Updates Concerning Non-Geostationary, Fixed-Satellite Service Systems and Related Matters, 3258-3279 [2016-31795]
Download as PDF
3258
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
(ii) Identify existing or emerging
technology, vessel design, infrastructure
designs, and other improvements that
would reduce emissions, increase fuel
economy, and lower costs of Marine
Highway transportation and increase the
efficiency of intermodal transfers.
(iii) Identify impediments to the
establishment of Marine Highway
services.
(iv) Identify incentives to increase the
use and efficiency of Marine Highway
services.
(b) The Secretary, in consultation
with the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency, may
conduct research on short sea
transportation regarding:
(1) The environmental and
transportation benefits to be derived
from short sea transportation
alternatives for other forms of
transportation;
(2) Technology, vessel design, and
other improvements that would reduce
emissions, increase fuel economy, and
lower costs of short sea transportation
and increase the efficiency of
intermodal transfers; and
(3) Solutions to impediments to short
sea transportation projects designated.
(a) How does MARAD administer the
AMHP grant program?
(1) The Associate Administrator for
Intermodal Systems Development
manages the program under the
guidance and the immediate
administrative direction of the Maritime
Administrator.
(2) MARAD establishes grant program
priorities as reflected in its grant
opportunity announcements and, from
time-to-time, issues clarifying guidance
documents through the MARAD Web
site and the Federal Register.
(3) The Administrator makes funding
recommendations to the Secretary, who
has the authority to award grants.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
(b) How does MARAD make grant
opportunities known?
(1) MARAD determines which grant
opportunities it will offer, and
establishes application deadlines, and
programmatic requirements when grant
funds become available to the AMHP.
(2) The MARAD staff prepares Notice
of Funding Opportunity (NOFO)
announcements consisting of all
information necessary to apply for each
grant and publishes the announcement
in the Federal Register and on
grants.gov.
(3) The MARAD staff publishes notice
of each announcement on https://
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
(c) How may an applicant apply for an
AMHP grant?
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–00342 Filed 1–10–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
(1) Applicants may apply for a grant
using grants.gov or, in connection with
a Federal Register announcement, by
submitting the necessary information to
the AMHP Office in electronic form.
(2) [Reserved].
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 2 and 25
(Authority: Pub. L. 110–140, title XI, subtitle
C sections 1121–1123, 121 Stat. 1494; Pub. L.
112–213, title IV, section 405, 126 Stat. 1541;
49 CFR 1.92 and 1.93(a), 46 U.S.C. 55601,
55604, 55605)
[IB Docket No. 16–408; FCC 16–170]
*
AGENCY:
*
*
*
*
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
T. Mitchell Hudson, Jr.,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2017–00249 Filed 1–10–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 1, 2, 15, 25, 30, and 101
[GN Docket No. 14–177, IB Docket Nos. 15–
256 and 97–95, WT Docket No. 10–112;
Report No. 3065]
§ 393.6 America’s Marine Highway
Program Project Grants.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
grants.gov, a Federal government Web
site widely available to the public.
Petitions for Reconsideration of Action
in Rulemaking Proceeding
Federal Communications
Commission.
AGENCY:
Petition for reconsideration;
correction.
ACTION:
The Federal Communications
Commission (Commission) published a
document in the Federal Register of
December 30, 2016, concerning
petitions for reconsideration filed in the
Commission’s rulemaking proceeding.
The date for filing replies was incorrect.
This document corrects the filing
deadline date for replies to an
opposition to the Petitions.
SUMMARY:
John
Schauble, Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau, (202) 418–0797; email:
John.Schauble@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Correction
In the Federal Register of December
30, 2016, in FR Doc. 2016–31709, on
page 96415, in the first column, correct
the DATES section to read:
Oppositions to the Petitions
must be filed on or before January 17,
2017. Replies to an opposition must be
filed on or before January 27, 2017.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Updates Concerning NonGeostationary, Fixed-Satellite Service
Systems and Related Matters
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
The Federal Communications
Commission proposes to update, clarify,
and streamline its rules to facilitate the
deployment of recently proposed nongeostationary-satellite orbit (NGSO),
fixed-satellite service (FSS) satellite
systems.
SUMMARY:
Comments are due February 27,
2017. Reply comments are due March
27, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by IB Docket No. 16–408, by
any of the following methods:
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web site: https://
apps.fcc.gov/ecfs. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by email: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
For detailed instructions for
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clay
DeCell, 202–418–0803.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), FCC 16–
170, adopted December 14, 2016, and
released December 15, 2016. The full
text of the NPRM is available at https://
apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/
FCC-16-170A1.pdf. The NPRM is also
available for inspection and copying
during business hours in the FCC
Reference Information Center, Portals II,
445 12th Street SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities, send an email
to FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
& Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202–
418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 (TTY).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Comment Filing Requirements
Interested parties may file comments
and reply comments on or before the
dates indicated in the DATES section
above. Comments may be filed using the
Commission’s Electronic Comment
Filing System (ECFS).
• Electronic Filers. Comments may be
filed electronically using the Internet by
accessing the ECFS, https://apps.fcc.gov/
ecfs.
• Paper Filers. Parties who file by
paper must include an original and four
copies of each filing.
Filings may be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
Æ All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary must be
delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445
12th Street SW., Room TW–A325,
Washington, DC 20554. All hand
deliveries must be held together with
rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes must be disposed of before
entering the building.
Æ Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300
East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights,
MD 20743.
Æ U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
• Persons with Disabilities. To request
materials in accessible formats for
persons with disabilities (braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format), or
to request reasonable accommodations
for filing comments (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.), send an email to fcc504@
fcc.gov or call 202–418–0530 (voice) or
202–418–0432 (TTY).
Ex Parte Presentations
Pursuant to 47 CFR 1.1200(a), this
proceeding will be treated as a ‘‘permitbut-disclose’’ proceeding in accordance
with the Commission’s ex parte rules.
Persons making ex parte presentations
must file a copy of any written
presentation or a memorandum
summarizing any oral presentation
within two business days after the
presentation (unless a different deadline
applicable to the Sunshine period
applies). Persons making oral ex parte
presentations are reminded that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
memoranda summarizing the
presentation must (1) list all persons
attending or otherwise participating in
the meeting at which the ex parte
presentation was made, and (2)
summarize all data presented and
arguments made during the
presentation. If the presentation
consisted in whole or in part of the
presentation of data or arguments
already reflected in the presenter’s
written comments, memoranda or other
filings in the proceeding, the presenter
may provide citations to such data or
arguments in his or her prior comments,
memoranda, or other filings (specifying
the relevant page and/or paragraph
numbers where such data or arguments
can be found) in lieu of summarizing
them in the memorandum. Documents
shown or given to Commission staff
during ex parte meetings are deemed to
be written ex parte presentations and
must be filed consistent with 47 CFR
1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by
47 CFR 1.49(f) or for which the
Commission has made available a
method of electronic filing, written ex
parte presentations and memoranda
summarizing oral ex parte
presentations, and all attachments
thereto, must be filed through the
electronic comment filing system
available for that proceeding, and must
be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc,
.xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants
in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission’s ex
parte rules.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains proposed
new and modified information
collection requirements. The
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burdens,
invites the general public and the Office
of Management and Budget to comment
on the information collection
requirements contained in this
document, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. In addition,
pursuant to the Small Business
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, we seek
specific comment on how we might
further reduce the information
collection burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
Synopsis
In this NPRM, we propose revisions to
certain of the Commission’s rules and
policies governing satellite services,
prompted by a planned new generation
of large NGSO FSS systems. We propose
to update, clarify, and streamline our
rules to facilitate the deployment of
NGSO FSS systems, which have the
capability to provide services, including
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3259
Internet access, to underserved
communities worldwide. We also
propose to update certain rules
governing operation of FSS space
stations in the geostationary-satellite
orbit (GSO) to enable greater operational
flexibility.
Ka-Band Plan
Proposal Overview. In light of
decisions waiving the plan for the Kaband, or the 17.7–20.2 GHz and 27.5–30
GHz bands, and to promote more
flexible use of the spectrum, we propose
to reinstate certain secondary FSS use in
the 17.8–20.2 GHz band and to allow
new FSS operations in the 19.3–19.4
GHz, 19.6–19.7 GHz, and 29.3–29.5 GHz
bands. This proposal would codify
existing practices and formally enable
the spectrum use proposed by NGSO
FSS broadband constellations currently
pending before the Commission. It
would further make available for FSS
systems spectrum currently designated
for, but never used by, NGSO mobilesatellite service (MSS) feeder links.
17.8–18.3 GHz. We propose to create
a new secondary allocation to the FSS
in the 17.8–18.3 GHz band, subject to
protections for the primary fixed service
(FS). We anticipate that the power fluxdensity (PFD) limits established by the
International Telecommunication Union
(ITU) for protection of the FS by the FSS
in the 17.7–18.3 GHz band are also
sufficient to protect U.S. terrestrial fixed
users, without generally requiring
coordination. This has long been the
case in the 3700–4200 MHz band, for
example, in which FSS space stations
operate on a co-primary basis with FS
terrestrial stations, are not typically
coordinated with terrestrial operators,
and are subject to ITU PFD limits
codified in 47 CFR 25.208(a). And the
United States participated actively in
the development of ITU PFD limits in
the 17.8–18.3 GHz band, with input
from U.S. terrestrial operators.
Thus, we are no longer concerned
about coordination and delay concerns
that the Commission expressed in 2000.
The Commission did not discuss the
adequacy of any PFD limits in this
context. And, both NGSO FSS and GSO
FSS systems have been successfully
authorized to operate in this band by
waiver on an unprotected, noninterference basis with respect to the FS.
We also note that WorldVu Satellites
Limited, d/b/a OneWeb, has filed a
petition for declaratory ruling to access
the U.S. market in the 17.8–18.6 GHz
band using its proposed system of 720
NGSO satellites. Accordingly, and to
promote additional operational
flexibility, we propose to adopt a
secondary allocation to the FSS (space-
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
3260
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
to-Earth) in the 17.8–18.3 GHz band
currently designated solely for the FS.
Both GSO FSS and NGSO FSS
operations would be permitted under
this secondary FSS allocation. NonFederal FSS operations would also be
secondary to primary Federal FSS
operations in this band. We intend to
limit this allocation to individually
licensed earth stations, which are more
likely than ubiquitously deployed user
terminals to be able to operate
successfully on an unprotected basis
with respect to primary FS stations. We
also propose to include in our rules the
international PFD limits on space
stations in this band. Finally, to
promote compatibility among FSS
systems, we propose to authorize NGSO
FSS systems in this band only on an
unprotected, non-interference basis with
respect to GSO FSS networks. We seek
comment on these proposals. As
indicated above, we anticipate that PFD
limits established by the ITU, with
significant involvement of the United
States, will be adequate to protect U.S.
fixed users from interference. However,
we seek comment on these PFD limits.
In the unlikely event that harmful
interference did occur to an FS station,
we expect that the FS operator would
attempt to locate and contact the source
of the interference, or seek assistance
from the Commission. We seek
comment on this issue.
18.3–18.6 GHz and 19.7–20.2 GHz.
We also propose to allow NGSO FSS
systems to operate on an unprotected
basis with respect to GSO FSS networks
in the 18.3–18.6 GHz and 19.7–20.2 GHz
bands, subject to limits on equivalent
power flux-density (EPFD) to ensure
protection of GSO FSS networks, as
explained below. We do not propose to
extend NGSO FSS operation to the
18.6–18.8 GHz band, in which GSO FSS
networks are also currently designated
co-primary, due to concerns of
protection for the coequal Earth
exploration-satellite service (passive)
and the space research service (passive).
As we concluded for operations in the
10.7–14.5 GHz band, which is available
for licensing of both GSO and NGSO
FSS systems, we anticipate that
compliance with EPFD limits applicable
internationally will be sufficient to
protect GSO FSS networks from
unacceptable interference, by generally
limiting NGSO FSS operations near the
geostationary orbit. Permitting NGSO
FSS operations in the 18.3–18.6 GHz
and 19.7–20.2 GHz bands would also be
consistent with waivers issued on
delegated authority.
18.8–19.3 GHz. In addition, we
propose to allow GSO FSS operation in
the 18.8–19.3 GHz downlink band on an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
unprotected, non-interference basis with
respect to NGSO FSS systems,
consistent with Bureau waivers and
matching the current secondary GSO
FSS designation in the paired 28.6–29.1
GHz uplink band. Because NGSO FSS
systems would not be required to alter
their operations to accommodate any
GSO FSS operations in this band, we do
not believe this allowance for GSO FSS
would prove burdensome to NGSO FSS
systems, but we seek comment on such
burdens.
18.8–19.3 GHz and 28.6–29.1 GHz.
Internationally, these bands are
allocated to the FSS on a primary basis.
GSO satellite networks and NGSO
systems in these bands are subject to
coordination, and No. 22.2 of the ITU
Radio Regulations does not apply. This
rule provides that, regardless of their
ITU filing dates, NGSO systems must
not cause unacceptable interference to
and, unless otherwise specified in the
Radio Regulations, must not claim
protection from GSO FSS and GSO
broadcasting-satellite service (BSS)
networks operating in accordance with
the Radio Regulations. We request
comment on the possibility of giving
GSO operations co-primary status with
NGSO operations in these bands, as
opposed to the secondary designation
already existing in the 28.6–29.1 GHz
band and our proposal above for the
18.8–19.3 GHz band. We seek comment
on any potential difficulties that this
approach might raise, particularly since
our rules separately address GSO-like
applications and NGSO-like
applications, but do not provide a
mechanism for us to consider an
application of one type (GSO-like or
`
NGSO-like) vis-a-vis previous
applications or authorizations of the
other type in the bands 18.8–19.3 GHz
and 28.6–29.1 GHz. Significantly, in
these bands NGSO-like operations do
not have to meet EPFD limits in order
to ensure the protection of GSO-like
operations.
19.3–19.4 GHz, 19.6–19.7 GHz, and
29.3–29.5 GHz. To facilitate satellite use
of the bands, we propose to permit both
GSO and NGSO FSS systems to operate
in the 19.3–19.4 GHz, 19.6–19.7 GHz,
and 29.3–29.5 GHz bands currently
designated for, but unused by, NGSO
MSS feeder links. We propose to
authorize NGSO FSS systems on an
unprotected, non-interference basis with
respect to GSO FSS networks in these
bands. In the 19.3–19.4 GHz and 19.6–
19.7 GHz bands, which are shared on a
co-primary basis with terrestrial
services, any FSS earth stations would
be individually licensed and
coordinated with terrestrial stations.
Existing terrestrial operations in these
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
bands would not have to protect any
new FSS deployment under general
first-come, first-served coordination
procedures. PFD limits are already in
place to protect such terrestrial
operations from downlink interference.
Further, we anticipate that new stations
in the FS and the FSS will be
compatible in these bands through
coordination of the specific operating
parameters of each station, FS or FSS,
at the time of licensing. We seek
comment on this proposal, including
relevant technical analyses regarding
coordination parameters for new
individually licensed earth stations and
future FS stations.
Codification. For clarity, we propose
at this time to codify the Ka-band Plan’s
satellite designations into footnotes to
the U.S. Table of Frequency Allocations,
47 CFR 2.106. In doing so, we propose
to specify that, in the 27.5–28.35 GHz
band, NGSO FSS systems must operate
on an unprotected, non-interference
basis with respect to GSO FSS networks.
This treatment would promote
compatibility between the two system
designs and is consistent with our
proposals in most shared GSO–NGSO
FSS bands. Additionally, while the MSS
is not designated in the Commission’s
Ka-band Plan, we do not propose to
remove the allocations for this service in
the 19.7–20.2 GHz and 29.5–30 GHz
bands. We also propose to remove
duplicative notes in 47 CFR
25.202(a)(1), except with respect to the
Commission’s recent decision regarding
the 27.5–28.35 GHz band in the
Spectrum Frontiers proceeding.
Similarly, we propose to incorporate
into footnotes in the Table the
remaining frequency-use restrictions in
47 CFR 25.202(a)(1) that were not
recently amended in the Commission’s
Spectrum Frontiers proceeding.
However, we propose to specify the
limitation on NGSO FSS deployment in
the 10.7–11.7 GHz and 12.75–13.25 GHz
bands as to individually licensed earth
stations only, rather than to gateway
earth stations only as currently
prescribed. This would be consistent
both with our proposal for the 17.8–18.3
GHz band and with the Commission’s
recent decision regarding the shared
27.5–28.35 GHz band in the Spectrum
Frontiers proceeding. In addition, rather
than attempt to reproduce in 47 CFR
25.202(a)(1) all of the frequency bands
available for FSS, which are already
stated completely in the Table of
Frequency Allocations in 47 CFR 2.106,
we propose to use this paragraph only
to note the restrictions on FSS not
codified in the Table.
PFD Limits in 17.7–19.7 GHz for GSO
FSS Space Stations. Section 25.208(c)
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
contains PFD limits on emissions from
space stations in, among others, the
following frequency bands: 18.3–18.8
GHz and 19.3–19.7 GHz. In addition, 47
CFR 25.208(e) contains PFD limits on
emissions by NGSO FSS space stations
in the 18.8–19.3 GHz band. Since we are
proposing changes to the U.S. Table of
Frequency Allocations that will allow
the operation of GSO FSS and/or NGSO
FSS space stations in frequency bands
where such operation was not
previously contemplated, we propose to
extend the applicability of PFD limits to
these frequency bands. Accordingly, we
propose to make the limits in 47 CFR
25.208(c) applicable to GSO FSS space
stations in the frequency bands 17.7–
19.7 GHz and to all space stations in the
bands 22.55–23.55 GHz and 24.45–24.75
GHz. These limits have already been
applied in portions of the 17.7–19.7
GHz band when granting authorizations
for operation in this band through
waivers.
PFD Limits for NGSO FSS Space
Stations. We also propose to make the
limits in 47 CFR 25.208(e) applicable to
NGSO FSS space stations in the
frequency bands 17.8–18.6 GHz and
18.8–19.7 GHz. We recognize, however,
that these limits were derived for
constellations up to a certain number of
satellites and may not be appropriate for
some of the large NGSO FSS
constellations being currently proposed.
The interference produced by an NGSO
FSS constellation to a terrestrial station
is time-varying and, for that reason, the
protection of such a station would be
better ensured through the
establishment of an EPFD limit. We
invite comment on this point and on
what would be an appropriate EPFD for
the protection of a terrestrial station in
the frequency bands under
consideration. As an alternative, and
until such EPFD limit can be developed,
we propose that an NGSO FSS
constellation be deemed as having met
the requirements in 47 CFR 25.208(e) if
the aggregate PFD produced by the
whole constellation at any point in the
Earth’s surface does not exceed ¥115
(dBW/m2)/MHz. We invite comments
on this proposal.
Other. As NGSO FSS systems deploy
in different frequency bands, it is
important to consider how these
systems can share spectrum with other
non-satellite systems. In this respect, we
request comments on any other
emerging uses, technologies, or
platforms that should be taken into
account as additional NGSO uses occur.
Would the rules proposed in this Notice
preclude in any way other uses of this
spectrum or hinder future sharing with
other services? Are there additional
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
technical rules or other means by which
we can facilitate additional sharing in
these bands?
EPFD Limits
Ka-band. While the Commission has
not previously included in its rules the
Ka-band EPFD limits found in Article 22
of the ITU Radio Regulations, NGSO
FSS applicants in these bands have
nonetheless demonstrated compliance
with the limits when seeking to operate
`
on a non-interference basis vis-a-vis
GSO FSS networks. The International
Bureau has approved such operations
on the basis of these showings.
Similarly, we expect that compliance
with the Article 22 EPFD limits will be
sufficient for NGSO FSS systems to
protect GSO FSS networks in the 17.8–
18.6 GHz, 19.7–20.2 GHz, 27.5–28.35
GHz, and 29.5–30 GHz bands, as the
U.S. GSO FSS community participated
actively in their development.
Accordingly, to provide greater certainty
regarding the compatibility of NGSO
FSS and GSO FSS operations, we
propose to require NGSO FSS
applicants in these bands to
demonstrate conformance with
applicable EPFD limits in the same
manner that NGSO FSS applicants must
for operation in the 10.7–14.5 GHz
band. We intend that compliance with
EPFD limits in the Ka-band would
satisfy any obligation on an NGSO FSS
system to operate on a non-interference
basis with respect to a GSO FSS
network. In addition, we propose to
incorporate EPFD limits on intersatellite emissions from NGSO FSS
space stations into GSO FSS space
stations, which are currently found in
Article 22 but omitted from our rules.
We also propose to extend relevant
Article 22 EPFD limits to the 19.3–19.4
GHz, 19.6–19.7 GHz, and 29.3–29.5 GHz
bands in which we are proposing to
allow new NGSO FSS operations on an
unprotected, non-interference basis with
respect to GSO FSS networks.
