Revision of the Department of Energy's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Regulations, 94915-94922 [2016-31337]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 1004
RIN 1901–AB41
Revision of the Department of
Energy’s Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) Regulations
FOIA Program, Office of Public
Information, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) issues a final rule
amending its regulations that prescribe
the procedures by which the public may
request records pursuant to the Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA) from DOE
offices, excluding the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC). This
final rule makes changes to DOE’s
regulations to reflect statutory
amendments made to the FOIA by the
FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, and to
make minor grammatical and other
editorial changes throughout the
regulations. The editorial changes
clarify various defined terms, update the
internal procedures for processing
records requested under FOIA, and
reflect minor changes to DOE’s internal
organizational structure.
DATES: This rule is effective December
27, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Alexander Morris, FOIA Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of Public
Information, Mail Stop MA–46,
Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585–
0121. Telephone: (202) 586–5955.
Email: Alexander.Morris@hq.doe.gov.
Ms. Elizabeth Kohl, U.S. Department
of Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
GC–33, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–7796. Email:
Elizabeth.Kohl@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 10 CFR
part 1004 contains DOE’s regulations
that implement the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552.
The regulations provide information
concerning the procedures by which the
public may request records from DOE
offices, and the policies and procedures
by which DOE provides such records to
members of the public. DOE previously
amended its regulations in 1988 (53 FR
15660, May 3, 1988) and 2014 (79 FR
22855, Apr. 25, 2014). DOE is now
updating its regulations to implement
the requirements of the FOIA
Improvement Act of 2016, Public Law
114–185 (June 30, 2016) (Act). The Act
requires that Federal agencies review
and update their FOIA regulations in
accordance with its provisions. The Act
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Dec 23, 2016
Jkt 241001
addresses a range of procedural issues,
including a requirement that agencies
make available for public inspection in
an electronic format records that have
become or are likely to become the
subject of subsequent requests for
substantially the same records, or
records that have been requested three
or more times. The Act also requires
that agencies provide a minimum of 90
days for requesters to file an
administrative appeal following an
adverse determination, and that they
provide dispute resolution services at
various times throughout the FOIA
process. The Act also codifies the U.S.
Department of Justice’s ‘‘foreseeable
harm’’ standard, specifying that an
agency shall withhold information only
if the agency reasonably foresees that
disclosure would harm an interest
protected by an exemption described in
5 U.S.C. 552(b) or if disclosure is
prohibited by law. This provision also
requires that agencies consider whether
partial disclosure is possible if full
disclosure is not possible, and that
agencies take reasonable steps to
segregate and release nonexempt
information. The Act also amends
Exemption 5 to specify that the
deliberative process privilege does not
apply to records created 25 years or
more before the date of the request;
creates a new ‘‘FOIA Council’’ charged
with, among other things, developing
recommendations for increased agency
compliance and efficiency; and adds
two new elements to agency Annual
FOIA Reports (i.e., the number of times
an agency has denied a request for
records under 5 U.S.C. 552(c) and the
number of records made available for
public inspection under 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(2)).
DOE also makes additional revisions
to update, clarify, and streamline the
language in several procedural
provisions, as described in Section I.
I. Section by Section Analysis
In the paragraphs that follow, DOE
describes the changes to each section of
10 CFR part 1004 that it is promulgating
in this final rule.
In § 1004.1, DOE adds a citation to the
FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, which
was enacted on June 30, 2016. The
citation is to Public Law 114–185, 130
Stat. 538.
In § 1004.2(b), DOE clarifies the
definition of ‘‘Authorizing or Denying
Official’’; clarifies that term in reference
to DOE’s National Nuclear Security
Administration (NNSA); and corrects
several typographical errors.
In § 1004.2(h)(1), DOE updates the
address of the Bonneville Power
Administration.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
94915
In § 1004.2(h)(5), DOE updates the
address of the Golden Field Office.
In § 1004.2(h)(6), DOE updates its
Headquarters address.
In § 1004.2(h)(8), DOE updates the
address of the National Nuclear Security
Administration.
In § 1004.2(h)(9), DOE updates the
address of the National Energy
Technology Laboratory.
In § 1004.2(h)(13), DOE updates the
address of the Office of Scientific and
Technical Information.
In § 1004.2(i), DOE revises the
reference to the DOE Organization Act,
Public Law 95–91, and clarifies the
definition of ‘‘General Counsel’’ in
reference to the NNSA General Counsel,
as defined by the National Nuclear
Security Administration Act, Public
Law 106–65.
In § 1004.2(m), DOE updates the
definition of ‘‘Representative of the
news media’’ to mirror the term as
defined in the FOIA, 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(A)(ii)(III).
In § 1004.2(n), DOE corrects a
typographical error.
In § 1004.2(p), DOE corrects
typographical errors.
In § 1004.3, DOE revises the language
to conform to the requirements of the
FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, which
amended 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) to require
that agencies maintain, for public
inspection in an electronic format, the
materials required by FOIA to be made
available for public inspection and
copying. The Act also requires that
agencies make available for public
inspection in an electronic format
records that have become or are likely
to become the subject of frequent
requests for substantially the same
records or that have been requested
three or more times. DOE will
implement this section consistent with
FOIA, as amended by the Act.
DOE deletes paragraphs (b) through
(d) of § 1004.3 and renumbers
§ 1004.3(e) as § 1004.3(b). Paragraphs (b)
and (c) pertained to reading rooms at
DOE field offices, and paragraph (d) was
reserved.
In renumbered § 1004.3(b), DOE
revises the reference to 5 U.S.C.
552(b)(2) by deleting ‘‘(2)’’ to make this
section consistent with the Supreme
Court decision in Milner v. Dep’t of the
Navy, 131 S. Ct. 1259 (2011), wherein
the Court clarified that FOIA Exemption
2, 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(2), prevents
disclosure only of material that relates
solely to the internal personnel rules
and practices of an agency. DOE’s
revision is also consistent with the
intent of FOIA, which promotes a policy
of disclosure unless disclosure is
prohibited by law or by any of the
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
94916
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
enumerated exemptions in 5 U.S.C.
552(b), not solely the exemption found
at § 552(b)(2).
In renumbered § 1004.3(b)(2), DOE
revises references to paragraphs
§ 1004.3(e)(1) and (e)(4) to refer to
renumbered paragraphs § 1004.3(b)(1)
and (b)(4), respectively.
In renumbered § 1004.3(b)(4), DOE
revises the reference to paragraph
§ 1004.3(e)(2) to refer to renumbered
paragraph § 1004.3(b)(2).
In § 1004.4(a), DOE revises the
language to conform to the requirements
of the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016,
which requires that agencies maintain,
for public inspection in an electronic
format, the materials required by FOIA
to be made available for public
inspection and copying. 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(2). DOE further revises
§ 1004.4(a) by clarifying that requests
can be submitted via facsimile or
electronically on an appropriate agency
Web site. DOE also corrects a
typographical error.
In § 1004.4(c)(2), DOE corrects a
typographical error.
In § 1004.5(b), DOE revises the
procedure for processing requests for
records to conform to the requirements
of the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016,
which requires that a written response
to the requester shall notify the
requester of the right to seek dispute
resolution services from the DOE FOIA
Public Liaison or the Office of
Government Information Services. 5
U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A)(i).
In § 1004.5(c), DOE corrects
grammatical errors in the procedure for
processing requests for records in the
custody of one or more Authorizing
Officials. No change to current practice
is intended.
In § 1004.5(d), DOE clarifies the
definition of ‘‘days’’ with respect to the
time limit for processing requests, to
eliminate any confusion with existing
§ 1004.12 on computation of time. No
change in the time limit is intended.
DOE also amends the reference to when
a request is ‘‘received’’ for purposes of
the time limits prescribed in § 1004.4(a).
In § 1004.5(d)(iii), DOE clarifies the
extension of time that can be granted
before a decision on a request can be
reached, consistent with existing
§ 1004.12. No change in the length of an
extension is intended. DOE also revises
this section to conform to the
requirements of the FOIA Improvement
Act of 2016, which provides that in
unusual circumstances, the agency shall
notify the requester of the right to seek
dispute resolution services from the
DOE FOIA Public Liaison or the Office
of Government Information Services. 5
U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(B)(i).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Dec 23, 2016
Jkt 241001
In § 1004.5(d)(4), DOE corrects a
typographical error.
In § 1004.5(d)(7), DOE extends the
time period during which a requester
can appeal a denial of expedited
processing to 90 days, as required by the
FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, which
prescribes the time period in which
adverse determinations may be
appealed. 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(A)(i)(III)(aa). DOE also corrects
a typographical error.
In § 1004.7(b), DOE corrects a
typographical error.
In § 1004.7(b)(4), DOE extends the
period during which requesters may
challenge the adequacy of search to 90
days, as required by the FOIA
Improvement Act of 2016. 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(A)(i)(III)(aa).
In § 1004.7(b)(5), DOE extends the
period during which requesters may
appeal a determination to deny records
to 90 days, as required by the FOIA
Improvement Act of 2016. 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(A)(i)(III)(aa).
In § 1004.8(a), DOE revises the time
limit for an appeal of an initial denial
of a request for records to 90 days, as
required by the FOIA Improvement Act
of 2016. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A)(i)(III)(aa).
DOE also corrects typographical errors
in this section.
In § 1004.8(b), DOE revises the
methods by which an appeal may be
delivered to the Office of Hearings and
Appeals and corrects typographical
errors.
In § 1004.8(c), DOE corrects
typographical errors.
In § 1004.8(d), DOE clarifies the
definition of ‘‘days’’ with respect to the
Appeal Authority’s time limit for acting
upon an appeal, consistent with existing
§ 1004.12. No change in the time limit
is intended.
In § 1004.8(d)(2), DOE clarifies the
means by which DOE notifies requesters
of an extension of the time to make an
appeal decision.
In § 1004.9(a), DOE updates the
reference to the Government Printing
Office to the Government Publishing
Office. DOE also corrects a grammatical
error.
In § 1004.9(a)(2), DOE revises the
language regarding computer searches
for records and removes the reference to
the central processing unit (CPU),
consistent with current practice.
In § 1004.9(a)(6)(i), DOE clarifies the
definition of ‘‘search time’’ and clarifies
how fees for search time are calculated,
consistent with current practices.
DOE adds paragraphs (a)(6)(iii)
through (iv)(cc) in § 1004.9 consistent
with the FOIA Improvement Act of
2016. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(vii). The
amendments in the Act enumerate
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
exceptions to DOE’s ability to assess
search fees for certain categories of
requesters when DOE has not complied
with the time limits described in
§ 1004.5(d). The Act also specifies that
DOE may assess search fees when it has
determined that unusual circumstances
apply; more than 5,000 pages are
necessary to respond to the request;
DOE has provided the requester with a
timely written notice; and DOE has
made no fewer than three good-faith
attempts to contact the requester to
discuss how the requester could
effectively limit the scope of the request
in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(B)(ii).
