Operations Notice for the Expansion of the Moving To Work Demonstration Program Solicitation of Comment, 8056-8080 [2017-01310]
Download as PDF
8056
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5994–N–01]
Operations Notice for the Expansion of
the Moving To Work Demonstration
Program Solicitation of Comment
Office of Public and Indian
Housing, HUD.
ACTION: Notice; solicitation of comment.
AGENCY:
The Public Housing/Section 8
Moving to Work (MTW) demonstration
program was first established under
Section 204 of the Omnibus
Consolidated Rescissions and
Appropriations Act of 1996 to provide
statutory and regulatory flexibility to
participating public housing agencies
(PHAs) under three statutory objectives.
Those three statutory objectives are: To
reduce cost and achieve greater cost
effectiveness in federal expenditures; to
give incentives to families with children
where the head of household is
working, is seeking work, or is
preparing for work by participating in
job training, educational programs, or
programs that assist people to obtain
employment and become economically
self-sufficient; and to increase housing
choices for eligible low-income families.
Section 239 of the Fiscal Year 2016
Appropriations Act, Public Law 114–
113 (2016 MTW Expansion Statute),
signed by the President in December of
2015, authorizes HUD to expand the
MTW demonstration program from the
current level of 39 PHAs to an
additional 100 PHAs over a period of
seven years. In this notice, HUD seeks
public comment on the draft Operations
Notice for the Expansion of the MTW
demonstration program (Operations
Notice). The Operations Notice
establishes requirements for the
implementation and continued
operations of the MTW demonstration
program pursuant to the 2016 MTW
Expansion Statute. HUD seeks public
comment on all aspects of the
Operations Notice and on specific areas
for comment identified throughout this
notice. HUD also seeks comment on the
topic of regionalization in the MTW
demonstration, which is discussed in
Section 9 of the Operations Notice.
Appendix C of this notice contains a
listing of all of the questions in which
HUD seeks public comment.
DATES: Comment Due Date: March 24,
2017.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
SUMMARY:
Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this notice to the Regulations Division,
Office of General Counsel, Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
451 7th Street SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410–0500.
Communications must refer to the above
docket number and title.
Electronic Submission of Comments.
Interested persons may submit
comments electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly
encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic
submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare
and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to
make them immediately available to the
public. Comments submitted
electronically through the
www.regulations.gov Web site can be
viewed by other commenters and
interested members of the public.
Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that site to
submit comments electronically.
Note: To receive consideration as public
comments, comments must be submitted
through one of the two methods specified
above. Again, all submissions must refer to
the docket number and title of the notice.
No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile
(fax) comments are not acceptable.
Public Inspection of Public
Comments. All properly submitted
comments and communications
submitted to HUD will be available for
public inspection and copying between
8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays at the above
address. Due to security measures at the
HUD Headquarters building, an
appointment to review the public
comments must be scheduled in
advance by calling the Regulations
Division at 202–708–3055 (this is not a
toll-free number). Individuals with
speech or hearing impairments may
access this number via TTY by calling
the Federal Relay Service at 1–800–877–
8339 (this is a toll-free number). Copies
of all comments submitted are available
for inspection and downloading at
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marianne Nazzaro, Office of Public and
Indian Housing, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW., Room 4130, Washington, DC
20410; email address mtw-info@
hud.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
MTW Demonstration Program
The MTW demonstration program
was first established under Section 204
of Title II of section 101(e) of the
Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and
Appropriations Act of 1996, Public Law
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
104–134, 110 Stat. 1321–281; 42 U.S.C.
1437f note (1996 MTW Statute) 1 to
provide statutory and regulatory
flexibility 2 to participating PHAs under
three statutory objectives. Those three
statutory objectives are to:
• Reduce cost and achieve greater
cost effectiveness in federal
expenditures;
• give incentives to families with
children where the head of household is
working; is seeking work; or is
preparing for work by participating in
job training, educational programs, or
programs that assist people to obtain
employment and become economically
self-sufficient; and
• increase housing choices for eligible
low-income families.
To achieve these objectives, PHAs
selected for participation in the MTW
demonstration are given exemptions
from many existing public housing and
voucher rules and offered more
flexibility with how they use their
Federal funds. MTW agencies use the
opportunities presented by MTW to
better address local housing needs.
Learning from the experience of MTW
agencies, HUD develops new housing
policy recommendations that can
positively impact assisted housing
delivery for all PHAs nationwide.
In addition to statutory and regulatory
relief,3 MTW agencies have the
flexibility to apply fungibility between
public housing operating, public
housing capital, and Housing Choice
Voucher (HCV) assistance into an
agency-wide funding source referred to
as the ‘‘MTW Block Grant.’’ 4 Use of the
MTW Block Grant as a source of
providing funding for eligible MTW
activities across the three programs does
not negate the need to track the funding
to its original source.
Throughout participation in the MTW
demonstration program, all MTW
agencies must continue to meet five
statutory requirements established
under the 1996 MTW Statute. These five
statutory requirements are:
1 PHAs currently operating an MTW
demonstration program include PHAs with an
active MTW agreement as of December 15, 2015.
PHAs currently operating an MTW program do not
include PHAs that previously participated in the
MTW demonstration and later left the
demonstration.
2 The MTW demonstration program may only
provide certain flexibilities under the 1937 Act. For
more information on the history of the MTW
demonstration program, please go to: www.hud.gov/
mtw.
3 For more information about the MTW
demonstration program and the specific programs
of current MTW agencies, please refer to the MTW
Web site at: https://www.hud.gov/mtw.
4 Funds awarded under Sections 8(o), 9(d), and
9(e) of the 1937 Act are eligible for inclusion in the
MTW Block Grant, with the exception of funds
provided for specific non-MTW HCV sub-programs.
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
(1) To ensure at least 75 percent of
families assisted are very low-income as
defined in Section 3(b)(2) of the U.S.
Housing Act of 1937 (the 1937 Act);
(2) to establish a reasonable rent
policy that is designed to encourage
employment and self-sufficiency;
(3) to continue to assist substantially
the same total number of eligible lowincome families as would have been
served had funds not been combined; 5
(4) to maintain a comparable mix of
families (by family size) as would have
been provided had the funds not been
used under the MTW demonstration
program; and
(5) to ensure housing assisted under
the MTW demonstration program meets
housing quality standards established or
approved by the Secretary.
There are currently 39 PHAs 6
participating in the MTW demonstration
program. The administrative structure
for these 39 PHAs is outlined in the
Standard MTW Agreement, a contract
between each current MTW PHA and
HUD. The 2016 MTW Expansion Statute
extended the term of the Standard MTW
Agreement through each of the current
MTW PHA’s 2028 fiscal year.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
2016 Expansion to the MTW
Demonstration Program
As directed by the 2016 MTW
Expansion Statute, HUD is authorized to
expand the MTW demonstration
program from the current level of 39
PHAs to an additional 100 PHAs over a
period of seven years. In expanding the
MTW demonstration, HUD intends to
build on the successes and lessons from
the demonstration thus far. The vision
for the MTW expansion is to learn from
MTW interventions in order to improve
5 HUD’s verification method detailed in Section
6(c)(i) of this notice.
6 The 39 PHAs are: Alaska Housing Finance
Corporation; Atlanta Housing Authority; Housing
Authority of the City of Baltimore; Boulder Housing
Partners; Cambridge Housing Authority; Housing
Authority of Champaign County; Charlotte Housing
Authority; Chicago Housing Authority; Housing
Authority of Columbus, Georgia; District of
Columbia Housing Authority; Delaware State
Housing Authority; Fairfax County Redevelopment
and Housing Authority; Holyoke Housing
Authority; Keene Housing; King County Housing
Authority; Lawrence-Douglas County Housing
Authority; Massachusetts Department of Housing
and Community Development; Minneapolis Public
Housing Authority; Housing Authority of the City
of New Haven; Oakland Housing Authority;
Orlando Housing Authority; Philadelphia Housing
Authority; Housing Authority of the City of
Pittsburgh; Portage Metropolitan Housing
Authority; Home Forward (Portland, OR); Housing
Authority of the City of Reno; San Antonio Housing
Authority; Housing Authority of the County of San
Bernardino; San Diego Housing Commission;
Housing Authority of the County of San Mateo;
Housing Authority of the County of Santa Clara/
City of San Jose; Seattle Housing Authority; Tacoma
Housing Authority; Tulare County Housing
Authority; and Vancouver Housing Authority.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
the delivery of federally assisted
housing and promote self-sufficiency for
low-income families across the nation.
Through the expansion, HUD will
extend flexibility to a broader range of
PHAs both in terms of size and
geographic diversity and will balance
the flexibility inherent in MTW with the
need for measurement and evaluation at
the outset.
HUD will select the additional 100
PHAs in cohorts, with applications for
each cohort to be sought via PIH
Notice.7 For each cohort of agencies
selected, the 2016 MTW Expansion
Statute requires HUD to direct all the
agencies in the cohort to implement one
specific policy change, which HUD will
rigorously evaluate. PHAs may
implement additional policy changes.
The MTW Research Advisory
Committee, described further below,
advised HUD on the policy changes to
be tested through the new cohorts of
MTW agencies and the methods of
research and evaluation.
Eligibility and Selection for the
Expansion of the MTW Demonstration
The 2016 MTW Expansion Statute
provides that the 100 MTW agencies
selected must be high performers, at the
time of application to the
demonstration, and represent
geographic diversity across the country.
Further, the statute provides that of
these 100 PHAs:
• No less than 50 PHAs shall
administer 1,000 or fewer aggregate
housing voucher and public housing
units;
• no less than 47 PHAs shall
administer 1,001–6,000 aggregate
housing voucher and public housing
units;
• no more than 3 PHAs shall
administer 6,001–27,000 aggregate
housing voucher and public housing
units;
• no PHA shall be granted MTW
designation if it administers more than
27,000 aggregate housing voucher and
public housing units; and
• five of the PHAs selected shall be
agencies with a Rental Assistance
Demonstration (RAD) portfolio award.
HUD will issue separate notices, by
cohort, soliciting applications from
eligible PHAs for participation in the
MTW demonstration. These notices,
when issued, will outline the specific
application submission requirements,
evaluation criteria, and process HUD
will use when selecting PHAs for MTW
participation.
7 PIH Notice 2017–01 provides the Request for
Applications for the first cohort of PHAs to be
selected pursuant to the 2016 MTW Expansion
Statute.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
8057
MTW Research Advisory Committee
The 2016 MTW Expansion Statute
established the MTW Research Advisory
Committee (the Committee). The
Committee is governed by the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C.
Appendix 2), which sets forth standards
for the formation and use of advisory
committees. The purpose of the
Committee is to provide independent
advice with respect to the policies to be
studied through the MTW expansion
and the methods of research and
evaluation related. The Advisory
Committee is charged with advising
HUD on the following:
• Policy proposals and evaluation
methods for the MTW demonstration to
inform the one specific policy change
required for each cohort of agencies;
• rigorous research methodologies to
measure the impact of policy changes
studied;
• policy changes adopted by MTW
agencies that have proven successful
and can be applied more broadly to all
PHAs; and
• statutory and/or regulatory changes
(specific waivers and program and
policy flexibility) necessary to
implement policy changes for all PHAs.
The Committee has no role in
reviewing or selecting the 100 PHAs to
participate in the expansion of the MTW
demonstration.
The Committee members were
appointed in June 2016 by the HUD
Secretary and chosen to ensure balance,
diversity, and a broad representation of
ideas.8 The Committee includes
program and research experts from
HUD; a representation of MTW
agencies, including current and former
residents; and independent subject
matter experts in housing policy
research.
PHAs are reminded that the MTW
demonstration program does not permit
waivers related to fair housing,
nondiscrimination, labor standards, or
environmental requirements. Other
subject matter prohibited from waivers
or restricted with respect to waivers is
discussed elsewhere in this notice.
Operations Notice for the Expansion of
the MTW Demonstration
HUD’s guiding principles for the
expansion of the MTW demonstration
are: (1) Simplify; (2) learn; and (3)
apply. HUD seeks to design and test
new approaches to providing and
administering housing assistance and
then to apply the lessons learned
8 For more information on the establishment,
purpose, members and meeting content of the MTW
Research Advisory Committee, please go to: https://
go.usa.gov/xZnj9.
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
8058
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
nationwide, all within a framework of
simplifying program administration.
The Operations Notice is a first step
toward implementing this vision. The
Operations Notice describes a new
framework for the MTW demonstration
that streamlines and simplifies HUD’s
oversight of participating PHAs while
providing for rigorous evaluation of
specific policy changes. The new
framework would apply to all PHAs
designated as an MTW PHA pursuant to
the 2016 MTW Expansion Statute and to
any previously-designated MTW
agencies that agree to operate under the
new framework. These PHAs are
referred to in the Operations Notice as
‘‘MTW agencies.’’ Participation in the
new framework will be formalized by an
amendment to the PHA’s Annual
Contributions Contract (ACC), or other
agreement as determined by HUD.
A key feature of the new framework
is that PHAs will not be required to seek
HUD’s approval for some of the waivers
identified in the Operations Notice, as
determined by HUD. Instead, via the
Operations Notice, HUD will grant a set
of general waivers to all MTW agencies
when they are so designated. In
addition, HUD seeks to reduce the data
collection and reporting requirements
for PHAs under the new framework,
focusing on financial data, basic
program monitoring and performance
assessment, and evaluation of the
specific policy changes to be tested
through each cohort. HUD will rely on
existing data and reporting that PHAs
will continue to submit through HUD
administrative systems.
HUD is seeking comment on the draft
Operations Notice because robust public
comment is critical to ensuring that the
Operations Notice effectively positions
MTW agencies to be able to meet the
demonstration’s goals of increasing cost
effectiveness, self-sufficiency, and
housing choice.
The Operations Notice is organized
into 12 sections as follows:
1. Purpose and Applicability
2. Waivers
a. General Waivers
b. Conditional Waivers
c. Cohort-specific Waivers
3. Term of Participation
4. Funding, MTW Block Grant, and Financial
Reporting
a. Level of Funding
b. Calculation of Funding
c. MTW Block Grant and Flexibility in Use
of Funds
d. Financial Reporting and Auditing
5. Evaluation
a. Program-wide Evaluation
b. Cohort-specific Evaluation
6. Program Administration and Oversight
a. Planning and Reporting
b. Performance Assessment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
c. Monitoring and Oversight
7. Rental Assistance Demonstration Program
8. Applying MTW Flexibilities to Special
Purpose Vouchers
a. Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing
(HUD–VASH)
b. Family Unification Program (FUP)
c. Non-Elderly Persons with Disabilities
(NED) Vouchers
d. Enhanced Vouchers and Tenant
Protection Vouchers
9. Regionalization
10. Applicability of Other Federal, State, and
Local Requirements
11. MTW Agencies Admitted Prior to 2016
MTW Expansion Statute
12. Sanctions, Terminations, and Default
HUD seeks comment on all 12
sections of the Operations Notice, as
well as Appendix A General Waivers,
and Appendix B Conditional Waivers,
which outline available waivers and
MTW activities that may be
implemented by MTW agencies. In
addition, for some sections of the
Operations Notice, HUD identifies
specific topics for comment and poses
questions on those topics.
The majority of the Operations Notice
applies only to MTW agencies, defined
above as PHAs designated MTW
pursuant to the 2016 MTW Expansion
Statute and any previously-designated
MTW agencies that agree to operate
under the new framework. However,
Section 9 of the Notice (Regionalization)
also applies to existing MTW agencies,
that is, those with an active MTW
agreement as of December 15, 2015.
II. Draft Operations Notice
1. Purpose and Applicability
The Operations Notice establishes
requirements for the implementation
and continued operation of the
expansion of the MTW demonstration
program pursuant to the 2016 MTW
Expansion Statute. The Operations
Notice applies to all PHAs designated as
MTW pursuant to the 2016 MTW
Expansion Statute and to any
previously-designated MTW PHA that
elects to operate under the terms of this
Notice.
Through an amended ACC, or other
agreement as determined by HUD, an
MTW agency agrees to abide by the
program structure, flexibilities, and
terms and conditions detailed in the
Operations Notice for the term of the
agency’s participation in MTW
demonstration. HUD may supplement
the Operations Notice with PIH Notices
providing more detailed guidance and
reserves the right to revise the
Operations Notice to address unforeseen
circumstances and programmatic
clarifications. Any significant updates to
the Operations Notice by HUD will be
preceded by a public comment period.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Additionally, HUD will develop
informational materials to address
various program elements that HUD will
post on the MTW Web site.
Unless otherwise provided in the
Operations Notice, a PHA’s MTW
program applies to all of the agency’s
public housing assisted units (including
agency-owned properties and units
comprising a part of mixed-income,
mixed finance communities), tenantbased Section 8 HCV assistance, projectbased Section 8 voucher assistance
under Section 8(o), and Homeownership
units developed using Section 8(y) HCV
assistance. This Operating Notice does
not apply to Section 8 HCV assistance
that is required: (i) For payments to
other public housing agencies under
Section 8 HCV portability billing
procedures; (ii) to meet particular
purposes for which HUD has expressly
committed the assistance to the
agency; 9 or (iii) to meet existing
contractual obligations of the agency to
a third party (such as HAP contracts
with owners under the agency’s Section
8 HCV program), unless a third party
agrees to PBV activities implemented
under the MTW program with the
agency.
2. Waivers
Pursuant to this section of the
Operations Notice, HUD delegates to the
MTW agency the authority to pursue
locally-driven policies, procedures, and
programs with the aim of developing
more efficient ways to provide and
administer housing assistance that
increases housing choice, gives
incentives to low, very-low, and
extremely low-income families to
achieve economic self-sufficiency, and
reduce costs and achieve greater costeffectiveness in federal expenditures.
Many of these policies, procedures and
programs require waivers of existing
statutory and regulatory requirements.
HUD therefore waives certain provisions
of the 1937 Act as well as HUD’s
implementing requirements and
regulations to implement the PHA’s
MTW demonstration activities as
described in this Notice. Certain
provisions of the 1937 Act will continue
to apply to the PHA and the assistance
received pursuant to the Act. These
ongoing provisions, as well as other
applicable federal, state, and local
requirements, are described in Section
10 of this Operations Notice.
9 Five Year Mainstream Vouchers, Moderate
Rehabilitation Renewals, HUD-Veterans Affairs
Supportive Housing (HUD–VASH) Vouchers, NonElderly Disabled (NED) Vouchers, and Family
Unification Program (FUP) Vouchers are not part of
the MTW demonstration program.
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
This Notice discusses three categories
of waivers, and the associated activities,
that MTW agencies may pursue—
general waivers; conditional waivers;
and cohort-specific waivers. This Notice
specifies the process for implementing
MTW activities using the waivers under
each category. Appendix A—General
Waivers and Appendix B—Conditional
Waivers provide the complete list of
waivers and associated activities
available for all MTW agencies. General
Waivers are available to MTW agencies
without HUD review—beyond the MTW
application review. Conditional Waivers
are available following additional HUD
review and approval, as described
generally in Appendix B. CohortSpecific Waivers will be defined in a
series of notices soliciting applications
for participation in MTW.
Appendices A and B provide an
overview of the General and Conditional
Waivers. The actual statutory and
regulatory provisions that will be
waived will be more clearly identified
in the final Operations Notice, in
response to this notice and further
refinement. The specific statutory and
regulatory provisions that will be
covered by the waivers will be included
in the final MTW Operations Notice,
which is anticipated to be published
later this summer. Please note that in
adopting an MTW program, HUD and
PHA may not waive or otherwise
deviate from compliance with Fair
Housing and Civil Rights laws and
regulations.
While MTW activities are listed by
specific waiver, MTW agencies may
group activities together to create more
comprehensive initiatives at the local
level.
MTW agencies are subject to all
remaining regulatory and statutory
requirements, unless an activity is
specifically and explicitly authorized in
the Notice via the attached waivers, in
which case the agency is exempt from
the applicable regulatory and statutory
requirements under the 1937 Act. The
five statutory requirements established
under the 1996 MTW Statute cannot be
waived. Additionally, in implementing
activities, MTW agencies remain subject
to all other terms, conditions, and
obligations under this Notice, and all
other federal requirements applicable to
public housing, HCV, PBV, and PHAs.
To the extent any MTW activity
conflicts with any of the five statutory
requirements or other applicable
requirements, HUD reserves the right to
require the MTW agency to discontinue
the activity or to revise it so that the
requirements are complied with. HUD
also reserves the right to require an
MTW agency to discontinue any activity
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
derived from a waiver should it have
unforeseen, significant negative impacts
on families, as determined by HUD.
HUD understands that MTW agencies
may wish to undertake activities that are
not listed in Appendix A and Appendix
B. If an MTW agency wishes to
implement activities or request waivers
that are not included in Appendix A or
Appendix B, the MTW agency may seek
approval from HUD for doing so via the
MTW Supplement to the Annual Plan.
(The MTW Supplement is discussed in
Section 6 of this Notice.) The MTW
agency must obtain explicit prior
written approval from HUD for each
additional activity and waiver.
If HUD determines that an activity(s)
derived from either a general waiver or
a conditional waiver would impact or
conflict with the specific policy(s) to be
studied in the MTW agency’s cohort
group, the MTW agency will not be able
to conduct that activity(s) until the
evaluation of the specific policy change
has concluded. (Once the evaluation of
the policy change is completed, the
MTW agency may implement the
conflicting activities for the remainder
of the agency’s term of MTW
participation.) Any MTW activities that
would impact or conflict with the
cohort-specific policy change will be
identified in the respective Selection
Notice so that the MTW agency is aware
of this potential restriction on its use of
waivers before it enters the MTW
demonstration program.
a. General Waivers
The MTW activities derived from the
general waivers, within the specified
program parameters listed in Appendix
A, are available to all MTW agencies
when the MTW ACC amendment, or
other agreement to be determined by
HUD, is executed. The MTW PHA must
indicate via the MTW Supplement to its
Annual Plan the MTW activities that it
will undertake from the general waivers
category. Prior HUD approval is not
required to implement activities from
the general waivers category.
Appendix A contains the full list of
general waivers currently available, the
MTW activities associated with these
general waivers, and the specific
parameters around the implementation
of those activities.
b. Conditional Waivers
Conditional waivers listed in
Appendix B are available to all MTW
agencies within certain program
parameters, but implementation of these
MTW activities may not begin until
additional information is received,
vetted, and approved by HUD. The
additional information required for each
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
8059
activity associated with a conditional
waiver will be specified in the MTW
Supplement to the Annual Plan (see
Section 6 of this Notice). Conditional
waivers are expected to have a greater
and more direct impact on assisted
households. Consequently, HUD seeks
to ensure that adequate protections are
in place for participants and MTW
agencies prior to implementation. The
additional information required must be
submitted by the MTW agency via the
MTW Supplement and reviewed and
approved by HUD before the MTW PHA
may implement the activity. Additional
information may also be required
throughout the time the MTW agency is
conducting an activity associated with a
conditional waiver. Upon request from
the Department for the continued
oversight of the conditional waivers,
MTW agencies must provide hardship
policies, impact analyses and/or other
information required by HUD.
Appendix B provides the full list of
conditional waivers, the activities
associated with these conditional
waivers, and any specific parameters
around the implementation of those
activities.
Waivers and MTW activities that are
not provided as a general waiver or
conditional waiver may be proposed by
MTW agencies to HUD. Such waivers
may be needed to implement an
initiative being pursued by an MTW
agency or may be the result of a local
condition. Additional waivers will be
reviewed on a case-by-case basis as part
of the MTW Supplement review
process. MTW agencies may not seek or
obtain waivers from nondiscrimination
or equal opportunity requirements.
c. Cohort-Specific Waivers
A cohort-specific waiver is one that is
not included in the general waivers or
conditional waivers categories and that
is available exclusively to an MTW
agency that is implementing a cohortspecific policy change that requires the
waivers. At the time of selection to
MTW, each agency will be selected into
an evaluative cohort that seeks to test a
specific policy change, as specified in
that cohort’s Selection Notice. To the
extent that one or more additional
waivers, beyond the general waivers or
conditional waivers, are needed to
implement a specific policy change,
HUD will grant that waiver(s) to the
MTW agencies in the cohort as cohortspecific waivers.
The cohort-specific waiver and the
associated activity(s) will be described
in detail in the applicable Selection
Notice so that the MTW agency is aware
of this in advance of entry to the MTW
demonstration program. One or more
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
8060
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
cohort-specific waivers may be
associated with a particular cohort of
MTW agencies. It is possible that the
specific policy changes to be tested
through a given cohort would not need
any cohort-specific waivers. Cohortspecific waivers and the associated
MTW activities may only be used to the
extent allowed under the applicable
evaluative framework provided by HUD
in the applicable Selection Notice.
More detail on the specific statutory
and regulatory citations will be
included in the final Operations Notice,
which will be published later this
summer. Please note that certain
regulations will be interpreted to protect
Fair Housing and Civil Rights laws and
regulations.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
Specific Areas for Comment on Waivers
HUD is seeking comment on the
general waivers and conditional waivers
presented in Appendix A and Appendix
B. HUD is specifically seeking comment
on the following questions regarding
waivers:
• Does the list of general waivers,
MTW activities, and parameters in
Appendix A and Appendix B contain
the needed flexibility to achieve the
three MTW statutory objectives? If not,
what waivers, activities, and/or
parameters are missing?
• Are there any MTW activities and/
or waivers that should not be included
as general waivers, available to all MTW
agencies without prior HUD approval?
• Are there any MTW activities and/
or waivers that should not be included
as conditional waivers but rather should
be included as general waivers, or not
included at all?
• Does the list of conditional waivers,
MTW activities, and parameters in
Appendix B contain the needed
flexibility to implement any alternative
income-based rent model? If not, what
waivers, activities, and/or parameters
are missing?
3. Term of Participation
The term of each agency’s MTW
designation expires at the end of the
MTW agency’s Fiscal Year 2028. All
general and conditional waivers
provided through the Operations Notice
expire at the end of the agency’s term of
participation. However, cohort-specific
waivers provided to enable a cohortspecific policy change will be extended
beyond the agency’s term of
participation with HUD’s specific
approval if HUD determines that
additional time is needed to evaluate
the policy change.
The MTW agency must end all
activities requiring MTW-specific
waivers upon expiration of MTW
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
participation, as HUD cannot guarantee
that it will be able to extend any waivers
beyond that point. For this reason, when
entering into contracts with thirdparties that draw upon MTW flexibility,
the agency should disclose that such
flexibility is only available during the
term of the agency’s participation in the
MTW demonstration as permitted in
this notice. An exception is third-party
contracts that relate to the cohortspecific policy change and associated
waiver(s), if HUD determines that
additional time beyond the end of the
PHA’s MTW term is needed to evaluate
the policy change and specifically
approves an extension of the cohortspecific waiver(s).
It is the MTW agency’s responsibility
to plan for the expiration of its MTW
agreement and associated waivers. HUD
recommends that MTW agencies begin
transition planning10 at least one year in
advance of the expiration of its MTW
designation. Not later than nine months
prior to the agency’s expiration date, the
agency must submit a transition plan to
HUD that describes the agency’s plans
for phasing out the MTW-specific
waivers that it is using, and describes
the agency’s plans for re-establishing
regular reporting to HUD on a standard
schedule. After submitting the transition
plan to HUD, MTW agencies will begin
drafting changes to their policies and
procedures documents, notifying
participants of any changes to the terms
of their residency or rent calculation,
planning for the submission of standard
data to HUD, and re-training PHA staff
as needed.
Specific Areas for Comment on MTW
Term of Participation
With respect to the term of MTW
participation, HUD is specifically
seeking comment on the following
questions:
• Assuming all cohorts are selected
between 2017 and 2020, is the end of
each MTW agency’s Fiscal Year 2028 an
appropriate timeframe for MTW
participation, and understanding that
HUD may extend cohort-specific
waivers to accommodate evaluation of
MTW activities that require additional
time?
• Is there a preferable length or
structure for the term of MTW
participation?
HUD will develop additional
guidance on the required elements of
the transition plan and a recommended
transition process via PIH Notice. HUD
is specifically seeking comment on:
10 https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/
huddoc?id=DOC_10542.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
• What elements of the MTW
agency’s transition plan should be
mandatory?
• What elements of the transition
process should HUD require in order to
protect participants from potential harm
and minimize disruptions to agency
operations?
4. Funding, MTW Block Grant, and
Financial Reporting
During the term of the demonstration,
HUD will provide the MTW agencies
designated pursuant to the 2016 MTW
Expansion Statute with public housing
Operating Fund subsidies, public
housing Capital Fund program (CFP)
grants, and Section 8 HCV assistance, as
provided in this notice. CFP grants may
include Formula grants, Demolition or
Disposition Transitional Funding
(DDTF, included in regular Formula
grants) as well as Replacement Housing
Factor (RHF) grants (superseded by
DDTF). The funding amount for MTW
agencies may be increased by additional
allocations of vouchers or by
replacement public housing units to
which the agency is awarded over the
term of its participation in the MTW
demonstration.
MTW agencies will have the
flexibility to apply fungibility between
public housing operating, public
housing capital, and HCV assistance
into an agency-wide funding source
referred to as the ‘‘MTW Block Grant.’’
The agency must complete an annual
audit pursuant to the Single Audit Act
requirements set forth in 2 CFR 200
Subpart F, including any applicable
Compliance Supplement(s), as
determined by the auditor, to be
relevant to MTW and other programs.
The Single Audit Act-compliant audit
must be submitted to HUD in
accordance with HUD regulations.
a. Level of Funding
The 1996 MTW Statute and the 2016
MTW Expansion Statute prohibit MTW
agencies from receiving any more or any
less funding than they would receive if
they were not participating in the MTW
demonstration.
The 1996 MTW Statute states, in part,
that, ‘‘The amount of assistance received
under section 8, section 9, or pursuant
to section 14 by a public housing agency
participating in the demonstration
under this part shall not be diminished
by its participation.’’ In addition, the
2016 MTW Expansion Statute states, in
part, that, ‘‘No PHA granted this
designation through this section shall
receive more funding under sections 8
or 9 of the 1937 Act than they otherwise
would have received absent this
designation.’’
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
b. Calculation of Funding
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
i. Public Housing Operating Fund
Subsidy
(a) The calculation of an MTW PHA’s
Operating Fund subsidy eligibility will
continue in accordance with operating
subsidy formula law, regulations, and
appropriations act requirements.
(b) The agency may use these funds
for any eligible activity permissible
under Section 9(e)(1) of the 1937 Act or,
if the agency proposes to use the
funding as part of the MTW Block
Grant, it may use these funds for any
eligible activity permissible under
Section 8(o), 9(d)(1) and 9(e)(1) and as
specified in this Notice.
(c) For operating subsidy funding
provided in years prior to the
designation of the agency as an MTW
agency, the agency may use any
accumulated operating reserves for
eligible MTW purposes, subject to
applicable provisions of this Notice,
subsequent legislation, including
appropriations acts, and HUD and other
federal requirements.
ii. Public Housing Capital Fund
Formula and Grants
(a) The agency’s Public Housing
Capital Fund formula characteristics
and grant amounts, including DDTF and
RHF, will continue to be calculated in
accordance with public housing law,
regulations, and appropriations act
requirements. Capital Funds will be
disbursed in accordance with standard
HUD procedures for disbursement of
public housing Capital Fund grants,
provided however that the agency may
not accelerate drawdown of funds in
order to fund reserves.
(b) In requisitioning Capital Fund
grant funds, the MTW agency will not
be required to provide line item detail
in HUD’s Line of Credit Control System
(LOCCS), but will request the funds
using a single MTW line item with the
exception of grant funds required for
payment of debt service pursuant to the
Capital Fund Financing Program
(CFFP). The agency will provide to HUD
information on all capital activities
funded by the MTW Block Grant as
necessary to ensure compliance with
requirements outside the scope of MTW,
including environmental review
requirements and Energy and
Performance Information Center (EPIC)
reporting requirements.
