Taking of Threatened or Endangered Marine Mammals Incidental to Commercial Fishing Operations; Proposed Issuance of Permit, 2954-2960 [2017-00265]
Download as PDF
2954
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2017 / Notices
and recommend programs, policies, and
actions to help the Department in its
efforts to ensure that U.S. trading
partners comply with their trade
agreement commitments; and
recommend ways that the Department’s
trade enforcement and compliance
policies and programs can better
support a strong trade and
manufacturing agenda and enhance the
commercial competitiveness of the
United States. The ACTEC shall act as
a liaison with the stakeholders
represented by the membership, and
shall provide a forum for stakeholder
input regarding current and emerging
issues in trade enforcement and
compliance matters. The Department of
Commerce will publish a notice in
January soliciting nominations for
membership on the ACTEC.
DATES: Effective January 10, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Meredith Rutherford, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Room 3089, Washington, DC
20230; telephone: 202 482 6199; email:
meredith.rutherford@trade.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
I. Background and Authority
The ACTEC is established in
accordance with the provisions of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended, 5 U.S.C. App., to advise the
Secretary on matters relating to relating
to the Department’s statutory missions
to enforce U.S. trade remedy laws and
seek foreign government compliance
with trade agreements. The Department
affirms that the creation of the ACTEC
is necessary and in the public interest.
The Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, shall serve as the Executive
Director of the ACTEC. The Executive
Director shall designate both the
Designated Federal Officer (DFO) and a
Secondary DFO from among the
employees of the International Trade
Administration’s Enforcement and
Compliance unit. The DFO serves as the
ACTEC Executive Secretary.
The ACTEC shall advise the Secretary
on laws and government policies that
deal with trade enforcement; identify
and recommend programs, policies, and
actions to help the Department in its
efforts to ensure that U.S. trading
partners comply with their trade
agreement commitments; and
recommend ways that the Department’s
enforcement and compliance activities
can better support a strong trade and
manufacturing agenda and advance the
commercial competitiveness of U.S.
firms and workers.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:59 Jan 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
The ACTEC shall act as a liaison with
the stakeholders represented by the
membership, and shall provide a forum
for stakeholders on current and
emerging issues concerning trade
enforcement and compliance matters.
The ACTEC shall report to the
Secretary on its activities and
recommendations regarding the
Department’s trade enforcement and
compliance efforts. In creating its
reports, the ACTEC should survey and
evaluate the trade enforcement and
compliance concerns of its stakeholders,
should identify and examine specific
trade problems that require attention,
and should examine the needs in this
area to inform the ACTEC’s efforts. The
ACTEC should recommend specific
solutions to the problems and needs it
identifies.
II. Structure, Membership, and
Operation
The ACTEC shall consist of no more
than twenty members appointed by the
Secretary. Members shall represent U.S.
entities involved in and significantly
affected by imports and/or those that
heavily export to, or operate in,
countries with which the United States
has trade agreements.
All members must be U.S. Nationals
and shall be selected based on their
ability to carry out the objectives of the
ACTEC, in accordance with applicable
Department of Commerce guidelines, in
a manner that ensures the ACTEC is
balanced in terms of points of view,
demographics, industry sector,
geography of both production
infrastructure and product inputs, and
company size. Members shall also
represent a broad range of products and
services and shall be drawn from large,
medium, and small enterprises, private
sector organizations, and other entities,
such as, non-governmental
organizations, associations, and
economic development organizations.
Members shall serve in a representative
capacity, representing the views and
interests of their sponsoring entities and
those of their particular industrial and
regional sector (as applicable); they are,
therefore, not Special Government
Employees. Appointments to the
ACTEC shall be made without regard to
political affiliation.
Members serve for a term of two years
and will serve at the pleasure of the
Secretary. The Secretary may at his/her
discretion reappoint any member to an
additional term or terms, provided that
the member proves to work effectively
on the ACTEC and his/her knowledge
and advice are still needed.
The Secretary shall designate the
ACTEC chair and vice chair or vice
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
chairs from among the members of the
ACTEC. The Executive Director may
establish subcommittees from among
the ACTEC members, in order to
perform specific functions within the
jurisdiction of the ACTEC, subject to the
provisions of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA), the FACA
implementing regulations, and
applicable Department of Commerce
guidance. Subcommittees must report
back to the parent committee and do not
provide advice or work product directly
to the Secretary.
III. Compensation
Members will not be compensated for
their services or reimbursed for their
travel expenses.
Dated: January 4, 2017.
Steven Presing,
Executive Director for Trade Agreements
Policy and Negotiations.
[FR Doc. 2017–00254 Filed 1–9–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE909
Taking of Threatened or Endangered
Marine Mammals Incidental to
Commercial Fishing Operations;
Proposed Issuance of Permit
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
We, the National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS), are proposing
to issue a permit for a period of three
years to authorize the incidental, but not
intentional, take of two stocks of marine
mammals listed as threatened or
endangered under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA), under the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), by the
California (CA) thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet fishery (>14 inch
mesh) and the Washington (WA)/
Oregon (OR)/CA sablefish pot fishery. In
accordance with the MMPA, NMFS
issues this permit provided that it can
make the determination that: The
incidental take will have a negligible
impact on the affected stocks; a recovery
plan for all affected stocks of threatened
or endangered marine mammals has
been developed or is being developed;
and as required by the MMPA, a take
reduction plan and monitoring program
have been implemented, and vessels in
the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2017 / Notices
gillnet fishery (>14 inch mesh) and the
WA/OR/CA sablefish pot fisheries are
registered. We have made a preliminary
determination that incidental taking
from commercial fishing will have a
negligible impact on the ESA-listed
humpback whale (CA/OR/WA stock)
and sperm whale (CA/OR/WA stock).
Recovery plans have been completed for
humpback and sperm whales. We solicit
public comments on the draft negligible
impact determination (NID) and on the
proposal to issue a permit to vessels that
operate in these fisheries for the taking
of affected endangered stocks of marine
mammals.
DATES: Comments on this action and
supporting documents must be received
by February 9, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document and the draft
negligible impact determination, which
are available on the Internet at the
following address: https://
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
protected_species/marine_mammals/
fisheries_interactions.html. Recovery
plans for these two species are available
on the Internet at the following address:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/recovery/
plans.htm#mammals.
You may submit comments on this
document or the draft negligible impact
determination, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2016–0129, by either of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20160129, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Send written comments to:
Chris Yates, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Protected Resources
Division, West Coast Region, 501 W.
Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200; Long Beach,
CA 90802. Comments may also be faxed
to (562) 980–4027. Include the identifier
‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2016–0129’’ in the
comments.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:59 Jan 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christina Fahy, NMFS West Coast
Region, (562) 980–4023 or
Christina.Fahy@noaa.gov; or Shannon
Bettridge, NMFS Office of Protected
Resources, (301) 427–8402 or
Shannon.Bettridge@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 101(a)(5)(E) of the MMPA, 16
U.S.C. 1361 et seq., states that NMFS, as
delegated by the Secretary of Commerce,
shall for a period of up to three years
allow the incidental taking of marine
mammal species listed under the ESA,
16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq., by persons using
vessels of the United States and those
vessels which have valid fishing permits
issued by the Secretary in accordance
with section 204(b) of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1824(b),
while engaging in commercial fishing
operations, if NMFS makes certain
determinations. NMFS must determine,
after notice and opportunity for public
comment, that: (1) Incidental mortality
and serious injury (M/SI) will have a
negligible impact on the affected species
or stock; (2) a recovery plan has been
developed or is being developed for
such species or stock under the ESA;
and (3) where required under section
118 of the MMPA, a monitoring program
has been established, vessels engaged in
such fisheries are registered in
accordance with section 118 of the
MMPA, and a take reduction plan has
been developed or is being developed
for such species or stock.
We propose to issue a permit under
MMPA section 101(a)(5)(E) to vessels
registered in the CA thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet fishery (>14 inch
mesh) to incidentally take individuals
from two stocks of endangered marine
mammals: The CA/OR/WA stock of
humpback whales (Megaptera
novaeangliae) and the CA/OR/WA stock
of sperm whales (Physeter
macrocephalus); and to vessels
registered in WA/OR/CA sablefish pot
fishery to incidentally take individuals
from the CA/OR/WA stock of humpback
whales. A history of MMPA section
101(a)(5)(E) permits related to these
stocks was included in previous notices
for other permits to take threatened or
endangered marine mammals incidental
to commercial fishing (e.g., 72 FR
60814, October 26, 2007; 78 FR 54553,
September 4, 2013) and is not repeated
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2955
here. The data for considering these
authorizations were reviewed
coincident with the 2016 MMPA List of
Fisheries (LOF; 81 FR 20550, April 8,
2016), the final 2015 U.S. Pacific Marine
Mammal Stock Assessment Report
(SAR) (Carretta et al. 2016), Carretta and
Moore (2014), Moore and Barlow (2014),
the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for
U.S. West Coast Fisheries for Highly
Migratory Species (HMS), recovery
plans for these species (available on the
Internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/recovery/plans.htm#mammals), the
best available scientific information and
available data, and other relevant
sources.
