Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Control of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Generating Units, 3233-3234 [2017-00309]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0238; FRL–9957–87–
Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Control of Nitrogen Oxide
Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric
Generating Units
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
state implementation plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Maryland.
This SIP submittal consists of a
regulation for inclusion in the Maryland
SIP which regulates nitrogen oxides
(NOX) emissions from seven coal-fired
electric generating units (EGU) in the
State. This action is being taken under
the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before February 10, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
OAR–2016–0238 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
pino.maria@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
confidential business information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marilyn Powers, (215) 814–2308 or by
email at powers.marilyn@epa.gov.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
On
November 20, 2015, the State of
Maryland, through the Maryland
Department of the Environment (MDE),
submitted a revision to its SIP seeking
to include regulation COMAR
26.11.38.01—.05—Control of NOX
Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric
Generating Units, in the Maryland SIP.
On September 8, 2016, MDE provided a
letter to EPA to clarify that this
regulation was submitted as a SIP
strengthening measure, and not as a
submission to address reasonably
available control technology (RACT) for
coal-fired EGUs.1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
I. Background
On March 12, 2008, EPA strengthened
the national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) for ground level
ozone, setting both the primary and
secondary standards to a level of 0.075
parts per million (ppm) or 75 parts per
billion (ppb) averaged over an 8-hour
period (2008 ozone NAAQS). On May
21, 2012 (77 FR 30088), EPA designated
areas that were not attaining the 2008
ozone NAAQS as nonattainment,
including the following three areas or
portions of areas in Maryland: Cecil
County (part of the PhiladelphiaWilmington-Atlantic City
Nonattainment Area); Calvert, Charles,
Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince
Georges Counties (part of the
Washington, DC-MD-VA Nonattainment
Area); and Anne Arundel, Baltimore,
Carroll, Harford, and Howard Counties
and the City of Baltimore (the Baltimore
Nonattainment Area). The PhiladelphiaWilmington-Atlantic City Area and
Washington, DC-MD-VA Area were
classified as marginal nonattainment
areas, and the Baltimore Area was
classified as a moderate nonattainment
area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA
Analysis
On November 20, 2015, MDE
submitted a regulation as a SIP revision
for EPA approval and incorporation into
the Maryland SIP. The revision consists
of Maryland regulation COMAR
26.11.38—Control of NOX Emissions
from Coal-Fired Electric Generating
1 Subsequent to MDE’s submission of this SIP
revision to EPA, the State finalized several changes
to COMAR 26.11.38 that were effective on
December 10, 2015. This subsequent MDE action
modified sections .01, recodified sections .04 and
.05 to sections .05 and .06, respectively, and added
new sections .04 and .07. These changes to COMAR
26.11.38 have not yet been submitted to EPA for
incorporation in the Maryland SIP. EPA is
proposing approval of sections .01 through .05 of
COMAR 26.11.38 as submitted by MDE on
November 20, 2015, which had a state effective date
of August 31, 2015.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3233
Units. The regulation, effective in
August 2015, establishes NOX emission
standards and additional monitoring
and reporting requirements for coalfired EGUs.
COMAR 26.11.38 defines the affected
units for the regulation as Brandon
Shores Units 1 and 2, C.P. Crane Units
1 and 2, Chalk Point Units 1 and 2,
Dickerson Units 1, 2, and 3, H.A.
Wagner Units 2 and 3, Morgantown
Units 1 and 2, and Warrior Run. The
regulation requires an affected EGU to
minimize NOX emissions by operating
and optimizing the use of all installed
pollution controls and combustion
controls during all times that the unit is
in operation while burning coal. For
demonstrating compliance with this
requirement, the owner or operator is
required to submit a plan to MDE and
EPA for approval that summarizes the
data to be collected to show that each
affected EGU is operating its installed
controls.
The regulation establishes a systemwide emissions rate of 0.15 pounds per
million British thermal units (lbs/
mmBtu) on a 30-day rolling average for
coal-burning EGUs during the ozone
season.2 System-wide emissions are an
aggregation of NOX emissions from all
coal-fired EGUs owned, operated, or
controlled by the same company.
Continuous emissions monitoring
(CEM) systems already installed on
these units as a requirement of previous
federal and state programs, will be used
to track system-wide emissions and to
determine compliance with the 30-day
rolling average emissions limit. See
COMAR 26.11.38.05. The 0.15 lb/
mmBtu emission rate does not apply to
C.P. Crane and AES Warrior Run, as
they are not a part of a system.
To demonstrate compliance with the
requirement to optimize controls, MDE
established 24-hour block emissions
levels for each coal-burning EGU based
on historical emissions data. Id. During
the ozone season, EGU owners are
required to provide a daily report for
any unit that exceeds its 24-hour
emissions level. The report requires
specific operating data and an
explanation of any exceedances of the
24-hour level. A detailed discussion of
the requirements of regulation COMAR
26.11.38 may be found in the EPA
technical support document (TSD)
prepared in support of this proposed
rulemaking, which is available in the
2 The limit does not apply to an EGU located at
a facility that is solely owned, operated, or
controlled. AES Warrior Run is subject to a limit
of 0.10 lb/mmBtu and Charles P. Crane is subject
to the 24-hour block average rates which trigger
reporting requirements.
