Information Collection Being Submitted for Review and Approval to the Office of Management and Budget, 3791-3793 [2017-00478]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2017 / Notices
Dated: January 9, 2017.
Martha Berger,
Designated Federal Official.
PRA@fcc.gov and to Nicole.Ongele@
fcc.gov. Include in the comments the
OMB control number as shown in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below.
[FR Doc. 2017–00547 Filed 1–11–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
For
additional information or copies of the
information collection, contact Nicole
Ongele at (202) 418–2991. To view a
copy of this information collection
request (ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) Go
to the Web page ,
(2) look for the section of the Web page
called ‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ (3)
click on the downward-pointing arrow
in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box below the
‘‘Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4)
select ‘‘Federal Communications
Commission’’ from the list of agencies
presented in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box,
(5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ button to the
right of the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, (6)
when the list of FCC ICRs currently
under review appears, look for the OMB
control number of this ICR and then
click on the ICR Reference Number. A
copy of the FCC submission to OMB
will be displayed.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–0057.
Title: Application for Equipment
Authorization, FCC Form 731.
Form Number: FCC Form 731.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities, and state, local, or tribal
government.
Number of Respondents and
Responses: 3,740 respondents; 22,250
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 35
hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement and third party
disclosure requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. Statutory
authority for these collections are
contained in Sections 4(i), 301, 302,
303(e), 303(f), and 303(r) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 301,
302, 303(e), 303(f), and 303(r).
Total Annual Burden: 778,750 hours.
Total Annual Cost: No cost.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
There is no need for confidentiality with
this collection of information.
Needs and Uses: Commission rules
require that manufacturers of certain
radio frequency (RF) equipment file FCC
Form 731 to obtain approval prior to
marketing their equipment.
Manufacturers may then market their RF
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[OMB 3060–0057]
Information Collection Being
Submitted for Review and Approval to
the Office of Management and Budget
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
As part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork burdens, and as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC or
Commission) invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collections.
Comments are requested concerning:
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and ways to
further reduce the information
collection burden on small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
PRA that does not display a valid OMB
control number.
DATES: Written comments should be
submitted on or before February 13,
2017. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contacts below as soon as
possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Kimberly R. Keravuori, OMB, via email
Kimberly_R_Keravuori@omb.eop.gov;
and to Nicole Ongele, FCC, via email
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:28 Jan 11, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3791
equipment based on a showing of
compliance with technical standards
established in the FCC Rules for each
type of equipment or device operated
under the applicable FCC Rule part. The
following types of equipment are
regulated (a) the RF equipment is
regulated under certain rule sections of
47 CFR part 15 and Part 18, and (b) in
addition, rules governing certain RF
equipment operating in the licensed
services also require equipment
authorization as established in the
procedural rules in 47 CFR part 2. The
RF equipment manufacturers comply
with the information collection
requirements by (a) Filing FCC Form
731 electronically with the Commission,
or (b) Submitting the information to a
Telecommunications Certification Body
(TCB), which acts on behalf of the FCC
to issue grants of certification and may
issue grants more expeditiously than the
FCC. The TCBs have flexibility in the
format in which they require the
collection of information (i) TCBs may
require applicants to submit the
required information in FCC Form 731
format or in another format selected by
the TCB, but (ii) whatever the
information collection method, the
information required is governed by the
procedural rules in 47 CFR part 2 and
a showing of compliance with the FCC
technical standards for the specific type
of equipment. RF manufacturer
applicants for equipment certification
may also request ‘‘expedited
authorization’’ to market their
equipment by: (a) Choosing to pay the
fee levied by a TCB, and (b) submitting
their request to a TCB in order for
expedited authorization to market. The
TCB processes the RF equipment
manufacturer’s application as follows:
(i) The TCB receives and reviews the RF
manufacturer’s information submission/
application; and (ii) the TCB enters the
information into the FCC Equipment
Authorization System database using an
interface that provides the TCB with the
tools to issue a standardized Grant of
Equipment Authorization. Whichever
method the RF manufacturers choose to
submit their information—via either the
FCC on FCC Form 731 or the TCB, FCC
Rules require that applicants supply the
following data: (a) Demographic
information including Grantee name
and address, contact information, etc.;
(b) information specific to the
equipment including FCC Identifier,
equipment class, technical
specifications, etc.; and (c) attachments
that demonstrate compliance with FCC
Rules that may include any combination
of the following based on the applicable
Rule parts for the equipment for which
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
3792
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2017 / Notices
authorization is requested: (1)
Identification of equipment (47 CFR
2.925); (2) attestation statements that
may be required for specific
equipments; (3) external photos of the
equipment for which authorization is
requested; (4) block diagram of the
device; (5) schematics; (6) test report; (7)
test setup photos; (8) Users Manual; (9)
Internal Photos; (10) Parts List/Tune Up
Information; (11) RF Exposure
Information; (12) Operational
Description; (13) Cover Letters; and, (14)
Software Defined Radio/Cognitive Radio
Files.
