Notice of Inquiry; Request for Comments Regarding United States Munitions List Category XII, 4226-4229 [2017-00651]
Download as PDF
4226
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2016–D–3401 for ‘‘Scientific Evaluation
of the Evidence on the Beneficial
Physiological Effects of Isolated or
Synthetic Non-Digestible Carbohydrates
Submitted as a Citizen Petition; Draft
Guidance for Industry.’’ Received
comments will be placed in the docket
and, except for those submitted as
‘‘Confidential Submissions,’’ publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ We
will review this copy, including the
claimed confidential information, in our
consideration of comments. The second
copy, which will have the claimed
confidential information redacted/
blacked out, will be available for public
viewing and posted on https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this
information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any
information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paula R. Trumbo, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–830), Food
and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus
Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240–402–
2579.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Federal Register of November 23, 2016
(81 FR 84516), we published a notice
announcing the availability of a draft
guidance entitled ‘‘Scientific Evaluation
of the Evidence on the Beneficial
Physiological Effects of Isolated or
Synthetic Non-Digestible Carbohydrates
Submitted as a Citizen Petition.’’ The
draft guidance explains the scientific
review approach we plan to use for
evaluating scientific evidence submitted
to us in citizen petitions to determine
whether a particular isolated or
synthetic non-digestible carbohydrate
that is added to food should be added
to our definition of ‘‘dietary fiber’’ that
is found in the Nutrition and
Supplement Facts label final rule,
which appeared in the Federal Register
of May 27, 2016 (81 FR 33742). Only
those isolated or synthetic nondigestible carbohydrates that meet the
definition can be declared as a dietary
fiber on a Nutrition and Supplement
Facts label. We provided a 60-day
comment period that was scheduled to
close on January 23, 2017.
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, we have published a notice to
reopen the comment period for a related
notice that appeared in the Federal
Register of November 23, 2016 (81 FR
84595). We requested scientific data,
information and comments in the
related November 23, 2016, notice to
help us evaluate the potential beneficial
physiological effects on human health of
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26 specific isolated or synthetic nondigestible carbohydrates that are added
to food so that we may determine
whether any of them should be added
to our definition of dietary fiber in our
Nutrition Facts and Supplement Facts
label final rule. The November 23, 2016,
notice also announced the availability of
a document entitled ‘‘Science Review of
Isolated and Synthetic Non-Digestible
Carbohydrates,’’ which summarizes a
scientific literature review that we
conducted of clinical studies associated
with the 26 specific isolated or synthetic
non-digestible carbohydrates. The
original comment period for this notice
closed on January 9, 2017.
We have received requests to extend
the comment period for the isolated or
synthetic non-digestible carbohydrates
draft guidance. The requests conveyed
concern that the current 60-day
comment period does not allow
sufficient time to develop meaningful or
thoughtful comments to the draft
guidance.
We have considered the requests and
are extending the comment period for
the draft guidance until February 13,
2017. We believe that this extension
allows adequate time for interested
persons to submit comments without
significantly delaying finalizing the
guidance. The extended comment
period deadline February 13, 2017, for
the draft guidance also coincides with
the reopened comment period for our
related request for scientific data,
information, and comments for the
November 23, 2016, notice.
Dated: January 10, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017–00724 Filed 1–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 121
[Public Notice: 9852]
Notice of Inquiry; Request for
Comments Regarding United States
Munitions List Category XII
Department of State.
Notice of Inquiry, request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of State
requests comments from the public
regarding recent revisions to Category
XII of the United States Munitions List
(USML). In light of the ongoing
transition of the USML to a more
‘‘positive list’’ pursuant to the
President’s Export Control Reform (ECR)
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13JAP1.SGM
13JAP1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules
initiative, the Department requests that
the public comment on (1) alternatives
to controls on certain items when
‘‘specially designed for a military end
user,’’ (2) the scope of the control in
paragraph (b)(1), and (3) certain
technical parameters that the
Department is evaluating to replace
‘‘specially designed’’ controls.
DATES: The Department of State will
accept comments on this Notice of
Inquiry until March 14, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
submit comments by one of the
following methods:
• Email: DDTCPublicComments@
state.gov with the subject line, ‘‘Request
for Comments Regarding USML
Category XII.’’
• Internet: At www.regulations.gov,
search for this notice using its docket
number, DOS–2017–0002.
Comments submitted through
www.regulations.gov will be visible to
other members of the public; the
Department will publish all comments
on the Directorate of Defense Trade
Controls Web site
(www.pmddtc.state.gov). Therefore,
commenters are cautioned not to
include proprietary or other sensitive
information in their comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
C. Edward Peartree, Director, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Policy,
Department of State, telephone (202)
663–2792; email
DDTCPublicComments@state.gov.
