Notice of Availability of the BLM Draft Presumed To Conform List of Actions Under General Conformity-Upper Green River Basin, Wyoming, 96033-96043 [2016-31631]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Judith Wilson, USEITI Secretariat, 1849
C Street NW., MS 4211, Washington, DC
20240. You may also contact the USEITI
Secretariat via email to useiti@
ios.doi.gov, by phone at 202–208–0272,
or by fax at 202–513–0682.
The U.S.
Department of the Interior established
the USEITI Advisory Committee
(Committee) on July 26, 2012, to serve
as the USEITI multi-stakeholder group.
More information about the Committee,
including its charter, is available at
www.doi.gov/eiti/faca.
Meeting Agendas: At the February
1–2, 2017, meeting the MSG will
discuss and decide scope, approaches to
the Independent Administrator’s (IA)
recommendations regarding Reporting
and Reconciliation, and the first phase
of additions and updates to the USEITI
Data Portal for the 2017 USEITI Report.
The June 7–8, 2017, meeting agenda will
include the MSG discussion of the IA
draft Executive Summary and the
second phase of additions and updates
to the USEITI Data Portal for the 2017
USEITI Report. At the November 15–16,
2017, meeting the MSG will discuss and
approve the final 2017 USEITI Report
and the 2018 Annual Workplan. The
USEITI Secretariat, which is the
administrator for USEITI, will post the
final agendas and materials for all
meetings on the USEITI MSG Web site
at www.doi.gov/eiti/faca. All Committee
meetings are open to the public.
Whenever possible, we encourage
those participating by telephone to
gather in conference rooms in order to
share teleconference lines. Please plan
to dial into the meeting and/or log into
WebEx at least 10–15 minutes prior to
the scheduled start time in order to
avoid possible technical difficulties. We
will accommodate individuals with
special needs whenever possible. If you
require special assistance (such as an
interpreter for the hearing impaired),
please notify Department of the Interior
staff in advance of the meeting at 202–
208–0272 or via email to useiti@
ios.doi.gov.
We will post the minutes from these
proceedings on the USEITI MSG Web
site at www.doi.gov/eiti/faca and they
will also be available for public
inspection and copying at our office at
the Stewart Lee Udall Department of the
Interior Building in Washington, DC by
contacting Department of the Interior
staff via email to useiti@ios.doi.gov or by
telephone at 202–208–0272. For more
information on USEITI, visit
www.doi.gov/eiti.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:41 Dec 28, 2016
Jkt 241001
Dated: December 13, 2016.
Gregory J. Gould,
Director, Office of Natural Resources
Revenue.
[FR Doc. 2016–31620 Filed 12–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4335–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLORB00000.L17110000.PH0000.
LXSSH1060000.17XL1109AF; HAG 17–0053]
Notice of Public Meeting for the Steens
Mountain Advisory Council
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act and the Federal Advisory
Committee Act of 1972, and the U.S.
Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Land Management (BLM), the Steens
Mountain Advisory Council (SMAC)
will meet as indicated below:
DATES: Thursday, January 19, 2017 from
10 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Friday, January
20, 2017, from 8:30 a.m. to 2 p.m., at the
Hilton Garden Inn, 425 SW Bluff Drive,
Bend, Oregon. Daily sessions may end
early if all business items are
accomplished ahead of schedule, or go
longer if discussions warrant more time.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara
Thissell, Public Affairs Specialist, BLM
Burns District Office, 28910 Highway 20
West, Hines, Oregon 97738, (541) 573–
4519, or email tthissell@blm.gov.
Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Relay Service at 1(800) 877–
8339 to contact the above individual
during normal business hours. The
service is available 24 hours a day, 7
days a week, to leave a message or
question with the above individual. You
will receive a reply during normal
business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
SMAC was initiated August 14, 2001,
pursuant to the Steens Mountain
Cooperative Management and Protection
Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–399). The
SMAC provides representative counsel
and advice to the BLM regarding new
and unique approaches to management
of the land within the bounds of the
Steens Mountain Cooperative
Management and Protection Area
(CMPA), recommends cooperative
programs and incentives for landscape
management that meet human needs,
and advises the BLM on maintenance
and improvement of the ecological and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
96033
economic integrity of the area. Agenda
items for January 19–20, 2017 session
include, but are not limited to: An
update from the Designated Federal
Official; information sharing on the
implementation of projects for the
Steens Mountain Comprehensive
Recreation Plan; discussion of access to
inholdings in the CMPA; a
subcommittee report and discussion on
public access at Pike Creek Canyon; and
regular business items such as
approving the previous meeting’s
minutes, member round-table, and
planning the next meeting’s agenda.
Any other matters that may reasonably
come before the SMAC may also be
included, such as program status
updates and previous meetings’ followup items. A public comment period is
available both days. Unless otherwise
approved by the SMAC Chair, the
public comment period will last no
longer than 30 minutes, and each
speaker may address the SMAC for a
maximum of five minutes.
Jeff Rose,
Burns District Manager.
[FR Doc. 2016–31648 Filed 12–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLWY930000.L10100000.PH0000]
Notice of Availability of the BLM Draft
Presumed To Conform List of Actions
Under General Conformity—Upper
Green River Basin, Wyoming
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the Clean
Air Act, Clean Air Act Amendments of
1990, and U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency’s (EPA) regulations,
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
has developed a Draft Presumed to
Conform List of Actions under General
Conformity for the Upper Green River
Basin (UGRB) ozone nonattainment area
and by this notice is announcing the
opening of the comment period.
DATES: To ensure comments will be
considered, the BLM must receive
comments on the Draft Presumed to
Conform List on or before February 13,
2017. The BLM will announce future
meetings or hearings and any other
public involvement activities at least 15
days in advance through media releases.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
96034
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
• Web site: https://bit.ly/WYPtCList.
• Email: BLM_WY_PTCList_
comments@blm.gov.
Copies of the Draft Presumed to
Conform List are available at the BLM
Wyoming State Office, 5353
Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne, WY
82009 and online at the above Web site.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charis Tuers, Air Resource Specialist;
Telephone: 307–775–6099; address:
BLM Wyoming State Office, 5353
Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne, WY
82009, or P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, WY
82003; or email: BLM_WY_PTCList_
comments@blm.gov. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Relay
Service at 1–800–877–8339 to contact
the above individual during normal
business hours. The Service is available
24 hours a day, seven days a week, to
leave a message or question with the
above individual. You will receive a
reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Clean
Air Act section 176(c), 42 U.S.C. 7506(c)
and Clean Air Act Amendments of
1990 1 require that all Federal actions
conform to an applicable State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for the
criteria pollutants and precursors
identified in 40 CFR 93.153(b)(1) and
(b)(2) and in the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS) under 40
CFR 50.4–50.12.2 The criteria pollutants
for which there are established NAAQS
include: ozone (O3), carbon monoxide
(CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), lead (Pb),
sulfur dioxide (SO2),3 particulate matter
consisting of particles with a diameter
less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers
(PM2.5), and particulate matter
consisting of particles with a diameter
greater than 2.5 but less than or equal
to 10 micrometers (PM10).4 A SIP is the
written plan submitted to the EPA
detailing a state’s strategy to control air
emissions to meet and maintain the
NAAQS for these pollutants, and thus to
comply with the Clean Air Act.5
The U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has established criteria
and procedures for Federal agencies to
use in demonstrating conformity with
an applicable SIP. The criteria and
1 The Clean Air Act Title 1 Air Pollution
Prevention and Control, Part D. Subpart 1, Section
176 Limitation on Certain Federal Assistance.
2 The NAAQS established by the EPA represent
maximum concentration standards for criteria
pollutants to protect human health (primary
standards) and to protect property and aesthetics
(secondary standards).
3 The BLM calculated SO is considered equal to
X
SO2.
4 PM
2.5 is a subset of PM10 with separate
standards for each.
5 40 CFR 93.153(f).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:41 Dec 28, 2016
Jkt 241001
procedures can be found at 40 CFR
93.150 et seq. (General Conformity
Rule).
The General Conformity Rule allows
Federal agencies to develop a list of
actions that are presumed to conform to
a SIP with respect to the criteria
pollutants and their precursors that are
identified in 40 CFR 93.153(b)(1) and
(b)(2). Addressing the need for
efficiency and streamlining, the EPA
states that the provisions allowing
Federal agencies to establish categories
of actions that are presumed to conform
are ‘‘intended to assure that these Rules
are not overly burdensome and Federal
agencies would not spend undue time
assessing actions that have little or no
impact on air quality.’’ 6 Furthermore,
the EPA states that ‘‘Federal actions
which are de minimis should not be
required by this Rule to make an
applicability analysis.’’ 7 To achieve this
end, the General Conformity Rule
allows individual Federal agencies to
present categories of activities that have
been documented to have de minimis
emissions, and therefore could be
presumed to conform under 40 CFR
93.153(f).
To identify actions that are presumed
to conform, Federal agencies must meet
the following criteria from the General
Conformity regulations:
(1) Clearly demonstrate that the total
of direct and indirect emissions of the
criteria pollutants or precursor
pollutants from the type of activities
that would be presumed to conform
would not:
(i) Cause or contribute to any new
violation of any standard in any area;
(ii) Interfere with provisions in the
applicable SIP for maintaining any
standard;
(iii) Increase the frequency or severity
of any existing violation of any standard
in any area; or
(iv) Delay timely attainment of any
standard or any required interim
emission reductions or other milestones
in any area including emission levels
specified in the applicable SIP; 8 or
(2) Provide documentation that
emissions from the types of actions that
would be presumed to conform are
below the applicable thresholds
established in 40 CFR 93.153(b)(1) and
(b)(2).9 This documentation may be
based on similar actions that the agency
has taken over recent years.10
Besides documenting the basis for
presuming that the activities would
6 58
FR 63228 (Nov. 30, 1993).
FR 63229 (Nov. 30, 1993).
8 40 CFR 93.153(g)(1).
9 40 CFR 93.153(g)(2).
10 Ibid.
7 58
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
conform, Federal agencies must fulfill
procedural requirements under the
General Conformity Rule by publishing
the list of activities that are presumed to
conform in the Federal Register;
notifying Federal, State, and local
agencies that the list is available;
providing opportunity for public
comment; and making available the
agency’s responses to any public
comments.11
The BLM has developed a draft list of
activities that are Presumed to Conform
to Wyoming’s SIP for the Upper Green
River Basin (UGRB) ozone
nonattainment area. Wyoming’s UGRB
was designated by EPA as an ozone
nonattainment area with a marginal
classification on April 30, 2012. A
nonattainment area is any area that does
not meet the national primary or
secondary ambient air quality standard
for the specified pollutant. Ozone
nonattainment designations are
classified based on the severity of the
nonattainment. A marginal designation
is the lowest, or least severe,
classification. As a result of the
nonattainment designation, the BLM
must comply with the General
Conformity regulations in 40 CFR 93
Subpart B (which have subsequently
been incorporated by the State of
Wyoming in Chapter 8, Section 3 of the
Wyoming Air Quality Standards and
Regulations (WAQSR)) before
authorizing or approving any Federal
action undertaken within the designated
nonattainment area.
As noted, the BLM must demonstrate
conformity by completing a conformity
analysis, and cannot approve any action
that would cause or contribute to a new
violation of the applicable NAAQS or
increase the frequency or severity of any
existing violation. With respect to ozone
in the UGRB, the presumed to conform
analysis is completed by ensuring that
emissions of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides
(NOX), the precursor pollutants that
form ground level ozone, are below the
de minimis emission thresholds
specified in the regulations for marginal
nonattainment areas. The de minimis
emission thresholds identified in 40
CFR 93.153(b)(1) and (b)(2) for a
marginal ozone nonattainment are 100
tons/year of VOCs and 100 tons/year of
NOX). Federal actions and activities that
demonstrate total direct and indirect
emissions below the de minimis
emission thresholds can be presumed to
conform to the regulations and
authorized without further analysis.
Actions that exceed the de minimis
emission thresholds require further
11 40
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
CFR 93.153(h).
29DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
evaluation and a conformity
determination.
In this Notice, the BLM is identifying
a list of de minimis actions and
activities that are presumed to conform.
This Notice contains a summary of
documentation and analysis that
demonstrates that the actions described
will not exceed the applicable emission
levels for the UGRB ozone
nonattainment area. The actions involve
BLM approval and/or financial
assistance for projects or agency
activities within the UGRB in Wyoming.
Adoption of the list would reduce
agency costs and time associated with
conducting individualized evaluations
of actions that have minimal emissions.
Once the list is finalized, the BLM will
be able to improve its environmental
review process by streamlining review
of actions with minimal impacts and
applying more resources to actions that
have the potential to reach regulated
emission levels or adversely impact air
quality.
This draft list identifies two categories
of actions: (1) Actions that are presumed
to conform to the SIP for the UGRB area
because they are projected to result in
emissions lower than the established de
minimis thresholds; and (2) actions that
are entirely exempt from the General
Conformity Rule, under 40 CFR
93.153(c)(2), because they fall within
broad categories of exempt actions—as
defined by EPA—that result in no
emissions increase, associated increases
in emissions that are already covered by
the SIP, or emissions increases that are
clearly de minimis.
Notification Process for the BLM UGRB
Presumed To Conform List
The notification requirements in the
General Conformity Rule are as
follows: 12
(1) The Federal agency must publish
in the Federal Register its draft list of
activities that are presumed to conform
and the basis for the presumptions;
(2) The Federal agency must notify
the appropriate EPA Regional Office(s),
state and local air quality agencies and,
where applicable, the agency designated
under section 174 of the Clean Air Act
and the relevant metropolitan planning
organization, and provide at least 30
days for the public to comment on the
list of proposed activities presumed to
conform;
(3) The Federal agency must
document its response to all the
comments received and make the
comments, responses, and final list of
activities available to the public upon
request; and
(4) The Federal agency must publish
the final list of activities presumed to
conform in the Federal Register.
The BLM is initiating its notification
requirements by publishing this Draft
Presumed to Conform List. The public
may obtain further program information
or review project documentation by
contacting the office and person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
The major sections of this document
follow:
I. Background
II. Existing Exemptions
III. BLM UGRB Presumed To Conform List
and Technical Justifications
IV. How To Apply Presumed To Conform
Actions
I. Background
General conformity refers to the
process of demonstrating that a Federal
action conforms to the applicable SIP. A
general conformity determination is
required for each pollutant identified as
nonattainment or maintenance in a
particular area, when the total of direct
and indirect emissions caused by a
Federal action equals or exceeds any of
the applicable thresholds.13 In cases
where emissions equal or exceed the
applicable thresholds, the Federal
agency must complete additional
evaluation to demonstrate how the
action will conform to the SIP and meet
General Conformity requirements.
However, for actions where the
emissions are below the applicable
thresholds, an applicability analysis is
used to demonstrate that the emissions
are below the thresholds and are
considered de minimis. No further
evaluation or demonstration of
conformity is required if this is the case.