(c) The agency may use these funds
for any eligible activity permissible
under Section 9(d)(1) of the 1937 Act or,
if the agency proposes to use the
funding as part of the MTW Block
Grant, it may use these funds for any
eligible activity permissible under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
Section 8(o), 9(d)(1) and 9(e)(1) and as
specified in this Notice. CFP funds not
included in the MTW Block Grant are
subject to all requirements relevant to
non-MTW agency CFP funding,
including eligible activities and cost
limits.
(d) For Capital Funds provided in
years prior to the designation of the
agency as an MTW agency, the agency
may use such funds for eligible MTW
purposes, subject to applicable
provisions of this Notice, subsequent
legislation, including appropriations
acts, and HUD and other federal
requirements.
(e) The agency remains subject to the
requirements of Section 9(j) of the 1937
Act with respect to Capital Fund grants.
Section 9(d) funds remain subject to the
obligation and expenditure deadlines
and requirements provided in Section
9(j) despite the fact that they are
combined in a single block grant fund.
Capital Funds awarded to MTW
agencies must be obligated within two
years and expended within four years of
award. Funds not obligated or expended
within those timeframes will be subject
to recapture. As with all PHAs, an MTW
PHA may requisition CFP funds from
HUD only when such funds are due and
payable, unless HUD approves another
payment schedule.
iii. Housing Choice Voucher (HCV)
Funding
(a) For the calendar year after the
MTW agency joins the MTW
demonstration (the ‘‘Initial Year’’), an
agency’s HCV HAP renewal funding
will be calculated based on the previous
CY’s HAP expenses reported in VMS
that originated from HAP funds adjusted
by any applicable inflation factor and
national proration, in accordance with
the funding formula in the
appropriations act used for all HCV
agencies. This adjusted amount will be
the agency’s Annual Voucher Budget
Authority (AVBA) for the initial year of
MTW participation.
(b) For subsequent years, the HCV
HAP renewal funding will be calculated
as follows:
(i) HCV HAP Renewal funding will be
calculated based on (i) the previous
CY’s HAP expenses reported in VMS
that originated from HAP funds plus (ii)
the previous CY’s eligible non-HAP
MTW expenses (subject to the
conditions and percentage limitations
described below) and (iii) the eligible
non-HAP MTW commitments and
obligations (subject to the conditions,
percentage limitations and utilization
requirements described below), the sum
of which will be adjusted by any
applicable inflation factor appropriate
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
8061
for the HAP and non-HAP expenses and
national proration for the current CY.
The resulting adjusted amount is the
agency’s AVBA for the current CY. The
amount of non-HAP expenses and the
amount of commitments and obligations
that may be included in the above
calculation are subject to percentage
limitations and utilization requirements
described below.
(ii) An MTW agency is required to
spend at least 90% of its CY AVBA on
eligible HAP expenses each year. If the
MTW agency meets this requirement but
the actual HAP expenses did not exceed
100% of its CY AVBA, then the agency’s
eligible non-HAP MTW expenses and
the agency’s commitments and
obligations will be included in its
renewal funding eligibility for the next
CY as described herein. The amount of
eligible non-HAP MTW expenses,
commitments, and obligations that will
be included in the renewal calculation
is limited to the lower of: (a) The
amount of AVBA expended, committed,
or obligated for eligible non-HAP MTW
expenses as reported and validated in
VMS, or (b) the amount of AVBA that
was not used for HAP expenses, or (c)
10% of AVBA.
(iii) Only HAP expenses that
originated from HAP Funds (including
HAP reserves) are included in the HAP
renewal funding formula. Public
Housing Operating funds and Capital
funds, and Section 8 Administrative Fee
funds that may have been used for HAP
expenses as part of MTW flexibility will
not be included in the following
calendar year’s renewal funding
formula.
(iv) If an MTW agency expends 100%
or more of its AVBA in HAP expenses
in a given year, the total HAP expenses
will be used for the next CY’s Renewal
funding formula to the extent that the
HAP expenses originated from HAP or
HAP reserves. However, none of the
funds provided in the renewal formula
may be used to fund a total number or
unit months under lease which exceeds
the MTW agency’s authorized level of
unit months available under the MTW
agency’s ACC, in accordance with the
funding formula used for non-MTW
agencies.
(c) Additional details about the HCV
Renewal funding formula are provided
below:
(i) Budget Utilization Requirement.
Starting in the Initial Year of MTW
funding, and for the duration of its
participation in the MTW
demonstration, the MTW agency must
spend at least 90 percent of each CY’s
MTW AVBA on HCVP eligible HAP
expenses in the funded year. Eligible
HAP expenses are defined in HUD’s
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
8062
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
Voucher Management System (VMS)
guidebook (or the guidebook of any
successor system). HUD’s VMS (or its
successor system) will be the data
source to verify compliance with the
HCVP budget utilization requirement
throughout the duration of participation
in the MTW demonstration. If
performance below the 90% utilization
requirement persists, HUD may take
appropriate corrective actions
including, but not limited to, the
restriction of uses of funds, other
administrative actions, including the
termination of the MTW agency’s
participation in the MTW
demonstration.
(ii) HAP-Originated Reserves. Any
reserves the MTW agency has
accumulated prior to the start of the
Initial Year may be used for any eligible
MTW activity. If pre-existing reserves
before the start of the Initial Year are
used for HAP expenses, those expenses
will be included in the subsequent
year’s funding formula to the extent
those funds originated from HAP. Any
sum generated by the MTW agency in
the Restricted Net Position (RNP)
account or HUD-held reserves after the
effective date that the MTW agency
receives MTW designation shall remain
available and may be used for all
eligible MTW activities, subject to
applicable provisions of this Notice,
subsequent legislation, including
appropriations acts, and other HUD
requirements. HAP-Originated reserves
accumulated after the effective date that
the MTW agency receives MTW
designation will be included in the
subsequent year’s funding formula if
spent on HAP expenses.
(iii) Limitation of Amount of HUDHeld Reserves. The maximum HAPOriginated funds in HUD-held reserves
cannot exceed 100% of AVBA. If the
total amount of HAP-Originated reserves
at CY end exceeds 100% of AVBA, any
reserves originated from HAP in excess
of this amount will be reduced from the
subsequent year’s funding formula.
(iv) Cash Management Requirements
Apply. All undisbursed HAP funds
including HAP-Originated reserve funds
will be held as HUD-held reserves per
OMB cash management requirements
and can be requested by the MTW
agency when HAP (or non-HAP)
immediate need exceeds the scheduled
HAP and Fee monthly disbursements,
but only after consideration of available
MTW agency-held RNP or unrestricted
net position (UNA), respectively. Any
sum held by the MTW agency as excess
administrative fee funds (Unrestricted
Net Position) shall remain available to
the MTW agency. All excess
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
administrative fee funds may be used
for any eligible MTW activities.
(v) Commitments/Obligations of
Funds. Commitments and obligations of
funds that will be used for eligible MTW
activities in the future will receive
consideration in the HCV Renewal
funding formula as described above.
Committed and obligated funds remain
part of HUD-held reserves until drawn
down and all cash management
requirements and other rules applicable
to reserve amounts apply. In addition,
committed and obligated funds may be
subject to HUD reserve offsets as part of
future Congressional Appropriations
Bills.
• Commitments. A commitment is the
setting aside or earmarking of
undisbursed and unobligated funds to
be used for eligible MTW activities in
the future. An MTW agency may
commit funds to planned future MTW
eligible uses, as evidenced in the MTW
Supplement to the Annual Plan which
must be adopted by the board. For
commitments to qualify for
consideration in the Renewal funding
formula, an MTW agency must describe
its future plans to use the funds for a
certain type of MTW eligible use with
sufficient supporting detail in the MTW
Supplement to the Annual PHA Plan.
Such detail may include the program
type (i.e., public housing, housing
voucher, both, or local, non-traditional),
development number/name, description
of work or activity, quantity, estimated
cost, anticipated timeline, and other
information as applicable. Committed
unspent MTW funds must be reported
in VMS in the Unspent MTW Funds
section (see VMS User’s Manual for
more details). An MTW agency may
update and revise commitments as
necessary, in response to changing local
conditions.
• Obligations. An obligation is a
legally binding agreement that will
require an outlay or expenditure of
funds, immediately or in the future. An
example of an obligation is an executed
construction contract between the MTW
agency and a construction company.
Obligated unspent MTW funds must be
reported in VMS in the Unspent MTW
Funds section (see VMS User’s Manual
for more details). HUD intends to
exclude obligated funds in HUD-held
reserves from Congressional offset to the
extent that future statutory language
would allow such exclusion.
(vi) Administrative Fees. The
administrative fee rates used to
calculate fee eligibility for MTW
agencies shall be established according
to the same methodology used to
establish administrative fee rates for all
other public housing agencies.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Administrative fees will be paid on the
basis of units leased as of the first day
of each month; this data will be
extracted from VMS at the close of each
reporting cycle. Administrative fees for
MTW agencies are also subject to the
national proration factor and any other
appropriations act requirements to the
total eligibility amount.
(vii) Incremental Vouchers. If the
MTW agency receives incremental
HCVP vouchers and funding (including
tenant protection vouchers), other than
special purpose vouchers (described in
(x) below), renewal funding for those
vouchers will be included in the MTW
HCV renewal funding eligibility
calculation for the following year. (See
Section 8 of this Operations Notice for
further discussion of tenant protection
and other special purpose vouchers.)
The MTW agency’s renewal funding
eligibility (which includes renewal
funding associated with these vouchers)
remains subject to the budget utilization
requirement detailed above. The
renewal amount is based on the MTW
per unit cost (PUC), any months not
covered by initial increment, and
adjusted by the inflation factor.
Incremental vouchers included in the
MTW agency’s renewal funding
eligibility will be funded pursuant to
the current year’s per unit funding
amount.
(viii) Adjustments for the first-time
renewal of certain vouchers. HUD will
also make adjustments to the renewal
funding for the first-time renewal of
certain vouchers that are included in the
MTW HAP renewal calculation when
the funding increment will expire
during the CY.
(ix) Applicable inflation factor and
proration. The same applicable inflation
factor that applies for non-MTW
agencies will be applied each CY to
determine the MTW agency’s HAP
funding renewal eligibility. Likewise,
the MTW agency’s HAP funding
renewal eligibility is subject to the same
national proration as non-MTW
agencies’ renewal eligibility, based on
the total eligibility of all MTW agencies
compared to the actual amount
appropriated for HAP renewal funding
for the CY.
(x) Rental Assistance Demonstration
(RAD). Any vouchers received as part of
a RAD component I conversion shall be
added to the ACC for the remainder of
the CY in which they are awarded. HUD
will issue a new increment of voucher
funding in support of those vouchers for
the first full CY following a RAD
component I conversion. In subsequent
years, voucher funding for RAD
converted units will be renewed under
the MTW HCV renewal funding
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
calculation, based on a weighted MTW
per unit cost (PUC), plus inflation factor
and the applicable proration factor. RAD
component II conversions are funded in
accordance with the incremental
voucher section above. Administrative
fees for RAD vouchers will be
established based on the same
methodology used to establish
administrative fees in (vi) of this
section. Fees for RAD vouchers will be
prorated at the same level that applies
to all non-MTW agencies.
(xi) Voucher Programs Not Included
in MTW Program. Vouchers and
funding provided for the following
special purpose vouchers, whether for
new allocations or renewal of existing
increments, shall not be included in the
HCV MTW Program renewal
calculation: Five Year Mainstream,
Moderate Rehabilitation renewals,
Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing
(VASH), Non-Elderly Disabled (NED),
and Family Unification Program (FUP).
These vouchers will be renewed under
the regular voucher renewal
requirements as provided under the
appropriations acts. Special purpose
vouchers are discussed in more detail in
Section 8 of this Operations Notice.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
c. MTW Block Grant and Flexibility
An agency participating in the MTW
demonstration program may combine
public housing Operating and Capital
Funds provided under Sections 9(d) and
9(e) of the 1937 Act and voucher
program funds provided under Section
8 of the 1937 Act as the MTW Block
Grant. Certain provisions of Sections 8
and 9 of the 1937 Act and 24 CFR 982
are waived as necessary, to implement
the MTW Block Grant. MTW Block
Grant flexibility is optional and does not
require prior HUD approval.
The agency may use MTW Block
Grant funds for any eligible activity
under Sections 9(d)(1), 9(e)(1) and
Section 8(o) of the 1937 Act and for the
local, non-traditional activities specified
in this Notice, including Appendix A
and B. Within the scope of the
permissible eligible activities, the
agency can carry out the purposes of the
MTW demonstration program to provide
flexibility in the design and
administration of housing assistance to
eligible families; (1) To reduce cost and
achieve greater cost effectiveness in
federal expenditures, (2) to give
incentives to families with children
where the head of household is
working, seeking work, or is preparing
for work by participating in job training,
educational programs, or programs that
assist people to obtain employment and
become economically self-sufficient,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
and (3) to increase housing choices for
low-income families.
The agency may use MTW Block
Grant funds to support the evaluation of
MTW activities subject to reasonable
cost requirements set forth in 2 CFR part
200.
d. Financial Reporting and Auditing
MTW agencies must submit year-end
unaudited and audited financial
information to the Department using the
Financial Data Schedule (FDS)
contained in the Real Estate Assessment
Center’s (REAC) Financial Assessment
Subsystem (FASS–PH), or its successor
system. Financial reporting
requirements for MTW agencies are
currently posted on the REAC Web site
at https://www.hud.gov/offices/reac/
products/fass/fass_pdf/mtwreporting.pdf.
An MTW agency must submit
unaudited financial information into
REAC’s FASS–PH, or its successor
system, within 60 days of the end of its
fiscal year, and audited financial
information with nine months of the
end of its fiscal year. REAC reviews
financial submissions for basic financial
soundness (e.g., cash balances, accounts
receivable and accounts payable, quick
ratio, current ratio, etc.). The MTW
agency will keep project level budgeting
and accounting and report financial
information in the FDS. The MTW
agency will abide by project level
management reviews in accordance
with Asset Management guidance
contained in PIH Notice 2007–9, or any
successor guidance. The MTW agency
will conform to the cost requirements of
2 CFR 200 and any HUD
implementation thereof.
The MTW agency must procure an
Independent Public Accountant (IPA) to
perform an annual audit pursuant to
federal requirements at 2 CFR part 200
and 24 CFR 990.190, or successor, as
well as any audit compliance
supplements developed specifically for
use with the MTW demonstration. An
MTW agency that may be otherwise
exempt from a single audit will be
required to perform an annual financial
statement audit as a condition of
becoming an MTW agency under the
MTW Expansion.
Completed IPA audits must be
submitted to HUD in accordance with
current HUD regulations. HUD will
review the IPA audits of MTW agencies
to determine appropriate action relative
to any findings, prepare
recommendations for audit finding
resolution, and follow up with MTW
agencies to assure finding closure. If
there are audit findings related to the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
8063
MTW program itself, HUD will monitor
the resolution of all audit findings.
Specific Areas for Comment on
Funding, MTW Block Grant, and
Financial Reporting
With respect to funding, MTW Block
Grant, and financial reporting, HUD is
specifically seeking comment on the
following questions:
• Is a 90 percent HAP budget
utilization requirement the appropriate
amount?
• What sanctions or restrictions
should HUD consider using should an
MTW agency continue to fail to meet
the budget utilization requirement?
• Are there other methods for
calculating HCV funding that HUD
should consider?
• Are there other factors HUD should
consider in the calculation of funding?
• Are there any comments or
clarifications needed in relation to
funding, the MTW Block Grant, or
financial reporting?
5. Evaluation
As a condition of participating in the
MTW demonstration, MTW agencies
agree to cooperate fully with HUD and
its contractors in the monitoring and
evaluation of the MTW demonstration,
to keep records, and to submit reports
and other information as required by
HUD. This includes any data collection
required for the use of waivers (e.g.,
conditional waivers) and any evaluation
efforts that HUD undertakes for the
cohort-specific policy changes.
MTW is a demonstration that
provides PHAs flexibilities to innovate
and try different approaches to housing
assistance in order to achieve at least
one of the three statutory objectives laid
out in the 1996 MTW Statute. At its
core, the demonstration is an
opportunity for PHAs, participants,
HUD, stakeholders and the general
public to learn from different
approaches to providing federal housing
assistance to low-income families. This
includes learning from approaches that
are effective and produce desired
outcomes, and from approaches that are
less effective than anticipated and
where results may have unintended
consequences.
Because PHAs have the ability to use
different flexibilities calling on multiple
MTW waivers that serve local
populations in various parts of the
country, interpreting PHA-reported
performance metrics data on the effects
of an individual MTW activity is not
always clear-cut. Consequently, and
while adhering to the guiding principles
for the expansion (simplify, learn, and
apply), HUD will create and develop an
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
8064
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
evaluation system that will tell the story
of the MTW demonstration through the
lens of the three statutory objectives
relating to cost effectiveness, selfsufficiency, and housing choice.
HUD envisions two types of
evaluation—program-wide evaluation
and cohort-specific evaluation. Through
this notice, HUD is seeking feedback on
each of these evaluation types.
a. Program-Wide Evaluation
Program-wide evaluation would seek
to assess whether or not, and to what
extent, MTW agencies use Federal
dollars more efficiently, help residents
find employment and become selfsufficient, and increase housing choices
for low-income families. HUD intends to
develop performance metrics for
program-wide evaluation that are based,
to the extent possible, on information
already being collected from MTW
agencies through existing HUD
administrative data systems. HUD may
determine and require that some
additional reporting is necessary to
effectively evaluate MTW.
The following are examples of
potential performance metrics that
could be used for each statutory
objective; the list is not exhaustive and
will be revised further with feedback
from this notice and additional internal
evaluation:
MTW statutory objective:
Potential performance metrics
1. Reduce cost and achieve greater cost effectiveness in federal expenditures.
• Administrative cost savings per unit in direct program administration
(HCVP and public housing) and indirect costs.
• Changes in rental revenue.
• Changes in number of families served.
• Changes in employment rates or hours worked.
• Changes in earned income levels since entering the program.
• Changes in rent burden.
• Changes in number of households receiving supportive services
aimed to increase self-sufficiency.
• Changes in the quality and type of housing stock accessible to extremely low-income, very low-income, and low-income households.
• Changes in the percentage of households moving to or living in
areas with lower rates of poverty.
• Changes in occupancy rates in public housing and utilization rates of
housing vouchers.
• Changes in average applicant time on waiting list.
2. Give incentives to families with children where the head of household is working; is seeking work; or is preparing for work by participating in job training, educational programs, or programs that assist
people to obtain employment and become economically self-sufficient.
3. Increase housing choices for eligible low-income families ..................
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
b. Cohort-Specific Evaluation
The 2016 MTW Expansion Statute
requires HUD to direct all the agencies
in a cohort to implement one specific
policy change and to conduct a rigorous
evaluation of the one specific policy
change. The MTW Research Advisory
Committee has considered input from
the public and advised HUD on the
policy changes to be tested through the
new cohorts of MTW agencies and on
the methods of research and evaluation.
The cohort-specific policy change and
evaluation methods will be described in
the applicable Selection Notice so that
the MTW agency is aware, in advance
of application to the MTW
demonstration program, of the policy it
will be required to implement and the
evaluation requirements. The specific
evaluation methods (and requirements
for participating MTW agencies) will
vary based on the policy changes to be
tested. Some cohorts of MTW agencies
may be required to participate in
Randomized Control Trials (RCTs),
while others may be required to
participate in detailed process studies or
ethnographic research. HUD’s Office of
Policy Development and Research is
seeking funding for evaluating cohortspecific policy changes. In all cases, the
purpose of the evaluation will be to
measure the outcomes associated with
the specific policy change(s) in order to
offer policy recommendations for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
implementing the policy change(s)
across all PHAs.
HUD will determine the length and
timeframe for the evaluation based on
the recommendations of the MTW
Research Advisory Committee. In some
cases, the evaluation timeframe may
extend beyond the agency’s term of
MTW participation. The MTW agency is
required to participate in the evaluation
for the full timeframe designated by
HUD. HUD intends to extend waivers
beyond the agency’s term of
participation to the extent that those
waivers are needed to support the
evaluation of the specific policy change
and HUD determines that additional
time is needed to evaluate the policy
change.
Specific Areas for Comment on
Evaluation
With respect to the program-wide
evaluation, HUD is specifically seeking
comment on the following questions:
• Is there any information not
captured in HUD administrative data
systems that would provide informative
data points or performance metrics for
evaluating the MTW demonstration?
• What are measures of MTW
activities that ‘‘reduce cost and achieve
greater cost effectiveness in Federal
expenditures’’ that can apply to and are
either being reported in existing HUD
systems or can be reported by every
MTW agency?
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
• What are measures of MTW
activities that ‘‘give incentives to
families with children where the head
of household is working, seeking work,
or is preparing for work by participating
in job training, educational programs, or
programs that assist people to obtain
employment and become economically
self-sufficient’’ that can apply to and are
either being reported in existing HUD
systems or can be reported by every
MTW agency?
• Should HUD standardize a
definition of ‘‘self-sufficient’’? If so what
elements of self-sufficiency should be
included in HUD’s definition?
• What are measures of MTW
activities that ‘‘increase housing choices
for low-income families’’ that can apply
to and are either being reported in
existing HUD systems or can be reported
by every MTW agency?
• What is the best way to capture and
report exit data on families exiting the
Public Housing, HCV, and local nontraditional housing programs? What are
the appropriate exit reasons to capture?
• Is there any information not
captured in HUD administrative data
systems that would be informative data
points or performance metrics in terms
of evaluating the MTW demonstration?
• In the list of performance metrics
provided above, should any be clarified
or removed?
• Are there any alternative or
additional metrics that would enhance
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
performance evaluation on the MTW
demonstration?
With respect to the cohort-specific
evaluation, HUD will consider the
advice provided by the MTW Research
Advisory Committee.
6. Program Administration and
Oversight
In general, MTW agencies will be
subject to the same planning and
reporting protocols as non-MTW
agencies, including the PHA Plan (5Year Plan and Annual Plan) and Capital
Fund planning. MTW agencies must
also report data in HUD data systems, as
required.
New protocols and instruments will
be developed for assessing MTW PHA
performance, and incorporated into
HUD’s Public Housing Assessment
System (PHAS) and Section Eight
Management Program (SEMAP), or
successor assessment systems. In
addition, HUD will employ standard
program compliance and monitoring
approaches including assessment of
relative risk and on-site monitoring
conducted by HUD or by entities
contracted by HUD
a. Planning and Reporting
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
i. The PHA Plan
MTW agencies must adhere to Public
Housing Agency Plan regulations at 24
CFR part 903, any implementing HUD
Notices and guidance, as well as any
succeeding regulations. The PHA Plan
consists of the 5-Year Plan that a PHA
must submit to HUD once every five
PHA fiscal years and the Annual Plan
that the PHA must submit to HUD for
each PHA’s fiscal year. Any HUD
assistance that the PHA is authorized to
use under the MTW demonstration must
be used in accordance with the PHA’s
Annual Plan, as applicable.
Annual and 5-Year Plans must be
submitted in a format prescribed by
HUD. Currently, submission format
requirements are outlined in Notice PIH
2015–18 (HA), issued October 23, 2015,
which is effective until amended,
superseded or rescinded. The MTW
agency must submit:
• HUD–50075–5Y, the 5-Year Plan
• HUD–50075–HP, the Annual Plan for
high performing agencies, along with
supporting documents
Æ HUD 50077–ST–HCV–HP
Æ HUD–50077–SL
Æ Resident Advisory Board (RAB)
comments received
Æ Any challenged elements of the Plan
• MTW Supplement to the Annual Plan
(under development)
As an MTW agency, all PHA Plan
information must be provided in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
context of the PHA’s participation in the
MTW demonstration. This includes
taking into account the waivers and
flexibilities afforded to the MTW
agency. To this end, the MTW agency
will provide and HUD will make
available to the public, an MTW
Supplement to the Annual Plan, in a
format to be developed by HUD. HUD
anticipates that MTW agencies would
use the MTW Supplement to the Annual
Plan to:
(a) Indicate the MTW activities and
associated waivers that the agency will
undertake in the Annual Plan year that
require general waivers (Appendix A)
using a check-box or other simple
format.
(b) Indicate the MTW activities and
associated waivers that the agency will
undertake in the Annual Plan year that
require conditional waivers (Appendix
B) using a check-box or other simple
format.
(c) Indicate the MTW activities that
the agency will undertake in the Annual
Plan year that require cohort-specific
waivers (as applicable and identified in
each cohort’s Selection Notice), and the
cohort-specific waivers to be used, using
a check-box or other simple, nonnarrative format.
(d) Submit specific information or
data required by HUD for any
conditional waiver(s) the agency intends
to use for the first time in the Annual
Plan year.
(e) Submit data or reporting required
for the ongoing use of any MTW waivers
from the preceding year.
(f) Submit data required for HUD’s
verification of the MTW agency’s
compliance with the five statutory
requirements established under the
1996 MTW Statute.
(g) Request HUD approval for any
MTW activities and waivers that the
MTW agency seeks to implement in the
Annual Plan year that are outside of the
lists of general, conditional, and cohortspecific waivers.
Non-MTW PHAs with a combined
unit total of 550 or less public housing
units and vouchers and that are not
designated as troubled under PHAS and
that do not have a failing score under
SEMAP are exempt from the
requirement to submit the Annual Plan.
Per this Operations Notice, MTW
agencies with a combined unit total of
550 or less public housing units and
vouchers would be required, at a
minimum, to submit the MTW
Supplement to the Annual Plan on an
annual basis.
MTW agencies must submit to HUD
the Annual PHA Plan, including any
required attachments and the MTW
supplement, no later than seventy-five
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
8065
(75) days prior to the start of the
agency’s fiscal year.11 Before
submission to HUD, the PHA must have
a 45-day public review period and a
public hearing. PHAs must consider, in
consultation with the RABs, all the
comments received at the public
hearing. The recommendations received
must be submitted by the PHAs as a
required attachment to the Plan. PHAs
must also include a narrative describing
their analysis of the recommendations
and the decisions made on these
recommendations. PHAs must also
obtain the proper signed certifications
and board certification.
HUD will notify the MTW agency in
writing if HUD objects to any provisions
or information in the Annual Plan or the
MTW supplement. When the MTW
agency submits its Plan seventy-five (75)
days in advance of its fiscal year, HUD
will respond to the MTW agency within
75 days. If HUD does not respond to the
MTW agency within 75 days after an ontime receipt of the Annual Plan, the
agency’s Annual Plan (and MTW
Supplement) is approved. If HUD does
not receive the agency’s Annual Plan on
time, the Plan is not approved until
HUD responds.
ii. Admissions and Continued
Occupancy Policy (ACOP) and
Administrative Plan
The MTW agency must update its
ACOP and Administrative Plan to be
consistent with the MTW activities and
related waivers that it implements. The
agency may not implement an MTW
activity or waiver until the relevant
sections of the ACOP and/or
Administrative Plan are updated. MTW
agencies must provide HUD with
electronic versions of the ACOP and
Administrative Plan upon request. If the
MTW agency implements an activity
using the local, non-traditional uses of
funds waiver, the MTW agency must
create and update an implementing
document specifically for such activity.
In addition, the PHA must review its
Administrative Plan, ACOP, and other
selection and admissions related
policies to ensure that they comply with
Departmental regulations and other
directives concerning the use of
criminal records and other criminal
activity in admissions and continued
occupancy decisions. The PHA’s
policies and procedures may not permit
the automatic exclusion of an applicant
11 It is understood that the requirements in the
remainder of this section refer to the Annual Plan
and the MTW Supplement if the MTW agency is
required to submit the Annual Plan and only to the
MTW Supplement if the MTW agency is not
required to submit an Annual Plan as discussed in
the previous paragraph.
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
8066
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
or participant on the basis of the record
of a criminal arrest alone. The same
applies to policies and procedures
concerning prospective tenant screening
by landlords and other third parties.
HUD may review the PHA’s admissions
and continued occupancy policies to
ensure compliance with HUD
requirements concerning criminal
records and criminal activity. For more
information, see the related letter from
HUD’s Office of General Counsel at:
https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/
documents/huddoc?id=HUD_
OGCGuidAppFHAStandCR.pdf and
PIH’s related notice at https://
portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/
huddoc?id=PIH2015-19.pdf.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
iii. Capital Planning and Reporting
MTW agencies must adhere to CFP
regulations at 24 CFR part 905, any
implementing HUD Notices and
guidance, as well as any succeeding
regulations.
As noted previously, MTW agencies
are funded in accordance with CFP
regulations and formula funds are
calculated and distributed in the same
manner as non-MTW agencies.
MTW agencies have the authority and
flexibility to combine CFP funds with
other funds as part of the MTW Block
Grant. HUD will award a Capital Fund
grant to the MTW agencies, in keeping
with the standard process for all PHAs.
The Field Office will spread the funds
in LOCCs to the MTW agencies in the
same manner as for the non-MTW
agencies. As with other PHAs, an MTW
PHA may requisition Capital Funds
from HUD only when such funds are
due and payable, unless HUD approves
another payment schedule. To the
extent that the MTW agency places CFP
funding in the MTW Block Grant, the
CFP funding would be recorded on
Budget Line Item (BLI) 1492 (Moving to
Work) on form HUD–50075.1. CFP
funds entered on BLI 1492 would not
need to be broken out and itemized in
the part II supporting pages of the HUD–
50075.1. However, an MTW PHA may
not accelerate drawdowns of funds in
order to fund reserves.
An MTW agency is not required to
include all or a portion of its CFP grant
in the MTW Block Grant. To the extent
that the MTW agency wishes to dedicate
all or a portion of its CFP grant to
specific capital improvements, the
agency may record CFP funding on any
BLI on form HUD–50075.1 other than
BLI 1492.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
iv. Inventory Management System
(IMS)/PIH Information Center (PIC)
Reporting
Data from HUD’s Inventory
Management System (IMS) and PIH
Information Center (PIC), or successor
systems, is critical to all aspects of
program administration, including HUD
monitoring and tracking of MTW agency
progress in meeting the MTW statutory
objectives. IMS/PIC data is used to
establish funding eligibility levels for
both Operating Subsidy and Capital
Fund grants. Further, HUD relies on
IMS/PIC data to provide a thorough and
comprehensive view of PHA program
performance and compliance.
MTW agencies are required to submit
the following information to HUD via
IMS/PIC (or its successor system):
• Family data to IMS/PIC using Form
HUD–50058 or Form HUD–50058 MTW
(or successor forms) and in compliance
with HUD’s 50058 or 50058 MTW
submission requirements for MTW
agencies. HUD will identify which form
the MTW agencies will submit for
families in the publication of the final
Operations Notice. MTW agencies must
report information on all families
receiving some form of tenant-based or
project-based housing assistance, either
directly or indirectly, as well as all
public housing families, to at least a 95
percent level.
• Current building and unit
information in the development module
of IMS/PIC (or successor system).
• Basic data about the PHA (address,
phone number, email address, etc.).
HUD will monitor MTW agency
reporting to IMS/PIC (or successor
system) to ensure compliance and
provide technical assistance to MTW
agencies as needed.
v. Voucher Management System (VMS)
Reporting
MTW agencies are required to report
voucher utilization in the Voucher
Management System (VMS), or its
successor system. There are several
areas in which VMS reporting is
different for MTW agencies. These areas
are highlighted in the VMS User’s
Manual (https://portal.hud.gov/
hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=
instructions.pdf) which details the VMS
reporting requirements.
