Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of Certain Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas, 3677-3678 [2017-00577]
Download as PDF
3677
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 82, No. 8
Thursday, January 12, 2017
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206–AN48
Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition
of Certain Nonappropriated Fund
Federal Wage System Wage Areas
U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This rule proposes to amend
the geographic boundaries of several
nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal
Wage System (FWS) wage areas. Based
on recommendations of the Federal
Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee
(FPRAC), the U.S. Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) would define Lee
County, Florida, as an area of
application county to the Hillsborough,
FL, NAF FWS wage area; Leon County,
FL, as an area of application county to
the Lowndes, Georgia, NAF FWS wage
area; Fulton County, GA, as an area of
application county to the Cobb, GA,
NAF FWS wage area; and Lane County,
Oregon, as an area of application county
to the Pierce, Washington, NAF FWS
wage area. These changes are necessary
because there are NAF FWS employees
working in these four counties, and the
counties are not currently defined to
NAF wage areas. In addition, OPM is
proposing to remove Mississippi
County, AR, from the wage area
definition of the Shelby, TN, NAF FWS
wage area because there are no longer
NAF FWS employees working in the
county.
SUMMARY:
We must receive comments on or
before February 13, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 3206–AN48, using any
of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Brenda L. Roberts, Deputy
Associate Director for Pay and Leave,
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jan 11, 2017
Jkt 241001
Employee Services, U.S. Office of
Personnel Management, Room 7H31,
1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC
20415–8200.
Email: pay-leave-policy@opm.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Madeline Gonzalez, by telephone at
(202) 606–2838 or by email at pay-leavepolicy@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OPM is
issuing a proposed rule that would
make changes to several NAF FWS wage
area definitions. The Department of
Veterans Affairs notified OPM that the
Veterans Canteen Service (VCS) now
employs NAF FWS employees in Lee
and Leon Counties, FL; Fulton County,
GA; and Lane County, OR. In addition,
OPM is proposing to remove Mississippi
County, AR, from the wage area
definition of the Shelby, TN, NAF FWS
wage area because there are no longer
NAF FWS employees working in the
county.
Under § 532.219 of title 5, Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), each NAF
wage area ‘‘shall consist of one or more
survey areas, along with nonsurvey
areas, if any, having nonappropriated
fund employees.’’ Lee, Leon, Fulton,
and Lane Counties do not meet the
regulatory criteria under 5 CFR 532.219
to be established as separate NAF wage
areas; however, nonsurvey counties may
be combined with a survey area to form
a wage area. Section 532.219 lists the
regulatory criteria that OPM considers
when defining FWS wage area
boundaries:
(i) Proximity of largest facilities
activity in each county;
(ii) Transportation facilities and
commuting patterns; and
(iii) Similarities of the counties in—
(A) Overall population;
(B) Private employment in major
industry categories; and
(C) Kinds and sizes of private
industrial establishments.
OPM recently completed reviews of
the definitions of Lee, Leon, Fulton,
Lane, and Mississippi Counties and is
proposing the changes described below.
FPRAC, the national labor-management
committee responsible for advising
OPM on matters concerning the pay of
FWS employees, recommended these
changes by consensus. These changes
would apply on the first day of the first
applicable pay period beginning on or
after 30 days following publication of
the final regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Lee County, FL
Lee County would be defined as an
area of application county to the
Hillsborough, FL, NAF FWS wage area.
The proximity criterion favors the
Hillsborough wage area. The
transportation facilities criterion favors
the Hillsborough wage area. The
commuting patterns criterion does not
favor one wage area more than another.
The overall population, employment
sizes, and kinds and sizes of private
industrial establishments criterion does
not favor one wage area more than
another. While a standard review of
regulatory criteria shows mixed results,
the proximity criterion solidly favors
the Hillsborough wage area.
With the definition of Lee County to
the Hillsborough NAF wage area, the
Hillsborough wage area would consist of
one survey county, Hillsborough
County, and three area of application
counties: Lee, Pinellas, and Polk
Counties, FL.
Leon County, FL
Leon County would be defined as an
area of application county to the
Lowndes, GA, NAF FWS wage area. The
proximity criterion favors the Lowndes
wage area. The transportation facilities
and commuting patterns criterion does
not favor one wage area more than
another. Although the overall
population, employment sizes, and
kinds and sizes of private industrial
establishments criterion does not favor
one wage area more than another, the
industrial distribution pattern for Leon
County is similar to the Lowndes survey
area. Based on this analysis, we
recommend that Leon County be
defined to the Lowndes NAF wage area.
