Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney Turbofan Engines, 93855-93857 [2016-30114]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
based on mortality rates for annuitants
paid from the Civil Service Retirement
and Disability Fund; and increases each
year at an assumed rate of cost-of-living
adjustment. Assumed rates of interest,
mortality, and cost-of-living adjustments
used in computing the present value are
those used by the Board of Actuaries of
the Civil Service Retirement System for
valuation of the Federal Employees’
Retirement System based on dynamic
assumptions. The present value factors
are unisex factors obtained as a
composite of sex-distinct present value
factors. Separate present value factors
apply for FERS annuities that receive
cost-of-living adjustments before the
retiree attains age 62, versus FERS
annuities that do not receive cost-ofliving adjustments before the retiree
attains age 62.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 21. Add § 842.616 to subpart F to read
as follows:
§ 842.616
factors.
Publication of present value
When OPM publishes in the Federal
Register notice of normal cost
percentages under § 841.407 of this
chapter, it will also publish updated
present value factors.
■ 22. Amend § 842.702 by revising the
definition of ‘‘present value factor’’ to
read as follows:
§ 842.702
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Present value factor has the same
meaning in this subpart as defined in
§ 842.602.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 847—ELECTIONS OF
RETIREMENT COVERAGE BY
CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES
OF NONAPPROPRIATED FUND
INSTRUMENTALITIES
23. The authority citation for part 847
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 8332(b)(17) and
8411(b)(6) and sections 1131 and 1132 of
Pub. L. 107–107, December 28, 2001, 115 Stat
1242; 5 U.S.C. 8347(a) and 8461(g) and
section 1043(b) of Pub. L. 104–106, Div. A,
Title X, Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 434. Subpart
B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 8347(q) and
8461(n).
Subpart A—General Provisions
24. Amend § 847.103(b) by revising
the definition of ‘‘actuarial present
value’’ and adding the definition of
‘‘present value factor’’ in alphabetical
order as follows:
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
■
§ 847.103
*
Definitions.
*
*
(b) * * *
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
15:19 Dec 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
Actuarial present value means the
amount of monthly annuity at time of
retirement multiplied by the applicable
present value factor.
* * *
Present value factor has the same
meaning in this part as defined in
§ 842.602.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 847.602
[Removed and Reserved]
■ 25. Remove and reserve § 847.602.
[FR Doc. 2016–30487 Filed 12–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–38–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0740; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NE–24–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pratt &
Whitney Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2014–05–
32, which applies to all Pratt & Whitney
(PW) PW2037, PW2037D, PW2037M,
PW2040, PW2040D, PW2043, PW2143,
PW2643, and F117–PW–100 turbofan
engines. AD 2014–05–32 currently
requires one-time eddy current
inspection (ECI) of affected engines with
certain diffuser and HPT cases installed.
AD 2014–05–32 also requires a
fluorescent-penetrant inspection (FPI) of
the diffuser case rear flange and the HPT
case front flange. Since we issued AD
2014–05–32, the manufacturer
determined through analysis that the
inspections required by AD 2014–05–32
are not adequate to maintain safety. This
proposed AD would add additional
repetitive, on-wing ECI inspections. We
are proposing this AD to correct the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by February 6, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
93855
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Pratt & Whitney,
400 Main St., East Hartford, CT 06108;
phone: 860–565–8770; fax: 860–565–
4503. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2013–
0740; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Kierstead, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine
& Propeller Directorate, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:
781–238–7772; fax: 781–238–7199;
email: brian.kierstead@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2013–0740; Directorate Identifier
2013–NE–24–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
93856
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Discussion
On March 6, 2014, we issued AD
2014–05–32, Amendment 39–17804 (79
FR 17856, March 31, 2014), (‘‘AD 2014–
05–32’’), for all PW PW2037, PW2037D,
PW2037M, PW2040, PW2040D,
PW2043, PW2143, PW2643, and F117–
PW–100 turbofan engines. AD 2014–05–
32 requires a one-time ECI of affected
engines with certain diffuser and HPT
cases installed. AD 2014–05–32 also
requires an FPI of the diffuser case rear
flange and HPT case front flange. AD
2014–05–32 resulted from a rupture of
the diffuser-to-HPT case flange. We
issued AD 2014–05–32 to prevent
failure of the diffuser-to-HPT case
flange, which could lead to uncontained
engine failure and damage to the
airplane.