The procedure for assessing
conformity depends on whether the
relevant action is classified as a Federal
‘‘transportation’’ action or a ‘‘general’’
Federal action. A Federal transportation
action is an action related to
transportation plans, programs, and
projects that are developed, funded, or
approved under Title 23 United States
Code (U.S.C.) or the Federal Transit Act
(FTA).14 A general Federal action is
defined as any Federal action that is not
a transportation action and
consequently not subject to the
conformity requirements established for
Federal highway or transit actions,
referred to as ‘‘transportation
conformity.’’ Since the BLM actions
described in this Notice do not meet the
definition of a transportation action,
they are general actions by default, and
13 40
12 40
CFR 93.153(h)(1–4).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:41 Dec 28, 2016
14 49
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
CFR 93.153(b).
U.S.C. 1601 et seq.
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
thus subject to the General Conformity
Rule.
The BLM and other Federal agencies
subject to general conformity must make
a determination, prior to taking or
authorizing any Federal action, that the
action conforms to the applicable SIP’s
purpose to meet and maintain the
NAAQS. If the actions are not
specifically exempt, covered under an
existing SIP, or classified as presumed
to conform, the BLM or other agency
must complete an emissions inventory
as part of the applicability analysis to
determine if emissions are likely to
equal or exceed the established de
minimis emission thresholds allowed
for the nonattainment area.
Administering and enforcing conformity
regulations are delegated by the EPA to
the individual states through provisions
in each SIP. When a nonattainment area
achieves compliance with the NAAQS,
it becomes a maintenance area for at
least 10 years, with ongoing state
responsibility to ensure continued
attainment.15
Under the General Conformity Rule
(40 CFR 93.153(g) and (h)), Federal
agencies may develop a list of actions
that are presumed to conform to
relevant SIPs. As noted, the process of
establishing presumed to conform
classifications is predicated on ensuring
that an activity that is presumed to
conform does not cause or contribute to
any new violations of the NAAQS,
exacerbate existing violations, or
interfere with provisions contained in
the applicable SIP.
II. Existing Exemptions
To provide the proper context and
baseline for identifying and proposing a
list of presumed to conform Federal
actions for the UGRB, the BLM must
first consider whether any individual
actions and activities already qualify for
exemption from general conformity
requirements. The EPA has defined
broad categories of exempt actions
under 40 CFR 93.153. Actions in these
categories result in no emissions
increase, emissions increases that are
already covered by the SIP, or emissions
increases that are clearly de minimis.
These exempt actions are not subject to
further analysis for applicability,
conformity, or regional significance
under the General Conformity Rule.
Further, activities that qualify for
exemptions from the conformity
analysis under 40 CFR 93.153 are not
subject to the same public review and
notification requirements as those
activities that the BLM has listed as
presumed to conform. Nevertheless, in
15 Clean
Sfmt 4703
96035
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
Air Act, Section 175A, 42 U.S.C. 7505a.
29DEN1
96036
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices
this Federal Register Notice, the BLM is
identifying those activities occurring in
the UGRB ozone nonattainment area
that are exempt from the conformity
requirements on the basis that
associated emissions are de minimis.
(The complete list of activities
identified by the BLM as being exempt
from the conformity regulation is
available at: https://bit.ly/WYPtCList.)
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A. Continuing and Recurring Activity
(40 CFR 93.153(c)(2)(ii))
The BLM regularly conducts activities
in support of its management of public
lands in the UGRB, including but not
limited to: (1) Archaeological surveys;
(2) issuing grazing permits; (3) weed
control on public lands; (4) resource
surveys for visual resources, wildlife,
etc.; and (5) collecting transportation
data. These activities may involve shortterm and infrequent vehicle use by
employees to travel into the field. The
BLM has determined that any air
emissions associated with the
corresponding vehicle use are de
minimis, and therefore these activities
are exempt from general conformity
requirements.
B. Routine Maintenance and Repair
Activities (40 CFR 93.153(c)(2)(iv))
BLM activities in the UGRB also
involve actions that qualify as routine
operations and maintenance under the
General Conformity Rule. Examples of
such activities include, but are not
limited to: (1) Maintaining air quality
monitoring equipment operated by the
BLM; (2) managing solid waste collected
at public use areas such as at
campgrounds, picnic grounds, etc.; (3)
maintaining BLM-managed lands such
as cleaning cattle-guards, and windmill/
fence repair; and (4) performing routine
maintenance of trails, campgrounds,
and other recreational sites managed by
the BLM. These activities typically
involve short-term and infrequent
vehicle use by employees to travel into
the field, and may at times also include
short-term use of heavy equipment. Due
to the short-term and infrequent nature
of such activities, the BLM has
determined that any air emissions
associated with the corresponding
vehicle and/or equipment use are de
minimis, and therefore these activities
are exempt from general conformity
requirements.
It should be noted that activities that
involve extensive construction and/or
earthmoving are not considered routine
and do not qualify under the exemption
described above. However, some
construction activities associated with
specific projects may qualify as
presumed to conform under this Draft
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:41 Dec 28, 2016
Jkt 241001
Presumed to Conform List, depending
on the level of the associated emissions.
activities may be included on the BLM
UGRB Presumed to Conform List.
C. Regulatory Monitoring and
Inspections (40 CFR 93.153(c)(2)(v))
The BLM inspects and monitors
compliance of regulated activities under
its jurisdiction within the UGRB. These
inspection and monitoring activities
include, but are not limited to: (1)
Monitoring and assessing cultural
resources; (2) identifying and
monitoring solid waste and/or
hazardous waste sites; (3) inspecting,
monitoring and assessing range, forests
and other lands; (4) conducting field
inspections of oil and gas operations,
sand and gravel operations, and similar
activities where the BLM has issued
authorizations for resource
development; (5) monitoring and
assessing recreational activities such as
off-road vehicle use; and (6) monitoring
wildlife and wild horse populations on
BLM-managed lands. These activities
may at times involve short-term and
infrequent vehicle use by employees to
travel into the field. The BLM has
determined that due to the short-term
and infrequent nature of such activities,
any air emissions associated with the
corresponding vehicle use are de
minimis, and therefore these activities
are exempt from general conformity
requirements.
E. Debris Removal (40 CFR
93.153(c)(2)(ix))
D. Administrative Actions (40 CFR
93.153(c)(2)(vi))
The BLM issues permits and conducts
other administrative actions as part of
its land management activities.
Examples of such permits include, but
are not limited to: Forest permits,
recreation permits, small group tours,
and meetings. The administrative
actions of the BLM generally do not
involve activities that would produce
air emissions, but they may at times
include short-term and infrequent
vehicle use by employees. The BLM has
determined that any air emissions
associated with the corresponding shortterm and infrequent vehicle use are de
minimis, and therefore these permitting
activities are exempt from general
conformity requirements.
Note that the various activities
permitted by the BLM may not be
exempt in their own right; the
exemption described above only applies
to the administrative processing of these
actions. If a particular activity subject to
a BLM permit or other approval is
reasonably foreseeable and has
quantifiable air emissions, then the
specified activity will need to undergo
the appropriate conformity review
before the BLM issues the required
permit or approval. Some related
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Activities involving debris removal
from BLM-managed lands are exempt
from conformity. This includes events
where individuals and/or groups pick
up litter and other debris at
campgrounds, trails, etc. These
activities are expected to involve shortterm and infrequent vehicle use;
however, the BLM has determined that
any air emissions associated with the
corresponding vehicle use are de
minimis.
F. Emissions Not Reasonably
Foreseeable (40 CFR 93.153(d)(3))
In some cases, BLM activities in the
UGRB that do not themselves produce
significant emissions may be expected
to lead to future air emissions. In many
cases, however, the emissions are not
reasonably foreseeable or quantifiable at
the time of the action. One example is
offering for lease a tract or parcel of land
or holding a mineral lease sale. The sale
itself is an administrative action that
does not authorize development or the
approval of emission generating
activities. However, it is recognized that
the sale could result in air emissions at
the time development occurs. Since the
associated emissions are largely
dependent on the specifics of the
development proposal, which is
unknown at the time of the lease
offering, the emissions are not
reasonably foreseeable or quantifiable at
the leasing stage. However, any resource
development that is proposed following
the lease sale would trigger additional
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) analysis, and the development
in question would be subject to
conformity requirements at that time.
G. Clean Air Act Permitted Sources (40
CFR 93.153(d)(1))
Some activities within the UGRB are
subject to multiple regulatory approvals.
One example is air emission units that
are subject to the State of Wyoming air
quality permit program administered by
the Wyoming Department of
Environmental Quality (WDEQ). Any
regulated emissions source that receives
an air quality permit through the
WDEQ’s New Source Review (NSR)
permitting program is exempt from
inclusion in the BLM’s conformity
analysis per 40 CFR 93.153(d)(1) and the
Wyoming Air Quality Standards and
Regulations, Chapter 8, Section 3.
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices
H. Emergency Response (40 CFR
93.153(d)(2))
The BLM may at times need to
provide for emergency response when
incidents occur on BLM-managed lands.
Examples include responding to
wildfires, spills associated with oil and
gas operations, or other hazardous
material incidents. While such activities
may include significant air emissions
associated with the event itself and/or
with the response, these activities are
exempt because the associated
emissions are not reasonably
foreseeable, nor are they quantifiable.
Also, the analysis involved in assessing
compliance with the general conformity
requirements is not generally consistent
with emergencies, which require an
immediate response so as not to create
and/or exacerbate a public safety or
other environmental hazard.
I. Research (40 CFR 93.153(d)(3))
BLM-sponsored research is also
exempt from a conformity analysis.
Within the UGRB, a primary BLM
research activity is installing and
operating air quality monitoring
equipment and water quality monitoring
activities. These activities may involve
short-term and infrequent vehicle use by
the BLM and/or its contractors. The
BLM has determined that any emissions
associated with vehicle use for these
activities are de minimis, and therefore
these activities are exempt from general
conformity requirements.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
J. Prescribed Fire (40 CFR 93.153(i)(2))
The BLM’s land management in the
UGRB may at times include the use of
prescribed fire. Prescribed fire activities
are exempt from conformity to the
extent that the BLM conducts them
according to the WDEQ’s approved
Prescribed Burn Management Program.
Prescribed burns require a permit from
the WDEQ prior to being conducted. For
the purpose of conformity, any air
emissions associated with prescribed
fire within the confines of an approved
management plan have already been
incorporated into the Wyoming SIP and
are exempt from the BLM conformity
analysis.
III. BLM UGRB Presumed To Conform
List and Technical Justification
The BLM UGRB Presumed to Conform
List addresses projects proposed in the
UGRB ozone nonattainment area.
Conformity requires that any such
project demonstrate that emissions
would be less than the threshold levels
given in 40 CFR 93.153(b)(1) and
Chapter 8, Section 3 of the Wyoming Air
Quality Standards and Regulations
(WAQSR)—that is, 100 tpy for either
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:41 Dec 28, 2016
Jkt 241001
NOX or VOCs, the precursor pollutants
that form ozone in the atmosphere.
Projects on the Presumed to Conform
List would be considered to conform
and would not be required to develop
project-specific emission inventories to
demonstrate compliance. To develop
the list, the BLM quantified project
emissions based on similar actions
undertaken, approved, or permitted by
the BLM over recent years within the
UGRB. The BLM recognizes that any
individual project subject to BLM
authorization may include multiple
component activities. For any project
with multiple component activities, the
emissions for each pollutant need to be
summed across all project-related
activities to determine conformity. The
project conforms if the summed NOX
and VOC emissions are less than 100
tpy for each pollutant. General
Conformity for large scale oil and gas
development projects that are being
evaluated through an EIS will not be
determined using the Presumed to
Conform List. Such projects are required
to submit comprehensive, detailed
emission inventories for the life of the
project in order to evaluate the year of
maximum emissions for General
Conformity compliance.
The BLM has developed the
Presumed to Conform List using
emissions data from a variety of sources.
For operations proposed by the oil and
gas industry, data were compiled from
emissions information used in current
and past actions. The total emissions for
development and operation were
summed over the expected emission
sources at the project and expressed in
terms of three units: Emissions per well,
per road-mile, or per pipeline-mile. The
emissions data were compiled in a
calculation workbook and, by using this
workbook, the number of such units that
could be developed in a single year
without emissions exceeding the
conformity thresholds was calculated.
For example, if developing one well is,
on average, associated with emissions of
nine tons of NOX or VOC per well, then
projects with up to 11 wells in a single
year would be presumed to conform,
(since 9 tpy*11wells = 99 tpy, which is
less than the100 tpy de minimis
threshold for each pollutant). Note that
this example assumes the project has no
additional reasonably foreseeable or
quantifiable direct or indirect emissions.
Emission sources and associated
activity levels were solicited from UGRB
oil and gas operators for well
development and operations, including
associated infrastructure such as roads
and pipelines. Several datasets were
received and reviewed for quality
control purposes. In order to maintain
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
96037
confidentiality of the operators, these
datasets are referred to as Scenario A,
Scenario B, etc. in the calculation
workbook. Emissions data from the
scenarios were grouped according to
typical major phases of development:
Construction, drilling, completion,
operations/workovers, and reclamation.
Within each phase, the scenario data
that showed the maximum emissions
per unit of development was selected.
These data were then combined to form
a composite scenario that represents a
maximum emissions case for the
activity. The composite scenario is the
basis for the presumed to conform
emissions estimate. Use of this
composite maximum emissions case
assures that the presumed to conform
criteria are set conservatively—that is,
this approach ensures that the estimates
of emissions associated with particular
levels of development overstate the
actual emissions that are expected
fromthe activity, and therefore the total
annual emissions from the specified
activities will be less than the
conformity thresholds.
The following table lists the items
where BLM has determined that
emissions are presumed to conform.
Additional discussion of each activity
that is presumed to conform is
presented below the table. The
supporting technical calculations and
workbooks for all activities included on
the BLM UGRB Presumed to Conform
List can be found at: https://bit.ly/
WYPtCList. In many cases, the table lists
emissions associated with particular
activities on a per-unit basis (e.g. per
well, or per mile, or per facility). For
these activities, to assess whether a
larger project can be presumed to
conform, the number of units in the
project must be multiplied by the
expected per-unit emissions to
determine whether the overall
emissions from the project is expected
to be less than the thresholds of 100 tpy
NOX and 100 tpy VOCs. For example, in
the oil and gas full development
scenario in the table, the emissions are
estimated at 7.0 tpy of NOX per well,
and 0.4 tpy of VOCs per well; full
development of up to 14 wells in a
single 12-month period could therefore
be presumed to conform, because 14 ×
7.0 is 98 tpy NOX, under the de minimis
threshold of 100 tpy.
In other cases, the table lists
emissions associated with overall
activities, such as emissions associated
with any amount of cultural resource
excavation. In these cases, the total
emissions for the overall activity are so
low that any amount of the activity can
be presumed to conform; no per-unit
analysis is necessary.
