Propiconazole; Extension of Tolerance for Emergency Exemptions, 1208-1210 [2016-31827]

Download as PDF 1208 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 6, 2017. Filing a petition for econsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of today’s Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2). reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: December 15, 2016. Heather McTeer Toney, Regional Administrator, Region 4. 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart L—Georgia 2. In § 52.570, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising the entry ‘‘391–3–1–.01’’ to read as follows: ■ § 52.570 List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by * Identification of plan. * * (c) * * * * * EPA APPROVED GEORGIA REGULATIONS State effective date State citation Title/subject 391–3–1–.01 ...................... Definitions ......................... * * * * * * * * [FR Doc. 2016–31753 Filed 1–4–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 180 [EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0682; FRL–9956–54] Propiconazole; Extension of Tolerance for Emergency Exemptions Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: This regulation extends a time-limited tolerance for combined residues of the fungicide propiconazole and its metabolites in or on avocado at 10 parts per million (ppm) for an additional 3-year period. This tolerance will expire and is revoked on December 31, 2019. This action is in response to EPA’s granting of an emergency exemption under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) authorizing use of the pesticide on avocado trees. In addition, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Jan 04, 2017 8/14/2016 Jkt 241001 EPA approval date 1/5/2017, [insert Federal Register citation]. * * Act (FFDCA) requires EPA to establish a time-limited tolerance or exemption from the requirement for a tolerance for pesticide chemical residues in food that will result from the use of a pesticide under an emergency exemption granted by EPA under FIFRA. DATES: This regulation is effective January 5, 2017. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before March 6, 2017, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0682, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the OPP PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4700 Explanation Sfmt 4700 * * Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael L. Goodis, Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; main telephone number: (703) 305–7090; email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include: • Crop production (NAICS code 111). • Animal production (NAICS code 112). E:\FR\FM\05JAR1.SGM 05JAR1 asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations • Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311). • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532). B. How can I get electronic access to other related information? You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR site at https:// www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/ 40tab_02.tpl. C. How can I file an objection or hearing request? Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– OPP–2016–0682 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before March 6, 2017. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b). In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing request, identified by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 2016–0682, by one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. • Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Jan 04, 2017 Jkt 241001 II. Background and Statutory Findings EPA originally issued a final rule, published in the Federal Register of May 11, 2011 (76 FR 27261) (FRL–8873– 2), which announced that on its own initiative under FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a, it established a timelimited tolerance for the combined residues of propiconazole and its metabolites in or on avocado at 10 ppm, with an expiration date of December 31, 2013. Subsequently, EPA published a final rule in the Federal Register of December 27, 2013 (78 FR 78746) (FRL– 9904–15) to extend (revise) the expiration date for this tolerance to December 31, 2016. EPA established the tolerance because FFDCA section 408(l)(6) requires EPA to establish a time-limited tolerance or exemption from the requirement for a tolerance for pesticide chemical residues in food that will result from the use of a pesticide under an emergency exemption granted by EPA under FIFRA section 18. Such tolerances can be established without providing notice or period for public comment. In 2014, EPA received a request to extend the use of propiconazole on avocado for an additional 3 years (under a quarantine exemption) due to the disease situation remaining an emergency condition, warranting authorization of use of propiconazole under a quarantine exemption. After having reviewed the submission, EPA concurred that emergency conditions exist. EPA authorized under FIFRA section 18 the use of propiconazole on avocado trees for control of laurel wilt disease in Florida. EPA assessed the potential risks presented by residues of propiconazole in or on avocado. In doing so, EPA considered the safety standard in FFDCA section 408(b)(2), and decided that the necessary tolerance under FFDCA section 408(l)(6) would be consistent with the safety standard and with FIFRA section 18. The data and other relevant material have been evaluated and discussed in the final rule published in the Federal Register of May 11, 2011. Based on that data and information considered, the Agency reaffirms that extension of the timelimited tolerance will continue to meet the requirements of FFDCA section 408(l)(6). Therefore, the time-limited tolerance is extended for an additional 3-year period. EPA will publish a document in the Federal Register to remove the revoked tolerance from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Although this tolerance will