Definition of Form I-94 To Include Electronic Format, 91646-91670 [2016-30459]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
91646
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
handlers, have to bear the burden of the
increased assessment rate.
As previously noted, assessments are
minimal and uniform on all handlers.
Thus, small handlers bear a
proportional burden compared to larger
handlers. The increase was
recommended unanimously by the
Board, which is made up of small and
large handlers, as well as small and
large growers, representing the entire
California walnut industry. The Board
made the unanimous recommendation
based upon deliberations by four of its
standing committees: the Market
Development Committee, Production
Research Committee, Grades and
Standards Committee, and Budget and
Personnel Committee. All four
committees reviewed the proposed
expenses and crop size, and considered
alternative assessment rates. All of the
committees recommended the increased
assessment rate and determined that the
budget was prudent, resulting in a
unanimous recommendation from the
Board.
Accordingly, no changes will be made
to the rule as proposed, based on the
comments received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Richard Lower
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Board and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because handlers are already receiving
2016–17 crop walnuts from growers, the
crop year began on September 1, 2016,
and the assessment rate applies to all
walnuts received during the 2016–17
and subsequent seasons. Further,
handlers are aware of this rule, which
was recommended at a public meeting.
Also, a 30-day comment period was
provided for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
Marketing agreements, Nuts,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is amended as
follows:
PART 984—WALNUTS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 984 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 984.347 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 984.347
Assessment rate.
On and after September 1, 2016, an
assessment rate of $0.0465 per
kernelweight pound is established for
California merchantable walnuts.
Dated: December 12, 2016.
Bruce Summers,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–30307 Filed 12–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
8 CFR PARTS 1, 210, 212, 214, 215,
231, 235, 245, 245a, 247, 253, 264, 274a,
and 286
[Docket No. USCBP–2013–0011; CBP Dec.
No. 16–27]
RIN 1651–AA96
Definition of Form I–94 To Include
Electronic Format
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule adopts,
without change, interim amendments to
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) regulations which were
published in the Federal Register on
March 27, 2013, as CBP Dec. No. 13–06.
These amendments enabled DHS to
transition the issuance of the Form I–94
(Arrival/Departure Record) to an
automated process. In the automated
process, DHS creates a Form I–94 in an
electronic format based on passenger,
passport and visa information DHS
obtains electronically from air and sea
carriers and the Department of State
(DOS) as well as through the inspection
process. This document addresses the
comments received in response to the
interim rule and discusses some
operational modifications to the Form I–
94 process that were implemented after
publication of the interim rule.
DATES: This final rule is effective
January 18, 2017.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne Shepherd, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection Office of Field
Operations by telephone (202) 344–2073
or by email, Suzanne.M.Shepherd@
dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Abbreviations and Terms Used in This
Document
ACI–A Airports Council InternationalNorth America
ACIP American Council on International
Personnel
ADIS Arrival and Departure Information
System
AILA American Immigration Lawyers
Association
APA Administrative Procedure Act
APIS Advance Passenger Information
Systems
CBP U.S. Customs and Border Protection
CBSA Canadian Border Services Agency
CCD Consular Consolidated Database
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
DIS Deferred Inspection Site
DMV Departments of Motor Vehicles
DOS Department of State
DOT Department of Transportation
ESTA Electronic System of Travel
Authorization
FAQ Frequently Asked Question
FNU First Name Unknown
FOIA Freedom of Information Act
ICAO International Civil Aviation
Organization
ICE U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement
IFR Interim Final Rule
INA Immigration and Nationality Act
´
INM Instituto Nacional de Migracion
INS Immigration and Naturalization Service
LNU Last Name Unknown
MRZ Machine Readable Zone
NAFSA NAFSA: Association of
International Educators
OIS Office of Immigration Statistics
OMB Office of Management and Budget
OTTI Office of Travel and Tourism
Industries
PIA Privacy Impact Assessment
PII Personally Identifiable Information
POE Port of Entry
SAVE USCIS’s Systematic Alien
Verification for Entitlements program
SEVIS Student and Exchange Visitor
Information System
SEVP Student and Exchange Visitor
Information Program
SHRM Society for Human Resource
Management
SSA Social Security Administration
USCIS U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services
USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture
VWP Visa Waiver Program
Executive Summary
The Form I–94 (Arrival/Departure
Record) is issued by DHS to certain
nonimmigrant foreign nationals upon
arrival in the United States or when
they change status in the United States.
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
The Form I–94 is used to document
arrival and departure and provides
evidence of the terms of admission or
parole. The Form I–94 is also used by
individuals granted asylum in the
United States as a proof of their grant of
asylum and by refugees as proof of their
refugee status. CBP, a component of
DHS, generally issues the Form I–94 to
nonimmigrants at the time they lawfully
enter the United States. Nonimmigrant
travelers use the Form I–94 for various
purposes such as completing the Form
I–9 to verify employment eligibility,
applying for immigration benefits, or
presenting to a university to verify
eligibility for enrollment.
On March 27, 2013, CBP published an
interim final rule (IFR) in the Federal
Register (78 FR 18457) that added to the
regulations a definition of ‘‘Form I–94’’
to allow the Form I–94 to be in either
paper or electronic format. Prior to the
effective date of the IFR, the Form I–94
was a paper form only. The IFR made
necessary changes to the regulations to
enable CBP to transition from only
paper to allow for an electronic form. In
the case of air and sea ports of entry, the
regulation allowed CBP to transition to
an automated process whereby CBP
creates an electronic Form I–94 based
on information collected via the
Advance Passenger Information System
(APIS) along with visa information
transmitted to CBP by the Department of
State. The automated process applies
only to nonimmigrants arriving at air
and sea ports of entry because APIS data
is currently collected only for air and
sea. The automation of the Form I–94
process for nonimmigrants arriving by
air or sea eliminates duplicative
information collections and saves time
and money for the traveling public,
carriers, and CBP.
CBP makes the electronic Form I–94
available through a Web site. To access
the Form I–94 through the Web site the
traveler inputs information from his/her
passport. If needed, nonimmigrants may
print out a copy of the Form I–94 from
the Web site and present it to third
parties in lieu of the paper form. CBP
continues to provide a paper Form I–94
to certain classes of aliens, such as
asylees, certain parolees, and others
upon request or whenever CBP
determines the issuance of a paper form
is appropriate.1
This regulation also is consistent with
CBP’s enhancements to the I–94 Web
site to enable travelers arriving at a land
port of entry to submit the Form I–94
information to CBP and pay the required
fee prior to arrival. Unlike the
automated process for air and sea where
CBP creates an electronic Form I–94
based on information collected via APIS
and other sources, this I–94 land border
process enables travelers to provide the
Form I–94 information to CBP
electronically prior to arrival to
facilitate the land border issuance
process. The enhanced I–94 Web site
launched on September 29, 2016.
DHS received eighteen submissions in
response to the IFR. Most of these
submissions contained comments
providing support, voicing concerns,
highlighting issues, or offering
suggestions for modifications to the
automation process. After review of the
comments, CBP has decided to finalize
the interim final rule without change.
