Exploring Industry Practices on Distribution and Display of Airline Fare, Schedule, and Availability Information: Extension of Response Deadline for Request for Information, 94021-94023 [2016-30830]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2016 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Hazardous Materials: Notice of
Applications for Special Permits
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: List of applications for
modification of special permit.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special
permits from the Department of
Transportation’s Hazardous Material
Regulations (49 CFR part 107, subpart
B), notice is hereby given that the Office
of Hazardous Materials Safety has
received the application described
herein. Each mode of transportation for
SUMMARY:
Application
No.
Docket No.
which a particular special permit is
requested is indicated by a number in
the ‘‘Nature of Application’’ portion of
the table below as follows: 1—Motor
vehicle, 2—Rail freight, 3—Cargo vessel,
4—Cargo aircraft only, 5—Passengercarrying aircraft.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 23, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Address Comments To:
Record Center, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration U.S.
Department of Transportation
Washington, DC 20590.
Comments should refer to the
application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of
comments is desired, include a selfaddressed stamped postcard showing
the special permit number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ryan Paquet, Director, Office of
Hazardous Materials Approvals and
Applicant
Regulation(s) affected
94021
Permits Division, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, East Building, PHH–30,
1200 New Jersey Avenue Southeast,
Washington, DC 20590–0001, (202) 366–
4535.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of
the applications are available for
inspection in the Records Center, East
Building, PHH–30, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue Southeast, Washington, DC or at
https://regulations.gov.
This notice of receipt of applications
for special permit is published in
accordance with Part 107 of the Federal
hazardous materials transportation law
(49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 8,
2016.
Donald Burger,
Chief, Office of the Special Permits and
Approvals.
Nature of the special permits thereof
Special Permits Data
15458–M .....
........................
Southern States, LLC .......
[FR Doc. 2016–30575 Filed 12–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4909–60–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
[Docket No. DOT–OST–2016–0204]
Exploring Industry Practices on
Distribution and Display of Airline
Fare, Schedule, and Availability
Information: Extension of Response
Deadline for Request for Information
Office of the Secretary (OST),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Request for Information (RFI),
response to document and data request;
clarification; and extension of response
deadline.
AGENCY:
DOT is extending the
response period for the RFI regarding
industry practices on the distribution
and display of airline flight schedule,
fare, and availability information. The
Department is extending the period for
persons to submit responses to the RFI
from December 30, 2016, to March 31,
2017. This action also addresses a
request for documents or data submitted
to the Department in connection with
issues addressed in the RFI. This
request for documents will be processed
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Dec 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
173.301(c), 173.304(a) .....
To modify the special permit to authorize transportation of a larger model of the equipment currently
authorized under the special permit.
pursuant to requirements under the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
This notice also responds to a request
for clarification of statements in the RFI.
DATES: Responses should be filed by
March 31, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may file responses
identified by the docket number DOT–
OST–2016–0204 by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., between 9:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251
Instructions: You must include the
agency name and docket number DOT–
OST–2016–0204 at the beginning of
your submission. All submissions
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all submissions
PO 00000
Frm 00141
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
received in any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
document (or signing the submission, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents and
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or to the street
address listed above. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kyle-Etienne Joseph, Trial Attorney,
Office of the General Counsel for
Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC,
20590, 202–366–9342, 202–366–7152
(fax), kyle-etienne.joseph@dot.gov
(email).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DOT’s Request for Information (RFI)
On October 31, 2016, the Department
of Transportation published a Request
for Information (RFI) to obtain public
input regarding industry practices on
the distribution and display of airline
flight schedule, fare, and availability
E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM
22DEN1
94022
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2016 / Notices
information. The Department’s RFI
requests information on whether airline
restrictions on the distribution or
display of airline flight information
harm consumers and constitute an
unfair and deceptive business practice
and/or an unfair method of competition.
