Air Plan Approval; MA; Infrastructure State Implementation Plan Requirements, 93627-93631 [2016-30466]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 245 / Wednesday, December 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
receive adverse comments by January
20, 2017, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to
notify the public that the direct final
action will not take effect and we will
address the comments in a subsequent
final action based on the proposal. If we
do not receive timely adverse
comments, the direct final action will be
effective without further notice on
February 21, 2017.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action makes a determination
based on air quality data and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, the action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to the requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP
obligations discussed herein do not
apply to Indian tribes, and thus this
action will not impose substantial direct
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Dec 20, 2016
Jkt 241001
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by February 21,
2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. Parties with objections to this
direct final rule are encouraged to file a
comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this
action published in the Proposed Rules
section of today’s Federal Register,
rather than file an immediate petition
for judicial review of this direct final
rule, so that the EPA can withdraw this
direct final rule and address the
comment in the proposed rulemaking.
This action may not be challenged later
in proceedings to enforce its
requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Oxides of Nitrogen, Ozone, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: December 2, 2016.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
93627
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.282 is amended by
adding paragraph (j) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.282
Ozone
Control strategy and regulations:
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Determination of attainment. The
EPA has determined that, as of February
21, 2017, the Mariposa County 2008 8hour ozone nonattainment area in
California has attained the 2008 ozone
standard, based upon complete, qualityassured and certified data for 2013–
2015. Under the provisions of the EPA’s
ozone implementation rule (see 40 CFR
51.1118), this determination suspends
the requirements for the area to submit
attainment demonstrations and
associated reasonably available control
measures, reasonable further progress
plans, contingency measures for failure
to attain or make reasonable further
progress and other planning SIPs related
to attainment of the 2008 ozone
standard for as long as the area
continues to attain the 2008 ozone
standard. If the EPA determines, after
notice-and-comment rulemaking, that
the Mariposa County ozone
nonattainment area no longer meets the
2008 ozone standard, the corresponding
determination of attainment for this area
shall be withdrawn.
[FR Doc. 2016–30477 Filed 12–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R01–OAR–2014–0720; A–1–FRL–
9952–94–Region 1]
Air Plan Approval; MA; Infrastructure
State Implementation Plan
Requirements
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving most
elements of State Implementation Plan
(SIP) submissions from Massachusetts
regarding the infrastructure
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA
or Act) for the 1997 ozone, 2008 lead
(Pb), 2008 ozone, 2010 nitrogen dioxide
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
93628
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 245 / Wednesday, December 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(NO2), and 2010 sulfur dioxide (SO2)
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS). EPA is also conditionally
approving three aspects of the
Commonwealth’s submittals. In
addition, we are also making findings of
failure to submit pertaining to various
aspects of the prevention of significant
deterioration (PSD) requirements of
infrastructure SIPs. Lastly, we are
removing 40 CFR 52.1160 as legally
obsolete. This action is being taken in
accordance with the Clean Air Act.
DATES: This rule is effective on January
20, 2017.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R01–OAR–
2014–0720. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://
www.regulations.gov Web site. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available at https://
www.regulations.gov or at the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, Office of
Ecosystem Protection, Air Quality
Planning Unit, 5 Post Office Square—
Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA requests
that if at all possible, you contact the
contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob
McConnell, Environmental Engineer,
Air Quality Planning Unit, Air Programs
Branch (Mail Code OEP05–02), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 1, 5 Post Office Square, Suite
100, Boston, Massachusetts, 02109–
3912; (617) 918–1046;
mcconnell.robert@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. The term ‘‘the Commonwealth’’
refers to the state of Massachusetts.
Organization of this document. The
following outline is provided to aid in
locating information in this preamble.
infrastructure requirements of the CAA
for the 1997 ozone, 2008 lead, 2008
ozone, 2010 NO2, and 2010 SO2
NAAQS, proposed to conditionally
approve three aspects of the
Commonwealth’s submittals, and
proposed findings of failure to submit
pertaining to various aspects of the PSD
requirements of infrastructure SIPs.
Additionally, we proposed to remove 40
CFR 52.1160 as legally obsolete. The
Commonwealth submitted its
infrastructure State Implementation
Plan (ISIP) for the 1997 ozone NAAQS
on December 14, 2007, its ISIP for the
2008 Pb NAAQS on December 4, 2012,
and its ISIPs for the 2008 ozone, 2010
NO2, and 2010 SO2 NAAQS on June 6,
2014.
