Procedures for Disclosure or Production of Information Under the Freedom of Information Act; Amendments, 59-67 [2016-31131]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Bureau of the Census: Freedom of
Information Act Officer
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2016–31314 Filed 12–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–BX–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 1015
Procedures for Disclosure or
Production of Information Under the
Freedom of Information Act;
Amendments
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Consumer Product Safety
Commission (Commission, CPSC, or we)
is issuing this notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) to update its Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA) rule. We are
proposing to revise the rule to conform
to the amendments of the FOIA
Improvement Act of 2016 (the 2016
FOIA) to the FOIA. The Commission
also proposes to update the rule to
reflect changes in Commission
procedures, update Commission contact
information, including current methods
of submitting requests for records to the
Commission, revise employee titles, and
make various technical changes and
corrections. This NPR seeks comments
on the proposed changes to the rule.
DATES: Submit comments by March 20,
2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CPSC–2016–
0030, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit
electronic comments to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
The Commission does not accept
comments submitted by electronic mail
(email), except through: https://
www.regulations.gov/. The Commission
encourages you to submit electronic
comments by using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, as described above.
Written Submissions: Submit written
comments by mail/hand delivery/
courier to: Office of the Secretariat,
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Room 820, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301)
504–7923.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this proposed
rulemaking. All comments received may
be posted without change, including
any personal identifiers, contact
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:13 Dec 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
59
information, or other personal
information provided, to: https://
www.regulations.gov/. Do not submit
confidential business information, trade
secret information, or other sensitive or
protected information that you do not
want to be available to the public. If
furnished at all, such information
should be submitted by mail/hand
delivery/courier.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to: https://
www.regulations.gov/, and insert the
docket number, CPSC–2016–0030, into
the ‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the
prompts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Renee McCune, Office of the General
Counsel, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504–7673; or
Todd A. Stevenson, Chief Freedom of
Information Officer, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301)
504–6836.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission is proposing to amend the
agency’s procedures for disclosure or
production of information under the
Freedom of Information Act. 16 CFR
part 1015.
administrative appeal of an adverse
determination from 30 to 90 days;
limiting the FOIA Exemption for records
created 25 years or more before the date
on which the records were requested;
the assessment of fees be limited in
certain circumstances; and requesters be
notified of available dispute resolution
services from the FOIA Public Liaison of
the agency or the Office of Government
Information Services.
The Commission proposes
amendments to its regulations
implementing the 2016 FOIA, 16 CFR
part 1015, to incorporate these new
statutory requirements. The proposed
amendments would revise the
Commission’s FOIA regulations to
comply with the FOIA, as amended by
the 2016 FOIA, and would update
Commission procedures, contact
information, and methods of submitting
requests for records to the Commission,
in addition to other conforming and
technical revisions. Updating
Commission procedures and
Commission contact information would
provide clarity for requesters seeking
records from the Commission.
Table of Contents
Subpart A—Production or Disclosure
Under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
I. Background Information
II. Section-by-Section Analysis of the
Proposed Revisions of the Procedures for
Disclosure or Production of Information
Under the Freedom of Information Act
III. Environmental Issues
IV. Regulatory Flexibility
V. Paperwork Reduction
VI. Preemption
VII. Effective Date
VIII. Request for Comments
I. Background Information
On June 30, 2016, the President
signed into law the 2016 FOIA, Public
Law 114–185 (2016). The 2016 FOIA
amends the Freedom of Information Act,
5 U.S.C. 552, requiring an agency to
review its FOIA regulations and issue
regulations on procedures for the
disclosure of records under the new
amendments. Specifically, the 2016
FOIA requires: Certain records be
available for public inspection in an
electronic format; agencies to make
available for public inspection in an
electronic format records that have been
requested three or more times; that an
agency not withhold information under
FOIA unless the agency reasonably
foresees that disclosure would harm an
interest protected by a FOIA Exemption
or disclosure is prohibited by law;
extending the number of days for an
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
II. Section-by-Section Analysis of the
Proposed Revision of the Procedures for
Disclosure or Production of Information
Under the Freedom of Information Act
Proposed Changes to § 1015.1 (Purpose
and Scope)
Initially, we would update § 1015.1(a)
to add the Children’s Gasoline Burn
Prevention Act, the Virginia Graeme
Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act, and the
Child Nicotine Poisoning Prevention
Act to the scope of statutes for which
records must be maintained in
connection with the Commission’s
responsibilities and functions under
those acts because they were enacted
after the last revision to the regulation
in 1997.
The proposal also would revise
§ 1015.1(b) to reflect new FOIA 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(8)(A), requiring agencies to
analyze under a foreseeable harm
standard the withholding of information
permitted by the exemptions set forth in
5 U.S.C. 552(b). The proposal would
allow information to be withheld
pursuant to the exemptions, only if the
Commission reasonably foresees that
disclosure would harm an interest
protected by a specific FOIA exemption,
or if disclosure is otherwise prohibited
by law. This proposal, consistent with
the 2016 FOIA, would not require
disclosure of information otherwise
prohibited from disclosure by law, or
otherwise exempted from disclosure
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
60
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules
under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3) (FOIA
Exemption 3), which prohibits the
disclosure of matters specifically
exempted from disclosure by another
statute. The proposal would specify that
the Commission will consider the
record’s age, content, and character in
assessing whether it reasonably foresees
that disclosure of the document would
harm an interest protected by an
exemption. Additionally, consistent
with the FOIA as amended by the 2016
FOIA, we also propose a revision that
would require that we consider partial
disclosure when full disclosure of a
record is not possible and that we take
reasonable steps to segregate and release
nonexempt information.
Under the proposed revision, for
example, Commission records that
currently fall within the parameters of 5
U.S.C. 552(b)(5) (FOIA Exemption 5)
would be subject to the foreseeable
harm standard. FOIA Exemption 5
incorporates, among other privileges,
the deliberative process privilege, which
is considered a discretionary exemption,
meaning that withholding of records
resides within the discretion of the
agency, rather than mandated by law.
As the Senate report on the FOIA
amendment explains: ‘‘[t]he foreseeable
harm standard applies only to those
FOIA Exemptions under which
discretionary disclosures can be made.
Several FOIA Exemptions, by their own
existing terms, cover information that is
prohibited from disclosure or exempt
from disclosure under a law outside the
four corners of the FOIA. Such
information is not subject to
discretionary disclosure and is therefore
not subject to the foreseeable harm
standard.’’ Senate Report No. 114–4, p
8 (February 23, 2015). Under this
analysis and Department of Justice
guidance, records protected by the
deliberative process privilege under
FOIA Exemption 5 shall be considered
for release under the foreseeable harm
standard, even if the records may
otherwise be properly withheld under
this exemption. In deciding whether to
make a discretionary release of records
protected by the deliberative process
privilege, the Commission may
consider, in addition to the record’s age,
content, and character, the nature of the
decision at issue, the status of that
decision, and the personnel involved.
The foreseeable harm standard,
however, would not be applied to
disclosures prohibited by law or
covered by FOIA Exemption 3, which
pertains to matters specifically
exempted from disclosure by another
statute. Exemption 3 would include
disclosures prohibited under section 6
of the Consumer Product Safety Act
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:13 Dec 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
(CPSA), 15 U.S.C. 2055(a)(2), and thus,
the proposal to apply the foreseeable
harm standard would not alter, or
otherwise limit, the information
disclosure restrictions set forth in
section 6. Current § 1015.1(b) already
references disclosures prohibited by law
under Section 6(a)(2) of the CPSA. The
proposal, as revised, would preserve
that prohibition, consistent with the
statutory direction, and it would clarify
that information covered by FOIA
Exemption 3 is prohibited from
disclosure and not subject to analysis
under the foreseeable harm standard.
Specifically, the proposed revision
would state that Commission records
subject to Section 6 and 25(c) of the
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2055 and 2074(c), fall
within the scope of FOIA Exemption 3.
The proposal also would revise
§ 1015.1(c) to remove the existing
statement that the Attorney General’s
Memorandum on the 1974 Amendments
to the FOIA may be consulted in
considering questions arising under the
FOIA. That memorandum is outdated
and should not be consulted in
considering questions arising under the
FOIA because the FOIA has been
statutorily amended multiple times
since 1974.
In place of the current § 1015.1(c), we
propose a new § 1015.1(c) to reflect that
the Commission Secretariat serves as the
agency’s Chief FOIA Officer. The 2016
FOIA amends the FOIA at 5 U.S.C.
552(j) to require each agency to
designate a Chief FOIA Officer, who
shall be a senior official of the agency,
and shall have, subject to the authority
of the head of the agency, among other
responsibilities, responsibility for
compliance and implementation of
section (j) of the FOIA. The revised
§ 1015.1(c) would state that the
Commission’s Chief Freedom of
Information Officer, a senior official at
the Commission, would be the
Secretariat. Therefore, for clarity and
consistency with the provisions of
§ 1015.4, which vests ultimate authority
for responding to FOIA requests in the
Commission’s Secretariat, and in
conformance with amendments made to
the FOIA, we propose new language
explaining that the Secretariat of the
Commission is the Chief Freedom of
Information Officer, who, subject to the
authority of the Chairman, is
responsible for compliance with, and
implementation of, 5 U.S.C. 552(j).
We additionally propose minor and
non-substantive changes in grammar.
Proposed Changes to § 1015.2 (Public
Reference Facilities)
To reflect amendments in the 2016
FOIA that focus on public inspection in
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
an electronic format, we are proposing
to revise the title of this section to
‘‘Public inspection.’’ Additionally, we
propose removing ‘‘and copying’’ from
§ 1015.2(a) and (b), and replacing that
phrase with ‘‘in an electronic format,’’
to conform to the amendments to the
FOIA at 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
We also propose removing the
statements in § 1015.2(b) regarding
additional Commission public reference
facilities. With changes in technology,
public inspection at the Commission
headquarters is rare, and we do not
anticipate a need for additional public
reference facilities. To provide
additional information to the public
about the Commission’s electronic
reading room, we propose adding the
Commission’s Web site address to
§ 1015.2(c) and a statement indicating
that records that the Commission must
make available for public inspection in
an electronic format may be accessed
through the e-FOIA Public Access Link
at the Commission’s Web site address.
Additionally, to conform with
amendments to the FOIA at 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(2)(D), we are proposing a new
§ 1015.2(d), which requires the agency,
subject to any restrictions imposed by
section 6 of the CPSA, to make available
for public inspection in an electronic
format, copies of certain records,
regardless of form. Specifically, the
Commission shall make available for
public inspection, records that have
been released under FOIA, records that,
because of the nature of the subject
matter, the agency determines are likely
to become the subject of subsequent
requests for substantially the same
records, and records that have been
requested three or more times.
We additionally propose correcting
‘‘Secretary’’ to the current title of
‘‘Secretariat’’ throughout this paragraph
and updating the room number of the
Office of the Secretariat.
Proposed Changes to § 1015.3 (Requests
for Records and Copies)
We propose a revision to the title of
this section by removing ‘‘and copies’’
to reflect amendments to the FOIA at 5
U.S.C. 552(a).
To reflect current practice, we also
propose updating § 1015.3(a) on the
ways requesters may submit requests for
records to the Commission, to include
electronic methods. In addition to
submitting requests by mail, requesters
would be able to submit a request
through the Commission’s e-FOIA
Public Access Link, email, or facsimile.
We also propose a technical correction
to reflect the Commission’s address. To
promote good FOIA customer service,
we also propose to revise § 1015.3(b) to
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules
state that, before submitting requests,
requesters may contact the
Commission’s FOIA contact or FOIA
Public Liaison to discuss the records the
submitter seeks and to receive
assistance in describing the records.
Additionally, throughout this section
we propose changing ‘‘Secretary’’ to
‘‘Secretariat’’ to update the position to
its current title.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Proposed Changes to § 1015.4
(Responses To Requests for Records;
Responsibility)
We propose changing ‘‘Secretary’’ to
‘‘Secretariat’’ throughout this section to
reflect the name of the position to its
current title.
Proposed Changes to Rule § 1015.5
(Time Limitations on Responses to
Requests for Records and Requests for
Expedited Processing)
We propose updating § 1015.5(a) to
incorporate new procedural
requirements and to reflect current
Commission practices and advances in
technology. We propose clarifying that
time limitations on responses to
requests submitted by postal mail would
begin to run at the time the request is
received and date-stamped by the Office
of the Secretary (which we propose
revising to the Office of the Secretariat).