However, CBP has made some
operational changes, primarily to the I–
94 Web site, in response to the
91647
comments. These changes, which are
described in the comment responses, are
intended to help travelers retrieve their
Form I–94 information and travel
history more easily.
CBP has completed an updated
economic assessment analyzing the
effects of the automation of the Form I–
94. This rule affects CBP, air and sea
carriers that transport foreign nationals
to the United States, and the foreign
nationals themselves. CBP will incur
costs associated with linking its data
systems and building and maintaining
the I–94 Web site. CBP benefits through
lower printing, storage, and contract
costs. CBP estimated a net benefit of
$15.5 million for CBP in 2013. Carriers
benefit as a result of lower printing and
storage costs. CBP estimated a net
benefit of $1.3 million for carriers in
2013. Foreign nationals traveling to the
United States incur opportunity costs
associated with logging onto the Web
site to access their electronic Form I–94,
printing their Form I–94, and, for some
travelers, the cost to drive to a location
with internet access so they can access
and print their electronic Form I–94.
Foreign nationals benefit from a reduced
opportunity cost associated with filling
out a paper Form I–94 and reduced
opportunity and fee costs associated
with filing a Form I–102 to replace a lost
Form I–94. CBP estimates a net benefit
of between $4141.1 million and $6565.9
million in 2013 for foreign travelers. In
total, CBP estimates that net benefits to
all parties ranged from $5757.9 million
to $8282.7 million in 2013. Net benefits
to U.S. entities (carriers and CBP)
totaled $16.8 million in 2013. Net
benefits are summarized in table ES–1
below.
EXHIBIT ES–1—NET BENEFITS
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
CBP ..........................................................
Carriers ....................................................
Travelers—Low ........................................
Travelers—Primary ..................................
Travelers—High .......................................
¥1,321,000
0
0
0
0
15,461,360
1,344,450
41,109,614
51,503,032
65,882,967
15,461,360
1,344,450
76,986,391
96,140,493
122,641,373
15,461,360
1,344,450
80,597,880
100,696,430
128,504,014
16,167,798
1,344,450
85,173,424
106,131,707
135,128,784
20,447,110
1,344,450
93,439,507
115,548,989
146,138,820
Grand Total—Low .............................
Grand Total—Primary .......................
¥1,321,000
¥1,321,000
57,915,424
68,308,842
93,792,201
112,946,303
97,403,690
117,502,240
102,685,671
123,643,955
115,231,067
137,340,549
Grand Total—High .....................
¥1,321,000
82,688,777
139,447,183
145,309,824
152,641,032
167,930,380
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
1 As of September 2015, CBP has automated the
Form I–94 process for refugees. Refugees can now
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
access their Form I–94 from the I–94 Web site. CBP
no longer provides a paper Form I–94 to refugees
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
unless one is requested or CBP determines that it
is appropriate to issue one.
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
91648
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Background
The Form I–94
Prior to the implementation of the
IFR, the Form I–94 was generally issued
to foreign nationals at ports of entry
(POEs) at the time they lawfully enter
the United States. See 8 CFR 235.1(h).
The Form I–94 is also issued when a
foreign national changes immigration
status within the United States. The
Form I–94 is used to document status in
the United States, the authorized length
of stay, and departure. The Form I–94
collects biographical information, visa
and passport information, and the
address and phone number where the
traveler can be reached while in the
United States.
The Form I–94 has been used for
approximately 50 years by DHS, its
predecessor agencies, and external
stakeholders for a variety of purposes.
CBP and U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE), components of DHS,
use the form to document arrival and
departure, as well as class of admission
or duration of parole. U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services (USCIS), also
a component of DHS, issues Forms I–94
to foreign nationals extending their
authorized length of stay or changing
their immigration status while in the
United States and to individuals granted
asylum or refugee status in the United
States as proof of their grant of asylum
or refugee status. USCIS also uses Form
I–94 information to verify lawful
admission or parole when adjudicating
immigration benefit requests,
confirming employment authorization
for employers participating in USCIS’s
E-Verify program, or verifying
immigration status for benefit granting
state and federal government agencies
participating in USCIS’s Systematic
Alien Verification for Entitlements
(SAVE) program. The Form I–94 is also
used by the Social Security
Administration (SSA), state agencies,
such as Departments of Motor Vehicles
(DMV), and public assistance agencies
and organizations, to verify eligibility
for benefits. The form is used by certain
foreign nationals for evidence of lawful
admission or parole, as well as, where
applicable, employment eligibility and
eligibility for public benefits. For more
complete information on the Form I–94,
its uses, and the automation, please
refer to the background section of the
IFR.
Automation of the Form I–94 at Airports
and Seaports
Nearly all of the traveler information
collected on the Form I–94 is also
collected by CBP in advance of the
traveler’s arrival via the Advance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
Passenger Information System (APIS).
Using information collected via APIS
along with visa information transmitted
to CBP by DOS, CBP is now able to
generate Forms I–94 electronically,
which reduces paperwork burdens for
travelers and reduces costs for air and
sea carriers and CBP.
On March 27, 2013, CBP published an
IFR in the Federal Register (78 FR
18457) amending the DHS regulations to
include new definitions at 8 CFR 1.4 for
the term ‘‘Form I–94’’ and other terms
when used in relation to the Form I–94.
The IFR became effective on April 26,
2013, and on that date, CBP began the
transition to an automated Form I–94
process whereby CBP creates an
electronic Form I–94 for travelers
arriving by air or sea based on the
information in its databases. CBP
continues to provide a paper Form I–94
to those who request such form, as well
as to certain classes of aliens, such as
asylees, certain parolees, and whenever
CBP determines the issuance of a paper
form is appropriate. For these
individuals arriving by air and sea
carriers, an electronic Form I–94 is also
created.
Travelers are able to access and print
their electronic Form I–94 via the Web
site CBP has established for this
purpose: www.cbp.gov/I94.2 Travelers to
whom an electronic Form I–94 has been
issued may log on to the Web site using
identifying information and print a copy
of the electronic Form I–94. In order to
access the Form I–94 from the Web site,
the traveler is required to enter
information from his or her passport;
thus, a third party without access to the
traveler’s passport is not able to access
the Form I–94 from the Web site. The
printout from the Web site is the
equivalent of the departure portion of
the paper form and contains the same
information as the departure portion of
the paper form. CBP continues to stamp
the traveler’s passport at the time of
inspection and will annotate the stamp
with the class of admission or parole
and duration of admission or parole.
I–94 information to CBP and pay the
required fee prior to arrival. CBP
expects that these enhancements will
result in time savings to travelers who
choose this option.
Before September 29, 2016, when a
traveler requiring a Form I–94 arrived at
the land border, he/she provided the I–
94 information to a CBP officer who
input the data into a CBP computer
system. After determining the traveler’s
admissibility, the CBP officer printed a
Form I–94A 3 for the traveler and
referred him/her to the cashier to pay
the $6 fee.4
Under the new process, a traveler who
requires an I–94 and intends to enter the
United States at a land port of entry will
have the option to either follow the
above process or to apply for an I–94
and pay the $6 fee up to seven days in
advance of arrival. Using the I–94 Web
site, the traveler enters all of the
necessary data for I–94 processing that
would be collected by CBP at the port
of entry. Upon paying the fee, the
traveler will receive a ‘‘provisional I–
94’’. This ‘‘provisional
I–94’’ will become effective after the
traveler presents it to a CBP officer at a
land port of entry and completes the
issuance process with a CBP officer. If
the ‘‘provisional I–94’’ is not processed
within 7 days of submitting the
application, it will expire and the fee
will be forfeited.