The RFI also requests information on
whether any entities are blocking access
to critical resources needed for
competitive entry into the air
transportation industry. Finally, the RFI
requests information on whether
Department action is unnecessary or
whether Department action in these
areas would promote a more
competitive air transportation
marketplace or help ensure that
consumers have access to the
information needed to make informed
air transportation choices. See 81 FR
75481 (October 31, 2016). Responses on
the matters discussed in the RFI were
requested 60 days after publication in
the Federal Register or by December 30,
2016.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
A4A’s Request for Extension of the
Response Period on DOT’s RFI
On November 8, 2016, we received a
request from A4A to extend the
response date to the RFI to either 60
days after the Department provides
additional information in the docket as
requested by A4A, or until March 31,
2017. See DOT–OST–2016–0204–0003.
On November 17, 2016, the Travel
Technology Association (TTA) provided
a response to the Department opposing
A4A’s requests. See DOT–OST–2016–
0204–0004. TTA asks the Department to
deny A4A’s request for an extension of
91 days but states that it would not
object to an extension of the response
time to January 13, 2017, noting that the
December 30, 2016, response date is
close to two major holidays.
On November 23, 2016, A4A provided
a response to TTA’s letter opposing
A4A’s request for an extension. See
DOT–OST–2016–0204–0012.
On November 30, 2016, Delta Air
Lines, Inc. (Delta) provided a letter to
the Department in support of A4A’s
request to extend the response period.
See DOT–OST–2016–0204–0249.
On December 6, 2016, the Department
received TTA’s response to the
November 23, 2016, A4A letter, and the
November 30, 2016, Delta letter. See
DOT–OST–2016–0204–0747.
The Department has considered the
requests of A4A, TTA, and Delta. In
response to the requests for extension of
the response period, we grant the
extension to March 31, 2017.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Dec 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
A4A’s Request for Clarification on
DOT’s RFI
On November 8, 2016, we received a
request from A4A to clarify certain
statements and questions in the RFI. See
DOT–OST–2016–0204–0003. A4A states
that it needs clarification regarding
some of the questions posed in the RFI
and that it is not sure how the
Department is using certain terms. In
response to A4A’s request, the
Department provides the following
clarifications.
A4A’s first request for clarification is
regarding terms that appear on 81 FR
75485. The RFI states on page 75485,
center column, bottom paragraph,
‘‘Some ticket agents assert that Web
sites such as theirs can potentially better
position new entrant airlines to compete
with larger and more established
airlines, especially considering recent
airline consolidation.’’ A4A states that
the phrase ‘‘better position new entrant
airlines to compete’’ implies that ticket
agents can bias their displays in favor of
new entrant airlines, which A4A states
would be unfair and deceptive. We note
that the Department recently issued a
regulation that prohibits both ticket
agents and carriers from biasing certain
flight information displays based on
carrier identity without disclosing such
bias. See 81 FR 76800.
As described in the RFI, the
Department requests additional
information to aid the Department in its
analysis. The phrase identified by A4A,
‘‘better position new entrant airlines to
compete,’’ repeats assertions made by
some ticket agents and we are
requesting input on this assertion. See
81 FR 75485.
A4A’s second clarification request
relates to terms that appear on 81 FR
75486 where the RFI asks on the first
column, whether ‘‘any entities are
blocking access to critical resources
needed for competitive entry into the air
transportation industry.’’ Specifically,
A4A asks what do ‘‘critical resources’’
and ‘‘competitive entry’’ mean in this
context. The RFI also discusses the
terms ‘‘critical resources’’ on page
75482, bottom of second column, top of
third column, as follows:
On April 15, 2016, the White House issued
Executive Order 13725: Steps to Increase
Competition and Better Inform Consumers
and Workers to Support Continued Growth of
the American Economy (the ‘‘Executive
Order’’). The Executive Order expresses the
importance of a fair, efficient, and
competitive marketplace and notes that
consumers need both competitive markets
and information to make informed choices.
The Department shares the goal of ensuring
consumers are provided with information
they need to make informed choices. In
PO 00000
Frm 00142
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
particular, as directed in the Executive Order,
the DOT wants to identify any specific
practices in connection with air
transportation, such as blocking access to
critical resources, that may impede informed
consumer choice or unduly stifle new market
entrants and determine whether the
Department can potentially address those
practices in appropriate instances. [emphasis
added.]
