Nonproprietary Naming of Biological Products; Guidance for Industry; Availability, 4345-4348 [2017-00694]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This guidance contains collections of
information that are subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). Under the PRA, Federal Agencies
must obtain approval from OMB for
each collection of information they
conduct or sponsor. ‘‘Collection of
information’’ is defined in 44 U.S.C.
3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3 and includes
Agency requests or requirements that
members of the public submit reports,
keep records, or provide information to
a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a
60-day notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information before submitting the
collection to OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, in the
Federal Register of February 19, 2015,
we gave interested persons 60 days to
comment on the information collection
provisions in the draft guidance (80 FR
8884 at 8885).
After publishing the 60-day notice
requesting public comment, section
3507 of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3507)
requires Federal Agencies to submit the
proposed collection to OMB for review
and clearance. In compliance with 44
U.S.C. 3507, we will be submitting a
proposed collection of information to
OMB for review and clearance. FDA is
issuing this guidance as final with
portions of it subject to OMB approval
of the collection of information and
shaded gray. Those provisions that are
shaded gray and subject to OMB
approval will be final if the collection
of information is approved. If the
collection is approved, FDA will
publish a notice in the Federal Register
concerning OMB approval and
providing an OMB control number for
these provisions.
The guidance also references
registration and adverse event reporting
for outsourcing facilities. The
collections of information for
outsourcing facility registration have
been approved by OMB under OMB
control number 0910–0777. The
collections of information for adverse
event reporting by outsourcing facilities
have been approved by OMB under
OMB control number 0910–0800.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
can obtain the document at either https://
www.fda.gov/Drugs/Guidance
ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
Guidances/default.htm or https://
www.regulations.gov.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
Dated: January 10, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017–00723 Filed 1–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–D–1543]
Nonproprietary Naming of Biological
Products; Guidance for Industry;
Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice of availability.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing the availability of a
guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Nonproprietary Naming of Biological
Products.’’ The guidance describes our
current thinking on the need for
biological products previously and
newly licensed under the Public Health
Service Act (PHS Act) to bear
nonproprietary names that include
FDA-designated suffixes. Accordingly,
we intend to designate nonproprietary
names for originator biological products,
related biological products, or
biosimilar products which will include
a core name and a distinguishing suffix
that is devoid of meaning and composed
of four lowercase letters. This guidance
finalizes the draft guidance issued on
August 28, 2015.
FDA is also announcing that a
proposed collection of information has
been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on Agency guidances
at any time. Submit written comments
on the collection of information by
February 13, 2017.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:
202–395–7285, or emailed to oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the
OMB control number 0910—New and
title ‘‘Nonproprietary Naming of
Biological Products.’’ Also include the
FDA docket number found in brackets
in the heading of this document.
You may submit comments as
follows:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4345
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2013–D–1543 for ‘‘Nonproprietary
Naming of Biological Products.’’
Received comments will be placed in
the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4346
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this
information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any
information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit written requests for single
copies of this guidance to the Division
of Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10001 New
Hampshire Ave., Hillandale Building,
4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, or the Office of Communication,
Outreach and Development, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research
(CBER), Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71,
Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive
label to assist that office in processing
your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the guidance document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regarding the guidance: Sandra Benton,
Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6340, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–1042; or
Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 240–
402–7911. Regarding the information
collection: FDA PRA Staff, Office of
Operations, Food and Drug
Administration, Three White Flint
North, 10A63, 11601 Landsdown St.,
North Bethesda, MD 20852, PRAStaff@
fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
a guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Nonproprietary Naming of Biological
Products.’’ The guidance describes our
current thinking on the need for
biological products licensed under
section 351(a) and (k) of the PHS Act (42
U.S.C. 262(a) and (k)) to bear a
nonproprietary name that includes an
FDA-designated suffix. Under this
naming convention, the nonproprietary
name designated for each originator
biological product, related biological
product, and biosimilar product will be
a proper name that is a combination of
the core name and a distinguishing
suffix that is devoid of meaning and
composed of four lowercase letters. The
suffix format described in this guidance
is applicable to originator biological
products, related biological products,
and biosimilar products previously
licensed and newly licensed under
section 351(a) or 351(k) of the PHS Act.
FDA is continuing to consider the
appropriate suffix format for
interchangeable biological products.
