United States Standards for Grades of Canned Vegetables, 93572-93574 [2016-30619]
Download as PDF
93572
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 245 / Wednesday, December 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
inspection applications will meet CBP’s
requirement for ITDS.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered
the economic impact of this action on
small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Small agricultural producers are
defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) as those having
annual receipts of no more than
$750,000 and small agricultural service
firms are defined as those having annual
receipts of no more than $7.5 million.
Under these definitions, AMS estimates
the number of companies affected is
approximately 60,000, with 24,000, or
40%, of the companies considered small
businesses. AMS does not foresee any
negative impact on members of the
industry, regardless of size, as a result
of this interim rule.
AMS is making these administrative
changes to allow for the use of current
technology by allowing the application
for inspection to be submitted
electronically and eliminating
references to filing applications for
service by telegraph.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the information collection
requirements for form SC–357, Initial
Inspection Request for Regulated
Imported Commodities, was previously
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) and assigned OMB
No. 0581–0125, effective August 1,
2016. AMS has determined that no
changes are required to the information
collection requirements as a result of the
changes in this action. Should
additional changes become necessary,
they would be submitted to OMB for
approval. AMS is committed to
complying with the E-Government Act,
to promote the use of the internet and
other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes.
In addition, USDA has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
rule.
Finally, interested persons are invited
to submit comments on this interim
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Dec 20, 2016
Jkt 241001
rule, including the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.
This rule invites comments on
updates to application requirements and
the administrative change to the
inspection, certification and standards
requirements for fresh and processed
fruit, vegetable, and specialty crops.
Any comments received will be
considered prior to finalization of this
rule.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, it is found that this
interim rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act of 1946. Pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 553, AMS has found and
determined upon good cause that it is
impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to the public interest to give
preliminary notice prior to putting this
rule into effect because: (1) The changes
in this rule reflect current practices; (2)
the import industry is aware of the ITDS
initiative and its goal to automate paperbased processes; (3) CBP is requiring the
timely update of import regulations to
meet the ITDS electronic data
submission requirement; and (4) this
rule provides a 60-day comment period,
and all comments received will be
considered prior to the finalization of
this rule.
may require that it be confirmed by the
applicant in writing or electronically.
An application may be made for one or
more lots, or it may be in the nature of
a blanket application for inspection of
all designated lots of a given commodity
within a particular period, or for all
designated lots loaded or received at a
specified point.
PART 52—PROCESSED FRUITS AND
VEGETABLES, PROCESSED
PRODUCTS THEREOF, AND CERTAIN
OTHER PROCESSED FOOD
PRODUCTS
3. Revise § 52.7 paragraph (a) to read
as follows:
■
§ 52.7 Information required in connection
with application.
(a) Application for inspection service
shall be made in the English language
and may be made orally (in person or
by telephone), in writing, or
electronically. If an application for
inspection is made orally, written
confirmation may be required by the
inspection service involved.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: December 14, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–30570 Filed 12–20–16; 8:45 am]
List of Subjects
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
7 CFR Part 51
Food grades and standards, Fruits,
Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping,
Vegetables.
7 CFR Part 52
Food grades and standards, Food
labeling, Frozen foods, Fruits, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Vegetables.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR parts 51 and 52 are
amended as follows:
■ 1. The authority citation for parts 51
and 52 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
PART 51—FRESH FRUITS,
VEGETABLES AND OTHER
PRODUCTS (INSPECTION,
CERTIFICATION, AND STANDARDS)
■
2. Revise § 51.6 to read as follows:
§ 51.6
How to make application.
An application for inspection service
may be filed in an office of inspection
at any market referred to in § 51.4 (b),
(c), or (d) or with any inspector. It may
be made in writing, orally,
electronically, or by telephone. If made
orally or by telephone, the inspector
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 52
[Document Number AMS–FV–15–0049, FV–
16–332]
United States Standards for Grades of
Canned Vegetables
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final notice of U.S. grade
standards.
AGENCY:
The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) of the Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is revising 18 U.S.
grade standards for canned vegetables
issued on or before August 3, 1998.
