National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures and Executive Order 12114 Categorical Exclusions, 4306-4313 [2017-00553]
Download as PDF
4306
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
agenda details, see SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held
at: Hilton Garden Inn Kitty Hawk, 5353
N. Virginia Dare Trail, Kitty Hawk, NC
27949, telephone: (252) 261–1290.
Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council, 800 N. State
Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901;
telephone: (302) 674–2331 or on their
Web site at www.mafmc.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council, telephone: (302)
526–5255.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following items are on the agenda,
though agenda items may be addressed
out of order (changes will be noted on
the Council’s Web site when possible).
Agenda
Tuesday, February 14, 2017
River Herring/Shad Committee Meeting
Discuss criteria to assess progress in
river herring/shad conservation
Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Meeting
as a Committee of the Whole
Review and approve public hearing
document Squid Amendment
Law Enforcement Report
Presentation on National Marine
Sanctuary Nomination Process
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Wednesday, February 15, 2017
Meeting with the Atlantic States Marine
Fisheries Commission’s Summer
Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass
Boards
62nd Northeast Regional Stock
Assessment Workshop (62nd SAW)
Overview of black sea bass benchmark
stock assessment findings and peer
review panelist findings
Black Sea Bass 2017–2019
Specifications
Overview and staff recommendation,
SSC recommendation, review
Monitoring Committee and
Advisory Panel recommendations,
and adopt recommendations for
2017–2019
Black Sea Bass Research Update
Black Sea Bass Recreational
Specifications
Review Monitoring Committee and
Advisory Panel recommendations,
adopt recommendations for 2017
management measures, review
Recreational Working Group
recommendations and regional/
state proposals (possible Board
action)
Black Sea Bass Commercial AM
Framework
Review background, issues, and draft
alternatives
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
Summer Flounder Amendment
Update on progress and timeline
Thursday, February 16, 2017
Business Session
The day will conclude with brief
reports from the National Marine
Fisheries Service’s GARFO and the
Northeast Fisheries Science Center,
NOAA’s Office of General Counsel, the
ASMFC, the New England and South
Atlantic Fishery Council’s liaisons and
the Regional Planning Body Report. The
Council will also receive the Council’s
Executive Director’s Report, the Science
Report, Committee Reports, and discuss
any continuing and/or new business.
Although other non-emergency issues
not contained in this agenda may come
before this Council for discussion, those
issues may not be the subjects of formal
action during this meeting. Council
action will be restricted to those issues
specifically listed in this notice and any
issues arising after publication of this
notice that require emergency action
under section 305(c) of the MagnusonStevens act, provided that the public
has been notified of the Council’s intent
to take final action to address the
emergency.
Special Accommodations
This meeting is physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Requests for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to M.
Jan Saunders, (302) 526–5251, at least 5
days prior to the meeting date.
Dated: January 10, 2017.
Jeffrey N. Lonergan,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–00737 Filed 1–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[Docket Number: NOAA–HQ–2016–0145]
RIN 0648–XF137
National Environmental Policy Act
Implementing Procedures and
Executive Order 12114 Categorical
Exclusions
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
The National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
publishes this notice to notify the public
that NOAA has finalized revisions to the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
agency’s procedures for implementing
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) and related authorities, as
contained in the Companion Manual to
NOAA Administrative Order NAO 216–
6A (Companion Manual). Included in
the Companion Manual are NOAA’s
revised categorical exclusions (CE) and
related extraordinary circumstances.
This notice provides a summary of the
public comments received and the
agency’s responses as well as a
summary of changes from the draft to
the final procedures. The final
Companion Manual is available online
at https://www.nepa.noaa.nepa.gov.
The revised procedures are
effective January 13, 2017.
DATES:
For
information regarding NOAA’s NEPA
procedures, contact Katherine Renshaw,
NOAA NEPA Coordinator, at
noaa.nepa@noaa.gov or 301–713–7380.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On April 22, 2016, NOAA issued
NOAA Administrative Order 216–6A
(NAO 216–6A), which updated NOAA’s
policy for compliance with NEPA, the
CEQ NEPA regulations, and other
related authorities, including Executive
Order (EO) 12114, Environmental
Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions;
EO 11988, Floodplain Management; and
EO 11990, Protection of Wetlands. The
NOAA Administrative Order authorized
the development of a Companion
Manual entitled Policy and Procedures
for Compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act and Related
Authorities (‘‘Companion Manual’’). On
November, 17, 2016, NOAA published a
notice in the Federal Register inviting
public comments for a 30-day period on
the draft Companion Manual, which
included NOAA’s revised CEs. After
careful consideration of the public
comments received in response to that
notice, and upon further internal
review, NOAA has decided to finalize
the Companion Manual and CEs with
some minor revisions from the
November 17, 2016 draft.
II. Comments Received and NOAA’s
Responses
NOAA received comments from
private citizens, nongovernmental
organizations, states and state
organizations. All substantive comments
received and considered are available
online at (https://noaa.nepa.gov), and on
the Regulations.gov Web site
(www.regulations.gov) at docket ID:
[NOAA–HQ–2016–0145]. NOAA has
considered all comments received, and
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
NOAA’s response to the comments is
contained below.
A. Comments on NOAA’s NEPA Process
State commenters raised concerns
regarding the process of applying NEPA
to the Federal grant application process.
State commenters also sought additional
criteria for determining whether
cumulative and secondary impacts will
trigger an Environmental Assessment
(EA), specifically requesting a clear flow
chart on the process.
NOAA appreciates the concerns
expressed by these comments and will
continue to seek ways to improve
coordination of environmental review
requirements as we begin implementing
these revised procedures.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
B. Comments on Previously Analyzed
Activities
State commenters requested that
NOAA develop a CE that ‘‘includes
projects that have already undergone
sufficient environmental review under
NEPA.’’
NOAA does not agree that a broad CE
that would cover all such activities
would be appropriate. Instead, NOAA
would point the commenters to section
5 of the Companion Manual that
provides guidance on how to determine
whether existing NOAA NEPA
documents adequately analyze the
impacts of a proposed action; as well as
section 6(H) that provides guidance on
adopting other agency NEPA
documents. We believe that the
processes outlined in those sections that
include factors to consider and required
documentation (including, for example,
the requirement that NOAA issue its
own FONSI when adopting another
agency EA), are the appropriate
processes to use when relying on
existing NEPA documents, consistent
with the Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ) regulations and guidance.
C. Comments on Definitions Used in the
Companion Manual and CEs
State commenters requested that
NOAA provide definitions for
frequently used terms including
‘‘minor,’’ ‘‘small scale,’’
‘‘nondestructive,’’ and ‘‘substantial.’’
NOAA provided definitions for the
terms ‘‘previously disturbed ground,’’
‘‘minor,’’ ‘‘small scale,’’ and
‘‘negligible’’ in the November 17, 2016
Federal Register notice (81 FR 81067).
In order to ensure consistent application
of its procedures, NOAA determined
that such definitions should be included
in the Companion Manual and will add
the definitions included in our initial
Federal Register notice to the glossary
at Appendix A of the Companion
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
Manual. NOAA will also add definitions
for the terms ‘‘short term,’’ ‘‘long term,’’
and ‘‘nondestructive,’’ to provide
further clarity. These additional terms
will be defined as follows:
Short-term—refers to a potential
impact of short duration, relative to the
proposed project and the environmental
resource. Short-term impacts occur
while the activity is underway, and do
not persist once the activity ends. Noise
produced by temporary construction
activities is an example of a short-term
impact. Long-term—refers to a potential
impact of long duration, relative to the
proposed project and the environmental
resources. Long-term impacts continue
after the project has ceased. Permanent
impacts that remain after the
construction phase of a project is an
example of a long-term impact.
Nondestructive—this terms refers to
actions that do not result in long term
or permanent physical alteration of a
component of the human environment.
Passive acoustics, ground penetrating
radar, and air quality sampling are
examples of nondestructive methods to
collect environmental data.
D. Comments on Individual CEs
A1
One commenter recommended
deleting the phrase ‘‘access to fishery
resources’’ from A1. The commenter
notes that actions that change access to
fishery resources do not necessarily
result in environmental impacts when
there are no changes of any of the other
actions listed in the CE, i.e., fishing
location, timing, effort, authorized gear
types, or harvest levels.
We agree, and have removed the
phrase ‘‘access to fishery resources’’
from the text of CE A1.
A5
State commenters requested that
NOAA modify CE A5 so as to include
minor five-year updates to National
Estuarine Research Reserve (NERR)
management plans relative to boundary
expansion based on acquisition of
property for conservation purposes. The
proposed A5 applies to updates to
NERR management plans, provided that
the update does not change NERR
boundaries.
Boundary changes will involve areas
that fall outside the geographic scope of
the original Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) prepared pursuant to 15
CFR 921.13, and may involve
potentially significant impacts to
additional species or habitats that were
not considered when the reserve was
established. For this reason, NOAA will
retain the proposed limiting language in
the CE in the final procedures.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4307
B4
One comment raised concerns with
proposed CE B4. Generally, the
comment expresses concern that the
application of the CE will result in a
failure to consider the cumulative
impacts of activities authorized under
that CE. Additionally, the commenter is
concerned about NOAA’s decision to
include authorizations under both
sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) in the same CE, arguing that
doing so ignores the differences in these
authorizations. The commenter finally
expressed a concern that NOAA has
eliminated language from the 1999
procedures that had specifically stated
that ‘‘if authorization under 101(a)(5)(A)
does not tier from a programmatic
environmental review, that action may
require an EIS, EA, or CE, based on a
case-by-case review.’’
NOAA has determined that this CE,
by its terms, and in light of the
requirement to consider extraordinary
circumstances, is appropriate and
would not have the potential for
significant impacts. In particular, NOAA
notes that extraordinary circumstances
(l) refers to ‘‘the potential for significant
cumulative impacts when the proposed
action is combined with other past,
present and reasonably foreseeable
future actions, even though the impacts
of the proposed action may not be
significant by themselves.’’ See
Companion Manual for NOAA
Administrative Order 216–6A at 4–5.