Under sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the
CAA, states are required to submit
infrastructure SIPs to ensure that their
SIPs provide for implementation,
maintenance, and enforcement of the
NAAQS, including the 1997 ozone,
2008 Pb, 2008 ozone, 2010 NO2, and
2010 SO2 NAAQS. These submissions
must contain any revisions needed for
meeting the applicable SIP requirements
of section 110(a)(2), or certifications that
their existing SIPs for the NAAQS
already meet those requirements. Table
1 below provides a summary of the
actions we are taking on the various
portions of the Commonwealth’s
infrastructure submittals.
I. Background and Purpose
II. Final Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
On July 20, 2016 (81 FR 47133), EPA
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPR) for the State of
Massachusetts which proposed approval
of most elements of SIP submissions
from the Commonwealth regarding the
TABLE 1—FINAL ACTION ON MA INFRASTRUCTURE SIP SUBMITTALS FOR VARIOUS NAAQS
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Element
1997 Ozone
(A): Emission limits and other control measures ...............
(B): Ambient air quality monitoring and data system .........
(C)(i): Enforcement of SIP measures .................................
(C)(ii): PSD program for major sources and major modifications.
(C)(iii): Permitting program for minor sources and minor
modifications.
(D)(i)(I): Contribute to nonattainment/interfere with maintenance of NAAQS (prongs 1 and 2).
(D)(i)(II): PSD (prong 3) ......................................................
(D)(i)(II): Visibility Protection (prong 4) ...............................
(D)(ii): Interstate Pollution Abatement ................................
(D)(ii): International Pollution Abatement ...........................
(E)(i): Adequate resources .................................................
(E)(ii): State boards ............................................................
(E)(iii): Necessary assurances with respect to local agencies.
(F): Stationary source monitoring system ..........................
(G): Emergency power .......................................................
(H): Future SIP revisions ....................................................
(I): Nonattainment area plan or plan revisions under part
D.
(J)(i): Consultation with government officials .....................
(J)(ii): Public notification .....................................................
(J)(iii): PSD .........................................................................
(J)(iv): Visibility protection ..................................................
(K): Air quality modeling and data ......................................
(L): Permitting fees .............................................................
(M): Consultation and participation by affected local entities.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Dec 20, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
2008 Pb
2008 Ozone
2010 NO2
2010 SO2
CA
A
A
PF
CA
A
A
PF
CA
A
A
PF
CA
A
A
FS
CA
A
A
FS
A
A
A
A
A
NI
A
NS
A
NS
PF/CA
A
PF
A
A
A
NA
PF/CA
A
PF
A
A
A
NA
PF/CA
A
PF
A
A
A
NA
FS/CA
A
FS
A
A
A
NA
FS/CA
A
FS
A
A
A
NA
A
CA
A
+
A
A
A
+
A
CA
A
+
A
A
A
+
A
CA
A
+
FS
A
PF
+
A
A
A
FS
A
PF
+
A
A
A
FS
A
PF
+
A
A
A
FS
A
FS
+
A
A
A
FS
A
FS
+
A
A
A
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 245 / Wednesday, December 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
In the above table, the key is as
follows:
A ...........
CA ........
FS ........
NA ........
NI .........
NS ........
PF ........
+ ...........
Approve.
Conditional approval.
Finding of failure to submit.
Not applicable.
Not included in submittal we are
acting on in today’s action.
No Submittal.
Prior finding of failure to submit.
Not germane to infrastructure
SIPs.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
The specific requirements of ISIPs
and the rationale for EPA’s proposed
actions on the Commonwealth’s
submittals are explained in the NPR and
will not be restated here. No public
comments were received on the NPR.
II. Final Action
EPA is approving most portions of
Massachusetts ISIP submittals for the
1997 ozone, 2008 lead, 2008 ozone,
2010 NO2, and 2010 SO2 NAAQS as
outlined within Table 1 of this final
rulemaking.
