Mixing, Diluting, or Repackaging Biological Products Outside the Scope of an Approved Biologics License Application; Revised Draft Guidance For Industry; Availability, 4358-4361 [2017-00722]
Download as PDF
4358
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
3520). The collections of information in
21 CFR part 812 have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0078;
the collections of information in 21 CFR
50.23 (Exception from general
requirements for informed consent)
have been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0586; the collections of
information in 21 CFR 56.115
(Institutional Review Board records)
have been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0130; and the collections
of information in 21 CFR part 50,
subpart B (Informed Consent of Human
Subjects) and part 56 (Institutional
Review Boards) have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0755.
Dated: January 9, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017–00604 Filed 1–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2014–D–1525]
Mixing, Diluting, or Repackaging
Biological Products Outside the Scope
of an Approved Biologics License
Application; Revised Draft Guidance
For Industry; Availability
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or the Agency) is
announcing the availability of a revised
draft guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Mixing, Diluting, or Repackaging
Biological Products Outside the Scope
of an Approved Biologics License
Application.’’ This revised draft
guidance describes the conditions under
which FDA does not intend to take
action against a State-licensed
pharmacy, a Federal facility, or an
outsourcing facility that mixes, dilutes,
or repackages certain biological
products outside the scope of an
approved biologics license application
(BLA). It also describes the conditions
under which FDA does not intend to
take action when a State-licensed
pharmacy, a Federal facility, an
outsourcing facility, or a physician
prepares prescription sets of allergenic
extracts for subcutaneous
immunotherapy. This revised draft
guidance for industry replaces the draft
guidance for industry of the same title
issued in February 2015.
DATES: Although you can comment on
any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
considers your comment on this draft
guidance before it begins work on the
final version of the guidance, submit
either electronic or written comments
on the draft guidance by March 14,
2017.
ADDRESSES:
You may submit comments
as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2014–D–1525 for ‘‘Mixing, Diluting, or
Repackaging Biological Products
Outside the Scope of an Approved
Biologics License Application.’’
Received comments will be placed in
the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this
information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any
information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit written requests for single
copies of the draft guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food
and Drug Administration, 10001 New
Hampshire Ave., Hillandale Building,
4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002; or the Office of Communication,
Outreach and Development, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research
(CBER), Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Bldg.
71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive
label to assist that office in processing
your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance document.
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
Sara
Rothman, Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 5197, Silver Spring,
MD 20903, 301–796–3110; or Stephen
Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 240–402–7911.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
a revised draft guidance for industry
entitled ‘‘Mixing, Diluting, or
Repackaging Biological Products
Outside the Scope of an Approved
Biologics License Application.’’ Certain
licensed biological products may
sometimes be mixed, diluted, or
repackaged in a way not described in
the approved labeling for the product to
meet the needs of a specific patient. For
example, for some biological products
there is no licensed pediatric strength
and/or dosage form. In addition, there
may be certain circumstances when a
person would remove a licensed
biological product from its original
container and place it into a different
container(s) (repackage it), in a manner
that is not within the scope of the
approved labeling for the product. As
described in the draft guidance, mixed,
diluted, or repackaged biological
products are not eligible for the
statutory exemptions available to certain
compounded drugs under sections 503A
and 503B of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
353a and 353b). In addition, a biological
product that is mixed, diluted, or
repackaged outside the scope of an
approved BLA is considered an
unlicensed biological product under
section 351 of the Public Health Service
(PHS) Act (42 U.S.C. 262).
This draft guidance describes the
conditions under which FDA does not
intend to take action for violations of
section 351 of the PHS Act and section
502(f)(1) (21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)), section
582 (21 U.S.C. 360eee–1), and where
specified, section 501(a)(2)(B) (21 U.S.C.
351(a)(2)(B)) of the FD&C Act, when a
state-licensed pharmacy, a Federal
facility, or an outsourcing facility
dilutes, mixes, or repackages certain
biological products outside the scope of
an approved BLA.
This draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
This guidance, when finalized, will
represent FDA’s current thinking on
mixing, diluting, and repackaging of
biological products not within the scope
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
of the product’s approved BLA as
described in the approved labeling for
the product. It does not create or confer
any rights for or on any person and does
not operate to bind FDA or the public.
An alternative approach may be used if
such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This draft guidance contains
information collection provisions that
are subject to review by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520). The title,
description, and respondent description
of the information collection are given
under this section with an estimate of
the annual reporting and recordkeeping
burdens. Included in the estimate is the
time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information.