Additionally, the B4 CE does not
ignore the differences between
101(a)(5)(A) and (D); rather it was
crafted to apply to incidental take
authorizations issued under either
provision if they meet the criterion of no
serious injury or mortality (and are not
disqualified under the extraordinary
circumstances evaluation). While it is
true that criterion will be satisfied with
any authorization issued under section
101(a)(5)(D), it is also true that in some
cases authorizations issued under
section 101(a)(5)(A) could meet that
criterion as well, depending on the
specified activity. Section 101(a)(5)(A)
allows for authorization of take by
serious injury or mortality but is not
only for activities involving those
effects.
Finally, NOAA notes that although
language specific to the application of
NEPA to the MMPA process was
removed in the revised NEPA
procedures, generally applicable
provisions still apply to MMPA
authorizations. For example, section 3
of the Companion Manual explains
how, on a case-by-case basis, to
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
4308
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
determine the proper level of NEPA
analysis for an action.
One comment raises a concern that
proposed CE B12 is overly broad and
requests that NOAA delete the CE. As
proposed, B12 would cover ‘‘issuance of
Exempted Fishing Permits (EFP) under
the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (MSA) and Scientific Research
Permits (SRP) and other permits for
research that may impact species
regulated under the authority of the
MSA and the Atlantic Tunas
Convention Act (ATCA). This includes
permitted research of limited size,
magnitude or duration with negligible
individual or cumulative impacts,
which requires temporary relief of
fishery management regulations.’’
NOAA has determined that this CE,
by its terms, and in light of the
requirement to consider extraordinary
circumstances, is appropriate and
would not have the potential for
significant impacts. We agree, however,
that as proposed, CE B12 would benefit
from revision for clarity to make clear
that the limitations described in the
proposed category apply to all activities
under the CE. NOAA will revise B12 in
the following manner: ‘‘Issuance of
Exempted Fishing Permits (EFP),
Scientific Research Permits (SRP), and
other permits for research that may
impact species regulated under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (MSA) and the Atlantic Tunas
Convention Act (ATCA). This CE is
limited to permits that authorize
activities of limited size, magnitude or
duration, which have no potential for
significant individual or cumulative
impacts.’’
C1
State commenters asked for several
areas of clarification regarding the
application of CE C1 that addresses
habitat restoration activities.
The state commenters requested that
NOAA either remove the CE’s dredge
and fill limitation, or provide additional
clarity as to the application of that
limitation. As proposed, C1 is limited to
projects that ‘‘[do] not require
substantial placement of fill or
dredging.’’
NOAA believes that the limitation of
the CE with respect to dredging and
placement of fill is appropriate and
notes that its application will be context
dependent. When considering whether
placement of fill or dredging are
‘‘substantial,’’ NOAA will consider the
volume of the fill to be placed, as well
as the context in which it would occur
to determine that the placement will not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
have the potential to cause significant
environmental impacts. Thus, NOAA is
not proposing any modifications to this
CE to address this issue.
Additionally, the states requested that
NOAA further limit covered habitat
restoration actions to those that
transplant only native species. The
proposed C1 language would limit
actions to those that ‘‘transplant’’ only
organisms currently or formerly present
at the site or in its immediate vicinity
(if transplant is a component of the
action). The states expressed concern
that without limiting transplant to
native species that such actions may
result in impacts from exotic invasive
species.
NOAA has determined that this CE,
by its terms, and in light of the
requirement to consider extraordinary
circumstances, is appropriate and
would not have the potential for
significant impacts. In particular, NOAA
notes that extraordinary circumstance (j)
refers to the ‘‘contribution to the
introduction, continued existence, or
spread of noxious weeds or non-native
invasive species known to occur in the
area or actions that may promote the
introduction, growth, or expansion of
the range of the species.’’ See
Companion Manual for NOAA
Administrative Order 216–6A at 4–5.
Accordingly, if a proposed action to
transplant organisms has the potential
to result in significant impacts due to
the potential spread of exotic invasive
species, such an action may require
additional analysis.
Finally, the states requested further
guidance as to the applicability of C1 to
various restoration activities such as
living shoreline construction, routine
terrestrial restoration activities, and
stocking fish and associated activities.
As noted in Appendix E, the
examples provided with the CEs are
intended to be illustrative, but not
exhaustive. Thus, omission of a
particular activity does not mean that
such activity could not potentially be
covered by the CE. In reviewing whether
an activity, such as a living shoreline
construction project would be
potentially included within C1, NOAA
would consider the particular elements
of that project to determine whether the
proposed action fits within the limits of
the CE.
F3
State commenters requested
clarification as to whether CE F3 applies
to the restoration or repair of buildings
of cultural or historic significance.
Additionally, state commenters sought
clarification as to whether the CE
applies to small-scale construction of
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
boat ramps, fishing piers, and
observation platforms. Commenters note
that limitations in F3(b), such as
F3(b)(3) that would preclude proposed
uses of newly constructed facilities that
will substantially increase the number
of marine vessels in the area would
potentially preclude application to the
construction of public access facilities
such as boat ramps. Finally, one
commenter questioned how NOAA will
determine viewshed impacts.
NOAA’s extraordinary circumstance
(e) would require evaluation of whether
a proposed activity would involve
adverse effects on properties listed or
eligible for listing on the National
Register of Historic Places authorized by
the National Historic Preservation Act of
1966, National Historic Landmarks
designated by the Secretary of the
Interior, or National Monuments
designated through the Antiquities Act
of 1906; Federally recognized tribal and
Native Alaskan lands, cultural or
natural resources, or religious or
cultural sites that cannot be resolved
through applicable regulatory processes.
See Companion Manual for NOAA
Administrative Order 216–6A at 4–5.
With respect to the construction of
public access facilities, NOAA notes
that such activities are covered
explicitly under F3(c), and not F3(b).
Thus, the limitations that the
commenters are concerned with would
not be applicable to the construction of
public access facilities such as boat
ramps, docks, or observation platforms.
Those projects are potentially allowable
under the CE so long as the proposed
activity is (1) small-scale and
nondestructive; and (2) is consistent
with applicable right-of-way conditions
and approved land use plans. NOAA
notes that there is a typographical error
in the proposed CE that included an
‘‘and’’ following F3(c)(2), which may be
confusing, and has corrected that error.
As discussed above, NOAA is adding
several additional definitions to the
handbook, including ‘‘nondestructive.’’
NOAA does not believe that it is
necessary to make any modifications to
the CE to exempt small scale
construction of public access facilities
such as boat ramps, fishing piers, and
observation platforms as such activities
are explicitly covered by F3(c), and
included as examples of activities
covered by the CE. As described in our
definitions section, we believe that it is
appropriate to define small scale
relative to the potential impacts of the
project, rather than with respect to the
funding level involved.
Finally, with respect to viewshed
impact evaluation, NOAA’s staff will
rely upon their professional expertise
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
and standard practices and procedures
to evaluate potential impacts to
viewsheds. Viewshed analysis, through
the use of GIS technology, is commonly
used by researchers and natural
resource managers to assess potential
visual impacts of development.
F4
State commenters request that NOAA
clarify whether routine grounds keeping
and landscaping would include native
landscaping installation or rain gardens
and other storm water Best Management
Practices.
As discussed above, when
determining whether a particular
proposed action would be potentially
included within a CE, NOAA will
consider the particular elements of the
project to determine its eligibility.
NOAA does note however, that
activities that involve improvements of
real property may be better categorized
under CE F3.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
G1
State commenters request clarification
as to whether CE G1 applies to the
development of community
development plans, vulnerability
assessments, erosion management plans,
feasibility studies, and engineering/
design plans for restoration projects.
G1 includes routine administrative
actions such as development,
establishment, and revisions to
documents including, but not limited to
interagency agreements, memoranda of
understanding, memoranda of
agreement, cooperative agreements and
university agreements. As noted in
Appendix E, the examples provided
with the CEs are intended to be
illustrative, but not exhaustive. Thus,
omission of a particular activity does
not mean that such activity could not
potentially be covered by the CE. NOAA
will evaluate proposed actions on a
case-by-case basis to determine whether
they are appropriately addressed by the
CE.
H4
State commenters request clarification
as to whether the acquisition of land
intended for habitat restoration,
including removal of invasive plant
species or off-site native plants/trees
would be included within CE H4.
Commenters additionally request the
development of a new CE to explicitly
cover tree removal activities.
CE H4 applies to the acquisition of
real property that is not acquired
through condemnation of a lease
interest, and will not result in
significant change in use and does
involve construction or modification.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
Accordingly, so long as the acquisition
is done in accordance with the terms of
the CE, and upon review by NOAA’s
NEPA professional staff, acquisition of
land intended for habitat restoration
may potentially be covered. NOAA
notes that one of the examples provided
of activities covered by the CE includes
funding for land acquisition under the
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
and Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act
(FWCA)to purchase land (submerged or
not submerged) or interests in land that
includes but is not limited to
conservation easements, for purposes
that do not involve construction or
modification.
With respect to the request for the
development of an additional CE to
specifically cover tree removal, NOAA
does not currently have the experience
to support expanding the CE to include
such projects, but this may change as
NOAA gains experience over time.
III. Additional Changes to Companion
Manual and Categorical Exclusions
In addition to revisions to CEs based
on its consideration of public
comments, NOAA further reviewed the
proposed CEs and determined that
certain CEs would benefit from
revisions that clarified the scope and
applicability of the CE, specifically the
limitations described in the text of the
CE to ensure it is only applied to
activities with no potential for
significant effects on the environment
under normal circumstances. Internal
discussions also resulted in many
instances in the addition or revision of
examples provided for the CEs for the
benefit of NOAA NEPA practitioners.
Additionally, NOAA identified
typographical and grammatical errors
and corrected those errors. This section
explains the substantive revisions
NOAA made to its proposed CEs and
the rationale for those revisions.
E3
NOAA is adding two additional
examples of activities that fit within this
category: ‘‘use of mobile platforms (e.g.,
ships, aircraft, balloons, vehicles) to
study biological, chemical, or physical
processes;’’ and ‘‘collection of cultural
and environmental data to find and
assess archaeological resources.’’
E4
NOAA has made minor modifications
to the text of E4 following internal
discussions with subject matter experts
in order to ensure that the category of
activities is sufficiently limited. The
revised text is as follows: ‘‘Activities
that remotely survey or observe living
resources in the field using non-invasive
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4309
techniques, which have little to no
potential to adversely affect the
environment or interfere with organisms
or habitat.’’ NOAA has also slightly
modified one of the examples provided
to make clear that electronic monitoring
activities under this category are limited
to deployment of non animal-borne
devices.
