Airworthiness Directives The Boeing Company Airplanes, 93795-93798 [2016-30032]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
can either limit the scope of your
request so that it can be processed
within the statutory time limit or agree
to an alternative time frame for
processing your request. In such cases,
NCUA will make available its FOIA
Public Liaison and notify the requester
of the right to seek dispute resolution
services from the Office of Government
Information Services.
■ 8. Revise § 792.17 to read as follows:
§ 792.17 What can I do if the time limit
passes and I still have not received a
response?
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
(a) If NCUA does not comply with the
time limits under § 792.15, or as
extended under § 792.16, you do not
have to pay search fees; requesters
qualifying for free search fees will not
have to pay duplication fees. However,
if NCUA has extended the time limits
under § 792.16 and more than 5,000
pages are necessary to respond to the
request, NCUA may charge you search
fees (or for requesters qualifying for free
search fees, duplication fees), if NCUA
has discussed with you via written mail,
electronic mail, or telephone (or made
not less than 3 good-faith attempts to do
so) how you could effectively limit the
scope of the request.
(b) You can seek assistance from the
FOIA Public Liaison or dispute
resolution services from the Office of
Government Information Services. You
also can file suit against NCUA because
you will be deemed to have exhausted
your administrative remedies if NCUA
fails to comply with the time limit
provisions of this subpart. If NCUA can
show that exceptional circumstances
exist and that it is exercising due
diligence in responding to your request,
the court may retain jurisdiction and
allow NCUA to complete its review of
the records. You may have to pay search
or duplication fees if a court has
determined that exceptional
circumstances exist and has extended
the time limits for NCUA’s response by
a court order. In determining whether
exceptional circumstances exist, the
court may consider your refusal to
modify the scope of your request or
arrange an alternative time frame for
processing after being given the
opportunity to do so by NCUA, when it
notifies you of the existence of unusual
circumstances as set forth in § 792.16.
■ 9. In § 792.28, revise the introductory
text to read as follows:
§ 792.28 What if I am not satisfied with the
response I receive?
If you are not satisfied with NCUA’s
response to your request, you can seek
dispute resolution services from the
FOIA Public Liaison and the Office of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:15 Dec 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
Government Information Services, and
you can file an administrative appeal.
Your appeal must be in writing and
must be filed within 90 days from
receipt of the initial determination (in
cases of denials of the entire request or
denials of a fee waiver or reduction), or
from receipt of any records being made
available pursuant to the initial
determination (in cases of partial
denials). In the response to your initial
request, the Freedom of Information Act
Officer or the Inspector General (or
designee), will notify you that you may
appeal any adverse determination to the
Office of General Counsel. The General
Counsel, or designee, as set forth in this
paragraph, will:
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2016–30748 Filed 12–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–7531; Directorate
Identifier 2015–NM–052–AD; Amendment
39–18747; AD 2016–25–21]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 787–8
airplanes. This AD was prompted by
reports of electrical shorts of the motor
stator wiring burning a hole through the
housing of the motor of the cabin air
compressor (CAC). This AD requires
installing modified inboard and
outboard CAC modules on the left-hand
(LH) side and right-hand (RH) side cabin
air conditioning and temperature
control system (CACTCS) packs. We are
issuing this AD to prevent the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective January 26,
2017.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of January 26, 2017.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC
110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740;
telephone 562–797–1717; Internet
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
93795
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221. It is also
available on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
7531.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
7531; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric
Brown, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin
Safety and Environmental Systems
Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–
3356; phone: 425–917–6476; fax: 425–
917–6590; email: eric.m.brown@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 787–8 airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on
December 29, 2015 (80 FR 81220) (‘‘the
NPRM’’). The NPRM was prompted by
reports of electrical shorts of the motor
stator wiring burning a hole through the
housing of the motor of the CAC. The
NPRM proposed to require installing
modified inboard and outboard CAC
modules on the LH side and RH side
CACTCS packs. We are issuing this AD
to prevent an electrical short from
burning through the housing of the
motor of the CAC. This condition, in
combination with flammable fuel
vapors, could result in a fire in the pack
bay and consequent reduced
controllability of the airplane.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. The
following presents the comments
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
93796
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
Support for the NPRM
United Airlines (UA) stated that it
agrees with the proposed compliance
time.