HUD will monitor each MTW
agency’s VMS reporting to ensure
compliance and provide technical
assistance to MTW agencies as needed.
vi. General Reporting Requirement
In addition to the reporting
requirements outlined in this
Operations Notice, MTW agencies are
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
required to comply with any and all
HUD reporting requirements not
specifically waived by HUD for
participation in the MTW
demonstration program, including the
requirement (discussed in Section 5) to
comply with HUD’s evaluation of the
specific-policy changes being
implemented by cohort.
b. Performance Assessment
Assessing the performance of PHAs
(both MTW and non-MTW) helps the
delivery of services in the public
housing and voucher programs and
enhances trust among PHAs, public
housing participants, HUD, and the
general public. To facilitate this effort,
HUD will provide management tools for
effectively and fairly measuring the
performance of a PHA in essential
housing operations.
Currently, HUD uses PHAS and
SEMAP to assess risk and identify
underperforming PHAs in the
traditional public housing and voucher
programs. However, since some of the
MTW flexibilities make it difficult to
accurately depict the performance of
MTW agencies under the existing
systems, HUD will develop alternative,
MTW-specific performance indicators in
consultation with MTW agencies and
incorporate them into PHAS and
SEMAP (or successor assessment
system(s)). MTW agencies may not opt
out of the MTW-specific successor
system(s).
i. Public Housing Assessment System
(PHAS)
MTW agencies are scored in PHAS
but they can elect not to receive the
overall score (MTW agencies continue
to receive PHAS sub-scores even if they
elect not to receive the overall score). If
an MTW agency elects to receive its
overall PHAS score, the agency must
continue to be scored for the duration of
the demonstration, or until the agency is
assessed under performance indicators
designed specifically for MTW agencies
in a successor system(s) to PHAS,
whichever comes first. Once developed,
MTW agencies that elect not to receive
an overall PHAS score must be assessed
under the MTW-specific successor
system(s).
Per the 1996 MTW statute, when
providing public housing, the MTW
agency must ensure that the housing is
safe, decent, sanitary, and in good
repair, according to the physical
inspection protocols established and
approved by HUD. Thus, MTW agencies
continue to be subject to HUD physical
inspections. To the extent that HUD
physical inspections reveal deficiencies,
the MTW agency must continue to
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
address these deficiencies in accordance
with existing physical inspection
requirements. If an MTW agency does
not maintain public housing adequately,
as evidenced by the physical inspection
performed by HUD and is determined to
be troubled in this area, HUD will
determine appropriate remedial actions.
The actions to be taken by HUD and the
PHA will include actions statutorily
required and such other actions as may
be determined appropriate by HUD.
These actions may include developing
and executing a Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) with the MTW
agency, suspension or termination of the
MTW ACC amendment, or other
agreement to be determined by HUD, in
accordance with the provisions therein,
or such other actions legally available to
the Department.
MTW agencies must continue to
submit year-end financial information
into the Financial Data Schedule (FDS)
or successor system, as discussed
earlier.
ii. Section 8 Management Assessment
System (SEMAP)
MTW agencies are scored in SEMAP
but they can elect not to receive the
overall score. If an MTW agency elects
to receive its overall SEMAP score, the
agency must continue to be scored for
the duration of the demonstration, or
until the agency is assessed under an
assessment system designed specifically
for MTW agencies, whichever comes
first. Once developed, MTW agencies
that opt out of SEMAP must be assessed
under the MTW-specific successor
system(s).
iii. MTW-specific Assessment
HUD will develop new performance
indicators for evaluating MTW agencies
and for measuring the relative progress
of assisted families toward selfsufficiency. Such MTW-specific
performance indicators will be
incorporated into PHAS and SEMAP (or
successor system(s)) for purposes of
MTW agencies and will address PHA
8067
performance (general public housing
and Section 8 HCV management, as well
as MTW-specific activities) and PHA
risk associated with MTW.
c. Monitoring and Oversight
MTW agencies remain subject to the
full range of HUD monitoring and
oversight efforts including, but not
limited to, annual risk assessments, onsite monitoring reviews, monitoring
reviews relating to VMS reporting and
rent reasonableness, review of the
accuracy of data reported into HUD data
systems, use of HUD data systems to
assess PHA program performance,
among other activities.
i. MTW Statutory Requirements
Throughout participation in the MTW
demonstration program, all MTW
agencies must continue to meet five
statutory requirements established
under the 1996 MTW Statute. HUD will
monitor and determine MTW agencies’
compliance with these five
requirements as follows:
MTW statutory requirement:
HUD verification approach:
1. MTW agencies must ensure that at least 75 percent of the families
assisted are very low income families, as defined in section 3(b)(2)
of the 1937 Act..
HUD will verify this requirement by pulling Public Housing and HCV
data from PIC, or its successor system, and the MTW agency will
provide income data for its families served through local, non-traditional housing programs, if any, in the MTW Supplement to the Annual Plan.
HUD will verify this requirement through its review of the MTW Supplement to the Annual Plan.
HUD will verify this requirement in accordance with the calculation in
Notice PIH–2013–02, Baseline Methodology for MTW agencies, or
successor notice.
HUD will verify this requirement by pulling Public Housing and HCV
data from PIC, or successor system.
2. MTW agencies must establish a reasonable rent policy. ....................
3. MTW agencies must continue to assist substantially the same total
number of eligible low-income families as would have been served
had the amounts not been combined..
4. MTW agencies must maintain a comparable mix of families (by family size) as would have been provided had the amounts not been
used under the demonstration..
5. MTW agencies must ensure that housing assisted under the demonstration meets housing quality standards established or approved
by the Secretary..
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
ii. Income Integrity and Enterprise
Income Verification System (EIV)
Reviews
iii. MTW Site Visit
MTW agencies are required to comply
with the final rule regarding EIV issued
December 29, 2009, and utilize EIV for
all income verifications. EIV has been
modified for MTW agencies so that
family information submitted in PIC
will not expire for 40 months, in order
to accommodate agencies choosing to
extend recertification periods for up to
three years.
MTW agencies are subject to HUD
review to ensure compliance with EIV
requirements as well as monitor the
accuracy and integrity of the MTW
agencies’ income and rent
determination policies, procedures, and
outcomes.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
HUD will verify this requirement through its review of PHAS Physical
scores, or successor assessment system.
HUD will periodically conduct a site
visit to provide guidance, discuss the
MTW agency’s MTW activities, and
offer needed technical assistance
regarding its program. The purpose of
the site visit will be to confirm reported
agency MTW activities, to review the
status and effectiveness of the agency’s
MTW strategies, and to identify and
resolve outstanding MTW related issues.
The MTW agency shall give HUD
access, at reasonable times and places,
to all requested sources of information
including access to files, access to units
and an opportunity to interview agency
staff and assisted participants.
Where travel funding or staff
resources are not available to facilitate
in-person site visits, HUD may exercise
the option to conduct remote site visits
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
via telephone, videoconference, or
webinar.
To the extent possible, HUD will
coordinate the MTW site visit with
other site visits to be conducted by
HUD.
iv. Housing Choice Voucher Utilization
HUD will monitor HCV utilization at
MTW agencies and it will ensure that
HCV funds are fully utilized, subject to
Section 6(a)(iii)(c) of this notice. Where
leasing levels are inconsistent, HUD
may take appropriate actions to work
with the MTW agency to increase
leasing and utilization.
v. Public Housing Occupancy
HUD will monitor public housing
occupancy rates for MTW agencies. In
instances where the MTW agency’s
public housing occupancy rate falls
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
8068
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
below 96 percent, HUD may require, at
its discretion, that the MTW agency
enter into an Occupancy Action Plan to
address the occupancy issues. The
Occupancy Action Plan will include the
cause of the occupancy issue, the
intended solution, and reasonable
timeframes to address the cause of the
occupancy issue.
vi. Additional Monitoring and Oversight
HUD may, based on the MTW
agency’s risks and at HUD’s discretion,
conduct management, financial, or other
reviews of the MTW agency. The MTW
agency shall respond to any findings
with appropriate corrective action(s).
In addition, HUD will make use of all
HUD data systems and available
information to conduct ongoing remote
monitoring and oversight actions for
MTW agencies, consistent with the
results of the PIH risk assessment.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
Specific areas for comment on Program
Administration and Oversight
With respect to planning and
reporting requirements for MTW
agencies, HUD is specifically seeking
comment on the following questions:
• Is the MTW Supplement to the
Annual Plan, as described, an
appropriate mechanism for HUD to
track MTW agencies’ activities and use
of waivers? Are there specific elements
that should be included in the MTW
Supplement to the Annual Plan?
• Should MTW agencies with a
combined unit total of 550 or less public
housing units and Section 8 vouchers be
exempt from the requirement to submit
the Annual Plan? If so, how should
HUD collect information on the
activities and waivers implemented over
the course of the demonstration?
• Do you have suggestions for how
HUD can strengthen the public
engagement process to ensure that
participants have an opportunity to offer
meaningful input in the selection and
implementation of MTW activities?
With respect to public housing and
voucher program performance
assessment for MTW agencies, HUD is
specifically seeking comment on the
following questions:
• How could HUD measure public
housing and voucher program
performance for MTW agencies and
incorporate those measures into PHAS
and SEMAP?
• Are there MTW-specific indicators
that should be included in a revised
PHAS and SEMAP assessment?
• Should an MTW agency retain its
high-performer status in PHAS or
SEMAP until MTW specific indicators
are developed?
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
With respect to monitoring and
oversight for MTW agencies, HUD is
specifically seeking comment on the
following questions:
• Are HUD’s monitoring and
oversight efforts sufficient for MTW
agencies?
• What are the specific areas of risk
that should be considered for MTW
agencies?
• Are there additional areas that
should be monitored for MTW agencies?
7. Rental Assistance Demonstration
(RAD) Program
MTW agencies converting public
housing program units to Section 8
assistance under the Rental Assistance
Demonstration (RAD) program are able
to retain MTW regulatory and statutory
flexibilities in the management of those
units, subject to RAD requirements, if
the conversion is to Section 8 ProjectBased Voucher (PBV) assistance. MTW
agencies converting projects under RAD
to PBV may continue to undertake
flexibilities except to the extent limited
by RAD, as described in the RAD
Notice, PIH–2012–32, REV–2 or its
successor notice.12
8. Applying MTW Flexibilities to Special
Purpose Vouchers
Special Purpose Vouchers (SPVs) are
specifically provided for by Congress in
line item appropriations which
distinguish them from regular vouchers.
Generally, SPVs are not part of the
MTW demonstration. Following is
guidance on how MTW flexibilities may
be applied to specific types of SPVs,
which can be found on the MTW Web
site13.
a. Veteran Affairs Supportive Housing
(HUD–VASH)
HUD–VASH vouchers have separate
operating requirements and must be
administered in accordance with the
requirements listed at www.hud.gov/
offices/pih/programs/hcv/vash. The
operating requirements waive and alter
many of the standard HCV statutes and
regulations at 24 CFR 982. Unless stated
in the HUD–VASH operating
requirements, however, the regulatory
requirements at 24 CFR 982 and all
other HUD directives for the HCV
program are applicable to HUD–VASH
vouchers. PHAs may submit a request to
HUD to operate HUD–VASH vouchers
in accordance with MTW administrative
flexibilities.
12 Notices and laws related to RAD can be found
at https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/RAD/
library/notices.
13 https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/
huddoc?id=DOC_10495.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
b. Family Unification Program (FUP)
The FUP NOFA language allows
vouchers to be administered in
accordance with MTW operations
unless MTW provisions are inconsistent
with the appropriations act or
requirements of the FUP NOFA. In the
event of a conflict between the Final
Operations Notice and the
appropriations act or FUP NOFA
language, the act and NOFA govern.
c. Non-elderly Persons with Disabilities
(NED) Vouchers
The NED NOFA language allows
vouchers to be administered in
accordance with operations unless
MTW provisions are inconsistent with
the appropriations act or requirements
of the NED NOFA. In the event of a
conflict between the Final Operations
Notice and the appropriations act or
FUP NOFA language, the act and NOFA
govern.
d. Enhanced Vouchers and Tenant
Protection Vouchers
Enhanced and tenant protection
vouchers funds will be fungible one
year after a family receives the voucher.
The family must still be provided
assistance until the end of the initial
protection period which lasts until the
family moves out of the residence where
the voucher was originally received or
is terminated from the program. Once
the initial protection period ends, the
enhanced or tenant protection voucher
becomes a regular voucher. MTW
agencies must follow the procedures
described in PIH Notice 2013–27, or its
successor notice, when the recipient of
an enhanced voucher voluntarily agrees
to relinquish such assistance in
exchange for the provision of PBV
assistance.
9. Regionalization
The 2016 MTW Expansion Statute
states that:
• The Secretary may, at the request of
an MTW agency and one or more
adjacent PHAs in the same area,
designate that MTW agency as a
regional agency.
• An MTW agency may be selected as
a regional agency if the Secretary
determines that unified administration
of assistance under sections 8 and 9 by
that agency across multiple jurisdictions
will lead to a) efficiencies and to b)
greater housing choice for low-income
persons in the region.
• A regional MTW agency may
administer the assistance under sections
8 and 9 of the 1937 Act for the
participating agencies within its region
pursuant to the terms of its MTW ACC
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
amendment, or other agreement to be
determined by HUD, with HUD.
• The Secretary may agree to extend
the term of the ACC amendment, or
other agreement to be determined by
HUD, and to make any necessary
changes to accommodate
regionalization.
HUD will operationalize this
regionalization provision through the
same terms and conditions as the MTW
Operations Notice. HUD will issue a
separate PIH Notice addressing the
criteria for designation as a regional
MTW agency, the mechanisms for
administration by the regional MTW
agency on behalf of participating
agencies, and the procedures for
extending or modifying MTW activities
to accommodate regionalization.
Specific Areas for Comment on
Regionalization
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
In anticipation of the guidance that
HUD plans to issue on regionalization,
HUD seeks comment on the following
issues:
• How should ‘‘adjacent’’ be defined
for the purposes of identifying which
PHAs should be allowed to be part of an
MTW agency’s regional agency
designation? Should regional MTW
agencies extend across state borders?
• What flexibilities should the
regional MTW agency be able to
administer on behalf of its regional
partners? Should the partner PHAs have
full flexibility in the use of funds?
• How should regional partners be
included in the MTW evaluation
process? What data should they need to
submit in conjunction with the MTW
agency?
• What form of governance structure,
if any, should be formed between the
regional MTW agency and its partner
PHAs?
• What form should the agreement
(i.e., contract, memorandum of
understanding, partnership agreement,
etc.) take between the regional MTW
agency and its PHA partners?
• Should the criteria for
regionalization be the same for current
MTW agencies and PHAs that join
under the expansion?
• Should HUD issue a revised Public
Housing and Voucher Consortia Rule to
further the regionalization concept?
10. Applicability of Other Federal, State,
and Local Requirements
Notwithstanding the MTW waivers
described in this Operations Notice, the
following provisions of the 1937 Act
continue to apply to MTW agencies and
the assistance received pursuant to the
1937 Act:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
i. The terms ‘‘low-income families’’
and ‘‘very low-income families’’ shall
continue to be defined by reference to
Section 3(b)(2) of the 1937 Act (42
U.S.C. 1437a(b)(2));
ii. Section 12 of the 1937 Act (42
U.S.C. 1437j), as amended, shall apply
to housing assisted under the
demonstration, other than housing
assisted solely due to occupancy by
families receiving tenant-based
assistance; and
iii. Section 18 of the 1937 Act (42
U.S.C. 1437p, as amended by Section
1002(d) of Public Law 104–19, Section
201(b)(1) of Public Law 104–134, and
Section 201(b) of Public Law 104–202),
governing demolition and disposition,
shall continue to apply to public
housing notwithstanding any use of the
housing under MTW.
iv. Section 8(r)(1) of the 1937 Act on
HCV portability shall continue to apply
unless provided as a cohort-specific
waiver and associated activity(s) in an
evaluative cohort as necessary to
implement comprehensive rent reform
and occupancy policies. Such a cohortspecific waiver and associated
activity(s) would contain, at a
minimum, exceptions for requests to
port due to employment, education,
health and safety and reasonable
accommodation.
Notwithstanding any requirement
contained in this Notice or any MTW
waiver granted herein, other federal,
state and local requirements applicable
to public housing or HCV assistance
will continue to apply. The ACC
Amendment, or agreement to be
determined by HUD, will place in HUD
the authority to determine if any future
law or future regulation conflicts with
any MTW-related agreement or Notice.
If a future law conflicts, the law shall be
implemented, and no breach of contract
claim, or any claim for monetary
damages, may result from the conflict or
implementation of the conflicting law or
regulation.
If any requirement applicable to
public housing, outside of the 1937 Act,
contains a provision that conflicts or is
inconsistent with any MTW waiver
granted by HUD, the PHA remains
subject to the terms of that non-1937 Act
requirement. Such requirements
include, but are not limited to:
• Requirements for Federal Funds:
Notwithstanding the flexibilities
described in this Notice, the public
housing and voucher funding provided
to MTW agencies remain federal funds
and are subject to any and all other
federal requirements outside of the 1937
Act (e.g., including but not limited to
competitive HUD NOFAs under which
the MTW agency has received an award,
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
8069
state and local laws, federal statutes
other than the 1937 Act (including
appropriations acts), and OMB Circulars
and requirements), as modified from
time to time. The MTW agency’s
expenditures must comply with 2 CFR
part 200 and other applicable federal
requirements, which provide basic
guidelines for the use of federal funds,
including the requirements of this
Notice.
• National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA): MTW agencies must comply
with NEPA, 24 CFR part 50 or Part 58,
as applicable, and other related federal
laws and authorities identified in 24
CFR part 50 or Part 58, as applicable.
• Fair Housing and Equal
Opportunity: As with the administration
of all HUD programs and all HUDassisted activities, fair housing and civil
rights issues apply to the administration
of MTW demonstration programs. This
includes actions and policies that may
have a discriminatory effect on the basis
of race, color, sex, national origin,
religion, disability, or familial status
(see 24 CFR part 1 and part 100 subpart
G) or that may impede, obstruct,
prevent, or undermine efforts to
affirmatively further fair housing. PHA
Plans must include a civil rights
certification required by Section 5A of
the 1937 Act and implemented by
regulation at 24 CFR 903.7(o) and
903.15, as well as a statement of the
PHA’s strategies and actions to achieve
fair housing goals outlined in an
approved Assessment of Fair Housing
consistent with 24 CFR 5.154. If the
PHA does not have a HUD accepted
AFH, it must still provide a civil rights
certification and statement of the PHA’s
fair housing strategies, which would be
informed by the corresponding
jurisdiction’s AFH or Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
and the PHA’s assessment of its own
operations.
All PHAs, including MTW agencies,
are obligated to comply with nondiscrimination and equal opportunity
laws and implementing regulation,
including those in 24 CFR 5.105.
Specific laws and regulations must be
viewed in their entirety for full
compliance, as this Operations Notice
does not incorporate a complete
discussion of all legal authorities. For
example, PHAs, including MTW
agencies, are required to comply with
the Fair Housing Act, Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II
of the Americans with Disabilities Act
of 1990, Architectural Barriers Act of
1968, Executive Order 11063: Equal
Opportunity in Housing, Executive
Order 13166: Improving Access to
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
8070
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
Services for Persons with Limited
English Proficiency, HUD’s Equal
Access Rule (24 CFR 5.105(a)(2), Age
Discrimination Act of 1975, and Title IX
of the Education Amendments Act of
1972, as well as HUD and governmentwide regulations implementing these
authorities.. PHAs should review PIH
Notice 2011–31 for more details.
• Court Orders and Voluntary
Compliance Agreements: MTW agencies
must comply with the terms of any
applicable court orders or Voluntary
Compliance Agreements that are in
existence or may come into existence
during the term of the ACC
Amendment, or other agreement as
determined by HUD, The PHA must
cooperate fully with any investigation
by the HUD Office of Inspector General
or any other investigative and law
enforcement agencies of the U.S.
Government.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
11. MTW Agencies Admitted Prior to
2016 MTW Expansion Statute
The 39 MTW agencies that entered
the MTW demonstration prior to the
2016 MTW Expansion Statute adhere to
an administrative structure outlined in
the Standard MTW Agreement, a
contract between each current PHA and
HUD. The 2016 MTW Expansion Statute
extended the term of the Standard MTW
Agreement for these existing MTW
agencies through each PHA’s 2028 fiscal
year.
Some PHAs that entered the MTW
demonstration prior to the 2016 MTW
Expansion Statute may wish to opt out
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
of their Standard MTW Agreement and
join the MTW Expansion. HUD will
support an existing MTW PHA’s request
to join the MTW Expansion provided
that:
• The PHA makes the change at the
end of its fiscal year, so that it does not
have part of a fiscal year under the
Standard Agreement and part under the
new framework;
• The PHA follows the same public
comment and Board resolution process
as would be required for amending the
Standard MTW Agreement; and
• The PHA agrees to all the terms and
conditions that apply to MTW agencies
admitted pursuant to the 2016 MTW
Expansion Statute, including all of the
provisions of this Operations Notice and
the accompanying ACC amendment, or
other agreement as determined by HUD.
The only difference between an MTW
agency admitted pursuant to the 2016
MTW Expansion Statute and an existing
MTW PHA that elects to join the new
framework will be that the existing
MTW PHA joining the framework
described in this Operations Notice will
not be required to implement the
specific policy change associated with
each cohort of post-2016 MTW agencies
and will not be required to participate
in the evaluation of that specific policy
change.
Specific areas for comment on MTW
Agencies Admitted Prior to 2016 MTW
Expansion Statute
With respect to MTW agencies
admitted prior to the 2016 MTW
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Expansion Statute, HUD is specifically
seeking comment on the following
questions:
• Is it appropriate to permit existing
MTW agencies to come under the
framework of this Operations Notice
and associated ACC amendment, or
other agreement as determined by HUD?
• Should these existing PHAs be
subject to any different or supplemental
requirements?
12. Sanctions, Terminations and Default
If the MTW agency violates any of the
requirements outlined in this Notice,
HUD is authorized to take any corrective
or remedial action. Sanctions,
terminations, and default are covered in
the PHA’s MTW ACC amendment, or
other agreement as determined by HUD.
III. Environmental Impact
1. Purpose and Applicability
A Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) with respect to the
environment has been made in
accordance with HUD regulations in 24
CFR part 50 that implement section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)). The FONSI will be available
for public inspection on
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: January 13, 2017.
Jemine A. Bryon,
General Deputy Assistant, Secretary for Public
and Indian Housing.
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
8071
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
APPENDIX A—GENERAL WAIVERS
Waiver name
Regulations
waived
Waiver description
Available activities
Parameters
Activities Related to Public Housing and Housing Choice Vouchers
Limited Lease
Terms.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
Homeownership
Program.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
The Agency may develop and adopt a
program to limit the term of assistance in Section 8 and 9 programs
in order to create a new limited
lease term housing program. Successful participants in these programs will be eligible for transfer to
the Agency’s public housing or HCV
programs. The Agency will ensure
that these programs do not have a
disparate impact on protected classes, and will be operated in a manner that is consistent with the requirements of nondiscrimination and
equal opportunity authorities, including but not limited to Section 504 of
the Rehabilitation Act. More specifically, under no circumstances will
residents of such programs be required to participate in supportive
services that are targeted at persons with disabilities in general, or
persons with any specific disability.
In addition, admission to any of the
programs or priority for supportive
services developed under this section will not be conditioned on a diagnosis or specific disability of a
member of an applicant or participant family. This section is not intended to govern the designation of
housing that is subject to Section 7
of the 1937 Act.
The Agency is authorized to use the
Section 8 Homeownership Program
as the basis for providing homeownership opportunities to families
who are low-income, including public housing residents, HCV or PBV
tenants, or other low-income families. Participants in this Homeownership Program will be subject to
the Section 8 occupancy and admission requirements. Subject to
subsidy layering review, the Agency
is authorized to apply the Section 8
Homeownership requirements to
families who are low-income, including public housing and other low-income families. The Section 8
Homeownership requirements can
be modified to provide soft second
mortgages or down payment assistance to participating low-income
families or to provide monthly HAP
payments to HCV recipients.
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Certain provisions
of Sections 3, 4,
5, 6, 8, and 9 of
the 1937 Act
and 24 CFR 966
Subpart A, 960
Subpart B, and
982.303.
Limited Lease
Term Housing
Program (PH):
The Agency may
create a limited
lease term housing program with
reasonable conditions in its public housing program.
Limited Lease
Term Housing
Program (HCV):
The Agency may
create a limited
lease term housing program with
reasonable conditions in its
HCV program.
Successful participants must be eligible to transfer into regular public
housing/HCV programs; must not
have disparate impact on a protected class or other protected characteristic; policies, procedures, and
programs must be consistent with
applicable nondiscrimination and
equal opportunity authorities, including but not limited to Section 504 of
the Rehabilitation Act; participants
are not required to participate in
services targeted to persons with
disabilities; admission is not conditioned on a diagnosis or specific
disability of an applicant or participant family. The term of assistance
may not be shorter than 6 months.
Agencies seeking to create a limited
lease term program that goes beyond the activities listed in this
waiver may propose an activity
under the Local Non-Traditional Activities Rental Subsidy Program
Waiver located in the Conditional
Waivers.
Certain provisions
of Sections 5, 9,
24, 32, 35,
8(o)(15) and 8(y)
of the 1937 Act,
24 CFR 905,
906, 24 CFR
982.625 through
982.643.
Homeownership
(Both): The
Agency may create a homeownership program
that includes soft
second mortgages or down
payment assistance to low income families including PH residents, PBV and
HCV families in
lieu of monthly
HAP.
Inventory removal of current public
housing units must be approved in
advance by HUD. The Agency is required to submit a Section 32
homeownership application to HUD
via the Inventory Removal Submodule of IMS/PIC. If the Agency is
seeking to waive portions of 24
CFR 906, then the Agency must include those regulations as part of
the Section 32 Homeownership application. Note that the disposition
requirements of Section 18 and 24
CFR Part 970 do not apply to the
sale of public housing units in accordance with the Section 32 homeownership plan. Assistance under
this waiver is still subject to subsidy
layering review. Recruitment, eligibility, and selection policies and
procedures must be consistent with
the Department’s nondiscrimination
and equal opportunity requirements.
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
8072
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
APPENDIX A—GENERAL WAIVERS—Continued
Waiver name
Available activities
VerDate Sep<11>2014
The Agency is authorized to operate
any of its existing self-sufficiency
and training programs, including its
Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) Program and any successor programs
exempt from certain HUD program
requirements. If the Agency receives dedicated funding for an
FSS coordinator, such funds must
be used to employ a self-sufficiency
coordinator. In developing and operating such programs, the Agency is
authorized to establish strategic relationships and partnerships with
local private and public agencies
and service providers to leverage
expertise and funding. In implementing this waiver, the Agency
must execute a contract of participation, or other locally developed
agreement, that is at least 5 years
but no more than 10 years. However, notwithstanding the above,
any funds granted pursuant to a
competition must be used in accordance with the NOFA and the
approved application and work plan.
..............................................................
...............................
Alternative Family
Selection Procedures (Both):
The Agency is
authorized to develop its own recruitment and
selection procedures for its FSS
program(s).
...............................
Modify or Eliminate
the Contract of
Participation
(Both): The
Agency is authorized to modify the terms of,
or eliminate the
contract of participation, in lieu
of a local form.
Parameters
Certain provisions
Waive Operating a
of Section 23 of
Required FSS
the 1937 Act
Program (Both):
and 24 CFR 984.
The Agency is
authorized to
waive its requirement to operate
the traditional
FSS program.
Alternative to Program Coordinating Committee (Both):
The Agency is
authorized to
create an alternative structure
for securing local
resources to
support an FSS
program.
..............................................................
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
Authorizations Related to Family
Self Sufficiency.
Regulations
waived
Waiver description
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
Recruitment, eligibility, and selection
policies and procedures must be
consistent with the Department’s
nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements. Agency may
not require families to participate in
the program as a condition of receiving housing assistance. Agency
may not include current work status,
work history and/or source of income as part of the selection criteria. ‘‘Family’’ is not limited to families with a member who is able to
work full time, but is defined broadly
so as not to exclude families with a
member who is disabled but able to
work, disabled but unable to work,
or working as a caregiver for a family member with a disability.
The Agency may modify the terms of
the contract of participation to align
with adjustments made to its FSS
program(s) using MTW flexibility.
Further, the Agency may discontinue use of the contract of participation and instead employ a locally-developed agreement that
codifies the terms of participation.
23JAN3
8073
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
APPENDIX A—GENERAL WAIVERS—Continued
Waiver description
Regulations
waived
Available activities
Parameters
..............................................................
...............................
..............................................................
...............................
Consistent with the goals and structure of its MTW FSS program, the
Agency can set policies for whether
income increases are recognized
for purposes of increasing rent or
changing the amount of funds
moved to escrow/savings through
the program. The Agency may not
use income increases during participation in the FSS program to
change a family’s eligibility status
for purposes of participation in the
FSS program or for the receipt public housing or HCV assistance.
The Agency may set policies to defer
income increases to savings OR to
allow participants to earn savings
deposits based on meeting certain
program milestones. Such policies
must be made clear to participants
in writing prior to starting their participation in the program.
..............................................................
...............................
Policies for Addressing Increases in Family Income
(Both): The
Agency is authorized to set
its own policies
for addressing
increases in
family income
during participation in the FSS
program.
Calculating FSS
Credits (Both):
The Agency is
authorized to
create alternative methods
for computing
the family’s FSS
credit.
Disbursement of
Savings (Both):
The Agency may
set its own policies for when
savings funds
can be disbursed to participants.
Waiver name
Consistent with the goals and structure of its MTW FSS program, the
Agency can set policies for when
savings are disbursed to participants. This could mean all funds
are disbursed at once, or at certain
key points of participation. Such
policies must be made clear to participants in writing prior to starting
their participation in the program.
Activities Related to Public Housing
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
PH—Initial, Annual
and Interim Income Review
Process.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
The Agency is authorized to restructure the initial, annual and interim
review process in the public housing program in order to affect the
frequency of the reviews and the
methods and process used to establish the integrity of the income
information provided. In addition,
the Agency is expressly authorized
to adopt a local system of income
verification in lieu of the current
HUD system. For example, the
Agency may implement alternate
time
frames
for
validity
of
verification or adopt policies for
verification of income and assets
through sources other than those
currently allowed under the 1937
Act. The terms ‘‘low-income families’’ and ‘‘very low-income families’’
shall continue to be defined by reference to Section 3(b)(2) of the
1937 Act (42 U.S.C. 1437a(b)(2)).
HUD has defined ‘‘Annual Income’’
at 24 CFR 5.609 and MTW Agencies must determine the eligibility of
the family in accordance with provisions of 24 CFR 5.609.
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Certain provisions
of sections
3(a)(1) and
3(a)(2) of the
1937 Act and 24
CFR 966.4 and
960.257.
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Alternate Reexamination Schedule
for Workable
Households
(PH): The Agency may establish
an alternate reexamination
schedule for
workable households.
Alternate Reexamination Schedule
for Elderly/Disabled Households (PH): The
Agency may establish an alternate reexamination schedule for
elderly and/or
disabled households.
Alternate
Verification Policy (PH): The
Agency may
verify information
provided by the
participant in alternate ways.
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
Reexaminations must occur at least
every three years. Must allow at
least one interim adjustment at the
request of the household per year.
Reexaminations must occur at least
every four years. Must continue to
allow interim adjustments at the request of the household.
The Agency must determine the eligibility of a families in accordance
with 24 CFR 5.609. Prior to the implementation of the activity a hardship policy and impact analysis
must be developed and adopted in
accordance with MTW guidance.
23JAN3
8074
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
APPENDIX A—GENERAL WAIVERS—Continued
Waiver name
Regulations
waived
Waiver description
Available activities
Parameters
Activities Related to Housing Choice Vouchers
HCV—Operational
Policies and Procedures.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Certain provisions
of Section
8(o)(5), 8(o)(7)
and 8(o)(13)(F)
of the 1937 Act
and 24 CFR
982.516 and
982.162(b).
..............................................................
HCV—Leasing Incentives.
The Agency is authorized to define,
adopt and implement a reexamination program that differs from the
reexamination program currently
mandated in the 1937 Act and its
implementing
regulations.