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
96038
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices
TABLE 1—PRESUMED TO CONFORM ACTIVITIES
Emissions
BLM resource area
Description of activity
NOX
(ton/yr)
VOC
(ton/yr)
Comments
Cultural Resources .......................
Data recovery/site excavation.
Excavation usually related to
well pad construction.
Install
powerlines/transmission
lines.
Install roads (non-oil and gas) .....
Install communications tower/facility.
Construct natural gas support facility.
<0.1 ...................
<0.1 ...................
Based on one passenger vehicle traveling up to 200
miles per day for 60 days.
0.44 tons/mile ...
1.61 tons/mile ...
0.032 tons/mile
0.13 tons/mile ...
1.5 per tower ....
0.2 per tower ....
0.45 tons/facility
0.1 tons/facility ..
Full development scenario; includes drilling well, pad and facility construction (including
road construction, pipeline construction, and electric line construction (oil well only)), well
completion,
production/
workover/operations, and reclamation.
7.0 tons/well ......
0.4 tons/well ......
Calculated per mile of transmission or distribution
line, based on emissions for a 24-mile project.
Calculated per mile of road.
Estimated for South Rim Communications Tower (one
tower).
Calculated for a single support facility, based on data
for Facility Construction in supporting Oil and Gas
Workbook. Conformity for a project would be based
on the number of facilities. For example, construction of up to 222 facilities in a single 12-month period would conform.
Oil wells—Calculated for a single well using the maximum emissions for local development areas. Conformity for a project would be based on the number
of wells. For example, full development for up to 14
wells in a single 12-month period would conform.
4.0 tons/well ......
0.5 tons/well ......
5.6 tons/well ......
0.3 tons/well ......
2.6 tons/well ......
0.3 tons/well ......
<0.1 tons/well ...
<0.1 tons/well ...
<0.1 tons/well ....
<0.1 tons/well ...
Activities Associated with Land
Use Permits, such as Rights-ofWay (ROW).
Oil and Gas—Emissions are for a
Single Well.
Oil and Gas—Emissions are for a
Single Well.
New well on existing pad scenario; excludes pad, facility,
and pipeline construction.
Existing well scenario; production/
workover/operations only.
Install pipelines ............................
1.24 tons/mile ...
0.136 tons/mile
Other Minerals ..............................
Sand and gravel operations (includes stripping, digging, crushing and hauling).
4.0 .....................
0.3 .....................
Range ............................................
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Oil and Gas ...................................
Drilling water well .........................
0.53 ...................
0.02 ...................
Converting windmills to solar energy.
<0.1 ...................
<0.1 ...................
Construct recreation facilities (i.e.,
campgrounds).
0.7 .....................
0.1 .....................
River access sites ........................
1.5 .....................
0.2 .....................
Recreation .....................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:41 Dec 28, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Natural gas wells—Calculated for a single well using
the maximum emissions for local development
areas. Conformity for a project would be based on
the number of wells. For example, full development
for up to 24 wells in a single 12-month period
would conform.
Oil wells—Calculated for a single well using the maximum emissions for local development areas. Conformity for a project would be based on the number
of wells. For example, up to 17 new wells in a single 12-month period on an existing pad would conform.
Natural gas wells—Calculated for a single well using
the maximum emissions for local development
areas. Conformity for a project would be based on
the number of wells. For example, up to 38 new
wells in a single 12-month period on an existing
pad would conform.
Oil wells—Calculated for a single well using the maximum emissions for local development areas. Conformity for a project would be based on the number
of wells. For example, redevelopment of up to
1,287 existing wells in a single 12-month period
would conform.
Natural gas wells—Calculated for a single well using
the maximum emissions for local development
areas. Conformity for a project would be based on
the number of wells. For example, redevelopment
of up to 1,207 existing wells in a single 12-month
period would conform.
Based on maximum development of 79 miles for natural gas pipeline, 20 to 30 inches diameter. Conformity for a project would be based on the number
of miles of pipeline constructed. For example, construction of up to 80 miles of pipeline in a single
12-month period would conform.
Based on 20,000 cubic yards of sand/gravel extraction over a 3–5 year contract period. Hauling based
on 160,000 miles/yr (20 trips per day @ 200 miles
round-trip for two 20-day operations per year).
Calculated for a single water well based on emissions
estimates for Cabrito 3–31 Water Well.,
Calculated for a single conversion project. Infrequent—Minor construction (no heavy duty vehicles;
based on single day of pickup use).
Calculated for construction of a single facility, based
on Sand Dunes recreation improvement project,
Wind River Front reconstruction project, general annual maintenance, etc.
Calculated for construction of a single site, based on
projects constructing multi-vehicle boat ramps, including pre-work design/survey, road, ramp, and
parking lot construction, installation of visitor facilities (restrooms, kiosks, barricades, fencing, etc.).
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices
96039
TABLE 1—PRESUMED TO CONFORM ACTIVITIES—Continued
Emissions
BLM resource area
Description of activity
NOX
(ton/yr)
VOC
(ton/yr)
Comments
Special Use Permits, e.g., commercial hunting and fishing
guides.
Trail construction .........................
0.1 .....................
<0.1 ...................
<0.1 ...................
<0.1 ...................
Wild Horses ...................................
Gather wild horses .......................
<0.1 ...................
<0.1 ...................
Wildlife ...........................................
Habitat improvement projects (includes selecting and designating sites, planning, and implementation).
Wildlife survey (aircraft) ...............
1.9 .....................
0.2 .....................
Calculated for a single issued permit, assuming 1
passenger vehicle traveling up to 200 miles round
trip for 250 trips per year.
Calculated for a single construction project up to 5
days in duration. Assumes primarily hand construction and one tractor or backhoe operating for 5
days.
Calculated for a single gather, based on helicopter
use (Bell 206 JetRanger) for one week period.
Calculated for a single project, based on Wyoming
Range Mule Deer Habitat Project EA.
0.1 .....................
<0.1 ...................
Road maintenance and upkeep ..
9.7 .....................
0.7 .....................
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Misc. Activities ..............................
For pollutant emissions presented in
the above table for oil and gas industry
sources, the following key assumptions
are applicable and can also be further
reviewed in the supporting Oil and Gas
Workbook (included with the
supporting emission calculations)
located at: https://bit.ly/WYPtCList:
• EPA regulates the emissions from
mobile sources by setting standards for
the specific pollutants being emitted.
EPA established progressively more
stringent emission standards for carbon
monoxide, hydrocarbons, nitrogen
oxides, and particulate matter in the
early 1990s for non-road engines and
equipment. Emissions standards set
limits on the amount of pollution a
vehicle or engine can emit. A higher tier
standard corresponds to lower
emissions. Emissions shown on the list
assume non-road equipment/engines
meet either EPA Tier 2 or a mix of Tier
1 and Tier 2 emission standards. In
order to determine emissions for a
project using entirely Tier 1 non-road
equipment/engines, the comparison
panels in the supporting Oil and Gas
Workbook must be used.
• For projects using Tier 3 or better
non-road equipment/engines, a higher
number of wells may conform, but the
supporting Oil and Gas Workbook must
be used to adjust the single well
emission values.
• For projects using drill rigs
permitted through the WDEQ, New
Source Review (NSR) permitting
program, a higher number of wells may
conform since NSR-permitted sources
are excluded from the BLM’s General
conformity analysis. The supporting Oil
and Gas Workbook can be used to adjust
the single well emission values by
excluding permitted drill rig emissions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:41 Dec 28, 2016
Jkt 241001
• Emissions data for on-road vehicles
correspond to calendar years 2008 to
2013, depending on the operator, and so
are expected to be conservative
(overestimate emissions) for 2014 and
later years. Emissions data were
previously generated using EPA’s Motor
Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES)
modeling system which estimates
emissions for mobile sources at the
national, county, and project level for
criteria air pollutants, greenhouse gases,
and air toxics. Emissions data for offroad vehicles, such as construction
equipment, were previously generated
using EPA’s NONROAD Model.
• The ton per year (tpy) emissions
presented for a single well are rounded
to one decimal place; however, the
number of wells noted as conforming in
the comments are based on more precise
emissions that can be found in the
supporting Oil and Gas Workbook.
Further explanation of the Presumed
to Conform activities identified in the
table is provided below in the order in
which they appear in the table.
1. Cultural Resources: Data Recovery/
Site Excavation
Cultural resource evaluations may
occur during site excavation, whether
connected to oil and gas development or
to other BLM projects. These activities
are expected to result in de minimis
emissions associated with infrequent
and short-term light-duty vehicle use for
personnel to travel to the project site.
Calculations were based on one
passenger vehicle traveling up to 200
miles per day for 60 days. Emissions for
NOX and VOC have each been
calculated to be less than 0.1 ton per
year. Since the emissions for this
activity are de minimis, no
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Calculated and based on a single survey with twin
engine aircraft use (Beech King Air) for one week
period.
Infrequent and short-term vehicle use, minor heavy
duty equipment. Based on grader and diesel pickup
use to maintain 40,000 miles of road annually. Not
applicable to initial road construction.
extrapolation of the number of cultural
site excavations that could occur in a
single year is provided; this activity is
not a daily activity and would never
approach the emissions threshold.
These activities are de minimis and
presumed to conform.
2. Lands: Install Power/Transmission
Lines
Due to the remote location of many oil
and gas development projects in the
UGRB, electrical power is not available
at the project site and electrical
transmission or distribution lines may
be installed in order to bring power to
the project site. Constructing these
transmission or distribution lines results
in NOX and VOC emissions associated
with construction equipment activities.
Based on an actual 24-mile transmission
or distribution line, construction
assumes standard construction
equipment including light-duty and
heavy-duty trucks, along with a backhoe
and forklift, operating 12 hours per day.
The calculated emissions are 0.44 tpy of
NOX and 0.032 tpy of VOCs per mile. By
extrapolation, any transmission or
distribution line construction project up
to 225 miles in a 12-month period could
be developed without exceeding the
emissions threshold. These activities are
de minimis and presumed to conform.
3. Lands: Install Roads (Non-Oil and
Gas)
New road construction may be
undertaken or authorized by the BLM to
create access to previously inaccessible
locations. Emissions would be
associated with the construction
equipment needed to build the access
road, such as backhoes, bulldozers,
tractor scrapers, and motor graders,
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
96040
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices
operating 12 hours per day. Based on
2009 Sublette County emission factors
from EPA’s NONROAD emissions
model, the calculated emissions are 1.61
tpy of NOX and 0.13 tpy of VOCs per
mile. Accordingly, any access road
construction project up to about 61
miles in a 12-month period could be
developed without exceeding the
emissions threshold. This activity is de
minimis and presumed to conform.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4. Lands: Install Communication Tower/
Facility
The BLM may authorize construction
of communication towers and ancillary
facilities on Federal lands within the
UGRB in order to improve cellular
telephone and other communications in
the region. Estimated emissions are
associated with the construction
equipment for installing a single tower,
based on construction of the South Rim
Communications Tower, including light
and heavy-duty trucks, backhoes, cranes
and a truck drill rig, operating 10 hours
per day. Off-road vehicles assumed 2008
Sublette County NONROAD emission
factors and on-road vehicles assumed
2013 emission factors from EPA’s
MOVES model. The calculated
emissions are 1.5 tpy of NOX and 0.2 tpy
of VOCs. By extrapolation, up to 66
towers could be constructed in a single
12-month period without exceeding the
emissions threshold. This activity is de
minimis and presumed to conform.
5. Oil and Gas: Full Development
Scenario
Developing an oil and gas well
involves many different activities,
including well pad construction, well
drilling, completion workovers and
construction of on-site facilities and
associated roads and pipelines.
Emissions were calculated for these
activities assuming full development for
a single well using a maximum
development scenario for the UGRB.
Separate calculations were performed
for oil wells and natural gas wells.
For a single oil well, the calculation
assumes a drill rig and boiler with
drilling activities lasting 15 days for 24
hours per day (hr/day). Construction is
assumed to last 3 days at 10 hr/day and
involve standard construction
equipment such as dozers, backhoes,
motor graders, dump trucks, and water
tankers. Completion activities involve a
pump engine operating for 5 days and
a rig engine operating for 1 day, at 12
hr/day. Workovers are assumed to
involve one rig engine operating for 5
days at 12 hr/day. Off-road equipment is
assumed to meet EPA Tier 2 emissions
standards. On-road vehicles would
consist of light and heavy-duty trucks.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:41 Dec 28, 2016
Jkt 241001
Equipment and vehicle emissions are
calculated for 2013.
For a single oil well, the calculated
emissions are 7.0 tpy of NOX and 0.4 tpy
of VOCs. By extrapolation, up to 14 oil
wells could be developed for a project
in a 12-month period without exceeding
the emissions threshold.
For a single natural gas well, the
calculation assumes a drill rig and
boiler, with a drilling duration of 10
days at 24 hours per day. Construction
is assumed to last 15 days. Completion
is assumed to involve a pump engine
operating for 5 days and a rig engine
operating for 1 day at 12 hr/day.
Workovers are assumed to involve two
engines operating for 2 days at 8 hr/day.
Off-road equipment is assumed to meet
EPA Tier 2 emissions standards. Onroad vehicles would consist of light and
heavy trucks. Equipment and vehicle
emissions are calculated for 2008. For a
single natural gas well, the calculated
emissions are 4.0 tpy of NOX and 0.5 tpy
of VOCs. By extrapolation, up to 24
natural gas wells could be developed for
a project in a 12-month period without
exceeding the emissions threshold.
Each of these activities are de minimis
and presumed to conform.
6. Oil and Gas: New Well on an Existing
Pad
For a new oil or natural gas well on
an existing pad, the emissions are the
same as described above except that
construction emissions are excluded
(since the associated facilities already
exist). The assumptions and data used
for equipment and vehicles in this
calculation are the same as for the Full
Development Scenario (number 5
above).
For a single oil well drilled on an
existing pad, the calculated emissions
are 5.6 tpy of NOX and 0.3 tpy of VOCs.
By extrapolation, up to 17 oil wells on
an existing pad could be developed in
a 12-month period without exceeding
the emissions threshold.
For a single natural gas well drilled
on an existing pad, the calculated
emissions are 2.6 tpy of NOX and 0.3 tpy
of VOCs. By extrapolation, up to 38
natural gas wells could be developed on
an existing pad in a 12-month period
without exceeding the emissions
threshold. These activities are de
minimis and presumed to conform.
7. Oil and Gas: Production/Workover/
Operations Only
Once a well is drilled and producing,
production-related maintenance
activities such as workovers typically
occur annually and generate emissions
that may not be included in the well
site’s production permit. Workovers
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
typically require the short-term use of
diesel-fired engines associated with the
workover rig itself. Also, there are
typically traffic-related emissions from
workers travelling to the site.
For a single oil or natural gas well, the
calculation for workovers assumes a
single engine operating for 5 days at 12
hr/day. Off-road equipment is assumed
to meet EPA Tier 2 emissions standards.