Additionally, EPA is conditionally
approving three portions of these
submittals. First, for the five NAAQS
listed within Table 1 we are
conditionally approving an aspect of the
Commonwealth’s submittals for element
110(a)(2)(A) pertaining to ambient air
quality standards because the current,
SIP-approved version of 310 CMR 7.00,
Air Pollution Control, does not reflect
the current version of the various
NAAQS we are taking action on in this
rulemaking. However, by letter dated
June 14, 2016, the Commonwealth
committed to rectify this deficiency by
adding a definition of NAAQS to 310
CMR 7.00 that includes a calendar date
to address this issue. Therefore, EPA is
conditionally approving this SIP
revision. Second, we are conditionally
approving the Commonwealth’s
submittals for element 110(a)(2)(G)
pertaining to contingency plans for the
1997 ozone, 2008 ozone, and 2010 SO2
NAAQS pursuant to Massachusetts
commitment within their June 14, 2016
letter to submit a regulation meeting the
contingency plan requirement of
element 110(a)(2)(G). And last, we are
conditionally approving the aspect of
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) for the five NAAQS
listed within Table 1 pertaining to the
Commonwealth’s Nonattainment New
Source Review (NNSR) program
pursuant to the state’s June 14, 2016
letter committing to submit portions of
310 CMR 7.00: Appendix A, to EPA as
a SIP revision request. Massachusetts
must make the above mentioned
submittals to EPA by a date no later
than one year from EPA’s final action on
these infrastructure SIPs. If the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Dec 20, 2016
Jkt 241001
Commonwealth fails to do so, this
approval will become a disapproval on
that date, and we will notify
Massachusetts by letter that this action
has occurred. At that time, this
commitment will no longer be a part of
the approved Massachusetts SIP. EPA
subsequently will publish a notice in
the notice section of the Federal
Register notifying the public that the
conditional approval automatically
converted to a disapproval. If the State
meets its commitments within the
applicable time frame, the conditionally
approved submissions will remain a
part of the SIP until EPA takes final
action approving or disapproving the
new legislative authority. If EPA
disapproves the new submittal, these
conditionally approved aspects of the
Commonwealth’s ISIPs will also be
disapproved at that time. If EPA
approves the Commonwealth’s
submittals, they will be fully approved
in their entirety and replace the
conditionally approved items in the
Massachusetts SIP. If the conditional
approval is converted to a disapproval,
the final disapproval triggers the Federal
implementation plan (FIP) requirement
under section 110(c).
As noted within Table 1 of this final
rulemaking notice, we are also making
findings of failure to submit for the
aspects of the Commonwealth’s ISIPs
noted within CAA sections
110(a)(2)(C)(ii), (D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), J(i), and
J(iii). These findings relate to
inadequacies with Massachusetts’
program for the prevention of significant
deterioration (PSD), and are elaborated
on within our July 20, 2016 NPR. As
mentioned in our proposed rulemaking,
the Commonwealth is subject to a PSD
Federal Implementation Plan (FIP), and
has implemented and enforced the
federal PSD program through a
delegation agreement. See 76 FR 31241;
May 31, 2011. Therefore, our findings of
failure to submit will not trigger any
additional FIP obligation by the EPA
under section 110(c)(1), because the
deficiency is addressed by the FIP
already in place. Moreover, the state is
not subject to mandatory sanctions
solely as a result of this finding, because
the SIP submittal deficiencies are
neither with respect to a sub-element
that is required under part D nor in
response to a SIP call under section
110(k)(5) of the Act.
Furthermore, as proposed, we are
incorporating into the Massachusetts
SIP sections 6 and 6A of the state’s
Conflict of Interest law, which the
Commonwealth submitted on June 6,
2014, and are removing 40 CFR 52.1160
regarding Massachusetts Low Emission
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
93629
Vehicle program in that this section is
legally obsolete.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of M.G.L c.
268A, sections 6 and 6A of the
Commonwealth’s Conflict of Interest
law submitted to EPA on June 6, 2014,
as described in the amendments to 40
CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA
has made, and will continue to make,
these documents generally available
through https://www.regulations.gov.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
93630
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 245 / Wednesday, December 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by February 21,
2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (see section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Dec 20, 2016
Jkt 241001
Dated: September 13, 2016.