The I–94 Web site will instruct the
traveler to appear at the land port of
entry for an interview and biometric
collection. When the traveler arrives at
the port of entry, he/she completes the
issuance process with a CBP officer. The
CBP officer will locate the traveler’s
information by swiping the traveler’s
passport or other travel document in
CBP’s database. This will verify that the
fee was paid and pre-populate the data
fields from the document swipe and the
information provided by the traveler in
the Web site. If the CBP officer
determines that the traveler is
admissible, the CBP officer will print
out a Form I–94A to give to the traveler.
Enhanced Form I–94 Land Border
Process
In addition to the automation of the
Form I–94 at air and sea ports of entry,
on September 29, 2016, CBP modified
the process by which a traveler arriving
at the land border can provide Form I–
94 information and pay the related fee
by adding an electronic option.
Specifically, CBP enhanced the I–94
Web site to enable travelers arriving at
a land port of entry to submit the Form
Discussion of Comments
2 The direct link is: https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/I94/
request.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Overview
Although CBP promulgated the IFR
without first soliciting public comment,
CBP provided a thirty-day postpromulgation comment period soliciting
public comments that CBP would
consider before adopting the interim
regulations as final. CBP received
3 The Form I–94A is the version of the Form
I–94 that CBP issues at land ports of entry.
4 The amount of fee for the issuance of the Form
I–94 at a land border port of entry is provided for
in 8 CFR 103.7(b)(1)(ii)(D).
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
eighteen submissions in response to the
IFR. Commenters included individuals,
the American Immigration Lawyers
Association (AILA), the American
Council on International Personnel
(ACIP), the Society for Human Resource
Management (SHRM), Feld
Entertainment, Inc., the Intel
Corporation, NAFSA: Association of
International Educators (NAFSA), and
the Airports Council International-North
America (ACI–NA). Many commenters
raised multiple issues, and several
issues were raised by numerous
commenters. Of the eighteen
submissions, most included comments
seeking clarification of specific issues,
highlighting concerns or issues with the
Form I–94 automation, or offering
solutions to issues or alternatives.
Several of the operational issues raised
by commenters have already been
addressed by CBP, which our responses
reflect. CBP has grouped the issues by
topic and provides responses below.
Benefits of Automation
Comment: Many commenters were
supportive of the change to an
electronic Form I–94, saying that it will
provide increased efficiency for
passengers, airlines, and CBP.
Commenters said that no longer
requiring passengers to fill out the paper
form on the plane while en route to the
United States would not only save
passengers time, but would also save air
carriers time and money and would free
up airline staff to perform other duties.
Commenters also anticipated reduced
wait times at the POEs, and increased
officer efficiency.
Response: CBP appreciates this
feedback and agrees that the automation
of the Form I–94 benefits the traveling
public, air and sea carriers, and CBP.
Comment: One commenter requested
that the Form I–94 be automated for the
land ports as well as air and sea, as this
will help reduce wait times and
improve commerce at the land border.
Response: CBP agrees that automating
the Form I–94 at land POEs would
provide benefits to travelers and is
exploring expanding automation to
include land border POEs. However, the
electronic Form I–94 relies in large part
on information collected via APIS, and
APIS data is currently collected only for
air and sea. Therefore, CBP cannot fully
automate the Form I–94 process at land
border POE’s at this time. CBP’s
enhanced Form I–94 land border
process, however, is expected to
increase the efficiency of the entry
process and reduce administrative
duties for CBP officers, ultimately
resulting in shorter wait times for
travelers requiring a Form I–94.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
Regulatory Amendments
Comment: One commenter requested
that the Form I–94 printout from the I–
94 Web site be added to the list of
evidence of registration for purposes of
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA)
section 264(e).
Response: The list of acceptable
registration documents for purposes of
INA 264(e) is found in 8 CFR 264.1(b).
The Form I–94, Arrival-Departure
Record, is already included in the list of
evidence of registration in 8 CFR
264.1(b). The IFR added a new
provision to the regulations to define
‘‘Form I–94’’ and related terms. The new
definition makes clear that the Form I–
94 now includes information collected
electronically, and also defines ‘‘original
Form I–94’’ to include the printout from
the I–94 Web site. Due to the new
definition provided for the Form I–94,
CBP believes it is clear that the printout
constitutes evidence of registration and
no further change is needed.
Comment: One commenter requested
that the definition of ‘‘original
document’’ in 8 CFR 274a.2(b)(1)(v) be
amended to include a Form I–94
printout.
Response: CBP believes that the
definition of ‘‘original Form I–94’’
included in the IFR accomplishes the
desired result, and, therefore, it is not
necessary to amend 8 CFR
274a.2(b)(1)(v). That definition provides
that the term ‘original Form I–94’
includes, but is not limited to, any
printout or electronic transmission of
information from DHS systems
containing the electronic record of
admission or arrival/departure. See 8
CFR 1.4(d). 8 CFR 274a.2 concerns the
Form I–9, which is a USCIS form.
USCIS agrees that a printout of the Form
I–94 from the Web site constitutes an
‘‘original document’’ under this
regulation.
Comment: One commenter, NAFSA,
requested that paragraph (e) of section
1.4 be amended to add ‘‘or electronic
transmission’’ after the word ‘‘printout.’’
The commenter states that the revision
would clarify that a traveler may present
an electronic version of the Form I–94,
such as a PDF or image scan.
Response: CBP believes that such
amendment is unnecessary and could
cause confusion as to what can be
presented or submitted in various
situations. For example, at this time, a
printout of the Form I–94 is still
necessary in a number of situations,
including the completion of the USCIS
Form I–9. However, the current
definition specifically states that the
terms in question ‘‘are not limited to’’
providing a printout, and thus, could be
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
91649
applied more broadly as appropriate by
stakeholders. Although CBP is hopeful
that the Form I–94 in electronic form
will be accepted in the future by all
stakeholders to whom these regulations
apply and that a printout will not
always be required, that is not the case
now.
Administrative Procedure Act
Comment: One commenter, Feld
Entertainment, Inc., disagreed that the
rulemaking is procedural. The
commenter states that because the rule
was promulgated without prior notice
and comment, it violates the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
The commenter was also concerned that
the comments received in response to
the IFR would be disregarded.
Response: The IFR enabled CBP to
transition to an automated process
whereby CBP creates a Form I–94 in an
electronic format. CBP has not changed
the substantive regulations relating to
the Form I–94, but only the operational
means by which CBP issues the form.
Thus, the rule is a procedural rule
exempt from prior notice-and-comment
requirements under the APA. CBP
already has adopted a number of the
commenters’ operational suggestions,
which are described in many of the
responses below. Many of the
commenters’ questions have been
addressed on the FAQs page of the I–94
Web site for easy reference.