This naming convention will facilitate
pharmacovigilance for originator
biological products, related biological
products, and biosimilar products
containing related drug substances
when other means to track a specific
dispensed product are not readily
accessible or available. Distinguishable
nonproprietary names will also facilitate
accurate identification of these
biological products by health care
practitioners and patients. Further,
distinguishing suffixes should help
minimize inadvertent substitution of
any such products that have not been
determined to be interchangeable.
Application of the naming convention
to biological products licensed under
the PHS Act should (1) encourage
routine use of designated suffixes in
ordering, prescribing, dispensing,
recordkeeping, and pharmacovigilance
practices and (2) avoid inaccurate
perceptions of the safety and
effectiveness of biological products
based on their licensure pathway, as
described in detail in the guidance.
The guidance provides information to
industry, the health care community,
other regulatory agencies, and the
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
public on FDA’s rationale for this
naming convention. The guidance is
also intended to assist applicants and
application holders in proposing the
suffix to be incorporated into an
originator biological product, related
biological product, or biosimilar
product’s nonproprietary name.
In the Federal Register of August 28,
2015 (80 FR 52296), FDA announced the
availability of the draft guidance of the
same title. FDA received numerous
comments on the draft guidance, and
those comments were considered as the
guidance was finalized. In the notice
announcing the draft guidance, FDA
asked about the benefits and challenges
of designating (1) a suffix that is devoid
of meaning versus meaningful (e.g.,
derived from the name of the license
holder) and (2) a suffix that is unique to
each biological product versus shared
by each biological product
manufactured by that license holder.
FDA determined that the suffix format
that best achieves the goals described in
the guidance is a suffix that is devoid of
meaning and not shared by each
biological product manufactured by that
license holder.
FDA intends to apply a naming
convention to interchangeable products
that will feature a core name and a
suffix included in the proper name;
however, FDA is continuing to consider
the appropriate format of the suffix for
these products.
This guidance also will apply to those
biological products that are approved
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) on or
before March 23, 2020, when such
products are deemed to be licensed
under section 351 of the PHS Act on
March 23, 2020 (section 7002(e)(2)
through (e)(4) of the Biologics Price
Competition and Innovation Act of 2009
(BPCI Act)). FDA intends to provide
additional guidance regarding
administrative issues associated with
the transition (including the process for
implementing the naming convention
described in this guidance).
For the purposes of the guidance,
unless otherwise specified, references to
biological products include biological
products licensed under the PHS Act,
such as therapeutic protein products,
vaccines, allergenic products, and blood
derivatives, and do not include certain
biological products that also meet the
definition of a device in section 201(h)
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 321(h)), such
as in vitro reagents (e.g., antibody to
hepatitis B surface antigen, blood
grouping reagents, hepatitis C virus
encoded antigen) and blood donor
screening tests (e.g., HIV and hepatitis
C). Also, for the purposes of the
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
4347
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
guidance, unless otherwise specified,
references to biological products do not
include products for which a proper
name is provided in the regulations
(e.g., 21 CFR part 640) or to certain
categories of biological products for
which there are well-established, robust
identification and tracking systems to
ensure safe dispensing practices and
optimal pharmacovigilance (e.g., ISBT
128 for cord blood products and blood
components).
This guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The guidance represents the current
thinking of FDA on nonproprietary
naming of biological products. It does
not establish any rights for any person
and is not binding on FDA or the public.
You can use an alternative approach if
it satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.
In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507,
FDA has submitted the following
proposed collection of information to
OMB for review and clearance.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Nonproprietary Naming of Biological
Products, OMB Control Number 0910—
New
The guidance describes FDA’s current
thinking on the need for biological
products licensed under the PHS Act to
bear a nonproprietary name that
includes an FDA-designated suffix.
There is a need to clearly identify
biological products to facilitate
pharmacovigilance and safe use.
Accordingly, for originator biological
products, related biological products, or
biosimilar products licensed under the
PHS Act, FDA intends to designate a
nonproprietary name that includes a
core name and a distinguishing suffix.
This naming convention is applicable to
biological products previously licensed
and newly licensed under section 351(a)
or 351(k) of the PHS Act.
The final guidance proposes a new
collection of information by requesting
that applicants and application holders
propose a suffix composed of four
lowercase letters for use as the suffix
included in the proper name. The
proper name is designated by FDA in
the license for biological products
licensed under the PHS Act. The suffix
will be incorporated in the
nonproprietary name of the product.