Consolidation. In adding these Kaband EPFD rules, we propose to
consolidate our NGSO FSS licensing
provisions for operation in the Ka-band,
currently found in 47 CFR 25.145, into
the licensing rules for NGSO FSS
operation in the 10.7–14.5 GHz band,
set forth in 47 CFR 25.146. In doing so,
we propose to delete 47 CFR 25.145(e),
similar provisions in 47 CFR 25.142(d)
and 25.143(d), and the cross-references
to 47 CFR 25.142(d) in 47 CFR 25.217,
all of which proscribe certain
exclusionary arrangements to serve
foreign markets. These provisions have
been superseded by section 648 of the
Open-market Reorganization for the
Betterment of International
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3261
Telecommunications (ORBIT) Act,
which contains a parallel prohibition.
We also request comment on ways we
might simplify 47 CFR 25.146.
NGSO–GSO Default Sharing. Finally,
the first sentence of 47 CFR 25.156(d)(5)
provides that, in frequency bands in
which the Commission has not yet
adopted sharing criteria between GSOlike and NGSO-like satellite operations,
the Commission will not grant an
application for NGSO-like operation
after it has granted an application for
GSO-like operation, or vice versa. The
effect of this provision is to preclude
joint NGSO-like and GSO-like use of
frequency bands until the Commission
has adopted formal sharing criteria
between the different types of satellite
operation in that band. As noted above,
however, the International Bureau has
approved by waiver both GSO-like and
NGSO-like operations in the same Kaband frequencies without EPFD sharing
criteria yet codified in our rules.
Similarly, we believe that an applicant
demonstrating that it can operate
compatibly with any existing
operations, either through technical
demonstrations or coordination, ought
not be precluded from providing service
to the public while the Commission
initiates and conducts a rulemaking to
establish formal sharing criteria. We
therefore propose to delete the first
sentence of 47 CFR 25.156(d)(5). We
also request comment as to whether we
should adopt, as a default sharing rule,
a provision similar to No. 22.2 of the
ITU Radio Regulations. This provision
would state that, except as otherwise
provided in our rules, NGSO systems
must not cause unacceptable
interference to, and must not claim
protection from, GSO FSS networks and
GSO BSS networks. For example, the
18.8–19.3 GHz and 28.6–29.1 GHz
bands would be excepted from such a
provision, because in these bands we
require GSO FSS networks to operate on
an unprotected, non-interference basis
with respect to NGSO FSS systems.
Avoidance of In-line Interference
Background. The Commission has
adopted a default mechanism to enable
spectrum sharing among NGSO FSS
systems in the 10.7–12.7 GHz, 12.75–
13.25 GHz, 13.75–14.5 GHz, 18.8–19.3
GHz, and 28.6–29.1 GHz bands. Under
this mechanism, an NGSO FSS system
may operate throughout its authorized
band except during ‘‘in-line’’ events. An
‘‘in-line’’ event occurs when satellites of
different NGSO FSS systems are
physically aligned with an operating
earth station of one of those systems,
such that the topocentric angle between
the satellites is less than 10 degrees as
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
3262
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
measured from the earth station. To
avoid interference among the systems
experiencing an in-line event, the
Commission requires the affected
satellite operators to divide the
commonly assigned spectrum equally
according to the chosen ‘‘home’’
spectrum for the duration of the in-line
event, absent another sharing agreement
by the operators.
Section 25.261. The avoidance of inline interference mechanism is codified
in 47 CFR 25.261. This section,
however, omits the 10.7–12.7 GHz,
12.75–13.25 GHz, and 13.75–14.5 GHz
bands. We propose to correct this
omission. We also propose to include in
47 CFR 25.261 the bands in which we
currently designate NGSO FSS
operation on a secondary basis—27.5–
28.6 GHz and 29.5–30 GHz—and the
bands in which we are proposing to
allow NGSO FSS operation—17.8–18.6
GHz, 19.3–19.4 GHz, 19.6–20.2 GHz,
and 29.3–29.5 GHz. We otherwise
propose to clarify that 47 CFR 25.261
applies only to NGSO FSS systems
communicating with earth stations with
directional antennas. We seek comment
on expanding this spectrum sharing
method to NGSO FSS operations in
other frequency bands, in place of the
alternative procedure for assigning
spectrum to NGSO satellite systems by
simply dividing it equally among the
qualified applicants in a processing
round. In this regard, we propose to
clarify in 47 CFR 25.157 that these
band-splitting procedures do not apply
to applications granted on the condition
of compliance with the avoidance of inline interference mechanism specified
in 47 CFR 25.261. We also seek
comment on any other standard for
assigning spectrum.
Ephemeris Data. In order to effectuate
the avoidance of in-line interference
mechanism, NGSO FSS operators must
know the locations of co-frequency
NGSO FSS space stations to predict
when in-line events will occur. Section
25.271(e) requires NGSO FSS licensees
in the 10.7–14.5 GHz band to maintain
a Web site with ephemeris data for each
satellite in its constellation, which
facilitates coordination for this purpose.
NGSO FSS licensees in the 18.8–19.3
GHz and 28.6–29.1 GHz bands must also
share ephemeris data. Accordingly, we
propose to include the 18.8–19.3 GHz
and 28.6–29.1 GHz bands in 47 CFR
25.271(e), along with the portions of the
Ka-band currently designated for NGSO
FSS operation on a secondary basis or
proposed for NGSO FSS operation in
this Notice, i.e., the 17.8–18.6 GHz,
19.3–19.4 GHz, 19.6–20.2 GHz, 27.5–
28.6 GHz, and 29.3–30 GHz bands. We
also propose to apply this requirement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
explicitly to non-U.S.-licensed NGSO
FSS operators that are granted market
access in the United States.
We understand that satellites in the
low-Earth orbit (LEO) region, i.e., the
region of space at Earth altitudes below
2,000 km, that do not have stationkeeping capability have experienced
orbital perturbations from solar events
resulting in a reduction in altitude of up
to several kilometers from a single solar
event. We invite comment as to whether
the current ephemeris data update
frequency of once every three days as
required by 47 CFR 25.271(e) is
appropriate for such satellites, or
whether we should require more
frequent updates, and if so, what the
appropriate update interval would be.
We also invite comment as to whether
an electronic Web site bulletin board as
currently required by 47 CFR 25.271(e)
is the most appropriate means of making
ephemeris data available, or whether
another method, such as requiring
active participation in the Space Data
Association and/or requiring the sharing
of data with the U. S. Strategic
Command’s Joint Space Operations
Center (or any successor) might be a
more effective means.
10-degree Trigger. In addition, we
note that the 10-degree default
separation for co-frequency NGSO FSS
space station operations is based on the
characteristics of satellite systems
proposed around the turn of the
millennium. We invite comment as to
whether the separation-angle trigger
should be increased or decreased to
reflect current system designs.
Accommodation of Later Entrants.
Finally, when authorizing NGSO FSS
systems in the past, the International
Bureau has required licensees to abide
by the avoidance of in-line interference
mechanism generally with respect to
later-authorized NGSO FSS systems,
unless coordination agreements are
reached. To the extent that laterauthorized systems increase the
frequency of in-line events, or increase
the number of satellite systems involved
in an in-line event, such later entrants
can diminish the amount of spectrum
available to an existing NGSO FSS
system. We invite comment on how best
to balance the competing interests of
encouraging new market entry and
providing NGSO FSS operators certainty
with respect to a minimum amount of
spectrum available for their services.
For example, should we specify that the
avoidance of in-line interference
mechanism applies only to those in-line
events among the existing grantee, O3b
Limited, and any licensees and market
access holders approved as a result of a
processing round? In this case, an
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
applicant requesting authority after any
processing round would be required to
protect existing NGSO FSS
authorization holders, and would be
required, during an in-line event, to
cease operations on the commonly
authorized spectrum.
Earth Station E.I.R.P. Density Limits
In light of the ability of the O3b NGSO
FSS system to operate within existing
e.i.r.p. density criteria for GSO FSS
earth stations, and considering the
spectrum sharing benefits of such
criteria, we invite comment on adopting
e.i.r.p. density limits for NGSO FSS
uplink transmissions. These could be
based, for example, on the limits we
have prescribed for FSS earth stations
transmitting to GSO space stations.
Such default limits could be exceeded
to the extent that higher levels are
coordinated with all other NGSO FSS
systems authorized in the same
frequency bands. If we were to adopt
e.i.r.p. density limits for NGSO FSS
uplink transmissions, should we simply
require a certification from applicants
that they will abide by these default
power limits unless higher transmission
levels are appropriately coordinated?
This certification requirement could be
similar to certification requirements the
Commission has recently adopted for
GSO FSS and 17/24 GHz BSS space
station operations. We also seek
comment on whether, similar to our
policy regarding GSO FSS space
stations, there are appropriate downlink
power limits and earth station receive
gain criteria that we should adopt to
facilitate sharing among NGSO FSS
systems. We further seek comment on
any other measures that should be
recommended to facilitate sharing.
Milestones
Background. The Commission
requires all satellites in an authorized
NGSO constellation to be launched and
operated within six years of grant. This
milestone requirement is intended to
ensure timely provision of service, and
to prevent ‘‘warehousing’’ of spectrum
and orbital resources. Failure to meet
this requirement, incorporated as a
condition of the constellation grant,
renders the authorization null and void,
and subjects the grantee to forfeiture of
up to $5 million under the surety bond
posted for the authorization.
NGSO Milestone. Operation of every
space station in an authorized
constellation, however, may not be
necessary to provide the services
proposed in the application. Additional
space stations could be authorized to
reduce latency or to increase capacity
and reliability, for example. And while
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
failure to successfully launch and
operate such additional space stations
within six years might not preclude
service to the public, it could, under
current rules, result in automatic
termination of the license. To afford
operators greater flexibility with system
design and implementation, we propose
to modify the six-year milestone
obligation for NGSO systems to require
the launch and operation of a
percentage of the authorized
constellation sufficient to provide
substantial service to the public. We
tentatively conclude that 75 percent is
an appropriate number for this
requirement. Satisfaction of this
milestone would release the operator
from its surety bond obligation. Failure
to operate the minimum number of
space stations by this milestone,
however, would result in forfeiture of
the bond and an automatic reduction in
the number of authorized satellites to
the number actually in orbit as of the
milestone date. Even under this ‘‘keep
what you use’’ proposal, however, we
would continue to terminate
automatically the full license of a
satellite system if no authorized space
stations were functional in orbit as of
the time of the milestone deadline. For
operators that satisfy the first milestone,
we propose a second milestone, nine
years after grant, requiring launch and
operation of the entire authorized
constellation. Operators failing to
complete their constellations by this
second milestone date would similarly
have their number of authorized space
stations reduced automatically to the
number deployed as of the second
milestone date. We invite comment on
this and any other modifications to our
NGSO milestone policy.
As an alternative to specifying a
percentage of the authorized
constellation for an initial milestone, for
example, should we require the launch
and operation of a number of satellites
specific to the services and constellation
proposed? If so, should the applicant be
required to state the minimum number
of satellites necessary to provide the
services it proposes? If we adopt a more
flexible milestone requirement, should
it be limited to large NGSO
constellations, and if so what size?
Should we add additional, periodic
milestones, to automatically reduce the
number of authorized satellites if a
licensee demonstrates that it is unlikely
to maintain its larger, authorized
constellation size following the
decommissioning of its initial
deployment? We could, for example,
specify that the number of authorized
satellites is reduced automatically to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
greatest number operated concurrently
during the previous year if the licensee
falls below a certain percentage of its
authorized constellation. If, after
satisfaction of any milestones, an NGSO
licensee fails to maintain at least one
operational satellite in orbit for a
specified period of time, should its
license be terminated automatically?
Replacements. We also propose to
clarify in 47 CFR 25.164 that both GSO
and NGSO replacement space stations,
which must be scheduled for launch
before the retirement of the space
stations being replaced, are not subject
to the separate milestone requirements
in that section.
Geographic Coverage
The Commission requires the design
of NGSO FSS systems that will operate
in the 10.7–14.5 GHz, 18.8–19.3 GHz, or
28.6–29.1 GHz bands to enable service
worldwide for at least 18 hours every
day. This requirement is intended to
foster seamless global communication
networks and to maximize the use of
global spectrum resources, but also
prohibits certain NGSO system designs.
In light of the spectrum sharing
opportunities among NGSO FSS
systems, and given the separate
requirements for coverage of the United
States already included in our rules, we
propose to eliminate this global
coverage requirement in order to
provide operators greater flexibility to
design their systems to meet market
demands. We invite comment on this
proposal.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission
has prepared this Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the
possible significant economic impact on
small entities by the policies and rules
proposed in this NPRM. We request
written public comments on this IRFA.
Commenters must identify their
comments as responses to the IRFA and
must file the comments by the deadlines
for comments on the Notice in the DATES
section above. The Commission will
send a copy of the NPRM, including this
IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy
of the Small Business Administration.
In addition, summaries of the Notice
and IRFA will be published in the
Federal Register.
A. Need for, and Objectives of, the
Proposed Rules
The Notice seeks comment on several
proposals relating to the Commission’s
rules and policies for satellite services,
especially those concerning nongeostationary-satellite (NGSO), fixed-
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3263
satellite service (FSS) systems.
Adoption of the proposed changes
would, among other things, provide for
more flexible use of the 17.8–20.2 GHz
bands for FSS; promote shared use of
spectrum among NGSO FSS satellite
systems; and remove unnecessary
design restrictions on NGSO FSS
systems.
The NPRM proposes several changes
to 47 CFR parts 2 and 25. Principally,
it proposes to:
(1) Allocate additional spectrum for
use by FSS systems on a secondary basis
in the 17.8–18.3 GHz band, subject to
power flux-density limits designed to
protect primary terrestrial services.
(2) Allow additional operation of
NGSO FSS systems in segments of the
17.8–20.2 GHz band within limits
protective of FSS satellite systems in the
geostationary-satellite orbit (GSO).
(3) Allow GSO FSS operation in the
18.8–19.3 GHz band on an unprotected,
non-interference basis with regard to
NGSO FSS systems, to provide
additional operational flexibility.
(4) Amend the Commission’s satellite
milestone policies and geographic
coverage rules to provide additional
regulatory flexibility to operators of
NGSO FSS systems.
B. Legal Basis
The proposed action is authorized
under sections 4(i), 303, and 316 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 303, 316.
C. Description and Estimate of the
Number of Small Entities to Which the
Proposed Rules May Apply
The RFA directs agencies to provide
a description of, and, where feasible, an
estimate of, the number of small entities
that may be affected by adoption of
proposed rules. The RFA generally
defines the term ‘‘small entity’’ as
having the same meaning as the terms
‘‘small business,’’ ‘‘small organization,’’
and ‘‘small governmental jurisdiction.’’
In addition, the term ‘‘small business’’
has the same meaning as the term
‘‘small business concern’’ under the
Small Business Act. A small business
concern is one which: (1) Is
independently owned and operated; (2)
is not dominant in its field of operation;
and (3) satisfies any additional criteria
established by the Small Business
Administration (SBA). Below, we
describe and estimate the number of
small entity licensees that may be
affected by adoption of the proposed
rules.
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
3264
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Satellite Telecommunications and All
Other Telecommunications
The rules proposed in this Notice
would affect some providers of satellite
telecommunications services, if
adopted. Satellite telecommunications
service providers include satellite and
earth station operators. Since 2007, the
SBA has recognized two census
categories for satellite
telecommunications firms: ‘‘Satellite
Telecommunications’’ and ‘‘Other
Telecommunications.’’ Under both
categories, a business is considered
small if it had $32.5 million or less in
annual receipts.
The first category of Satellite
Telecommunications ‘‘comprises
establishments primarily engaged in
providing point-to-point
telecommunications services to other
establishments in the
telecommunications and broadcasting
industries by forwarding and receiving
communications signals via a system of
satellites or reselling satellite
telecommunications.’’ For this category,
Census Bureau data for 2007 show that
there were a total of 512 satellite
communications firms that operated for
the entire year. Of this total, 482 firms
had annual receipts of under $25
million.
The second category of Other
Telecommunications is comprised of
entities ‘‘primarily engaged in providing
specialized telecommunications
services, such as satellite tracking,
communications telemetry, and radar
station operation. This industry also
includes establishments primarily
engaged in providing satellite terminal
stations and associated facilities
connected with one or more terrestrial
systems and capable of transmitting
telecommunications to, and receiving
telecommunications from, satellite
systems. Establishments providing
Internet services or voice over Internet
protocol (VoIP) services via clientsupplied telecommunications
connections are also included in this
industry.’’ For this category, Census
Bureau data for 2007 show that there
were a total of 2,383 firms that operated
for the entire year. Of this total, 2,346
firms had annual receipts of under $25
million. We anticipate that some of
these ‘‘Other Telecommunications
firms,’’ which are small entities, are
earth station applicants/licensees that
might be affected if our proposed rule
changes are adopted.
We anticipate that our proposed rule
changes may have an impact on earth
station and space station applicants and
licensees. Space station applicants and
licensees, however, rarely qualify under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
the definition of a small entity.
Generally, space stations cost hundreds
of millions of dollars to construct,
launch, and operate. Consequently, we
do not anticipate that any space station
operators are small entities that would
be affected by our proposed actions.
D. Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements for Small Entities
The Notice proposes and seeks
comment on several rule changes that
would affect compliance requirements
for earth station and space station
operators. Most proposed changes,
however, are directed at space station
applicants and licensees. As noted
above, these parties rarely qualify as
small entities.
For example, we propose to allow
additional uses of certain frequencies
within the 17.8–20.2 GHz band, subject
to compliance with power limits
designed to protect other users of the
bands. We also seek comment on
revised or new technical standards to
promote sharing among NGSO FSS
systems, and ask whether we should
allow entities to certify that that will
comply with such resulting
requirements, as a means to avoid
unnecessary regulatory burdens.
We also propose modified rules for
satellite system implementation to
provide additional flexibility to
operators. We propose to eliminate a
geographic service requirement that
restricts the design possibilities of
certain NGSO FSS satellite systems. In
total, the proposals and questions in the
Notice are designed to achieve the
Commission’s mandate to regulate in
the public interest while imposing the
lowest necessary burden on all affected
parties, including small entities.
E. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant
Economic Impact on Small Entities, and
Significant Alternatives Considered
The RFA requires an agency to
describe any significant, specifically
small business, alternatives that it has
considered in reaching its proposed
approach, which may include the
following four alternatives (among
others): ‘‘(1) the establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance and reporting requirements
under the rules for such small entities;
(3) the use of performance rather than
design standards; and (4) an exemption
from coverage of the rule, or any part
thereof, for such small entities.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The Notice seeks comment from all
interested parties. The Commission is
aware that some of the proposals under
consideration may impact small entities.
Small entities are encouraged to bring to
the Commission’s attention any specific
concerns they may have with the
proposals outlined in the Notice.
The Commission expects to consider
the economic impact on small entities,
as identified in comments filed in
response to the NPRM, in reaching its
final conclusions and taking action in
this proceeding.
In this NPRM, the Commission invites
comment on means to minimize
negative economic impacts on
applicants and licensees, including
small entities. For example, the
Commission seeks comment on whether
compliance with certain power limits
could be certified to by applicants,
rather than demonstrated technically,
thereby reducing burdens. And the
Commission proposes to relax a satellite
system geographic coverage
requirement, which could lessen the
economic burden on applicants and
licensees. Overall, the proposals in the
Notice seek to increase flexibility for
NGSO FSS applicants and licensees and
reduce burdens, while maintaining
adequate protections against
interference.
F. Federal Rules That May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed
Rules
None.
Incorporation by Reference
In § 25.108, we propose to incorporate
by reference a portion of Appendix 4 of
the ITU Radio Regulations concerning
the orbital information of satellite
networks. Specifically, we propose to
incorporate by reference the ITU Radio
Regulations, Volume 2: Appendices,
Appendix 4, ‘‘Consolidated list and
tables of characteristics for use in the
application of the procedures of Chapter
III,’’ Annex 2, ‘‘Characteristics of
satellite networks, earth stations or
radio astronomy stations,’’ Section A.4,
‘‘Orbital Information,’’ Edition of 2012.
This material is reasonably available to
interested parties from the International
Telecommunication Union (ITU), Place
des Nations, 1211 Geneva 20
Switzerland; www.itu.int; Voice: +41 22
730 5111; Fax: +41 22 733 7256; email:
itumail@itu.int. The material is also
directly available online at https://
www.itu.int/pub/R-REG-RR-2012, and
would be made available for inspection
at the Commission.
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects
47 CFR Part 2
Radio, Table of frequency allocations.
