Request for Comments Regarding the Continuation of the Accelerated Examination Program, 3758-3759 [2017-00568]
Download as PDF
3758
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2017 / Notices
to the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. Applications for
the special use permits discussed in this
notice involve a collection-of
information requirement subject to the
requirements of the PRA. OMB has
approved this collection-of-information
requirement under OMB control number
0648–0141. The collection-ofinformation requirement applies to
persons seeking special use permits and
is necessary to determine whether the
proposed activities are consistent with
the terms and conditions of special use
permits prescribed by the NMSA. Public
reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average
twenty four (24) hours per response
(application, annual report, and
financial report), including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection
of information. This estimate does not
include additional time that may be
required should the applicant be
required to provide information to
NOAA for the preparation of
documentation that may be required
under NEPA.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
[Docket No. PTO–P–2016–0054]
Request for Comments Regarding the
Continuation of the Accelerated
Examination Program
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) is requesting
comments from its stakeholders on
whether the accelerated examination
program should be retained. In an
August 16, 2016 notice updating the
program to reflect changes in the law
and examination practice, the USPTO
indicated that the number of accelerated
examination requests has been quite
low. In particular, in each of the fiscal
years 2012–2015, fewer than 250
applications were accepted into the
accelerated examination program.
Accordingly, the USPTO seeks feedback
from its stakeholders on whether the
accelerated examination program
provides a sufficient benefit to the
public to justify the cost of
implementation.
Comment Deadline: To be ensured of
consideration, written comments must
be received on or before March 13, 2017.
No public hearing will be held.
Addresses for Comments: Written
comments should be sent by electronic
mail addressed to AEcomments2016@
uspto.gov. Comments may also be
SUMMARY:
1. MBNMS Guidelines for Desalination
Plants in the MBNMS; May 2010, online:
https://montereybay.noaa.gov/
resourcepro/resmanissues/pdf/050610
desal.pdf.
2. ONMS Fair Market Value Analysis for a
Fiber Optic Cable Permit in National
Marine Sanctuaries, Aug 2002.
3. NOAA Final Notice of Applicability of
Special Use Permit Requirements to
Certain Categories of Activities
Conducted Within the National Marine
Sanctuary System; May 2013, online:
https://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/management
/fr/78fr25957.pdf.
4. Moss Landing Marine Lab, Ecological
Effects of the Moss Landing Powerplant
Thermal Discharge; June 2006.
5. Ballard Marine Construction report
prepared for Monterey Regional Water
Pollution Control Agency; 2014.
6. Geoscience Technical Memo; South
Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination
Project—Vertical Infiltration Rate of
Ocean Water Migrating Through the
Seafloor in the Vicinity of the Slant Well
Intake System; 2010.
7. Geoscience NPDES Start-up Report:
Marina Slant Test Well Water Discharge
Jkt 241001
BILLING CODE 3510–NK–P
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Request for comments.
References
19:46 Jan 11, 2017
[FR Doc. 2017–00515 Filed 1–11–17; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
Dated: January 3, 2017.
John Armor,
Director, Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
to the Monterey Regional Water
Pollution Control Agency (MRWPCA)
Pacific Ocean Outfall; 2015.
8. Jenkins Consulting Memo, Potential
Impacts on Wave and Current Transport
Processes Due to Infiltration Rates
Induced by the South Orange Coastal
Ocean Desalination Project; 2010.
9. Chambers Group Memo: Pretreatment and
Design Considerations for Large-Scale
Seawater Facilities; 2010, online: https://
www.mwdoc.com/cms2/ckfinder/files/
files/Evaluation%20of%20Potential
%20Impacts%20%20to%20Marine%20
Life%20by%20Slant%20Wells%20%20MLPA%20DEIR%20Comment
%202010-10-13.pdf.
10. Bureau of Reclamation Report:
Pretreatment and Design Considerations
for Large-Scale Seawater Facilities,
online: https://www.usbr.gov/research/
AWT/reportpdfs/report137.pdf.
11. NOAA National Centers for
Environmental Information Web site;
Table 1; online: https://www.ngdc.
noaa.gov/mgg/global/etopo1_ocean_
volumes.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
submitted by mail addressed to: Mail
Stop Comments—Patents,
Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box
1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450,
marked to the attention of Pinchus
Laufer, Senior Legal Advisor, Office of
Patent Legal Administration, Office of
the Deputy Commissioner for Patent
Examination Policy. Although
comments may be submitted by mail,
the USPTO prefers to receive comments
via the Internet.