With the definition of Leon County to
the Lowndes NAF wage area, the
Lowndes wage area would consist of
one survey county, Lowndes County,
GA, and one area of application county,
Leon County, FL.
Fulton County, GA
Fulton County would be defined as an
area of application county to the Cobb,
GA, NAF FWS wage area. The closest
NAF wage area to Fulton County is the
Cobb wage area. There are no other NAF
wage areas in the immediate vicinity of
Fulton County. The VCS No.357 is
located approximately 22 miles from
Dobbins Air Reserve Base, the Cobb
wage area’s host activity. Based on this
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
3678
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2017 / Proposed Rules
analysis, we recommend that Fulton
County be defined to the Cobb NAF
wage area.
With the definition of Fulton County
to the Cobb NAF wage area, the Cobb
wage area would consist of one survey
county, Cobb County, GA, and three
area of application counties: Bartow, De
Kalb, and Fulton Counties, GA.
Lane County, OR
Lane County would be defined as an
area of application county to the Pierce,
WA, NAF FWS wage area. The closest
NAF wage area to Lane County is the
Pierce, WA, wage area. There are no
other NAF wage areas in the immediate
vicinity of Lane County. While VCS No.
356 is located approximately 240 miles
from Joint Base Lewis-McChord, the
Pierce wage area’s host activity, Lane
County is adjacent to two counties
currently defined to the Pierce wage
area: Coos and Douglas Counties, OR.
Based on this analysis, we recommend
that Lane County be defined to the
Pierce NAF wage area.
With the definition of Lane County to
the Pierce NAF wage area, the Pierce
wage area would consist of one survey
county, Pierce County, WA, and eight
area of application counties: Clatsop,
Coos, Douglas, Lane, Multnomah, and
Tillamook Counties, OR, and Clark and
Grays Harbor, WA.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Mississippi County, AR
Mississippi County would be
removed as an area of application
county to the Shelby, TN, NAF FWS
wage area. No NAF FWS employment
has been reported in Mississippi County
since the closure of Eaker Air Force
Base in 1992, and NAF employers have
no plans to establish an activity there in
the future. Under 5 U.S.C.
5343(a)(1)(B)(i), NAF wage areas ‘‘shall
not extend beyond the immediate
locality in which the particular
prevailing rate employees are
employed.’’ Therefore, Mississippi
County should not be defined as part of
an NAF wage area.
With the removal of Mississippi
County from the Shelby NAF wage area,
the Shelby wage area would consist of
one survey county, Shelby County, TN,
and one area of application county,
Butler County, MO.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that these regulations would
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
because they would affect only Federal
agencies and employees.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jan 11, 2017
Jkt 241001
*
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and
procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Beth F. Cobert,
Acting Director.
Accordingly, OPM is proposing to
amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows:
PART 532—PREVAILING RATE
SYSTEMS
1. The authority citation for part 532
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707
also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532—
Nonappropriated Fund Wage and
Survey Areas
2. Appendix D to Subpart B is
amended by revising the wage area
listing for the Hillsborough, FL; Cobb,
GA; Lowndes, GA; Shelby, TN; and
Pierce, WA, wage areas to read as
follows:
■
*
*
*
*
*
FLORIDA
*
Hillsborough
Survey Area
*
*
*
*
Florida:
Hillsborough
Area of Application. Survey area
Florida:
Lee
Pinellas
Polk
*
*
*
*
GEORGIA
*
*
*
*
Cobb
Survey Area
Georgia:
Cobb
Area of Application. Survey area
Georgia:
Bartow
De Kalb
Fulton
*
*
*
*
Lowndes
Survey Area
Georgia:
Lowndes
Area of Application. Survey area
Florida:
Leon
*
*
*
*
TENNESSEE
Shelby
Survey Area
Tennessee:
Shelby
Area of Application. Survey area
Missouri:
Butler
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
plus:
*
*
*
*
WASHINGTON
*
*
*
*
*
Pierce
Survey Area
Washington:
Pierce
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Oregon:
Clatsop
Coos
Douglas
Multnomah
Tillamook
Washington:
Clark
Grays Harbor
Lane
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2017–00577 Filed 1–11–17; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Part 424
[CMS–6012–P]
RIN 0938–AR84
Medicare Program; Establishment of
Special Payment Provisions and
Requirements for Qualified
Practitioners and Qualified Suppliers
of Prosthetics and Custom-Fabricated
Orthotics
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
*
This proposed rule would
specify the qualifications needed for
qualified practitioners to furnish and
fabricate, and qualified suppliers to
fabricate prosthetics and customfabricated orthotics; accreditation
requirements that qualified suppliers
must meet in order to bill for prosthetics
and custom-fabricated orthotics;
requirements that an organization must
meet in order to accredit qualified
suppliers to bill for prosthetics and
custom-fabricated orthotics; and a
timeframe by which qualified
practitioners and qualified suppliers
must meet the applicable licensure,
certification, and accreditation
requirements. In addition, this rule
would remove the current exemption
from accreditation and quality standards
for certain practitioners and suppliers.
