Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, South Coast Air Quality Management District, 95472-95473 [2016-31226]
Download as PDF
95472
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 249 / Wednesday, December 28, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
corporation, and the foreign partnership
would not have made the distribution
but for a funding of the partnership
through an obligation held (or treated as
held) by the controlled foreign
corporation, notwithstanding § 1.956–
1(e), the partner’s share of the
partnership obligation is the greater of—
*
*
*
*
*
Martin V. Franks,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief
Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2016–31411 Filed 12–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0444; FRL–9955–94–
Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan
Revisions, South Coast Air Quality
Management District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
Local agency
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve revisions to the South Coast Air
Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern emissions of oxides of
nitrogen (NOX) from ovens, dryers,
dehydrators, heaters, kilns, calciners,
furnaces, crematories, incinerators,
heated pots, cookers, roasters, smokers,
fryers, closed and open heated tanks
and evaporators, distillation units,
afterburners, degassing units, vapor
incinerators, catalytic or thermal
oxidizers, soil and water remediation
units, and other combustion equipment.
We are finalizing our approval of local
rules that regulate these emission
sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA
or the Act).
DATES: These rules will be effective on
January 27, 2017.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0444. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
SUMMARY:
1147
1153.1
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On September 16, 2016, the EPA
proposed to approve the following rules
into the California SIP. 81 FR 63732.
Adopted/
amended/
revised
NOx Reductions from Miscellaneous Sources ................................................
Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Commercial Food Ovens ...................
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received one comment
regarding EPA’s proposed approval of
Rule 1153.1 that was submitted
anonymously.
Comment: The comment generally
supports EPA’s proposal to approve
Rule 1153.1. The commenter
acknowledges Rule 1153.1 was designed
to address delays in emission reduction
technology development. However, the
comment letter expressed a concern
regarding the exemption for units with
daily NOX emissions of 1 pound per day
or less. The commenter states, ‘‘burners
could be replaced with larger emission
burners and it could easily go unknown
by the enforcing agency.’’ Additionally,
the commenter makes a
16:15 Dec 27, 2016
information is not publicly available,
e.g., confidential business information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–
4126, Law.nicole@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Rule title
We proposed to approve these rules
because we determined that they
complied with the relevant CAA
requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rules
and our evaluation.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Final rule.
Rule No.
SCAQMD .......
SCAQMD .......
VerDate Sep<11>2014
ACTION:
Jkt 241001
recommendation for ‘‘a testing schedule
that is less strict for the small emission
burners compared to the larger ones.’’
Response: The EPA appreciates the
comment letter’s general support of our
approval of Rule 1153.1. The exemption
discussed in the comment is found in
section (g)(2) of Rule 1153.1. Sections
(g)(2)(A)–(g)(2)(E) of Rule 1153.1
describe the documentation required of
units with daily NOX emissions of 1
pound per day or less. These
requirements ensure the exempted units
are rated at a heat input capacity of less
than 325,000 BTU per hour, comply
with a permit condition limiting NOX
emissions to 1 pound per day or less,
and keep daily records of unit operation
and fuel gas consumption. Because of
these requirements, we disagree that the
enforcing agency would not know about
these units. The rule exempts these
units from requirements to comply with
the limits for larger units and testing
requirements associated with those
units. The testing required is used to
confirm compliance with the limits in
Table 1 of the rule. If the commenter’s
recommendation for a less strict testing
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
09/09/2011
09/07/2014
Submitted
02/06/2013
04/07/2015
schedule were implemented for the
smaller units, it is unclear what would
be tested, since the exempted units do
not have emissions limits in the rule to
comply with. As noted above, the
comment letter generally supports our
approval of Rule 1153.1 and does not
request or recommend any specific
changes to our proposed action. The
comment letter recognizes that Rule
1153.1 will decrease NOX emissions.
For these reasons, the EPA is finalizing
its proposed approval of Rule 1153.1
without change based on the comment.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment of the rules as
described in our proposed action.
Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving these rules into the California
SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 249 / Wednesday, December 28, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
SCAQMD rules described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Dec 27, 2016
Jkt 241001
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by February 27,
2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 21, 2016.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
95473
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(379)(i)(A)(7),
(c)(428)(i)(D)(2), and (c)(461)(i)(C)(3) to
read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan—in part.
(c) * * *
(379) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(7) Previously approved on August 4,
2010 in paragraph (c)(379)(i)(A)(4) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph
(c)(428)(i)(D)(2), Rule 1147, ‘‘NOX
Reductions from Miscellaneous
Sources,’’ adopted on December 5, 2008.