In § 1004.9(a)(8)(i), DOE corrects
typographical errors.
In § 1004.9(a)(8)(ii), DOE corrects
typographical errors.
In § 1004.9(b), DOE corrects a
typographical error.
In § 1004.9(b)(1), DOE corrects a
typographical error.
In § 1004.9(b)(5), DOE clarifies when
it will begin assessing interest charges
on the amount billed to requesters who
fail to pay fees. This change is
consistent with existing § 1004.12, and
no change in the administrative time
limits is intended.
In § 1004.9(b)(6), DOE clarifies that it
is not required to assess charges for
search time even if the search fails to
identify responsive records or if the
records located are exempt from
disclosure.
In § 1004.9(b)(8)(ii), DOE clarifies the
definition of ‘‘days’’ for purposes of
determining when a requester has failed
to pay a fee in a timely fashion for
purposes of exemption from making an
advance payment, by deleting the word
‘‘working’’ as superfluous. This section
also clarifies the definition of ‘‘days’’ for
purposes of administrative time limits
for certain actions when DOE receives
advance fee payments. This change is
consistent with existing § 1004.12, and
no change in the administrative time
limits is intended.
In § 1004.10(b)(5), DOE revises the
definition of exemption (b)(5) to
conform to the requirements of the
FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, which
states that the deliberative process
privilege shall not apply to records
created 25 years or more before the date
on which the records were requested. 5
U.S.C. 552(b)(5).
In § 1004.10(c), DOE revises its
obligations to reasonably segregate
nonexempt portions of records as
required by the FOIA Improvement Act
of 2016, which states that an agency
shall withhold information under 5
U.S.C. 552 only if the agency reasonably
foresees that disclosure would harm an
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
interest protected by an exemption
described in subsection (b) of 5 U.S.C.
552, or disclosure is prohibited by law.
5 U.S.C. 552(a)(8)(A)–(B). The section is
also revised to reflect the requirement in
the Act that agencies consider whether
partial disclosure of information is
possible whenever the agency
determines that a full disclosure of a
requested record is not possible and
take reasonable steps necessary to
segregate and release nonexempt
information.
In § 1004.11(g), DOE clarifies the
definition of ‘‘days’’ for purposes of the
time limit for informing submitters of
DOE’s intended discretionary release
prior to public disclosure of the
information to a requester. This change
is consistent with the existing
§ 1004.11(c), (d), and (e), and no change
in the administrative time limits is
intended.
II. Procedural Issues and Regulatory
Review
A. Review Under the Administrative
Procedure Act
DOE has determined that notice and
comment is not required pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B), which requires notice
and an opportunity for comment unless
an agency finds good cause that notice
and public procedures are
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest. In this
rulemaking, DOE is implementing
changes required by the FOIA
Improvement Act of 2016, Public Law
114–185 (June 30, 2016). DOE is
exercising no discretion in
implementing these statutory changes.
DOE is also correcting minor
typographical errors and making other
minor changes to, for example, reflect
the current DOE organizational
structure. As a result, seeking public
comment on these changes is
unnecessary. For these same reasons
DOE finds good cause to waive the 30day delay in effective date provided for
in 5 U.S.C. 553(d).
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
B. Review Under Executive Orders
12866 and 13563
This rule has been determined to be
not significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review,’’ 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993). As
a result, the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs within the Office of
Management and Budget did not review
this rule.
C. Review Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires preparation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Dec 23, 2016
Jkt 241001
of a final regulatory flexibility analysis
(FRFA) for any final rule where the
agency was first required by law to
publish a proposed rule for public
comment. As required by Executive
Order 13272, ‘‘Proper Consideration of
Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking,’’
67 FR 53461 (Aug. 16, 2002), DOE
published procedures and policies on
February 19, 2003, to ensure that the
potential impacts of its rules on small
entities are properly considered during
the rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990.
DOE has made its procedures and
policies available on the Office of the
General Counsel’s Web site (https://
energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel).
Because there was no requirement to
first publish this regulation for
comment, as discussed in section II.A.,
no analysis is required for purposes of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
D. Review Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act
This rule does not contain a
collection-of-information requirement
subject to review and approval by OMB
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA).
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
E. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
DOE has reviewed this final rule
under 10 CFR part 1021, DOE’s National
Environmental Policy Act Implementing
Procedures. DOE has determined that
the final rule fits within categorical
exclusion A.5 listed in Appendix A to
10 CFR part 1021, subpart D:
Rulemaking that interprets or amends
an existing rule or regulation and that
does not change the environmental
effect of the rule or regulation being
amended. Accordingly, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required. DOE’s CX determination for
this rule is available at https://
energy.gov/nepa/categorical-exclusioncx-determinations-cx.
F. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism.’’
64 FR 43255 (Aug. 10, 1999) imposes
certain requirements on Federal
agencies formulating and implementing
policies or regulations that preempt
State law or that have Federalism
implications. The Executive Order
requires agencies to examine the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
94917
constitutional and statutory authority
supporting any action that would limit
the policymaking discretion of the
States and to carefully assess the
necessity for such actions. The
Executive Order also requires agencies
to have an accountable process to
ensure meaningful and timely input by
State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have Federalism implications. On
March 14, 2000, DOE published a
statement of policy describing the
intergovernmental consultation process
it will follow in the development of
such regulations. 65 FR 13735. DOE has
examined this rule, which would
update DOE’s FOIA regulations for
consistency with the FOIA
Improvement Act of 2016, and has
determined that it would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, no
further action is required by Executive
Order 13132.
G. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing
regulations and the promulgation of
new regulations, section 3(a) of
Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil Justice
Reform,’’ imposes on Federal agencies
the general duty to adhere to the
following requirements: (1) eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; (3)
provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct rather than a general
standard; and (4) promote simplification
and burden reduction. 61 FR 4729 (Feb.
7, 1996). Regarding the review required
by section 3(a), section 3(b) of Executive
Order 12988 specifically requires that
Executive agencies make every
reasonable effort to ensure that the
regulation: (1) clearly specifies the
preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly
specifies any effect on existing Federal
law or regulation; (3) provides a clear
legal standard for affected conduct
while promoting simplification and
burden reduction; (4) specifies the
retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately
defines key terms; and (6) addresses
other important issues affecting clarity
and general draftsmanship under any
guidelines issued by the Attorney
General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order
12988 requires Executive agencies to
review regulations in light of applicable
standards in section 3(a) and section
3(b) to determine whether they are met
or it is unreasonable to meet one or
more of them. DOE has completed the
required review and determined that, to
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
94918
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
J. Review Under Executive Order 12630
the extent permitted by law, this final
rule meets the relevant standards of
Executive Order 12988.
H. Review Under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) requires
each Federal agency to assess the effects
of Federal regulatory actions on State,
local, and Tribal governments and the
private sector. Public Law 104–4, sec.
201 (codified at 2 U.S.C. 1531). For a
regulatory action likely to result in a
rule that may cause the expenditure by
State, local, and Tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100 million or more in any one year
(adjusted annually for inflation), section
202 of UMRA requires a Federal agency
to publish a written statement that
estimates the resulting costs, benefits,
and other effects on the national
economy. (2 U.S.C. 1532(a), (b)) The
UMRA also requires a Federal agency to
develop an effective process to permit
timely input by elected officers of State,
local, and Tribal governments on a
‘‘significant intergovernmental
mandate,’’ and requires an agency plan
for giving notice and opportunity for
timely input to potentially affected
small governments before establishing
any requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect them. On
March 18, 1997, DOE published a
statement of policy on its process for
intergovernmental consultation under
UMRA. 62 FR 12820. DOE’s policy
statement is also available at https://
energy.gov/sites/prod/files/gcprod/
documents/umra_97.pdf.
DOE has concluded that this final rule
will not result in the expenditure by
States, tribal, or local governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million in any one year. As a
result, no assessment or analysis is
required under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Public Law 105–277) requires
Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule
that may affect family well-being. This
rule would not have any impact on the
autonomy or integrity of the family as
an institution. Accordingly, DOE has
concluded that it is not necessary to
prepare a Family Policymaking
Assessment.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Dec 23, 2016
Jkt 241001
Pursuant to Executive Order 12630,
‘‘Governmental Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights’’ 53 FR 8859 (March 18, 1988),
DOE has determined that this rule
would not result in any takings that
might require compensation under the
Fifth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution.
K. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516, note)
provides for Federal agencies to review
most disseminations of information to
the public under information quality
guidelines established by each agency
pursuant to general guidelines issued by
OMB. OMB’s guidelines were published
at 67 FR 8452 (Feb. 22, 2002), and
DOE’s guidelines were published at 67
FR 62446 (Oct. 7, 2002). DOE has
reviewed this final rule under the OMB
and DOE guidelines and has concluded
that it is consistent with applicable
policies in those guidelines.
L. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use,’’ 66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to
prepare and submit to OIRA at OMB, a
Statement of Energy Effects for any
significant energy action. A ‘‘significant
energy action’’ is defined as any action
by an agency that promulgates or is
expected to lead to promulgation of a
final rule, and that: (1) is a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866, or any successor order; and (2)
is likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, or (3) is designated by the
Administrator of OIRA as a significant
energy action. For any significant energy
action, the agency must give a detailed
statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use
should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the
action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use.
DOE has concluded that this
regulatory action, which sets forth
amended procedures by which the
public may request records from DOE
offices under the FOIA, and the policies
and procedures by which DOE will
provide such records to members of the
public, is not a significant energy action
because the final rule is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12866 and is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy, nor has it
been designated as such by the
Administrator at OIRA. Accordingly,
DOE has not prepared a Statement of
Energy Effects on this final rule.
M. Congressional Notification
As required by 5 U.S.C. 801, DOE will
report to Congress on the promulgation
of this rule prior to its effective date.
The report will state that it has been
determined that the rule is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 1004
Freedom of Information.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
21, 2016.
Ingrid Kolb,
Director, Office of Management.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, amend part 1004 of Title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations as set
forth below:
PART 1004—FREEDOM OF
INFORMATION ACT (FOIA)
1. The authority citation for part 1004
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552.
2. Section 1004.1 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 1004.1
Purpose and scope.
This part contains the regulations of
the Department of Energy (DOE) that
implement Freedom of Information
(FOIA) 5 U.S.C. 552, Public Law 89–
487, as amended by Public Law 93–502,
88 Stat. 1561, by Public Law 94–409, 90
Stat. 1241, by Public Law 99–570, 100
Stat. 3207–49, by Public Law 104–231,
110 Stat. 3048, by Public Law 110–175,
121 Stat. 2524, Public Law 111–83
§ 564, 123 Stat. 2142, 2184, and by
Public Law 114–185, 130 Stat. 538. The
regulations of this part provide
information concerning the procedures
by which records may be requested from
all DOE offices, excluding the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
Records of DOE made available
pursuant to the requirements of 5 U.S.C.
552 shall be furnished to members of
the public as prescribed by this part.