Based on observer data and marine
mammal injury reporting forms, vessels
operating in the Category I CA thresher
shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery
(>14 inch mesh) and the Category II
WA/OR/CA sablefish pot fishery are the
two Federally-managed Category I and II
fisheries that operate in the ranges of
affected stocks, namely the CA/OR/WA
stocks of humpback whale and sperm
whale, and are currently considered for
authorization. A brief description of
these fisheries can be found below. The
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet fishery (>14 inch mesh), is the
only Federally-managed Category I
fishery operating off the coast of
California. The WA/OR/CA sablefish
pot fishery is the only Federallymanaged Category II fishery operating
off the coasts of California, Oregon, and
Washington. All other Category II
fisheries that may interact with the
marine mammal stocks observed off the
coasts of California, Oregon, and
Washington are state-managed and are
not considered for authorization under
this permit; however, M/SI related to
these fisheries and all other human
sources was evaluated in the draft NID.
Participants in Category III fisheries are
not required to obtain incidental take
permits under MMPA section
101(a)(5)(E) but are required to report
any mortality or injury of marine
mammals incidental to their operations.
Basis for Determining Negligible Impact
Prior to issuing a permit to take ESAlisted marine mammals incidental to
commercial fishing, NMFS must
determine if the M/SI incidental to
commercial fisheries will have a
negligible impact on the affected species
or stocks of marine mammals. NMFS
satisfies this requirement through
completion of a NID. We clarify that for
purposes of the draft negligible impact
analysis, incidental M/SI from
commercial fisheries includes M/SI
from entanglement in fishing gear or
ingestion of fishing gear. Indirect effects,
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
2956
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2017 / Notices
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
such as the effects of removing prey
from habitat, are not included in this
analysis. A biological opinion prepared
under ESA section 7 considers direct
and indirect effects of Federal actions
(available at https://
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/), and
thus, contains a broader scope of
analysis than is required by MMPA
section 101(a)(5)(E).
Although the MMPA does not define
‘‘negligible impact,’’ NMFS has issued
regulations providing a qualitative
definition of ‘‘negligible impact’’ (50
CFR 216.103), and through scientific
analysis, peer review, and public notice
developed a quantitative approach for
determining negligible impact. As it
applies here, the definition of
‘‘negligible impact’’ is ‘‘an impact
resulting from the specified activity that
cannot be reasonably expected to, and is
not reasonably likely to adversely affect
the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
The development of the approach is
outlined in detail in the current draft
NID made available through this notice
and was described in previous notices
for other permits to take threatened or
endangered marine mammals incidental
to commercial fishing (e.g., 72 FR
60814, October 26, 2007; 78 FR 54553,
September 4, 2013).
Criteria for Determining Negligible
Impact
In 1999 NMFS adopted criteria for
making NIDs for MMPA 101(a)(5)(E)
permits (64 FR 28800, May 27, 1999). In
applying the 1999 criteria to determine
whether M/SI incidental to commercial
fisheries will have a negligible impact
on a listed marine mammal stock,
Criterion 1 is whether total humanrelated M/SI is less than 10 percent of
the stock’s potential biological removal
level (PBR). If total human-related M/SI
is less than 10 percent of PBR, the
analysis would be concluded, and the
impact would be determined to be
negligible. If Criterion 1 is not satisfied,
NMFS may use one of the other criteria
as appropriate. The remaining criteria
describe alternatives under certain
conditions. Criterion 2 is satisfied if the
total human-related M/SI is greater than
PBR, but commercial fisheries-related
M/SI is less than 10 percent of PBR. If
Criterion 2 is satisfied, vessels operating
in individual fisheries may be permitted
if management measures are being taken
to address non-fisheries-related
mortality and serious injury. Criterion 3
is satisfied if total commercial fisheriesrelated M/SI is greater than 10 percent
of PBR and less than PBR, and the
population is stable or increasing.
Fisheries may then be permitted subject
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:59 Jan 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
to individual review and certainty of
data. Criterion 4 stipulates that if the
population abundance of a stock is
declining, the threshold level of 10
percent of PBR will continue to be used.
Criterion 5 states that if total
commercial fisheries-related M/SI is
greater than PBR, permits may not be
issued for that species or stock.
We considered two time frames for
this analysis: 5 years (2010–2014) and
14 years (2001–2014). The first time
frame we considered for both stocks of
whales is the most recent five-year
period for which data are available and
have been analyzed (here, January 1,
2010 through December 31, 2014) and is
typically used for NID analyses. A fiveyear time frame in many cases provides
enough data to adequately capture yearto-year variations in take levels, while
reflecting current environmental and
fishing conditions, as they may change
over time. However, NMFS’ Guidelines
for Assessing Marine Mammal Stocks
(GAMMS) suggest that mortality
estimates could be averaged over as
many years as necessary to achieve a
coefficient of variation of less than or
equal to 0.3.
In addition, Carretta and Moore (2014)
recommend pooling longer time series
of data when bycatch is a rare event. For
example, pooling 10 years of fishery
data resulted in bycatch estimates
within 25 percent of the true bycatch
rate over 50 percent of the time (i.e.,
estimates were within 25 percent of the
true value more often than not). Key to
this approach was that the fishery must
have had sufficiently constant
characteristics (e.g., effort, gear,
locations) to support the inference of
consistent results across years such as
with the CA thresher shark/swordfish
drift gillnet fishery (≥14 inch mesh).
Rare bycatch events typically involve
smaller populations paired with low
observer coverage in a fishery. If true
bycatch mortality is low, but near PBR,
then estimation bias needs to be
reduced to allow reliable evaluation of
the bycatch estimate against a low
removal threshold.
Currently, the humpback whale and
the sperm whale stocks are the only
ESA-listed marine mammal species
interacting with the CA thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet fishery (≥14 inch
mesh) that meet the conditions
described in Carretta and Moore (2014):
These stocks have relatively small
minimum population estimates and
have been recorded as having been
incidentally killed or seriously injured
in rare events (in the CA thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet fishery (≥14 inch
mesh). The CA/OR/WA stock of
humpback whale has also been recorded
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
as having been rarely incidentally killed
or seriously injured in the WA/OR/CA
sablefish pot fishery.
In 2001, a time/area closure of the
drift gillnet fishery off central and
northern California/southern Oregon to
protect leatherback sea turtles was
implemented through regulations, and
resulted in a decrease in overall fishing
effort and a shift in effort to southern
California. Therefore, the post-2000 time
period best represents the current
spatial state of the fishery, so we used
the 14-year period post-2000 to
calculate mean annual mortality
estimate for these two stocks of whales,
based on recommendations contained in
the GAMMS and Carretta and Moore
(2014). This time frame also provides a
comprehensive look at the WA/OR/CA
sablefish pot fishery, given changes in
oceanographic conditions, fishing
practices, and reporting and stranding
records.
A conservative, or precautionary,
approach is taken in these analyses for
evaluating the negligible impact of
fisheries and other sources of injury or
mortality, such as recreational fisheries
and ship strikes, on these stocks. In
certain cases, the maximum estimate of
M/SI was used for the calculations. For
example, if a ship strike occurred, but
M/SI was not observed on scene or
confirmed by necropsy of the stranded
animal, and if further review of reports
and other sources then confirmed M/SI,
it was assumed for purposes of this
analysis, that M/SI occurred.
Additionally, M/SI from unknown or
unidentified fisheries was
conservatively considered to be from
commercial fisheries. Furthermore, in
using two time frames for the negligible
impact analyses (2001–2014 and 2010–
2014), we took a precautionary
approach by ensuring that a NID could
be made for both time frames
considered.
Negligible Impact Determinations
Below is a summary of our
application of the negligible impact
criteria and determination regarding the
effects of commercial fisheries off the
U.S. west coast on the CA/OR/WA
stocks of humpback whale and sperm
whale.
Criterion 1 Analysis
Criterion 1 would be satisfied if the
total human-related M/SI is less than 10
percent of PBR.
The 5-year (2010–2014) average
annual human-related M/SI to the CA/
OR/WA stock of humpback whales is
6.8 or 62.0 percent of the PBR (11.0).
The 14-year (2001–2014) average annual
human-related M/SI to the CA/OR/WA
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2017 / Notices
stock of humpback whales is 5.1 or 46.4
percent of the PBR. The total annual
human-related M/SI for this stock of
humpback whales is not less than 10
percent of PBR for both time frames
considered.
The 5-year (2010–2014) average
annual human-related M/SI of the CA/
OR/WA stock of sperm whales is 0.6 or
22.2 percent of the PBR (2.7). The 14year (2001–2014) average annual
human-related M/SI to the CA/OR/WA
stock of sperm whales from all human
sources is 0.9 or 33.3 percent of the
PBR. The total annual human-caused
M/SI for this stock of sperm whales is
not less than 10 percent of the PBR for
both time frames considered.
Criterion 1 was not satisfied because
the total annual human-related M/SI for
these stocks is not less than 10 percent
of PBR for the time periods considered.
As a result, the other criteria must be
examined.
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
Criterion 2 Analysis
Criterion 2 would be satisfied if total
human-related M/SI is greater than PBR
and the total fisheries-related mortality
is less than 10 percent of PBR. This
criterion was not satisfied because total
human-related M/SI (detailed above) is
less than PBR, and total fisheries-related
mortality (detailed below) is greater
than 10 percent of PBR for each stock
(both time frames analyzed). As a result,
the other criteria were examined.