DATES: To be assured consideration,
comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later
than 5 p.m. on March 13, 2017.
SUMMARY:
*
plus:
*
plus:
*
plus:
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3677-3678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00577]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2017 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 3677]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206-AN48
Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of Certain Nonappropriated
Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas
AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule proposes to amend the geographic boundaries of
several nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS) wage
areas. Based on recommendations of the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory
Committee (FPRAC), the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) would
define Lee County, Florida, as an area of application county to the
Hillsborough, FL, NAF FWS wage area; Leon County, FL, as an area of
application county to the Lowndes, Georgia, NAF FWS wage area; Fulton
County, GA, as an area of application county to the Cobb, GA, NAF FWS
wage area; and Lane County, Oregon, as an area of application county to
the Pierce, Washington, NAF FWS wage area. These changes are necessary
because there are NAF FWS employees working in these four counties, and
the counties are not currently defined to NAF wage areas. In addition,
OPM is proposing to remove Mississippi County, AR, from the wage area
definition of the Shelby, TN, NAF FWS wage area because there are no
longer NAF FWS employees working in the county.
DATES: We must receive comments on or before February 13, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN 3206-AN48, using
any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Brenda L. Roberts, Deputy Associate Director for Pay and
Leave, Employee Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Room
7H31, 1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20415-8200.
Email: pay-leave-policy@opm.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, by telephone at
(202) 606-2838 or by email at pay-leave-policy@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OPM is issuing a proposed rule that would
make changes to several NAF FWS wage area definitions. The Department
of Veterans Affairs notified OPM that the Veterans Canteen Service
(VCS) now employs NAF FWS employees in Lee and Leon Counties, FL;
Fulton County, GA; and Lane County, OR. In addition, OPM is proposing
to remove Mississippi County, AR, from the wage area definition of the
Shelby, TN, NAF FWS wage area because there are no longer NAF FWS
employees working in the county.
Under Sec. 532.219 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
each NAF wage area ``shall consist of one or more survey areas, along
with nonsurvey areas, if any, having nonappropriated fund employees.''
Lee, Leon, Fulton, and Lane Counties do not meet the regulatory
criteria under 5 CFR 532.219 to be established as separate NAF wage
areas; however, nonsurvey counties may be combined with a survey area
to form a wage area. Section 532.219 lists the regulatory criteria that
OPM considers when defining FWS wage area boundaries:
(i) Proximity of largest facilities activity in each county;
(ii) Transportation facilities and commuting patterns; and
(iii) Similarities of the counties in--
(A) Overall population;
(B) Private employment in major industry categories; and
(C) Kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments.
OPM recently completed reviews of the definitions of Lee, Leon,
Fulton, Lane, and Mississippi Counties and is proposing the changes
described below. FPRAC, the national labor-management committee
responsible for advising OPM on matters concerning the pay of FWS
employees, recommended these changes by consensus. These changes would
apply on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on
or after 30 days following publication of the final regulations.
Lee County, FL
Lee County would be defined as an area of application county to the
Hillsborough, FL, NAF FWS wage area. The proximity criterion favors the
Hillsborough wage area. The transportation facilities criterion favors
the Hillsborough wage area. The commuting patterns criterion does not
favor one wage area more than another. The overall population,
employment sizes, and kinds and sizes of private industrial
establishments criterion does not favor one wage area more than
another. While a standard review of regulatory criteria shows mixed
results, the proximity criterion solidly favors the Hillsborough wage
area.