The
terms ‘‘low-income families’’ and
‘‘very low-income families’’ shall
continue to be defined by reference
to Section 3(b)(2) of the 1937 Act
(42 U.S.C. 1437a(b)(2)).
..............................................................
...............................
The Agency is authorized to determine a damage claim and/or vacancy loss policy and payment policy for occupied units that differs
from the policy requirements currently mandated in the 1937 Act
and its implementing regulations.
Damage and vacancy authority are
subject to state and local laws.
..............................................................
Certain provisions
of Section
8(o)(9), of the
1937 Act and 24
CFR 982.311.
Vacancy Loss
(HCV): The
Agency may provide landlords
with vacancy
loss payments
up to 3 months.
...............................
Damage Claims
(HCV): The
Agency may provide landlords
with compensation in the event
that a tenant
leaves the unit
with significant
damage.
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
...............................
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Alternate Reexamination Schedule
for Workable
Households
(HCV): The
Agency may establish an alternate reexamination schedule for
workable households.
Alternate Reexamination Schedule
for Elderly/Disabled Households (HCV):
The Agency may
establish an alternate reexamination schedule
for elderly and/or
disabled households.
Alternate
Verification Policy (HCV): The
Agency may
verify information
provided by the
participant in alternate ways.
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
Reexaminations must occur at least
every three years. Must allow at
least one interim adjustment at the
request of the household per year.
The Department will develop a rider
to the HAP contract that reflects
MTW authorizations that adjust the
current elements of the HAP contract.
Reexaminations must occur at least
every four years. Must continue to
allow interim adjustments at the request of the household. The Department will develop a rider to the HAP
contract that reflects MTW authorizations that adjust the current elements of the HAP contract.
The Agency must determine the eligibility of a families in accordance
with 24 CFR 5.609. Prior to the implementation of the activity a hardship policy and impact analysis
must be developed and adopted in
accordance with MTW guidance.
The Department will develop a rider
to the HAP contract that reflects
MTW authorizations that adjust the
current elements of the HAP contract.
The Agency must update its Administrative Plan to reflect vacancy loss
claim policy. In order to incentivize
landlords to lease to HCV families
an Agency may provide vacancy
loss payments to landlords whether
or not a family is terminated.
The Agency must update its Administrative Plan to reflect damage claim
policy. In implementing this activity,
the tenant’s security deposit should
first be used to cover damages before the Agency provides compensation to a landlord.
23JAN3
8075
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
APPENDIX A—GENERAL WAIVERS—Continued
Waiver description
Regulations
waived
Available activities
Parameters
PBV—Unit Cap
Percentage Waiver.
The Agency is authorized to use for
project-based assistance up to 50%
of its total authorized units as long
as units are located in census tracts
with no more than 20% poverty rate
and/or house at-risk populations defined as an individual or family that
does not have sufficient resources
or support networks immediately
available to prevent them from moving to an emergency shelter or
lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate
nighttime residence.
Section 8(o)(13)(B)
of the 1937 Act
and 24 CFR
983.6.
Raise PBV Unit
Cap (PBV): The
Agency may
project-base up
to 50% of its authorized units.
PBV—Development
Percentage Waiver.
The Agency is authorized to determine the percentage of units within
a development that can be projectbased that differs from the percentage currently mandated in the 1937
Act and its implementing regulations. In using this authorization, the
Agency must place units in locally
defined areas of opportunity.
Section 8(o)(13)(B)
of the 1937 Act
and 24 CFR
983.56.
Subject to subsidy layering review, the
Agency is authorized to projectbase Section 8 assistance at properties owned by a single asset entity of the Agency that are not public
housing properties, subject to
HUD’s requirements regarding subsidy layering. Project-based assistance for such owned units does not
need to be competitively bid, nor
are the owned units subject to any
required assessments for voluntary
conversion. Agency still needs to
complete site selection requirements. This waiver does not waive
24 CFR 983.57 despite reference to
Part 983, Subpart B. This waiver
also does not waive the requirement of 24 CFR 983.59(b) that
HQS inspections be performed by
an independent entity.
Certain provisions
of Sections
8(o)(13)(B and
D) of the 1937
Act and 24 CFR
982.1, 982.352
and 24 CFR Part
983 Subpart B.
Raise PBV Cap
Within a Development to 50%
PBV (PBV): The
Agency may
raise the PBV
cap within a development to
50%.
Raise PBV Cap
Within a Development to 75%
PBV (PBV): The
Agency may
raise the PBV
cap within a development to
75%.
Raise PBV Cap
Within a Development to 100%
(PBV): The
Agency may
raise the PBV
cap within a development to
100%.
Eliminate PBV
Competitive
Process (PBV):
The Agency may
eliminate the
competitive process in the award
of PBVs to properties owned by
a single asset
entity of the
Agency that are
not public housing.
The Agency is subject to the PBV
Section of PIH Notice 2015–05 or
any successor notice and/or guidance. If more than 20% of the total
authorized units are project based,
the additional units must meet one
of the following criteria: house people who meet the HUD definition of
homeless; house vulnerable populations; house veterans; provide
supportive housing for elderly or
disabled; or be located in areas of
high-opportunity. Agency must comply with Fair Housing and Civil
Rights requirements. The Agency is
subject to Notice 2013–27.
The Agency is subject to the PBV
Section of PIH Notice 2015–05 or
any successor notice and/or guidance. If more than 20% of the units
in a development are project-based,
the additional units must meet one
of the following criteria: house people who meet the HUD definition of
homeless; house vulnerable populations; house veterans; provide
supportive housing for elderly or
disabled; is located in an area of
high opportunity; or is a market-rate
rental property owned by the Agency. The Agency must comply with
Fair Housing and Civil Rights requirements. Agency is subject to
Notice PIH 2013–27.
PBV—Elimination of
Competitive Process.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
Waiver name
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
The Agency is still subject to the PBV
Section of Notice PIH 2015–05 or
any successor notice and/or guidance. Agency is subject to Notice
PIH 2013–27. This waiver does not
waive Part 983, Subpart B in its entirety and Agency must still comply
with 24 CFR 983.57 and 983.59(b)
which requires that HQS inspections be completed by independent
entities.
23JAN3
8076
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
APPENDIX A—GENERAL WAIVERS—Continued
Regulations
waived
Waiver name
Waiver description
PBV—Alternate
Competitive Process.
The Agency is authorized to establish
a reasonable competitive process or
utilize an existing local competitive
process for project-basing leased
housing assistance at units that
meet existing Housing Quality
Standards and that are owned by
non-profit, for-profit housing entities,
or a single asset entity of the Agency.
The Agency is authorized to determine the time period for amending
the PBV HAP contract to add units
thereto, the length of the lease period, when vouchers expire, and
when vouchers will be issued or reissued.
PBV—Operational
Policies and Procedures.
Available activities
Parameters
Certain provisions
of 24 CFR
983.51.
Establish Alternate
PBV Competitive
Process (PBV):
The Agency may
establish an alternate competitive process in
the award PBVs.
Agency is subject to PBV Section of
Notice PIH 2015–05 or any successor notice and/or guidance.
Agency is subject to Notice PIH
2013–27.
Certain provisions
of Sections
8(o)(7)(a),
8(o)(13)(F) and
8(o)(13)(G) of
the 1937 Act
and 24 CFR 983
Subpart F.
Add Units to PBV
HAP Contract
(PBV): The
Agency may add
units to a PBV
HAP contract at
any time.
The anniversary and expiration date
for any additional units added to a
PBV HAP contract must be the
same as that for the original units
under the PBV HAP contract.
APPENDIX B—CONDITIONAL WAIVERS
No.
Waiver name
Waiver description
Regulations waived
Available activities
Parameters
Activities Related to Public Housing
PH—Leases ....
The Agency is authorized to develop and
adopt a new form of local lease and establish community rules and reasonable tenant fees based on proven private management models (subject to State and local
laws), provided that no-cause evictions are
not permitted and the Agency allows for
grievance procedures.
Certain provisions of
Section 6(l) of the
1937 Act and 24
CFR 966.4.
Establish Community Rules through Local
Lease (PH): The Agency may establish
community rules through a local lease.
Establish Reasonable Fees through Local
Lease (PH): The Agency may charge fees
that are reasonable and cost effective
through a local lease.
2 .......
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
1 .......
PH—Rent Policies.
The Agency is authorized to determine family
payment, including the total tenant payment, the minimum rent, utility reimbursements and tenant rent. The Agency is authorized to adopt and implement any reasonable policies for setting rents in public
housing, including but not limited to: Establishing definitions of income and adjusted
income or earned income disallowance
that differ from those in current statues
and regulations. Agency must comply with
Section 3(b)(2) of the Act to determine eligibility.
Certain provisions of
Section 3(a)(2),
3(a)(3)(A) and Section 6(l) of the 1937
Act and 24 CFR
5.603, 5.611, 5.628,
5.630, 5.632, 5.634
and 960.255 and
966 Subpart A.
Rent Policies (PH): Income bands—The
Agency may implement changes to the
rent calculation in order to create a system
based upon rent bands. Such rent policies
are structured using two variables: (1) Income bands, or ranges, that assign dollar
increments that have been determined locally by the Agency, and (2) bedroom size.
In a table, the y-axis lists the income
bands and the x-axis lists the various bedroom sizes. In creating this system, the
Agency may also adopt a flat rent policy
within each income band instead of calculating rent based on adjusted income. The
income bands may result in total tenant
payment being more than 30%.
Rent Policies (PH): Flat Rents—The Agency
may establish flat rents based on bedroom
size.
Rent Policies (PH): Minimum Rent—The
Agency may implement a minimum rent
policy that is targeted towards work able
families.
Rent Policies (PH): Other Income-Based
Rent Model—The Agency may calculate
rent at an alternative adjusted income.
Rent Policies (PH): Gross Income Rents—
The Agency may calculate rent as a percentage of gross income that does not include income deductions and/or exemptions.
Rent Policies (PH): Alternative Utility Allowance—The Agency may create a utility
schedule(s) for all units based upon bedroom size, the property location and/or the
types of utilities paid by resident.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
Agency may only implement changes to the
lease under this activity that do not require
either a regulatory or statutory waiver. Fair
Housing and other civil rights requirements
continue to apply.
An appeals process and hardship policy
must be put in place. The hardship policy
must be developed and adopted in accordance with MTW guidance.
The rent bands must be set in accordance
with bedroom size. A hardship policy must
be put in place. The hardship policy must
be developed and adopted in accordance
with MTW guidance.
Minimum rent may not exceed $250. Tenant
rents may be calculated between 25% to
50% of adjusted income. Hardship policy,
impact analysis, and any other information
required by HUD for the oversight of this
policy must be provided to HUD upon request.
The gross income calculation may not exceed 40% of rent burden for working families and 27% for elderly and/or disabled
households.
The Agency should review its schedule of
utility allowances each year, and must revise its allowance for a utility category if
there has been a change of 10 percent or
more from the prior year. The Agency
must maintain information supporting its
annual review of utility allowances and any
revisions made in its utility allowance
schedule.
23JAN3
8077
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
APPENDIX B—CONDITIONAL WAIVERS—Continued
No.
Waiver name
Waiver description
Regulations waived
Available activities
Parameters
3 .......
PH—Work Requirements.
The Agency is authorized to implement a requirement that a specified segment of its
public housing residents work as a condition of tenancy subject to subject to all applicable Fair Housing Requirements and
the mandatory admission and prohibition
requirements imposed by sections 576–
578 of the Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act of 1998 and Section 428 of
Public Law 105–276. Those individuals exempt from the Community Service Requirement in accordance with Section
12(c)(2)(A), (B), (D) and (E) of the 1937
Act are also exempt from the Agency’s
work requirement.
Certain provisions of
Section 3 of the
1937 Act and 24
CFR 960.206.
Work Requirement (PH): The Agency may
implement a work requirement for public
housing residents between the ages of 18
and 54. The requirement shall be no less
than 15 hours of work per week and no
more than 30 hours of work per week.
Work requirements shall not be applied to
exclude, or have the effect of excluding,
the admission of or participation by persons with disabilities or families that include persons with disabilities. Work requirements shall not apply to person with
disabilities or families that include persons
with disabilities. However, persons with
disabilities and families that include persons with disabilities must have equal access to the full range of program services
and other incentives.
The Agency is authorized to adopt and implement term limits for its Public Housing
program.
Certain provisions of
Section 3(a)(3)(A)
and Section 6(l) of
the 1937 Act and 24
CFR 5.603 and 966
Subpart A.
Term Limits (PH): The Agency may limit the
duration for which a family receives housing assistance.
PH—Income
Deductions
and Exclusions.
The Agency is authorized to restructure the
initial, annual and interim review process in
the public housing program in order to affect the income deductions and exclusions.
The terms ‘‘low-income families’’ and ‘‘very
low-income families’’ shall continue to be
defined by Section 3(b)(2) of the 1937 Act
(42 U.S.C. 1437a(b)(2)). HUD has defined
‘‘Annual Income’’ at 24 CFR 5.609 and
MTW Agencies must determine the eligibility of the family in accordance with provisions of 24 CFR 5.609.
Certain provisions of
sections 3(a)(1) and
3(a)(2) of the 1937
Act and 24 CFR
5.611, 966.4 and
960.257.
Elimination of Deduction(s) (PH): The Agency may eliminate one, some or all deductions.
Standard Deductions (PH): The Agency may
replace existing deduction(s) with a standard deduction(s).
Alternate Income Inclusions/Exclusions (PH):
The Agency may establish alternate policies to include or exclude certain forms of
participant income during the income review and rent calculation process. These
alternate policies must be consistent with
the inclusions and exclusions at 24 CFR
5.609.
Residents must have the opportunity to utilize the provisions of the Agency’s Grievance Procedure to resolve a dispute regarding a determination that a resident has
failed to comply with the work requirement.
The Agency must update its ACOP to include a description of the circumstances in
which residents shall be exempt for the requirement and hardship policies. The
ACOP should include a description of what
is considered work as well as other activities that shall be considered acceptable
substitutes for work. Services, or referrals
to services, must be provided by the Agency to support preparing families to comply
with this requirement. The hardship policy
in the ACOP should apply to residents who
are actively trying to comply with the Agency’s work requirement, but are having difficulties obtaining work or an acceptable
substitute. The ACOP should also describe
the consequences of failure to comply with
the work requirement. Agencies may not
implement the PH-Work Requirements
Waiver on individuals exempted from the
Community Service Requirement under
Section 12(c)(2)(A), (B), (D) and (E).
While the work requirements do not apply to
persons with disabilities or families that include a person with disabilities, such persons and families are not precluded from
working or engaging in substitute activities
(such as caring for a family member who
is disabled). Regardless of the level of engagement with work or substitute activities,
persons and families that include persons
with disabilities must have equal access to
services or referral to services to support
their efforts to obtain work or an acceptable substitute, and any other services or
other incentives associated with the program.
The term of assistance may not be shorter
than 5 years except in the case of shortterm transitional housing programs. Services, or referrals to services, must be provided by the Agency to support preparing
families for the termination of assistance. A
hardship policy must also be created to
address extenuating circumstances. Hardship information and any other information
required by HUD for the oversight of this
policy must be provided to HUD upon request. Agency must also conduct an impact analysis prior to the implementation of
this activity. An Agency may not retroactively apply the 5-year term limit to families currently residing in public housing.
The Agency must determine the initial eligibility of a families in accordance with 24
CFR 5.609. Prior to the implementation of
the activity a hardship policy and impact
analysis must be developed and adopted
in accordance with MTW guidance. Agencies are required to follow 24 CFR
5.609(c) and other federal statutes that
specifically exclude certain income sources
from being counted as income.
4 .......
PH—Term Limits.
5 .......
1 .......
HCV—Earned
Income Disregard.
The Agency must comply with Section Certain provisions of
3(b)(2) of the Act to determine eligibility.
Sections 16(b) of
The Agency may calculate the tenant’s
the 1937 Act and 24
share of rent in a manner other than that
CFR 5.603, 5.609,
required by statute and regulation in order
5.611, 5.628,
to eliminate or create an alternative
982.516, 982.201
Earned Income Disregard which may not
and 982 Subpart E.
be used to determine eligibility or recertification. Rent calculations must comply with
Fair Housing and Civil Rights requirements.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
Activities Related to Housing Choice Vouchers
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
EID (HCV): The Agency may eliminate the
Earned Income Disregard from the calculation of the tenant’s share of the rent.
EID (HCV): The Agency may create an alternative to the Earned Income Disregard in
order to calculate the tenant’s share of the
rent.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
8078
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
APPENDIX B—CONDITIONAL WAIVERS—Continued
No.
HCV & PBV—
Reexamination Policies
and Lease
Terms.
Waiver description
Regulations waived
Available activities
Parameters
The Agency is authorized to define, adopt
and implement a reexamination program
that differs from the reexamination program currently mandated in the 1937 Act
and its implementing regulations. The
terms ‘‘low-income families’’ and ‘‘very lowincome families’’ shall continue to be defined by reference to Section 3(b)(2) of the
1937 Act (42 U.S.C. 1437a(b)(2)).
Certain provisions of
Section 8(o)(5),
8(o)(7) and
8(o)(13)(F) and (G)
of the 1937 Act and
24 CFR 982.516
and 982.162(b).
The Agency is authorized to determine the
length of the HAP contract, the length of
the lease period, when vouchers expire,
and when vouchers will be issued or reissued.
2 .......
Waiver name
Certain provisions of
Sections 8(o)(7)(a),
8(o)(13)(F) and
8(o)(13)(G) of the
1937 Act and 24
CFR 983 Subpart F.
Elimination of Deduction(s) (HCV): The
Agency may eliminate one, some or all deductions.
Standard Deductions (HCV): The Agency
may replace existing deduction(s) with a
standard deduction(s).
Alternate
Income
Inclusions/Exclusions
(HCV): The Agency may establish alternate ways to include or exclude participant
income.
Length of HAP Contract (HCV & PBV): The
Agency may change the term of a HAP
contract.
Alteration of HAP Contract (HCV & PBV):
The Agency may alter the length of the
lease period, when vouchers expire and
when vouchers will be issued or reissued.
The Agency must determine the eligibility of
a families in accordance with 24 CFR
5.609. Prior to the implementation of the
activity a hardship policy and impact analysis must be developed and adopted in accordance with MTW guidance. The Department will develop a rider to the HAP contract that reflects MTW authorizations that
adjust the current elements of the HAP
contract.
Agencies implementing revised lease terms,
including length of lease period for HCV
and PBV families, must demonstrate how
the altered lease terms, including length,
benefit the tenant. The anniversary and expiration date for any additional units added
to a PBV HAP contract must be the same
as that for the original units under the PBV
HAP contract. The Department develop a
rider to the HAP contract that reflects
MTW authorizations that adjust the current
elements of the HAP contract.
The term of assistance may not be shorter
than 5 years except in the case of shortterm transitional housing programs. Services, or referrals to services, must be provided by the Agency to support preparing
families for the termination of assistance. A
hardship policy must also be created to
address extenuating circumstances. Hardship information and any other information
required by HUD for the oversight of this
policy must be provided to HUD upon request. Agency must also conduct an impact analysis prior to the implementation of
this activity.
A hardship policy must also be created to
address extenuating circumstances. Hardship information and any other information
required by HUD for the oversight of this
policy must be provided to HUD upon request.
HCV & PBV—
Tenant Term
Limits.
The Agency is authorized to implement term
limits for HCV and PBV units designated
as part of the MTW Demonstration.
Certain provisions of
Section 8(o)(7) and
8(o)(13)(F)–(G) of
the 1937 Act and 24
CFR 982 Subpart L
and 983 Subpart E.
Term Limits (HCV & PBV): The Agency may
limit the duration for which a family receives housing assistance.
4 .......
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
3 .......
HCV & PBV—
Rent Policies.
The Agency is authorized to adopt and implement any reasonable policy to establish
payment standards, rents or subsidy levels
for tenant-based assistance that differ from
the currently mandated program requirements in the 1937 Act and its implementing regulations. The Agency is authorized to adopt and implement any reasonable policies to calculate the tenant portion
of the rent that differ from the currently
mandated program requirements in the
1937 Act and its implementing regulations.
Certain provisions of
Sections 8(o)(2)(A),
8(o)(2)(B), 8(o)(3),
3(a)(1), 8(o)(2)(C),
and 8(o)(13)(H)–(I)
of the 1937 Act and
24 CFR 982.508,
982.503 and
982.518.
Rent Policies (HCV & PBV): Payment Standards—The Agency is authorized to adopt
and implement any reasonable policy to
establish payment standards that do not
exceed 200% of the FMR. This may include the setting of payment standards
outside of the basic range, and creating
multiple payment standards based on variations in the local rental market.
Certain provisions of
Sections 8(o)(1),
8(o)(2), 8(o)(3),
8(o)(10) and
8(o)(13)(H)–(I) of
the 1937 Act and 24
CFR 982.508.
Certain provisions of
Sections 8(o)(1),
8(o)(2), 8(o)(3),
8(o)(10) and
8(o)(13)(H)–(I) of
the 1937 Act, 24
CFR 982.518,
982.308, 982.451,
983 Subpart E,
982.508, and
982.503.
Certain provisions of
Sections 8(o)(1),
8(o)(2), 8(o)(3),
8(o)(10) and
8(o)(13)(H)–(I) of
the 1937 Act and 24
CFR 982.518.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Rent Policies (HCV & PBV): Income Bands—
The Agency may implement changes to
the rent calculation in order to create a
system based upon rent bands. Such rent
policies are structured using two variables:
(1) Income bands, or ranges, that assign
dollar increments that have been determined locally by the Agency, and (2) bedroom size. In a table, the y-axis lists the income bands and the x-axis lists the various bedroom sizes. In creating this system, the Agency may also adopt a flat rent
policy within each income band instead of
calculating rent based on adjusted income.
Rent Policies (HCV & PBV): Initial Rent Burden—The Agency may waive the maximum family share at initial occupancy of
40% of the family’s adjusted monthly income.
Rent Policies (HCV & PBV): Stepped Rent—
The Agency may create a stepped rent
model that alters the family’s rent payment
on a fixed schedule in both frequency and
amount. Implementation of this activity
may only occur if the Stepped Rent activity
is combined with another Rent Policy waiver identified in HCV-Rent Policies Available
Activities.
Rent Policies (HCV & PBV): Minimum
Rent—The Agency is authorized to adopt
and implement any reasonable policies to
calculate the tenant portion of the rent that
differ from the currently mandated program
requirements in the 1937 Act and its implementing regulations.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
A hardship policy must also be created to
address extenuating circumstances. Hardship information and any other information
required by HUD for the oversight of this
policy must be provided to HUD upon request.
A hardship policy must also be created to
address extenuating circumstances. Hardship information and any other information
required by HUD for the oversight of this
policy must be provided to HUD upon request. Agency must also conduct an impact analysis.
Rent increases may not occur more than
once per year. This activity may only apply
to non-elderly and/or non-elderly and disabled residents. Agency must implement a
grace period policy for HCV families that
reach zero HAP through this activity. The
grace period would allow families to receive zero HAP for at least six months before being transitioned off the HCV program.
Minimum rent may not exceed $250. Tenant
rents may be calculated between 25% to
50% of adjusted income. Hardship policy,
impact analysis, and any other information
required by HUD for the oversight of this
policy must be provided to HUD upon request.
23JAN3
8079
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
APPENDIX B—CONDITIONAL WAIVERS—Continued
No.
Waiver name
Waiver description
Regulations waived
Available activities
Parameters
The Agency is authorized to determine contract rents and increases and to determine
the content of the HAP contract that differ
from the currently mandated program requirements in the 1937 Act and its implementing regulations.
Certain provisions of
Sections 8(o)(1)(B)
and 8(o)(13)(H) of
the 1937 Act and 24
CFR 982.308,
982.451 and 983
Subpart E.
Certain provisions of
Section 8(o)(10) of
the 1937 Act and 24
CFR 982.507.
Rent Policies (HCV & PBV): Contract
Rents—The Agency is authorized to determine contract rents and increases and to
determine the content of the HAP contracts that differ from the currently mandated program requirements in the 1937
Act and its implementing regulations.
Rent Reasonableness (HCV & PBV): The
Agency is authorized to develop a local
process to determine rent reasonableness
that differs from the currently mandated
program requirements in the 1937 Act and
its implementing regulations.
A family’s rents may be calculated between
25% to 50% of adjusted income. Any lease
alteration(s) must comply with State and
local law. A hardship policy must be put in
place. The hardship policy must be developed and adopted in accordance with
MTW guidance.
Agencies must provide, for HUD’s approval,
an alternative measure to determine that
rents charged by owners to voucher participants are reasonable.
Certain provisions of
Sections 8(o)(7)(a),
8(o)(13)(F), and
8(o)(13)(G) of the
1937 Act and 24
CFR 982.303,
982.309 and 983
Support F.
Work Requirement (HCV & PBV): The Agency may implement a work requirement for
HCV and PBV residents between the ages
of 18 and 54. The requirement shall be no
less than 15 hours of work per week and
no more than 30 hours of work per week.
The Agency shall provide supportive services to assist families obtain employment
or an acceptable substitute. Work requirements shall not be applied to exclude, or
have the effect of excluding, the admission
of or participation by persons with disabilities or families that include persons with
disabilities. Work requirements shall not
apply to persons with disabilities or families that include persons with disabilities.
However, persons with disabilities and
families that include persons with disabilities must have equal access to the full
range of program services and other incentives.
PBV Unit Types: As long as units are rental
housing and meet HQS, the Agency may
attach and pay PBV assistance for units in
various types of housing including housing
described at 24 CFR 983.53(a)(3), (5) and
(6).
The Agency must update its Administrative
Plan to include a description of the circumstances in which families shall be exempt from the requirement. The Administrative Plan must also include a hardship
policy. The Administrative Plan should include a description of what is considered
work as well as other activities that shall
be considered acceptable substitutes for
work. Services, or referrals to services,
must be provided by the Agency to support
preparing families for the termination of assistance. The hardship policy in the Administrative Plan should apply to families who
are actively trying to comply with the Agency’s work requirement, but are having difficulties obtaining work or an acceptable
substitute. The Administrative Plan should
also describe the consequences of failure
to comply with the work requirement.
5 .......
HCV & PBV–
Rent Reasonableness.
6 .......
HCV & PBV—
Work Requirements.
7 .......
PBV Unit Types
Subject to subsidy layering review, the Agency is authorized to determine property eligibility criteria, including types of units currently prohibited by Section 8 regulations
so long as these units are rental housing
and meet HQS.
1 .......
Local Non-Traditional Activities—
Rental Subsidy Programs.
The Agency is authorized to use MTW funds
to provide rental subsidy to a third-party
entity.
N/A .............................
2 .......
Local Non-Traditional Activities—Service Provision.
The Agency is authorized to use MTW funds
to provide supportive services to eligible
participants.
N/A .............................
3 .......
Local Non-Traditional Activities—
Housing Development
Programs.
The Agency is authorized to contribute MTW
funds to the development of affordable
housing outside of Sections 8 and 9.
N/A .............................
The Agency is authorized to develop a local
process to determine rent reasonableness
that differs from the currently mandated
program requirements in the 1937 Act and
its implementing regulations. Agency must
determine that rents charged by owners
are reasonable before entering into a HAP
contract.
The Agency is authorized to implement a requirement that a specified segment of its
HCV and PBV residents work as a condition of tenancy subject to all applicable
Fair Housing Requirements.
Certain provisions of
Section 8(p) of the
1937 Act and 24
CFR 983.53(a)–(b)
and 982 Subparts H
and M.
The Agency must provide a transition plan to
both the affected residents and HUD prior
to the end of the demonstration. If the
Agency places a PBV unit in a public
housing project, then the Agency will not
receive operating funds for that PH unit.
PBV units must comply with HQS and be
consistent
with
fair
housing
deconcentration requirements. This waiver
is subject to subsidy layering review.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
Activities Related to Local, Non-Traditional
Appendix C—Public Comments To Be
Solicited Through MTW Operations
Notice
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
Rental Subsidy Programs: The Agency may
provide funds for supportive housing programs and services.
Rental Subsidy Programs: The Agency may
provide funds for homeless/transitional
housing programs and services.
Rental Subsidy Programs: The Agency may
provide funds for the creation of a local
rental subsidy program that addresses
special needs populations.
Service Provision: The Agency may provide
services for residents of other Agency
owned or managed low-income housing
that is not public housing or Housing
Choice Voucher assistance.
Service Provision: The Agency may provide
services for low-income non-residents.
Service Provision: The Agency may provide
supportive services subsidies or budgets
for low-income families.
Service Provision: The Agency may contract
with a third party provider for the provision
of services to eligible participants.
LIHTC Development: The Agency may contribute MTW funds towards a Low Income
Housing Tax Credit project.
Affordable Housing Development: The Agency may contribute MTW funds towards the
development of housing for low-income
families.
Waivers
Does the list of general waivers, MTW activities, and parameters in Appendix A and
Appendix B contain the needed flexibility to
achieve the three MTW statutory objectives? If not, what waivers, activities, and/
or parameters are missing?
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Agency is subject to Notice PIH 2011–45 or
any successor notice and/or guidance. Any
MTW funds awarded to a third party provider must be competitively bid.
Agency is subject to Notice PIH 2011–45 or
any successor notice and/or guidance. Any
MTW funds awarded to a third party provider must be competitively bid.
Agency is subject to Notice PIH 2011–45 or
any successor notice and/or guidance. The
use of federal funds must be consistent
with the requirements of 2 CFR 200 and
other basic federal principles.
Are there any MTW activities and/or waivers
that should not be included as general
waivers, available to all MTW agencies
without prior HUD approval?
Are there any MTW activities and/or waivers
that should not be included as conditional
waivers but rather should be included as
general waivers, or not included at all?
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
8080
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Notices
Does the list of conditional waivers, MTW activities, and parameters in Appendix B contain the needed flexibility to implement any
alternative income-based rent model? If
not, what waivers, activities, and/or parameters are missing?
Term of Participation
Assuming all cohorts are selected between
2017 and 2020, is the end of each MTW
agency’s Fiscal Year 2028 an appropriate
timeframe for MTW participation, and understanding that HUD may extend cohortspecific waivers to accommodate evaluation of MTW activities that require additional time?
Is there a preferable length or structure for
the term of MTW participation?
What elements of the MTW agency’s transition plan should be mandatory?
What elements of the transition process
should HUD require in order to protect
residents from potential harm and minimize
disruptions to agency operations?
Funding, Single Fund Budget, and
Financial Reporting
Is a 90 percent HAP budget utilization requirement the appropriate amount?
What sanctions or restrictions should HUD
consider using should an MTW agency
continue to fail to meet the budget utilization requirement?
Are there other methods for calculating HCV
funding that HUD should consider?
Are there other factors HUD should consider
in the calculation of funding?
Are there any comments or clarifications
needed in relation to funding, the MTW
Block Grant, or financial reporting?
Evaluation
Is there any information not captured in HUD
administrative data systems that would
provide informative data points or performance metrics for evaluating the MTW demonstration?
What are measures of activities that ‘‘reduce
cost and achieve greater cost effectiveness
in Federal expenditures’’ that can apply to
and are either being reported in existing
HUD systems or can be reported by every
MTW agency?
What are measures of activities that ‘‘give incentives to families with children where the
head of household is working, seeking
work, or is preparing for work by participating in job training, educational programs, or programs that assist people to
obtain employment and become economically self-sufficient’’ that can apply to and
are either being reported in existing HUD
systems or can be reported by every MTW
agency?
Should HUD standardize a definition of ‘‘selfsufficient’’? If so what elements of self-sufficiency should be included in HUD’s definition?
What are measures of MTW activities that
‘‘increase housing choices for low-income
families’’ that can apply to and are either
being reported in existing HUD systems or
can be reported by every MTW agency?