Actions Since AD 2014–05–32 Was
Issued
Since we issued AD 2014–05–32, the
manufacturer identified a subpopulation
of diffuser cases installed on the
affected engines with a repaired flange
that has a lower fatigue capability. The
repaired flange cannot be distinguished
from non-repaired flanges on diffuser
cases installed on the affected engines.
We determined, therefore, that the
inspections required by AD 2014–05–32
are not adequate to maintain safety. To
correct this unsafe condition, we are
now proposing additional, repetitive
ECI inspections.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed PW Service Bulletin No.
PW2000 72–763, Revision No. 1, dated
August 30, 2013; and PW Alert Service
Bulletin No. PW2000 A72–765, Revision
No. 1, dated July 13, 2016. This service
information describes procedures for a
one-time ECI inspection of the engine
diffuser case and the HPT case, and
repetitive on-wing ECIs of the engine
diffuser case assembly, respectively.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would retain the
requirements of AD 2014–05–32 except
it would eliminate the Prohibition
Statement. We determined that this
statement is unnecessary for compliance
with the AD. In addition, this proposed
AD would require repetitive, on-wing
ECI inspections. This proposed AD
would also remove the PW2240 and
PW2337 engines from the applicability
section since these engines were
removed from PW Type Certificate
Number E17NE.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
will affect 910 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
On-wing/module ECI Inspection.
FPI Inspection ........................
Labor cost
8 work-hours × $85 per hour
= $680.
3 work-hours × $85 per hour
= $255.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Dec 21, 2016
Parts cost
Jkt 241001
Cost per product
$0
$680 .......................................
20
$275 per inspection cycle ......
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Cost on U.S. operators
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
$230,520 per inspection
cycle.
$250,250 per inspection
cycle.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2014–05–32, Amendment 39–17804 (79
FR 17856, March 31, 2014), and adding
the following new AD:
■
Pratt & Whitney: Docket No. FAA–2013–
0740; Directorate Identifier 2013–NE–
24–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
AD action by February 6, 2017.
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
This AD replaces AD 2014–05–32,
Amendment 39–17804 (79 FR 17856, March
31, 2014).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Pratt & Whitney
(PW) PW2037, PW2037D, PW2037M,
PW2040, PW2040D, PW2043, PW2143,
PW2643, and F117–PW–100 turbofan
engines.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)
Code 72, Turbine/Turboprop Engine.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a rupture of the
diffuser-to-high-pressure turbine (HPT) case
flange. We are issuing this AD to prevent
failure of the diffuser-to-HPT case flange,
which could lead to uncontained engine
failure and damage to the airplane.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
(f) Compliance
Unless already done, comply with this AD
within the compliance times specified.
(1) For diffuser case, part number (P/N)
1B7461, serial numbers (S/Ns) DGGUAK1306
and DGGUAK1308, and HPT case, P/N
1B2440, S/N DKLBCS1032:
(i) Within 100 flight cycles or 30 days after
May 5, 2014, whichever is later, eddy current
inspect the diffuser case and the HPT case Mflange. Use PW Service Bulletin (SB) No.
PW2000 72–763, Revision No. 1, dated
August 30, 2013, to do the inspection.
(ii) Reserved.
(2) For all diffuser and HPT cases, at the
next piece-part opportunity and every piecepart opportunity thereafter, perform a high
sensitivity fluorescent-penetrant inspection
(FPI) of the entire diffuser case rear flange
(M-flange) and bolt holes, and the entire HPT
case forward flange (M-flange) and bolt holes.
(3) For diffuser cases that have not
incorporated PW SB PW2000–72–364 or have
incorporated either PW SB PW2000–72–700
or PW2000 Series Engine Manual, Repair-28,
Task 72–41–01–300–028 (M-flange
replacement), perform initial and repetitive
eddy current inspections (ECIs) of the Mflange of the diffuser case in accordance with
paragraph (f)(4) of this AD.