H. Curtis Spalding,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF AIR QUALITY
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart W—Massachusetts
2. Section 52.1119 is amended by
adding paragraphs (a)(3) through (5) to
read as follows:
■
§ 52.1119
approval
Identification of plan-conditional
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(3) Massachusetts submitted an
infrastructure State Implementation
Plan (ISIP) for the 1997 ozone national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS)
on December 14, 2007, submitted an
ISIP for the 2008 Pb NAAQS on
December 4, 2012, and submitted ISIPs
for the 2008 ozone, 2010 NO2, and 2010
SO2 NAAQS on June 6, 2014. On June
14, 2016, Massachusetts submitted a
letter committing to add a definition of
NAAQS to Massachusetts regulation 310
CMR 7.00, and to submit the amended
version of this regulation to EPA as a
SIP revision request, by a date no later
than one year from the effective date of
EPA’s actions on these ISIPs. In light of
this commitment, the portion of the
Commonwealth’s ISIP submittals
mentioned above made to address Clean
Air Act section 110(a)(2)(A), Emission
limits and other control measures, is
conditionally approved.
(4) Massachusetts submitted an
infrastructure State Implementation
Plan (ISIP) for the 1997 ozone national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS)
on December 14, 2007, submitted an
ISIP for the 2008 Pb NAAQS on
December 4, 2012, and submitted ISIPs
for the 2008 ozone, 2010 NO2, and 2010
SO2 NAAQS on June 6, 2014. On June
14, 2016, Massachusetts submitted a
letter committing to submit portions of
310 CMR 7.00: Appendix A: Emission
Offsets and Nonattainment Review, to
EPA as a SIP revision request, by a date
no later than one year from the effective
date of EPA’s actions on these ISIPs. In
light of this commitment, the portions of
the Commonwealth’s ISIP submittals
mentioned above made to address Clean
Air Act section 110 (a)(2)(D)(i)(II), PSD,
is conditionally approved.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(5) Massachusetts submitted an
infrastructure State Implementation
Plan (ISIP) for the 1997 ozone national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS)
on December 14, 2007, and submitted
ISIPs for the 2008 ozone and 2010 SO2
NAAQS on June 6, 2014. On June 14,
2016, Massachusetts submitted a letter
committing to submit 310 CMR 8.00,
The Prevention and/or Abatement of Air
Pollution Episode and Air Pollution
Incident Emergencies, to EPA as a SIP
revision request, by a date no later than
one year from the effective date of EPA’s
actions on these ISIPs. In light of this
commitment, the portions of the
Commonwealth’s ISIP submittals
mentioned above made to address Clean
Air Act section 110 (a)(2)(G), Emergency
power, is conditionally approved.
■ 3. Section 52.1120 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(145) through
(147) to read as follows:
§ 52.1120
Identification of plan
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(145) Revisions to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection on December
14, 2007. The submittal consists of an
Infrastructure SIP for the 1997 ozone
national ambient air quality standard.
(146) Revisions to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection on December
4, 2012. The submittal consists of an
Infrastructure SIP for the 2008 lead
national ambient air quality standard.
(147) Revisions to the State
Implementation Plan submitted by the
Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection on June 6,
2014. The submittal consists of
Infrastructure SIPs for the 2008 ozone,
2010 NO2, and 2010 SO2 national
ambient air quality standards.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Section 6, ‘‘Financial interest of
state employee, relative, or associates;
disclosure,’’ of the Massachusetts
General Laws Annotated, chapter 268A,
‘‘Conduct of Public Officials and
Employees,’’ as amended by Statute
1978, chapter 210, § 9.
(B) Section 6A, ‘‘Conflict of interest of
public officials; reporting requirement,’’
of the Massachusetts General Laws
Annotated, chapter 268A, ‘‘Conduct of
Public Officials and Employees,’’ as
amended by Statute 1984, chapter 189,
§ 163.
§ 52.1160
[Removed and Reserved]
4. Section 52.1160 is removed and
reserved.
■
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 245 / Wednesday, December 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
5. In § 52.1167, Table 52.1167 is
amended by adding a state citation for
conflict of interest law at the end of the
table to read as follows:
■
93631
§ 52.1167 EPA-approved Massachusetts
State regulations.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 52.1167—EPA-APPROVED RULES AND REGULATIONS
[See Notes at end of Table]
State citation
Title/subject
Date submitted
by State
*
M.G.L. c. 268A, sections 6 and 6A.
*
Conduct of Public
Officials and Employees.
*
June 6, 2014 ....
Date
approved by
EPA
Federal
Register citation
*
12/21/16
*
[Insert Federal
Register citation].
52.1120(c)
147
Comments/unapproved
sections
*
*
Approved Section 6: Financial
interest of state employee,
relative or associates; disclosure, and Section 6A:
Conflict of interest of public
official; reporting requirement.