What is the best way to capture and report
exit data on families exiting the Public
Housing, HCV, and local non-traditional
housing programs? What are the appropriate exit reasons to capture?
Is there any information not captured in HUD
administrative data systems that would be
informative data points or performance
metrics in terms of evaluating the MTW
demonstration?
In the list of performance metrics provided
above, should any be clarified or removed?
Are there any alternative or additional metrics
that would enhance performance evaluation on the MTW demonstration?
Program Administration and Oversight
Is the MTW Supplement to the Annual Plan,
as described, an appropriate mechanism
for HUD to track MTW agencies’ activities
and use of waivers? Are there specific elements that should be included in the MTW
Supplement to the Annual Plan?
Should MTW agencies with a combined unit
total of 550 or less public housing units
and Section 8 vouchers be exempt from
the requirement to submit the Annual
Plan? If so, how should HUD collect information on the activities and waivers implemented over the course of the demonstration?
Do you have suggestions for how HUD can
strengthen the public engagement process
to ensure that residents have an opportunity to offer meaningful input in the selection and implementation of MTW activities?
How could HUD measure public housing and
voucher program performance for MTW
agencies and incorporate those measures
into PHAS and SEMAP?
Are there MTW-specific indicators that should
be included in a revised PHAS and
SEMAP assessment?
Should an MTW agency retain its high-performer status in PHAS or SEMAP until
MTW specific indicators are developed?
Are HUD’s monitoring and oversight efforts
sufficient for MTW agencies?
What are the specific areas of risk that
should be considered for MTW agencies?
Are there additional areas that should be
monitored for MTW agencies?
Regionalization
How should ‘‘adjacent’’ be defined for the
purposes of identifying which PHAs should
be allowed to be part of an MTW agency’s
regional agency designation? Should regional MTW agencies extend across state
borders?
What flexibilities should the regional MWT
agency be able to administer on behalf of
its regional partners? Should the partner
PHAs have full flexibility in the use of
funds?
What form of governance structure, if any,
should be formed between the regional
MTW agency and its partner PHAs?
What form should the agreement (i.e., contract, memorandum of understanding, partnership agreement, etc.) take between the
regional MTW agency and its PHA partners?
Should the criteria for regionalization be the
same for current MTW agencies and PHAs
that join under the expansion?
Should HUD issue a revised Public Housing
and Voucher Consortia Rule to further the
regionalization concept?
MTW Agencies Admitted Prior to 2016
MTW Expansion Statute
Is it appropriate to permit existing MTW
agencies to come under the framework of
this Operations Notice and associated
MTW agreement?
Should these existing PHAs be subject to
any different or supplemental requirements?
[FR Doc. 2017–01310 Filed 1–19–17; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES3
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\23JAN3.SGM
23JAN3
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 13 (Monday, January 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8056-8080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-01310]
[[Page 8055]]
Vol. 82
Monday,
No. 13
January 23, 2017
Part V
Department of Housing and Urban Development
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Operations Notice for the Expansion of the Moving To Work Demonstration
Program Solicitation of Comment; Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 82 , No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 /
Notices
[[Page 8056]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-5994-N-01]
Operations Notice for the Expansion of the Moving To Work
Demonstration Program Solicitation of Comment
AGENCY: Office of Public and Indian Housing, HUD.
ACTION: Notice; solicitation of comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Public Housing/Section 8 Moving to Work (MTW)
demonstration program was first established under Section 204 of the
Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996 to
provide statutory and regulatory flexibility to participating public
housing agencies (PHAs) under three statutory objectives. Those three
statutory objectives are: To reduce cost and achieve greater cost
effectiveness in federal expenditures; to give incentives to families
with children where the head of household is working, is seeking work,
or is preparing for work by participating in job training, educational
programs, or programs that assist people to obtain employment and
become economically self-sufficient; and to increase housing choices
for eligible low-income families.
Section 239 of the Fiscal Year 2016 Appropriations Act, Public Law
114-113 (2016 MTW Expansion Statute), signed by the President in
December of 2015, authorizes HUD to expand the MTW demonstration
program from the current level of 39 PHAs to an additional 100 PHAs
over a period of seven years. In this notice, HUD seeks public comment
on the draft Operations Notice for the Expansion of the MTW
demonstration program (Operations Notice). The Operations Notice
establishes requirements for the implementation and continued
operations of the MTW demonstration program pursuant to the 2016 MTW
Expansion Statute. HUD seeks public comment on all aspects of the
Operations Notice and on specific areas for comment identified
throughout this notice. HUD also seeks comment on the topic of
regionalization in the MTW demonstration, which is discussed in Section
9 of the Operations Notice. Appendix C of this notice contains a
listing of all of the questions in which HUD seeks public comment.
DATES: Comment Due Date: March 24, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this notice to the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel,
Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room
10276, Washington, DC 20410-0500. Communications must refer to the
above docket number and title.
Electronic Submission of Comments. Interested persons may submit
comments electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to make them immediately available to
the public. Comments submitted electronically through the
www.regulations.gov Web site can be viewed by other commenters and
interested members of the public. Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that site to submit comments electronically.
Note: To receive consideration as public comments, comments
must be submitted through one of the two methods specified above.
Again, all submissions must refer to the docket number and title of
the notice.
No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile (fax) comments are not acceptable.
Public Inspection of Public Comments. All properly submitted
comments and communications submitted to HUD will be available for
public inspection and copying between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays at the
above address. Due to security measures at the HUD Headquarters
building, an appointment to review the public comments must be
scheduled in advance by calling the Regulations Division at 202-708-
3055 (this is not a toll-free number). Individuals with speech or
hearing impairments may access this number via TTY by calling the
Federal Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339 (this is a toll-free number).
Copies of all comments submitted are available for inspection and
downloading at www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marianne Nazzaro, Office of Public
and Indian Housing, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451
7th Street SW., Room 4130, Washington, DC 20410; email address mtw-info@hud.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
MTW Demonstration Program
The MTW demonstration program was first established under Section
204 of Title II of section 101(e) of the Omnibus Consolidated
Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996, Public Law 104-134, 110
Stat. 1321-281; 42 U.S.C. 1437f note (1996 MTW Statute) \1\ to provide
statutory and regulatory flexibility \2\ to participating PHAs under
three statutory objectives. Those three statutory objectives are to:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ PHAs currently operating an MTW demonstration program
include PHAs with an active MTW agreement as of December 15, 2015.
PHAs currently operating an MTW program do not include PHAs that
previously participated in the MTW demonstration and later left the
demonstration.
\2\ The MTW demonstration program may only provide certain
flexibilities under the 1937 Act. For more information on the
history of the MTW demonstration program, please go to: www.hud.gov/mtw.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reduce cost and achieve greater cost effectiveness in
federal expenditures;
give incentives to families with children where the head
of household is working; is seeking work; or is preparing for work by
participating in job training, educational programs, or programs that
assist people to obtain employment and become economically self-
sufficient; and
increase housing choices for eligible low-income families.
To achieve these objectives, PHAs selected for participation in the
MTW demonstration are given exemptions from many existing public
housing and voucher rules and offered more flexibility with how they
use their Federal funds. MTW agencies use the opportunities presented
by MTW to better address local housing needs. Learning from the
experience of MTW agencies, HUD develops new housing policy
recommendations that can positively impact assisted housing delivery
for all PHAs nationwide.
In addition to statutory and regulatory relief,\3\ MTW agencies
have the flexibility to apply fungibility between public housing
operating, public housing capital, and Housing Choice Voucher (HCV)
assistance into an agency-wide funding source referred to as the ``MTW
Block Grant.'' \4\ Use of the MTW Block Grant as a source of providing
funding for eligible MTW activities across the three programs does not
negate the need to track the funding to its original source.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For more information about the MTW demonstration program and
the specific programs of current MTW agencies, please refer to the
MTW Web site at: https://www.hud.gov/mtw.
\4\ Funds awarded under Sections 8(o), 9(d), and 9(e) of the
1937 Act are eligible for inclusion in the MTW Block Grant, with the
exception of funds provided for specific non-MTW HCV sub-programs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughout participation in the MTW demonstration program, all MTW
agencies must continue to meet five statutory requirements established
under the 1996 MTW Statute. These five statutory requirements are:
[[Page 8057]]
(1) To ensure at least 75 percent of families assisted are very
low-income as defined in Section 3(b)(2) of the U.S. Housing Act of
1937 (the 1937 Act);
(2) to establish a reasonable rent policy that is designed to
encourage employment and self-sufficiency;
(3) to continue to assist substantially the same total number of
eligible low-income families as would have been served had funds not
been combined; \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ HUD's verification method detailed in Section 6(c)(i) of
this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) to maintain a comparable mix of families (by family size) as
would have been provided had the funds not been used under the MTW
demonstration program; and
(5) to ensure housing assisted under the MTW demonstration program
meets housing quality standards established or approved by the
Secretary.
There are currently 39 PHAs \6\ participating in the MTW
demonstration program. The administrative structure for these 39 PHAs
is outlined in the Standard MTW Agreement, a contract between each
current MTW PHA and HUD. The 2016 MTW Expansion Statute extended the
term of the Standard MTW Agreement through each of the current MTW
PHA's 2028 fiscal year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The 39 PHAs are: Alaska Housing Finance Corporation; Atlanta
Housing Authority; Housing Authority of the City of Baltimore;
Boulder Housing Partners; Cambridge Housing Authority; Housing
Authority of Champaign County; Charlotte Housing Authority; Chicago
Housing Authority; Housing Authority of Columbus, Georgia; District
of Columbia Housing Authority; Delaware State Housing Authority;
Fairfax County Redevelopment and Housing Authority; Holyoke Housing
Authority; Keene Housing; King County Housing Authority; Lawrence-
Douglas County Housing Authority; Massachusetts Department of
Housing and Community Development; Minneapolis Public Housing
Authority; Housing Authority of the City of New Haven; Oakland
Housing Authority; Orlando Housing Authority; Philadelphia Housing
Authority; Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh; Portage
Metropolitan Housing Authority; Home Forward (Portland, OR); Housing
Authority of the City of Reno; San Antonio Housing Authority;
Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino; San Diego Housing
Commission; Housing Authority of the County of San Mateo; Housing
Authority of the County of Santa Clara/City of San Jose; Seattle
Housing Authority; Tacoma Housing Authority; Tulare County Housing
Authority; and Vancouver Housing Authority.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2016 Expansion to the MTW Demonstration Program
As directed by the 2016 MTW Expansion Statute, HUD is authorized to
expand the MTW demonstration program from the current level of 39 PHAs
to an additional 100 PHAs over a period of seven years. In expanding
the MTW demonstration, HUD intends to build on the successes and
lessons from the demonstration thus far. The vision for the MTW
expansion is to learn from MTW interventions in order to improve the
delivery of federally assisted housing and promote self-sufficiency for
low-income families across the nation. Through the expansion, HUD will
extend flexibility to a broader range of PHAs both in terms of size and
geographic diversity and will balance the flexibility inherent in MTW
with the need for measurement and evaluation at the outset.
HUD will select the additional 100 PHAs in cohorts, with
applications for each cohort to be sought via PIH Notice.\7\ For each
cohort of agencies selected, the 2016 MTW Expansion Statute requires
HUD to direct all the agencies in the cohort to implement one specific
policy change, which HUD will rigorously evaluate. PHAs may implement
additional policy changes. The MTW Research Advisory Committee,
described further below, advised HUD on the policy changes to be tested
through the new cohorts of MTW agencies and the methods of research and
evaluation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ PIH Notice 2017-01 provides the Request for Applications for
the first cohort of PHAs to be selected pursuant to the 2016 MTW
Expansion Statute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eligibility and Selection for the Expansion of the MTW Demonstration
The 2016 MTW Expansion Statute provides that the 100 MTW agencies
selected must be high performers, at the time of application to the
demonstration, and represent geographic diversity across the country.
Further, the statute provides that of these 100 PHAs:
No less than 50 PHAs shall administer 1,000 or fewer
aggregate housing voucher and public housing units;
no less than 47 PHAs shall administer 1,001-6,000
aggregate housing voucher and public housing units;
no more than 3 PHAs shall administer 6,001-27,000
aggregate housing voucher and public housing units;
no PHA shall be granted MTW designation if it administers
more than 27,000 aggregate housing voucher and public housing units;
and
five of the PHAs selected shall be agencies with a Rental
Assistance Demonstration (RAD) portfolio award.
HUD will issue separate notices, by cohort, soliciting applications
from eligible PHAs for participation in the MTW demonstration. These
notices, when issued, will outline the specific application submission
requirements, evaluation criteria, and process HUD will use when
selecting PHAs for MTW participation.
MTW Research Advisory Committee
The 2016 MTW Expansion Statute established the MTW Research
Advisory Committee (the Committee). The Committee is governed by the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), which sets forth
standards for the formation and use of advisory committees. The purpose
of the Committee is to provide independent advice with respect to the
policies to be studied through the MTW expansion and the methods of
research and evaluation related. The Advisory Committee is charged with
advising HUD on the following:
Policy proposals and evaluation methods for the MTW
demonstration to inform the one specific policy change required for
each cohort of agencies;
rigorous research methodologies to measure the impact of
policy changes studied;
policy changes adopted by MTW agencies that have proven
successful and can be applied more broadly to all PHAs; and
statutory and/or regulatory changes (specific waivers and
program and policy flexibility) necessary to implement policy changes
for all PHAs.
The Committee has no role in reviewing or selecting the 100 PHAs to
participate in the expansion of the MTW demonstration.
The Committee members were appointed in June 2016 by the HUD
Secretary and chosen to ensure balance, diversity, and a broad
representation of ideas.\8\ The Committee includes program and research
experts from HUD; a representation of MTW agencies, including current
and former residents; and independent subject matter experts in housing
policy research.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For more information on the establishment, purpose, members
and meeting content of the MTW Research Advisory Committee, please
go to: https://go.usa.gov/xZnj9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHAs are reminded that the MTW demonstration program does not
permit waivers related to fair housing, nondiscrimination, labor
standards, or environmental requirements. Other subject matter
prohibited from waivers or restricted with respect to waivers is
discussed elsewhere in this notice.
Operations Notice for the Expansion of the MTW Demonstration
HUD's guiding principles for the expansion of the MTW demonstration
are: (1) Simplify; (2) learn; and (3) apply. HUD seeks to design and
test new approaches to providing and administering housing assistance
and then to apply the lessons learned
[[Page 8058]]
nationwide, all within a framework of simplifying program
administration. The Operations Notice is a first step toward
implementing this vision. The Operations Notice describes a new
framework for the MTW demonstration that streamlines and simplifies
HUD's oversight of participating PHAs while providing for rigorous
evaluation of specific policy changes. The new framework would apply to
all PHAs designated as an MTW PHA pursuant to the 2016 MTW Expansion
Statute and to any previously-designated MTW agencies that agree to
operate under the new framework. These PHAs are referred to in the
Operations Notice as ``MTW agencies.'' Participation in the new
framework will be formalized by an amendment to the PHA's Annual
Contributions Contract (ACC), or other agreement as determined by HUD.
A key feature of the new framework is that PHAs will not be
required to seek HUD's approval for some of the waivers identified in
the Operations Notice, as determined by HUD. Instead, via the
Operations Notice, HUD will grant a set of general waivers to all MTW
agencies when they are so designated. In addition, HUD seeks to reduce
the data collection and reporting requirements for PHAs under the new
framework, focusing on financial data, basic program monitoring and
performance assessment, and evaluation of the specific policy changes
to be tested through each cohort. HUD will rely on existing data and
reporting that PHAs will continue to submit through HUD administrative
systems.
HUD is seeking comment on the draft Operations Notice because
robust public comment is critical to ensuring that the Operations
Notice effectively positions MTW agencies to be able to meet the
demonstration's goals of increasing cost effectiveness, self-
sufficiency, and housing choice.
The Operations Notice is organized into 12 sections as follows:
1. Purpose and Applicability
2. Waivers
a. General Waivers
b. Conditional Waivers
c. Cohort-specific Waivers
3. Term of Participation
4. Funding, MTW Block Grant, and Financial Reporting
a. Level of Funding
b. Calculation of Funding
c. MTW Block Grant and Flexibility in Use of Funds
d. Financial Reporting and Auditing
5. Evaluation
a. Program-wide Evaluation
b. Cohort-specific Evaluation
6. Program Administration and Oversight
a. Planning and Reporting
b. Performance Assessment
c. Monitoring and Oversight
7. Rental Assistance Demonstration Program
8. Applying MTW Flexibilities to Special Purpose Vouchers
a. Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH)
b. Family Unification Program (FUP)
c. Non-Elderly Persons with Disabilities (NED) Vouchers
d. Enhanced Vouchers and Tenant Protection Vouchers
9. Regionalization
10. Applicability of Other Federal, State, and Local Requirements
11. MTW Agencies Admitted Prior to 2016 MTW Expansion Statute
12. Sanctions, Terminations, and Default
HUD seeks comment on all 12 sections of the Operations Notice, as
well as Appendix A General Waivers, and Appendix B Conditional Waivers,
which outline available waivers and MTW activities that may be
implemented by MTW agencies. In addition, for some sections of the
Operations Notice, HUD identifies specific topics for comment and poses
questions on those topics.
The majority of the Operations Notice applies only to MTW agencies,
defined above as PHAs designated MTW pursuant to the 2016 MTW Expansion
Statute and any previously-designated MTW agencies that agree to
operate under the new framework. However, Section 9 of the Notice
(Regionalization) also applies to existing MTW agencies, that is, those
with an active MTW agreement as of December 15, 2015.
II. Draft Operations Notice
1. Purpose and Applicability
The Operations Notice establishes requirements for the
implementation and continued operation of the expansion of the MTW
demonstration program pursuant to the 2016 MTW Expansion Statute. The
Operations Notice applies to all PHAs designated as MTW pursuant to the
2016 MTW Expansion Statute and to any previously-designated MTW PHA
that elects to operate under the terms of this Notice.
Through an amended ACC, or other agreement as determined by HUD, an
MTW agency agrees to abide by the program structure, flexibilities, and
terms and conditions detailed in the Operations Notice for the term of
the agency's participation in MTW demonstration. HUD may supplement the
Operations Notice with PIH Notices providing more detailed guidance and
reserves the right to revise the Operations Notice to address
unforeseen circumstances and programmatic clarifications. Any
significant updates to the Operations Notice by HUD will be preceded by
a public comment period. Additionally, HUD will develop informational
materials to address various program elements that HUD will post on the
MTW Web site.
Unless otherwise provided in the Operations Notice, a PHA's MTW
program applies to all of the agency's public housing assisted units
(including agency-owned properties and units comprising a part of
mixed-income, mixed finance communities), tenant-based Section 8 HCV
assistance, project-based Section 8 voucher assistance under Section
8(o), and Homeownership units developed using Section 8(y) HCV
assistance. This Operating Notice does not apply to Section 8 HCV
assistance that is required: (i) For payments to other public housing
agencies under Section 8 HCV portability billing procedures; (ii) to
meet particular purposes for which HUD has expressly committed the
assistance to the agency; \9\ or (iii) to meet existing contractual
obligations of the agency to a third party (such as HAP contracts with
owners under the agency's Section 8 HCV program), unless a third party
agrees to PBV activities implemented under the MTW program with the
agency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Five Year Mainstream Vouchers, Moderate Rehabilitation
Renewals, HUD-Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH)
Vouchers, Non-Elderly Disabled (NED) Vouchers, and Family
Unification Program (FUP) Vouchers are not part of the MTW
demonstration program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Waivers
Pursuant to this section of the Operations Notice, HUD delegates to
the MTW agency the authority to pursue locally-driven policies,
procedures, and programs with the aim of developing more efficient ways
to provide and administer housing assistance that increases housing
choice, gives incentives to low, very-low, and extremely low-income
families to achieve economic self-sufficiency, and reduce costs and
achieve greater cost-effectiveness in federal expenditures. Many of
these policies, procedures and programs require waivers of existing
statutory and regulatory requirements. HUD therefore waives certain
provisions of the 1937 Act as well as HUD's implementing requirements
and regulations to implement the PHA's MTW demonstration activities as
described in this Notice. Certain provisions of the 1937 Act will
continue to apply to the PHA and the assistance received pursuant to
the Act. These ongoing provisions, as well as other applicable federal,
state, and local requirements, are described in Section 10 of this
Operations Notice.
[[Page 8059]]
This Notice discusses three categories of waivers, and the
associated activities, that MTW agencies may pursue--general waivers;
conditional waivers; and cohort-specific waivers. This Notice specifies
the process for implementing MTW activities using the waivers under
each category. Appendix A--General Waivers and Appendix B--Conditional
Waivers provide the complete list of waivers and associated activities
available for all MTW agencies. General Waivers are available to MTW
agencies without HUD review--beyond the MTW application review.
Conditional Waivers are available following additional HUD review and
approval, as described generally in Appendix B. Cohort-Specific Waivers
will be defined in a series of notices soliciting applications for
participation in MTW.
Appendices A and B provide an overview of the General and
Conditional Waivers. The actual statutory and regulatory provisions
that will be waived will be more clearly identified in the final
Operations Notice, in response to this notice and further refinement.
The specific statutory and regulatory provisions that will be covered
by the waivers will be included in the final MTW Operations Notice,
which is anticipated to be published later this summer. Please note
that in adopting an MTW program, HUD and PHA may not waive or otherwise
deviate from compliance with Fair Housing and Civil Rights laws and
regulations.
While MTW activities are listed by specific waiver, MTW agencies
may group activities together to create more comprehensive initiatives
at the local level.
MTW agencies are subject to all remaining regulatory and statutory
requirements, unless an activity is specifically and explicitly
authorized in the Notice via the attached waivers, in which case the
agency is exempt from the applicable regulatory and statutory
requirements under the 1937 Act. The five statutory requirements
established under the 1996 MTW Statute cannot be waived. Additionally,
in implementing activities, MTW agencies remain subject to all other
terms, conditions, and obligations under this Notice, and all other
federal requirements applicable to public housing, HCV, PBV, and PHAs.
To the extent any MTW activity conflicts with any of the five statutory
requirements or other applicable requirements, HUD reserves the right
to require the MTW agency to discontinue the activity or to revise it
so that the requirements are complied with. HUD also reserves the right
to require an MTW agency to discontinue any activity derived from a
waiver should it have unforeseen, significant negative impacts on
families, as determined by HUD.
HUD understands that MTW agencies may wish to undertake activities
that are not listed in Appendix A and Appendix B. If an MTW agency
wishes to implement activities or request waivers that are not included
in Appendix A or Appendix B, the MTW agency may seek approval from HUD
for doing so via the MTW Supplement to the Annual Plan. (The MTW
Supplement is discussed in Section 6 of this Notice.) The MTW agency
must obtain explicit prior written approval from HUD for each
additional activity and waiver.
If HUD determines that an activity(s) derived from either a general
waiver or a conditional waiver would impact or conflict with the
specific policy(s) to be studied in the MTW agency's cohort group, the
MTW agency will not be able to conduct that activity(s) until the
evaluation of the specific policy change has concluded. (Once the
evaluation of the policy change is completed, the MTW agency may
implement the conflicting activities for the remainder of the agency's
term of MTW participation.) Any MTW activities that would impact or
conflict with the cohort-specific policy change will be identified in
the respective Selection Notice so that the MTW agency is aware of this
potential restriction on its use of waivers before it enters the MTW
demonstration program.
a. General Waivers
The MTW activities derived from the general waivers, within the
specified program parameters listed in Appendix A, are available to all
MTW agencies when the MTW ACC amendment, or other agreement to be
determined by HUD, is executed. The MTW PHA must indicate via the MTW
Supplement to its Annual Plan the MTW activities that it will undertake
from the general waivers category. Prior HUD approval is not required
to implement activities from the general waivers category.
Appendix A contains the full list of general waivers currently
available, the MTW activities associated with these general waivers,
and the specific parameters around the implementation of those
activities.
b. Conditional Waivers
Conditional waivers listed in Appendix B are available to all MTW
agencies within certain program parameters, but implementation of these
MTW activities may not begin until additional information is received,
vetted, and approved by HUD. The additional information required for
each activity associated with a conditional waiver will be specified in
the MTW Supplement to the Annual Plan (see Section 6 of this Notice).
Conditional waivers are expected to have a greater and more direct
impact on assisted households. Consequently, HUD seeks to ensure that
adequate protections are in place for participants and MTW agencies
prior to implementation. The additional information required must be
submitted by the MTW agency via the MTW Supplement and reviewed and
approved by HUD before the MTW PHA may implement the activity.
Additional information may also be required throughout the time the MTW
agency is conducting an activity associated with a conditional waiver.
Upon request from the Department for the continued oversight of the
conditional waivers, MTW agencies must provide hardship policies,
impact analyses and/or other information required by HUD.
Appendix B provides the full list of conditional waivers, the
activities associated with these conditional waivers, and any specific
parameters around the implementation of those activities.
Waivers and MTW activities that are not provided as a general
waiver or conditional waiver may be proposed by MTW agencies to HUD.
Such waivers may be needed to implement an initiative being pursued by
an MTW agency or may be the result of a local condition. Additional
waivers will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis as part of the MTW
Supplement review process. MTW agencies may not seek or obtain waivers
from nondiscrimination or equal opportunity requirements.
c. Cohort-Specific Waivers
A cohort-specific waiver is one that is not included in the general
waivers or conditional waivers categories and that is available
exclusively to an MTW agency that is implementing a cohort-specific
policy change that requires the waivers. At the time of selection to
MTW, each agency will be selected into an evaluative cohort that seeks
to test a specific policy change, as specified in that cohort's
Selection Notice. To the extent that one or more additional waivers,
beyond the general waivers or conditional waivers, are needed to
implement a specific policy change, HUD will grant that waiver(s) to
the MTW agencies in the cohort as cohort-specific waivers.
The cohort-specific waiver and the associated activity(s) will be
described in detail in the applicable Selection Notice so that the MTW
agency is aware of this in advance of entry to the MTW demonstration
program. One or more
[[Page 8060]]
cohort-specific waivers may be associated with a particular cohort of
MTW agencies. It is possible that the specific policy changes to be
tested through a given cohort would not need any cohort-specific
waivers. Cohort-specific waivers and the associated MTW activities may
only be used to the extent allowed under the applicable evaluative
framework provided by HUD in the applicable Selection Notice.
More detail on the specific statutory and regulatory citations will
be included in the final Operations Notice, which will be published
later this summer. Please note that certain regulations will be
interpreted to protect Fair Housing and Civil Rights laws and
regulations.
Specific Areas for Comment on Waivers
HUD is seeking comment on the general waivers and conditional
waivers presented in Appendix A and Appendix B. HUD is specifically
seeking comment on the following questions regarding waivers:
Does the list of general waivers, MTW activities, and
parameters in Appendix A and Appendix B contain the needed flexibility
to achieve the three MTW statutory objectives? If not, what waivers,
activities, and/or parameters are missing?
Are there any MTW activities and/or waivers that should
not be included as general waivers, available to all MTW agencies
without prior HUD approval?
Are there any MTW activities and/or waivers that should
not be included as conditional waivers but rather should be included as
general waivers, or not included at all?
Does the list of conditional waivers, MTW activities, and
parameters in Appendix B contain the needed flexibility to implement
any alternative income-based rent model? If not, what waivers,
activities, and/or parameters are missing?
3. Term of Participation
The term of each agency's MTW designation expires at the end of the
MTW agency's Fiscal Year 2028. All general and conditional waivers
provided through the Operations Notice expire at the end of the
agency's term of participation. However, cohort-specific waivers
provided to enable a cohort-specific policy change will be extended
beyond the agency's term of participation with HUD's specific approval
if HUD determines that additional time is needed to evaluate the policy
change.
The MTW agency must end all activities requiring MTW-specific
waivers upon expiration of MTW participation, as HUD cannot guarantee
that it will be able to extend any waivers beyond that point. For this
reason, when entering into contracts with third-parties that draw upon
MTW flexibility, the agency should disclose that such flexibility is
only available during the term of the agency's participation in the MTW
demonstration as permitted in this notice. An exception is third-party
contracts that relate to the cohort-specific policy change and
associated waiver(s), if HUD determines that additional time beyond the
end of the PHA's MTW term is needed to evaluate the policy change and
specifically approves an extension of the cohort-specific waiver(s).
It is the MTW agency's responsibility to plan for the expiration of
its MTW agreement and associated waivers. HUD recommends that MTW
agencies begin transition planning\10\ at least one year in advance of
the expiration of its MTW designation. Not later than nine months prior
to the agency's expiration date, the agency must submit a transition
plan to HUD that describes the agency's plans for phasing out the MTW-
specific waivers that it is using, and describes the agency's plans for
re-establishing regular reporting to HUD on a standard schedule. After
submitting the transition plan to HUD, MTW agencies will begin drafting
changes to their policies and procedures documents, notifying
participants of any changes to the terms of their residency or rent
calculation, planning for the submission of standard data to HUD, and
re-training PHA staff as needed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=DOC_10542.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specific Areas for Comment on MTW Term of Participation
With respect to the term of MTW participation, HUD is specifically
seeking comment on the following questions:
Assuming all cohorts are selected between 2017 and 2020,
is the end of each MTW agency's Fiscal Year 2028 an appropriate
timeframe for MTW participation, and understanding that HUD may extend
cohort-specific waivers to accommodate evaluation of MTW activities
that require additional time?
Is there a preferable length or structure for the term of
MTW participation?
HUD will develop additional guidance on the required elements of
the transition plan and a recommended transition process via PIH
Notice. HUD is specifically seeking comment on:
What elements of the MTW agency's transition plan should
be mandatory?
What elements of the transition process should HUD require
in order to protect participants from potential harm and minimize
disruptions to agency operations?
4. Funding, MTW Block Grant, and Financial Reporting
During the term of the demonstration, HUD will provide the MTW
agencies designated pursuant to the 2016 MTW Expansion Statute with
public housing Operating Fund subsidies, public housing Capital Fund
program (CFP) grants, and Section 8 HCV assistance, as provided in this
notice. CFP grants may include Formula grants, Demolition or
Disposition Transitional Funding (DDTF, included in regular Formula
grants) as well as Replacement Housing Factor (RHF) grants (superseded
by DDTF). The funding amount for MTW agencies may be increased by
additional allocations of vouchers or by replacement public housing
units to which the agency is awarded over the term of its participation
in the MTW demonstration.
MTW agencies will have the flexibility to apply fungibility between
public housing operating, public housing capital, and HCV assistance
into an agency-wide funding source referred to as the ``MTW Block
Grant.'' The agency must complete an annual audit pursuant to the
Single Audit Act requirements set forth in 2 CFR 200 Subpart F,
including any applicable Compliance Supplement(s), as determined by the
auditor, to be relevant to MTW and other programs. The Single Audit
Act-compliant audit must be submitted to HUD in accordance with HUD
regulations.
a. Level of Funding
The 1996 MTW Statute and the 2016 MTW Expansion Statute prohibit
MTW agencies from receiving any more or any less funding than they
would receive if they were not participating in the MTW demonstration.
The 1996 MTW Statute states, in part, that, ``The amount of
assistance received under section 8, section 9, or pursuant to section
14 by a public housing agency participating in the demonstration under
this part shall not be diminished by its participation.'' In addition,
the 2016 MTW Expansion Statute states, in part, that, ``No PHA granted
this designation through this section shall receive more funding under
sections 8 or 9 of the 1937 Act than they otherwise would have received
absent this designation.''
[[Page 8061]]
b. Calculation of Funding
i. Public Housing Operating Fund Subsidy
(a) The calculation of an MTW PHA's Operating Fund subsidy
eligibility will continue in accordance with operating subsidy formula
law, regulations, and appropriations act requirements.
(b) The agency may use these funds for any eligible activity
permissible under Section 9(e)(1) of the 1937 Act or, if the agency
proposes to use the funding as part of the MTW Block Grant, it may use
these funds for any eligible activity permissible under Section 8(o),
9(d)(1) and 9(e)(1) and as specified in this Notice.