On-road vehicles would consist of light
and heavy trucks. Equipment and
vehicle emissions are calculated for
2013.
For a single oil well and a single
natural gas well, the calculated
emissions associated with production
maintenance activities are less than 0.1
tpy for both NOX and VOCs. By
extrapolation, up to 1,287 oil wells and
1,207 natural gas wells could be
maintained in a 12-month period
without exceeding the emissions
threshold. Each of these activities are de
minimis and presumed to conform.
8. Oil and Gas: Install Pipelines
Once an oil or gas well is developed,
pipelines are often constructed to
transport the recovered oil, condensate,
gas and water. Emissions result from the
construction equipment used for
pipeline projects. For a 79-mile pipeline
(up to 30-inch diameter pipe) the
calculation assumes that construction
proceeds at the rate of 1 to 4 days per
mile, depending on the phase of work.
Up to 8 pieces of equipment are
assumed to be operating simultaneously
(up to 20 for welding). Equipment is
assumed to operate for 12 hr/day and
includes standard construction
equipment such as excavators, dozers,
backhoes, motor graders, sidebooms,
and cranes. Additional equipment
includes welders and x-ray trucks.
Vehicles include light-duty trucks,
heavy-duty trucks, and water tankers.
Off-road equipment is assumed to
consist of 50% meeting EPA Tier 1 and
50% meeting Tier 2 emissions
standards. Equipment and vehicle
emissions are calculated for 2008.
For a 79-mile pipeline (up to 30-inch
diameter pipe), the calculated emissions
are 98.3 tpy of NOX and 10.7 tpy of
VOCs. The average emissions per mile
of pipeline are 1.24 tons/mile of NOX
and 0.136 tons/mile of VOCs. By
extrapolation, any pipeline construction
project up to about 80 miles in a 12month period could be developed
without exceeding the emissions
threshold. This activity is de minimis
and presumed to conform.
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices
9. Other Minerals: Sand and Gravel
Operations
The BLM issues contracts and
authorizations for developing sand and
gravel resources within the UGRB. Air
emissions result from on-site heavy
equipment (front loaders and
bulldozers), operation of a crushing/
screening plant (which generally run on
diesel-fueled engines), employee/
contractor traffic (light-duty vehicles),
and use of heavy-duty trucks to
transport the aggregate product to
nearby markets. The emission
calculations were based on 20,000 cubic
yards of sand/gravel extraction over a
3–5 year contract period and a one-way
hauling distance of 100 miles, which is
the BLM’s maximum projected
development level.
Under the development scenario
described above, the calculated
emissions are 4.0 tpy of NOX and 0.3 tpy
of VOCs. By extrapolation, up to 24
sand and gravel operations could occur
in a single year 12-month period
without exceeding the emissions
threshold.
Also presumed to conform under this
category are activities associated with
selling and removing decorative rock.
Activities associated with gathering
decorative stone typically create fewer
emissions than sand and gravel sites
since no crushing/screening equipment
is necessary. Each of these activities are
de minimis and presumed to conform.
10. Range: Drilling a Water Well
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Water well development occurs on
BLM lands within the UGRB. Emissions
are associated with the drill rig and
ancillary equipment although the
intensity and duration of activity for
drilling water wells is significantly less
than that for an oil or gas well.
Water well drilling assumes a water
well drill rig, with Tier 2 engines, along
with supporting light and heavy-duty
trucks. A round trip distance of 70 miles
was assumed for the on-road vehicles.
The calculated emissions for a single
water well are 0.5 tpy of NOX and 0.02
tpy of VOCs. By extrapolation, up to 186
water wells could be developed in a
12-month period without exceeding the
emissions threshold. This activity is de
minimis and presumed to conform.
11. Range: Converting Windmills to
Solar Energy
The BLM has a program to convert
existing windmills to solar energy.
These activities are expected to result in
de minimis emissions associated with
infrequent and short-term light-duty
vehicle use for personnel to travel to the
project site. Emissions for NOX and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:41 Dec 28, 2016
Jkt 241001
96041
VOCs have been calculated to be less
than 0.1 ton per year for each
conversion. Since the emissions for this
activity are de minimis, no
extrapolation of the number conversions
that could occur in a single year is
provided; this activity is infrequent and
would never approach the emissions
threshold. This activity is de minimis
and presumed to conform.
traffic associated with the hunting and
fishing trips. Based on 250 trips per year
and 200 miles (round-trip) for each
guided trip, the calculated emissions are
less than 0.1 tpy each for NOX and
VOCs. By extrapolation, up to 1,911
permits could be issued in a 12-month
period without exceeding the emissions
threshold. This activity is de minimis
and presumed to conform.
12. Recreation: Construct Recreation
Facilities, i.e., Campgrounds
The BLM may also construct
recreational facilities such as
campgrounds or picnic areas to enhance
visitor use of recreation areas. This
activity may involve construction over a
small area, generally lasting up to about
15 working days. Air emissions would
result from the construction equipment
and work vehicles, such as front
loaders, a Bobcat, a motor grader, and
light-duty and heavy-duty trucks,
operating 10 hours per day. Off-road
vehicles assumed 2008 Sublette County
NONROAD emission factors and onroad vehicles assumed MOVES 2013
emission factors.
For recreation facility construction,
the calculated emissions are 0.7 tpy of
NOX and 0.1 tpy of VOCs per facility.
By extrapolation, up to 142 facilities
could be developed in a 12-month
period without exceeding the emissions
threshold. This activity is de minimis
and presumed to conform.
15. Recreation: Trail Construction
The BLM maintains and constructs
trails within the UGRB. Most trail
construction involves hand equipment,
but may occasionally require use of
mechanized equipment such as a
tractor, depending upon local site
conditions. These activities are typically
short-term (i.e., 5 days duration, 8 hours
per day). The calculated emissions are
less than 0.1 tpy each for NOX and
VOCs per construction project. By
extrapolation, up to 2,181 trail
construction projects could occur in a
12-month period without exceeding the
emissions threshold. This activity is de
minimis and presumed to conform.
13. Recreation: River Access Sites
At river access sites within the UGRB,
projects can include constructing multivehicle boat ramps, access roads,
parking areas and visitor facilities such
as restrooms, kiosks, barricades and
fencing. Typical projects involve about
40 days of construction activities at the
site, and associated air emissions result
from construction equipment and work
vehicles, including a front loader,
excavator, and motor grader, along with
light-duty and heavy-duty trucks,
operating 10 hours per day. Off-road
vehicles assumed 2008 Sublette County
NONROAD emission factors and onroad vehicles assumed MOVES 2013
emission factors. For constructing river
access sites, the calculated emissions
are 1.5 tpy of NOX and 0.2 tpy of VOCs
per access site. By extrapolation, up to
66 sites could be developed in a 12month period without exceeding the
emissions threshold. This activity is de
minimis and presumed to conform.
14. Recreation: Special Use Permits
Examples of Special Use Permits
issued by the BLM include commercial
hunting and fishing guide permits.
Emissions result from light duty vehicle
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16. Wild Horses: Gather Wild Horses
Wild horse gathers within the UGRB
typically involve the use of a helicopter,
which is the primary emissions source
for this activity. The calculations are
based on use of a Bell 206 Jet Ranger
helicopter over a five day period, with
an average flight time of 6 hours each
day. The calculated emissions are less
than 0.1 tpy each for NOX and VOCs per
gather. This activity is de minimis and
presumed to conform.
17. Wildlife: Habitat Improvement
Projects
The BLM conducts and/or authorizes
habitat improvement projects within the
UGRB. Activities for these projects
typically include the use of off-road
construction equipment (such as a
tractor, feller buncher, and skidder) for
10 hours per day, as well as light duty
vehicle use and occasional helicopter
use and heavy-duty fire engines. The
calculated emissions are 1.9 tpy of NOX
and 0.2 tpy of VOCs, per project. By
extrapolation, up to 52 projects could be
completed in a 12-month period
without exceeding the emissions
threshold. This activity is de minimis
and presumed to conform.
18. Wildlife: Wildlife Surveys (Aircraft)
The BLM conducts or participates in
aerial wildlife surveys within the UGRB.
Emissions are based on the use of a twin
engine aircraft (e.g., Beechcraft King
Air) for a 5-day week, with an average
flight time of 4 hours each day. The
calculated emissions are 0.1 tpy of NOX
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
96042
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices
and less than 0.1 tpy of VOCs per
survey. By extrapolation, up to 1,833
surveys could be conducted in a 12month period without exceeding the
emissions threshold. This activity is de
minimis and presumed to conform
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
19. Miscellaneous: Road Maintenance
and Upkeep
The BLM conducts and authorizes
maintenance of existing roads within
the UGRB. Air emissions result from the
short-term use of heavy duty
construction equipment. The calculated
emissions are 9.7 tpy of NOX and 0.7 tpy
of VOCs calculated for 40,000 miles per
year of road maintenance activities (this
is 5 times the normal amount of activity
that typically occurs based on BLM–WY
submitted data). This activity is de
minimis and presumed to conform.
IV. How To Apply Presumed To
Conform Actions
The list of qualifying project
categories discussed in the preceding
section is referred to as the BLM UGRB
Presumed to Conform List. The analyses
for BLM’s presumed to conform actions
are considered representative of a
majority of common, recurring projects
within the UGRB. However, the BLM
must consider the appropriateness of
applying this list to any particular
project, by assessing how the proposed
project compares to the presumed to
conform categories of projects.16
As authorized under the Clean Air
Act, the list provides an additional way
for the BLM to improve its
environmental program management
while still ensuring that agency air
quality goals and requirements are met.
Use of the BLM UGRB Presumed to
Conform List will reduce review times,
eliminate unnecessary paperwork,
clarify analytical requirements for all
project actions, and ensure that the
proper level of documentation is
applied in each case. Moreover, the
BLM UGRB Presumed to Conform List
will provide a method that the BLM can
use to demonstrate conformity with the
Wyoming SIP. When applying the BLM
UGRB Presumed to Conform List, the
BLM will determine whether the project
in question represents one or more
single actions or a combined action. The
BLM will also determine whether any
combined action involves multiple
connected presumed to conform actions.
16 The list must be used carefully because
‘‘[w]here an action otherwise presumed to conform
under paragraph (f) of this section * * * does not
in fact meet one of the criteria in paragraph (g)(1)
of this section, that action shall not be presumed
to conform and the requirements of 93.150 and
93.155 through 93.160 shall apply for the Federal
action.’’ See 40 CFR 93.153(j).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:41 Dec 28, 2016
Jkt 241001
Below is a description of the different
BLM actions and procedures.
Single Action. A single presumed to
conform action is defined as a presumed
to conform action that is not connected
or dependent on other actions and that
has independent utility.17 For such
actions, no general conformity
evaluation or applicability analysis is
required and BLM officials may simply
document that the project action is
presumed to conform on the basis of
this Notice and the applicable project
category.
Using the Presumed to Conform List
and supporting calculation workbooks
for this Notice meets the major intent of
EPA’s rationale for developing
presumed to conform activities—to
reduce the analysis burden for actions
that have minimal or no direct or
indirect emissions. By analyzing each
project category in the BLM UGRB
Presumed to Conform List and reporting
the findings, the BLM has shown that
the resulting emissions from each single
presumed to conform action will
typically be below the applicable
emission thresholds.
Combined Action. A combined action
is defined as either: (1) Multiple
presumed to conform actions that are
connected to each other; or (2) one or
more presumed to conform actions that
are connected to one or more nonpresumed to conform actions being
evaluated under the environmental
review requirements of NEPA. The
Council on Environmental Quality
defines connected actions as actions
that are closely related involving, for
example, interdependent parts of a
larger action, dependence on a larger
action for justification, or dependence
on other actions taken previously or
simultaneously.18
Where there is a combined action,
only one action specified on the BLM
UGRB Presumed to Conform List may be
excluded in calculating total direct and
indirect emissions. The emissions from
all the other actions that are not
otherwise exempt must be calculated to
determine the total emissions from the
remaining actions.19 For example, the
BLM may undertake a project with
several connected actions that must be
analyzed under NEPA. Several of those
actions may individually be listed on
the BLM UGRB Presumed to Conform
List because those actions taken alone
would typically have emissions below
the threshold levels. To determine
17 40 CFR 1506.1(c)(1) and 1508.25(a), Council on
Environmental Quality, Regulations for
Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA.
18 40 CFR 1508.25(1).
19 An allowance to this provision is discussed in
the following paragraph.
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
whether such a project requires a
conformity determination, the BLM
would exclude one presumed to
conform action and then prepare an
applicability analysis for the remaining
actions. For example, an oil and gas
operator could propose a project to
install pipelines from existing well pads
to a proposed new compressor station.
In this example, only one proposed
activity would be excluded using the
Presumed to Conform List—either the
pipeline installation or the construction
activities for the compressor station.
Emissions from the other activity would
be calculated to determine if the
remaining total emissions are still below
the de minimis emission thresholds.
The above procedures for combined
actions allow the BLM to exclude the
emissions from one presumed to
conform action and to prepare an
applicability analysis based upon the
total direct and indirect emissions of the
actions that are not otherwise exempt.20
Thus, in a combined action, the
emissions from one presumed to
conform action may be excluded from
the calculation of total project
emissions. The process could show that
either the combined action (minus the
one excluded presumed to conform
action) would equal or exceed the
emission thresholds and thus trigger a
conformity determination, or that the
combined action (minus the one
excluded presumed to conform action)
is below the emissions thresholds, in
which case no further action would be
required. In making this determination,
the BLM may elect to apply the
calculated emissions in the BLM UGRB
Presumed to Conform List to determine
the total emissions where applicable.
BLM officials will decide which
individual presumed to conform action
is excluded if more than one is present
in a combined action.21
The BLM has determined as a matter
of policy to implement the BLM UGRB
Presumed to Conform List with respect
to combined actions by balancing
considerations about project
segmentation,22 connected actions
20 Emissions from exempt actions are excluded in
accordance with 40 CFR 93.152.
21 Requirements and allowances for combined
actions are based on interagency communications
with the EPA.
22 In the preamble to the General Conformity
Rule, the EPA decided not to adopt its initial
proposal to permit Federal agencies to use the
NEPA concept of tiering and analyze actions in a
staged manner in analyzing conformity. EPA
explained, among other things: ‘‘[T]iering could
cause the segmentation of projects for conformity
analysis, which might provide an overall inaccurate
estimate of emissions. The segmentation of projects
for conformity analyses when emissions are
reasonably foreseeable is not permitted by this
rule.’’ (58 FR 63240).
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices
under NEPA,23 and the permitted
exclusion of emissions attributable to
presumed to conform actions under the
General Conformity Rule. Regarding the
latter, 40 CFR 93.152 states: ‘‘The
portion of emissions which are exempt
or presumed to conform under Section
93.153(c), (d), (e), or (f) are not included
in the total of direct and indirect
emissions.’’ Likewise, as stated in the
preamble (58 FR 63233): ‘‘The final rule
requires the inclusion of the total direct
and indirect emissions in the
applicability and conformity
determinations, except the portion of
emissions which are exempt or
presumed to conform.’’ 24
The BLM will apply this definition to
exclude emissions for single and
multiple presumed to conform actions
that are not connected to one another.
