Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission, 1364-1370 [2016-31980]
Download as PDF
1364
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 2017 / Notices
of General Electric Company, Galion,
Ohio.
At the request of the State of Ohio, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm.
New information obtained by the
Department revealed that some workers
separated from employment had their
wages reported under the name Lineage
Power Group.
It is the Department’s intent to issue
a certification that accurately reflects
the worker group eligible to apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
Accordingly, the Department is
amending this certification to properly
reflect this matter.
The amended certification applicable
to TA–W–85,605 is hereby issued as
follows:
‘‘All workers of GE Power Electronics, Inc.,
GE Energy Management Division, a Business
Unit of General Electric Company, including
workers whose wages are reported under
Lineage Power Group, Galion, Ohio, who
became totally or partially separated from
employment on or after October 17, 2013,
through September 9, 2015, and all workers
in the group threatened with total or partial
separation from employment on September 9,
2015 through September 9, 2017, are eligible
to apply for adjustment assistance under
Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974,
as amended.’’
Signed in Washington, DC, this 3rd day of
November, 2016.
Del-Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2016–31972 Filed 1–4–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–193; NRC–2016–0213]
Rhode Island Atomic Energy
Commission
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact;
issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering
renewal of Facility License No. R–95,
held by the Rhode Island Atomic Energy
Commission (RIAEC or the licensee), for
the continued operation of the Rhode
Island Nuclear Science Center Reactor
(RINSC reactor or the facility), located
in the Narragansett, Washington County,
Rhode Island. The NRC is issuing an
environmental assessment (EA) and
finding of no significant impact (FONSI)
associated with the renewal of the
license.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:06 Jan 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
The EA and FONSI are available
on January 5, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2016–0213 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2016–0213. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. For the
convenience of the reader, the ADAMS
accession numbers are provided in a
table in the ‘‘Availability of Documents’’
section of this document.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room OWFN–01F21,
One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick G. Boyle, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Rockville, MD
20852. Telephone: 301–415–3936;
email: Patrick.Boyle@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
I. Introduction
The NRC is considering issuance of a
renewed Facility Operating License No.
R–95, held by RIAEC, which would
authorize continued operation of the
RINSC reactor, located in Narragansett,
Washington County, Rhode Island. As
required by section 51.21 of title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR), ‘‘Criteria for and identification of
licensing and regulatory actions
requiring environmental assessments,’’
the NRC staff prepared an EA
documenting its environmental review.
Based on the results of the EA that
follows, the NRC has determined not to
prepare an environmental impact
statement for the proposed renewed
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
license and is issuing a FONSI in
accordance with 10 CFR 51.32, ‘‘Finding
of no significant impact.’’
II. Environmental Assessment
Facility Site and Environs
The RINSC reactor is located on the
University of Rhode Island Narragansett
Bay Campus. The RINSC facility
consists of one building that houses the
reactor and support areas. The
confinement section of the reactor
building is constructed primarily of
concrete, brick, steel, and aluminum.
The RINSC site comprises the reactor
building and a small area immediately
surrounding it, partially bounded by a
chain-link fence. Adjacent to the reactor
site are athletic facilities to the north
and west, fields and parking lots to the
east, and academic and research
buildings to the south. Surrounding
areas are well developed with offsite
land use mostly residential in nature.
The nearest residences are located
approximately 500 meters (1,640 feet)
west-northwest and south of the facility.
The RINSC reactor is a pool-type,
water moderated and cooled research
reactor licensed to operate at a thermal
steady-state power level of 2 megawatts
(MWt). The reactor was designed to
permit later conversion to a steady-state
power level of 5 MWt. The fuel is
located at the bottom of an aluminumlined concrete pool with a volume of
approximately 40,000 gallons (151,000
liters) and a depth of 32 feet (9.7 m).
The reactor is fueled with standard
plate-type low-enriched uranium fuel
provided by the Department of Energy.
The RINSC reactor uses
demineralized water for primary
coolant, shielding, and as a reactor
moderator and city water for secondary
coolant. At power levels below 0.1
MWt, the core can be cooled by natural
convection of water through the reactor
core and at power levels above 0.1 MWt
the core is cooled by forced convection
of water through the reactor core. In
natural convection mode cooling, heat
from the core is transferred to the
primary cooling water in the pool where
it is dissipated to the surrounding
environment. In forced convection
mode cooling, heat is transferred from
the primary cooling water to two heat
exchangers, which pass the heat to the
secondary cooling loops, which in turn
dissipate the heat to the surrounding
environment via two cooling towers.
Operation of the primary and secondary
cooling systems are checked on a daily
basis prior to forced convection reactor
operation. During this checkout, the
performance of each system is
monitored with emphasis on pump
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 2017 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
outlet pressures, pressure differentials
and system flow rates. The licensee
conducts periodic tests of the secondary
water for sodium-24 which would
indicate a leak from the primary water
into the secondary water.
During normal operation of the RINSC
reactor, the only significant airborne
radioactive effluent is Argon–41 (Ar–
41). The primary liquid radioactive
effluents produced during normal
operation include miscellaneous
neutron activation products in the
primary coolant, many of which are
deposited in the mechanical filter and
demineralizer resins and, therefore,
disposed of as solid radioactive waste.
Non-routine liquid radioactive wastes
can result from decontamination or
maintenance activities, such as filter or
resin replacements. Solid radioactive
wastes include waste generated from
reactor maintenance operations and
laboratory wastes from experiments.
Much of the solid radioactive waste
generated at the RINSC facility is held
in a restricted area and allowed to decay
to background levels and then disposed
of as non-radioactive waste. Solid
radioactive waste that is not decayed in
storage is transferred to a low-level
waste broker for appropriate disposal.
The RIAEC maintains a Radiation
Protection Program, which involves
regular monitoring of airborne, liquid,
and solid gamma and beta radiation to
ensure that any effluent releases are
within the limits of 10 CFR part 20,
‘‘Standards For Protection Against
Radiation.’’ The current environmental
program consists of radiation area
monitors (RAMs), continuous air
monitors (CAMs), portable radiation
survey instruments, personnel monitors,
and stack gas and particulate monitors.
Perimeter monitoring at the RINSC
facility consists of Optically-Stimulated
Luminescent Dosimeters (OLDs) which
detect X-ray and gamma radiation.
A detailed description of the reactor
and its operations can be found in the
Safety Analysis Report (SAR) for the
RINSC reactor submitted by RIAEC with
its renewal application.
Description of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would renew
Facility Operating License No. R–95 for
a period of 20 years from the date of
issuance of the renewed license. The
proposed action is in accordance with
the licensee’s application dated May 3,
2004, as supplemented on January 19,
February 4, August 6, August 18,
September 3, September 8, November
26, December 7, and December 14, 2010;
January 24, February 24, and July 15,
2011; March 15, September 16, and
December 19, 2013; February 24, April
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:06 Jan 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
28, and June 30, 2014; August 7 and
August 11, 2015; and January 20,
February 26, March 1, April 21, July 20,
October 6, November 1, November 14,
December 1, December 8, December 13,
and December 15, 2016 (collectively
referred to as ‘‘the renewal
application’’). Initially, the operating
license was to expire at midnight on
August 27, 2002, but a construction time
recapture license amendment issued on
July 28, 2000 extended the license
expiration date to July 21, 2004. Because
of the timely renewal provision
contained in 10 CFR 2.109(a), the
licensee is permitted to continue
operation of the reactor under the terms
and conditions of its operating license
until the license renewal application
before the NRC has been finally
determined. The proposed renewal
would authorize continued operation of
the reactor for an additional 20 years
from the date of issuance of the renewed
license.
Need for the Proposed Action
The proposed action is needed to
allow the continued operation of the
RINSC reactor to routinely provide
teaching, research, and services to
numerous institutions for a period of 20
years from the date of issuance of the
renewed license.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
The environmental impacts of the
proposed action are discussed below. As
discussed below, the proposed action
will not have a significant
environmental impact. In addition, the
proposed action will not require any
physical changes to the facility and the
impacts are similar to those occurring
during past operations.
A. Radiological Impacts
Environmental Effects of Reactor
Operations
The only significant gaseous
radioactive effluent resulting from the
operation of the RINSC reactor is Ar–41.
This nuclide is released to the
environment from the reactor building
from an exhaust stack on the roof that
combines the ventilation exhausts from
both the main and the purge systems.
The stack discharge length is 115 feet
(35 meters). Nitrogen–16 (N–16) is also
produced during reactor operation, but
its release from the reactor stack is
insignificant because the half-life of N–
16 is approximately 7 seconds and most
of the N–16 produced in the reactor
coolant would decay before reaching the
stack. Therefore Ar–41 is the most
significant radionuclide released as a
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1365
gaseous effluent during normal reactor
operations.