Persons seeking information or records
of DOE may find it helpful to consult
with a DOE FOIA Officer before
invoking the formal procedures set out
below. To the extent permitted by other
laws, DOE will make records available
which it is authorized to withhold
under 5 U.S.C. 552 whenever it
determines that such disclosure is in the
public interest.
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
3. Section 1004.2 is amended by
revising paragraphs (b), (h)(1), (h)(5),
(h)(6), (h)(8), (h)(9), (h)(13), (i), (m) and
(n) to read as follows:
■
§ 1004.2
Definitions.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Authorizing or Denying Official
means that DOE officer having custody
of or responsibility for records requested
under 5 U.S.C. 552. In DOE
Headquarters, the term refers to The
Freedom of Information Act Officer and
officials who report directly to either the
Office of the Secretary or a Secretarial
Officer as defined. In the field offices,
the term refers to the head of a field
location identified in paragraph (h) of
this section and the heads of field
offices to which they provide
administrative support and have
delegated this authority. In the National
Nuclear Security Administration
(NNSA), the term refers to the official
appointed at such location as identified
in paragraph (h)(8) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(1) Bonneville Power Administration,
P.O. Box 3621CHI–7, Portland, OR
97208–3621.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Golden Field Office, 15013 Denver
West Parkway, Mail Stop RSF DOE
Golden, CO 80401.
(6) Headquarters, Department of
Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) National Nuclear Security
Administration Albuquerque Complex,
P.O. Box 5400, Albuquerque, NM 87185.
(9) National Energy Technology
Laboratory, 626 Cochrans Mill Road,
P.O. Box 10940, Pittsburgh, PA 15236–
0940.
*
*
*
*
*
(13) Office of Scientific and Technical
Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN
37830.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) General Counsel means the General
Counsel provided for in section 202(e)
of the DOE Organization Act, or any
DOE attorney designated by the General
Counsel as having responsibility for
counseling the Department on Freedom
of Information Act matters. In the
NNSA, the term refers to the NNSA
General Counsel, or any attorney
designated by the NNSA General
Counsel for counseling the NNSA on
Freedom of Information Act matters, as
provided for in section 3217 of the
National Nuclear Security
Administration Act, 50 U.S.C. 2407,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Dec 23, 2016
Jkt 241001
Pub. L. 106–65. The NNSA General
Counsel is not a Secretarial Officer.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) Representative of the news media
refers to any person or entity that
gathers information of potential interest
to a segment of the public, uses its
editorial skills to turn the raw materials
into a distinct work, and distributes that
work to an audience. The term ‘‘news’’
means information that is about current
events or that would be of current
interest to the public. Examples of
news-media entities are television or
radio stations broadcasting to the public
at large and publishers of periodicals
(but only if such entities qualify as
disseminators of ‘‘news’’) who make
their products available for purchase by
or subscription by or free distribution to
the general public. These examples are
not all-inclusive. Moreover, as methods
of news delivery evolve (for example,
the adoption of the electronic
dissemination of newspapers through
telecommunications services), such
alternative media shall be considered to
be news-media entities. A freelance
journalist shall be regarded as working
for a news-media entity if the journalist
can demonstrate a solid basis for
expecting publication through that
entity, whether or not the journalist is
actually employed by the entity. A
publication contract would present a
solid basis for such an expectation; DOE
may also consider the past publication
record of the requester in making such
a determination.
(n) Review refers to the process of
examining documents located in
response to a commercial use request
(see paragraph (c) of this section) to
determine whether any portion of any
document located is permitted to be
withheld. It also includes processing
any documents for disclosure, e.g.,
doing all that is necessary to excise
them and otherwise prepare them for
release. Review does not include time
spent resolving general legal or policy
issues regarding the application of
exemptions.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Section 1004.3 is amended by:
■ a. Revising the section heading and
paragraph (a);
■ b. Removing paragraphs (b) through
(d);
■ c. Redesignating paragraph (e) as
paragraph (b);
■ d. Revising newly designated
paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2), and (b)(4).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 1004.3 Public inspection in an electronic
format and policy on contractor records.
(a) DOE will maintain, for public
inspection in an electronic format, the
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
94919
materials which are required by 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(2) to be made available for public
inspection and copying. An electronic
public reading room can be accessed via
www.energy.gov and nnsa.energy.gov.
(b) Contractor records. (1) When a
contract with DOE provides that any
records acquired or generated by the
contractor in its performance of the
contract shall be the property of the
Government, DOE will make available
to the public such records that are in the
possession of the Government or the
contractor, unless the records are
exempt from public disclosure under 5
U.S.C. 552(b).
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(1)
of this section, records owned by the
Government under contract that contain
information or technical data having
commercial value as defined in
paragraph (b)(4) of this section or
information for which the contractor
claims a privilege recognized under
Federal or State law shall be made
available only when they are in the
possession of the Government and not
otherwise exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552(b).
*
*
*
*
*
(4) For purposes of paragraph (b)(2) of
this section, ‘‘technical data and
information having commercial value’’
means technical data and related
commercial or financial information
which is generated or acquired by a
contractor and possessed by that
contractor, and whose disclosure the
contractor certifies to DOE would cause
competitive harm to the commercial
value or use of the information or data.
■ 6. Section 1004.4 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a) and (c)(2) to read
as follows:
§ 1004.4
Elements of a request.
(a) Addressed to the FOIA Officer. A
request for a record of DOE which is not
available for public inspection in an
electronic format, as described in
§ 1004.3, shall be: Addressed to the
Headquarters or appropriate field FOIA
Officer at DOE at a location listed in
§ 1004.2(h), and both the envelope and
the letter shall be clearly marked
‘‘Freedom of Information Act Request;’’
or submitted via facsimile or
electronically, on an appropriate agency
Web site. Except as provided in
paragraph (e) of this section, a request
will be considered to be received by
DOE for purposes of 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)
and the 20-day response period will
start upon actual receipt by the
appropriate FOIA Officer, or not later
than ten days after receipt by a
designated FOIA Officer at any location
in § 1004.2(h). Requests delivered after
regular business hours are considered
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
94920
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
received on the next regular business
day.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) Assistance in reformulating a nonconforming request. If a request does not
reasonably describe the records sought,
as specified in paragraph (c)(1) of this
section, the DOE response will specify
the reasons why the request failed to
meet the requirements of paragraph
(c)(1) of this section and will invite the
requester to confer with knowledgeable
DOE personnel in an attempt to restate
the request or reduce the request to
manageable proportions by
reformulation or by agreeing on an
orderly procedure for the production of
the records. If DOE responds that
additional information is needed from
the requester to render records
reasonably described, any reformulated
request submitted by the requester will
be treated as an initial request for
purposes of calculating the time for DOE
response.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Section 1004.5 is amended by:
■ a. Revising paragraphs (b) and (c);
■ b. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (d)(1), and revising
paragraphs (d)(1)(iii), (d)(4), and(d)(7).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 1004.5
Processing requests for records.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The Authorizing Official will
promptly identify and review the
records encompassed by the request.
The Authorizing Official or FOIA
Officer will prepare a written
response—
(1) Granting the request;
(2) Denying the request;
(3) Granting/denying it in part;
(4) Replying with a response stating
that the request has been referred to
another agency under § 1004.4(f) or
§ 1004.6(e); or
(5) Informing the requester that
responsive records cannot be located or
do not exist. The written response shall
also notify the requester of the right to
seek dispute resolution services from
the DOE FOIA Public Liaison(s) or the
Office of Government Information
Services.
(c) Where a request involves records
that are in the custody of or are the
concern of more than one Authorizing
Official, the FOIA Officer will identify
all concerned Authorizing Officials that
can reasonably be expected to have
custody of the requested records. Upon
identification of the appropriate
Authorizing Officials, the FOIA Officer
will forward them a copy of the request
and a request for action. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Dec 23, 2016
Jkt 241001
Authorizing Officials will prepare a
DOE response to the requester
consistent with paragraph (b) of this
section. The response will identify the
Authorizing Official having
responsibility for the determination to
release or deny records.
(d) Time for processing requests. (1)
Action pursuant to paragraph (b) of this
section will be taken within 20 days of
a request for DOE records being received
(‘‘received’’ is defined in § 1004.4(a)),
except that,
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) If unusual circumstances require
an extension of time before a decision
on a request can be reached and the
person requesting records is promptly
informed in writing by the Authorizing
Official or FOIA Officer of the reasons
for such extension and the date on
which a determination is expected to be
dispatched, then the Authorizing
Official or FOIA Officer may take an
extension not to exceed ten days. In
cases where the Authorizing Official
determines that unusual circumstances
exist, the requester shall be notified in
writing of the right to seek dispute
resolution services from the DOE FOIA
Public Liaison(s) or the Office of
Government Information Services.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) If no determination has been made
at the end of the 20-day period, or the
last extension thereof, the requester may
deem his administrative remedies to
have been exhausted, giving rise to a
right of review in a district court of the
United States as specified in 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4). When no determination can
be made within the applicable time
limit, the responsible Authorizing
Official or FOIA Officer will
nevertheless continue to process the
request. If DOE is unable to provide a
response within the statutory period,
the Authorizing Official or FOIA Officer
will inform the requester of the reason
for the delay; the date on which a
determination may be expected to be
made; and the requester’s right to seek
remedy through the courts, but will ask
the requester to forego such action until
a determination is made.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) A determination to grant or deny
a request for expedited processing will
be made by the appropriate FOIA
Officer within ten days after receipt of
the request. The requester will be
notified of the determination and
informed that any denial may be
appealed within 90 calendar days to the
Office of Hearings and Appeals.
■ 8. Section 1004.7 is amended by:
■ a. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (b);
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
b. Revising paragraphs (b)(4) and
(b)(5).
The revisions read as follows:
■
§ 1004.7 Responses by authorizing
officials; Form and content.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Form of denial. A reply denying a
request for a record will be in writing.
It will be signed by a FOIA Officer or
the Denying Official pursuant to
§ 1004.5 (b) or (c) and will include:
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Adequacy of search. Although a
determination that no such record is
known to exist is not a denial, the
requester will be informed that a
challenge may be made to the adequacy
of the search by appealing within 90
calendar days to the Office of Hearings
and Appeals.
(5) Administrative appeal. A
statement that the determination to
deny documents made within the
statutory time period may be appealed
within 90 calendar days to the Office of
Hearings and Appeals.
■ 9. Section 1004.8 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d)(1),
and (d)(2) to read as follows:
§ 1004.8
Appeal of initial denial.
(a) Appeal to Office of Hearings and
Appeals. When the Authorizing or
Denying Official or FOIA Officer has
denied a request for records in whole or
in part or has responded that there are
no documents responsive to the request
consistent with § 1004.4(d), or when the
FOIA Officer has denied a request for
expedited processing consistent with
§ 1004.5(d) or for waiver of fees
consistent with § 1004.9, the requester
may, within 90 calendar days of its
receipt, appeal the determination to the
Office of Hearings and Appeals.