Notes:
1. This table lists regulations adopted as of 1972. It does not depict regulatory requirements which may have been part of the Federal SIP before this date.
2. The regulations are effective statewide unless otherwise stated in comments or title section.
[FR Doc. 2016–30466 Filed 12–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R05–OAR–2016–0372; FRL–9956–59–
Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Ohio;
Redesignation of the Columbus, Ohio
Area to Attainment of the 2008 Ozone
Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is finding that the
Columbus, Ohio area is attaining the
2008 ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS or standard)
and redesignating the area to attainment
for the 2008 ozone NAAQS because the
area meets the statutory requirements
for redesignation under the Clean Air
Act (CAA or Act). The Columbus area
includes Delaware, Fairfield, Knox,
Licking, and Mason Counties. EPA is
also approving, as a revision to the Ohio
State Implementation Plan (SIP), the
state’s plan for maintaining the 2008
ozone standard through 2030 in the
Columbus area. Finally, EPA finds
adequate and is approving the state’s
2020 and 2030 volatile organic
compound (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets
(MVEBs) for the Columbus area. The
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency
(Ohio EPA) submitted the SIP revision
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Dec 20, 2016
Jkt 241001
and redesignation request on June 16,
2016.
DATES: This final rule is effective
December 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2016–0372. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either through
https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen D’Agostino, Environmental
Scientist, Attainment Planning and
Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 886–1767,
dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
This rule takes action on the June 16,
2016, submission from Ohio EPA
requesting redesignation of the
Columbus area to attainment for the
2008 ozone standard. The background
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
for today’s action is discussed in detail
in EPA’s proposal, dated September 28,
2016 (81 FR 66578). In that rulemaking,
we noted that, under EPA regulations at
40 CFR part 50, the 2008 ozone NAAQS
is attained in an area when the 3-year
average of the annual fourth highest
daily maximum 8-hour average
concentration is equal to or less than
0.075 ppm, when truncated after the
thousandth decimal place, at all of the
ozone monitoring sites in the area. (See
40 CFR 50.15 and appendix P to 40 CFR
part 50.) Under the CAA, EPA may
redesignate nonattainment areas to
attainment if sufficient complete,
quality-assured data are available to
determine that the area has attained the
standard and if it meets the other CAA
redesignation requirements in section
107(d)(3)(E). The proposed rule, dated
September 28, 2016, provides a detailed
discussion of how Ohio has met these
CAA requirements.
As discussed in the proposed rule,
quality-assured and certified monitoring
data for 2013–2015 and preliminary
data for 2016 show that the Columbus
area has attained and continues to attain
the 2008 ozone standard. In the
maintenance plan submitted for the
area, Ohio has demonstrated that the
ozone standard will be maintained in
the area through 2030. Finally, Ohio has
adopted 2020 and 2030 VOC and NOX
MVEBs for the Columbus area that are
supported by Ohio’s maintenance
demonstration.
II. What comments did we receive on
the proposed rule?
EPA provided a 30-day review and
comment period for the September 28,
2016, proposed rule. The comment
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 21, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 93627-93631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30466]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R01-OAR-2014-0720; A-1-FRL-9952-94-Region 1]
Air Plan Approval; MA; Infrastructure State Implementation Plan
Requirements
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving most
elements of State Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions from
Massachusetts regarding the infrastructure requirements of the Clean
Air Act (CAA or Act) for the 1997 ozone, 2008 lead (Pb), 2008 ozone,
2010 nitrogen dioxide
[[Page 93628]]
(NO2), and 2010 sulfur dioxide (SO2) National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). EPA is also conditionally
approving three aspects of the Commonwealth's submittals. In addition,
we are also making findings of failure to submit pertaining to various
aspects of the prevention of significant deterioration (PSD)
requirements of infrastructure SIPs. Lastly, we are removing 40 CFR
52.1160 as legally obsolete. This action is being taken in accordance
with the Clean Air Act.
DATES: This rule is effective on January 20, 2017.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R01-OAR-2014-0720. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed
in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem Protection, Air
Quality Planning Unit, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you contact the contact listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection.
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob McConnell, Environmental Engineer,
Air Quality Planning Unit, Air Programs Branch (Mail Code OEP05-02),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, 5 Post Office Square,
Suite 100, Boston, Massachusetts, 02109-3912; (617) 918-1046;
mcconnell.robert@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. The term ``the Commonwealth''
refers to the state of Massachusetts.