The licensee’s Technical
Specifications require that public doses
from Ar–41 not exceed the 100 millirem
(mrem) annual public dose limit in 10
CFR 20.1301, ‘‘Dose limits for
individual members of the public.’’ The
Ar–41 release rate would reach a
maximum during continuous operation
at full power. Historical data shows that
the reactor generates approximately 0.14
± 0.03 Curie (Ci) of Ar–41 per MW hour
of operation. Using the Environmental
Protection Agency COMPLY computer
code, the licensee calculated the dose to
the maximally-exposed member of the
public located 100 meters (328 feet)
from the stack to be 0.021 mrem
(0.00021 millisieverts (mSv)) per Ci of
Ar–41 released. Using this result, the
licensee also calculated that an annual
release of 476 Ci of Ar–41
(corresponding to approximately 3,400
MW-hours, or 1,700 hours of operation
at full licensed power) from the RINSC
reactor would correspond to a
maximum public dose of 10 mrem (0.10
mSv) per year. The NRC staff finds the
licensee’s calculations to be reasonable
and conservative. Seven annual
operational reports covering the period
July 2009 through June 2016 (each
annual report covers a July through June
reporting period) show that the
maximum recorded release of Ar–41 in
1 year was 129.4 Ci, which would result
in a dose of 2.7 mrem (0.027 mSv) in 1
year to a member of the public. This is
less than 3 percent of the 100 mrem (1
mSv) per year limit specified in 10 CFR
20.1301. The maximum radiation dose
of 2.7 mrem (0.027 mSv) in 1 year also
demonstrates compliance with the as
low as is reasonably achievable
(ALARA) air emissions dose constraint
of 10 mrem (0.10 mSv) specified in 10
CFR 20.1101, ‘‘Radiation protection
programs,’’ paragraph(d).
Liquid radioactive wastes are
produced as a result of normal operation
of the RINSC reactor, and typically
consist of miscellaneous neutron
activation product impurities in the
reactor coolant. Since most of these
activation products can be removed
from the reactor coolant by collection on
the mechanical filters and the
demineralizer resins, most of these
radioactive materials are typically
disposed as solid radioactive sources.
While some non-routine liquid
radioactive waste could be generated
due to decontamination or maintenance
activities, the amounts, based on a
review of the licensee’s past operating
experience, as reported in their annual
reports, have been and are expected to
remain a small volume. Liquid
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
1366
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 2017 / Notices
radioactive wastes at the RINSC facility
are allowed to decay in storage, are
disposed of into the sanitary sewer in
accordance with 10 CFR 20.2003,
‘‘Disposal by release into sanitary
sewerage,’’ or, when necessary, are
packaged and transported offsite for
disposal. Annual operational reports
covering the period July 2009 through
June 2016 show that the licensee
complied with the limits on discharges
to the sanitary sewer in 10 CFR part 20,
Appendix B.
Low-level solid radioactive waste
generated from reactor operations
typically includes laboratory wastes
such as irradiated plastics,
contaminated tools, towels, as well as
reactor demineralizer resins and
particulate filters. Any radioactive waste
that contains radionuclides with halflives of less than 90 days is allowed to
decay in storage and is then disposed of
as normal solid waste. Historically, one
or two 55-gallon drums of solid waste
are generated each year, with the
activity being in the microcurie range.
This waste is disposed of by a low-level
waste broker in accordance with all
applicable regulations for transportation
of radioactive materials. To comply with
the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982,
the licensee has entered into a contract
with the U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE) that provides that DOE retains
title to the fuel utilized at RINSC reactor
and that DOE is obligated to take the
fuel from the site for final disposition.
As described in Chapter 11 of the
RINSC reactor SAR, personnel
exposures are well within the limits set
by 10 CFR 20.1201, ‘‘Occupational dose
limits for adults,’’ and are ALARA. The
licensee tracks exposures of personnel
monitored with dosimeters, and
exposures are usually less than 10
percent of the occupational limit of
5,000 mrem (50 mSv) per year. Area
thermo-luminescent dosimeter monitors
mounted in the control room and the
reactor bay provide an additional
monthly measurement of total radiation
exposures at those locations. Annual
operational reports covering the period
July 2009 through June 2016 show that
the personnel doses were well within
the 10 CFR 20.1201 limits. No changes
in reactor operation that would lead to
an increase in occupational dose are
expected or proposed as a result of the
proposed action.
The radiation monitoring systems
associated with reactor operations at the
RINSC facility are provided and
maintained as a means of ensuring
compliance with radiation limits
established under 10 CFR part 20,
‘‘Standards for Protection against
Radiation.’’ The RINSC facility
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:06 Jan 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
monitoring systems consist of RAMs,
CAMs, portable radiation survey
instruments, perimeter monitors, and
stack gas and particulate monitors. The
stack particulate and gas monitoring
systems measure the beta-gamma
activity emitted by radioactive
particulates and the activity of gaseous
radioactive nuclides, respectively, that
are exhausted through the RINSC
facility stack. Perimeter monitoring at
RINSC facility consists of OLDs which
detect X-ray and gamma radiation.
The licensee conducts a monitoring
program to record and track the
radiological impact of reactor operation
on the surrounding unrestricted area.
The program consists of quarterly
exposure measurements at three
locations outside the reactor building
using OLDs. The licensee then applies
an occupancy factor to determine the
final exposure measurement. The
licensee’s radiation safety officer
administers the program and maintains
the appropriate records. Annual
operational reports covering the period
July 2009 through June 2016 show that
radiation exposures at the monitoring
locations were below the limits to the
public as required by 10 CFR part 20.
Year-to-year trends in exposures are
consistent between monitoring
locations. Also, no correlation exists
between total annual reactor operation
and annual exposures measured at the
monitoring locations. Based on review
of data for the years 2009 through 2016,
the NRC staff finds that operation of the
RINSC reactor does not have any
significant radiological impact on the
surrounding environment. No changes
in reactor operation that would affect
off-site radiation levels are expected or
proposed as a result of the proposed
action.
Because occupational and public
exposures are below regulatory limits,
the NRC staff concludes that the
proposed action would not have a
significant radiological impact.
Environmental Effects of Accidents
Accident scenarios are discussed in
Chapter 13 of the RINSC SAR. The
accidents analyzed in Chapter 13 cover
a range of anticipated events, including
a postulated accident involving a fission
product release with radiological
consequences that exceed those of any
accident considered to be credible. This
limiting accident is referred to as the
maximum hypothetical accident (MHA).
The licensee considers the uncontrolled
release of the gaseous fission products
from a fissionable experiment to be the
MHA. In the scenario used by the
licensee, an experiment containing
fissionable material fails, and the
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
gaseous fission products in the
experiment are released into the air of
the reactor building. From the reactor
building, the release would continue to
the environment. The licensee
calculated doses to facility personnel
during a five minute evacuation
duration, and also calculated the dose to
a member of the public outside the
facility during the two hours it would
take the entire plume of released
radioactive material to pass. The
licensee estimated an occupational dose
of 1,570 mrem (15.7 mSv), and a dose
of 100 mrem (1 mSv) to the maximallyexposed member of the public. The NRC
staff reviewed the licensee’s
calculations, and found them to be
generally reasonable and acceptable.
The NRC staff also performed
independent calculations to verify that
the licensee’s calculated doses
represented conservative estimates for
the MHA. The NRC staff estimated an
occupational dose of 4,100 mrem (41.0
mSv), and a dose of 88 mrem (0.88 mSv)
to the maximally-exposed member of
the public. The details of these
calculations are provided in the safety
evaluation report that the NRC staff is
preparing to document the safety review
of the application for a renewed license.
The NRC staff estimates that the
occupational radiation doses resulting
from the postulated MHA would be
below the 10 CFR 20.1201 limit of 5,000
mrem (50 mSv). The NRC staff also
estimates that the maximum radiation
doses for members of the public
resulting from the postulated MHA
would be at or below the 10 CFR
20.1301 limit of 100 mrem (1 mSv).
The licensee has systems in place for
controlling the release of radiological
effluents, and implements a radiation
protection program to monitor
personnel exposures and releases of
radioactive effluents. The licensee’s
systems and radiation protection
program are appropriate for the types
and quantities of effluents expected to
be generated by continued operation of
the reactor. The NRC also staff evaluated
information contained in the licensee’s
renewal application and data the
licensee reported to the NRC for the last
7 years of operation to determine the
projected radiological impact of the
facility on the environment during the
period of the renewed license. The NRC
staff finds that releases of radioactive
material and personnel exposures were
all well within applicable regulatory
limits. Because the licensee has not
requested any changes to the facility
design or operating conditions as part of
the application for license renewal, the
proposed action would not significantly
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 2017 / Notices
increase the probability or consequences
of accidents, would not significantly
change the types or quantities of
effluents that may be released off-site,
and would not significantly increase
individual or cumulative occupational
or public radiation exposure. Based on
its evaluation, the NRC staff concludes
that continued operation of the reactor
would not have a significant
environmental impact.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
B. Non-Radiological Impacts
The proposed action does not involve
any change in the operation of the
reactor, change in the emissions or heat
load dissipated to the environment, or
construction or other land disturbance
activities. The proposed action would
not result in any land use changes or
increase in noise or air emissions, and
would not have a significant impact on
air quality, noise or visual, terrestrial or
aquatic resources. The proposed license
renewal would not affect surface water
or groundwater resources, because water
is supplied through the city and no
changes in facility operations are
proposed. Heat produced cooling the
reactor is ultimately disposed to the
environment through the secondary
cooling system and cooling tower. There
are no increased thermal effects on the
environment in the proposed action.