We would also update the regulation to
reflect the current practice that the
Office of the Secretariat will date-stamp
requests the same day that it receives
the requests. We also propose that time
limitations on responses to requests
submitted electronically would begin to
run at the time the request is
electronically received, if the request is
submitted during ‘‘working hours,’’
which we define as 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
EST. For responses submitted
electronically during non-working
hours, the proposed change would
require that time limitations begin to
run the next working day after the
request is submitted.
If the Commission is unable to
respond to a request within this time
frame, the current § 1015.5(b) allows the
Secretariat, at the initial stage, or the
General Counsel, at the appellate stage,
to extend the time for responding to
requests up to 10 additional working
days, if a request satisfies the criteria for
‘‘unusual circumstances.’’ Moreover, as
explained in current § 1015.5(d), if the
Secretariat or General Counsel
determines that an extension of more
than 10 days is required, the Secretariat
or General Counsel must give the
requester an opportunity to limit the
scope of the request or arrange for an
alternative timeframe to process the
request. Under the new FOIA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:13 Dec 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
amendments, in those circumstances,
agencies are required to make available
its FOIA Public Liaison to assist in the
resolution of any disputes between the
requester and the agency. The 2016
FOIA additionally requires agencies to
notify requesters of the right to seek
dispute resolution services from the
Office of Government Information
Services. Therefore, we propose
adopting language stating that if an
extension of time greater than 10
working days is necessary, the
Commission will make available its
FOIA Public Liaison for purposes of
dispute resolution. Additionally, we
propose providing information about
where on the Commission’s Web site,
the Commission’s designated FOIA
Liaison(s) is listed and also stating that
the Commission will notify requesters
in writing of the availability of the
Office of Government Information
Services to provide dispute resolution
services, as required by the 2016 FOIA.
We propose inserting this language into
a new § 1015.5(e), and we propose redesignating the succeeding paragraphs
in § 1015.5 to conform to this change.
We also propose adding a statement to
the current § 1015.5(f)(2), clarifying that
requests for expedited processing may
be submitted through any of the
methods described in the proposed
§ 1015.3(a), in which we propose
updating the regulation to reflect new
electronic methods of submission.
We additionally propose revising
Secretary’’ to ‘‘Secretariat’’ throughout,
to change the name of the position to its
current title.
Proposed Changes to § 1015.6 (Form and
Content)
To reflect the current organizational
structure of the agency and to align with
the 2016 FOIA amendments to the
FOIA, indicating that documents for
public inspection will be made available
in electronic format, we propose
revising § 1015.6(a) to state that when a
requested record has been identified,
requesters shall be supplied with a copy
or notified of where and when the
document will be made available for
public inspection in an electronic
format. We also propose removing the
reference to making records available at
a requested regional office. This option
is outdated and no longer applicable
because the Commission does not have
regional offices that the public can visit.
We additionally propose amending
§ 1015.6(a) to conform with the 2016
FOIA amendments to 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(A)(i), which require the
Commission, when responding to a
records request, to notify requesters of
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
61
their right to seek assistance from the
Commission’s FOIA Public Liaison.
In the case of a denial, we propose
revisions to conform with the 2016
FOIA amendments to 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(A)(i)(III)(aa), which requires
that agencies notify requesters when
there is an adverse determination that
requesters have the right to appeal
within a period determined by the head
of the agency that is not less than 90
days after the date of such
determination. Accordingly, we propose
revising § 1015.6(b)(4) to change ‘‘30
calendar days’’ to ‘‘90 calendar days.’’
We also propose adding a new
§ 1015.6(b)(5), which would require the
Commission, in the case of a denial, to
notify requesters of their right to seek
dispute resolution services from the
Office of Government Information
Services.
We additionally propose revising
‘‘Secretary’’ to ‘‘Secretariat’’ throughout
the section, to revise the title of the
position to its current title.
Proposed Changes to § 1015.7 (Appeals
From Initial Denials; Reconsideration by
the Secretary)
We propose revising the deadline for
appealing a denial of a records request
from 30 days to 90 calendar days in
§ 1015.7(a) to conform with the 2016
FOIA amendments described above
regarding proposed changes to § 1015.6.
We additionally propose updating the
regulation at § 1015.7(a) to list the ways,
including electronic methods, that a
requester may appeal a denial to the
General Counsel of the Commission.
To reflect changes in Commission
procedures due to advances in
information technology, we propose
updating § 1015.7(b) to specify that time
limitations on appeals submitted by
postal mail would begin to run when
the appeal is received and date-stamped
by the Office of the Secretary (proposed
to be changed to the Office of the
Secretariat). We would also update the
regulation to reflect the current practice
that the Office of the Secretariat will
date-stamp requests the same day that it
receives the requests. We also propose
that time limitations on appeals
submitted electronically would begin to
run at the time the appeal is
electronically received, if the request is
submitted during ‘‘working hours,’’
which we define as 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
EST. For responses submitted
electronically during non-working
hours, the proposed change would
require that time limitations begin to
run the next working day.
To conform with the 2016 FOIA
amendments to 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(A)(i)(III)(bb), which require
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
62
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules
agencies to provide notification in an
adverse determination of the right to
seek dispute resolution services from
the FOIA Public Liaison of the agency
or the Office of Government Information
Services, we propose including a
statement in § 1015.7(e) stating that the
Commission will provide such a
notification.
We additionally propose revising
‘‘Secretary’’ to ‘‘Secretariat’’ throughout
the section, including in the title, to
correct the name of this position.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Proposed Changes to § 1015.9 (Fees for
Production of Records.)
We propose to make technical
changes throughout this section,
including a revision to § 1015.9(b) to
reflect updated ways to effectuate fee
payment. We also propose to account
for efforts expended to locate and
retrieve electronic information by
revising the term ‘‘search’’ in
§ 1015.9(c)(2) and the definition of
‘‘duplication’’ in § 1015.9(c)(3) and to
account for new technology changes
that are not reflected in the regulation.
The proposal would also account for the
efforts to scan documents through a
revision of § 1015.9(e)(1), which would
require a requester to pay the direct
costs associated with scanning
documents.
We also propose to revise
§ 1015.9(f)(6) to conform to the 2016
FOIA amendments to 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(A)(viii)(II). The changes would
require the Commission to waive fees
where the agency fails to comply with
a time limit that it has extended because
the agency has determined that unusual
circumstances apply. However, if the
extension for unusual circumstances
involves more than 5,000 responsive
pages, the Commission may continue to
charge fees, provided it has given timely
notice to the requester and has
discussed with the requester how to
effectively limit the scope of the request.
Thus, the regulation would be revised to
prevent the Commission from assessing
search fees for any requester or
duplication fees for an educational
institution, non-commercial scientific
instiution, or a representative of the
news media requester, if the
Commission fails to comply with an
extended time limit, unless 5,000 pages
are responsive to the request, and the
Commission has made three good faith
attempts to discuss with the FOIA
requester limiting the scope of the
request.
We additionally propose revising
‘‘Secretary’’ to ‘‘Secretariat’’ throughout
the section, including in the title, to
correct the name of this position.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:13 Dec 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
Proposed Changes to § 1015.10
(Commission Report of Actions to
Congress)
We propose revisions to this section
to conform to the 2016 FOIA
amendments to 5 U.S.C. 552(e)(1).
Specifically, we propose adding a
statement that the Commission must
submit the report to the Director of the
Office of Government Information
Services in addition to its current
requirement to submit the report to the
Attorney General of the United States.
We also propose adding, in
conformance with the statute, new
§ 1015.10(h), stating that the report shall
include the number of times the
Commission denied a request for
records under 5 U.S.C. 552(c) and new
§ 1015.10(i), stating that the report shall
include the number of records that were
made available for public inspection in
an electronic format under 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(2).
Proposed Changes to Rule § 1015.11
(Disclosure of Trade Secrets to
Consultants and Contractors;
Nondisclosure to Advisory Committees
and Other Government Agencies)
We propose to add language to
§ 1015.11 to clarify that the reference in
§ 1015.11(a) and (b) to 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)
includes not only trade secrets, but also
includes commercial or financial
information.
We also propose revising § 1015.11(b)
to incorporate an amendment to the
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2078(f), by the
Consumer Product Safety Improvement
Act of 2008, Public Law 110–314 (2008),
which permits the Commission to share
information with federal, state, and
local agencies, if certain requirements
are satisfied.
Subpart B—Exemptions From
Production and Disclosure Under 5
U.S.C. 552(b)
Proposed Changes to § 1015.15 (Purpose
and Scope)
We propose removing language in
§ 1015.15(a) that references the internal
Commission procedure for withholding
exempt records because, as explained
below in Proposed Changes to Rule
§ 1015.17 (Internal Commission
procedure for withholding exempt
records.), we propose removing
§ 1015.17 entirely.
We also propose revisions to
§ 1015.15(b) to conform to the 2016
FOIA amendment to 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(8)(A), which provides that
agencies shall withhold information
under 5 U.S.C. 552, only if the agency
reasonably foresees that disclosure
would harm an interest protected by an
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
exemption described in 5 U.S.C. 552(b),
or disclosure is otherwise prohibited by
law. Currently, the rule states that the
Commission will make available, to the
extent permitted by law, records
authorized to be withheld under 5
U.S.C. 552(b), unless the Commission
determines that disclosure is contrary to
the public interest. To align with the
2016 FOIA amendments, we propose
revising this section to state that the
Commission will make available records
authorized to be withheld under one of
the FOIA exemptions, ‘‘unless the
Commission reasonably foresees that
disclosure would harm an interest
protected by the exemption or
disclosure is prohibited by law or
otherwise exempted from disclosure
under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3).’’
Additionally, we propose updating
§ 1015.15(c) to reflect the focus of the
2016 FOIA on public inspection of
documents in an electronic format,
which is consistent with current
practice. The proposal would require
that briefing packages, or portions
thereof, which the Secretary (which we
propose revising to Secretariat), upon
the advice of the Office of the General
Counsel, has determined would be
released, upon request, would be made
available for public inspection in an
electronic format through the
Commission’s Web site. Specifically, we
propose removing the language stating
that such briefing packages would be
publicly available in the public
reference facility established under
§ 1015.2, and replacing it with proposed
language indicating that the information
will be available electronically on the
Commission’s Web site.
We also propose revising ‘‘Secretary’’
to ‘‘Secretariat’’ in § 1015.15(c), to
correct the name of this position and
propose a non-substantive grammatical
revision in the first sentence of
§ 1015.15(b).
Proposed Changes to § 1015.16
(Exemptions (5 U.S.C. 552(b)).)
The 2016 FOIA amends 5 U.S.C.
552(b)(5) to include a sunset provision
on the deliberative process privilege so
that it does not apply to records created
25 years or more before the date on
which the records were requested. We
propose amending § 1015.16(e) to add
language reflecting this change.
We also propose non-substantive
technical corrections to §§ 1015.16(e)
and (f) to track the statutory language.
Proposed Changes to § 1015.17 (Internal
Commission Procedure for Withholding
Exempt Records)
We propose removing all of § 1015.17
and reserving this section. Section
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules
CFR part 1021. These regulations
provide a categorical exclusion for
certain CPSC actions that normally have
‘‘little or no potential for affecting the
human environment.’’ 16 CFR
1021.5(c)(1). This proposed rule falls
within the categorical exclusion.
Subpart C—Disclosure of Commission
Accident or Investigation Reports Under
15 U.S.C. 2074(c)
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
1015.17 describes an internal
Commission procedure that allows a
Commission bureau or office director
who believes that it is against the public
interest to disclose a Commission record
prepared by his/her office that may be
exempt from disclosure under the interintra-agency memorandum exemption at
5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5) or the investigatory
file exemption at 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7) to
request that the Secretary withhold the
document, and, if necessary, appeal that
decision to the Commission. The
current § 1015.17(a)(1) states that if the
Secretary agrees to withhold the
document, the requester shall be
notified in writing of the denial and of
his/her right to appeal. Section 1015.17
is not necessary and should be removed
because procedures for Commission
responses to requests based on an
analysis of harm to the public interest
would now be described in detail in
proposed § 1015.1(b) and § 1015.6 and
include additional updated
requirements not in § 1015.17.
Accordingly, we propose removing
§ 1015.17 because it does not reflect
current internal Commission
procedures. Moreover, even if the
provisions were not outdated, we would
propose removing this provision
because it describes an internal
procedure that is more appropriate for
including in a Commission Directive on
staff procedure than in a regulatory
scheme.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
establishes certain requirements when
an agency conducts or sponsors a
‘‘collection of information.’’ 44 U.S.C.
3501–3520. The proposed rule would
amend the Commission’s rule to
conform to the 2016 FOIA and to update
Commission procedures and make other
technical changes and corrections. The
proposed rule would not impose any
information collection requirements.