The comments will be available for
public inspection at the Office of the
Commissioner for Patents, located in
Madison East, Tenth Floor, 600 Dulany
Street, Alexandria, Virginia, and will be
available via the USPTO Internet Web
site at https://www.uspto.gov. Because
comments will be available for public
inspection, information that is not
desired to be made public, such as an
address or phone number, should not be
included in the comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pinchus M. Laufer, Senior Legal Advisor
((571) 272–7726) or Matthew Sked,
Legal Advisor ((571) 272–7627), Office
of Patent Legal Administration, Office of
the Deputy Commissioner for Patent
Examination Policy.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In August
2006, the USPTO implemented the
accelerated examination program under
which an application will be advanced
out of turn for examination if the
applicant files a petition to make special
with the appropriate showing. See
Changes to Practice for Petitions in
Patent Applications To Make Special
and for Accelerated Examination, 71 FR
36323 (June 26, 2006). The program
proved to be relatively popular as it was
one of the few options an applicant had
to expedite examination. The program
was recently updated on August 16,
2016, to reflect changes in the law and
examination practice. See Changes in
Accelerated Examination Practice, 81
FR 54564 (August 16, 2016).
On September 26, 2011, the USPTO
implemented the prioritized
examination program (referred to as
‘‘Track One’’), provided for in the
Leahy-Smith America Invents Act
(AIA). See Changes to Implement the
Prioritized Examination Track (Track I)
of the Enhanced Examination Timing
Control Procedures under the LeahySmith America Invents Act, 76 FR
59050 (September 23, 2011). Track One
also provides the ability to advance an
application out of turn, but without an
applicant having to meet the
requirements of the accelerated
examination program, such as
performing a pre-examination search.
Under Track One, applicants simply pay
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2017 / Notices
an additional fee. In each of the past few
fiscal years since Track One was
implemented (fiscal years 2012–2015),
fewer than 250 applications have met
the requirements to take advantage of
the accelerated examination program. In
contrast, Track One has become a much
more popular program than accelerated
examination in that the number of
requests approaches 10,000 annually
over this same time.
Additionally, over this period, the
overall first action pendency for newly
filed applications has dropped
incrementally each year. In particular,
the overall first action pendency in
fiscal year 2015 was approximately 17
months. A lower first action pendency
and lower accelerated examination
numbers seem to indicate that
applicants have less need for as many
programs that expedite patent
examination.
Due to the low usage of the
accelerated examination program, the
reduction in overall first action
pendency, the popularity of the Track
One program, and the inconvenience to
practitioners and the USPTO of
retaining a seemingly redundant
program with its own special handling
procedures (See MPEP 708.02(a)), it is
unclear whether the accelerated
examination program still provides a
sufficient benefit to the public to justify
the cost of implementation.
Accordingly, the USPTO seeks
comments from the public on whether
the accelerated examination program
should be retained or discontinued.
Dated: January 9, 2017.
Michelle K. Lee,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2017–00568 Filed 1–11–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
Information Collection; Submission for
OMB Review, Comment Request
The Corporation for National
and Community Service (CNCS) has
submitted a public information
collection request (ICR) entitled
‘‘Independent Living Performance
Measures Aggregation Tool’’ for review
and approval in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13, (44 U.S.C. Chapter
35). Copies of this ICR, with applicable
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:28 Jan 11, 2017
Jkt 241001
Comments may be
submitted, identified by the title of the
information collection activity, to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attn: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB
Desk Officer for the Corporation for
National and Community Service, by
any of the following two methods
within 30 days from the date of
publication in the Federal Register:
(1) By fax to: 202–395–6974,
Attention: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB Desk
Officer for the Corporation for National
and Community Service; or
(2) By email to: smar@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OMB
is particularly interested in comments
which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of CNCS, including whether
the information will have practical
utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Propose ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
• Propose ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
ADDRESSES:
Comments
Corporation for National and
Community Service.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
supporting documentation, may be
obtained by calling the Corporation for
National and Community Service, Jill
Sears, at 202–606–7577 or email to
jsears@cns.gov. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TTY–TDD) may call 1–800–833–3722
between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
DATES: Comments may be submitted,
identified by the title of the information
collection activity, by February 13,
2017.
A 60-day Notice requesting public
comment was published in the Federal
Register on May 19, 2016 at 81 FR 97.
This comment period ended July 18,
2016. No public comments were
received from this Notice.
Description: Senior Companion
Program grantees are required to use the
currently cleared surveys to solicit
outcome data from clients and
caregivers served by Senior Companion
volunteers.
Type of Review: Renewal.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3759
Agency: Corporation for National and
Community Service.
Title: Independent Living
Performance Measures Aggregation Tool
and Independent Living and Respite
Surveys.
OMB Number: 3045–0152.
Agency Number: None.
Affected Public: Senior Companion
Program grantees.
Total Respondents: 53,470.
Frequency: Once.
Average Time per Response: 30
minutes.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 26,735
hours.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
None.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintenance): None.
Dated: January 6, 2017.
