Safety Zones; San Francisco, CA, 5482-5485 [2017-01050]
Download as PDF
5482
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2017 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
during the weeks of Veterans Day and
Thanksgiving Day. The Captain of the
Port Honolulu, will establish
enforcement dates that will be
announced by Notice of Enforcement,
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast
Notice to Mariners, on-scene designated
representatives, and outreach.
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and
vessels not registered with the sponsor
as participants or support/enforcement
vessels are considered spectators. The
‘‘support/enforcement vessels’’ consist
of any territory, or local law
enforcement and sponsor provided
vessels assigned or approved by the
Captain of the Port Honolulu to patrol
the regulated area.
(2) No spectator shall anchor, block,
loiter or impede the transit of
participants or support/enforcement
vessels in the regulated area during the
enforcement dates and times, unless
cleared for entry by or through a
support/enforcement vessel.
(3) Spectator vessels may be moored
to a waterfront facility within the
regulated area in such a way that they
shall not interfere with the progress of
the event. Such mooring must be
complete at least 30 minutes prior to the
establishment of the regulated area and
remain moored through the duration of
the event.
(d) Informational Broadcasts. The
Captain of the Port Honolulu, will
establish enforcement dates and times
with a Notice of Enforcement. If
circumstances render enforcement of
the regulated area unnecessary for the
entirety of these periods, the Captain of
the Port or his designated representative
will inform the public through
broadcast notices to mariners that the
regulated area is no longer being
enforced. The harbor will remain closed
until the Coast Guard issues an ‘‘All
Clear’’ for the harbor after the race has
concluded and the harbor is deemed
safe for normal operations.
(e) Penalties. Vessels or persons
violating this rule may be subject to the
penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1233.
Dated: January 10, 2017.
M.C. Long,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2017–00861 Filed 1–17–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0836]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; San Francisco, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
amend, add, and delete several
permanent safety zones located in the
Captain of the Port San Francisco zone
that are established to protect public
safety during annual firework displays.
These amendments will update listed
events to accurately reflect the firework
display locations. This proposed
rulemaking would limit the movement
of vessels within the established
firework display areas unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port (COTP) San
Francisco or a designated
representative. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before February 17, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2016–0836 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of
theSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for further instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Junior Grade Christina Ramirez, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Francisco;
telephone 415–399–3585, email D11-PFMarineEvents@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
PATCOM Patrol Commander
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
The Coast Guard is conducting this
rulemaking under the authority of 33
U.S.C. 1231. Fireworks displays are held
annually on a recurring basis on the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Jan 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
navigable waters within the COTP San
Francisco zone. One of the published
annual fireworks events that require
safety zones does not currently reflect
the accurate location of the respective
display sites. Three annual fireworks
events that require safety zones are not
published in 33 CFR 165.1191 and one
published fireworks event has not
occurred since 2009. These safety zones
are necessary to provide for the safety of
the crew, spectators, participants of the
event, participating vessels, and other
users and vessels of the waterway from
the hazards associated with firework
displays. The effect of these proposed
safety zones will be to restrict general
navigation in the vicinity of the events,
from the start of each event until the
conclusion of that event. Except for the
persons or vessels authorized by the
COTP San Francisco or a designated
representative, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the regulated area.
These regulations are needed to keep
spectators and vessels a safe distance
away from the fireworks displays to
ensure the safety of participants,
spectators, and transiting vessels.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard has reviewed 33 CFR
165.1191 for accuracy. The Coast Guard
is proposing to amend Table 1 in § 1191
to modify one event to reflect the
current event locations, add three
events, and delete one outdated event.
The event proposed to be modified is
listed numerically in Table 1 of this
section as item 9, ‘‘Fourth of July
Fireworks, City of Richmond.’’ The
display location currently listed,
Richmond Harbor, has been deemed
undesirable or hazardous by the event
sponsors, and so it is being changed to
a barge located in the harbor, and the
area of the safety zone would be the area
around the barge.
We are also proposing to add three
events to Table 1 of 33 CFR 165.1191,
as items 28, 29, and 30. These events are
titled Execpro Services Fourth of July
Fireworks, Monte Foundation
Fireworks, Lake Tahoe, and Sausalito
Lighted Boat Parade Fireworks,
respectively. The events proposed to be
added have taken place in 2011, 2013,
and 2014, and we believe that they will
likely be regularly scheduled in the
future. For those reasons, we believe it
is beneficial to include them in the
permanent regulation.