We invite comments on these topics:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of FDA’s functions,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
FDA’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
The draft guidance includes the
following collection of information
under the PRA.
One condition described in the draft
guidance is that if the labeling for the
licensed biological product includes
storage and/or handling instructions
(e.g., protect from light, do not freeze,
keep at specified storage temperature),
the labeling for the biological product
that is mixed, diluted, or repackaged
specifies the same storage conditions.
Another condition described in the
draft guidance is that, if the biological
product is mixed, diluted, or repackaged
by an outsourcing facility, the label on
the immediate container (primary
packaging, e.g., the syringe) of the
mixed, diluted, or repackaged product
includes the following information:
• The statement ‘‘This biological
product was mixed/diluted by [name of
outsourcing facility],’’ or ‘‘This product
was repackaged by [name of outsourcing
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4359
facility],’’ whichever statement is
appropriate;
• The address and phone number of
the outsourcing facility that mixed,
diluted, or repackaged the biological
product;
• The proper name of the original
biological product that was mixed,
diluted, or repackaged;
• The lot or batch number of the
mixed, diluted, or repackaged biological
product;
• The dosage form and strength;
• A statement of either the quantity or
the volume of the mixed, diluted, or
repackaged biological product,
whichever is appropriate;
• The date the biological product was
mixed, diluted, or repackaged;
• The beyond-use-date (BUD) of the
mixed, diluted, or repackaged biological
product;
• Storage and handling instructions
for the mixed, diluted, or repackaged
biological product;
• The National Drug Code (NDC)
number of the mixed, diluted, or
repackaged biological product, if
available; 1
• The statement ‘‘Not for resale,’’ and,
if the biological product is distributed
by an outsourcing facility other than
pursuant to a prescription for an
individual identified patient, the
statement ‘‘Office Use Only’’; and
• If included on the label of the FDAlicensed product from which the
biological product is being mixed,
diluted, or repackaged, a list of the
active and inactive ingredients; and if
the biological product is mixed or
diluted, a list of any ingredients that
appear in the mixed or diluted product
in addition to those ingredients that are
on the label of the original FDA-licensed
biological product.
In addition, the draft guidance
includes as a condition for biological
products mixed, diluted, or repackaged
by an outsourcing facility that, if the
immediate product label is too small to
bear the active and inactive ingredients,
such information should be included on
the label of the container from which
the individual units are removed for
administration (secondary packaging,
e.g., the bag, box, or other package in
which the mixed, diluted, or repackaged
biological products are distributed).
The draft guidance also describes the
condition for biological products mixed,
diluted, or repackaged by an
outsourcing facility that the label on the
container from which the individual
units are removed for administration
1 The NDC number of the original licensed
biological product should not be placed on the
mixed, diluted, or repackaged biological product.
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
4360
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
include directions for use, including, as
appropriate, dosage and administration,
and the following information to
facilitate adverse event reporting: https://
www.fda.gov/medwatch and 1–800–
FDA–1088.
Finally, the draft guidance described
a condition for biological products
repackaged by an outsourcing facility
for which the BUD is established based
on a stability program conducted in
accordance with Appendix A of the
draft guidance, that the outsourcing
facility maintains records of the testing
performed in accordance with
Appendix A.
We estimate that annually a total of
approximately 15 outsourcing facilities
that mix, dilute, or repackage biological
products (‘‘Number of Respondents’’ in
table 1, row 1) will each design, test,
and produce approximately five
different labels (‘‘Frequency per
Disclosure’’ in table 1, row 1), for a total
of 75 labels that include the information
set forth in section III.B of the draft
guidance (including directions for use)
as well as inclusion of storage and/or
handling instructions (‘‘Total
Disclosures’’ in table 1, row 1). We also
estimate that designing, testing, and
producing each label will take
approximately 0.5 hours (‘‘Hours per
Disclosure’’ in table 1, row 1). The
provision to add https://www.fda.gov/
medwatch and 1–800–FDA–1088 is not
included in this burden estimate
because it is not considered a collection
of information under the PRA because
the information is ‘‘originally supplied
by the Federal Government to the
recipient for the purpose of disclosure
to the public’’ (5 CFR 1320.3(c)(2)).