BLM’s procedures for combined actions
offer a reasonable approach by placing
a more conservative limit on the
permitted exclusion of presumed to
conform emissions than 40 CFR 93.152.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Documentation
Documentation requirements for
combined/multiple actions are typically
greater than for single actions. For some
projects with combined/multiple
actions, the BLM may require that
proponents submit a project-specific
emissions inventory in lieu of using the
Presumed to Conform list. This
methodology is project-specific and
more refined than quantifying the
project emissions using the Presumed to
Conform List emission estimates.
Specifically, the methodology
described above must be used if the
project includes: (1) One or more
presumed to conform actions that are
connected to non-presumed to conform
actions which are being evaluated under
the environmental review requirements
of NEPA; or (2) actions which are not
supported by emissions quantification
described elsewhere in the Notice.
Consistent with the goal of reducing the
analysis burden for presumed to
conform actions, the BLM UGRB
Presumed to Conform List may be used
to document emissions for select
activities in lieu of a project-specific
emissions inventory if the activities are
represented on the Presumed to
Conform List.
23 40
CFR 1508.7.
EPA gives as an example a Federal action
that includes construction of a new industrial boiler
project, that is exempt, and a separate office
building. The emissions from the hypothetical
boiler exceed de minimis levels however it is
exempt and so the emissions are excluded. The
emissions from the office building alone are below
de minimis levels. As a result, the action as a whole
does not need a conformity determination. (58 FR
63233).
24 The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:41 Dec 28, 2016
Jkt 241001
Also, where the emissions in the BLM
UGRB Presumed to Conform List are
based on specific project assumptions
that vary from the project in question,
the emissions in the list may be adjusted
as described in the BLM Emissions
Workbook if appropriate. In other
words, the BLM UGRB Presumed to
Conform List may be used if the project
is a single action or if it is limited to
multiple presumed to conform actions
that are supported in the Notice.
Brian W. Davis,
Acting State Director.
[FR Doc. 2016–31631 Filed 12–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLOR957000.L14400000.BJ0000.
17XL1109AF.HAG 17–0054]
Filing of Plats of Survey: Oregon/
Washington
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The plats of survey of the
following described lands are scheduled
to be officially filed in the Bureau of
Land Management, Oregon State Office,
Portland, Oregon, 30 days from the date
of this publication.
SUMMARY:
96043
of Land Management, stating that they
wish to protest. A statement of reasons
for a protest may be filed with the notice
of protest and must be filed with the
Oregon State Director within thirty days
after the protest is filed. If a protest
against the survey is received prior to
the date of official filing, the filing will
be stayed pending consideration of the
protest. A plat will not be officially filed
until the day after all protests have been
dismissed or otherwise resolved. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personally
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personally identifying information—
may be made publicly available at any
time. While you can ask us in your
comment to withhold your personally
identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so.
Mary J.M. Hartel,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor of Oregon/
Washington.
[FR Doc. 2016–31618 Filed 12–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[17X LLAK980600.L1820000.XX0000.
LXSIARAC0000]
Willamette Meridian, Oregon
T. 4 S., R. 5 E., accepted December 12, 2016
T. 23 S., R. 8 W., accepted December 12, 2016
T. 19 S., R. 7 W., accepted December 12, 2016
T. 3 S., R. 3 E., accepted December 12, 2016
T. 6 S., R. 3 E., accepted December 12, 2016
Notice of Public Meeting, BLM Alaska
Resource Advisory Council
A copy of the plats may be
obtained from the Public Room at the
Bureau of Land Management, Oregon
State Office, 1220 SW. 3rd Avenue,
Portland, Oregon 97204, upon required
payment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle
Hensley, (503) 808–6124, Branch of
Geographic Sciences, Bureau of Land
Management, 1220 SW. 3rd Avenue,
Portland, Oregon 97204. Persons who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay
Service at 1–800–877–8339 to contact
the above individual during normal
business hours. The service is available
24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave
a message or question with the above
individual. You will receive a reply
during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A person
or party who wishes to protest against
this survey must file a written notice
with the Oregon State Director, Bureau
SUMMARY:
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Bureau of Land Management,
Alaska State Office, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976 as amended (FLPMA) and
the Federal Advisory Committee Act of
1972 (FACA), the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) Alaska Resource
Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as
indicated below.
DATES: The meeting will be held
February 2–3, 2017, at the BLM Alaska
Fairbanks District Office, 220 University
Avenue, Fairbanks, Alaska 99709–3844.
The meeting starts at 9 a.m. in the
Kobuk Conference Room and will
adjourn at noon on February 3. The
council will accept comments from the
public from 11 a.m. to noon on February
2.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lesli Ellis-Wouters, BLM Alaska State
Office, 222 W. 7th Avenue #13,
Anchorage, AK 99513; lellis@blm.gov;
907–271–4418. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 250 (Thursday, December 29, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 96033-96043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31631]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLWY930000.L10100000.PH0000]
Notice of Availability of the BLM Draft Presumed To Conform List
of Actions Under General Conformity--Upper Green River Basin, Wyoming
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Clean Air Act, Clean Air Act Amendments
of 1990, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) regulations,
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has developed a Draft Presumed to
Conform List of Actions under General Conformity for the Upper Green
River Basin (UGRB) ozone nonattainment area and by this notice is
announcing the opening of the comment period.
DATES: To ensure comments will be considered, the BLM must receive
comments on the Draft Presumed to Conform List on or before February
13, 2017. The BLM will announce future meetings or hearings and any
other public involvement activities at least 15 days in advance through
media releases.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
[[Page 96034]]
Web site: https://bit.ly/WYPtCList.
Email: BLM_WY_PTCList_comments@blm.gov.
Copies of the Draft Presumed to Conform List are available at the
BLM Wyoming State Office, 5353 Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne, WY 82009 and
online at the above Web site.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charis Tuers, Air Resource Specialist;
Telephone: 307-775-6099; address: BLM Wyoming State Office, 5353
Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne, WY 82009, or P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, WY
82003; or email: BLM_WY_PTCList_comments@blm.gov. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay
Service at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal
business hours. The Service is available 24 hours a day, seven days a
week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You
will receive a reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Clean Air Act section 176(c), 42 U.S.C.
7506(c) and Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 \1\ require that all
Federal actions conform to an applicable State Implementation Plan
(SIP) for the criteria pollutants and precursors identified in 40 CFR
93.153(b)(1) and (b)(2) and in the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) under 40 CFR 50.4-50.12.\2\ The criteria pollutants
for which there are established NAAQS include: ozone (O3),
carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), lead (Pb),
sulfur dioxide (SO2),\3\ particulate matter consisting of
particles with a diameter less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers
(PM2.5), and particulate matter consisting of particles with
a diameter greater than 2.5 but less than or equal to 10 micrometers
(PM10).\4\ A SIP is the written plan submitted to the EPA
detailing a state's strategy to control air emissions to meet and
maintain the NAAQS for these pollutants, and thus to comply with the
Clean Air Act.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Clean Air Act Title 1 Air Pollution Prevention and
Control, Part D. Subpart 1, Section 176 Limitation on Certain
Federal Assistance.
\2\ The NAAQS established by the EPA represent maximum
concentration standards for criteria pollutants to protect human
health (primary standards) and to protect property and aesthetics
(secondary standards).
\3\ The BLM calculated SOX is considered equal to
SO2.
\4\ PM2.5 is a subset of PM10 with
separate standards for each.
\5\ 40 CFR 93.153(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established
criteria and procedures for Federal agencies to use in demonstrating
conformity with an applicable SIP. The criteria and procedures can be
found at 40 CFR 93.150 et seq. (General Conformity Rule).
The General Conformity Rule allows Federal agencies to develop a
list of actions that are presumed to conform to a SIP with respect to
the criteria pollutants and their precursors that are identified in 40
CFR 93.153(b)(1) and (b)(2). Addressing the need for efficiency and
streamlining, the EPA states that the provisions allowing Federal
agencies to establish categories of actions that are presumed to
conform are ``intended to assure that these Rules are not overly
burdensome and Federal agencies would not spend undue time assessing
actions that have little or no impact on air quality.'' \6\
Furthermore, the EPA states that ``Federal actions which are de minimis
should not be required by this Rule to make an applicability
analysis.'' \7\ To achieve this end, the General Conformity Rule allows
individual Federal agencies to present categories of activities that
have been documented to have de minimis emissions, and therefore could
be presumed to conform under 40 CFR 93.153(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 58 FR 63228 (Nov. 30, 1993).
\7\ 58 FR 63229 (Nov. 30, 1993).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To identify actions that are presumed to conform, Federal agencies
must meet the following criteria from the General Conformity
regulations:
(1) Clearly demonstrate that the total of direct and indirect
emissions of the criteria pollutants or precursor pollutants from the
type of activities that would be presumed to conform would not:
(i) Cause or contribute to any new violation of any standard in any
area;
(ii) Interfere with provisions in the applicable SIP for
maintaining any standard;
(iii) Increase the frequency or severity of any existing violation
of any standard in any area; or
(iv) Delay timely attainment of any standard or any required
interim emission reductions or other milestones in any area including
emission levels specified in the applicable SIP; \8\ or
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 40 CFR 93.153(g)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Provide documentation that emissions from the types of actions
that would be presumed to conform are below the applicable thresholds
established in 40 CFR 93.153(b)(1) and (b)(2).\9\ This documentation
may be based on similar actions that the agency has taken over recent
years.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 40 CFR 93.153(g)(2).
\10\ Ibid.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Besides documenting the basis for presuming that the activities
would conform, Federal agencies must fulfill procedural requirements
under the General Conformity Rule by publishing the list of activities
that are presumed to conform in the Federal Register; notifying
Federal, State, and local agencies that the list is available;
providing opportunity for public comment; and making available the
agency's responses to any public comments.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 40 CFR 93.153(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The BLM has developed a draft list of activities that are Presumed
to Conform to Wyoming's SIP for the Upper Green River Basin (UGRB)
ozone nonattainment area. Wyoming's UGRB was designated by EPA as an
ozone nonattainment area with a marginal classification on April 30,
2012. A nonattainment area is any area that does not meet the national
primary or secondary ambient air quality standard for the specified
pollutant. Ozone nonattainment designations are classified based on the
severity of the nonattainment. A marginal designation is the lowest, or
least severe, classification. As a result of the nonattainment
designation, the BLM must comply with the General Conformity
regulations in 40 CFR 93 Subpart B (which have subsequently been
incorporated by the State of Wyoming in Chapter 8, Section 3 of the
Wyoming Air Quality Standards and Regulations (WAQSR)) before
authorizing or approving any Federal action undertaken within the
designated nonattainment area.
As noted, the BLM must demonstrate conformity by completing a
conformity analysis, and cannot approve any action that would cause or
contribute to a new violation of the applicable NAAQS or increase the
frequency or severity of any existing violation. With respect to ozone
in the UGRB, the presumed to conform analysis is completed by ensuring
that emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides
(NOX), the precursor pollutants that form ground level
ozone, are below the de minimis emission thresholds specified in the
regulations for marginal nonattainment areas. The de minimis emission
thresholds identified in 40 CFR 93.153(b)(1) and (b)(2) for a marginal
ozone nonattainment are 100 tons/year of VOCs and 100 tons/year of
NOX). Federal actions and activities that demonstrate total
direct and indirect emissions below the de minimis emission thresholds
can be presumed to conform to the regulations and authorized without
further analysis. Actions that exceed the de minimis emission
thresholds require further
[[Page 96035]]
evaluation and a conformity determination.
In this Notice, the BLM is identifying a list of de minimis actions
and activities that are presumed to conform. This Notice contains a
summary of documentation and analysis that demonstrates that the
actions described will not exceed the applicable emission levels for
the UGRB ozone nonattainment area. The actions involve BLM approval
and/or financial assistance for projects or agency activities within
the UGRB in Wyoming. Adoption of the list would reduce agency costs and
time associated with conducting individualized evaluations of actions
that have minimal emissions. Once the list is finalized, the BLM will
be able to improve its environmental review process by streamlining
review of actions with minimal impacts and applying more resources to
actions that have the potential to reach regulated emission levels or
adversely impact air quality.
This draft list identifies two categories of actions: (1) Actions
that are presumed to conform to the SIP for the UGRB area because they
are projected to result in emissions lower than the established de
minimis thresholds; and (2) actions that are entirely exempt from the
General Conformity Rule, under 40 CFR 93.153(c)(2), because they fall
within broad categories of exempt actions--as defined by EPA--that
result in no emissions increase, associated increases in emissions that
are already covered by the SIP, or emissions increases that are clearly
de minimis.
Notification Process for the BLM UGRB Presumed To Conform List
The notification requirements in the General Conformity Rule are as
follows: \12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 40 CFR 93.153(h)(1-4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The Federal agency must publish in the Federal Register its
draft list of activities that are presumed to conform and the basis for
the presumptions;
(2) The Federal agency must notify the appropriate EPA Regional
Office(s), state and local air quality agencies and, where applicable,
the agency designated under section 174 of the Clean Air Act and the
relevant metropolitan planning organization, and provide at least 30
days for the public to comment on the list of proposed activities
presumed to conform;
(3) The Federal agency must document its response to all the
comments received and make the comments, responses, and final list of
activities available to the public upon request; and
(4) The Federal agency must publish the final list of activities
presumed to conform in the Federal Register.