The guidance recommends that
applicants and application holders
submit up to 10 proposed suffixes, in
the order of the applicant’s preference.
FDA also recommends including
supporting analyses demonstrating that
the proposed suffixes meet the factors
described in the final guidance for
FDA’s consideration.
As indicated in table 1, we estimate
that we will receive a total of
approximately 40 requests annually for
the proposed proper name for biological
products submitted under section 351(a)
of the PHS Act and six requests
annually for the proposed proper name
for biological products submitted under
section 351(k) of the PHS Act. The
average burden per response (hours) is
based on the Agency’s experience with
similar information collection
requirements for applicants to create
and submit suffix proposals to FDA.
As noted, in the Federal Register of
August 28, 2015, FDA published a 60day notice requesting public comment
on the proposed collection of
information. Most comments supported
FDA’s proposal to designate a suffix.
Many comments suggested that a
meaningful, distinguishable suffix may
help to improve pharmacovigilance,
enhance safety, and facilitate
identification between biological
products. Some comments supported
use of a random suffix to avoid creating
an unfair advantage for specific
manufacturers. Several comments stated
that the current practices of FDA and
non-FDA entities for identifying
products is sufficient for the purpose of
pharmacovigilance, and designation of a
suffix is not needed. One comment
stated that FDA’s estimate of 6 hours to
submit proposed suffixes is based only
on the time needed to prepare the
submission itself after the multiple
suffixes have been selected. The
comment further stated that because
FDA suggests that each respondent
submit three suggested suffixes for
Agency consideration, the time needed
to do an analysis of each suffix would
exceed 720 hours per suffix (based on
their own company experience) or 2,160
hours total for the three suffixes. The
commenter subsequently submitted
additional information to clarify how
the estimates were calculated.
Response: FDA’s estimate of the
annual reporting burden results from
information that would be submitted to
FDA by applicants in order to facilitate
FDA’s designation of a suffix as part of
the proper name of a biological product.
We estimated that sponsors would
spend 2 hours completing the
submission for each of the three
suffixes, resulting in 6 hours as the
average burden. This estimate for
submission of the requested information
is based on the average number of
responses per respondent and the
average burden per response over a 3year period. FDA understands that there
is a certain amount of research and
other costs that an applicant might
encounter in analyzing any proposed
name for a biological product. FDA also
recognizes that the burden may be
higher for some applicants and lower for
other applicants based on a variety of
factors specific to the applicant.
The comment suggests that it will take
720 hours to complete an analysis and
submission for each suffix. We have
considered the information provided in
support of this estimate and believe the
estimate is likely too high. Our original
estimate of 6 hours was based on the
Agency’s familiarity with the time it
would take to make similar submissions
to FDA. However, as identified by the
comment, FDA’s original estimate failed
to adequately account for the time spent
on creating proposed suffixes. We have
reconsidered our original estimate as a
result of the comment, and we have
revised our estimate to account for the
burden to create and submit up to 10
proposed suffixes to FDA for
designation. As indicated in table 1, we
estimate an average burden of
approximately 420 hours to account for
creating and submitting multiple
proposed suffixes.
FDA estimates the information
collection burden as follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Number of
respondents
Activity
Information for the Proposed Proper Name for Applicable
Biological Products Submitted Under Section 351(a) of
the PHS Act ......................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Number of
responses per
respondent
20
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Total annual
responses
2
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
40
13JAN1
Average
burden per
response
420
Total hours
16,800
4348
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1—Continued
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Activity
Average
burden per
response
Total annual
responses
Total hours
Information for the Proposed Proper Name for Applicable
Biological Products Submitted Under Section 351(k) of
the PHS Act ......................................................................
3
2
6
420
2,520
Total ..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
19,320
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
This guidance also refers to
previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations.
The collection of information related to
the submission of a BLA under section
351(k) of the PHS Act (biosimilar
products and interchangeable products)
has been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0719. The guidance also
refers to a previously approved
collection of information found in FDA
regulations that is expected to change as
a result of the guidance and the
retrospective application of the naming
convention. The collections of
information in 21 CFR part 601 related
to the submission of a biologics license
application (BLA) and changes to an
approved application have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0338. As a result of the guidance,
the estimated number of additional
responses for the annual burden for
changes to an approved application
under § 601.12 would be increased by
approximately 25 responses.