(b) Elements of appeal. The appeal
must be in writing, addressed to the
Director, Office of Hearings and
Appeals, Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–1615 and both
the envelope and letter must be clearly
marked ‘‘Freedom of Information Act
Appeal.’’ The appeal may be delivered
by U.S Mail, commercial delivery
service, or by electronic mail to
OHA.Filings@hq.doe.gov. The appeal
must contain a concise statement of the
grounds upon which it is brought and
a description of the relief sought. It
should also include a discussion of all
relevant authorities, including, but not
limited to, DOE (and predecessor
agencies) rulings, regulations,
interpretations and decisions on
appeals, and any judicial
determinations being relied upon to
support the appeal. A copy of the letter
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
containing the determination which is
being appealed must be submitted with
the appeal. The appeal should also
provide a telephone number, electronic
mail address, or other means for
communicating with the requester
during business hours.
(c) Receipt of appeal. An appeal will
be considered to be received for
purposes of 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6) upon
receipt by the Appeal Authority.
Documents delivered after the regular
business hours of the Office of Hearings
and Appeals are considered received on
the next regular business day.
(d) Action within 20 days. (1) The
Appeal Authority will act upon the
appeal within 20 days of its receipt,
except that if unusual circumstances (as
defined in § 1004.5(d)(2)) require an
extension of time before a decision on
a request can be reached, the Appeal
Authority may extend the time for final
action for an additional ten days less the
number of days of any statutory
extension which may have been taken
by the Authorizing Official during the
period of initial determination.
(2) The requester must be promptly
notified in writing of the extension,
setting forth the reasons for the
extension, and the date on which a
determination is expected to be issued.
Notification will be sent by electronic
mail, when possible, or by letter.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. Section 1004.9 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a) introductory
text, (a)(2), (a)(6), (a)(8) introductory
text, (a)(8)(i) introductory text, (a)(8)(ii)
introductory text, (b) introductory text,
(b)(1), (b)(5), (b)(6) and (b)(8)(ii) to read
as follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 1004.9
Fees for providing records.
(a) Fees to be charged. DOE may
charge fees that recoup the full
allowable direct costs incurred. DOE
will use the most efficient and least
costly methods to comply with requests
for documents made under FOIA. DOE
may contract with private sector
services to locate, reproduce and
disseminate records in response to FOIA
requests when that is the most efficient
and least costly method. When doing so,
however, DOE will ensure that the
ultimate cost to the requester is no
greater than it would be if DOE itself
had performed these tasks. In no case
will DOE contract out responsibilities
which FOIA provides that only the
agency may discharge, such as
determining the applicability of an
exemption, or determining whether to
waive or reduce fees, which are
determinations by Authorizing Officials
or FOIA Officers. Where DOE can
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Dec 23, 2016
Jkt 241001
identify documents that are responsive
to a request and are maintained for
public distribution by other agencies
such as the National Technical
Information Service and the
Government Publishing Office, the
FOIA Officer will inform requesters of
the procedures to obtain records from
those sources.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Computer searches for records.
DOE will charge at the actual direct cost
of providing the service.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Restrictions on assessing fees. (i)
With the exception of requesters seeking
documents for a commercial use
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(iv),
DOE will provide the first 100 pages of
duplication and the first two hours of
search time without charge. Moreover,
DOE will not charge fees to any
requester, including commercial use
requesters, if the cost of collecting the
fee would be equal to or greater than the
fee itself. These provisions work
together, so that except for commercial
use requesters, DOE will not begin to
assess fees until after the Department
has provided the free search and
reproduction. For example, if a request
involves two hours and ten minutes of
search time and results in 105 pages of
documents, DOE will charge for only
ten minutes of search time and only five
pages of reproduction. If this cost is
equal to or less than $15.00, the amount
DOE incurs to process a fee collection,
no charges would be assessed. For
purposes of these restrictions on
assessment of fees, the word ‘‘pages’’
refers to paper copies of a standard
agency size which will be normally be
‘‘81⁄2 × 11’’ or ‘‘11 × 14.’’ Thus,
requesters would not be entitled to 100
microfiche or 100 computer disks, for
example. A microfiche containing the
equivalent of 100 pages or 100 pages of
computer printout, however, might meet
the terms of the restriction. Similarly,
the term ‘‘search time’’ is based on a
manual or electronic search. To apply
this term, DOE will calculate the hourly
rates of the subject matter expert and/or
FOIA analysts conducting the search
plus 16 percent.
(ii) When unusual or exceptional
circumstances do not apply and time
limits specified in FOIA are not met,
DOE will not charge any search fees, or
duplication fees for educational and
non-commercial scientific institution
requesters and requesters who are
representatives of the news media.
(iii) Except as provided in paragraph
(a)(6)(iv) of this section, DOE will not
assess any search fees (or in the case of
a requester who is an educational or
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
94921
noncommercial scientific institution,
whose purpose is scholarly or scientific
research; or a representative of the news
media, duplication fees) under this
paragraph (a)(6)(iii) if DOE has failed to
comply with any time limit under
§ 1004.5(d).
(iv)(A) If DOE has determined that
unusual circumstances apply (as the
term is defined in § 1004.5(d)(2)) and
DOE provided a timely written notice to
the requester in accordance with
§ 1004.5(d)(1)(iii), a failure described in
paragraph (a)(6)(iii) of this section is
excused for an additional 10 days. If
DOE fails to comply with the extended
time limit, DOE may not assess any
search fees (or in the case of a requester
described under paragraph (a)(6)(iii) of
this section, duplication fees).
(B) If DOE has determined that
unusual circumstances (as that term is
defined in § 1004.5(d)(2)) apply and
more than 5,000 pages are necessary to
respond to the request, DOE may charge
search fees (or in the case of a requester
described under paragraph (a)(6)(iii) of
this section, duplication fees) if DOE
has provided a timely written notice to
the requester in accordance with
§ 1004.5(d)(1)(iii) and DOE has
discussed with the requester via written
mail, electronic mail, or telephone (or
made not less than three good-faith
attempts to do so) how the requester
could effectively limit the scope of the
request in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(B)(ii).
(C) If a court has determined that
unusual circumstances exist (as that
term is defined in § 1004.5(d)(2)), a
failure described in paragraph (a)(6)(iv)
of this of this section shall be excused
for the length of time provided by the
court order.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) Waiving or reducing fees. DOE will
furnish documents without charge or at
reduced charges if disclosure of the
information is in the public interest
because it is likely to contribute
significantly to public understanding of
the operations or activities of the
government and disclosure is not
primarily in the commercial interest of
the requester. This fee waiver standard
thus sets forth two basic requirements,
both of which must be satisfied before
fees will be waived or reduced. First it
must be established that disclosure of
the requested information is in the
public interest because it is likely to
contribute significantly to public
understanding of the operations or
activities of the government. Second, it
must be established that disclosure of
the information is not primarily in the
commercial interest of the requester.
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
94922
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
When these requirements are satisfied,
based upon information supplied by a
requester or otherwise made known to
DOE, the waiver or reduction of a FOIA
fee will be granted. In determining
when fees should be waived or reduced
the appropriate FOIA Officer should
address the following two criteria:
(i) That disclosure of the information
‘‘is in the public interest because it is
likely to contribute significantly to
public understanding of the operations
or activities of the government.’’ Factors
to be considered in applying this criteria
include but are not limited to:
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) If disclosure of the information ‘‘is
not primarily in the commercial interest
of the requester.’’ Factors to be
considered in applying this criteria
include but are not limited to:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Fees to be charged—categories of
requesters. There are four categories of
FOIA requesters: Commercial use
requesters; educational and noncommercial scientific institutions;
representatives of the news media; and
all other requesters. The FOIA Officers
will make determinations regarding
categories of requesters as defined at
§ 1004.2. The Headquarters FOIA
Officers will assist field FOIA Officers
in categorizing requesters, and will
resolve conflicting categorizations.
FOIA prescribes specific levels of fees
for each of these categories:
(1) Commercial use requesters. When
DOE receives a request for documents
which appears to be for commercial use,
charges will be assessed to recover the
full direct costs of searching for,
reviewing for release, and duplicating
the records sought. Commercial use
requesters are not entitled to two hours
of free search time nor 100 free pages of
reproduction of documents. DOE will
recover the cost of searching for and
reviewing records even if there is
ultimately no disclosure of records.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Charging interest—notice and rate.
Interest will be charged to those
requesters who fail to pay fees. DOE will
begin to assess interest charges on the
amount billed on the 31st calendar day
following the day on which the billing
was sent to the requester. Interest will
be at the rate prescribed in section 3717
of Title 31 U.S.C. and will accrue from
the date of the billing.
(6) Charges for unsuccessful search.
DOE may assess charges for time spent
searching even if the search fails to
identify responsive records or if records
located are determined to be exempt
from disclosure. If DOE estimates that
search charges are likely to exceed $25,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Dec 23, 2016
Jkt 241001
it will notify the requester of the
estimated amount of fees, unless the
requester has indicated in advance his
willingness to pay fees as high as those
anticipated. Such a notice will offer the
requester the opportunity to confer with
agency personnel in order to
reformulate the request to reduce the
cost of the request.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) * * *
(ii)(A) A requester has previously
failed to pay a fee in a timely fashion
(i.e., within 30 calendar days of the date
of the billing). DOE will require the
requester to pay the full amount
delinquent plus any applicable interest
as provided in paragraph (b)(5) of this
section, or demonstrate that he or she
has, in fact, paid the delinquent fee; and
to make an advance payment of the full
amount of the estimated current fee
before we begin to process a new
request or a pending request from that
requester.
(B) When DOE acts under paragraphs
(b)(8) (i) or (ii) of this section, the
administrative time limits prescribed in
section (a)(6) of FOIA (i.e., 20 days from
receipt of initial requests and 20 days
from receipt of appeals from initial
denials, plus permissible extensions of
these time limits) will begin only after
DOE has received fee payments
described.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. Section 1004.10 is amended by
revising paragraphs (b)(5) and (c) to read
as follows:
§ 1004.10
Exemptions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(5) Inter-agency or intra-agency
memoranda or letters that would not be
available by law to a party other than an
agency in litigation with the agency,
provided that the deliberative process
privilege shall not apply to records
created 25 years or more before the date
on which the records were requested;
*
*
*
*
*
(c) DOE shall withhold information
under this section only if—
(1) The agency reasonably foresees
that disclosure would harm an interest
protected by an exemption described in
paragraph (b) of this section; or
(2) Disclosure is prohibited by law.
DOE shall consider whether partial
disclosure of information is possible
whenever the agency determines that a
full disclosure of a requested record is
not possible and take reasonable steps
necessary to segregate and release
nonexempt information. Nothing in this
paragraph requires disclosure of
information that is otherwise prohibited
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
from disclosure by law, or otherwise
exempted from disclosure by paragraph
(b)(3) of this section.
■ 12. Section 1004.11 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a) and (g) to read as
follows:
§ 1004.11 Handling information of a private
business, foreign government, or an
international organization.