ATTN: Request for Comments Regarding
USML Category XII.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 10, 2010, the Department
provided notice to the public of its
intent, pursuant to the ECR initiative, to
revise the USML to create a ‘‘positive
list’’ that describes controlled items
using, to the extent possible, objective
criteria rather than broad, open-ended,
subjective, or design intent-based
criteria (see 75 FR 76935). As a practical
matter, this meant revising USML
categories so that, with some
exceptions, the descriptions of defense
articles that continued to warrant
control under the USML did not use
catch-all phrases to control unspecified
items. As a general matter, the defense
articles that warranted control under the
USML were those that provided the
United States with a critical military or
intelligence advantage. All other items
were to become subject to the Export
Administration Regulations. Since that
time, the Department has published
final rules setting forth revisions for
eighteen USML categories, each of
which has been reorganized into a
uniform and more positive list structure.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
The advantage of revising the USML
into a more positive list is that its
controls can be tailored to satisfy the
national security and foreign policy
objectives of the U.S. government by
maintaining control over those defense
articles that provide a critical military or
intelligence advantage, or otherwise
warrant control under the International
Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR),
without inadvertently controlling items
in normal commercial use. This
approach, however, requires that the
lists be regularly revised and updated to
account for technological developments,
practical application issues identified
by exporters and reexporters, and
changes in the military and commercial
applications of items affected by the list.
In addition, the USML and the
Commerce Control List require regular
revision in order to ensure that they
satisfy the national security and foreign
policy objectives of the reform effort,
which are to (i) improve interoperability
of U.S. military forces with allied
countries, (ii) strengthen the U.S.
industrial base by, among other things,
reducing incentives for foreign
manufacturers to design out and avoid
U.S.-origin content and services, which
ensures continued U.S. visibility and
control, and (iii) allow export control
officials to focus government resources
on transactions that pose greater
concern.
Comments on Specially Designed for
a Military End User Parameters: On
October 12, 2016, the Department
published a final rule amending USML
Category XII, effective December 31,
2016 (81 FR 70340). In the final rule, the
Department adopted control text in
seven subparagraphs that controls
specific items when they are specially
designed for a military end user. The
term military end user is defined in the
new Note to Category XII, as the
national armed services (army, navy,
marine, air force, or coast guard),
national guard, national police,
government intelligence or
reconnaissance organizations, or any
person or entity whose actions or
functions are intended to support
military end uses. As the Note further
states, an item is not specially designed
for a military end user if it was
developed for both military and nonmilitary end users, or if the item was
created for no specific end user. The
Note also provides that
contemporaneous documents are
required to support the design intent;
otherwise, use by a military end user
establishes that the item is specially
designed for a military end user.
As stated in the final rule, the
Department adopted this control based
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4227
on original design intent because the
Department and its interagency partners
cannot yet articulate objective technical
criteria that would establish a bright
line between military and commercial
and civil systems. The Department is
soliciting additional public input,
asking for suggested control parameters
for these seven entries in the final rule:
1. (b)(6) Light detection and ranging
(LIDAR), laser detection and ranging
(LADAR), or range-gated systems,
specially designed for a military end
user.
2. (c)(1) Binoculars, bioculars,
monoculars, goggles, or head or helmetmounted imaging systems (including
video-based articles having a separate
near-to-eye display), as follows:
(iii) Having an infrared focal plane
array or infrared imaging camera, and
specially designed for a military end
user.
3. (c)(3) Electro-optical
reconnaissance, surveillance, target
detection, or target acquisition systems,
specially designed for articles in this
subchapter or specially designed for a
military end user.
4. (c)(4) Infrared search and track
(IRST) systems having one of the
following: (ii) Specially designed for a
military end user.
5. (c)(5) Distributed aperture systems
having a peak response wavelength
exceeding 710 nm specially designed for
articles in this subchapter or specially
designed for a military end user.
6. (c)(6) Infrared imaging systems, as
follows:
(viii) Gimbaled infrared systems, as
follows:
(B) Specially designed for articles in
this subchapter or specially designed for
a military end user.
and
7. (c)(7) Terahertz imaging systems as
follows: (ii) Specially designed for a
military end user.
Comments on Scope of Paragraph
(b)(1): Paragraph (b)(1) includes all laser
target designators and coded target
markers that can mediate the delivery of
ordnance to a target. This includes a
laser target designator or coded target
marker that may also be used for other
purposes, including battlefield target
handoff or communication of battlefield
intelligence information. The
Department requests that the public
comment on this provision.
Comments to Assist with the
Evaluation of Potential Control
Parameters: The Department is also
evaluating several potential parameters.