Request To Clarify the Unsafe
Condition
Boeing asked that we clarify the
unsafe condition in the NPRM to specify
that for a fire to occur in the pack bay,
an electrical short would have to burn
through the housing of the CAC motor
in combination with the presence of
flammable fluid vapors. Boeing stressed
that the top-level event requires both an
ignition source and flammable fluid
vapors.
We agree with the commenter’s
request for the reason provided. We
have revised the unsafe condition in the
Discussion section and paragraph (e) of
this AD accordingly.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Requests To Increase Work-Hour
Estimate
Boeing and Japan Airlines (JAL) asked
that we increase the work-hour estimate
in the ‘‘Costs of Compliance’’ section of
the NPRM. Boeing stated that Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210055–00, Issue 001, dated March
12, 2015, specifies 25.25 work-hours for
the LH side pack replacement and 28.25
work-hours for the RH side pack
replacement. Boeing added that the
NPRM should either specify 30 workhours per side or 60 work-hours per
airplane. JAL stated that the
replacement for each pack specified in
the proposed AD requires more than 25
work-hours, as specified in the
referenced service information.
We agree. We have confirmed that the
proposed work-hour estimate should be
increased. Therefore, we have increased
the work-hour estimate in the ‘‘Costs of
Compliance’’ section of this final rule
from ‘‘up to 30 work-hours’’ to ‘‘up to
54 work-hours’’ for accomplishing the
required actions.
Request To Extend Compliance Time
JAL asked that the proposed
compliance time for the CAC
replacements specified in the NPRM be
extended so the actions can be done
during scheduled heavy maintenance.
JAL stated that the replacement for each
pack specified in the proposed AD
requires more than 25 work-hours,
which would necessitate a longer
compliance time.
We do not agree with the commenter’s
request to extend the compliance time
for the CAC replacements. We have
determined that the compliance time, as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:15 Dec 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
proposed, represents the maximum
interval of time allowable for the
affected airplanes to continue to safely
operate before the CAC replacements are
accomplished. Airplanes affected by
this AD will undergo at least one
maintenance check (C-check) within the
required compliance time (5 years after
the effective date of this AD); the
replacement can be done at that time.
Therefore, we have made no change to
this AD in this regard.
Request To Use Alternative Part
Aeromexico asked if installing an H10
CAC having part number (P/N)
7010101H10 could be considered as an
alternative to installing H09 CAC parts
having P/N 7010101H09. Aeromexico
stated that Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB210055–00, Issue 001,
dated March 12, 2015, specifies
installing the H09 CAC, but UTC
Aerospace Systems (the parts vendor)
stated that there are no H09 CACs
presently available. Aeromexico added
that UTC Aerospace Systems indicated
that H10 CACs having P/N 7010101H10
will be available for retrofit during 2016.
Aeromexico noted that Boeing and UTC
Aerospace Systems have indicated that
P/N 7010101H09 and P/N 7010101H10
will be interchangeable.
We agree that clarification is
necessary. Future part designs might be
acceptable as replacement parts for the
part mandated by this AD, because
those future parts should include design
changes meant to address the unsafe
condition identified in this AD.
However, we do not agree to allow use
of P/N 7010101H10 CACs, because P/N
7010101H10 is not an approved part for
installation on Model 787 airplanes at
this time. Therefore, under the
provisions of paragraph (h) of this AD,
we will consider requests for approval
of specific parts as an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) with
this AD if data are submitted to
substantiate that those parts would
provide an acceptable level of safety.
We have not revised this AD in this
regard.
