Submission for OMB Review; Payment of Subcontractors, 95141-95142 [2016-31130]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the Commission’s privacy policy, at
https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To
Aid Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission has
accepted, subject to final approval, an
agreement containing a consent order
from Turn Inc. (‘‘Turn’’).
The proposed consent order has been
placed on the public record for thirty
(30) days for receipt of comments by
interested persons. Comments received
during this period will become part of
the public record. After thirty (30) days,
the Commission again will review the
agreement and the comments received
and will decide whether it should
withdraw from the agreement or make
final the agreement’s proposed order.
This matter involves Turn, a digital
advertising company that enables
commercial brands and ad agencies to
engage in targeted advertising, which is
the practice of tracking a consumer’s
activities or characteristics to deliver
ads tailored to the consumer’s interests.
The FTC complaint alleges that Turn
violated Section 5(a) of the FTC Act by
falsely representing to consumers the
extent to which consumers could
restrict the company’s tracking of their
online activities and the extent to which
Turn’s opt-out applied to mobile app
advertising.
Specifically, the complaint alleges
that until at least April 2015, Turn’s
privacy policy misrepresented that
consumers could prevent Turn’s
tracking by blocking or otherwise
limiting cookies. Contrary to
representations that consumers could
opt out of tracking by instructing their
browser to ‘‘stop accepting cookies,’’
Turn tracked consumers by using and
synchronizing the Verizon X–UIDH
header, a unique identifier appended to
the internet traffic of more than 100
million consumers on the Verizon
Wireless data network. Even if a
consumer deleted cookies or reset their
device advertising identifier (e.g.,
Apple’s IDFA or Google’s advertising
ID), Turn would be able to recognize the
user by cross-referencing the unique X–
UIDH header associated with an
individual consumer’s device. In fact, if
a Verizon Wireless user deleted their
cookies, Turn would attempt to set a
new cookie containing the same unique
identifier as the cookie the user had
deleted, thereby maintaining the linkage
between the consumer’s browser or
device and an identifier associated with
behavioral, demographic, or tracking
data.
In addition, the complaint alleges that
Turn’s privacy policy misrepresented
that its opt-out mechanism would be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:45 Dec 23, 2016
Jkt 241001
effective in blocking targeted advertising
on both mobile Web sites and in mobile
apps. Contrary to Turn’s
representations, Turn’s opt-out applied
only to mobile browsers, and was not
effective in blocking ads in mobile
applications.
The proposed consent order contains
provisions designed to prevent Turn
from engaging in similar acts and
practices in the future. Part I of the
proposed order prohibits Turn from
misrepresenting (1) the extent to which
it collects, uses, discloses, retains, or
shares Covered Information; and (2) the
extent to which users may limit, control,
or prevent Turn’s collection, use,
disclosure, retention, or sharing of
covered information. Part II of the
proposed order requires Turn, within
thirty days following service of the
order, to place a clear and conspicuous
hyperlink on the Turn Web site
homepage that states ‘‘Consumer Opt
Out of Targeted Advertising.’’ The
hyperlink must take consumers to a
clear and conspicuous disclosure that
explains what information Turn collects
and uses for targeted advertising, and
provides an effective opt-out
mechanism that allows consumers to
prevent Turn from collecting or using
consumers’ information. In addition,
Turn’s Web site must describe to
consumers the technologies and
methods it uses for targeted advertising.
Part III of the proposed order requires
Turn to honor mobile operating system
control signal (e.g., Apple’s IDFA or
Google’s advertising ID) to opt out of or
otherwise control or limit targeted
advertising, where it knows or
reasonably should know that it is
receiving such a signal.
Parts IV through VIII of the proposed
order are reporting and compliance
provisions. Part IV requires
acknowledgment of the order and
dissemination of the order now and in
the future to persons with managerial
responsibilities relating to the subject
matter of the order. Part V ensures
notification to the FTC of changes in
corporate status and mandates that Turn
submit an initial compliance report to
the FTC. Part VI requires Turn to retain
documents relating to its compliance
with the order for a five-year period.
Part VII mandates that Turn make
available to the FTC information or
subsequent compliance reports, as
requested. Part VIII is a provision
‘‘sunsetting’’ the order after twenty (20)
years, with certain exceptions.
The purpose of this analysis is to
facilitate public comment on the
proposed order. It is not intended to
constitute an official interpretation of
the proposed complaint order or to
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
95141
modify in any way the proposed orders
terms.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–31132 Filed 12–23–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–0196; Docket No.
2016–0053; Sequence 33]
Submission for OMB Review; Payment
of Subcontractors
Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public
comments regarding an extension to an
existing OMB clearance.