Finally, we propose to remove item 2,
‘‘KFOG KaBoom,’’ as this event is
outdated. It is unlikely to reoccur and
its continued inclusion in the regulation
offers the possibility of confusion.
The Coast Guard proposes this
rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C.
E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM
18JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2017 / Proposed Rules
1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–
1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This NPRM has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of each safety zone.
Vessel traffic would be able to safely
transit around each safety zone which
would impact a small designated area of
the COTP San Francisco zone for less
than 1 hour during the evening when
vessel traffic is normally low. Moreover,
the Coast Guard would issue a Local
Notice to Mariner and Broadcast Notice
to Mariners via VHF–FM marine
channel 16 about the zone, and the rule
would allow vessels to seek permission
to enter the zones.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above this
proposed rule would not have a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Jan 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5483
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves a safety zones lasting less than
1 hour that would prohibit entry within
1,000 feet of a fireworks barge. Normally
such actions are categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of Commandant
Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist and
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM
18JAP1
5484
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2017 / Proposed Rules
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
Management System in the March 24,
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend to 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. In § 165.1191, in Table 1 to
§ 165.1191, remove and reserve item 2,
revise item 9, and add items 28, 29, and
30, to read as follows:
■
§ 165.1191 Northern California and Lake
Tahoe Area Annual Fireworks Events.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 1 TO § 165.1191
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
2. [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
9. Fourth of July Fireworks, City of Richmond
Sponsor ................................
Event Description .................
Date ......................................
Location ................................
Regulated Area ....................
*
Various Sponsors.
Fireworks Display.
Week of July 4th.
A barge located in Richmond Harbor in approximate position 37°54′40″ N, 122°21′05″ W, Richmond, CA.
100-foot radius around the fireworks barge during the loading, transit, setup, and until the commencement of the
scheduled display. Increases to a 560-foot radius upon commencement of the fireworks display.
*
*
*
*
*
*
28. Execpro Services Fourth of July Fireworks
Sponsor ................................
Event Description .................
Date ......................................
Location ................................
Regulated Area ....................
Execpro Services Inc.
Fireworks Display.
Week of July 4th.
Off-shore from Incline Village, NV.
100-foot radius around the fireworks barge during the loading, transit, setup, and until the commencement of the
scheduled display. Increases to a 1,000-foot radius upon commencement of the fireworks display.
29. Monte Foundation Fireworks, Lake Tahoe
Sponsor ................................
Event Description .................
Date ......................................
Location ................................
Regulated Area ....................
Monte Foundation.
Fireworks Display.
Week of Labor Day.
Carnelian Bay, Lake Tahoe, CA.
100-foot radius around the fireworks barge during the loading, transit, setup, and until the commencement of the
scheduled display. Increases to a 1,000-foot radius upon commencement of the fireworks display.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
30. Sausalito Lighted Boat Parade Fireworks
Sponsor ................................
Event Description .................
Date ......................................
Location ................................
Regulated Area ....................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Jan 17, 2017
Various Sponsors.
Fireworks Display.
A Saturday or Sunday in December.
Off-shore from Sausalito Point, Sausalito, CA.
100-foot radius around the fireworks barge during the loading, transit, setup, and until the commencement of the
scheduled display. Increases to a 1,000-foot radius upon commencement of the fireworks display.
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM
18JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Dated: December 13, 2016.
Anthony J. Ceraolo,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard,Captain of the Port
San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2017–01050 Filed 1–17–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
menu and selecting ‘‘Smoking’’ from the
list of policy subjects.
Michael Bean,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish
and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2017–01060 Filed 1–17–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
36 CFR Parts 1 and 2
Office of the Secretary
42 CFR Part 2
[NPS–WASO–REGS–17326; GPO Deposit
Account 4311H2]
[SAMHSA–4162–20]
RIN 0930–ZA07
RIN 1024–AE30
Withdrawal of the Proposed Rule To
Revise General Provisions; Electronic
Cigarettes
AGENCY:
ACTION:
National Park Service; Interior.
Proposed rule; withdrawal.
The National Park Service
withdraws the proposed rule that would
revise the regulation that defines
smoking to include the use of electronic
cigarettes and other electronic nicotine
delivery systems; and would allow a
superintendent to close an area,
building, structure, or facility to
smoking when necessary to maintain
public health and safety. The
withdrawal is based upon a need to
engage in additional interagency
coordination and review of the
proposal.
SUMMARY:
The January 6, 2017, proposed
rule (82 FR 1647) is withdrawn as of
January 18, 2017.
