BJS Confidentiality Pledge Revision Notice, 96521-96523 [2016-31705]
Download as PDF
96521
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 251 / Friday, December 30, 2016 / Notices
collection—one for the pilot study and
a second for the annual collection to
include all law enforcement agencies.
Burden estimates were based on sources
from the FBI UCR Program, the BJS, and
the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
The BJS has recently estimated that
approximately 1,400 fatalities attributed
to a law enforcement use of force occur
annually (Planty, et al., 2015, ArrestRelated Deaths Program: Data Quality
Profile, https://www.bjs.gov/
index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=5260). In
addition, the CDC estimates the
incidences of fatal and nonfatal injury—
including those due to legal
intervention—from emergency
department data. In their piece entitled,
‘‘The real risks during deadly police
¨
shootouts: Accuracy of the naıve
shooter,’’ Lewinski, et al. (2015)
estimates law enforcement officers miss
their target approximately 50 percent of
the time at the firing range and was used
as a simple estimate for the number of
firearm discharges at or in the direction
of a person, but did not strike the
individual. In addition, the UCR
Program collects counts of the number
of law enforcement sworn and civilian
employees in law enforcement agencies.
The table below uses a rate per officer
to estimate the anticipated number of
reports that could be received within
the two pilot phases and an annual
collection. Because the nonfatal injury
due to legal intervention estimate from
the CDC does not provide any overt
measure of severity, these injuries are
estimated to be as high as 82,283 or as
low as 5,546. Based upon these
estimates, the FBI is requesting 52,416
burden hours for an annual collection of
this data.
ESTIMATED BURDEN FOR PILOT STUDY
Annual rate per officer
Timeframe
Pilot I (3 months) ...................
Pilot II (3 months) ..................
Pilot Total (6 months) ............
Reporting group
Approximate
number of
officers
Large agencies ......................
Pilot I States ..........................
Large agencies ......................
Pilot I & II States ...................
— ...........................................
Estimated number of
incidents
Estimated burden hours
Maximum
Minimum
Maximum
(3 mos)
Minimum
(3 mos)
Estimated
burden
hours per
incident
0.112
0.112
0.112
0.112
—
0.012
0.012
0.012
0.012
—
5,000
1,534
5,000
2,300
13,834
536
165
554
247
1,502
0.63
0.63
0.63
0.63
0.63
3,150
966
3,150
6,140
13,406
338
104
349
156
947
178,557
54,781
178,557
82,172
—
Maximum
Minimum
Estimated Burden for All Law Enforcement Agencies in Annual Collection
Approximate
number of
officers
Timeframe
Reporting group
Collection (Annual) ................
All agencies ...........................
If additional information is required
contact: Ms. Amy Blasher, Unit Chief,
United States DOJ, FBI CJIS Division,
Crime Data Modernization Team,
Module D–3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road,
Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306.
Dated: December 27, 2016.
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2016–31697 Filed 12–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
Maximum
Minimum
Maximum
Minimum
Estimated
burden
hours per
incident
Maximum
Minimum
0.112
0.012
83,200
8,700
0.63
52,416
5,481
701,486
required by the passage and
implementation of provisions of the
federal Cybersecurity Enhancement Act
of 2015, which requires the Secretary of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) to provide Federal civilian
agencies’ information technology
systems with cybersecurity protection
for their Internet traffic. More details on
this announcement are presented in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below.
These revisions become effective
on December 30, 2016.
DATES:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Questions about this notice
should be addressed to the Bureau of
Justice Statistics, Office of Justice
Programs, U.S. Department of Justice,
ATTN: Allina Lee, 810 7th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20151.
ADDRESSES:
Office of Justice Programs
[OMB Number 1121–NEW]
BJS Confidentiality Pledge Revision
Notice
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Justice.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Justice
Statistics (BJS), a component of the
Office of Justice Programs (OJP) in the
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), is
announcing revisions to the
confidentiality pledge(s) it provides to
its respondents. These revisions are
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:18 Dec 29, 2016
Jkt 241001
Allina Lee by telephone at 202–305–
0765 (this is not a toll-free number); by
email at Allina.Lee@usdoj.gov; or by
mail or courier to the Bureau of Justice
Statistics, Office of Justice Programs,
U.S. Department of Justice, ATTN:
Allina Lee, 810 7th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20151. Because of
delays in the receipt of regular mail
related to security screening,
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
respondents are encouraged to use
electronic communications.