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
3234
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
docket for this rulemaking action and
online at www.regulations.gov.
The 14 affected units at the seven
plants that are subject to COMAR
26.11.38 have all installed controls as a
result of programs requiring NOX
reductions by previous regulatory
requirements such as the NOX SIP Call
(65 FR 57356, October 27, 1998), the
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) (70 FR
25162, May 12, 2005), the Cross State
Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) (76 FR
48208, August 8, 2011), and Maryland’s
Healthy Air Act (HAA). All of the
affected units have either selective
catalytic reduction (SCR), selective noncatalytic reduction (SNCR), or selective
alternative catalytic reduction (SACR).
EPA finds that the submittal
strengthens the Maryland SIP. COMAR
26.11.38 imposes NOX emissions limits
on units subject to the regulation which
are expected to lower NOX emissions
within the State. The NOX emissions
limits plus the operation and
optimization of the existing NOX
controls whenever the units are in
operation will help Maryland’s
attainment and maintenance of the 2008
ozone NAAQS. EPA’s detailed analysis
of the Maryland submittal can be found
in the TSD developed in support of this
proposed rulemaking action, and can be
found in the docket for this rulemaking
action and at www.regulations.gov.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the
November 20, 2015 Maryland SIP
submittal which seeks to include
regulation COMAR 26.11.38, Control of
Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from CoalFired Electric Generating Units, in the
Maryland SIP as a SIP strengthening
measure in accordance with CAA
section 110. EPA is soliciting public
comments on the issues discussed in
this document. These comments will be
considered before taking final action.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this proposed rule, EPA is
proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference Maryland regulation COMAR
26.11.28—Control of Nitrogen Oxides
Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric
Generating Units. EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these materials
generally available through https://
www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA
Region III Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this action proposing to
approve Maryland’s regulation to
control NOX emissions from coal-fired
electric generating units does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 16, 2016.
Shawn M. Garvin,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2017–00309 Filed 1–10–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R04–OAR–2012–0773; FRL–9957–92–
Region 4]
Air Plan Approval and Air Quality
Designation; KY; Redesignation of the
Kentucky Portion of the Louisville 1997
Annual PM2.5 Nonattainment Area to
Attainment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
On March 5, 2012, the
Commonwealth of Kentucky, through
the Kentucky Energy and Environment
Cabinet, Division for Air Quality (DAQ),
submitted a request for the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
to redesignate the portion of Kentucky
that is within the bi-state Louisville,
KY–IN fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
nonattainment area (hereafter referred to
as the ‘‘bi-state Louisville Area’’ or
‘‘Area’’) to attainment for the 1997
Annual PM2.5 national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS) and to
approve a state implementation plan
(SIP) revision containing a maintenance
plan for the Area. EPA is proposing to
approve the Commonwealth’s plan for
maintaining the 1997 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS in the Area, including the
motor vehicle emission budgets
(MVEBs) for nitrogen oxide (NOX) and
PM2.5 for the years 2015 and 2025 for
the bi-state Louisville Area, and
incorporate it into the SIP, and to
redesignate the Kentucky portion of the
Area to attainment for the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA is also notifying the
public of the status of EPA’s adequacy
determination for the MVEBs for the bistate Louisville Area.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3233-3234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00309]
[[Page 3233]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2016-0238; FRL-9957-87-Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Control of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric
Generating Units
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
State of Maryland. This SIP submittal consists of a regulation for
inclusion in the Maryland SIP which regulates nitrogen oxides
(NOX) emissions from seven coal-fired electric generating
units (EGU) in the State. This action is being taken under the Clean
Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before February 10,
2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2016-0238 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
pino.maria@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marilyn Powers, (215) 814-2308 or by
email at powers.marilyn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 20, 2015, the State of Maryland,
through the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE), submitted a
revision to its SIP seeking to include regulation COMAR
26.11.38.01--.05--Control of NOX Emissions from Coal-Fired
Electric Generating Units, in the Maryland SIP. On September 8, 2016,
MDE provided a letter to EPA to clarify that this regulation was
submitted as a SIP strengthening measure, and not as a submission to
address reasonably available control technology (RACT) for coal-fired
EGUs.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Subsequent to MDE's submission of this SIP revision to EPA,
the State finalized several changes to COMAR 26.11.38 that were
effective on December 10, 2015. This subsequent MDE action modified
sections .01, recodified sections .04 and .05 to sections .05 and
.06, respectively, and added new sections .04 and .07. These changes
to COMAR 26.11.38 have not yet been submitted to EPA for
incorporation in the Maryland SIP. EPA is proposing approval of
sections .01 through .05 of COMAR 26.11.38 as submitted by MDE on
November 20, 2015, which had a state effective date of August 31,
2015.\\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Background
On March 12, 2008, EPA strengthened the national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS) for ground level ozone, setting both the
primary and secondary standards to a level of 0.075 parts per million
(ppm) or 75 parts per billion (ppb) averaged over an 8-hour period
(2008 ozone NAAQS). On May 21, 2012 (77 FR 30088), EPA designated areas
that were not attaining the 2008 ozone NAAQS as nonattainment,
including the following three areas or portions of areas in Maryland:
Cecil County (part of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City
Nonattainment Area); Calvert, Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, and
Prince Georges Counties (part of the Washington, DC-MD-VA Nonattainment
Area); and Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard
Counties and the City of Baltimore (the Baltimore Nonattainment Area).
The Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City Area and Washington, DC-MD-VA
Area were classified as marginal nonattainment areas, and the Baltimore
Area was classified as a moderate nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS.
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis
On November 20, 2015, MDE submitted a regulation as a SIP revision
for EPA approval and incorporation into the Maryland SIP. The revision
consists of Maryland regulation COMAR 26.11.38--Control of
NOX Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Generating Units. The
regulation, effective in August 2015, establishes NOX
emission standards and additional monitoring and reporting requirements
for coal-fired EGUs.
COMAR 26.11.38 defines the affected units for the regulation as
Brandon Shores Units 1 and 2, C.P. Crane Units 1 and 2, Chalk Point
Units 1 and 2, Dickerson Units 1, 2, and 3, H.A. Wagner Units 2 and 3,
Morgantown Units 1 and 2, and Warrior Run. The regulation requires an
affected EGU to minimize NOX emissions by operating and
optimizing the use of all installed pollution controls and combustion
controls during all times that the unit is in operation while burning
coal. For demonstrating compliance with this requirement, the owner or
operator is required to submit a plan to MDE and EPA for approval that
summarizes the data to be collected to show that each affected EGU is
operating its installed controls.
The regulation establishes a system-wide emissions rate of 0.15
pounds per million British thermal units (lbs/mmBtu) on a 30-day
rolling average for coal-burning EGUs during the ozone season.\2\
System-wide emissions are an aggregation of NOX emissions
from all coal-fired EGUs owned, operated, or controlled by the same
company. Continuous emissions monitoring (CEM) systems already
installed on these units as a requirement of previous federal and state
programs, will be used to track system-wide emissions and to determine
compliance with the 30-day rolling average emissions limit. See COMAR
26.11.38.05. The 0.15 lb/mmBtu emission rate does not apply to C.P.
Crane and AES Warrior Run, as they are not a part of a system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The limit does not apply to an EGU located at a facility
that is solely owned, operated, or controlled. AES Warrior Run is
subject to a limit of 0.10 lb/mmBtu and Charles P. Crane is subject
to the 24-hour block average rates which trigger reporting
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To demonstrate compliance with the requirement to optimize
controls, MDE established 24-hour block emissions levels for each coal-
burning EGU based on historical emissions data. Id. During the ozone
season, EGU owners are required to provide a daily report for any unit
that exceeds its 24-hour emissions level. The report requires specific
operating data and an explanation of any exceedances of the 24-hour
level. A detailed discussion of the requirements of regulation COMAR
26.11.38 may be found in the EPA technical support document (TSD)
prepared in support of this proposed rulemaking, which is available in
the
[[Page 3234]]
docket for this rulemaking action and online at www.regulations.gov.
The 14 affected units at the seven plants that are subject to COMAR
26.11.38 have all installed controls as a result of programs requiring
NOX reductions by previous regulatory requirements such as
the NOX SIP Call (65 FR 57356, October 27, 1998), the Clean
Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) (70 FR 25162, May 12, 2005), the Cross State
Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) (76 FR 48208, August 8, 2011), and
Maryland's Healthy Air Act (HAA). All of the affected units have either
selective catalytic reduction (SCR), selective non-catalytic reduction
(SNCR), or selective alternative catalytic reduction (SACR).
EPA finds that the submittal strengthens the Maryland SIP. COMAR
26.11.38 imposes NOX emissions limits on units subject to
the regulation which are expected to lower NOX emissions
within the State. The NOX emissions limits plus the
operation and optimization of the existing NOX controls
whenever the units are in operation will help Maryland's attainment and
maintenance of the 2008 ozone NAAQS. EPA's detailed analysis of the
Maryland submittal can be found in the TSD developed in support of this
proposed rulemaking action, and can be found in the docket for this
rulemaking action and at www.regulations.gov.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the November 20, 2015 Maryland SIP
submittal which seeks to include regulation COMAR 26.11.38, Control of
Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Generating Units, in
the Maryland SIP as a SIP strengthening measure in accordance with CAA
section 110. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed
in this document. These comments will be considered before taking final
action.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this proposed rule, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA
rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference Maryland regulation COMAR 26.11.28--Control of
Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Generating Units.
EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally
available through https://www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region
III Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this action proposing to approve Maryland's regulation
to control NOX emissions from coal-fired electric generating
units does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order
13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved
to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it
will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 16, 2016.
Shawn M. Garvin,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2017-00309 Filed 1-10-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P