In general, an applicant’s submission
is as follows: (a) FCC Form 731 includes
approximately two pages covering the
demographic and equipment
identification information; and (b)
applicants must supply additional
documentation and other information,
as described above, demonstrating
conformance with FCC Rules, which
may range from 100–1,000 pages. The
supplemental information is essential to
control potential interference to radio
communications, which the FCC may
use, as is necessary, to investigate
complaints of harmful interference. In
response to new technologies and in
allocating spectrum, the Commission
may establish new technical operating
standards: (a) RF equipment
manufacturers must meet the new
standards to receive an equipment
authorization, and (b) RF equipment
manufacturers must still comply with
the Commission’s requirements in FCC
Form 731 and demonstrate compliance
as required by 47 CFR part 2 of FCC
Rules. Thus, this information collection
applies to a variety of RF equipment: (a)
That is currently manufactured, (b) that
may be manufactured in the future, and
(c) that operates under varying technical
standards. On July 8, 2004, the
Commission adopted a Report and
Order, Modification of Parts 2 and 15 of
the Commission’s Rules for Unlicensed
Devices and Equipment Approval, ET
Docket No. 03–201, FCC 04–165. The
change requires that all paper filings
required in 47 CFR Sections 2.913,
2.926(c), 2.929(c), and 2.929(d) of the
rules are outdated and now must be
filed electronically via the Internet on
FCC Form 731. The Commission
believes that electronic filing speeds up
application processing and supports the
Commission in further streamlining to
reduce cost and increase efficiency.
Information on the procedures for
electronically filing equipment
authorization applications can be
obtained from the Commission’s rules,
and from the Internet at: https://
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:28 Jan 11, 2017
Jkt 241001
transition.fcc.gov/oet/ea/ea-appinfo.htm.
On October 26, 2014, the Federal
Communications Commission released a
Report and Order, FCC 14–172, PS
Docket 13–87, that modified Sections
2.1033 and 90.548 of the rules and
effectively required equipment
manufacturers to demonstrate
compliance with the Interoperability
Technical Standards contained in
Section 90.548 of the Commission’s
rules as a condition for FCC certification
of equipment designed to operate on the
700 MHz narrowband interoperability
channels. One method of demonstrating
this requirement is documenting
compliance with the Project 25
Compliance Assessment Program (P25
CAP). CAP is a program that establishes
an independent compliance assessment
process to ensure that communications
equipment conforms to Project 25
standards and is interoperable across
vendors. Alternatively, a manufacturer
may submit a document describing how
it determined compliance with Section
90.548 and that its equipment is
interoperable across vendors.