Section III.C of the draft guidance
discusses the preparation of
prescription sets (i.e., licensed
allergenic extracts that are mixed and
diluted to provide subcutaneous
immunotherapy to an individual
patient) by a physician, State-licensed
pharmacy, a Federal facility, or
outsourcing facility. One of the
conditions described in the draft
guidance is if the prescription set is
mixed or diluted by an outsourcing
facility, the label on the immediate
container of the prescription set
(primary packaging) includes:
• The patient’s name as identified on
the prescription or order;
• The statement ‘‘This prescription
set was prepared by [name of
outsourcing facility]’’;
• The address and phone number of
the outsourcing facility that prepared
the prescription set;
• The identity of each allergenic
extract in the prescription set and the
quantity of each;
• The dilution of each dilution vial;
• The lot or batch number of the
prescription set;
• The date the prescription set was
prepared;
• The BUD as the expiry date for the
prescription set;
• Storage and handling instructions
for the prescription set; and
• The statement ‘‘Not for resale.’’
Another condition under the draft
guidance is that if the prescription set
is prepared by an outsourcing facility,
the label of the container from which
the individual units of the prescription
set are removed for administration
(secondary packaging) includes the
following information to facilitate
adverse event reporting: https://
www.fda.gov/medwatch and 1–800–
FDA–1088. Each prescription set
prepared by an outsourcing facility is
also accompanied by instructions for
use.
We estimate that annually a total of
approximately five outsourcing facilities
that prepare prescription sets (‘‘Number
of Respondents’’ in table 2, row 1) will
each include the information set forth in
section III.C of the draft guidance
(including directions for use) on the
labels, packages, and/or containers of
approximately 300 prescription sets
(‘‘Frequency per Disclosure’’ in table 2,
row 1) for a total of 1500 disclosures
(‘‘Total Disclosures’’ in table 2, row 1).
We also estimate that the initial process
of designing, testing, and producing,
and attaching each label, package, and/
or container to each prescription set will
take approximately 0.5 hours (‘‘Hours
per Disclosure’’ in table 2, row 1). The
provision to add ‘‘https://www.fda.gov/
medwatch’’ and ‘‘1–800–FDA–1088’’ is
not included in this burden estimate
because it is not considered a collection
of information under the PRA because
the information is ‘‘originally supplied
by the Federal Government to the
recipient for the purpose of disclosure
to the public’’ (5 CFR 1320.3(c)(2)).
We estimate that annually a total of
approximately 5 outsourcing facilities
that repackage biological products and
establish a BUD in accordance with
Appendix A (‘‘No. of Recordkeepers’’ in
table 3) will maintain approximately
150 records of the testing, as described
in Appendix A (‘‘total annual records’’
in table 3). We estimate that maintaining
the records will take approximately 5
minutes per record.
The total estimated third-party
disclosure burden resulting from the
draft guidance is as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL THIRD-PARTY DISCLOSURE BURDEN 1
Biological product mixing, diluting, and
repackaging
Number of
respondents
Number of
disclosures per
respondent
Total
annual
disclosures
Average burden per
disclosure
Total hours
Designing, testing, and producing the label, container, packages, and/or outer containers for
each mixed, diluted, or repackaged biological
product.
15
5
75
0.5 (30 minutes) ........
37.5
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL THIRD-PARTY DISCLOSURE BURDEN 1
Preparation of prescription sets
Number of
respondents
Number of
disclosures per
respondent
Total
annual
disclosures
Average burden per
disclosure
Total hours
Designing, testing, and producing each label on
immediate containers, packages, and/or outer
containers.
5
300
1,500
0.5 (30 minutes) ........
750
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
4361
TABLE 3—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1
Type of recordkeeping
Number of
recordkeepers
Number of
records per
recordkeeper
Total
annual
records
Average burden per
recordkeeping
Total hours
Records that the outsourcing facility maintains of
the testing performed in accordance with Appendix A of the guidance.
5
30
150
0.083 (5 minutes) ......
12.5
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
The draft guidance also references
registration, adverse event reporting,
product reporting, and current good
manufacturing practice (CGMP)
requirements for outsourcing facilities.