Request To Clarify Certain Actions in
Service Information
UA asked that, for Group 1 airplanes
in Work Packages 1 and 2 of the Work
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB210055–00,
Issue 001, dated March 12, 2015, the
steps identified as RC (Required for
Compliance) be changed to refer to all
applicable steps within that service
information instead of referring to the
actions specified in UTC Aerospace
Systems Service Bulletins 7010188–21–
6 and 7010189–21–6, both Revision 1,
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
both dated January 30, 2015. UA stated
that referring to the UTC Aerospace
Systems service information forces
operators to request multiple AMOCs in
order to comply with the actions in the
proposed AD.
We agree that clarification is
necessary. Although certain steps,
which describe the access, removal, and
installation of the CACs, are labeled as
‘‘RC,’’ the specifics of how those actions
are to be accomplished are not
mandated. The Work Instructions in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787–
81205–SB210055–00, Issue 001, dated
March 12, 2015, do refer to UTC
Aerospace Systems, Service Bulletins
7010188–21–6 and 7010189–21–6, both
Revision 1, both dated January 30, 2015,
for accomplishing certain actions, but
that service information is only an
additional source of service information
that operators may use (as indicated by
the use of the words ‘‘refer to’’ in the RC
step).
UA asked that the UTC Aerospace
Systems kit part number be called out
in paragraph 3.A. under ‘‘Parts
Necessary for Each Airplane,’’ in data
module B787–A–21–00–0055–00A–
934A–D, ‘‘Material Information,’’ of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787–
81205–SB210055, Issue 001, dated
March 12, 2015. UA noted that, as
written, the proposed AD suggests that
no parts are required.
We do not agree with the commenter’s
request. In Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB210055, Issue 001,
dated March 12, 2015; Step 3.A., ‘‘Parts
Necessary for Each Airplane’’ for
Groups 1 and 2 airplanes, within data
module B787–A–21–00–0055–00A–
934A–D, ‘‘Material Information,’’
identifies the parts necessary for each
airplane that would be supplied by
Boeing. Step 3.B. identifies the parts
and materials that are supplied by
operators. Although having all kit
information in one location might
provide a single list of parts needed, it
could be confusing to determine who is
responsible for supplying which parts.
Therefore, we have made no change to
this AD in this regard.
UA pointed out several instances
where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB210055, Issue 001,
dated March 12, 2015, is referenced for
certain sealing and bonding check
instructions. UA stated that UTC
Aerospace Systems Service Bulletins
7010188–21–6 and 7010189–21–6, both
Revision 1, both dated January 30, 2015,
refer back to Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB210055, Issue
001, dated March 12, 2015, which does
not provide guidance on how to
accomplish these actions. From these
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
statements, we infer that UA is
requesting that we revise the proposed
requirements to clarify how these
actions are to be accomplished.
We find that clarification is necessary.
The Work Instructions in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210055, Issue 001, dated March 12,
2015, specify ‘‘The electrical surface
bond and fay seal data is provided in
the applicable 787 airplane maintenance
manual (AMM) 21–51–19, Cabin Air
Compressor—Preparation Before
Installation AMMs.’’ The instructions
are contained within those AMM
procedures; however, those steps are not
required for compliance with this AD
because alternative procedures may be
used. Therefore, we have made no
change to this AD in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
with the changes described previously
and minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
correcting the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this AD.
93797
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB210055–00,
Issue 001, dated March 12, 2015. This
service information describes
procedures for installing modified
inboard and outboard CAC modules on
the LH side and RH side CACTCS packs.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 22
airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Modification, installation, and
installation test.
Labor cost
Up to 54 work-hours × $85
per hour = $4,590.
According to the manufacturer, some
of the costs of this AD may be covered
under warranty, thereby reducing the
cost impact on affected individuals. We
do not control warranty coverage for
affected individuals. As a result, we
have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, and Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:15 Dec 21, 2016
Parts cost
Jkt 241001
Cost per product
$0
Up to $4,590 ..........................
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Cost on U.S. operators
§ 39.13
Up to $100,980.
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2016–25–21 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–18747; Docket No.