On August, 22, 2016, the Federal
Communications Commission released
an Order on Reconsideration, FCC 16–
111, PS Docket No. 13–87 (see attached)
that modified Part 2 and Part 90 of the
Rules for equipment approval and
Private Land Mobile Radio Services. See
81 FR 66830 (Sept. 29, 2016). The
amended rule requires all Wireless
Communications Equipment
Manufacturers who manufacture 700
MHz narrowband equipment capable of
operating on the interoperability
channels to demonstrate compliance
with the Commission’s Interoperability
Technical Standards in 90.548. The
Order on Reconsideration prescribes
two methods for showing compliance
with Section 90.548 after equipment
authorization application approval and
before the marketing and sale of
equipment capable of operating on the
700 MHz narrowband interoperability
channels. Specifically, the Commission
modified Section 2.1033(c)(20) to
provide that:
Before equipment operating under
part 90 of this chapter and capable of
operating on the 700 MHz
interoperability channels (See
§ 90.531(b)(1) of this chapter) may be
marketed or sold, the manufacturer
thereof shall have a Compliance
Assessment Program Supplier’s
Declaration of Conformity and Summary
Test Report or, alternatively, a
document detailing how the
manufacturer determined that its
equipment complies with § 90.548 of
this chapter and that the equipment is
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
interoperable across vendors.
Submission of a 700 MHz narrowband
radio for certification will constitute a
representation by the manufacturer that
the radio will be shown, by testing, to
be interoperable across vendors before it
is marketed or sold.
The Commission also modified
Section 90.548(c) of the Commission’s
rules to provide:
Transceivers capable of operating on
the interoperability channels listed in
§ 90.531(b)(1) shall not be marketed or
sold unless the transceiver has
previously been certified for
interoperability by the Compliance
Assessment Program (CAP)
administered by the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security; provided, however,
that this requirement is suspended if the
CAP is discontinued. Submission of a
700 MHz narrowband radio for
certification will constitute a
representation by the manufacturer that
the radio will be shown, by testing, to
be interoperable across vendors before it
is marketed or sold. In the alternative,
manufacturers may employ their own
protocol for verifying compliance with
Project 25 standards and determining
that their product is interoperable
among vendors. In the event that field
experience reveals that a transceiver is
not interoperable, the Commission may
require the manufacturer thereof to
provide evidence of compliance with
this § 90.548.
To effectively implement the
provisions of the new Rules, no
modifications to the existing FCC Form
731 Application for Equipment
Authorization are required. The changes
are intended to simplify the filing
process, ensure equipment complies
with Project 25 standards and is
interoperable across vendors. The
following specific methods are proposed
to ensure compliance with Section
90.548 and simplify filing processes for
equipment manufacturers:
(1) The Order on Reconsideration
establishes that before the marketing or
sale of equipment designed to operate
on the 700 MHz narrowband
interoperability channels,
manufacturers shall have a Compliance
Assessment Program Supplier’s
Declaration of Conformity and Summary
Test Report or, alternatively, a
document detailing how the
manufacturer determined that its
equipment complies with § 90.548 and
that the equipment is interoperable
across vendors. OMB has approved the
information collections associated with
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2017 / Notices
P25 CAP compliance under OMB
Control No. 1640–0015.1
(2) In the event that field experience
reveals that a transceiver is not
interoperable, the Commission may
require the manufacturer thereof to
provide evidence of compliance with
§ 90.548.
The modified rules provide a benefit
to public safety licensees by ensuring
that only equipment that has been tested
for interoperability in a vendor-neutral
environment before equipment can be
marketed or sold to public safety. This
will provide the additional benefit of
engendering competition in the public
safety equipment marketplace by
eliminating system compatibility as a
gating factor when evaluating
equipment purchases. The Order on
Reconsideration reduces the burden on
equipment manufacturers by allowing
them to meet this standard by
demonstrating compliance with the P25
CAP or manufacturers’ interoperability
testing protocol. Compliance with the
P25 CAP program is already a requisite
for grant eligibility and agency
purchasing standards, consequently any
new burden imposed by this
requirement would be minimal.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–00478 Filed 1–11–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Agreements Filed
The Commission hereby gives notice
of the filing of the following agreements
under the Shipping Act of 1984.