Organization of this document. The following outline is provided to
aid in locating information in this preamble.
I. Background and Purpose
II. Final Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
On July 20, 2016 (81 FR 47133), EPA published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPR) for the State of Massachusetts which proposed approval
of most elements of SIP submissions from the Commonwealth regarding the
infrastructure requirements of the CAA for the 1997 ozone, 2008 lead,
2008 ozone, 2010 NO2, and 2010 SO2 NAAQS,
proposed to conditionally approve three aspects of the Commonwealth's
submittals, and proposed findings of failure to submit pertaining to
various aspects of the PSD requirements of infrastructure SIPs.
Additionally, we proposed to remove 40 CFR 52.1160 as legally obsolete.
The Commonwealth submitted its infrastructure State Implementation Plan
(ISIP) for the 1997 ozone NAAQS on December 14, 2007, its ISIP for the
2008 Pb NAAQS on December 4, 2012, and its ISIPs for the 2008 ozone,
2010 NO2, and 2010 SO2 NAAQS on June 6, 2014.
Under sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA, states are required to
submit infrastructure SIPs to ensure that their SIPs provide for
implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the NAAQS, including
the 1997 ozone, 2008 Pb, 2008 ozone, 2010 NO2, and 2010
SO2 NAAQS. These submissions must contain any revisions
needed for meeting the applicable SIP requirements of section
110(a)(2), or certifications that their existing SIPs for the NAAQS
already meet those requirements. Table 1 below provides a summary of
the actions we are taking on the various portions of the Commonwealth's
infrastructure submittals.
Table 1--Final Action on MA Infrastructure SIP Submittals for Various NAAQS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Element 1997 Ozone 2008 Pb 2008 Ozone 2010 NO2 2010 SO2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A): Emission limits and other CA CA CA CA CA
control measures.
(B): Ambient air quality A A A A A
monitoring and data system.
(C)(i): Enforcement of SIP A A A A A
measures.
(C)(ii): PSD program for major PF PF PF FS FS
sources and major modifications.
(C)(iii): Permitting program for A A A A A
minor sources and minor
modifications.
(D)(i)(I): Contribute to NI A NS A NS
nonattainment/interfere with
maintenance of NAAQS (prongs 1
and 2).
(D)(i)(II): PSD (prong 3)....... PF/CA PF/CA PF/CA FS/CA FS/CA
(D)(i)(II): Visibility A A A A A
Protection (prong 4).
(D)(ii): Interstate Pollution PF PF PF FS FS
Abatement.
(D)(ii): International Pollution A A A A A
Abatement.
(E)(i): Adequate resources...... A A A A A
(E)(ii): State boards........... A A A A A
(E)(iii): Necessary assurances NA NA NA NA NA
with respect to local agencies.
(F): Stationary source A A A A A
monitoring system.
(G): Emergency power............ CA A CA A CA
(H): Future SIP revisions....... A A A A A
(I): Nonattainment area plan or + + + + +
plan revisions under part D.
(J)(i): Consultation with FS FS FS FS FS
government officials.
(J)(ii): Public notification.... A A A A A
(J)(iii): PSD................... PF PF PF FS FS
(J)(iv): Visibility protection.. + + + + +
(K): Air quality modeling and A A A A A
data.
(L): Permitting fees............ A A A A A
(M): Consultation and A A A A A
participation by affected local
entities.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 93629]]
In the above table, the key is as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A...................................... Approve.
CA..................................... Conditional approval.
FS..................................... Finding of failure to submit.
NA..................................... Not applicable.
NI..................................... Not included in submittal we
are acting on in today's
action.
NS..................................... No Submittal.
PF..................................... Prior finding of failure to
submit.
+...................................... Not germane to infrastructure
SIPs.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The specific requirements of ISIPs and the rationale for EPA's
proposed actions on the Commonwealth's submittals are explained in the
NPR and will not be restated here. No public comments were received on
the NPR.
II. Final Action
EPA is approving most portions of Massachusetts ISIP submittals for
the 1997 ozone, 2008 lead, 2008 ozone, 2010 NO2, and 2010
SO2 NAAQS as outlined within Table 1 of this final
rulemaking.