With the definition of Lee County to the Hillsborough NAF wage
area, the Hillsborough wage area would consist of one survey county,
Hillsborough County, and three area of application counties: Lee,
Pinellas, and Polk Counties, FL.
Leon County, FL
Leon County would be defined as an area of application county to
the Lowndes, GA, NAF FWS wage area. The proximity criterion favors the
Lowndes wage area. The transportation facilities and commuting patterns
criterion does not favor one wage area more than another. Although the
overall population, employment sizes, and kinds and sizes of private
industrial establishments criterion does not favor one wage area more
than another, the industrial distribution pattern for Leon County is
similar to the Lowndes survey area. Based on this analysis, we
recommend that Leon County be defined to the Lowndes NAF wage area.
With the definition of Leon County to the Lowndes NAF wage area,
the Lowndes wage area would consist of one survey county, Lowndes
County, GA, and one area of application county, Leon County, FL.
Fulton County, GA
Fulton County would be defined as an area of application county to
the Cobb, GA, NAF FWS wage area. The closest NAF wage area to Fulton
County is the Cobb wage area. There are no other NAF wage areas in the
immediate vicinity of Fulton County. The VCS No.357 is located
approximately 22 miles from Dobbins Air Reserve Base, the Cobb wage
area's host activity. Based on this
[[Page 3678]]
analysis, we recommend that Fulton County be defined to the Cobb NAF
wage area.
With the definition of Fulton County to the Cobb NAF wage area, the
Cobb wage area would consist of one survey county, Cobb County, GA, and
three area of application counties: Bartow, De Kalb, and Fulton
Counties, GA.
Lane County, OR
Lane County would be defined as an area of application county to
the Pierce, WA, NAF FWS wage area. The closest NAF wage area to Lane
County is the Pierce, WA, wage area. There are no other NAF wage areas
in the immediate vicinity of Lane County. While VCS No. 356 is located
approximately 240 miles from Joint Base Lewis-McChord, the Pierce wage
area's host activity, Lane County is adjacent to two counties currently
defined to the Pierce wage area: Coos and Douglas Counties, OR. Based
on this analysis, we recommend that Lane County be defined to the
Pierce NAF wage area.
With the definition of Lane County to the Pierce NAF wage area, the
Pierce wage area would consist of one survey county, Pierce County, WA,
and eight area of application counties: Clatsop, Coos, Douglas, Lane,
Multnomah, and Tillamook Counties, OR, and Clark and Grays Harbor, WA.
Mississippi County, AR
Mississippi County would be removed as an area of application
county to the Shelby, TN, NAF FWS wage area. No NAF FWS employment has
been reported in Mississippi County since the closure of Eaker Air
Force Base in 1992, and NAF employers have no plans to establish an
activity there in the future. Under 5 U.S.C. 5343(a)(1)(B)(i), NAF wage
areas ``shall not extend beyond the immediate locality in which the
particular prevailing rate employees are employed.'' Therefore,
Mississippi County should not be defined as part of an NAF wage area.
With the removal of Mississippi County from the Shelby NAF wage
area, the Shelby wage area would consist of one survey county, Shelby
County, TN, and one area of application county, Butler County, MO.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that these regulations would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they
would affect only Federal agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Beth F. Cobert,
Acting Director.
Accordingly, OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows:
PART 532--PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; Sec. 532.707 also issued under
5 U.S.C. 552.
Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532--Nonappropriated Fund Wage and
Survey Areas
0
2. Appendix D to Subpart B is amended by revising the wage area listing
for the Hillsborough, FL; Cobb, GA; Lowndes, GA; Shelby, TN; and
Pierce, WA, wage areas to read as follows:
* * * * *
FLORIDA
* * * * *
Hillsborough
Survey Area
Florida:
Hillsborough
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Florida:
Lee
Pinellas
Polk
* * * * *
GEORGIA
* * * * *
Cobb
Survey Area
Georgia:
Cobb
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Georgia:
Bartow
De Kalb
Fulton
* * * * *
Lowndes
Survey Area
Georgia:
Lowndes
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Florida:
Leon
* * * * *
TENNESSEE
Shelby
Survey Area
Tennessee:
Shelby
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Missouri:
Butler
* * * * *
WASHINGTON
* * * * *
Pierce
Survey Area
Washington:
Pierce
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Oregon:
Clatsop
Coos
Douglas
Multnomah
Tillamook
Washington:
Clark
Grays Harbor
Lane
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-00577 Filed 1-11-17; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P