The Department is requesting that the
public comment on these parameters to
aid in its evaluation. Specifically, the
Department requests comment on
E:\FR\FM\13JAP1.SGM
13JAP1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
4228
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules
whether any civil or commercial items
are described by the following
parameters, including items for which
civil or commercial use is anticipated in
the next five years:
A. Free-space laser communication
systems specially designed for articles
in this subchapter.
B. Binoculars, bioculars, monoculars,
goggles, or head or helmet-mounted
imaging systems (including video-based
articles having a separate near-to-eye
display), having any of the following:
(i) A dynamically gain modulated
image intensifier tube incorporating a
GaAs, GaInAs, or other III–V
semiconductor photocathode with a
peak response in the wavelength range
exceeding 400 nm but not exceeding
2,000 nm;
(ii) An image intensifier tube
incorporating a photocathode with a
peak response in the wavelength range
exceeding 400 nm but not exceeding
2,000 nm and incorporating a focal
plane array in the tube vacuum space;
(iii) Fusing outputs of multiple
infrared focal plane arrays each having
a peak response at a wavelength greater
than 1,000 nm;
(iv) An infrared focal plane array with
a peak response in the wavelength range
exceeding 1,000 nm but not exceeding
2,500 nm with a total noise floor less
than 75 electrons at an operating
temperature of 300 K; or
(v) An infrared focal plane array with
a peak response in the wavelength range
exceeding 7,500 nm, and a laser
illuminator or pointer.
C. Weapon sights (i.e., with a reticle),
aiming or imaging systems (e.g., clipon), specially designed to mount to a
weapon or to withstand weapon shock
or recoil, with or without an integrated
viewer or display, and also
incorporating or specially designed to
incorporate any of the following:
(i) An image intensifier tube having a
multi-alkali photocathode with a peak
response in the wavelength range
exceeding 400 nm but not exceeding
2,000 nm and a luminous sensitivity
exceeding 350 microamps per lumen;
(ii) An image intensifier tube having
a GaAs, GaInAs, or other III–V
semiconductor photocathode, with a
peak response in the wavelength range
exceeding 400 nm but not exceeding
2,000 nm; or
(iii) An image intensifier tube having
a photocathode with a peak response in
the wavelength range exceeding 400 nm
but not exceeding 2,000 nm and a focal
plane array in the tube vacuum space.
D. Infrared imaging systems, as
follows: Mobile reconnaissance, mobile
scout, or mobile surveillance systems,
that provide real-time target geolocation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
at ranges greater than 3 km (e.g., LRAS3,
CIV, HTI, SeeSpot, MMS).
E. Infrared imaging systems, as
follows: Gimbaled infrared systems (e.g.,
T-bar, yoke, ball turrets, or pods), as
follows and specially designed parts
and components therefor:
(i) Having a root mean square (RMS)
stabilization better (less) than 25
microradians and incorporating an
infrared camera having a peak response
at a wavelength exceeding 1,000 nm
with an optical angular resolution (i.e.,
detector instantaneous field-of-view) of
25 microradians or less;
(ii) Having an RMS stabilization better
(less) than 25 microradians for any
payload having any dimension of 15
inches or greater; or
(iii) Specially designed for articles in
this subchapter or specially designed for
a military end user.
F. Image intensifier tubes having all
the following, and specially designed
parts and components therefor:
(i) A peak response in the wavelength
range exceeding 400 nm but not
exceeding 1,050 nm;
(ii) A multi-alkali photocathode with
a luminous sensitivity of 1,300
microamps per lumen or greater; and
(iii) A limiting resolution of 64 line
pairs per millimeter or greater.
G. Image intensifier tubes having all
of the following, and specially designed
parts and components therefor:
(i) A peak response in the wavelength
range exceeding 400 nm but not
exceeding 1,050 nm;
(ii) A GaAs, GaInAs, or other III–V
compound semiconductor photocathode
having a luminous sensitivity of 1,800
microamps per lumen or greater; and
(iii) A limiting resolution of 57 line
pairs per millimeter or greater.
H. Image intensifier tubes having all
of the following, and specially designed
parts and components therefor:
(i) A peak response in the wavelength
range exceeding 1,050 nm but not
exceeding 2,000 nm; and
(ii) A GaAs, GaInAs, or other III–V
compound semiconductor photocathode
having a radiant sensitivity of 10
milliamps per watt or greater.
I. Infrared focal plane arrays or
dewars specially designed for optical
augmentation reduction.
J. Infrared focal plane array dewar
assemblies with peak response in the
wavelength range greater than 3,000 nm
but not exceeding 14,000 nm, and
having a variable aperture mechanism.