Web Site and Printouts
Comment: One commenter noted that
the Web site option is helpful for those
who lose or misplace their Forms I–94,
or when the paper form becomes so
worn that it is no longer accepted by
agencies.
Response: CBP appreciates this
feedback, and agrees that the Web site
makes it easier for travelers to obtain
copies of their Forms I–94 when
necessary. Since the implementation of
the Form I–94 automation, CBP has
expanded the Web site to provide
additional benefits, including allowing
nonimmigrants to access their five-year
travel history.
Comment: A few commenters
requested that the Web site be updated
to reflect changes in status granted by
USCIS. Commenters said that, if this is
done, nonimmigrants who have had a
change of status will not have to file a
Form
I–102 for a replacement Form I–94 if
needed.
Response: CBP agrees that providing
this information through the Web site
would be helpful and would reduce the
number of Forms I–102 that would be
filed. The Form I–102 is the USCIS form
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
91650
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
nonimmigrants use to apply for a new
or replacement Form I–94. Adding
information about changes of status
granted by USCIS to the Web site is not
currently possible. However, CBP is
looking into whether USCIS information
can be reliably added to the Web site in
the future. Any updates on this issue
will be included in the FAQs page of the
I–94 Web site.
Comment: A few commenters,
including AILA, disagreed with the
assumption in the economic analysis
that B–1/B–2 visa holders would not
access the Web site. Commenters said
that these visa holders, especially those
in the United States for at least six
months, would have reason to obtain
their Form I–94 records or may wish to
obtain a record of their admission for
future use.
Response: CBP agrees that some B–1/
B–2 visa holders, including those who
are given a year to stay as a B–1/B–2
visa holder, may have a need to access
the I–94 Web site. Accordingly, CBP has
revised the assumption in the economic
analysis. Based on Web site query
history since the interim rule went into
effect, we now assume that one percent
of B–1/B–2 visa holders will access the
I–94 Web site. In addition, CBP agrees
that some travelers may wish to obtain
a record of their admission for future
use. CBP has made changes to the I–94
Web site to allow travelers to access
their most recent Form I–94 record as
well as a five-year travel history. This
can now be accessed by travelers who
have already left the United States in
addition to those present in the United
States.
Comment: Some commenters noted
that CBP is assuming all travelers will
have access to a printer. The
commenters stated that it is not as easy
as CBP assumes for a foreign national to
access public libraries soon after arrival
in the United States. They would have
to learn that public libraries offer
internet, that one can print from them,
that there is a library nearby, that public
transportation is available, how to
navigate public transportation, and
explain what library resources are
needed.
One commenter, the Intel
Corporation, was concerned that
employees would not be able to access
the Web site before they must start work
in the United States, which is
problematic because the Form I–94 is
required to complete the Form I–9. The
commenter stated that it has a company
policy to complete the Form I–9 during
new employee orientation, which
requires the employee to have his or her
Form I–94 in hand. The company does
not allow new hires access to company
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
computers until after the new employee
orientation, and due to data privacy
protection protocol, the company
cannot allow employees to access
Personally Identifiable Information (PII)
on a computer assigned to someone else.
The commenter suggests CBP provide a
way for the employer to access the new
hire’s Form I–94 number directly.
Several commenters suggested that
CBP print a copy of the departure
portion for the traveler and include
instructions on how to print more
copies, or alternatively, that CBP
provide kiosks at the airports where
foreign nationals can inspect and print
the Form I–94.
Response: CBP recognizes that access
to the internet and printers is a barrier
to many travelers who need their
electronic Form I–94, including those
who need to present their Form I–94
when completing the Form I–9. For this
reason employers, or third parties, may
access Form I–94 records when consent
is obtained from the record holder. For
more information on third party consent
visit: https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/I94/
request.html.
In the regulatory assessment for the
interim final rule, CBP discussed the
difficulties some foreign nationals face
when they need to access the I–94 Web
site to print their electronic Form I–94.
The analysis estimated that
approximately 1,028,876 travelers
would need to drive 20 miles and that
it would take 60 minutes of a traveler’s
time to access and print their electronic
Form I–94. CBP estimated that this cost
aliens about $21 million in 2013. We
have updated these estimates for this
final rule in the economic assessment.
For more information, see the below
section entitled Executive Order 12866
(Regulatory Planning and Review) and
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review). CBP
now estimates that it cost $17 million in
2014 (the first full year the rule is in
effect). CBP acknowledges that this
represents a significant negative impact
to these travelers and strives to
minimize this burden to the extent
possible. To that end, CBP continues to
provide paper Forms I–94 upon request
when the individual arrives in the
United States at the port’s secondary
inspection station and at Deferred
Inspection Sites (DISs) once the traveler
is in the United States.
CBP recognizes the potential
usefulness of placing kiosks at ports
where foreign nationals could inspect
and print their Forms I–94 and has
evaluated the merits of placing such
kiosks at the busiest 20 airports and the
busiest 20 seaports. Based on this
analysis, for travelers’ benefits to exceed
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the kiosks costs, greater than one
percent of the subset of travelers who
would otherwise need to travel to access
and print their electronic Form I–94
would instead need to use a kiosk.
Based on the few travelers who
currently request paper Forms I–94, CBP
does not believe there are enough
foreign nationals who would take
advantage of the kiosks to offset CBP’s
costs of installing them. In addition, due
to budget constraints, CBP does not
have the funds to acquire these kiosks
at this time. See the Regulatory
Alternatives section of the economic
assessment below for more information.
Comment: One commenter had
concerns about what a traveler would
do if he or she loses his or her passport
and cannot access the necessary
information to retrieve the Form I–94
from the Web site.
Response: CBP believes that making
the Form I–94 available on the Web site
will not put travelers who lose their
passports in a worse position than they
were in prior to the automation of the
Form I–94. Paper Forms I–94 were
typically stored or stapled into a
traveler’s passport; thus, prior to
automation, loss of a passport would
have required the traveler to obtain a
new Form I–94 as well. With
automation, if the traveler loses his or
her passport, but has the passport
information documented elsewhere, he
or she will be able to obtain the Form
I–94 from the Web site. CBP has made
various updates to the I–94 Web site to
address some of the comments. One of
these updates is that a traveler no longer
needs to enter the date and class of
admission, which will make accessing
the Form I–94 record easier for travelers.
Comment: Many commenters
encouraged CBP to make archival
records of Form I–94 records available
indefinitely, as this will reduce the
administrative burden placed on CBP to
respond to Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) requests.
Response: CBP has made changes to
the I–94 Web site to allow travelers to
access their most recent Form I–94
record, even if the traveler has already
departed the United States. Although
CBP is not able to make the Form I–94
records available on the Web site
indefinitely, CBP has updated the Web
site so that Form I–94 records are
available dating back five years. The
Web site also now allows travelers to
request their five-year U.S. border
crossing history. Travelers frequently
request their five-year travel history
from DHS, as this history is often
required when they apply for certain
benefits. CBP agrees that providing this
information through the Web site will
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
help reduce FOIA requests regarding
travel history. More details about the
benefits CBP anticipates from this
change can be found in the economic
assessment below, entitled ‘‘Executive
Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) and Executive Order 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review).’’