The licensee uses no chemical
treatments in the secondary cooling
system. Hazardous chemicals may be
used in experiments at the RINSC
facility, but no releases of potentially
hazardous chemicals to the environment
occur during normal facility operation.
Disposal of non-radioactive waste,
including hazardous chemicals,
generated by individuals associated
with the University of Rhode Island, is
conducted by the campus Department of
Safety and Risk Management in
accordance with EPA regulations. The
Safety and Risk Management
organization provides training for users,
performs inspections, and complies
with OSHA and EPA regulations.
Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that
the proposed action would have no
significant non-radiological impacts.
Other Applicable Environmental Laws
In addition to the National
Environmental Policy Act, which
requires Federal agencies to consider
the environmental impacts of proposed
actions, the NRC has responsibilities
that are derived from other
environmental laws, which include the
Endangered Species Act, Coastal Zone
Management Act, Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act, National Historic
Preservation Act, and Executive Order
12898, ‘‘Federal Actions to Address
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:06 Jan 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations.’’ The following presents a
brief discussion of impacts associated
with resources protected by these laws
and related requirements.
1. Endangered Species Act (ESA)
The ESA was enacted to prevent
further decline of endangered and
threatened species and restore those
species and their critical habitat.
Section 7 of the ESA requires Federal
agencies to consult with the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (FWS) or National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
regarding actions that may affect listed
species or designated critical habitats.
The NRC staff conducted a search of
federally listed species and critical
habitats that have the potential to occur
in the vicinity of the RINSC facility
using the FWS’s Environmental
Conservation Online System
Information for Planning and
Conservation system. Eight Federallylisted species occur in Washington
County: The American burying beetle
(Nicrophorus americanus), hawksbill
sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata),
leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys
coriacea), northern long-eared bat
(Myotis septentrionalis), piping plover
(Charadrius melodus), red knot (Calidris
canutus rufa), roseate tern (Sterna
dougallii dougallii), and sandplain
gerardia (Agalinis acuta). However,
none of these species are likely to occur
near the RINSC reactor because the
facility is located on the University of
Rhode Island Narragansett Bay Campus,
which does not provide suitable habitat
for Federally listed species because it
has been developed, and in use, for
research and educational purposes for
many decades. Additionally, operation
of the RINSC reactor has no direct nexus
to the natural environment that could
otherwise affect federally listed species.
Accordingly, the NRC staff concludes
that the proposed license renewal of the
RINSC reactor would have no effect on
federally listed species or critical
habitats. Federal agencies are not
required to consult with the FWS if they
determine that an action will not affect
listed species or critical habitats
(ADAMS Accession No. ML16120A505).
Thus, the ESA does not require
consultation for the proposed RINSC
reactor license renewal, and the NRC
staff considers its obligations under ESA
Section 7 to be fulfilled for the proposed
action.
2. Coastal Zone Management Act
(CZMA)
The CZMA, in part, encourages States
to preserve, protect, develop, and
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1367
restore coastal resources. Applicants for
Federal licenses to conduct an activity
that affects any land or water use or
natural resource of the coastal zone of
a state must provide a certification in
that the proposed activities complies
with the State’s approved coastal zone
management program and will conduct
activities consistent with that program.
Rhode Island’s approved coastal zone
includes the area encompassed within
the State’s seaward boundary (3 miles
(4.8 kilometers)) to the inland
boundaries of the State’s 21 coastal
municipalities, of which Narragansett is
one. Although the RINSC reactor is
located within the State’s coastal zone,
the proposed license renewal is not
reasonably likely to affect any land or
water use or natural resource of the
coastal zone, and thus, the CZMA
consistency certification process does
not apply. Therefore, the NRC staff finds
that the licensee does not need to
provide a certification under the CZMA.
3. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act
(FWCA)
The FWCA requires Federal agencies
that license water resource development
projects to consult with the FWS (or
NMFS, when applicable) and the State
wildlife resource agencies regarding the
potential impacts of the project on fish
and wildlife resources.
The proposed license renewal does
not involve any water resource
development projects, including any of
the modifications relating to
impounding a body of water, damming,
diverting a stream or river, deepening a
channel, irrigation, or altering a body of
water for navigation or drainage.
Therefore, no coordination with other
agencies pursuant to the FWCA is
required for the proposed action.
4. National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA)
The NHPA requires Federal agencies
to consider the effects of their
undertakings on historic properties. As
stated in the Act, historic properties are
any prehistoric or historic district, site,
building, structure, or object included
in, or eligible for inclusion in the
National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP).
The NRHP lists one historic property
on the University of Rhode Island
Narragansett Bay Campus, the
Narragansett Baptist Church. The
location of the Narragansett Baptist
Church is approximately 1,000 feet
(304.8 meters) northwest of the RINSC
facility. Operation of the RINSC reactor
has not likely had any impact on this
property. A request for a Section 106
project review was submitted to the
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
1368
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 2017 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
State Historic Preservation Officer
(SHPO) regarding this undertaking and
determination. By letter dated December
19, 2013, the Rhode Island SHPO
concurred that this action would not
affect any historic properties (ADAMS
Accession No. ML14006A420). Based on
this information, the NRC staff finds
that the proposed license renewal and
the continued operation of the RINSC
reactor would have no adverse effect on
historic properties located near the
RINSC reactor.
5. Executive Order 12898—
Environmental Justice
Executive Order 12898, ‘‘Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations,’’ 59 FR 7629
(February 16, 1994), directs agencies to
identify and address the
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
of their actions on minority and lowincome populations, to the greatest
extent practicable and permitted by law.
The environmental justice impact
analysis evaluates the potential for
disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental effects
on minority and low-income
populations that could result from the
relicensing and the continued operation
of the RINSC reactor. Such effects may
include human health, biological,
cultural, economic, or social impacts.
Minority and low-income populations
are subsets of the general public
residing around the RINSC reactor, and
all are exposed to the same health and
environmental effects generated from
activities at the RINSC reactor.
Minority Populations in the Vicinity
of the RINSC Reactor—According to the
U.S. Census Bureau’s 2010 Census,
approximately 12 percent of the total
population (approximately 125,000
individuals) residing within a 10-mile
radius of the RINSC reactor identified
themselves as minorities. The largest
minority populations were Hispanic,
Latino, or Spanish origin of any race
(approximately 4,900 or 4 percent)
followed by Black or African American
(approximately 3,700 or 3 percent).
According to the 2010 Census, 7.6
percent of the Washington County
population identified themselves as
minorities, with persons of Hispanic,
Latino, or Spanish origin of any race,
Asians, and Black or African Americans
comprising the largest minority
populations (2.4 percent, 2.1 percent,
and 2.0 percent, respectively).
According to the U.S. Census Bureau’s
2015 American Community Survey 1year Estimates, the minority population
of Washington County, as a percent of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:06 Jan 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
the total population, had increased to
about 9 percent.
Low-income Populations in the
Vicinity of the RINSC Reactor—
According to U.S. Census Bureau’s
2010–2014 American Community
Survey 5-Year Estimates, approximately
11,000 persons and 1,500 families
(approximately 10 and 5 percent,
respectively) residing within a 10-mile
radius of the RINSC reactor were
identified as living below the Federal
poverty threshold. The 2014 Federal
poverty threshold was $24,230 for a
family of four. According to the U.S.
Census Bureau’s 2015 American
Community Survey Census 1-Year
Estimates, the median household
income for the State of Rhode Island
was $58,073 while approximately 10
percent of families and 14 percent of the
state population were found to be living
below the Federal poverty threshold.
Washington County had a higher
median household income average
($72,453) and a lower percent of
families (8 percent) and persons (10
percent) living below the poverty level,
respectively.
Impact Analysis—Potential impacts to
minority and low-income populations
would mostly consist of radiological
effects; however, radiation doses from
continued operations associated with
the proposed license renewal are
expected to continue at current levels,
and would be below regulatory limits.
No significant visual or noise impacts
are expected to result from the proposed
action. Based on this information and
the analysis of human health and
environmental impacts presented in this
EA, the proposed license renewal would
not have disproportionately high and
adverse human health and
environmental effects on minority and
low-income populations residing in the
vicinity of the RINSC reactor.
Environmental Impacts of the
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to license renewal,
the NRC considered denying the
proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’
alternative). If the NRC denied the
request for license renewal, reactor
operations would cease and
decommissioning would be required
(sooner than if a renewed license were
issued) and the environmental effects of
decommission would occur.
Decommissioning would be conducted
in accordance with an NRC-approved
decommissioning plan, which would
require a separate environmental review
under 10 CFR part 51.21. Cessation of
reactor operations would reduce or
eliminate radioactive effluents.
However, as previously discussed in
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
this EA, radioactive effluents from
reactor operations constitute a small
fraction of the applicable regulatory
limits. Therefore, the environmental
impacts of license renewal and the
denial of the request for license renewal
would be similar. In addition, denying
the request for license renewal would
eliminate the benefits of teaching,
research, and services provided by the
RINSC reactor.
