Recruitment and Selection Through Competitive Examination, 5335-5340 [2017-00800]
Download as PDF
5335
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 82, No. 11
Wednesday, January 18, 2017
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Parts 330, 332, and 337
RIN 3206–AN46
Recruitment and Selection Through
Competitive Examination
U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) is issuing an
interim rule to implement the
Competitive Service Act of 2015 to
allow an appointing authority (i.e., the
head of a Federal agency or department)
to share a competitive certificate with
one or more appointing authorities for
the purpose of making selections of
qualified candidates. The intended
effect of this rule is to facilitate the
hiring of top talent across Federal
agencies.
SUMMARY:
Interim rule effective February
17, 2017; comments must be received on
or before March 20, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov. All
submissions received through the Portal
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulation Identifier
Number (RIN) for this proposed
rulemaking.
You may also send, deliver, or fax
comments to Kimberly A. Holden,
Deputy Associate Director for
Recruitment and Hiring, Employee
Services, U.S. Office of Personnel
Management, Room 6500 AI, 1900 E
Street NW., Washington, DC 20415–
9700; email at employ@opm.gov or by
fax at (202) 606–4430.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roseanna Ciarlante by telephone on
(267) 932–8640, by fax at (202) 606–
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Jan 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
4430, by TTY at (202) 418–3134, or by
email at Roseanna.Ciarlante@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
18, 2016, the Competitive Service Act of
2015 (the ‘‘Act’’) was enacted as Public
Law 114–137. The Act allows an
‘‘appointing authority’’ to share a
competitive certificate issued under
delegated examining procedures with
one or more ‘‘appointing authorities’’ to
make an appointment to a position that
is in the same occupational series, grade
level (or equivalent), and duty location
during the 240-day period beginning on
the date of issuance of the certificate of
eligibles.
Under current rules, an appointing
authority may share a certificate within
the bureaus and components of his or
her department or agency. The current
practice allows an appointing authority
to expedite hiring when multiple
vacancies for the same position exist
throughout his or her organization. For
example, suppose that the Department
of Treasury headquarters human
resources (HQ HR) office recruits for a
Financial Management Specialist, GS–
501–12, and hires two highly qualified
individuals from the certificate of
eligibles. Treasury’s HQ HR office may
currently share the certificate with its
components, like the Bureau of the
Fiscal Service and the Internal Revenue
Service, that have identified Financial
Management Specialist vacancies that
need to be filled. This current practice
allows these different components with
the Department to leverage the
recruitment efforts already undertaken
by the Department.
While the Act does not define
‘‘appointing authority’’ for the purpose
of shared certificates, its clear purpose
is to expand current practice to allow an
appointing authority to share his or her
certificates with an appointing authority
in other departments or agencies, not
just within the same agency (e.g., the
Department of Treasury will now be
able to share certificates with the
Department of Energy). Consistent with
this purpose, in this interim rule, OPM
refers to the ‘‘original hiring agency’’
and the ‘‘receiving agency’’ with respect
to shared certificates, rather than using
the more generic term ‘‘appointing
authority.’’
Congress’s purpose in enacting the
Act was to help facilitate faster hiring
through the sharing of talent across the
Government by permitting agencies to
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
share resumes and select from among
candidates who have competed for
similar positions at another hiring
agency, were assessed, and were
referred by that agency. The new
process will benefit agencies who may
make selections from among the top
rated applicants readily available, as
well as applicants who through one job
application may now be considered for
more public service opportunities in
their desired Federal occupation.
The law specifies that an appointing
official can select an applicant for
appointment from the certificate of
another agency provided that certain
conditions are met.
• The hiring agency seeking to share
the certificate may share the certificate
with one or more hiring agencies only
if the announcement of the original
position stated that the resulting
certificate may be used by one or more
Federal agencies, and applicants ‘‘optin,’’ electing to have their applications
shared with agencies other than the
agency posting the job announcement.
• An agency seeking to use another
agency’s certificate must provide
advance notice of the available position
to its own employees, give them up to
10 days to apply, and review their
qualifications before it can make a
selection from the certificate from the
original hiring agency.
It is plain from the Act that only the
original hiring agency may ‘‘share’’ a
certificate with any other agency. But
Congress did not define precisely what
it means to ‘‘share’’ the certificate. One
possible approach is that when the
original hiring agency ‘‘shares’’ the
certificate with other agencies they must
simultaneously work the certificate in a
coordinated fashion, accounting for
declinations, failures to respond,
selections, and so on as if they were
integrated arms of the same employer.
(This is how the process might work
when a department shares a certificate
among a number of its different
components.) Another possible
approach is that each of the other
agencies may work the certificate
independently, as if the certificates had
been referred from the top of a register
or inventory. Neither of these
approaches is compelled by the text of
the statute and as such OPM has
determined that the most reasonable
approach, and the one that best
effectuates Congress’s apparent purpose,
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
5336
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
is the latter of the two. A shared
certificate of eligibles may be used by a
receiving agency independently of other
receiving agencies. Each receiving
agency is responsible for establishing a
unique instance of a case file to
document that agency’s use of the
certificate. This will be helpful in the
event a receiving agency must later
reconstruct its hiring actions. Allowing
multiple agencies to use certificates
independently of one another also
supports the timeliest and practical
implementation of these provisions and
minimizes the risk of error associated
with multiple agencies simultaneously
working the same certificate.
However, because of the added
complexity of any ‘‘sharing’’ of
certificates, the ability to track the
distribution of certificates to receiving
agencies must be a feature of these
provisions. Thus, whenever the original
agency shares a certificate, it must
maintain a record of any agencies with
whom the certificate was shared. This is
important in the event any errors occur
which require reconstruction of all
hiring actions which flow from a
certificate generated by the original
agency. In this scenario, if an error
occurs at the original agency, the
original agency is responsible solely for
notifying each succeeding receiving
agency that received a shared certificate
of the error. Any corrective actions or
reconstructions subsequent to the
original agency’s would be the
responsibility of each receiving agency
that made a selection.
How It Will Work
The original hiring agency (i.e., the
agency sharing the certificate) must
issue a certificate in accordance with
competitive examining procedures for a
position it is seeking to fill. This
includes public notice, rating and
ranking, the application of veterans’
preference, etc. The 240-day window
(during which other Federal agencies
may use the certificate of eligibles to
select an individual) begins on the date
the certificate is issued by the original
hiring agency. OPM notes that the
Competitive Service Act includes this
240-day window in 5 U.S.C. 3318,
related to rule-of-three hiring, but does
not expressly repeat this requirement in
5 U.S.C. 3319, related to hiring through
category rating. However, the legislative
history expresses congressional intent to
apply the 240-day limitation to both
hiring methods. See H.R. Rep. No. 114–
367 (Dec. 3, 2015); S. Rep. No. 114–143
(Sept. 15, 2015). Moreover, there is no
logical reason to have different
expiration periods for shared certificates
depending on whether the original
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Jan 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
hiring agency chooses to hire by the
rule-of-three method or the category
rating method, and having two different
expiration periods for shared certificates
could lead to confusion. For this reason
we are applying the same 240-day
expiration period to shared certificates
under both hiring methods.
The original hiring agency can (1)
make a selection and then share the
certificate with one or more receiving
agencies or (2) share the certificate with
one or more receiving agencies after
reviewing, and deciding not to hire
from, its certificate of eligible
applicants. OPM notes in this regard
that when an agency announces a
position, examines and rates applicants,
and issues a certificate of eligibles, it
must do so for its own hiring needs in
the first instance. An agency may not
generate a certificate solely for the
purpose of sharing it with another
agency. That would be misleading to
applicants and contrary to competitive
principles.