The Executive Order referenced above
directs the Department to take action to
promote competition, and specifically to
act in connection with abuses such as
blocking access to critical resources that
are needed for competitive entry.
[emphasis added.] The Department uses
‘‘critical resources’’ and ‘‘competitive
entry’’ in the same manner discussed in
the RFI paragraph above and in the
Executive Order.
A4A next asks what the Department
means by ‘‘air transportation industry,’’
which appears on page 75486, and
whether it refers to the distribution or
the provision of air transportation.
Regarding the ‘‘air transportation
industry,’’ the Department is gathering
information and did not distinguish
specific aspects of the industry such as
the distribution or provision of air
transportation. Any interested party
should provide any information it
deems relevant to the issues identified
in the RFI.
Also on page 75486, the RFI goes on
to ask ‘‘whether Department action in
this area would promote a more
competitive air transportation
marketplace.’’ A4A asks what ‘‘more
competitive air transportation
marketplace’’ means. As discussed in
the RFI, some ticket agents informed the
Department that they believed airline
actions had an anti-competitive impact.
As stated in the RFI, the Department is
seeking any information relevant to the
issues and concerns regarding
competition identified in the RFI.
Finally, A4A’s third clarification
request refers to page 75486, in the third
column, under ‘‘Effects of Airlines
Restricting Use of Flight Information,’’
where the RFI says:
We note that flight information is available
through airline Web sites. Would a reduction
in the availability of airline flight information
on non-airline Web sites due to airline
restrictions on the distribution and/or
display of such information have a
significant negative impact on consumers?
A4A states that the question is vague
and asks what ‘‘reduction in the
availability of airline fight information’’
means and what the baseline is for
determining a ‘‘reduction?’’ The RFI
describes and discusses the current
availability of flight information on both
airline and non-airline Web sites and
E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM
22DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2016 / Notices
this question asks about a reduction as
compared to currently available flight
information. Any interested party
should provide any information it
deems relevant to the question.
A4A’s Request for Documents and Data
Related to DOT’s RFI
On November 8, 2016, we also
received a request from A4A to provide
any documents or data related to the RFI
that would enable airlines and other
stakeholders to provide meaningful and
comprehensive responses. See DOT–
OST–2016–0204–0003. On November
30, 2016, Delta provided a letter to the
Department in support of A4A’s request
for the Department to provide additional
documents and data related to the RFI.
See DOT–OST–0204–0249.
A4A and Delta request the following:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
1. Formal and informal complaints (such as
correspondence or memoranda) by online
travel agents (OTAs) and metasearch sites
(MSSs) regarding airline distribution
practices for the period 2011 to present.
2. Documentation regarding the resolution
of any such formal or informal complaint.
3. Research, data, and analysis provided to
support any such complaints or to support
the concerns claimed by OTAs and MSSs as
described in the Notice.
4. Data provided by OTAs or MSSs
indicating the number of OTAs or MSSs
affected by air carrier distribution restrictions
described in the Notice.
5. The Travel Technology Association/
Charles River Associates paper dated May 19,
2015 and any supporting work papers, data
or supplemental information.
6. Correspondence and records of
communications between the Department
and Travel Technology Association or
Charles River Associates, or any of their
representatives.
7. Correspondence between the
Department and any other Federal, State or
local agency regarding the topic of the
Notice, including the issue of consumer
rights and comparison shopping.
8. Data provided by OTAs/MSSs or other
ticket agents regarding the volume of
combined one-way tickets sold that are
packaged to create a round-trip itinerary in
order to provide a lower cost option than a
single carrier round trip offering, and related
savings data.
In response to A4A’s request for
documents and data, the Department
notes that the Travel Technology
Association/Charles River Associates
paper dated May 19, 2015, is already
publicly available as described in the
RFI. Nevertheless, the Department has
posted the document in the docket for
this proceeding. The Department has
also posted Executive Order 13725 in
the docket. Regarding the remaining
documents and data requested by A4A,
the Department has identified this
request as one for records under the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Dec 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
has forwarded it to the Office of the
Secretary’s FOIA Office for processing.