The existing rule and the proposed
revisions do not require or request
information from firms, but rather,
explain the Commission’s FOIA
procedures. Thus, the PRA is not
implicated in this proposed rulemaking.
Proposed Changes to § 1015.20 (Public
Availability of Accident or Investigation
Reports)
We propose updating § 1015.20(a) to
reflect current Commission procedure.
The rule currently states that accident or
investigation reports are available to the
public under the procedures set forth in
subpart A and that no portion of such
reports are subject to the investigatory
file exemption. Current Commission
procedure allows for the withholding of
accident or investigation reports, if the
requirements of the investigatory file
exemption are met. Therefore, we
propose revising this section to state
that accident or investigation reports are
available to the public under the
procedures set forth in subpart A, unless
such reports are subject to the
investigatory file exemption.
III. Environmental Considerations
The Commission’s regulations address
whether the Commission is required to
prepare an environmental assessment or
an environmental impact statement. 16
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:13 Dec 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Under section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), when the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) or
another law requires an agency to
publish a general notice of proposed
rulemaking, the agency must prepare an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis
(IFRA), assessing the economic impact
of the proposed rule on small entities or
certify that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. 5
U.S.C. 603(a), 605. The Commission
chooses to provide notice and comment
for this rulemaking. However, because
this is a ‘‘rule of agency organization,
procedure, or practice,’’ the APA does
not require a notice of proposed
rulemaking. 5 U.S.C. 553. Additionally,
we note that the rule would merely set
out in a regulation the procedural
requirements stated in the FOIA of
2016, update Commission procedures,
and make other technical changes and
corrections. We expect that the
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
VI. Executive Order 12988 (Preemption)
According to Executive Order 12988
(February 5, 1996), agencies must state
in clear language the preemptive effect,
if any, of new regulations. Section 26 of
the CPSA explains the preemptive effect
of consumer product safety standards
issued under the CPSA. 15 U.S.C. 2075.
The proposed rule is not a consumer
product safety standard, but rather,
would revise a rule of agency practice
and procedure by implementing the
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63
FOIA of 2016 and making technical
revisions or corrections. Therefore,
section 26 of the CPSA would not apply
to this rulemaking.
VII. Effective Date
In accordance with the APA’s general
requirement that the effective date of a
rule be at least 30 days after publication
of the final rule, the Commission
proposes that the effective date be 30
days after the date of publication of a
final rule in the Federal Register. 5
U.S.C. 553(d).
VIII. Request for Comments
The Commission requests comments
on all aspects of the proposed rule.
Comments should be submitted in
accordance with the instructions in the
ADDRESSES section at the beginning of
this document. Written comments must
be received by March 20, 2017.
List of Subjects in 16 CFR 1015
Administrative practice and
procedure; Consumer protection;
Disclosure of information; Freedom of
information.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Commission proposes to
amend 16 CFR part 1015 to read, as
follows:
PART 1015 —PROCEDURES FOR
DISCLOSURE OR PRODUCTION OF
INFORMATION UNDER THE FREEDOM
OF INFORMATION ACT
1. The authority citation for part 1015
is revised to read, as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2051–2084; 15 U.S.C.
1261–1278; 15 U.S.C. 1471–1476; 15 U.S.C.
1211–1214; 15 U.S.C. 1191–1204; 15 U.S.C.
8001–8008; 110 P.L. 278, 122 Stat. 2602; 5
U.S.C. 552.
2. Amend § 1015.1 by revising the
third sentence in paragraph (a) and
revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read,
as follows:
■
§ 1015.1
Purpose and scope.
(a) * * * These records include those
maintained in connection with the
Commission’s responsibilities and
functions under the Consumer Product
Safety Act, as well as those
responsibilities and functions
transferred to the Commission under the
Federal Hazardous Substances Act, the
Poison Prevention Packaging Act of
1970, the Refrigerator Safety Act, the
Flammable Fabrics Act, the Children’s
Gasoline Burn Prevention Act, the
Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa
Safety Act, and the Child Nicotine
Poisoning Prevention Act, and those
maintained under any other authorized
activity. * * *
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
64
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules
(b) The Commission’s policy with
respect to requests for records is that
disclosure is the rule and withholding is
the exception. All records or portions of
records not exempt from disclosure will
be made available. Records which may
be exempted from disclosure will be
made available unless: (1) Disclosure is
prohibited by law; (2) the Commission
reasonably foresees that disclosure
would harm an interest protected by an
exemption described in 5 U.S.C. 552(b);
or (3) disclosure is exempted under 5
U.S.C. 552(b)(3). See § 1015.15(b).
Section 6(a)(2) of the Consumer Product
Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. 2055(a)(2),
prohibits the disclosure of trade secrets
or other matters referred to in 18 U.S.C.
1905; Section 6(b) and Section 25(c) of
the CPSA. The Commission will
consider the record’s age, content, and
character in assessing whether it
reasonably foresees that disclosure of
the document would harm an interest
protected by an exemption.
Additionally, the Commission will
consider whether partial disclosure of
information is possible whenever the
Commission determines that a full
disclosure of a requested record is not
possible and will take reasonable steps
necessary to segregate and release
nonexempt information.
(c) The Secretariat of the Commission
is the designated Chief Freedom of
Information Officer who, subject to the
authority of the Chairman, is
responsible for compliance with and
implementation of 5 U.S.C. 552(j).
■ 3. Amend § 1015.2 by:
■ a. Revising the section heading;
■ b. Revising paragraphs (a), (b) and (c);
and
■ c. Adding paragraph (d).
The revisions read, as follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1015.2
Public inspection.
(a) The Consumer Product Safety
Commission will maintain in a public
reference room or area the materials
relating to the Consumer Product Safety
Commission that are required by 5
U.S.C. 552(a)(2) and 552(a)(5) to be
made available for public inspection in
an electronic format. The principal
location will be in the Office of the
Secretariat of the Commission. The
address of this office is: Office of the
Secretariat, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814.
(b) This public reference facility will
maintain and make available for public
inspection in an electronic format a
current index of the materials available
at that facility which are required to be
indexed by 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2).
(c) The Consumer Product Safety
Commission will maintain an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:13 Dec 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
‘‘electronic reading room’’ on the
World-Wide Web at https://
www.cpsc.gov for those records that are
required by 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) to be
available by ‘‘computer
telecommunications.’’ Records that the
FOIA requires the Commission to make
available for public inspection in an
electronic format may be accessed
through the e-FOIA Public Access Link
at https://www.cpsc.gov.
(d) Subject to the requirements of
Section 6 of the CPSA, the Commission
will make available for public
inspection in an electronic format
copies of all records, regardless of form
or format, that (1) have been released to
any person under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(3) and
(2) that because of the nature of their
subject matter, the Commission
determines have become or are likely to
become the subject of subsequent
requests for substantially the same
records or that have been requested
three or more times.
■ 4. Amend § 1015.3 by:
■ a. Revising the section heading;
■ b. Revising the first sentence of
paragraph (a);
■ c. Adding a sentence at the end of
paragraph (b); and
■ d. Removing the word ‘‘Secretary’’
from paragraphs (d) and (e), wherever it
appears, and adding, in its place, the
word ‘‘Secretariat’’.
The revisions read, as follows:
§ 1015.3
Requests for records.
(a) A request for access to records of
the Commission shall be in writing
addressed to the Secretariat and shall be
submitted through any of the following
methods: The e-FOIA Public Access
Link at https://www.cpsc.gov; email to
cpsc-foia@cpsc.gov; mail to Consumer
Product Safety Commission, 4330 East
West Highway, Room 820, Bethesda,
MD 20814; or facsimile to 301–504–
0127. * * *
(b) * * * Before submitting their
requests, requesters may contact the
Commission’s FOIA contact or FOIA
Public Liaison to discuss the records
they seek and to receive assistance in
describing the records.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) If a requested record cannot be
located from the information supplied,
or is known to have been destroyed or
otherwise disposed of, the requester
shall be so notified by the Secretariat or
delegate of the Secretariat.
(e) The Consumer Product Safety
Commission uses a multitrack system to
process requests under the Freedom of
Information Act that is based on the
amount of work and/or time involved in
processing requests. Requests for
records are processed in the order they
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
are received within each track. Upon
receipt of a request for records, the
Secretariat or delegate of the Secretariat
will determine which track is
appropriate for the request. The
Secretariat or delegate of the Secretariat
may contact requesters whose requests
do not appear to qualify for the fastest
tracks and provide such requesters the
opportunity to limit their requests so as
to qualify for a faster track. Requesters
who believe that their requests qualify
for the fastest tracks and who wish to be
notified if the Secretariat or delegate of
the Secretariat disagrees may so indicate
in the request and, where appropriate
and feasible, will also be given an
opportunity to limit their requests.
§ 1015.4
[Amended]
5. Amend § 1015.4 by removing the
word ‘‘Secretary’’ wherever it appears,
and adding, in its place, the word
‘‘Secretariat’’.
■ 6. Amend § 1015.5 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (a)
■ b. Removing the word ‘‘Secretary’’ in
paragraphs (b), (b)(1), (d), and (d)(2)
wherever it appears adding, in its place,
the word ‘‘Secretariat’’;
■ c. Redesignating paragraphs (e)
through (g), as paragraphs (f) through
(h), respectively;
■ d. Add new paragraph (e);
■ e. Removing the word ‘‘Secretary’’ in
redesignated paragraphs (f), (g), (g)(3),
(g)(5), and (h) wherever it appears, and
adding, in its place, the word
‘‘Secretariat’’; and
■ f. Revising redesignated paragraph
(g)(2).
The revisions read, as follows:
■
§ 1015.5 Time limitation on responses to
requests for records and requests for
expedited processing.
(a) The Secretariat or delegate of the
Secretariat shall respond to all written
requests for records within twenty (20)
working days (excepting Saturdays,
Sundays, and legal public holidays).
The time limitations on responses to
requests for records submitted by mail
shall begin to run at the time a request
for records is received and date stamped
by the Office of the Secretariat. The
Office of the Secretariat shall date stamp
the request the same day that it receives
the request. The time limitations on
responses to requests for records
submitted electronically during working
hours (8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. EST) shall
begin to run at the time the request was
electronically received and the time
limitations on responses submitted
electronically during non-working hours
will begin to run the next working day.
(b) The time for responding to
requests for records may be extended by
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules
the Secretariat at the initial stage or by
the General Counsel of the Commission
at the appellate stage up to an additional
ten (10) working days under the
following unusual circumstances:
(1) The need to search for and collect
the requested records from field
facilities or other establishments that are
separate from the Office of the
Secretariat.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) If the Secretariat at the initial stage
or the General Counsel at the appellate
stage determines that an extension of
time greater than ten (10) working days
is necessary to respond to a request
satisfying the ‘‘unusual circumstances’’
specified in paragraph (b) of this
section, the Secretariat or the General
Counsel shall so notify the requester
and give the requester the opportunity
to:
(1) * * *
(2) Arrange with the Secretariat or the
General Counsel an alternative time
frame for processing the request or a
modified request.
(e) If an extension of time greater than
ten (10) working days is necessary, the
Commission shall make available its
FOIA Public Liaison for this purpose. A
list of the Commission FOIA Public
Liaisons is available at https://
www.cpsc.gov/Newsroom/FOIA. The
Commission will also notify requesters
in writing to the availability of the
Office of Government Information
Services of the National Archives and
Records Administration to provide
dispute resolution services.
(f) The Secretariat or delegate of the
Secretariat may aggregate and process as
a single request requests by the same
requester, or a group of requesters acting
in concert, if the Secretariat or delegate
reasonably believes that the requests
actually constitute a single request
which would otherwise satisfy the
unusual circumstances specified in
paragraph (b) of this section, and the
requests involve clearly related matters.
(g) The Secretariat or delegate of the
Secretariat will provide expedited
processing of requests in cases where
the requester demonstrates a compelling
need for such processing.
(1) * * *
(2) Requesters for expedited
processing must include in their
requests, which may be submitted
through any of the methods described in
§ 1015.3(a) of this part, a statement
setting forth the basis for the claim that
a ‘‘compelling need’’ exists for the
requested information, certified by the
requester to be true and correct to the
best of his or her knowledge and belief.
(3) The Secretariat or delegate of the
Secretariat will determine whether to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:13 Dec 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
grant a request for expedited processing
and will notify the requester of such
determination within ten (10) days of
receipt of the request.
(4) * * *
(5) The Secretariat or delegate of the
Secretariat will process as soon as
practicable the documents responsive to
a request for which expedited
processing is granted.
(h) The Secretariat may be unable to
comply with the time limits set forth in
this § 1015.5 when disclosure of
documents responsive to a request
under this part is subject to the
requirements of section 6(b) of the
Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C.