*
*
*
*
*
(428) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) * * *
(2) Rule 1147, ‘‘NOX Reductions from
Miscellaneous Sources,’’ amended on
September 9, 2011.
*
*
*
*
*
(461) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) * * *
(3) Rule 1153.1, ‘‘Emissions of Oxides
of Nitrogen from Commercial Food
Ovens,’’ adopted on November 7, 2014.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2016–31226 Filed 12–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0393; FRL–9955–62–
Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan
Revisions, Great Basin Unified Air
Pollution Control District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the Great Basin
Unified Air Pollution Control District
(GBUAPCD) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). This
revision concerns emissions of
particulate matter at Owens Lake, CA.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 28, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 95472-95473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31226]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0444; FRL-9955-94-Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, South Coast Air
Quality Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve revisions to the South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These revisions concern emissions of oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) from ovens, dryers, dehydrators, heaters, kilns,
calciners, furnaces, crematories, incinerators, heated pots, cookers,
roasters, smokers, fryers, closed and open heated tanks and
evaporators, distillation units, afterburners, degassing units, vapor
incinerators, catalytic or thermal oxidizers, soil and water
remediation units, and other combustion equipment. We are finalizing
our approval of local rules that regulate these emission sources under
the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: These rules will be effective on January 27, 2017.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0444. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
confidential business information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-
4126, Law.nicole@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On September 16, 2016, the EPA proposed to approve the following
rules into the California SIP. 81 FR 63732.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adopted/
Local agency Rule No. Rule title amended/ Submitted
revised
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCAQMD........................... 1147 NOx Reductions from 09/09/2011 02/06/2013
Miscellaneous Sources.
SCAQMD........................... 1153.1 Emissions of Oxides of 09/07/2014 04/07/2015
Nitrogen from Commercial
Food Ovens.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they
complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rules and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received one comment regarding EPA's proposed
approval of Rule 1153.1 that was submitted anonymously.
Comment: The comment generally supports EPA's proposal to approve
Rule 1153.1. The commenter acknowledges Rule 1153.1 was designed to
address delays in emission reduction technology development. However,
the comment letter expressed a concern regarding the exemption for
units with daily NOX emissions of 1 pound per day or less.
The commenter states, ``burners could be replaced with larger emission
burners and it could easily go unknown by the enforcing agency.''
Additionally, the commenter makes a recommendation for ``a testing
schedule that is less strict for the small emission burners compared to
the larger ones.''
Response: The EPA appreciates the comment letter's general support
of our approval of Rule 1153.1. The exemption discussed in the comment
is found in section (g)(2) of Rule 1153.1. Sections (g)(2)(A)-(g)(2)(E)
of Rule 1153.1 describe the documentation required of units with daily
NOX emissions of 1 pound per day or less. These requirements
ensure the exempted units are rated at a heat input capacity of less
than 325,000 BTU per hour, comply with a permit condition limiting
NOX emissions to 1 pound per day or less, and keep daily
records of unit operation and fuel gas consumption. Because of these
requirements, we disagree that the enforcing agency would not know
about these units. The rule exempts these units from requirements to
comply with the limits for larger units and testing requirements
associated with those units. The testing required is used to confirm
compliance with the limits in Table 1 of the rule. If the commenter's
recommendation for a less strict testing schedule were implemented for
the smaller units, it is unclear what would be tested, since the
exempted units do not have emissions limits in the rule to comply with.
As noted above, the comment letter generally supports our approval of
Rule 1153.1 and does not request or recommend any specific changes to
our proposed action. The comment letter recognizes that Rule 1153.1
will decrease NOX emissions. For these reasons, the EPA is
finalizing its proposed approval of Rule 1153.1 without change based on
the comment.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rules
as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in
section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving these rules
into the California SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
[[Page 95473]]
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
SCAQMD rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office
(please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 27, 2017. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 21, 2016.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(379)(i)(A)(7),
(c)(428)(i)(D)(2), and (c)(461)(i)(C)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan--in part.
(c) * * *
(379) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(7) Previously approved on August 4, 2010 in paragraph
(c)(379)(i)(A)(4) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
paragraph (c)(428)(i)(D)(2), Rule 1147, ``NOX Reductions
from Miscellaneous Sources,'' adopted on December 5, 2008.
* * * * *
(428) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) * * *
(2) Rule 1147, ``NOX Reductions from Miscellaneous
Sources,'' amended on September 9, 2011.
* * * * *
(461) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) * * *
(3) Rule 1153.1, ``Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Commercial
Food Ovens,'' adopted on November 7, 2014.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-31226 Filed 12-27-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P