Federal
statistics provide key information that
the Nation uses to measure its
performance and make informed
choices about budgets, employment,
health, investments, taxes, and a host of
other significant topics. Most federal
surveys are completed on a voluntary
basis. Respondents, ranging from
businesses to households to institutions,
may choose whether or not to provide
the requested information. Many of the
most valuable federal statistics come
from surveys that ask for highly
sensitive information such as
proprietary business data from
companies or particularly personal
information or practices from
individuals. BJS protects all data
collected under its authority under the
confidentiality provisions of 42 U.S.C.
3789g. Strong and trusted
confidentiality and exclusively
statistical use pledges under Title 42
U.S.C. 3789g and similar statutes are
effective and necessary in honoring the
trust that businesses, individuals, and
institutions, by their responses, place in
statistical agencies.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
96522
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 251 / Friday, December 30, 2016 / Notices
Under statistical confidentiality
protection statutes, federal statistical
agencies make statutory pledges that the
information respondents provide will be
seen only by statistical agency
personnel or their agents and will be
used only for statistical purposes. These
statutes protect such statistical
information from administrative, law
enforcement, taxation, regulatory, or any
other non-statistical use and immunize
the information submitted to statistical
agencies from legal process. Moreover,
many of these statutes carry monetary
fines and/or criminal penalties for
conviction of a knowing and willful
unauthorized disclosure of covered
information. Any person violating the
confidentiality provisions of 42 U.S.C.
3789g may be punished by a fine of up
to $10,000, in addition to any other
penalties imposed by law.
As part of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2016
(Pub. L. 114–113) signed on December
17, 2015, the Congress included the
Federal Cybersecurity Enhancement Act
of 2015 (codified in relevant part at 6
U.S.C. 151). This act, among other
provisions, permits and requires the
Secretary of Homeland Security to
provide federal civilian agencies’
information technology systems with
cybersecurity protection for their
Internet traffic. The technology
currently used to provide this protection
against cyber malware is known as
Einstein 3A. Einstein 3A electronically
searches internet traffic in and out of
federal civilian agencies in real time for
malware signatures.
When such a signature is found, the
internet packets that contain the
malware signature are shunted aside for
further inspection by DHS personnel.
Because it is possible that such packets
entering or leaving a statistical agency’s
information technology system may
contain a small portion of confidential
statistical data, statistical agencies can
no longer promise their respondents
that their responses will be seen only by
statistical agency personnel or their
agents. However, federal statistical
agencies can promise, in accordance
with provisions of the Federal
Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of
2015, that such monitoring can be used
only to protect information and
information systems from cybersecurity
risks, thereby, in effect, providing
stronger protection to the integrity of the
respondents’ submissions.
Consequently, with the passage of the
Federal Cybersecurity Enhancement Act
of 2015, the federal statistical
community has an opportunity to
welcome the further protection of its
confidential data offered by DHS’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:18 Dec 29, 2016
Jkt 241001
Einstein 3A cybersecurity protection
program. The DHS cybersecurity
program’s objective is to protect federal
civilian information systems from
malicious malware attacks. The federal
statistical system’s objective is to
endeavor to ensure that the DHS
Secretary performs those essential
duties in a manner that honors the
statistical agencies’ statutory promises
to the public to protect their
confidential data. DHS and the federal
statistical system have been successfully
engaged in finding a way to balance
both objectives and achieve these
mutually reinforcing objectives.
However, pledges of confidentiality
made pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 3789g and
similar statutes assure respondents that
their data will be seen only by statistical
agency personnel or their agents.
Because it is possible that DHS
personnel could see some portion of
those confidential data in the course of
examining the suspicious Internet
packets identified by Einstein 3A
sensors, statistical agencies are revising
their confidentiality pledges to reflect
this process change.