The BLM is initiating its notification requirements by publishing
this Draft Presumed to Conform List. The public may obtain further
program information or review project documentation by contacting the
office and person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
The major sections of this document follow:
I. Background
II. Existing Exemptions
III. BLM UGRB Presumed To Conform List and Technical Justifications
IV. How To Apply Presumed To Conform Actions
I. Background
General conformity refers to the process of demonstrating that a
Federal action conforms to the applicable SIP. A general conformity
determination is required for each pollutant identified as
nonattainment or maintenance in a particular area, when the total of
direct and indirect emissions caused by a Federal action equals or
exceeds any of the applicable thresholds.\13\ In cases where emissions
equal or exceed the applicable thresholds, the Federal agency must
complete additional evaluation to demonstrate how the action will
conform to the SIP and meet General Conformity requirements. However,
for actions where the emissions are below the applicable thresholds, an
applicability analysis is used to demonstrate that the emissions are
below the thresholds and are considered de minimis. No further
evaluation or demonstration of conformity is required if this is the
case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 40 CFR 93.153(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The procedure for assessing conformity depends on whether the
relevant action is classified as a Federal ``transportation'' action or
a ``general'' Federal action. A Federal transportation action is an
action related to transportation plans, programs, and projects that are
developed, funded, or approved under Title 23 United States Code
(U.S.C.) or the Federal Transit Act (FTA).\14\ A general Federal action
is defined as any Federal action that is not a transportation action
and consequently not subject to the conformity requirements established
for Federal highway or transit actions, referred to as ``transportation
conformity.'' Since the BLM actions described in this Notice do not
meet the definition of a transportation action, they are general
actions by default, and thus subject to the General Conformity Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 49 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The BLM and other Federal agencies subject to general conformity
must make a determination, prior to taking or authorizing any Federal
action, that the action conforms to the applicable SIP's purpose to
meet and maintain the NAAQS. If the actions are not specifically
exempt, covered under an existing SIP, or classified as presumed to
conform, the BLM or other agency must complete an emissions inventory
as part of the applicability analysis to determine if emissions are
likely to equal or exceed the established de minimis emission
thresholds allowed for the nonattainment area. Administering and
enforcing conformity regulations are delegated by the EPA to the
individual states through provisions in each SIP. When a nonattainment
area achieves compliance with the NAAQS, it becomes a maintenance area
for at least 10 years, with ongoing state responsibility to ensure
continued attainment.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Clean Air Act, Section 175A, 42 U.S.C. 7505a.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the General Conformity Rule (40 CFR 93.153(g) and (h)),
Federal agencies may develop a list of actions that are presumed to
conform to relevant SIPs. As noted, the process of establishing
presumed to conform classifications is predicated on ensuring that an
activity that is presumed to conform does not cause or contribute to
any new violations of the NAAQS, exacerbate existing violations, or
interfere with provisions contained in the applicable SIP.
II. Existing Exemptions
To provide the proper context and baseline for identifying and
proposing a list of presumed to conform Federal actions for the UGRB,
the BLM must first consider whether any individual actions and
activities already qualify for exemption from general conformity
requirements. The EPA has defined broad categories of exempt actions
under 40 CFR 93.153. Actions in these categories result in no emissions
increase, emissions increases that are already covered by the SIP, or
emissions increases that are clearly de minimis. These exempt actions
are not subject to further analysis for applicability, conformity, or
regional significance under the General Conformity Rule. Further,
activities that qualify for exemptions from the conformity analysis
under 40 CFR 93.153 are not subject to the same public review and
notification requirements as those activities that the BLM has listed
as presumed to conform. Nevertheless, in
[[Page 96036]]
this Federal Register Notice, the BLM is identifying those activities
occurring in the UGRB ozone nonattainment area that are exempt from the
conformity requirements on the basis that associated emissions are de
minimis. (The complete list of activities identified by the BLM as
being exempt from the conformity regulation is available at: https://bit.ly/WYPtCList.)
A. Continuing and Recurring Activity (40 CFR 93.153(c)(2)(ii))
The BLM regularly conducts activities in support of its management
of public lands in the UGRB, including but not limited to: (1)
Archaeological surveys; (2) issuing grazing permits; (3) weed control
on public lands; (4) resource surveys for visual resources, wildlife,
etc.; and (5) collecting transportation data. These activities may
involve short-term and infrequent vehicle use by employees to travel
into the field. The BLM has determined that any air emissions
associated with the corresponding vehicle use are de minimis, and
therefore these activities are exempt from general conformity
requirements.
B. Routine Maintenance and Repair Activities (40 CFR 93.153(c)(2)(iv))
BLM activities in the UGRB also involve actions that qualify as
routine operations and maintenance under the General Conformity Rule.
Examples of such activities include, but are not limited to: (1)
Maintaining air quality monitoring equipment operated by the BLM; (2)
managing solid waste collected at public use areas such as at
campgrounds, picnic grounds, etc.; (3) maintaining BLM-managed lands
such as cleaning cattle-guards, and windmill/fence repair; and (4)
performing routine maintenance of trails, campgrounds, and other
recreational sites managed by the BLM. These activities typically
involve short-term and infrequent vehicle use by employees to travel
into the field, and may at times also include short-term use of heavy
equipment. Due to the short-term and infrequent nature of such
activities, the BLM has determined that any air emissions associated
with the corresponding vehicle and/or equipment use are de minimis, and
therefore these activities are exempt from general conformity
requirements.
It should be noted that activities that involve extensive
construction and/or earthmoving are not considered routine and do not
qualify under the exemption described above. However, some construction
activities associated with specific projects may qualify as presumed to
conform under this Draft Presumed to Conform List, depending on the
level of the associated emissions.
C. Regulatory Monitoring and Inspections (40 CFR 93.153(c)(2)(v))
The BLM inspects and monitors compliance of regulated activities
under its jurisdiction within the UGRB. These inspection and monitoring
activities include, but are not limited to: (1) Monitoring and
assessing cultural resources; (2) identifying and monitoring solid
waste and/or hazardous waste sites; (3) inspecting, monitoring and
assessing range, forests and other lands; (4) conducting field
inspections of oil and gas operations, sand and gravel operations, and
similar activities where the BLM has issued authorizations for resource
development; (5) monitoring and assessing recreational activities such
as off-road vehicle use; and (6) monitoring wildlife and wild horse
populations on BLM-managed lands. These activities may at times involve
short-term and infrequent vehicle use by employees to travel into the
field. The BLM has determined that due to the short-term and infrequent
nature of such activities, any air emissions associated with the
corresponding vehicle use are de minimis, and therefore these
activities are exempt from general conformity requirements.
D. Administrative Actions (40 CFR 93.153(c)(2)(vi))
The BLM issues permits and conducts other administrative actions as
part of its land management activities. Examples of such permits
include, but are not limited to: Forest permits, recreation permits,
small group tours, and meetings. The administrative actions of the BLM
generally do not involve activities that would produce air emissions,
but they may at times include short-term and infrequent vehicle use by
employees. The BLM has determined that any air emissions associated
with the corresponding short-term and infrequent vehicle use are de
minimis, and therefore these permitting activities are exempt from
general conformity requirements.
Note that the various activities permitted by the BLM may not be
exempt in their own right; the exemption described above only applies
to the administrative processing of these actions. If a particular
activity subject to a BLM permit or other approval is reasonably
foreseeable and has quantifiable air emissions, then the specified
activity will need to undergo the appropriate conformity review before
the BLM issues the required permit or approval. Some related activities
may be included on the BLM UGRB Presumed to Conform List.
E. Debris Removal (40 CFR 93.153(c)(2)(ix))
Activities involving debris removal from BLM-managed lands are
exempt from conformity. This includes events where individuals and/or
groups pick up litter and other debris at campgrounds, trails, etc.
These activities are expected to involve short-term and infrequent
vehicle use; however, the BLM has determined that any air emissions
associated with the corresponding vehicle use are de minimis.
F. Emissions Not Reasonably Foreseeable (40 CFR 93.153(d)(3))
In some cases, BLM activities in the UGRB that do not themselves
produce significant emissions may be expected to lead to future air
emissions. In many cases, however, the emissions are not reasonably
foreseeable or quantifiable at the time of the action. One example is
offering for lease a tract or parcel of land or holding a mineral lease
sale. The sale itself is an administrative action that does not
authorize development or the approval of emission generating
activities. However, it is recognized that the sale could result in air
emissions at the time development occurs. Since the associated
emissions are largely dependent on the specifics of the development
proposal, which is unknown at the time of the lease offering, the
emissions are not reasonably foreseeable or quantifiable at the leasing
stage. However, any resource development that is proposed following the
lease sale would trigger additional National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) analysis, and the development in question would be subject to
conformity requirements at that time.
G. Clean Air Act Permitted Sources (40 CFR 93.153(d)(1))
Some activities within the UGRB are subject to multiple regulatory
approvals. One example is air emission units that are subject to the
State of Wyoming air quality permit program administered by the Wyoming
Department of Environmental Quality (WDEQ). Any regulated emissions
source that receives an air quality permit through the WDEQ's New
Source Review (NSR) permitting program is exempt from inclusion in the
BLM's conformity analysis per 40 CFR 93.153(d)(1) and the Wyoming Air
Quality Standards and Regulations, Chapter 8, Section 3.
[[Page 96037]]
H. Emergency Response (40 CFR 93.153(d)(2))
The BLM may at times need to provide for emergency response when
incidents occur on BLM-managed lands. Examples include responding to
wildfires, spills associated with oil and gas operations, or other
hazardous material incidents. While such activities may include
significant air emissions associated with the event itself and/or with
the response, these activities are exempt because the associated
emissions are not reasonably foreseeable, nor are they quantifiable.
Also, the analysis involved in assessing compliance with the general
conformity requirements is not generally consistent with emergencies,
which require an immediate response so as not to create and/or
exacerbate a public safety or other environmental hazard.
I. Research (40 CFR 93.153(d)(3))
BLM-sponsored research is also exempt from a conformity analysis.
Within the UGRB, a primary BLM research activity is installing and
operating air quality monitoring equipment and water quality monitoring
activities. These activities may involve short-term and infrequent
vehicle use by the BLM and/or its contractors. The BLM has determined
that any emissions associated with vehicle use for these activities are
de minimis, and therefore these activities are exempt from general
conformity requirements.
J. Prescribed Fire (40 CFR 93.153(i)(2))
The BLM's land management in the UGRB may at times include the use
of prescribed fire. Prescribed fire activities are exempt from
conformity to the extent that the BLM conducts them according to the
WDEQ's approved Prescribed Burn Management Program. Prescribed burns
require a permit from the WDEQ prior to being conducted. For the
purpose of conformity, any air emissions associated with prescribed
fire within the confines of an approved management plan have already
been incorporated into the Wyoming SIP and are exempt from the BLM
conformity analysis.
III. BLM UGRB Presumed To Conform List and Technical Justification
The BLM UGRB Presumed to Conform List addresses projects proposed
in the UGRB ozone nonattainment area. Conformity requires that any such
project demonstrate that emissions would be less than the threshold
levels given in 40 CFR 93.153(b)(1) and Chapter 8, Section 3 of the
Wyoming Air Quality Standards and Regulations (WAQSR)--that is, 100 tpy
for either NOX or VOCs, the precursor pollutants that form
ozone in the atmosphere. Projects on the Presumed to Conform List would
be considered to conform and would not be required to develop project-
specific emission inventories to demonstrate compliance. To develop the
list, the BLM quantified project emissions based on similar actions
undertaken, approved, or permitted by the BLM over recent years within
the UGRB. The BLM recognizes that any individual project subject to BLM
authorization may include multiple component activities. For any
project with multiple component activities, the emissions for each
pollutant need to be summed across all project-related activities to
determine conformity. The project conforms if the summed NOX
and VOC emissions are less than 100 tpy for each pollutant. General
Conformity for large scale oil and gas development projects that are
being evaluated through an EIS will not be determined using the
Presumed to Conform List. Such projects are required to submit
comprehensive, detailed emission inventories for the life of the
project in order to evaluate the year of maximum emissions for General
Conformity compliance.
The BLM has developed the Presumed to Conform List using emissions
data from a variety of sources. For operations proposed by the oil and
gas industry, data were compiled from emissions information used in
current and past actions. The total emissions for development and
operation were summed over the expected emission sources at the project
and expressed in terms of three units: Emissions per well, per road-
mile, or per pipeline-mile. The emissions data were compiled in a
calculation workbook and, by using this workbook, the number of such
units that could be developed in a single year without emissions
exceeding the conformity thresholds was calculated. For example, if
developing one well is, on average, associated with emissions of nine
tons of NOX or VOC per well, then projects with up to 11
wells in a single year would be presumed to conform, (since 9
tpy*11wells = 99 tpy, which is less than the100 tpy de minimis
threshold for each pollutant). Note that this example assumes the
project has no additional reasonably foreseeable or quantifiable direct
or indirect emissions.
Emission sources and associated activity levels were solicited from
UGRB oil and gas operators for well development and operations,
including associated infrastructure such as roads and pipelines.
Several datasets were received and reviewed for quality control
purposes. In order to maintain confidentiality of the operators, these
datasets are referred to as Scenario A, Scenario B, etc. in the
calculation workbook. Emissions data from the scenarios were grouped
according to typical major phases of development: Construction,
drilling, completion, operations/workovers, and reclamation. Within
each phase, the scenario data that showed the maximum emissions per
unit of development was selected. These data were then combined to form
a composite scenario that represents a maximum emissions case for the
activity. The composite scenario is the basis for the presumed to
conform emissions estimate. Use of this composite maximum emissions
case assures that the presumed to conform criteria are set
conservatively--that is, this approach ensures that the estimates of
emissions associated with particular levels of development overstate
the actual emissions that are expected fromthe activity, and therefore
the total annual emissions from the specified activities will be less
than the conformity thresholds.
The following table lists the items where BLM has determined that
emissions are presumed to conform. Additional discussion of each
activity that is presumed to conform is presented below the table. The
supporting technical calculations and workbooks for all activities
included on the BLM UGRB Presumed to Conform List can be found at:
https://bit.ly/WYPtCList. In many cases, the table lists emissions
associated with particular activities on a per-unit basis (e.g. per
well, or per mile, or per facility). For these activities, to assess
whether a larger project can be presumed to conform, the number of
units in the project must be multiplied by the expected per-unit
emissions to determine whether the overall emissions from the project
is expected to be less than the thresholds of 100 tpy NOX
and 100 tpy VOCs. For example, in the oil and gas full development
scenario in the table, the emissions are estimated at 7.0 tpy of
NOX per well, and 0.4 tpy of VOCs per well; full development
of up to 14 wells in a single 12-month period could therefore be
presumed to conform, because 14 x 7.0 is 98 tpy NOX, under
the de minimis threshold of 100 tpy.
In other cases, the table lists emissions associated with overall
activities, such as emissions associated with any amount of cultural
resource excavation. In these cases, the total emissions for the
overall activity are so low that any amount of the activity can be
presumed to conform; no per-unit analysis is necessary.
[[Page 96038]]
Table 1--Presumed To Conform Activities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emissions
BLM resource area Description of ---------------------------------------- Comments
activity NOX (ton/yr) VOC (ton/yr)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cultural Resources............. Data recovery/site <0.1.............. <0.1.............. Based on one
excavation. passenger vehicle
Excavation traveling up to
usually related 200 miles per day
to well pad for 60 days.
construction.
Activities Associated with Land Install powerlines/ 0.44 tons/mile.... 0.032 tons/mile... Calculated per mile
Use Permits, such as Rights-of- transmission 1.61 tons/mile.... 0.13 tons/mile.... of transmission or
Way (ROW). lines. distribution line,
Install roads (non- based on emissions
oil and gas). for a 24-mile
project.
Calculated per mile
of road.
Install 1.5 per tower..... 0.2 per tower..... Estimated for South
communications Rim Communications
tower/facility. Tower (one tower).
Construct natural 0.45 tons/facility 0.1 tons/facility. Calculated for a
gas support single support
facility. facility, based on
data for Facility
Construction in
supporting Oil and
Gas Workbook.