(a) Whenever a document submitted
to DOE contains information which may
be exempt from public disclosure, it
will be handled in accordance with the
procedures in this section. While DOE
is responsible for making the final
determination with regard to the
disclosure or nondisclosure of
information contained in requested
documents, DOE will consider the
submitter’s views (as that term is
defined in this section) in making its
determination. Nothing in this section
will preclude the submission of a
submitter’s views at the time of the
submission of the document to which
the views relate, or at any other time.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) When DOE, in the course of
responding to a Freedom of Information
Act request, determines that information
exempt from the mandatory public
disclosure requirements of the Freedom
of Information Act is to be released in
accordance with § 1004.1, DOE will
notify the submitter of the intended
discretionary release no less than seven
(7) calendar days prior to the intended
public disclosure of the information in
question.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2016–31337 Filed 12–23–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 249
[Docket No. R–1525; Regulation WW]
RIN 7100 AE–39
Liquidity Coverage Ratio: Public
Disclosure Requirements; Extension of
Compliance Period for Certain
Companies To Meet the Liquidity
Coverage Ratio Requirements
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (Board) is
adopting a final rule to implement
public disclosure requirements for the
liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) rule. The
final rule applies to all depository
institution holding companies and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 27, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 94915-94922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31337]
[[Page 94915]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 1004
RIN 1901-AB41
Revision of the Department of Energy's Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) Regulations
AGENCY: FOIA Program, Office of Public Information, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issues a final rule
amending its regulations that prescribe the procedures by which the
public may request records pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) from DOE offices, excluding the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC). This final rule makes changes to DOE's regulations
to reflect statutory amendments made to the FOIA by the FOIA
Improvement Act of 2016, and to make minor grammatical and other
editorial changes throughout the regulations. The editorial changes
clarify various defined terms, update the internal procedures for
processing records requested under FOIA, and reflect minor changes to
DOE's internal organizational structure.
DATES: This rule is effective December 27, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Alexander Morris, FOIA Officer,
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Public Information, Mail Stop MA-
46, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-5955. Email:
Alexander.Morris@hq.doe.gov.
Ms. Elizabeth Kohl, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the
General Counsel, GC-33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-7796. Email:
Elizabeth.Kohl@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 10 CFR part 1004 contains DOE's regulations
that implement the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552. The regulations provide
information concerning the procedures by which the public may request
records from DOE offices, and the policies and procedures by which DOE
provides such records to members of the public. DOE previously amended
its regulations in 1988 (53 FR 15660, May 3, 1988) and 2014 (79 FR
22855, Apr. 25, 2014). DOE is now updating its regulations to implement
the requirements of the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, Public Law 114-
185 (June 30, 2016) (Act). The Act requires that Federal agencies
review and update their FOIA regulations in accordance with its
provisions. The Act addresses a range of procedural issues, including a
requirement that agencies make available for public inspection in an
electronic format records that have become or are likely to become the
subject of subsequent requests for substantially the same records, or
records that have been requested three or more times. The Act also
requires that agencies provide a minimum of 90 days for requesters to
file an administrative appeal following an adverse determination, and
that they provide dispute resolution services at various times
throughout the FOIA process. The Act also codifies the U.S. Department
of Justice's ``foreseeable harm'' standard, specifying that an agency
shall withhold information only if the agency reasonably foresees that
disclosure would harm an interest protected by an exemption described
in 5 U.S.C. 552(b) or if disclosure is prohibited by law. This
provision also requires that agencies consider whether partial
disclosure is possible if full disclosure is not possible, and that
agencies take reasonable steps to segregate and release nonexempt
information. The Act also amends Exemption 5 to specify that the
deliberative process privilege does not apply to records created 25
years or more before the date of the request; creates a new ``FOIA
Council'' charged with, among other things, developing recommendations
for increased agency compliance and efficiency; and adds two new
elements to agency Annual FOIA Reports (i.e., the number of times an
agency has denied a request for records under 5 U.S.C. 552(c) and the
number of records made available for public inspection under 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(2)).
DOE also makes additional revisions to update, clarify, and
streamline the language in several procedural provisions, as described
in Section I.
I. Section by Section Analysis
In the paragraphs that follow, DOE describes the changes to each
section of 10 CFR part 1004 that it is promulgating in this final rule.
In Sec. 1004.1, DOE adds a citation to the FOIA Improvement Act of
2016, which was enacted on June 30, 2016. The citation is to Public Law
114-185, 130 Stat. 538.
In Sec. 1004.2(b), DOE clarifies the definition of ``Authorizing
or Denying Official''; clarifies that term in reference to DOE's
National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); and corrects several
typographical errors.
In Sec. 1004.2(h)(1), DOE updates the address of the Bonneville
Power Administration.
In Sec. 1004.2(h)(5), DOE updates the address of the Golden Field
Office.
In Sec. 1004.2(h)(6), DOE updates its Headquarters address.
In Sec. 1004.2(h)(8), DOE updates the address of the National
Nuclear Security Administration.
In Sec. 1004.2(h)(9), DOE updates the address of the National
Energy Technology Laboratory.
In Sec. 1004.2(h)(13), DOE updates the address of the Office of
Scientific and Technical Information.
In Sec. 1004.2(i), DOE revises the reference to the DOE
Organization Act, Public Law 95-91, and clarifies the definition of
``General Counsel'' in reference to the NNSA General Counsel, as
defined by the National Nuclear Security Administration Act, Public Law
106-65.
In Sec. 1004.2(m), DOE updates the definition of ``Representative
of the news media'' to mirror the term as defined in the FOIA, 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(A)(ii)(III).
In Sec. 1004.2(n), DOE corrects a typographical error.
In Sec. 1004.2(p), DOE corrects typographical errors.
In Sec. 1004.3, DOE revises the language to conform to the
requirements of the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, which amended 5
U.S.C. 552(a)(2) to require that agencies maintain, for public
inspection in an electronic format, the materials required by FOIA to
be made available for public inspection and copying. The Act also
requires that agencies make available for public inspection in an
electronic format records that have become or are likely to become the
subject of frequent requests for substantially the same records or that
have been requested three or more times. DOE will implement this
section consistent with FOIA, as amended by the Act.
DOE deletes paragraphs (b) through (d) of Sec. 1004.3 and
renumbers Sec. 1004.3(e) as Sec. 1004.3(b). Paragraphs (b) and (c)
pertained to reading rooms at DOE field offices, and paragraph (d) was
reserved.
In renumbered Sec. 1004.3(b), DOE revises the reference to 5
U.S.C. 552(b)(2) by deleting ``(2)'' to make this section consistent
with the Supreme Court decision in Milner v. Dep't of the Navy, 131 S.
Ct. 1259 (2011), wherein the Court clarified that FOIA Exemption 2, 5
U.S.C. 552(b)(2), prevents disclosure only of material that relates
solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency.
DOE's revision is also consistent with the intent of FOIA, which
promotes a policy of disclosure unless disclosure is prohibited by law
or by any of the
[[Page 94916]]
enumerated exemptions in 5 U.S.C. 552(b), not solely the exemption
found at Sec. 552(b)(2).
In renumbered Sec. 1004.3(b)(2), DOE revises references to
paragraphs Sec. 1004.3(e)(1) and (e)(4) to refer to renumbered
paragraphs Sec. 1004.3(b)(1) and (b)(4), respectively.
In renumbered Sec. 1004.3(b)(4), DOE revises the reference to
paragraph Sec. 1004.3(e)(2) to refer to renumbered paragraph Sec.
1004.3(b)(2).
In Sec. 1004.4(a), DOE revises the language to conform to the
requirements of the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, which requires that
agencies maintain, for public inspection in an electronic format, the
materials required by FOIA to be made available for public inspection
and copying. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2). DOE further revises Sec. 1004.4(a) by
clarifying that requests can be submitted via facsimile or
electronically on an appropriate agency Web site. DOE also corrects a
typographical error.
In Sec. 1004.4(c)(2), DOE corrects a typographical error.
In Sec. 1004.5(b), DOE revises the procedure for processing
requests for records to conform to the requirements of the FOIA
Improvement Act of 2016, which requires that a written response to the
requester shall notify the requester of the right to seek dispute
resolution services from the DOE FOIA Public Liaison or the Office of
Government Information Services. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A)(i).
In Sec. 1004.5(c), DOE corrects grammatical errors in the
procedure for processing requests for records in the custody of one or
more Authorizing Officials. No change to current practice is intended.
In Sec. 1004.5(d), DOE clarifies the definition of ``days'' with
respect to the time limit for processing requests, to eliminate any
confusion with existing Sec. 1004.12 on computation of time. No change
in the time limit is intended. DOE also amends the reference to when a
request is ``received'' for purposes of the time limits prescribed in
Sec. 1004.4(a).
In Sec. 1004.5(d)(iii), DOE clarifies the extension of time that
can be granted before a decision on a request can be reached,
consistent with existing Sec. 1004.12. No change in the length of an
extension is intended. DOE also revises this section to conform to the
requirements of the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, which provides that
in unusual circumstances, the agency shall notify the requester of the
right to seek dispute resolution services from the DOE FOIA Public
Liaison or the Office of Government Information Services. 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(B)(i).
In Sec. 1004.5(d)(4), DOE corrects a typographical error.
In Sec. 1004.5(d)(7), DOE extends the time period during which a
requester can appeal a denial of expedited processing to 90 days, as
required by the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, which prescribes the time
period in which adverse determinations may be appealed. 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(A)(i)(III)(aa). DOE also corrects a typographical error.
In Sec. 1004.7(b), DOE corrects a typographical error.
In Sec. 1004.7(b)(4), DOE extends the period during which
requesters may challenge the adequacy of search to 90 days, as required
by the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A)(i)(III)(aa).
In Sec. 1004.7(b)(5), DOE extends the period during which
requesters may appeal a determination to deny records to 90 days, as
required by the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016. 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(A)(i)(III)(aa).
In Sec. 1004.8(a), DOE revises the time limit for an appeal of an
initial denial of a request for records to 90 days, as required by the
FOIA Improvement Act of 2016. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A)(i)(III)(aa). DOE
also corrects typographical errors in this section.
In Sec. 1004.8(b), DOE revises the methods by which an appeal may
be delivered to the Office of Hearings and Appeals and corrects
typographical errors.
In Sec. 1004.8(c), DOE corrects typographical errors.
In Sec. 1004.8(d), DOE clarifies the definition of ``days'' with
respect to the Appeal Authority's time limit for acting upon an appeal,
consistent with existing Sec. 1004.12. No change in the time limit is
intended.
In Sec. 1004.8(d)(2), DOE clarifies the means by which DOE
notifies requesters of an extension of the time to make an appeal
decision.
In Sec. 1004.9(a), DOE updates the reference to the Government
Printing Office to the Government Publishing Office. DOE also corrects
a grammatical error.