K. Infrared focal plane arrays having
all of the following:
(i) A peak response in the wavelength
range exceeding 710 nm but not
exceeding 1,100 nm;
(ii) A non-binned pixel pitch of 10
microns or greater;
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(iii) More than 1,024 detector
elements in any direction; and
(iv) Total noise of 3 electrons or less
at an input light level of 1 millilux, in
a binned or non-binned operating mode,
and measured at an ambient operating
temperature of 300 K.
L. Infrared focal plane arrays having
greater than 81,920 but not exceeding
327,680 detector elements, a peak
response in the wavelength range 1,100
nm but not exceeding 1,700 nm, and
any of the following:
(i) Noise equivalent irradiance less
than 829 million photons per centimeter
squared per second;
(ii) Readout integrated circuits
capable of pulse interval modulation
decoding or pulse repetition frequency
decoding (e.g., an asynchronous
detector read out integrated circuit,
frame rates windowed or nonwindowed greater than 2,000 Hz); or
(iii) Temperature dependent nonuniformity correction (e.g., without the
use of a temperature stabilization)
Note: Noise equivalent irradiance is
defined as a ratio with the numerator
comprised of the focal plane noise floor in
units of electrons at a focal plane array
temperature of 300 K and the denominator as
the multiplied value of detector area in
square centimeters, spectral quantum
efficiency at 1,550 nm, and an integration
time of 0.032 seconds.
M. Infrared focal plane arrays having
greater than 327,680 detector elements,
a peak response in the wavelength range
exceeding 1,100 nm but not exceeding
1,700 nm, and any of the following:
(i) Noise equivalent irradiance less
than 1.54 billion photons per centimeter
squared per second;
(ii) A readout integrated circuits
capable of pulse interval modulation
decoding or pulse repetition frequency
decoding (e.g., an asynchronous
detector read out integrated circuit,
frame rates windowed or nonwindowed greater than 2,000 Hz); or
(iii) Temperature dependent nonuniformity correction (e.g., without the
use of temperature stabilization)
Note: Noise equivalent irradiance is
defined as a ratio with the numerator
comprised of the focal plane noise floor in
units of electrons at a focal plane array
temperature of 300 K and the denominator as
the numerator to the multiplied value of
detector area in square centimeters, spectral
quantum efficiency at 1,550 nm, and an
integration time of 0.032 seconds.
N. Infrared focal plane arrays having
greater than 327,680 detector elements,
a peak response in the wavelength range
exceeding 1,700 nm but not exceeding
3,000 nm, and any of the following:
(i) Readout integrated circuits capable
of pulse interval modulation decoding
E:\FR\FM\13JAP1.SGM
13JAP1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules
or pulse repetition frequency decoding
(e.g. an asynchronous detector read out
integrated circuit, frame rates windowed
or non-windowed greater than 2,000
Hz);
(ii) A total noise floor less than 75
electrons at an operating temperature of
300 K; or
(iii) A detector pitch less than or
equal to 20 microns.
O. Infrared focal plane arrays having
an internal quantum efficiency
exceeding 10 percent anywhere in the
wavelength range exceeding 3,000 nm
but not exceeding 7,500 nm and any of
the following:
(i) A detector pitch less than 12.5
microns; or
(ii) More than 1,331,200 detector
elements.
P. Infrared focal plane arrays having
a peak response in the wavelength range
exceeding 7,500 nm but not exceeding
30,000 nm, and all of the following:
(i) A detector element of the photon,
not thermal, type;
(ii) A detector pitch less than or equal
to 30 microns; and
(iii) Greater than or equal to 262,144
detector elements.
Q. Infrared focal plane arrays having
a peak response in the wavelength range
exceeding 7,500 nm but not exceeding
14,000 nm and all of the following:
(i) A detector element of the photon,
not thermal, type;
(ii) Greater than 300 detector
elements; and
(iii) Time delay integration of detector
elements.
R. Microbolometer focal plane arrays
having an unfiltered response in the
wavelength range exceeding 7,500 nm
but not exceeding 14,000 nm and any of
the following:
(i) Vacuum packaged and specially
designed to withstand weapon shock; or
(ii) Greater than 328,000 detector
elements with a detector pitch less than
or equal to 14 microns.
S. Infrared focal plane arrays specially
designed to provide distinct outputs
corresponding to more than one spectral
band, and having all the following:
(i) Multiple spectral bands with a
photo-response in the wavelength range
exceeding 1,100 nm but not exceeding
14,000 nm; and
(ii) A detector element pitch less than
50 microns.