If the original hiring agency makes a
selection and shares the certificate, any
pass-overs of preference eligibles or
objections to other eligible candidates
must be resolved by that agency before
the certificate may be shared with
another agency. The 240-day window
cannot be extended while the pass-over
of a preference eligible or objection
request is being resolved; the law does
not permit extensions of shared
certificates.
Once the above processes have been
completed, the original hiring agency
may share the certificate of eligibles
with one or more Federal agencies. In
order to share a certificate, the
Delegated Examining Unit (DEU) of the
original agency may transmit the
certificate to a DEU of a receiving
agency. The DEU of the original agency
must audit the original agency’s own
use of the certificate in accordance with
the procedures of the Delegated
Examining Operations Handbook
(DEOH) before the certificate is shared.
When sharing a certificate of eligibles,
the original agency must include all
documentation pertaining to the
creation of that certificate (e.g., the job
analysis, a copy of job opportunity
announcement, the rating schedule, job
applications, etc.) and must safeguard
(i.e., redact) any personally identifiable
information not required by the
receiving agency to use the certificate
for its intended purpose. The original
agency shares the certificate of eligibles
in its original form, with the names of
those applicants who have been selected
and those who have chosen not to ‘‘optin’’ redacted, in order to retain the
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
original ordering of the certificate
subject to these appropriate deletions.
The original agency may share a
certificate in one or both of two ways:
(1) Simultaneous sharing with multiple
agencies; and (2) serial sharing, i.e.,
sharing with one agency at a time.
Simultaneous Sharing. The original
agency may share the certificate with
one or more agencies at the same time.
Each receiving agency works the
certificate independently. All selections
from shared certificates must be made
within 240 days of the date of the
issuance of the certificate by the original
agency. Each receiving agency creates
its own case file for audit and
reconstruction purposes, documenting
its compliance with the DEOH and all
applicable regulations.
Serial Sharing. Another option is for
the original agency to share a certificate
with just one agency at a time. Under
this option, the original agency shares
the certificate with the first receiving
agency. The first receiving agency works
the certificate and makes selections
within 240 days of the date of issuance
of the certificate by the original agency.
After sharing the certificate with the
first receiving agency, the original
agency may share the certificate with a
second receiving agency. The second
receiving agency works the certificate
and makes selections within 240 days of
the date of issuance of the certificate by
the original agency. Each receiving
agency must create its own case file for
audit and reconstruction purposes,
documenting its compliance with the
DEOH and all applicable regulations.
This process may continue to additional
receiving agencies as long as this
procedure is followed and all selections
are made within 240 days of the date of
issuance of the certificate by the original
agency.
As noted above, the processes are not
exclusive, i.e., an agency may start with
simultaneous sharing and subsequently
permit additional sharing through a
serial sharing scenario.
In the event that the original agency
determines that an error was made on
the original certificate, the original
agency must notify all receiving
agencies of the details of the error;
receiving agencies are responsible for
taking appropriate action to address any
erroneous actions that may have
occurred due to the error by the original
agency.
The Internal Application Process
Before using a shared certificate, a
receiving agency must consider its own
employees for the position under the
agency’s merit promotion procedures.
This includes considering individuals
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
covered under the agency’s Career
Transition Assistance Program (CTAP)
and the agency’s reemployment priority
list (RPL), where applicable, as well as
other individuals for which
consideration is required as part of the
internal selection process. See 5 CFR
part 330, subparts B and F.
The Competitive Service Act provides
for notice to a receiving agency’s own
employees, an internal application
period of no more than 10 days, and
consideration of the internal applicants
before a selection can be made from this
shared certificate. The law does not
permit an extension of this internal
application period beyond 10 days.
The law also specifies that the
internal application process is subject to
applicable collective bargaining
obligations (to the extent consistent
with law). However, the Competitive
Service Act does not affect the provision
of the Federal Service LaborManagement Relations Statute under
which management has the right to fill
a position either from among properly
ranked and certified candidates for
promotion or from any other
appropriate source, such as a
competitive certificate. See 5 U.S.C.
7106(a)(2)(C); 5 CFR 330.102,
335.103(b)(4).
If a receiving agency makes a
selection from among its own
employees (i.e., under merit promotion
procedures) the process ends with
respect to that agency. But if the agency
wishes to make a selection from the
shared certificate (after first considering
its own employees), it must first provide
selection priority, where applicable, to
individuals eligible under the
Interagency Career Transition
Assistance Program (ICTAP) who
applied to the original job
announcement. See 5 CFR part 330,
subpart G. The agency is not required to
re-advertise the position for ICTAP
eligibles because the original agency has
already afforded an opportunity for
ICTAP eligibles to apply and be
considered. This allows the agency to
use a ready-made certificate of eligibles
while still adhering to the provisions of
part 330, subpart G.
If there are no ICTAP eligibles, a
receiving agency can make a selection
from the shared certificate in
accordance with veterans’ preference
rules and the provisions governing
selections under competitive examining
procedures. A receiving agency may not
reassess the applicants for purposes of
rating/ranking. A receiving agency may
seek to pass over a preference eligible,
and would follow the usual rules for
doing so when filling positions under
competitive examining procedures.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Jan 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
Authorized Appointment Types
OPM is proposing to limit use of
shared certificates to delegated
examining for permanent and term
appointments. We are excluding
temporary appointments, i.e., those not
to exceed one year, from these
provisions because of the requirement
that a receiving agency must first
consider individuals from within its
own workforce prior to making a
selection from a shared certificate. We
believe it would be inefficient to
undergo this process for appointments
of a very short duration.
Positions may be full-time or other
than full-time (i.e., part-time, seasonal,
on-call, and intermittent). As noted
above, the original hiring agency must
complete all of its actions on the
certificate before it may be shared. As
also was previously observed, the
original hiring agency does not have to
make a selection in order for the
certificate to be shared. The original
agency may share the certificate with
one or more agencies.
Requirement for Appointment at a
‘‘Similar Grade Level’’
A receiving hiring agency may select
an individual from a shared certificate
only for a position of the same
occupational series, grade level, and
duty location as the position advertised
by the original hiring agency. The Act
states that the shared certificate may
also be used to select for a ‘‘similar
grade level’’ to that for which the
original hiring agency issued its
certificate. OPM interprets the term
‘‘similar grade level’’ in this context to
mean a corresponding rate or level of
pay under an alternative pay system for
a position excluded from the General
Schedule. We do not interpret the term
‘‘similar grade level’’ to mean a higher
or lower General Schedule grade than
that for which the original hiring agency
issued its certificate. It would not be
efficient for an agency to use a
certificate for higher-graded positions to
select for lower-graded positions, and it
would violate competitive principles to
use a certificate for lower-graded
positions to select for higher-graded
positions (as different applicants would
have competed if they had been aware
that the vacancy could be filled at a
higher level than advertised). For the
same reasons OPM is not permitting the
use of shared certificates to fill
vacancies for positions with higher full
performance levels.
Qualification Requirements
A receiving agency must verify
through its job analysis that the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5337
minimum qualification requirements
(including use of any selective
placement factors) and competencies—
or knowledge, skills, and abilities
(KSAs)—assessed for the original
position are appropriate for the position
to be filled. This verification is
necessary to establish the jobrelatedness and relevance of the
assessment method used, consistent
with 5 CFR part 300, subpart A.
Time Limit for Applicant Selection
A receiving agency may make its
selection from a shared certificate
within the 240-day period beginning on
the date the original hiring agency
issued the certificate of eligibles (not on
the date on which the original hiring
agency provided the certificate to the
receiving agency).
Public Notice by the Original Hiring
Agency
The original hiring agency must
provide public notice via a job
opportunity announcement posted on
www.USAJOBS.gov for the position
being filled, in accordance with public
notice requirements for filling jobs
under the competitive examining
process. The original announcement
must indicate that the resulting list of
eligible candidates may be shared with
one or more other hiring agencies.