(4) Use, as applicable, either the
Accomplishment Instructions, ‘‘For Engines
Installed on the Aircraft,’’ paragraphs 3.(I)
through 3.(J), or the Accomplishment
Instructions, ‘‘For Engines Removed from the
Aircraft,’’ paragraphs 3.(D) through 3.(E), of
PW Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. PW2000
A72–765, Revision No. 1, dated July 13,
2016, to do the ECI as follows:
(i) Perform an initial inspection within the
following period, whichever occurs later:
(A) Within 5,500 cycles since new or since
M-flange replacement, or
(B) Within 2,500 cycles since last piecepart FPI inspection, or
(C) Within 500 cycles from the effective
date of this AD.
(ii) If no crack indications are found, reinspect within 2,500 cycles since last ECI or
last piece-part FPI inspection, whichever
occurs first.
15:19 Dec 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
(iii) If crack indications are found, measure
the crack length and determine the re-inspect
interval in accordance with:
(A) Paragraphs 5.(C) through 5.(D) of PW
ASB No. PW2000 A72–765, Revision No. 1,
dated July 13, 2016, ‘‘For Engines Installed
on the Aircraft’’; or
(B) Paragraphs 4.(C) through 4.(D) of PW
ASB No. PW2000 A72–765, Revision No. 1,
dated July 13, 2016, ‘‘For Engines Removed
from the Aircraft.’’
(iv) Remove from service diffuser cases
with cracks exceeding 0.170 inches.
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
(g) Definition
(b) Affected ADs
VerDate Sep<11>2014
93857
SUMMARY:
For the purpose of this AD, piece-part
opportunity is defined as when the part is
completely disassembled.
(h) Credit for Previous Actions
If you performed an ECI of the diffuser case
and HPT case M-flange using the
Accomplishment Instructions of PW SB No.
PW2000 72–763, Revision No. 1, dated
August 13, 2013, or an earlier version, or you
performed a high sensitivity FPI of the
diffuser case and HPT case at the piece-part
opportunity after January 1, 2010, you met
the requirements of paragraph (f)(1) of this
AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office,
FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to
make your request. You may email your
request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this
proposed AD, contact Brian Kierstead,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: 781–238–7772; fax: 781–238–7199;
email: brian.kierstead@faa.gov.
(2) PW SB No. PW2000 72–763, Revision
No. 1, dated August 30, 2013; and PW ASB
No. PW2000 A72–765, Revision No. 1, dated
July 13, 2016, can be obtained from PW using
the contact information in paragraph (j)(3) of
this AD.
(3) For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Pratt & Whitney,
United Technologies Corporation, 400 Main
St., East Hartford, CT 06108; phone: 860–
565–8770; fax: 860–565–4503.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
December 1, 2016.
Colleen M. D’Alessandro,
Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–30114 Filed 12–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15 CFR Parts 2004 and 2005
[Docket Number USTR–2016–0027]
RIN 0350–AA09
Privacy Act Policies and Procedures
Office of the United States
Trade Representative.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
As part of a comprehensive
review of agency practices related to the
disclosure of records and information,
the Office of the United States Trade
Representative (USTR) is updating both
its systems of records and implementing
rule under the Privacy Act of 1974
(Privacy Act). This proposed rule
describes how individuals can find out
if a USTR system of records contains
information about them and, if so, how
to access or amend a record. The
proposed rule would move the Privacy
Act regulation from part 2005 into a
new subpart C to part 2004. USTR
previously renamed and reorganized
part 2004 to include all of the rules
governing disclosure of USTR records
and information. Elsewhere in this issue
of the Federal Register, USTR is
publishing a notice concerning updates
to its Privacy Act systems of records.
DATES: We must receive your written
comments on or before January 23,
2017.
ADDRESSES: You should submit written
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. The docket
number for this rulemaking is USTR–
2016–0027. USTR invites comments on
all aspects of the proposed rule, and
will revise the language as appropriate
after taking all timely comments into
consideration. Copies of all comments
will be available for public viewing at
www.regulations.gov upon completion
of processing. You can view a
submission by entering the docket
number USTR–2016–0027 in the search
field at https://www.regulations.gov. We
will post comments without change and
will include any personal information
you provide, such as your name,
mailing address, email address, and
telephone number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janice Kaye, Monique Ricker or Melissa
Keppel, Office of General Counsel,
Office of the US Trade Representative,
Anacostia Naval Annex, Building 410/
Door 123, 250 Murray Lane SW.,
Washington DC 20509, jkaye@ustr.eop.
gov; mricker@ustr.eop.gov; mkeppel@
ustr.eop.gov; 202–395–3150.