FAA–2015–7531; Directorate Identifier
2015–NM–052–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective January 26, 2017.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 787–8 airplanes, certificated in any
category, as identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787–81205–SB210055–00,
Issue 001, dated March 12, 2015.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 21, Air conditioning.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of
electrical shorts of the motor stator wiring
burning a hole through the housing of the
motor of the cabin air compressor (CAC). We
are issuing this AD to prevent an electrical
short from burning through the housing of
the motor of the CAC. This condition, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors,
could result in a fire in the pack bay and
consequent reduced controllability of the
airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
93798
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(g) Replacement of CAC Modules
Within 5 years after the effective date of
this AD, install modified inboard and
outboard CAC modules on the left side and
right side cabin air conditioning and
temperature control system (CACTCS) packs,
in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB210055–00, Issue 001, dated
March 12, 2015.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (i) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair method,
modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of
the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains
steps that are labeled as Required for
Compliance (RC), the provisions of
paragraphs (h)(4)(i) and (h)(4)(ii) of this AD
apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. An AMOC is required
for any deviations to RC steps, including
substeps and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(i) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Eric Brown, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems
Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
phone: 425–917–6476; fax: 425–917–6590;
email: eric.m.brown@faa.gov.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:15 Dec 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787–
81205–SB210055–00, Issue 001, dated March
12, 2015.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740;
telephone 562–797–1717; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 6, 2016.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–30032 Filed 12–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–9527; Directorate
Identifier 2016–CE–036–AD; Amendment
39–18748; AD 2016–25–22]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air
Limited Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
Examining the AD Docket
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Viking Air Limited Models DHC–2 Mk.
I, DHC–2 Mk. II, and DHC–2 Mk. III
airplanes that supersedes AD 2016–19–
08. This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) issued by the aviation authority
of another country to identify and
correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes
the unsafe condition as corrosion of the
elevator control rod and of the elevator
actuating lever on the control column,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
which could cause these components to
fail. We are issuing this AD to require
actions to address the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective December
22, 2016.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of October 24, 2016 (81 FR 64053,
September 19, 2016).
We must receive comments on this
AD by February 6, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Viking Air Limited
Technical Support, 1959 De Havilland
Way, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada,
V8L 5V5; telephone: (North America)
(800) 663–8444; fax: (250) 656–0673;
email: technical.support@vikingair.com;
Internet: https://www.vikingair.com/
support/service-bulletins. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call (816) 329–4148. It is also available
on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
locating Docket No. FAA–2016–9527.
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
9527; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647–
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aziz
Ahmed, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, New
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 246 (Thursday, December 22, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 93795-93798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30032]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-7531; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-052-AD;
Amendment 39-18747; AD 2016-25-21]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 787-8 airplanes. This AD was prompted by
reports of electrical shorts of the motor stator wiring burning a hole
through the housing of the motor of the cabin air compressor (CAC).
This AD requires installing modified inboard and outboard CAC modules
on the left-hand (LH) side and right-hand (RH) side cabin air
conditioning and temperature control system (CACTCS) packs. We are
issuing this AD to prevent the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective January 26, 2017.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of January 26,
2017.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740; telephone 562-797-1717; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. It
is also available on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-7531.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
7531; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Brown, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin
Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6476; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
eric.m.brown@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 787-8 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on
December 29, 2015 (80 FR 81220) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM was prompted
by reports of electrical shorts of the motor stator wiring burning a
hole through the housing of the motor of the CAC. The NPRM proposed to
require installing modified inboard and outboard CAC modules on the LH
side and RH side CACTCS packs. We are issuing this AD to prevent an
electrical short from burning through the housing of the motor of the
CAC. This condition, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could
result in a fire in the pack bay and consequent reduced controllability
of the airplane.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments
[[Page 93796]]
received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.
Support for the NPRM
United Airlines (UA) stated that it agrees with the proposed
compliance time.