Therefore, we are amending 5 CFR part
330 to require that if an agency is
sharing a certificate of eligibles under
part 332, the original hiring agency must
provide notice in the job opportunity
announcement that the resulting list of
eligible candidates may be used by one
or more other hiring agencies. The
original hiring agency must provide an
opportunity for applicants to ‘‘opt-in’’ to
have their applications and other
personal information shared with one or
more other hiring agencies under these
provisions. This allows the applicant to
furnish advance written consent for
disclosure of the information under the
Privacy Act. See 5 U.S.C. 552a(b).
The original hiring agency may not
share a certificate containing the name
and personal information of an
applicant unless that applicant has
chosen to ‘‘opt-in’’ for these purposes. If
an applicant chooses not to ‘‘opt-in,’’
his/her application materials will not be
shared and the applicant will receive no
further consideration when a certificate
of eligibles is shared with one or more
hiring agencies. His or her name will be
redacted on the shared certificate.
The Receiving Agency’s Notice to
Internal Applicants
Before making a selection from a
shared certificate, a receiving agency
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
5338
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
must notify its employees of the
opportunity to apply and be considered
before a selection can be made from the
shared certificate and of a period of up
to 10 days to apply consistent with the
provisions of part 335. If the agency has
RPL eligibles or CTAP eligibles, the
notice must provide information about
their priority.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
The Receiving Agency’s Notice to
Shared Certificate Applicants
Before using a shared certificate, a
receiving agency must notify the list of
candidates of its receipt of their names
and application materials and its
intention of considering them for a
position. A receiving agency must also
inform these individuals of its
obligation to consider applicants from
within its own workforce who apply
during the required internal application
period and any other individuals the
agency is required to consider (e.g.,
individuals eligible for consideration
under the CTAP or from the RPL). The
notification must include the agency,
position title, series, grade level (or
equivalent), and duty location.
The Receiving Agency’s Selection
Process
Before using a shared certificate, a
receiving agency must consider its own
employees for the position that the
original hiring agency advertised. The
receiving agency must consider
individuals covered under the agency’s
RPL or CTAP where applicable. At this
point, a receiving agency either makes a
selection from among its own
employees under merit promotion
procedures, or it may consider
applicants from the certificate of
eligibles shared by the original hiring
agency.
If, after considering its own
employees, a receiving agency wishes to
make a selection from the shared
certificate, it must first provide selection
priority to any external applicants who
applied to the original job
announcement who are ICTAP eligible.
If there are no ICTAP eligibles who met
the well-qualified definition, a receiving
agency can make a selection from the
shared certificate in accordance with
veterans’ preference rules and the
provisions governing selections under
competitive examining procedures.
Upon completion of the process, a
receiving agency must audit the
certificate.
Objections/Pass Overs
Objections to a non-preference
eligible applicant and requests to pass
over an individual entitled to veterans’
preference must be adjudicated on a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Jan 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
case-by-case basis. Each case must be
reviewed on its own merits. Therefore,
adjudications by the original hiring
agency (or the Office of Personnel
Management in the case of a 30 percent
or more disabled veteran) sustaining
objections or granting requests to pass
over do not extend to the receiving
agency if a certificate is shared. A
receiving agency may object to an
applicant or request to pass over an
individual entitled to veterans’
preference on a shared certificate in
accordance with the procedures
outlined in the DEOH and the
provisions of part 332.
Likewise, if using numerical rating,
the consideration of an applicant by the
original hiring agency does not count as
a consideration of the applicant by a
receiving agency for purposes of the
three-consideration rule, 5 CFR 332.405.
The three-consideration rule does not
apply when using category rating.
Documentation
When sharing a certificate of eligibles,
the original hiring agency must share all
documentation pertaining to the
creation of that certificate, including but
not limited to the job analysis, testing
and examination materials, the job
opportunity announcement, and
applications, as relevant. The original
agency must safeguard any personally
identifiable information not needed for
effective use of the certificate by the
receiving agency.
The original hiring agency and any
receiving agency using a shared
certificate must each maintain case file
documentation for that agency’s
selection or selections sufficient for
each agency that used the certificate to
make a selection to reconstruct its own
hiring actions later, if necessary. Each
time a certificate is shared, each
receiving agency is responsible for
creating a new instance of a case file to
document its use.
In the event that the original agency
determines that an error was made on
the original certificate, the original
agency must notify all receiving
agencies of the details of the error. The
original hiring agency must make
available, to any receiving agency that
needs it, all relevant case file documents
concerning the selection or selections
made by the original agency, as
necessary, to make full reconstruction
possible. Each receiving agency would
be responsible for taking appropriate
action to address any erroneous actions
that it took due to the error by the
original agency.
Each agency is responsible for the
proper selection, audit, recordkeeping,
etc., of delegated examining activities.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
All actions taken on competitive
certificates must be documented in
accordance with the DEOH and all
applicable regulations.
Request for Comments
OPM welcomes recommendations on
rule changes to improve the
administration of the Competitive
Service Act of 2015 and on
implementation guidance.
Technical Amendment
OPM is also amending § 337.304 to
reflect the Act’s renumbering of 5 U.S.C.
3319.
Waiver of Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
Section 2(d) of Public Law 114–137,
the Competitive Service Act of 2015,
directs the rulemaking procedure to be
followed for this rule. It states that ‘‘the
Director of the Office of Personnel
Management shall issue an interim final
rule with comment to carry out the
amendments made by this section.’’
Therefore the general notice of proposed
rulemaking typically required for
rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) is
statutorily waived for this rule.
E.O. 13563 and E.O. 12866, Regulatory
Review
This rule has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget in
accordance with Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that this regulation would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because it affects only Federal
employees.
E.O. 13132, Federalism
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
it is determined that this rule does not
have sufficient federalism implications
to warrant preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This regulation meets the applicable
standard set forth in section 3(a) and
(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local or tribal
governments of more than $100 million
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
annually. Thus, no written assessment
of unfunded mandates is required.
Congressional Review Act
This action pertains to agency
management, personnel and
organization and does not substantially
affect the rights or obligations of nonagency parties and, accordingly, is not
a ‘‘rule’’ as that term is used by the
Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA)). Therefore, the reporting
requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not
apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This final regulatory action will not
impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
List of Subjects
5 CFR Part 330
Armed forces reserves, District of
Columbia, Government employees.
5 CFR Part 332
Government employees.
5 CFR Part 337
Government employees.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Beth F. Cobert,
Acting Director.
Accordingly, OPM is amending parts
330, 332, and 337 of title 5, Code of
Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 330—RECRUITMENT,
SELECTION, AND PLACEMENT
(GENERAL)
1. The authority citation for part 330
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1104, 1302, 3301, 3302,
3304, and 3330; E.O. 10577, 3 CFR, 1954–58
Comp., p. 218; Section 330.103 also issued
under 5 U.S.C. 3327; Section 330.104 also
issued under sec. 2(d), Pub. L. 114–137, 130
Stat. 310; Subpart B also issued under 5
U.S.C. 3315 and 8151; Section 330.401 also
issued under 5 U.S.C. 3310; Subparts F and
G also issued under Presidential
Memorandum on Career Transition
Assistance for Federal Employees, September
12, 1995; Subpart G also issued under 5
U.S.C. 8337(h) and 8456(b).
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
■
2. Add § 330.104(c) to read as follows:
§ 330.104 Requirements for vacancy
announcements.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) If an agency is sharing a certificate
of eligibles under part 332 of this
chapter, the original hiring agency must
provide notice in the job opportunity
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Jan 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
announcement that the resulting list of
eligible candidates may be used by one
or more hiring agencies, and of how the
applicant may opt-in to the disclosure of
his or her applicant records to other
hiring agencies.