Alternative Use of Resources
The proposed license renewal does
not involve the use of any different
resources or significant quantities of
resources beyond those previously
considered in the issuance of Facility
License No. R–95 on July 21, 1964,
which authorized RIAEC to operate the
RINSC reactor, the license amendment
issued on September 10, 1968, which
authorized operation up to a maximum
of 2 MWt, and the license amendment
issued on March 17, 1993, which
authorized the conversion from highlyenriched uranium fuel to low-enriched
uranium fuel in the RINSC reactor.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
With the exception of the Rhode
Island SHPO as previously described in
this EA, the NRC staff did not enter into
consultation with any other Federal
agencies or with the State of Rhode
Island regarding the environmental
impact of the proposed action. However,
on December 20, 2016, the NRC notified
the Rhode Island State official, Mr. Paul
D’Abbraccio, Radiological Emergency
Preparedness Program Manager, of the
Rhode Island Emergency Management
Agency of the proposed action. Mr. Paul
D’Abbraccio responded by email on
December 22, 2016 and had no
comments.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The NRC is considering issuance of a
renewed Facility License No. R–95, held
by the RIAEC, which would authorize
the continued operation of the RINSC
reactor for an additional 20 years from
the date of issuance of the renewed
license.
On the basis of the EA included in
Section II of this notice and
incorporated by reference in this
finding, the NRC staff finds that the
proposed action will not have a
significant impact on the quality of the
human environment. The proposed
action would result in no significant
impacts on terrestrial, surface or
groundwater resources, or the
radiological environment. In addition,
the proposed action will not affect
Federally-protected species or affect any
designated habitat. The NRC staff’s
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 2017 / Notices
evaluation considered information
provided in the licensee’s application,
as supplemented, and the NRC staff’s
review of related environmental
documents. Section IV below lists the
environmental documents related to the
proposed action and includes
information on the availability of these
documents. Accordingly, the NRC has
determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement for the
proposed action.
IV. Availability of Documents
The following table identifies the
references cited in this document and
related to the NRC’s FONSI. These
documents are available for public
inspection online through ADAMS at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html or in person at the NRC’s
PDR as described previously.
ADAMS
accession No.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Document
‘‘Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission—‘Requesting Renewal of Operating License R–095 (Enclosure 2)’ [REDACTED
Safety Analysis Report],’’ May 3, 2004.
‘‘Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission, Requesting Renewal of Operating License R–095,’’ May 3, 2004 ...........................
‘‘Response to Request for Additional Information Concerning Plans for Decommissioning Facility at the End of Useful Life Ref
Item 3 Parts a, b, and c,’’ January 19, 2010.
‘‘Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center, Appendix A to Safety Analysis Report, Information on Ar–41 and N–16,’’ (received
December 5, 2016), February 4, 2010.
‘‘Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center Reactor Submittal of Response to Request for Additional Information Re License Renewal,’’ August 6, 2010.
‘‘Responding to Requests for Additional Information (RAI) regarding our Analysis of the Maximum Hypothetical Accident
(MHA) for Renewal of License R–95,’’ August 18, 2010.
‘‘Memorandum Steady-State Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis for Forced-Convective Flow in the Rhode Island Nuclear Science
(RINSC) Reactor,’’ September 3, 2010.
‘‘Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission, Fourth Response to Request for Additional Information dated April 23, 2010 (Redacted),’’ September 8, 2010.
‘‘Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission Fifth Response to April 13, 2010 Request for Additional Information (Regarding License Renewal redacted),’’ November 26, 2010.
‘‘Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission—Response to Requests for Additional Information Regarding Aging Issues Raised
in RAIs,’’ December 7, 2010.
‘‘Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission Response to April 13, 2010, Request for Additional Information Regarding License
Renewal Technical Specifications (Redacted),’’ December 14, 2010.
‘‘Reply to your Request for Additional Information (RAI) dated April 13, 2010, regarding License Renewal for the Rhode Island
Nuclear Science Center Reactor (RINSC),’’ January 24, 2011.
‘‘Letter re: Request for Additional Information dated April 13, 2010 Regarding License Renewal for the Rhode Island Nuclear
Science Center Reactor (RINSC),’’ February 24, 2011.
‘‘Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Renewal,’’ July
15, 2011.
‘‘Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission Tenth Response to the April 13, 2010, Request for Additional Information Regarding License Renewal (Redacted),’’ July 15, 2011.
‘‘Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission Responses to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Renewal (Redacted),’’ July 15, 2011.
‘‘Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center Tenth Response to NRC Request for Additional Information dated April 13, 2010,
Pages 126 Through 204,’’ July 15, 2011.
‘‘Response to NRC’s Request for Additional Information Regarding Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center Reactor License
Renewal,’’ March 15, 2013.
‘‘Response to NRC’s Request for Additional Information Regarding Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center Reactor License
Renewal,’’ March 15, 2013.
‘‘Response to NRC’s Request for Additional Information Regarding Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center Reactor License
Renewal, Proposed Technical Specification 130314,’’ March 15, 2013.
‘‘Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Financial Qualifications for the RINSC Reactor License Renewal,’’
September 16, 2013.
‘‘Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission License Renewal Historical Resource Impact Response Letter,’’ December 19,
2013.
‘‘Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Requalification Plan for the RINSC Reactor License Renewal,’’
February 24, 2014.
‘‘Compilation of All Submitted Requests for Additional Information for the Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center Reactor License Renewal. Part 1 of 3,’’ April 28, 2014.
‘‘Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission Consolidated Responses to Request for Additional Information Regarding License
Renewal. Part 2 of 3 (Redacted),’’ April 28, 2014.
‘‘Compilation of All Submitted Requests for Additional Information for the Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center Reactor License Renewal. Part 3 of 3,’’ April 28, 2014.
‘‘Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center Reactor—Updated Proposed Technical Specifications,’’ June 30, 2014 .........................
‘‘Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center Updated Technical Specifications,’’ August 7, 2015 ........................................................
‘‘Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center Submittal of Updated Proposed Technical Specification,’’ August 11, 2015 ...................
‘‘Summary of Changes to the Proposed Technical Specifications,’’ August 11, 2015 ....................................................................
‘‘Contractor Comments and Responses,’’ August 11, 2015 ............................................................................................................
‘‘Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center Transient Analyses Revised January 20, 2016,’’ January 20, 2016 ................................
‘‘Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center Technical Specifications,’’ February 26, 2016 ..................................................................
‘‘Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission—Response to Requests for Additional Information dated September 3, 2015,’’
March 1, 2016.
‘‘Fuel Failure Addendum 160229,’’ March 1, 2016 ..........................................................................................................................
‘‘New Transient Analysis Results 160226,’’ March 1, 2016 .............................................................................................................
‘‘150903 RAI Responses 160301,’’ March 1, 2016 ..........................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:06 Jan 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
1369
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
ML14038A386
ML041270519
ML100270176
ML16340A068
ML102240257
ML102360440
ML16062A376
ML16279A516
ML16279A518
ML103490242
ML16279A519
ML110320416
ML110600699
ML11202A287
ML16279A520
ML16279A521
ML11202A290
ML13080A361
ML13080A362
ML13080A364
ML13260A474
ML14006A420
ML14057A639
ML14126A192
ML16279A523
ML14126A195
ML14184B361
ML15223A953
ML15223A952
ML15223A954
ML15223A955
ML16062A378
ML16062A380
ML16062A373
ML16062A381
ML16062A379
ML16062A374
1370
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 2017 / Notices
ADAMS
accession No.
Document
‘‘Core Change Summary for Conversion from RINSC LEU Core #5 to LEU Core #6,’’ March 1, 2016 ........................................
‘‘[RINSC] Fuel Failure Analysis [Dose Table],’’ March 1, 2016 .......................................................................................................
‘‘Request for Change to License for the Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission,’’ April 21, 2016 ............................................
‘‘Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission Research Reactor—Responses to NRC Staff Request for Additional Information
for License Renewal Review (Redacted Version),’’ July 20, 2016.
‘‘State of Rhode Island and Province Plantations—Response to Request for Additional Dated August 3, 2016, Rhode Island
Nuclear Science Center Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding the Renewal, and Rhode Island
Nuclear Science Center Technical Specifications,’’ October 6, 2016.
‘‘State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations—Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Calculations
for Fuel Element Failure Accident Scenario,’’ Letter and Responses, November 1, 2016.
‘‘Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission—Transmittal of Supplemental Information in Support of Relicensing for the Rhode
Island Nuclear Science Center (R–95),’’ Letter and Responses, November 14, 2016.
‘‘Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center—Supplemental Information for the Relicensing of the Rhode Island Atomic Energy
Commission, Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center—Safety Analysis Report, and Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center—
Technical Specifications,’’ December 1, 2016.
‘‘State of Rhode Island and Province Plantations—Supplemental Information Regarding Relicensing for the Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center,’’ December 8, 2016.
‘‘Rhode Island December 13, 2016 Conversation Record,’’ December 13, 2016 ...........................................................................
‘‘Supplemental Information Re: Relicensing for the Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center (R–95),’’ December 15, 2016 ...........