Therefore, BJS is providing this notice
to alert the public to these
confidentiality pledge revisions in an
efficient and coordinated fashion. Below
is a listing of BJS’s current Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) OMB numbers and
information collection titles and their
associated revised confidentiality
pledge(s) for the Information Collections
whose confidentiality pledges will
change to reflect the statutory
implementation of DHS’ Einstein 3A
monitoring for cybersecurity protection
purposes.
The following BJS statistical
confidentiality pledge will now apply to
the Information Collections conducted
by BJS and protected under 42 U.S.C.
3789g, whose PRA OMB numbers and
titles are listed below. The new lines
added to address the new cybersecurity
monitoring activities are bolded for
reference only, and will not be bolded
in the pledge provided to respondents:
‘‘The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS)
is dedicated to maintaining the
confidentiality of your personally
identifiable information, and will
protect it to the fullest extent under
federal law. BJS, BJS employees, and
BJS data collection agents will use the
information you provide for statistical
purposes only, and will not disclose
your information in identifiable form
without your consent to anyone outside
of the BJS project team. All data
collected under BJS’s authority are
protected under the confidentiality
provisions of 42 U.S.C. 3789g, and any
person who violates these provisions
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
may be punished by a fine up to
$10,000, in addition to any other
penalties imposed by law. Further, per
the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of
2015 (codified in relevant part at 6
U.S.C. 151), federal information systems
are protected from malicious activities
through cybersecurity screening of
transmitted data. For more information
on the federal statutes, regulations, and
other authorities that govern how BJS,
BJS employees, and data collection
agents use, handle, and protect your
information, see the BJS Data Protection
Guidelines.’’
OMB
Control
No.
1121–0094 ...
1121–0065 ...
Information collection title
Deaths in Custody Reporting
Program.
National Corrections Reporting Program.
BJS has also added information about
the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act and
Einstein 3A to the BJS Data Protection
Guidelines to provide more details to
interested respondents about the new
cybersecurity monitoring requirements.
The following text has been added to
Section V. Information System Security
and Privacy Requirements:
‘‘The Cybersecurity Enhancement Act
of 2015 (codified in relevant part at 6
U.S.C. 151) required the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) to provide
cybersecurity protection for federal
civilian agency information technology
systems and to conduct cybersecurity
screening of the Internet traffic going in
and out of these systems to look for
viruses, malware, and other
cybersecurity threats. DHS has
implemented this requirement by
instituting procedures such that, if a
potentially malicious malware signature
were found, the Internet packets that
contain the malware signature would be
further inspected, pursuant to any legal
required legal process, to identify and
mitigate the cybersecurity threat. In
accordance with the Act’s provisions,
DHS conducts these cybersecurity
screening activities solely to protect
federal information and information
systems from cybersecurity risks. OJP
has installed DHS’s cybersecurity
protection software, Einstein 3A, on its
information technology systems to
comply with the Act’s requirements and
to further safeguard the information
transmitted to and from its systems,
including BJS data, from cybersecurity
threats and vulnerabilities.’’
The Census Bureau collects data on
behalf of BJS for the below listing of
PRA OMB numbers and information
collection titles. These collections are
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 251 / Friday, December 30, 2016 / Notices
protected under Title 13 U.S.C. Section
9. The Census Bureau issued a Federal
Register notice (FRN) and submitted an
emergency clearance request to OMB for
revised confidentiality pledge language,
with the new line to address the new
cybersecurity screening requirements
bolded for reference:
‘‘The U.S. Census Bureau is required
by law to proteect your information. The
Census Bureau is not permitted to
publicly release your responses in a way
that could identify you. Per the Federal
Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2015,
your data are protected from
cybersecurity risks through screening of
the systems that transmit your data.’’
OMB
Control
No.
1121–0111 ...
1121–0184 ...
1121–0317 ...
1121–0260 ...
1121–0302 ...
Information collection title
National Crime Victimization
Survey (NCVS).
School Crime Supplement to
the NCVS.
Identity Theft Supplement to
the NCVS.
Police Public Contact Supplement to the NCVS.
Supplemental Victimization
Survey to the NCVS.
The FRN submitted by the Census
Bureau can be accessed at https://
www.federalregister.gov/documents/
2016/12/14/2016-30014/confidentialitypledge-revision-notice, and the Census
Bureau’s PRA clearance request can be
accessed at https://www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_
nbr=201612-0607-001.