Criterion 3 Analysis
Unlike Criteria 1 and 2, which
examine total human-related M/SI
relative to PBR, Criterion 3 compares
total fisheries-related M/SI to PBR.
Criterion 3 would be satisfied if the total
commercial fisheries-related M/SI
(including state and Federal fisheries) is
greater than 10 percent of and less than
100 percent of PBR for each stock for the
respective time frame considered, and
the populations of these stocks are
considered to be stable or increasing. If
the Criterion is met, vessels may be
permitted subject to individual review
and certainty of data.
Criterion 3 was satisfied for the CA/
OR/WA humpback whale stock as the
annual average fishery-related M/SI
from all commercial fisheries is greater
than 10 percent of and less than 100
percent of PBR, and the population is
increasing (6–7 percent per year). The 5year (2010–2014) average annual
fishery-related M/SI from all
commercial fisheries for the CA/OR/WA
humpback whale stock is estimated at
5.6 or 51.0 percent of PBR and 4.1 or
37.3 percent of PBR for the 14-year
period (2001–2014), which is between
10 percent and 100 percent of PBR. In
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:59 Jan 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
addition, the stock has experienced a
positive growth rate (6–7 percent per
year). Accordingly, Criterion 3 is
satisfied in determining that M/SI of the
CA/OR/WA humpback whale stock
incidental to commercial fishing would
have a negligible impact on the stock.
In 2015, there was a significant
increase in reports of entangled
humpback whales off the U.S. west
coast, primarily in the state-managed
pot/trap fisheries. In addition, there
were two fatal ship strikes of humpback
whales. We evaluated the 2015
preliminary raw entanglement and ship
strike data to understand how future
data may impact this type of analysis.
Serious injury determinations for 2015
will be completed in early 2017. If not
all entanglements or ship strikes are
determined to be M/SI, it is possible to
conclude there is a negligible impact
under Criterion 3 for both the 15-year
and five-year time frames. Based on past
humpback whale injury determinations
from 2007 through 2014, 84 percent
were determined to be M/SI.
Criterion 3 was satisfied for the CA/
OR/WA sperm whale stock as the total
fishery-related M/SI is greater than 10
percent of and less than 100 percent of
PBR, and the population is stable. The
5-year (2010–2014) annual average
fishery-related M/SI from all
commercial fisheries for the CA/OR/WA
sperm whale stock is estimated at 0.4 or
14.8 percent of PBR and 0.6 or 22.2
percent of PBR for the 14-year average
(2001–2014), which is between 10
percent and 100 percent of PBR. The
population is considered to be stable.
In 2015, there were no reports of
entangled or ship-struck sperm whales.
Therefore, the addition of one more year
of data would not change the conclusion
reached in the draft NID.
Accordingly, Criterion 3 is satisfied in
determining that M/SI of the CA/OR/
WA sperm whale stock incidental to
commercial fishing would have a
negligible impact on the stock.
In conclusion, based on the criteria
outlined in 1999 (64 FR 28800), the final
2015 U.S. Pacific SAR (Carretta et al,.
2016), Carretta and Moore (2014), Moore
and Barlow (2014), and the best
available scientific information,
available data and other sources, NMFS
has determined that the M/SI incidental
to the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet fishery (≥14 inch mesh) and the
WA/OR/CA sablefish pot fishery will
have a negligible impact on the CA/OR/
WA stock of humpback whales and the
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet fishery (≥14 inch mesh) will have
a negligible impact on the CA/OR/WA
stock of sperm whales. NMFS therefore
proposes to issue the MMPA
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2957
101(a)(5)(E) permit. Specifically, NMFS
proposes that vessels operating in these
identified commercial fisheries within
the range of the CA/OR/WA humpback
and sperm whale stocks may be
permitted subject to individual review
of the fishery and the certainty of
relevant data, and provided that the
other provisions of section 101(a)(5)(E)
are met.
Description of Fisheries
The following is an individual review
of the two Federally-authorized fisheries
classified as Category I and II in the
2016 LOF (81 FR 20550) which are
known through observer records, fisher
self-reports, and confirmed
entanglement reports to kill or seriously
injure ESA-listed marine mammals
incidental to commercial fishing
operations. Detailed descriptions of
those fisheries can be found in the
NMFS (2011) Biological Opinion on the
operation of the Pacific groundfish
fishery, which includes the WA/OR/CA
sablefish pot fishery; the NMFS (2013)
Biological Opinion for the CA thresher
shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery (≥14
inch mesh); the 2015 SAR (Carretta et al.
2016); and the draft NID.
California Thresher Shark/Swordfish
Drift Gillnet Fishery (>14 Inch Mesh)
Participants in the CA thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet fishery (≥14 inch
mesh) are required to have a valid
permit issued annually by the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife. In
accordance with MMPA section 118(c),
only those vessels participating in the
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet fishery (≥14 inch mesh) that have
registered with the Marine Mammal
Authorization Program are authorized to
take marine mammals incidental to their
fishing operations. Vessels holding this
authorization must comply with the
Pacific Offshore Cetacean Take
Reduction Plan and implementing
regulations. Any vessel that violates
regulations will be subject to
enforcement action. The estimated
number of vessels in the fishery is based
upon the number of vessels that
indicated intent to participate in the
fishery according to historical reference
and may not be an accurate estimate of
the number of vessels actively engaged
in fishing in any given year. The CA
thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet
fishery (≥14 inch mesh) is a limited
entry program, managed with gear,
seasons, and area closures. The number
of vessels participating in the CA
thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet
fishery (≥14 inch mesh) has decreased
from 148 permits issued and 98 active
vessels in 1998 to 72 permits issued and
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
2958
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2017 / Notices
18 active vessels in 2016. Information
on the number of active permit holders
was obtained from the ‘‘Status of the
U.S. west coast fisheries for HMS
through 2004; Stock Assessment and
Fishery Evaluation’’ report, available
from the Pacific Fishery Management
Council Web site (www.pcouncil.org).
The fishery targets swordfish and
thresher shark. It operates outside of
state waters to about 150 nautical miles
(nm) offshore ranging from the U.S./
Mexico border in the south to the
Oregon border in the north, depending
on sea surface temperature conditions.
Regulations restrict the fishery to waters
outside 200 nm from February 1 through
April 30, and outside 75 nm from May
1 through August 14, while allowing
fishing inside 75 nm from August 15
through January 31. Vessels in this
fishery targeting swordfish tend to set
on warm ocean water temperature
breaks, which do not appear along the
California coast until late summer.
Because of these restrictions, vessels are
not active during February, March, and
April, and very little fishing effort
occurs during the months of May, June,
and July.
In 2001, a seasonal (15 August–15
November) area closure was
implemented in the CA thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet fishery (≥14 inch
mesh) north of Point Conception, to
protect leatherback turtles that feed in
the area and were observed entangled in
previous fishing seasons. Additional
seasonal/area closures in southern
California have been established in the
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet fishery to protect loggerhead
turtles during a forecast or occurring El
˜
Nino event during the months of June,
July and/or August.
The NMFS West Coast Region has
operated an at-sea observer program in
the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet fishery (≥14 inch mesh) since
July 1990 to the present. The objectives
of the NMFS observer program are to
record, among other things, information
on non-target fish species and protected
species interactions. NMFS typically
targets 20 percent observer coverage of
the annual sets by the CA thresher
shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery (≥14
inch mesh) fleet, with close to 100
percent of net retrievals monitored on
observed trips for, among other things,
species identification and enumeration.
WA/OR/CA Sablefish Pot Fishery
The WA/OR/CA sablefish pot fishery
targets sablefish using trapezoid,
conical, or rectangular steel frame traps,
wrapped with ≥2 inch nylon webbing.
The fishery generally sets gear at depths
between 80 and 300 fathoms off the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:59 Jan 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
west coast of the U.S. The fishery is
managed under regulations
implementing the Pacific Coast
Groundfish FMP developed by the
Pacific Fishery Management Council.
There are four distinct segments of the
Pacific coast groundfish fishery where
sablefish may be harvested, by some or
all of the participants, with pot gear:
Limited entry fixed gear sablefish
primary fishery and daily trip limit
fishery; the trawl individual fishing
quota (IFQ) fishery when vessels are
‘‘gear switching’’ (allowed since 2011);
and the open access sablefish daily trip
limit fishery. Further information about
each of these segments of the groundfish
fishery that may harvest sablefish with
pot gear is provided below.
The limited entry fixed gear sablefish
primary fishery occurs between 36° N.
latitude (lat.) and the U.S.—Canada
border and requires at least one limited
entry permit, with both a fixed gear
endorsement and a sablefish
endorsement, be registered to a vessel.
The primary fishery is composed of a
three-tier system of cumulative landing
quotas within a restricted season, from
April 1 to October 31. Permits were
assigned to a tier based on landing
history when the system originally
began in 1998. There are 32 Limited
Entry Permits issued for the sablefish
trap fishery on the West Coast. Fishing
outside of the primary season or after
fulfillment of tier quota is allowed,
subject to limited entry fixed gear
weekly and two-month cumulative
limits. The limited entry permits are
currently associated with vessels spread
throughout the Pacific Northwest from
Northern California through
Washington, and some vessels
registered to limited entry permits also
fish in waters off Alaska. Up to three
sablefish-endorsed permits may be
stacked for cumulative landings on one
vessel and may include both trap and
longline gear endorsements.