AMS is replacing the two-term grading
system (dual nomenclature) with a
single term to describe each quality
level for the grade standards identified
in this document. Terms using the letter
grade will be retained and the
descriptive term will be eliminated. For
example, grade standards using the term
‘‘U.S. Grade A’’ or ‘‘U.S. Fancy’’ will be
revised to use only the term ‘‘U.S. Grade
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 245 / Wednesday, December 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
A.’’ Likewise, grade standards using the
term ‘‘U.S. Grade B’’ or ‘‘U.S. Extra
Standard’’ will be revised to use the
single term ‘‘U.S. Grade B.’’ These
changes will bring the grade standards
in line with the present quality levels
being marketed today and provide
guidance in the effective use of these
products. Editorial changes will also be
made to the grade standards that
conform to recent changes made in
other grade standards.
DATES: These grade standards go into
effect January 20, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Standardization Branch,
Specialty Crops Inspection Division,
Specialty Crops Program, Agricultural
Marketing Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., Room 0709-South Building; STOP
0247, Washington, DC 20250.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dana N. White, at the address above, by
phone (202) 720–5870; fax (202) 690–
1527; or email: Dana.White@
ams.usda.gov. Copies of the revised U.S.
standards for grades for the 18 canned
vegetables covered by this document
will be available on the Internet at
https://www.ams.usda.gov/gradesstandards/vegetables.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
203(c) of the Agricultural Marketing Act
U.S. Standards for grades of canned
of 1946, as amended, directs and
authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture
‘‘to develop and improve standards of
quality, condition, quantity, grade, and
packaging, and recommend and
demonstrate such standards in order to
encourage uniformity and consistency
in commercial practices.’’
AMS is committed to carrying out this
authority in a manner that facilitates the
marketing of agricultural commodities
and makes copies of official standards
available upon request. The U.S.
standards for grades of fruits and
vegetables not connected with Federal
Marketing Orders or U.S. import
requirements no longer appear in the
Code of Federal Regulations, but are
maintained by USDA, AMS, Specialty
Crops Program and are available on the
internet at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
grades-standards/vegetables. AMS
revised these U.S. Standards for Grades
using the procedures that appear in part
36 of title 7 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (7 CFR part 36).
BACKGROUND: AMS periodically reviews
the grade standards for usefulness in
serving the industry. AMS has
determined that changes to 18 grade
standards covering various canned
vegetables are required. More recently
developed grade standards use a single
term, such as ‘‘U.S. Grade A’’ or ‘‘U.S.
Change level
of quality
designation to
single term
Effective date
06/20/73
Yes ...............
Beets ................................................
Carrots ..............................................
Chili Sauce .......................................
Corn, Cream Style ............................
08/03/98
08/03/98
10/20/53
07/01/57
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hominy .............................................
Leafy Greens ....................................
03/10/58
09/01/73
Yes ...............
Yes ...............
Okra ..................................................
Okra and Tomatoes or Tomatoes
and Okra.
Onions ..............................................
07/08/57
12/24/57
Yes ...............
Yes ...............
11/02/57
Yes ...............
Peas and Carrots .............................
Peas, Field and Black-eye Peas ......
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Asparagus ........................................
07/20/70
07/01/57
Yes ...............
Yes ...............
Pimientos ..........................................
Pumpkin (Squash) ............................
Sauerkraut ........................................
Spinach .............................................
10/23/67
07/01/57
05/13/63
05/08/71
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Squash (Summer Type) ...................
Succotash .........................................
05/25/59
05/24/67
Yes ...............
Yes ...............
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Dec 20, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Grade B,’’ to describe each level of
quality within a grade standard. Older
grade standards used dual
nomenclature, such as ‘‘U.S. Grade A’’
and ‘‘U.S. Fancy,’’ ‘‘U.S. Grade B’’ and
‘‘U.S. Extra Standard,’’ and ‘‘U.S. Grade
C’’ and ‘‘U.S. Standard,’’ to describe the
same level of quality. The terms ‘‘U.S.