DATES:
The withdrawal of the
proposed rule, and comments, are
available at www.regulations.gov by
searching for Regulation Identifier
Number (RIN) 1024–AE30.
ADDRESSES:
Sara
Newman, Director, Office of Public
Health, by telephone 202–513–7225, or
email sara_newman@nps.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
This
withdrawal does not affect Director’s
Order #50D (Smoking Policy), originally
issued in 2003 and then revised and
reissued in 2009, and Policy
Memorandum 15–03 (Use of Electronic
Nicotine Delivery Systems), issued on
September 10, 2015, which remain in
effect and are available online on the
NPS Office of Policy Web site at https://
www.nps.gov/applications/npspolicy/
index.cfm by clicking on the drop-down
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Jan 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
Confidentiality of Substance Use
Disorder Patient Records
Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
On Feb. 9, 2016, the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA)
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) that proposed
policy changes to update and modernize
the Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug
Abuse Patient Records (42 CFR part 2).
SAMHSA explained in the NPRM that
these changes were intended to better
align the regulations with advances in
the U.S. health care delivery system
while retaining important privacy
protections for individuals seeking
treatment for substance use disorders.
The last substantive update to these
regulations was in 1987. SAMHSA is
issuing this Supplemental Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (SNPRM) to
propose additional clarifications to the
part 2 regulations as amended by the
concurrently issued final rule. As noted
in the final rule, 42 CFR part 2
Confidentiality of Substance Use
Disorder Patient Records, questions
raised by commenters highlighted
varying interpretations of the 1987
rule’s restrictions on lawful holders and
their contractors and subcontractors’ use
and disclosure of part 2-covered data for
purposes of carrying out payment,
health care operations, and other health
care related activities. In consideration
of this feedback and given the critical
role that third-party payers, other lawful
holders, and their contractors,
subcontractors, and legal representatives
play in the provision of health care
services, SAMHSA is issuing this
SNPRM to seek further comments on
our proposals to address and help
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5485
clarify these matters before establishing
any appropriate restrictions on
disclosures to contractors,
subcontractors and legal representatives.
DATES: To be assured consideration,
comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later
than 5 p.m. on February 17, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Regulatory Information
Number (RIN) 0930–AA21, by any of the
following methods:
Electronically: Federal eRulemaking
Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for
submitting comments.
Regular, Express or Overnight Mail, or
Hand Delivery or Courier: Written
comments sent by hand delivery, or
mailed by regular, express, or overnight
mail must be sent to the following
address ONLY: The Substance Abuse
and Mental Health Services
Administration, Department of Health
and Human Services, Attn: Danielle
Tarino, SAMHSA, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Room 13E89A, Rockville, Maryland
20857.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
Instructions: To avoid duplication,
please submit only one copy of your
comments by only one method. All
submissions received must include the
agency name and docket number or RIN
for this rulemaking. All comments
received will become a matter of public
record and will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process
and viewing public comments, see the
‘‘Request for Public Comments’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Danielle Tarino, SAMHSA, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Room 13E89A, Rockville,
Maryland 20857, 240–276–2857, Email
address: Danielle.Tarino@
samhsa.hhs.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 9, 2016, SAMHSA
published an NPRM in the Federal
Register (81 FR 6987) proposing updates
to regulations for the Confidentiality of
Alcohol and Drug Abuse Patient
Records (42 CFR part 2). These
regulations implement title 42, section
E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM
18JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5482-5485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-01050]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2016-0836]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zones; San Francisco, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to amend, add, and delete several
permanent safety zones located in the Captain of the Port San Francisco
zone that are established to protect public safety during annual
firework displays. These amendments will update listed events to
accurately reflect the firework display locations. This proposed
rulemaking would limit the movement of vessels within the established
firework display areas unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) San Francisco or a designated representative. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before February 17, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2016-0836 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of theSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade Christina
Ramirez, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Francisco; telephone 415-399-3585,
email D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
PATCOM Patrol Commander
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
The Coast Guard is conducting this rulemaking under the authority
of 33 U.S.C. 1231. Fireworks displays are held annually on a recurring
basis on the navigable waters within the COTP San Francisco zone. One
of the published annual fireworks events that require safety zones does
not currently reflect the accurate location of the respective display
sites. Three annual fireworks events that require safety zones are not
published in 33 CFR 165.1191 and one published fireworks event has not
occurred since 2009. These safety zones are necessary to provide for
the safety of the crew, spectators, participants of the event,
participating vessels, and other users and vessels of the waterway from
the hazards associated with firework displays. The effect of these
proposed safety zones will be to restrict general navigation in the
vicinity of the events, from the start of each event until the
conclusion of that event. Except for the persons or vessels authorized
by the COTP San Francisco or a designated representative, no person or
vessel may enter or remain in the regulated area. These regulations are
needed to keep spectators and vessels a safe distance away from the
fireworks displays to ensure the safety of participants, spectators,
and transiting vessels.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard has reviewed 33 CFR 165.1191 for accuracy. The
Coast Guard is proposing to amend Table 1 in Sec. 1191 to modify one
event to reflect the current event locations, add three events, and
delete one outdated event.