The limited entry fixed gear daily trip
limit fishery occurs coast wide, yearround. Vessels registered to limited
entry permits with pot/trap gear
endorsements may harvest sablefish
with pot/trap gear year round, according
to the applicable weekly and two-month
cumulative limits, applicable to their
time/area. Accounting for stacking of
permits, there were 41 vessels using
traps only and five using a combination
of traps and longline to harvest sablefish
in 2014.
The vessels participating in the
limited entry trawl Shore-based IFQ
Program may choose to harvest their
sablefish quota with non-trawl gear,
including pot gear, under provisions of
the Program that allow for an activity
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
called ‘‘gear switching.’’ Vessels fishing
in the Shore-based IFQ Program under
gear switching provisions are subject to
most of the same requirements as those
vessels fishing trawl gear to harvest
their groundfish quota, including 100
percent observer coverage, fishing on
their own individual quota, etc.
However, regulations that apply
specifically to non-trawl gears, like gearspecific area and depth restrictions,
apply to vessels gear switching.
The open access fishery is comprised
of vessels not registered to limited entry
permits, is available to fishermen year
round, and managed throughout the
year with daily, weekly, and two-month
trip limits. NOAA’s Northwest Fisheries
Science Center estimates 204 fishermen
(number of state-issued permits, not
reflective of number of active
fishermen), participating in the open
access sector in 2014 based on a query,
conducted on June 17, 2014 of the
NMFS groundfish Web site (https://
www.webapps.nwfsc.noaa.gov/apex_ifq/
f?p=112:23).
Participants in the sablefish fishery
are required to keep daily logs of fishing
activities. Depending on the area of the
coast, fishing for sablefish with nontrawl gear (e.g. pot gear, etc.) is
prohibited in certain depths by the
Groundfish Non-Trawl Rockfish
Conservation Area. Specific depth
restrictions vary, and may be modified
during the year, but generally prohibit
setting sablefish pots between 30
fathoms and 100 fathoms (from
Washington to central California) and
between 60 fathoms and 150 fathoms
(southern California). Federal
regulations pertaining to depth-based
closures for limited entry fixed gear can
be found in Table 2 (North and South)
of 50 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
part 660, subpart E, and open access
closures can be found in Table 3, 50
CFR part 660, subpart F. The state
management agencies may close
additional areas. For example, south of
Point Arguello, near Santa Barbara, the
minimum depth for setting traps
targeting sablefish is 200 fathoms.
Multiple traps are connected to a
common ground line made of nylon or
nylon blend and 5⁄16th or 3⁄8th inch
wide. Limited entry permit holders
commonly fish 20 to 50 traps per string,
as opposed to open access fishermen
who generally fish several smaller
strings; up to eight strings with one to
four traps per string, each with a float
line and buoy stick.
Conclusions for Proposed Permit
Based on the individual review of the
fisheries and the certainty of relevant
data, and as described in the
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2017 / Notices
accompanying draft NID, NMFS
concludes that the M/SI incidental to
the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet fishery (≥14 inch mesh) and the
WA/OR/CA sablefish pot fishery will
have a negligible impact on the CA/OR/
WA stock of humpback whales and the
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet fishery (≥14 inch mesh) will have
a negligible impact on the CA/OR/WA
stock of sperm whales.
The National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) requires Federal agencies to
evaluate the impacts of alternatives for
their actions on the human
environment. The impacts on the
human environment of continuing and
modifying the CA thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet fishery (≥14 inch
mesh) (as part of the HMS fisheries) and
the WA/OR/CA sablefish pot fishery (as
part of the West Coast groundfish
fisheries), including the taking of
threatened and endangered species of
marine mammals, were analyzed in: the
Pacific Fishery Management Council
Highly Migratory Species FMP final
environmental impact statement
(August 2003); the Pacific Fishery
Management Council Proposed Harvest
Specifications and Management
Measures for the 2013–2014 Pacific
Coast Groundfish Fishery and
Amendment 21–2 to the Pacific Coast
FMP (September 2012); Risk assessment
of U.S. West Coast groundfish fisheries
to threatened and endangered marine
species (NWFSC, 2012); and in the Final
Biological Opinion prepared for the
West Coast groundfish fisheries (NMFS,
2011) and the Biological Opinion for the
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet fishery (≥14 inch mesh) (NMFS,
2013), pursuant to the ESA. Because this
proposed permit would not modify any
fishery operation and the effects of the
fishery operations have been evaluated
fully in accordance with NEPA, no
additional NEPA analysis is required for
this permit. Issuing the proposed permit
would have no additional impact to the
human environment or effects on
threatened or endangered species
beyond those analyzed in these
documents. NMFS now reviews the
remaining requirements to issue a
permit to take the subject listed species
incidental to the CA thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet fishery (≥14 inch
mesh) and WA/OR/CA sablefish pot
fisheries.
Recovery Plans
Recovery Plans for humpback whales
and sperm whales have been completed
(see https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
recovery/plans.htm#mammals).
Accordingly, the requirement to have
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:59 Jan 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
recovery plans in place or being
developed is satisfied.
Vessel Registration
MMPA section 118(c) requires that
vessels participating in Category I and II
fisheries register to obtain an
authorization to take marine mammals
incidental to fishing activities. Further,
section 118(c)(5)(A) provides that
registration of vessels in fisheries
should, after appropriate consultations,
be integrated and coordinated to the
maximum extent feasible with existing
fisher licenses, registrations, and related
programs. Participants in the CA
thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet
fishery (≥14 inch mesh) and WA/OR/CA
sablefish pot fisheries provide the
information needed by NMFS to register
their vessels for the MMPA incidental
take authorization through the Federal
limited entry permit process. Therefore,
vessel registration for an MMPA
authorization is integrated through
those programs in accordance with
MMPA section 118.
Monitoring Program
The CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet fishery (≥14 inch mesh) has been
observed by NMFS since 1990. Levels of
observer coverage vary over years but
are adequate to produce reliable
estimates of M/SI of listed species (e.g.,
from 2001–2014, coverage ranged from
approximately 12.0 to 37 percent). As
part of the West Coast groundfish
fishery and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
objectives, the WA/OR/CA limited entry
sablefish pot fishery, as managed under
the groundfish FMP, has been observed
between 13 percent and 57 percent
between 2002 and 2014. Accordingly, as
required by MMPA section 118, a
monitoring program is in place for both
fisheries.
Take Reduction Plans
Subject to available funding, MMPA
section 118 requires the development
and implementation of a Take
Reduction Plan (TRP) in cases where a
strategic stock interacts with a Category
I or II fishery. The two stocks
considered for this permit are
designated as strategic stocks under the
MMPA because they are listed as
endangered under the ESA (MMPA
section 3(19)(C)).
In 1996, NMFS convened a take
reduction team (TRT) to develop a TRP
to address the incidental taking of
several strategic marine mammal stocks,
including CA/OR/WA stocks of sperm
whales and humpback whales, in the
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet fishery (≥14 inch mesh). The
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2959
Pacific Offshore Cetacean TRP was
implemented through regulations in
October, 1997 (62 FR 51813) and has
been in place ever since. Although a
TRP is in place for the gillnet fishery,
there is currently not one in place for
the sablefish pot fishery.
The short- and long-term goals of a
TRP are to reduce mortality and serious
injury of marine mammals incidental to
commercial fishing to levels below PBR
and to a zero mortality rate goal, defined
by NMFS as 10 percent of PBR. MMPA
section 118(b)(2) states that fisheries
maintaining such M/SI levels are not
required to further reduce their M/SI
rates. However, the obligations to
develop and implement a TRP are
subject to the availability of funding.
MMPA section 118(f)(3) (16 U.S.C.
1387(f)(3)) contains specific priorities
for developing TRPs. NMFS has
insufficient funding available to
simultaneously develop and implement
TRPs for all strategic stocks that interact
with Category I or Category II fisheries.
As provided in MMPA section
118(f)(6)(A) and (f)(7), NMFS uses the
most recent SAR and LOF as the basis
to determine its priorities for
establishing TRTs and developing TRPs.
Through this process for developing
TRTs, in 2015, NMFS evaluated the CA/
OR/WA stock of humpback whales and
the WA/OR/CA sablefish pot fishery
and identified it as a lower priority
compared to other marine mammal
stocks and fisheries for establishing
TRTs, based on population trends of the
stock and M/SI levels incidental to that
commercial fishery. In addition, NMFS
continues to collect data to categorize
fixed gear fisheries and assess their risk
to large whales off the U.S. west coast.
Accordingly, given these factors and
NMFS’ priorities, implementation of a
TRP for the WA/OR/CA sablefish pot
trap fishery and other similar Category
II fisheries will be currently deferred
under section 118 as other stocks/
fisheries are a higher priority for any
available funding for establishing new
TRPs.