(c) For operating subsidy funding provided in years prior to the
designation of the agency as an MTW agency, the agency may use any
accumulated operating reserves for eligible MTW purposes, subject to
applicable provisions of this Notice, subsequent legislation, including
appropriations acts, and HUD and other federal requirements.
ii. Public Housing Capital Fund Formula and Grants
(a) The agency's Public Housing Capital Fund formula
characteristics and grant amounts, including DDTF and RHF, will
continue to be calculated in accordance with public housing law,
regulations, and appropriations act requirements. Capital Funds will be
disbursed in accordance with standard HUD procedures for disbursement
of public housing Capital Fund grants, provided however that the agency
may not accelerate drawdown of funds in order to fund reserves.
(b) In requisitioning Capital Fund grant funds, the MTW agency will
not be required to provide line item detail in HUD's Line of Credit
Control System (LOCCS), but will request the funds using a single MTW
line item with the exception of grant funds required for payment of
debt service pursuant to the Capital Fund Financing Program (CFFP). The
agency will provide to HUD information on all capital activities funded
by the MTW Block Grant as necessary to ensure compliance with
requirements outside the scope of MTW, including environmental review
requirements and Energy and Performance Information Center (EPIC)
reporting requirements.
(c) The agency may use these funds for any eligible activity
permissible under Section 9(d)(1) of the 1937 Act or, if the agency
proposes to use the funding as part of the MTW Block Grant, it may use
these funds for any eligible activity permissible under Section 8(o),
9(d)(1) and 9(e)(1) and as specified in this Notice. CFP funds not
included in the MTW Block Grant are subject to all requirements
relevant to non-MTW agency CFP funding, including eligible activities
and cost limits.
(d) For Capital Funds provided in years prior to the designation of
the agency as an MTW agency, the agency may use such funds for eligible
MTW purposes, subject to applicable provisions of this Notice,
subsequent legislation, including appropriations acts, and HUD and
other federal requirements.
(e) The agency remains subject to the requirements of Section 9(j)
of the 1937 Act with respect to Capital Fund grants. Section 9(d) funds
remain subject to the obligation and expenditure deadlines and
requirements provided in Section 9(j) despite the fact that they are
combined in a single block grant fund. Capital Funds awarded to MTW
agencies must be obligated within two years and expended within four
years of award. Funds not obligated or expended within those timeframes
will be subject to recapture. As with all PHAs, an MTW PHA may
requisition CFP funds from HUD only when such funds are due and
payable, unless HUD approves another payment schedule.
iii. Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Funding
(a) For the calendar year after the MTW agency joins the MTW
demonstration (the ``Initial Year''), an agency's HCV HAP renewal
funding will be calculated based on the previous CY's HAP expenses
reported in VMS that originated from HAP funds adjusted by any
applicable inflation factor and national proration, in accordance with
the funding formula in the appropriations act used for all HCV
agencies. This adjusted amount will be the agency's Annual Voucher
Budget Authority (AVBA) for the initial year of MTW participation.
(b) For subsequent years, the HCV HAP renewal funding will be
calculated as follows:
(i) HCV HAP Renewal funding will be calculated based on (i) the
previous CY's HAP expenses reported in VMS that originated from HAP
funds plus (ii) the previous CY's eligible non-HAP MTW expenses
(subject to the conditions and percentage limitations described below)
and (iii) the eligible non-HAP MTW commitments and obligations (subject
to the conditions, percentage limitations and utilization requirements
described below), the sum of which will be adjusted by any applicable
inflation factor appropriate for the HAP and non-HAP expenses and
national proration for the current CY. The resulting adjusted amount is
the agency's AVBA for the current CY. The amount of non-HAP expenses
and the amount of commitments and obligations that may be included in
the above calculation are subject to percentage limitations and
utilization requirements described below.
(ii) An MTW agency is required to spend at least 90% of its CY AVBA
on eligible HAP expenses each year. If the MTW agency meets this
requirement but the actual HAP expenses did not exceed 100% of its CY
AVBA, then the agency's eligible non-HAP MTW expenses and the agency's
commitments and obligations will be included in its renewal funding
eligibility for the next CY as described herein. The amount of eligible
non-HAP MTW expenses, commitments, and obligations that will be
included in the renewal calculation is limited to the lower of: (a) The
amount of AVBA expended, committed, or obligated for eligible non-HAP
MTW expenses as reported and validated in VMS, or (b) the amount of
AVBA that was not used for HAP expenses, or (c) 10% of AVBA.
(iii) Only HAP expenses that originated from HAP Funds (including
HAP reserves) are included in the HAP renewal funding formula. Public
Housing Operating funds and Capital funds, and Section 8 Administrative
Fee funds that may have been used for HAP expenses as part of MTW
flexibility will not be included in the following calendar year's
renewal funding formula.
(iv) If an MTW agency expends 100% or more of its AVBA in HAP
expenses in a given year, the total HAP expenses will be used for the
next CY's Renewal funding formula to the extent that the HAP expenses
originated from HAP or HAP reserves. However, none of the funds
provided in the renewal formula may be used to fund a total number or
unit months under lease which exceeds the MTW agency's authorized level
of unit months available under the MTW agency's ACC, in accordance with
the funding formula used for non-MTW agencies.
(c) Additional details about the HCV Renewal funding formula are
provided below:
(i) Budget Utilization Requirement. Starting in the Initial Year of
MTW funding, and for the duration of its participation in the MTW
demonstration, the MTW agency must spend at least 90 percent of each
CY's MTW AVBA on HCVP eligible HAP expenses in the funded year.
Eligible HAP expenses are defined in HUD's
[[Page 8062]]
Voucher Management System (VMS) guidebook (or the guidebook of any
successor system). HUD's VMS (or its successor system) will be the data
source to verify compliance with the HCVP budget utilization
requirement throughout the duration of participation in the MTW
demonstration. If performance below the 90% utilization requirement
persists, HUD may take appropriate corrective actions including, but
not limited to, the restriction of uses of funds, other administrative
actions, including the termination of the MTW agency's participation in
the MTW demonstration.
(ii) HAP-Originated Reserves. Any reserves the MTW agency has
accumulated prior to the start of the Initial Year may be used for any
eligible MTW activity. If pre-existing reserves before the start of the
Initial Year are used for HAP expenses, those expenses will be included
in the subsequent year's funding formula to the extent those funds
originated from HAP. Any sum generated by the MTW agency in the
Restricted Net Position (RNP) account or HUD-held reserves after the
effective date that the MTW agency receives MTW designation shall
remain available and may be used for all eligible MTW activities,
subject to applicable provisions of this Notice, subsequent
legislation, including appropriations acts, and other HUD requirements.
HAP-Originated reserves accumulated after the effective date that the
MTW agency receives MTW designation will be included in the subsequent
year's funding formula if spent on HAP expenses.
(iii) Limitation of Amount of HUD-Held Reserves. The maximum HAP-
Originated funds in HUD-held reserves cannot exceed 100% of AVBA. If
the total amount of HAP-Originated reserves at CY end exceeds 100% of
AVBA, any reserves originated from HAP in excess of this amount will be
reduced from the subsequent year's funding formula.
(iv) Cash Management Requirements Apply. All undisbursed HAP funds
including HAP-Originated reserve funds will be held as HUD-held
reserves per OMB cash management requirements and can be requested by
the MTW agency when HAP (or non-HAP) immediate need exceeds the
scheduled HAP and Fee monthly disbursements, but only after
consideration of available MTW agency-held RNP or unrestricted net
position (UNA), respectively. Any sum held by the MTW agency as excess
administrative fee funds (Unrestricted Net Position) shall remain
available to the MTW agency. All excess administrative fee funds may be
used for any eligible MTW activities.
(v) Commitments/Obligations of Funds. Commitments and obligations
of funds that will be used for eligible MTW activities in the future
will receive consideration in the HCV Renewal funding formula as
described above. Committed and obligated funds remain part of HUD-held
reserves until drawn down and all cash management requirements and
other rules applicable to reserve amounts apply. In addition, committed
and obligated funds may be subject to HUD reserve offsets as part of
future Congressional Appropriations Bills.
Commitments. A commitment is the setting aside or
earmarking of undisbursed and unobligated funds to be used for eligible
MTW activities in the future. An MTW agency may commit funds to planned
future MTW eligible uses, as evidenced in the MTW Supplement to the
Annual Plan which must be adopted by the board. For commitments to
qualify for consideration in the Renewal funding formula, an MTW agency
must describe its future plans to use the funds for a certain type of
MTW eligible use with sufficient supporting detail in the MTW
Supplement to the Annual PHA Plan. Such detail may include the program
type (i.e., public housing, housing voucher, both, or local, non-
traditional), development number/name, description of work or activity,
quantity, estimated cost, anticipated timeline, and other information
as applicable. Committed unspent MTW funds must be reported in VMS in
the Unspent MTW Funds section (see VMS User's Manual for more details).
An MTW agency may update and revise commitments as necessary, in
response to changing local conditions.
Obligations. An obligation is a legally binding agreement
that will require an outlay or expenditure of funds, immediately or in
the future. An example of an obligation is an executed construction
contract between the MTW agency and a construction company. Obligated
unspent MTW funds must be reported in VMS in the Unspent MTW Funds
section (see VMS User's Manual for more details). HUD intends to
exclude obligated funds in HUD-held reserves from Congressional offset
to the extent that future statutory language would allow such
exclusion.
(vi) Administrative Fees. The administrative fee rates used to
calculate fee eligibility for MTW agencies shall be established
according to the same methodology used to establish administrative fee
rates for all other public housing agencies. Administrative fees will
be paid on the basis of units leased as of the first day of each month;
this data will be extracted from VMS at the close of each reporting
cycle. Administrative fees for MTW agencies are also subject to the
national proration factor and any other appropriations act requirements
to the total eligibility amount.
(vii) Incremental Vouchers. If the MTW agency receives incremental
HCVP vouchers and funding (including tenant protection vouchers), other
than special purpose vouchers (described in (x) below), renewal funding
for those vouchers will be included in the MTW HCV renewal funding
eligibility calculation for the following year. (See Section 8 of this
Operations Notice for further discussion of tenant protection and other
special purpose vouchers.) The MTW agency's renewal funding eligibility
(which includes renewal funding associated with these vouchers) remains
subject to the budget utilization requirement detailed above. The
renewal amount is based on the MTW per unit cost (PUC), any months not
covered by initial increment, and adjusted by the inflation factor.
Incremental vouchers included in the MTW agency's renewal funding
eligibility will be funded pursuant to the current year's per unit
funding amount.
(viii) Adjustments for the first-time renewal of certain vouchers.
HUD will also make adjustments to the renewal funding for the first-
time renewal of certain vouchers that are included in the MTW HAP
renewal calculation when the funding increment will expire during the
CY.
(ix) Applicable inflation factor and proration. The same applicable
inflation factor that applies for non-MTW agencies will be applied each
CY to determine the MTW agency's HAP funding renewal eligibility.
Likewise, the MTW agency's HAP funding renewal eligibility is subject
to the same national proration as non-MTW agencies' renewal
eligibility, based on the total eligibility of all MTW agencies
compared to the actual amount appropriated for HAP renewal funding for
the CY.
(x) Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD). Any vouchers received as
part of a RAD component I conversion shall be added to the ACC for the
remainder of the CY in which they are awarded. HUD will issue a new
increment of voucher funding in support of those vouchers for the first
full CY following a RAD component I conversion. In subsequent years,
voucher funding for RAD converted units will be renewed under the MTW
HCV renewal funding
[[Page 8063]]
calculation, based on a weighted MTW per unit cost (PUC), plus
inflation factor and the applicable proration factor. RAD component II
conversions are funded in accordance with the incremental voucher
section above. Administrative fees for RAD vouchers will be established
based on the same methodology used to establish administrative fees in
(vi) of this section. Fees for RAD vouchers will be prorated at the
same level that applies to all non-MTW agencies.
(xi) Voucher Programs Not Included in MTW Program. Vouchers and
funding provided for the following special purpose vouchers, whether
for new allocations or renewal of existing increments, shall not be
included in the HCV MTW Program renewal calculation: Five Year
Mainstream, Moderate Rehabilitation renewals, Veterans Affairs
Supportive Housing (VASH), Non-Elderly Disabled (NED), and Family
Unification Program (FUP). These vouchers will be renewed under the
regular voucher renewal requirements as provided under the
appropriations acts. Special purpose vouchers are discussed in more
detail in Section 8 of this Operations Notice.
c. MTW Block Grant and Flexibility
An agency participating in the MTW demonstration program may
combine public housing Operating and Capital Funds provided under
Sections 9(d) and 9(e) of the 1937 Act and voucher program funds
provided under Section 8 of the 1937 Act as the MTW Block Grant.
Certain provisions of Sections 8 and 9 of the 1937 Act and 24 CFR 982
are waived as necessary, to implement the MTW Block Grant. MTW Block
Grant flexibility is optional and does not require prior HUD approval.
The agency may use MTW Block Grant funds for any eligible activity
under Sections 9(d)(1), 9(e)(1) and Section 8(o) of the 1937 Act and
for the local, non-traditional activities specified in this Notice,
including Appendix A and B. Within the scope of the permissible
eligible activities, the agency can carry out the purposes of the MTW
demonstration program to provide flexibility in the design and
administration of housing assistance to eligible families; (1) To
reduce cost and achieve greater cost effectiveness in federal
expenditures, (2) to give incentives to families with children where
the head of household is working, seeking work, or is preparing for
work by participating in job training, educational programs, or
programs that assist people to obtain employment and become
economically self-sufficient, and (3) to increase housing choices for
low-income families.
The agency may use MTW Block Grant funds to support the evaluation
of MTW activities subject to reasonable cost requirements set forth in
2 CFR part 200.
d. Financial Reporting and Auditing
MTW agencies must submit year-end unaudited and audited financial
information to the Department using the Financial Data Schedule (FDS)
contained in the Real Estate Assessment Center's (REAC) Financial
Assessment Subsystem (FASS-PH), or its successor system. Financial
reporting requirements for MTW agencies are currently posted on the
REAC Web site at https://www.hud.gov/offices/reac/products/fass/fass_pdf/mtw-reporting.pdf.
An MTW agency must submit unaudited financial information into
REAC's FASS-PH, or its successor system, within 60 days of the end of
its fiscal year, and audited financial information with nine months of
the end of its fiscal year. REAC reviews financial submissions for
basic financial soundness (e.g., cash balances, accounts receivable and
accounts payable, quick ratio, current ratio, etc.). The MTW agency
will keep project level budgeting and accounting and report financial
information in the FDS. The MTW agency will abide by project level
management reviews in accordance with Asset Management guidance
contained in PIH Notice 2007-9, or any successor guidance. The MTW
agency will conform to the cost requirements of 2 CFR 200 and any HUD
implementation thereof.
The MTW agency must procure an Independent Public Accountant (IPA)
to perform an annual audit pursuant to federal requirements at 2 CFR
part 200 and 24 CFR 990.190, or successor, as well as any audit
compliance supplements developed specifically for use with the MTW
demonstration. An MTW agency that may be otherwise exempt from a single
audit will be required to perform an annual financial statement audit
as a condition of becoming an MTW agency under the MTW Expansion.
Completed IPA audits must be submitted to HUD in accordance with
current HUD regulations. HUD will review the IPA audits of MTW agencies
to determine appropriate action relative to any findings, prepare
recommendations for audit finding resolution, and follow up with MTW
agencies to assure finding closure. If there are audit findings related
to the MTW program itself, HUD will monitor the resolution of all audit
findings.
Specific Areas for Comment on Funding, MTW Block Grant, and Financial
Reporting
With respect to funding, MTW Block Grant, and financial reporting,
HUD is specifically seeking comment on the following questions:
Is a 90 percent HAP budget utilization requirement the
appropriate amount?
What sanctions or restrictions should HUD consider using
should an MTW agency continue to fail to meet the budget utilization
requirement?
Are there other methods for calculating HCV funding that
HUD should consider?
Are there other factors HUD should consider in the
calculation of funding?
Are there any comments or clarifications needed in
relation to funding, the MTW Block Grant, or financial reporting?
5. Evaluation
As a condition of participating in the MTW demonstration, MTW
agencies agree to cooperate fully with HUD and its contractors in the
monitoring and evaluation of the MTW demonstration, to keep records,
and to submit reports and other information as required by HUD. This
includes any data collection required for the use of waivers (e.g.,
conditional waivers) and any evaluation efforts that HUD undertakes for
the cohort-specific policy changes.
MTW is a demonstration that provides PHAs flexibilities to innovate
and try different approaches to housing assistance in order to achieve
at least one of the three statutory objectives laid out in the 1996 MTW
Statute. At its core, the demonstration is an opportunity for PHAs,
participants, HUD, stakeholders and the general public to learn from
different approaches to providing federal housing assistance to low-
income families. This includes learning from approaches that are
effective and produce desired outcomes, and from approaches that are
less effective than anticipated and where results may have unintended
consequences.
Because PHAs have the ability to use different flexibilities
calling on multiple MTW waivers that serve local populations in various
parts of the country, interpreting PHA-reported performance metrics
data on the effects of an individual MTW activity is not always clear-
cut. Consequently, and while adhering to the guiding principles for the
expansion (simplify, learn, and apply), HUD will create and develop an
[[Page 8064]]
evaluation system that will tell the story of the MTW demonstration
through the lens of the three statutory objectives relating to cost
effectiveness, self-sufficiency, and housing choice.
HUD envisions two types of evaluation--program-wide evaluation and
cohort-specific evaluation. Through this notice, HUD is seeking
feedback on each of these evaluation types.
a. Program-Wide Evaluation
Program-wide evaluation would seek to assess whether or not, and to
what extent, MTW agencies use Federal dollars more efficiently, help
residents find employment and become self-sufficient, and increase
housing choices for low-income families. HUD intends to develop
performance metrics for program-wide evaluation that are based, to the
extent possible, on information already being collected from MTW
agencies through existing HUD administrative data systems. HUD may
determine and require that some additional reporting is necessary to
effectively evaluate MTW.
The following are examples of potential performance metrics that
could be used for each statutory objective; the list is not exhaustive
and will be revised further with feedback from this notice and
additional internal evaluation:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MTW statutory objective: Potential performance metrics
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Reduce cost and achieve greater cost Administrative cost
effectiveness in federal expenditures. savings per unit in direct
program administration (HCVP
and public housing) and
indirect costs.
Changes in rental
revenue.
Changes in number of
families served.
2. Give incentives to families with Changes in employment
children where the head of household rates or hours worked.
is working; is seeking work; or is Changes in earned
preparing for work by participating in income levels since entering
job training, educational programs, or the program.
programs that assist people to obtain Changes in rent
employment and become economically burden.
self-sufficient. Changes in number of
households receiving
supportive services aimed to
increase self-sufficiency.
3. Increase housing choices for Changes in the quality
eligible low-income families. and type of housing stock
accessible to extremely low-
income, very low-income, and
low-income households.
Changes in the
percentage of households
moving to or living in areas
with lower rates of poverty.
Changes in occupancy
rates in public housing and
utilization rates of housing
vouchers.
Changes in average
applicant time on waiting
list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Cohort-Specific Evaluation
The 2016 MTW Expansion Statute requires HUD to direct all the
agencies in a cohort to implement one specific policy change and to
conduct a rigorous evaluation of the one specific policy change. The
MTW Research Advisory Committee has considered input from the public
and advised HUD on the policy changes to be tested through the new
cohorts of MTW agencies and on the methods of research and evaluation.
The cohort-specific policy change and evaluation methods will be
described in the applicable Selection Notice so that the MTW agency is
aware, in advance of application to the MTW demonstration program, of
the policy it will be required to implement and the evaluation
requirements. The specific evaluation methods (and requirements for
participating MTW agencies) will vary based on the policy changes to be
tested. Some cohorts of MTW agencies may be required to participate in
Randomized Control Trials (RCTs), while others may be required to
participate in detailed process studies or ethnographic research. HUD's
Office of Policy Development and Research is seeking funding for
evaluating cohort-specific policy changes. In all cases, the purpose of
the evaluation will be to measure the outcomes associated with the
specific policy change(s) in order to offer policy recommendations for
implementing the policy change(s) across all PHAs.
HUD will determine the length and timeframe for the evaluation
based on the recommendations of the MTW Research Advisory Committee. In
some cases, the evaluation timeframe may extend beyond the agency's
term of MTW participation. The MTW agency is required to participate in
the evaluation for the full timeframe designated by HUD. HUD intends to
extend waivers beyond the agency's term of participation to the extent
that those waivers are needed to support the evaluation of the specific
policy change and HUD determines that additional time is needed to
evaluate the policy change.
Specific Areas for Comment on Evaluation
With respect to the program-wide evaluation, HUD is specifically
seeking comment on the following questions:
Is there any information not captured in HUD
administrative data systems that would provide informative data points
or performance metrics for evaluating the MTW demonstration?
What are measures of MTW activities that ``reduce cost and
achieve greater cost effectiveness in Federal expenditures'' that can
apply to and are either being reported in existing HUD systems or can
be reported by every MTW agency?
What are measures of MTW activities that ``give incentives
to families with children where the head of household is working,
seeking work, or is preparing for work by participating in job
training, educational programs, or programs that assist people to
obtain employment and become economically self-sufficient'' that can
apply to and are either being reported in existing HUD systems or can
be reported by every MTW agency?
Should HUD standardize a definition of ``self-
sufficient''? If so what elements of self-sufficiency should be
included in HUD's definition?
What are measures of MTW activities that ``increase
housing choices for low-income families'' that can apply to and are
either being reported in existing HUD systems or can be reported by
every MTW agency?
What is the best way to capture and report exit data on
families exiting the Public Housing, HCV, and local non-traditional
housing programs? What are the appropriate exit reasons to capture?
Is there any information not captured in HUD
administrative data systems that would be informative data points or
performance metrics in terms of evaluating the MTW demonstration?
In the list of performance metrics provided above, should
any be clarified or removed?
Are there any alternative or additional metrics that would
enhance
[[Page 8065]]
performance evaluation on the MTW demonstration?
With respect to the cohort-specific evaluation, HUD will consider
the advice provided by the MTW Research Advisory Committee.
6. Program Administration and Oversight
In general, MTW agencies will be subject to the same planning and
reporting protocols as non-MTW agencies, including the PHA Plan (5-Year
Plan and Annual Plan) and Capital Fund planning. MTW agencies must also
report data in HUD data systems, as required.
New protocols and instruments will be developed for assessing MTW
PHA performance, and incorporated into HUD's Public Housing Assessment
System (PHAS) and Section Eight Management Program (SEMAP), or
successor assessment systems. In addition, HUD will employ standard
program compliance and monitoring approaches including assessment of
relative risk and on-site monitoring conducted by HUD or by entities
contracted by HUD
a. Planning and Reporting
i. The PHA Plan
MTW agencies must adhere to Public Housing Agency Plan regulations
at 24 CFR part 903, any implementing HUD Notices and guidance, as well
as any succeeding regulations. The PHA Plan consists of the 5-Year Plan
that a PHA must submit to HUD once every five PHA fiscal years and the
Annual Plan that the PHA must submit to HUD for each PHA's fiscal year.
Any HUD assistance that the PHA is authorized to use under the MTW
demonstration must be used in accordance with the PHA's Annual Plan, as
applicable.
Annual and 5-Year Plans must be submitted in a format prescribed by
HUD. Currently, submission format requirements are outlined in Notice
PIH 2015-18 (HA), issued October 23, 2015, which is effective until
amended, superseded or rescinded. The MTW agency must submit:
HUD-50075-5Y, the 5-Year Plan
HUD-50075-HP, the Annual Plan for high performing agencies,
along with supporting documents
[cir] HUD 50077-ST-HCV-HP
[cir] HUD-50077-SL
[cir] Resident Advisory Board (RAB) comments received
[cir] Any challenged elements of the Plan
MTW Supplement to the Annual Plan (under development)
As an MTW agency, all PHA Plan information must be provided in the
context of the PHA's participation in the MTW demonstration. This
includes taking into account the waivers and flexibilities afforded to
the MTW agency. To this end, the MTW agency will provide and HUD will
make available to the public, an MTW Supplement to the Annual Plan, in
a format to be developed by HUD. HUD anticipates that MTW agencies
would use the MTW Supplement to the Annual Plan to:
(a) Indicate the MTW activities and associated waivers that the
agency will undertake in the Annual Plan year that require general
waivers (Appendix A) using a check-box or other simple format.
(b) Indicate the MTW activities and associated waivers that the
agency will undertake in the Annual Plan year that require conditional
waivers (Appendix B) using a check-box or other simple format.
(c) Indicate the MTW activities that the agency will undertake in
the Annual Plan year that require cohort-specific waivers (as
applicable and identified in each cohort's Selection Notice), and the
cohort-specific waivers to be used, using a check-box or other simple,
non-narrative format.
(d) Submit specific information or data required by HUD for any
conditional waiver(s) the agency intends to use for the first time in
the Annual Plan year.
(e) Submit data or reporting required for the ongoing use of any
MTW waivers from the preceding year.
(f) Submit data required for HUD's verification of the MTW agency's
compliance with the five statutory requirements established under the
1996 MTW Statute.
(g) Request HUD approval for any MTW activities and waivers that
the MTW agency seeks to implement in the Annual Plan year that are
outside of the lists of general, conditional, and cohort-specific
waivers.
Non-MTW PHAs with a combined unit total of 550 or less public
housing units and vouchers and that are not designated as troubled
under PHAS and that do not have a failing score under SEMAP are exempt
from the requirement to submit the Annual Plan. Per this Operations
Notice, MTW agencies with a combined unit total of 550 or less public
housing units and vouchers would be required, at a minimum, to submit
the MTW Supplement to the Annual Plan on an annual basis.
MTW agencies must submit to HUD the Annual PHA Plan, including any
required attachments and the MTW supplement, no later than seventy-five
(75) days prior to the start of the agency's fiscal year.\11\ Before
submission to HUD, the PHA must have a 45-day public review period and
a public hearing. PHAs must consider, in consultation with the RABs,
all the comments received at the public hearing. The recommendations
received must be submitted by the PHAs as a required attachment to the
Plan. PHAs must also include a narrative describing their analysis of
the recommendations and the decisions made on these recommendations.
PHAs must also obtain the proper signed certifications and board
certification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ It is understood that the requirements in the remainder of
this section refer to the Annual Plan and the MTW Supplement if the
MTW agency is required to submit the Annual Plan and only to the MTW
Supplement if the MTW agency is not required to submit an Annual
Plan as discussed in the previous paragraph.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
HUD will notify the MTW agency in writing if HUD objects to any
provisions or information in the Annual Plan or the MTW supplement.
When the MTW agency submits its Plan seventy-five (75) days in advance
of its fiscal year, HUD will respond to the MTW agency within 75 days.
If HUD does not respond to the MTW agency within 75 days after an on-
time receipt of the Annual Plan, the agency's Annual Plan (and MTW
Supplement) is approved. If HUD does not receive the agency's Annual
Plan on time, the Plan is not approved until HUD responds.
ii. Admissions and Continued Occupancy Policy (ACOP) and Administrative
Plan
The MTW agency must update its ACOP and Administrative Plan to be
consistent with the MTW activities and related waivers that it
implements. The agency may not implement an MTW activity or waiver
until the relevant sections of the ACOP and/or Administrative Plan are
updated. MTW agencies must provide HUD with electronic versions of the
ACOP and Administrative Plan upon request. If the MTW agency implements
an activity using the local, non-traditional uses of funds waiver, the
MTW agency must create and update an implementing document specifically
for such activity.
In addition, the PHA must review its Administrative Plan, ACOP, and
other selection and admissions related policies to ensure that they
comply with Departmental regulations and other directives concerning
the use of criminal records and other criminal activity in admissions
and continued occupancy decisions. The PHA's policies and procedures
may not permit the automatic exclusion of an applicant
[[Page 8066]]
or participant on the basis of the record of a criminal arrest alone.
The same applies to policies and procedures concerning prospective
tenant screening by landlords and other third parties. HUD may review
the PHA's admissions and continued occupancy policies to ensure
compliance with HUD requirements concerning criminal records and
criminal activity. For more information, see the related letter from
HUD's Office of General Counsel at: https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=HUD_OGCGuidAppFHAStandCR.pdf and PIH's related
notice at https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=PIH2015-19.pdf.
iii. Capital Planning and Reporting
MTW agencies must adhere to CFP regulations at 24 CFR part 905, any
implementing HUD Notices and guidance, as well as any succeeding
regulations.
As noted previously, MTW agencies are funded in accordance with CFP
regulations and formula funds are calculated and distributed in the
same manner as non-MTW agencies.
MTW agencies have the authority and flexibility to combine CFP
funds with other funds as part of the MTW Block Grant. HUD will award a
Capital Fund grant to the MTW agencies, in keeping with the standard
process for all PHAs. The Field Office will spread the funds in LOCCs
to the MTW agencies in the same manner as for the non-MTW agencies. As
with other PHAs, an MTW PHA may requisition Capital Funds from HUD only
when such funds are due and payable, unless HUD approves another
payment schedule. To the extent that the MTW agency places CFP funding
in the MTW Block Grant, the CFP funding would be recorded on Budget
Line Item (BLI) 1492 (Moving to Work) on form HUD-50075.1. CFP funds
entered on BLI 1492 would not need to be broken out and itemized in the
part II supporting pages of the HUD-50075.1. However, an MTW PHA may
not accelerate drawdowns of funds in order to fund reserves.
An MTW agency is not required to include all or a portion of its
CFP grant in the MTW Block Grant. To the extent that the MTW agency
wishes to dedicate all or a portion of its CFP grant to specific
capital improvements, the agency may record CFP funding on any BLI on
form HUD-50075.1 other than BLI 1492.
iv. Inventory Management System (IMS)/PIH Information Center (PIC)
Reporting
Data from HUD's Inventory Management System (IMS) and PIH
Information Center (PIC), or successor systems, is critical to all
aspects of program administration, including HUD monitoring and
tracking of MTW agency progress in meeting the MTW statutory
objectives. IMS/PIC data is used to establish funding eligibility
levels for both Operating Subsidy and Capital Fund grants. Further, HUD
relies on IMS/PIC data to provide a thorough and comprehensive view of
PHA program performance and compliance.
MTW agencies are required to submit the following information to
HUD via IMS/PIC (or its successor system):
Family data to IMS/PIC using Form HUD-50058 or Form HUD-
50058 MTW (or successor forms) and in compliance with HUD's 50058 or
50058 MTW submission requirements for MTW agencies. HUD will identify
which form the MTW agencies will submit for families in the publication
of the final Operations Notice. MTW agencies must report information on
all families receiving some form of tenant-based or project-based
housing assistance, either directly or indirectly, as well as all
public housing families, to at least a 95 percent level.
Current building and unit information in the development
module of IMS/PIC (or successor system).
Basic data about the PHA (address, phone number, email
address, etc.).
HUD will monitor MTW agency reporting to IMS/PIC (or successor
system) to ensure compliance and provide technical assistance to MTW
agencies as needed.
v. Voucher Management System (VMS) Reporting
MTW agencies are required to report voucher utilization in the
Voucher Management System (VMS), or its successor system. There are
several areas in which VMS reporting is different for MTW agencies.
These areas are highlighted in the VMS User's Manual (https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=instructions.pdf) which
details the VMS reporting requirements.
HUD will monitor each MTW agency's VMS reporting to ensure
compliance and provide technical assistance to MTW agencies as needed.
vi. General Reporting Requirement
In addition to the reporting requirements outlined in this
Operations Notice, MTW agencies are required to comply with any and all
HUD reporting requirements not specifically waived by HUD for
participation in the MTW demonstration program, including the
requirement (discussed in Section 5) to comply with HUD's evaluation of
the specific-policy changes being implemented by cohort.
b. Performance Assessment
Assessing the performance of PHAs (both MTW and non-MTW) helps the
delivery of services in the public housing and voucher programs and
enhances trust among PHAs, public housing participants, HUD, and the
general public. To facilitate this effort, HUD will provide management
tools for effectively and fairly measuring the performance of a PHA in
essential housing operations.