Comment: One commenter asked
whether nonimmigrants who received
paper Forms I–94 would be able to get
replacements from the Web site.
Response: The Web site now provides
access to Forms I–94 issued up to five
years prior to the query date. Currently,
nonimmigrants who have received
paper Forms I–94 since 2009 are able to
access their Form I–94 information via
the Web site.
Comment: Several commenters were
concerned that foreign nationals may
not be able to access their records on the
Web site due to typographical or
biographical errors that occur during the
creation of the electronic Form I–94
record. In particular, a few commenters
noted that information is frequently
entered incorrectly on visas, especially
incorrect name spellings. Information
drawn from visas would then be
incorrect, and travelers would not be
successful when querying their Form
I–94 record.
Response: Most of the biographical
information CBP uses in creating the
electronic Form I–94 is drawn from the
traveler’s passport. The only
information drawn from the visa for the
Form I–94 is the visa classification and
issuance date. The exact format of the
name used in the electronic Form I–94
is found in the Machine Readable Zone
(MRZ) of the passport, found at the
bottom of the biographical page of the
passport. A traveler having trouble
finding his or her Form I–94 record
should look at the way his or her name
is formatted in the passport MRZ. The
MRZ shows the traveler’s name
immediately following the three letter
country code, as last/surname and given
name separated by chevrons (<<<<). A
traveler should not include the country
code when querying his or her Form
I–94 record. The MRZ does not use
punctuation such as hyphens or
apostrophes. In some cases, a traveler’s
name might be truncated in the MRZ; in
such cases, the traveler should query the
truncated version of the name. CBP has
included guidance on this issue on the
FAQs page of the I–94 Web site, along
with an example passport page for
reference.
Comment: A few commenters
requested that CBP ensure that the Web
site is accessible on a variety of
platforms and browsers, including
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
mobile devices. Commenters also
requested that both www.cbp.gov/I-94
and www.cbp.gov/I-94 [note the hyphen
in I–94] direct users to the proper Web
site.
Response: Although CBP does not
have the resources to conduct testing on
multiple platforms, CBP has not
received any feedback concerning a lack
of functionality on any platform. Due to
updates that CBP has made to
www.cbp.gov as a whole, the full
address for the Form I–94 retrieval Web
site is now: https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/I-94/
request.html. Both web addresses
www.cbp.gov/I-94 and www.cbp.gov/I94 direct users to a Web site with
information about the Form I–94, and
includes a link to the Form I–94
retrieval page.
Comment: Several commenters,
including AILA, ACIP, SHRM, and Feld
Entertainment, suggested adding an
endorsement or other information on
the printout to help educate those
stakeholders who are not accustomed to
seeing Form I–94 printouts from the
Web site, and might be reluctant to
accept the printout. Some commenters
also suggested including a phone
number or email address on the
printout.
Response: CBP agrees that additional
language on the printout would help
educate stakeholders, and has added
language to the printout indicating that
the Form I–94 has now been automated
for most nonimmigrants. While CBP has
decided not to add a phone number or
email to the printout, there is a link on
the I–94 retrieval Web site that directs
users to the CBP help desk.
Comment: A few commenters stated
that it was unclear how CBP would
prevent fraudulent printouts.
Response: CBP does not believe that
the printout creates a greater risk of
fraud than the paper Forms I–94, which
did not contain any security features.
CBP continues to encourage
stakeholders to verify a traveler’s
information through SAVE or E-Verify,
when registered or enrolled,
respectively, in these services, and only
as authorized.
The SAVE program is a USCIS service
that helps federal, state, and local
benefit-issuing agencies, institutions,
and licensing agencies determine the
immigration status of benefit applicants
so only those entitled to benefits receive
them. More information on SAVE can be
found at: https://www.uscis.gov/save.
E-Verify is a web-based system that
allows businesses to confirm the
eligibility of their employees to work in
the United States. More information on
E-Verify can be found at: https://
www.uscis.gov/e-verify.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
91651
Comment: A few commenters had
privacy concerns related to the Web site.
One commenter was concerned that
CBP will automatically collect
information on those persons attempting
to access the Form I–94 information
from the Web site. Another commenter
was concerned that the personal
information available on the Web site
could be accessed by unauthorized
parties, which put refugees or those
seeking asylum in the United States at
risk.
Response: DHS/CBP has issued a
Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA), which
describes the I–94 Web site, and posted
it online at: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/
default/files/publications/privacy/PIAs/
pia-cbp-16–I–94-automation20130227.pdf. DHS/CBP has also
updated and reissued the System of
Records Notice (SORN) for the
Nonimmigrant and Immigrant
Information System (NIIS) at 80 FR
13398, a system for maintaining the
arrival and departure records of
nonimmigrants, and for APIS at 80 FR
13407. CBP is in the process of updating
the PIA, which will discuss how the
I–94 Web site will retain information
about attempts to access the I–94 Web
site (i.e. the search history) for only
three months and as part of the Web
site’s audit log. The search history, as
part of the audit log, is part of the Web
site’s infrastructure. The audit log is
only maintained in the Web site’s
infrastructure, and the search history is
retained for only three months, to
reduce the risk of improper use or
disclosure of the search history. The
benefits of keeping an audit log of
searches conducted on the I–94 Web site
include preventing improper and
unauthorized use of the Web site, and
holding accountable anyone who uses
the I–94 Web site improperly or without
authorization.
CBP believes that the benefits of
having an audit log outweigh the small
and limited risks of improper use and
disclosure of search histories. The log of
search histories allows CBP to conduct
audits and uncover when an
unauthorized party is attempting to
obtain information from the I–94 Web
site. For example, if a single access
point conducts multiple searches for
different individuals, CBP will
investigate whether someone or
something is conducting searches
without the travelers’ consent. CBP has
included a new security consent page to
the Form I–94 retrieval Web site that
users must read and accept before
querying an Form I–94 record. The
security page requires users to affirm
that they are authorized to obtain that
traveler’s history, and to understand
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
91652
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
that unauthorized or improper use
could result in criminal and civil
penalties. With respect to information
pertaining to persons whose asylee
status is prohibited from public
disclosure pursuant to 8 CFR 208.6, CBP
is taking the added precaution of
requiring asylees to manually submit
verifiable identity information before
they may access their Form I–94
information. Asylees will continue to
receive a paper Form I–94. Refugees and
certain parolees may access their Form
I–94 via the Web site.
Automatic Revalidation
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Comment: Numerous commenters
were concerned about how the
automation of the Form I–94 would
affect automatic revalidation.5
Commenters noted that nonimmigrants
seeking to use the automatic
revalidation provisions will have to
demonstrate to carriers that they are
legally allowed to board the plane or
vessel with an expired visa and a
passport stamp that reflects a change or
extension of status. Thus, commenters
encourage CBP to require air and sea
carriers to provide instructions to their
personnel regarding the documentation
for such persons.
Specifically, commenters suggested
that CBP officers would need to override
a nonimmigrant’s automated departure
record when a nonimmigrant seeks
readmission under 22 CFR 41.112(d).