As noted in the summary above, all of
the requirements to issue a permit to the
following Federally-authorized fisheries
have been satisfied: the CA thresher
shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery (≥14
inch mesh) and WA/OR/CA sablefish
pot fishery. Accordingly, NMFS
proposes to issue a permit to
participants in these Category I and II
fisheries for the taking of CA/OR/WA
humpback whales and CA/OR/WA
sperm whales incidental to the fisheries’
operations. As noted under MMPA
section 101(a)(5)(E)(ii), no permit is
required for vessels in Category III
fisheries. For incidental taking of
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
2960
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2017 / Notices
marine mammals to be authorized in
Category III fisheries, any mortality or
serious injury must be reported to
NMFS. NMFS solicits public comments
on the proposed permit and the
preliminary determinations supporting
the permit.
Dated: January 4, 2017.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XF128
Nominations for the Western and
Central Pacific Fisheries Commission
Permanent Advisory Committee
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of request for
nominations.
AGENCY:
NMFS, on behalf of the
Secretary of Commerce, is seeking
nominations for the advisory committee
established under the Western and
Central Pacific Fisheries Convention
Implementation Act (Act). The
Permanent Advisory Committee,
composed of individuals from groups
concerned with the fisheries covered by
the Western and Central Pacific
Fisheries Convention (Convention), will
be given the opportunity to provide
input to the United States
Commissioners to the Western and
Central Pacific Fisheries Commission
(Commission) regarding the
deliberations and decisions of the
Commission.
DATES: Nominations must be received
no later than February 24, 2017.
Nominations received after the deadline
will not be accepted.
ADDRESSES: Nominations should be
directed to Michael Tosatto, Regional
Administrator, NMFS Pacific Islands
Regional Office, and may be submitted
by any of the following means:
• Email: pir.wcpfc@noaa.gov. Include
in the subject line the following
document identifier: ‘‘Permanent
Advisory Committee nominations’’.
Email comments, including
attachments, are limited to 5 megabytes.
• Mail or hand delivery: 1845 Wasp
Boulevard, Bldg 176, Honolulu, HI
96818
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:59 Jan 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
Zora
McGinnis, NMFS Pacific Islands
Regional Office; telephone: 808–725–
5037 facsimile: 808–725–5215; email:
zora.mcginnis@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Convention and the Commission
[FR Doc. 2017–00265 Filed 1–9–17; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
• Facsimile: 808–725–5215.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The objective of the Convention is to
ensure, through effective management,
the long-term conservation and
sustainable use of highly migratory fish
stocks in the western and central Pacific
Ocean in accordance with the United
Nations Convention on the Law of the
Sea of 10 December 1982 (UNCLOS) and
the Agreement for the Implementation
of the Provisions of the UNCLOS
Relating to the Conservation and
Management of Straddling Fish Stocks
and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks. The
Convention establishes the Commission,
the secretariat of which is based in
Pohnpei, Federated States of
Micronesia.
The Convention applies to all highly
migratory fish stocks (defined as all fish
stocks of the species listed in Annex I
of the UNCLOS occurring in the
Convention Area, and such other
species of fish as the Commission may
determine), except sauries.
The United States actively supported
the negotiations and the development of
the Convention and signed the
Convention when it was opened for
signature in 2000. It participated as a
cooperating non-member of the
Commission since it became operational
in 2005. The United States became a
Contracting Party to the Convention and
a full member of the Commission when
it ratified the Convention in January
2007. Under the Act, the United States
is to be represented on the Commission
by five United States Commissioners,
appointed by the President.
Permanent Advisory Committee
The Act (16 U.S.C. 6902) provides (in
section 6902(d)) that the Secretary of
Commerce, in consultation with the
United States Commissioners to the
Commission, will appoint individuals
as members of the advisory committee
established under the Act, referred to
here as the ‘‘Permanent Advisory
Committee’’.
The appointed members of the
Permanent Advisory Committee are to
include not less than 15 or more than
20 individuals selected from the various
groups concerned with the fisheries
covered by the Convention, providing,
to the extent practicable, an equitable
balance among such groups. On behalf
of the Secretary of Commerce, NMFS is
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
now seeking nominations for these
appointments.
In addition to the 15–20 appointed
members, the Permanent Advisory
Committee includes the chair of the
Western Pacific Fishery Management
Council’s Advisory Committee (or
designee), and officials of the fisheries
management authorities of American
Samoa, Guam, and the Northern
Mariana Islands (or their designees).
Members of the Permanent Advisory
Committee will be invited to attend all
non-executive meetings of the United
States Commissioners to the
Commission and at such meetings will
be given opportunity to examine and be
heard on all proposed programs of
investigation, reports,
recommendations, and regulations of
the Commission.
Each appointed member of the
Permanent Advisory Committee will
serve for a term of 2 years and is eligible
for reappointment. This request for
nominations is for the term to begin on
August 3, 2017, and is for a term of 2
consecutive years.
The Secretaries of Commerce and
State will furnish the Permanent
Advisory Committee with relevant
information concerning fisheries and
international fishery agreements.
NMFS, on behalf of the Secretary of
Commerce, will provide to the
Permanent Advisory Committee
administrative and technical support
services as are necessary for its effective
functioning.
Appointed members of the Permanent
Advisory Committee will serve without
pay, but while away from their homes
or regular places of business in the
performance of services for the advisory
committee will be allowed travel
expenses, including per diem in lieu of
subsistence, in the same manner as
persons employed intermittently in the
Government service are allowed
expenses under section 5703 of title 5,
United States Code. They will not be
considered Federal employees while
performing service as members of the
advisory committee except for the
purposes of injury compensation or tort
claims liability as provided in chapter
81 of title 5, United States Code and
Chapter 171 of title 28, United States
Code.
Procedure for Submitting Nominations
Nominations for the Permanent
Advisory Committee should be
submitted to NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
This request for nominations is for firsttime nominees as well as previous and
current Permanent Advisory Committee
members. Self nominations are
acceptable. Nominations should include
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2954-2960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00265]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XE909
Taking of Threatened or Endangered Marine Mammals Incidental to
Commercial Fishing Operations; Proposed Issuance of Permit
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), are
proposing to issue a permit for a period of three years to authorize
the incidental, but not intentional, take of two stocks of marine
mammals listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species
Act (ESA), under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), by the
California (CA) thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery (>14
inch mesh) and the Washington (WA)/Oregon (OR)/CA sablefish pot
fishery. In accordance with the MMPA, NMFS issues this permit provided
that it can make the determination that: The incidental take will have
a negligible impact on the affected stocks; a recovery plan for all
affected stocks of threatened or endangered marine mammals has been
developed or is being developed; and as required by the MMPA, a take
reduction plan and monitoring program have been implemented, and
vessels in the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
[[Page 2955]]
gillnet fishery (>14 inch mesh) and the WA/OR/CA sablefish pot
fisheries are registered. We have made a preliminary determination that
incidental taking from commercial fishing will have a negligible impact
on the ESA-listed humpback whale (CA/OR/WA stock) and sperm whale (CA/
OR/WA stock). Recovery plans have been completed for humpback and sperm
whales. We solicit public comments on the draft negligible impact
determination (NID) and on the proposal to issue a permit to vessels
that operate in these fisheries for the taking of affected endangered
stocks of marine mammals.
DATES: Comments on this action and supporting documents must be
received by February 9, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document and the draft
negligible impact determination, which are available on the Internet at
the following address: https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/protected_species/marine_mammals/fisheries_interactions.html. Recovery
plans for these two species are available on the Internet at the
following address: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/recovery/plans.htm#mammals.
You may submit comments on this document or the draft negligible
impact determination, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2016-0129, by either of
the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2016-0129, click the ``Comment Now!'' icon,
complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments.
Mail: Send written comments to: Chris Yates, Assistant
Regional Administrator, Protected Resources Division, West Coast
Region, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200; Long Beach, CA 90802. Comments
may also be faxed to (562) 980-4027. Include the identifier ``NOAA-
NMFS-2016-0129'' in the comments.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christina Fahy, NMFS West Coast
Region, (562) 980-4023 or Christina.Fahy@noaa.gov; or Shannon
Bettridge, NMFS Office of Protected Resources, (301) 427-8402 or
Shannon.Bettridge@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 101(a)(5)(E) of the MMPA, 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq., states
that NMFS, as delegated by the Secretary of Commerce, shall for a
period of up to three years allow the incidental taking of marine
mammal species listed under the ESA, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq., by persons
using vessels of the United States and those vessels which have valid
fishing permits issued by the Secretary in accordance with section
204(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act,
16 U.S.C. 1824(b), while engaging in commercial fishing operations, if
NMFS makes certain determinations. NMFS must determine, after notice
and opportunity for public comment, that: (1) Incidental mortality and
serious injury (M/SI) will have a negligible impact on the affected
species or stock; (2) a recovery plan has been developed or is being
developed for such species or stock under the ESA; and (3) where
required under section 118 of the MMPA, a monitoring program has been
established, vessels engaged in such fisheries are registered in
accordance with section 118 of the MMPA, and a take reduction plan has
been developed or is being developed for such species or stock.