In Sec. 1004.9(a)(2), DOE revises the language regarding computer
searches for records and removes the reference to the central
processing unit (CPU), consistent with current practice.
In Sec. 1004.9(a)(6)(i), DOE clarifies the definition of ``search
time'' and clarifies how fees for search time are calculated,
consistent with current practices.
DOE adds paragraphs (a)(6)(iii) through (iv)(cc) in Sec. 1004.9
consistent with the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016. 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(A)(vii). The amendments in the Act enumerate exceptions to
DOE's ability to assess search fees for certain categories of
requesters when DOE has not complied with the time limits described in
Sec. 1004.5(d). The Act also specifies that DOE may assess search fees
when it has determined that unusual circumstances apply; more than
5,000 pages are necessary to respond to the request; DOE has provided
the requester with a timely written notice; and DOE has made no fewer
than three good-faith attempts to contact the requester to discuss how
the requester could effectively limit the scope of the request in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(B)(ii).
In Sec. 1004.9(a)(8)(i), DOE corrects typographical errors.
In Sec. 1004.9(a)(8)(ii), DOE corrects typographical errors.
In Sec. 1004.9(b), DOE corrects a typographical error.
In Sec. 1004.9(b)(1), DOE corrects a typographical error.
In Sec. 1004.9(b)(5), DOE clarifies when it will begin assessing
interest charges on the amount billed to requesters who fail to pay
fees. This change is consistent with existing Sec. 1004.12, and no
change in the administrative time limits is intended.
In Sec. 1004.9(b)(6), DOE clarifies that it is not required to
assess charges for search time even if the search fails to identify
responsive records or if the records located are exempt from
disclosure.
In Sec. 1004.9(b)(8)(ii), DOE clarifies the definition of ``days''
for purposes of determining when a requester has failed to pay a fee in
a timely fashion for purposes of exemption from making an advance
payment, by deleting the word ``working'' as superfluous. This section
also clarifies the definition of ``days'' for purposes of
administrative time limits for certain actions when DOE receives
advance fee payments. This change is consistent with existing Sec.
1004.12, and no change in the administrative time limits is intended.
In Sec. 1004.10(b)(5), DOE revises the definition of exemption
(b)(5) to conform to the requirements of the FOIA Improvement Act of
2016, which states that the deliberative process privilege shall not
apply to records created 25 years or more before the date on which the
records were requested. 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5).
In Sec. 1004.10(c), DOE revises its obligations to reasonably
segregate nonexempt portions of records as required by the FOIA
Improvement Act of 2016, which states that an agency shall withhold
information under 5 U.S.C. 552 only if the agency reasonably foresees
that disclosure would harm an
[[Page 94917]]
interest protected by an exemption described in subsection (b) of 5
U.S.C. 552, or disclosure is prohibited by law. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(8)(A)-
(B). The section is also revised to reflect the requirement in the Act
that agencies consider whether partial disclosure of information is
possible whenever the agency determines that a full disclosure of a
requested record is not possible and take reasonable steps necessary to
segregate and release nonexempt information.
In Sec. 1004.11(g), DOE clarifies the definition of ``days'' for
purposes of the time limit for informing submitters of DOE's intended
discretionary release prior to public disclosure of the information to
a requester. This change is consistent with the existing Sec.
1004.11(c), (d), and (e), and no change in the administrative time
limits is intended.
II. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under the Administrative Procedure Act
DOE has determined that notice and comment is not required pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), which requires notice and an opportunity for
comment unless an agency finds good cause that notice and public
procedures are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest. In this rulemaking, DOE is implementing changes required by
the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, Public Law 114-185 (June 30, 2016).
DOE is exercising no discretion in implementing these statutory
changes. DOE is also correcting minor typographical errors and making
other minor changes to, for example, reflect the current DOE
organizational structure. As a result, seeking public comment on these
changes is unnecessary. For these same reasons DOE finds good cause to
waive the 30-day delay in effective date provided for in 5 U.S.C.
553(d).
B. Review Under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' 58 FR 51735
(Oct. 4, 1993). As a result, the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs within the Office of Management and Budget did not review this
rule.
C. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of a final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) for any
final rule where the agency was first required by law to publish a
proposed rule for public comment. As required by Executive Order 13272,
``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking,'' 67 FR
53461 (Aug. 16, 2002), DOE published procedures and policies on
February 19, 2003, to ensure that the potential impacts of its rules on
small entities are properly considered during the rulemaking process.
68 FR 7990. DOE has made its procedures and policies available on the
Office of the General Counsel's Web site (https://energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel). Because there was no requirement to first publish
this regulation for comment, as discussed in section II.A., no analysis
is required for purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
D. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain a collection-of-information requirement
subject to review and approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA).
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
E. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
DOE has reviewed this final rule under 10 CFR part 1021, DOE's
National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures. DOE has
determined that the final rule fits within categorical exclusion A.5
listed in Appendix A to 10 CFR part 1021, subpart D: Rulemaking that
interprets or amends an existing rule or regulation and that does not
change the environmental effect of the rule or regulation being
amended. Accordingly, neither an environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is required. DOE's CX determination for
this rule is available at https://energy.gov/nepa/categorical-exclusion-cx-determinations-cx.
F. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism.'' 64 FR 43255 (Aug. 10, 1999)
imposes certain requirements on Federal agencies formulating and
implementing policies or regulations that preempt State law or that
have Federalism implications. The Executive Order requires agencies to
examine the constitutional and statutory authority supporting any
action that would limit the policymaking discretion of the States and
to carefully assess the necessity for such actions. The Executive Order
also requires agencies to have an accountable process to ensure
meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have Federalism implications.
On March 14, 2000, DOE published a statement of policy describing the
intergovernmental consultation process it will follow in the
development of such regulations. 65 FR 13735. DOE has examined this
rule, which would update DOE's FOIA regulations for consistency with
the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, and has determined that it would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Therefore, no further action is required by Executive Order 13132.
G. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing regulations and the
promulgation of new regulations, section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988,
``Civil Justice Reform,'' imposes on Federal agencies the general duty
to adhere to the following requirements: (1) eliminate drafting errors
and ambiguity; (2) write regulations to minimize litigation; (3)
provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct rather than a
general standard; and (4) promote simplification and burden reduction.
61 FR 4729 (Feb. 7, 1996). Regarding the review required by section
3(a), section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988 specifically requires that
Executive agencies make every reasonable effort to ensure that the
regulation: (1) clearly specifies the preemptive effect, if any; (2)
clearly specifies any effect on existing Federal law or regulation; (3)
provides a clear legal standard for affected conduct while promoting
simplification and burden reduction; (4) specifies the retroactive
effect, if any; (5) adequately defines key terms; and (6) addresses
other important issues affecting clarity and general draftsmanship
under any guidelines issued by the Attorney General. Section 3(c) of
Executive Order 12988 requires Executive agencies to review regulations
in light of applicable standards in section 3(a) and section 3(b) to
determine whether they are met or it is unreasonable to meet one or
more of them. DOE has completed the required review and determined
that, to
[[Page 94918]]
the extent permitted by law, this final rule meets the relevant
standards of Executive Order 12988.
H. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires each Federal agency to assess the effects of Federal
regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments and the
private sector. Public Law 104-4, sec. 201 (codified at 2 U.S.C. 1531).
For a regulatory action likely to result in a rule that may cause the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year
(adjusted annually for inflation), section 202 of UMRA requires a
Federal agency to publish a written statement that estimates the
resulting costs, benefits, and other effects on the national economy.
(2 U.S.C. 1532(a), (b)) The UMRA also requires a Federal agency to
develop an effective process to permit timely input by elected officers
of State, local, and Tribal governments on a ``significant
intergovernmental mandate,'' and requires an agency plan for giving
notice and opportunity for timely input to potentially affected small
governments before establishing any requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect them. On March 18, 1997, DOE published
a statement of policy on its process for intergovernmental consultation
under UMRA. 62 FR 12820. DOE's policy statement is also available at
https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/gcprod/documents/umra_97.pdf.
DOE has concluded that this final rule will not result in the
expenditure by States, tribal, or local governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million in any one year. As a result,
no assessment or analysis is required under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995.
I. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Public Law 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a
Family Policymaking Assessment for any rule that may affect family
well-being. This rule would not have any impact on the autonomy or
integrity of the family as an institution. Accordingly, DOE has
concluded that it is not necessary to prepare a Family Policymaking
Assessment.
J. Review Under Executive Order 12630
Pursuant to Executive Order 12630, ``Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights'' 53 FR
8859 (March 18, 1988), DOE has determined that this rule would not
result in any takings that might require compensation under the Fifth
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
K. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516, note) provides for Federal agencies to
review most disseminations of information to the public under
information quality guidelines established by each agency pursuant to
general guidelines issued by OMB. OMB's guidelines were published at 67
FR 8452 (Feb. 22, 2002), and DOE's guidelines were published at 67 FR
62446 (Oct. 7, 2002). DOE has reviewed this final rule under the OMB
and DOE guidelines and has concluded that it is consistent with
applicable policies in those guidelines.
L. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit to OIRA
at OMB, a Statement of Energy Effects for any significant energy
action. A ``significant energy action'' is defined as any action by an
agency that promulgates or is expected to lead to promulgation of a
final rule, and that: (1) is a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, or any successor order; and (2) is likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, or (3) is designated by the Administrator of OIRA as a
significant energy action. For any significant energy action, the
agency must give a detailed statement of any adverse effects on energy
supply, distribution, or use should the proposal be implemented, and of
reasonable alternatives to the action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use.
DOE has concluded that this regulatory action, which sets forth
amended procedures by which the public may request records from DOE
offices under the FOIA, and the policies and procedures by which DOE
will provide such records to members of the public, is not a
significant energy action because the final rule is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have
a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy, nor has it been designated as such by the Administrator at
OIRA. Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a Statement of Energy Effects
on this final rule.
M. Congressional Notification
As required by 5 U.S.C. 801, DOE will report to Congress on the
promulgation of this rule prior to its effective date. The report will
state that it has been determined that the rule is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 1004
Freedom of Information.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 21, 2016.
Ingrid Kolb,
Director, Office of Management.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, amend part 1004 of Title
10 of the Code of Federal Regulations as set forth below:
PART 1004--FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA)
0
1. The authority citation for part 1004 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552.
0
2. Section 1004.1 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1004.1 Purpose and scope.
This part contains the regulations of the Department of Energy
(DOE) that implement Freedom of Information (FOIA) 5 U.S.C. 552, Public
Law 89-487, as amended by Public Law 93-502, 88 Stat. 1561, by Public
Law 94-409, 90 Stat. 1241, by Public Law 99-570, 100 Stat. 3207-49, by
Public Law 104-231, 110 Stat. 3048, by Public Law 110-175, 121 Stat.