AGENCY:
Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Regulatory Secretariat will be
submitting to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request to review
and approve an extension of a currently
approved information collection
requirement concerning Payment of
Subcontractors.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
January 26, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing this
burden to: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs of OMB, Attention:
Desk Officer for GSA, Room 10236,
NEOB, Washington, DC 20503.
Additionally submit a copy to GSA by
any of the following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
searching for OMB control number
9000–0196, Payment of Subcontractors.
Select the link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’
that corresponds with ‘‘9000–0196;
Payment of Subcontractors.’’ Follow the
instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ screen. Please include your
name, company name (if any), and
‘‘9000–0196; Payment of
Subcontractors’’ on your attached
document.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW.,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
95142
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2016 / Notices
Washington, DC 20405. ATTN: Ms.
Flowers/IC 9000–0196.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite IC 9000–0196, in all
correspondence related to this case. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided. To confirm
receipt of your comment(s), please
check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Curtis E. Glover, Sr., Procurement
Analyst, at 202–501–1448, or email
curtis.glover@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
Section 1334 of the Small Business
Jobs and Credit Act of 2010 (Pub. L.
111–240) and the Small Business
Administration’s Final Rule at 78 FR
42391, Small Business Subcontracting,
published on July 16, 2013, and
effective August 15, 2013, requires the
prime contractor to self-report to the
contracting officer when the prime
contractor makes late or reduced
payments to small business
subcontractors. In addition, the
contracting officer is required to record
the identity of contractors with a history
of late or reduced payments to small
business subcontractors in the Federal
Awardee Performance and Integrity
Information System (FAPIIS). FAR Part
42 is revised to include in the past
performance evaluation reduced or
untimely payments reported to the
contracting officer by the prime
contractor in accordance with the clause
at 52.242–XX, Payments to Small
Business Subcontractors, that are
determined by the contracting officer to
be unjustified.
A notice was published in the Federal
Register at 81 FR 3087, on January 20,
2016, as part of a proposed rule under
FAR Case 2014–004. Two comments
were received on the information
collection.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
B. Discussion and Analysis
Comment: Two respondents stated
that the Councils had underestimated
the public burden in regards to the
proposed rule. One respondent
commented that the FAR Council has
greatly underestimated the
implementation burden on commercial
item and COTS item contractors,
especially considering the broad
definition of ‘‘subcontractor’’ that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:45 Dec 23, 2016
Jkt 241001
applies to the proposed rule. The other
respondent believed that the estimate of
reporting time of only two hours per
respondent is grossly underestimated.
This negligible amount of time assumes
that all contractors can easily identify
from their payment systems which
subcontractors are small businesses. The
respondent believed that this is often
not the case, and that the small business
size status of a subcontractor may be
unknown to the contractor’s other
accounting systems. The other
respondent commented that since the
Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 does
not specifically require that the
subcontractor payment clause apply to
commercial contracts, the respondent
recommended that the FAR Council
seek additional information about the
burden on contractors before a
determination is made to apply the
payment of subcontractor requirements
to commercial item acquisitions. The
respondent did not find that the
availability of limited information
indicated that the burden may not be
significant, as described in the proposed
rule. Rather, initial feedback from
contractors suggested that the burdens
associated with reporting under the rule
will have a significant impact.
Response: The respondents do not
offer data with which to support
changing the current estimated public
burden hours. However, since this is a
new rule without an empirical frame of
reference, the public reporting burden is
reviewed every three years and can be
adjusted as necessary.
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the FAR,
and whether it will have practical
utility; whether our estimate of the
public burden of this collection of
information is accurate, and based on
valid assumptions and methodology;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways in which we can
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, through the use of appropriate
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
C. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 5,457.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Total Annual Responses: 5,457.
Hours per Response: 2.
Total Burden Hours: 10,914.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB),
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC
20405, telephone 202–501–4755. Please
cite OMB Control Number 9000–0196,
Payment of Subcontractors, in all
correspondence.
Dated: November 15, 2016.
Lorin S. Curit,
Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division,
Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy,
Office of Acquisition Policy, Office of
Governmentwide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–31130 Filed 12–23–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Disease, Disability, and Injury
Prevention and Control Special
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Initial Review
In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463), the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC)
announces a meeting for the initial
review of applications in response to
Funding Opportunity Announcement
(FOA) GH17–001, Evaluations to
Improve Prevention Interventions Under
the President’s Emergency Plan for
AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).
Time and Date: 9:00 a.m.–2:00 p.m.,
EST, January 25, 2017 (Closed).
Place: Teleconference.
Status: The meeting will be closed to
the public in accordance with
provisions set forth in Section
552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and
the Determination of the Director,
Management Analysis and Services
Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92–
463.