expire and is revoked on December 31, 2019, under FFDCA section 408(l)(5), residues of the PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 1209 pesticide not in excess of the amounts specified in the tolerance remaining in or on avocado after that date will not be unlawful, provided the pesticide is applied in a manner that was lawful under FIFRA and the application occurred prior to the revocation of the tolerance. EPA will take action to revoke this tolerance earlier if any experience with, scientific data on, or other relevant information on this pesticide indicate that the residues are not safe. III. International Residue Limits In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). The Codex is a joint United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization/ World Health Organization food standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain the reasons for departing from the Codex level. The Codex has not established a MRL for propiconazole on avocado. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews This action establishes a tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ‘‘Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority E:\FR\FM\05JAR1.SGM 05JAR1 1210 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations Populations and Low-Income Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply. This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this action alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES V. Congressional Review Act Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Jan 04, 2017 Jkt 241001 Dated: December 20, 2016. Daniel J. Rosenblatt, Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. Rockville, MD 20857, or by telephone at 301–594–4353. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background Section 602 of Public Law 102–585, the ‘‘Veterans Health Care Act of 1992,’’ enacted section 340B of the PHSA, PART 180—[AMENDED] ‘‘Limitation on Prices of Drugs Purchased by Covered Entities,’’ ■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 codified at 42 U.S.C. 256b. The 340B continues to read as follows: Program permits covered entities ‘‘to Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. stretch scarce Federal resources as far as ■ 2. In § 180.434, revise the entry for possible, reaching more eligible patients ‘‘avocado’’ in the table under paragraph and providing more comprehensive (b) to read as follows: services.’’ H.R. REP. No. 102–384(II), at 12 (1992). Eligible covered entity types § 180.434 Propiconazole; tolerances for are defined in section 340B(a)(4) of the residues. PHSA. Section 340B of the PHSA * * * * * instructs HHS to enter into a (b) * * * pharmaceutical pricing agreement (PPA) with certain drug manufacturers. When Expiration/ Parts per Commodity revocation a drug manufacturer signs a PPA, it is million date opting into the 340B Program and it agrees to the statutory requirement that Avocado ........ 10 12/31/19 the prices charged for covered outpatient drugs to covered entities will * * * * * not exceed defined 340B ceiling prices, which are based on quarterly pricing * * * * * data obtained from the Centers for [FR Doc. 2016–31827 Filed 1–4–17; 8:45 am] Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Section 7102 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. 111– 148) as amended by section 2302 of the DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Health Care and Education HUMAN SERVICES Reconciliation Act (Pub. L. 111–152) (HCERA) (hereinafter referred to as the 42 CFR Part 10 ‘‘Affordable Care Act’’), added section RIN 0906–AA89 340B(d)(1)(B)(vi) of the PHSA, which provides for the imposition of sanctions 340B Drug Pricing Program Ceiling in the form of civil monetary penalties, Price and Manufacturer Civil Monetary which— Penalties Regulation (I) shall be assessed according to standards established in regulations to AGENCY: Health Resources and Services be promulgated by the Secretary; Administration, Department of Health (II) shall not exceed $5,000 for each and Human Services (HHS). instance of overcharging a covered ACTION: Final rule. entity that may have occurred; and (III) shall apply to any manufacturer SUMMARY: The Health Resources and with an agreement under Section 340B Services Administration (HRSA) of the PHSA that knowingly and administers section 340B of the Public intentionally charges a covered entity a Health Service Act (PHSA), referred to price for purchase of a drug that exceeds as the ‘‘340B Drug Pricing Program’’ or the ‘‘340B Program.’’ This final rule will the maximum applicable price under apply to all drug manufacturers that are subsection 340B(a)(1). The Affordable Care Act also added required to make their drugs available to section 340B(d)(1)(B)(i)(I) of the PHSA, covered entities under the 340B which requires ‘‘[d]eveloping and Program. This final rule sets forth the calculation of the 340B ceiling price and publishing through an appropriate policy or regulatory issuance, precisely application of civil monetary penalties defined standards and methodology for (CMPs). the calculation of ceiling prices . . .’’ DATES: This rule is effective March 6, CMPs provide a critical enforcement 2017. mechanism for HHS if manufacturers do FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: not comply with statutory pricing CAPT Krista Pedley, Director, Office of obligations under the 340B Program. Pharmacy Affairs (OPA), Healthcare HHS is also finalizing this rule to Systems Bureau (HSB), HRSA, 5600 provide increased clarity in the Fishers Lane, Mail Stop 08W05A, marketplace for all 340B Program Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows: PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05JAR1.SGM 05JAR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 3 (Thursday, January 5, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1208-1210]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31827]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0682; FRL-9956-54]