The collections of information for
outsourcing facility registration have
been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
OMB control number 0910–0777 (79 FR
69859). The collections of information
for adverse event reporting by
outsourcing facilities have been
approved by OMB under OMB control
number 0910–0800 (80 FR 60917). In
the Federal Register of December 4,
2013 (78 FR 72897), FDA estimated the
burden resulting from outsourcing
facility electronic drug product
reporting. In the Federal Register of July
2, 2014 (79 FR 37743), FDA estimated
the burden resulting from outsourcing
facility compliance with CGMP
requirements.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
can obtain the document at either https://
www.fda.gov/Drugs/
GuidanceComplianceRegulatory
Information/Guidances/default.htm,
https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBlood
Vaccines/GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/default.htm or
https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: January 10, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017–00722 Filed 1–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2016–D–4645]
180-Day Exclusivity: Questions and
Answers; Draft Guidance for Industry;
Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice of availability.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing the availability of a draft
guidance for industry entitled ‘‘180-Day
Exclusivity: Questions and Answers.’’
This draft guidance is intended to
address questions that have been raised
about the provisions of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C
Act) that relate to generic drug
exclusivity, which commonly is known
as ‘‘180-day exclusivity’’ for generic
drug products. As a general matter, FDA
has implemented these statutory
provisions within the context of
application-specific decisions. Some
FDA decisions have been made publicly
available (e.g., in FDA citizen petition
responses and documents released in
litigation). FDA believes that a guidance
for industry that provides answers to
commonly asked questions about 180day exclusivity would enhance
transparency and facilitate the
development, approval, and timely
marketing of generic drug products.
FDA intends to update this guidance to
include additional questions and
answers as appropriate.
DATES: Although you can comment on
any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency
considers your comment on this draft
guidance before it begins work on the
final version of the guidance, submit
either electronic or written comments
on the draft guidance by March 14,
2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2016–D–4645 for ‘‘180-Day Exclusivity:
Questions and Answers.’’ Received
comments will be placed in the docket
and, except for those submitted as
‘‘Confidential Submissions,’’ publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4358-4361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00722]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2014-D-1525]
Mixing, Diluting, or Repackaging Biological Products Outside the
Scope of an Approved Biologics License Application; Revised Draft
Guidance For Industry; Availability
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) is
announcing the availability of a revised draft guidance for industry
entitled ``Mixing, Diluting, or Repackaging Biological Products Outside
the Scope of an Approved Biologics License Application.'' This revised
draft guidance describes the conditions under which FDA does not intend
to take action against a State-licensed pharmacy, a Federal facility,
or an outsourcing facility that mixes, dilutes, or repackages certain
biological products outside the scope of an approved biologics license
application (BLA). It also describes the conditions under which FDA
does not intend to take action when a State-licensed pharmacy, a
Federal facility, an outsourcing facility, or a physician prepares
prescription sets of allergenic extracts for subcutaneous
immunotherapy. This revised draft guidance for industry replaces the
draft guidance for industry of the same title issued in February 2015.
DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment on this
draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by March 14, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2014-D-1525 for ``Mixing, Diluting, or Repackaging Biological
Products Outside the Scope of an Approved Biologics License
Application.'' Received comments will be placed in the docket and,
except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit written requests for single copies of the draft guidance to
the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave.,
Hillandale Building, 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002; or the
Office of Communication, Outreach and Development, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Avenue, Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002.
Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in
processing your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the draft guidance document.
[[Page 4359]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara Rothman, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 5197, Silver Spring, MD 20903, 301-796-
3110; or Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm.
7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-402-7911.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of a revised draft guidance for
industry entitled ``Mixing, Diluting, or Repackaging Biological
Products Outside the Scope of an Approved Biologics License
Application.'' Certain licensed biological products may sometimes be
mixed, diluted, or repackaged in a way not described in the approved
labeling for the product to meet the needs of a specific patient. For
example, for some biological products there is no licensed pediatric
strength and/or dosage form. In addition, there may be certain
circumstances when a person would remove a licensed biological product
from its original container and place it into a different container(s)
(repackage it), in a manner that is not within the scope of the
approved labeling for the product. As described in the draft guidance,
mixed, diluted, or repackaged biological products are not eligible for
the statutory exemptions available to certain compounded drugs under
sections 503A and 503B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 353a and 353b). In addition, a biological product
that is mixed, diluted, or repackaged outside the scope of an approved
BLA is considered an unlicensed biological product under section 351 of
the Public Health Service (PHS) Act (42 U.S.C. 262).
This draft guidance describes the conditions under which FDA does
not intend to take action for violations of section 351 of the PHS Act
and section 502(f)(1) (21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)), section 582 (21 U.S.C.
360eee-1), and where specified, section 501(a)(2)(B) (21 U.S.C.