2524, Public Law 111-83 Sec. 564, 123 Stat. 2142, 2184, and by Public
Law 114-185, 130 Stat. 538. The regulations of this part provide
information concerning the procedures by which records may be requested
from all DOE offices, excluding the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC). Records of DOE made available pursuant to the
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 552 shall be furnished to members of the
public as prescribed by this part. Persons seeking information or
records of DOE may find it helpful to consult with a DOE FOIA Officer
before invoking the formal procedures set out below. To the extent
permitted by other laws, DOE will make records available which it is
authorized to withhold under 5 U.S.C. 552 whenever it determines that
such disclosure is in the public interest.
[[Page 94919]]
0
3. Section 1004.2 is amended by revising paragraphs (b), (h)(1),
(h)(5), (h)(6), (h)(8), (h)(9), (h)(13), (i), (m) and (n) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1004.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
(b) Authorizing or Denying Official means that DOE officer having
custody of or responsibility for records requested under 5 U.S.C. 552.
In DOE Headquarters, the term refers to The Freedom of Information Act
Officer and officials who report directly to either the Office of the
Secretary or a Secretarial Officer as defined. In the field offices,
the term refers to the head of a field location identified in paragraph
(h) of this section and the heads of field offices to which they
provide administrative support and have delegated this authority. In
the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), the term refers to
the official appointed at such location as identified in paragraph
(h)(8) of this section.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(1) Bonneville Power Administration, P.O. Box 3621CHI-7, Portland,
OR 97208-3621.
* * * * *
(5) Golden Field Office, 15013 Denver West Parkway, Mail Stop RSF
DOE Golden, CO 80401.
(6) Headquarters, Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585.
* * * * *
(8) National Nuclear Security Administration Albuquerque Complex,
P.O. Box 5400, Albuquerque, NM 87185.
(9) National Energy Technology Laboratory, 626 Cochrans Mill Road,
P.O. Box 10940, Pittsburgh, PA 15236-0940.
* * * * *
(13) Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62,
Oak Ridge, TN 37830.
* * * * *
(i) General Counsel means the General Counsel provided for in
section 202(e) of the DOE Organization Act, or any DOE attorney
designated by the General Counsel as having responsibility for
counseling the Department on Freedom of Information Act matters. In the
NNSA, the term refers to the NNSA General Counsel, or any attorney
designated by the NNSA General Counsel for counseling the NNSA on
Freedom of Information Act matters, as provided for in section 3217 of
the National Nuclear Security Administration Act, 50 U.S.C. 2407, Pub.
L. 106-65. The NNSA General Counsel is not a Secretarial Officer.
* * * * *
(m) Representative of the news media refers to any person or entity
that gathers information of potential interest to a segment of the
public, uses its editorial skills to turn the raw materials into a
distinct work, and distributes that work to an audience. The term
``news'' means information that is about current events or that would
be of current interest to the public. Examples of news-media entities
are television or radio stations broadcasting to the public at large
and publishers of periodicals (but only if such entities qualify as
disseminators of ``news'') who make their products available for
purchase by or subscription by or free distribution to the general
public. These examples are not all-inclusive. Moreover, as methods of
news delivery evolve (for example, the adoption of the electronic
dissemination of newspapers through telecommunications services), such
alternative media shall be considered to be news-media entities. A
freelance journalist shall be regarded as working for a news-media
entity if the journalist can demonstrate a solid basis for expecting
publication through that entity, whether or not the journalist is
actually employed by the entity. A publication contract would present a
solid basis for such an expectation; DOE may also consider the past
publication record of the requester in making such a determination.
(n) Review refers to the process of examining documents located in
response to a commercial use request (see paragraph (c) of this
section) to determine whether any portion of any document located is
permitted to be withheld. It also includes processing any documents for
disclosure, e.g., doing all that is necessary to excise them and
otherwise prepare them for release. Review does not include time spent
resolving general legal or policy issues regarding the application of
exemptions.
* * * * *
0
4. Section 1004.3 is amended by:
0
a. Revising the section heading and paragraph (a);
0
b. Removing paragraphs (b) through (d);
0
c. Redesignating paragraph (e) as paragraph (b);
0
d. Revising newly designated paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2), and (b)(4).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1004.3 Public inspection in an electronic format and policy on
contractor records.
(a) DOE will maintain, for public inspection in an electronic
format, the materials which are required by 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) to be
made available for public inspection and copying. An electronic public
reading room can be accessed via www.energy.gov and nnsa.energy.gov.
(b) Contractor records. (1) When a contract with DOE provides that
any records acquired or generated by the contractor in its performance
of the contract shall be the property of the Government, DOE will make
available to the public such records that are in the possession of the
Government or the contractor, unless the records are exempt from public
disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b).
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(1) of this section, records owned
by the Government under contract that contain information or technical
data having commercial value as defined in paragraph (b)(4) of this
section or information for which the contractor claims a privilege
recognized under Federal or State law shall be made available only when
they are in the possession of the Government and not otherwise exempt
under 5 U.S.C. 552(b).
* * * * *
(4) For purposes of paragraph (b)(2) of this section, ``technical
data and information having commercial value'' means technical data and
related commercial or financial information which is generated or
acquired by a contractor and possessed by that contractor, and whose
disclosure the contractor certifies to DOE would cause competitive harm
to the commercial value or use of the information or data.
0
6. Section 1004.4 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (c)(2) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1004.4 Elements of a request.
(a) Addressed to the FOIA Officer. A request for a record of DOE
which is not available for public inspection in an electronic format,
as described in Sec. 1004.3, shall be: Addressed to the Headquarters
or appropriate field FOIA Officer at DOE at a location listed in Sec.
1004.2(h), and both the envelope and the letter shall be clearly marked
``Freedom of Information Act Request;'' or submitted via facsimile or
electronically, on an appropriate agency Web site. Except as provided
in paragraph (e) of this section, a request will be considered to be
received by DOE for purposes of 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6) and the 20-day
response period will start upon actual receipt by the appropriate FOIA
Officer, or not later than ten days after receipt by a designated FOIA
Officer at any location in Sec. 1004.2(h). Requests delivered after
regular business hours are considered
[[Page 94920]]
received on the next regular business day.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Assistance in reformulating a non-conforming request. If a
request does not reasonably describe the records sought, as specified
in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the DOE response will specify the
reasons why the request failed to meet the requirements of paragraph
(c)(1) of this section and will invite the requester to confer with
knowledgeable DOE personnel in an attempt to restate the request or
reduce the request to manageable proportions by reformulation or by
agreeing on an orderly procedure for the production of the records. If
DOE responds that additional information is needed from the requester
to render records reasonably described, any reformulated request
submitted by the requester will be treated as an initial request for
purposes of calculating the time for DOE response.
* * * * *
0
7. Section 1004.5 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (b) and (c);
0
b. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (d)(1), and revising
paragraphs (d)(1)(iii), (d)(4), and(d)(7).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1004.5 Processing requests for records.
* * * * *
(b) The Authorizing Official will promptly identify and review the
records encompassed by the request. The Authorizing Official or FOIA
Officer will prepare a written response--
(1) Granting the request;
(2) Denying the request;
(3) Granting/denying it in part;
(4) Replying with a response stating that the request has been
referred to another agency under Sec. 1004.4(f) or Sec. 1004.6(e); or
(5) Informing the requester that responsive records cannot be
located or do not exist. The written response shall also notify the
requester of the right to seek dispute resolution services from the DOE
FOIA Public Liaison(s) or the Office of Government Information
Services.
(c) Where a request involves records that are in the custody of or
are the concern of more than one Authorizing Official, the FOIA Officer
will identify all concerned Authorizing Officials that can reasonably
be expected to have custody of the requested records. Upon
identification of the appropriate Authorizing Officials, the FOIA
Officer will forward them a copy of the request and a request for
action. The Authorizing Officials will prepare a DOE response to the
requester consistent with paragraph (b) of this section. The response
will identify the Authorizing Official having responsibility for the
determination to release or deny records.
(d) Time for processing requests. (1) Action pursuant to paragraph
(b) of this section will be taken within 20 days of a request for DOE
records being received (``received'' is defined in Sec. 1004.4(a)),
except that,
* * * * *
(iii) If unusual circumstances require an extension of time before
a decision on a request can be reached and the person requesting
records is promptly informed in writing by the Authorizing Official or
FOIA Officer of the reasons for such extension and the date on which a
determination is expected to be dispatched, then the Authorizing
Official or FOIA Officer may take an extension not to exceed ten days.
In cases where the Authorizing Official determines that unusual
circumstances exist, the requester shall be notified in writing of the
right to seek dispute resolution services from the DOE FOIA Public
Liaison(s) or the Office of Government Information Services.
* * * * *
(4) If no determination has been made at the end of the 20-day
period, or the last extension thereof, the requester may deem his
administrative remedies to have been exhausted, giving rise to a right
of review in a district court of the United States as specified in 5
U.S.C. 552(a)(4). When no determination can be made within the
applicable time limit, the responsible Authorizing Official or FOIA
Officer will nevertheless continue to process the request. If DOE is
unable to provide a response within the statutory period, the
Authorizing Official or FOIA Officer will inform the requester of the
reason for the delay; the date on which a determination may be expected
to be made; and the requester's right to seek remedy through the
courts, but will ask the requester to forego such action until a
determination is made.
* * * * *
(7) A determination to grant or deny a request for expedited
processing will be made by the appropriate FOIA Officer within ten days
after receipt of the request. The requester will be notified of the
determination and informed that any denial may be appealed within 90
calendar days to the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
0
8. Section 1004.7 is amended by:
0
a. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (b);
0
b. Revising paragraphs (b)(4) and (b)(5).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1004.7 Responses by authorizing officials; Form and content.
* * * * *
(b) Form of denial. A reply denying a request for a record will be
in writing. It will be signed by a FOIA Officer or the Denying Official
pursuant to Sec. 1004.5 (b) or (c) and will include:
* * * * *
(4) Adequacy of search. Although a determination that no such
record is known to exist is not a denial, the requester will be
informed that a challenge may be made to the adequacy of the search by
appealing within 90 calendar days to the Office of Hearings and
Appeals.
(5) Administrative appeal. A statement that the determination to
deny documents made within the statutory time period may be appealed
within 90 calendar days to the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
0
9. Section 1004.8 is amended by revising paragraphs (a), (b), (c),
(d)(1), and (d)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 1004.8 Appeal of initial denial.
(a) Appeal to Office of Hearings and Appeals. When the Authorizing
or Denying Official or FOIA Officer has denied a request for records in
whole or in part or has responded that there are no documents
responsive to the request consistent with Sec. 1004.4(d), or when the
FOIA Officer has denied a request for expedited processing consistent
with Sec. 1004.5(d) or for waiver of fees consistent with Sec.