‘‘Rhode Island December 15 2016 Conversation Record,’’ December 15, 2016 ............................................................................
‘‘Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center—Supplemental Information Regarding Relicensing,’’ December 15, 2016 .....................
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day
of December 2016.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Steven T. Lynch,
Chief (Acting), Research and Test Reactors
Branch, Division of Policy and Rulemaking,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2016–31980 Filed 1–4–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
Comments must be filed by
February 6, 2017. A request for a
hearing must be filed by March 6, 2017.
Any potential party as defined in § 2.4
of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), who believes
access to SUNSI is necessary to respond
to this notice must request document
access by January 17, 2017.
DATES:
You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2016–0272. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey,
Office of Administration, Mail Stop:
OWFN–12–H08, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
ADDRESSES:
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–391; NRC–2016–0272]
Tennessee Valley Authority; Watts Bar
Nuclear Plant, Unit 2
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: License amendment request;
notice of opportunity to comment,
request a hearing, and petition for leave
to intervene; order imposing
procedures.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) received and is
considering issuance of an amendment
to Facility Operating License No. NPF–
96, issued to the Tennessee Valley
Authority, for operation of the Watts Bar
Nuclear Plant (WBN), Unit 2. The
proposed amendment would revise the
WBN, Unit 2, Cyber Security Plan (CSP)
Implementation Schedule for Milestone
8 and would revise the associated
license condition in the Facility
Operating License. Because the
amendment request contains sensitive
unclassified non-safeguards information
(SUNSI), an order imposes procedures
to obtain access to SUNSI for contention
preparation.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:06 Jan 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Schaaf, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington DC 20555–
0001; telephone: 301–415–6020; email:
Robert.Schaaf@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ML16062A375
ML16062A382
ML16112A071
ML16202A008
ML16280A420
ML16306A063
ML16319A298
ML16336A734
ML16343A851
ML16351A003
ML16350A042
ML16351A012
ML16350A256
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2016–
0272 and facility name, unit number(s),
plant docket number, application date,
and subject when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information for
this action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2016–0272.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
License Amendment Request (WBN–
TS–16–04) to Change the Completion
Date of Cyber Security Plan
Implementation Milestone 8 is available
in ADAMS under Accession No.
ML16320A161.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC–2016–
0272 and facility name, unit number(s),
plant docket number, application date,
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 3 (Thursday, January 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1364-1370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31980]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-193; NRC-2016-0213]
Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact;
issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering
renewal of Facility License No. R-95, held by the Rhode Island Atomic
Energy Commission (RIAEC or the licensee), for the continued operation
of the Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center Reactor (RINSC reactor or
the facility), located in the Narragansett, Washington County, Rhode
Island. The NRC is issuing an environmental assessment (EA) and finding
of no significant impact (FONSI) associated with the renewal of the
license.
DATES: The EA and FONSI are available on January 5, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2016-0213 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2016-0213. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. For
the convenience of the reader, the ADAMS accession numbers are provided
in a table in the ``Availability of Documents'' section of this
document.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room OWFN-01F21, One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick G. Boyle, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rockville, MD
20852. Telephone: 301-415-3936; email: Patrick.Boyle@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The NRC is considering issuance of a renewed Facility Operating
License No. R-95, held by RIAEC, which would authorize continued
operation of the RINSC reactor, located in Narragansett, Washington
County, Rhode Island. As required by section 51.21 of title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), ``Criteria for and identification
of licensing and regulatory actions requiring environmental
assessments,'' the NRC staff prepared an EA documenting its
environmental review. Based on the results of the EA that follows, the
NRC has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for
the proposed renewed license and is issuing a FONSI in accordance with
10 CFR 51.32, ``Finding of no significant impact.''
II. Environmental Assessment
Facility Site and Environs
The RINSC reactor is located on the University of Rhode Island
Narragansett Bay Campus. The RINSC facility consists of one building
that houses the reactor and support areas. The confinement section of
the reactor building is constructed primarily of concrete, brick,
steel, and aluminum. The RINSC site comprises the reactor building and
a small area immediately surrounding it, partially bounded by a chain-
link fence. Adjacent to the reactor site are athletic facilities to the
north and west, fields and parking lots to the east, and academic and
research buildings to the south. Surrounding areas are well developed
with offsite land use mostly residential in nature. The nearest
residences are located approximately 500 meters (1,640 feet) west-
northwest and south of the facility.
The RINSC reactor is a pool-type, water moderated and cooled
research reactor licensed to operate at a thermal steady-state power
level of 2 megawatts (MWt). The reactor was designed to permit later
conversion to a steady-state power level of 5 MWt. The fuel is located
at the bottom of an aluminum-lined concrete pool with a volume of
approximately 40,000 gallons (151,000 liters) and a depth of 32 feet
(9.7 m). The reactor is fueled with standard plate-type low-enriched
uranium fuel provided by the Department of Energy.
The RINSC reactor uses demineralized water for primary coolant,
shielding, and as a reactor moderator and city water for secondary
coolant. At power levels below 0.1 MWt, the core can be cooled by
natural convection of water through the reactor core and at power
levels above 0.1 MWt the core is cooled by forced convection of water
through the reactor core. In natural convection mode cooling, heat from
the core is transferred to the primary cooling water in the pool where
it is dissipated to the surrounding environment. In forced convection
mode cooling, heat is transferred from the primary cooling water to two
heat exchangers, which pass the heat to the secondary cooling loops,
which in turn dissipate the heat to the surrounding environment via two
cooling towers. Operation of the primary and secondary cooling systems
are checked on a daily basis prior to forced convection reactor
operation. During this checkout, the performance of each system is
monitored with emphasis on pump
[[Page 1365]]
outlet pressures, pressure differentials and system flow rates. The
licensee conducts periodic tests of the secondary water for sodium-24
which would indicate a leak from the primary water into the secondary
water.
During normal operation of the RINSC reactor, the only significant
airborne radioactive effluent is Argon-41 (Ar-41). The primary liquid
radioactive effluents produced during normal operation include
miscellaneous neutron activation products in the primary coolant, many
of which are deposited in the mechanical filter and demineralizer
resins and, therefore, disposed of as solid radioactive waste. Non-
routine liquid radioactive wastes can result from decontamination or
maintenance activities, such as filter or resin replacements. Solid
radioactive wastes include waste generated from reactor maintenance
operations and laboratory wastes from experiments. Much of the solid
radioactive waste generated at the RINSC facility is held in a
restricted area and allowed to decay to background levels and then
disposed of as non-radioactive waste. Solid radioactive waste that is
not decayed in storage is transferred to a low-level waste broker for
appropriate disposal.
The RIAEC maintains a Radiation Protection Program, which involves
regular monitoring of airborne, liquid, and solid gamma and beta
radiation to ensure that any effluent releases are within the limits of
10 CFR part 20, ``Standards For Protection Against Radiation.'' The
current environmental program consists of radiation area monitors
(RAMs), continuous air monitors (CAMs), portable radiation survey
instruments, personnel monitors, and stack gas and particulate
monitors. Perimeter monitoring at the RINSC facility consists of
Optically-Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeters (OLDs) which detect X-ray
and gamma radiation.
A detailed description of the reactor and its operations can be
found in the Safety Analysis Report (SAR) for the RINSC reactor
submitted by RIAEC with its renewal application.
Description of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would renew Facility Operating License No. R-95
for a period of 20 years from the date of issuance of the renewed
license. The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's
application dated May 3, 2004, as supplemented on January 19, February
4, August 6, August 18, September 3, September 8, November 26, December
7, and December 14, 2010; January 24, February 24, and July 15, 2011;
March 15, September 16, and December 19, 2013; February 24, April 28,
and June 30, 2014; August 7 and August 11, 2015; and January 20,
February 26, March 1, April 21, July 20, October 6, November 1,
November 14, December 1, December 8, December 13, and December 15, 2016
(collectively referred to as ``the renewal application''). Initially,
the operating license was to expire at midnight on August 27, 2002, but
a construction time recapture license amendment issued on July 28, 2000
extended the license expiration date to July 21, 2004. Because of the
timely renewal provision contained in 10 CFR 2.109(a), the licensee is
permitted to continue operation of the reactor under the terms and
conditions of its operating license until the license renewal
application before the NRC has been finally determined. The proposed
renewal would authorize continued operation of the reactor for an
additional 20 years from the date of issuance of the renewed license.
Need for the Proposed Action
The proposed action is needed to allow the continued operation of
the RINSC reactor to routinely provide teaching, research, and services
to numerous institutions for a period of 20 years from the date of
issuance of the renewed license.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The environmental impacts of the proposed action are discussed
below. As discussed below, the proposed action will not have a
significant environmental impact. In addition, the proposed action will
not require any physical changes to the facility and the impacts are
similar to those occurring during past operations.
A. Radiological Impacts
Environmental Effects of Reactor Operations
The only significant gaseous radioactive effluent resulting from
the operation of the RINSC reactor is Ar-41. This nuclide is released
to the environment from the reactor building from an exhaust stack on
the roof that combines the ventilation exhausts from both the main and
the purge systems. The stack discharge length is 115 feet (35 meters).