351(a)(2)(B)) of the FD&C Act, when a state-licensed pharmacy, a
Federal facility, or an outsourcing facility dilutes, mixes, or
repackages certain biological products outside the scope of an approved
BLA.
This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). This guidance, when
finalized, will represent FDA's current thinking on mixing, diluting,
and repackaging of biological products not within the scope of the
product's approved BLA as described in the approved labeling for the
product. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person
and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach
may be used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This draft guidance contains information collection provisions that
are subject to review by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The title, description, and respondent
description of the information collection are given under this section
with an estimate of the annual reporting and recordkeeping burdens.
Included in the estimate is the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
We invite comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
FDA's functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
The draft guidance includes the following collection of information
under the PRA.
One condition described in the draft guidance is that if the
labeling for the licensed biological product includes storage and/or
handling instructions (e.g., protect from light, do not freeze, keep at
specified storage temperature), the labeling for the biological product
that is mixed, diluted, or repackaged specifies the same storage
conditions.
Another condition described in the draft guidance is that, if the
biological product is mixed, diluted, or repackaged by an outsourcing
facility, the label on the immediate container (primary packaging,
e.g., the syringe) of the mixed, diluted, or repackaged product
includes the following information:
The statement ``This biological product was mixed/diluted
by [name of outsourcing facility],'' or ``This product was repackaged
by [name of outsourcing facility],'' whichever statement is
appropriate;
The address and phone number of the outsourcing facility
that mixed, diluted, or repackaged the biological product;
The proper name of the original biological product that
was mixed, diluted, or repackaged;
The lot or batch number of the mixed, diluted, or
repackaged biological product;
The dosage form and strength;
A statement of either the quantity or the volume of the
mixed, diluted, or repackaged biological product, whichever is
appropriate;
The date the biological product was mixed, diluted, or
repackaged;
The beyond-use-date (BUD) of the mixed, diluted, or
repackaged biological product;
Storage and handling instructions for the mixed, diluted,
or repackaged biological product;
The National Drug Code (NDC) number of the mixed, diluted,
or repackaged biological product, if available; \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The NDC number of the original licensed biological product
should not be placed on the mixed, diluted, or repackaged biological
product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The statement ``Not for resale,'' and, if the biological
product is distributed by an outsourcing facility other than pursuant
to a prescription for an individual identified patient, the statement
``Office Use Only''; and
If included on the label of the FDA-licensed product from
which the biological product is being mixed, diluted, or repackaged, a
list of the active and inactive ingredients; and if the biological
product is mixed or diluted, a list of any ingredients that appear in
the mixed or diluted product in addition to those ingredients that are
on the label of the original FDA-licensed biological product.
In addition, the draft guidance includes as a condition for
biological products mixed, diluted, or repackaged by an outsourcing
facility that, if the immediate product label is too small to bear the
active and inactive ingredients, such information should be included on
the label of the container from which the individual units are removed
for administration (secondary packaging, e.g., the bag, box, or other
package in which the mixed, diluted, or repackaged biological products
are distributed).
The draft guidance also describes the condition for biological
products mixed, diluted, or repackaged by an outsourcing facility that
the label on the container from which the individual units are removed
for administration
[[Page 4360]]
include directions for use, including, as appropriate, dosage and
administration, and the following information to facilitate adverse
event reporting: https://www.fda.gov/medwatch and 1-800-FDA-1088.
Finally, the draft guidance described a condition for biological
products repackaged by an outsourcing facility for which the BUD is
established based on a stability program conducted in accordance with
Appendix A of the draft guidance, that the outsourcing facility
maintains records of the testing performed in accordance with Appendix
A.
We estimate that annually a total of approximately 15 outsourcing
facilities that mix, dilute, or repackage biological products (``Number
of Respondents'' in table 1, row 1) will each design, test, and produce
approximately five different labels (``Frequency per Disclosure'' in
table 1, row 1), for a total of 75 labels that include the information
set forth in section III.B of the draft guidance (including directions
for use) as well as inclusion of storage and/or handling instructions
(``Total Disclosures'' in table 1, row 1). We also estimate that
designing, testing, and producing each label will take approximately
0.5 hours (``Hours per Disclosure'' in table 1, row 1). The provision
to add https://www.fda.gov/medwatch and 1-800-FDA-1088 is not included
in this burden estimate because it is not considered a collection of
information under the PRA because the information is ``originally
supplied by the Federal Government to the recipient for the purpose of
disclosure to the public'' (5 CFR 1320.3(c)(2)).