We propose to issue a permit under MMPA section 101(a)(5)(E) to
vessels registered in the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet
fishery (>14 inch mesh) to incidentally take individuals from two
stocks of endangered marine mammals: The CA/OR/WA stock of humpback
whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) and the CA/OR/WA stock of sperm whales
(Physeter macrocephalus); and to vessels registered in WA/OR/CA
sablefish pot fishery to incidentally take individuals from the CA/OR/
WA stock of humpback whales. A history of MMPA section 101(a)(5)(E)
permits related to these stocks was included in previous notices for
other permits to take threatened or endangered marine mammals
incidental to commercial fishing (e.g., 72 FR 60814, October 26, 2007;
78 FR 54553, September 4, 2013) and is not repeated here. The data for
considering these authorizations were reviewed coincident with the 2016
MMPA List of Fisheries (LOF; 81 FR 20550, April 8, 2016), the final
2015 U.S. Pacific Marine Mammal Stock Assessment Report (SAR) (Carretta
et al. 2016), Carretta and Moore (2014), Moore and Barlow (2014), the
Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for U.S. West Coast Fisheries for Highly
Migratory Species (HMS), recovery plans for these species (available on
the Internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/recovery/plans.htm#mammals), the best available scientific information and
available data, and other relevant sources.
Based on observer data and marine mammal injury reporting forms,
vessels operating in the Category I CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet fishery (>14 inch mesh) and the Category II WA/OR/CA sablefish
pot fishery are the two Federally-managed Category I and II fisheries
that operate in the ranges of affected stocks, namely the CA/OR/WA
stocks of humpback whale and sperm whale, and are currently considered
for authorization. A brief description of these fisheries can be found
below. The CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery (>14 inch
mesh), is the only Federally-managed Category I fishery operating off
the coast of California. The WA/OR/CA sablefish pot fishery is the only
Federally-managed Category II fishery operating off the coasts of
California, Oregon, and Washington. All other Category II fisheries
that may interact with the marine mammal stocks observed off the coasts
of California, Oregon, and Washington are state-managed and are not
considered for authorization under this permit; however, M/SI related
to these fisheries and all other human sources was evaluated in the
draft NID. Participants in Category III fisheries are not required to
obtain incidental take permits under MMPA section 101(a)(5)(E) but are
required to report any mortality or injury of marine mammals incidental
to their operations.
Basis for Determining Negligible Impact
Prior to issuing a permit to take ESA-listed marine mammals
incidental to commercial fishing, NMFS must determine if the M/SI
incidental to commercial fisheries will have a negligible impact on the
affected species or stocks of marine mammals. NMFS satisfies this
requirement through completion of a NID. We clarify that for purposes
of the draft negligible impact analysis, incidental M/SI from
commercial fisheries includes M/SI from entanglement in fishing gear or
ingestion of fishing gear. Indirect effects,
[[Page 2956]]
such as the effects of removing prey from habitat, are not included in
this analysis. A biological opinion prepared under ESA section 7
considers direct and indirect effects of Federal actions (available at
https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/), and thus, contains a broader
scope of analysis than is required by MMPA section 101(a)(5)(E).
Although the MMPA does not define ``negligible impact,'' NMFS has
issued regulations providing a qualitative definition of ``negligible
impact'' (50 CFR 216.103), and through scientific analysis, peer
review, and public notice developed a quantitative approach for
determining negligible impact. As it applies here, the definition of
``negligible impact'' is ``an impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably
likely to adversely affect the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.'' The development of the
approach is outlined in detail in the current draft NID made available
through this notice and was described in previous notices for other
permits to take threatened or endangered marine mammals incidental to
commercial fishing (e.g., 72 FR 60814, October 26, 2007; 78 FR 54553,
September 4, 2013).
Criteria for Determining Negligible Impact
In 1999 NMFS adopted criteria for making NIDs for MMPA 101(a)(5)(E)
permits (64 FR 28800, May 27, 1999). In applying the 1999 criteria to
determine whether M/SI incidental to commercial fisheries will have a
negligible impact on a listed marine mammal stock, Criterion 1 is
whether total human-related M/SI is less than 10 percent of the stock's
potential biological removal level (PBR). If total human-related M/SI
is less than 10 percent of PBR, the analysis would be concluded, and
the impact would be determined to be negligible. If Criterion 1 is not
satisfied, NMFS may use one of the other criteria as appropriate. The
remaining criteria describe alternatives under certain conditions.
Criterion 2 is satisfied if the total human-related M/SI is greater
than PBR, but commercial fisheries-related M/SI is less than 10 percent
of PBR. If Criterion 2 is satisfied, vessels operating in individual
fisheries may be permitted if management measures are being taken to
address non-fisheries-related mortality and serious injury. Criterion 3
is satisfied if total commercial fisheries-related M/SI is greater than
10 percent of PBR and less than PBR, and the population is stable or
increasing. Fisheries may then be permitted subject to individual
review and certainty of data. Criterion 4 stipulates that if the
population abundance of a stock is declining, the threshold level of 10
percent of PBR will continue to be used. Criterion 5 states that if
total commercial fisheries-related M/SI is greater than PBR, permits
may not be issued for that species or stock.
We considered two time frames for this analysis: 5 years (2010-
2014) and 14 years (2001-2014). The first time frame we considered for
both stocks of whales is the most recent five-year period for which
data are available and have been analyzed (here, January 1, 2010
through December 31, 2014) and is typically used for NID analyses. A
five-year time frame in many cases provides enough data to adequately
capture year-to-year variations in take levels, while reflecting
current environmental and fishing conditions, as they may change over
time. However, NMFS' Guidelines for Assessing Marine Mammal Stocks
(GAMMS) suggest that mortality estimates could be averaged over as many
years as necessary to achieve a coefficient of variation of less than
or equal to 0.3.
In addition, Carretta and Moore (2014) recommend pooling longer
time series of data when bycatch is a rare event. For example, pooling
10 years of fishery data resulted in bycatch estimates within 25
percent of the true bycatch rate over 50 percent of the time (i.e.,
estimates were within 25 percent of the true value more often than
not). Key to this approach was that the fishery must have had
sufficiently constant characteristics (e.g., effort, gear, locations)
to support the inference of consistent results across years such as
with the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery (>=14 inch
mesh). Rare bycatch events typically involve smaller populations paired
with low observer coverage in a fishery. If true bycatch mortality is
low, but near PBR, then estimation bias needs to be reduced to allow
reliable evaluation of the bycatch estimate against a low removal
threshold.
Currently, the humpback whale and the sperm whale stocks are the
only ESA-listed marine mammal species interacting with the CA thresher
shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery (>=14 inch mesh) that meet the
conditions described in Carretta and Moore (2014): These stocks have
relatively small minimum population estimates and have been recorded as
having been incidentally killed or seriously injured in rare events (in
the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery (>=14 inch mesh).
The CA/OR/WA stock of humpback whale has also been recorded as having
been rarely incidentally killed or seriously injured in the WA/OR/CA
sablefish pot fishery.
In 2001, a time/area closure of the drift gillnet fishery off
central and northern California/southern Oregon to protect leatherback
sea turtles was implemented through regulations, and resulted in a
decrease in overall fishing effort and a shift in effort to southern
California. Therefore, the post-2000 time period best represents the
current spatial state of the fishery, so we used the 14-year period
post-2000 to calculate mean annual mortality estimate for these two
stocks of whales, based on recommendations contained in the GAMMS and
Carretta and Moore (2014). This time frame also provides a
comprehensive look at the WA/OR/CA sablefish pot fishery, given changes
in oceanographic conditions, fishing practices, and reporting and
stranding records.
A conservative, or precautionary, approach is taken in these
analyses for evaluating the negligible impact of fisheries and other
sources of injury or mortality, such as recreational fisheries and ship
strikes, on these stocks. In certain cases, the maximum estimate of M/
SI was used for the calculations. For example, if a ship strike
occurred, but M/SI was not observed on scene or confirmed by necropsy
of the stranded animal, and if further review of reports and other
sources then confirmed M/SI, it was assumed for purposes of this
analysis, that M/SI occurred. Additionally, M/SI from unknown or
unidentified fisheries was conservatively considered to be from
commercial fisheries. Furthermore, in using two time frames for the
negligible impact analyses (2001-2014 and 2010-2014), we took a
precautionary approach by ensuring that a NID could be made for both
time frames considered.
Negligible Impact Determinations
Below is a summary of our application of the negligible impact
criteria and determination regarding the effects of commercial
fisheries off the U.S. west coast on the CA/OR/WA stocks of humpback
whale and sperm whale.
Criterion 1 Analysis
Criterion 1 would be satisfied if the total human-related M/SI is
less than 10 percent of PBR.
The 5-year (2010-2014) average annual human-related M/SI to the CA/
OR/WA stock of humpback whales is 6.8 or 62.0 percent of the PBR
(11.0). The 14-year (2001-2014) average annual human-related M/SI to
the CA/OR/WA
[[Page 2957]]
stock of humpback whales is 5.1 or 46.4 percent of the PBR. The total
annual human-related M/SI for this stock of humpback whales is not less
than 10 percent of PBR for both time frames considered.
The 5-year (2010-2014) average annual human-related M/SI of the CA/
OR/WA stock of sperm whales is 0.6 or 22.2 percent of the PBR (2.7).
The 14-year (2001-2014) average annual human-related M/SI to the CA/OR/
WA stock of sperm whales from all human sources is 0.9 or 33.3 percent
of the PBR. The total annual human-caused M/SI for this stock of sperm
whales is not less than 10 percent of the PBR for both time frames
considered.
Criterion 1 was not satisfied because the total annual human-
related M/SI for these stocks is not less than 10 percent of PBR for
the time periods considered. As a result, the other criteria must be
examined.