The FOIA Office will provide any
responsive and releasable information to
A4A and Delta and the Department also
will place this information in the
docket. The Department does not view
the outcome of the FOIA request to be
material to stakeholders’ ability to
respond to the RFI. Accordingly, to the
extent that the Department has not
responded to the FOIA request by
March 31, 2017, interested parties
should not delay providing a response.
Issued this 16th day of December, 2016, in
Washington, DC
Molly J. Moran,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2016–30830 Filed 12–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Department of the Treasury.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
December 19, 2016.
The Department of the Treasury will
submit the following information
collection requests to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, on or after the date of publication
of this notice.
DATES: Comments should be received on
or before January 23, 2017 to be assured
of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Send comments regarding
the burden estimates, or any other
aspect of the information collections,
including suggestions for reducing the
burden, to (1) Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Attention:
Desk Officer for Treasury, New
Executive Office Building, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503, or email at
OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.gov and
(2) Treasury PRA Clearance Officer,
1750 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Suite
8142, Washington, DC 20220, or email
at PRA@treasury.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Copies of the submissions may be
obtained by emailing PRA@treasury.gov,
calling (202) 622–0934, or viewing the
entire information collection request at
www.reginfo.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Authority: Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, Public Law 104–13.
PO 00000
Frm 00143
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
94023
Fiscal Service (FS)
OMB Control Number: 1530–0030.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Title: Special Bond of Indemnity By
Purchaser of United States Savings
Bonds/Notes Involved in a Chain Letter
Scheme.
Form: FS Form 2966.
Abstract: The information is
requested to support a request for
refund of the purchase price of savings
bonds purchased in a chain letter
scheme.
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 320.
OMB Control Number: 1530–0046.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Title: Agreement And Request For
Disposition Of A Decedent’s Treasury
Securities.
Form: FS Form 5394.
Abstract: The information is
necessary to distribute Treasury
securities and/or payments to the
entitled person(s) when the decedent’s
estate was formally administered
through the court and has been closed,
or the estate is being settled in
accordance with State statute without
the necessity of the court appointing a
legal representative.
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 9,250.
OMB Control Number: 1530–0051.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Title: Offering of U.S. Mortgage
Guaranty Insurance Company Tax and
Loss Bonds.
Abstract: Regulations governing the
issue, reissue, and redemption of U.S.
Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Company
Tax and Loss Bonds.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profits.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 13.
Bob Faber,
Acting Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–30888 Filed 12–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AS–P
E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM
22DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 246 (Thursday, December 22, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 94021-94023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30830]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
[Docket No. DOT-OST-2016-0204]
Exploring Industry Practices on Distribution and Display of
Airline Fare, Schedule, and Availability Information: Extension of
Response Deadline for Request for Information
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST), Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Request for Information (RFI), response to document and data
request; clarification; and extension of response deadline.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DOT is extending the response period for the RFI regarding
industry practices on the distribution and display of airline flight
schedule, fare, and availability information. The Department is
extending the period for persons to submit responses to the RFI from
December 30, 2016, to March 31, 2017. This action also addresses a
request for documents or data submitted to the Department in connection
with issues addressed in the RFI. This request for documents will be
processed pursuant to requirements under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA). This notice also responds to a request for clarification of
statements in the RFI.
DATES: Responses should be filed by March 31, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may file responses identified by the docket number DOT-
OST-2016-0204 by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: (202) 493-2251
Instructions: You must include the agency name and docket number
DOT-OST-2016-0204 at the beginning of your submission. All submissions
received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
submissions received in any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the document (or signing the submission, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you may visit
https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents and
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov or to the street
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle-Etienne Joseph, Trial Attorney,
Office of the General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE.,
Washington, DC, 20590, 202-366-9342, 202-366-7152 (fax), kyle-etienne.joseph@dot.gov (email).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DOT's Request for Information (RFI)
On October 31, 2016, the Department of Transportation published a
Request for Information (RFI) to obtain public input regarding industry
practices on the distribution and display of airline flight schedule,
fare, and availability
[[Page 94022]]
information. The Department's RFI requests information on whether
airline restrictions on the distribution or display of airline flight
information harm consumers and constitute an unfair and deceptive
business practice and/or an unfair method of competition. The RFI also
requests information on whether any entities are blocking access to
critical resources needed for competitive entry into the air
transportation industry. Finally, the RFI requests information on
whether Department action is unnecessary or whether Department action
in these areas would promote a more competitive air transportation
marketplace or help ensure that consumers have access to the
information needed to make informed air transportation choices. See 81
FR 75481 (October 31, 2016). Responses on the matters discussed in the
RFI were requested 60 days after publication in the Federal Register or
by December 30, 2016.