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 246 (Thursday, December 22, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 93855-93857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30114]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0740; Directorate Identifier 2013-NE-24-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2014-05-
32, which applies to all Pratt & Whitney (PW) PW2037, PW2037D, PW2037M,
PW2040, PW2040D, PW2043, PW2143, PW2643, and F117-PW-100 turbofan
engines. AD 2014-05-32 currently requires one-time eddy current
inspection (ECI) of affected engines with certain diffuser and HPT
cases installed. AD 2014-05-32 also requires a fluorescent-penetrant
inspection (FPI) of the diffuser case rear flange and the HPT case
front flange. Since we issued AD 2014-05-32, the manufacturer
determined through analysis that the inspections required by AD 2014-
05-32 are not adequate to maintain safety. This proposed AD would add
additional repetitive, on-wing ECI inspections. We are proposing this
AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by February 6,
2017.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Pratt &
Whitney, 400 Main St., East Hartford, CT 06108; phone: 860-565-8770;
fax: 860-565-4503. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
781-238-7125.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2013-
0740; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Kierstead, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781-238-7772; fax: 781-
238-7199; email: brian.kierstead@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2013-0740;
Directorate Identifier 2013-NE-24-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
[[Page 93856]]
Discussion
On March 6, 2014, we issued AD 2014-05-32, Amendment 39-17804 (79
FR 17856, March 31, 2014), (``AD 2014-05-32''), for all PW PW2037,
PW2037D, PW2037M, PW2040, PW2040D, PW2043, PW2143, PW2643, and F117-PW-
100 turbofan engines. AD 2014-05-32 requires a one-time ECI of affected
engines with certain diffuser and HPT cases installed. AD 2014-05-32
also requires an FPI of the diffuser case rear flange and HPT case
front flange. AD 2014-05-32 resulted from a rupture of the diffuser-to-
HPT case flange. We issued AD 2014-05-32 to prevent failure of the
diffuser-to-HPT case flange, which could lead to uncontained engine
failure and damage to the airplane.
Actions Since AD 2014-05-32 Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2014-05-32, the manufacturer identified a
subpopulation of diffuser cases installed on the affected engines with
a repaired flange that has a lower fatigue capability. The repaired
flange cannot be distinguished from non-repaired flanges on diffuser
cases installed on the affected engines. We determined, therefore, that
the inspections required by AD 2014-05-32 are not adequate to maintain
safety. To correct this unsafe condition, we are now proposing
additional, repetitive ECI inspections.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed PW Service Bulletin No. PW2000 72-763, Revision No. 1,
dated August 30, 2013; and PW Alert Service Bulletin No. PW2000 A72-
765, Revision No. 1, dated July 13, 2016. This service information
describes procedures for a one-time ECI inspection of the engine
diffuser case and the HPT case, and repetitive on-wing ECIs of the
engine diffuser case assembly, respectively. This service information
is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to
it through their normal course of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would retain the requirements of AD 2014-05-32
except it would eliminate the Prohibition Statement. We determined that
this statement is unnecessary for compliance with the AD. In addition,
this proposed AD would require repetitive, on-wing ECI inspections.
This proposed AD would also remove the PW2240 and PW2337 engines from
the applicability section since these engines were removed from PW Type
Certificate Number E17NE.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 910 engines installed
on airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On-wing/module ECI Inspection.... 8 work-hours x $85 $0 $680............... $230,520 per
per hour = $680. inspection cycle.
FPI Inspection................... 3 work-hours x $85 20 $275 per inspection $250,250 per
per hour = $255. cycle. inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2014-05-32, Amendment 39-17804 (79 FR 17856, March 31, 2014), and
adding the following new AD:
Pratt & Whitney: Docket No. FAA-2013-0740; Directorate Identifier
2013-NE-24-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by February 6,
2017.