2055(b), and the regulations
implementing that section, 16 CFR part
1101. The Secretariat or delegate of the
Secretariat will notify requesters whose
requests will be delayed for this reason.
■ 7. Revise § 1015.6 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (a);
■ b. Removing the word ‘‘Secretary’’
from paragraphs (b), and (c) wherever it
appears, and adding, in its place, the
word ‘‘Secretariat;’’
■ c. Removing the number ‘‘30’’ in
paragraph (b)(4), and adding, in its
place, the number ‘‘90’’; and
■ d. Adding paragraph (b)(5).
The revisions read, as follows:
§ 1015.6
Responses: Form and content.
(a) When a requested record has been
identified and is available for
disclosure, the requester shall be
supplied with a copy or notified as to
where and when the record will be
made available for public inspection in
an electronic format. If the payment of
fees is required the requester shall be
advised by the Secretariat in writing of
any applicable fees under § 1015.9
hereof. The requester will be notified of
the right to seek assistance from the
Commission’s FOIA Public Liaison.
(b) A response denying a written
request for a record shall be in writing
signed by the Secretariat or delegate of
the Secretariat and shall include:
*
*
*
*
*
(4) A statement that the denial may be
appealed to the Commissioners of the
Consumer Product Safety Commission.
Any such appeal must be made within
90 calendar days of receipt of the denial
by the requester.
(5) A statement that the requester has
the right to seek dispute resolution
services from the Commission’s FOIA
Public Liaison or the Office of
Government Information Services.
(c) If no response is made within
twenty (20) working days or any
extension thereof, the requester can
consider his or her administrative
remedies exhausted and seek judicial
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
65
relief in a United States District Court as
specified in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B). When
it appears that no response can be made
to the requester within the applicable
time limit, the Secretariat or delegate of
the Secretariat may ask the requester to
forego judicial relief until a response
can be made. The Secretariat or delegate
of the Secretariat shall inform the
requester of the reason for the delay, of
the date on which a response may be
expected and of his/her right to seek
judicial review as specified in 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(B).
■ 8. Amend § 1015.7 by:
■ a. Revising the section heading;
■ b. Revising paragraphs (a) and (b);
■ c. Removing the word ‘‘Secretary’’ in
paragraphs (c) and (g) wherever it
appears, and adding, in its place, the
word ‘‘Secretariat’’; and
■ d. Revising paragraph (e).
The revisions read, as follows:
§ 1015.7 Appeals from initial denials;
reconsideration by the Secretariat.
(a) When the Secretariat or delegate of
the Secretariat has denied a request for
records in whole or in part, the
requester may, within 90 calendar days
of its receipt, appeal the denial to the
General Counsel of the Consumer
Product Safety Commission, attention of
the Secretariat. Appeals may be
submitted through any of the following
methods: The e-FOIA Public Access
Link at https://www.cpsc.gov; email to
cpsc-foia@cpsc.gov; mail to 4330 East
West Highway, Room 820, Bethesda,
MD 20814; or facsimile to 301–504–
0127.
(b) The General Counsel, or the
Secretariat upon reconsideration, will
act upon an appeal within 20 working
days of its receipt. The time limitations
on an appeal submitted by mail shall
begin to run at the time an appeal is
received and date stamped by the Office
of the Secretariat. The Office of the
Secretariat will date stamp the request
the same day that it receives the request.
The time limitations on an appeal
submitted electronically during working
hours (8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. EST) shall
begin to run at the time the appeal was
electronically received and the time
limitations on responses electronically
submitted during non-working hours
will begin to run the next working day.
(c) After reviewing the appeal, the
Secretariat will reconsider his/her
initial denial. If the Secretariat upon
reconsideration decides to release any
or all of the information requested on
appeal, an appeal as to the information
released will be considered moot; and
the Secretariat will so inform the
requester and submitter of the
information in accordance with
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
66
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules
§§ 1015.6(a) and 1015.18(b). If the
Secretariat decides to affirm the initial
denial, in whole or in part, the General
Counsel will decide the appeal within
the 20-day time limit or any extension
thereof in accordance with § 1015.5.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The General Counsel’s action on
appeal shall be in writing, shall be
signed by the General Counsel, and
shall constitute final agency action. A
denial in whole or in part of a request
on appeal shall set forth the exemption
relied upon; a brief explanation,
consistent with the purpose of the
exemption, of how the exemption
applies to the records withheld; and the
reasons for asserting it. The decision
will inform the requester of the right to
seek dispute resolution services from
the Commission’s FOIA Liaison or the
Office of Government Information
Services. A denial in whole or in part
shall also inform the requester of his/her
right to seek judicial review of the
Commission’s final determination in a
United States district court, as specified
in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B).
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Copies of all appeals and copies of
all actions on appeal shall be furnished
to and maintained in a public file by the
Secretariat.
■ 9. Amend § 1015.9 by:
■ a. Removing the word ‘‘Secretary’’ in
paragraphs (a), (e)(9), (f)(4), (5) and (7),
and adding, in its place, the word
‘‘Secretariat’’;
■ b. Revising paragraph (b), (c)(2) and
(3);
■ c. Adding a sentence at the end of
paragraph (e)(1);
■ d. Adding paragraph (f)(6);
■ e. Redesignating paragraph (f)(6) as
paragraph (f)(7).
The revisions read, as follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1015. 9
Fees for production of records.
(a) The Commission will provide, at
no charge, certain routine information.
For other Commission responses to
information requests, the Secretariat
shall determine and levy fees for
duplication, search, review, and other
services, in accordance with this
section.
(b) Fees shall be paid to the Treasury
of the United States according to the
directions provided by the Commission.
*
*
*
*
*
(c)(2) Search includes all time spent
looking for material that is responsive to
a request, including page-by-page or
line-by-line identification of material
within documents and the reasonable
efforts expended to locate and retrieve
information from electronic records.
(3) Duplication refers to the process of
making a copy of a document, including
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:13 Dec 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
electronically, necessary to respond to a
FOIA request. The Commission will
honor the requester’s preference for
receiving a record in a particular format
when it can readily reproduce it in the
form or format requested.
*
*
*
*
*
(e)(1) * * * Where paper documents
must be scanned in order to comply
with a requester’s preference to receive
records in an electronic format, the
requester must also pay the direct costs
associated with scanning those
materials.
(f)(6) Search fees shall be waived for
all requests and duplication fees shall
be waived for requests from educational
institutions, non-commercial scientific
institutions, and representatives of the
news media if the Commission fails to
comply with any time limit and notice
under § 1015.5(b)–(d) and 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6) other than those exceptions
stated in 5 U.S.C. 552 (a)(4)(A)(viii)(ll).
Those exceptions include:
(i) if the Commission has determined
that unusual circumstances as defined
in § 1015.5(b) apply and the
Commission provided timely written
notice to the requester as required by
§ 1015.5(e), then failure to comply with
the time limit in § 1015.5(b)–(d) is
excused for 10 additional days; or
(ii) if the Commission has determined
that unusual circumstances as defined
in § 1015.5(b) apply and more than
5,000 pages are necessary to respond to
the request, and the Commission has
provided timely written notice in
accordance with § 1015.5(e) and the
Commission has discussed with the
requester via written mail, email, or
telephone (or made not less than three
good-faith efforts to do so) how the
requester could effectively limit the
scope of the request; or
(iii) if a court has determined that
exceptional circumstances exist as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 552(6)(C), then
failure to comply with § 1015.6(b)–(d)
and 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6) shall be excused
for the length of time provided by the
court order.
(7) Any determination made by the
Secretariat concerning fee waivers may
be appealed by the requester to the
Commission’s General Counsel in the
manner described at § 1015.7.
■ 10. Revise § 1015.10 as follows:
■ a. Adding a phrase at the end of the
undesignated introductory paragraph;
■ b. Add paragraph (h) and (i).
The revisions read, as follows:
§ 1015.10 Commission report of actions to
Congress.
On or before February 1 of each year,
the Commission shall submit a report of
its activities with regard to freedom of
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
information requests during the
preceding fiscal year to the Attorney
General of the United States and to the
Director of the Office of Government
Information Services. This report shall
include:
*
*
*
*
*
(h) The number of times the
Commission denied a request for
records under 5 U.S.C. 552(c).
(i) The number of records that were
made available for public inspection in
an electronic format under 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(2).
■ 11. Amend § 1015.11 by revising
paragraphs (a) and (b) to read, as
follows:
§ 1015.11 Disclosure of trade secrets to
consultants and contractors; nondisclosure
to advisory committees and other
government agencies.
(a) In accordance with section 6(a)(2)
of the CPSA, the Commission may
disclose information which it has
determined to be a trade secret or other
matter referred to under 5 U.S.C.
552(b)(4) to Commission consultants
and contractors for use only in their
work for the Commission. Such persons
are subject to the same restrictions with
respect to disclosure of such
information as any Commission
employee.
(b) In accordance with section 6(a)(2)
of the CPSA, the Commission is
prohibited from disclosing information
which it has determined to be a trade
secret or other matter referred to under
5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4) to advisory
committees, except when required in
the official conduct of their business, or
to other Federal agencies and state and
local governments except when
permitted by the provisions of section
29(f) of the CPSA.
■ 12. Amend § 1015.15 by:
■ a. Removing the words ‘‘and the
internal Commission procedure for
withholding exempt records’’ from
paragraph (a); and
■ b. Revising paragraph (b) and (c).
The revisions read, as follows:
§ 1015.15
Purpose and scope.
(a) The regulations of this subpart
provide information concerning the
types of records which may be withheld
from production and disclosure by the
Consumer Product Safety Commission.
These regulations also provide
information on the method whereby
persons submitting information to the
Commission may request that the
information be considered exempt from
disclosure, and information concerning
the Commission’s treatment of
documents submitted with a request
that they be treated as exempt from
disclosure.
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules
(b) No identifiable record requested in
accordance with the procedures
contained in this part shall be withheld
from disclosure unless it falls within
one of the classes of records exempt
under 5 U.S.C. 552(b). The Commission
will make available, to the extent
permitted by law, records authorized to
be withheld under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)
unless the Commission reasonably
foresees that disclosure would harm an
interest protected by the exemption or
disclosure is prohibited by law or
otherwise exempted from disclosure
under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3). In this regard
the Commission will not ordinarily
release documents that provide legal
advice to the Commission concerning
pending or prospective litigation where
the release of such documents would
significantly interfere with the
Commission’s regulatory or enforcement
proceedings.
(c) Draft documents that are agency
records are subject to release upon
request in accordance with this
regulation. However, in order to avoid
any misunderstanding of the
preliminary nature of a draft document,
each draft document released will be
marked to indicate its tentative nature.
Similarly, staff briefing packages, which
have been completed but not yet
transmitted to the Commission by the
Office of the Secretariat are subject to
release upon request in accordance with
this regulation. Each briefing package or
portion thereof released will be marked
to indicate that it has not been
transmitted to or acted upon by the
Commission. In addition, briefing
packages, or portions thereof, which the
Secretariat upon the advice of the Office
of the General Counsel has determined
would be released upon request in
accordance with this regulation, will be
made available for public inspection in
an electronic format through the
Commission’s Web site at https://
www.cpsc.gov promptly after the
briefing package has been transmitted to
the Commissioners by the Office of the
Secretariat. Such packages will be
marked to indicate that they have not
been acted upon by the Commission.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 13. Amend § 1015.16 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (e); and
■ b. Removing from paragraph (f) the
misspelled word ‘‘consititute’’ and
adding, in its place, the word
‘‘constitute’’.
The revisions read, as follows:
§ 1015.16
Exemptions (5 U.S.C. 552(b)).
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Inter-agency or intra-agency
memoranda or letters that would not be
available by law to a party other than an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:13 Dec 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
agency in litigation with the agency
provided that the deliberative process
privilege shall not apply to records
created 25 years or more before the date
on which the records were requested.
(f) Personnel and medical files and
similar files the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1015.17
■
[Reserved]
14. Remove and reserve § 1015.17.
§ 1015.20 Public availability of accident or
investigation reports.
15. Amend § 1015.20, by removing the
period and the words ‘‘No portion of’’
from the first and second sentence of
paragraph (a), and adding, in its place,
‘‘unless’’ and ‘‘s’’ to the word ‘‘report’’
to read as follows:
(a) Accident or investigation reports
made by an officer, employee, or agent
of the Commission are available to the
public under the procedures set forth in
subpart A of this part 1015 unless such
reports are subject to the investigatory
file exemption contained in the
Freedom of Information Act (as restated
in § 1015.16) except that portions
identifying any injured person or any
person treating such injured person will
be deleted in accordance with section
25(c)(1) of the CPSA. * * *
■
Dated: December 21, 2016.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretariat, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–31131 Filed 12–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
31 CFR Part 40
RIN 1505–AC54
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of
Disability in Programs or Activities
Receiving Federal Financial
Assistance From the Department of the
Treasury
Department of the Treasury.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This proposed rule would set
out the Department of the Treasury
(Treasury) rules for implementing
section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended (section 504), for
Treasury’s programs offering Federal
financial assistance. Section 504
prohibits discrimination on the basis of
disability in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance.