PART 332—RECRUITMENT AND
SELECTION THROUGH COMPETITIVE
EXAMINATION
3. The authority citation for part 332
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1103, 1104, 1302, 2108,
3301, 3302, 3304, 3312, 3317, 3318, 3319;
sec. 2(d), Pub. L. 114–137, 130 Stat. 310; E.O.
10577, 19 FR 7521, 3 CFR, 1954–1958 Comp.,
p. 218.
■
4. Add § 332.408 to read as follows:
§ 332.408 Shared use of a competitive
certificate.
(a) General authority. (1) A hiring
agency may share a competitive service
certificate issued under its delegated
examining authority with one or more
hiring agencies for a position(s) to be
filled on a permanent or term basis.
Positions filled on a term basis are
subject to the provisions of 5 CFR part
316, subpart C. Positions may be fulltime or other than full-time (i.e., parttime, seasonal, on-call, and
intermittent).
(2) Another Federal agency may make
a selection from a certificate shared with
it under paragraph (b) of this section
only after it has considered individuals
it is required to consider when filling
positions from within its own workforce
and other internal applicants under
paragraph (c) of this section.
(3) All actions taken on a shared
certificate must be made within the 240day period beginning on the date the
original hiring agency issued the
certificate of eligibles. This period
cannot be extended.
(4) The original hiring agency and any
receiving agency using a shared
certificate must each maintain case file
documentation sufficient for each
agency to reconstruct its own use of the
certificate in accordance with the
Delegated Examining Operations
Handbook, and must safeguard testing
and examination materials, examination
results, and the names of applicants
from disclosure to other persons in
accordance with § 300.201 of this
chapter.
(5) All actions taken on competitive
certificates must be done in accordance
with the Delegated Examining
Operations Handbook and all applicable
regulations in this part and part 337 of
this chapter.
(6) Agencies sharing certificates must
keep records of the instances of sharing
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5339
certificates and/or using shared
certificates.
(b) Requirements for the original
hiring agency. (1) A hiring agency may
share a competitive certificate it has
issued under § 332.402 (for traditional
rating and ranking) or under 5 CFR
337.303 (for category rating) with one or
more hiring agencies for use in filling a
position(s) if:
(i) The original hiring agency intends
to use the certificate for its own hiring;
(ii) The original hiring agency has
provided notice within the job
opportunity announcement for the
original vacancy that the resulting list of
eligible candidates may be used by one
or more hiring agencies;
(iii) The original hiring agency has
provided an opportunity for applicants
to opt-in to have their applications and
other personal information shared with
one or more hiring agencies;
(iv) The original hiring agency’s
objections to eligibles or requests to pass
over preference eligibles on the
certificate under § 332.406 or § 337.304
of this chapter have been resolved by
that agency’s Delegated Examining Unit;
(v) The original hiring agency has
either made a selection from the
certificate or has made no selection from
the certificate, and has documented its
reason for non-selection; and
(vi) The Delegated Examining Unit of
the original hiring agency has closed
and audited the certificate in
accordance with the procedures in the
Delegated Examining Operations
Handbook.
(2) When sharing a certificate of
eligibles, the original hiring agency
must share all documentation pertaining
to the creation of that certificate,
including but not limited to the job
analysis, testing and examination
materials, the job opportunity
announcement, and applications, as
relevant, and must safeguard any
personally identifiable information not
needed for effective use of the certificate
by the receiving agency. The original
hiring agency must share the certificate
of eligibles in its original form in order
to retain the original ordering of the
certificate; must safeguard any
personally identifiable information from
unauthorized access during the
transmission process; and must redact
the names of applicants who did not
opt-in to the shared certificate, and who
therefore may not be considered by the
receiving agency.
(3) The original hiring agency may
share a certificate of eligibles with one
or more agencies.
(4) If the original hiring agency
determines that it has made an error that
may affect selections by a receiving
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
5340
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
agency or agencies, it must notify each
affected receiving agency.
(c) Requirements for the receiving
agency—(1) Vacancies that may be
filled. A receiving agency may use a
shared certificate to fill a vacancy in the
same occupational series, at the same
grade level (or a corresponding rate or
level of pay for a position excluded from
the General Schedule), with the same
full performance level, and in the same
duty location as was listed on the
original hiring agency’s certificate. If the
original hiring agency’s certificate is for
an interdisciplinary position as
described in the Delegated Examining
Operations Handbook, the receiving
agency may use it to fill an
interdisciplinary position. The receiving
agency must verify through its job
analysis that the minimum qualification
requirements (including use of any
selective placement factors) and the
competencies, or knowledge, skills, and
abilities, that were used for the original
position are appropriate for the position
to be filled.
(2) Notification to individuals who
applied to the original vacancy. Before
using a shared certificate, a receiving
agency must notify the list of candidates
of its receipt of their names and
application materials and its intention
of considering them for a position. The
receiving agency must also inform these
individuals of its requirement to
consider its own employees as well as
other individuals the agency is required
to consider before consideration of
anyone on the shared certificate. At a
minimum, the notification must include
the agency, position title, series, grade
level or equivalent, and duty location.
(3) Consideration of internal
candidates. Before making a selection
from a shared certificate, a receiving
agency must provide notice of its intent
to fill the available position(s) to its own
employees and other individuals the
agency is required to consider, to
provide these internal candidates the
opportunity to apply consistent with the
provisions of part 335 of this chapter,
and to review the qualifications of the
internal candidates.
(i) This notice and opportunity for
internal candidates to apply is subject to
applicable collective bargaining
obligations (to the extent consistent
with law). Nothing in this paragraph
affects agencies’ right to fill a position
from any appropriate source under
§§ 330.102 and 335.103 of this chapter.
(ii) Agencies are prohibited from
providing an application period any
longer than 10 days for internal
candidates. This time limit cannot be
waived or extended.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Jan 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
(iii) Before considering other
candidates, a receiving agency must first
provide for the consideration for
selection required for individuals
covered under its Career Transition
Assistance Program and its
Reemployment Priority List under part
330, subparts B and F, of this chapter.
(4) Selection from the shared
certificate. After considering internal
candidates, a receiving agency may
consider candidates referred on the
shared certificate.
(i) The receiving agency must
consider candidates on a shared
certificate independently of the actions
of any other agency with which the
certificate is simultaneously shared
under paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
(ii) The receiving agency may not
reassess the applicants for purposes of
rating/ranking.
(iii) The receiving agency must
provide selection priority to individuals
eligible under the Interagency Career
Transition Assistance Program under
part 330, subpart G, of this chapter who
applied to the original job
announcement.
(5) Time limit on selection from a
shared certificate. The receiving agency
has 240 days from the date the
certificate was issued (in the original
hiring agency) to select individuals from
the shared certificate.
(6) Limit on further sharing by the
receiving agency. The receiving agency
may not share or distribute the shared
certificate to another Federal agency.
PART 337—EXAMINING SYSTEM
5. The authority citation for part 337
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1104(a)(2), 1302, 2302,
3301, 3302, 3304, 3319, 5364; 116 Stat. 2290,
sec. 1413, Pub. L. 108–136, 117 Stat. 1392,
as amended by sec. 853 of Pub. L. 110–181,
122 Stat. 3; sec. 2(d), Pub. L. 114–137, 130
Stat. 310; E.O. 10577, 19 FR 7521, 3 CFR,
1954–1958 Comp., p. 218.
■
6. Revise § 337.304 to read as follows:
§ 337.304
Veterans’ preference.
In this subpart:
(a) Veterans’ preference must be
applied as prescribed in 5 U.S.C.
3319(b) and (c)(7);
(b) Veterans’ preference points as
prescribed in § 337.101 are not applied
in category rating; and
(c) Sections 3319(b) and 3319(c)(7) of
title 5 U.S.C. constitute veterans’
preference requirements for purposes of
5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(11)(A) and (B).
