordings, or transcripts on the ANA Web site at on
the Events section of the ANA Web site at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/ana/events after the teleconference or webinar has concluded and no later
than 30 days prior to the application due date. ANA has historically
posted its Pre-Application Guide to Developing and Writing Your ANA
Application that is used in in-person pre-application meetings and will
continue to do so. This resource can be found at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/ana/resource/pre-application-training-manual. For the
dates, times, registration, and other information for scheduled pre-
application in-person trainings applicants should contact the
appropriate regional Training and Technical Assistance Provider at
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/ana/t-ta-regions-map. This proposed policy and
practice will be reflected in Section I. Program Description--Pre-
Application Teleconferences or Webinars of the FOAs.
b. Application periods. ANA proposes to reduce from 90 to 60 days
the time period applicants have to respond to all FY 2017 FOAs because
we have determined, based on experience and feedback provided by prior
applicants
[[Page 7835]]
and TA providers, that a 60-day period to prepare, finalize, and submit
applications responsive to the FOAs is a sufficient period of time. In
addition, a 60-day application period will help ANA to ensure grants
are awarded timely given the time required for competitive panel
review, internal review, award decisions, and administrative processing
of grant awards. This proposed policy and practice will be reflected in
the Overview Section of the FOAs.
c. Application Toolkit. ANA proposes to add a link in all FOAs to
allow applicants to access ANA's newly established ANA Application
Toolkit. The purpose of the Application Toolkit is to provide examples
and templates to assist eligible applicants to navigate the application
requirements detailed in FOAs. As a collection of otherwise available
tools, use of the ANA Application Toolkit is voluntary. This proposed
practice will be reflected in Section VIII. Other Information,
Reference Web sites in the FOAs.
2. The following is applicable to Social and Economic Development
Strategies (SEDS) FOA (HHS-2017-ACF-ANA-NA-1236), including Social and
Economic Development Strategies for Alaska (SEDS-AK) (HHS-2015-ACF-ANA-
NK-0960), beginning in FY 2017:
New Program Area of Interest. In response to the enactment of the
Native American Tourism and Improving Visitor Experience Act (NATIVE
Act), Public Law 114-221, in September 2016, ANA proposes to include a
new economic development program area of interest under the SEDS and
SEDS-AK FOAs. The new program area of interest is proposed as:
Tourism--Planning or developing resources, services, and
businesses that promote travel, recreation and tourism, or branding
to tell the story of Native Americans as the First Peoples of the
United States. Projects may use the arts or other cultural resources
to help revitalize Native communities, promote economic development,
increase livability, and present the uniqueness of the Native
communities to visitors in a way that celebrates the diversity of
the United States
Even though ANA has previously funded economic and social
development projects broadly falling under tourism, the new program
area of interest is proposed in response to new specific statutory
authority under the NATIVE Act. This proposed policy will be reflected
in Section I. Program Description, Program Areas of Interest in the
SEDS and SEDS-AK FOAs.
3. The following is applicable to Native Youth Initiative for
Leadership, Empowerment, and Development (I-LEAD) (HHS-2017-ACF-ANA-NC-
1263) FOA beginning in FY 2017:
a. Application due dates. ANA proposes to modify the application
due dates for I-LEAD applications because ANA anticipates earlier
publication than in FY 2016. In addition, ANA proposes a 60-day
application period for all FY 2017 FOAs. These two factors combine to
result in earlier I-LEAD application deadlines.
b. Grants as the instruments of I-LEAD financial assistance. In
2016, ANA awarded I-LEAD financial assistance as cooperative
agreements. We propose, beginning in FY 2017, to award I-LEAD financial
assistance as grants instead of cooperative agreements because we do
not believe the level of substantial federal involvement associated
with cooperative agreements is necessary for successful future I-LEAD
projects. Both cooperative agreements and grants are legal instruments
of financial assistance, but cooperative agreements are distinguished
from grants in that cooperative agreements provide for substantial
federal involvement between the federal awarding agency (ANA) and the
non-federal entity (I-LEAD awardee) in carrying out the activity(ies)
contemplated by the federal award. In general terms, ``substantial
federal involvement'' refers to the degree to which federal employees
(or technical assistance providers) are directly performing,
implementing, or directing parts of the funded program. In a
cooperative agreement, federal employees and their agents participate
more closely in performance under the financial assistance award
including mandated collaborations and activities with other entities.
In contrast, with grants, the federal government is limited to an
oversight and monitoring role but does not direct grant performance.