Erin McGrath,
Senior Corps Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 2017–00569 Filed 1–11–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050–28–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
Early Engagement Opportunity:
Implementation of National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017
Department of Defense (DoD).
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
DoD announces an early
engagement opportunity regarding
implementation of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017
within the acquisition regulations.
DATES: Early inputs should be submitted
in writing to the address shown below
on or before February 13, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit early inputs via the
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
(DARS) Web site at https://
www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/
index.html.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Send inquiries via email to Ms. Jennifer
Hawes at osd.dfars@mail.mil and
reference ‘‘Early Engagement
Opportunity: Implementation of
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2017’’ in the subject line.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DoD is
providing an opportunity for the public
to provide early inputs on
implementation of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2017 within the acquisition
regulations. The public is invited to
submit early inputs on sections of the
NDAA for FY 2017 via the DARS Web
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3758-3759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00568]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
[Docket No. PTO-P-2016-0054]
Request for Comments Regarding the Continuation of the
Accelerated Examination Program
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is
requesting comments from its stakeholders on whether the accelerated
examination program should be retained. In an August 16, 2016 notice
updating the program to reflect changes in the law and examination
practice, the USPTO indicated that the number of accelerated
examination requests has been quite low. In particular, in each of the
fiscal years 2012-2015, fewer than 250 applications were accepted into
the accelerated examination program. Accordingly, the USPTO seeks
feedback from its stakeholders on whether the accelerated examination
program provides a sufficient benefit to the public to justify the cost
of implementation.
Comment Deadline: To be ensured of consideration, written comments
must be received on or before March 13, 2017. No public hearing will be
held.
Addresses for Comments: Written comments should be sent by
electronic mail addressed to AEcomments2016@uspto.gov. Comments may
also be submitted by mail addressed to: Mail Stop Comments--Patents,
Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450,
marked to the attention of Pinchus Laufer, Senior Legal Advisor, Office
of Patent Legal Administration, Office of the Deputy Commissioner for
Patent Examination Policy. Although comments may be submitted by mail,
the USPTO prefers to receive comments via the Internet.
The comments will be available for public inspection at the Office
of the Commissioner for Patents, located in Madison East, Tenth Floor,
600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia, and will be available via the
USPTO Internet Web site at https://www.uspto.gov. Because comments will
be available for public inspection, information that is not desired to
be made public, such as an address or phone number, should not be
included in the comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pinchus M. Laufer, Senior Legal
Advisor ((571) 272-7726) or Matthew Sked, Legal Advisor ((571) 272-
7627), Office of Patent Legal Administration, Office of the Deputy
Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In August 2006, the USPTO implemented the
accelerated examination program under which an application will be
advanced out of turn for examination if the applicant files a petition
to make special with the appropriate showing. See Changes to Practice
for Petitions in Patent Applications To Make Special and for
Accelerated Examination, 71 FR 36323 (June 26, 2006). The program
proved to be relatively popular as it was one of the few options an
applicant had to expedite examination. The program was recently updated
on August 16, 2016, to reflect changes in the law and examination
practice. See Changes in Accelerated Examination Practice, 81 FR 54564
(August 16, 2016).
On September 26, 2011, the USPTO implemented the prioritized
examination program (referred to as ``Track One''), provided for in the
Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). See Changes to Implement the
Prioritized Examination Track (Track I) of the Enhanced Examination
Timing Control Procedures under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 76
FR 59050 (September 23, 2011). Track One also provides the ability to
advance an application out of turn, but without an applicant having to
meet the requirements of the accelerated examination program, such as
performing a pre-examination search. Under Track One, applicants simply
pay
[[Page 3759]]
an additional fee. In each of the past few fiscal years since Track One
was implemented (fiscal years 2012-2015), fewer than 250 applications
have met the requirements to take advantage of the accelerated
examination program. In contrast, Track One has become a much more
popular program than accelerated examination in that the number of
requests approaches 10,000 annually over this same time.
Additionally, over this period, the overall first action pendency
for newly filed applications has dropped incrementally each year. In
particular, the overall first action pendency in fiscal year 2015 was
approximately 17 months. A lower first action pendency and lower
accelerated examination numbers seem to indicate that applicants have
less need for as many programs that expedite patent examination.
Due to the low usage of the accelerated examination program, the
reduction in overall first action pendency, the popularity of the Track
One program, and the inconvenience to practitioners and the USPTO of
retaining a seemingly redundant program with its own special handling
procedures (See MPEP 708.02(a)), it is unclear whether the accelerated
examination program still provides a sufficient benefit to the public
to justify the cost of implementation. Accordingly, the USPTO seeks
comments from the public on whether the accelerated examination program
should be retained or discontinued.
Dated: January 9, 2017.
Michelle K. Lee,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of
the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2017-00568 Filed 1-11-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P