Matters for Discussion: The meeting
will include the initial review,
discussion, and evaluation of
applications received in response to
FOA GH17–001, Evaluations to Improve
Prevention Interventions Under the
President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS
Relief (PEPFAR).
Contact Person for More Information:
Hylan Shoob, Scientific Review Officer,
Center for Global Health (CGH) Science
Office, CGH, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road,
NE., Mailstop D–69, Atlanta, Georgia
30329, Telephone: (404) 639–4796.
The Director, Management Analysis
and Services Office, has been delegated
the authority to sign Federal Register
notices pertaining to announcements of
meetings and other committee
management activities, for both the
Centers for Disease Control and
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 95141-95142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31130]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000-0196; Docket No. 2016-0053; Sequence 33]
Submission for OMB Review; Payment of Subcontractors
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public comments regarding an extension to
an existing OMB clearance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Regulatory Secretariat will be submitting to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request to review and approve an extension of a
currently approved information collection requirement concerning
Payment of Subcontractors.
DATES: Submit comments on or before January 26, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments regarding this burden estimate or any other
aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for
reducing this burden to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
of OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for GSA, Room 10236, NEOB, Washington,
DC 20503. Additionally submit a copy to GSA by any of the following
methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching for OMB
control number 9000-0196, Payment of Subcontractors. Select the link
``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with ``9000-0196; Payment of
Subcontractors.'' Follow the instructions provided at the ``Submit a
Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and
``9000-0196; Payment of Subcontractors'' on your attached document.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW.,
[[Page 95142]]
Washington, DC 20405. ATTN: Ms. Flowers/IC 9000-0196.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite IC 9000-0196, in
all correspondence related to this case. All comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential information provided. To confirm
receipt of your comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting
(except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Curtis E. Glover, Sr., Procurement
Analyst, at 202-501-1448, or email curtis.glover@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
Section 1334 of the Small Business Jobs and Credit Act of 2010
(Pub. L. 111-240) and the Small Business Administration's Final Rule at
78 FR 42391, Small Business Subcontracting, published on July 16, 2013,
and effective August 15, 2013, requires the prime contractor to self-
report to the contracting officer when the prime contractor makes late
or reduced payments to small business subcontractors. In addition, the
contracting officer is required to record the identity of contractors
with a history of late or reduced payments to small business
subcontractors in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity
Information System (FAPIIS). FAR Part 42 is revised to include in the
past performance evaluation reduced or untimely payments reported to
the contracting officer by the prime contractor in accordance with the
clause at 52.242-XX, Payments to Small Business Subcontractors, that
are determined by the contracting officer to be unjustified.
A notice was published in the Federal Register at 81 FR 3087, on
January 20, 2016, as part of a proposed rule under FAR Case 2014-004.
Two comments were received on the information collection.
B. Discussion and Analysis
Comment: Two respondents stated that the Councils had
underestimated the public burden in regards to the proposed rule. One
respondent commented that the FAR Council has greatly underestimated
the implementation burden on commercial item and COTS item contractors,
especially considering the broad definition of ``subcontractor'' that
applies to the proposed rule. The other respondent believed that the
estimate of reporting time of only two hours per respondent is grossly
underestimated. This negligible amount of time assumes that all
contractors can easily identify from their payment systems which
subcontractors are small businesses. The respondent believed that this
is often not the case, and that the small business size status of a
subcontractor may be unknown to the contractor's other accounting
systems. The other respondent commented that since the Small Business
Jobs Act of 2010 does not specifically require that the subcontractor
payment clause apply to commercial contracts, the respondent
recommended that the FAR Council seek additional information about the
burden on contractors before a determination is made to apply the
payment of subcontractor requirements to commercial item acquisitions.
The respondent did not find that the availability of limited
information indicated that the burden may not be significant, as
described in the proposed rule. Rather, initial feedback from
contractors suggested that the burdens associated with reporting under
the rule will have a significant impact.
Response: The respondents do not offer data with which to support
changing the current estimated public burden hours. However, since this
is a new rule without an empirical frame of reference, the public
reporting burden is reviewed every three years and can be adjusted as
necessary.
Public comments are particularly invited on: Whether this
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
functions of the FAR, and whether it will have practical utility;
whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection of
information is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and
methodology; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways in which we can minimize the
burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond,
through the use of appropriate technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
C. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 5,457.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Total Annual Responses: 5,457.
Hours per Response: 2.
Total Burden Hours: 10,914.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals: Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from the General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street
NW., Washington, DC 20405, telephone 202-501-4755. Please cite OMB
Control Number 9000-0196, Payment of Subcontractors, in all
correspondence.
Dated: November 15, 2016.
Lorin S. Curit,
Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition Policy, Office of
Governmentwide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-31130 Filed 12-23-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P