Commenters also recommended that
CBP emphasize in training that CBP
officers will be expected to reactivate
previously closed Form I–94 records for
automatic revalidation.
Commenters were concerned that
admission errors are common in
automatic revalidation and that
nonimmigrants without a paper Form I–
94 may experience challenges during
the inspection process. Commenters
additionally noted that for
nonimmigrants to print Forms I–94 to
retain in the event they go to Canada or
Mexico and wish to use the automatic
revalidation provisions upon return to
the United States would be very
burdensome on those with limited
internet and printing capabilities.
Response: The IFR expanded the
definition of a Form I–94 to include
electronic means. It did not change the
requirements for the issuance and use of
5 Automatic revalidation allows certain persons to
seek readmission to the United States for the
duration of an unexpired period of a previous
admission. Pursuant to 8 CFR 214.1 and 22 CFR
41.112, automatic revalidation allows readmittance
of certain aliens who have been out of the United
States for thirty days or less in a contiguous
territory and who have an unexpired nonimmigrant
visa.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
the Form I–94. Automatic revalidation
requirements are outlined in 8 CFR
214.1(b) and 22 CFR 41.112(d). Under
the automatic revalidation provisions,
certain temporary visitors holding
expired nonimmigrant visas who seek to
return to the United States may be
admitted at a U.S. port of entry by CBP
if they meet certain requirements
including, but not limited to certain
nonimmigrants with a valid, unexpired
admission stamp on the Form I–94 or an
electronic Form I–94. CBP maintains the
electronic Form I–94 record in CBP
systems and will use the electronic
format to revalidate a previous,
unexpired admission or extension of
stay if all other revalidation
requirements are met.
CBP has provided guidance to CBP
officers at POEs regarding automatic
revalidation. The primary processing
system allows a CBP officer to re-use an
existing Form I–94 when automatic
revalidation requirements are met. CBP
has also conducted outreach with the
travel industry about the new
documentary requirements. CBP has
updated the Carrier Information Guide
to assist carriers in recognizing
acceptable documents and to ensure
that carriers are informed of the Form I–
94 automation. The Carrier Information
Guide now includes an example of the
electronic Form I–94 Web site printout
and guidance to carriers on automatic
revalidation.
An air carrier or vessel may require
evidence of an unexpired admission by
a traveler prior to embarkation. The
Form I–94 Web site printout is evidence
of that admission and can be presented
to a carrier if requested. CBP has made
changes to the I–94 Web site to allow
travelers to access their Form I–94
records after departure. This allows
travelers who have already departed the
United States, but who may need the
printout for automatic revalidation
purposes to obtain the printout to
present to a carrier.
CBP has included guidance on
automatic revalidation in the FAQs on
the I–94 Web site.
Departure
Comment: Some commenters stated
that it was unclear what procedures
were to be followed at the time of
departure. Commenters were
particularly concerned about the
procedures that should be followed in
the case of a nonimmigrant arriving by
air or sea but departing by land. The
commenters were concerned that CBP’s
database would record the arrival
information, but would not record the
departure, which could create
difficulties for nonimmigrants seeking
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to travel to the United States in the
future. Commenters wanted to know
whether nonimmigrants departing by
land have any affirmative duties to
ensure that departures by land are
recorded correctly.
Response: CBP has added information
concerning departure by land to the
FAQs page of the I–94 Web site. CBP
and the Canadian Border Services
Agency (CBSA) have partnered to create
an entry/exit system that exchanges
entry information at land border ports of
entry for certain individuals.
Information collected on entry to one
country is shared in order to
electronically record as exit from the
other. Thus, entry into Canada from the
United States now creates a departure
record for the United States.
CBP does not currently have a system
for automatically recording departures
by land to Mexico. If a traveler departs
the United States by land to Mexico, the
traveler may wish to retain evidence of
departure to Mexico. Evidence of
departure can include, but is not limited
to, entry stamps in a passport,
transportation tickets, pay stubs and/or
other receipts. A traveler can request an
entry stamp from the Instituto Nacional
´
de Migracion (INM) when entering
Mexico. CBP is not, however, placing
any affirmative duty on the travelers to
carry such evidence.
Travelers departing the United States
by air or sea will have their departures
recorded automatically when the air or
sea carrier sends CBP departure
manifests.
Comment: One commenter was
concerned that airlines do not always
timely update their departure manifests
when travelers cancel and rebook
flights. Where CBP relies on carrier data,
CBP might document inaccurate
departure data, which could result in
denial of benefits. The traveler would
have no means to seek redress.
Response: APIS reports whether a
person is ‘‘on board’’ or ‘‘not on board’’
in order to accurately reflect changes in
reservations. CBP relies on confirmed
departure information, and has updated
the I–94 Web site to ensure that only
confirmed departures are reflected. DHS
is able to independently verify
departures through DHS law
enforcement databases, and overstay
records are reviewed before any adverse
action is taken.6
6 According to confirmation studies conducted by
CBP and outside studies conducted by contractors
and GAO, CBP estimates that 99% of APIS
departure data is accurate. CBP also confirms
departure data independently by using information
travelers send from outside the U.S., visa
information from the State Department, or
subsequent arrival data.
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
The DHS TRIP program is an
established means for a traveler to
inquire to seek resolution to any
difficulties experienced during travel
into or departure from the United States.
A traveler can submit evidence of a
timely departure in DHS TRIP. If a
traveler believes that CBP maintains
incorrect departure information, the
traveler can apply for redress at https://
www.dhs.gov/dhs-trip.
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Visa Classification
Comment: A number of commenters
requested clarification on how visa
classification data will populate an
automated Form I–94 when a
nonimmigrant has more than one visa.
Response: CBP receives visa
information from DOS. There may be
instances where a traveler has multiple
eligible visa classifications. In these
cases, the CBP officer determines at the
time of entry which visa classification
the traveler qualifies for and admits the
traveler under that class of admission.
The electronic Form I–94 record will
reflect the class of admission chosen by
the CBP officer at the time of entry. This
process is substantially the same as the
process followed during issuance of a
paper Form I–94.
Comment: Commenters asked how
nonimmigrants seeking to enter the
United States from Visa Waiver Program
(VWP) countries would be handled in
view of the Form I–94 automation.
Response: Travelers entering the
United States under the VWP used to
receive a Form I–94W, which is
different than the Form I–94. The Form
I–94W was automated by the Electronic
System for Traveler Authorization
(ESTA) in August 2010. VWP visitors no
longer receive a Form I–94W when
arriving in the United States by air or
sea, but rather must apply for and
receive an ESTA prior to travel to the
United States. For further information
about ESTA, see 8 CFR 217.5 and
www.cbp.gov/esta/. Upon arrival in the
United States, VWP visitors receive an
annotated stamp in their passports. This
process is not affected by the
automation of the Form I–94.
Errors and CBP Officer Training
Comment: A few commenters were
concerned that frequently there are
errors in admission records due to CBP
officer error or misapplication of
periods of stay for the various
nonimmigrant visa categories.
Commenters believe that more training
is necessary for CBP officers on visa
categories, automatic revalidation, and
creation of the automated Form I–94.