If additional information is required
contact: Melody Braswell, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405B,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: December 27, 2016.
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2016–31705 Filed 12–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 52–025 and 52–026; NRC–
2008–0252]
Southern Nuclear Operating Company,
Inc., Vogtle Electric Generating Plant,
Units 3 and 4; Tier 1 Editorial and
Consistency Changes
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:18 Dec 29, 2016
Jkt 241001
Exemption and combined
license amendment; issuance.
ACTION:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is granting an
exemption to allow a departure from the
certification information of Tier 1 of the
generic design control document (DCD)
and is issuing License Amendment No.
56 to Combined Licenses (COL) NPF–91
and NPF–92. The COLs were issued to
Southern Nuclear Operating Company,
Inc., and Georgia Power Company,
Oglethorpe Power Corporation, MEAG
Power SPVM, LLC, MEAG Power SPVJ,
LLC, MEAG Power SPVP, LLC,
Authority of Georgia, and the City of
Dalton, Georgia (the licensee); for
construction and operation of the Vogtle
Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Units
3 and 4, located in Burke County,
Georgia. The granting of the exemption
allows the changes to Tier 1 information
asked for in the amendment. Because
the acceptability of the exemption was
determined in part by the acceptability
of the amendment, the exemption and
amendment are being issued
concurrently.
SUMMARY:
Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2008–0252 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may access information related to
this document, which the NRC
possesses and is publicly available,
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2008–0252. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
it is mentioned in this document. The
request for the amendment and
exemption was submitted by letter
dated June 3, 2016, and available in
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
96523
ADAMS under Accession No.
ML16155A366.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chandu Patel, Office of New Reactors,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–3025; email: Chandu.Patel@
nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The NRC is granting an exemption
from Paragraph B of section III, ‘‘Scope
and Contents,’’ of appendix D, ‘‘Design
Certification Rule for the AP1000,’’ to
part 52 of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), and issuing
License Amendment No. 56 to COLs,
NPF–91 and NPF–92, to the licensee.
The exemption is required by Paragraph
A.4 of Section VIII, ‘‘Processes for
Changes and Departures,’’ appendix D,
to 10 CFR part 52 to allow the licensee
to depart from Tier 1 information. With
the requested amendment, the licensee
sought proposed changes that would
correct editorial errors in plant-specific
Tier 1 information, with corresponding
changes to the associated COL
Appendix C information, to promote
consistency with the Updated Final
Safety Analysis Report Tier 2
information. One of the proposed
changes to plant-specific Tier 1
information also involves a change to
Updated Final Safety Analysis Report
Tier 2 information. The proposed
amendment also involves a proposed
editorial correction to COL Paragraph
2.D.(12)(g)1. Part of the justification for
granting the exemption was provided by
the review of the amendment. Because
the exemption is necessary in order to
issue the requested license amendment,
the NRC granted the exemption and
issued the amendment concurrently,
rather than in sequence. This included
issuing a combined safety evaluation
containing the NRC’s review of both the
exemption request and the license
amendment. The exemption met all
applicable regulatory criteria set forth in
10 CFR 50.12, 10 CFR 52.7, and Section
VIII.A.4 of appendix D to 10 CFR part
52. The license amendment was found
to be acceptable as well. The combined
safety evaluation is available in ADAMS
under Accession No. ML16244A345.
Identical exemption documents
(except for referenced unit numbers and
license numbers) were issued to the
licensee for VEGP Units 3 and 4 (COLs
NPF–91 and NPF–92). The exemption
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 251 (Friday, December 30, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 96521-96523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31705]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of Justice Programs
[OMB Number 1121-NEW]
BJS Confidentiality Pledge Revision Notice
AGENCY: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Justice.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), a component of the
Office of Justice Programs (OJP) in the U.S. Department of Justice
(DOJ), is announcing revisions to the confidentiality pledge(s) it
provides to its respondents. These revisions are required by the
passage and implementation of provisions of the federal Cybersecurity
Enhancement Act of 2015, which requires the Secretary of the Department
of Homeland Security (DHS) to provide Federal civilian agencies'
information technology systems with cybersecurity protection for their
Internet traffic. More details on this announcement are presented in
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below.