Criterion 2 Analysis
Criterion 2 would be satisfied if total human-related M/SI is
greater than PBR and the total fisheries-related mortality is less than
10 percent of PBR. This criterion was not satisfied because total
human-related M/SI (detailed above) is less than PBR, and total
fisheries-related mortality (detailed below) is greater than 10 percent
of PBR for each stock (both time frames analyzed). As a result, the
other criteria were examined.
Criterion 3 Analysis
Unlike Criteria 1 and 2, which examine total human-related M/SI
relative to PBR, Criterion 3 compares total fisheries-related M/SI to
PBR. Criterion 3 would be satisfied if the total commercial fisheries-
related M/SI (including state and Federal fisheries) is greater than 10
percent of and less than 100 percent of PBR for each stock for the
respective time frame considered, and the populations of these stocks
are considered to be stable or increasing. If the Criterion is met,
vessels may be permitted subject to individual review and certainty of
data.
Criterion 3 was satisfied for the CA/OR/WA humpback whale stock as
the annual average fishery-related M/SI from all commercial fisheries
is greater than 10 percent of and less than 100 percent of PBR, and the
population is increasing (6-7 percent per year). The 5-year (2010-2014)
average annual fishery-related M/SI from all commercial fisheries for
the CA/OR/WA humpback whale stock is estimated at 5.6 or 51.0 percent
of PBR and 4.1 or 37.3 percent of PBR for the 14-year period (2001-
2014), which is between 10 percent and 100 percent of PBR. In addition,
the stock has experienced a positive growth rate (6-7 percent per
year). Accordingly, Criterion 3 is satisfied in determining that M/SI
of the CA/OR/WA humpback whale stock incidental to commercial fishing
would have a negligible impact on the stock.
In 2015, there was a significant increase in reports of entangled
humpback whales off the U.S. west coast, primarily in the state-managed
pot/trap fisheries. In addition, there were two fatal ship strikes of
humpback whales. We evaluated the 2015 preliminary raw entanglement and
ship strike data to understand how future data may impact this type of
analysis. Serious injury determinations for 2015 will be completed in
early 2017. If not all entanglements or ship strikes are determined to
be M/SI, it is possible to conclude there is a negligible impact under
Criterion 3 for both the 15-year and five-year time frames. Based on
past humpback whale injury determinations from 2007 through 2014, 84
percent were determined to be M/SI.
Criterion 3 was satisfied for the CA/OR/WA sperm whale stock as the
total fishery-related M/SI is greater than 10 percent of and less than
100 percent of PBR, and the population is stable. The 5-year (2010-
2014) annual average fishery-related M/SI from all commercial fisheries
for the CA/OR/WA sperm whale stock is estimated at 0.4 or 14.8 percent
of PBR and 0.6 or 22.2 percent of PBR for the 14-year average (2001-
2014), which is between 10 percent and 100 percent of PBR. The
population is considered to be stable.
In 2015, there were no reports of entangled or ship-struck sperm
whales. Therefore, the addition of one more year of data would not
change the conclusion reached in the draft NID.
Accordingly, Criterion 3 is satisfied in determining that M/SI of
the CA/OR/WA sperm whale stock incidental to commercial fishing would
have a negligible impact on the stock.
In conclusion, based on the criteria outlined in 1999 (64 FR
28800), the final 2015 U.S. Pacific SAR (Carretta et al,. 2016),
Carretta and Moore (2014), Moore and Barlow (2014), and the best
available scientific information, available data and other sources,
NMFS has determined that the M/SI incidental to the CA thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet fishery (>=14 inch mesh) and the WA/OR/CA
sablefish pot fishery will have a negligible impact on the CA/OR/WA
stock of humpback whales and the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet fishery (>=14 inch mesh) will have a negligible impact on the
CA/OR/WA stock of sperm whales. NMFS therefore proposes to issue the
MMPA 101(a)(5)(E) permit. Specifically, NMFS proposes that vessels
operating in these identified commercial fisheries within the range of
the CA/OR/WA humpback and sperm whale stocks may be permitted subject
to individual review of the fishery and the certainty of relevant data,
and provided that the other provisions of section 101(a)(5)(E) are met.
Description of Fisheries
The following is an individual review of the two Federally-
authorized fisheries classified as Category I and II in the 2016 LOF
(81 FR 20550) which are known through observer records, fisher self-
reports, and confirmed entanglement reports to kill or seriously injure
ESA-listed marine mammals incidental to commercial fishing operations.
Detailed descriptions of those fisheries can be found in the NMFS
(2011) Biological Opinion on the operation of the Pacific groundfish
fishery, which includes the WA/OR/CA sablefish pot fishery; the NMFS
(2013) Biological Opinion for the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet fishery (>=14 inch mesh); the 2015 SAR (Carretta et al. 2016);
and the draft NID.
California Thresher Shark/Swordfish Drift Gillnet Fishery (>14 Inch
Mesh)
Participants in the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet
fishery (>=14 inch mesh) are required to have a valid permit issued
annually by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. In
accordance with MMPA section 118(c), only those vessels participating
in the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery (>=14 inch
mesh) that have registered with the Marine Mammal Authorization Program
are authorized to take marine mammals incidental to their fishing
operations. Vessels holding this authorization must comply with the
Pacific Offshore Cetacean Take Reduction Plan and implementing
regulations. Any vessel that violates regulations will be subject to
enforcement action. The estimated number of vessels in the fishery is
based upon the number of vessels that indicated intent to participate
in the fishery according to historical reference and may not be an
accurate estimate of the number of vessels actively engaged in fishing
in any given year. The CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet
fishery (=14 inch mesh) is a limited entry program, managed
with gear, seasons, and area closures. The number of vessels
participating in the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery
(=14 inch mesh) has decreased from 148 permits issued and 98
active vessels in 1998 to 72 permits issued and
[[Page 2958]]
18 active vessels in 2016. Information on the number of active permit
holders was obtained from the ``Status of the U.S. west coast fisheries
for HMS through 2004; Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation'' report,
available from the Pacific Fishery Management Council Web site
(www.pcouncil.org).
The fishery targets swordfish and thresher shark. It operates
outside of state waters to about 150 nautical miles (nm) offshore
ranging from the U.S./Mexico border in the south to the Oregon border
in the north, depending on sea surface temperature conditions.
Regulations restrict the fishery to waters outside 200 nm from February
1 through April 30, and outside 75 nm from May 1 through August 14,
while allowing fishing inside 75 nm from August 15 through January 31.
Vessels in this fishery targeting swordfish tend to set on warm ocean
water temperature breaks, which do not appear along the California
coast until late summer. Because of these restrictions, vessels are not
active during February, March, and April, and very little fishing
effort occurs during the months of May, June, and July.
In 2001, a seasonal (15 August-15 November) area closure was
implemented in the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery
(>=14 inch mesh) north of Point Conception, to protect leatherback
turtles that feed in the area and were observed entangled in previous
fishing seasons. Additional seasonal/area closures in southern
California have been established in the CA thresher shark/swordfish
drift gillnet fishery to protect loggerhead turtles during a forecast
or occurring El Ni[ntilde]o event during the months of June, July and/
or August.
The NMFS West Coast Region has operated an at-sea observer program
in the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery (>=14 inch
mesh) since July 1990 to the present. The objectives of the NMFS
observer program are to record, among other things, information on non-
target fish species and protected species interactions. NMFS typically
targets 20 percent observer coverage of the annual sets by the CA
thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery (>=14 inch mesh) fleet,
with close to 100 percent of net retrievals monitored on observed trips
for, among other things, species identification and enumeration.
WA/OR/CA Sablefish Pot Fishery
The WA/OR/CA sablefish pot fishery targets sablefish using
trapezoid, conical, or rectangular steel frame traps, wrapped with >=2
inch nylon webbing. The fishery generally sets gear at depths between
80 and 300 fathoms off the west coast of the U.S. The fishery is
managed under regulations implementing the Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP
developed by the Pacific Fishery Management Council. There are four
distinct segments of the Pacific coast groundfish fishery where
sablefish may be harvested, by some or all of the participants, with
pot gear: Limited entry fixed gear sablefish primary fishery and daily
trip limit fishery; the trawl individual fishing quota (IFQ) fishery
when vessels are ``gear switching'' (allowed since 2011); and the open
access sablefish daily trip limit fishery. Further information about
each of these segments of the groundfish fishery that may harvest
sablefish with pot gear is provided below.
The limited entry fixed gear sablefish primary fishery occurs
between 36[deg] N. latitude (lat.) and the U.S.--Canada border and
requires at least one limited entry permit, with both a fixed gear
endorsement and a sablefish endorsement, be registered to a vessel. The
primary fishery is composed of a three-tier system of cumulative
landing quotas within a restricted season, from April 1 to October 31.
Permits were assigned to a tier based on landing history when the
system originally began in 1998. There are 32 Limited Entry Permits
issued for the sablefish trap fishery on the West Coast. Fishing
outside of the primary season or after fulfillment of tier quota is
allowed, subject to limited entry fixed gear weekly and two-month
cumulative limits. The limited entry permits are currently associated
with vessels spread throughout the Pacific Northwest from Northern
California through Washington, and some vessels registered to limited
entry permits also fish in waters off Alaska. Up to three sablefish-
endorsed permits may be stacked for cumulative landings on one vessel
and may include both trap and longline gear endorsements.