Section III.C of the draft guidance discusses the preparation of
prescription sets (i.e., licensed allergenic extracts that are mixed
and diluted to provide subcutaneous immunotherapy to an individual
patient) by a physician, State-licensed pharmacy, a Federal facility,
or outsourcing facility. One of the conditions described in the draft
guidance is if the prescription set is mixed or diluted by an
outsourcing facility, the label on the immediate container of the
prescription set (primary packaging) includes:
The patient's name as identified on the prescription or
order;
The statement ``This prescription set was prepared by
[name of outsourcing facility]'';
The address and phone number of the outsourcing facility
that prepared the prescription set;
The identity of each allergenic extract in the
prescription set and the quantity of each;
The dilution of each dilution vial;
The lot or batch number of the prescription set;
The date the prescription set was prepared;
The BUD as the expiry date for the prescription set;
Storage and handling instructions for the prescription
set; and
The statement ``Not for resale.''
Another condition under the draft guidance is that if the
prescription set is prepared by an outsourcing facility, the label of
the container from which the individual units of the prescription set
are removed for administration (secondary packaging) includes the
following information to facilitate adverse event reporting: https://www.fda.gov/medwatch and 1-800-FDA-1088. Each prescription set prepared
by an outsourcing facility is also accompanied by instructions for use.
We estimate that annually a total of approximately five outsourcing
facilities that prepare prescription sets (``Number of Respondents'' in
table 2, row 1) will each include the information set forth in section
III.C of the draft guidance (including directions for use) on the
labels, packages, and/or containers of approximately 300 prescription
sets (``Frequency per Disclosure'' in table 2, row 1) for a total of
1500 disclosures (``Total Disclosures'' in table 2, row 1). We also
estimate that the initial process of designing, testing, and producing,
and attaching each label, package, and/or container to each
prescription set will take approximately 0.5 hours (``Hours per
Disclosure'' in table 2, row 1). The provision to add ``https://www.fda.gov/medwatch'' and ``1-800-FDA-1088'' is not included in this
burden estimate because it is not considered a collection of
information under the PRA because the information is ``originally
supplied by the Federal Government to the recipient for the purpose of
disclosure to the public'' (5 CFR 1320.3(c)(2)).
We estimate that annually a total of approximately 5 outsourcing
facilities that repackage biological products and establish a BUD in
accordance with Appendix A (``No. of Recordkeepers'' in table 3) will
maintain approximately 150 records of the testing, as described in
Appendix A (``total annual records'' in table 3). We estimate that
maintaining the records will take approximately 5 minutes per record.
The total estimated third-party disclosure burden resulting from
the draft guidance is as follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Third-Party Disclosure Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Biological product mixing, diluting, and Number of disclosures per Total annual Average burden per disclosure Total hours
repackaging respondents respondent disclosures
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designing, testing, and producing the 15 5 75 0.5 (30 minutes)....................... 37.5
label, container, packages, and/or outer
containers for each mixed, diluted, or
repackaged biological product.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Table 2--Estimated Annual Third-Party Disclosure Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Preparation of prescription sets Number of disclosures per Total annual Average burden per disclosure Total hours
respondents respondent disclosures
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designing, testing, and producing each 5 300 1,500 0.5 (30 minutes)....................... 750
label on immediate containers, packages,
and/or outer containers.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
[[Page 4361]]
Table 3--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Number of records Total annual
Type of recordkeeping recordkeepers per recordkeeper records Average burden per recordkeeping Total hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Records that the outsourcing facility 5 30 150 0.083 (5 minutes)...................... 12.5
maintains of the testing performed in
accordance with Appendix A of the
guidance.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
The draft guidance also references registration, adverse event
reporting, product reporting, and current good manufacturing practice
(CGMP) requirements for outsourcing facilities. The collections of
information for outsourcing facility registration have been approved by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under OMB control number
0910-0777 (79 FR 69859). The collections of information for adverse
event reporting by outsourcing facilities have been approved by OMB
under OMB control number 0910-0800 (80 FR 60917). In the Federal
Register of December 4, 2013 (78 FR 72897), FDA estimated the burden
resulting from outsourcing facility electronic drug product reporting.
In the Federal Register of July 2, 2014 (79 FR 37743), FDA estimated
the burden resulting from outsourcing facility compliance with CGMP
requirements.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet can obtain the document at
either https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/default.htm or https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: January 10, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-00722 Filed 1-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P