Nitrogen-16 (N-16) is also produced during reactor operation, but its
release from the reactor stack is insignificant because the half-life
of N-16 is approximately 7 seconds and most of the N-16 produced in the
reactor coolant would decay before reaching the stack. Therefore Ar-41
is the most significant radionuclide released as a gaseous effluent
during normal reactor operations.
The licensee's Technical Specifications require that public doses
from Ar-41 not exceed the 100 millirem (mrem) annual public dose limit
in 10 CFR 20.1301, ``Dose limits for individual members of the
public.'' The Ar-41 release rate would reach a maximum during
continuous operation at full power. Historical data shows that the
reactor generates approximately 0.14 0.03 Curie (Ci) of
Ar-41 per MW hour of operation. Using the Environmental Protection
Agency COMPLY computer code, the licensee calculated the dose to the
maximally-exposed member of the public located 100 meters (328 feet)
from the stack to be 0.021 mrem (0.00021 millisieverts (mSv)) per Ci of
Ar-41 released. Using this result, the licensee also calculated that an
annual release of 476 Ci of Ar-41 (corresponding to approximately 3,400
MW-hours, or 1,700 hours of operation at full licensed power) from the
RINSC reactor would correspond to a maximum public dose of 10 mrem
(0.10 mSv) per year. The NRC staff finds the licensee's calculations to
be reasonable and conservative. Seven annual operational reports
covering the period July 2009 through June 2016 (each annual report
covers a July through June reporting period) show that the maximum
recorded release of Ar-41 in 1 year was 129.4 Ci, which would result in
a dose of 2.7 mrem (0.027 mSv) in 1 year to a member of the public.
This is less than 3 percent of the 100 mrem (1 mSv) per year limit
specified in 10 CFR 20.1301. The maximum radiation dose of 2.7 mrem
(0.027 mSv) in 1 year also demonstrates compliance with the as low as
is reasonably achievable (ALARA) air emissions dose constraint of 10
mrem (0.10 mSv) specified in 10 CFR 20.1101, ``Radiation protection
programs,'' paragraph(d).
Liquid radioactive wastes are produced as a result of normal
operation of the RINSC reactor, and typically consist of miscellaneous
neutron activation product impurities in the reactor coolant. Since
most of these activation products can be removed from the reactor
coolant by collection on the mechanical filters and the demineralizer
resins, most of these radioactive materials are typically disposed as
solid radioactive sources. While some non-routine liquid radioactive
waste could be generated due to decontamination or maintenance
activities, the amounts, based on a review of the licensee's past
operating experience, as reported in their annual reports, have been
and are expected to remain a small volume. Liquid
[[Page 1366]]
radioactive wastes at the RINSC facility are allowed to decay in
storage, are disposed of into the sanitary sewer in accordance with 10
CFR 20.2003, ``Disposal by release into sanitary sewerage,'' or, when
necessary, are packaged and transported offsite for disposal. Annual
operational reports covering the period July 2009 through June 2016
show that the licensee complied with the limits on discharges to the
sanitary sewer in 10 CFR part 20, Appendix B.
Low-level solid radioactive waste generated from reactor operations
typically includes laboratory wastes such as irradiated plastics,
contaminated tools, towels, as well as reactor demineralizer resins and
particulate filters. Any radioactive waste that contains radionuclides
with half-lives of less than 90 days is allowed to decay in storage and
is then disposed of as normal solid waste. Historically, one or two 55-
gallon drums of solid waste are generated each year, with the activity
being in the microcurie range. This waste is disposed of by a low-level
waste broker in accordance with all applicable regulations for
transportation of radioactive materials. To comply with the Nuclear
Waste Policy Act of 1982, the licensee has entered into a contract with
the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) that provides that DOE retains
title to the fuel utilized at RINSC reactor and that DOE is obligated
to take the fuel from the site for final disposition.
As described in Chapter 11 of the RINSC reactor SAR, personnel
exposures are well within the limits set by 10 CFR 20.1201,
``Occupational dose limits for adults,'' and are ALARA. The licensee
tracks exposures of personnel monitored with dosimeters, and exposures
are usually less than 10 percent of the occupational limit of 5,000
mrem (50 mSv) per year. Area thermo-luminescent dosimeter monitors
mounted in the control room and the reactor bay provide an additional
monthly measurement of total radiation exposures at those locations.
Annual operational reports covering the period July 2009 through June
2016 show that the personnel doses were well within the 10 CFR 20.1201
limits. No changes in reactor operation that would lead to an increase
in occupational dose are expected or proposed as a result of the
proposed action.
The radiation monitoring systems associated with reactor operations
at the RINSC facility are provided and maintained as a means of
ensuring compliance with radiation limits established under 10 CFR part
20, ``Standards for Protection against Radiation.'' The RINSC facility
monitoring systems consist of RAMs, CAMs, portable radiation survey
instruments, perimeter monitors, and stack gas and particulate
monitors. The stack particulate and gas monitoring systems measure the
beta-gamma activity emitted by radioactive particulates and the
activity of gaseous radioactive nuclides, respectively, that are
exhausted through the RINSC facility stack. Perimeter monitoring at
RINSC facility consists of OLDs which detect X-ray and gamma radiation.
The licensee conducts a monitoring program to record and track the
radiological impact of reactor operation on the surrounding
unrestricted area. The program consists of quarterly exposure
measurements at three locations outside the reactor building using
OLDs. The licensee then applies an occupancy factor to determine the
final exposure measurement. The licensee's radiation safety officer
administers the program and maintains the appropriate records. Annual
operational reports covering the period July 2009 through June 2016
show that radiation exposures at the monitoring locations were below
the limits to the public as required by 10 CFR part 20. Year-to-year
trends in exposures are consistent between monitoring locations. Also,
no correlation exists between total annual reactor operation and annual
exposures measured at the monitoring locations. Based on review of data
for the years 2009 through 2016, the NRC staff finds that operation of
the RINSC reactor does not have any significant radiological impact on
the surrounding environment. No changes in reactor operation that would
affect off-site radiation levels are expected or proposed as a result
of the proposed action.
Because occupational and public exposures are below regulatory
limits, the NRC staff concludes that the proposed action would not have
a significant radiological impact.
Environmental Effects of Accidents
Accident scenarios are discussed in Chapter 13 of the RINSC SAR.
The accidents analyzed in Chapter 13 cover a range of anticipated
events, including a postulated accident involving a fission product
release with radiological consequences that exceed those of any
accident considered to be credible. This limiting accident is referred
to as the maximum hypothetical accident (MHA). The licensee considers
the uncontrolled release of the gaseous fission products from a
fissionable experiment to be the MHA. In the scenario used by the
licensee, an experiment containing fissionable material fails, and the
gaseous fission products in the experiment are released into the air of
the reactor building. From the reactor building, the release would
continue to the environment. The licensee calculated doses to facility
personnel during a five minute evacuation duration, and also calculated
the dose to a member of the public outside the facility during the two
hours it would take the entire plume of released radioactive material
to pass. The licensee estimated an occupational dose of 1,570 mrem
(15.7 mSv), and a dose of 100 mrem (1 mSv) to the maximally-exposed
member of the public. The NRC staff reviewed the licensee's
calculations, and found them to be generally reasonable and acceptable.
The NRC staff also performed independent calculations to verify that
the licensee's calculated doses represented conservative estimates for
the MHA. The NRC staff estimated an occupational dose of 4,100 mrem
(41.0 mSv), and a dose of 88 mrem (0.88 mSv) to the maximally-exposed
member of the public. The details of these calculations are provided in
the safety evaluation report that the NRC staff is preparing to
document the safety review of the application for a renewed license.
The NRC staff estimates that the occupational radiation doses resulting
from the postulated MHA would be below the 10 CFR 20.1201 limit of
5,000 mrem (50 mSv). The NRC staff also estimates that the maximum
radiation doses for members of the public resulting from the postulated
MHA would be at or below the 10 CFR 20.1301 limit of 100 mrem (1 mSv).
The licensee has systems in place for controlling the release of
radiological effluents, and implements a radiation protection program
to monitor personnel exposures and releases of radioactive effluents.
The licensee's systems and radiation protection program are appropriate
for the types and quantities of effluents expected to be generated by
continued operation of the reactor. The NRC also staff evaluated
information contained in the licensee's renewal application and data
the licensee reported to the NRC for the last 7 years of operation to
determine the projected radiological impact of the facility on the
environment during the period of the renewed license. The NRC staff
finds that releases of radioactive material and personnel exposures
were all well within applicable regulatory limits. Because the licensee
has not requested any changes to the facility design or operating
conditions as part of the application for license renewal, the proposed
action would not significantly
[[Page 1367]]
increase the probability or consequences of accidents, would not
significantly change the types or quantities of effluents that may be
released off-site, and would not significantly increase individual or
cumulative occupational or public radiation exposure. Based on its
evaluation, the NRC staff concludes that continued operation of the
reactor would not have a significant environmental impact.