47 CFR Part 25
Administrative practice and
procedure, Earth stations, Incorporation
by reference, Satellites.
Federal Communications Commission.
Katura Howard,
Federal Register Liaison Officer. Office of the
Secretary.
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, and
336, unless otherwise noted.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
parts 2 and 25 as follows:
■
PART 2—FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS
AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS;
GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 2
continues to read as follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
3265
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2. Amend § 2.106 as follows:
a. Revise pages 48, 49, 52, and 55 of
the Table of Frequency Allocations.
■ b. Revise footnotes NG164, NG165,
and NG166.
■ c. Add footnotes NGXX1, NGXX2,
NGXX3, and NGXX4.
■
§ 2.106
Table of Frequency Allocations.
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
3266
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Jkt 241001
5 477 5 478 5 479
10-10.45
FIXED
MOBILE
RADIOLOCATION
Amateur
PO 00000
5 479
10.45-10 5
RADIOLOCATION
Amateur
Amateur-satellite
9 9-10
RADIOLOCATION
10-10.45
RADIOLOCATION
Amateur
10-10.45
FIXED
MOBILE
RAD IOL OCATl ON
Amateur
5479 5480
5 479
10-10 5
RADIOLOCATION US108 G32
5 479
10-10.45
Amateur
Radiolocatron US1 08
5 479
Private Land Mobile (90)
Amateur Radro (97)
5 479 US128 NG50
10.45-10.5
Amateur
Amateur-satellrte
Radiolocatron US1 08
Frm 00056
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
5 481
10.5-10.55
10 5-10.55
FIXED
FIXED
MOBILE
MOBILE
Radiolocation
RADIOLOCATION
10.55-106
FIXED
MOBILE except aeronautical mobile
Radiolocation
106-1068
EARTH EXPLORATION-SATELLITE (passive)
FIXED
MOBILE except aeronautrcal mobrle
RADIO ASTRONOMY
SPACE RESEARCH (passive)
Radiolocation
5 479 US128
10.5-10.55
RADIOLOCATION US59
US128 NG50
10.55-10 6
10.55-10.6
FIXED
106-1068
EARTH EXPLORATIONSATELLITE (passive)
SPACE RESEARCH (passive)
106-1068
EARTH EXPLORATIONSATELLITE (passive)
FIXED US482
SPACE RESEARCH (passive)
5 149 5 482 5 482A
US130 US131 US482
US130 US131
10.68-10 7
EARTH EXPLORATION-SATELLITE (passrve)
RADIO ASTRONOMY
SPACE RESEARCH (passive)
10.68-10 7
EARTH EXPLORATION-SATELLITE (passrve)
RADIO ASTRONOMY US7 4
SPACE RESEARCH (passive)
5 340 5 483
10.7-11.7
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
5 441 5 484A (Earth-to-space)
5.484
MOBILE except aeronautical mobile
117-125
FIXED
MOBILE except aeronautical
mobile
BROADCASTING
BROADCAST! NG-SATELLITE
5 492
US131 US246
10.7-11.7
10.7-11.7
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth) 5 441 5 484A
MOBILE except aeronautical mobile
Private Land Mobile (90)
Fixed Mrcrowave (101)
10.7-11 7
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-toEarth) 5.441 US131 US211
NG52 NGXX1
Satellrte
Communrcatrons (25)
Frxed Mrcrowave (101)
11.7-122
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-toEarth) 5 485 5 488 NG55
NG143
Satellrte
Communrcations (25)
US131 US211
11.7-12.1
FIXED 5.486
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
5.484A 5.488
Mobile except aeronautrcal mobrle
11.7-12.2
FIXED
MOBILE except aeronautical mobile
BROADCASTING
BROADCASTING-SATELLITE 5 492
11.7-12.2
5.485
12.1-12.2
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
5 484A 5 488
5.485 5.489
5.487 5.487A
EP11JA17.017
9 9-10
Radrolocatron
5 487 5 487A
Page 48
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
9 9-10
RADIOLOCATION
Frxed
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12.2-15.4 GHz (SHF)
Page 49
International Table
ReQion 1 Table
(See previous page)
Jkt 241001
12 5-12.75
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-toEarth) 5.484A (Earth-to-space)
PO 00000
ReQion 2 Table
12.2-12 7
FIXED
MOBILE except aeronautrcal mobile
BROADCASTING
BROADCASTING-SATELLITE 5.492
ReQion 3 Table
12.2-12.5
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
MOBILE except aeronautical mobile
BROADCASTING
5 487A 5 488 5 490
12.7-12 75
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-spaoe)
MOBILE except aeronautrcal mobile
5.484A 5 487
12.5-12.75
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
5.484A
MOBILE except aeronautical mobile
BROADCASTING-SATELLITE 5.493
Frm 00057
5.494 5.495 5. 496
1275-1325
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space) 5 441
MOBILE
Spaoe research (deep space) (space-to-Earth)
Federal Table
12.2-12.75
United States Table
Non-Federal Table
12.2-12.7
FIXED
BROAD CAS Tl NG-SATELLITE
5 487A 5 488 5 490
12.7-12.75
FIXED NG118
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space)
MOBILE
1275-1325
1275-1325
FIXED NG118
FIXED-SATELLITE
(Earth-to-space) 5.441 NG52
NGXX1
MOBILE
US251
Fmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
13.25-13.4
EARTH EXPLORATIONSATELLITE (active)
AERONAUTICAL
RADIONAVIGATION 5 497
SPACE RESEARCH (active)
5.498A 5.499
13 4-13.75
EARTH EXPLORATION-SATELLITE (active)
RADIOLOCATION
SPACE RESEARCH 5 501A
Standard frequency and time signal-satellite (Earth-to-space)
5.498A
13.4-13.75
EARTH EXPLORATIONSATELLITE (actrve)
RADIOLOCATION G59
SPACE RESEARCH 5.501A
Standard frequency and time
srgnal-satellite (Earth-to-space)
5.499 5.500 5.501 5.501 B
13 75-14
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space) 5.484A
RADIOLOCATION
Earth exploratron-satellrte
Standard frequency and time signal-satellite (Earth-to-space)
Space research
5.501B
13 75-14
RADIOLOCATION G59
Standard frequency and trme
srgnal-satellite (Earth-to-space)
Space research US337
5.499 5.500 5.501 5.502 5.503
14-14.25
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space) 5 457A 5 457B 5 484A 5 506 5 506B
RADIONAVIGATION 5 504
Mobile-satellite (Earth-to-space) 5 504B 5 504C 5 506A
Space research
Sfmt 4725
13 25-13.4
EARTH EXPLORATION-SATELLITE (actrve)
AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.497
SPACE RESEARCH (active)
US356 US357
14-14.2
Space research US 133
US251 NG53
13.25-13 4
AERONAUTICAL
RADIONAVIGATION 5 497
Earth exploration-satellite (actrve)
Space research (active)
13.4-13.75
Earth exploration-satellite (actrve)
Radiolocation
Space research
Standard frequency and time
signal-satellite (Earth-to-space)
13 75-14
FIXED-SATELLITE
(Earth-to-space) US337
Standard frequency and time
srgnal-satellrte (Earth-to-space)
Space research
Radiolocation
US356 US357
14-14 2
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space)
NG55
Mobrle-satellite (Earth-to-space)
Space research
FCC Rule Part(s)
Satellite
Communications (25)
Frxed Microwave (101)
TV Broadcast Auxrliary
(74F)
Cable TV Relay (78)
Frxed Microwave (101)
Satellite
Communrcatrons (25)
TV Broadcast Auxrlrary
(74F)
Cable TV Relay (78)
Frxed Microwave (101)
Avratron (87)
Private Land Mobile (90)
Satellrte
Communrcatrons (25)
Prrvate Land Mobrle (90)
Satellite
Communications (25)
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Table of Frequency Allocatrons
US133
3267
EP11JA17.018
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
3268
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
17 8-18 3
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-toEarth) US334 G117
17 8-18 3
FIXED
Frxed-satelllte (space-to-Earth)
NGXX2 NGXX3
US519
18.3-18.6
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-toEarth) US334 G117
US334 US519
18.3-18.6
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
NGXX3
US139
18 6-18 8
EARTH EXPLORATIONSATELLITE (passrve)
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-toEarth) US255 US334 G117
SPACE RESEARCH (passrve)
US139 US334
18 6-18 8
EARTH EXPLORATIONSATELLITE (passive)
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
US255 NG164
SPACE RESEARCH (passive)
US139 US254
18.8-20.2
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-toEarth) US334 G117
US139 US254 US334
18.8-19.3
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
NG165
5 519
18.1-18.4
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth) 5 484A 5 516B (Earth-to-space) 5 520
MOBILE
5 519 5.521
18 4-18 6
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth) 5.484A 5.516B
MOBILE
18 6-18 8
18 6-18 8
EARTH EXPLORATIONEARTH EXPLORATIONSATELLITE (passrve)
SATELLITE (passive)
FIXED
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
(space-to-Earth) 5 522B
5 516B 5 522B
MOBILE except aeronautical mobile
MOBILE except aeronautical mobile
Space research (passive)
SPACE RESEARCH (passive)
5 522A 5 522C
5.522A
18.8-19.3
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth) 5.516B 5.523A
MOBILE
18 6-18 8
EARTH EXPLORATIONSATELLITE (passive)
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
5 522B
MOBILE except aeronautical mobile
Space research (passrve)
5 522A
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
US139 US334
19.3-197
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
NG166 NGXX2 NGXX3
19.3-197
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth) (Earth-to-space) 5.523B 5.523C 5.523D 5 523E
MOBILE
19.7-201
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
5.484A 5 516B
Mobrle-satelllte (space-to-Earth)
19.7-20.1
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
5 484A 5.516B
MOBILE-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
11JAP1
5.524
5.524 5.525 5.526 5.527 5.528 5.529
20.1-20.2
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth) 5.484A 5.516B
MOBILE-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
US334
19.7-20.2
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
NGXX3
MOBILE-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
19.7-201
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
5.484A 5 516B
Mobrle-satelllte (space-to-Earth)
Satellrte
Communrcations (25)
Satellrte
Communrcations (25)
TV Broadcast
Auxrliary (74F)
Cable TV Relay (78)
Fixed Mrcrowave (1 01)
Satellrte
Communrcatrons (25)
5.524
5 524 5 525 5 526 5 527 5 528
20.2-21.2
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
MOBILE-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
Standard frequency and time signal-satellite (space-to-Earth)
US139
20.2-21.2
FIXED-SATELLITE
(space-to-Earth)
MOBILE-SATELLITE
(space-to-Earth)
Standard frequency and trme
srgnal-satellrte (space-to-Earth)
5 524
EP11JA17.019
Satellrte
Communrcatrons (25)
TV Broadcast Auxiliary
(74F)
Cable TV Relay (78)
Frxed Mrcrowave (1 01)
G117
5 525 5 526 5 527 5 528 5 529 US334
20.2-21.2
Standard frequency and time
srgnal-satelllte (space-to-Earth)
Page 52
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
17 8-18 1
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth)
5 484A (Earth-to-space) 5 516
MOBILE
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Region 1 Table
27-27.5
FIXED
INTER-SATELLITE 5 536
MOBILE
Jkt 241001
International Table
Reg ron 2 Table
27-27.5
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space)
INTER-SATELLITE 5.536 5.537
MOBILE
Region 3 Table
27.5-28.5
FIXED 5.537A
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space) 5.484A 5.516B 5.539
MOBILE
Page 55
Federal Table
27-27.5
FIXED
INTER-SATELLITE 5.536
MOBILE
27.5-30
United States Table
Non-Federal Table
27-27.5
Inter-satellite 5.536
Frm 00059
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11JAP1
5.538 5.540
28 35-29.1
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space)
NG165 NGXX3
RF Devices ( 15)
RF Devrces (15)
Satellrte
Communrcations (25)
Upper Microwave Flexible
Use (30)
Fixed Mrcrowave (101)
Satellrte
Communrcations (25)
28.5-29.1
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space) 5.484A 5.516B 5.523A 5.539
MOBILE
Earth exploration-satellite (Earth-to-space) 5.541
5.540
29.1-29.5
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space) 5 5168 5 523C 5 523E 5 535A 5 539 5 541A
MOBILE
Earth exploration-satellite (Earth-to-space) 5.541
29 1-29.25
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space)
NG166
MOBILE
29 25-29.5
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space)
NGXX3 NGXX4
29 5-30
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space)
NGXX3
MOBILE-SATELLITE
(Earth-to-space)
5.540
29.5-29 9
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space)
5 484A 5 5168 5 539
Earth exploration-satellrte
(Earth-to-space) 5 541
Mobile-satellite (Earth-to-space)
29.5-29.9
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space)
5 484A 5 5168 5 539
MOBILE-SATELLITE
(Earth-to-space)
Earth exploration-satellite
(Earth-to-space) 5.541
5.525 5.526 5.527 5 529 5.540
5.542
5.540 5.542
29 9-30
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space) 5 484A 5 5168 5 539
MOBILE-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space)
Earth exploration-satellite (Earth-to-space) 5.541 5.543
5.525 5 526 5.527 5.538 5.540 5.542
30-31
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space) 5.338A
MOBILE-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space)
Standard frequency and time signal-satellite (space-to-Earth)
5.542
29.5-29 9
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space)
5 484A 5 516B 5 539
Earth exploration-satellite
(Earth-to-space) 5 541
Mobile-satellite (Earth-to-space)
5.540 5.542
30-31
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space)
MOBILE-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space)
Standard frequency and time
signal-satellite (space-to-Earth)
5.525 5.526 5.527 5.529 5.543
30-31
Standard frequency and time
srg nal-satellrte (space-to-Earth)
RF Devices ( 15)
Satellrte
Communrcations (25)
Fixed Mrcrowave (101)
Satellrte
Communrcations (25)
Satellrte
Communrcations (25)
G117
3269
NG165 In the bands 18.8–19.3 GHz
(space-to-Earth) and 28.6–29.1 GHz
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
to-Earth) is limited to geostationarysatellite networks.
PO 00000
27 5-28.35
FIXED
FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space)
NGXX3
MOBILE
FCC Rule Part(s)
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
NG164 The use of the band 18.6–18.8
GHz by the fixed-satellite service (space-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
EP11JA17.020
27-34.7 GHz (SHF/EHF)
Table of Frequency Allocatrons
3270
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
(Earth-to-space), geostationary-satellite
networks in the fixed-satellite service
shall not cause harmful interference to,
or claim protection from, nongeostationary-satellite systems in the
fixed-satellite service.
NG166 The use of the bands 19.4–19.6
GHz (space-to-Earth) and 29.1–29.25
GHz (Earth-to-space) by the fixedsatellite service is limited to feeder links
for non-geostationary-satellite systems
in the mobile-satellite service.
*
*
*
*
*
NGXX1 The use of the bands 10.7–
11.7 GHz (space-to-Earth) and 12.75–
13.25 GHz (Earth-to-space) by nongeostationary-satellite systems in the
fixed-satellite service is limited to
communications with individually
licensed earth stations.
NGXX2 The use of the bands 17.8–
18.3 GHz, 19.3–19.4 GHz, and 19.6–19.7
GHz by the fixed-satellite service (spaceto-Earth) is limited to communications
with individually licensed earth
stations. Ubiquitously deployed user
terminals are not permitted.
NGXX3 In the bands 17.8–18.6 GHz
(space-to-Earth), 19.3–19.4 GHz (spaceto-Earth), 19.6–20.2 GHz (space-toEarth), 27.5–28.6 GHz (Earth-to-space),
and 29.3–30 GHz (Earth-to-space), nongeostationary-satellite systems in the
fixed-satellite service shall not cause
unacceptable interference to, or claim
protection from, geostationary-satellite
networks in the fixed-satellite service.
A non-geostationary-satellite system
operating within the applicable
equivalent power flux-density limits set
forth in § 25.208 of this chapter shall not
be considered to cause unacceptable
interference to any geostationarysatellite network in the fixed-satellite
service.
NGXX4 The use of the band 29.25–
29.3 GHz by the fixed-satellite service
(Earth-to-space) is limited to
geostationary-satellite networks and to
feeder links for non-geostationarysatellite systems in the mobile-satellite
service.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 25—SATELLITE
COMMUNICATIONS
§ 25.108
(a) Certain material is incorporated by
reference into this part with the
approval of the Director of the Federal
Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. All approved material is
available for inspection at the Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street SW., Reference Information
Center, Room CY–A257, Washington,
DC 20554, 202–418–0270, and is
available from the sources listed below.
It is also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030 or
go to https://www.archives.gov/federal_
register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
(b) * * *
(2) ITU Radio Regulations, Volume 2:
Appendices, Appendix 4, ‘‘Consolidated
list and tables of characteristics for use
in the application of the procedures of
Chapter III,’’ Annex 2, ‘‘Characteristics
of satellite networks, earth stations or
radio astronomy stations,’’ Section A.4,
‘‘Orbital Information,’’ Edition of 2012,
https://www.itu.int/pub/R–REG–RR–
2012. Incorporation by reference
approved for § 25.146.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. In § 25.114, revise paragraph (d)(12)
to read as follows:
§ 25.114 Applications for space station
authorizations.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(12) The information required by
§ 25.146, if the application is for an
NGSO FSS system authorization in the
10.7–14.5 GHz, 17.8–18.6 GHz, 18.8–
19.4 GHz, 19.6–20.2 GHz, 27.5–29.1
GHz, or 29.3–30 GHz bands.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 25.142
6. In § 25.142, remove paragraphs (c)
and (d).
■
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
[Amended]
■
§ 25.143
3. The authority citation for part 25
continues to read as follows: Authority:
Interprets or applies 47 U.S.C. 154, 301,
302, 303, 307, 309, 310, 319, 332, 605,
and 721, unless otherwise noted.
■ 4. In § 25.108, revise paragraph (a),
redesignate paragraphs (b)(2) through
(b)(5) as paragraphs (b)(3) through (b)(6)
and add new paragraph (b)(2) to read as
follows:
Incorporation by Reference.
[Amended]
7. Remove § 25.143(d).
§ 25.145
[Removed]
8. Remove § 25.145.
■ 9. In § 25.146, revise the section
heading, the first sentence in paragraph
(a) introductory text, the first sentence
in paragraph (b) introductory text, and
paragraphs (b)(1)(v), (b)(2), (c), (e), and
(i) to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 25.146 Licensing and operating
provisions for NGSO FSS satellite systems
in the 10.7–14.5 GHz, 17.8–18.6 GHz, 18.8–
19.4 GHz, 19.6–20.2 GHz, 27.5–29.1 GHz, or
29.3–30 GHz bands.
(a) A comprehensive technical
showing must be submitted for the
proposed NGSO FSS system in the
10.7–14.5 GHz, 17.8–18.6 GHz, 18.8–
19.4 GHz, 19.6–20.2 GHz, 27.5–29.1
GHz, or 29.3–30 GHz bands. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Ninety days prior to the initiation
of service to the public, the NGSO FSS
system licensee must submit a
comprehensive technical showing for
the NGSO FSS system. * * *
(1) * * *
(v) Provide the result, the cumulative
probability distribution function of
EPFD, of the execution of the
verification computer program
described in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this
section by using only the input
parameters contained in paragraphs
(b)(1)(i) and (b)(1)(iv) of this section for
each of the submitted test points
provided by the Commission. These test
points are based on information from
U.S.-licensed GSO FSS and
Broadcasting-Satellite Service operators
in the 10.7–14.5 GHz, 17.8–18.6 GHz,
18.8–19.4 GHz, 19.6–20.2 GHz, 27.5–
29.1 GHz, and 29.3–30 GHz bands. Each
U.S.-licensed GSO FSS and
Broadcasting-Satellite Service operator
may submit up to 10 test points for this
section containing the latitude,
longitude, altitude, azimuth, elevation
angle, antenna size, efficiency to be
used by NGSO FSS licensees during the
upcoming year.
(2) Operational equivalent power fluxdensity, space-to-Earth direction,
(operational EPFDdown) limits. Using the
information contained in (b)(1) of this
section plus the measured space station
antenna patterns, provide the result of
the execution of the computer
simulation for the anticipated in-line
operational EPFDdown levels for each of
the submitted test points provided by
the Commission. Submitted test points
are based on inputs from U.S.-licensed
GSO FSS and Broadcasting-Satellite
Service operators in the 10.7–14.5 GHz,
17.8–18.6 GHz, 18.8–19.4 GHz, 19.6–
20.2 GHz, 27.5–29.1 GHz, and 29.3–30
GHz bands. Each U.S.-licensed GSO FSS
and Broadcasting-Satellite Service
operator may submit up to 10 test points
for this section containing the latitude,
longitude, altitude, azimuth, elevation
angle, antenna size, efficiency to be
used by NGSO FSS licensees during the
upcoming year.