1004.9, the requester may, within 90 calendar days of its receipt,
appeal the determination to the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
(b) Elements of appeal. The appeal must be in writing, addressed to
the Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department of Energy,
1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-1615 and both the
envelope and letter must be clearly marked ``Freedom of Information Act
Appeal.'' The appeal may be delivered by U.S Mail, commercial delivery
service, or by electronic mail to OHA.Filings@hq.doe.gov. The appeal
must contain a concise statement of the grounds upon which it is
brought and a description of the relief sought. It should also include
a discussion of all relevant authorities, including, but not limited
to, DOE (and predecessor agencies) rulings, regulations,
interpretations and decisions on appeals, and any judicial
determinations being relied upon to support the appeal. A copy of the
letter
[[Page 94921]]
containing the determination which is being appealed must be submitted
with the appeal. The appeal should also provide a telephone number,
electronic mail address, or other means for communicating with the
requester during business hours.
(c) Receipt of appeal. An appeal will be considered to be received
for purposes of 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6) upon receipt by the Appeal
Authority. Documents delivered after the regular business hours of the
Office of Hearings and Appeals are considered received on the next
regular business day.
(d) Action within 20 days. (1) The Appeal Authority will act upon
the appeal within 20 days of its receipt, except that if unusual
circumstances (as defined in Sec. 1004.5(d)(2)) require an extension
of time before a decision on a request can be reached, the Appeal
Authority may extend the time for final action for an additional ten
days less the number of days of any statutory extension which may have
been taken by the Authorizing Official during the period of initial
determination.
(2) The requester must be promptly notified in writing of the
extension, setting forth the reasons for the extension, and the date on
which a determination is expected to be issued. Notification will be
sent by electronic mail, when possible, or by letter.
* * * * *
0
10. Section 1004.9 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) introductory
text, (a)(2), (a)(6), (a)(8) introductory text, (a)(8)(i) introductory
text, (a)(8)(ii) introductory text, (b) introductory text, (b)(1),
(b)(5), (b)(6) and (b)(8)(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 1004.9 Fees for providing records.
(a) Fees to be charged. DOE may charge fees that recoup the full
allowable direct costs incurred. DOE will use the most efficient and
least costly methods to comply with requests for documents made under
FOIA. DOE may contract with private sector services to locate,
reproduce and disseminate records in response to FOIA requests when
that is the most efficient and least costly method. When doing so,
however, DOE will ensure that the ultimate cost to the requester is no
greater than it would be if DOE itself had performed these tasks. In no
case will DOE contract out responsibilities which FOIA provides that
only the agency may discharge, such as determining the applicability of
an exemption, or determining whether to waive or reduce fees, which are
determinations by Authorizing Officials or FOIA Officers. Where DOE can
identify documents that are responsive to a request and are maintained
for public distribution by other agencies such as the National
Technical Information Service and the Government Publishing Office, the
FOIA Officer will inform requesters of the procedures to obtain records
from those sources.
* * * * *
(2) Computer searches for records. DOE will charge at the actual
direct cost of providing the service.
* * * * *
(6) Restrictions on assessing fees. (i) With the exception of
requesters seeking documents for a commercial use pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(A)(iv), DOE will provide the first 100 pages of duplication
and the first two hours of search time without charge. Moreover, DOE
will not charge fees to any requester, including commercial use
requesters, if the cost of collecting the fee would be equal to or
greater than the fee itself. These provisions work together, so that
except for commercial use requesters, DOE will not begin to assess fees
until after the Department has provided the free search and
reproduction. For example, if a request involves two hours and ten
minutes of search time and results in 105 pages of documents, DOE will
charge for only ten minutes of search time and only five pages of
reproduction. If this cost is equal to or less than $15.00, the amount
DOE incurs to process a fee collection, no charges would be assessed.
For purposes of these restrictions on assessment of fees, the word
``pages'' refers to paper copies of a standard agency size which will
be normally be ``8\1/2\ x 11'' or ``11 x 14.'' Thus, requesters would
not be entitled to 100 microfiche or 100 computer disks, for example. A
microfiche containing the equivalent of 100 pages or 100 pages of
computer printout, however, might meet the terms of the restriction.
Similarly, the term ``search time'' is based on a manual or electronic
search. To apply this term, DOE will calculate the hourly rates of the
subject matter expert and/or FOIA analysts conducting the search plus
16 percent.
(ii) When unusual or exceptional circumstances do not apply and
time limits specified in FOIA are not met, DOE will not charge any
search fees, or duplication fees for educational and non-commercial
scientific institution requesters and requesters who are
representatives of the news media.
(iii) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(6)(iv) of this section,
DOE will not assess any search fees (or in the case of a requester who
is an educational or noncommercial scientific institution, whose
purpose is scholarly or scientific research; or a representative of the
news media, duplication fees) under this paragraph (a)(6)(iii) if DOE
has failed to comply with any time limit under Sec. 1004.5(d).
(iv)(A) If DOE has determined that unusual circumstances apply (as
the term is defined in Sec. 1004.5(d)(2)) and DOE provided a timely
written notice to the requester in accordance with Sec.
1004.5(d)(1)(iii), a failure described in paragraph (a)(6)(iii) of this
section is excused for an additional 10 days. If DOE fails to comply
with the extended time limit, DOE may not assess any search fees (or in
the case of a requester described under paragraph (a)(6)(iii) of this
section, duplication fees).
(B) If DOE has determined that unusual circumstances (as that term
is defined in Sec. 1004.5(d)(2)) apply and more than 5,000 pages are
necessary to respond to the request, DOE may charge search fees (or in
the case of a requester described under paragraph (a)(6)(iii) of this
section, duplication fees) if DOE has provided a timely written notice
to the requester in accordance with Sec. 1004.5(d)(1)(iii) and DOE has
discussed with the requester via written mail, electronic mail, or
telephone (or made not less than three good-faith attempts to do so)
how the requester could effectively limit the scope of the request in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(B)(ii).
(C) If a court has determined that unusual circumstances exist (as
that term is defined in Sec. 1004.5(d)(2)), a failure described in
paragraph (a)(6)(iv) of this of this section shall be excused for the
length of time provided by the court order.
* * * * *
(8) Waiving or reducing fees. DOE will furnish documents without
charge or at reduced charges if disclosure of the information is in the
public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to
public understanding of the operations or activities of the government
and disclosure is not primarily in the commercial interest of the
requester. This fee waiver standard thus sets forth two basic
requirements, both of which must be satisfied before fees will be
waived or reduced. First it must be established that disclosure of the
requested information is in the public interest because it is likely to
contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or
activities of the government. Second, it must be established that
disclosure of the information is not primarily in the commercial
interest of the requester.
[[Page 94922]]
When these requirements are satisfied, based upon information supplied
by a requester or otherwise made known to DOE, the waiver or reduction
of a FOIA fee will be granted. In determining when fees should be
waived or reduced the appropriate FOIA Officer should address the
following two criteria:
(i) That disclosure of the information ``is in the public interest
because it is likely to contribute significantly to public
understanding of the operations or activities of the government.''
Factors to be considered in applying this criteria include but are not
limited to:
* * * * *
(ii) If disclosure of the information ``is not primarily in the
commercial interest of the requester.'' Factors to be considered in
applying this criteria include but are not limited to:
* * * * *
(b) Fees to be charged--categories of requesters. There are four
categories of FOIA requesters: Commercial use requesters; educational
and non-commercial scientific institutions; representatives of the news
media; and all other requesters. The FOIA Officers will make
determinations regarding categories of requesters as defined at Sec.
1004.2. The Headquarters FOIA Officers will assist field FOIA Officers
in categorizing requesters, and will resolve conflicting
categorizations. FOIA prescribes specific levels of fees for each of
these categories:
(1) Commercial use requesters. When DOE receives a request for
documents which appears to be for commercial use, charges will be
assessed to recover the full direct costs of searching for, reviewing
for release, and duplicating the records sought. Commercial use
requesters are not entitled to two hours of free search time nor 100
free pages of reproduction of documents. DOE will recover the cost of
searching for and reviewing records even if there is ultimately no
disclosure of records.
* * * * *
(5) Charging interest--notice and rate. Interest will be charged to
those requesters who fail to pay fees. DOE will begin to assess
interest charges on the amount billed on the 31st calendar day
following the day on which the billing was sent to the requester.
Interest will be at the rate prescribed in section 3717 of Title 31
U.S.C. and will accrue from the date of the billing.
(6) Charges for unsuccessful search. DOE may assess charges for
time spent searching even if the search fails to identify responsive
records or if records located are determined to be exempt from
disclosure. If DOE estimates that search charges are likely to exceed
$25, it will notify the requester of the estimated amount of fees,
unless the requester has indicated in advance his willingness to pay
fees as high as those anticipated. Such a notice will offer the
requester the opportunity to confer with agency personnel in order to
reformulate the request to reduce the cost of the request.
* * * * *
(8) * * *
(ii)(A) A requester has previously failed to pay a fee in a timely
fashion (i.e., within 30 calendar days of the date of the billing). DOE
will require the requester to pay the full amount delinquent plus any
applicable interest as provided in paragraph (b)(5) of this section, or
demonstrate that he or she has, in fact, paid the delinquent fee; and
to make an advance payment of the full amount of the estimated current
fee before we begin to process a new request or a pending request from
that requester.
(B) When DOE acts under paragraphs (b)(8) (i) or (ii) of this
section, the administrative time limits prescribed in section (a)(6) of
FOIA (i.e., 20 days from receipt of initial requests and 20 days from
receipt of appeals from initial denials, plus permissible extensions of
these time limits) will begin only after DOE has received fee payments
described.
* * * * *
0
11. Section 1004.10 is amended by revising paragraphs (b)(5) and (c) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1004.10 Exemptions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) Inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda or letters that would
not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation
with the agency, provided that the deliberative process privilege shall
not apply to records created 25 years or more before the date on which
the records were requested;
* * * * *
(c) DOE shall withhold information under this section only if--
(1) The agency reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an
interest protected by an exemption described in paragraph (b) of this
section; or
(2) Disclosure is prohibited by law. DOE shall consider whether
partial disclosure of information is possible whenever the agency
determines that a full disclosure of a requested record is not possible
and take reasonable steps necessary to segregate and release nonexempt
information. Nothing in this paragraph requires disclosure of
information that is otherwise prohibited from disclosure by law, or
otherwise exempted from disclosure by paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
0
12. Section 1004.11 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (g) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1004.11 Handling information of a private business, foreign
government, or an international organization.
(a) Whenever a document submitted to DOE contains information which
may be exempt from public disclosure, it will be handled in accordance
with the procedures in this section. While DOE is responsible for
making the final determination with regard to the disclosure or
nondisclosure of information contained in requested documents, DOE will
consider the submitter's views (as that term is defined in this
section) in making its determination. Nothing in this section will
preclude the submission of a submitter's views at the time of the
submission of the document to which the views relate, or at any other
time.
* * * * *
(g) When DOE, in the course of responding to a Freedom of
Information Act request, determines that information exempt from the
mandatory public disclosure requirements of the Freedom of Information
Act is to be released in accordance with Sec. 1004.1, DOE will notify
the submitter of the intended discretionary release no less than seven
(7) calendar days prior to the intended public disclosure of the
information in question.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-31337 Filed 12-23-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P