Conformity for a
project would be
based on the
number of
facilities. For
example,
construction of up
to 222 facilities
in a single 12-
month period would
conform.
Oil and Gas--Emissions are for Full development 7.0 tons/well..... 0.4 tons/well..... Oil wells--
a Single Well. scenario; Calculated for a
includes drilling single well using
well, pad and the maximum
facility emissions for
construction local development
(including road areas. Conformity
construction, for a project
pipeline would be based on
construction, and the number of
electric line wells. For
construction (oil example, full
well only)), well development for up
completion, to 14 wells in a
production/ single 12-month
workover/ period would
operations, and conform.
reclamation.
4.0 tons/well..... 0.5 tons/well..... Natural gas wells--
Calculated for a
single well using
the maximum
emissions for
local development
areas. Conformity
for a project
would be based on
the number of
wells. For
example, full
development for up
to 24 wells in a
single 12-month
period would
conform.
Oil and Gas--Emissions are for New well on 5.6 tons/well..... 0.3 tons/well..... Oil wells--
a Single Well. existing pad Calculated for a
scenario; single well using
excludes pad, the maximum
facility, and emissions for
pipeline local development
construction. areas. Conformity
for a project
would be based on
the number of
wells. For
example, up to 17
new wells in a
single 12-month
period on an
existing pad would
conform.
2.6 tons/well..... 0.3 tons/well..... Natural gas wells--
Calculated for a
single well using
the maximum
emissions for
local development
areas. Conformity
for a project
would be based on
the number of
wells. For
example, up to 38
new wells in a
single 12-month
period on an
existing pad would
conform.
Existing well <0.1 tons/well.... <0.1 tons/well.... Oil wells--
scenario; Calculated for a
production/ single well using
workover/ the maximum
operations only. emissions for
local development
areas. Conformity
for a project
would be based on
the number of
wells. For
example,
redevelopment of
up to 1,287
existing wells in
a single 12-month
period would
conform.
<0.1 tons/well.... <0.1 tons/well.... Natural gas wells--
Calculated for a
single well using
the maximum
emissions for
local development
areas. Conformity
for a project
would be based on
the number of
wells. For
example,
redevelopment of
up to 1,207
existing wells in
a single 12-month
period would
conform.
Oil and Gas.................... Install pipelines. 1.24 tons/mile.... 0.136 tons/mile... Based on maximum
development of 79
miles for natural
gas pipeline, 20
to 30 inches
diameter.
Conformity for a
project would be
based on the
number of miles of
pipeline
constructed. For
example,
construction of up
to 80 miles of
pipeline in a
single 12-month
period would
conform.
Other Minerals................. Sand and gravel 4.0............... 0.3............... Based on 20,000
operations cubic yards of
(includes sand/gravel
stripping, extraction over a
digging, crushing 3-5 year contract
and hauling). period. Hauling
based on 160,000
miles/yr (20 trips
per day @ 200
miles round-trip
for two 20-day
operations per
year).
Range.......................... Drilling water 0.53.............. 0.02.............. Calculated for a
well. single water well
based on emissions
estimates for
Cabrito 3-31 Water
Well.,
Converting <0.1.............. <0.1.............. Calculated for a
windmills to single conversion
solar energy. project.
Infrequent--Minor
construction (no
heavy duty
vehicles; based on
single day of
pickup use).
Recreation..................... Construct 0.7............... 0.1............... Calculated for
recreation construction of a
facilities (i.e., single facility,
campgrounds). based on Sand
Dunes recreation
improvement
project, Wind
River Front
reconstruction
project, general
annual
maintenance, etc.
River access sites 1.5............... 0.2............... Calculated for
construction of a
single site, based
on projects
constructing multi-
vehicle boat
ramps, including
pre-work design/
survey, road,
ramp, and parking
lot construction,
installation of
visitor facilities
(restrooms,
kiosks,
barricades,
fencing, etc.).
[[Page 96039]]
Special Use 0.1............... <0.1.............. Calculated for a
Permits, e.g., single issued
commercial permit, assuming 1
hunting and passenger vehicle
fishing guides. traveling up to
200 miles round
trip for 250 trips
per year.
Trail construction <0.1.............. <0.1.............. Calculated for a
single
construction
project up to 5
days in duration.
Assumes primarily
hand construction
and one tractor or
backhoe operating
for 5 days.
Wild Horses.................... Gather wild horses <0.1.............. <0.1.............. Calculated for a
single gather,
based on
helicopter use
(Bell 206
JetRanger) for one
week period.
Wildlife....................... Habitat 1.9............... 0.2............... Calculated for a
improvement single project,
projects based on Wyoming
(includes Range Mule Deer
selecting and Habitat Project
designating EA.
sites, planning,
and
implementation).
Wildlife survey 0.1............... <0.1.............. Calculated and
(aircraft). based on a single
survey with twin
engine aircraft
use (Beech King
Air) for one week
period.
Misc. Activities............... Road maintenance 9.7............... 0.7............... Infrequent and
and upkeep. short-term vehicle
use, minor heavy
duty equipment.
Based on grader
and diesel pickup
use to maintain
40,000 miles of
road annually. Not
applicable to
initial road
construction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For pollutant emissions presented in the above table for oil and
gas industry sources, the following key assumptions are applicable and
can also be further reviewed in the supporting Oil and Gas Workbook
(included with the supporting emission calculations) located at: https://bit.ly/WYPtCList:
EPA regulates the emissions from mobile sources by setting
standards for the specific pollutants being emitted. EPA established
progressively more stringent emission standards for carbon monoxide,
hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter in the early
1990s for non-road engines and equipment. Emissions standards set
limits on the amount of pollution a vehicle or engine can emit. A
higher tier standard corresponds to lower emissions. Emissions shown on
the list assume non-road equipment/engines meet either EPA Tier 2 or a
mix of Tier 1 and Tier 2 emission standards. In order to determine
emissions for a project using entirely Tier 1 non-road equipment/
engines, the comparison panels in the supporting Oil and Gas Workbook
must be used.
For projects using Tier 3 or better non-road equipment/
engines, a higher number of wells may conform, but the supporting Oil
and Gas Workbook must be used to adjust the single well emission
values.
For projects using drill rigs permitted through the WDEQ,
New Source Review (NSR) permitting program, a higher number of wells
may conform since NSR-permitted sources are excluded from the BLM's
General conformity analysis. The supporting Oil and Gas Workbook can be
used to adjust the single well emission values by excluding permitted
drill rig emissions.
Emissions data for on-road vehicles correspond to calendar
years 2008 to 2013, depending on the operator, and so are expected to
be conservative (overestimate emissions) for 2014 and later years.
Emissions data were previously generated using EPA's Motor Vehicle
Emission Simulator (MOVES) modeling system which estimates emissions
for mobile sources at the national, county, and project level for
criteria air pollutants, greenhouse gases, and air toxics. Emissions
data for off-road vehicles, such as construction equipment, were
previously generated using EPA's NONROAD Model.
The ton per year (tpy) emissions presented for a single
well are rounded to one decimal place; however, the number of wells
noted as conforming in the comments are based on more precise emissions
that can be found in the supporting Oil and Gas Workbook.
Further explanation of the Presumed to Conform activities
identified in the table is provided below in the order in which they
appear in the table.
1. Cultural Resources: Data Recovery/Site Excavation
Cultural resource evaluations may occur during site excavation,
whether connected to oil and gas development or to other BLM projects.
These activities are expected to result in de minimis emissions
associated with infrequent and short-term light-duty vehicle use for
personnel to travel to the project site. Calculations were based on one
passenger vehicle traveling up to 200 miles per day for 60 days.
Emissions for NOX and VOC have each been calculated to be
less than 0.1 ton per year. Since the emissions for this activity are
de minimis, no extrapolation of the number of cultural site excavations
that could occur in a single year is provided; this activity is not a
daily activity and would never approach the emissions threshold. These
activities are de minimis and presumed to conform.
2. Lands: Install Power/Transmission Lines
Due to the remote location of many oil and gas development projects
in the UGRB, electrical power is not available at the project site and
electrical transmission or distribution lines may be installed in order
to bring power to the project site. Constructing these transmission or
distribution lines results in NOX and VOC emissions
associated with construction equipment activities. Based on an actual
24-mile transmission or distribution line, construction assumes
standard construction equipment including light-duty and heavy-duty
trucks, along with a backhoe and forklift, operating 12 hours per day.
The calculated emissions are 0.44 tpy of NOX and 0.032 tpy
of VOCs per mile. By extrapolation, any transmission or distribution
line construction project up to 225 miles in a 12-month period could be
developed without exceeding the emissions threshold. These activities
are de minimis and presumed to conform.
3. Lands: Install Roads (Non-Oil and Gas)
New road construction may be undertaken or authorized by the BLM to
create access to previously inaccessible locations. Emissions would be
associated with the construction equipment needed to build the access
road, such as backhoes, bulldozers, tractor scrapers, and motor
graders,
[[Page 96040]]
operating 12 hours per day. Based on 2009 Sublette County emission
factors from EPA's NONROAD emissions model, the calculated emissions
are 1.61 tpy of NOX and 0.13 tpy of VOCs per mile.
Accordingly, any access road construction project up to about 61 miles
in a 12-month period could be developed without exceeding the emissions
threshold. This activity is de minimis and presumed to conform.
4. Lands: Install Communication Tower/Facility
The BLM may authorize construction of communication towers and
ancillary facilities on Federal lands within the UGRB in order to
improve cellular telephone and other communications in the region.
Estimated emissions are associated with the construction equipment for
installing a single tower, based on construction of the South Rim
Communications Tower, including light and heavy-duty trucks, backhoes,
cranes and a truck drill rig, operating 10 hours per day. Off-road
vehicles assumed 2008 Sublette County NONROAD emission factors and on-
road vehicles assumed 2013 emission factors from EPA's MOVES model. The
calculated emissions are 1.5 tpy of NOX and 0.2 tpy of VOCs.
By extrapolation, up to 66 towers could be constructed in a single 12-
month period without exceeding the emissions threshold. This activity
is de minimis and presumed to conform.
5. Oil and Gas: Full Development Scenario
Developing an oil and gas well involves many different activities,
including well pad construction, well drilling, completion workovers
and construction of on-site facilities and associated roads and
pipelines. Emissions were calculated for these activities assuming full
development for a single well using a maximum development scenario for
the UGRB. Separate calculations were performed for oil wells and
natural gas wells.
For a single oil well, the calculation assumes a drill rig and
boiler with drilling activities lasting 15 days for 24 hours per day
(hr/day). Construction is assumed to last 3 days at 10 hr/day and
involve standard construction equipment such as dozers, backhoes, motor
graders, dump trucks, and water tankers. Completion activities involve
a pump engine operating for 5 days and a rig engine operating for 1
day, at 12 hr/day. Workovers are assumed to involve one rig engine
operating for 5 days at 12 hr/day. Off-road equipment is assumed to
meet EPA Tier 2 emissions standards. On-road vehicles would consist of
light and heavy-duty trucks. Equipment and vehicle emissions are
calculated for 2013.
For a single oil well, the calculated emissions are 7.0 tpy of
NOX and 0.4 tpy of VOCs. By extrapolation, up to 14 oil
wells could be developed for a project in a 12-month period without
exceeding the emissions threshold.
For a single natural gas well, the calculation assumes a drill rig
and boiler, with a drilling duration of 10 days at 24 hours per day.
Construction is assumed to last 15 days. Completion is assumed to
involve a pump engine operating for 5 days and a rig engine operating
for 1 day at 12 hr/day. Workovers are assumed to involve two engines
operating for 2 days at 8 hr/day. Off-road equipment is assumed to meet
EPA Tier 2 emissions standards. On-road vehicles would consist of light
and heavy trucks. Equipment and vehicle emissions are calculated for
2008. For a single natural gas well, the calculated emissions are 4.0
tpy of NOX and 0.5 tpy of VOCs. By extrapolation, up to 24
natural gas wells could be developed for a project in a 12-month period
without exceeding the emissions threshold.
Each of these activities are de minimis and presumed to conform.
6. Oil and Gas: New Well on an Existing Pad
For a new oil or natural gas well on an existing pad, the emissions
are the same as described above except that construction emissions are
excluded (since the associated facilities already exist). The
assumptions and data used for equipment and vehicles in this
calculation are the same as for the Full Development Scenario (number 5
above).
For a single oil well drilled on an existing pad, the calculated
emissions are 5.6 tpy of NOX and 0.3 tpy of VOCs. By
extrapolation, up to 17 oil wells on an existing pad could be developed
in a 12-month period without exceeding the emissions threshold.
For a single natural gas well drilled on an existing pad, the
calculated emissions are 2.6 tpy of NOX and 0.3 tpy of VOCs.
By extrapolation, up to 38 natural gas wells could be developed on an
existing pad in a 12-month period without exceeding the emissions
threshold. These activities are de minimis and presumed to conform.
7. Oil and Gas: Production/Workover/Operations Only
Once a well is drilled and producing, production-related
maintenance activities such as workovers typically occur annually and
generate emissions that may not be included in the well site's
production permit. Workovers typically require the short-term use of
diesel-fired engines associated with the workover rig itself. Also,
there are typically traffic-related emissions from workers travelling
to the site.
For a single oil or natural gas well, the calculation for workovers
assumes a single engine operating for 5 days at 12 hr/day. Off-road
equipment is assumed to meet EPA Tier 2 emissions standards. On-road
vehicles would consist of light and heavy trucks. Equipment and vehicle
emissions are calculated for 2013.
For a single oil well and a single natural gas well, the calculated
emissions associated with production maintenance activities are less
than 0.1 tpy for both NOX and VOCs. By extrapolation, up to
1,287 oil wells and 1,207 natural gas wells could be maintained in a
12-month period without exceeding the emissions threshold. Each of
these activities are de minimis and presumed to conform.
8. Oil and Gas: Install Pipelines
Once an oil or gas well is developed, pipelines are often
constructed to transport the recovered oil, condensate, gas and water.
Emissions result from the construction equipment used for pipeline
projects. For a 79-mile pipeline (up to 30-inch diameter pipe) the
calculation assumes that construction proceeds at the rate of 1 to 4
days per mile, depending on the phase of work. Up to 8 pieces of
equipment are assumed to be operating simultaneously (up to 20 for
welding). Equipment is assumed to operate for 12 hr/day and includes
standard construction equipment such as excavators, dozers, backhoes,
motor graders, sidebooms, and cranes. Additional equipment includes
welders and x-ray trucks. Vehicles include light-duty trucks, heavy-
duty trucks, and water tankers. Off-road equipment is assumed to
consist of 50% meeting EPA Tier 1 and 50% meeting Tier 2 emissions
standards. Equipment and vehicle emissions are calculated for 2008.
For a 79-mile pipeline (up to 30-inch diameter pipe), the
calculated emissions are 98.3 tpy of NOX and 10.7 tpy of
VOCs. The average emissions per mile of pipeline are 1.24 tons/mile of
NOX and 0.136 tons/mile of VOCs. By extrapolation, any
pipeline construction project up to about 80 miles in a 12-month period
could be developed without exceeding the emissions threshold. This
activity is de minimis and presumed to conform.