(c) Applicants for NGSO FSS system
authorizations proposing space-to-Earth
transmissions in the 10.7–11.7 GHz,
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
12.5–12.75 GHz, or 17.8–18.4 GHz
frequency bands must also demonstrate,
in accordance with ITU–R S.1503–2
(incorporated by reference, see
§ 25.108), that the EPFDis limits in
§ 25.208(f) will be met.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) An NGSO FSS system licensee
operating a system in compliance with
the limits specified in § 25.208(g), (i), (j),
(k), (l), and (m) must not claim
protection from GSO FSS and BSS
networks operating in accordance with
this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) NGSO FSS applicants must also
provide the following:
(1) Sufficient information on the
NGSO FSS system characteristics to
properly model the system in computer
sharing simulations, including, at a
minimum, NGSO hand-over and
satellite switching strategies, NGSO
satellite antenna gain patterns, and
NGSO earth station antenna gain
patterns. In particular, except for
operation in the 18.8–19.3 GHz or 28.6–
29.1 GHz bands, each NGSO FSS
applicant must explain the switching
protocols it will use to avoid
transmitting while passing through the
geostationary satellite orbit arc, or
provide an explanation as to how the
PFD limits in § 25.208 will be met
without using geostationary-satellite
orbit arc avoidance. In addition, each
NGSO FSS applicant must provide the
orbital parameters contained in Section
A.4 of Annex 2 to Appendix 4 of the
ITU Radio Regulations (incorporated by
reference, see § 25.108). Further, each
NGSO FSS applicant must provide a
sufficient technical showing to
demonstrate that the proposed NGSO
system meets the applicable PFD limits
in § 25.208.
(2) For operation in the 10.7 GHz-14.5
GHz, 18.8–19.3 GHz, or 28.6–29.1 GHz
bands, a demonstration that the
proposed system is capable of providing
FSS on a continuous basis throughout
the fifty states, Puerto Rico and the U.S.
Virgin Islands.
§ 25.156
[Amended]
10. Remove the first sentence of
§ 25.156(d)(5).
■ 11. Revise § 25.157(b) to read as
follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
■
§ 25.157 Consideration of applications for
NGSO-like satellite operation.
*
*
*
*
*
(b)(1) The procedures prescribed in
this section do not apply to an
application for authority to operate a
replacement space station(s) that meets
the relevant criteria in § 25.165(e)(1) and
(2) and that will be launched before the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
space station(s) to be replaced is retired
from service or within a reasonable time
after loss of a space station during
launch or due to premature failure in
orbit.
(2) The procedures in paragraphs (e),
(f), and (g) of this section do not apply
to an application granted with a
condition to share spectrum pursuant to
§ 25.261.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. Revise § 25.161(a) to read as
follows:
§ 25.161 Automatic termination of station
authorization.
*
*
*
*
*
(a)(1) The failure to meet an
applicable milestone specified in
§ 25.164(a) and/or (b), if no authorized
space station is functional in orbit;
(2) The failure to meet an applicable
milestone specified in § 25.164(b)(1) or
(b)(2), if at least one authorized space
station is functional in orbit, which
failure will result in the termination of
authority for the number, type, and
orbital parameters of space stations not
in orbit as of the milestone date; or
(3) The failure to meet any other
milestone or construction requirement
imposed as a condition of authorization.
In the case of a space station
authorization when at least one
authorized space station is functional in
orbit, however, such termination will be
with respect to only the authorization
for any space stations not in orbit as of
the milestone date.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 13. In § 25.164, revise paragraphs (a),
(b), and (g) to read as follows:
§ 25.164
Milestones.
(a) The recipient of an initial license
for a GSO space station, other than a
DBS space station, SDARS space station,
or replacement space station as defined
in § 25.165(e), must launch the space
station, position it in its assigned orbital
location, and operate it in accordance
with the station authorization no later
than five years after the grant of the
license, unless a different schedule is
established by Title 47, Chapter I, or the
Commission.
(b)(1) The recipient of an initial
authorization for an NGSO satellite
system, other than an SDARS system,
must launch 75 percent of the maximum
number of space stations authorized for
service, place them in their assigned
orbits, and operate them in accordance
with the station authorization no later
than six years after the grant of the
authorization, unless a different
schedule is established by Title 47,
Chapter I, or the Commission. This
paragraph does not apply to
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3271
replacement NGSO space stations as
defined in § 25.165(e).
(2) A licensee that satisfies the
requirement in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section must launch the remaining
space stations necessary to complete its
authorized service constellation, place
them in their assigned orbits, and
operate each of them in accordance with
the authorization no later than nine
years after the grant of the authorization.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Licensees of satellite systems that
include both NGSO satellites and GSO
satellites must meet the requirement in
paragraph (a) of this section with
respect to the GSO satellite(s) and the
applicable requirements in paragraph
(b) of this section with respect to the
NGSO satellites.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 14. In § 25.165, revise paragraphs (c)
and (d) to read as follows:
§ 25.165
Surety bonds.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) A licensee will be considered to be
in default with respect to a bond filed
pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section
if it surrenders the license before
meeting the applicable milestone
requirement(s) in § 25.164(a) and/or
(b)(1) or if it fails to satisfy any such
milestone.
(d) A licensee will be relieved of its
bond obligation under paragraph (a) of
this section upon a Commission finding
that the licensee has satisfied the
applicable milestone requirement(s) in
§ 25.164(a) and/or (b)(1) for the
authorization.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 15. Revise § 25.202(a)(1) to read as
follows:
§ 25.202 Frequencies, frequency tolerance,
and emission limits.
(a)(1) In addition to the frequency-use
restrictions set forth in § 2.106 of this
chapter, the following restrictions
apply:
(i) In the 27.5–28.35 GHz band, the
FSS (Earth-to-space) is secondary to the
Upper Microwave Flexible Use Service
authorized pursuant to part 30 of this
chapter, except for FSS operations
associated with earth stations
authorized pursuant to § 25.136.
(ii) Use of the 37.5–40 GHz band by
the FSS (space-to-Earth) is limited to
individually licensed earth stations.
Earth stations in this band must not be
ubiquitously deployed and must not be
used to serve individual consumers.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 16. In § 25.208, revise the section
heading, paragraph (c) introductory text,
the first sentence of paragraph (e), and
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
3272
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
paragraphs (f), (g), (h), (j), and (k) to read
as follows:
§ 25.208
Power flux-density limits.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) For a GSO space station in the
17.7–19.7 GHz, 22.55–23.55 GHz, or
24.45–24.75 GHz bands, or for an NGSO
space station in the 22.55–23.55 GHz or
24.45–24.75 GHz bands, the PFD at the
Earth’s surface produced by emissions
for all conditions and for all methods of
modulation must not exceed the
following values:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) For an NGSO space station, the
PFD at the Earth’s surface produced by
emissions in the 17.8–18.6 GHz or 18.8–
19.7 GHz bands, for all conditions and
for all methods of modulation, must not
exceed the following values, unless the
aggregate PFD produced by the entire
authorized constellation at any point at
the Earth’s surface does not exceed -115
((dBW/m2)/MHz):
*
*
*
*
*
(f) The EPFD produced at any point in
the geostationary-satellite orbit by
emissions from all the space stations in
an NGSO FSS system (EPFDis), in the
frequency bands and Regions listed
below, for all conditions and for all
methods of modulation, must not
exceed the given limits for the specified
percentages of time. These limits relate
to the EPFD that would be obtained
under free-space propagation conditions
into a reference antenna and in the
reference bandwidth specified below,
for all pointing directions towards the
Earth’s surface visible from any given
location in the geostationary-satellite
orbit.
LIMITS TO THE EPFDIS RADIATED BY NGSO FSS SYSTEMS IN CERTAIN FREQUENCY BANDS
Frequency band
(GHz)
EPFDdown
(dB(W/m2))
Percentage of
time during
which
EPFDdown
may not be
exceeded
Reference
bandwidth
(kHz)
10.7–11.7, 12.5–12.75 ....................................
¥160
100
40
17.8–18.4, 19.3–19.4, 19.6–19.7 ....................
¥160
100
40
Reference antenna diameter and reference
radiation pattern 1
4° Recommendation ITU–R S.672–4, Ls
=¥20
4° Recommendation ITU–R S.672–4, Ls
=¥20
1 In this Table, the reference pattern of Recommendation ITU–R S. 672.4 must be used only for the calculation of interference from NGSO
FSS systems into GSO FSS networks. In applying the equations of Annex 1 to Recommendation ITU–R S.672–4, the parabolic main beam
equation must start at zero.
(g) In the frequency bands and
Regions listed in Tables IG through 4G
below, the single-entry EPFD in the
space-to-Earth direction (EPFDdown) at
any point on the Earth’s
surfaceproduced by emissions from all
co-frequency space stations of a single
NGSO FSS system must not exceed
limits for the given percentages of time.
TABLE 1G—LIMITS TO THE EPFDDOWN RADIATED BY NGSO FSS SYSTEMS IN CERTAIN FREQUENCY BANDS 1 2
Frequency band
(GHz)
EPFDdown
(dB(W/m2))
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
10.7–11.7 in all Regions; 11.7–12.2 in Region
2; 12.2–12.5 in Region 3; and 12.5–12.75
in Regions 1 and 3.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Percentage of
time during
which
EPFDdown
may not be
exceeded
¥175.4
¥174
¥170.8
¥165.3
¥160.4
¥160
¥160
¥181.9
¥178.4
¥173.4
¥173
¥164
¥161.6
¥161.4
¥160.8
¥160.5
¥160
¥160
Frm 00062
0
90
99
99.73
99.991
99.997
100
0
99.5
99.74
99.857
99.954
99.984
99.991
99.997
99.997
99.9993
100
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Reference
bandwidth
(kHz)
Reference antenna diameter and reference
radiation pattern 3
40
60 cm Recommendation ITU–R S.1428–1.
40
1.2 m Recommendation ITU–R S.1428–1.
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
3273
TABLE 1G—LIMITS TO THE EPFDDOWN RADIATED BY NGSO FSS SYSTEMS IN CERTAIN FREQUENCY BANDS 1 2—
Continued
Frequency band
(GHz)
EPFDdown
(dB(W/m2))
Percentage of
time during
which
EPFDdown
may not be
exceeded
¥190.45
¥189.45
¥187.45
¥182.4
¥182
¥168
¥164
¥162
¥160
¥160
¥195.45
¥195.45
¥190
¥190
¥172.5
¥160
¥160
0
90
99.5
99.7
99.855
99.971
99.988
99.995
99.999
100
0
99
99.65
99.71
99.99
99.998
100
Reference
bandwidth
(kHz)
Reference antenna diameter and reference
radiation pattern 3
40
3 m Recommendation ITU–R S.1428–1.
40
10 m Recommendation ITU–R S.1428–1.
1 In addition to the limits shown in Table 1G, the limits shown in Table 2G apply to all antenna sizes greater than 60 cm in the frequency
bands listed in Table 1G.
2 For each reference antenna diameter, the limit consists of the complete curve on a plot which is linear in decibels for the EPFD
down levels
and logarithmic for the time percentages, with straight lines joining the data points.
3 The earth station antenna reference patterns are to be used only for the calculation of interference from NGSO FSS systems into GSO FSS
networks.
TABLE 2G—LIMITS TO THE EPFDDOWN RADIATED BY NGSO FSS SYSTEMS AT CERTAIN LATITUDES
100% of the time EPFDdown
(dB(W/(m2/40 kHz)))
Latitude (North or South in degrees)
¥160 .................................................................................................................................................................
¥160 + 3.4(57.5 ¥ | Latitude |)/4 ....................................................................................................................
¥165.3 ..............................................................................................................................................................
0 <| Latitude | ≤ 57.5.
57.5 <| Latitude | ≤ 63.75.
63.75 ≤| Latitude |.
TABLE 3G—LIMITS TO THE EPFDDOWN RADIATED BY NGSO FSS SYSTEMS IN CERTAIN FREQUENCY BANDS 2 4
Frequency band
(GHz)
EPFDdown
(dB(W/m2))
17.8–18.6 ........................................................
19.3–19.4 ........................................................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
19.6–19.7 ........................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Percentage of
time during
which
EPFDdown
may not be
exceeded
¥175.4
¥175.4
¥172.5
¥167
¥164
¥164
¥161.4
¥161.4
¥158.5
¥153
¥150
¥150
¥178.4
¥178.4
¥171.4
¥170.5
¥166
¥164
¥164
¥164.4
¥164.4
¥157.4
¥156.5
Frm 00063
0
90
99
99.714
99.971
100
0
90
99
99.714
99.971
100
0
99.4
99.9
99.913
99.971
99.977
100
0
99.4
99.9
99.913
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Reference antenna
diameter and
reference
radiation pattern 3
Reference
bandwidth
(kHz)
40
1 m Recommendation ITU–R S.1428–1.
1000
40
2 m Recommendation ITU–R S.1428–1.
1000
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
3274
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 3G—LIMITS TO THE EPFDDOWN RADIATED BY NGSO FSS SYSTEMS IN CERTAIN FREQUENCY BANDS 2 4—
Continued
Frequency band
(GHz)
EPFDdown
(dB(W/m2))
Percentage of
time during
which
EPFDdown
may not be
exceeded
¥152
¥150
¥150
¥185.4
¥185.4
¥180
¥180
¥172
¥164
¥164
¥171.4
¥171.4
¥166
¥166
¥158
¥150
¥150
4 An
99.971
99.977
100
0
99.8
99.8
99.943
99.943
99.998
100
0
99.8
99.8
99.943
99.943
99.998
100
Reference antenna
diameter and
reference
radiation pattern 3
Reference
bandwidth
(kHz)
40
5 m Recommendation ITU–R S.1428–1.
1000
NGSO satellite system must meet the limits of Table 3G in both the 40 kHz and the 1 MHz reference bandwidths.
TABLE 4G—LIMITS TO THE EPFDDOWN RADIATED BY NGSO FSS SYSTEMS IN CERTAIN FREQUENCY BANDS 2 4
Frequency band
(GHz)
EPFDdown
(dB(W/m2))
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
19.7–20.2 ........................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
¥187.4
¥182
¥172
¥154
¥154
¥173.4
¥168
¥158
¥140
¥140
¥190.4
¥181.4
¥170.4
¥168.6
¥165
¥160
¥154
¥154
¥176.4
¥167.4
¥156.4
¥154.6
¥151
¥146
¥140
¥140
¥196.4
¥162
¥154
¥154
¥182.4
¥148
¥140
¥140
Frm 00064
Percentage of
time during
which
EPFDdown
may not be
exceeded
0
71.429
97.143
99.983
100
0
71.429
97.143
99.983
100
0
91
99.8
99.8
99.943
99.943
99.997
100
0
91
99.8
99.8
99.943
99.943
99.997
100
0
99.98
99.99943
100
0
99.98
99.99943
100
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Reference
bandwidth
(kHz)
40
Reference antenna diameter and
reference radiation
pattern 3
70 cm Recommendation ITU–R S.1428–1.
1000
40
90 cm Recommendation ITU–R S.1428–1.
1000
40
2.5 m Recommendation ITU–R S.1428–1.
1000
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
3275
TABLE 4G—LIMITS TO THE EPFDDOWN RADIATED BY NGSO FSS SYSTEMS IN CERTAIN FREQUENCY BANDS 2 4—
Continued
Frequency band
(GHz)
EPFDdown
(dB(W/m2))
Percentage of
time during
which
EPFDdown
may not be
exceeded
¥200.4
¥189.4
¥187.8
¥184
¥175
¥164.2
¥154.6
¥154
¥154
¥186.4
¥175.4
¥173.8
¥170
¥161
¥150.2
¥140.6
¥140
¥140
Note to paragraph (g): These limits
relate to the EPFD that would be
obtained under free-space propagation
conditions for all conditions and for all
methods of modulation. (h) In the
0
90
94
97.143
99.886
99.99
99.999
99.9992
100
0
90
94
97.143
99.886
99.99
99.999
99.9992
100
Reference
bandwidth
(kHz)
40
Reference antenna diameter and
reference radiation
pattern 3
5 m Recommendation ITU–R S.1428–1.
1000
frequency bands and Regions listed in
Tables 1H through 4H below, the
aggregate EPFD in the space-to-Earth
direction (EPFDdown) at any point on the
Earth’s surface produced by emissions
from all co-frequency space stations of
all NGSO FSS systems must not exceed
the specified limits for the given
percentages of time.
TABLE 1H—LIMITS ON AGGREGATE EPFDDOWN RADIATED BY NGSO FSS SYSTEMS IN CERTAIN FREQUENCY BANDS 1 2
Frequency band
(GHz)
EPFDdown
(dB(W/m2))
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
10.7–11.7 in all Regions; 11.7–12.2 in Region
2; 12.2–12.5 in Region 3; and 12.5–12.75
in Regions 1 and 3.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
¥170
¥168.6
¥165.3
¥160.4
¥160
¥160
¥176.5
¥173
¥164
¥161.6
¥164.4
¥160.8
¥160.5
¥160
¥160
¥185
¥184
¥182
¥168
¥164
¥162
¥160
¥160
Frm 00065
Percentage of
time during
which
EPFDdown
may not be
exceeded
0
90
99
99.97
99.99
100
0
99.5
99.84
99.945
99.97
99.99
99.99
99.9975
100
0
90
........................
99.5
99.9
99.96
99.982
99.997
100
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Reference
bandwidth
(kHz)
Reference antenna diameter and reference
radiation pattern 3
40
60 cm Recommendation ITU–R S.1428.
40
1.2 m Recommendation ITU–R S.1428.
40
3 m Recommendation ITU–R S.1428.
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
3276
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1H—LIMITS ON AGGREGATE EPFDDOWN RADIATED BY NGSO FSS SYSTEMS IN CERTAIN FREQUENCY
BANDS 1 2—Continued
Frequency band
(GHz)
EPFDdown
(dB(W/m2))
Percentage of
time during
which
EPFDdown
may not be
exceeded
¥190
¥190
¥166
¥160
¥160
0
99
99.99
99.998
100
Reference
bandwidth
(kHz)
40
Reference antenna diameter and reference
radiation pattern 3
10 m Recommendation ITU–R S.1428.
1 In addition to the limits shown in Table 1H, the aggregate EPFD
down limits shown in Table 2H apply to all antenna sizes greater than 60 cm
in the frequency bands listed in Table 1H.
2 For each reference antenna diameter, the limit consists of the complete curve on a plot which is linear in decibels for the EPFD
down levels
and logarithmic for the time percentages, with straight lines joining the data points.
3 The earth station antenna reference patterns are to be used only for the calculation of interference from NGSO FSS systems into GSO FSS
networks.
TABLE 2H— LIMITS ON AGGREGATE EPFDDOWN RADIATED BY NGSO FSS SYSTEMS AT CERTAIN LATITUDES
100% of the time EPFDdown
(dB(W/(m2/40 kHz)))
Latitude (North or South in degrees)
¥160 .................................................................................................................................................................
¥160 + 3.4(57.5 ¥ | Latitude |)/4 ....................................................................................................................
¥165.3 ..............................................................................................................................................................
0 <| Latitude | ≤ 57.5.
57.5 <| Latitude | ≤ 63.75.
63.75 ≤| Latitude |.
TABLE 3H—LIMITS ON AGGREGATE EPFDDOWN RADIATED BY NGSO FSS SYSTEMS IN CERTAIN FREQUENCY BANDS 2 4
Frequency band
(GHz)
EPFDdown
(dB(W/m2))
17.8–18.6 ........................................................
19.3–19.4 ........................................................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
19.6–19.7 ........................................................
4 An
Percentage of
time during
which
EPFDdown
may not be
exceeded
¥170
¥170
¥164
¥164
¥156
¥156
¥150
¥150
¥173
¥173
¥166
¥164
¥164
¥159
¥159
¥152
¥150
¥150
¥180
¥180
¥172
¥164
¥164
¥166
¥166
¥158
¥150
¥150
0
90
99.9
100
0
90
99.9
100
0
99.4
99.9
99.92
100
0
99.4
99.9
99.92
100
0
99.8
99.8
99.992
100
0
99.8
99.8
99.992
100
Reference
bandwidth
(kHz)
40
Reference antenna diameter and
reference radiation
pattern 3
1 m Recommendation ITU–R S.1428.
1000
40
2 m Recommendation ITU–R S.1428.
1000
40
5 m Recommendation ITU–R S.1428.