The event proposed to be modified is listed numerically in Table 1
of this section as item 9, ``Fourth of July Fireworks, City of
Richmond.'' The display location currently listed, Richmond Harbor, has
been deemed undesirable or hazardous by the event sponsors, and so it
is being changed to a barge located in the harbor, and the area of the
safety zone would be the area around the barge.
We are also proposing to add three events to Table 1 of 33 CFR
165.1191, as items 28, 29, and 30. These events are titled Execpro
Services Fourth of July Fireworks, Monte Foundation Fireworks, Lake
Tahoe, and Sausalito Lighted Boat Parade Fireworks, respectively. The
events proposed to be added have taken place in 2011, 2013, and 2014,
and we believe that they will likely be regularly scheduled in the
future. For those reasons, we believe it is beneficial to include them
in the permanent regulation.
Finally, we propose to remove item 2, ``KFOG KaBoom,'' as this
event is outdated. It is unlikely to reoccur and its continued
inclusion in the regulation offers the possibility of confusion.
The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33
U.S.C.
[[Page 5483]]
1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of each safety zone. Vessel traffic
would be able to safely transit around each safety zone which would
impact a small designated area of the COTP San Francisco zone for less
than 1 hour during the evening when vessel traffic is normally low.
Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Local Notice to Mariner and
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the
zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the
zones.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety
zones lasting less than 1 hour that would prohibit entry within 1,000
feet of a fireworks barge. Normally such actions are categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary environmental analysis
checklist and Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment
[[Page 5484]]
applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend to 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. In Sec. 165.1191, in Table 1 to Sec. 165.1191, remove and reserve
item 2, revise item 9, and add items 28, 29, and 30, to read as
follows:
Sec. 165.1191 Northern California and Lake Tahoe Area Annual
Fireworks Events.
* * * * *
Table 1 to Sec. 165.1191
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. [Reserved]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Fourth of July Fireworks, City of Richmond
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsor...................... Various Sponsors.
Event Description............ Fireworks Display.
Date......................... Week of July 4th.
Location..................... A barge located in Richmond Harbor in
approximate position 37[deg]54'40'' N,
122[deg]21'05'' W, Richmond, CA.
Regulated Area............... 100-foot radius around the fireworks
barge during the loading, transit,
setup, and until the commencement of the
scheduled display. Increases to a 560-
foot radius upon commencement of the
fireworks display.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
28. Execpro Services Fourth of July Fireworks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsor...................... Execpro Services Inc.
Event Description............ Fireworks Display.
Date......................... Week of July 4th.
Location..................... Off-shore from Incline Village, NV.
Regulated Area............... 100-foot radius around the fireworks
barge during the loading, transit,
setup, and until the commencement of the
scheduled display. Increases to a 1,000-
foot radius upon commencement of the
fireworks display.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
29. Monte Foundation Fireworks, Lake Tahoe
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsor...................... Monte Foundation.
Event Description............ Fireworks Display.
Date......................... Week of Labor Day.
Location..................... Carnelian Bay, Lake Tahoe, CA.
Regulated Area............... 100-foot radius around the fireworks
barge during the loading, transit,
setup, and until the commencement of the
scheduled display. Increases to a 1,000-
foot radius upon commencement of the
fireworks display.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
30. Sausalito Lighted Boat Parade Fireworks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsor...................... Various Sponsors.
Event Description............ Fireworks Display.
Date......................... A Saturday or Sunday in December.
Location..................... Off-shore from Sausalito Point,
Sausalito, CA.
Regulated Area............... 100-foot radius around the fireworks
barge during the loading, transit,
setup, and until the commencement of the
scheduled display. Increases to a 1,000-
foot radius upon commencement of the
fireworks display.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 5485]]
Dated: December 13, 2016.
Anthony J. Ceraolo,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard,Captain of the Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2017-01050 Filed 1-17-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P