Request To Clarify the Unsafe Condition
Boeing asked that we clarify the unsafe condition in the NPRM to
specify that for a fire to occur in the pack bay, an electrical short
would have to burn through the housing of the CAC motor in combination
with the presence of flammable fluid vapors. Boeing stressed that the
top-level event requires both an ignition source and flammable fluid
vapors.
We agree with the commenter's request for the reason provided. We
have revised the unsafe condition in the Discussion section and
paragraph (e) of this AD accordingly.
Requests To Increase Work-Hour Estimate
Boeing and Japan Airlines (JAL) asked that we increase the work-
hour estimate in the ``Costs of Compliance'' section of the NPRM.
Boeing stated that Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210055-
00, Issue 001, dated March 12, 2015, specifies 25.25 work-hours for the
LH side pack replacement and 28.25 work-hours for the RH side pack
replacement. Boeing added that the NPRM should either specify 30 work-
hours per side or 60 work-hours per airplane. JAL stated that the
replacement for each pack specified in the proposed AD requires more
than 25 work-hours, as specified in the referenced service information.
We agree. We have confirmed that the proposed work-hour estimate
should be increased. Therefore, we have increased the work-hour
estimate in the ``Costs of Compliance'' section of this final rule from
``up to 30 work-hours'' to ``up to 54 work-hours'' for accomplishing
the required actions.
Request To Extend Compliance Time
JAL asked that the proposed compliance time for the CAC
replacements specified in the NPRM be extended so the actions can be
done during scheduled heavy maintenance. JAL stated that the
replacement for each pack specified in the proposed AD requires more
than 25 work-hours, which would necessitate a longer compliance time.
We do not agree with the commenter's request to extend the
compliance time for the CAC replacements. We have determined that the
compliance time, as proposed, represents the maximum interval of time
allowable for the affected airplanes to continue to safely operate
before the CAC replacements are accomplished. Airplanes affected by
this AD will undergo at least one maintenance check (C-check) within
the required compliance time (5 years after the effective date of this
AD); the replacement can be done at that time. Therefore, we have made
no change to this AD in this regard.
Request To Use Alternative Part
Aeromexico asked if installing an H10 CAC having part number (P/N)
7010101H10 could be considered as an alternative to installing H09 CAC
parts having P/N 7010101H09. Aeromexico stated that Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210055-00, Issue 001, dated March 12,
2015, specifies installing the H09 CAC, but UTC Aerospace Systems (the
parts vendor) stated that there are no H09 CACs presently available.
Aeromexico added that UTC Aerospace Systems indicated that H10 CACs
having P/N 7010101H10 will be available for retrofit during 2016.
Aeromexico noted that Boeing and UTC Aerospace Systems have indicated
that P/N 7010101H09 and P/N 7010101H10 will be interchangeable.
We agree that clarification is necessary. Future part designs might
be acceptable as replacement parts for the part mandated by this AD,
because those future parts should include design changes meant to
address the unsafe condition identified in this AD. However, we do not
agree to allow use of P/N 7010101H10 CACs, because P/N 7010101H10 is
not an approved part for installation on Model 787 airplanes at this
time. Therefore, under the provisions of paragraph (h) of this AD, we
will consider requests for approval of specific parts as an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) with this AD if data are submitted to
substantiate that those parts would provide an acceptable level of
safety. We have not revised this AD in this regard.
Request To Clarify Certain Actions in Service Information
UA asked that, for Group 1 airplanes in Work Packages 1 and 2 of
the Work Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB210055-00, Issue 001, dated March 12, 2015, the steps identified as
RC (Required for Compliance) be changed to refer to all applicable
steps within that service information instead of referring to the
actions specified in UTC Aerospace Systems Service Bulletins 7010188-
21-6 and 7010189-21-6, both Revision 1, both dated January 30, 2015. UA
stated that referring to the UTC Aerospace Systems service information
forces operators to request multiple AMOCs in order to comply with the
actions in the proposed AD.