Section 504 and the section 504
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
67
coordination regulation (coordination
regulation) require that all agencies that
extend Federal financial assistance issue
agency-specific regulations
implementing section 504. Treasury
recipients have been subject to section
504 since its effective date in 1973.
Accordingly, today’s proposed rule
would not substantially change the
existing duty of recipients of financial
assistance from Treasury to refrain from
discrimination on the basis of disability.
This proposed rule fulfills the obligation
of Treasury to issue agency-specific
rules under the law, clarifies the
responsibilities of recipients of financial
assistance from Treasury under section
504, and describes the Treasury
investigation and enforcement
procedures to ensure compliance. The
proposed regulation is consistent with
the ADA Amendments Act of 2008
(ADA Amendments Act), which
amended section 504.
Comments must be received on
or before March 6, 2017.
DATES:
Members of the public are
invited to submit comments on all
aspects of this proposed rule. Comments
on this proposed rule should be sent to
Mariam G. Harvey, Director, Office of
Civil Rights and Diversity (OCRD),
Department of Treasury, 1500
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20220. Comments may be submitted
through www.regulations.gov. The
Department encourages electronic
submission of comments via
www.regulations.gov. Brief comments
(maximum five pages) may be submitted
by facsimile machine (FAX) to (202)
622–0367. Receipt of submissions,
whether online, by mail or FAX
transmittal, will not be acknowledged;
however, the sender may request
confirmation that a submission has been
received by telephoning OCRD at (202)
622–1160 (VOICE) or (202) 622–7104
(TTY/TDD).
In general, comments received will be
posted to Regulations.gov without
change, including any business or
personal information provided. Please
submit only information appropriate for
public disclosure. Copies of this
proposed rule in the alternative formats
of large print and electronic file on
computer disk are available upon
request. To obtain the proposed rule in
an alternative format, contact OCRD at
the telephone and address listed above.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lydia E. Aponte, Civil Rights Program
Manager, OCRD, (202) 622–8335
(VOICE) or (202) 622–7104 (TTY/TDD).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59-67]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31131]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 1015
Procedures for Disclosure or Production of Information Under the
Freedom of Information Act; Amendments
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Consumer Product Safety Commission (Commission, CPSC, or
we) is issuing this notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) to update its
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) rule. We are proposing to revise the
rule to conform to the amendments of the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016
(the 2016 FOIA) to the FOIA. The Commission also proposes to update the
rule to reflect changes in Commission procedures, update Commission
contact information, including current methods of submitting requests
for records to the Commission, revise employee titles, and make various
technical changes and corrections. This NPR seeks comments on the
proposed changes to the rule.
DATES: Submit comments by March 20, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CPSC-2016-
0030, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit electronic comments to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. The Commission does not accept
comments submitted by electronic mail (email), except through: https://www.regulations.gov/. The Commission encourages you to submit
electronic comments by using the Federal eRulemaking Portal, as
described above.
Written Submissions: Submit written comments by mail/hand delivery/
courier to: Office of the Secretariat, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814;
telephone (301) 504-7923.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this proposed rulemaking. All comments received
may be posted without change, including any personal identifiers,
contact information, or other personal information provided, to:
https://www.regulations.gov/. Do not submit confidential business
information, trade secret information, or other sensitive or protected
information that you do not want to be available to the public. If
furnished at all, such information should be submitted by mail/hand
delivery/courier.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to: https://www.regulations.gov/, and insert the
docket number, CPSC-2016-0030, into the ``Search'' box, and follow the
prompts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Renee McCune, Office of the General
Counsel, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7673; or Todd A. Stevenson, Chief Freedom
of Information Officer, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East
West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-6836.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission is proposing to amend the
agency's procedures for disclosure or production of information under
the Freedom of Information Act. 16 CFR part 1015.
Table of Contents
I. Background Information
II. Section-by-Section Analysis of the Proposed Revisions of the
Procedures for Disclosure or Production of Information Under the
Freedom of Information Act
III. Environmental Issues
IV. Regulatory Flexibility
V. Paperwork Reduction
VI. Preemption
VII. Effective Date
VIII. Request for Comments
I. Background Information
On June 30, 2016, the President signed into law the 2016 FOIA,
Public Law 114-185 (2016). The 2016 FOIA amends the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, requiring an agency to review its FOIA
regulations and issue regulations on procedures for the disclosure of
records under the new amendments. Specifically, the 2016 FOIA requires:
Certain records be available for public inspection in an electronic
format; agencies to make available for public inspection in an
electronic format records that have been requested three or more times;
that an agency not withhold information under FOIA unless the agency
reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest protected by
a FOIA Exemption or disclosure is prohibited by law; extending the
number of days for an administrative appeal of an adverse determination
from 30 to 90 days; limiting the FOIA Exemption for records created 25
years or more before the date on which the records were requested; the
assessment of fees be limited in certain circumstances; and requesters
be notified of available dispute resolution services from the FOIA
Public Liaison of the agency or the Office of Government Information
Services.
The Commission proposes amendments to its regulations implementing
the 2016 FOIA, 16 CFR part 1015, to incorporate these new statutory
requirements. The proposed amendments would revise the Commission's
FOIA regulations to comply with the FOIA, as amended by the 2016 FOIA,
and would update Commission procedures, contact information, and
methods of submitting requests for records to the Commission, in
addition to other conforming and technical revisions. Updating
Commission procedures and Commission contact information would provide
clarity for requesters seeking records from the Commission.
II. Section-by-Section Analysis of the Proposed Revision of the
Procedures for Disclosure or Production of Information Under the
Freedom of Information Act
Subpart A--Production or Disclosure Under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
Proposed Changes to Sec. 1015.1 (Purpose and Scope)
Initially, we would update Sec. 1015.1(a) to add the Children's
Gasoline Burn Prevention Act, the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa
Safety Act, and the Child Nicotine Poisoning Prevention Act to the
scope of statutes for which records must be maintained in connection
with the Commission's responsibilities and functions under those acts
because they were enacted after the last revision to the regulation in
1997.
The proposal also would revise Sec. 1015.1(b) to reflect new FOIA
5 U.S.C. 552(a)(8)(A), requiring agencies to analyze under a
foreseeable harm standard the withholding of information permitted by
the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552(b). The proposal would allow
information to be withheld pursuant to the exemptions, only if the
Commission reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest
protected by a specific FOIA exemption, or if disclosure is otherwise
prohibited by law. This proposal, consistent with the 2016 FOIA, would
not require disclosure of information otherwise prohibited from
disclosure by law, or otherwise exempted from disclosure
[[Page 60]]
under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3) (FOIA Exemption 3), which prohibits the
disclosure of matters specifically exempted from disclosure by another
statute. The proposal would specify that the Commission will consider
the record's age, content, and character in assessing whether it
reasonably foresees that disclosure of the document would harm an
interest protected by an exemption. Additionally, consistent with the
FOIA as amended by the 2016 FOIA, we also propose a revision that would
require that we consider partial disclosure when full disclosure of a
record is not possible and that we take reasonable steps to segregate
and release nonexempt information.
Under the proposed revision, for example, Commission records that
currently fall within the parameters of 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5) (FOIA
Exemption 5) would be subject to the foreseeable harm standard. FOIA
Exemption 5 incorporates, among other privileges, the deliberative
process privilege, which is considered a discretionary exemption,
meaning that withholding of records resides within the discretion of
the agency, rather than mandated by law. As the Senate report on the
FOIA amendment explains: ``[t]he foreseeable harm standard applies only
to those FOIA Exemptions under which discretionary disclosures can be
made. Several FOIA Exemptions, by their own existing terms, cover
information that is prohibited from disclosure or exempt from
disclosure under a law outside the four corners of the FOIA. Such
information is not subject to discretionary disclosure and is therefore
not subject to the foreseeable harm standard.'' Senate Report No. 114-
4, p 8 (February 23, 2015). Under this analysis and Department of
Justice guidance, records protected by the deliberative process
privilege under FOIA Exemption 5 shall be considered for release under
the foreseeable harm standard, even if the records may otherwise be
properly withheld under this exemption. In deciding whether to make a
discretionary release of records protected by the deliberative process
privilege, the Commission may consider, in addition to the record's
age, content, and character, the nature of the decision at issue, the
status of that decision, and the personnel involved.
The foreseeable harm standard, however, would not be applied to
disclosures prohibited by law or covered by FOIA Exemption 3, which
pertains to matters specifically exempted from disclosure by another
statute. Exemption 3 would include disclosures prohibited under section
6 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA), 15 U.S.C. 2055(a)(2), and
thus, the proposal to apply the foreseeable harm standard would not
alter, or otherwise limit, the information disclosure restrictions set
forth in section 6. Current Sec. 1015.1(b) already references
disclosures prohibited by law under Section 6(a)(2) of the CPSA. The
proposal, as revised, would preserve that prohibition, consistent with
the statutory direction, and it would clarify that information covered
by FOIA Exemption 3 is prohibited from disclosure and not subject to
analysis under the foreseeable harm standard. Specifically, the
proposed revision would state that Commission records subject to
Section 6 and 25(c) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2055 and 2074(c), fall
within the scope of FOIA Exemption 3.
The proposal also would revise Sec. 1015.1(c) to remove the
existing statement that the Attorney General's Memorandum on the 1974
Amendments to the FOIA may be consulted in considering questions
arising under the FOIA. That memorandum is outdated and should not be
consulted in considering questions arising under the FOIA because the
FOIA has been statutorily amended multiple times since 1974.
In place of the current Sec. 1015.1(c), we propose a new Sec.
1015.1(c) to reflect that the Commission Secretariat serves as the
agency's Chief FOIA Officer. The 2016 FOIA amends the FOIA at 5 U.S.C.
552(j) to require each agency to designate a Chief FOIA Officer, who
shall be a senior official of the agency, and shall have, subject to
the authority of the head of the agency, among other responsibilities,
responsibility for compliance and implementation of section (j) of the
FOIA. The revised Sec. 1015.1(c) would state that the Commission's
Chief Freedom of Information Officer, a senior official at the
Commission, would be the Secretariat. Therefore, for clarity and
consistency with the provisions of Sec. 1015.4, which vests ultimate
authority for responding to FOIA requests in the Commission's
Secretariat, and in conformance with amendments made to the FOIA, we
propose new language explaining that the Secretariat of the Commission
is the Chief Freedom of Information Officer, who, subject to the
authority of the Chairman, is responsible for compliance with, and
implementation of, 5 U.S.C. 552(j).
We additionally propose minor and non-substantive changes in
grammar.
Proposed Changes to Sec. 1015.2 (Public Reference Facilities)
To reflect amendments in the 2016 FOIA that focus on public
inspection in an electronic format, we are proposing to revise the
title of this section to ``Public inspection.'' Additionally, we
propose removing ``and copying'' from Sec. 1015.2(a) and (b), and
replacing that phrase with ``in an electronic format,'' to conform to
the amendments to the FOIA at 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
We also propose removing the statements in Sec. 1015.2(b)
regarding additional Commission public reference facilities. With
changes in technology, public inspection at the Commission headquarters
is rare, and we do not anticipate a need for additional public
reference facilities. To provide additional information to the public
about the Commission's electronic reading room, we propose adding the
Commission's Web site address to Sec. 1015.2(c) and a statement
indicating that records that the Commission must make available for
public inspection in an electronic format may be accessed through the
e-FOIA Public Access Link at the Commission's Web site address.
Additionally, to conform with amendments to the FOIA at 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(2)(D), we are proposing a new Sec. 1015.2(d), which requires
the agency, subject to any restrictions imposed by section 6 of the
CPSA, to make available for public inspection in an electronic format,
copies of certain records, regardless of form. Specifically, the
Commission shall make available for public inspection, records that
have been released under FOIA, records that, because of the nature of
the subject matter, the agency determines are likely to become the
subject of subsequent requests for substantially the same records, and
records that have been requested three or more times.
We additionally propose correcting ``Secretary'' to the current
title of ``Secretariat'' throughout this paragraph and updating the
room number of the Office of the Secretariat.
Proposed Changes to Sec. 1015.3 (Requests for Records and Copies)
We propose a revision to the title of this section by removing
``and copies'' to reflect amendments to the FOIA at 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
To reflect current practice, we also propose updating Sec.