Fancy,’’ ‘‘U.S. Extra Standard,’’ and
‘‘U.S. Standard’’ will be removed and
the terms ‘‘U.S. Grade A,’’ ‘‘U.S. Grade
B,’’ and ‘‘U.S. Grade C’’ will be used
exclusively. AMS proposed editorial
changes to these grade standards, i.e.,
updating addresses to obtain copies of
the grade standards, removing specific
addresses for licensed suppliers of color
standards and inspection aids, and
updating Code of Federal Regulations
references where applicable. Contact
information for current licensed
suppliers is available in the Fresh and
Processed Equipment Catalog on the
AMS Web site at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/grades-standards/
how-purchase-equipment-and-visualaids.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These
revisions will provide a format that is
consistent with those of other grade
standards (75 FR 43141). The following
table summarizes the changes made by
AMS.
Other revisions proposed
Update address for standards.
Correct Standard of Identity citation.
Update address for standards.
Update address for standards.
Update address for standards.
Update address for standards.
Add Standard of Identity citation.
Add Latin name.
Update address for standards.
Update address for standards.
Add titles to Tables IV and V.
Correct Standard of Identity citation.
Update address for standards.
Update address for standards.
Update address for standards.
Add titles for Tables II and III.
Add Standard of Identity citation.
Update address for standards.
Update address for standards.
Replace ‘‘U.S. Grade D’’ with ‘‘Substandard.’’
Update address for standards.
Update address for standards.
Update address for standards.
Update address for standards.
Correct Standard of Identity citation.
Update address for standards.
Update address for standards.
Replace ‘‘U.S. Grade D’’ with ‘‘Substandard.’’
Put ‘‘proportion of ingredients’’ in outline form.
Sfmt 4700
93573
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
93574
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 245 / Wednesday, December 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
These revisions provide a common
language for trade and better reflect the
current marketing of fruits and
vegetables.
On June 17, 2016, AMS published a
Proposed Notice in the Federal Register
(81 FR 39596) soliciting comments on
replacing the two-term grading system
with a single term to describe each
quality level for the grade standards
identified in this document. Two
comments were received by August 16,
2016, the closing date of the public
comment period, from one private
citizen and one individual associated
with a tribal government agency.
The two comments supported the
replacement of the two-term grading
system with a single term as a positive
step forward. USDA stands by its
decision to replace the two-term grading
system (dual nomenclature) with a
single term.
Based on the information gathered,
AMS is removing the two-term grading
system (dual nomenclature) and making
editorial changes to the aforementioned
U.S. Standards for Grade. The revision
brings these grade standards in line with
other recently amended standards and
current terminology, and updates the
standards to more accurately represent
today’s marketing practices.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
Dated: December 15, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Office of Inspector General
This rule relates to agency
organization and internal agency
management. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(A), such rules are not subject to the
requirement to provide public notice of
proposed rulemaking and opportunity
for public comment. Therefore, notice
and comment before the effective date
are being waived.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
OIG has reviewed this rule to ensure
its consistency with the regulatory
philosophy and principles set forth in
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563. OIG
has determined that this rule is nonsignificant within the meaning of
Executive Order 12866. Therefore, this
rule is not required to be and has not
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12291
7 CFR Part 2610
This rule relates to internal agency
organization and management.
Therefore, it is exempt from the
provisions of Executive Order 12291.
Organization, Functions, and
Delegations of Authority
Office of Inspector General,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Paperwork Reduction Act
The U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA), Office of Inspector
General (OIG) amends its regulation
relating to organization, functions, and
delegations of authority. The
amendments are necessary to reflect
reorganizations within OIG.
DATES: Effective December 21, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christy Slamowitz, Counsel to the
Inspector General, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., Room 441–E, Washington, DC
SUMMARY:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Administrative Procedure Act
These regulations will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Therefore, a regulatory flexibility
analysis as provided by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, as amended, is not
required.
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
17:05 Dec 20, 2016
The
regulation on USDA–OIG’s organization,
functions, and delegations of authority
was last published in 1995 (60 FR
52840). Since that time, OIG has had
several internal reorganizations. In order
to provide the public with current
information regarding OIG’s
organization, functions, and delegations
of authority, OIG is amending its
regulations.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Flexibility Act
[FR Doc. 2016–30619 Filed 12–20–16; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20250–2308, Telephone: (202) 720–
9110.
Jkt 241001
These regulations impose no
additional reporting and recordkeeping
requirements. Therefore, clearance by
OMB is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
This rule does not have Federalism
implications, as set forth in Executive
Order 13132. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Congressional Review Act
OIG has determined that this rule is
not a major rule as defined by the
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 804.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 2610
Authority delegations (Government
agencies), Organization and functions
(Government agencies).