We agree that clarification is necessary. Although certain steps,
which describe the access, removal, and installation of the CACs, are
labeled as ``RC,'' the specifics of how those actions are to be
accomplished are not mandated. The Work Instructions in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210055-00, Issue 001, dated March 12,
2015, do refer to UTC Aerospace Systems, Service Bulletins 7010188-21-6
and 7010189-21-6, both Revision 1, both dated January 30, 2015, for
accomplishing certain actions, but that service information is only an
additional source of service information that operators may use (as
indicated by the use of the words ``refer to'' in the RC step).
UA asked that the UTC Aerospace Systems kit part number be called
out in paragraph 3.A. under ``Parts Necessary for Each Airplane,'' in
data module B787-A-21-00-0055-00A-934A-D, ``Material Information,'' of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210055, Issue 001, dated
March 12, 2015. UA noted that, as written, the proposed AD suggests
that no parts are required.
We do not agree with the commenter's request. In Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210055, Issue 001, dated March 12, 2015;
Step 3.A., ``Parts Necessary for Each Airplane'' for Groups 1 and 2
airplanes, within data module B787-A-21-00-0055-00A-934A-D, ``Material
Information,'' identifies the parts necessary for each airplane that
would be supplied by Boeing. Step 3.B. identifies the parts and
materials that are supplied by operators. Although having all kit
information in one location might provide a single list of parts
needed, it could be confusing to determine who is responsible for
supplying which parts. Therefore, we have made no change to this AD in
this regard.
UA pointed out several instances where Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin B787-81205-SB210055, Issue 001, dated March 12, 2015, is
referenced for certain sealing and bonding check instructions. UA
stated that UTC Aerospace Systems Service Bulletins 7010188-21-6 and
7010189-21-6, both Revision 1, both dated January 30, 2015, refer back
to Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210055, Issue 001, dated
March 12, 2015, which does not provide guidance on how to accomplish
these actions. From these
[[Page 93797]]
statements, we infer that UA is requesting that we revise the proposed
requirements to clarify how these actions are to be accomplished.
We find that clarification is necessary. The Work Instructions in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210055, Issue 001, dated
March 12, 2015, specify ``The electrical surface bond and fay seal data
is provided in the applicable 787 airplane maintenance manual (AMM) 21-
51-19, Cabin Air Compressor--Preparation Before Installation AMMs.''
The instructions are contained within those AMM procedures; however,
those steps are not required for compliance with this AD because
alternative procedures may be used. Therefore, we have made no change
to this AD in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
[Agr]re consistent with the intent that was proposed in
the NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210055-00,
Issue 001, dated March 12, 2015. This service information describes
procedures for installing modified inboard and outboard CAC modules on
the LH side and RH side CACTCS packs. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 22 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modification, installation, and Up to 54 $0 Up to $4,590....... Up to $100,980.
installation test. work[dash]hours x
$85 per hour =
$4,590.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, and Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2016-25-21 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18747; Docket No. FAA-
2015-7531; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-052-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective January 26, 2017.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 787-8 airplanes,
certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin B787-81205-SB210055-00, Issue 001, dated March 12, 2015.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 21, Air
conditioning.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of electrical shorts of the
motor stator wiring burning a hole through the housing of the motor
of the cabin air compressor (CAC). We are issuing this AD to prevent
an electrical short from burning through the housing of the motor of
the CAC. This condition, in combination with flammable fuel vapors,
could result in a fire in the pack bay and consequent reduced
controllability of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
[[Page 93798]]
(g) Replacement of CAC Modules
Within 5 years after the effective date of this AD, install
modified inboard and outboard CAC modules on the left side and right
side cabin air conditioning and temperature control system (CACTCS)
packs, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210055-00, Issue 001, dated
March 12, 2015.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or
alteration deviation must meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as Required for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs
(h)(4)(i) and (h)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. An AMOC is required for any deviations to RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(i) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Eric Brown,
Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch,
ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; phone: 425-917-6476; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
eric.m.brown@faa.gov.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210055-00, Issue
001, dated March 12, 2015.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740;
telephone 562-797-1717; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 6, 2016.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-30032 Filed 12-21-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P