B. Non-Radiological Impacts
The proposed action does not involve any change in the operation of
the reactor, change in the emissions or heat load dissipated to the
environment, or construction or other land disturbance activities. The
proposed action would not result in any land use changes or increase in
noise or air emissions, and would not have a significant impact on air
quality, noise or visual, terrestrial or aquatic resources. The
proposed license renewal would not affect surface water or groundwater
resources, because water is supplied through the city and no changes in
facility operations are proposed. Heat produced cooling the reactor is
ultimately disposed to the environment through the secondary cooling
system and cooling tower. There are no increased thermal effects on the
environment in the proposed action. The licensee uses no chemical
treatments in the secondary cooling system. Hazardous chemicals may be
used in experiments at the RINSC facility, but no releases of
potentially hazardous chemicals to the environment occur during normal
facility operation. Disposal of non-radioactive waste, including
hazardous chemicals, generated by individuals associated with the
University of Rhode Island, is conducted by the campus Department of
Safety and Risk Management in accordance with EPA regulations. The
Safety and Risk Management organization provides training for users,
performs inspections, and complies with OSHA and EPA regulations.
Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that the proposed action would have
no significant non-radiological impacts.
Other Applicable Environmental Laws
In addition to the National Environmental Policy Act, which
requires Federal agencies to consider the environmental impacts of
proposed actions, the NRC has responsibilities that are derived from
other environmental laws, which include the Endangered Species Act,
Coastal Zone Management Act, Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act,
National Historic Preservation Act, and Executive Order 12898,
``Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations.'' The following presents a
brief discussion of impacts associated with resources protected by
these laws and related requirements.
1. Endangered Species Act (ESA)
The ESA was enacted to prevent further decline of endangered and
threatened species and restore those species and their critical
habitat. Section 7 of the ESA requires Federal agencies to consult with
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) or National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS) regarding actions that may affect listed species or
designated critical habitats. The NRC staff conducted a search of
federally listed species and critical habitats that have the potential
to occur in the vicinity of the RINSC facility using the FWS's
Environmental Conservation Online System Information for Planning and
Conservation system. Eight Federally-listed species occur in Washington
County: The American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus), hawksbill
sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata), leatherback sea turtle
(Dermochelys coriacea), northern long-eared bat (Myotis
septentrionalis), piping plover (Charadrius melodus), red knot
(Calidris canutus rufa), roseate tern (Sterna dougallii dougallii), and
sandplain gerardia (Agalinis acuta). However, none of these species are
likely to occur near the RINSC reactor because the facility is located
on the University of Rhode Island Narragansett Bay Campus, which does
not provide suitable habitat for Federally listed species because it
has been developed, and in use, for research and educational purposes
for many decades. Additionally, operation of the RINSC reactor has no
direct nexus to the natural environment that could otherwise affect
federally listed species. Accordingly, the NRC staff concludes that the
proposed license renewal of the RINSC reactor would have no effect on
federally listed species or critical habitats. Federal agencies are not
required to consult with the FWS if they determine that an action will
not affect listed species or critical habitats (ADAMS Accession No.
ML16120A505). Thus, the ESA does not require consultation for the
proposed RINSC reactor license renewal, and the NRC staff considers its
obligations under ESA Section 7 to be fulfilled for the proposed
action.
2. Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
The CZMA, in part, encourages States to preserve, protect, develop,
and restore coastal resources. Applicants for Federal licenses to
conduct an activity that affects any land or water use or natural
resource of the coastal zone of a state must provide a certification in
that the proposed activities complies with the State's approved coastal
zone management program and will conduct activities consistent with
that program.
Rhode Island's approved coastal zone includes the area encompassed
within the State's seaward boundary (3 miles (4.8 kilometers)) to the
inland boundaries of the State's 21 coastal municipalities, of which
Narragansett is one. Although the RINSC reactor is located within the
State's coastal zone, the proposed license renewal is not reasonably
likely to affect any land or water use or natural resource of the
coastal zone, and thus, the CZMA consistency certification process does
not apply. Therefore, the NRC staff finds that the licensee does not
need to provide a certification under the CZMA.
3. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA)
The FWCA requires Federal agencies that license water resource
development projects to consult with the FWS (or NMFS, when applicable)
and the State wildlife resource agencies regarding the potential
impacts of the project on fish and wildlife resources.
The proposed license renewal does not involve any water resource
development projects, including any of the modifications relating to
impounding a body of water, damming, diverting a stream or river,
deepening a channel, irrigation, or altering a body of water for
navigation or drainage. Therefore, no coordination with other agencies
pursuant to the FWCA is required for the proposed action.
4. National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA)
The NHPA requires Federal agencies to consider the effects of their
undertakings on historic properties. As stated in the Act, historic
properties are any prehistoric or historic district, site, building,
structure, or object included in, or eligible for inclusion in the
National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).
The NRHP lists one historic property on the University of Rhode
Island Narragansett Bay Campus, the Narragansett Baptist Church. The
location of the Narragansett Baptist Church is approximately 1,000 feet
(304.8 meters) northwest of the RINSC facility. Operation of the RINSC
reactor has not likely had any impact on this property. A request for a
Section 106 project review was submitted to the
[[Page 1368]]
State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding this undertaking
and determination. By letter dated December 19, 2013, the Rhode Island
SHPO concurred that this action would not affect any historic
properties (ADAMS Accession No. ML14006A420). Based on this
information, the NRC staff finds that the proposed license renewal and
the continued operation of the RINSC reactor would have no adverse
effect on historic properties located near the RINSC reactor.
5. Executive Order 12898--Environmental Justice
Executive Order 12898, ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations,'' 59 FR
7629 (February 16, 1994), directs agencies to identify and address the
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects of their actions on minority and low-income populations, to the
greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
The environmental justice impact analysis evaluates the potential
for disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental
effects on minority and low-income populations that could result from
the relicensing and the continued operation of the RINSC reactor. Such
effects may include human health, biological, cultural, economic, or
social impacts. Minority and low-income populations are subsets of the
general public residing around the RINSC reactor, and all are exposed
to the same health and environmental effects generated from activities
at the RINSC reactor.
Minority Populations in the Vicinity of the RINSC Reactor--
According to the U.S. Census Bureau's 2010 Census, approximately 12
percent of the total population (approximately 125,000 individuals)
residing within a 10-mile radius of the RINSC reactor identified
themselves as minorities. The largest minority populations were
Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin of any race (approximately 4,900 or
4 percent) followed by Black or African American (approximately 3,700
or 3 percent). According to the 2010 Census, 7.6 percent of the
Washington County population identified themselves as minorities, with
persons of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin of any race, Asians, and
Black or African Americans comprising the largest minority populations
(2.4 percent, 2.1 percent, and 2.0 percent, respectively). According to
the U.S. Census Bureau's 2015 American Community Survey 1-year
Estimates, the minority population of Washington County, as a percent
of the total population, had increased to about 9 percent.
Low-income Populations in the Vicinity of the RINSC Reactor--
According to U.S. Census Bureau's 2010-2014 American Community Survey
5-Year Estimates, approximately 11,000 persons and 1,500 families
(approximately 10 and 5 percent, respectively) residing within a 10-
mile radius of the RINSC reactor were identified as living below the
Federal poverty threshold. The 2014 Federal poverty threshold was
$24,230 for a family of four. According to the U.S. Census Bureau's
2015 American Community Survey Census 1-Year Estimates, the median
household income for the State of Rhode Island was $58,073 while
approximately 10 percent of families and 14 percent of the state
population were found to be living below the Federal poverty threshold.
Washington County had a higher median household income average
($72,453) and a lower percent of families (8 percent) and persons (10
percent) living below the poverty level, respectively.
Impact Analysis--Potential impacts to minority and low-income
populations would mostly consist of radiological effects; however,
radiation doses from continued operations associated with the proposed
license renewal are expected to continue at current levels, and would
be below regulatory limits. No significant visual or noise impacts are
expected to result from the proposed action. Based on this information
and the analysis of human health and environmental impacts presented in
this EA, the proposed license renewal would not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health and environmental effects on minority and
low-income populations residing in the vicinity of the RINSC reactor.
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to license renewal, the NRC considered denying
the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative). If the NRC
denied the request for license renewal, reactor operations would cease
and decommissioning would be required (sooner than if a renewed license
were issued) and the environmental effects of decommission would occur.
Decommissioning would be conducted in accordance with an NRC-approved
decommissioning plan, which would require a separate environmental
review under 10 CFR part 51.21. Cessation of reactor operations would
reduce or eliminate radioactive effluents. However, as previously
discussed in this EA, radioactive effluents from reactor operations
constitute a small fraction of the applicable regulatory limits.
Therefore, the environmental impacts of license renewal and the denial
of the request for license renewal would be similar. In addition,
denying the request for license renewal would eliminate the benefits of
teaching, research, and services provided by the RINSC reactor.