Propiconazole; Extension of Tolerance for Emergency Exemptions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation extends a time-limited tolerance for combined 
residues of the fungicide propiconazole and its metabolites in or on 
avocado at 10 parts per million (ppm) for an additional 3-year period. 
This tolerance will expire and is revoked on December 31, 2019. This 
action is in response to EPA's granting of an emergency exemption under 
the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) 
authorizing use of the pesticide on avocado trees. In addition, the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) requires EPA to establish 
a time-limited tolerance or exemption from the requirement for a 
tolerance for pesticide chemical residues in food that will result from 
the use of a pesticide under an emergency exemption granted by EPA 
under FIFRA.

DATES: This regulation is effective January 5, 2017. Objections and 
requests for hearings must be received on or before March 6, 2017, and 
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR 
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0682, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory 
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency 
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public 
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public 
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP 
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and 
additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael L. Goodis, Registration 
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address: 
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System 
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. 
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).

[[Page 1209]]

     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR 
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
    C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a 
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a 
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided 
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify 
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0682 in the subject line on the first 
page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and must be 
received by the Hearing Clerk on or before March 6, 2017. Addresses for 
mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided 
in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the 
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of 
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for 
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential 
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without 
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing 
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0682, by one of 
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

    EPA originally issued a final rule, published in the Federal 
Register of May 11, 2011 (76 FR 27261) (FRL-8873-2), which announced 
that on its own initiative under FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a, it 
established a time-limited tolerance for the combined residues of 
propiconazole and its metabolites in or on avocado at 10 ppm, with an 
expiration date of December 31, 2013. Subsequently, EPA published a 
final rule in the Federal Register of December 27, 2013 (78 FR 78746) 
(FRL-9904-15) to extend (revise) the expiration date for this tolerance 
to December 31, 2016. EPA established the tolerance because FFDCA 
section 408(l)(6) requires EPA to establish a time-limited tolerance or 
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance for pesticide chemical 
residues in food that will result from the use of a pesticide under an 
emergency exemption granted by EPA under FIFRA section 18. Such 
tolerances can be established without providing notice or period for 
public comment.
    In 2014, EPA received a request to extend the use of propiconazole 
on avocado for an additional 3 years (under a quarantine exemption) due 
to the disease situation remaining an emergency condition, warranting 
authorization of use of propiconazole under a quarantine exemption. 
After having reviewed the submission, EPA concurred that emergency 
conditions exist. EPA authorized under FIFRA section 18 the use of 
propiconazole on avocado trees for control of laurel wilt disease in 
Florida.
    EPA assessed the potential risks presented by residues of 
propiconazole in or on avocado. In doing so, EPA considered the safety 
standard in FFDCA section 408(b)(2), and decided that the necessary 
tolerance under FFDCA section 408(l)(6) would be consistent with the 
safety standard and with FIFRA section 18. The data and other relevant 
material have been evaluated and discussed in the final rule published 
in the Federal Register of May 11, 2011. Based on that data and 
information considered, the Agency reaffirms that extension of the 
time-limited tolerance will continue to meet the requirements of FFDCA 
section 408(l)(6). Therefore, the time-limited tolerance is extended 
for an additional 3-year period. EPA will publish a document in the 
Federal Register to remove the revoked tolerance from the Code of 
Federal Regulations (CFR). Although this tolerance will expire and is 
revoked on December 31, 2019, under FFDCA section 408(l)(5), residues 
of the pesticide not in excess of the amounts specified in the 
tolerance remaining in or on avocado after that date will not be 
unlawful, provided the pesticide is applied in a manner that was lawful 
under FIFRA and the application occurred prior to the revocation of the 
tolerance. EPA will take action to revoke this tolerance earlier if any 
experience with, scientific data on, or other relevant information on 
this pesticide indicate that the residues are not safe.

III. International Residue Limits

    In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S. 
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent 
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA 
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established 
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA 
section 408(b)(4). The Codex is a joint United Nations Food and 
Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food standards 
program, and it is recognized as an international food safety 
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United 
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from 
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain 
the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
    The Codex has not established a MRL for propiconazole on avocado.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes a tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in 
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from 
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and 
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been 
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not 
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning 
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or 
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled 
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any 
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any 
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal 
Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority

[[Page 1210]]

Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 
1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis 
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this 
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the 
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
seq.), do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food 
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this 
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and 
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions 
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that 
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or 
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government 
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between 
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has 
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled 
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this 
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded 
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would 
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant 
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

V. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), 
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required 
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and 
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of 
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' 
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: December 20, 2016.
Daniel J. Rosenblatt,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

0
2. In Sec.  180.434, revise the entry for ``avocado'' in the table 
under paragraph (b) to read as follows:


Sec.  180.434   Propiconazole; tolerances for residues.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Expiration/
                 Commodity                    Parts per     revocation
                                               million         date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avocado....................................           10        12/31/19
 
                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-31827 Filed 1-4-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.