ANA has determined that I-LEAD projects do not require the level of
``substantial federal involvement'' contemplated by cooperative
agreements. While ANA intends to continue to develop and refine
technical assistance resources, materials, and opportunities for all
recipients of I-LEAD awards and to encourage and facilitate communities
of practice across funded projects serving Native youth, we have
determined that the oversight and monitoring role is sufficient to
ensure the purposes of I-LEAD projects are adequately supported while,
at the same time, allowing I-LEAD grant recipients to determine how to
implement their grants within the terms and conditions of their grant
awards.
c. Length of project periods. ANA proposes to shorten the project
period for I-LEAD awards beginning in FY 2017 from no more than 60
months to no more than 48 months because we have determined that
project periods of up to 48 months better position I-LEAD projects for
long-term success. Based on ANA's experience with the first recipients
of I-LEAD financial assistance, we believe slightly more compressed I-
LEAD project periods will facilitate greater emphasis by I-LEAD
grantees, at the beginning their projects, on the efficient
implementation of culturally relevant evidence-based programming as
well as a greater emphasis at end of I-LEAD project periods on
activities to ensure financial and programmatic sustainability of
project outcomes. We believe there is an inherent momentum in 48-month
project periods that will carry I-LEAD projects forward from planning,
implementation, and continuous quality improvement to long term
sustainability at the end of 48-month I-LEAD project periods. This
proposed policy will be reflected in the Executive Summary of the I-
LEAD FOA.
d. Project Description--
i. Objective Work Plan. ANA proposes requiring submission of the
Objective Work Plan (OWP) as part of the initial application submission
and reflecting the entire project period of up to 48 months. When I-
LEAD projects were funded as cooperative agreements, part of ANA's
substantial federal involvement included post-award development of the
OWP in partnership with I-LEAD recipients. Since ANA proposes to award
I-LEAD financial assistance as grants, without the substantial federal
involvement entailed by joint development of OWPs, submission of the
OWP as an application requirement beginning in FY 2017 has been
determined necessary to support adequate project planning and post-
award monitoring. This proposed policy will be reflected in Section
IV.2. Content and Form of Application Submission--Project Description--
Objective Work Plan in the I-LEAD FOA.
ii. Outcome oriented project objectives. ANA proposes outcome
oriented objectives that are Specific, Measurable, Achievable,
Relevant, and Time-bound (S.M.A.R.T.) be included in funding
applications because it is our experience that objectives that are
S.M.A.R.T. are more likely to be achieved and are more likely to be
useful to gauge project progress. This change for I-LEAD projects would
also make the requirements for I-LEAD applications consistent with the
[[Page 7836]]
application requirements for ANA's other funding opportunities. This
proposed policy will be reflected in Section IV.2. Content and Form of
Application Submission--Project Description--Expected Outcomes--
Objectives and V.1. Criteria--Outcomes Expected in the I-LEAD FOA.
iii. Impact Indicator. ANA proposes applications for I-LEAD
financial assistance include at least one impact indicator: a
qualitative measure that defines factor(s) the project needs to
benchmark and monitor. Impact indicators also provide the means for
measuring and evaluating an I-LEAD project's progress and impact. This
proposed policy will be reflected in the Section IV.2. Content and Form
of Application Submission--Project Description--Expected Outcomes--
Impact in the I-LEAD FOA.
e. Project Budget and Budget Justification. I-LEAD applicants are
required to attend ANA's annual grantee meeting. We propose to add a
new requirement of attendance for an additional day to convene with I-
LEAD projects funded by ANA and the youth involved in project
implementation. This proposed policy will be reflected in Section IV.2.
Content and Form of Application Submission--Project Description--
Project Budget and Budget Justification in the I-LEAD FOA and will also
reflect suggested travel costs increased by $500 per region for
additional estimated lodging and per diem.
f. Review Criteria--
i. Elimination of Bonus Points. ANA proposes to remove the bonus
points that were authorized in FY 2016 I-LEAD FOAs because our
experience with the prior year's application review demonstrated the
allocation of up to 5 bonus points for letters of support from youth is
not necessary to ensure applications reflect support from youth
involved in the development of the project proposal as well as in
project implementation. The proposed application point allocation
reflecting the discontinued use of bonus points is found at Section
V.1. Criteria of the I-LEAD FOA.
ii. Allocation of points across I-LEAD application evaluation
criteria. ANA proposes to modify the point allocation across I-LEAD
application review criteria to account for the proposed elimination of
bonus points as well as the proposed OWP application requirement. We
propose, beginning in FY 2017, the following evaluation criteria point
allocations: Needs for Assistance up to 10 points; Outcomes Expected up
to 25 points; Approach up to 35 points; OWP up to 20 points; and the
Budget and Budget Justification up to10 points. The proposed
modification to the point allocation can be found at Section V.1.
Criteria for the I-LEAD FOA.
Statutory Authority: Section 814 of the Native American Programs
Act of 1974 (NAPA), as amended.
Kimberly Romine,
Deputy Commissioner, Administration for Native Americans.
[FR Doc. 2017-01418 Filed 1-19-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-34-P