Additionally, EPA is conditionally approving three portions of
these submittals. First, for the five NAAQS listed within Table 1 we
are conditionally approving an aspect of the Commonwealth's submittals
for element 110(a)(2)(A) pertaining to ambient air quality standards
because the current, SIP-approved version of 310 CMR 7.00, Air
Pollution Control, does not reflect the current version of the various
NAAQS we are taking action on in this rulemaking. However, by letter
dated June 14, 2016, the Commonwealth committed to rectify this
deficiency by adding a definition of NAAQS to 310 CMR 7.00 that
includes a calendar date to address this issue. Therefore, EPA is
conditionally approving this SIP revision. Second, we are conditionally
approving the Commonwealth's submittals for element 110(a)(2)(G)
pertaining to contingency plans for the 1997 ozone, 2008 ozone, and
2010 SO2 NAAQS pursuant to Massachusetts commitment within
their June 14, 2016 letter to submit a regulation meeting the
contingency plan requirement of element 110(a)(2)(G). And last, we are
conditionally approving the aspect of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) for the five
NAAQS listed within Table 1 pertaining to the Commonwealth's
Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) program pursuant to the state's
June 14, 2016 letter committing to submit portions of 310 CMR 7.00:
Appendix A, to EPA as a SIP revision request. Massachusetts must make
the above mentioned submittals to EPA by a date no later than one year
from EPA's final action on these infrastructure SIPs. If the
Commonwealth fails to do so, this approval will become a disapproval on
that date, and we will notify Massachusetts by letter that this action
has occurred. At that time, this commitment will no longer be a part of
the approved Massachusetts SIP. EPA subsequently will publish a notice
in the notice section of the Federal Register notifying the public that
the conditional approval automatically converted to a disapproval. If
the State meets its commitments within the applicable time frame, the
conditionally approved submissions will remain a part of the SIP until
EPA takes final action approving or disapproving the new legislative
authority. If EPA disapproves the new submittal, these conditionally
approved aspects of the Commonwealth's ISIPs will also be disapproved
at that time. If EPA approves the Commonwealth's submittals, they will
be fully approved in their entirety and replace the conditionally
approved items in the Massachusetts SIP. If the conditional approval is
converted to a disapproval, the final disapproval triggers the Federal
implementation plan (FIP) requirement under section 110(c).
As noted within Table 1 of this final rulemaking notice, we are
also making findings of failure to submit for the aspects of the
Commonwealth's ISIPs noted within CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C)(ii),
(D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), J(i), and J(iii). These findings relate to
inadequacies with Massachusetts' program for the prevention of
significant deterioration (PSD), and are elaborated on within our July
20, 2016 NPR. As mentioned in our proposed rulemaking, the Commonwealth
is subject to a PSD Federal Implementation Plan (FIP), and has
implemented and enforced the federal PSD program through a delegation
agreement. See 76 FR 31241; May 31, 2011. Therefore, our findings of
failure to submit will not trigger any additional FIP obligation by the
EPA under section 110(c)(1), because the deficiency is addressed by the
FIP already in place. Moreover, the state is not subject to mandatory
sanctions solely as a result of this finding, because the SIP submittal
deficiencies are neither with respect to a sub-element that is required
under part D nor in response to a SIP call under section 110(k)(5) of
the Act.
Furthermore, as proposed, we are incorporating into the
Massachusetts SIP sections 6 and 6A of the state's Conflict of Interest
law, which the Commonwealth submitted on June 6, 2014, and are removing
40 CFR 52.1160 regarding Massachusetts Low Emission Vehicle program in
that this section is legally obsolete.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of M.G.L c.
268A, sections 6 and 6A of the Commonwealth's Conflict of Interest law
submitted to EPA on June 6, 2014, as described in the amendments to 40
CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these documents generally available through https://www.regulations.gov.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National
[[Page 93630]]
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with
the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 21, 2017. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (see section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: September 13, 2016.