Interested parties may submit comments
on the agreements to the Secretary,
Federal Maritime Commission,
Washington, DC 20573, within twelve
days of the date this notice appears in
the Federal Register. Copies of the
agreements are available through the
Commission’s Web site (www.fmc.gov)
or by contacting the Office of
Agreements at (202)–523–5793 or
tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.
Agreement No.: 008493–031.
Title: Trans-Pacific American Flag
Berth Operators Agreement.
Parties: American President Lines,
Ltd. and A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S.
1 Congressional direction for a P25 compliance
assessment program can be found in the COPS Law
Enforcement Technologies and Interoperable
Communications Program section of the Conference
Report to Public Law 109–148, as well as the
Science & Technology Management and
Administration section of Division E of the
Conference Report to Public Law 110–161.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:28 Jan 11, 2017
Jkt 241001
Filing Party: Eric Jeffrey, Esq; Nixon
Peabody; 799 9th Street NW., Suite 500;
Washington, DC 20001.
Synopsis: The amendment adds
Matson Navigation Company as a
member of the Agreement.
Agreement No.: 012067–017.
Title: U.S. Supplemental Agreement
to HLC Agreement.
Parties: BBC Chartering Carriers
GmbH & Co. KG and BBC Chartering &
Logistic GmbH & Co. KG, as a single
member; Chipolbrok (Chinese-Polish
Joint Stock Shipping Company); Hanssy
Shipping Pte. Ltd.; Industrial Maritime
Carriers, L.L.C.; MACS Maritime Carrier
Shipping GmbH & Co.; and RickmersLinie GmbH & Cie. KG.
Filing Party: Wade S. Hooker, Esq.;
211 Central Park W; New York, NY
10024.
Synopsis: The amendment changes
the number of members of the Executive
Committee of the worldwide Heavy Lift
Club (‘‘HLC’’) from thirty-five percent of
the HLC members to four or five HLC
members, and updates the membership
of the HLC. There is no change in the
parties to the U.S. Agreement.
Agreement No.: 012426–001.
Title: The OCEAN Alliance
Agreement.
Parties: COSCO SHIPPING Lines Co.,
Ltd.; CMA CGM S.A.; Evergreen Marine
Corporation (Taiwan) Ltd. acting on its
own behalf and/or on behalf of other
members of the Evergreen Line Joint
Service Agreement (ELJSA); and Orient
Overseas Container Line Limited and
OOCL (Europe) Limited, acting as one
party.
Filing Party: Robert K. Magovern,
Esq.; Cozen O’Connor; 1200 Nineteenth
St. NW., Washington DC 20036.
Synopsis: This Amendment revises
Article 2 of the Agreement to reflect a
recently implemented name change of
one of the parties, COSCO Container
Lines Co., Ltd., to COSCO SHIPPING
Lines Co., Ltd.
Agreement No.: 012452.
Title: CMA CGM/HLAG U.S.-West
Med Slot Sale Arrangement.
Parties: CMA CGM S.A. and HapagLloyd AG.
Filing Party: Heather M. Spring, Esq.;
CMA CGM (America) LLC; 5701 Lake
Wright Drive; Norfolk, VA 23502.
Synopsis: The agreement authorizes
CMA CGM to charter space to Hapag
Lloyd on a single voyage from Spain
and Italy to the U.S. Gulf Coast.
Agreement No.: 012453.
Title: MOL/NMCC/WLS/KL Space
Charter Agreement.
Parties: Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.;
Nissan Motor Car Carrier Co., Ltd.;
World Logistics Services (U.S.A.), Inc.;
and Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3793
Filing Party: Eric Jeffrey, Esq; Nixon
Peabody; 799 9th Street NW., Suite 500;
Washington, DC 20001.
Synopsis: The agreement authorizes
the parties to charter space to one
another on an as needed, as available,
basis for the carriage of vehicles and
other Ro-Ro cargo in the trades between
the United States and all foreign
countries.
By Order of the Federal Maritime
Commission.