1015.3(a) on the ways requesters may submit requests for records to the
Commission, to include electronic methods. In addition to submitting
requests by mail, requesters would be able to submit a request through
the Commission's e-FOIA Public Access Link, email, or facsimile. We
also propose a technical correction to reflect the Commission's
address. To promote good FOIA customer service, we also propose to
revise Sec. 1015.3(b) to
[[Page 61]]
state that, before submitting requests, requesters may contact the
Commission's FOIA contact or FOIA Public Liaison to discuss the records
the submitter seeks and to receive assistance in describing the
records.
Additionally, throughout this section we propose changing
``Secretary'' to ``Secretariat'' to update the position to its current
title.
Proposed Changes to Sec. 1015.4 (Responses To Requests for Records;
Responsibility)
We propose changing ``Secretary'' to ``Secretariat'' throughout
this section to reflect the name of the position to its current title.
Proposed Changes to Rule Sec. 1015.5 (Time Limitations on Responses to
Requests for Records and Requests for Expedited Processing)
We propose updating Sec. 1015.5(a) to incorporate new procedural
requirements and to reflect current Commission practices and advances
in technology. We propose clarifying that time limitations on responses
to requests submitted by postal mail would begin to run at the time the
request is received and date-stamped by the Office of the Secretary
(which we propose revising to the Office of the Secretariat). We would
also update the regulation to reflect the current practice that the
Office of the Secretariat will date-stamp requests the same day that it
receives the requests. We also propose that time limitations on
responses to requests submitted electronically would begin to run at
the time the request is electronically received, if the request is
submitted during ``working hours,'' which we define as 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m. EST. For responses submitted electronically during non-working
hours, the proposed change would require that time limitations begin to
run the next working day after the request is submitted.
If the Commission is unable to respond to a request within this
time frame, the current Sec. 1015.5(b) allows the Secretariat, at the
initial stage, or the General Counsel, at the appellate stage, to
extend the time for responding to requests up to 10 additional working
days, if a request satisfies the criteria for ``unusual
circumstances.'' Moreover, as explained in current Sec. 1015.5(d), if
the Secretariat or General Counsel determines that an extension of more
than 10 days is required, the Secretariat or General Counsel must give
the requester an opportunity to limit the scope of the request or
arrange for an alternative timeframe to process the request. Under the
new FOIA amendments, in those circumstances, agencies are required to
make available its FOIA Public Liaison to assist in the resolution of
any disputes between the requester and the agency. The 2016 FOIA
additionally requires agencies to notify requesters of the right to
seek dispute resolution services from the Office of Government
Information Services. Therefore, we propose adopting language stating
that if an extension of time greater than 10 working days is necessary,
the Commission will make available its FOIA Public Liaison for purposes
of dispute resolution. Additionally, we propose providing information
about where on the Commission's Web site, the Commission's designated
FOIA Liaison(s) is listed and also stating that the Commission will
notify requesters in writing of the availability of the Office of
Government Information Services to provide dispute resolution services,
as required by the 2016 FOIA. We propose inserting this language into a
new Sec. 1015.5(e), and we propose re-designating the succeeding
paragraphs in Sec. 1015.5 to conform to this change.
We also propose adding a statement to the current Sec.
1015.5(f)(2), clarifying that requests for expedited processing may be
submitted through any of the methods described in the proposed Sec.
1015.3(a), in which we propose updating the regulation to reflect new
electronic methods of submission.
We additionally propose revising Secretary'' to ``Secretariat''
throughout, to change the name of the position to its current title.
Proposed Changes to Sec. 1015.6 (Form and Content)
To reflect the current organizational structure of the agency and
to align with the 2016 FOIA amendments to the FOIA, indicating that
documents for public inspection will be made available in electronic
format, we propose revising Sec. 1015.6(a) to state that when a
requested record has been identified, requesters shall be supplied with
a copy or notified of where and when the document will be made
available for public inspection in an electronic format. We also
propose removing the reference to making records available at a
requested regional office. This option is outdated and no longer
applicable because the Commission does not have regional offices that
the public can visit.
We additionally propose amending Sec. 1015.6(a) to conform with
the 2016 FOIA amendments to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A)(i), which require the
Commission, when responding to a records request, to notify requesters
of their right to seek assistance from the Commission's FOIA Public
Liaison.
In the case of a denial, we propose revisions to conform with the
2016 FOIA amendments to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A)(i)(III)(aa), which
requires that agencies notify requesters when there is an adverse
determination that requesters have the right to appeal within a period
determined by the head of the agency that is not less than 90 days
after the date of such determination. Accordingly, we propose revising
Sec. 1015.6(b)(4) to change ``30 calendar days'' to ``90 calendar
days.'' We also propose adding a new Sec. 1015.6(b)(5), which would
require the Commission, in the case of a denial, to notify requesters
of their right to seek dispute resolution services from the Office of
Government Information Services.
We additionally propose revising ``Secretary'' to ``Secretariat''
throughout the section, to revise the title of the position to its
current title.
Proposed Changes to Sec. 1015.7 (Appeals From Initial Denials;
Reconsideration by the Secretary)
We propose revising the deadline for appealing a denial of a
records request from 30 days to 90 calendar days in Sec. 1015.7(a) to
conform with the 2016 FOIA amendments described above regarding
proposed changes to Sec. 1015.6.
We additionally propose updating the regulation at Sec. 1015.7(a)
to list the ways, including electronic methods, that a requester may
appeal a denial to the General Counsel of the Commission.
To reflect changes in Commission procedures due to advances in
information technology, we propose updating Sec. 1015.7(b) to specify
that time limitations on appeals submitted by postal mail would begin
to run when the appeal is received and date-stamped by the Office of
the Secretary (proposed to be changed to the Office of the
Secretariat). We would also update the regulation to reflect the
current practice that the Office of the Secretariat will date-stamp
requests the same day that it receives the requests. We also propose
that time limitations on appeals submitted electronically would begin
to run at the time the appeal is electronically received, if the
request is submitted during ``working hours,'' which we define as 8
a.m. to 4:30 p.m. EST. For responses submitted electronically during
non-working hours, the proposed change would require that time
limitations begin to run the next working day.
To conform with the 2016 FOIA amendments to 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(A)(i)(III)(bb), which require
[[Page 62]]
agencies to provide notification in an adverse determination of the
right to seek dispute resolution services from the FOIA Public Liaison
of the agency or the Office of Government Information Services, we
propose including a statement in Sec. 1015.7(e) stating that the
Commission will provide such a notification.
We additionally propose revising ``Secretary'' to ``Secretariat''
throughout the section, including in the title, to correct the name of
this position.
Proposed Changes to Sec. 1015.9 (Fees for Production of Records.)
We propose to make technical changes throughout this section,
including a revision to Sec. 1015.9(b) to reflect updated ways to
effectuate fee payment. We also propose to account for efforts expended
to locate and retrieve electronic information by revising the term
``search'' in Sec. 1015.9(c)(2) and the definition of ``duplication''
in Sec. 1015.9(c)(3) and to account for new technology changes that
are not reflected in the regulation. The proposal would also account
for the efforts to scan documents through a revision of Sec.
1015.9(e)(1), which would require a requester to pay the direct costs
associated with scanning documents.
We also propose to revise Sec. 1015.9(f)(6) to conform to the 2016
FOIA amendments to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(viii)(II). The changes would
require the Commission to waive fees where the agency fails to comply
with a time limit that it has extended because the agency has
determined that unusual circumstances apply. However, if the extension
for unusual circumstances involves more than 5,000 responsive pages,
the Commission may continue to charge fees, provided it has given
timely notice to the requester and has discussed with the requester how
to effectively limit the scope of the request. Thus, the regulation
would be revised to prevent the Commission from assessing search fees
for any requester or duplication fees for an educational institution,
non-commercial scientific instiution, or a representative of the news
media requester, if the Commission fails to comply with an extended
time limit, unless 5,000 pages are responsive to the request, and the
Commission has made three good faith attempts to discuss with the FOIA
requester limiting the scope of the request.
We additionally propose revising ``Secretary'' to ``Secretariat''
throughout the section, including in the title, to correct the name of
this position.
Proposed Changes to Sec. 1015.10 (Commission Report of Actions to
Congress)
We propose revisions to this section to conform to the 2016 FOIA
amendments to 5 U.S.C. 552(e)(1). Specifically, we propose adding a
statement that the Commission must submit the report to the Director of
the Office of Government Information Services in addition to its
current requirement to submit the report to the Attorney General of the
United States. We also propose adding, in conformance with the statute,
new Sec. 1015.10(h), stating that the report shall include the number
of times the Commission denied a request for records under 5 U.S.C.
552(c) and new Sec. 1015.10(i), stating that the report shall include
the number of records that were made available for public inspection in
an electronic format under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2).
Proposed Changes to Rule Sec. 1015.11 (Disclosure of Trade Secrets to
Consultants and Contractors; Nondisclosure to Advisory Committees and
Other Government Agencies)
We propose to add language to Sec. 1015.11 to clarify that the
reference in Sec. 1015.11(a) and (b) to 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4) includes
not only trade secrets, but also includes commercial or financial
information.
We also propose revising Sec. 1015.11(b) to incorporate an
amendment to the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2078(f), by the Consumer Product
Safety Improvement Act of 2008, Public Law 110-314 (2008), which
permits the Commission to share information with federal, state, and
local agencies, if certain requirements are satisfied.
Subpart B--Exemptions From Production and Disclosure Under 5 U.S.C.
552(b)
Proposed Changes to Sec. 1015.15 (Purpose and Scope)
We propose removing language in Sec. 1015.15(a) that references
the internal Commission procedure for withholding exempt records
because, as explained below in Proposed Changes to Rule Sec. 1015.17
(Internal Commission procedure for withholding exempt records.), we
propose removing Sec. 1015.17 entirely.
We also propose revisions to Sec. 1015.15(b) to conform to the
2016 FOIA amendment to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(8)(A), which provides that
agencies shall withhold information under 5 U.S.C. 552, only if the
agency reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest
protected by an exemption described in 5 U.S.C. 552(b), or disclosure
is otherwise prohibited by law. Currently, the rule states that the
Commission will make available, to the extent permitted by law, records
authorized to be withheld under 5 U.S.C. 552(b), unless the Commission
determines that disclosure is contrary to the public interest. To align
with the 2016 FOIA amendments, we propose revising this section to
state that the Commission will make available records authorized to be
withheld under one of the FOIA exemptions, ``unless the Commission
reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest protected by
the exemption or disclosure is prohibited by law or otherwise exempted
from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3).''
Additionally, we propose updating Sec. 1015.15(c) to reflect the
focus of the 2016 FOIA on public inspection of documents in an
electronic format, which is consistent with current practice. The
proposal would require that briefing packages, or portions thereof,
which the Secretary (which we propose revising to Secretariat), upon
the advice of the Office of the General Counsel, has determined would
be released, upon request, would be made available for public
inspection in an electronic format through the Commission's Web site.
Specifically, we propose removing the language stating that such
briefing packages would be publicly available in the public reference
facility established under Sec. 1015.2, and replacing it with proposed
language indicating that the information will be available
electronically on the Commission's Web site.
We also propose revising ``Secretary'' to ``Secretariat'' in Sec.
1015.15(c), to correct the name of this position and propose a non-
substantive grammatical revision in the first sentence of Sec.
1015.15(b).
Proposed Changes to Sec. 1015.16 (Exemptions (5 U.S.C. 552(b)).)
The 2016 FOIA amends 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5) to include a sunset
provision on the deliberative process privilege so that it does not
apply to records created 25 years or more before the date on which the
records were requested. We propose amending Sec. 1015.16(e) to add
language reflecting this change.
We also propose non-substantive technical corrections to Sec. Sec.
1015.16(e) and (f) to track the statutory language.
Proposed Changes to Sec. 1015.17 (Internal Commission Procedure for
Withholding Exempt Records)
We propose removing all of Sec. 1015.17 and reserving this
section. Section
[[Page 63]]
1015.17 describes an internal Commission procedure that allows a
Commission bureau or office director who believes that it is against
the public interest to disclose a Commission record prepared by his/her
office that may be exempt from disclosure under the inter- intra-agency
memorandum exemption at 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5) or the investigatory file
exemption at 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7) to request that the Secretary withhold
the document, and, if necessary, appeal that decision to the
Commission. The current Sec. 1015.17(a)(1) states that if the
Secretary agrees to withhold the document, the requester shall be
notified in writing of the denial and of his/her right to appeal.