E5
NOAA has made minor modifications
to the text of E5 following internal
discussions with subject matter experts
in order to ensure that the category of
activities is sufficiently limited. The
revised text is as follows: ‘‘Activities
involving invasive techniques or
methods that are conducted for
scientific purposes, when such activities
are conducted in accordance with all
applicable provisions of the Endangered
Species Act, Marine Mammal Protection
Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act.
Such activities will be limited to
impacting living resources on a small
scale relative to the size of their
populations, and limited to
methodologies and locations to ensure
that there are no long-term, adverse
ecosystem impacts.’’
E6
NOAA made a minor modification to
the text of E6 to improve internal
consistency. The text of the revised CE
is as follows: ‘‘Research that involves
the development and testing of new and
modified fishing gear and technology in
order to reduce adverse effects from
fishing gear on non-target species, and
is limited in size, magnitude or duration
with no potential for significant
individual or cumulative impacts.’’
E7
Based on internal discussions on
proposed CE E7, NOAA has revised the
text of the CE to remove the references
to fishing vessels and dockside as
locations for the collection of data and
biological samples. These terms were
intended to be broad and to encompass
any number of locations, including, for
example, on fishing vessels, on
motherships, in processing plants,
dockside, and shoreside. However, that
broad scope might not have been
obvious to readers on the face of the
proposed CE, and including the terms
‘‘fishing vessels’’ and ‘‘dockside’’ may
have unintentionally suggested a
narrower scope than what was intended.
Therefore, we are removing those terms
from the text of the CE and leaving the
CE to broadly encompass data and
biological samples collected as part of
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
4310
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
previously authorized commercial and/
or recreational fishing activities. This
change does not change the intended
scope of the proposed CE, but only
makes the scope of the CE clearer for
users and the public. In addition, we
have revised the first example under
this CE to add ‘‘Collecting data from’’
before ‘‘observer coverage onboard
commercial and recreational fishing
vessels.’’ This change is being made to
make it more explicit that the example
is referring only to the collection of data
through previously authorized observer
coverage, and nothing else related to
observer coverage. This CE does not
cover observer coverage requirements
onboard commercial or recreational
fishing vessels, which are generally
addressed through fishery management
plans or regulations for the fishery for
which observer coverage is being
implemented.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
E8
NOAA made a minor modification to
the text of E8 following internal
discussions with subject matter experts
to ensure that the scope of the CE
correctly described the activities
undertaken and funded by NOAA. The
text of the revised CE is as follows:
‘‘Biological, chemical, food production,
ecological, or toxicological research
conducted in closed system mesocosm/
aquaculture facilities that are conducted
according to recommended protocols
that provide containment and disposal
of waste, chemicals, toxins, non-native
species, etc., in compliance with
established Federal and state regulatory
guidelines, and best management
practices.’’
IV. NOAA Categorical Exclusions
The following series of CEs includes
actions that may be implemented either
directly by NOAA or by the recipient of
a financial assistance award. The
activities contemplated in the series of
CEs have been evaluated and found not
to have individual or cumulative
significant impacts on the human
environment, whether implemented by
a grantee through a financial assistance
award or directly implemented by
NOAA. These CEs can be found as
appendix E to the Companion Manual,
along with illustrative examples for
many of the categories.
Trust Resource Management Actions
[A1]. ‘‘An action that is a technical
correction or a change to a fishery
management action or regulation, which
does not result in a substantial change
in any of the following: fishing location,
timing, effort, authorized gear types, or
harvest levels.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
[A2]. ‘‘Preparation of a recovery plan
pursuant to section 4(f)(1) of the ESA.
Such plans are advisory documents that
provide consultative and technical
assistance in recovery planning and do
not implement site-specific or speciesspecific management actions. However,
implementation of specific tasks
identified in a recovery plan may
require an EA or EIS depending on the
nature of the action.’’
[A3.] ‘‘Temporary fishery closures or
extensions of closures under Section
305(c)(3)(C) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act to ensure public health and safety.’’
[A4.] ‘‘Minor updates to existing
national marine sanctuary management
plans. This CE does not apply to
sanctuary designations, expansions,
changes in terms of designation, or new
sanctuary management plans.’’
[A5.] ‘‘Updates to existing National
Estuarine Research Reserve (NERR)
management plans, provided that the
update does not change NERR
boundaries or add or significantly
change allowable uses, uses requiring a
permit, or restrictions on uses. This CE
does not apply to new NERR
management plans, or to the execution
of any specific action subsequently
funded to support the updated NERR
management plan.’’
[A6.] ‘‘Review and approval of
changes to state coastal management
programs under the Coastal Zone
Management Act (CZMA) § 306(e) (16
U.S.C. 1455(e)) and NOAA’s regulations
at 15 CFR part 923.’’
Trust Resource Authorization and
Permitting Actions
[B1.] ‘‘Issuance of permits or permit
modifications under section 10(a)(1)(A)
of the ESA for take, import, or export of
endangered species for scientific
purposes or to enhance the propagation
or survival of the affected species, or in
accordance with the requirements of an
ESA section 4(d) regulation for
threatened species.’’
[B2.] ‘‘Issuance of permits or permit
amendments under section 104 of the
MMPA for take or import of marine
mammals for scientific research,
enhancement, commercial or
educational photography or public
display purposes; and issuance of
Letters of Confirmation under the
General Authorization for scientific
research involving only Level B
harassment.’’
[B3.] ‘‘Issuance of, and amendments
to, ‘‘low effect’’ Incidental Take Permits
and their supporting ‘‘low effect’’
Habitat Conservation Plans under
section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[B4.] ‘‘Issuance of incidental
harassment authorizations under section
101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA for
the incidental, but not intentional, take
by harassment of marine mammals
during specified activities and for which
no serious injury or mortality is
anticipated.’’
[B5.] ‘‘Issuance of, or amendments to,
general permits for activities that are
included in established permit
categories at 15 CFR pt. 922 and that
meet the regulatory review criteria at 15
CFR pt. 922, that limit any potential
impacts so that the proposed activity
will be conducted in a manner
compatible with the National Marine
Sanctuaries Act’s primary objective of
resource protection.’’
[B6.] ‘‘Issuance of, or amendments to,
special use permits for activities in a
national marine sanctuary that are
necessary to either establish conditions
of access to and use of any sanctuary
resource or promote public use and
understanding of a sanctuary resource
and must be conducted in a manner that
does not destroy, cause the loss of, or
injure sanctuary resources in
accordance with the National Marine
Sanctuaries Act.’’
[B7.] ‘‘Issuance of or amendments to,
authorizations for activities allowed by
a valid federal, regional, state, local or
tribal government approval (e.g., leases,
permits and licenses) issued after the
effective date of sanctuary designation
or expansion, so long as such
authorizations are based upon a
consideration of the regulatory review
criteria at 15 CFR pt. 922, and will only
result in negligible effects to sanctuary
resources.’’
[B8.] ‘‘Issuance of, or amendments to
certifications for pre-existing activities
authorized by a valid federal, regional,
state, local, or tribal government
approval (e.g., leases, permits and
licenses) or rights of subsistence use or
access in existence on the date of the
designation or expansion of any
national marine sanctuary where the
Office of National Marine Sanctuaries
issues terms and conditions that are
either ministerial or prescribe
avoidance, minimization, or mitigation
measures designed to ensure negligible
effects to sanctuary resources.’’
[B9.] ‘‘Issuance of, or amendments to
¯
¯
Papahanaumokuakea Marine National
Monument (as originally established by
Presidential Proclamation 8031 and
¯
¯
named Papahanaumokuakea Marine
National Monument by Presidential
Proclamation 8112) permits for
activities that are included in
established permit categories (50 CFR
pt. 404) and that meet the regulatory
review criteria at (50 CFR 404.11), that
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
limit any potential impacts so that the
proposed activity will be conducted in
a manner compatible with the
monument’s primary objective of
resource protection.’’
[B10.] ‘‘Issuance of, or amendments
¯
¯
to, Papahanaumokuakea Marine
National Monument special ocean use
permits for activities or use of the
monument that are engaged in to
generate revenue or profits for one or
more of the persons associated with the
activity or use, and do not destroy,
cause the loss of, or injure monument
resources.’’
[B11.] ‘‘Issuance of, or amendments to
permits or authorizations for activities
that are conducted within Marine
National Monuments other than
¯
¯
Papahanaumokuakea that are limited in
scope so that the potential impacts of
the proposed activities will be
conducted in a manner compatible with
a monument’s primary objective of
resource protection, and do not destroy,
cause the loss of, or injure monument
resources.’’
[B12.] ‘‘Issuance of Exempted Fishing
Permits (EFPs), Scientific Research
Permits (SRPs), and other permits for
research that may impact species under
the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (MSA) and the Atlantic Tunas
Convention Act (ATCA). This CE is
limited to permits that authorize
activities that are limited in size,
magnitude or duration with no potential
for significant individual or cumulative
impacts.’’
Habitat Restoration Actions
[C1.] ‘‘Habitat restoration actions,
provided that such action: (1)
transplants only organisms currently or
formerly present at the site or in its
immediate vicinity (if transplant is a
component of the action); (2) does not
require substantial placement of fill or
dredging; (3) does not involve any
removal of debris, excavation, or
conditioning of soils unless such
removal of debris, excavation, or
conditioning of soils is geographically
limited to the impact area such that site
conditions will not impede or
negatively alter natural processes, is in
compliance with all permit and disposal
requirements,), and will not impact
critical aquifers or recharge areas; and
(4) does not involve an added risk of
human or environmental exposure to
toxic or hazardous substances,
pathogens, or radioactive materials.
Notes: If applicable, limitations and
mitigation measures identified in the
NOAA Restoration Center Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement for
Habitat Restoration Actions must be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
followed. This CE includes, but is not
limited to, response or restoration
actions under CERLCA, OPA, or NMSA,
if such actions help to restore an
ecosystem, habitat, biotic community, or
population of living resources to a
determinable preimpact condition prior
to the incident leading to the response
or restoration.’’