Dated: January 6, 2017.
Rachel E. Dickon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–00471 Filed 1–11–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6731–AA–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications will also be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than February 8,
2017.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
(Robert L. Triplett III, Senior Vice
President) 2200 North Pearl Street,
Dallas, Texas 75201–2272:
1. Independent Bank Group, Inc.,
McKinney, Texas; to acquire 100 percent
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3791-3793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00478]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
[OMB 3060-0057]
Information Collection Being Submitted for Review and Approval to
the Office of Management and Budget
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens,
and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) invites the
general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on the following information collections. Comments are
requested concerning: Whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected;
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the
information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees. The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) control number. No person shall be subject to any
penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject
to the PRA that does not display a valid OMB control number.
DATES: Written comments should be submitted on or before February 13,
2017. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find
it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice,
you should advise the contacts below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Kimberly R. Keravuori, OMB, via
email Kimberly_R_Keravuori@omb.eop.gov; and to Nicole Ongele, FCC, via
email PRA@fcc.gov and to Nicole.Ongele@fcc.gov. Include in the comments
the OMB control number as shown in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or copies
of the information collection, contact Nicole Ongele at (202) 418-2991.
To view a copy of this information collection request (ICR) submitted
to OMB: (1) Go to the Web page <https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain>, (2) look for the section of the Web page called ``Currently
Under Review,'' (3) click on the downward-pointing arrow in the
``Select Agency'' box below the ``Currently Under Review'' heading, (4)
select ``Federal Communications Commission'' from the list of agencies
presented in the ``Select Agency'' box, (5) click the ``Submit'' button
to the right of the ``Select Agency'' box, (6) when the list of FCC
ICRs currently under review appears, look for the OMB control number of
this ICR and then click on the ICR Reference Number. A copy of the FCC
submission to OMB will be displayed.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060-0057.
Title: Application for Equipment Authorization, FCC Form 731.
Form Number: FCC Form 731.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities, and state,
local, or tribal government.
Number of Respondents and Responses: 3,740 respondents; 22,250
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 35 hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement and third
party disclosure requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Statutory authority for these collections are contained in Sections
4(i), 301, 302, 303(e), 303(f), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of
1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 301, 302, 303(e), 303(f),
and 303(r).
Total Annual Burden: 778,750 hours.
Total Annual Cost: No cost.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: There is no need for
confidentiality with this collection of information.
Needs and Uses: Commission rules require that manufacturers of
certain radio frequency (RF) equipment file FCC Form 731 to obtain
approval prior to marketing their equipment. Manufacturers may then
market their RF equipment based on a showing of compliance with
technical standards established in the FCC Rules for each type of
equipment or device operated under the applicable FCC Rule part. The
following types of equipment are regulated (a) the RF equipment is
regulated under certain rule sections of 47 CFR part 15 and Part 18,
and (b) in addition, rules governing certain RF equipment operating in
the licensed services also require equipment authorization as
established in the procedural rules in 47 CFR part 2. The RF equipment
manufacturers comply with the information collection requirements by
(a) Filing FCC Form 731 electronically with the Commission, or (b)
Submitting the information to a Telecommunications Certification Body
(TCB), which acts on behalf of the FCC to issue grants of certification
and may issue grants more expeditiously than the FCC. The TCBs have
flexibility in the format in which they require the collection of
information (i) TCBs may require applicants to submit the required
information in FCC Form 731 format or in another format selected by the
TCB, but (ii) whatever the information collection method, the
information required is governed by the procedural rules in 47 CFR part
2 and a showing of compliance with the FCC technical standards for the
specific type of equipment. RF manufacturer applicants for equipment
certification may also request ``expedited authorization'' to market
their equipment by: (a) Choosing to pay the fee levied by a TCB, and
(b) submitting their request to a TCB in order for expedited
authorization to market. The TCB processes the RF equipment
manufacturer's application as follows: (i) The TCB receives and reviews
the RF manufacturer's information submission/application; and (ii) the
TCB enters the information into the FCC Equipment Authorization System
database using an interface that provides the TCB with the tools to
issue a standardized Grant of Equipment Authorization. Whichever method
the RF manufacturers choose to submit their information--via either the
FCC on FCC Form 731 or the TCB, FCC Rules require that applicants
supply the following data: (a) Demographic information including
Grantee name and address, contact information, etc.; (b) information
specific to the equipment including FCC Identifier, equipment class,
technical specifications, etc.; and (c) attachments that demonstrate
compliance with FCC Rules that may include any combination of the
following based on the applicable Rule parts for the equipment for
which
[[Page 3792]]
authorization is requested: (1) Identification of equipment (47 CFR
2.925); (2) attestation statements that may be required for specific
equipments; (3) external photos of the equipment for which
authorization is requested; (4) block diagram of the device; (5)
schematics; (6) test report; (7) test setup photos; (8) Users Manual;
(9) Internal Photos; (10) Parts List/Tune Up Information; (11) RF
Exposure Information; (12) Operational Description; (13) Cover Letters;
and, (14) Software Defined Radio/Cognitive Radio Files.