[FR Doc. 2017–00800 Filed 1–17–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 339
RIN 3206–AL14
Medical Qualification Determinations
U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Final rule.
The U.S. Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) is issuing a final
rule to revise its regulations for medical
qualification determinations. The
revised regulations update references
and language; add and modify
definitions; clarify coverage and
applicability; address the need for
medical documentation and medical
examination and/or testing for an
applicant or employee whose position
may or may not have medical standards
and/or physical requirements; and
recommend the establishment of agency
medical review boards. The final rule
provides agencies guidance regarding
medical evaluation procedures.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective February
17, 2017.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Monica Butler, by telephone at (202)
606–4209; by email at employ@opm.gov;
by fax at (202) 606–0864; or by TTY at
(202) 418–3134.
On
December 27, 2007, OPM issued a
proposed rule at 72 FR 73282 to revise
regulations on medical qualification
determinations. The public comment
period on the proposed rule ended
February 25, 2008. OPM received
written comments from four agencies, a
union, and an individual pertinent to
the proposed rule. A discussion of the
comments is provided under the
respective subpart below.
The final rule also replaces the verb
‘‘shall’’ with ‘‘must’’ for added clarity
and readability. Any provisions in this
part using the verb ‘‘must’’ have the
same meaning and effect as previous
provisions in this part using ‘‘shall.’’
The final rule also adds four authority
citations to clarify the scope of
applicability: (1) 5 U.S.C. 3312
Preference eligibles; physical
qualifications; waiver; (2) 5 U.S.C. 3318
Competitive service; selection from
certificates; (3) 5 U.S.C. 3320 Excepted
service; government of the District of
Columbia; selection; and (4) 5 U.S.C.
3504 Preference eligibles; retention;
physical qualifications; waiver.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5335-5340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00800]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2017 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 5335]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Parts 330, 332, and 337
RIN 3206-AN46
Recruitment and Selection Through Competitive Examination
AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing an
interim rule to implement the Competitive Service Act of 2015 to allow
an appointing authority (i.e., the head of a Federal agency or
department) to share a competitive certificate with one or more
appointing authorities for the purpose of making selections of
qualified candidates. The intended effect of this rule is to facilitate
the hiring of top talent across Federal agencies.
DATES: Interim rule effective February 17, 2017; comments must be
received on or before March 20, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. All submissions received through
the Portal must include the agency name and docket number or Regulation
Identifier Number (RIN) for this proposed rulemaking.
You may also send, deliver, or fax comments to Kimberly A. Holden,
Deputy Associate Director for Recruitment and Hiring, Employee
Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Room 6500 AI, 1900 E
Street NW., Washington, DC 20415-9700; email at employ@opm.gov or by
fax at (202) 606-4430.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roseanna Ciarlante by telephone on
(267) 932-8640, by fax at (202) 606-4430, by TTY at (202) 418-3134, or
by email at Roseanna.Ciarlante@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 18, 2016, the Competitive Service
Act of 2015 (the ``Act'') was enacted as Public Law 114-137. The Act
allows an ``appointing authority'' to share a competitive certificate
issued under delegated examining procedures with one or more
``appointing authorities'' to make an appointment to a position that is
in the same occupational series, grade level (or equivalent), and duty
location during the 240-day period beginning on the date of issuance of
the certificate of eligibles.
Under current rules, an appointing authority may share a
certificate within the bureaus and components of his or her department
or agency. The current practice allows an appointing authority to
expedite hiring when multiple vacancies for the same position exist
throughout his or her organization. For example, suppose that the
Department of Treasury headquarters human resources (HQ HR) office
recruits for a Financial Management Specialist, GS-501-12, and hires
two highly qualified individuals from the certificate of eligibles.
Treasury's HQ HR office may currently share the certificate with its
components, like the Bureau of the Fiscal Service and the Internal
Revenue Service, that have identified Financial Management Specialist
vacancies that need to be filled. This current practice allows these
different components with the Department to leverage the recruitment
efforts already undertaken by the Department.
While the Act does not define ``appointing authority'' for the
purpose of shared certificates, its clear purpose is to expand current
practice to allow an appointing authority to share his or her
certificates with an appointing authority in other departments or
agencies, not just within the same agency (e.g., the Department of
Treasury will now be able to share certificates with the Department of
Energy). Consistent with this purpose, in this interim rule, OPM refers
to the ``original hiring agency'' and the ``receiving agency'' with
respect to shared certificates, rather than using the more generic term
``appointing authority.''
Congress's purpose in enacting the Act was to help facilitate
faster hiring through the sharing of talent across the Government by
permitting agencies to share resumes and select from among candidates
who have competed for similar positions at another hiring agency, were
assessed, and were referred by that agency. The new process will
benefit agencies who may make selections from among the top rated
applicants readily available, as well as applicants who through one job
application may now be considered for more public service opportunities
in their desired Federal occupation.
The law specifies that an appointing official can select an
applicant for appointment from the certificate of another agency
provided that certain conditions are met.
The hiring agency seeking to share the certificate may
share the certificate with one or more hiring agencies only if the
announcement of the original position stated that the resulting
certificate may be used by one or more Federal agencies, and applicants
``opt-in,'' electing to have their applications shared with agencies
other than the agency posting the job announcement.
An agency seeking to use another agency's certificate must
provide advance notice of the available position to its own employees,
give them up to 10 days to apply, and review their qualifications
before it can make a selection from the certificate from the original
hiring agency.
It is plain from the Act that only the original hiring agency may
``share'' a certificate with any other agency. But Congress did not
define precisely what it means to ``share'' the certificate. One
possible approach is that when the original hiring agency ``shares''
the certificate with other agencies they must simultaneously work the
certificate in a coordinated fashion, accounting for declinations,
failures to respond, selections, and so on as if they were integrated
arms of the same employer. (This is how the process might work when a
department shares a certificate among a number of its different
components.) Another possible approach is that each of the other
agencies may work the certificate independently, as if the certificates
had been referred from the top of a register or inventory. Neither of
these approaches is compelled by the text of the statute and as such
OPM has determined that the most reasonable approach, and the one that
best effectuates Congress's apparent purpose,
[[Page 5336]]
is the latter of the two. A shared certificate of eligibles may be used
by a receiving agency independently of other receiving agencies. Each
receiving agency is responsible for establishing a unique instance of a
case file to document that agency's use of the certificate. This will
be helpful in the event a receiving agency must later reconstruct its
hiring actions. Allowing multiple agencies to use certificates
independently of one another also supports the timeliest and practical
implementation of these provisions and minimizes the risk of error
associated with multiple agencies simultaneously working the same
certificate.
However, because of the added complexity of any ``sharing'' of
certificates, the ability to track the distribution of certificates to
receiving agencies must be a feature of these provisions. Thus,
whenever the original agency shares a certificate, it must maintain a
record of any agencies with whom the certificate was shared. This is
important in the event any errors occur which require reconstruction of
all hiring actions which flow from a certificate generated by the
original agency. In this scenario, if an error occurs at the original
agency, the original agency is responsible solely for notifying each
succeeding receiving agency that received a shared certificate of the
error. Any corrective actions or reconstructions subsequent to the
original agency's would be the responsibility of each receiving agency
that made a selection.
How It Will Work
The original hiring agency (i.e., the agency sharing the
certificate) must issue a certificate in accordance with competitive
examining procedures for a position it is seeking to fill. This
includes public notice, rating and ranking, the application of
veterans' preference, etc. The 240-day window (during which other
Federal agencies may use the certificate of eligibles to select an
individual) begins on the date the certificate is issued by the
original hiring agency. OPM notes that the Competitive Service Act
includes this 240-day window in 5 U.S.C. 3318, related to rule-of-three
hiring, but does not expressly repeat this requirement in 5 U.S.C.