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Office of Inspector
General revises 7 CFR part 2610 to read
as follows:
■
PART 2610—ORGANIZATION,
FUNCTIONS, AND DELEGATIONS OF
AUTHORITY
Sec.
2610.1
2610.2
2610.3
2610.4
2610.5
General statement.
Headquarters organization.
Regional organization.
Requests for service.
Delegations of authority.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552; Inspector
General Act of 1978, as amended, 5 U.S.C.
app.; 7 U.S.C. 2270.
§ 2610.1
General statement.
(a) The Inspector General Act of 1978,
as amended, 5 U.S.C. app. (IG Act),
established an Office of Inspector
General (OIG) in the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) and transferred to it
the functions, powers, and duties of
offices referred to in the Department as
the ‘‘Office of Investigation’’ and the
‘‘Office of Audit,’’ previously assigned
to the OIG created by the Secretary’s
Memoranda 1915 and 1727, dated
March 23, 1977, and October 5, 1977,
respectively. Under the IG Act, OIG was
established as an independent and
objective unit, headed by the Inspector
General (IG), who is appointed by the
President and reports to and is under
the general supervision of the Secretary.
(b) OIG conducts and supervises
audits and investigations relating to
Department programs and operations;
provides leadership and coordination
and recommends policies for activities
designed to promote economy,
efficiency, and effectiveness in the
administration of, and to prevent and
detect fraud and abuse in, such
programs and operations; and provides
a means for keeping the Secretary of
Agriculture and the Congress fully and
currently informed about problems and
deficiencies relating to the
administration of such programs and
operations and the necessity for and
progress of corrective action.
(c) The IG has specific duties,
responsibilities, and authorities
pursuant to the IG Act, including to:
(1) Provide policy direction for, and
conduct, supervise, and coordinate
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 21, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 93572-93574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30619]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 52
[Document Number AMS-FV-15-0049, FV-16-332]
United States Standards for Grades of Canned Vegetables
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final notice of U.S. grade standards.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) of the Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is revising 18 U.S. grade standards for canned
vegetables issued on or before August 3, 1998. AMS is replacing the
two-term grading system (dual nomenclature) with a single term to
describe each quality level for the grade standards identified in this
document. Terms using the letter grade will be retained and the
descriptive term will be eliminated. For example, grade standards using
the term ``U.S. Grade A'' or ``U.S. Fancy'' will be revised to use only
the term ``U.S. Grade
[[Page 93573]]
A.'' Likewise, grade standards using the term ``U.S. Grade B'' or
``U.S. Extra Standard'' will be revised to use the single term ``U.S.
Grade B.'' These changes will bring the grade standards in line with
the present quality levels being marketed today and provide guidance in
the effective use of these products. Editorial changes will also be
made to the grade standards that conform to recent changes made in
other grade standards.
DATES: These grade standards go into effect January 20, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Standardization Branch, Specialty Crops Inspection Division,
Specialty Crops Program, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Room 0709-
South Building; STOP 0247, Washington, DC 20250.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dana N. White, at the address above,
by phone (202) 720-5870; fax (202) 690-1527; or email:
Dana.White@ams.usda.gov. Copies of the revised U.S. standards for
grades for the 18 canned vegetables covered by this document will be
available on the Internet at https://www.ams.usda.gov/grades-standards/vegetables.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 203(c) of the Agricultural Marketing
Act of 1946, as amended, directs and authorizes the Secretary of
Agriculture ``to develop and improve standards of quality, condition,
quantity, grade, and packaging, and recommend and demonstrate such
standards in order to encourage uniformity and consistency in
commercial practices.''
AMS is committed to carrying out this authority in a manner that
facilitates the marketing of agricultural commodities and makes copies
of official standards available upon request. The U.S. standards for
grades of fruits and vegetables not connected with Federal Marketing
Orders or U.S. import requirements no longer appear in the Code of
Federal Regulations, but are maintained by USDA, AMS, Specialty Crops
Program and are available on the internet at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/grades-standards/vegetables. AMS revised these U.S. Standards for
Grades using the procedures that appear in part 36 of title 7 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (7 CFR part 36).