In general, an applicant's submission is as follows: (a) FCC Form
731 includes approximately two pages covering the demographic and
equipment identification information; and (b) applicants must supply
additional documentation and other information, as described above,
demonstrating conformance with FCC Rules, which may range from 100-
1,000 pages. The supplemental information is essential to control
potential interference to radio communications, which the FCC may use,
as is necessary, to investigate complaints of harmful interference. In
response to new technologies and in allocating spectrum, the Commission
may establish new technical operating standards: (a) RF equipment
manufacturers must meet the new standards to receive an equipment
authorization, and (b) RF equipment manufacturers must still comply
with the Commission's requirements in FCC Form 731 and demonstrate
compliance as required by 47 CFR part 2 of FCC Rules. Thus, this
information collection applies to a variety of RF equipment: (a) That
is currently manufactured, (b) that may be manufactured in the future,
and (c) that operates under varying technical standards. On July 8,
2004, the Commission adopted a Report and Order, Modification of Parts
2 and 15 of the Commission's Rules for Unlicensed Devices and Equipment
Approval, ET Docket No. 03-201, FCC 04-165. The change requires that
all paper filings required in 47 CFR Sections 2.913, 2.926(c),
2.929(c), and 2.929(d) of the rules are outdated and now must be filed
electronically via the Internet on FCC Form 731. The Commission
believes that electronic filing speeds up application processing and
supports the Commission in further streamlining to reduce cost and
increase efficiency. Information on the procedures for electronically
filing equipment authorization applications can be obtained from the
Commission's rules, and from the Internet at: https://transition.fcc.gov/oet/ea/ea-app-info.htm.
On October 26, 2014, the Federal Communications Commission released
a Report and Order, FCC 14-172, PS Docket 13-87, that modified Sections
2.1033 and 90.548 of the rules and effectively required equipment
manufacturers to demonstrate compliance with the Interoperability
Technical Standards contained in Section 90.548 of the Commission's
rules as a condition for FCC certification of equipment designed to
operate on the 700 MHz narrowband interoperability channels. One method
of demonstrating this requirement is documenting compliance with the
Project 25 Compliance Assessment Program (P25 CAP). CAP is a program
that establishes an independent compliance assessment process to ensure
that communications equipment conforms to Project 25 standards and is
interoperable across vendors. Alternatively, a manufacturer may submit
a document describing how it determined compliance with Section 90.548
and that its equipment is interoperable across vendors.
On August, 22, 2016, the Federal Communications Commission released
an Order on Reconsideration, FCC 16-111, PS Docket No. 13-87 (see
attached) that modified Part 2 and Part 90 of the Rules for equipment
approval and Private Land Mobile Radio Services. See 81 FR 66830 (Sept.