Additional External Funding
[D1.] ‘‘Financial activities for the
following financial services: (1) Loans
for purchase, refinancing, or
reconstruction of fishing vessels and
purchase or refinancing of individual
fishing quota through the Fisheries
Finance Program; (2) Deferred tax
program provided to fishermen to
construct, reconstruct, or acquire fishing
vessels through the Capital Construction
Fund Program; and (3) Compensation to
fishermen for economic and property
losses caused by oil and gas
obstructions on the U.S. Outer
Continental Shelf under the Fishermen’s
Contingency Fund.’’
[D2.] ‘‘Provision of a grant, a contract
or other financial assistance to a State,
Fishery Management Council or Marine
Fisheries Commission under 16 U.S.C.
1881a(d).’’
Research Actions
[E1.] ‘‘Activities conducted in
laboratories and facilities where
research practices and safeguards
prevent environmental impacts.’’
[E2.] ‘‘Social science projects and
programs, including economic, political
science, human geography,
demography, and sociology studies,
including information collection
activities in support of studies.’’
[E3.] ‘‘Activities to collect aquatic,
terrestrial, and atmospheric data in a
non-destructive manner.’’
[E4.] ‘‘Activities that remotely survey
or observe living resources in the field
using non-invasive techniques, which
have little to no potential to adversely
affect the environment or interfere with
organisms or habitat.’’
[E5.] ‘‘Activities involving invasive
techniques or methods that are
conducted for scientific purposes, when
such activities are conducted in
accordance with all applicable
provisions of the Endangered Species
Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act,
Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act.
Such activities will be limited to
impacting living resources on a small
scale relative to the size of their
populations, and limited to
methodologies and locations to ensure
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4311
that there are no long-term adverse
ecosystem impacts.’’
[E6.] ‘‘Research that involves the
development and testing of new and
modified fishing gear and technology in
order to reduce adverse effects from
fishing gear on non-target species, and
is limited in size, magnitude, or
duration with no potential for
significant individual or cumulative
impacts.’’
[E7.] ‘‘Collection of data and
biological samples as part of previously
authorized commercial and/or
recreational fishing activities.’’
[E8.] ‘‘Biological, chemical, food
production, ecological, or toxicological
research conducted in closed system
mesocosm/aquaculture facilities that are
conducted according to recommended
protocols that provide containment and
disposal of waste, chemicals, toxins,
non-native species, etc., in compliance
with established Federal and state
regulatory guidelines, and best
management practices.’’
Real and Personal Property
Improvement, Maintenance, and
Construction Actions
[F1.] ‘‘Siting, construction (or
modification), and operation of support
buildings and support structures
(including, but not limited to, trailers
and prefabricated buildings) within or
contiguous to an already developed area
(where active utilities and currently
used roads are readily accessible).’’
[F2.] ‘‘In-kind replacement of personal
property and fixtures and other
components of real property when such
activities do not result in a substantial
change in the existing construction
footprint. In-kind replacement includes
installation of new components to
replace outmoded components if the
replacement does not result in a
substantial change to the design
capacity, or function of the facility.’’
[F3.] ‘‘(a) Routine repair,
maintenance, and improvement of real
and personal property, where such
activities are required to maintain and
preserve buildings, structures,
infrastructures, vehicles, and equipment
in a condition suitable to be used for its
designed purpose.
(b) New construction, expansion and/
or improvement of facilities where all of
the following conditions are met:
(1) The site is in a developed area
and/or a previously disturbed site;
(2) The structure and proposed use
are compatible with applicable Federal,
Tribal, State, and local planning and
zoning standards and consistent with
Federally approved State coastal
management programs and the National
Historic Preservation Act;
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4312
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
(3) The proposed use will not
substantially increase the number of
motor vehicles, marine vessels, or
aircraft at the facility or in the area;
(4) The site and scale of construction
or improvement are consistent with
those of existing, adjacent, or nearby
buildings;
(5) The construction or improvement
will not result in uses that exceed
existing infrastructure capacities (e.g.,
electrical, roads, sewer, water, parking);
(6) The construction or improvement
will not result in operational uses that
adversely affect the surrounding
community (e.g., noise); and
(7) The community-valued view sheds
are not adversely affected.
(c) Installation, repair, maintenance,
and enhancement of public access
facilities and infrastructure, if the
activity:
(1) Is small-scale and nondestructive;
and
(2) Is consistent with applicable rightof-way conditions and approved land
use plans.’’
[F4]. ‘‘Routine groundskeeping and
landscaping activities where ground
disturbance is limited to previously
disturbed areas (e.g., previously filled
paved, or cleared areas).’’
[F5.] ‘‘Installation, operation,
maintenance, improvements, repair,
upgrade, removal, and/or replacement
of instruments or instrument systems in
or on:
1. An existing structure or object (e.g.,
tower, antenna, building, pier, buoy,
terrestrial vehicle, or bridge) or
2. on previously disturbed (e.g., filled,
paved, or cleared) ground, or
3. on undisturbed ground, if the
equipment installation, operation, and
removal will require no or minimal
ground disturbance.’’
Microwave/radio communications
towers and antennas must be limited to
200 feet in height without guy wires.
NOAA proposes a new CE to cover
activities of installing, operating,
repairing, maintaining, upgrading,
removing and/or replacing instruments
or instrument systems in or on an
existing structure or object, or on
previously disturbed ground or on
undisturbed ground that involve either
no or minimal ground disturbance.
[F6.] ‘‘The determination that real
property is excess to the needs of the
Agency, when the real property is
excessed in conformity with General
Services Administration procedures or
is legislatively authorized to be
excessed.’’
[F7.] ‘‘The disposal, demolition or
removal of real property and related
improvements, buildings and structures,
including associated site restoration,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
and the disposal of personal property
and debris in accordance with all
applicable agency procedures and legal
requirements.’’
Operational Actions
[G1.] ‘‘Routine administrative actions
such as (1) program planning, direction
and evaluation, (2) administrative tasks,
services and support including
personnel and fiscal management,
advisory services, document and policy
preparation, and records management,
and (3) development, establishment,
and revisions to documents including,
but not limited to interagency
agreements, memoranda of
understanding, memoranda of
agreement, cooperative agreements, and
university agreements. This CE does not
include any associated activities
proposed in these documents beyond
the administrative task of creating and
establishing the document. Actions
subsequently funded by or undertaken
pursuant to the approved documents
may require additional NEPA review at
the time those actions are proposed.’’
[G2.] ‘‘Routine movement of mobile
assets, such as vessels and aircraft, for
homeport reassignments or repair/
overhaul, where no new support
facilities are required.’’
[G3.] ‘‘Topographic, bathymetric, land
use and land cover, geological,
hydrologic mapping, charting, and
surveying services that do not involve
major surface or subsurface land
disturbance and involve no permanent
physical, chemical, or biological change
to the environment.’’
[G4.] ‘‘Basic environmental services
and monitoring, such as weather
observations, communications,
analyses, and predictions;
environmental satellite operations and
services; digital and physical
environmental data and information
services; air and water quality
observations and analysis, and IT
operations. All such activities must be
conducted within existing facilities.’’
[G5.] ‘‘Enforcement operations
conducted under legislative mandate
such as the MSA, ESA, MMPA, the
Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 (Lacey),
and/or the National Marine Sanctuaries
Act. This does not include bringing
judicial or administrative civil or
criminal enforcement actions which are
outside the scope of NEPA in
accordance with 40 CFR 1508.18(a).’’
[G6.] ‘‘Actions that change the
NEXRAD radar coverage patterns that
do not lower the lowest scan elevation
and do not result in direct scanning of
previously non-scanned terrain by the
NEXRAD main beam.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[G7.] ‘‘Preparation of policy
directives, rules, regulations, and
guidelines of an administrative,
financial, legal, technical, or procedural
nature, or for which the environmental
effects are too broad, speculative or
conjectural to lend themselves to
meaningful analysis and will be subject
later to the NEPA process, either
collectively or on a case-by-case basis.’’
[G8.] ‘‘Activities that are educational,
informational, or advisory to other
agencies, public and private entities,
visitors, individuals, or the general
public, including training exercises and
simulations.’’
[G9.] ‘‘Actions taken to identify,
determine sources of, assess, prevent,
reduce, remove, dispose, or recycle
marine debris when removal is
undertaken in a non-destructive manner
and actions are in accordance with
Federal, State, and local laws and
regulations for environmental
protection, and where all relevant
regulatory consultation, and/or permit
requirements have been satisfied.’’
Acquisition and Real Property Actions
[H1.] ‘‘Procurement of labor,
equipment, materials, data and software
needed to execute mission requirements
in accordance with applicable
procurement regulations, executive
orders, and policies. This includes, but
is not limited to, procurement of mobile
and portable equipment that is stored in
existing structures or facilities.’’
[H2.] ‘‘Procurement of space by
purchase or lease of or within an
existing facility or structure in
accordance with applicable
procurement regulations, executive
orders, and policies when there is no
change in the general type of use, no
new construction of buildings or
utilities, and minimal change in design
from the previous occupancy level.’’
[H3.] ‘‘Outgranting of governmentcontrolled property in accordance with
applicable regulations, executive orders,
and policies to a Federal entity for any
purpose consistent with the existing
land or facility use or to a non-Federal
entity, when the use will remain
substantially the same.’’
[H4.] ‘‘Acquisition of real property
(including fee simple estates,
leaseholds, and easements) that is not
acquired through condemnation of a
lease interest, and will not result in
significant change in use and does not
involve construction or modification.’’
[H5.] ‘‘Granting easements or rights of
entry to use NOAA controlled property
for activities that, if conducted by
NOAA, could be categorically excluded.
Grants of easements or rights-of-way for
the use of NOAA controlled real
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
property complementing the use of
existing rights-of-way or real property
use for use by vehicles (not to include
significant increases in vehicle loading);
electrical, telephone, and other
transmission and communication lines;
water, wastewater, stormwater, and
irrigation pipelines, pumping stations,
and facilities; and similar utility and
transportation uses.’’
[H6.] ‘‘Relocation of employees into
existing Federally-owned or
commercially leased office space within
the same metropolitan area not
involving a substantial increase in the
number of motor or other vehicles at a
facility.’’
[H7.] ‘‘Transferring real property to a
non-Federal entity, an agency other than
GSA, as well as to States, local agencies
and Indian Tribes, including return of
public domain lands to the Department
of the Interior.’’