FDA is issuing this final guidance
subject to OMB approval of the
collections of information. Before
implementing the information
collection provisions of the guidance,
FDA will publish a notice in the Federal
Register announcing OMB’s decision to
approve, modify, or disapprove the
collections of information, including
OMB control number(s) for newly
approved collections.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the guidance at https://www.
fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/
BiologicsBloodVaccines/Guidance
ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
Guidances/default.htm, or https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: January 10, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017–00694 Filed 1–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2016–N–3389]
Evaluation of the Beneficial
Physiological Effects of Isolated or
Synthetic Non-Digestible
Carbohydrates; Request For Scientific
Data, Information, and Comments;
Reopening of Comment Period
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice; reopening of comment
period.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
reopening the comment period for the
document requesting scientific data,
information, and comments entitled
‘‘Evaluation of the Beneficial
Physiological Effects of Isolated or
Synthetic Non-Digestible
Carbohydrates’’ that appeared in the
Federal Register of November 23, 2016
(81 FR 84595). In the document, we
requested scientific data, information,
and comments to help us determine
whether a particular isolated or
synthetic non-digestible carbohydrate
should be added to our definition of
‘‘dietary fiber’’ for purposes of being
declared as dietary fiber on a Nutrition
Facts or Supplement Facts label. We
also announced in the document the
availability for comment of a scientific
literature review document that we
conducted that summarizes clinical
studies associated with 26 specific
isolated or synthetic non-digestible
carbohydrates. We are taking this action
in response to requests to allow
interested persons additional time to
submit comments.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments by February 13, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2016–N–3389 for ‘‘Evaluation of the
Beneficial Physiological Effects of
Isolated or Synthetic Non-Digestible
Carbohydrates; Request for Scientific
Data, Information, and Comments.’’
Received comments will be placed in
the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4345-4348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00694]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2013-D-1543]
Nonproprietary Naming of Biological Products; Guidance for
Industry; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a guidance for industry entitled ``Nonproprietary
Naming of Biological Products.'' The guidance describes our current
thinking on the need for biological products previously and newly
licensed under the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) to bear
nonproprietary names that include FDA-designated suffixes. Accordingly,
we intend to designate nonproprietary names for originator biological
products, related biological products, or biosimilar products which
will include a core name and a distinguishing suffix that is devoid of
meaning and composed of four lowercase letters. This guidance finalizes
the draft guidance issued on August 28, 2015.
FDA is also announcing that a proposed collection of information
has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on Agency guidances
at any time. Submit written comments on the collection of information
by February 13, 2017.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX: 202-395-7285, or emailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910--New and
title ``Nonproprietary Naming of Biological Products.'' Also include
the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of this
document.
You may submit comments as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2013-D-1543 for ``Nonproprietary Naming of Biological Products.''
Received comments will be placed in the docket and, except for those
submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of Dockets Management between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential
[[Page 4346]]
with a heading or cover note that states ``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in its consideration of comments.
The second copy, which will have the claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available for public viewing and posted
on https://www.regulations.gov. Submit both copies to the Division of
Dockets Management. If you do not wish your name and contact
information to be made publicly available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not in the body of your comments and
you must identify this information as ``confidential.'' Any information
marked as ``confidential'' will not be disclosed except in accordance
with 21 CFR 10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA's posting of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access the information at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit written requests for single copies of this guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave., Hillandale
Building, 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, or the Office of
Communication, Outreach and Development, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing
your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the guidance document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regarding the guidance: Sandra Benton,
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6340, Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002, 301-796-1042; or Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-402-7911.
Regarding the information collection: FDA PRA Staff, Office of
Operations, Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North,
10A63, 11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852,
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of a guidance for industry
entitled ``Nonproprietary Naming of Biological Products.'' The guidance
describes our current thinking on the need for biological products
licensed under section 351(a) and (k) of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. 262(a)
and (k)) to bear a nonproprietary name that includes an FDA-designated
suffix. Under this naming convention, the nonproprietary name
designated for each originator biological product, related biological
product, and biosimilar product will be a proper name that is a
combination of the core name and a distinguishing suffix that is devoid
of meaning and composed of four lowercase letters. The suffix format
described in this guidance is applicable to originator biological
products, related biological products, and biosimilar products
previously licensed and newly licensed under section 351(a) or 351(k)
of the PHS Act. FDA is continuing to consider the appropriate suffix
format for interchangeable biological products.