3319, related to hiring through category rating. However, the
legislative history expresses congressional intent to apply the 240-day
limitation to both hiring methods. See H.R. Rep. No. 114-367 (Dec. 3,
2015); S. Rep. No. 114-143 (Sept. 15, 2015). Moreover, there is no
logical reason to have different expiration periods for shared
certificates depending on whether the original hiring agency chooses to
hire by the rule-of-three method or the category rating method, and
having two different expiration periods for shared certificates could
lead to confusion. For this reason we are applying the same 240-day
expiration period to shared certificates under both hiring methods.
The original hiring agency can (1) make a selection and then share
the certificate with one or more receiving agencies or (2) share the
certificate with one or more receiving agencies after reviewing, and
deciding not to hire from, its certificate of eligible applicants. OPM
notes in this regard that when an agency announces a position, examines
and rates applicants, and issues a certificate of eligibles, it must do
so for its own hiring needs in the first instance. An agency may not
generate a certificate solely for the purpose of sharing it with
another agency. That would be misleading to applicants and contrary to
competitive principles.
If the original hiring agency makes a selection and shares the
certificate, any pass-overs of preference eligibles or objections to
other eligible candidates must be resolved by that agency before the
certificate may be shared with another agency. The 240-day window
cannot be extended while the pass-over of a preference eligible or
objection request is being resolved; the law does not permit extensions
of shared certificates.
Once the above processes have been completed, the original hiring
agency may share the certificate of eligibles with one or more Federal
agencies. In order to share a certificate, the Delegated Examining Unit
(DEU) of the original agency may transmit the certificate to a DEU of a
receiving agency. The DEU of the original agency must audit the
original agency's own use of the certificate in accordance with the
procedures of the Delegated Examining Operations Handbook (DEOH) before
the certificate is shared.
When sharing a certificate of eligibles, the original agency must
include all documentation pertaining to the creation of that
certificate (e.g., the job analysis, a copy of job opportunity
announcement, the rating schedule, job applications, etc.) and must
safeguard (i.e., redact) any personally identifiable information not
required by the receiving agency to use the certificate for its
intended purpose. The original agency shares the certificate of
eligibles in its original form, with the names of those applicants who
have been selected and those who have chosen not to ``opt-in''
redacted, in order to retain the original ordering of the certificate
subject to these appropriate deletions.
The original agency may share a certificate in one or both of two
ways: (1) Simultaneous sharing with multiple agencies; and (2) serial
sharing, i.e., sharing with one agency at a time.
Simultaneous Sharing. The original agency may share the certificate
with one or more agencies at the same time. Each receiving agency works
the certificate independently. All selections from shared certificates
must be made within 240 days of the date of the issuance of the
certificate by the original agency. Each receiving agency creates its
own case file for audit and reconstruction purposes, documenting its
compliance with the DEOH and all applicable regulations.
Serial Sharing. Another option is for the original agency to share
a certificate with just one agency at a time. Under this option, the
original agency shares the certificate with the first receiving agency.
The first receiving agency works the certificate and makes selections
within 240 days of the date of issuance of the certificate by the
original agency. After sharing the certificate with the first receiving
agency, the original agency may share the certificate with a second
receiving agency. The second receiving agency works the certificate and
makes selections within 240 days of the date of issuance of the
certificate by the original agency. Each receiving agency must create
its own case file for audit and reconstruction purposes, documenting
its compliance with the DEOH and all applicable regulations. This
process may continue to additional receiving agencies as long as this
procedure is followed and all selections are made within 240 days of
the date of issuance of the certificate by the original agency.
As noted above, the processes are not exclusive, i.e., an agency
may start with simultaneous sharing and subsequently permit additional
sharing through a serial sharing scenario.
In the event that the original agency determines that an error was
made on the original certificate, the original agency must notify all
receiving agencies of the details of the error; receiving agencies are
responsible for taking appropriate action to address any erroneous
actions that may have occurred due to the error by the original agency.
The Internal Application Process
Before using a shared certificate, a receiving agency must consider
its own employees for the position under the agency's merit promotion
procedures. This includes considering individuals
[[Page 5337]]
covered under the agency's Career Transition Assistance Program (CTAP)
and the agency's reemployment priority list (RPL), where applicable, as
well as other individuals for which consideration is required as part
of the internal selection process. See 5 CFR part 330, subparts B and
F.
The Competitive Service Act provides for notice to a receiving
agency's own employees, an internal application period of no more than
10 days, and consideration of the internal applicants before a
selection can be made from this shared certificate. The law does not
permit an extension of this internal application period beyond 10 days.
The law also specifies that the internal application process is
subject to applicable collective bargaining obligations (to the extent
consistent with law). However, the Competitive Service Act does not
affect the provision of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations
Statute under which management has the right to fill a position either
from among properly ranked and certified candidates for promotion or
from any other appropriate source, such as a competitive certificate.
See 5 U.S.C. 7106(a)(2)(C); 5 CFR 330.102, 335.103(b)(4).
If a receiving agency makes a selection from among its own
employees (i.e., under merit promotion procedures) the process ends
with respect to that agency. But if the agency wishes to make a
selection from the shared certificate (after first considering its own
employees), it must first provide selection priority, where applicable,
to individuals eligible under the Interagency Career Transition
Assistance Program (ICTAP) who applied to the original job
announcement. See 5 CFR part 330, subpart G. The agency is not required
to re-advertise the position for ICTAP eligibles because the original
agency has already afforded an opportunity for ICTAP eligibles to apply
and be considered. This allows the agency to use a ready-made
certificate of eligibles while still adhering to the provisions of part
330, subpart G.
If there are no ICTAP eligibles, a receiving agency can make a
selection from the shared certificate in accordance with veterans'
preference rules and the provisions governing selections under
competitive examining procedures. A receiving agency may not reassess
the applicants for purposes of rating/ranking. A receiving agency may
seek to pass over a preference eligible, and would follow the usual
rules for doing so when filling positions under competitive examining
procedures.
Authorized Appointment Types
OPM is proposing to limit use of shared certificates to delegated
examining for permanent and term appointments. We are excluding
temporary appointments, i.e., those not to exceed one year, from these
provisions because of the requirement that a receiving agency must
first consider individuals from within its own workforce prior to
making a selection from a shared certificate. We believe it would be
inefficient to undergo this process for appointments of a very short
duration.
Positions may be full-time or other than full-time (i.e., part-
time, seasonal, on-call, and intermittent). As noted above, the
original hiring agency must complete all of its actions on the
certificate before it may be shared. As also was previously observed,
the original hiring agency does not have to make a selection in order
for the certificate to be shared. The original agency may share the
certificate with one or more agencies.
Requirement for Appointment at a ``Similar Grade Level''
A receiving hiring agency may select an individual from a shared
certificate only for a position of the same occupational series, grade
level, and duty location as the position advertised by the original
hiring agency. The Act states that the shared certificate may also be
used to select for a ``similar grade level'' to that for which the
original hiring agency issued its certificate. OPM interprets the term
``similar grade level'' in this context to mean a corresponding rate or
level of pay under an alternative pay system for a position excluded
from the General Schedule. We do not interpret the term ``similar grade
level'' to mean a higher or lower General Schedule grade than that for
which the original hiring agency issued its certificate. It would not
be efficient for an agency to use a certificate for higher-graded
positions to select for lower-graded positions, and it would violate
competitive principles to use a certificate for lower-graded positions
to select for higher-graded positions (as different applicants would
have competed if they had been aware that the vacancy could be filled
at a higher level than advertised). For the same reasons OPM is not
permitting the use of shared certificates to fill vacancies for
positions with higher full performance levels.
Qualification Requirements
A receiving agency must verify through its job analysis that the
minimum qualification requirements (including use of any selective
placement factors) and competencies--or knowledge, skills, and
abilities (KSAs)--assessed for the original position are appropriate
for the position to be filled. This verification is necessary to
establish the job-relatedness and relevance of the assessment method
used, consistent with 5 CFR part 300, subpart A.