Section 1015.17 is not necessary and should be removed because
procedures for Commission responses to requests based on an analysis of
harm to the public interest would now be described in detail in
proposed Sec. 1015.1(b) and Sec. 1015.6 and include additional
updated requirements not in Sec. 1015.17. Accordingly, we propose
removing Sec. 1015.17 because it does not reflect current internal
Commission procedures. Moreover, even if the provisions were not
outdated, we would propose removing this provision because it describes
an internal procedure that is more appropriate for including in a
Commission Directive on staff procedure than in a regulatory scheme.
Subpart C--Disclosure of Commission Accident or Investigation Reports
Under 15 U.S.C. 2074(c)
Proposed Changes to Sec. 1015.20 (Public Availability of Accident or
Investigation Reports)
We propose updating Sec. 1015.20(a) to reflect current Commission
procedure. The rule currently states that accident or investigation
reports are available to the public under the procedures set forth in
subpart A and that no portion of such reports are subject to the
investigatory file exemption. Current Commission procedure allows for
the withholding of accident or investigation reports, if the
requirements of the investigatory file exemption are met. Therefore, we
propose revising this section to state that accident or investigation
reports are available to the public under the procedures set forth in
subpart A, unless such reports are subject to the investigatory file
exemption.
III. Environmental Considerations
The Commission's regulations address whether the Commission is
required to prepare an environmental assessment or an environmental
impact statement. 16 CFR part 1021. These regulations provide a
categorical exclusion for certain CPSC actions that normally have
``little or no potential for affecting the human environment.'' 16 CFR
1021.5(c)(1). This proposed rule falls within the categorical
exclusion.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Under section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), when the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) or another law requires an agency to
publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking, the agency must
prepare an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IFRA), assessing
the economic impact of the proposed rule on small entities or certify
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603(a), 605. The
Commission chooses to provide notice and comment for this rulemaking.
However, because this is a ``rule of agency organization, procedure, or
practice,'' the APA does not require a notice of proposed rulemaking. 5
U.S.C. 553. Additionally, we note that the rule would merely set out in
a regulation the procedural requirements stated in the FOIA of 2016,
update Commission procedures, and make other technical changes and
corrections. We expect that the proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) establishes certain requirements
when an agency conducts or sponsors a ``collection of information.'' 44
U.S.C. 3501-3520. The proposed rule would amend the Commission's rule
to conform to the 2016 FOIA and to update Commission procedures and
make other technical changes and corrections. The proposed rule would
not impose any information collection requirements. The existing rule
and the proposed revisions do not require or request information from
firms, but rather, explain the Commission's FOIA procedures. Thus, the
PRA is not implicated in this proposed rulemaking.
VI. Executive Order 12988 (Preemption)
According to Executive Order 12988 (February 5, 1996), agencies
must state in clear language the preemptive effect, if any, of new
regulations. Section 26 of the CPSA explains the preemptive effect of
consumer product safety standards issued under the CPSA. 15 U.S.C.
2075. The proposed rule is not a consumer product safety standard, but
rather, would revise a rule of agency practice and procedure by
implementing the FOIA of 2016 and making technical revisions or
corrections. Therefore, section 26 of the CPSA would not apply to this
rulemaking.
VII. Effective Date
In accordance with the APA's general requirement that the effective
date of a rule be at least 30 days after publication of the final rule,
the Commission proposes that the effective date be 30 days after the
date of publication of a final rule in the Federal Register. 5 U.S.C.
553(d).
VIII. Request for Comments
The Commission requests comments on all aspects of the proposed
rule. Comments should be submitted in accordance with the instructions
in the ADDRESSES section at the beginning of this document. Written
comments must be received by March 20, 2017.
List of Subjects in 16 CFR 1015
Administrative practice and procedure; Consumer protection;
Disclosure of information; Freedom of information.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Commission proposes
to amend 16 CFR part 1015 to read, as follows:
PART 1015 --PROCEDURES FOR DISCLOSURE OR PRODUCTION OF INFORMATION
UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
0
1. The authority citation for part 1015 is revised to read, as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2051-2084; 15 U.S.C. 1261-1278; 15 U.S.C.
1471-1476; 15 U.S.C. 1211-1214; 15 U.S.C. 1191-1204; 15 U.S.C. 8001-
8008; 110 P.L. 278, 122 Stat. 2602; 5 U.S.C. 552.
0
2. Amend Sec. 1015.1 by revising the third sentence in paragraph (a)
and revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read, as follows:
Sec. 1015.1 Purpose and scope.
(a) * * * These records include those maintained in connection with
the Commission's responsibilities and functions under the Consumer
Product Safety Act, as well as those responsibilities and functions
transferred to the Commission under the Federal Hazardous Substances
Act, the Poison Prevention Packaging Act of 1970, the Refrigerator
Safety Act, the Flammable Fabrics Act, the Children's Gasoline Burn
Prevention Act, the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act, and
the Child Nicotine Poisoning Prevention Act, and those maintained under
any other authorized activity. * * *
[[Page 64]]
(b) The Commission's policy with respect to requests for records is
that disclosure is the rule and withholding is the exception. All
records or portions of records not exempt from disclosure will be made
available. Records which may be exempted from disclosure will be made
available unless: (1) Disclosure is prohibited by law; (2) the
Commission reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest
protected by an exemption described in 5 U.S.C. 552(b); or (3)
disclosure is exempted under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3). See Sec. 1015.15(b).
Section 6(a)(2) of the Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C.
2055(a)(2), prohibits the disclosure of trade secrets or other matters
referred to in 18 U.S.C. 1905; Section 6(b) and Section 25(c) of the
CPSA. The Commission will consider the record's age, content, and
character in assessing whether it reasonably foresees that disclosure
of the document would harm an interest protected by an exemption.
Additionally, the Commission will consider whether partial disclosure
of information is possible whenever the Commission determines that a
full disclosure of a requested record is not possible and will take
reasonable steps necessary to segregate and release nonexempt
information.
(c) The Secretariat of the Commission is the designated Chief
Freedom of Information Officer who, subject to the authority of the
Chairman, is responsible for compliance with and implementation of 5
U.S.C. 552(j).
0
3. Amend Sec. 1015.2 by:
0
a. Revising the section heading;
0
b. Revising paragraphs (a), (b) and (c); and
0
c. Adding paragraph (d).
The revisions read, as follows:
Sec. 1015.2 Public inspection.
(a) The Consumer Product Safety Commission will maintain in a
public reference room or area the materials relating to the Consumer
Product Safety Commission that are required by 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) and
552(a)(5) to be made available for public inspection in an electronic
format. The principal location will be in the Office of the Secretariat
of the Commission. The address of this office is: Office of the
Secretariat, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East
West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814.
(b) This public reference facility will maintain and make available
for public inspection in an electronic format a current index of the
materials available at that facility which are required to be indexed
by 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2).
(c) The Consumer Product Safety Commission will maintain an
``electronic reading room'' on the World-Wide Web at https://www.cpsc.gov for those records that are required by 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2)
to be available by ``computer telecommunications.'' Records that the
FOIA requires the Commission to make available for public inspection in
an electronic format may be accessed through the e-FOIA Public Access
Link at https://www.cpsc.gov.
(d) Subject to the requirements of Section 6 of the CPSA, the
Commission will make available for public inspection in an electronic
format copies of all records, regardless of form or format, that (1)
have been released to any person under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(3) and (2) that
because of the nature of their subject matter, the Commission
determines have become or are likely to become the subject of
subsequent requests for substantially the same records or that have
been requested three or more times.
0
4. Amend Sec. 1015.3 by:
0
a. Revising the section heading;
0
b. Revising the first sentence of paragraph (a);
0
c. Adding a sentence at the end of paragraph (b); and
0
d. Removing the word ``Secretary'' from paragraphs (d) and (e),
wherever it appears, and adding, in its place, the word
``Secretariat''.
The revisions read, as follows:
Sec. 1015.3 Requests for records.
(a) A request for access to records of the Commission shall be in
writing addressed to the Secretariat and shall be submitted through any
of the following methods: The e-FOIA Public Access Link at https://www.cpsc.gov; email to cpsc-foia@cpsc.gov; mail to Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Room 820, Bethesda, MD
20814; or facsimile to 301-504-0127. * * *
(b) * * * Before submitting their requests, requesters may contact
the Commission's FOIA contact or FOIA Public Liaison to discuss the
records they seek and to receive assistance in describing the records.
* * * * *
(d) If a requested record cannot be located from the information
supplied, or is known to have been destroyed or otherwise disposed of,
the requester shall be so notified by the Secretariat or delegate of
the Secretariat.
(e) The Consumer Product Safety Commission uses a multitrack system
to process requests under the Freedom of Information Act that is based
on the amount of work and/or time involved in processing requests.
Requests for records are processed in the order they are received
within each track. Upon receipt of a request for records, the
Secretariat or delegate of the Secretariat will determine which track
is appropriate for the request. The Secretariat or delegate of the
Secretariat may contact requesters whose requests do not appear to
qualify for the fastest tracks and provide such requesters the
opportunity to limit their requests so as to qualify for a faster
track. Requesters who believe that their requests qualify for the
fastest tracks and who wish to be notified if the Secretariat or
delegate of the Secretariat disagrees may so indicate in the request
and, where appropriate and feasible, will also be given an opportunity
to limit their requests.
Sec. 1015.4 [Amended]
0
5. Amend Sec. 1015.4 by removing the word ``Secretary'' wherever it
appears,
and adding, in its place, the word ``Secretariat''.
0
6. Amend Sec. 1015.5 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a)
0
b. Removing the word ``Secretary'' in paragraphs (b), (b)(1), (d), and
(d)(2) wherever it appears adding, in its place, the word
``Secretariat'';
0
c. Redesignating paragraphs (e) through (g), as paragraphs (f) through
(h), respectively;
0
d. Add new paragraph (e);
0
e. Removing the word ``Secretary'' in redesignated paragraphs (f), (g),
(g)(3), (g)(5), and (h) wherever it appears, and adding, in its place,
the word ``Secretariat''; and
0
f. Revising redesignated paragraph (g)(2).
The revisions read, as follows:
Sec. 1015.5 Time limitation on responses to requests for records and
requests for expedited processing.
(a) The Secretariat or delegate of the Secretariat shall respond to
all written requests for records within twenty (20) working days
(excepting Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays). The time
limitations on responses to requests for records submitted by mail
shall begin to run at the time a request for records is received and
date stamped by the Office of the Secretariat. The Office of the
Secretariat shall date stamp the request the same day that it receives
the request. The time limitations on responses to requests for records
submitted electronically during working hours (8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. EST)
shall begin to run at the time the request was electronically received
and the time limitations on responses submitted electronically during
non-working hours will begin to run the next working day.
(b) The time for responding to requests for records may be extended
by
[[Page 65]]
the Secretariat at the initial stage or by the General Counsel of the
Commission at the appellate stage up to an additional ten (10) working
days under the following unusual circumstances:
(1) The need to search for and collect the requested records from
field facilities or other establishments that are separate from the
Office of the Secretariat.
* * * * *
(d) If the Secretariat at the initial stage or the General Counsel
at the appellate stage determines that an extension of time greater
than ten (10) working days is necessary to respond to a request
satisfying the ``unusual circumstances'' specified in paragraph (b) of
this section, the Secretariat or the General Counsel shall so notify
the requester and give the requester the opportunity to:
(1) * * *
(2) Arrange with the Secretariat or the General Counsel an
alternative time frame for processing the request or a modified
request.
(e) If an extension of time greater than ten (10) working days is
necessary, the Commission shall make available its FOIA Public Liaison
for this purpose. A list of the Commission FOIA Public Liaisons is
available at https://www.cpsc.gov/Newsroom/FOIA. The Commission will
also notify requesters in writing to the availability of the Office of
Government Information Services of the National Archives and Records
Administration to provide dispute resolution services.
(f) The Secretariat or delegate of the Secretariat may aggregate
and process as a single request requests by the same requester, or a
group of requesters acting in concert, if the Secretariat or delegate
reasonably believes that the requests actually constitute a single
request which would otherwise satisfy the unusual circumstances
specified in paragraph (b) of this section, and the requests involve
clearly related matters.
(g) The Secretariat or delegate of the Secretariat will provide
expedited processing of requests in cases where the requester
demonstrates a compelling need for such processing.
(1) * * *
(2) Requesters for expedited processing must include in their
requests, which may be submitted through any of the methods described
in Sec. 1015.3(a) of this part, a statement setting forth the basis
for the claim that a ``compelling need'' exists for the requested
information, certified by the requester to be true and correct to the
best of his or her knowledge and belief.
(3) The Secretariat or delegate of the Secretariat will determine
whether to grant a request for expedited processing and will notify the
requester of such determination within ten (10) days of receipt of the
request.