A4A's Request for Extension of the Response Period on DOT's RFI
On November 8, 2016, we received a request from A4A to extend the
response date to the RFI to either 60 days after the Department
provides additional information in the docket as requested by A4A, or
until March 31, 2017. See DOT-OST-2016-0204-0003.
On November 17, 2016, the Travel Technology Association (TTA)
provided a response to the Department opposing A4A's requests. See DOT-
OST-2016-0204-0004. TTA asks the Department to deny A4A's request for
an extension of 91 days but states that it would not object to an
extension of the response time to January 13, 2017, noting that the
December 30, 2016, response date is close to two major holidays.
On November 23, 2016, A4A provided a response to TTA's letter
opposing A4A's request for an extension. See DOT-OST-2016-0204-0012.
On November 30, 2016, Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta) provided a
letter to the Department in support of A4A's request to extend the
response period. See DOT-OST-2016-0204-0249.
On December 6, 2016, the Department received TTA's response to the
November 23, 2016, A4A letter, and the November 30, 2016, Delta letter.
See DOT-OST-2016-0204-0747.
The Department has considered the requests of A4A, TTA, and Delta.
In response to the requests for extension of the response period, we
grant the extension to March 31, 2017.
A4A's Request for Clarification on DOT's RFI
On November 8, 2016, we received a request from A4A to clarify
certain statements and questions in the RFI. See DOT-OST-2016-0204-
0003. A4A states that it needs clarification regarding some of the
questions posed in the RFI and that it is not sure how the Department
is using certain terms. In response to A4A's request, the Department
provides the following clarifications.
A4A's first request for clarification is regarding terms that
appear on 81 FR 75485. The RFI states on page 75485, center column,
bottom paragraph, ``Some ticket agents assert that Web sites such as
theirs can potentially better position new entrant airlines to compete
with larger and more established airlines, especially considering
recent airline consolidation.'' A4A states that the phrase ``better
position new entrant airlines to compete'' implies that ticket agents
can bias their displays in favor of new entrant airlines, which A4A
states would be unfair and deceptive. We note that the Department
recently issued a regulation that prohibits both ticket agents and
carriers from biasing certain flight information displays based on
carrier identity without disclosing such bias. See 81 FR 76800.
As described in the RFI, the Department requests additional
information to aid the Department in its analysis. The phrase
identified by A4A, ``better position new entrant airlines to compete,''
repeats assertions made by some ticket agents and we are requesting
input on this assertion. See 81 FR 75485.
A4A's second clarification request relates to terms that appear on
81 FR 75486 where the RFI asks on the first column, whether ``any
entities are blocking access to critical resources needed for
competitive entry into the air transportation industry.'' Specifically,
A4A asks what do ``critical resources'' and ``competitive entry'' mean
in this context. The RFI also discusses the terms ``critical
resources'' on page 75482, bottom of second column, top of third
column, as follows:
On April 15, 2016, the White House issued Executive Order 13725:
Steps to Increase Competition and Better Inform Consumers and
Workers to Support Continued Growth of the American Economy (the
``Executive Order''). The Executive Order expresses the importance
of a fair, efficient, and competitive marketplace and notes that
consumers need both competitive markets and information to make
informed choices. The Department shares the goal of ensuring
consumers are provided with information they need to make informed
choices. In particular, as directed in the Executive Order, the DOT
wants to identify any specific practices in connection with air
transportation, such as blocking access to critical resources, that
may impede informed consumer choice or unduly stifle new market
entrants and determine whether the Department can potentially
address those practices in appropriate instances. [emphasis added.]