Currently, HUD uses PHAS and SEMAP to assess risk and identify
underperforming PHAs in the traditional public housing and voucher
programs. However, since some of the MTW flexibilities make it
difficult to accurately depict the performance of MTW agencies under
the existing systems, HUD will develop alternative, MTW-specific
performance indicators in consultation with MTW agencies and
incorporate them into PHAS and SEMAP (or successor assessment
system(s)). MTW agencies may not opt out of the MTW-specific successor
system(s).
i. Public Housing Assessment System (PHAS)
MTW agencies are scored in PHAS but they can elect not to receive
the overall score (MTW agencies continue to receive PHAS sub-scores
even if they elect not to receive the overall score). If an MTW agency
elects to receive its overall PHAS score, the agency must continue to
be scored for the duration of the demonstration, or until the agency is
assessed under performance indicators designed specifically for MTW
agencies in a successor system(s) to PHAS, whichever comes first. Once
developed, MTW agencies that elect not to receive an overall PHAS score
must be assessed under the MTW-specific successor system(s).
Per the 1996 MTW statute, when providing public housing, the MTW
agency must ensure that the housing is safe, decent, sanitary, and in
good repair, according to the physical inspection protocols established
and approved by HUD. Thus, MTW agencies continue to be subject to HUD
physical inspections. To the extent that HUD physical inspections
reveal deficiencies, the MTW agency must continue to
[[Page 8067]]
address these deficiencies in accordance with existing physical
inspection requirements. If an MTW agency does not maintain public
housing adequately, as evidenced by the physical inspection performed
by HUD and is determined to be troubled in this area, HUD will
determine appropriate remedial actions. The actions to be taken by HUD
and the PHA will include actions statutorily required and such other
actions as may be determined appropriate by HUD. These actions may
include developing and executing a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with
the MTW agency, suspension or termination of the MTW ACC amendment, or
other agreement to be determined by HUD, in accordance with the
provisions therein, or such other actions legally available to the
Department.
MTW agencies must continue to submit year-end financial information
into the Financial Data Schedule (FDS) or successor system, as
discussed earlier.
ii. Section 8 Management Assessment System (SEMAP)
MTW agencies are scored in SEMAP but they can elect not to receive
the overall score. If an MTW agency elects to receive its overall SEMAP
score, the agency must continue to be scored for the duration of the
demonstration, or until the agency is assessed under an assessment
system designed specifically for MTW agencies, whichever comes first.
Once developed, MTW agencies that opt out of SEMAP must be assessed
under the MTW-specific successor system(s).
iii. MTW-specific Assessment
HUD will develop new performance indicators for evaluating MTW
agencies and for measuring the relative progress of assisted families
toward self-sufficiency. Such MTW-specific performance indicators will
be incorporated into PHAS and SEMAP (or successor system(s)) for
purposes of MTW agencies and will address PHA performance (general
public housing and Section 8 HCV management, as well as MTW-specific
activities) and PHA risk associated with MTW.
c. Monitoring and Oversight
MTW agencies remain subject to the full range of HUD monitoring and
oversight efforts including, but not limited to, annual risk
assessments, on-site monitoring reviews, monitoring reviews relating to
VMS reporting and rent reasonableness, review of the accuracy of data
reported into HUD data systems, use of HUD data systems to assess PHA
program performance, among other activities.
i. MTW Statutory Requirements
Throughout participation in the MTW demonstration program, all MTW
agencies must continue to meet five statutory requirements established
under the 1996 MTW Statute. HUD will monitor and determine MTW
agencies' compliance with these five requirements as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MTW statutory requirement: HUD verification approach:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. MTW agencies must ensure that at HUD will verify this
least 75 percent of the families requirement by pulling Public
assisted are very low income families, Housing and HCV data from PIC,
as defined in section 3(b)(2) of the or its successor system, and
1937 Act.. the MTW agency will provide
income data for its families
served through local, non-
traditional housing programs,
if any, in the MTW Supplement
to the Annual Plan.
2. MTW agencies must establish a HUD will verify this
reasonable rent policy.. requirement through its review
of the MTW Supplement to the
Annual Plan.
3. MTW agencies must continue to assist HUD will verify this
substantially the same total number of requirement in accordance with
eligible low-income families as would the calculation in Notice PIH-
have been served had the amounts not 2013-02, Baseline Methodology
been combined.. for MTW agencies, or successor
notice.
4. MTW agencies must maintain a HUD will verify this
comparable mix of families (by family requirement by pulling Public
size) as would have been provided had Housing and HCV data from PIC,
the amounts not been used under the or successor system.
demonstration..
5. MTW agencies must ensure that HUD will verify this
housing assisted under the requirement through its review
demonstration meets housing quality of PHAS Physical scores, or
standards established or approved by successor assessment system.
the Secretary..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ii. Income Integrity and Enterprise Income Verification System (EIV)
Reviews
MTW agencies are required to comply with the final rule regarding
EIV issued December 29, 2009, and utilize EIV for all income
verifications. EIV has been modified for MTW agencies so that family
information submitted in PIC will not expire for 40 months, in order to
accommodate agencies choosing to extend recertification periods for up
to three years.
MTW agencies are subject to HUD review to ensure compliance with
EIV requirements as well as monitor the accuracy and integrity of the
MTW agencies' income and rent determination policies, procedures, and
outcomes.
iii. MTW Site Visit
HUD will periodically conduct a site visit to provide guidance,
discuss the MTW agency's MTW activities, and offer needed technical
assistance regarding its program. The purpose of the site visit will be
to confirm reported agency MTW activities, to review the status and
effectiveness of the agency's MTW strategies, and to identify and
resolve outstanding MTW related issues.
The MTW agency shall give HUD access, at reasonable times and
places, to all requested sources of information including access to
files, access to units and an opportunity to interview agency staff and
assisted participants.
Where travel funding or staff resources are not available to
facilitate in-person site visits, HUD may exercise the option to
conduct remote site visits via telephone, videoconference, or webinar.
To the extent possible, HUD will coordinate the MTW site visit with
other site visits to be conducted by HUD.
iv. Housing Choice Voucher Utilization
HUD will monitor HCV utilization at MTW agencies and it will ensure
that HCV funds are fully utilized, subject to Section 6(a)(iii)(c) of
this notice. Where leasing levels are inconsistent, HUD may take
appropriate actions to work with the MTW agency to increase leasing and
utilization.
v. Public Housing Occupancy
HUD will monitor public housing occupancy rates for MTW agencies.
In instances where the MTW agency's public housing occupancy rate falls
[[Page 8068]]
below 96 percent, HUD may require, at its discretion, that the MTW
agency enter into an Occupancy Action Plan to address the occupancy
issues. The Occupancy Action Plan will include the cause of the
occupancy issue, the intended solution, and reasonable timeframes to
address the cause of the occupancy issue.
vi. Additional Monitoring and Oversight
HUD may, based on the MTW agency's risks and at HUD's discretion,
conduct management, financial, or other reviews of the MTW agency. The
MTW agency shall respond to any findings with appropriate corrective
action(s).
In addition, HUD will make use of all HUD data systems and
available information to conduct ongoing remote monitoring and
oversight actions for MTW agencies, consistent with the results of the
PIH risk assessment.
Specific areas for comment on Program Administration and Oversight
With respect to planning and reporting requirements for MTW
agencies, HUD is specifically seeking comment on the following
questions:
Is the MTW Supplement to the Annual Plan, as described, an
appropriate mechanism for HUD to track MTW agencies' activities and use
of waivers? Are there specific elements that should be included in the
MTW Supplement to the Annual Plan?
Should MTW agencies with a combined unit total of 550 or
less public housing units and Section 8 vouchers be exempt from the
requirement to submit the Annual Plan? If so, how should HUD collect
information on the activities and waivers implemented over the course
of the demonstration?
Do you have suggestions for how HUD can strengthen the
public engagement process to ensure that participants have an
opportunity to offer meaningful input in the selection and
implementation of MTW activities?
With respect to public housing and voucher program performance
assessment for MTW agencies, HUD is specifically seeking comment on the
following questions:
How could HUD measure public housing and voucher program
performance for MTW agencies and incorporate those measures into PHAS
and SEMAP?
Are there MTW-specific indicators that should be included
in a revised PHAS and SEMAP assessment?
Should an MTW agency retain its high-performer status in
PHAS or SEMAP until MTW specific indicators are developed?
With respect to monitoring and oversight for MTW agencies, HUD is
specifically seeking comment on the following questions:
Are HUD's monitoring and oversight efforts sufficient for
MTW agencies?
What are the specific areas of risk that should be
considered for MTW agencies?
Are there additional areas that should be monitored for
MTW agencies?
7. Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) Program
MTW agencies converting public housing program units to Section 8
assistance under the Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) program are
able to retain MTW regulatory and statutory flexibilities in the
management of those units, subject to RAD requirements, if the
conversion is to Section 8 Project-Based Voucher (PBV) assistance. MTW
agencies converting projects under RAD to PBV may continue to undertake
flexibilities except to the extent limited by RAD, as described in the
RAD Notice, PIH-2012-32, REV-2 or its successor notice.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Notices and laws related to RAD can be found at https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/RAD/library/notices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Applying MTW Flexibilities to Special Purpose Vouchers
Special Purpose Vouchers (SPVs) are specifically provided for by
Congress in line item appropriations which distinguish them from
regular vouchers. Generally, SPVs are not part of the MTW
demonstration. Following is guidance on how MTW flexibilities may be
applied to specific types of SPVs, which can be found on the MTW Web
site\13\.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=DOC_10495.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Veteran Affairs Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH)
HUD-VASH vouchers have separate operating requirements and must be
administered in accordance with the requirements listed at www.hud.gov/offices/pih/programs/hcv/vash. The operating requirements waive and
alter many of the standard HCV statutes and regulations at 24 CFR 982.
Unless stated in the HUD-VASH operating requirements, however, the
regulatory requirements at 24 CFR 982 and all other HUD directives for
the HCV program are applicable to HUD-VASH vouchers. PHAs may submit a
request to HUD to operate HUD-VASH vouchers in accordance with MTW
administrative flexibilities.
b. Family Unification Program (FUP)
The FUP NOFA language allows vouchers to be administered in
accordance with MTW operations unless MTW provisions are inconsistent
with the appropriations act or requirements of the FUP NOFA. In the
event of a conflict between the Final Operations Notice and the
appropriations act or FUP NOFA language, the act and NOFA govern.
c. Non-elderly Persons with Disabilities (NED) Vouchers
The NED NOFA language allows vouchers to be administered in
accordance with operations unless MTW provisions are inconsistent with
the appropriations act or requirements of the NED NOFA. In the event of
a conflict between the Final Operations Notice and the appropriations
act or FUP NOFA language, the act and NOFA govern.
d. Enhanced Vouchers and Tenant Protection Vouchers
Enhanced and tenant protection vouchers funds will be fungible one
year after a family receives the voucher. The family must still be
provided assistance until the end of the initial protection period
which lasts until the family moves out of the residence where the
voucher was originally received or is terminated from the program. Once
the initial protection period ends, the enhanced or tenant protection
voucher becomes a regular voucher. MTW agencies must follow the
procedures described in PIH Notice 2013-27, or its successor notice,
when the recipient of an enhanced voucher voluntarily agrees to
relinquish such assistance in exchange for the provision of PBV
assistance.
9. Regionalization
The 2016 MTW Expansion Statute states that:
The Secretary may, at the request of an MTW agency and one
or more adjacent PHAs in the same area, designate that MTW agency as a
regional agency.
An MTW agency may be selected as a regional agency if the
Secretary determines that unified administration of assistance under
sections 8 and 9 by that agency across multiple jurisdictions will lead
to a) efficiencies and to b) greater housing choice for low-income
persons in the region.
A regional MTW agency may administer the assistance under
sections 8 and 9 of the 1937 Act for the participating agencies within
its region pursuant to the terms of its MTW ACC
[[Page 8069]]
amendment, or other agreement to be determined by HUD, with HUD.
The Secretary may agree to extend the term of the ACC
amendment, or other agreement to be determined by HUD, and to make any
necessary changes to accommodate regionalization.
HUD will operationalize this regionalization provision through the
same terms and conditions as the MTW Operations Notice. HUD will issue
a separate PIH Notice addressing the criteria for designation as a
regional MTW agency, the mechanisms for administration by the regional
MTW agency on behalf of participating agencies, and the procedures for
extending or modifying MTW activities to accommodate regionalization.
Specific Areas for Comment on Regionalization
In anticipation of the guidance that HUD plans to issue on
regionalization, HUD seeks comment on the following issues:
How should ``adjacent'' be defined for the purposes of
identifying which PHAs should be allowed to be part of an MTW agency's
regional agency designation? Should regional MTW agencies extend across
state borders?
What flexibilities should the regional MTW agency be able
to administer on behalf of its regional partners? Should the partner
PHAs have full flexibility in the use of funds?
How should regional partners be included in the MTW
evaluation process? What data should they need to submit in conjunction
with the MTW agency?
What form of governance structure, if any, should be
formed between the regional MTW agency and its partner PHAs?
What form should the agreement (i.e., contract, memorandum
of understanding, partnership agreement, etc.) take between the
regional MTW agency and its PHA partners?
Should the criteria for regionalization be the same for
current MTW agencies and PHAs that join under the expansion?
Should HUD issue a revised Public Housing and Voucher
Consortia Rule to further the regionalization concept?
10. Applicability of Other Federal, State, and Local Requirements
Notwithstanding the MTW waivers described in this Operations
Notice, the following provisions of the 1937 Act continue to apply to
MTW agencies and the assistance received pursuant to the 1937 Act:
i. The terms ``low-income families'' and ``very low-income
families'' shall continue to be defined by reference to Section 3(b)(2)
of the 1937 Act (42 U.S.C. 1437a(b)(2));
ii. Section 12 of the 1937 Act (42 U.S.C. 1437j), as amended, shall
apply to housing assisted under the demonstration, other than housing
assisted solely due to occupancy by families receiving tenant-based
assistance; and
iii. Section 18 of the 1937 Act (42 U.S.C. 1437p, as amended by
Section 1002(d) of Public Law 104-19, Section 201(b)(1) of Public Law
104-134, and Section 201(b) of Public Law 104-202), governing
demolition and disposition, shall continue to apply to public housing
notwithstanding any use of the housing under MTW.
iv. Section 8(r)(1) of the 1937 Act on HCV portability shall
continue to apply unless provided as a cohort-specific waiver and
associated activity(s) in an evaluative cohort as necessary to
implement comprehensive rent reform and occupancy policies. Such a
cohort-specific waiver and associated activity(s) would contain, at a
minimum, exceptions for requests to port due to employment, education,
health and safety and reasonable accommodation.
Notwithstanding any requirement contained in this Notice or any MTW
waiver granted herein, other federal, state and local requirements
applicable to public housing or HCV assistance will continue to apply.
The ACC Amendment, or agreement to be determined by HUD, will place in
HUD the authority to determine if any future law or future regulation
conflicts with any MTW-related agreement or Notice. If a future law
conflicts, the law shall be implemented, and no breach of contract
claim, or any claim for monetary damages, may result from the conflict
or implementation of the conflicting law or regulation.
If any requirement applicable to public housing, outside of the
1937 Act, contains a provision that conflicts or is inconsistent with
any MTW waiver granted by HUD, the PHA remains subject to the terms of
that non-1937 Act requirement. Such requirements include, but are not
limited to:
Requirements for Federal Funds: Notwithstanding the
flexibilities described in this Notice, the public housing and voucher
funding provided to MTW agencies remain federal funds and are subject
to any and all other federal requirements outside of the 1937 Act
(e.g., including but not limited to competitive HUD NOFAs under which
the MTW agency has received an award, state and local laws, federal
statutes other than the 1937 Act (including appropriations acts), and
OMB Circulars and requirements), as modified from time to time. The MTW
agency's expenditures must comply with 2 CFR part 200 and other
applicable federal requirements, which provide basic guidelines for the
use of federal funds, including the requirements of this Notice.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): MTW agencies
must comply with NEPA, 24 CFR part 50 or Part 58, as applicable, and
other related federal laws and authorities identified in 24 CFR part 50
or Part 58, as applicable.
Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity: As with the
administration of all HUD programs and all HUD-assisted activities,
fair housing and civil rights issues apply to the administration of MTW
demonstration programs. This includes actions and policies that may
have a discriminatory effect on the basis of race, color, sex, national
origin, religion, disability, or familial status (see 24 CFR part 1 and
part 100 subpart G) or that may impede, obstruct, prevent, or undermine
efforts to affirmatively further fair housing. PHA Plans must include a
civil rights certification required by Section 5A of the 1937 Act and
implemented by regulation at 24 CFR 903.7(o) and 903.15, as well as a
statement of the PHA's strategies and actions to achieve fair housing
goals outlined in an approved Assessment of Fair Housing consistent
with 24 CFR 5.154. If the PHA does not have a HUD accepted AFH, it must
still provide a civil rights certification and statement of the PHA's
fair housing strategies, which would be informed by the corresponding
jurisdiction's AFH or Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
and the PHA's assessment of its own operations.
All PHAs, including MTW agencies, are obligated to comply with non-
discrimination and equal opportunity laws and implementing regulation,
including those in 24 CFR 5.105. Specific laws and regulations must be
viewed in their entirety for full compliance, as this Operations Notice
does not incorporate a complete discussion of all legal authorities.
For example, PHAs, including MTW agencies, are required to comply with
the Fair Housing Act, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990, Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, Executive
Order 11063: Equal Opportunity in Housing, Executive Order 13166:
Improving Access to
[[Page 8070]]
Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, HUD's Equal
Access Rule (24 CFR 5.105(a)(2), Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and
Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, as well as HUD and
government-wide regulations implementing these authorities.. PHAs
should review PIH Notice 2011-31 for more details.
Court Orders and Voluntary Compliance Agreements: MTW
agencies must comply with the terms of any applicable court orders or
Voluntary Compliance Agreements that are in existence or may come into
existence during the term of the ACC Amendment, or other agreement as
determined by HUD, The PHA must cooperate fully with any investigation
by the HUD Office of Inspector General or any other investigative and
law enforcement agencies of the U.S. Government.
11. MTW Agencies Admitted Prior to 2016 MTW Expansion Statute
The 39 MTW agencies that entered the MTW demonstration prior to the
2016 MTW Expansion Statute adhere to an administrative structure
outlined in the Standard MTW Agreement, a contract between each current
PHA and HUD. The 2016 MTW Expansion Statute extended the term of the
Standard MTW Agreement for these existing MTW agencies through each
PHA's 2028 fiscal year.
Some PHAs that entered the MTW demonstration prior to the 2016 MTW
Expansion Statute may wish to opt out of their Standard MTW Agreement
and join the MTW Expansion. HUD will support an existing MTW PHA's
request to join the MTW Expansion provided that:
The PHA makes the change at the end of its fiscal year, so
that it does not have part of a fiscal year under the Standard
Agreement and part under the new framework;
The PHA follows the same public comment and Board
resolution process as would be required for amending the Standard MTW
Agreement; and
The PHA agrees to all the terms and conditions that apply
to MTW agencies admitted pursuant to the 2016 MTW Expansion Statute,
including all of the provisions of this Operations Notice and the
accompanying ACC amendment, or other agreement as determined by HUD.
The only difference between an MTW agency admitted pursuant to the
2016 MTW Expansion Statute and an existing MTW PHA that elects to join
the new framework will be that the existing MTW PHA joining the
framework described in this Operations Notice will not be required to
implement the specific policy change associated with each cohort of
post-2016 MTW agencies and will not be required to participate in the
evaluation of that specific policy change.
Specific areas for comment on MTW Agencies Admitted Prior to 2016 MTW
Expansion Statute
With respect to MTW agencies admitted prior to the 2016 MTW
Expansion Statute, HUD is specifically seeking comment on the following
questions:
Is it appropriate to permit existing MTW agencies to come
under the framework of this Operations Notice and associated ACC
amendment, or other agreement as determined by HUD?
Should these existing PHAs be subject to any different or
supplemental requirements?
12. Sanctions, Terminations and Default
If the MTW agency violates any of the requirements outlined in this
Notice, HUD is authorized to take any corrective or remedial action.
Sanctions, terminations, and default are covered in the PHA's MTW ACC
amendment, or other agreement as determined by HUD.
III. Environmental Impact
1. Purpose and Applicability
A Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) with respect to the
environment has been made in accordance with HUD regulations in 24 CFR
part 50 that implement section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)). The FONSI will be available
for public inspection on www.regulations.gov.
Dated: January 13, 2017.
Jemine A. Bryon,
General Deputy Assistant, Secretary for Public and Indian Housing.
[[Page 8071]]
Appendix A--General Waivers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulations Available
Waiver name Waiver description waived activities Parameters
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Activities Related to Public Housing and Housing Choice Vouchers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limited Lease Terms........... The Agency may Certain Limited Lease Successful
develop and adopt a provisions of Term Housing participants must be
program to limit the Sections 3, 4, Program (PH): eligible to transfer
term of assistance 5, 6, 8, and 9 The Agency may into regular public
in Section 8 and 9 of the 1937 Act create a housing/HCV
programs in order to and 24 CFR 966 limited lease programs; must not
create a new limited Subpart A, 960 term housing have disparate
lease term housing Subpart B, and program with impact on a
program. Successful 982.303. reasonable protected class or
participants in conditions in other protected
these programs will its public characteristic;
be eligible for housing program. policies,
transfer to the Limited Lease procedures, and
Agency's public Term Housing programs must be
housing or HCV Program (HCV): consistent with
programs. The Agency The Agency may applicable
will ensure that create a nondiscrimination
these programs do limited lease and equal
not have a disparate term housing opportunity
impact on protected program with authorities,
classes, and will be reasonable including but not
operated in a manner conditions in limited to Section
that is consistent its HCV program. 504 of the
with the Rehabilitation Act;
requirements of participants are not
nondiscrimination required to
and equal participate in
opportunity services targeted to
authorities, persons with
including but not disabilities;
limited to Section admission is not
504 of the conditioned on a
Rehabilitation Act. diagnosis or
More specifically, specific disability
under no of an applicant or
circumstances will participant family.
residents of such The term of
programs be required assistance may not
to participate in be shorter than 6
supportive services months. Agencies
that are targeted at seeking to create a
persons with limited lease term
disabilities in program that goes
general, or persons beyond the
with any specific activities listed in
disability. In this waiver may
addition, admission propose an activity
to any of the under the Local Non-
programs or priority Traditional
for supportive Activities Rental
services developed Subsidy Program
under this section Waiver located in
will not be the Conditional
conditioned on a Waivers.
diagnosis or
specific disability
of a member of an
applicant or
participant family.
This section is not
intended to govern
the designation of
housing that is
subject to Section 7
of the 1937 Act.
Homeownership Program......... The Agency is Certain Homeownership Inventory removal of
authorized to use provisions of (Both): The current public
the Section 8 Sections 5, 9, Agency may housing units must
Homeownership 24, 32, 35, create a be approved in
Program as the basis 8(o)(15) and homeownership advance by HUD. The
for providing 8(y) of the program that Agency is required
homeownership 1937 Act, 24 includes soft to submit a Section
opportunities to CFR 905, 906, second 32 homeownership
families who are low- 24 CFR 982.625 mortgages or application to HUD
income, including through 982.643. down payment via the Inventory
public housing assistance to Removal Submodule of
residents, HCV or low income IMS/PIC. If the
PBV tenants, or families Agency is seeking to
other low-income including PH waive portions of 24
families. residents, PBV CFR 906, then the
Participants in this and HCV Agency must include
Homeownership families in those regulations as
Program will be lieu of monthly part of the Section
subject to the HAP. 32 Homeownership
Section 8 occupancy application. Note
and admission that the disposition
requirements. requirements of
Subject to subsidy Section 18 and 24
layering review, the CFR Part 970 do not
Agency is authorized apply to the sale of
to apply the Section public housing units
8 Homeownership in accordance with
requirements to the Section 32
families who are low- homeownership plan.
income, including Assistance under
public housing and this waiver is still
other low-income subject to subsidy
families. The layering review.
Section 8 Recruitment,
Homeownership eligibility, and
requirements can be selection policies
modified to provide and procedures must
soft second be consistent with
mortgages or down the Department's
payment assistance nondiscrimination
to participating low- and equal
income families or opportunity
to provide monthly requirements.
HAP payments to HCV
recipients.
[[Page 8072]]
Authorizations Related to The Agency is Certain Waive Operating .....................
Family Self Sufficiency. authorized to provisions of a Required FSS
operate any of its Section 23 of Program (Both):
existing self- the 1937 Act The Agency is
sufficiency and and 24 CFR 984. authorized to
training programs, waive its
including its Family requirement to
Self-Sufficiency operate the
(FSS) Program and traditional FSS
any successor program.
programs exempt from Alternative to
certain HUD program Program
requirements. If the Coordinating
Agency receives Committee
dedicated funding (Both): The
for an FSS Agency is
coordinator, such authorized to
funds must be used create an
to employ a self- alternative
sufficiency structure for
coordinator. In securing local
developing and resources to
operating such support an FSS
programs, the Agency program.
is authorized to
establish strategic
relationships and
partnerships with
local private and
public agencies and
service providers to
leverage expertise
and funding. In
implementing this
waiver, the Agency
must execute a
contract of
participation, or
other locally
developed agreement,
that is at least 5
years but no more
than 10 years.
However,
notwithstanding the
above, any funds
granted pursuant to
a competition must
be used in
accordance with the
NOFA and the
approved application
and work plan.
..................... ................ Alternative Recruitment,
Family eligibility, and
Selection selection policies
Procedures and procedures must
(Both): The be consistent with
Agency is the Department's
authorized to nondiscrimination
develop its own and equal
recruitment and opportunity
selection requirements. Agency
procedures for may not require
its FSS families to
program(s). participate in the
program as a
condition of
receiving housing
assistance. Agency
may not include
current work status,
work history and/or
source of income as
part of the
selection criteria.
``Family'' is not
limited to families
with a member who is
able to work full
time, but is defined
broadly so as not to
exclude families
with a member who is
disabled but able to
work, disabled but
unable to work, or
working as a
caregiver for a
family member with a
disability.
..................... ................ Modify or The Agency may modify
Eliminate the the terms of the
Contract of contract of
Participation participation to
(Both): The align with
Agency is adjustments made to
authorized to its FSS program(s)
modify the using MTW
terms of, or flexibility.
eliminate the Further, the Agency
contract of may discontinue use
participation, of the contract of
in lieu of a participation and
local form. instead employ a
locally-developed
agreement that
codifies the terms
of participation.
[[Page 8073]]
..................... ................ Policies for Consistent with the
Addressing goals and structure
Increases in of its MTW FSS
Family Income program, the Agency
(Both): The can set policies for
Agency is whether income
authorized to increases are
set its own recognized for
policies for purposes of
addressing increasing rent or
increases in changing the amount
family income of funds moved to
during escrow/savings
participation through the program.
in the FSS The Agency may not
program. use income increases
during participation
in the FSS program
to change a family's
eligibility status
for purposes of
participation in the
FSS program or for
the receipt public
housing or HCV
assistance.
..................... ................ Calculating FSS The Agency may set
Credits (Both): policies to defer
The Agency is income increases to
authorized to savings OR to allow
create participants to earn
alternative savings deposits
methods for based on meeting
computing the certain program
family's FSS milestones. Such
credit. policies must be
made clear to
participants in
writing prior to
starting their
participation in the
program.
..................... ................ Disbursement of Consistent with the
Savings (Both): goals and structure
The Agency may of its MTW FSS
set its own program, the Agency
policies for can set policies for
when savings when savings are
funds can be disbursed to
disbursed to participants. This
participants. could mean all funds
are disbursed at
once, or at certain
key points of
participation. Such
policies must be
made clear to
participants in
writing prior to
starting their
participation in the
program.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Activities Related to Public Housing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PH--Initial, Annual and The Agency is Certain Alternate Reexaminations must
Interim Income Review Process. authorized to provisions of Reexamination occur at least every
restructure the sections Schedule for three years. Must
initial, annual and 3(a)(1) and Workable allow at least one
interim review 3(a)(2) of the Households interim adjustment
process in the 1937 Act and 24 (PH): The at the request of
public housing CFR 966.4 and Agency may the household per
program in order to 960.257. establish an year.
affect the frequency alternate Reexaminations must
of the reviews and reexamination occur at least every
the methods and schedule for four years. Must
process used to workable continue to allow
establish the households. interim adjustments
integrity of the Alternate at the request of
income information Reexamination the household.
provided. In Schedule for The Agency must
addition, the Agency Elderly/ determine the
is expressly Disabled eligibility of a
authorized to adopt Households families in
a local system of (PH): The accordance with 24
income verification Agency may CFR 5.609. Prior to
in lieu of the establish an the implementation
current HUD system. alternate of the activity a
For example, the reexamination hardship policy and
Agency may implement schedule for impact analysis must
alternate time elderly and/or be developed and
frames for validity disabled adopted in
of verification or households. accordance with MTW
adopt policies for Alternate guidance.
verification of Verification
income and assets Policy (PH):
through sources The Agency may
other than those verify
currently allowed information
under the 1937 Act. provided by the
The terms ``low- participant in
income families'' alternate ways.
and ``very low-
income families''
shall continue to be
defined by reference
to Section 3(b)(2)
of the 1937 Act (42
U.S.C. 1437a(b)(2)).
HUD has defined
``Annual Income'' at
24 CFR 5.609 and MTW
Agencies must
determine the
eligibility of the
family in accordance
with provisions of
24 CFR 5.609.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 8074]]
Activities Related to Housing Choice Vouchers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HCV--Operational Policies and The Agency is Certain Alternate Reexaminations must
Procedures. authorized to provisions of Reexamination occur at least every
define, adopt and Section Schedule for three years. Must
implement a 8(o)(5), Workable allow at least one
reexamination 8(o)(7) and Households interim adjustment
program that differs 8(o)(13)(F) of (HCV): The at the request of
from the the 1937 Act Agency may the household per
reexamination and 24 CFR establish an year. The Department
program currently 982.516 and alternate will develop a rider
mandated in the 1937 982.162(b). reexamination to the HAP contract
Act and its schedule for that reflects MTW
implementing workable authorizations that
regulations. The households. adjust the current
terms ``low-income elements of the HAP
families'' and contract.
``very low-income
families'' shall
continue to be
defined by reference
to Section 3(b)(2)
of the 1937 Act (42
U.S.C. 1437a(b)(2)).
..................... ................ Alternate Reexaminations must
Reexamination occur at least every
Schedule for four years. Must
Elderly/ continue to allow
Disabled interim adjustments
Households at the request of
(HCV): The the household. The
Agency may Department will
establish an develop a rider to
alternate the HAP contract
reexamination that reflects MTW
schedule for authorizations that
elderly and/or adjust the current
disabled elements of the HAP
households. contract.
..................... ................ Alternate The Agency must
Verification determine the
Policy (HCV): eligibility of a
The Agency may families in
verify accordance with 24
information CFR 5.609. Prior to
provided by the the implementation
participant in of the activity a
alternate ways. hardship policy and
impact analysis must
be developed and
adopted in
accordance with MTW
guidance. The
Department will
develop a rider to
the HAP contract
that reflects MTW
authorizations that
adjust the current
elements of the HAP
contract.
HCV--Leasing Incentives....... The Agency is Certain Vacancy Loss The Agency must
authorized to provisions of (HCV): The update its
determine a damage Section Agency may Administrative Plan
claim and/or vacancy 8(o)(9), of the provide to reflect vacancy
loss policy and 1937 Act and 24 landlords with loss claim policy.
payment policy for CFR 982.311. vacancy loss In order to
occupied units that payments up to incentivize
differs from the 3 months. landlords to lease
policy requirements to HCV families an
currently mandated Agency may provide
in the 1937 Act and vacancy loss
its implementing payments to
regulations. Damage landlords whether or
and vacancy not a family is
authority are terminated.
subject to state and
local laws.