This naming convention will facilitate pharmacovigilance for
originator biological products, related biological products, and
biosimilar products containing related drug substances when other means
to track a specific dispensed product are not readily accessible or
available. Distinguishable nonproprietary names will also facilitate
accurate identification of these biological products by health care
practitioners and patients. Further, distinguishing suffixes should
help minimize inadvertent substitution of any such products that have
not been determined to be interchangeable. Application of the naming
convention to biological products licensed under the PHS Act should (1)
encourage routine use of designated suffixes in ordering, prescribing,
dispensing, recordkeeping, and pharmacovigilance practices and (2)
avoid inaccurate perceptions of the safety and effectiveness of
biological products based on their licensure pathway, as described in
detail in the guidance.
The guidance provides information to industry, the health care
community, other regulatory agencies, and the public on FDA's rationale
for this naming convention. The guidance is also intended to assist
applicants and application holders in proposing the suffix to be
incorporated into an originator biological product, related biological
product, or biosimilar product's nonproprietary name.
In the Federal Register of August 28, 2015 (80 FR 52296), FDA
announced the availability of the draft guidance of the same title. FDA
received numerous comments on the draft guidance, and those comments
were considered as the guidance was finalized. In the notice announcing
the draft guidance, FDA asked about the benefits and challenges of
designating (1) a suffix that is devoid of meaning versus meaningful
(e.g., derived from the name of the license holder) and (2) a suffix
that is unique to each biological product versus shared by each
biological product manufactured by that license holder. FDA determined
that the suffix format that best achieves the goals described in the
guidance is a suffix that is devoid of meaning and not shared by each
biological product manufactured by that license holder.
FDA intends to apply a naming convention to interchangeable
products that will feature a core name and a suffix included in the
proper name; however, FDA is continuing to consider the appropriate
format of the suffix for these products.
This guidance also will apply to those biological products that are
approved under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act)
on or before March 23, 2020, when such products are deemed to be
licensed under section 351 of the PHS Act on March 23, 2020 (section
7002(e)(2) through (e)(4) of the Biologics Price Competition and
Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCI Act)). FDA intends to provide additional
guidance regarding administrative issues associated with the transition
(including the process for implementing the naming convention described
in this guidance).
For the purposes of the guidance, unless otherwise specified,
references to biological products include biological products licensed
under the PHS Act, such as therapeutic protein products, vaccines,
allergenic products, and blood derivatives, and do not include certain
biological products that also meet the definition of a device in
section 201(h) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 321(h)), such as in vitro
reagents (e.g., antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen, blood grouping
reagents, hepatitis C virus encoded antigen) and blood donor screening
tests (e.g., HIV and hepatitis C). Also, for the purposes of the
[[Page 4347]]
guidance, unless otherwise specified, references to biological products
do not include products for which a proper name is provided in the
regulations (e.g., 21 CFR part 640) or to certain categories of
biological products for which there are well-established, robust
identification and tracking systems to ensure safe dispensing practices
and optimal pharmacovigilance (e.g., ISBT 128 for cord blood products
and blood components).
This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the
current thinking of FDA on nonproprietary naming of biological
products. It does not establish any rights for any person and is not
binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it
satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.
In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has submitted the following
proposed collection of information to OMB for review and clearance.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Nonproprietary Naming of
Biological Products, OMB Control Number 0910--New
The guidance describes FDA's current thinking on the need for
biological products licensed under the PHS Act to bear a nonproprietary
name that includes an FDA-designated suffix. There is a need to clearly
identify biological products to facilitate pharmacovigilance and safe
use. Accordingly, for originator biological products, related
biological products, or biosimilar products licensed under the PHS Act,
FDA intends to designate a nonproprietary name that includes a core
name and a distinguishing suffix. This naming convention is applicable
to biological products previously licensed and newly licensed under
section 351(a) or 351(k) of the PHS Act.
The final guidance proposes a new collection of information by
requesting that applicants and application holders propose a suffix
composed of four lowercase letters for use as the suffix included in
the proper name. The proper name is designated by FDA in the license
for biological products licensed under the PHS Act. The suffix will be
incorporated in the nonproprietary name of the product. The guidance
recommends that applicants and application holders submit up to 10
proposed suffixes, in the order of the applicant's preference. FDA also
recommends including supporting analyses demonstrating that the
proposed suffixes meet the factors described in the final guidance for
FDA's consideration.