DATES: These revisions become effective on December 30, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Questions about this notice should be addressed to the
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S.
Department of Justice, ATTN: Allina Lee, 810 7th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20151.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Allina Lee by telephone at 202-305-
0765 (this is not a toll-free number); by email at
Allina.Lee@usdoj.gov; or by mail or courier to the Bureau of Justice
Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice,
ATTN: Allina Lee, 810 7th Street NW., Washington, DC 20151. Because of
delays in the receipt of regular mail related to security screening,
respondents are encouraged to use electronic communications.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal statistics provide key information
that the Nation uses to measure its performance and make informed
choices about budgets, employment, health, investments, taxes, and a
host of other significant topics. Most federal surveys are completed on
a voluntary basis. Respondents, ranging from businesses to households
to institutions, may choose whether or not to provide the requested
information. Many of the most valuable federal statistics come from
surveys that ask for highly sensitive information such as proprietary
business data from companies or particularly personal information or
practices from individuals. BJS protects all data collected under its
authority under the confidentiality provisions of 42 U.S.C. 3789g.
Strong and trusted confidentiality and exclusively statistical use
pledges under Title 42 U.S.C. 3789g and similar statutes are effective
and necessary in honoring the trust that businesses, individuals, and
institutions, by their responses, place in statistical agencies.
[[Page 96522]]
Under statistical confidentiality protection statutes, federal
statistical agencies make statutory pledges that the information
respondents provide will be seen only by statistical agency personnel
or their agents and will be used only for statistical purposes. These
statutes protect such statistical information from administrative, law
enforcement, taxation, regulatory, or any other non-statistical use and
immunize the information submitted to statistical agencies from legal
process. Moreover, many of these statutes carry monetary fines and/or
criminal penalties for conviction of a knowing and willful unauthorized
disclosure of covered information. Any person violating the
confidentiality provisions of 42 U.S.C. 3789g may be punished by a fine
of up to $10,000, in addition to any other penalties imposed by law.
As part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2016
(Pub. L. 114-113) signed on December 17, 2015, the Congress included
the Federal Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2015 (codified in relevant
part at 6 U.S.C. 151). This act, among other provisions, permits and
requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide federal civilian
agencies' information technology systems with cybersecurity protection
for their Internet traffic. The technology currently used to provide
this protection against cyber malware is known as Einstein 3A. Einstein
3A electronically searches internet traffic in and out of federal
civilian agencies in real time for malware signatures.
When such a signature is found, the internet packets that contain
the malware signature are shunted aside for further inspection by DHS
personnel. Because it is possible that such packets entering or leaving
a statistical agency's information technology system may contain a
small portion of confidential statistical data, statistical agencies
can no longer promise their respondents that their responses will be
seen only by statistical agency personnel or their agents. However,
federal statistical agencies can promise, in accordance with provisions
of the Federal Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2015, that such
monitoring can be used only to protect information and information
systems from cybersecurity risks, thereby, in effect, providing
stronger protection to the integrity of the respondents' submissions.
Consequently, with the passage of the Federal Cybersecurity
Enhancement Act of 2015, the federal statistical community has an
opportunity to welcome the further protection of its confidential data
offered by DHS' Einstein 3A cybersecurity protection program. The DHS
cybersecurity program's objective is to protect federal civilian
information systems from malicious malware attacks. The federal
statistical system's objective is to endeavor to ensure that the DHS
Secretary performs those essential duties in a manner that honors the
statistical agencies' statutory promises to the public to protect their
confidential data. DHS and the federal statistical system have been
successfully engaged in finding a way to balance both objectives and
achieve these mutually reinforcing objectives.
However, pledges of confidentiality made pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
3789g and similar statutes assure respondents that their data will be
seen only by statistical agency personnel or their agents. Because it
is possible that DHS personnel could see some portion of those
confidential data in the course of examining the suspicious Internet
packets identified by Einstein 3A sensors, statistical agencies are
revising their confidentiality pledges to reflect this process change.