29, 2016). The amended rule requires all Wireless Communications
Equipment Manufacturers who manufacture 700 MHz narrowband equipment
capable of operating on the interoperability channels to demonstrate
compliance with the Commission's Interoperability Technical Standards
in 90.548. The Order on Reconsideration prescribes two methods for
showing compliance with Section 90.548 after equipment authorization
application approval and before the marketing and sale of equipment
capable of operating on the 700 MHz narrowband interoperability
channels. Specifically, the Commission modified Section 2.1033(c)(20)
to provide that:
Before equipment operating under part 90 of this chapter and
capable of operating on the 700 MHz interoperability channels (See
Sec. 90.531(b)(1) of this chapter) may be marketed or sold, the
manufacturer thereof shall have a Compliance Assessment Program
Supplier's Declaration of Conformity and Summary Test Report or,
alternatively, a document detailing how the manufacturer determined
that its equipment complies with Sec. 90.548 of this chapter and that
the equipment is interoperable across vendors. Submission of a 700 MHz
narrowband radio for certification will constitute a representation by
the manufacturer that the radio will be shown, by testing, to be
interoperable across vendors before it is marketed or sold.
The Commission also modified Section 90.548(c) of the Commission's
rules to provide:
Transceivers capable of operating on the interoperability channels
listed in Sec. 90.531(b)(1) shall not be marketed or sold unless the
transceiver has previously been certified for interoperability by the
Compliance Assessment Program (CAP) administered by the U.S. Department
of Homeland Security; provided, however, that this requirement is
suspended if the CAP is discontinued. Submission of a 700 MHz
narrowband radio for certification will constitute a representation by
the manufacturer that the radio will be shown, by testing, to be
interoperable across vendors before it is marketed or sold. In the
alternative, manufacturers may employ their own protocol for verifying
compliance with Project 25 standards and determining that their product
is interoperable among vendors. In the event that field experience
reveals that a transceiver is not interoperable, the Commission may
require the manufacturer thereof to provide evidence of compliance with
this Sec. 90.548.
To effectively implement the provisions of the new Rules, no
modifications to the existing FCC Form 731 Application for Equipment
Authorization are required. The changes are intended to simplify the
filing process, ensure equipment complies with Project 25 standards and
is interoperable across vendors. The following specific methods are
proposed to ensure compliance with Section 90.548 and simplify filing
processes for equipment manufacturers:
(1) The Order on Reconsideration establishes that before the
marketing or sale of equipment designed to operate on the 700 MHz
narrowband interoperability channels, manufacturers shall have a
Compliance Assessment Program Supplier's Declaration of Conformity and
Summary Test Report or, alternatively, a document detailing how the
manufacturer determined that its equipment complies with Sec. 90.548
and that the equipment is interoperable across vendors. OMB has
approved the information collections associated with
[[Page 3793]]
P25 CAP compliance under OMB Control No. 1640-0015.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Congressional direction for a P25 compliance assessment
program can be found in the COPS Law Enforcement Technologies and
Interoperable Communications Program section of the Conference
Report to Public Law 109-148, as well as the Science & Technology
Management and Administration section of Division E of the
Conference Report to Public Law 110-161.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) In the event that field experience reveals that a transceiver
is not interoperable, the Commission may require the manufacturer
thereof to provide evidence of compliance with Sec. 90.548.
The modified rules provide a benefit to public safety licensees by
ensuring that only equipment that has been tested for interoperability
in a vendor-neutral environment before equipment can be marketed or
sold to public safety. This will provide the additional benefit of
engendering competition in the public safety equipment marketplace by
eliminating system compatibility as a gating factor when evaluating
equipment purchases. The Order on Reconsideration reduces the burden on
equipment manufacturers by allowing them to meet this standard by
demonstrating compliance with the P25 CAP or manufacturers'
interoperability testing protocol. Compliance with the P25 CAP program
is already a requisite for grant eligibility and agency purchasing
standards, consequently any new burden imposed by this requirement
would be minimal.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-00478 Filed 1-11-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P