1000
NGSO system must meet the limits of this Table in both the 40 kHz and the 1 MHz reference bandwidths.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
3277
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 4H—LIMITS ON AGGREGATE EPFDDOWN RADIATED BY NGSO FSS SYSTEMS IN CERTAIN FREQUENCY BAND 2 4
Frequency band
(GHz)
EPFDdown
(dB(W/m2))
¥182
¥172
¥154
¥154
¥168
¥158
¥140
¥140
¥185
¥176
¥165
¥160
¥154
¥154
¥171
¥162
¥151
¥146
¥140
¥140
¥191
¥162
¥154
¥154
¥177
¥148
¥140
¥140
¥195
¥184
¥175
¥161
¥154
¥154
¥181
¥170
¥161
¥147
¥140
¥140
19.7–20.2 ........................................................
Note to paragraph (h): These limits
relate to the EPFD, which would be
obtained under free-space propagation
Percentage of
time during
which
EPFDdown
may not be
exceeded
Reference
bandwidth
(kHz)
0
90
99.94
100
0
90
99.94
100
0
91
99.8
99.8
99.99
100
0
91
99.8
99.8
99.99
100
0
99.933
99.998
100
0
99.933
99.998
100
0
90
99.6
99.984
99.9992
100
0
90
99.6
99.984
99.9992
100
Reference antenna diameter and
reference radiation
pattern 3
40
70 cm Recommendation ITU–R S.1428.
1000
40
90 cm Recommendation ITU–R S.1428.
1000
40
2.5 m
Recommendation
ITU–R S.1428
1000
40
5 m Recommendation ITU–R S.1428.
1000
conditions, for all conditions and for all
methods of modulation.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) In the frequency bands and Regions
listed in Tables 1J and 2J, the
operational EPFD in the space-to-Earth
direction (operational EPFDdown) at any
point on the Earth’s surface, produced
by actual operational emissions from the
in-line co-frequency space station of an
NGSO FSS system, must never exceed
the specified operational limits:
TABLE 1J—OPERATIONAL LIMITS TO THE EPFDDOWN RADIATED BY NGSO FSS SYSTEMS IN CERTAIN FREQUENCY
BANDS 1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
10.7–11.7 in all Regions ..................................................
11.7–12.2 in Region 2 .....................................................
12.2–12.5 in region 3, and ...............................................
12.5–12.75 in Region 1 and 3 (prior to 31 December
2005). ...........................................................................
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
Reference
bandwidth
(kHz)
¥163
¥166
¥167.5
100
........................
........................
40
........................
........................
3
6
9
≤2.5
¥169.5
........................
........................
≥18
............................
EPFDdown
(dB(W/m 2))
Frequency band (GHz)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Percentage of
time during
which
EPFDdown
may not be
exceeded
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
GSO system
receive earth
station
antenna gain
(dBi)
11JAP1
Orbital inclination
of the GSO
satellite
(degrees)
3278
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1J—OPERATIONAL LIMITS TO THE EPFDDOWN RADIATED BY NGSO FSS SYSTEMS IN CERTAIN FREQUENCY
BANDS 1—Continued
EPFDdown
(dB(W/m 2))
Frequency band (GHz)
¥160
¥163
¥164.5
¥166.5
¥161.25
¥164
¥165.5
10.7–11.7 in all Regions; .................................................
11.7–12.2 in Region 2; ....................................................
12.2–12.5 in Region 3; ....................................................
and 12.5–12.75 in Regions 1 and 3 (from 31 December
2005) ............................................................................
¥167.5
¥158.25
¥161
¥162.5
¥164.5
Percentage of
time during
which
EPFDdown
may not be
exceeded
Reference
bandwidth
(kHz)
100
40
100
........................
........................
40
........................
........................
........................
100
GSO system
receive earth
station
antenna gain
(dBi)
3
6
9
≥18
3
6
9
........................
40
≥18
3
6
9
≥18
Orbital inclination
of the GSO
satellite
(degrees)
≥2.5 and ≤4.5.
≤2.5.
≥2.5 and ≤4.5.
1 The operational limits on the EPFD
down radiated by NGSO FSS systems must be the values given in Table 2G or this table, whichever are
the more stringent.
2 For antenna diameters between the values given in this table, the limits are given by linear interpolation using a linear scale for EPFD
down in
decibels and a logarithmic scale for antenna diameter in meters.
TABLE 2J—OPERATIONAL LIMITS TO THE EPFDDOWN RADIATED BY NGSO FSS SYSTEMS IN CERTAIN FREQUENCY
BANDS 3
EPFDdown
(dB(W/m 2))
Frequency band (GHz)
GSO system
receive earth
station antenna gain
(dBi)
Reference
bandwidth
(kHz)
.............................................................
.............................................................
.............................................................
.............................................................
.............................................................
.............................................................
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
40
40
40
1000
1000
1000
40
40
≥49
≥49
3 ≥43≤
≥49
≥49
≥49
≤2.5
≤2.5
>2.5 and ≤4.5
≤2.5
≤2.5
>2.5 and ≤4.5
≤2.5
>2.5 and ≤4.5
¥150
¥148
19.7–20.2 .............................................................
≥49
Orbital inclination of the
GSO satellite (degrees)
¥157
¥157
¥155
¥143
¥143
¥141
¥164
¥162
19.7–20.2 .............................................................
17.8–18.6
19.3–19.4
19.6–19.7
17.8–18.6
19.3–19.4
19.6–19.7
Percentage of
time during
which
EPFDdown
may not be
exceeded
100
100
1000
1000
≥49
≥49
≤2.5
>2.5 and ≤4.5
3 ≥43
3 The operational limit applies to NGSO systems operating at altitudes of 7000 km or above in order to protect GSO FSS networks employing
adaptive coding.
Note to paragraph (j): These limits
relate to the operational EPFD which
would be obtained under free-space
propagation conditions, for all
conditions, for all methods of
modulation and for the specified
inclined GSO FSS operations.
(k) In the frequency bands and
Regions listed in the following Table,
the EPFD in the Earth-to-space direction
(EPFDup) produced at any point on the
GSO by the emissions from all cofrequency earth stations in an NGSO
FSS system, for all conditions and for
all methods of modulation, must not
exceed the specified limits for the given
percentages of time:
LIMITS TO THE EPFDUP RADIATED BY NGSO FSS SYSTEMS IN CERTAIN FREQUENCY BANDS
EPFDup
(dB(W/m 2))
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Frequency band (GHz)
12.5–12.75 ....................................
12.75–13.25
13.75–14.5
17.3–18.1 (Regions 1 and 3) .......
17.8–18.1 (Region 2) 2
27.5–28.6 ......................................
29.3–30 .........................................
Percentage of
time during
which EPFDup
may not be
exceeded
Reference
bandwidth
(kHz)
Reference antenna beamwidth and reference radiation
pattern 1
¥160
100
40
4 ° Recommendation ITU–R S.672–4, Ls = –20.
¥160
100
40
4 ° Recommendation ITU–R S.672–4, Ls = ¥20.
–162
–162
100
100
40
40
1.55 ° Recommendation ITU–R S.672–4, Ls = ¥20.
1.55 ° Recommendation ITU–R S.672–4, Ls = ¥20.
1 For the case of L = ¥10, the values a = 1.83 and b = 6.32 should be used in the equations in the Annex of Recommendation ITU–R S.672–
s
4 for single-feed circular beams. In all cases of Ls, the parabolic main beam equation should start at zero.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:08 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
3279
2 This EPFD
up level also applies to the 17.3–17.8 GHz band to protect BSS feeder links in Region 2 from NGSO FSS Earth-to-space transmissions in Regions 1 and 3.
Note to paragraph (k): These limits relate to the uplink EPFD, which would be obtained under free-space propagation conditions, for all conditions and for all methods of modulation.
*
*
*
*
*
17. In § 25.217, revise paragraphs
(b)(1) and (c)(1) to read as follows:
■
§ 25.217
Default service rules.
*
*
*
*
*
(b)(1) For all NGSO-like satellite
licenses for which the application was
filed pursuant to the procedures set
forth in § 25.157 after August 27, 2003,
authorizing operations in a frequency
band for which the Commission has not
adopted frequency band-specific service
rules at the time the license is granted,
the licensee will be required to comply
with the following technical
requirements, notwithstanding the
frequency bands specified in these rule
provisions: §§ 25.143(b)(2)(ii), (iii),
25.204(e), 25.210(f), (i).
*
*
*
*
*
(c)(1) For all GSO-like satellite
licenses for which the application was
filed pursuant to the procedures set
forth in § 25.158 after August 27, 2003,
authorizing operations in a frequency
band for which the Commission has not
adopted frequency band-specific service
rules at the time the license is granted,
the licensee will be required to comply
with the following technical
requirements, notwithstanding the
frequency bands specified in these rule
provisions: §§ 25.143(b)(2)(iv),
25.204(e), 25.210(f), (i), (j).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 18. Revise § 25.261 to read as follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 25.261 Procedures for avoidance of inline interference among NGSO FSS
systems.
(a) Scope. This section applies to
NGSO FSS satellite systems that
communicate with earth stations with
directional antennas and that operate
under a Commission license or grant of
U.S. market access under this part in the
10.7–12.7 GHz (space-to-Earth), 12.75–
13.25 GHz (Earth-to-space), 13.75–14.5
GHz (Earth-to-space), 17.8–18.6 GHz
(space-to-Earth), 18.8–19.4 GHz (spaceto-Earth), 19.6–20.2 GHz (space-toEarth), 27.5–29.1 GHz (Earth-to-space),
or 29.3–30 GHz (Earth-to-space) bands.
(b) Definition of ‘‘In-line event.’’ For
purposes of this section, an ‘‘in-line
event’’ associated with a specific
frequency range occurs when there is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 Jan 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
physical alignment of space stations of
two or more NGSO FSS satellite systems
authorized to use this frequency range
with an operating earth station of one of
these systems such that the angular
separation between operational links of
the satellite systems is less than 10° as
measured at the earth station.
(c) Default procedure. Unless
otherwise coordinated pursuant to
paragraph (d) of this section, NGSO FSS
satellite operators experiencing an inline event must divide their commonly
assigned spectrum in accordance with
the following procedure:
(1) Each of n (number of) satellite
systems involved in a particular in-line
event must select 1/n of the commonly
assigned frequency range for its ‘‘home’’
spectrum. The selection order for each
satellite system will be determined by
the date that the first space station in the
satellite system commences operation.
(2) The affected space station(s) of the
respective satellite systems must operate
only in the selected (1/n) spectrum
associated with its satellite system, its
home spectrum, for the duration of the
in-line event.
(3) All affected space station(s) may
resume operations throughout the
frequency range associated with the inline event once the angular separation
between the space stations exceeds 10°.
(d) Coordination procedure. Any
coordination procedure agreed among
the affected operating satellite systems,
which allows operations of the satellite
systems when each system’s respective
space stations are within the 10 degree
avoidance angle associated with an inline event, will supersede the default
procedure of paragraph (c) of this
section. All parties must coordinate in
good faith.
■ 19. Revise § 25.271(e) to read as
follows:
§ 25.271
Control of transmitting stations.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The licensee or market access
recipient for an NGSO FSS satellite
system operating in the 10.7–14.5 GHz,
17.8–18.6 GHz, 18.8–19.4 GHz, 19.6–
20.2 GHz, 27.5–29.1 GHz, or 29.3–30
GHz bands must maintain an electronic
Web site bulletin board to list the
satellite ephemeris data for each
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
satellite in the constellation, using the
North American Aerospace Defense
Command (NORAD) two-line orbital
element format. The orbital elements
must be updated at least once every
three days.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2016–31795 Filed 1–10–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket Nos. 14–50, 09–182, 07–294,
and 04–256; Report No. 3064]
Petitions for Reconsideration of Action
in Rulemaking Proceeding
Federal Communications
Commission.
AGENCY:
Petition for reconsideration;
correction.
ACTION:
The Federal Communications
Commission (Commission) published a
document in the Federal Register of
December 30, 2016, concerning
petitions for reconsideration filed in the
Commission’s rulemaking proceeding.
The date for filing replies was incorrect.
This document corrects the filing
deadline date for replies to an
opposition to the Petitions.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Benjamin Arden, Media Bureau, (202)
418–2605; email: Benjamin.Arden@
fcc.gov.
Correction
In the Federal Register of December
30, 2016, in FR Doc. 2016–31708, on
page 96415, in the second column,
correct the DATES section to read:
DATES: Oppositions to the Petitions must be
filed on or before January 17, 2017. Replies
to an opposition must be filed on or before
January 27, 2017.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–00341 Filed 1–10–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3258-3279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31795]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 2 and 25
[IB Docket No. 16-408; FCC 16-170]
Updates Concerning Non-Geostationary, Fixed-Satellite Service
Systems and Related Matters
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission proposes to update,
clarify, and streamline its rules to facilitate the deployment of
recently proposed non-geostationary-satellite orbit (NGSO), fixed-
satellite service (FSS) satellite systems.
DATES: Comments are due February 27, 2017. Reply comments are due March
27, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by IB Docket No. 16-408,
by any of the following methods:
Federal Communications Commission's Web site: https://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request
reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language
interpreters, CART, etc.) by email: FCC504@fcc.gov or phone: 202-418-
0530 or TTY: 202-418-0432.
For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clay DeCell, 202-418-0803.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), FCC 16-170, adopted December 14, 2016,
and released December 15, 2016. The full text of the NPRM is available
at https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-170A1.pdf. The
NPRM is also available for inspection and copying during business hours
in the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street
SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. To request materials in
accessible formats for people with disabilities, send an email to
FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer
[[Page 3259]]
& Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432
(TTY).
Comment Filing Requirements
Interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or
before the dates indicated in the DATES section above. Comments may be
filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS).
Electronic Filers. Comments may be filed electronically
using the Internet by accessing the ECFS, https://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs.
Paper Filers. Parties who file by paper must include an
original and four copies of each filing.
Filings may be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service
mail. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary,
Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
[cir] All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for
the Commission's Secretary must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445
12th Street SW., Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. All hand
deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes must be disposed of before entering the building.
[cir] Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton
Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
[cir] U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail
must be addressed to 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554.
Persons with Disabilities. To request materials in
accessible formats for persons with disabilities (braille, large print,
electronic files, audio format), or to request reasonable
accommodations for filing comments (accessible format documents, sign
language interpreters, CART, etc.), send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or
call 202-418-0530 (voice) or 202-418-0432 (TTY).
Ex Parte Presentations
Pursuant to 47 CFR 1.1200(a), this proceeding will be treated as a
``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's
ex parte rules. Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy
of any written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral
presentation within two business days after the presentation (unless a
different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons
making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda
summarizing the presentation must (1) list all persons attending or
otherwise participating in the meeting at which the ex parte
presentation was made, and (2) summarize all data presented and
arguments made during the presentation. If the presentation consisted
in whole or in part of the presentation of data or arguments already
reflected in the presenter's written comments, memoranda or other
filings in the proceeding, the presenter may provide citations to such
data or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other
filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where
such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the
memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex
parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must
be filed consistent with 47 CFR 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by
47 CFR 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method
of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda
summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto,
must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available
for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g.,
.doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding
should familiarize themselves with the Commission's ex parte rules.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains proposed new and modified information
collection requirements. The Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and the
Office of Management and Budget to comment on the information
collection requirements contained in this document, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. In addition, pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, we seek specific comment on how
we might further reduce the information collection burden for small
business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
Synopsis
In this NPRM, we propose revisions to certain of the Commission's
rules and policies governing satellite services, prompted by a planned
new generation of large NGSO FSS systems. We propose to update,
clarify, and streamline our rules to facilitate the deployment of NGSO
FSS systems, which have the capability to provide services, including
Internet access, to underserved communities worldwide. We also propose
to update certain rules governing operation of FSS space stations in
the geostationary-satellite orbit (GSO) to enable greater operational
flexibility.
Ka-Band Plan
Proposal Overview. In light of decisions waiving the plan for the
Ka-band, or the 17.7-20.2 GHz and 27.5-30 GHz bands, and to promote
more flexible use of the spectrum, we propose to reinstate certain
secondary FSS use in the 17.8-20.2 GHz band and to allow new FSS
operations in the 19.3-19.4 GHz, 19.6-19.7 GHz, and 29.3-29.5 GHz
bands. This proposal would codify existing practices and formally
enable the spectrum use proposed by NGSO FSS broadband constellations
currently pending before the Commission. It would further make
available for FSS systems spectrum currently designated for, but never
used by, NGSO mobile-satellite service (MSS) feeder links.
17.8-18.3 GHz. We propose to create a new secondary allocation to
the FSS in the 17.8-18.3 GHz band, subject to protections for the
primary fixed service (FS). We anticipate that the power flux-density
(PFD) limits established by the International Telecommunication Union
(ITU) for protection of the FS by the FSS in the 17.7-18.3 GHz band are
also sufficient to protect U.S. terrestrial fixed users, without
generally requiring coordination. This has long been the case in the
3700-4200 MHz band, for example, in which FSS space stations operate on
a co-primary basis with FS terrestrial stations, are not typically
coordinated with terrestrial operators, and are subject to ITU PFD
limits codified in 47 CFR 25.208(a). And the United States participated
actively in the development of ITU PFD limits in the 17.8-18.3 GHz
band, with input from U.S. terrestrial operators.
Thus, we are no longer concerned about coordination and delay
concerns that the Commission expressed in 2000. The Commission did not
discuss the adequacy of any PFD limits in this context. And, both NGSO
FSS and GSO FSS systems have been successfully authorized to operate in
this band by waiver on an unprotected, non-interference basis with
respect to the FS. We also note that WorldVu Satellites Limited, d/b/a
OneWeb, has filed a petition for declaratory ruling to access the U.S.
market in the 17.8-18.6 GHz band using its proposed system of 720 NGSO
satellites. Accordingly, and to promote additional operational
flexibility, we propose to adopt a secondary allocation to the FSS
(space-
[[Page 3260]]
to-Earth) in the 17.8-18.3 GHz band currently designated solely for the
FS. Both GSO FSS and NGSO FSS operations would be permitted under this
secondary FSS allocation. Non-Federal FSS operations would also be
secondary to primary Federal FSS operations in this band. We intend to
limit this allocation to individually licensed earth stations, which
are more likely than ubiquitously deployed user terminals to be able to
operate successfully on an unprotected basis with respect to primary FS
stations. We also propose to include in our rules the international PFD
limits on space stations in this band. Finally, to promote
compatibility among FSS systems, we propose to authorize NGSO FSS
systems in this band only on an unprotected, non-interference basis
with respect to GSO FSS networks. We seek comment on these proposals.
As indicated above, we anticipate that PFD limits established by the
ITU, with significant involvement of the United States, will be
adequate to protect U.S. fixed users from interference. However, we
seek comment on these PFD limits. In the unlikely event that harmful
interference did occur to an FS station, we expect that the FS operator
would attempt to locate and contact the source of the interference, or
seek assistance from the Commission. We seek comment on this issue.
18.3-18.6 GHz and 19.7-20.2 GHz. We also propose to allow NGSO FSS
systems to operate on an unprotected basis with respect to GSO FSS
networks in the 18.3-18.6 GHz and 19.7-20.2 GHz bands, subject to
limits on equivalent power flux-density (EPFD) to ensure protection of
GSO FSS networks, as explained below. We do not propose to extend NGSO
FSS operation to the 18.6-18.8 GHz band, in which GSO FSS networks are
also currently designated co-primary, due to concerns of protection for
the coequal Earth exploration-satellite service (passive) and the space
research service (passive). As we concluded for operations in the 10.7-
14.5 GHz band, which is available for licensing of both GSO and NGSO
FSS systems, we anticipate that compliance with EPFD limits applicable
internationally will be sufficient to protect GSO FSS networks from
unacceptable interference, by generally limiting NGSO FSS operations
near the geostationary orbit. Permitting NGSO FSS operations in the
18.3-18.6 GHz and 19.7-20.2 GHz bands would also be consistent with
waivers issued on delegated authority.
18.8-19.3 GHz. In addition, we propose to allow GSO FSS operation
in the 18.8-19.3 GHz downlink band on an unprotected, non-interference
basis with respect to NGSO FSS systems, consistent with Bureau waivers
and matching the current secondary GSO FSS designation in the paired
28.6-29.1 GHz uplink band. Because NGSO FSS systems would not be
required to alter their operations to accommodate any GSO FSS
operations in this band, we do not believe this allowance for GSO FSS
would prove burdensome to NGSO FSS systems, but we seek comment on such
burdens.
18.8-19.3 GHz and 28.6-29.1 GHz. Internationally, these bands are
allocated to the FSS on a primary basis. GSO satellite networks and
NGSO systems in these bands are subject to coordination, and No. 22.2
of the ITU Radio Regulations does not apply. This rule provides that,
regardless of their ITU filing dates, NGSO systems must not cause
unacceptable interference to and, unless otherwise specified in the
Radio Regulations, must not claim protection from GSO FSS and GSO
broadcasting-satellite service (BSS) networks operating in accordance
with the Radio Regulations. We request comment on the possibility of
giving GSO operations co-primary status with NGSO operations in these
bands, as opposed to the secondary designation already existing in the
28.6-29.1 GHz band and our proposal above for the 18.8-19.3 GHz band.