Alternative Use of Resources
The proposed license renewal does not involve the use of any
different resources or significant quantities of resources beyond those
previously considered in the issuance of Facility License No. R-95 on
July 21, 1964, which authorized RIAEC to operate the RINSC reactor, the
license amendment issued on September 10, 1968, which authorized
operation up to a maximum of 2 MWt, and the license amendment issued on
March 17, 1993, which authorized the conversion from highly-enriched
uranium fuel to low-enriched uranium fuel in the RINSC reactor.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
With the exception of the Rhode Island SHPO as previously described
in this EA, the NRC staff did not enter into consultation with any
other Federal agencies or with the State of Rhode Island regarding the
environmental impact of the proposed action. However, on December 20,
2016, the NRC notified the Rhode Island State official, Mr. Paul
D'Abbraccio, Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Manager, of
the Rhode Island Emergency Management Agency of the proposed action.
Mr. Paul D'Abbraccio responded by email on December 22, 2016 and had no
comments.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The NRC is considering issuance of a renewed Facility License No.
R-95, held by the RIAEC, which would authorize the continued operation
of the RINSC reactor for an additional 20 years from the date of
issuance of the renewed license.
On the basis of the EA included in Section II of this notice and
incorporated by reference in this finding, the NRC staff finds that the
proposed action will not have a significant impact on the quality of
the human environment. The proposed action would result in no
significant impacts on terrestrial, surface or groundwater resources,
or the radiological environment. In addition, the proposed action will
not affect Federally-protected species or affect any designated
habitat. The NRC staff's
[[Page 1369]]
evaluation considered information provided in the licensee's
application, as supplemented, and the NRC staff's review of related
environmental documents. Section IV below lists the environmental
documents related to the proposed action and includes information on
the availability of these documents. Accordingly, the NRC has
determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the
proposed action.
IV. Availability of Documents
The following table identifies the references cited in this
document and related to the NRC's FONSI. These documents are available
for public inspection online through ADAMS at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html or in person at the NRC's PDR as described
previously.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document ADAMS accession No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
``Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission-- ML14038A386
`Requesting Renewal of Operating
License R-095 (Enclosure 2)' [REDACTED
Safety Analysis Report],'' May 3, 2004.
``Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission, ML041270519
Requesting Renewal of Operating License
R-095,'' May 3, 2004.
``Response to Request for Additional ML100270176
Information Concerning Plans for
Decommissioning Facility at the End of
Useful Life Ref Item 3 Parts a, b, and
c,'' January 19, 2010.
``Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center, ML16340A068
Appendix A to Safety Analysis Report,
Information on Ar-41 and N-16,''
(received December 5, 2016), February
4, 2010.
``Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center ML102240257
Reactor Submittal of Response to
Request for Additional Information Re
License Renewal,'' August 6, 2010.
``Responding to Requests for Additional ML102360440
Information (RAI) regarding our
Analysis of the Maximum Hypothetical
Accident (MHA) for Renewal of License R-
95,'' August 18, 2010.
``Memorandum Steady-State Thermal- ML16062A376
Hydraulic Analysis for
Forced[dash]Convective Flow in the
Rhode Island Nuclear Science (RINSC)
Reactor,'' September 3, 2010.
``Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission, ML16279A516
Fourth Response to Request for
Additional Information dated April 23,
2010 (Redacted),'' September 8, 2010.
``Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission ML16279A518
Fifth Response to April 13, 2010
Request for Additional Information
(Regarding License Renewal redacted),''
November 26, 2010.
``Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission-- ML103490242
Response to Requests for Additional
Information Regarding Aging Issues
Raised in RAIs,'' December 7, 2010.
``Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission ML16279A519
Response to April 13, 2010, Request for
Additional Information Regarding
License Renewal Technical
Specifications (Redacted),'' December
14, 2010.
``Reply to your Request for Additional ML110320416
Information (RAI) dated April 13, 2010,
regarding License Renewal for the Rhode
Island Nuclear Science Center Reactor
(RINSC),'' January 24, 2011.
``Letter re: Request for Additional ML110600699
Information dated April 13, 2010
Regarding License Renewal for the Rhode
Island Nuclear Science Center Reactor
(RINSC),'' February 24, 2011.
``Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission ML11202A287
Response to Request for Additional
Information Regarding License
Renewal,'' July 15, 2011.
``Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission ML16279A520
Tenth Response to the April 13, 2010,
Request for Additional Information
Regarding License Renewal (Redacted),''
July 15, 2011.
``Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission ML16279A521
Responses to Request for Additional
Information Regarding License Renewal
(Redacted),'' July 15, 2011.
``Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center ML11202A290
Tenth Response to NRC Request for
Additional Information dated April 13,
2010, Pages 126 Through 204,'' July 15,
2011.
``Response to NRC's Request for ML13080A361
Additional Information Regarding Rhode
Island Nuclear Science Center Reactor
License Renewal,'' March 15, 2013.
``Response to NRC's Request for ML13080A362
Additional Information Regarding Rhode
Island Nuclear Science Center Reactor
License Renewal,'' March 15, 2013.
``Response to NRC's Request for ML13080A364
Additional Information Regarding Rhode
Island Nuclear Science Center Reactor
License Renewal, Proposed Technical
Specification 130314,'' March 15, 2013.
``Response to Request for Additional ML13260A474
Information Regarding Financial
Qualifications for the RINSC Reactor
License Renewal,'' September 16, 2013.
``Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission ML14006A420
License Renewal Historical Resource
Impact Response Letter,'' December 19,
2013.
``Response to Request for Additional ML14057A639
Information Regarding Requalification
Plan for the RINSC Reactor License
Renewal,'' February 24, 2014.
``Compilation of All Submitted Requests ML14126A192
for Additional Information for the
Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center
Reactor License Renewal. Part 1 of 3,''
April 28, 2014.
``Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission ML16279A523
Consolidated Responses to Request for
Additional Information Regarding
License Renewal. Part 2 of 3
(Redacted),'' April 28, 2014.
``Compilation of All Submitted Requests ML14126A195
for Additional Information for the
Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center
Reactor License Renewal. Part 3 of 3,''
April 28, 2014.
``Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center ML14184B361
Reactor--Updated Proposed Technical
Specifications,'' June 30, 2014.
``Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center ML15223A953
Updated Technical Specifications,''
August 7, 2015.
``Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center ML15223A952
Submittal of Updated Proposed Technical
Specification,'' August 11, 2015.
``Summary of Changes to the Proposed ML15223A954
Technical Specifications,'' August 11,
2015.
``Contractor Comments and Responses,'' ML15223A955
August 11, 2015.
``Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center ML16062A378
Transient Analyses Revised January 20,
2016,'' January 20, 2016.
``Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center ML16062A380
Technical Specifications,'' February
26, 2016.
``Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission-- ML16062A373
Response to Requests for Additional
Information dated September 3, 2015,''
March 1, 2016.
``Fuel Failure Addendum 160229,'' March ML16062A381
1, 2016.
``New Transient Analysis Results ML16062A379
160226,'' March 1, 2016.
``150903 RAI Responses 160301,'' March ML16062A374
1, 2016.
[[Page 1370]]
``Core Change Summary for Conversion ML16062A375
from RINSC LEU Core #5 to LEU Core
#6,'' March 1, 2016.
``[RINSC] Fuel Failure Analysis [Dose ML16062A382
Table],'' March 1, 2016.
``Request for Change to License for the ML16112A071
Rhode Island Atomic Energy
Commission,'' April 21, 2016.
``Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission ML16202A008
Research Reactor--Responses to NRC
Staff Request for Additional
Information for License Renewal Review
(Redacted Version),'' July 20, 2016.
``State of Rhode Island and Province ML16280A420
Plantations--Response to Request for
Additional Dated August 3, 2016, Rhode
Island Nuclear Science Center Response
to NRC Request for Additional
Information Regarding the Renewal, and
Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center
Technical Specifications,'' October 6,
2016.
``State of Rhode Island and Providence ML16306A063
Plantations--Response to Request for
Additional Information Regarding
Calculations for Fuel Element Failure
Accident Scenario,'' Letter and
Responses, November 1, 2016.
``Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission-- ML16319A298
Transmittal of Supplemental Information
in Support of Relicensing for the Rhode
Island Nuclear Science Center (R-95),''
Letter and Responses, November 14, 2016.
``Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center-- ML16336A734
Supplemental Information for the
Relicensing of the Rhode Island Atomic
Energy Commission, Rhode Island Nuclear
Science Center--Safety Analysis Report,
and Rhode Island Nuclear Science
Center--Technical Specifications,''
December 1, 2016.
``State of Rhode Island and Province ML16343A851
Plantations--Supplemental Information
Regarding Relicensing for the Rhode
Island Nuclear Science Center,''
December 8, 2016.
``Rhode Island December 13, 2016 ML16351A003
Conversation Record,'' December 13,
2016.
``Supplemental Information Re: ML16350A042
Relicensing for the Rhode Island
Nuclear Science Center (R-95),''
December 15, 2016.
``Rhode Island December 15 2016 ML16351A012
Conversation Record,'' December 15,
2016.
``Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center-- ML16350A256
Supplemental Information Regarding
Relicensing,'' December 15, 2016.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day of December 2016.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Steven T. Lynch,
Chief (Acting), Research and Test Reactors Branch, Division of Policy
and Rulemaking, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2016-31980 Filed 1-4-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P