H. Curtis Spalding,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF AIR QUALITY IMPLEMENTATION
PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart W--Massachusetts
0
2. Section 52.1119 is amended by adding paragraphs (a)(3) through (5)
to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1119 Identification of plan-conditional approval
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(3) Massachusetts submitted an infrastructure State Implementation
Plan (ISIP) for the 1997 ozone national ambient air quality standard
(NAAQS) on December 14, 2007, submitted an ISIP for the 2008 Pb NAAQS
on December 4, 2012, and submitted ISIPs for the 2008 ozone, 2010
NO2, and 2010 SO2 NAAQS on June 6, 2014. On June
14, 2016, Massachusetts submitted a letter committing to add a
definition of NAAQS to Massachusetts regulation 310 CMR 7.00, and to
submit the amended version of this regulation to EPA as a SIP revision
request, by a date no later than one year from the effective date of
EPA's actions on these ISIPs. In light of this commitment, the portion
of the Commonwealth's ISIP submittals mentioned above made to address
Clean Air Act section 110(a)(2)(A), Emission limits and other control
measures, is conditionally approved.
(4) Massachusetts submitted an infrastructure State Implementation
Plan (ISIP) for the 1997 ozone national ambient air quality standard
(NAAQS) on December 14, 2007, submitted an ISIP for the 2008 Pb NAAQS
on December 4, 2012, and submitted ISIPs for the 2008 ozone, 2010
NO2, and 2010 SO2 NAAQS on June 6, 2014. On June
14, 2016, Massachusetts submitted a letter committing to submit
portions of 310 CMR 7.00: Appendix A: Emission Offsets and
Nonattainment Review, to EPA as a SIP revision request, by a date no
later than one year from the effective date of EPA's actions on these
ISIPs. In light of this commitment, the portions of the Commonwealth's
ISIP submittals mentioned above made to address Clean Air Act section
110 (a)(2)(D)(i)(II), PSD, is conditionally approved.
(5) Massachusetts submitted an infrastructure State Implementation
Plan (ISIP) for the 1997 ozone national ambient air quality standard
(NAAQS) on December 14, 2007, and submitted ISIPs for the 2008 ozone
and 2010 SO2 NAAQS on June 6, 2014. On June 14, 2016,
Massachusetts submitted a letter committing to submit 310 CMR 8.00, The
Prevention and/or Abatement of Air Pollution Episode and Air Pollution
Incident Emergencies, to EPA as a SIP revision request, by a date no
later than one year from the effective date of EPA's actions on these
ISIPs. In light of this commitment, the portions of the Commonwealth's
ISIP submittals mentioned above made to address Clean Air Act section
110 (a)(2)(G), Emergency power, is conditionally approved.
0
3. Section 52.1120 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(145) through
(147) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1120 Identification of plan
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(145) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on December
14, 2007. The submittal consists of an Infrastructure SIP for the 1997
ozone national ambient air quality standard.
(146) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on December 4,
2012. The submittal consists of an Infrastructure SIP for the 2008 lead
national ambient air quality standard.
(147) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on June 6, 2014.
The submittal consists of Infrastructure SIPs for the 2008 ozone, 2010
NO2, and 2010 SO2 national ambient air quality
standards.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Section 6, ``Financial interest of state employee, relative, or
associates; disclosure,'' of the Massachusetts General Laws Annotated,
chapter 268A, ``Conduct of Public Officials and Employees,'' as amended
by Statute 1978, chapter 210, Sec. 9.
(B) Section 6A, ``Conflict of interest of public officials;
reporting requirement,'' of the Massachusetts General Laws Annotated,
chapter 268A, ``Conduct of Public Officials and Employees,'' as amended
by Statute 1984, chapter 189, Sec. 163.
Sec. 52.1160 [Removed and Reserved]
0
4. Section 52.1160 is removed and reserved.
[[Page 93631]]
0
5. In Sec. 52.1167, Table 52.1167 is amended by adding a state
citation for conflict of interest law at the end of the table to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.1167 EPA-approved Massachusetts State regulations.
* * * * *
Table 52.1167--EPA-Approved Rules and Regulations
[See Notes at end of Table]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
State citation Title/subject Date submitted by State approved by Federal Register 52.1120(c) Comments/unapproved
EPA citation sections
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
M.G.L. c. 268A, sections 6 and Conduct of Public June 6, 2014............ 12/21/16 [Insert Federal Register 147 Approved Section 6:
6A. Officials and citation]. Financial interest
Employees. of state employee,
relative or
associates;
disclosure, and
Section 6A:
Conflict of
interest of public
official;
reporting
requirement.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
1. This table lists regulations adopted as of 1972. It does not depict regulatory requirements which may have been part of the Federal SIP before this
date.
2. The regulations are effective statewide unless otherwise stated in comments or title section.
[FR Doc. 2016-30466 Filed 12-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P