The Executive Order referenced above directs the Department to take
action to promote competition, and specifically to act in connection
with abuses such as blocking access to critical resources that are
needed for competitive entry. [emphasis added.] The Department uses
``critical resources'' and ``competitive entry'' in the same manner
discussed in the RFI paragraph above and in the Executive Order.
A4A next asks what the Department means by ``air transportation
industry,'' which appears on page 75486, and whether it refers to the
distribution or the provision of air transportation. Regarding the
``air transportation industry,'' the Department is gathering
information and did not distinguish specific aspects of the industry
such as the distribution or provision of air transportation. Any
interested party should provide any information it deems relevant to
the issues identified in the RFI.
Also on page 75486, the RFI goes on to ask ``whether Department
action in this area would promote a more competitive air transportation
marketplace.'' A4A asks what ``more competitive air transportation
marketplace'' means. As discussed in the RFI, some ticket agents
informed the Department that they believed airline actions had an anti-
competitive impact. As stated in the RFI, the Department is seeking any
information relevant to the issues and concerns regarding competition
identified in the RFI.
Finally, A4A's third clarification request refers to page 75486, in
the third column, under ``Effects of Airlines Restricting Use of Flight
Information,'' where the RFI says:
We note that flight information is available through airline Web
sites. Would a reduction in the availability of airline flight
information on non-airline Web sites due to airline restrictions on
the distribution and/or display of such information have a
significant negative impact on consumers?
A4A states that the question is vague and asks what ``reduction in
the availability of airline fight information'' means and what the
baseline is for determining a ``reduction?'' The RFI describes and
discusses the current availability of flight information on both
airline and non-airline Web sites and
[[Page 94023]]
this question asks about a reduction as compared to currently available
flight information. Any interested party should provide any information
it deems relevant to the question.
A4A's Request for Documents and Data Related to DOT's RFI
On November 8, 2016, we also received a request from A4A to provide
any documents or data related to the RFI that would enable airlines and
other stakeholders to provide meaningful and comprehensive responses.
See DOT-OST-2016-0204-0003. On November 30, 2016, Delta provided a
letter to the Department in support of A4A's request for the Department
to provide additional documents and data related to the RFI. See DOT-
OST-0204-0249.
A4A and Delta request the following:
1. Formal and informal complaints (such as correspondence or
memoranda) by online travel agents (OTAs) and metasearch sites
(MSSs) regarding airline distribution practices for the period 2011
to present.
2. Documentation regarding the resolution of any such formal or
informal complaint.
3. Research, data, and analysis provided to support any such
complaints or to support the concerns claimed by OTAs and MSSs as
described in the Notice.
4. Data provided by OTAs or MSSs indicating the number of OTAs
or MSSs affected by air carrier distribution restrictions described
in the Notice.
5. The Travel Technology Association/Charles River Associates
paper dated May 19, 2015 and any supporting work papers, data or
supplemental information.
6. Correspondence and records of communications between the
Department and Travel Technology Association or Charles River
Associates, or any of their representatives.
7. Correspondence between the Department and any other Federal,
State or local agency regarding the topic of the Notice, including
the issue of consumer rights and comparison shopping.
8. Data provided by OTAs/MSSs or other ticket agents regarding
the volume of combined one-way tickets sold that are packaged to
create a round-trip itinerary in order to provide a lower cost
option than a single carrier round trip offering, and related
savings data.
In response to A4A's request for documents and data, the Department
notes that the Travel Technology Association/Charles River Associates
paper dated May 19, 2015, is already publicly available as described in
the RFI. Nevertheless, the Department has posted the document in the
docket for this proceeding. The Department has also posted Executive
Order 13725 in the docket. Regarding the remaining documents and data
requested by A4A, the Department has identified this request as one for
records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and has forwarded
it to the Office of the Secretary's FOIA Office for processing. The
FOIA Office will provide any responsive and releasable information to
A4A and Delta and the Department also will place this information in
the docket. The Department does not view the outcome of the FOIA
request to be material to stakeholders' ability to respond to the RFI.
Accordingly, to the extent that the Department has not responded to the
FOIA request by March 31, 2017, interested parties should not delay
providing a response.
Issued this 16th day of December, 2016, in Washington, DC
Molly J. Moran,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2016-30830 Filed 12-21-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P