Time Limit for Applicant Selection
A receiving agency may make its selection from a shared certificate
within the 240-day period beginning on the date the original hiring
agency issued the certificate of eligibles (not on the date on which
the original hiring agency provided the certificate to the receiving
agency).
Public Notice by the Original Hiring Agency
The original hiring agency must provide public notice via a job
opportunity announcement posted on www.USAJOBS.gov for the position
being filled, in accordance with public notice requirements for filling
jobs under the competitive examining process. The original announcement
must indicate that the resulting list of eligible candidates may be
shared with one or more other hiring agencies. Therefore, we are
amending 5 CFR part 330 to require that if an agency is sharing a
certificate of eligibles under part 332, the original hiring agency
must provide notice in the job opportunity announcement that the
resulting list of eligible candidates may be used by one or more other
hiring agencies. The original hiring agency must provide an opportunity
for applicants to ``opt-in'' to have their applications and other
personal information shared with one or more other hiring agencies
under these provisions. This allows the applicant to furnish advance
written consent for disclosure of the information under the Privacy
Act. See 5 U.S.C. 552a(b).
The original hiring agency may not share a certificate containing
the name and personal information of an applicant unless that applicant
has chosen to ``opt-in'' for these purposes. If an applicant chooses
not to ``opt-in,'' his/her application materials will not be shared and
the applicant will receive no further consideration when a certificate
of eligibles is shared with one or more hiring agencies. His or her
name will be redacted on the shared certificate.
The Receiving Agency's Notice to Internal Applicants
Before making a selection from a shared certificate, a receiving
agency
[[Page 5338]]
must notify its employees of the opportunity to apply and be considered
before a selection can be made from the shared certificate and of a
period of up to 10 days to apply consistent with the provisions of part
335. If the agency has RPL eligibles or CTAP eligibles, the notice must
provide information about their priority.
The Receiving Agency's Notice to Shared Certificate Applicants
Before using a shared certificate, a receiving agency must notify
the list of candidates of its receipt of their names and application
materials and its intention of considering them for a position. A
receiving agency must also inform these individuals of its obligation
to consider applicants from within its own workforce who apply during
the required internal application period and any other individuals the
agency is required to consider (e.g., individuals eligible for
consideration under the CTAP or from the RPL). The notification must
include the agency, position title, series, grade level (or
equivalent), and duty location.
The Receiving Agency's Selection Process
Before using a shared certificate, a receiving agency must consider
its own employees for the position that the original hiring agency
advertised. The receiving agency must consider individuals covered
under the agency's RPL or CTAP where applicable. At this point, a
receiving agency either makes a selection from among its own employees
under merit promotion procedures, or it may consider applicants from
the certificate of eligibles shared by the original hiring agency.
If, after considering its own employees, a receiving agency wishes
to make a selection from the shared certificate, it must first provide
selection priority to any external applicants who applied to the
original job announcement who are ICTAP eligible. If there are no ICTAP
eligibles who met the well-qualified definition, a receiving agency can
make a selection from the shared certificate in accordance with
veterans' preference rules and the provisions governing selections
under competitive examining procedures. Upon completion of the process,
a receiving agency must audit the certificate.
Objections/Pass Overs
Objections to a non-preference eligible applicant and requests to
pass over an individual entitled to veterans' preference must be
adjudicated on a case-by-case basis. Each case must be reviewed on its
own merits. Therefore, adjudications by the original hiring agency (or
the Office of Personnel Management in the case of a 30 percent or more
disabled veteran) sustaining objections or granting requests to pass
over do not extend to the receiving agency if a certificate is shared.
A receiving agency may object to an applicant or request to pass over
an individual entitled to veterans' preference on a shared certificate
in accordance with the procedures outlined in the DEOH and the
provisions of part 332.
Likewise, if using numerical rating, the consideration of an
applicant by the original hiring agency does not count as a
consideration of the applicant by a receiving agency for purposes of
the three-consideration rule, 5 CFR 332.405. The three-consideration
rule does not apply when using category rating.
Documentation
When sharing a certificate of eligibles, the original hiring agency
must share all documentation pertaining to the creation of that
certificate, including but not limited to the job analysis, testing and
examination materials, the job opportunity announcement, and
applications, as relevant. The original agency must safeguard any
personally identifiable information not needed for effective use of the
certificate by the receiving agency.
The original hiring agency and any receiving agency using a shared
certificate must each maintain case file documentation for that
agency's selection or selections sufficient for each agency that used
the certificate to make a selection to reconstruct its own hiring
actions later, if necessary. Each time a certificate is shared, each
receiving agency is responsible for creating a new instance of a case
file to document its use.
In the event that the original agency determines that an error was
made on the original certificate, the original agency must notify all
receiving agencies of the details of the error. The original hiring
agency must make available, to any receiving agency that needs it, all
relevant case file documents concerning the selection or selections
made by the original agency, as necessary, to make full reconstruction
possible. Each receiving agency would be responsible for taking
appropriate action to address any erroneous actions that it took due to
the error by the original agency.
Each agency is responsible for the proper selection, audit,
recordkeeping, etc., of delegated examining activities. All actions
taken on competitive certificates must be documented in accordance with
the DEOH and all applicable regulations.
Request for Comments
OPM welcomes recommendations on rule changes to improve the
administration of the Competitive Service Act of 2015 and on
implementation guidance.
Technical Amendment
OPM is also amending Sec. 337.304 to reflect the Act's renumbering
of 5 U.S.C. 3319.
Waiver of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Section 2(d) of Public Law 114-137, the Competitive Service Act of
2015, directs the rulemaking procedure to be followed for this rule. It
states that ``the Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall
issue an interim final rule with comment to carry out the amendments
made by this section.'' Therefore the general notice of proposed
rulemaking typically required for rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) is
statutorily waived for this rule.
E.O. 13563 and E.O. 12866, Regulatory Review
This rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
in accordance with Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that this regulation would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because it
affects only Federal employees.
E.O. 13132, Federalism
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This regulation meets the applicable standard set forth in section
3(a) and (b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local or
tribal governments of more than $100 million
[[Page 5339]]
annually. Thus, no written assessment of unfunded mandates is required.
Congressional Review Act
This action pertains to agency management, personnel and
organization and does not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties and, accordingly, is not a ``rule''
as that term is used by the Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA)).
Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This final regulatory action will not impose any additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction
Act.
List of Subjects
5 CFR Part 330
Armed forces reserves, District of Columbia, Government employees.
5 CFR Part 332
Government employees.
5 CFR Part 337
Government employees.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Beth F. Cobert,
Acting Director.
Accordingly, OPM is amending parts 330, 332, and 337 of title 5,
Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 330--RECRUITMENT, SELECTION, AND PLACEMENT (GENERAL)
0
1. The authority citation for part 330 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1104, 1302, 3301, 3302, 3304, and 3330; E.O.
10577, 3 CFR, 1954-58 Comp., p. 218; Section 330.103 also issued
under 5 U.S.C. 3327; Section 330.104 also issued under sec. 2(d),
Pub. L. 114-137, 130 Stat. 310; Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C.
3315 and 8151; Section 330.401 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 3310;
Subparts F and G also issued under Presidential Memorandum on Career
Transition Assistance for Federal Employees, September 12, 1995;
Subpart G also issued under 5 U.S.C. 8337(h) and 8456(b).
0
2. Add Sec. 330.104(c) to read as follows:
Sec. 330.104 Requirements for vacancy announcements.
* * * * *
(c) If an agency is sharing a certificate of eligibles under part
332 of this chapter, the original hiring agency must provide notice in
the job opportunity announcement that the resulting list of eligible
candidates may be used by one or more hiring agencies, and of how the
applicant may opt-in to the disclosure of his or her applicant records
to other hiring agencies.