We seek comment on any potential difficulties that this approach might
raise, particularly since our rules separately address GSO-like
applications and NGSO-like applications, but do not provide a mechanism
for us to consider an application of one type (GSO-like or NGSO-like)
vis-[agrave]-vis previous applications or authorizations of the other
type in the bands 18.8-19.3 GHz and 28.6-29.1 GHz. Significantly, in
these bands NGSO-like operations do not have to meet EPFD limits in
order to ensure the protection of GSO-like operations.
19.3-19.4 GHz, 19.6-19.7 GHz, and 29.3-29.5 GHz. To facilitate
satellite use of the bands, we propose to permit both GSO and NGSO FSS
systems to operate in the 19.3-19.4 GHz, 19.6-19.7 GHz, and 29.3-29.5
GHz bands currently designated for, but unused by, NGSO MSS feeder
links. We propose to authorize NGSO FSS systems on an unprotected, non-
interference basis with respect to GSO FSS networks in these bands. In
the 19.3-19.4 GHz and 19.6-19.7 GHz bands, which are shared on a co-
primary basis with terrestrial services, any FSS earth stations would
be individually licensed and coordinated with terrestrial stations.
Existing terrestrial operations in these bands would not have to
protect any new FSS deployment under general first-come, first-served
coordination procedures. PFD limits are already in place to protect
such terrestrial operations from downlink interference. Further, we
anticipate that new stations in the FS and the FSS will be compatible
in these bands through coordination of the specific operating
parameters of each station, FS or FSS, at the time of licensing. We
seek comment on this proposal, including relevant technical analyses
regarding coordination parameters for new individually licensed earth
stations and future FS stations.
Codification. For clarity, we propose at this time to codify the
Ka-band Plan's satellite designations into footnotes to the U.S. Table
of Frequency Allocations, 47 CFR 2.106. In doing so, we propose to
specify that, in the 27.5-28.35 GHz band, NGSO FSS systems must operate
on an unprotected, non-interference basis with respect to GSO FSS
networks. This treatment would promote compatibility between the two
system designs and is consistent with our proposals in most shared GSO-
NGSO FSS bands. Additionally, while the MSS is not designated in the
Commission's Ka-band Plan, we do not propose to remove the allocations
for this service in the 19.7-20.2 GHz and 29.5-30 GHz bands. We also
propose to remove duplicative notes in 47 CFR 25.202(a)(1), except with
respect to the Commission's recent decision regarding the 27.5-28.35
GHz band in the Spectrum Frontiers proceeding. Similarly, we propose to
incorporate into footnotes in the Table the remaining frequency-use
restrictions in 47 CFR 25.202(a)(1) that were not recently amended in
the Commission's Spectrum Frontiers proceeding. However, we propose to
specify the limitation on NGSO FSS deployment in the 10.7-11.7 GHz and
12.75-13.25 GHz bands as to individually licensed earth stations only,
rather than to gateway earth stations only as currently prescribed.
This would be consistent both with our proposal for the 17.8-18.3 GHz
band and with the Commission's recent decision regarding the shared
27.5-28.35 GHz band in the Spectrum Frontiers proceeding. In addition,
rather than attempt to reproduce in 47 CFR 25.202(a)(1) all of the
frequency bands available for FSS, which are already stated completely
in the Table of Frequency Allocations in 47 CFR 2.106, we propose to
use this paragraph only to note the restrictions on FSS not codified in
the Table.
PFD Limits in 17.7-19.7 GHz for GSO FSS Space Stations. Section
25.208(c)
[[Page 3261]]
contains PFD limits on emissions from space stations in, among others,
the following frequency bands: 18.3-18.8 GHz and 19.3-19.7 GHz. In
addition, 47 CFR 25.208(e) contains PFD limits on emissions by NGSO FSS
space stations in the 18.8-19.3 GHz band. Since we are proposing
changes to the U.S. Table of Frequency Allocations that will allow the
operation of GSO FSS and/or NGSO FSS space stations in frequency bands
where such operation was not previously contemplated, we propose to
extend the applicability of PFD limits to these frequency bands.
Accordingly, we propose to make the limits in 47 CFR 25.208(c)
applicable to GSO FSS space stations in the frequency bands 17.7-19.7
GHz and to all space stations in the bands 22.55-23.55 GHz and 24.45-
24.75 GHz. These limits have already been applied in portions of the
17.7-19.7 GHz band when granting authorizations for operation in this
band through waivers.
PFD Limits for NGSO FSS Space Stations. We also propose to make the
limits in 47 CFR 25.208(e) applicable to NGSO FSS space stations in the
frequency bands 17.8-18.6 GHz and 18.8-19.7 GHz. We recognize, however,
that these limits were derived for constellations up to a certain
number of satellites and may not be appropriate for some of the large
NGSO FSS constellations being currently proposed. The interference
produced by an NGSO FSS constellation to a terrestrial station is time-
varying and, for that reason, the protection of such a station would be
better ensured through the establishment of an EPFD limit. We invite
comment on this point and on what would be an appropriate EPFD for the
protection of a terrestrial station in the frequency bands under
consideration. As an alternative, and until such EPFD limit can be
developed, we propose that an NGSO FSS constellation be deemed as
having met the requirements in 47 CFR 25.208(e) if the aggregate PFD
produced by the whole constellation at any point in the Earth's surface
does not exceed -115 (dBW/m\2\)/MHz. We invite comments on this
proposal.
Other. As NGSO FSS systems deploy in different frequency bands, it
is important to consider how these systems can share spectrum with
other non-satellite systems. In this respect, we request comments on
any other emerging uses, technologies, or platforms that should be
taken into account as additional NGSO uses occur. Would the rules
proposed in this Notice preclude in any way other uses of this spectrum
or hinder future sharing with other services? Are there additional
technical rules or other means by which we can facilitate additional
sharing in these bands?
EPFD Limits
Ka-band. While the Commission has not previously included in its
rules the Ka-band EPFD limits found in Article 22 of the ITU Radio
Regulations, NGSO FSS applicants in these bands have nonetheless
demonstrated compliance with the limits when seeking to operate on a
non-interference basis vis-[agrave]-vis GSO FSS networks. The
International Bureau has approved such operations on the basis of these
showings. Similarly, we expect that compliance with the Article 22 EPFD
limits will be sufficient for NGSO FSS systems to protect GSO FSS
networks in the 17.8-18.6 GHz, 19.7-20.2 GHz, 27.5-28.35 GHz, and 29.5-
30 GHz bands, as the U.S. GSO FSS community participated actively in
their development. Accordingly, to provide greater certainty regarding
the compatibility of NGSO FSS and GSO FSS operations, we propose to
require NGSO FSS applicants in these bands to demonstrate conformance
with applicable EPFD limits in the same manner that NGSO FSS applicants
must for operation in the 10.7-14.5 GHz band. We intend that compliance
with EPFD limits in the Ka-band would satisfy any obligation on an NGSO
FSS system to operate on a non-interference basis with respect to a GSO
FSS network. In addition, we propose to incorporate EPFD limits on
inter-satellite emissions from NGSO FSS space stations into GSO FSS
space stations, which are currently found in Article 22 but omitted
from our rules. We also propose to extend relevant Article 22 EPFD
limits to the 19.3-19.4 GHz, 19.6-19.7 GHz, and 29.3-29.5 GHz bands in
which we are proposing to allow new NGSO FSS operations on an
unprotected, non-interference basis with respect to GSO FSS networks.
Consolidation. In adding these Ka-band EPFD rules, we propose to
consolidate our NGSO FSS licensing provisions for operation in the Ka-
band, currently found in 47 CFR 25.145, into the licensing rules for
NGSO FSS operation in the 10.7-14.5 GHz band, set forth in 47 CFR
25.146. In doing so, we propose to delete 47 CFR 25.145(e), similar
provisions in 47 CFR 25.142(d) and 25.143(d), and the cross-references
to 47 CFR 25.142(d) in 47 CFR 25.217, all of which proscribe certain
exclusionary arrangements to serve foreign markets. These provisions
have been superseded by section 648 of the Open-market Reorganization
for the Betterment of International Telecommunications (ORBIT) Act,
which contains a parallel prohibition. We also request comment on ways
we might simplify 47 CFR 25.146.
NGSO-GSO Default Sharing. Finally, the first sentence of 47 CFR
25.156(d)(5) provides that, in frequency bands in which the Commission
has not yet adopted sharing criteria between GSO-like and NGSO-like
satellite operations, the Commission will not grant an application for
NGSO-like operation after it has granted an application for GSO-like
operation, or vice versa. The effect of this provision is to preclude
joint NGSO-like and GSO-like use of frequency bands until the
Commission has adopted formal sharing criteria between the different
types of satellite operation in that band. As noted above, however, the
International Bureau has approved by waiver both GSO-like and NGSO-like
operations in the same Ka-band frequencies without EPFD sharing
criteria yet codified in our rules. Similarly, we believe that an
applicant demonstrating that it can operate compatibly with any
existing operations, either through technical demonstrations or
coordination, ought not be precluded from providing service to the
public while the Commission initiates and conducts a rulemaking to
establish formal sharing criteria. We therefore propose to delete the
first sentence of 47 CFR 25.156(d)(5). We also request comment as to
whether we should adopt, as a default sharing rule, a provision similar
to No. 22.2 of the ITU Radio Regulations. This provision would state
that, except as otherwise provided in our rules, NGSO systems must not
cause unacceptable interference to, and must not claim protection from,
GSO FSS networks and GSO BSS networks. For example, the 18.8-19.3 GHz
and 28.6-29.1 GHz bands would be excepted from such a provision,
because in these bands we require GSO FSS networks to operate on an
unprotected, non-interference basis with respect to NGSO FSS systems.
Avoidance of In-line Interference
Background. The Commission has adopted a default mechanism to
enable spectrum sharing among NGSO FSS systems in the 10.7-12.7 GHz,
12.75-13.25 GHz, 13.75-14.5 GHz, 18.8-19.3 GHz, and 28.6-29.1 GHz
bands. Under this mechanism, an NGSO FSS system may operate throughout
its authorized band except during ``in-line'' events. An ``in-line''
event occurs when satellites of different NGSO FSS systems are
physically aligned with an operating earth station of one of those
systems, such that the topocentric angle between the satellites is less
than 10 degrees as
[[Page 3262]]
measured from the earth station. To avoid interference among the
systems experiencing an in-line event, the Commission requires the
affected satellite operators to divide the commonly assigned spectrum
equally according to the chosen ``home'' spectrum for the duration of
the in-line event, absent another sharing agreement by the operators.
Section 25.261. The avoidance of in-line interference mechanism is
codified in 47 CFR 25.261. This section, however, omits the 10.7-12.7
GHz, 12.75-13.25 GHz, and 13.75-14.5 GHz bands. We propose to correct
this omission. We also propose to include in 47 CFR 25.261 the bands in
which we currently designate NGSO FSS operation on a secondary basis--
27.5-28.6 GHz and 29.5-30 GHz--and the bands in which we are proposing
to allow NGSO FSS operation--17.8-18.6 GHz, 19.3-19.4 GHz, 19.6-20.2
GHz, and 29.3-29.5 GHz. We otherwise propose to clarify that 47 CFR
25.261 applies only to NGSO FSS systems communicating with earth
stations with directional antennas. We seek comment on expanding this
spectrum sharing method to NGSO FSS operations in other frequency
bands, in place of the alternative procedure for assigning spectrum to
NGSO satellite systems by simply dividing it equally among the
qualified applicants in a processing round. In this regard, we propose
to clarify in 47 CFR 25.157 that these band-splitting procedures do not
apply to applications granted on the condition of compliance with the
avoidance of in-line interference mechanism specified in 47 CFR 25.261.
We also seek comment on any other standard for assigning spectrum.
Ephemeris Data. In order to effectuate the avoidance of in-line
interference mechanism, NGSO FSS operators must know the locations of
co-frequency NGSO FSS space stations to predict when in-line events
will occur. Section 25.271(e) requires NGSO FSS licensees in the 10.7-
14.5 GHz band to maintain a Web site with ephemeris data for each
satellite in its constellation, which facilitates coordination for this
purpose. NGSO FSS licensees in the 18.8-19.3 GHz and 28.6-29.1 GHz
bands must also share ephemeris data. Accordingly, we propose to
include the 18.8-19.3 GHz and 28.6-29.1 GHz bands in 47 CFR 25.271(e),
along with the portions of the Ka-band currently designated for NGSO
FSS operation on a secondary basis or proposed for NGSO FSS operation
in this Notice, i.e., the 17.8-18.6 GHz, 19.3-19.4 GHz, 19.6-20.2 GHz,
27.5-28.6 GHz, and 29.3-30 GHz bands. We also propose to apply this
requirement explicitly to non-U.S.-licensed NGSO FSS operators that are
granted market access in the United States.
We understand that satellites in the low-Earth orbit (LEO) region,
i.e., the region of space at Earth altitudes below 2,000 km, that do
not have station-keeping capability have experienced orbital
perturbations from solar events resulting in a reduction in altitude of
up to several kilometers from a single solar event. We invite comment
as to whether the current ephemeris data update frequency of once every
three days as required by 47 CFR 25.271(e) is appropriate for such
satellites, or whether we should require more frequent updates, and if
so, what the appropriate update interval would be. We also invite
comment as to whether an electronic Web site bulletin board as
currently required by 47 CFR 25.271(e) is the most appropriate means of
making ephemeris data available, or whether another method, such as
requiring active participation in the Space Data Association and/or
requiring the sharing of data with the U. S. Strategic Command's Joint
Space Operations Center (or any successor) might be a more effective
means.
10-degree Trigger. In addition, we note that the 10-degree default
separation for co-frequency NGSO FSS space station operations is based
on the characteristics of satellite systems proposed around the turn of
the millennium. We invite comment as to whether the separation-angle
trigger should be increased or decreased to reflect current system
designs.
Accommodation of Later Entrants. Finally, when authorizing NGSO FSS
systems in the past, the International Bureau has required licensees to
abide by the avoidance of in-line interference mechanism generally with
respect to later-authorized NGSO FSS systems, unless coordination
agreements are reached. To the extent that later-authorized systems
increase the frequency of in-line events, or increase the number of
satellite systems involved in an in-line event, such later entrants can
diminish the amount of spectrum available to an existing NGSO FSS
system. We invite comment on how best to balance the competing
interests of encouraging new market entry and providing NGSO FSS
operators certainty with respect to a minimum amount of spectrum
available for their services. For example, should we specify that the
avoidance of in-line interference mechanism applies only to those in-
line events among the existing grantee, O3b Limited, and any licensees
and market access holders approved as a result of a processing round?
In this case, an applicant requesting authority after any processing
round would be required to protect existing NGSO FSS authorization
holders, and would be required, during an in-line event, to cease
operations on the commonly authorized spectrum.
Earth Station E.I.R.P. Density Limits
In light of the ability of the O3b NGSO FSS system to operate
within existing e.i.r.p. density criteria for GSO FSS earth stations,
and considering the spectrum sharing benefits of such criteria, we
invite comment on adopting e.i.r.p. density limits for NGSO FSS uplink
transmissions. These could be based, for example, on the limits we have
prescribed for FSS earth stations transmitting to GSO space stations.
Such default limits could be exceeded to the extent that higher levels
are coordinated with all other NGSO FSS systems authorized in the same
frequency bands. If we were to adopt e.i.r.p. density limits for NGSO
FSS uplink transmissions, should we simply require a certification from
applicants that they will abide by these default power limits unless
higher transmission levels are appropriately coordinated? This
certification requirement could be similar to certification
requirements the Commission has recently adopted for GSO FSS and 17/24
GHz BSS space station operations. We also seek comment on whether,
similar to our policy regarding GSO FSS space stations, there are
appropriate downlink power limits and earth station receive gain
criteria that we should adopt to facilitate sharing among NGSO FSS
systems. We further seek comment on any other measures that should be
recommended to facilitate sharing.
Milestones
Background. The Commission requires all satellites in an authorized
NGSO constellation to be launched and operated within six years of
grant. This milestone requirement is intended to ensure timely
provision of service, and to prevent ``warehousing'' of spectrum and
orbital resources. Failure to meet this requirement, incorporated as a
condition of the constellation grant, renders the authorization null
and void, and subjects the grantee to forfeiture of up to $5 million
under the surety bond posted for the authorization.
NGSO Milestone. Operation of every space station in an authorized
constellation, however, may not be necessary to provide the services
proposed in the application. Additional space stations could be
authorized to reduce latency or to increase capacity and reliability,
for example. And while
[[Page 3263]]
failure to successfully launch and operate such additional space
stations within six years might not preclude service to the public, it
could, under current rules, result in automatic termination of the
license. To afford operators greater flexibility with system design and
implementation, we propose to modify the six-year milestone obligation
for NGSO systems to require the launch and operation of a percentage of
the authorized constellation sufficient to provide substantial service
to the public. We tentatively conclude that 75 percent is an
appropriate number for this requirement. Satisfaction of this milestone
would release the operator from its surety bond obligation. Failure to
operate the minimum number of space stations by this milestone,
however, would result in forfeiture of the bond and an automatic
reduction in the number of authorized satellites to the number actually
in orbit as of the milestone date. Even under this ``keep what you
use'' proposal, however, we would continue to terminate automatically
the full license of a satellite system if no authorized space stations
were functional in orbit as of the time of the milestone deadline. For
operators that satisfy the first milestone, we propose a second
milestone, nine years after grant, requiring launch and operation of
the entire authorized constellation. Operators failing to complete
their constellations by this second milestone date would similarly have
their number of authorized space stations reduced automatically to the
number deployed as of the second milestone date. We invite comment on
this and any other modifications to our NGSO milestone policy.
As an alternative to specifying a percentage of the authorized
constellation for an initial milestone, for example, should we require
the launch and operation of a number of satellites specific to the
services and constellation proposed? If so, should the applicant be
required to state the minimum number of satellites necessary to provide
the services it proposes? If we adopt a more flexible milestone
requirement, should it be limited to large NGSO constellations, and if
so what size? Should we add additional, periodic milestones, to
automatically reduce the number of authorized satellites if a licensee
demonstrates that it is unlikely to maintain its larger, authorized
constellation size following the decommissioning of its initial
deployment? We could, for example, specify that the number of
authorized satellites is reduced automatically to the greatest number
operated concurrently during the previous year if the licensee falls
below a certain percentage of its authorized constellation. If, after
satisfaction of any milestones, an NGSO licensee fails to maintain at
least one operational satellite in orbit for a specified period of
time, should its license be terminated automatically?
Replacements. We also propose to clarify in 47 CFR 25.164 that both
GSO and NGSO replacement space stations, which must be scheduled for
launch before the retirement of the space stations being replaced, are
not subject to the separate milestone requirements in that section.
Geographic Coverage
The Commission requires the design of NGSO FSS systems that will
operate in the 10.7-14.5 GHz, 18.8-19.3 GHz, or 28.6-29.1 GHz bands to
enable service worldwide for at least 18 hours every day. This
requirement is intended to foster seamless global communication
networks and to maximize the use of global spectrum resources, but also
prohibits certain NGSO system designs. In light of the spectrum sharing
opportunities among NGSO FSS systems, and given the separate
requirements for coverage of the United States already included in our
rules, we propose to eliminate this global coverage requirement in
order to provide operators greater flexibility to design their systems
to meet market demands. We invite comment on this proposal.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission
has prepared this Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the
possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies
and rules proposed in this NPRM. We request written public comments on
this IRFA. Commenters must identify their comments as responses to the
IRFA and must file the comments by the deadlines for comments on the
Notice in the DATES section above. The Commission will send a copy of
the NPRM, including this IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration. In addition, summaries of the Notice and
IRFA will be published in the Federal Register.
A. Need for, and Objectives of, the Proposed Rules
The Notice seeks comment on several proposals relating to the
Commission's rules and policies for satellite services, especially
those concerning non-geostationary-satellite (NGSO), fixed-satellite
service (FSS) systems. Adoption of the proposed changes would, among
other things, provide for more flexible use of the 17.8-20.2 GHz bands
for FSS; promote shared use of spectrum among NGSO FSS satellite
systems; and remove unnecessary design restrictions on NGSO FSS
systems.
The NPRM proposes several changes to 47 CFR parts 2 and 25.
Principally, it proposes to:
(1) Allocate additional spectrum for use by FSS systems on a
secondary basis in the 17.8-18.3 GHz band, subject to power flux-
density limits designed to protect primary terrestrial services.