Dated: January 6, 2017.
Lois J. Schiffer,
General Counsel for the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 2017–00553 Filed 1–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–12–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration
[Docket No. 170105023–7023–01]
RIN 0660–XC033
The Benefits, Challenges, and
Potential Roles for the Government in
Fostering the Advancement of the
Internet of Things
National Telecommunications
and Information Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice, request for public
comment.
AGENCY:
Recognizing the vital
importance of the Internet to U.S.
innovation, prosperity, education, and
civic and cultural life, the Department
of Commerce (Department) has made it
a top priority to encourage growth of the
digital economy and ensure that the
Internet remains an open platform for
innovation. Thus, as part of the
Department’s Digital Economy Agenda,
the National Telecommunications and
Information Administration (NTIA)
issued a green paper ‘‘Fostering the
Advancement of the Internet of Things’’
that lays out an approach and areas of
engagement for the Department’s
possible future work on the Internet of
Things (IoT). Through this Notice, NTIA
seeks broad input from all interested
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
stakeholders—including the private
industry, researchers, academia, and
civil society—on the issues and
proposed approach, current initiatives,
and next steps laid out in this paper.
These comments will help inform
Department leadership on possible
future Department action regarding IoT.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 27,
2017.
Written comments may be
submitted by email to iotrfc2017@
ntia.doc.gov. Comments submitted by
email should be machine-readable and
should not be copy-protected. Written
comments also may be submitted by
mail to the National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Room 4725, Attn: IOT RFC 2017,
Washington, DC 20230. Responders
should include the name of the person
or organization filing the comment, as
well as a page number on each page of
their submissions. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted on the
NTIA Web site, https://www.
ntia.doc.gov/, without change. All
personal identifying information (for
example, name, address) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter may be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NTIA will accept
anonymous comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Travis Hall, National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Room 4725, Washington, DC
20230; telephone (202) 482–3522; email
thall@ntia.doc.gov. Please direct media
inquiries to NTIA’s Office of Public
Affairs, (202) 482–7002, or at press@
ntia.doc.gov.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: As part of the
Department’s Digital Economy Agenda,
the National Telecommunications and
Information Administration (NTIA) is
requesting comment on the benefits,
challenges, and potential roles for the
government in fostering the
advancement of the Internet of Things
(IoT).
The Internet of Things—in which
connected devices are proliferating at an
unprecedented rate—is transforming the
way we live and do business. IoT
continues the decades-long trend of
increasing connectivity among devices
and the Internet, bringing online
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4313
everything from refrigerators to
automobiles to factory inventory
systems. At the same time, IoT
encompasses a widening scope of
industries and activities and a vastly
increasing scale and number of devices
being connected, thus raising the stakes
and impacts of broad connectivity. Due
to its expertise and experience with the
issues raised by IoT, as well as its
economy-wide perspective, the
Department is well placed to meet the
challenges of IoT and to champion the
development of a robust IoT
environment that benefits consumers,
the economy, and society as a whole.
With an April 2016 Request for
Comment, ‘‘The Benefits, Challenges,
and Potential Roles for the Government
in Fostering the Advancement of the
Internet of Things,’’ the Department
sought to review the current
technological and policy landscape
relating to IoT.1 A broad array of
stakeholders—from the private sector,
academia, government, and civil
society—offered perspectives in
response to the request.2 In September
2016, the Department hosted a
workshop to delve deeper into the
questions raised by the Request for
Comment, and to explore some of the
related issues arising from the public
comments.3 The Department issued a
green paper entitled ‘‘Fostering the
Advancement of the Internet of Things,’’
which represents the Department’s
analysis of those comments.4 The green
paper also identifies key issues that can
impact the deployment of IoT
technologies, highlights potential
benefits and challenges, and discusses
what role, if any, the U.S. Government,
particularly the Department, should
play in this evolving landscape. With
this Request for Comment, the
Department is asking for a response to
the issues raised by the green paper, as
well as the proposed approach, current
initiatives, and next steps.
1 Request for Comments on the Benefits,
Challenges, and Potential Roles for the Government
in Fostering the Advancement of the Internet of
Things, 81 FR 19956 (April 16, 2016), available at
https://ntia.doc.gov/federal-register-notice/2016/rfcpotential-roles-government-fostering-advancementinternet-of-things.
2 All comments are publicly available at: https://
ntia.doc.gov/federal-register-notice/2016/
comments-potential-roles-government-fosteringadvancement-internet-of-things.
3 ‘‘Fostering the Advancement of the Internet of
Things Workshop Webcast,’’ September 1, 2016,
available at https://ntia.doc.gov/other-publication/
2016/09012016-fostering-advancement-internetthings-workshop-webcast (In addition to the
webcast, also available are the Workshop agenda,
transcript, and various presentations).
4 The IOT green paper is available at: https://
www.ntia.doc.gov/other-publication/2017/greenpaper-fostering-advancement-internet-things.
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4306-4313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00553]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[Docket Number: NOAA-HQ-2016-0145]
RIN 0648-XF137
National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures and
Executive Order 12114 Categorical Exclusions
AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
publishes this notice to notify the public that NOAA has finalized
revisions to the agency's procedures for implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and related authorities, as contained
in the Companion Manual to NOAA Administrative Order NAO 216-6A
(Companion Manual). Included in the Companion Manual are NOAA's revised
categorical exclusions (CE) and related extraordinary circumstances.
This notice provides a summary of the public comments received and the
agency's responses as well as a summary of changes from the draft to
the final procedures. The final Companion Manual is available online at
https://www.nepa.noaa.nepa.gov.
DATES: The revised procedures are effective January 13, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information regarding NOAA's NEPA
procedures, contact Katherine Renshaw, NOAA NEPA Coordinator, at
noaa.nepa@noaa.gov or 301-713-7380.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On April 22, 2016, NOAA issued NOAA Administrative Order 216-6A
(NAO 216-6A), which updated NOAA's policy for compliance with NEPA, the
CEQ NEPA regulations, and other related authorities, including
Executive Order (EO) 12114, Environmental Effects Abroad of Major
Federal Actions; EO 11988, Floodplain Management; and EO 11990,
Protection of Wetlands. The NOAA Administrative Order authorized the
development of a Companion Manual entitled Policy and Procedures for
Compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act and Related
Authorities (``Companion Manual''). On November, 17, 2016, NOAA
published a notice in the Federal Register inviting public comments for
a 30-day period on the draft Companion Manual, which included NOAA's
revised CEs. After careful consideration of the public comments
received in response to that notice, and upon further internal review,
NOAA has decided to finalize the Companion Manual and CEs with some
minor revisions from the November 17, 2016 draft.
II. Comments Received and NOAA's Responses
NOAA received comments from private citizens, nongovernmental
organizations, states and state organizations. All substantive comments
received and considered are available online at (https://noaa.nepa.gov),
and on the Regulations.gov Web site (www.regulations.gov) at docket ID:
[NOAA-HQ-2016-0145]. NOAA has considered all comments received, and
[[Page 4307]]
NOAA's response to the comments is contained below.
A. Comments on NOAA's NEPA Process
State commenters raised concerns regarding the process of applying
NEPA to the Federal grant application process. State commenters also
sought additional criteria for determining whether cumulative and
secondary impacts will trigger an Environmental Assessment (EA),
specifically requesting a clear flow chart on the process.
NOAA appreciates the concerns expressed by these comments and will
continue to seek ways to improve coordination of environmental review
requirements as we begin implementing these revised procedures.
B. Comments on Previously Analyzed Activities
State commenters requested that NOAA develop a CE that ``includes
projects that have already undergone sufficient environmental review
under NEPA.''
NOAA does not agree that a broad CE that would cover all such
activities would be appropriate. Instead, NOAA would point the
commenters to section 5 of the Companion Manual that provides guidance
on how to determine whether existing NOAA NEPA documents adequately
analyze the impacts of a proposed action; as well as section 6(H) that
provides guidance on adopting other agency NEPA documents. We believe
that the processes outlined in those sections that include factors to
consider and required documentation (including, for example, the
requirement that NOAA issue its own FONSI when adopting another agency
EA), are the appropriate processes to use when relying on existing NEPA
documents, consistent with the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ)
regulations and guidance.
C. Comments on Definitions Used in the Companion Manual and CEs
State commenters requested that NOAA provide definitions for
frequently used terms including ``minor,'' ``small scale,''
``nondestructive,'' and ``substantial.''
NOAA provided definitions for the terms ``previously disturbed
ground,'' ``minor,'' ``small scale,'' and ``negligible'' in the
November 17, 2016 Federal Register notice (81 FR 81067). In order to
ensure consistent application of its procedures, NOAA determined that
such definitions should be included in the Companion Manual and will
add the definitions included in our initial Federal Register notice to
the glossary at Appendix A of the Companion Manual. NOAA will also add
definitions for the terms ``short term,'' ``long term,'' and
``nondestructive,'' to provide further clarity. These additional terms
will be defined as follows:
Short-term--refers to a potential impact of short duration,
relative to the proposed project and the environmental resource. Short-
term impacts occur while the activity is underway, and do not persist
once the activity ends. Noise produced by temporary construction
activities is an example of a short-term impact. Long-term--refers to a
potential impact of long duration, relative to the proposed project and
the environmental resources. Long-term impacts continue after the
project has ceased. Permanent impacts that remain after the
construction phase of a project is an example of a long-term impact.
Nondestructive--this terms refers to actions that do not result in
long term or permanent physical alteration of a component of the human
environment. Passive acoustics, ground penetrating radar, and air
quality sampling are examples of nondestructive methods to collect
environmental data.
D. Comments on Individual CEs
A1
One commenter recommended deleting the phrase ``access to fishery
resources'' from A1. The commenter notes that actions that change
access to fishery resources do not necessarily result in environmental
impacts when there are no changes of any of the other actions listed in
the CE, i.e., fishing location, timing, effort, authorized gear types,
or harvest levels.
We agree, and have removed the phrase ``access to fishery
resources'' from the text of CE A1.
A5
State commenters requested that NOAA modify CE A5 so as to include
minor five-year updates to National Estuarine Research Reserve (NERR)
management plans relative to boundary expansion based on acquisition of
property for conservation purposes. The proposed A5 applies to updates
to NERR management plans, provided that the update does not change NERR
boundaries.