As indicated in table 1, we estimate that we will receive a total
of approximately 40 requests annually for the proposed proper name for
biological products submitted under section 351(a) of the PHS Act and
six requests annually for the proposed proper name for biological
products submitted under section 351(k) of the PHS Act. The average
burden per response (hours) is based on the Agency's experience with
similar information collection requirements for applicants to create
and submit suffix proposals to FDA.
As noted, in the Federal Register of August 28, 2015, FDA published
a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed collection of
information. Most comments supported FDA's proposal to designate a
suffix. Many comments suggested that a meaningful, distinguishable
suffix may help to improve pharmacovigilance, enhance safety, and
facilitate identification between biological products. Some comments
supported use of a random suffix to avoid creating an unfair advantage
for specific manufacturers. Several comments stated that the current
practices of FDA and non-FDA entities for identifying products is
sufficient for the purpose of pharmacovigilance, and designation of a
suffix is not needed. One comment stated that FDA's estimate of 6 hours
to submit proposed suffixes is based only on the time needed to prepare
the submission itself after the multiple suffixes have been selected.
The comment further stated that because FDA suggests that each
respondent submit three suggested suffixes for Agency consideration,
the time needed to do an analysis of each suffix would exceed 720 hours
per suffix (based on their own company experience) or 2,160 hours total
for the three suffixes. The commenter subsequently submitted additional
information to clarify how the estimates were calculated.
Response: FDA's estimate of the annual reporting burden results
from information that would be submitted to FDA by applicants in order
to facilitate FDA's designation of a suffix as part of the proper name
of a biological product. We estimated that sponsors would spend 2 hours
completing the submission for each of the three suffixes, resulting in
6 hours as the average burden. This estimate for submission of the
requested information is based on the average number of responses per
respondent and the average burden per response over a 3-year period.
FDA understands that there is a certain amount of research and other
costs that an applicant might encounter in analyzing any proposed name
for a biological product. FDA also recognizes that the burden may be
higher for some applicants and lower for other applicants based on a
variety of factors specific to the applicant.
The comment suggests that it will take 720 hours to complete an
analysis and submission for each suffix. We have considered the
information provided in support of this estimate and believe the
estimate is likely too high. Our original estimate of 6 hours was based
on the Agency's familiarity with the time it would take to make similar
submissions to FDA. However, as identified by the comment, FDA's
original estimate failed to adequately account for the time spent on
creating proposed suffixes. We have reconsidered our original estimate
as a result of the comment, and we have revised our estimate to account
for the burden to create and submit up to 10 proposed suffixes to FDA
for designation. As indicated in table 1, we estimate an average burden
of approximately 420 hours to account for creating and submitting
multiple proposed suffixes.
FDA estimates the information collection burden as follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average
Activity Number of responses per Total annual burden per Total hours
respondents respondent responses response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information for the Proposed 20 2 40 420 16,800
Proper Name for Applicable
Biological Products Submitted
Under Section 351(a) of the PHS
Act............................
[[Page 4348]]
Information for the Proposed 3 2 6 420 2,520
Proper Name for Applicable
Biological Products Submitted
Under Section 351(k) of the PHS
Act............................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 19,320
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
This guidance also refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations. The collection of information
related to the submission of a BLA under section 351(k) of the PHS Act
(biosimilar products and interchangeable products) has been approved
under OMB control number 0910-0719. The guidance also refers to a
previously approved collection of information found in FDA regulations
that is expected to change as a result of the guidance and the
retrospective application of the naming convention. The collections of
information in 21 CFR part 601 related to the submission of a biologics
license application (BLA) and changes to an approved application have
been approved under OMB control number 0910-0338. As a result of the
guidance, the estimated number of additional responses for the annual
burden for changes to an approved application under Sec. 601.12 would
be increased by approximately 25 responses.
FDA is issuing this final guidance subject to OMB approval of the
collections of information. Before implementing the information
collection provisions of the guidance, FDA will publish a notice in the
Federal Register announcing OMB's decision to approve, modify, or
disapprove the collections of information, including OMB control
number(s) for newly approved collections.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the guidance at
https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, or
https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: January 10, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-00694 Filed 1-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P