(2) Allow additional operation of NGSO FSS systems in segments of
the 17.8-20.2 GHz band within limits protective of FSS satellite
systems in the geostationary-satellite orbit (GSO).
(3) Allow GSO FSS operation in the 18.8-19.3 GHz band on an
unprotected, non-interference basis with regard to NGSO FSS systems, to
provide additional operational flexibility.
(4) Amend the Commission's satellite milestone policies and
geographic coverage rules to provide additional regulatory flexibility
to operators of NGSO FSS systems.
B. Legal Basis
The proposed action is authorized under sections 4(i), 303, and 316
of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 303,
316.
C. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which
the Proposed Rules May Apply
The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of, and, where
feasible, an estimate of, the number of small entities that may be
affected by adoption of proposed rules. The RFA generally defines the
term ``small entity'' as having the same meaning as the terms ``small
business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small governmental
jurisdiction.'' In addition, the term ``small business'' has the same
meaning as the term ``small business concern'' under the Small Business
Act. A small business concern is one which: (1) Is independently owned
and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and (3)
satisfies any additional criteria established by the Small Business
Administration (SBA). Below, we describe and estimate the number of
small entity licensees that may be affected by adoption of the proposed
rules.
[[Page 3264]]
Satellite Telecommunications and All Other Telecommunications
The rules proposed in this Notice would affect some providers of
satellite telecommunications services, if adopted. Satellite
telecommunications service providers include satellite and earth
station operators. Since 2007, the SBA has recognized two census
categories for satellite telecommunications firms: ``Satellite
Telecommunications'' and ``Other Telecommunications.'' Under both
categories, a business is considered small if it had $32.5 million or
less in annual receipts.
The first category of Satellite Telecommunications ``comprises
establishments primarily engaged in providing point-to-point
telecommunications services to other establishments in the
telecommunications and broadcasting industries by forwarding and
receiving communications signals via a system of satellites or
reselling satellite telecommunications.'' For this category, Census
Bureau data for 2007 show that there were a total of 512 satellite
communications firms that operated for the entire year. Of this total,
482 firms had annual receipts of under $25 million.
The second category of Other Telecommunications is comprised of
entities ``primarily engaged in providing specialized
telecommunications services, such as satellite tracking, communications
telemetry, and radar station operation. This industry also includes
establishments primarily engaged in providing satellite terminal
stations and associated facilities connected with one or more
terrestrial systems and capable of transmitting telecommunications to,
and receiving telecommunications from, satellite systems.
Establishments providing Internet services or voice over Internet
protocol (VoIP) services via client-supplied telecommunications
connections are also included in this industry.'' For this category,
Census Bureau data for 2007 show that there were a total of 2,383 firms
that operated for the entire year. Of this total, 2,346 firms had
annual receipts of under $25 million. We anticipate that some of these
``Other Telecommunications firms,'' which are small entities, are earth
station applicants/licensees that might be affected if our proposed
rule changes are adopted.
We anticipate that our proposed rule changes may have an impact on
earth station and space station applicants and licensees. Space station
applicants and licensees, however, rarely qualify under the definition
of a small entity. Generally, space stations cost hundreds of millions
of dollars to construct, launch, and operate. Consequently, we do not
anticipate that any space station operators are small entities that
would be affected by our proposed actions.
D. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements for Small Entities
The Notice proposes and seeks comment on several rule changes that
would affect compliance requirements for earth station and space
station operators. Most proposed changes, however, are directed at
space station applicants and licensees. As noted above, these parties
rarely qualify as small entities.
For example, we propose to allow additional uses of certain
frequencies within the 17.8-20.2 GHz band, subject to compliance with
power limits designed to protect other users of the bands. We also seek
comment on revised or new technical standards to promote sharing among
NGSO FSS systems, and ask whether we should allow entities to certify
that that will comply with such resulting requirements, as a means to
avoid unnecessary regulatory burdens.
We also propose modified rules for satellite system implementation
to provide additional flexibility to operators. We propose to eliminate
a geographic service requirement that restricts the design
possibilities of certain NGSO FSS satellite systems. In total, the
proposals and questions in the Notice are designed to achieve the
Commission's mandate to regulate in the public interest while imposing
the lowest necessary burden on all affected parties, including small
entities.
E. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small
Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered
The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant,
specifically small business, alternatives that it has considered in
reaching its proposed approach, which may include the following four
alternatives (among others): ``(1) the establishment of differing
compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small entities; (2) the
clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and
reporting requirements under the rules for such small entities; (3) the
use of performance rather than design standards; and (4) an exemption
from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for such small
entities.''
The Notice seeks comment from all interested parties. The
Commission is aware that some of the proposals under consideration may
impact small entities. Small entities are encouraged to bring to the
Commission's attention any specific concerns they may have with the
proposals outlined in the Notice.
The Commission expects to consider the economic impact on small
entities, as identified in comments filed in response to the NPRM, in
reaching its final conclusions and taking action in this proceeding.
In this NPRM, the Commission invites comment on means to minimize
negative economic impacts on applicants and licensees, including small
entities. For example, the Commission seeks comment on whether
compliance with certain power limits could be certified to by
applicants, rather than demonstrated technically, thereby reducing
burdens. And the Commission proposes to relax a satellite system
geographic coverage requirement, which could lessen the economic burden
on applicants and licensees. Overall, the proposals in the Notice seek
to increase flexibility for NGSO FSS applicants and licensees and
reduce burdens, while maintaining adequate protections against
interference.
F. Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the
Proposed Rules
None.
Incorporation by Reference
In Sec. 25.108, we propose to incorporate by reference a portion
of Appendix 4 of the ITU Radio Regulations concerning the orbital
information of satellite networks. Specifically, we propose to
incorporate by reference the ITU Radio Regulations, Volume 2:
Appendices, Appendix 4, ``Consolidated list and tables of
characteristics for use in the application of the procedures of Chapter
III,'' Annex 2, ``Characteristics of satellite networks, earth stations
or radio astronomy stations,'' Section A.4, ``Orbital Information,''
Edition of 2012. This material is reasonably available to interested
parties from the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Place des
Nations, 1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland; www.itu.int; Voice: +41 22 730
5111; Fax: +41 22 733 7256; email: itumail@itu.int. The material is
also directly available online at https://www.itu.int/pub/R-REG-RR-2012,
and would be made available for inspection at the Commission.
[[Page 3265]]
List of Subjects
47 CFR Part 2
Radio, Table of frequency allocations.
47 CFR Part 25
Administrative practice and procedure, Earth stations,
Incorporation by reference, Satellites.
Federal Communications Commission.
Katura Howard,
Federal Register Liaison Officer. Office of the Secretary.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal
Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR parts 2 and 25 as
follows:
PART 2--FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS; GENERAL
RULES AND REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 2 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, and 336, unless otherwise
noted.
0
2. Amend Sec. 2.106 as follows:
0
a. Revise pages 48, 49, 52, and 55 of the Table of Frequency
Allocations.
0
b. Revise footnotes NG164, NG165, and NG166.
0
c. Add footnotes NGXX1, NGXX2, NGXX3, and NGXX4.
Sec. 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations.
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
[[Page 3266]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP11JA17.017
[[Page 3267]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP11JA17.018
[[Page 3268]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP11JA17.019
[[Page 3269]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP11JA17.020
NG164 The use of the band 18.6-18.8 GHz by the fixed-satellite
service (space-to-Earth) is limited to geostationary-satellite
networks.
NG165 In the bands 18.8-19.3 GHz (space-to-Earth) and 28.6-29.1 GHz
[[Page 3270]]
(Earth-to-space), geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-
satellite service shall not cause harmful interference to, or claim
protection from, non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-
satellite service.
NG166 The use of the bands 19.4-19.6 GHz (space-to-Earth) and 29.1-
29.25 GHz (Earth-to-space) by the fixed-satellite service is limited to
feeder links for non-geostationary-satellite systems in the mobile-
satellite service.
* * * * *
NGXX1 The use of the bands 10.7-11.7 GHz (space-to-Earth) and
12.75-13.25 GHz (Earth-to-space) by non-geostationary-satellite systems
in the fixed-satellite service is limited to communications with
individually licensed earth stations.
NGXX2 The use of the bands 17.8-18.3 GHz, 19.3-19.4 GHz, and 19.6-
19.7 GHz by the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is limited to
communications with individually licensed earth stations. Ubiquitously
deployed user terminals are not permitted.
NGXX3 In the bands 17.8-18.6 GHz (space-to-Earth), 19.3-19.4 GHz
(space-to-Earth), 19.6-20.2 GHz (space-to-Earth), 27.5-28.6 GHz (Earth-
to-space), and 29.3-30 GHz (Earth-to-space), non-geostationary-
satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not cause
unacceptable interference to, or claim protection from, geostationary-
satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service.
A non-geostationary-satellite system operating within the
applicable equivalent power flux-density limits set forth in Sec.
25.208 of this chapter shall not be considered to cause unacceptable
interference to any geostationary-satellite network in the fixed-
satellite service.
NGXX4 The use of the band 29.25-29.3 GHz by the fixed-satellite
service (Earth-to-space) is limited to geostationary-satellite networks
and to feeder links for non-geostationary-satellite systems in the
mobile-satellite service.
* * * * *
PART 25--SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
0
3. The authority citation for part 25 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Interprets or applies 47 U.S.C. 154, 301, 302, 303, 307,
309, 310, 319, 332, 605, and 721, unless otherwise noted.
0
4. In Sec. 25.108, revise paragraph (a), redesignate paragraphs (b)(2)
through (b)(5) as paragraphs (b)(3) through (b)(6) and add new
paragraph (b)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 25.108 Incorporation by Reference.
(a) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part
with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for
inspection at the Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street
SW., Reference Information Center, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554,
202-418-0270, and is available from the sources listed below. It is
also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
(b) * * *
(2) ITU Radio Regulations, Volume 2: Appendices, Appendix 4,
``Consolidated list and tables of characteristics for use in the
application of the procedures of Chapter III,'' Annex 2,
``Characteristics of satellite networks, earth stations or radio
astronomy stations,'' Section A.4, ``Orbital Information,'' Edition of
2012, https://www.itu.int/pub/R-REG-RR-2012. Incorporation by reference
approved for Sec. 25.146.
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 25.114, revise paragraph (d)(12) to read as follows:
Sec. 25.114 Applications for space station authorizations.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(12) The information required by Sec. 25.146, if the application
is for an NGSO FSS system authorization in the 10.7-14.5 GHz, 17.8-18.6
GHz, 18.8-19.4 GHz, 19.6-20.2 GHz, 27.5-29.1 GHz, or 29.3-30 GHz bands.
* * * * *
Sec. 25.142 [Amended]
0
6. In Sec. 25.142, remove paragraphs (c) and (d).
Sec. 25.143 [Amended]
0
7. Remove Sec. 25.143(d).
Sec. 25.145 [Removed]
0
8. Remove Sec. 25.145.
0
9. In Sec. 25.146, revise the section heading, the first sentence in
paragraph (a) introductory text, the first sentence in paragraph (b)
introductory text, and paragraphs (b)(1)(v), (b)(2), (c), (e), and (i)
to read as follows:
Sec. 25.146 Licensing and operating provisions for NGSO FSS
satellite systems in the 10.7-14.5 GHz, 17.8-18.6 GHz, 18.8-19.4 GHz,
19.6-20.2 GHz, 27.5-29.1 GHz, or 29.3-30 GHz bands.
(a) A comprehensive technical showing must be submitted for the
proposed NGSO FSS system in the 10.7-14.5 GHz, 17.8-18.6 GHz, 18.8-19.4
GHz, 19.6-20.2 GHz, 27.5-29.1 GHz, or 29.3-30 GHz bands. * * *
* * * * *
(b) Ninety days prior to the initiation of service to the public,
the NGSO FSS system licensee must submit a comprehensive technical
showing for the NGSO FSS system. * * *
(1) * * *
(v) Provide the result, the cumulative probability distribution
function of EPFD, of the execution of the verification computer program
described in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section by using only the
input parameters contained in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (b)(1)(iv) of
this section for each of the submitted test points provided by the
Commission. These test points are based on information from U.S.-
licensed GSO FSS and Broadcasting-Satellite Service operators in the
10.7-14.5 GHz, 17.8-18.6 GHz, 18.8-19.4 GHz, 19.6-20.2 GHz, 27.5-29.1
GHz, and 29.3-30 GHz bands. Each U.S.-licensed GSO FSS and
Broadcasting-Satellite Service operator may submit up to 10 test points
for this section containing the latitude, longitude, altitude, azimuth,
elevation angle, antenna size, efficiency to be used by NGSO FSS
licensees during the upcoming year.
(2) Operational equivalent power flux-density, space-to-Earth
direction, (operational EPFDdown) limits. Using the
information contained in (b)(1) of this section plus the measured space
station antenna patterns, provide the result of the execution of the
computer simulation for the anticipated in-line operational
EPFDdown levels for each of the submitted test points
provided by the Commission. Submitted test points are based on inputs
from U.S.-licensed GSO FSS and Broadcasting-Satellite Service operators
in the 10.7-14.5 GHz, 17.8-18.6 GHz, 18.8-19.4 GHz, 19.6-20.2 GHz,
27.5-29.1 GHz, and 29.3-30 GHz bands. Each U.S.-licensed GSO FSS and
Broadcasting-Satellite Service operator may submit up to 10 test points
for this section containing the latitude, longitude, altitude, azimuth,
elevation angle, antenna size, efficiency to be used by NGSO FSS
licensees during the upcoming year.
(c) Applicants for NGSO FSS system authorizations proposing space-
to-Earth transmissions in the 10.7-11.7 GHz,
[[Page 3271]]
12.5-12.75 GHz, or 17.8-18.4 GHz frequency bands must also demonstrate,
in accordance with ITU-R S.1503-2 (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
25.108), that the EPFDis limits in Sec. 25.208(f) will be
met.
* * * * *
(e) An NGSO FSS system licensee operating a system in compliance
with the limits specified in Sec. 25.208(g), (i), (j), (k), (l), and
(m) must not claim protection from GSO FSS and BSS networks operating
in accordance with this part.
* * * * *
(i) NGSO FSS applicants must also provide the following:
(1) Sufficient information on the NGSO FSS system characteristics
to properly model the system in computer sharing simulations,
including, at a minimum, NGSO hand-over and satellite switching
strategies, NGSO satellite antenna gain patterns, and NGSO earth
station antenna gain patterns. In particular, except for operation in
the 18.8-19.3 GHz or 28.6-29.1 GHz bands, each NGSO FSS applicant must
explain the switching protocols it will use to avoid transmitting while
passing through the geostationary satellite orbit arc, or provide an
explanation as to how the PFD limits in Sec. 25.208 will be met
without using geostationary-satellite orbit arc avoidance. In addition,
each NGSO FSS applicant must provide the orbital parameters contained
in Section A.4 of Annex 2 to Appendix 4 of the ITU Radio Regulations
(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 25.108). Further, each NGSO FSS
applicant must provide a sufficient technical showing to demonstrate
that the proposed NGSO system meets the applicable PFD limits in Sec.
25.208.
(2) For operation in the 10.7 GHz-14.5 GHz, 18.8-19.3 GHz, or 28.6-
29.1 GHz bands, a demonstration that the proposed system is capable of
providing FSS on a continuous basis throughout the fifty states, Puerto
Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sec. 25.156 [Amended]
0
10. Remove the first sentence of Sec. 25.156(d)(5).
0
11. Revise Sec. 25.157(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 25.157 Consideration of applications for NGSO-like satellite
operation.
* * * * *
(b)(1) The procedures prescribed in this section do not apply to an
application for authority to operate a replacement space station(s)
that meets the relevant criteria in Sec. 25.165(e)(1) and (2) and that
will be launched before the space station(s) to be replaced is retired
from service or within a reasonable time after loss of a space station
during launch or due to premature failure in orbit.
(2) The procedures in paragraphs (e), (f), and (g) of this section
do not apply to an application granted with a condition to share
spectrum pursuant to Sec. 25.261.
* * * * *
0
12. Revise Sec. 25.161(a) to read as follows:
Sec. 25.161 Automatic termination of station authorization.
* * * * *
(a)(1) The failure to meet an applicable milestone specified in
Sec. 25.164(a) and/or (b), if no authorized space station is
functional in orbit;
(2) The failure to meet an applicable milestone specified in Sec.
25.164(b)(1) or (b)(2), if at least one authorized space station is
functional in orbit, which failure will result in the termination of
authority for the number, type, and orbital parameters of space
stations not in orbit as of the milestone date; or
(3) The failure to meet any other milestone or construction
requirement imposed as a condition of authorization. In the case of a
space station authorization when at least one authorized space station
is functional in orbit, however, such termination will be with respect
to only the authorization for any space stations not in orbit as of the
milestone date.
* * * * *
0
13. In Sec. 25.164, revise paragraphs (a), (b), and (g) to read as
follows:
Sec. 25.164 Milestones.
(a) The recipient of an initial license for a GSO space station,
other than a DBS space station, SDARS space station, or replacement
space station as defined in Sec. 25.165(e), must launch the space
station, position it in its assigned orbital location, and operate it
in accordance with the station authorization no later than five years
after the grant of the license, unless a different schedule is
established by Title 47, Chapter I, or the Commission.
(b)(1) The recipient of an initial authorization for an NGSO
satellite system, other than an SDARS system, must launch 75 percent of
the maximum number of space stations authorized for service, place them
in their assigned orbits, and operate them in accordance with the
station authorization no later than six years after the grant of the
authorization, unless a different schedule is established by Title 47,
Chapter I, or the Commission. This paragraph does not apply to
replacement NGSO space stations as defined in Sec. 25.165(e).
(2) A licensee that satisfies the requirement in paragraph (b)(1)
of this section must launch the remaining space stations necessary to
complete its authorized service constellation, place them in their
assigned orbits, and operate each of them in accordance with the
authorization no later than nine years after the grant of the
authorization.
* * * * *
(g) Licensees of satellite systems that include both NGSO
satellites and GSO satellites must meet the requirement in paragraph
(a) of this section with respect to the GSO satellite(s) and the
applicable requirements in paragraph (b) of this section with respect
to the NGSO satellites.
* * * * *
0
14. In Sec. 25.165, revise paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 25.165 Surety bonds.
* * * * *
(c) A licensee will be considered to be in default with respect to
a bond filed pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section if it surrenders
the license before meeting the applicable milestone requirement(s) in
Sec. 25.164(a) and/or (b)(1) or if it fails to satisfy any such
milestone.
(d) A licensee will be relieved of its bond obligation under
paragraph (a) of this section upon a Commission finding that the
licensee has satisfied the applicable milestone requirement(s) in Sec.
25.164(a) and/or (b)(1) for the authorization.
* * * * *
0
15. Revise Sec. 25.202(a)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 25.202 Frequencies, frequency tolerance, and emission limits.
(a)(1) In addition to the frequency-use restrictions set forth in
Sec. 2.106 of this chapter, the following restrictions apply:
(i) In the 27.5-28.35 GHz band, the FSS (Earth-to-space) is
secondary to the Upper Microwave Flexible Use Service authorized
pursuant to part 30 of this chapter, except for FSS operations
associated with earth stations authorized pursuant to Sec. 25.136.
(ii) Use of the 37.5-40 GHz band by the FSS (space-to-Earth) is
limited to individually licensed earth stations. Earth stations in this
band must not be ubiquitously deployed and must not be used to serve
individual consumers.
* * * * *
0
16. In Sec. 25.208, revise the section heading, paragraph (c)
introductory text, the first sentence of paragraph (e), and
[[Page 3272]]
paragraphs (f), (g), (h), (j), and (k) to read as follows:
Sec. 25.208 Power flux-density limits.
* * * * *
(c) For a GSO space station in the 17.7-19.7 GHz, 22.55-23.55 GHz,
or 24.45-24.75 GHz bands, or for an NGSO space station in the 22.55-
23.55 GHz or 24.45-24.75 GHz bands, the PFD at the Earth's surface
produced by emissions for all conditions and for all methods of
modulation must not exceed the following values:
* * * * *
(e) For an NGSO space station, the PFD at the Earth's surface
produced by emissions in the 17.8-18.6 GHz or 18.8-19.7 GHz bands, for
all conditions and for all methods of modulation, must not exceed the
following values, unless the aggregate PFD produced by the entire
authorized constellation at any point at the Earth's surface does not
exceed -115 ((dBW/m\2\)/MHz):
* * * * *
(f) The EPFD produced at any point in the geostationary-satellite
orbit by emissions from all the space stations in an NGSO FSS system
(EPFDis), in the frequency bands and Regions listed below,
for all conditions and for all methods of modulation, must not exceed
the given limits for the specified percentages of time. These limits
relate to the EPFD that would be obtained under free-space propagation
conditions into a reference antenna and in the reference bandwidth
specified below, for all pointing directions towards the Earth's
surface visible from any given location in the geostationary-satellite
orbit.