Boundary changes will involve areas that fall outside the
geographic scope of the original Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
prepared pursuant to 15 CFR 921.13, and may involve potentially
significant impacts to additional species or habitats that were not
considered when the reserve was established. For this reason, NOAA will
retain the proposed limiting language in the CE in the final
procedures.
B4
One comment raised concerns with proposed CE B4. Generally, the
comment expresses concern that the application of the CE will result in
a failure to consider the cumulative impacts of activities authorized
under that CE. Additionally, the commenter is concerned about NOAA's
decision to include authorizations under both sections 101(a)(5)(A) and
(D) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) in the same CE, arguing
that doing so ignores the differences in these authorizations. The
commenter finally expressed a concern that NOAA has eliminated language
from the 1999 procedures that had specifically stated that ``if
authorization under 101(a)(5)(A) does not tier from a programmatic
environmental review, that action may require an EIS, EA, or CE, based
on a case-by-case review.''
NOAA has determined that this CE, by its terms, and in light of the
requirement to consider extraordinary circumstances, is appropriate and
would not have the potential for significant impacts. In particular,
NOAA notes that extraordinary circumstances (l) refers to ``the
potential for significant cumulative impacts when the proposed action
is combined with other past, present and reasonably foreseeable future
actions, even though the impacts of the proposed action may not be
significant by themselves.'' See Companion Manual for NOAA
Administrative Order 216-6A at 4-5.
Additionally, the B4 CE does not ignore the differences between
101(a)(5)(A) and (D); rather it was crafted to apply to incidental take
authorizations issued under either provision if they meet the criterion
of no serious injury or mortality (and are not disqualified under the
extraordinary circumstances evaluation). While it is true that
criterion will be satisfied with any authorization issued under section
101(a)(5)(D), it is also true that in some cases authorizations issued
under section 101(a)(5)(A) could meet that criterion as well, depending
on the specified activity. Section 101(a)(5)(A) allows for
authorization of take by serious injury or mortality but is not only
for activities involving those effects.
Finally, NOAA notes that although language specific to the
application of NEPA to the MMPA process was removed in the revised NEPA
procedures, generally applicable provisions still apply to MMPA
authorizations. For example, section 3 of the Companion Manual explains
how, on a case-by-case basis, to
[[Page 4308]]
determine the proper level of NEPA analysis for an action.
One comment raises a concern that proposed CE B12 is overly broad
and requests that NOAA delete the CE. As proposed, B12 would cover
``issuance of Exempted Fishing Permits (EFP) under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) and
Scientific Research Permits (SRP) and other permits for research that
may impact species regulated under the authority of the MSA and the
Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA). This includes permitted research
of limited size, magnitude or duration with negligible individual or
cumulative impacts, which requires temporary relief of fishery
management regulations.''
NOAA has determined that this CE, by its terms, and in light of the
requirement to consider extraordinary circumstances, is appropriate and
would not have the potential for significant impacts. We agree,
however, that as proposed, CE B12 would benefit from revision for
clarity to make clear that the limitations described in the proposed
category apply to all activities under the CE. NOAA will revise B12 in
the following manner: ``Issuance of Exempted Fishing Permits (EFP),
Scientific Research Permits (SRP), and other permits for research that
may impact species regulated under the authority of the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) and the Atlantic
Tunas Convention Act (ATCA). This CE is limited to permits that
authorize activities of limited size, magnitude or duration, which have
no potential for significant individual or cumulative impacts.''
C1
State commenters asked for several areas of clarification regarding
the application of CE C1 that addresses habitat restoration activities.
The state commenters requested that NOAA either remove the CE's
dredge and fill limitation, or provide additional clarity as to the
application of that limitation. As proposed, C1 is limited to projects
that ``[do] not require substantial placement of fill or dredging.''
NOAA believes that the limitation of the CE with respect to
dredging and placement of fill is appropriate and notes that its
application will be context dependent. When considering whether
placement of fill or dredging are ``substantial,'' NOAA will consider
the volume of the fill to be placed, as well as the context in which it
would occur to determine that the placement will not have the potential
to cause significant environmental impacts. Thus, NOAA is not proposing
any modifications to this CE to address this issue.
Additionally, the states requested that NOAA further limit covered
habitat restoration actions to those that transplant only native
species. The proposed C1 language would limit actions to those that
``transplant'' only organisms currently or formerly present at the site
or in its immediate vicinity (if transplant is a component of the
action). The states expressed concern that without limiting transplant
to native species that such actions may result in impacts from exotic
invasive species.
NOAA has determined that this CE, by its terms, and in light of the
requirement to consider extraordinary circumstances, is appropriate and
would not have the potential for significant impacts. In particular,
NOAA notes that extraordinary circumstance (j) refers to the
``contribution to the introduction, continued existence, or spread of
noxious weeds or non-native invasive species known to occur in the area
or actions that may promote the introduction, growth, or expansion of
the range of the species.'' See Companion Manual for NOAA
Administrative Order 216-6A at 4-5. Accordingly, if a proposed action
to transplant organisms has the potential to result in significant
impacts due to the potential spread of exotic invasive species, such an
action may require additional analysis.
Finally, the states requested further guidance as to the
applicability of C1 to various restoration activities such as living
shoreline construction, routine terrestrial restoration activities, and
stocking fish and associated activities.
As noted in Appendix E, the examples provided with the CEs are
intended to be illustrative, but not exhaustive. Thus, omission of a
particular activity does not mean that such activity could not
potentially be covered by the CE. In reviewing whether an activity,
such as a living shoreline construction project would be potentially
included within C1, NOAA would consider the particular elements of that
project to determine whether the proposed action fits within the limits
of the CE.
F3
State commenters requested clarification as to whether CE F3
applies to the restoration or repair of buildings of cultural or
historic significance. Additionally, state commenters sought
clarification as to whether the CE applies to small-scale construction
of boat ramps, fishing piers, and observation platforms. Commenters
note that limitations in F3(b), such as F3(b)(3) that would preclude
proposed uses of newly constructed facilities that will substantially
increase the number of marine vessels in the area would potentially
preclude application to the construction of public access facilities
such as boat ramps. Finally, one commenter questioned how NOAA will
determine viewshed impacts.
NOAA's extraordinary circumstance (e) would require evaluation of
whether a proposed activity would involve adverse effects on properties
listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic
Places authorized by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966,
National Historic Landmarks designated by the Secretary of the
Interior, or National Monuments designated through the Antiquities Act
of 1906; Federally recognized tribal and Native Alaskan lands, cultural
or natural resources, or religious or cultural sites that cannot be
resolved through applicable regulatory processes. See Companion Manual
for NOAA Administrative Order 216-6A at 4-5.
With respect to the construction of public access facilities, NOAA
notes that such activities are covered explicitly under F3(c), and not
F3(b). Thus, the limitations that the commenters are concerned with
would not be applicable to the construction of public access facilities
such as boat ramps, docks, or observation platforms. Those projects are
potentially allowable under the CE so long as the proposed activity is
(1) small-scale and nondestructive; and (2) is consistent with
applicable right-of-way conditions and approved land use plans. NOAA
notes that there is a typographical error in the proposed CE that
included an ``and'' following F3(c)(2), which may be confusing, and has
corrected that error.
As discussed above, NOAA is adding several additional definitions
to the handbook, including ``nondestructive.'' NOAA does not believe
that it is necessary to make any modifications to the CE to exempt
small scale construction of public access facilities such as boat
ramps, fishing piers, and observation platforms as such activities are
explicitly covered by F3(c), and included as examples of activities
covered by the CE. As described in our definitions section, we believe
that it is appropriate to define small scale relative to the potential
impacts of the project, rather than with respect to the funding level
involved.
Finally, with respect to viewshed impact evaluation, NOAA's staff
will rely upon their professional expertise
[[Page 4309]]
and standard practices and procedures to evaluate potential impacts to
viewsheds. Viewshed analysis, through the use of GIS technology, is
commonly used by researchers and natural resource managers to assess
potential visual impacts of development.
F4
State commenters request that NOAA clarify whether routine grounds
keeping and landscaping would include native landscaping installation
or rain gardens and other storm water Best Management Practices.
As discussed above, when determining whether a particular proposed
action would be potentially included within a CE, NOAA will consider
the particular elements of the project to determine its eligibility.
NOAA does note however, that activities that involve improvements of
real property may be better categorized under CE F3.
G1
State commenters request clarification as to whether CE G1 applies
to the development of community development plans, vulnerability
assessments, erosion management plans, feasibility studies, and
engineering/design plans for restoration projects.
G1 includes routine administrative actions such as development,
establishment, and revisions to documents including, but not limited to
interagency agreements, memoranda of understanding, memoranda of
agreement, cooperative agreements and university agreements. As noted
in Appendix E, the examples provided with the CEs are intended to be
illustrative, but not exhaustive. Thus, omission of a particular
activity does not mean that such activity could not potentially be
covered by the CE. NOAA will evaluate proposed actions on a case-by-
case basis to determine whether they are appropriately addressed by the
CE.
H4
State commenters request clarification as to whether the
acquisition of land intended for habitat restoration, including removal
of invasive plant species or off-site native plants/trees would be
included within CE H4. Commenters additionally request the development
of a new CE to explicitly cover tree removal activities.
CE H4 applies to the acquisition of real property that is not
acquired through condemnation of a lease interest, and will not result
in significant change in use and does involve construction or
modification. Accordingly, so long as the acquisition is done in
accordance with the terms of the CE, and upon review by NOAA's NEPA
professional staff, acquisition of land intended for habitat
restoration may potentially be covered. NOAA notes that one of the
examples provided of activities covered by the CE includes funding for
land acquisition under the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) and Fish
and Wildlife Conservation Act (FWCA)to purchase land (submerged or not
submerged) or interests in land that includes but is not limited to
conservation easements, for purposes that do not involve construction
or modification.
With respect to the request for the development of an additional CE
to specifically cover tree removal, NOAA does not currently have the
experience to support expanding the CE to include such projects, but
this may change as NOAA gains experience over time.