Therefore, BJS is providing this notice to alert the public to
these confidentiality pledge revisions in an efficient and coordinated
fashion. Below is a listing of BJS's current Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) OMB numbers and information collection titles and their
associated revised confidentiality pledge(s) for the Information
Collections whose confidentiality pledges will change to reflect the
statutory implementation of DHS' Einstein 3A monitoring for
cybersecurity protection purposes.
The following BJS statistical confidentiality pledge will now apply
to the Information Collections conducted by BJS and protected under 42
U.S.C. 3789g, whose PRA OMB numbers and titles are listed below. The
new lines added to address the new cybersecurity monitoring activities
are bolded for reference only, and will not be bolded in the pledge
provided to respondents:
``The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) is dedicated to
maintaining the confidentiality of your personally identifiable
information, and will protect it to the fullest extent under federal
law. BJS, BJS employees, and BJS data collection agents will use the
information you provide for statistical purposes only, and will not
disclose your information in identifiable form without your consent to
anyone outside of the BJS project team. All data collected under BJS's
authority are protected under the confidentiality provisions of 42
U.S.C. 3789g, and any person who violates these provisions may be
punished by a fine up to $10,000, in addition to any other penalties
imposed by law. Further, per the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2015
(codified in relevant part at 6 U.S.C. 151), federal information
systems are protected from malicious activities through cybersecurity
screening of transmitted data. For more information on the federal
statutes, regulations, and other authorities that govern how BJS, BJS
employees, and data collection agents use, handle, and protect your
information, see the BJS Data Protection Guidelines.''
------------------------------------------------------------------------
OMB Control No. Information collection title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1121-0094........................... Deaths in Custody Reporting
Program.
1121-0065........................... National Corrections Reporting
Program.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BJS has also added information about the Cybersecurity Enhancement
Act and Einstein 3A to the BJS Data Protection Guidelines to provide
more details to interested respondents about the new cybersecurity
monitoring requirements. The following text has been added to Section
V. Information System Security and Privacy Requirements:
``The Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2015 (codified in relevant
part at 6 U.S.C. 151) required the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) to provide cybersecurity protection for federal civilian agency
information technology systems and to conduct cybersecurity screening
of the Internet traffic going in and out of these systems to look for
viruses, malware, and other cybersecurity threats. DHS has implemented
this requirement by instituting procedures such that, if a potentially
malicious malware signature were found, the Internet packets that
contain the malware signature would be further inspected, pursuant to
any legal required legal process, to identify and mitigate the
cybersecurity threat. In accordance with the Act's provisions, DHS
conducts these cybersecurity screening activities solely to protect
federal information and information systems from cybersecurity risks.
OJP has installed DHS's cybersecurity protection software, Einstein 3A,
on its information technology systems to comply with the Act's
requirements and to further safeguard the information transmitted to
and from its systems, including BJS data, from cybersecurity threats
and vulnerabilities.''
The Census Bureau collects data on behalf of BJS for the below
listing of PRA OMB numbers and information collection titles. These
collections are
[[Page 96523]]
protected under Title 13 U.S.C. Section 9. The Census Bureau issued a
Federal Register notice (FRN) and submitted an emergency clearance
request to OMB for revised confidentiality pledge language, with the
new line to address the new cybersecurity screening requirements bolded
for reference:
``The U.S. Census Bureau is required by law to proteect your
information. The Census Bureau is not permitted to publicly release
your responses in a way that could identify you. Per the Federal
Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2015, your data are protected from
cybersecurity risks through screening of the systems that transmit your
data.''
------------------------------------------------------------------------
OMB Control No. Information collection title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1121-0111........................... National Crime Victimization
Survey (NCVS).
1121-0184........................... School Crime Supplement to the
NCVS.
1121-0317........................... Identity Theft Supplement to the
NCVS.
1121-0260........................... Police Public Contact Supplement
to the NCVS.
1121-0302........................... Supplemental Victimization Survey
to the NCVS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FRN submitted by the Census Bureau can be accessed at https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/12/14/2016-30014/confidentiality-pledge-revision-notice, and the Census Bureau's PRA
clearance request can be accessed at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=201612-0607-001.
If additional information is required contact: Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice,
Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two
Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405B, Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: December 27, 2016.
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2016-31705 Filed 12-29-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P