..................... ................ Damage Claims The Agency must
(HCV): The update its
Agency may Administrative Plan
provide to reflect damage
landlords with claim policy. In
compensation in implementing this
the event that activity, the
a tenant leaves tenant's security
the unit with deposit should first
significant be used to cover
damage. damages before the
Agency provides
compensation to a
landlord.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 8075]]
PBV--Unit Cap Percentage The Agency is Section Raise PBV Unit The Agency is subject
Waiver. authorized to use 8(o)(13)(B) of Cap (PBV): The to the PBV Section
for project-based the 1937 Act Agency may of PIH Notice 2015-
assistance up to 50% and 24 CFR project-base up 05 or any successor
of its total 983.6. to 50% of its notice and/or
authorized units as authorized guidance. If more
long as units are units. than 20% of the
located in census total authorized
tracts with no more units are project
than 20% poverty based, the
rate and/or house at- additional units
risk populations must meet one of the
defined as an following criteria:
individual or family house people who
that does not have meet the HUD
sufficient resources definition of
or support networks homeless; house
immediately vulnerable
available to prevent populations; house
them from moving to veterans; provide
an emergency shelter supportive housing
or lacks a fixed, for elderly or
regular, and disabled; or be
adequate nighttime located in areas of
residence. high-opportunity.
Agency must comply
with Fair Housing
and Civil Rights
requirements. The
Agency is subject to
Notice 2013-27.
PBV--Development Percentage The Agency is Section Raise PBV Cap The Agency is subject
Waiver. authorized to 8(o)(13)(B) of Within a to the PBV Section
determine the the 1937 Act Development to of PIH Notice 2015-
percentage of units and 24 CFR 50% PBV (PBV): 05 or any successor
within a development 983.56. The Agency may notice and/or
that can be project- raise the PBV guidance. If more
based that differs cap within a than 20% of the
from the percentage development to units in a
currently mandated 50%. development are
in the 1937 Act and Raise PBV Cap project-based, the
its implementing Within a additional units
regulations. In Development to must meet one of the
using this 75% PBV (PBV): following criteria:
authorization, the The Agency may house people who
Agency must place raise the PBV meet the HUD
units in locally cap within a definition of
defined areas of development to homeless; house
opportunity. 75%. vulnerable
Raise PBV Cap populations; house
Within a veterans; provide
Development to supportive housing
100% (PBV): The for elderly or
Agency may disabled; is located
raise the PBV in an area of high
cap within a opportunity; or is a
development to market-rate rental
100%. property owned by
the Agency. The
Agency must comply
with Fair Housing
and Civil Rights
requirements. Agency
is subject to Notice
PIH 2013-27.
PBV--Elimination of Subject to subsidy Certain Eliminate PBV The Agency is still
Competitive Process. layering review, the provisions of Competitive subject to the PBV
Agency is authorized Sections Process (PBV): Section of Notice
to project-base 8(o)(13)(B and The Agency may PIH 2015-05 or any
Section 8 assistance D) of the 1937 eliminate the successor notice and/
at properties owned Act and 24 CFR competitive or guidance. Agency
by a single asset 982.1, 982.352 process in the is subject to Notice
entity of the Agency and 24 CFR Part award of PBVs PIH 2013-27. This
that are not public 983 Subpart B. to properties waiver does not
housing properties, owned by a waive Part 983,
subject to HUD's single asset Subpart B in its
requirements entity of the entirety and Agency
regarding subsidy Agency that are must still comply
layering. Project- not public with 24 CFR 983.57
based assistance for housing. and 983.59(b) which
such owned units requires that HQS
does not need to be inspections be
competitively bid, completed by
nor are the owned independent
units subject to any entities.
required assessments
for voluntary
conversion. Agency
still needs to
complete site
selection
requirements. This
waiver does not
waive 24 CFR 983.57
despite reference to
Part 983, Subpart B.
This waiver also
does not waive the
requirement of 24
CFR 983.59(b) that
HQS inspections be
performed by an
independent entity.
[[Page 8076]]
PBV--Alternate Competitive The Agency is Certain Establish Agency is subject to
Process. authorized to provisions of Alternate PBV PBV Section of
establish a 24 CFR 983.51. Competitive Notice PIH 2015-05
reasonable Process (PBV): or any successor
competitive process The Agency may notice and/or
or utilize an establish an guidance. Agency is
existing local alternate subject to Notice
competitive process competitive PIH 2013-27.
for project-basing process in the
leased housing award PBVs.
assistance at units
that meet existing
Housing Quality
Standards and that
are owned by non-
profit, for-profit
housing entities, or
a single asset
entity of the Agency.
PBV--Operational Policies and The Agency is Certain Add Units to PBV The anniversary and
Procedures. authorized to provisions of HAP Contract expiration date for
determine the time Sections (PBV): The any additional units
period for amending 8(o)(7)(a), Agency may add added to a PBV HAP
the PBV HAP contract 8(o)(13)(F) and units to a PBV contract must be the
to add units 8(o)(13)(G) of HAP contract at same as that for the
thereto, the length the 1937 Act any time. original units under
of the lease period, and 24 CFR 983 the PBV HAP
when vouchers Subpart F. contract.
expire, and when
vouchers will be
issued or reissued.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appendix B--Conditional Waivers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulations
No. Waiver name Waiver description waived Available activities Parameters
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Activities Related to Public Housing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1...... PH--Leases...... The Agency is Certain Establish Community Agency may only
authorized to provisions of Rules through Local implement changes to
develop and adopt a Section 6(l) of Lease (PH): The the lease under this
new form of local the 1937 Act Agency may establish activity that do not
lease and establish and 24 CFR community rules require either a
community rules and 966.4. through a local regulatory or
reasonable tenant lease. statutory waiver.
fees based on proven Establish Reasonable Fair Housing and
private management Fees through Local other civil rights
models (subject to Lease (PH): The requirements
State and local Agency may charge continue to apply.
laws), provided that fees that are An appeals process
no-cause evictions reasonable and cost and hardship policy
are not permitted effective through a must be put in
and the Agency local lease. place. The hardship
allows for grievance policy must be
procedures. developed and
adopted in
accordance with MTW
guidance.
2...... PH--Rent The Agency is Certain Rent Policies (PH): The rent bands must
Policies. authorized to provisions of Income bands--The be set in accordance
determine family Section Agency may implement with bedroom size. A
payment, including 3(a)(2), changes to the rent hardship policy must
the total tenant 3(a)(3)(A) and calculation in order be put in place. The
payment, the minimum Section 6(l) of to create a system hardship policy must
rent, utility the 1937 Act based upon rent be developed and
reimbursements and and 24 CFR bands. Such rent adopted in
tenant rent. The 5.603, 5.611, policies are accordance with MTW
Agency is authorized 5.628, 5.630, structured using two guidance.
to adopt and 5.632, 5.634 variables: (1)
implement any and 960.255 and Income bands, or
reasonable policies 966 Subpart A. ranges, that assign
for setting rents in dollar increments
public housing, that have been
including but not determined locally
limited to: by the Agency, and
Establishing (2) bedroom size. In
definitions of a table, the y-axis
income and adjusted lists the income
income or earned bands and the x-axis
income disallowance lists the various
that differ from bedroom sizes. In
those in current creating this
statues and system, the Agency
regulations. Agency may also adopt a
must comply with flat rent policy
Section 3(b)(2) of within each income
the Act to determine band instead of
eligibility. calculating rent
based on adjusted
income. The income
bands may result in
total tenant payment
being more than 30%.
Rent Policies (PH): .....................
Flat Rents--The
Agency may establish
flat rents based on
bedroom size.
Rent Policies (PH): Minimum rent may not
Minimum Rent--The exceed $250. Tenant
Agency may implement rents may be
a minimum rent calculated between
policy that is 25% to 50% of
targeted towards adjusted income.
work able families. Hardship policy,
impact analysis, and
any other
information required
by HUD for the
oversight of this
policy must be
provided to HUD upon
request.
Rent Policies (PH): .....................
Other Income-Based
Rent Model--The
Agency may calculate
rent at an
alternative adjusted
income.
Rent Policies (PH): The gross income
Gross Income Rents-- calculation may not
The Agency may exceed 40% of rent
calculate rent as a burden for working
percentage of gross families and 27% for
income that does not elderly and/or
include income disabled households.
deductions and/or
exemptions.
Rent Policies (PH): The Agency should
Alternative Utility review its schedule
Allowance--The of utility
Agency may create a allowances each
utility schedule(s) year, and must
for all units based revise its allowance
upon bedroom size, for a utility
the property category if there
location and/or the has been a change of
types of utilities 10 percent or more
paid by resident. from the prior year.
The Agency must
maintain information
supporting its
annual review of
utility allowances
and any revisions
made in its utility
allowance schedule.
[[Page 8077]]
3...... PH--Work The Agency is Certain Work Requirement Residents must have
Requirements. authorized to provisions of (PH): The Agency may the opportunity to
implement a Section 3 of implement a work utilize the
requirement that a the 1937 Act requirement for provisions of the
specified segment of and 24 CFR public housing Agency's Grievance
its public housing 960.206. residents between Procedure to resolve
residents work as a the ages of 18 and a dispute regarding
condition of tenancy 54. The requirement a determination that
subject to subject shall be no less a resident has
to all applicable than 15 hours of failed to comply
Fair Housing work per week and no with the work
Requirements and the more than 30 hours requirement. The
mandatory admission of work per week. Agency must update
and prohibition Work requirements its ACOP to include
requirements imposed shall not be applied a description of the
by sections 576-578 to exclude, or have circumstances in
of the Quality the effect of which residents
Housing and Work excluding, the shall be exempt for
Responsibility Act admission of or the requirement and
of 1998 and Section participation by hardship policies.
428 of Public Law persons with The ACOP should
105-276. Those disabilities or include a
individuals exempt families that description of what
from the Community include persons with is considered work
Service Requirement disabilities. Work as well as other
in accordance with requirements shall activities that
Section 12(c)(2)(A), not apply to person shall be considered
(B), (D) and (E) of with disabilities or acceptable
the 1937 Act are families that substitutes for
also exempt from the include persons with work. Services, or
Agency's work disabilities. referrals to
requirement. However, persons services, must be
with disabilities provided by the
and families that Agency to support
include persons with preparing families
disabilities must to comply with this
have equal access to requirement. The
the full range of hardship policy in
program services and the ACOP should
other incentives. apply to residents
who are actively
trying to comply
with the Agency's
work requirement,
but are having
difficulties
obtaining work or an
acceptable
substitute. The ACOP
should also describe
the consequences of
failure to comply
with the work
requirement.
Agencies may not
implement the PH-
Work Requirements
Waiver on
individuals exempted
from the Community
Service Requirement
under Section
12(c)(2)(A), (B),
(D) and (E).
While the work
requirements do not
apply to persons
with disabilities or
families that
include a person
with disabilities,
such persons and
families are not
precluded from
working or engaging
in substitute
activities (such as
caring for a family
member who is
disabled).
Regardless of the
level of engagement
with work or
substitute
activities, persons
and families that
include persons with
disabilities must
have equal access to
services or referral
to services to
support their
efforts to obtain
work or an
acceptable
substitute, and any
other services or
other incentives
associated with the
program.
4...... PH--Term Limits. The Agency is Certain Term Limits (PH): The The term of
authorized to adopt provisions of Agency may limit the assistance may not
and implement term Section duration for which a be shorter than 5
limits for its 3(a)(3)(A) and family receives years except in the
Public Housing Section 6(l) of housing assistance. case of short-term
program. the 1937 Act transitional housing
and 24 CFR programs. Services,
5.603 and 966 or referrals to
Subpart A. services, must be
provided by the
Agency to support
preparing families
for the termination
of assistance. A
hardship policy must
also be created to
address extenuating
circumstances.
Hardship information
and any other
information required
by HUD for the
oversight of this
policy must be
provided to HUD upon
request. Agency must
also conduct an
impact analysis
prior to the
implementation of
this activity. An
Agency may not
retroactively apply
the 5-year term
limit to families
currently residing
in public housing.
5...... PH--Income The Agency is Certain Elimination of The Agency must
Deductions and authorized to provisions of Deduction(s) (PH): determine the
Exclusions. restructure the sections The Agency may initial eligibility
initial, annual and 3(a)(1) and eliminate one, some of a families in
interim review 3(a)(2) of the or all deductions. accordance with 24
process in the 1937 Act and 24 Standard Deductions CFR 5.609. Prior to
public housing CFR 5.611, (PH): The Agency may the implementation
program in order to 966.4 and replace existing of the activity a
affect the income 960.257. deduction(s) with a hardship policy and
deductions and standard impact analysis must
exclusions. The deduction(s). be developed and
terms ``low-income Alternate Income adopted in
families'' and Inclusions/ accordance with MTW
``very low-income Exclusions (PH): The guidance. Agencies
families'' shall Agency may establish are required to
continue to be alternate policies follow 24 CFR
defined by Section to include or 5.609(c) and other
3(b)(2) of the 1937 exclude certain federal statutes
Act (42 U.S.C. forms of participant that specifically
1437a(b)(2)). HUD income during the exclude certain
has defined ``Annual income review and income sources from
Income'' at 24 CFR rent calculation being counted as
5.609 and MTW process. These income.
Agencies must alternate policies
determine the must be consistent
eligibility of the with the inclusions
family in accordance and exclusions at 24
with provisions of CFR 5.609.
24 CFR 5.609.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Activities Related to Housing Choice Vouchers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1...... HCV--Earned The Agency must Certain EID (HCV): The Agency .....................
Income comply with Section provisions of may eliminate the
Disregard. 3(b)(2) of the Act Sections 16(b) Earned Income
to determine of the 1937 Act Disregard from the
eligibility. The and 24 CFR calculation of the
Agency may calculate 5.603, 5.609, tenant's share of
the tenant's share 5.611, 5.628, the rent.
of rent in a manner 982.516, EID (HCV): The Agency
other than that 982.201 and 982 may create an
required by statute Subpart E. alternative to the
and regulation in Earned Income
order to eliminate Disregard in order
or create an to calculate the
alternative Earned tenant's share of
Income Disregard the rent.
which may not be
used to determine
eligibility or
recertification.
Rent calculations
must comply with
Fair Housing and
Civil Rights
requirements.
[[Page 8078]]
2...... HCV & PBV-- The Agency is Certain Elimination of The Agency must
Reexamination authorized to provisions of Deduction(s) (HCV): determine the
Policies and define, adopt and Section The Agency may eligibility of a
Lease Terms. implement a 8(o)(5), eliminate one, some families in
reexamination 8(o)(7) and or all deductions. accordance with 24
program that differs 8(o)(13)(F) and Standard Deductions CFR 5.609. Prior to
from the (G) of the 1937 (HCV): The Agency the implementation
reexamination Act and 24 CFR may replace existing of the activity a
program currently 982.516 and deduction(s) with a hardship policy and
mandated in the 1937 982.162(b). standard impact analysis must
Act and its deduction(s). be developed and
implementing Alternate Income adopted in
regulations. The Inclusions/ accordance with MTW
terms ``low-income Exclusions (HCV): guidance. The
families'' and The Agency may Department will
``very low-income establish alternate develop a rider to
families'' shall ways to include or the HAP contract
continue to be exclude participant that reflects MTW
defined by reference income. authorizations that
to Section 3(b)(2) adjust the current
of the 1937 Act (42 elements of the HAP
U.S.C. 1437a(b)(2)). contract.
The Agency is Certain Length of HAP Agencies implementing
authorized to provisions of Contract (HCV & revised lease terms,
determine the length Sections PBV): The Agency may including length of
of the HAP contract, 8(o)(7)(a), change the term of a lease period for HCV
the length of the 8(o)(13)(F) and HAP contract. and PBV families,
lease period, when 8(o)(13)(G) of Alteration of HAP must demonstrate how
vouchers expire, and the 1937 Act Contract (HCV & the altered lease
when vouchers will and 24 CFR 983 PBV): The Agency may terms, including
be issued or Subpart F. alter the length of length, benefit the
reissued. the lease period, tenant. The
when vouchers expire anniversary and
and when vouchers expiration date for
will be issued or any additional units
reissued. added to a PBV HAP
contract must be the
same as that for the
original units under
the PBV HAP
contract. The
Department develop a
rider to the HAP
contract that
reflects MTW
authorizations that
adjust the current
elements of the HAP
contract.
3...... HCV & PBV-- The Agency is Certain Term Limits (HCV & The term of
Tenant Term authorized to provisions of PBV): The Agency may assistance may not
Limits. implement term Section 8(o)(7) limit the duration be shorter than 5
limits for HCV and and 8(o)(13)(F)- for which a family years except in the
PBV units designated (G) of the 1937 receives housing case of short-term
as part of the MTW Act and 24 CFR assistance. transitional housing
Demonstration. 982 Subpart L programs. Services,
and 983 Subpart or referrals to
E. services, must be
provided by the
Agency to support
preparing families
for the termination
of assistance. A
hardship policy must
also be created to
address extenuating
circumstances.
Hardship information
and any other
information required
by HUD for the
oversight of this
policy must be
provided to HUD upon
request. Agency must
also conduct an
impact analysis
prior to the
implementation of
this activity.
4...... HCV & PBV--Rent The Agency is Certain Rent Policies (HCV & A hardship policy
Policies. authorized to adopt provisions of PBV): Payment must also be created
and implement any Sections Standards--The to address
reasonable policy to 8(o)(2)(A), Agency is authorized extenuating
establish payment 8(o)(2)(B), to adopt and circumstances.
standards, rents or 8(o)(3), implement any Hardship information
subsidy levels for 3(a)(1), reasonable policy to and any other
tenant-based 8(o)(2)(C), and establish payment information required
assistance that 8(o)(13)(H)-(I) standards that do by HUD for the
differ from the of the 1937 Act not exceed 200% of oversight of this
currently mandated and 24 CFR the FMR. This may policy must be
program requirements 982.508, include the setting provided to HUD upon
in the 1937 Act and 982.503 and of payment standards request.
its implementing 982.518. outside of the basic
regulations. The range, and creating
Agency is authorized multiple payment
to adopt and standards based on
implement any variations in the
reasonable policies local rental market.
to calculate the
tenant portion of
the rent that differ
from the currently
mandated program
requirements in the
1937 Act and its
implementing
regulations.
Rent Policies (HCV & A hardship policy
PBV): Income Bands-- must also be created
The Agency may to address
implement changes to extenuating
the rent calculation circumstances.
in order to create a Hardship information
system based upon and any other
rent bands. Such information required
rent policies are by HUD for the
structured using two oversight of this
variables: (1) policy must be
Income bands, or provided to HUD upon
ranges, that assign request.
dollar increments
that have been
determined locally
by the Agency, and
(2) bedroom size. In
a table, the y-axis
lists the income
bands and the x-axis
lists the various
bedroom sizes. In
creating this
system, the Agency
may also adopt a
flat rent policy
within each income
band instead of
calculating rent
based on adjusted
income.
Certain Rent Policies (HCV & A hardship policy
provisions of PBV): Initial Rent must also be created
Sections Burden--The Agency to address
8(o)(1), may waive the extenuating
8(o)(2), maximum family share circumstances.
8(o)(3), at initial occupancy Hardship information
8(o)(10) and of 40% of the and any other
8(o)(13)(H)-(I) family's adjusted information required
of the 1937 Act monthly income. by HUD for the
and 24 CFR oversight of this
982.508. policy must be
provided to HUD upon
request. Agency must
also conduct an
impact analysis.
Certain Rent Policies (HCV & Rent increases may
provisions of PBV): Stepped Rent-- not occur more than
Sections The Agency may once per year. This
8(o)(1), create a stepped activity may only
8(o)(2), rent model that apply to non-elderly
8(o)(3), alters the family's and/or non-elderly
8(o)(10) and rent payment on a and disabled
8(o)(13)(H)-(I) fixed schedule in residents. Agency
of the 1937 both frequency and must implement a
Act, 24 CFR amount. grace period policy
982.518, Implementation of for HCV families
982.308, this activity may that reach zero HAP
982.451, 983 only occur if the through this
Subpart E, Stepped Rent activity. The grace
982.508, and activity is combined period would allow
982.503. with another Rent families to receive
Policy waiver zero HAP for at
identified in HCV- least six months
Rent Policies before being
Available Activities. transitioned off the
HCV program.
Certain Rent Policies (HCV & Minimum rent may not
provisions of PBV): Minimum Rent-- exceed $250. Tenant
Sections The Agency is rents may be
8(o)(1), authorized to adopt calculated between
8(o)(2), and implement any 25% to 50% of
8(o)(3), reasonable policies adjusted income.
8(o)(10) and to calculate the Hardship policy,
8(o)(13)(H)-(I) tenant portion of impact analysis, and
of the 1937 Act the rent that differ any other
and 24 CFR from the currently information required
982.518. mandated program by HUD for the
requirements in the oversight of this
1937 Act and its policy must be
implementing provided to HUD upon
regulations. request.
[[Page 8079]]
The Agency is Certain Rent Policies (HCV & A family's rents may
authorized to provisions of PBV): Contract be calculated
determine contract Sections Rents--The Agency is between 25% to 50%
rents and increases 8(o)(1)(B) and authorized to of adjusted income.
and to determine the 8(o)(13)(H) of determine contract Any lease
content of the HAP the 1937 Act rents and increases alteration(s) must
contract that differ and 24 CFR and to determine the comply with State
from the currently 982.308, content of the HAP and local law. A
mandated program 982.451 and 983 contracts that hardship policy must
requirements in the Subpart E. differ from the be put in place. The
1937 Act and its currently mandated hardship policy must
implementing program requirements be developed and
regulations. in the 1937 Act and adopted in
its implementing accordance with MTW
regulations. guidance.
5...... HCV & PBV- Rent The Agency is Certain Rent Reasonableness Agencies must
Reasonableness. authorized to provisions of (HCV & PBV): The provide, for HUD's
develop a local Section Agency is authorized approval, an
process to determine 8(o)(10) of the to develop a local alternative measure
rent reasonableness 1937 Act and 24 process to determine to determine that
that differs from CFR 982.507. rent reasonableness rents charged by
the currently that differs from owners to voucher
mandated program the currently participants are
requirements in the mandated program reasonable.
1937 Act and its requirements in the
implementing 1937 Act and its
regulations. Agency implementing
must determine that regulations.
rents charged by
owners are
reasonable before
entering into a HAP
contract.
6...... HCV & PBV--Work The Agency is Certain Work Requirement (HCV The Agency must
Requirements. authorized to provisions of & PBV): The Agency update its
implement a Sections may implement a work Administrative Plan
requirement that a 8(o)(7)(a), requirement for HCV to include a
specified segment of 8(o)(13)(F), and PBV residents description of the
its HCV and PBV and 8(o)(13)(G) between the ages of circumstances in
residents work as a of the 1937 Act 18 and 54. The which families shall
condition of tenancy and 24 CFR requirement shall be be exempt from the
subject to all 982.303, no less than 15 requirement. The
applicable Fair 982.309 and 983 hours of work per Administrative Plan
Housing Requirements. Support F. week and no more must also include a
than 30 hours of hardship policy. The
work per week. The Administrative Plan
Agency shall provide should include a
supportive services description of what
to assist families is considered work
obtain employment or as well as other
an acceptable activities that
substitute. Work shall be considered
requirements shall acceptable
not be applied to substitutes for
exclude, or have the work. Services, or
effect of excluding, referrals to
the admission of or services, must be
participation by provided by the
persons with Agency to support
disabilities or preparing families
families that for the termination
include persons with of assistance. The
disabilities. Work hardship policy in
requirements shall the Administrative
not apply to persons Plan should apply to
with disabilities or families who are
families that actively trying to
include persons with comply with the
disabilities. Agency's work
However, persons requirement, but are
with disabilities having difficulties
and families that obtaining work or an
include persons with acceptable
disabilities must substitute. The
have equal access to Administrative Plan
the full range of should also describe
program services and the consequences of
other incentives. failure to comply
with the work
requirement.
7...... PBV Unit Types.. Subject to subsidy Certain PBV Unit Types: As The Agency must
layering review, the provisions of long as units are provide a transition
Agency is authorized Section 8(p) of rental housing and plan to both the
to determine the 1937 Act meet HQS, the Agency affected residents
property eligibility and 24 CFR may attach and pay and HUD prior to the
criteria, including 983.53(a)-(b) PBV assistance for end of the
types of units and 982 units in various demonstration. If
currently prohibited Subparts H and types of housing the Agency places a
by Section 8 M. including housing PBV unit in a public
regulations so long described at 24 CFR housing project,
as these units are 983.53(a)(3), (5) then the Agency will
rental housing and and (6). not receive
meet HQS. operating funds for
that PH unit. PBV
units must comply
with HQS and be
consistent with fair
housing
deconcentration
requirements. This
waiver is subject to
subsidy layering
review.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Activities Related to Local, Non-Traditional
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1...... Local Non- The Agency is N/A............. Rental Subsidy Agency is subject to
Traditional authorized to use Programs: The Agency Notice PIH 2011-45
Activities--Ren MTW funds to provide may provide funds or any successor
tal Subsidy rental subsidy to a for supportive notice and/or
Programs. third-party entity. housing programs and guidance. Any MTW
services. funds awarded to a
Rental Subsidy third party provider
Programs: The Agency must be
may provide funds competitively bid.
for homeless/
transitional housing
programs and
services.
Rental Subsidy
Programs: The Agency
may provide funds
for the creation of
a local rental
subsidy program that
addresses special
needs populations.
2...... Local Non- The Agency is N/A............. Service Provision: Agency is subject to
Traditional authorized to use The Agency may Notice PIH 2011-45
Activities--Ser MTW funds to provide provide services for or any successor
vice Provision. supportive services residents of other notice and/or
to eligible Agency owned or guidance. Any MTW
participants. managed low-income funds awarded to a
housing that is not third party provider
public housing or must be
Housing Choice competitively bid.
Voucher assistance.
Service Provision:
The Agency may
provide services for
low-income non-
residents.
Service Provision:
The Agency may
provide supportive
services subsidies
or budgets for low-
income families.
Service Provision:
The Agency may
contract with a
third party provider
for the provision of
services to eligible
participants.
3...... Local Non- The Agency is N/A............. LIHTC Development: Agency is subject to
Traditional authorized to The Agency may Notice PIH 2011-45
Activities--Hou contribute MTW funds contribute MTW funds or any successor
sing to the development towards a Low Income notice and/or
Development of affordable Housing Tax Credit guidance. The use of
Programs. housing outside of project. federal funds must
Sections 8 and 9. Affordable Housing be consistent with
Development: The the requirements of
Agency may 2 CFR 200 and other
contribute MTW funds basic federal
towards the principles.
development of
housing for low-
income families.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appendix C--Public Comments To Be Solicited Through MTW Operations
Notice
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Waivers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Does the list of general waivers, MTW activities, and parameters in
Appendix A and Appendix B contain the needed flexibility to achieve the
three MTW statutory objectives? If not, what waivers, activities, and/
or parameters are missing?
Are there any MTW activities and/or waivers that should not be included
as general waivers, available to all MTW agencies without prior HUD
approval?
Are there any MTW activities and/or waivers that should not be included
as conditional waivers but rather should be included as general
waivers, or not included at all?
[[Page 8080]]
Does the list of conditional waivers, MTW activities, and parameters in
Appendix B contain the needed flexibility to implement any alternative
income-based rent model? If not, what waivers, activities, and/or
parameters are missing?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Term of Participation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assuming all cohorts are selected between 2017 and 2020, is the end of
each MTW agency's Fiscal Year 2028 an appropriate timeframe for MTW
participation, and understanding that HUD may extend cohort-specific
waivers to accommodate evaluation of MTW activities that require
additional time?
Is there a preferable length or structure for the term of MTW
participation?
What elements of the MTW agency's transition plan should be mandatory?
What elements of the transition process should HUD require in order to
protect residents from potential harm and minimize disruptions to
agency operations?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Funding, Single Fund Budget, and Financial Reporting
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is a 90 percent HAP budget utilization requirement the appropriate
amount?
What sanctions or restrictions should HUD consider using should an MTW
agency continue to fail to meet the budget utilization requirement?
Are there other methods for calculating HCV funding that HUD should
consider?
Are there other factors HUD should consider in the calculation of
funding?
Are there any comments or clarifications needed in relation to funding,
the MTW Block Grant, or financial reporting?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evaluation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is there any information not captured in HUD administrative data systems
that would provide informative data points or performance metrics for
evaluating the MTW demonstration?
What are measures of activities that ``reduce cost and achieve greater
cost effectiveness in Federal expenditures'' that can apply to and are
either being reported in existing HUD systems or can be reported by
every MTW agency?
What are measures of activities that ``give incentives to families with
children where the head of household is working, seeking work, or is
preparing for work by participating in job training, educational
programs, or programs that assist people to obtain employment and
become economically self-sufficient'' that can apply to and are either
being reported in existing HUD systems or can be reported by every MTW
agency?
Should HUD standardize a definition of ``self-sufficient''? If so what
elements of self-sufficiency should be included in HUD's definition?
What are measures of MTW activities that ``increase housing choices for
low-income families'' that can apply to and are either being reported
in existing HUD systems or can be reported by every MTW agency?
What is the best way to capture and report exit data on families exiting
the Public Housing, HCV, and local non-traditional housing programs?
What are the appropriate exit reasons to capture?
Is there any information not captured in HUD administrative data systems
that would be informative data points or performance metrics in terms
of evaluating the MTW demonstration?
In the list of performance metrics provided above, should any be
clarified or removed?
Are there any alternative or additional metrics that would enhance
performance evaluation on the MTW demonstration?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program Administration and Oversight
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is the MTW Supplement to the Annual Plan, as described, an appropriate
mechanism for HUD to track MTW agencies' activities and use of waivers?
Are there specific elements that should be included in the MTW
Supplement to the Annual Plan?
Should MTW agencies with a combined unit total of 550 or less public
housing units and Section 8 vouchers be exempt from the requirement to
submit the Annual Plan? If so, how should HUD collect information on
the activities and waivers implemented over the course of the
demonstration?
Do you have suggestions for how HUD can strengthen the public engagement
process to ensure that residents have an opportunity to offer
meaningful input in the selection and implementation of MTW activities?
How could HUD measure public housing and voucher program performance for
MTW agencies and incorporate those measures into PHAS and SEMAP?
Are there MTW-specific indicators that should be included in a revised
PHAS and SEMAP assessment?
Should an MTW agency retain its high-performer status in PHAS or SEMAP
until MTW specific indicators are developed?
Are HUD's monitoring and oversight efforts sufficient for MTW agencies?
What are the specific areas of risk that should be considered for MTW
agencies?
Are there additional areas that should be monitored for MTW agencies?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regionalization
------------------------------------------------------------------------
How should ``adjacent'' be defined for the purposes of identifying which
PHAs should be allowed to be part of an MTW agency's regional agency
designation? Should regional MTW agencies extend across state borders?
What flexibilities should the regional MWT agency be able to administer
on behalf of its regional partners? Should the partner PHAs have full
flexibility in the use of funds?
What form of governance structure, if any, should be formed between the
regional MTW agency and its partner PHAs?
What form should the agreement (i.e., contract, memorandum of
understanding, partnership agreement, etc.) take between the regional
MTW agency and its PHA partners?
Should the criteria for regionalization be the same for current MTW
agencies and PHAs that join under the expansion?
Should HUD issue a revised Public Housing and Voucher Consortia Rule to
further the regionalization concept?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MTW Agencies Admitted Prior to 2016 MTW Expansion Statute
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it appropriate to permit existing MTW agencies to come under the
framework of this Operations Notice and associated MTW agreement?
Should these existing PHAs be subject to any different or supplemental
requirements?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2017-01310 Filed 1-19-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P