(4) * * *
(5) The Secretariat or delegate of the Secretariat will process as
soon as practicable the documents responsive to a request for which
expedited processing is granted.
(h) The Secretariat may be unable to comply with the time limits
set forth in this Sec. 1015.5 when disclosure of documents responsive
to a request under this part is subject to the requirements of section
6(b) of the Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. 2055(b), and the
regulations implementing that section, 16 CFR part 1101. The
Secretariat or delegate of the Secretariat will notify requesters whose
requests will be delayed for this reason.
0
7. Revise Sec. 1015.6 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a);
0
b. Removing the word ``Secretary'' from paragraphs (b), and (c)
wherever it appears, and adding, in its place, the word
``Secretariat;''
0
c. Removing the number ``30'' in paragraph (b)(4), and adding, in its
place, the number ``90''; and
0
d. Adding paragraph (b)(5).
The revisions read, as follows:
Sec. 1015.6 Responses: Form and content.
(a) When a requested record has been identified and is available
for disclosure, the requester shall be supplied with a copy or notified
as to where and when the record will be made available for public
inspection in an electronic format. If the payment of fees is required
the requester shall be advised by the Secretariat in writing of any
applicable fees under Sec. 1015.9 hereof. The requester will be
notified of the right to seek assistance from the Commission's FOIA
Public Liaison.
(b) A response denying a written request for a record shall be in
writing signed by the Secretariat or delegate of the Secretariat and
shall include:
* * * * *
(4) A statement that the denial may be appealed to the
Commissioners of the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Any such
appeal must be made within 90 calendar days of receipt of the denial by
the requester.
(5) A statement that the requester has the right to seek dispute
resolution services from the Commission's FOIA Public Liaison or the
Office of Government Information Services.
(c) If no response is made within twenty (20) working days or any
extension thereof, the requester can consider his or her administrative
remedies exhausted and seek judicial relief in a United States District
Court as specified in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B). When it appears that no
response can be made to the requester within the applicable time limit,
the Secretariat or delegate of the Secretariat may ask the requester to
forego judicial relief until a response can be made. The Secretariat or
delegate of the Secretariat shall inform the requester of the reason
for the delay, of the date on which a response may be expected and of
his/her right to seek judicial review as specified in 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(B).
0
8. Amend Sec. 1015.7 by:
0
a. Revising the section heading;
0
b. Revising paragraphs (a) and (b);
0
c. Removing the word ``Secretary'' in paragraphs (c) and (g) wherever
it appears, and adding, in its place, the word ``Secretariat''; and
0
d. Revising paragraph (e).
The revisions read, as follows:
Sec. 1015.7 Appeals from initial denials; reconsideration by the
Secretariat.
(a) When the Secretariat or delegate of the Secretariat has denied
a request for records in whole or in part, the requester may, within 90
calendar days of its receipt, appeal the denial to the General Counsel
of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, attention of the
Secretariat. Appeals may be submitted through any of the following
methods: The e-FOIA Public Access Link at https://www.cpsc.gov; email
to cpsc-foia@cpsc.gov; mail to 4330 East West Highway, Room 820,
Bethesda, MD 20814; or facsimile to 301-504-0127.
(b) The General Counsel, or the Secretariat upon reconsideration,
will act upon an appeal within 20 working days of its receipt. The time
limitations on an appeal submitted by mail shall begin to run at the
time an appeal is received and date stamped by the Office of the
Secretariat. The Office of the Secretariat will date stamp the request
the same day that it receives the request. The time limitations on an
appeal submitted electronically during working hours (8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m. EST) shall begin to run at the time the appeal was electronically
received and the time limitations on responses electronically submitted
during non-working hours will begin to run the next working day.
(c) After reviewing the appeal, the Secretariat will reconsider
his/her initial denial. If the Secretariat upon reconsideration decides
to release any or all of the information requested on appeal, an appeal
as to the information released will be considered moot; and the
Secretariat will so inform the requester and submitter of the
information in accordance with
[[Page 66]]
Sec. Sec. 1015.6(a) and 1015.18(b). If the Secretariat decides to
affirm the initial denial, in whole or in part, the General Counsel
will decide the appeal within the 20-day time limit or any extension
thereof in accordance with Sec. 1015.5.
* * * * *
(e) The General Counsel's action on appeal shall be in writing,
shall be signed by the General Counsel, and shall constitute final
agency action. A denial in whole or in part of a request on appeal
shall set forth the exemption relied upon; a brief explanation,
consistent with the purpose of the exemption, of how the exemption
applies to the records withheld; and the reasons for asserting it. The
decision will inform the requester of the right to seek dispute
resolution services from the Commission's FOIA Liaison or the Office of
Government Information Services. A denial in whole or in part shall
also inform the requester of his/her right to seek judicial review of
the Commission's final determination in a United States district court,
as specified in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B).
* * * * *
(g) Copies of all appeals and copies of all actions on appeal shall
be furnished to and maintained in a public file by the Secretariat.
0
9. Amend Sec. 1015.9 by:
0
a. Removing the word ``Secretary'' in paragraphs (a), (e)(9), (f)(4),
(5) and (7), and adding, in its place, the word ``Secretariat'';
0
b. Revising paragraph (b), (c)(2) and (3);
0
c. Adding a sentence at the end of paragraph (e)(1);
0
d. Adding paragraph (f)(6);
0
e. Redesignating paragraph (f)(6) as paragraph (f)(7).
The revisions read, as follows:
Sec. 1015. 9 Fees for production of records.
(a) The Commission will provide, at no charge, certain routine
information. For other Commission responses to information requests,
the Secretariat shall determine and levy fees for duplication, search,
review, and other services, in accordance with this section.
(b) Fees shall be paid to the Treasury of the United States
according to the directions provided by the Commission.
* * * * *
(c)(2) Search includes all time spent looking for material that is
responsive to a request, including page-by-page or line-by-line
identification of material within documents and the reasonable efforts
expended to locate and retrieve information from electronic records.
(3) Duplication refers to the process of making a copy of a
document, including electronically, necessary to respond to a FOIA
request. The Commission will honor the requester's preference for
receiving a record in a particular format when it can readily reproduce
it in the form or format requested.
* * * * *
(e)(1) * * * Where paper documents must be scanned in order to
comply with a requester's preference to receive records in an
electronic format, the requester must also pay the direct costs
associated with scanning those materials.
(f)(6) Search fees shall be waived for all requests and duplication
fees shall be waived for requests from educational institutions, non-
commercial scientific institutions, and representatives of the news
media if the Commission fails to comply with any time limit and notice
under Sec. 1015.5(b)-(d) and 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6) other than those
exceptions stated in 5 U.S.C. 552 (a)(4)(A)(viii)(ll). Those exceptions
include:
(i) if the Commission has determined that unusual circumstances as
defined in Sec. 1015.5(b) apply and the Commission provided timely
written notice to the requester as required by Sec. 1015.5(e), then
failure to comply with the time limit in Sec. 1015.5(b)-(d) is excused
for 10 additional days; or
(ii) if the Commission has determined that unusual circumstances as
defined in Sec. 1015.5(b) apply and more than 5,000 pages are
necessary to respond to the request, and the Commission has provided
timely written notice in accordance with Sec. 1015.5(e) and the
Commission has discussed with the requester via written mail, email, or
telephone (or made not less than three good-faith efforts to do so) how
the requester could effectively limit the scope of the request; or
(iii) if a court has determined that exceptional circumstances
exist as defined in 5 U.S.C. 552(6)(C), then failure to comply with
Sec. 1015.6(b)-(d) and 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6) shall be excused for the
length of time provided by the court order.
(7) Any determination made by the Secretariat concerning fee
waivers may be appealed by the requester to the Commission's General
Counsel in the manner described at Sec. 1015.7.
0
10. Revise Sec. 1015.10 as follows:
0
a. Adding a phrase at the end of the undesignated introductory
paragraph;
0
b. Add paragraph (h) and (i).
The revisions read, as follows:
Sec. 1015.10 Commission report of actions to Congress.
On or before February 1 of each year, the Commission shall submit a
report of its activities with regard to freedom of information requests
during the preceding fiscal year to the Attorney General of the United
States and to the Director of the Office of Government Information
Services. This report shall include:
* * * * *
(h) The number of times the Commission denied a request for records
under 5 U.S.C. 552(c).
(i) The number of records that were made available for public
inspection in an electronic format under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2).
0
11. Amend Sec. 1015.11 by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read, as
follows:
Sec. 1015.11 Disclosure of trade secrets to consultants and
contractors; nondisclosure to advisory committees and other government
agencies.
(a) In accordance with section 6(a)(2) of the CPSA, the Commission
may disclose information which it has determined to be a trade secret
or other matter referred to under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4) to Commission
consultants and contractors for use only in their work for the
Commission. Such persons are subject to the same restrictions with
respect to disclosure of such information as any Commission employee.
(b) In accordance with section 6(a)(2) of the CPSA, the Commission
is prohibited from disclosing information which it has determined to be
a trade secret or other matter referred to under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4) to
advisory committees, except when required in the official conduct of
their business, or to other Federal agencies and state and local
governments except when permitted by the provisions of section 29(f) of
the CPSA.
0
12. Amend Sec. 1015.15 by:
0
a. Removing the words ``and the internal Commission procedure for
withholding exempt records'' from paragraph (a); and
0
b. Revising paragraph (b) and (c).
The revisions read, as follows:
Sec. 1015.15 Purpose and scope.
(a) The regulations of this subpart provide information concerning
the types of records which may be withheld from production and
disclosure by the Consumer Product Safety Commission. These regulations
also provide information on the method whereby persons submitting
information to the Commission may request that the information be
considered exempt from disclosure, and information concerning the
Commission's treatment of documents submitted with a request that they
be treated as exempt from disclosure.
[[Page 67]]
(b) No identifiable record requested in accordance with the
procedures contained in this part shall be withheld from disclosure
unless it falls within one of the classes of records exempt under 5
U.S.C. 552(b). The Commission will make available, to the extent
permitted by law, records authorized to be withheld under 5 U.S.C.
552(b) unless the Commission reasonably foresees that disclosure would
harm an interest protected by the exemption or disclosure is prohibited
by law or otherwise exempted from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3).
In this regard the Commission will not ordinarily release documents
that provide legal advice to the Commission concerning pending or
prospective litigation where the release of such documents would
significantly interfere with the Commission's regulatory or enforcement
proceedings.
(c) Draft documents that are agency records are subject to release
upon request in accordance with this regulation. However, in order to
avoid any misunderstanding of the preliminary nature of a draft
document, each draft document released will be marked to indicate its
tentative nature. Similarly, staff briefing packages, which have been
completed but not yet transmitted to the Commission by the Office of
the Secretariat are subject to release upon request in accordance with
this regulation. Each briefing package or portion thereof released will
be marked to indicate that it has not been transmitted to or acted upon
by the Commission. In addition, briefing packages, or portions thereof,
which the Secretariat upon the advice of the Office of the General
Counsel has determined would be released upon request in accordance
with this regulation, will be made available for public inspection in
an electronic format through the Commission's Web site at https://www.cpsc.gov promptly after the briefing package has been transmitted
to the Commissioners by the Office of the Secretariat. Such packages
will be marked to indicate that they have not been acted upon by the
Commission.
* * * * *
0
13. Amend Sec. 1015.16 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (e); and
0
b. Removing from paragraph (f) the misspelled word ``consititute'' and
adding, in its place, the word ``constitute''.
The revisions read, as follows:
Sec. 1015.16 Exemptions (5 U.S.C. 552(b)).
* * * * *
(e) Inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda or letters that would
not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation
with the agency provided that the deliberative process privilege shall
not apply to records created 25 years or more before the date on which
the records were requested.
(f) Personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of
which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal
privacy.
* * * * *
Sec. 1015.17 [Reserved]
0
14. Remove and reserve Sec. 1015.17.
Sec. 1015.20 Public availability of accident or investigation
reports.
0
15. Amend Sec. 1015.20, by removing the period and the words ``No
portion of'' from the first and second sentence of paragraph (a), and
adding, in its place, ``unless'' and ``s'' to the word ``report'' to
read as follows:
(a) Accident or investigation reports made by an officer, employee,
or agent of the Commission are available to the public under the
procedures set forth in subpart A of this part 1015 unless such reports
are subject to the investigatory file exemption contained in the
Freedom of Information Act (as restated in Sec. 1015.16) except that
portions identifying any injured person or any person treating such
injured person will be deleted in accordance with section 25(c)(1) of
the CPSA. * * *
Dated: December 21, 2016.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretariat, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016-31131 Filed 12-30-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P