[[Page 96041]]
9. Other Minerals: Sand and Gravel Operations
The BLM issues contracts and authorizations for developing sand and
gravel resources within the UGRB. Air emissions result from on-site
heavy equipment (front loaders and bulldozers), operation of a
crushing/screening plant (which generally run on diesel-fueled
engines), employee/contractor traffic (light-duty vehicles), and use of
heavy-duty trucks to transport the aggregate product to nearby markets.
The emission calculations were based on 20,000 cubic yards of sand/
gravel extraction over a 3-5 year contract period and a one-way hauling
distance of 100 miles, which is the BLM's maximum projected development
level.
Under the development scenario described above, the calculated
emissions are 4.0 tpy of NOX and 0.3 tpy of VOCs. By
extrapolation, up to 24 sand and gravel operations could occur in a
single year 12-month period without exceeding the emissions threshold.
Also presumed to conform under this category are activities
associated with selling and removing decorative rock. Activities
associated with gathering decorative stone typically create fewer
emissions than sand and gravel sites since no crushing/screening
equipment is necessary. Each of these activities are de minimis and
presumed to conform.
10. Range: Drilling a Water Well
Water well development occurs on BLM lands within the UGRB.
Emissions are associated with the drill rig and ancillary equipment
although the intensity and duration of activity for drilling water
wells is significantly less than that for an oil or gas well.
Water well drilling assumes a water well drill rig, with Tier 2
engines, along with supporting light and heavy-duty trucks. A round
trip distance of 70 miles was assumed for the on-road vehicles. The
calculated emissions for a single water well are 0.5 tpy of
NOX and 0.02 tpy of VOCs. By extrapolation, up to 186 water
wells could be developed in a 12-month period without exceeding the
emissions threshold. This activity is de minimis and presumed to
conform.
11. Range: Converting Windmills to Solar Energy
The BLM has a program to convert existing windmills to solar
energy. These activities are expected to result in de minimis emissions
associated with infrequent and short-term light-duty vehicle use for
personnel to travel to the project site. Emissions for NOX
and VOCs have been calculated to be less than 0.1 ton per year for each
conversion. Since the emissions for this activity are de minimis, no
extrapolation of the number conversions that could occur in a single
year is provided; this activity is infrequent and would never approach
the emissions threshold. This activity is de minimis and presumed to
conform.
12. Recreation: Construct Recreation Facilities, i.e., Campgrounds
The BLM may also construct recreational facilities such as
campgrounds or picnic areas to enhance visitor use of recreation areas.
This activity may involve construction over a small area, generally
lasting up to about 15 working days. Air emissions would result from
the construction equipment and work vehicles, such as front loaders, a
Bobcat, a motor grader, and light-duty and heavy-duty trucks, operating
10 hours per day. Off-road vehicles assumed 2008 Sublette County
NONROAD emission factors and on-road vehicles assumed MOVES 2013
emission factors.
For recreation facility construction, the calculated emissions are
0.7 tpy of NOX and 0.1 tpy of VOCs per facility. By
extrapolation, up to 142 facilities could be developed in a 12-month
period without exceeding the emissions threshold. This activity is de
minimis and presumed to conform.
13. Recreation: River Access Sites
At river access sites within the UGRB, projects can include
constructing multi-vehicle boat ramps, access roads, parking areas and
visitor facilities such as restrooms, kiosks, barricades and fencing.
Typical projects involve about 40 days of construction activities at
the site, and associated air emissions result from construction
equipment and work vehicles, including a front loader, excavator, and
motor grader, along with light-duty and heavy-duty trucks, operating 10
hours per day. Off-road vehicles assumed 2008 Sublette County NONROAD
emission factors and on-road vehicles assumed MOVES 2013 emission
factors. For constructing river access sites, the calculated emissions
are 1.5 tpy of NOX and 0.2 tpy of VOCs per access site. By
extrapolation, up to 66 sites could be developed in a 12-month period
without exceeding the emissions threshold. This activity is de minimis
and presumed to conform.
14. Recreation: Special Use Permits
Examples of Special Use Permits issued by the BLM include
commercial hunting and fishing guide permits. Emissions result from
light duty vehicle traffic associated with the hunting and fishing
trips. Based on 250 trips per year and 200 miles (round-trip) for each
guided trip, the calculated emissions are less than 0.1 tpy each for
NOX and VOCs. By extrapolation, up to 1,911 permits could be
issued in a 12-month period without exceeding the emissions threshold.
This activity is de minimis and presumed to conform.
15. Recreation: Trail Construction
The BLM maintains and constructs trails within the UGRB. Most trail
construction involves hand equipment, but may occasionally require use
of mechanized equipment such as a tractor, depending upon local site
conditions. These activities are typically short-term (i.e., 5 days
duration, 8 hours per day). The calculated emissions are less than 0.1
tpy each for NOX and VOCs per construction project. By
extrapolation, up to 2,181 trail construction projects could occur in a
12-month period without exceeding the emissions threshold. This
activity is de minimis and presumed to conform.
16. Wild Horses: Gather Wild Horses
Wild horse gathers within the UGRB typically involve the use of a
helicopter, which is the primary emissions source for this activity.
The calculations are based on use of a Bell 206 Jet Ranger helicopter
over a five day period, with an average flight time of 6 hours each
day. The calculated emissions are less than 0.1 tpy each for
NOX and VOCs per gather. This activity is de minimis and
presumed to conform.
17. Wildlife: Habitat Improvement Projects
The BLM conducts and/or authorizes habitat improvement projects
within the UGRB. Activities for these projects typically include the
use of off-road construction equipment (such as a tractor, feller
buncher, and skidder) for 10 hours per day, as well as light duty
vehicle use and occasional helicopter use and heavy-duty fire engines.
The calculated emissions are 1.9 tpy of NOX and 0.2 tpy of
VOCs, per project. By extrapolation, up to 52 projects could be
completed in a 12-month period without exceeding the emissions
threshold. This activity is de minimis and presumed to conform.
18. Wildlife: Wildlife Surveys (Aircraft)
The BLM conducts or participates in aerial wildlife surveys within
the UGRB. Emissions are based on the use of a twin engine aircraft
(e.g., Beechcraft King Air) for a 5-day week, with an average flight
time of 4 hours each day. The calculated emissions are 0.1 tpy of
NOX
[[Page 96042]]
and less than 0.1 tpy of VOCs per survey. By extrapolation, up to 1,833
surveys could be conducted in a 12-month period without exceeding the
emissions threshold. This activity is de minimis and presumed to
conform
19. Miscellaneous: Road Maintenance and Upkeep
The BLM conducts and authorizes maintenance of existing roads
within the UGRB. Air emissions result from the short-term use of heavy
duty construction equipment. The calculated emissions are 9.7 tpy of
NOX and 0.7 tpy of VOCs calculated for 40,000 miles per year
of road maintenance activities (this is 5 times the normal amount of
activity that typically occurs based on BLM-WY submitted data). This
activity is de minimis and presumed to conform.
IV. How To Apply Presumed To Conform Actions
The list of qualifying project categories discussed in the
preceding section is referred to as the BLM UGRB Presumed to Conform
List. The analyses for BLM's presumed to conform actions are considered
representative of a majority of common, recurring projects within the
UGRB. However, the BLM must consider the appropriateness of applying
this list to any particular project, by assessing how the proposed
project compares to the presumed to conform categories of projects.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ The list must be used carefully because ``[w]here an action
otherwise presumed to conform under paragraph (f) of this section *
* * does not in fact meet one of the criteria in paragraph (g)(1) of
this section, that action shall not be presumed to conform and the
requirements of 93.150 and 93.155 through 93.160 shall apply for the
Federal action.'' See 40 CFR 93.153(j).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As authorized under the Clean Air Act, the list provides an
additional way for the BLM to improve its environmental program
management while still ensuring that agency air quality goals and
requirements are met. Use of the BLM UGRB Presumed to Conform List will
reduce review times, eliminate unnecessary paperwork, clarify
analytical requirements for all project actions, and ensure that the
proper level of documentation is applied in each case. Moreover, the
BLM UGRB Presumed to Conform List will provide a method that the BLM
can use to demonstrate conformity with the Wyoming SIP. When applying
the BLM UGRB Presumed to Conform List, the BLM will determine whether
the project in question represents one or more single actions or a
combined action. The BLM will also determine whether any combined
action involves multiple connected presumed to conform actions. Below
is a description of the different BLM actions and procedures.
Single Action. A single presumed to conform action is defined as a
presumed to conform action that is not connected or dependent on other
actions and that has independent utility.\17\ For such actions, no
general conformity evaluation or applicability analysis is required and
BLM officials may simply document that the project action is presumed
to conform on the basis of this Notice and the applicable project
category.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 40 CFR 1506.1(c)(1) and 1508.25(a), Council on
Environmental Quality, Regulations for Implementing the Procedural
Provisions of NEPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using the Presumed to Conform List and supporting calculation
workbooks for this Notice meets the major intent of EPA's rationale for
developing presumed to conform activities--to reduce the analysis
burden for actions that have minimal or no direct or indirect
emissions. By analyzing each project category in the BLM UGRB Presumed
to Conform List and reporting the findings, the BLM has shown that the
resulting emissions from each single presumed to conform action will
typically be below the applicable emission thresholds.
Combined Action. A combined action is defined as either: (1)
Multiple presumed to conform actions that are connected to each other;
or (2) one or more presumed to conform actions that are connected to
one or more non-presumed to conform actions being evaluated under the
environmental review requirements of NEPA. The Council on Environmental
Quality defines connected actions as actions that are closely related
involving, for example, interdependent parts of a larger action,
dependence on a larger action for justification, or dependence on other
actions taken previously or simultaneously.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 40 CFR 1508.25(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Where there is a combined action, only one action specified on the
BLM UGRB Presumed to Conform List may be excluded in calculating total
direct and indirect emissions. The emissions from all the other actions
that are not otherwise exempt must be calculated to determine the total
emissions from the remaining actions.\19\ For example, the BLM may
undertake a project with several connected actions that must be
analyzed under NEPA. Several of those actions may individually be
listed on the BLM UGRB Presumed to Conform List because those actions
taken alone would typically have emissions below the threshold levels.
To determine whether such a project requires a conformity
determination, the BLM would exclude one presumed to conform action and
then prepare an applicability analysis for the remaining actions. For
example, an oil and gas operator could propose a project to install
pipelines from existing well pads to a proposed new compressor station.
In this example, only one proposed activity would be excluded using the
Presumed to Conform List--either the pipeline installation or the
construction activities for the compressor station. Emissions from the
other activity would be calculated to determine if the remaining total
emissions are still below the de minimis emission thresholds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ An allowance to this provision is discussed in the
following paragraph.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The above procedures for combined actions allow the BLM to exclude
the emissions from one presumed to conform action and to prepare an
applicability analysis based upon the total direct and indirect
emissions of the actions that are not otherwise exempt.\20\ Thus, in a
combined action, the emissions from one presumed to conform action may
be excluded from the calculation of total project emissions. The
process could show that either the combined action (minus the one
excluded presumed to conform action) would equal or exceed the emission
thresholds and thus trigger a conformity determination, or that the
combined action (minus the one excluded presumed to conform action) is
below the emissions thresholds, in which case no further action would
be required. In making this determination, the BLM may elect to apply
the calculated emissions in the BLM UGRB Presumed to Conform List to
determine the total emissions where applicable. BLM officials will
decide which individual presumed to conform action is excluded if more
than one is present in a combined action.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ Emissions from exempt actions are excluded in accordance
with 40 CFR 93.152.
\21\ Requirements and allowances for combined actions are based
on interagency communications with the EPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The BLM has determined as a matter of policy to implement the BLM
UGRB Presumed to Conform List with respect to combined actions by
balancing considerations about project segmentation,\22\ connected
actions
[[Page 96043]]
under NEPA,\23\ and the permitted exclusion of emissions attributable
to presumed to conform actions under the General Conformity Rule.
Regarding the latter, 40 CFR 93.152 states: ``The portion of emissions
which are exempt or presumed to conform under Section 93.153(c), (d),
(e), or (f) are not included in the total of direct and indirect
emissions.'' Likewise, as stated in the preamble (58 FR 63233): ``The
final rule requires the inclusion of the total direct and indirect
emissions in the applicability and conformity determinations, except
the portion of emissions which are exempt or presumed to conform.''
\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ In the preamble to the General Conformity Rule, the EPA
decided not to adopt its initial proposal to permit Federal agencies
to use the NEPA concept of tiering and analyze actions in a staged
manner in analyzing conformity. EPA explained, among other things:
``[T]iering could cause the segmentation of projects for conformity
analysis, which might provide an overall inaccurate estimate of
emissions. The segmentation of projects for conformity analyses when
emissions are reasonably foreseeable is not permitted by this
rule.'' (58 FR 63240).
\23\ 40 CFR 1508.7.
\24\ The EPA gives as an example a Federal action that includes
construction of a new industrial boiler project, that is exempt, and
a separate office building. The emissions from the hypothetical
boiler exceed de minimis levels however it is exempt and so the
emissions are excluded. The emissions from the office building alone
are below de minimis levels. As a result, the action as a whole does
not need a conformity determination. (58 FR 63233).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The BLM will apply this definition to exclude emissions for single
and multiple presumed to conform actions that are not connected to one
another. BLM's procedures for combined actions offer a reasonable
approach by placing a more conservative limit on the permitted
exclusion of presumed to conform emissions than 40 CFR 93.152.
Documentation
Documentation requirements for combined/multiple actions are
typically greater than for single actions. For some projects with
combined/multiple actions, the BLM may require that proponents submit a
project-specific emissions inventory in lieu of using the Presumed to
Conform list. This methodology is project-specific and more refined
than quantifying the project emissions using the Presumed to Conform
List emission estimates.
Specifically, the methodology described above must be used if the
project includes: (1) One or more presumed to conform actions that are
connected to non-presumed to conform actions which are being evaluated
under the environmental review requirements of NEPA; or (2) actions
which are not supported by emissions quantification described elsewhere
in the Notice. Consistent with the goal of reducing the analysis burden
for presumed to conform actions, the BLM UGRB Presumed to Conform List
may be used to document emissions for select activities in lieu of a
project-specific emissions inventory if the activities are represented
on the Presumed to Conform List.
Also, where the emissions in the BLM UGRB Presumed to Conform List
are based on specific project assumptions that vary from the project in
question, the emissions in the list may be adjusted as described in the
BLM Emissions Workbook if appropriate. In other words, the BLM UGRB
Presumed to Conform List may be used if the project is a single action
or if it is limited to multiple presumed to conform actions that are
supported in the Notice.
Brian W. Davis,
Acting State Director.
[FR Doc. 2016-31631 Filed 12-28-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P