The limited entry fixed gear daily trip limit fishery occurs coast
wide, year-round. Vessels registered to limited entry permits with pot/
trap gear endorsements may harvest sablefish with pot/trap gear year
round, according to the applicable weekly and two-month cumulative
limits, applicable to their time/area. Accounting for stacking of
permits, there were 41 vessels using traps only and five using a
combination of traps and longline to harvest sablefish in 2014.
The vessels participating in the limited entry trawl Shore-based
IFQ Program may choose to harvest their sablefish quota with non-trawl
gear, including pot gear, under provisions of the Program that allow
for an activity called ``gear switching.'' Vessels fishing in the
Shore-based IFQ Program under gear switching provisions are subject to
most of the same requirements as those vessels fishing trawl gear to
harvest their groundfish quota, including 100 percent observer
coverage, fishing on their own individual quota, etc. However,
regulations that apply specifically to non-trawl gears, like gear-
specific area and depth restrictions, apply to vessels gear switching.
The open access fishery is comprised of vessels not registered to
limited entry permits, is available to fishermen year round, and
managed throughout the year with daily, weekly, and two-month trip
limits. NOAA's Northwest Fisheries Science Center estimates 204
fishermen (number of state-issued permits, not reflective of number of
active fishermen), participating in the open access sector in 2014
based on a query, conducted on June 17, 2014 of the NMFS groundfish Web
site (https://www.webapps.nwfsc.noaa.gov/apex_ifq/f?p=112:23).
Participants in the sablefish fishery are required to keep daily
logs of fishing activities. Depending on the area of the coast, fishing
for sablefish with non-trawl gear (e.g. pot gear, etc.) is prohibited
in certain depths by the Groundfish Non-Trawl Rockfish Conservation
Area. Specific depth restrictions vary, and may be modified during the
year, but generally prohibit setting sablefish pots between 30 fathoms
and 100 fathoms (from Washington to central California) and between 60
fathoms and 150 fathoms (southern California). Federal regulations
pertaining to depth-based closures for limited entry fixed gear can be
found in Table 2 (North and South) of 50 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) part 660, subpart E, and open access closures can be found in
Table 3, 50 CFR part 660, subpart F. The state management agencies may
close additional areas. For example, south of Point Arguello, near
Santa Barbara, the minimum depth for setting traps targeting sablefish
is 200 fathoms. Multiple traps are connected to a common ground line
made of nylon or nylon blend and \5/16\th or \3/8\th inch wide. Limited
entry permit holders commonly fish 20 to 50 traps per string, as
opposed to open access fishermen who generally fish several smaller
strings; up to eight strings with one to four traps per string, each
with a float line and buoy stick.
Conclusions for Proposed Permit
Based on the individual review of the fisheries and the certainty
of relevant data, and as described in the
[[Page 2959]]
accompanying draft NID, NMFS concludes that the M/SI incidental to the
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery (=14 inch
mesh) and the WA/OR/CA sablefish pot fishery will have a negligible
impact on the CA/OR/WA stock of humpback whales and the CA thresher
shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery (>=14 inch mesh) will have a
negligible impact on the CA/OR/WA stock of sperm whales.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires Federal
agencies to evaluate the impacts of alternatives for their actions on
the human environment. The impacts on the human environment of
continuing and modifying the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet
fishery (>=14 inch mesh) (as part of the HMS fisheries) and the WA/OR/
CA sablefish pot fishery (as part of the West Coast groundfish
fisheries), including the taking of threatened and endangered species
of marine mammals, were analyzed in: the Pacific Fishery Management
Council Highly Migratory Species FMP final environmental impact
statement (August 2003); the Pacific Fishery Management Council
Proposed Harvest Specifications and Management Measures for the 2013-
2014 Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery and Amendment 21-2 to the Pacific
Coast FMP (September 2012); Risk assessment of U.S. West Coast
groundfish fisheries to threatened and endangered marine species
(NWFSC, 2012); and in the Final Biological Opinion prepared for the
West Coast groundfish fisheries (NMFS, 2011) and the Biological Opinion
for the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery (>=14 inch
mesh) (NMFS, 2013), pursuant to the ESA. Because this proposed permit
would not modify any fishery operation and the effects of the fishery
operations have been evaluated fully in accordance with NEPA, no
additional NEPA analysis is required for this permit. Issuing the
proposed permit would have no additional impact to the human
environment or effects on threatened or endangered species beyond those
analyzed in these documents. NMFS now reviews the remaining
requirements to issue a permit to take the subject listed species
incidental to the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery
(>=14 inch mesh) and WA/OR/CA sablefish pot fisheries.
Recovery Plans
Recovery Plans for humpback whales and sperm whales have been
completed (see https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/recovery/plans.htm#mammals).
Accordingly, the requirement to have recovery plans in place or being
developed is satisfied.
Vessel Registration
MMPA section 118(c) requires that vessels participating in Category
I and II fisheries register to obtain an authorization to take marine
mammals incidental to fishing activities. Further, section 118(c)(5)(A)
provides that registration of vessels in fisheries should, after
appropriate consultations, be integrated and coordinated to the maximum
extent feasible with existing fisher licenses, registrations, and
related programs. Participants in the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet fishery (>=14 inch mesh) and WA/OR/CA sablefish pot fisheries
provide the information needed by NMFS to register their vessels for
the MMPA incidental take authorization through the Federal limited
entry permit process. Therefore, vessel registration for an MMPA
authorization is integrated through those programs in accordance with
MMPA section 118.
Monitoring Program
The CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery (>=14 inch
mesh) has been observed by NMFS since 1990. Levels of observer coverage
vary over years but are adequate to produce reliable estimates of M/SI
of listed species (e.g., from 2001-2014, coverage ranged from
approximately 12.0 to 37 percent). As part of the West Coast groundfish
fishery and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
objectives, the WA/OR/CA limited entry sablefish pot fishery, as
managed under the groundfish FMP, has been observed between 13 percent
and 57 percent between 2002 and 2014. Accordingly, as required by MMPA
section 118, a monitoring program is in place for both fisheries.
Take Reduction Plans
Subject to available funding, MMPA section 118 requires the
development and implementation of a Take Reduction Plan (TRP) in cases
where a strategic stock interacts with a Category I or II fishery. The
two stocks considered for this permit are designated as strategic
stocks under the MMPA because they are listed as endangered under the
ESA (MMPA section 3(19)(C)).
In 1996, NMFS convened a take reduction team (TRT) to develop a TRP
to address the incidental taking of several strategic marine mammal
stocks, including CA/OR/WA stocks of sperm whales and humpback whales,
in the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery (>=14 inch
mesh). The Pacific Offshore Cetacean TRP was implemented through
regulations in October, 1997 (62 FR 51813) and has been in place ever
since. Although a TRP is in place for the gillnet fishery, there is
currently not one in place for the sablefish pot fishery.
The short- and long-term goals of a TRP are to reduce mortality and
serious injury of marine mammals incidental to commercial fishing to
levels below PBR and to a zero mortality rate goal, defined by NMFS as
10 percent of PBR. MMPA section 118(b)(2) states that fisheries
maintaining such M/SI levels are not required to further reduce their
M/SI rates. However, the obligations to develop and implement a TRP are
subject to the availability of funding. MMPA section 118(f)(3) (16
U.S.C. 1387(f)(3)) contains specific priorities for developing TRPs.
NMFS has insufficient funding available to simultaneously develop and
implement TRPs for all strategic stocks that interact with Category I
or Category II fisheries. As provided in MMPA section 118(f)(6)(A) and
(f)(7), NMFS uses the most recent SAR and LOF as the basis to determine
its priorities for establishing TRTs and developing TRPs. Through this
process for developing TRTs, in 2015, NMFS evaluated the CA/OR/WA stock
of humpback whales and the WA/OR/CA sablefish pot fishery and
identified it as a lower priority compared to other marine mammal
stocks and fisheries for establishing TRTs, based on population trends
of the stock and M/SI levels incidental to that commercial fishery. In
addition, NMFS continues to collect data to categorize fixed gear
fisheries and assess their risk to large whales off the U.S. west
coast. Accordingly, given these factors and NMFS' priorities,
implementation of a TRP for the WA/OR/CA sablefish pot trap fishery and
other similar Category II fisheries will be currently deferred under
section 118 as other stocks/fisheries are a higher priority for any
available funding for establishing new TRPs.
As noted in the summary above, all of the requirements to issue a
permit to the following Federally-authorized fisheries have been
satisfied: the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery (>=14
inch mesh) and WA/OR/CA sablefish pot fishery. Accordingly, NMFS
proposes to issue a permit to participants in these Category I and II
fisheries for the taking of CA/OR/WA humpback whales and CA/OR/WA sperm
whales incidental to the fisheries' operations. As noted under MMPA
section 101(a)(5)(E)(ii), no permit is required for vessels in Category
III fisheries. For incidental taking of
[[Page 2960]]
marine mammals to be authorized in Category III fisheries, any
mortality or serious injury must be reported to NMFS. NMFS solicits
public comments on the proposed permit and the preliminary
determinations supporting the permit.
Dated: January 4, 2017.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-00265 Filed 1-9-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P