III. Additional Changes to Companion Manual and Categorical Exclusions
In addition to revisions to CEs based on its consideration of
public comments, NOAA further reviewed the proposed CEs and determined
that certain CEs would benefit from revisions that clarified the scope
and applicability of the CE, specifically the limitations described in
the text of the CE to ensure it is only applied to activities with no
potential for significant effects on the environment under normal
circumstances. Internal discussions also resulted in many instances in
the addition or revision of examples provided for the CEs for the
benefit of NOAA NEPA practitioners. Additionally, NOAA identified
typographical and grammatical errors and corrected those errors. This
section explains the substantive revisions NOAA made to its proposed
CEs and the rationale for those revisions.
E3
NOAA is adding two additional examples of activities that fit
within this category: ``use of mobile platforms (e.g., ships, aircraft,
balloons, vehicles) to study biological, chemical, or physical
processes;'' and ``collection of cultural and environmental data to
find and assess archaeological resources.''
E4
NOAA has made minor modifications to the text of E4 following
internal discussions with subject matter experts in order to ensure
that the category of activities is sufficiently limited. The revised
text is as follows: ``Activities that remotely survey or observe living
resources in the field using non-invasive techniques, which have little
to no potential to adversely affect the environment or interfere with
organisms or habitat.'' NOAA has also slightly modified one of the
examples provided to make clear that electronic monitoring activities
under this category are limited to deployment of non animal-borne
devices.
E5
NOAA has made minor modifications to the text of E5 following
internal discussions with subject matter experts in order to ensure
that the category of activities is sufficiently limited. The revised
text is as follows: ``Activities involving invasive techniques or
methods that are conducted for scientific purposes, when such
activities are conducted in accordance with all applicable provisions
of the Endangered Species Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act, Migratory
Bird Treaty Act, and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act. Such activities will be limited to impacting living
resources on a small scale relative to the size of their populations,
and limited to methodologies and locations to ensure that there are no
long-term, adverse ecosystem impacts.''
E6
NOAA made a minor modification to the text of E6 to improve
internal consistency. The text of the revised CE is as follows:
``Research that involves the development and testing of new and
modified fishing gear and technology in order to reduce adverse effects
from fishing gear on non-target species, and is limited in size,
magnitude or duration with no potential for significant individual or
cumulative impacts.''
E7
Based on internal discussions on proposed CE E7, NOAA has revised
the text of the CE to remove the references to fishing vessels and
dockside as locations for the collection of data and biological
samples. These terms were intended to be broad and to encompass any
number of locations, including, for example, on fishing vessels, on
motherships, in processing plants, dockside, and shoreside. However,
that broad scope might not have been obvious to readers on the face of
the proposed CE, and including the terms ``fishing vessels'' and
``dockside'' may have unintentionally suggested a narrower scope than
what was intended. Therefore, we are removing those terms from the text
of the CE and leaving the CE to broadly encompass data and biological
samples collected as part of
[[Page 4310]]
previously authorized commercial and/or recreational fishing
activities. This change does not change the intended scope of the
proposed CE, but only makes the scope of the CE clearer for users and
the public. In addition, we have revised the first example under this
CE to add ``Collecting data from'' before ``observer coverage onboard
commercial and recreational fishing vessels.'' This change is being
made to make it more explicit that the example is referring only to the
collection of data through previously authorized observer coverage, and
nothing else related to observer coverage. This CE does not cover
observer coverage requirements onboard commercial or recreational
fishing vessels, which are generally addressed through fishery
management plans or regulations for the fishery for which observer
coverage is being implemented.
E8
NOAA made a minor modification to the text of E8 following internal
discussions with subject matter experts to ensure that the scope of the
CE correctly described the activities undertaken and funded by NOAA.
The text of the revised CE is as follows: ``Biological, chemical, food
production, ecological, or toxicological research conducted in closed
system mesocosm/aquaculture facilities that are conducted according to
recommended protocols that provide containment and disposal of waste,
chemicals, toxins, non-native species, etc., in compliance with
established Federal and state regulatory guidelines, and best
management practices.''
IV. NOAA Categorical Exclusions
The following series of CEs includes actions that may be
implemented either directly by NOAA or by the recipient of a financial
assistance award. The activities contemplated in the series of CEs have
been evaluated and found not to have individual or cumulative
significant impacts on the human environment, whether implemented by a
grantee through a financial assistance award or directly implemented by
NOAA. These CEs can be found as appendix E to the Companion Manual,
along with illustrative examples for many of the categories.
Trust Resource Management Actions
[A1]. ``An action that is a technical correction or a change to a
fishery management action or regulation, which does not result in a
substantial change in any of the following: fishing location, timing,
effort, authorized gear types, or harvest levels.''
[A2]. ``Preparation of a recovery plan pursuant to section 4(f)(1)
of the ESA. Such plans are advisory documents that provide consultative
and technical assistance in recovery planning and do not implement
site-specific or species-specific management actions. However,
implementation of specific tasks identified in a recovery plan may
require an EA or EIS depending on the nature of the action.''
[A3.] ``Temporary fishery closures or extensions of closures under
Section 305(c)(3)(C) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act to ensure public health and safety.''
[A4.] ``Minor updates to existing national marine sanctuary
management plans. This CE does not apply to sanctuary designations,
expansions, changes in terms of designation, or new sanctuary
management plans.''
[A5.] ``Updates to existing National Estuarine Research Reserve
(NERR) management plans, provided that the update does not change NERR
boundaries or add or significantly change allowable uses, uses
requiring a permit, or restrictions on uses. This CE does not apply to
new NERR management plans, or to the execution of any specific action
subsequently funded to support the updated NERR management plan.''
[A6.] ``Review and approval of changes to state coastal management
programs under the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) Sec. 306(e) (16
U.S.C. 1455(e)) and NOAA's regulations at 15 CFR part 923.''
Trust Resource Authorization and Permitting Actions
[B1.] ``Issuance of permits or permit modifications under section
10(a)(1)(A) of the ESA for take, import, or export of endangered
species for scientific purposes or to enhance the propagation or
survival of the affected species, or in accordance with the
requirements of an ESA section 4(d) regulation for threatened
species.''
[B2.] ``Issuance of permits or permit amendments under section 104
of the MMPA for take or import of marine mammals for scientific
research, enhancement, commercial or educational photography or public
display purposes; and issuance of Letters of Confirmation under the
General Authorization for scientific research involving only Level B
harassment.''
[B3.] ``Issuance of, and amendments to, ``low effect'' Incidental
Take Permits and their supporting ``low effect'' Habitat Conservation
Plans under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA.''
[B4.] ``Issuance of incidental harassment authorizations under
section 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA for the incidental, but not
intentional, take by harassment of marine mammals during specified
activities and for which no serious injury or mortality is
anticipated.''
[B5.] ``Issuance of, or amendments to, general permits for
activities that are included in established permit categories at 15 CFR
pt. 922 and that meet the regulatory review criteria at 15 CFR pt. 922,
that limit any potential impacts so that the proposed activity will be
conducted in a manner compatible with the National Marine Sanctuaries
Act's primary objective of resource protection.''
[B6.] ``Issuance of, or amendments to, special use permits for
activities in a national marine sanctuary that are necessary to either
establish conditions of access to and use of any sanctuary resource or
promote public use and understanding of a sanctuary resource and must
be conducted in a manner that does not destroy, cause the loss of, or
injure sanctuary resources in accordance with the National Marine
Sanctuaries Act.''
[B7.] ``Issuance of or amendments to, authorizations for activities
allowed by a valid federal, regional, state, local or tribal government
approval (e.g., leases, permits and licenses) issued after the
effective date of sanctuary designation or expansion, so long as such
authorizations are based upon a consideration of the regulatory review
criteria at 15 CFR pt. 922, and will only result in negligible effects
to sanctuary resources.''
[B8.] ``Issuance of, or amendments to certifications for pre-
existing activities authorized by a valid federal, regional, state,
local, or tribal government approval (e.g., leases, permits and
licenses) or rights of subsistence use or access in existence on the
date of the designation or expansion of any national marine sanctuary
where the Office of National Marine Sanctuaries issues terms and
conditions that are either ministerial or prescribe avoidance,
minimization, or mitigation measures designed to ensure negligible
effects to sanctuary resources.''
[B9.] ``Issuance of, or amendments to Papah[amacr]naumoku[amacr]kea
Marine National Monument (as originally established by Presidential
Proclamation 8031 and named Papah[amacr]naumoku[amacr]kea Marine
National Monument by Presidential Proclamation 8112) permits for
activities that are included in established permit categories (50 CFR
pt. 404) and that meet the regulatory review criteria at (50 CFR
404.11), that
[[Page 4311]]
limit any potential impacts so that the proposed activity will be
conducted in a manner compatible with the monument's primary objective
of resource protection.''
[B10.] ``Issuance of, or amendments to,
Papah[amacr]naumoku[amacr]kea Marine National Monument special ocean
use permits for activities or use of the monument that are engaged in
to generate revenue or profits for one or more of the persons
associated with the activity or use, and do not destroy, cause the loss
of, or injure monument resources.''
[B11.] ``Issuance of, or amendments to permits or authorizations
for activities that are conducted within Marine National Monuments
other than Papah[amacr]naumoku[amacr]kea that are limited in scope so
that the potential impacts of the proposed activities will be conducted
in a manner compatible with a monument's primary objective of resource
protection, and do not destroy, cause the loss of, or injure monument
resources.''
[B12.] ``Issuance of Exempted Fishing Permits (EFPs), Scientific
Research Permits (SRPs), and other permits for research that may impact
species under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (MSA) and the Atlantic Tunas Convention
Act (ATCA). This CE is limited to permits that authorize activities
that are limited in size, magnitude or duration with no potential for
significant individual or cumulative impacts.''
Habitat Restoration Actions
[C1.] ``Habitat restoration actions, provided that such action: (1)
transplants only organisms currently or formerly present at the site or
in its immediate vicinity (if transplant is a component of the action);
(2) does not require substantial placement of fill or dredging; (3)
does not involve any removal of debris, excavation, or conditioning of
soils unless such removal of debris, excavation, or conditioning of
soils is geographically limited to the impact area such that site
conditions will not impede or negatively alter natural processes, is in
compliance with all permit and disposal requirements,), and will not
impact critical aquifers or recharge areas; and (4) does not involve an
added risk of human or environmental exposure to toxic or hazardous
substances, pathogens, or radioactive materials.