T. Digital low-light-level sensors
incorporating a photocathode and a
focal plane array within the vacuum
space, with a peak response in the
wavelength range exceeding 400 nm but
not exceeding 2,000 nm, and having any
of the following:
(i) A photocathode with a luminous
sensitivity greater than 1,800 microamps
per lumen; or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
(ii) Greater than 2,040,000 focal plane
array detector elements.
U. Analog readout integrated circuits
specially designed for articles in this
subchapter.
and
V. Digital readout integrated circuits
specially designed for focal plane arrays
having a peak spectral response in the
wavelength band exceeding 1,100 nm
but not exceeding 30,000 nm, a digital
signal output, and any of the following:
(i) Dynamic range greater than 54 dB;
or
(ii) Pixel read-out rate greater than
540 million bits per second.
The Department will review all
comments from the public. If a
rulemaking is warranted based on the
comments received, the Department will
respond to comments received in a
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register.
C. Edward Peartree,
Office Director, Defense Trade Controls
Policy, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2017–00651 Filed 1–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2015–1113]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety zone; Tennessee River, Mile
446.0 to 454.5
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a safety zone for all waters of
the Tennessee River, beginning at mile
marker 446.0 and ending at mile marker
454.5 during periods of high water flow.
High water flow is determined by flow
rates that have reached or exceeded
100,000 cubic feet per second at
Chickamauga lock and dam on the
Tennessee River at mile marker 471.0.
This proposed safety zone is necessary
to provide safety for mariners transiting
on the Tennessee River during periods
of high water flow. Entry into this area
will be prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Ohio Valley or designated
representative. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before January 30, 2017.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4229
You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2015–1113 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Petty Officer
Ashley Schad, MSD Nashville,
Nashville, TN, at 615–736–5421 or at
Ashley.M.Schad@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
The Captain of the Port Ohio Valley
is proposing to establish a safety zone
for all waters of the Tennessee River,
from mile 446.0 to 454.5 during periods
of high water flow. This proposed safety
zone is necessary to provide safety for
mariners transiting on the Tennessee
River during periods of high water flow.
There have been temporary final rules
issued in the past establishing a safety
zone on the Tennessee River beginning
at mile marker 446.0 and ending at mile
marker 454.5 when flow rates reached
or exceeded 100,000 cubic feet per
second at Chickamauga lock and dam.
Examples of these previous temporary
final rules were published under docket
numbers USCG–2013–0025 and USCG–
2011–1148. This proposed rulemaking
is also necessary to more efficiently
effect necessary safety measures during
emergent high water events in the future
by reducing administrative burden and
the amount of paperwork required for
multiple individual rulemakings. The
Tennessee River beginning at mile
marker 446.0 and ending at 454.5 poses
a navigational hazard during periods of
high water flow. A high water flow
determination for this area is
established when flow rates reach or
exceed 100,000 cubic feet per second at
Chickamauga lock and dam on the
Tennessee River at mile marker 471.0.
The Captain of the Port Ohio Valley has
determined that additional safety
measures are necessary to protect all
mariners during periods of high water
flow. Therefore, the Coast Guard
E:\FR\FM\13JAP1.SGM
13JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4226-4229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00651]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 121
[Public Notice: 9852]
Notice of Inquiry; Request for Comments Regarding United States
Munitions List Category XII
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Notice of Inquiry, request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State requests comments from the public
regarding recent revisions to Category XII of the United States
Munitions List (USML). In light of the ongoing transition of the USML
to a more ``positive list'' pursuant to the President's Export Control
Reform (ECR)
[[Page 4227]]
initiative, the Department requests that the public comment on (1)
alternatives to controls on certain items when ``specially designed for
a military end user,'' (2) the scope of the control in paragraph
(b)(1), and (3) certain technical parameters that the Department is
evaluating to replace ``specially designed'' controls.
DATES: The Department of State will accept comments on this Notice of
Inquiry until March 14, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments by one of the
following methods:
Email: DDTCPublicComments@state.gov with the subject line,
``Request for Comments Regarding USML Category XII.''
Internet: At www.regulations.gov, search for this notice
using its docket number, DOS-2017-0002.
Comments submitted through www.regulations.gov will be visible to
other members of the public; the Department will publish all comments
on the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls Web site
(www.pmddtc.state.gov). Therefore, commenters are cautioned not to
include proprietary or other sensitive information in their comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. C. Edward Peartree, Director,
Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy, Department of State, telephone
(202) 663-2792; email DDTCPublicComments@state.gov. ATTN: Request for
Comments Regarding USML Category XII.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 10, 2010, the Department
provided notice to the public of its intent, pursuant to the ECR
initiative, to revise the USML to create a ``positive list'' that
describes controlled items using, to the extent possible, objective
criteria rather than broad, open-ended, subjective, or design intent-
based criteria (see 75 FR 76935). As a practical matter, this meant
revising USML categories so that, with some exceptions, the
descriptions of defense articles that continued to warrant control
under the USML did not use catch-all phrases to control unspecified
items. As a general matter, the defense articles that warranted control
under the USML were those that provided the United States with a
critical military or intelligence advantage. All other items were to
become subject to the Export Administration Regulations. Since that
time, the Department has published final rules setting forth revisions
for eighteen USML categories, each of which has been reorganized into a
uniform and more positive list structure.