[[Page 93857]]
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2014-05-32, Amendment 39-17804 (79 FR 17856,
March 31, 2014).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Pratt & Whitney (PW) PW2037, PW2037D,
PW2037M, PW2040, PW2040D, PW2043, PW2143, PW2643, and F117-PW-100
turbofan engines.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 72, Turbine/
Turboprop Engine.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a rupture of the diffuser-to-high-
pressure turbine (HPT) case flange. We are issuing this AD to
prevent failure of the diffuser-to-HPT case flange, which could lead
to uncontained engine failure and damage to the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Unless already done, comply with this AD within the compliance
times specified.
(1) For diffuser case, part number (P/N) 1B7461, serial numbers
(S/Ns) DGGUAK1306 and DGGUAK1308, and HPT case, P/N 1B2440, S/N
DKLBCS1032:
(i) Within 100 flight cycles or 30 days after May 5, 2014,
whichever is later, eddy current inspect the diffuser case and the
HPT case M-flange. Use PW Service Bulletin (SB) No. PW2000 72-763,
Revision No. 1, dated August 30, 2013, to do the inspection.
(ii) Reserved.
(2) For all diffuser and HPT cases, at the next piece-part
opportunity and every piece-part opportunity thereafter, perform a
high sensitivity fluorescent-penetrant inspection (FPI) of the
entire diffuser case rear flange (M-flange) and bolt holes, and the
entire HPT case forward flange (M-flange) and bolt holes.
(3) For diffuser cases that have not incorporated PW SB PW2000-
72-364 or have incorporated either PW SB PW2000-72-700 or PW2000
Series Engine Manual, Repair-28, Task 72-41-01-300-028 (M-flange
replacement), perform initial and repetitive eddy current
inspections (ECIs) of the M-flange of the diffuser case in
accordance with paragraph (f)(4) of this AD.
(4) Use, as applicable, either the Accomplishment Instructions,
``For Engines Installed on the Aircraft,'' paragraphs 3.(I) through
3.(J), or the Accomplishment Instructions, ``For Engines Removed
from the Aircraft,'' paragraphs 3.(D) through 3.(E), of PW Alert
Service Bulletin (ASB) No. PW2000 A72-765, Revision No. 1, dated
July 13, 2016, to do the ECI as follows:
(i) Perform an initial inspection within the following period,
whichever occurs later:
(A) Within 5,500 cycles since new or since M-flange replacement,
or
(B) Within 2,500 cycles since last piece-part FPI inspection, or
(C) Within 500 cycles from the effective date of this AD.
(ii) If no crack indications are found, re-inspect within 2,500
cycles since last ECI or last piece-part FPI inspection, whichever
occurs first.
(iii) If crack indications are found, measure the crack length
and determine the re-inspect interval in accordance with:
(A) Paragraphs 5.(C) through 5.(D) of PW ASB No. PW2000 A72-765,
Revision No. 1, dated July 13, 2016, ``For Engines Installed on the
Aircraft''; or
(B) Paragraphs 4.(C) through 4.(D) of PW ASB No. PW2000 A72-765,
Revision No. 1, dated July 13, 2016, ``For Engines Removed from the
Aircraft.''
(iv) Remove from service diffuser cases with cracks exceeding
0.170 inches.
(g) Definition
For the purpose of this AD, piece-part opportunity is defined as
when the part is completely disassembled.
(h) Credit for Previous Actions
If you performed an ECI of the diffuser case and HPT case M-
flange using the Accomplishment Instructions of PW SB No. PW2000 72-
763, Revision No. 1, dated August 13, 2013, or an earlier version,
or you performed a high sensitivity FPI of the diffuser case and HPT
case at the piece-part opportunity after January 1, 2010, you met
the requirements of paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request. You may email your request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this proposed AD, contact Brian
Kierstead, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA
01803; phone: 781-238-7772; fax: 781-238-7199; email:
brian.kierstead@faa.gov.
(2) PW SB No. PW2000 72-763, Revision No. 1, dated August 30,
2013; and PW ASB No. PW2000 A72-765, Revision No. 1, dated July 13,
2016, can be obtained from PW using the contact information in
paragraph (j)(3) of this AD.
(3) For service information identified in this proposed AD,
contact Pratt & Whitney, United Technologies Corporation, 400 Main
St., East Hartford, CT 06108; phone: 860-565-8770; fax: 860-565-
4503.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
781-238-7125.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on December 1, 2016.
Colleen M. D'Alessandro,
Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-30114 Filed 12-21-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P