Notes: If applicable, limitations and mitigation measures
identified in the NOAA Restoration Center Programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement for Habitat Restoration Actions must be followed. This
CE includes, but is not limited to, response or restoration actions
under CERLCA, OPA, or NMSA, if such actions help to restore an
ecosystem, habitat, biotic community, or population of living resources
to a determinable preimpact condition prior to the incident leading to
the response or restoration.''
Additional External Funding
[D1.] ``Financial activities for the following financial services:
(1) Loans for purchase, refinancing, or reconstruction of fishing
vessels and purchase or refinancing of individual fishing quota through
the Fisheries Finance Program; (2) Deferred tax program provided to
fishermen to construct, reconstruct, or acquire fishing vessels through
the Capital Construction Fund Program; and (3) Compensation to
fishermen for economic and property losses caused by oil and gas
obstructions on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf under the Fishermen's
Contingency Fund.''
[D2.] ``Provision of a grant, a contract or other financial
assistance to a State, Fishery Management Council or Marine Fisheries
Commission under 16 U.S.C. 1881a(d).''
Research Actions
[E1.] ``Activities conducted in laboratories and facilities where
research practices and safeguards prevent environmental impacts.''
[E2.] ``Social science projects and programs, including economic,
political science, human geography, demography, and sociology studies,
including information collection activities in support of studies.''
[E3.] ``Activities to collect aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric
data in a non-destructive manner.''
[E4.] ``Activities that remotely survey or observe living resources
in the field using non-invasive techniques, which have little to no
potential to adversely affect the environment or interfere with
organisms or habitat.''
[E5.] ``Activities involving invasive techniques or methods that
are conducted for scientific purposes, when such activities are
conducted in accordance with all applicable provisions of the
Endangered Species Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act, Migratory Bird
Treaty Act, and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act. Such activities will be limited to impacting living resources on a
small scale relative to the size of their populations, and limited to
methodologies and locations to ensure that there are no long-term
adverse ecosystem impacts.''
[E6.] ``Research that involves the development and testing of new
and modified fishing gear and technology in order to reduce adverse
effects from fishing gear on non-target species, and is limited in
size, magnitude, or duration with no potential for significant
individual or cumulative impacts.''
[E7.] ``Collection of data and biological samples as part of
previously authorized commercial and/or recreational fishing
activities.''
[E8.] ``Biological, chemical, food production, ecological, or
toxicological research conducted in closed system mesocosm/aquaculture
facilities that are conducted according to recommended protocols that
provide containment and disposal of waste, chemicals, toxins, non-
native species, etc., in compliance with established Federal and state
regulatory guidelines, and best management practices.''
Real and Personal Property Improvement, Maintenance, and Construction
Actions
[F1.] ``Siting, construction (or modification), and operation of
support buildings and support structures (including, but not limited
to, trailers and prefabricated buildings) within or contiguous to an
already developed area (where active utilities and currently used roads
are readily accessible).''
[F2.] ``In-kind replacement of personal property and fixtures and
other components of real property when such activities do not result in
a substantial change in the existing construction footprint. In-kind
replacement includes installation of new components to replace outmoded
components if the replacement does not result in a substantial change
to the design capacity, or function of the facility.''
[F3.] ``(a) Routine repair, maintenance, and improvement of real
and personal property, where such activities are required to maintain
and preserve buildings, structures, infrastructures, vehicles, and
equipment in a condition suitable to be used for its designed purpose.
(b) New construction, expansion and/or improvement of facilities
where all of the following conditions are met:
(1) The site is in a developed area and/or a previously disturbed
site;
(2) The structure and proposed use are compatible with applicable
Federal, Tribal, State, and local planning and zoning standards and
consistent with Federally approved State coastal management programs
and the National Historic Preservation Act;
[[Page 4312]]
(3) The proposed use will not substantially increase the number of
motor vehicles, marine vessels, or aircraft at the facility or in the
area;
(4) The site and scale of construction or improvement are
consistent with those of existing, adjacent, or nearby buildings;
(5) The construction or improvement will not result in uses that
exceed existing infrastructure capacities (e.g., electrical, roads,
sewer, water, parking);
(6) The construction or improvement will not result in operational
uses that adversely affect the surrounding community (e.g., noise); and
(7) The community-valued view sheds are not adversely affected.
(c) Installation, repair, maintenance, and enhancement of public
access facilities and infrastructure, if the activity:
(1) Is small-scale and nondestructive; and
(2) Is consistent with applicable right-of-way conditions and
approved land use plans.''
[F4]. ``Routine groundskeeping and landscaping activities where
ground disturbance is limited to previously disturbed areas (e.g.,
previously filled paved, or cleared areas).''
[F5.] ``Installation, operation, maintenance, improvements, repair,
upgrade, removal, and/or replacement of instruments or instrument
systems in or on:
1. An existing structure or object (e.g., tower, antenna, building,
pier, buoy, terrestrial vehicle, or bridge) or
2. on previously disturbed (e.g., filled, paved, or cleared)
ground, or
3. on undisturbed ground, if the equipment installation, operation,
and removal will require no or minimal ground disturbance.''
Microwave/radio communications towers and antennas must be limited
to 200 feet in height without guy wires. NOAA proposes a new CE to
cover activities of installing, operating, repairing, maintaining,
upgrading, removing and/or replacing instruments or instrument systems
in or on an existing structure or object, or on previously disturbed
ground or on undisturbed ground that involve either no or minimal
ground disturbance.
[F6.] ``The determination that real property is excess to the needs
of the Agency, when the real property is excessed in conformity with
General Services Administration procedures or is legislatively
authorized to be excessed.''
[F7.] ``The disposal, demolition or removal of real property and
related improvements, buildings and structures, including associated
site restoration, and the disposal of personal property and debris in
accordance with all applicable agency procedures and legal
requirements.''
Operational Actions
[G1.] ``Routine administrative actions such as (1) program
planning, direction and evaluation, (2) administrative tasks, services
and support including personnel and fiscal management, advisory
services, document and policy preparation, and records management, and
(3) development, establishment, and revisions to documents including,
but not limited to interagency agreements, memoranda of understanding,
memoranda of agreement, cooperative agreements, and university
agreements. This CE does not include any associated activities proposed
in these documents beyond the administrative task of creating and
establishing the document. Actions subsequently funded by or undertaken
pursuant to the approved documents may require additional NEPA review
at the time those actions are proposed.''
[G2.] ``Routine movement of mobile assets, such as vessels and
aircraft, for homeport reassignments or repair/overhaul, where no new
support facilities are required.''
[G3.] ``Topographic, bathymetric, land use and land cover,
geological, hydrologic mapping, charting, and surveying services that
do not involve major surface or subsurface land disturbance and involve
no permanent physical, chemical, or biological change to the
environment.''
[G4.] ``Basic environmental services and monitoring, such as
weather observations, communications, analyses, and predictions;
environmental satellite operations and services; digital and physical
environmental data and information services; air and water quality
observations and analysis, and IT operations. All such activities must
be conducted within existing facilities.''
[G5.] ``Enforcement operations conducted under legislative mandate
such as the MSA, ESA, MMPA, the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 (Lacey),
and/or the National Marine Sanctuaries Act. This does not include
bringing judicial or administrative civil or criminal enforcement
actions which are outside the scope of NEPA in accordance with 40 CFR
1508.18(a).''
[G6.] ``Actions that change the NEXRAD radar coverage patterns that
do not lower the lowest scan elevation and do not result in direct
scanning of previously non-scanned terrain by the NEXRAD main beam.''
[G7.] ``Preparation of policy directives, rules, regulations, and
guidelines of an administrative, financial, legal, technical, or
procedural nature, or for which the environmental effects are too
broad, speculative or conjectural to lend themselves to meaningful
analysis and will be subject later to the NEPA process, either
collectively or on a case-by-case basis.''
[G8.] ``Activities that are educational, informational, or advisory
to other agencies, public and private entities, visitors, individuals,
or the general public, including training exercises and simulations.''
[G9.] ``Actions taken to identify, determine sources of, assess,
prevent, reduce, remove, dispose, or recycle marine debris when removal
is undertaken in a non-destructive manner and actions are in accordance
with Federal, State, and local laws and regulations for environmental
protection, and where all relevant regulatory consultation, and/or
permit requirements have been satisfied.''
Acquisition and Real Property Actions
[H1.] ``Procurement of labor, equipment, materials, data and
software needed to execute mission requirements in accordance with
applicable procurement regulations, executive orders, and policies.
This includes, but is not limited to, procurement of mobile and
portable equipment that is stored in existing structures or
facilities.''
[H2.] ``Procurement of space by purchase or lease of or within an
existing facility or structure in accordance with applicable
procurement regulations, executive orders, and policies when there is
no change in the general type of use, no new construction of buildings
or utilities, and minimal change in design from the previous occupancy
level.''
[H3.] ``Outgranting of government-controlled property in accordance
with applicable regulations, executive orders, and policies to a
Federal entity for any purpose consistent with the existing land or
facility use or to a non-Federal entity, when the use will remain
substantially the same.''
[H4.] ``Acquisition of real property (including fee simple estates,
leaseholds, and easements) that is not acquired through condemnation of
a lease interest, and will not result in significant change in use and
does not involve construction or modification.''
[H5.] ``Granting easements or rights of entry to use NOAA
controlled property for activities that, if conducted by NOAA, could be
categorically excluded. Grants of easements or rights-of-way for the
use of NOAA controlled real
[[Page 4313]]
property complementing the use of existing rights-of-way or real
property use for use by vehicles (not to include significant increases
in vehicle loading); electrical, telephone, and other transmission and
communication lines; water, wastewater, stormwater, and irrigation
pipelines, pumping stations, and facilities; and similar utility and
transportation uses.''
[H6.] ``Relocation of employees into existing Federally-owned or
commercially leased office space within the same metropolitan area not
involving a substantial increase in the number of motor or other
vehicles at a facility.''
[H7.] ``Transferring real property to a non-Federal entity, an
agency other than GSA, as well as to States, local agencies and Indian
Tribes, including return of public domain lands to the Department of
the Interior.''
Dated: January 6, 2017.
Lois J. Schiffer,
General Counsel for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2017-00553 Filed 1-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-P