The advantage of revising the USML into a more positive list is
that its controls can be tailored to satisfy the national security and
foreign policy objectives of the U.S. government by maintaining control
over those defense articles that provide a critical military or
intelligence advantage, or otherwise warrant control under the
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), without inadvertently
controlling items in normal commercial use. This approach, however,
requires that the lists be regularly revised and updated to account for
technological developments, practical application issues identified by
exporters and reexporters, and changes in the military and commercial
applications of items affected by the list. In addition, the USML and
the Commerce Control List require regular revision in order to ensure
that they satisfy the national security and foreign policy objectives
of the reform effort, which are to (i) improve interoperability of U.S.
military forces with allied countries, (ii) strengthen the U.S.
industrial base by, among other things, reducing incentives for foreign
manufacturers to design out and avoid U.S.-origin content and services,
which ensures continued U.S. visibility and control, and (iii) allow
export control officials to focus government resources on transactions
that pose greater concern.
Comments on Specially Designed for a Military End User Parameters:
On October 12, 2016, the Department published a final rule amending
USML Category XII, effective December 31, 2016 (81 FR 70340). In the
final rule, the Department adopted control text in seven subparagraphs
that controls specific items when they are specially designed for a
military end user. The term military end user is defined in the new
Note to Category XII, as the national armed services (army, navy,
marine, air force, or coast guard), national guard, national police,
government intelligence or reconnaissance organizations, or any person
or entity whose actions or functions are intended to support military
end uses. As the Note further states, an item is not specially designed
for a military end user if it was developed for both military and non-
military end users, or if the item was created for no specific end
user. The Note also provides that contemporaneous documents are
required to support the design intent; otherwise, use by a military end
user establishes that the item is specially designed for a military end
user.
As stated in the final rule, the Department adopted this control
based on original design intent because the Department and its
interagency partners cannot yet articulate objective technical criteria
that would establish a bright line between military and commercial and
civil systems. The Department is soliciting additional public input,
asking for suggested control parameters for these seven entries in the
final rule:
1. (b)(6) Light detection and ranging (LIDAR), laser detection and
ranging (LADAR), or range-gated systems, specially designed for a
military end user.
2. (c)(1) Binoculars, bioculars, monoculars, goggles, or head or
helmet-mounted imaging systems (including video-based articles having a
separate near-to-eye display), as follows:
(iii) Having an infrared focal plane array or infrared imaging
camera, and specially designed for a military end user.
3. (c)(3) Electro-optical reconnaissance, surveillance, target
detection, or target acquisition systems, specially designed for
articles in this subchapter or specially designed for a military end
user.
4. (c)(4) Infrared search and track (IRST) systems having one of
the following: (ii) Specially designed for a military end user.
5. (c)(5) Distributed aperture systems having a peak response
wavelength exceeding 710 nm specially designed for articles in this
subchapter or specially designed for a military end user.
6. (c)(6) Infrared imaging systems, as follows:
(viii) Gimbaled infrared systems, as follows:
(B) Specially designed for articles in this subchapter or specially
designed for a military end user.
and
7. (c)(7) Terahertz imaging systems as follows: (ii) Specially
designed for a military end user.
Comments on Scope of Paragraph (b)(1): Paragraph (b)(1) includes
all laser target designators and coded target markers that can mediate
the delivery of ordnance to a target. This includes a laser target
designator or coded target marker that may also be used for other
purposes, including battlefield target handoff or communication of
battlefield intelligence information. The Department requests that the
public comment on this provision.
Comments to Assist with the Evaluation of Potential Control
Parameters: The Department is also evaluating several potential
parameters. The Department is requesting that the public comment on
these parameters to aid in its evaluation. Specifically, the Department
requests comment on
[[Page 4228]]
whether any civil or commercial items are described by the following
parameters, including items for which civil or commercial use is
anticipated in the next five years:
A. Free-space laser communication systems specially designed for
articles in this subchapter.