Response: CBP officers are trained in
all aspects of the inspection process.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
CBP conducts ongoing training in the
form of field guidance, musters, on-thejob training, and online training
modules. CBP has provided field
guidance and musters to CBP officers at
the Ports of Entry (POEs) regarding the
Form I–94 automation process. CBP has
issued additional guidance to CBP
officers to help the officers properly
create the electronic Form I–94. CBP
continues to instruct officers to verify
information and make any needed
corrections prior to creating the
electronic Form I–94.
Comment: Some commenters were
concerned that the regulations do not
require CBP to stamp the passport, and
state that CBP does not currently stamp
passports consistently. Thus, there is no
way for some travelers to review their
admission information at the time of
entry.
Response: It is CBP’s policy to stamp
the passport of visitors to the United
States, or provide them a receipt, as in
the case of Global Entry members.7 CBP
has provided extensive guidance and
training to CBP officers at POEs
regarding the documentation of a lawful
admission into the United States with a
CBP admission stamp. CBP will
continue to provide guidance and
training to CBP officers at the POEs to
ensure that officers are stamping
passports consistently. CBP notes,
however, that a traveler will be able to
find his or her admission record on the
I–94 retrieval Web site regardless of
whether the passport contains an
admission stamp.
Comment: Some commenters noted
that variations on naming conventions
and other data occur in travel
documents and records. These
commenters stated that there are often
variations due to inconsistent rules for
transliterating non-Latin alphabets, and
inconsistent rules for non-standard
characters or naming conventions. The
systems must be configured so that
travelers are not harmed by variations in
names and systems. Commenters prefer
that CBP use information from the
biographical page of the passport rather
than information from the visa, as the
visa name is often incorrect. The
commenters indicated that DOS naming
conventions are often not compatible
with the conventions of other agencies.
In particular, the First Name Unknown
(FNU) or Last Name Unknown (LNU)
designations create problems for
nonimmigrants when the U.S. visa is
7 Nonimmigrant Global Entry members receive a
printed Form I–94 from the Global Entry kiosk, and
can also retrieve the Form I–94 from the I–94 Web
site.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
91653
used as the primary source for an
official name.
Response: CBP has met with USCIS,
DOS, and representatives from ICE’s
Student and Exchange Visitor Program
(SEVP) to discuss naming conventions
and to attempt to resolve
inconsistencies. Currently, CBP creates
the Form I–94 admission record using
the name found in the MRZ of the
passport, not the visa. APIS and CBP
use standard International Civil
Aviation Organization (ICAO) naming
conventions. CBP will use FNU or LNU
only when a traveler does not have both
a given and surname.
Comment: A few commenters
suggested that CBP establish additional
resources to help address questions and
correct errors. Specific suggestions
included creating an ombudsman for the
electronic Form I–94, creating a Web
site with guidance, and establishing
dedicated help lines and email
addresses for use by travelers,
employers, and other government
agencies. Commenters were concerned
that there was not a mechanism
established for correcting errors in the
electronic records and no access to the
Web site at the time of entry into the
United States.
Response: Although CBP does not
have the resources to create a dedicated
helpline or ombudsman, CBP has
included additional guidance on the I–
94 Web site under the FAQs tab.
Travelers can check the passport
admission stamp obtained at the time of
entry into the United States to verify the
correct date and class of admission, and
ask the CBP officer to make corrections
if needed.
CBP will correct any errors in Form I–
94 records that originated with CBP at
CBP’s Deferred Inspection Sites (DISs).
DISs, located at most major airports,
will provide assistance to travelers
requiring Form I–94 corrections or
modifications. In many cases,
corrections can be completed through a
telephone call to a DIS. However, in
some cases, the traveler may be required
to appear in person in order to verify
identity or to provide additional
documentation to CBP. CBP has
provided guidance and training to the
CBP officers at the DISs about Form I–
94 corrections. A list of all DISs can be
found at https://www.cbp.gov/document/
forms/deferred-inspection-sites.
Travelers may also visit the CBP INFO
Center at https://help.cbp.gov for
assistance. The INFO Center has staff
dedicated to responding to Form I–94
issues. CBP has included a link to the
CBP INFO Center on the Form I–94
retrieval Web site.
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
91654
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Coordination With Other Agencies
Comment: Some commenters
complained of disparate guidance from
various government agencies concerning
the automated Form I–94. For example,
some commenters stated that the SSA
published guidance indicating that
either an unexpired admission stamp or
a printout from the Form I–94 Web site
will be accepted as proof of
nonimmigrant status. USCIS, however,
has published guidance on its Web site
stating that USCIS and state DMVs will
require a printout of the Form I–94.
Further, one commenter noted that at
least one DMV office still required a
stamp on the Form I–94 and had not
heard of the change to the automated
Form I–94.
Response: CBP has conducted
extensive outreach to other agencies and
to DMVs regarding the automation of
the Form I–94. The requirements of
various federal and state agencies may
differ for practical or legal reasons,
resulting in some agencies being able to
accept the admission stamp while
others may still require a printout of the
Form I–94. Per commenters’
suggestions, CBP has added the
following language on the Form I–94
printout to aid in educating
stakeholders not familiar with the
electronic Form I–94:
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Effective April 26, 2013, DHS began
automating the admission process. An alien
lawfully admitted or paroled into the United
States is no longer required to be in
possession of a preprinted Form I–94. A
record of admission printed from the CBP
Web site constitutes a lawful record of
admission. See 8 CFR 1.4(d).
Comment: Some commenters had
particular concerns about completing
USCIS’s Form I–9, as that form requests
the Form I–94 number. Commenters
suggested that either the period of
admission or the passport number and
country of issuance serve as the
required data fields on the Form I–9.
Otherwise, workers without internet
access will have trouble completing the
Form I–9.
Response: USCIS, the owner of the
Form I–9 (Employment Eligibility
Verification), is reviewing its forms and
applicable regulations and policies, but
at this time, it is not able to change the
required information on Section 1 of the
Form I–9. For completion of Section 2
of Form I–9, employees who are aliens
authorized for employment with a
specific employer incident to their
nonimmigrant status may choose to
present their foreign passport together
with Form I–94 in paper format (which
includes a printout from the Web site);
admission stamps are not acceptable for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
Form I–9 purposes. Refugees and
asylees may also choose to present
Forms I–94 for completion of Section 2
and Section 3 of the Form I–9, although
they also have the option to present
other documents instead. Refugees may
choose to present a Form I–94 printout
or a paper Form I–94 with a refugee
stamp as an acceptable receipt for Form
I–9 purposes that does not need to be
paired with any other document.
Asylees who wish to show a Form I–94
may present their paper Form I–94 as a
List C document in combination with a
valid List B document.
Comment: A few commenters,
including AILA and the Intel
Corporation, were concerned that
inconsistent rules regarding when a
Form I–94 printout is acceptable will
materially affect foreign nationals’
access to employment and benefits,
such as Social Security cards, driver’s
licenses and extensions or changes of
nonimmigrant status. Commenters also
said that inconsistent rules could
adversely affect U.S. businesses; for
example, if DHS continues to require
printouts bearing an admission number,
employers could be fined by DHS for
failure to record this number on the
Form I–9. A delay or grace period in any
enforcement actions related to the I–9
regarding the entry of admission
numbers is encouraged.