Limits to the EPFDIS Radiated by NGSO FSS Systems in Certain Frequency Bands
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage of
time during
EPFDdown which EPFDdown Reference Reference antenna
Frequency band (GHz) (dB(W/m\2\)) may not be bandwidth diameter and reference
exceeded (kHz) radiation pattern \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10.7-11.7, 12.5-12.75................. -160 100 40 4[deg] Recommendation
ITU-R S.672-4, Ls =-20
17.8-18.4, 19.3-19.4, 19.6-19.7....... -160 100 40 4[deg] Recommendation
ITU-R S.672-4, Ls =-20
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In this Table, the reference pattern of Recommendation ITU-R S. 672.4 must be used only for the calculation
of interference from NGSO FSS systems into GSO FSS networks. In applying the equations of Annex 1 to
Recommendation ITU-R S.672-4, the parabolic main beam equation must start at zero.
(g) In the frequency bands and Regions listed in Tables IG through
4G below, the single-entry EPFD in the space-to-Earth direction
(EPFDdown) at any point on the Earth's surfaceproduced by
emissions from all co-frequency space stations of a single NGSO FSS
system must not exceed limits for the given percentages of time.
Table 1G--Limits to the EPFDDOWN Radiated by NGSO FSS Systems in Certain Frequency Bands \1\ \2\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage of
time during
EPFDdown which EPFDdown Reference Reference antenna
Frequency band (GHz) (dB(W/m\2\)) may not be bandwidth diameter and reference
exceeded (kHz) radiation pattern \3\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10.7-11.7 in all Regions; 11.7-12.2 in -175.4 0 40 60 cm Recommendation ITU-
Region 2; 12.2-12.5 in Region 3; and -174 90 R S.1428-1.
12.5-12.75 in Regions 1 and 3. -170.8 99
-165.3 99.73
-160.4 99.991
-160 99.997
-160 100
-181.9 0 40 1.2 m Recommendation ITU-
-178.4 99.5 R S.1428-1.
-173.4 99.74
-173 99.857
-164 99.954
-161.6 99.984
-161.4 99.991
-160.8 99.997
-160.5 99.997
-160 99.9993
-160 100
[[Page 3273]]
-190.45 0 40 3 m Recommendation ITU-R
-189.45 90 S.1428-1.
-187.45 99.5
-182.4 99.7
-182 99.855
-168 99.971
-164 99.988
-162 99.995
-160 99.999
-160 100
-195.45 0 40 10 m Recommendation ITU-
-195.45 99 R S.1428-1.
-190 99.65
-190 99.71
-172.5 99.99
-160 99.998
-160 100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In addition to the limits shown in Table 1G, the limits shown in Table 2G apply to all antenna sizes greater
than 60 cm in the frequency bands listed in Table 1G.
\2\ For each reference antenna diameter, the limit consists of the complete curve on a plot which is linear in
decibels for the EPFDdown levels and logarithmic for the time percentages, with straight lines joining the
data points.
\3\ The earth station antenna reference patterns are to be used only for the calculation of interference from
NGSO FSS systems into GSO FSS networks.
Table 2G--Limits to the EPFDDOWN Radiated by NGSO FSS Systems at Certain Latitudes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
100% of the time EPFDdown (dB(W/(m\2\/40 kHz)))
Latitude (North or South in degrees)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-160............................................ 0 <[verbar] Latitude [verbar] <= 57.5.
-160 + 3.4(57.5 - [verbar] Latitude [verbar])/4. 57.5 <[verbar] Latitude [verbar] <= 63.75.
-165.3.......................................... 63.75 <=[verbar] Latitude [verbar].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3G--Limits to the EPFDDOWN Radiated by NGSO FSS Systems in Certain Frequency Bands \2\ \4\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage of
time during
EPFDdown which EPFDdown Reference Reference antenna
Frequency band (GHz) (dB(W/m\2\)) may not be bandwidth diameter and reference
exceeded (kHz) radiation pattern \3\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
17.8-18.6............................. -175.4 0 40 1 m Recommendation ITU-R
-175.4 90 S.1428-1.
19.3-19.4............................. -172.5 99
-167 99.714
19.6-19.7............................. -164 99.971
-164 100
-161.4 0 1000
-161.4 90
-158.5 99
-153 99.714
-150 99.971
-150 100
-178.4 0 40 2 m Recommendation ITU-R
S.1428-1.
-178.4 99.4
-171.4 99.9
-170.5 99.913
-166 99.971
-164 99.977
-164 100
-164.4 0 1000
-164.4 99.4
-157.4 99.9
-156.5 99.913
[[Page 3274]]
-152 99.971
-150 99.977
-150 100
-185.4 0 40 5 m Recommendation ITU-R
-185.4 99.8 S.1428-1.
-180 99.8
-180 99.943
-172 99.943
-164 99.998
-164 100
-171.4 0 1000
-171.4 99.8
-166 99.8
-166 99.943
-158 99.943
-150 99.998
-150 100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ An NGSO satellite system must meet the limits of Table 3G in both the 40 kHz and the 1 MHz reference
bandwidths.
Table 4G--Limits to the EPFDDOWN Radiated by NGSO FSS Systems in Certain Frequency Bands \2\ \4\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage of
time during
EPFDdown which EPFDdown Reference Reference antenna
Frequency band (GHz) (dB(W/m\2\)) may not be bandwidth diameter and reference
exceeded (kHz) radiation pattern \3\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19.7-20.2............................. -187.4 0 40 70 cm Recommendation ITU-
-182 71.429 R S.1428-1.
-172 97.143
-154 99.983
-154 100
-173.4 0 1000
-168 71.429
-158 97.143
-140 99.983
-140 100
-190.4 0 40 90 cm Recommendation ITU-
-181.4 91 R S.1428-1.
-170.4 99.8
-168.6 99.8
-165 99.943
-160 99.943
-154 99.997
-154 100
-176.4 0 1000
-167.4 91
-156.4 99.8
-154.6 99.8
-151 99.943
-146 99.943
-140 99.997
-140 100
-196.4 0 40 2.5 m Recommendation ITU-
-162 99.98 R S.1428-1.
-154 99.99943
-154 100
-182.4 0 1000
-148 99.98
-140 99.99943
-140 100
[[Page 3275]]
-200.4 0 40 5 m Recommendation ITU-R
-189.4 90 S.1428-1.
-187.8 94
-184 97.143
-175 99.886
-164.2 99.99
-154.6 99.999
-154 99.9992
-154 100
-186.4 0 1000
-175.4 90
-173.8 94
-170 97.143
-161 99.886
-150.2 99.99
-140.6 99.999
-140 99.9992
-140 100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note to paragraph (g): These limits relate to the EPFD that would
be obtained under free-space propagation conditions for all conditions
and for all methods of modulation. (h) In the frequency bands and
Regions listed in Tables 1H through 4H below, the aggregate EPFD in the
space-to-Earth direction (EPFDdown) at any point on the
Earth's surface produced by emissions from all co-frequency space
stations of all NGSO FSS systems must not exceed the specified limits
for the given percentages of time.
Table 1H--Limits on Aggregate EPFDDOWN Radiated by NGSO FSS Systems in Certain Frequency Bands \1\ \2\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage of
time during
EPFDdown which EPFDdown Reference Reference antenna
Frequency band (GHz) (dB(W/m\2\)) may not be bandwidth diameter and reference
exceeded (kHz) radiation pattern \3\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10.7-11.7 in all Regions; 11.7-12.2 in -170 0 40 60 cm Recommendation ITU-
Region 2; 12.2-12.5 in Region 3; and -168.6 90 R S.1428.
12.5-12.75 in Regions 1 and 3. -165.3 99
-160.4 99.97
-160 99.99
-160 100
-176.5 0 40 1.2 m Recommendation ITU-
-173 99.5 R S.1428.
-164 99.84
-161.6 99.945
-164.4 99.97
-160.8 99.99
-160.5 99.99
-160 99.9975
-160 100
-185 0 40 3 m Recommendation ITU-R
-184 90 S.1428.
-182 ..............
-168 99.5
-164 99.9
-162 99.96
-160 99.982
-160 99.997
100
[[Page 3276]]
-190 0 40 10 m Recommendation ITU-
-190 99 R S.1428.
-166 99.99
-160 99.998
-160 100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In addition to the limits shown in Table 1H, the aggregate EPFDdown limits shown in Table 2H apply to all
antenna sizes greater than 60 cm in the frequency bands listed in Table 1H.
\2\ For each reference antenna diameter, the limit consists of the complete curve on a plot which is linear in
decibels for the EPFDdown levels and logarithmic for the time percentages, with straight lines joining the
data points.
\3\ The earth station antenna reference patterns are to be used only for the calculation of interference from
NGSO FSS systems into GSO FSS networks.
Table 2H-- Limits on Aggregate EPFDDOWN Radiated by NGSO FSS Systems at Certain Latitudes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
100% of the time EPFDdown (dB(W/(m\2\/40 kHz)))
Latitude (North or South in degrees)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-160............................................ 0 <[verbar] Latitude [verbar] <= 57.5.
-160 + 3.4(57.5 - [verbar] Latitude [verbar])/4. 57.5 <[verbar] Latitude [verbar] <= 63.75.
-165.3.......................................... 63.75 <=[verbar] Latitude [verbar].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3H--Limits on Aggregate EPFDDOWN Radiated by NGSO FSS Systems in Certain Frequency Bands \2\ \4\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage of
time during
EPFDdown which EPFDdown Reference Reference antenna
Frequency band (GHz) (dB(W/m\2\)) may not be bandwidth diameter and reference
exceeded (kHz) radiation pattern \3\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
17.8-18.6............................. -170 0 40 1 m Recommendation ITU-R
-170 90 S.1428.
19.3-19.4............................. -164 99.9
-164 100
19.6-19.7............................. -156 0 1000
-156 90
-150 99.9
-150 100
-173 0 40 2 m Recommendation ITU-R
-173 99.4 S.1428.
-166 99.9
-164 99.92
-164 100
-159 0 1000
-159 99.4
-152 99.9
-150 99.92
-150 100
-180 0 40 5 m Recommendation ITU-R
-180 99.8 S.1428.
-172 99.8
-164 99.992
-164 100
-166 0 1000
-166 99.8
-158 99.8
-150 99.992
-150 100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ An NGSO system must meet the limits of this Table in both the 40 kHz and the 1 MHz reference bandwidths.
[[Page 3277]]
Table 4H--Limits on Aggregate EPFDDOWN Radiated by NGSO FSS Systems in Certain Frequency Band \2\ \4\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage of
time during
EPFDdown which EPFDdown Reference Reference antenna
Frequency band (GHz) (dB(W/m\2\)) may not be bandwidth diameter and reference
exceeded (kHz) radiation pattern \3\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19.7-20.2............................. -182 0 40 70 cm Recommendation ITU-
-172 90 R S.1428.
-154 99.94
-154 100
-168 0 1000
-158 90
-140 99.94
-140 100
-185 0 40 90 cm Recommendation ITU-
-176 91 R S.1428.
-165 99.8
-160 99.8
-154 99.99
-154 100
-171 0 1000
-162 91
-151 99.8
-146 99.8
-140 99.99
-140 100
-191 0 40 2.5 m
-162 99.933 Recommendation
-154 99.998 ITU-R S.1428
-154 100
-177 0 1000
-148 99.933
-140 99.998
-140 100
-195 0 40 5 m Recommendation ITU-R
-184 90 S.1428.
-175 99.6
-161 99.984
-154 99.9992
-154 100
-181 0 1000
-170 90
-161 99.6
-147 99.984
-140 99.9992
-140 100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note to paragraph (h): These limits relate to the EPFD, which would
be obtained under free-space propagation conditions, for all conditions
and for all methods of modulation.
* * * * *
(j) In the frequency bands and Regions listed in Tables 1J and 2J,
the operational EPFD in the space-to-Earth direction (operational
EPFDdown) at any point on the Earth's surface, produced by
actual operational emissions from the in-line co-frequency space
station of an NGSO FSS system, must never exceed the specified
operational limits:
Table 1J--Operational Limits to the EPFDDOWN Radiated by NGSO FSS Systems in Certain Frequency Bands \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage of
time during GSO system Orbital
EPFDdown (dB(W/ which EPFDdown Reference receive earth inclination of
Frequency band (GHz) m \2\)) may not be bandwidth station the GSO
exceeded (kHz) antenna gain satellite
(dBi) (degrees)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10.7-11.7 in all Regions...... -163 100 40 3 <=2.5
11.7-12.2 in Region 2......... -166 .............. .............. 6
12.2-12.5 in region 3, and.... -167.5 .............. .............. 9
12.5-12.75 in Region 1 and 3 -169.5 .............. .............. >=18 ................
(prior to 31 December 2005)..
[[Page 3278]]
-160 100 40 3 >=2.5 and <=4.5.
-163 6
-164.5 9
-166.5 >=18
10.7-11.7 in all Regions;..... -161.25 100 40 3 <=2.5.
11.7-12.2 in Region 2;........ -164 .............. .............. 6
12.2-12.5 in Region 3;........ -165.5 .............. .............. 9
and 12.5-12.75 in Regions 1 -167.5 .............. .............. >=18
and 3 (from 31 December 2005)
-158.25 100 40 3 >=2.5 and <=4.5.
-161 6
-162.5 9
-164.5 >=18
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The operational limits on the EPFDdown radiated by NGSO FSS systems must be the values given in Table 2G or
this table, whichever are the more stringent.
\2\ For antenna diameters between the values given in this table, the limits are given by linear interpolation
using a linear scale for EPFDdown in decibels and a logarithmic scale for antenna diameter in meters.
Table 2J--Operational Limits to the EPFDDOWN Radiated by NGSO FSS Systems in Certain Frequency Bands \3\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage of
time during GSO system
EPFDdown (dB(W/ which EPFDdown Reference receive earth Orbital inclination of the GSO satellite
Frequency band (GHz) m \2\)) may not be bandwidth station (degrees)
exceeded (kHz) antenna gain
(dBi)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19.7-20.2................................. -157 100 40 >=49 <=2.5
-157 100 40 \3\ >=43 <=2.5
-155 100 40 >=49 >2.5 and <=4.5
19.7-20.2................................. -143 100 1000 >=49 <=2.5
-143 100 1000 \3\ >=43> <=2.5
-141 100 1000 >=49 >2.5 and <=4.5
17.8-18.6................................. -164 100 40 >=49 <=2.5
19.3-19.4................................. -162 100 40 >=49 >2.5 and <=4.5
19.6-19.7.................................
17.8-18.6................................. -150 100 1000 >=49 <=2.5
19.3-19.4................................. -148 100 1000 >=49 >2.5 and <=4.5
19.6-19.7.................................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The operational limit applies to NGSO systems operating at altitudes of 7000 km or above in order to protect GSO FSS networks employing adaptive
coding.
Note to paragraph (j): These limits relate to the operational EPFD
which would be obtained under free-space propagation conditions, for
all conditions, for all methods of modulation and for the specified
inclined GSO FSS operations.
(k) In the frequency bands and Regions listed in the following
Table, the EPFD in the Earth-to-space direction (EPFDup)
produced at any point on the GSO by the emissions from all co-frequency
earth stations in an NGSO FSS system, for all conditions and for all
methods of modulation, must not exceed the specified limits for the
given percentages of time:
Limits to the EPFDUP Radiated by NGSO FSS Systems in Certain Frequency Bands
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage of
time during
EPFDup (dB(W/m which EPFDup Reference Reference antenna
Frequency band (GHz) \2\)) may not be bandwidth beamwidth and reference
exceeded (kHz) radiation pattern \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12.5-12.75............................ -160 100 40 4 [deg] Recommendation
ITU-R S.672-4, Ls = -
20.
12.75-13.25
13.75-14.5
17.3-18.1 (Regions 1 and 3)........... -160 100 40 4 [deg] Recommendation
ITU-R S.672-4, Ls = -
20.
17.8-18.1 (Region 2) \2\
27.5-28.6............................. -162 100 40 1.55 [deg]
Recommendation ITU-R
S.672-4, Ls = -20.
29.3-30............................... -162 100 40 1.55 [deg]
Recommendation ITU-R
S.672-4, Ls = -20.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For the case of Ls = -10, the values a = 1.83 and b = 6.32 should be used in the equations in the Annex of
Recommendation ITU-R S.672-4 for single-feed circular beams. In all cases of Ls, the parabolic main beam
equation should start at zero.
[[Page 3279]]
\2\ This EPFDup level also applies to the 17.3-17.8 GHz band to protect BSS feeder links in Region 2 from NGSO
FSS Earth-to-space transmissions in Regions 1 and 3.
Note to paragraph (k): These limits relate to the uplink EPFD, which would be obtained under free-space
propagation conditions, for all conditions and for all methods of modulation.
* * * * *
0
17. In Sec. 25.217, revise paragraphs (b)(1) and (c)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 25.217 Default service rules.
* * * * *
(b)(1) For all NGSO-like satellite licenses for which the
application was filed pursuant to the procedures set forth in Sec.
25.157 after August 27, 2003, authorizing operations in a frequency
band for which the Commission has not adopted frequency band-specific
service rules at the time the license is granted, the licensee will be
required to comply with the following technical requirements,
notwithstanding the frequency bands specified in these rule provisions:
Sec. Sec. 25.143(b)(2)(ii), (iii), 25.204(e), 25.210(f), (i).
* * * * *
(c)(1) For all GSO-like satellite licenses for which the
application was filed pursuant to the procedures set forth in Sec.
25.158 after August 27, 2003, authorizing operations in a frequency
band for which the Commission has not adopted frequency band-specific
service rules at the time the license is granted, the licensee will be
required to comply with the following technical requirements,
notwithstanding the frequency bands specified in these rule provisions:
Sec. Sec. 25.143(b)(2)(iv), 25.204(e), 25.210(f), (i), (j).
* * * * *
0
18. Revise Sec. 25.261 to read as follows:
Sec. 25.261 Procedures for avoidance of in-line interference among
NGSO FSS systems.
(a) Scope. This section applies to NGSO FSS satellite systems that
communicate with earth stations with directional antennas and that
operate under a Commission license or grant of U.S. market access under
this part in the 10.7-12.7 GHz (space-to-Earth), 12.75-13.25 GHz
(Earth-to-space), 13.75-14.5 GHz (Earth-to-space), 17.8-18.6 GHz
(space-to-Earth), 18.8-19.4 GHz (space-to-Earth), 19.6-20.2 GHz (space-
to-Earth), 27.5-29.1 GHz (Earth-to-space), or 29.3-30 GHz (Earth-to-
space) bands.
(b) Definition of ``In-line event.'' For purposes of this section,
an ``in-line event'' associated with a specific frequency range occurs
when there is physical alignment of space stations of two or more NGSO
FSS satellite systems authorized to use this frequency range with an
operating earth station of one of these systems such that the angular
separation between operational links of the satellite systems is less
than 10[deg] as measured at the earth station.
(c) Default procedure. Unless otherwise coordinated pursuant to
paragraph (d) of this section, NGSO FSS satellite operators
experiencing an in-line event must divide their commonly assigned
spectrum in accordance with the following procedure:
(1) Each of n (number of) satellite systems involved in a
particular in-line event must select 1/n of the commonly assigned
frequency range for its ``home'' spectrum. The selection order for each
satellite system will be determined by the date that the first space
station in the satellite system commences operation.
(2) The affected space station(s) of the respective satellite
systems must operate only in the selected (1/n) spectrum associated
with its satellite system, its home spectrum, for the duration of the
in-line event.
(3) All affected space station(s) may resume operations throughout
the frequency range associated with the in-line event once the angular
separation between the space stations exceeds 10[deg].
(d) Coordination procedure. Any coordination procedure agreed among
the affected operating satellite systems, which allows operations of
the satellite systems when each system's respective space stations are
within the 10 degree avoidance angle associated with an in-line event,
will supersede the default procedure of paragraph (c) of this section.
All parties must coordinate in good faith.
0
19. Revise Sec. 25.271(e) to read as follows:
Sec. 25.271 Control of transmitting stations.
* * * * *
(e) The licensee or market access recipient for an NGSO FSS
satellite system operating in the 10.7-14.5 GHz, 17.8-18.6 GHz, 18.8-
19.4 GHz, 19.6-20.2 GHz, 27.5-29.1 GHz, or 29.3-30 GHz bands must
maintain an electronic Web site bulletin board to list the satellite
ephemeris data for each satellite in the constellation, using the North
American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) two-line orbital element
format. The orbital elements must be updated at least once every three
days.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-31795 Filed 1-10-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P