PART 332--RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION THROUGH COMPETITIVE EXAMINATION
0
3. The authority citation for part 332 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1103, 1104, 1302, 2108, 3301, 3302, 3304,
3312, 3317, 3318, 3319; sec. 2(d), Pub. L. 114-137, 130 Stat. 310;
E.O. 10577, 19 FR 7521, 3 CFR, 1954-1958 Comp., p. 218.
0
4. Add Sec. 332.408 to read as follows:
Sec. 332.408 Shared use of a competitive certificate.
(a) General authority. (1) A hiring agency may share a competitive
service certificate issued under its delegated examining authority with
one or more hiring agencies for a position(s) to be filled on a
permanent or term basis. Positions filled on a term basis are subject
to the provisions of 5 CFR part 316, subpart C. Positions may be full-
time or other than full-time (i.e., part-time, seasonal, on-call, and
intermittent).
(2) Another Federal agency may make a selection from a certificate
shared with it under paragraph (b) of this section only after it has
considered individuals it is required to consider when filling
positions from within its own workforce and other internal applicants
under paragraph (c) of this section.
(3) All actions taken on a shared certificate must be made within
the 240-day period beginning on the date the original hiring agency
issued the certificate of eligibles. This period cannot be extended.
(4) The original hiring agency and any receiving agency using a
shared certificate must each maintain case file documentation
sufficient for each agency to reconstruct its own use of the
certificate in accordance with the Delegated Examining Operations
Handbook, and must safeguard testing and examination materials,
examination results, and the names of applicants from disclosure to
other persons in accordance with Sec. 300.201 of this chapter.
(5) All actions taken on competitive certificates must be done in
accordance with the Delegated Examining Operations Handbook and all
applicable regulations in this part and part 337 of this chapter.
(6) Agencies sharing certificates must keep records of the
instances of sharing certificates and/or using shared certificates.
(b) Requirements for the original hiring agency. (1) A hiring
agency may share a competitive certificate it has issued under Sec.
332.402 (for traditional rating and ranking) or under 5 CFR 337.303
(for category rating) with one or more hiring agencies for use in
filling a position(s) if:
(i) The original hiring agency intends to use the certificate for
its own hiring;
(ii) The original hiring agency has provided notice within the job
opportunity announcement for the original vacancy that the resulting
list of eligible candidates may be used by one or more hiring agencies;
(iii) The original hiring agency has provided an opportunity for
applicants to opt-in to have their applications and other personal
information shared with one or more hiring agencies;
(iv) The original hiring agency's objections to eligibles or
requests to pass over preference eligibles on the certificate under
Sec. 332.406 or Sec. 337.304 of this chapter have been resolved by
that agency's Delegated Examining Unit;
(v) The original hiring agency has either made a selection from the
certificate or has made no selection from the certificate, and has
documented its reason for non-selection; and
(vi) The Delegated Examining Unit of the original hiring agency has
closed and audited the certificate in accordance with the procedures in
the Delegated Examining Operations Handbook.
(2) When sharing a certificate of eligibles, the original hiring
agency must share all documentation pertaining to the creation of that
certificate, including but not limited to the job analysis, testing and
examination materials, the job opportunity announcement, and
applications, as relevant, and must safeguard any personally
identifiable information not needed for effective use of the
certificate by the receiving agency. The original hiring agency must
share the certificate of eligibles in its original form in order to
retain the original ordering of the certificate; must safeguard any
personally identifiable information from unauthorized access during the
transmission process; and must redact the names of applicants who did
not opt-in to the shared certificate, and who therefore may not be
considered by the receiving agency.
(3) The original hiring agency may share a certificate of eligibles
with one or more agencies.
(4) If the original hiring agency determines that it has made an
error that may affect selections by a receiving
[[Page 5340]]
agency or agencies, it must notify each affected receiving agency.
(c) Requirements for the receiving agency--(1) Vacancies that may
be filled. A receiving agency may use a shared certificate to fill a
vacancy in the same occupational series, at the same grade level (or a
corresponding rate or level of pay for a position excluded from the
General Schedule), with the same full performance level, and in the
same duty location as was listed on the original hiring agency's
certificate. If the original hiring agency's certificate is for an
interdisciplinary position as described in the Delegated Examining
Operations Handbook, the receiving agency may use it to fill an
interdisciplinary position. The receiving agency must verify through
its job analysis that the minimum qualification requirements (including
use of any selective placement factors) and the competencies, or
knowledge, skills, and abilities, that were used for the original
position are appropriate for the position to be filled.
(2) Notification to individuals who applied to the original
vacancy. Before using a shared certificate, a receiving agency must
notify the list of candidates of its receipt of their names and
application materials and its intention of considering them for a
position. The receiving agency must also inform these individuals of
its requirement to consider its own employees as well as other
individuals the agency is required to consider before consideration of
anyone on the shared certificate. At a minimum, the notification must
include the agency, position title, series, grade level or equivalent,
and duty location.
(3) Consideration of internal candidates. Before making a selection
from a shared certificate, a receiving agency must provide notice of
its intent to fill the available position(s) to its own employees and
other individuals the agency is required to consider, to provide these
internal candidates the opportunity to apply consistent with the
provisions of part 335 of this chapter, and to review the
qualifications of the internal candidates.
(i) This notice and opportunity for internal candidates to apply is
subject to applicable collective bargaining obligations (to the extent
consistent with law). Nothing in this paragraph affects agencies' right
to fill a position from any appropriate source under Sec. Sec. 330.102
and 335.103 of this chapter.
(ii) Agencies are prohibited from providing an application period
any longer than 10 days for internal candidates. This time limit cannot
be waived or extended.
(iii) Before considering other candidates, a receiving agency must
first provide for the consideration for selection required for
individuals covered under its Career Transition Assistance Program and
its Reemployment Priority List under part 330, subparts B and F, of
this chapter.
(4) Selection from the shared certificate. After considering
internal candidates, a receiving agency may consider candidates
referred on the shared certificate.
(i) The receiving agency must consider candidates on a shared
certificate independently of the actions of any other agency with which
the certificate is simultaneously shared under paragraph (b)(3) of this
section.
(ii) The receiving agency may not reassess the applicants for
purposes of rating/ranking.
(iii) The receiving agency must provide selection priority to
individuals eligible under the Interagency Career Transition Assistance
Program under part 330, subpart G, of this chapter who applied to the
original job announcement.
(5) Time limit on selection from a shared certificate. The
receiving agency has 240 days from the date the certificate was issued
(in the original hiring agency) to select individuals from the shared
certificate.
(6) Limit on further sharing by the receiving agency. The receiving
agency may not share or distribute the shared certificate to another
Federal agency.
PART 337--EXAMINING SYSTEM
0
5. The authority citation for part 337 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1104(a)(2), 1302, 2302, 3301, 3302, 3304,
3319, 5364; 116 Stat. 2290, sec. 1413, Pub. L. 108-136, 117 Stat.
1392, as amended by sec. 853 of Pub. L. 110-181, 122 Stat. 3; sec.
2(d), Pub. L. 114-137, 130 Stat. 310; E.O. 10577, 19 FR 7521, 3 CFR,
1954-1958 Comp., p. 218.
0
6. Revise Sec. 337.304 to read as follows:
Sec. 337.304 Veterans' preference.
In this subpart:
(a) Veterans' preference must be applied as prescribed in 5 U.S.C.
3319(b) and (c)(7);
(b) Veterans' preference points as prescribed in Sec. 337.101 are
not applied in category rating; and
(c) Sections 3319(b) and 3319(c)(7) of title 5 U.S.C. constitute
veterans' preference requirements for purposes of 5 U.S.C.
2302(b)(11)(A) and (B).
[FR Doc. 2017-00800 Filed 1-17-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P