B. Binoculars, bioculars, monoculars, goggles, or head or helmet-
mounted imaging systems (including video-based articles having a
separate near-to-eye display), having any of the following:
(i) A dynamically gain modulated image intensifier tube
incorporating a GaAs, GaInAs, or other III-V semiconductor photocathode
with a peak response in the wavelength range exceeding 400 nm but not
exceeding 2,000 nm;
(ii) An image intensifier tube incorporating a photocathode with a
peak response in the wavelength range exceeding 400 nm but not
exceeding 2,000 nm and incorporating a focal plane array in the tube
vacuum space;
(iii) Fusing outputs of multiple infrared focal plane arrays each
having a peak response at a wavelength greater than 1,000 nm;
(iv) An infrared focal plane array with a peak response in the
wavelength range exceeding 1,000 nm but not exceeding 2,500 nm with a
total noise floor less than 75 electrons at an operating temperature of
300 K; or
(v) An infrared focal plane array with a peak response in the
wavelength range exceeding 7,500 nm, and a laser illuminator or
pointer.
C. Weapon sights (i.e., with a reticle), aiming or imaging systems
(e.g., clip-on), specially designed to mount to a weapon or to
withstand weapon shock or recoil, with or without an integrated viewer
or display, and also incorporating or specially designed to incorporate
any of the following:
(i) An image intensifier tube having a multi-alkali photocathode
with a peak response in the wavelength range exceeding 400 nm but not
exceeding 2,000 nm and a luminous sensitivity exceeding 350 microamps
per lumen;
(ii) An image intensifier tube having a GaAs, GaInAs, or other III-
V semiconductor photocathode, with a peak response in the wavelength
range exceeding 400 nm but not exceeding 2,000 nm; or
(iii) An image intensifier tube having a photocathode with a peak
response in the wavelength range exceeding 400 nm but not exceeding
2,000 nm and a focal plane array in the tube vacuum space.
D. Infrared imaging systems, as follows: Mobile reconnaissance,
mobile scout, or mobile surveillance systems, that provide real-time
target geolocation at ranges greater than 3 km (e.g., LRAS3, CIV, HTI,
SeeSpot, MMS).
E. Infrared imaging systems, as follows: Gimbaled infrared systems
(e.g., T-bar, yoke, ball turrets, or pods), as follows and specially
designed parts and components therefor:
(i) Having a root mean square (RMS) stabilization better (less)
than 25 microradians and incorporating an infrared camera having a peak
response at a wavelength exceeding 1,000 nm with an optical angular
resolution (i.e., detector instantaneous field-of-view) of 25
microradians or less;
(ii) Having an RMS stabilization better (less) than 25 microradians
for any payload having any dimension of 15 inches or greater; or
(iii) Specially designed for articles in this subchapter or
specially designed for a military end user.
F. Image intensifier tubes having all the following, and specially
designed parts and components therefor:
(i) A peak response in the wavelength range exceeding 400 nm but
not exceeding 1,050 nm;
(ii) A multi-alkali photocathode with a luminous sensitivity of
1,300 microamps per lumen or greater; and
(iii) A limiting resolution of 64 line pairs per millimeter or
greater.
G. Image intensifier tubes having all of the following, and
specially designed parts and components therefor:
(i) A peak response in the wavelength range exceeding 400 nm but
not exceeding 1,050 nm;
(ii) A GaAs, GaInAs, or other III-V compound semiconductor
photocathode having a luminous sensitivity of 1,800 microamps per lumen
or greater; and
(iii) A limiting resolution of 57 line pairs per millimeter or
greater.
H. Image intensifier tubes having all of the following, and
specially designed parts and components therefor:
(i) A peak response in the wavelength range exceeding 1,050 nm but
not exceeding 2,000 nm; and
(ii) A GaAs, GaInAs, or other III-V compound semiconductor
photocathode having a radiant sensitivity of 10 milliamps per watt or
greater.
I. Infrared focal plane arrays or dewars specially designed for
optical augmentation reduction.
J. Infrared focal plane array dewar assemblies with peak response
in the wavelength range greater than 3,000 nm but not exceeding 14,000
nm, and having a variable aperture mechanism.
K. Infrared focal plane arrays having all of the following:
(i) A peak response in the wavelength range exceeding 710 nm but
not exceeding 1,100 nm;
(ii) A non-binned pixel pitch of 10 microns or greater;
(iii) More than 1,024 detector elements in any direction; and
(iv) Total noise of 3 electrons or less at an input light level of
1 millilux, in a binned or non-binned operating mode, and measured at
an ambient operating temperature of 300 K.