BACKGROUND: AMS periodically reviews the grade standards for usefulness
in serving the industry. AMS has determined that changes to 18 grade
standards covering various canned vegetables are required. More
recently developed grade standards use a single term, such as ``U.S.
Grade A'' or ``U.S. Grade B,'' to describe each level of quality within
a grade standard. Older grade standards used dual nomenclature, such as
``U.S. Grade A'' and ``U.S. Fancy,'' ``U.S. Grade B'' and ``U.S. Extra
Standard,'' and ``U.S. Grade C'' and ``U.S. Standard,'' to describe the
same level of quality. The terms ``U.S. Fancy,'' ``U.S. Extra
Standard,'' and ``U.S. Standard'' will be removed and the terms ``U.S.
Grade A,'' ``U.S. Grade B,'' and ``U.S. Grade C'' will be used
exclusively. AMS proposed editorial changes to these grade standards,
i.e., updating addresses to obtain copies of the grade standards,
removing specific addresses for licensed suppliers of color standards
and inspection aids, and updating Code of Federal Regulations
references where applicable. Contact information for current licensed
suppliers is available in the Fresh and Processed Equipment Catalog on
the AMS Web site at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/grades-standards/how-purchase-equipment-and-visual-aids.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These revisions will provide a format that
is consistent with those of other grade standards (75 FR 43141). The
following table summarizes the changes made by AMS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change level of quality
U.S. Standards for grades of canned Effective date designation to single Other revisions proposed
term
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Asparagus............................. 06/20/73 Yes...................... Update address for standards.
Correct Standard of Identity
citation.
Beets................................. 08/03/98 Yes...................... Update address for standards.
Carrots............................... 08/03/98 Yes...................... Update address for standards.
Chili Sauce........................... 10/20/53 Yes...................... Update address for standards.
Corn, Cream Style..................... 07/01/57 Yes...................... Update address for standards.
Add Standard of Identity
citation.
Add Latin name.
Hominy................................ 03/10/58 Yes...................... Update address for standards.
Leafy Greens.......................... 09/01/73 Yes...................... Update address for standards.
Add titles to Tables IV and
V.
Correct Standard of Identity
citation.
Okra.................................. 07/08/57 Yes...................... Update address for standards.
Okra and Tomatoes or Tomatoes and Okra 12/24/57 Yes...................... Update address for standards.
Onions................................ 11/02/57 Yes...................... Update address for standards.
Add titles for Tables II and
III.
Add Standard of Identity
citation.
Peas and Carrots...................... 07/20/70 Yes...................... Update address for standards.
Peas, Field and Black-eye Peas........ 07/01/57 Yes...................... Update address for standards.
Replace ``U.S. Grade D'' with
``Substandard.''
Pimientos............................. 10/23/67 Yes...................... Update address for standards.
Pumpkin (Squash)...................... 07/01/57 Yes...................... Update address for standards.
Sauerkraut............................ 05/13/63 Yes...................... Update address for standards.
Spinach............................... 05/08/71 Yes...................... Update address for standards.
Correct Standard of Identity
citation.
Squash (Summer Type).................. 05/25/59 Yes...................... Update address for standards.
Succotash............................. 05/24/67 Yes...................... Update address for standards.
Replace ``U.S. Grade D'' with
``Substandard.''
Put ``proportion of
ingredients'' in outline
form.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 93574]]
These revisions provide a common language for trade and better
reflect the current marketing of fruits and vegetables.
On June 17, 2016, AMS published a Proposed Notice in the Federal
Register (81 FR 39596) soliciting comments on replacing the two-term
grading system with a single term to describe each quality level for
the grade standards identified in this document. Two comments were
received by August 16, 2016, the closing date of the public comment
period, from one private citizen and one individual associated with a
tribal government agency.
The two comments supported the replacement of the two-term grading
system with a single term as a positive step forward. USDA stands by
its decision to replace the two-term grading system (dual nomenclature)
with a single term.
Based on the information gathered, AMS is removing the two-term
grading system (dual nomenclature) and making editorial changes to the
aforementioned U.S. Standards for Grade. The revision brings these
grade standards in line with other recently amended standards and
current terminology, and updates the standards to more accurately
represent today's marketing practices.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.
Dated: December 15, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-30619 Filed 12-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P