L. Infrared focal plane arrays having greater than 81,920 but not
exceeding 327,680 detector elements, a peak response in the wavelength
range 1,100 nm but not exceeding 1,700 nm, and any of the following:
(i) Noise equivalent irradiance less than 829 million photons per
centimeter squared per second;
(ii) Readout integrated circuits capable of pulse interval
modulation decoding or pulse repetition frequency decoding (e.g., an
asynchronous detector read out integrated circuit, frame rates windowed
or non-windowed greater than 2,000 Hz); or
(iii) Temperature dependent non-uniformity correction (e.g.,
without the use of a temperature stabilization)
Note: Noise equivalent irradiance is defined as a ratio with the
numerator comprised of the focal plane noise floor in units of
electrons at a focal plane array temperature of 300 K and the
denominator as the multiplied value of detector area in square
centimeters, spectral quantum efficiency at 1,550 nm, and an
integration time of 0.032 seconds.
M. Infrared focal plane arrays having greater than 327,680 detector
elements, a peak response in the wavelength range exceeding 1,100 nm
but not exceeding 1,700 nm, and any of the following:
(i) Noise equivalent irradiance less than 1.54 billion photons per
centimeter squared per second;
(ii) A readout integrated circuits capable of pulse interval
modulation decoding or pulse repetition frequency decoding (e.g., an
asynchronous detector read out integrated circuit, frame rates windowed
or non-windowed greater than 2,000 Hz); or
(iii) Temperature dependent non-uniformity correction (e.g.,
without the use of temperature stabilization)
Note: Noise equivalent irradiance is defined as a ratio with the
numerator comprised of the focal plane noise floor in units of
electrons at a focal plane array temperature of 300 K and the
denominator as the numerator to the multiplied value of detector
area in square centimeters, spectral quantum efficiency at 1,550 nm,
and an integration time of 0.032 seconds.
N. Infrared focal plane arrays having greater than 327,680 detector
elements, a peak response in the wavelength range exceeding 1,700 nm
but not exceeding 3,000 nm, and any of the following:
(i) Readout integrated circuits capable of pulse interval
modulation decoding
[[Page 4229]]
or pulse repetition frequency decoding (e.g. an asynchronous detector
read out integrated circuit, frame rates windowed or non-windowed
greater than 2,000 Hz);
(ii) A total noise floor less than 75 electrons at an operating
temperature of 300 K; or
(iii) A detector pitch less than or equal to 20 microns.
O. Infrared focal plane arrays having an internal quantum
efficiency exceeding 10 percent anywhere in the wavelength range
exceeding 3,000 nm but not exceeding 7,500 nm and any of the following:
(i) A detector pitch less than 12.5 microns; or
(ii) More than 1,331,200 detector elements.
P. Infrared focal plane arrays having a peak response in the
wavelength range exceeding 7,500 nm but not exceeding 30,000 nm, and
all of the following:
(i) A detector element of the photon, not thermal, type;
(ii) A detector pitch less than or equal to 30 microns; and
(iii) Greater than or equal to 262,144 detector elements.
Q. Infrared focal plane arrays having a peak response in the
wavelength range exceeding 7,500 nm but not exceeding 14,000 nm and all
of the following:
(i) A detector element of the photon, not thermal, type;
(ii) Greater than 300 detector elements; and
(iii) Time delay integration of detector elements.
R. Microbolometer focal plane arrays having an unfiltered response
in the wavelength range exceeding 7,500 nm but not exceeding 14,000 nm
and any of the following:
(i) Vacuum packaged and specially designed to withstand weapon
shock; or
(ii) Greater than 328,000 detector elements with a detector pitch
less than or equal to 14 microns.
S. Infrared focal plane arrays specially designed to provide
distinct outputs corresponding to more than one spectral band, and
having all the following:
(i) Multiple spectral bands with a photo-response in the wavelength
range exceeding 1,100 nm but not exceeding 14,000 nm; and
(ii) A detector element pitch less than 50 microns.
T. Digital low-light-level sensors incorporating a photocathode and
a focal plane array within the vacuum space, with a peak response in
the wavelength range exceeding 400 nm but not exceeding 2,000 nm, and
having any of the following:
(i) A photocathode with a luminous sensitivity greater than 1,800
microamps per lumen; or
(ii) Greater than 2,040,000 focal plane array detector elements.
U. Analog readout integrated circuits specially designed for
articles in this subchapter.
and
V. Digital readout integrated circuits specially designed for focal
plane arrays having a peak spectral response in the wavelength band
exceeding 1,100 nm but not exceeding 30,000 nm, a digital signal
output, and any of the following:
(i) Dynamic range greater than 54 dB; or
(ii) Pixel read-out rate greater than 540 million bits per second.
The Department will review all comments from the public. If a
rulemaking is warranted based on the comments received, the Department
will respond to comments received in a proposed rulemaking in the
Federal Register.
C. Edward Peartree,
Office Director, Defense Trade Controls Policy, Bureau of Political-
Military Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2017-00651 Filed 1-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P