Response: The requirements to record
document numbers on Section 2 of the
Form I–9 have not changed. DHS
regulations require employers to record
the necessary information from
documents the employee presents to
complete Form I–9 within three days
from the date of hire. Section 1 of Form
I–9 requires employees who attest to
being aliens authorized to work in the
United States to record either their alien
number (or USCIS number) or Form I–
94 admission number. Section 1 of Form
I–9 must be completed by the employee
at the time of hire (i.e., first day of work
for pay). The Form I–94 number can be
found on the Form I–94 printout; there
is no requirement that the number must
come from the Form I–94 itself. The
timing requirements for Form I–9
completion are regulatory. DHS may
provide more flexibility in the timing
requirements in a future rulemaking.
Employees are still required to
present documents of their choice from
the Lists of Acceptable Documents
specified in the Form I–9 to show
identity and employment authorization
on Form I–9. To satisfy 8 CFR 274a.2,
original documents must be presented
to employers, which employers must
examine to make a determination
regarding whether the documents
appear to be genuine and to reasonably
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
relate to the person presenting them.
According to USCIS, which issues the
Form I–9, if an employee chooses to
present a Form I–94 along with their
foreign passport to show identity and
employment authorization in Section 2
of the Form I–9, he or she will need to
present to his or her employer a Form
I–94 in paper format, which includes a
Form I–94 printed out from the CBP
Web site. If an employee provides the
Form I–94 he or she obtained from the
CBP Web site with his or her foreign
passport as a List A document, the
employer should accept these
documents if they appear to be genuine
and reasonably relate to the person
presenting them. Form I–9 rules permit
employees to present certain receipts in
lieu of the original document(s): 1. A
receipt for a replacement of a lost,
stolen, or damaged document; 2. the
arrival portion of the Form I–94 or Form
I–94A containing a Temporary I–551
stamp and photograph; and 3. the
departure portion of Form I–94 or I–94A
with an unexpired refugee admission
stamp. 8 CFR 274a.2(b). USCIS has
determined that a Form I–94 printed out
from the CBP Web site by a refugee is
acceptable for Form I–9 purposes
without an unexpired refugee admission
stamp as long as the printout provides
the class of admission as ‘‘RE’’ and
duration of admission as ‘‘D/S [duration
of status].’’
In the benefits-granting context, DHS
will continue its outreach to other
federal, State, and local agencies to
indicate that when a Form I–94 is
required as proof of valid admission to
the United States, a Form I–94 in either
paper or print-out format is acceptable.
Comment: Commenters encouraged
CBP to continue education outreach to
agencies, employers, and other
stakeholders that might remain unaware
of the change to electronic Forms I–94.
Commenters specifically urged
education to improve access to and use
of DHS verification tools, such as SAVE
and E-Verify.
Response: CBP has conducted
extensive outreach to local, state, and
federal agencies, scholarly
organizations, and other nongovernmental entities both before and
after automation. CBP involved all DHS
components, DOS, SSA, and the
Department of Commerce in the
automation process through working
groups. CBP in conjunction with USCIS
provided guidance and support to all
major DMVs that participate in the
SAVE program. CBP coordinated with
NAFSA and other student organizations
to inform academic institutions. CBP
has met with the U.S. Chamber of
Commerce, the travel and tourism
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
industry, refugee and asylum groups,
local law enforcement representatives,
and other interested organizations
during planning and development of the
electronic Form I–94.
Employers seeking employment
eligibility verification can do so through
the E-Verify program offered by USCIS.
Government agencies have access to
status verification or other inquiries
through a variety of sources, including
law enforcement channels and the
SAVE program offered by USCIS.
SEVIS
Comment: One commenter, NAFSA,
suggested that CBP should include the
SEVIS number in the electronic Form I–
94 record for nonimmigrants who are
monitored through SEVIS. The
commenter stated that this would
further DHS’s fulfillment of its
responsibility to notify educational
institutions and exchange program
sponsors that the student has been
properly admitted into the United
States. The commenter noted that CBP
officers often write the SEVIS number
on the paper Form I–94 of F and M
students and J exchange visitors, and
that this notation is used by Designated
School Officials and Responsible
Officers to ensure that the POE
information is associated with the
correct SEVIS record.
Another commenter asked how the
admission record will be tied to the
proper SEVIS number, if a student has
more than one SEVIS record. The
commenter stated that this is of
particular concern because CBP is no
longer stamping the Form I–20 or DS–
2019 upon entry in the United States,
and there is no way that the student can
make sure the correct SEVIS I–20 is
getting mapped to the admission
number.
Response: The Student and Exchange
Visitor Information System (SEVIS) is
utilized to track and monitor schools,
exchange visitor programs, and F, M
and J nonimmigrants while they visit
the United States and participate in the
U.S. education system. The SEVIS
number is the number generated when
a Form I–20 or Form DS–2019 is issued
to an individual to participate in a
specific educational or cultural
exchange program at a specific
institution. CBP currently verifies SEVIS
numbers prior to admission into the
United States. CBP now requires officers
to document SEVIS numbers, if
applicable, in the electronic Form I–94
record, but these numbers are not
accessible to the public or academic
institution. The SEVIS number is not
currently documented on the Form I–94
Web site or printout, as it is not a data
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
element required or collected on the
paper version of the Form I–94. CBP
will explore the feasibility of including
the SEVIS number on the Web site and
printout. CBP has provided guidance to
the field to include the SEVIS number
on the foreign travel document with the
CBP admission stamp when practical.
CBP has updated its systems to help
ensure that the correct SEVIS record is
mapped to the proper arrival/departure
record. The SEVIS information is stored
in CBP systems, and the Arrival and
Departure Information System (ADIS)
feeds information to SEVP for each
student. CBP is continuing to work to
enhance its systems to do a real-time
query of the SEVIS number to prevent
admission on an invalid SEVIS number.
Comment: One commenter requested
that CBP establish a mechanism for
Designated School Officials to request a
review when there is a problem with a
SEVIS record.
Response: If there is a problem with
the SEVIS record, the Designated School
Official should contact SEVP, which
oversees SEVIS. SEVP would then work
with CBP if SEVP determines that the
problem relates to the electronic Form
I–94 or is otherwise CBP-related. More
information about SEVIS can be found
on the SEVIS Web site: www.ice.gov/
sevis/.
Additional Comments
Comment: A few commenters
requested that CBP include additional
information on the tear sheet that is
handed out to travelers at the POEs to
include the purposes of the Form I–94
and a help line phone number or email
address. Commenters stated that not all
foreign nationals understand the
importance of the Form I–94 or how
soon they might need to print one.
Response: CBP designed the tear sheet
to fit into the traveler’s passport and
inform travelers, in 12 languages, how
to access their Form I–94 records. Due
to the size of the tear sheet and the
desirability of including any
information in multiple languages, CBP
is not able to add additional
information. Additionally, as the
traveling public becomes more familiar
with the Form I–94 automation, CBP
plans to phase out distribution of the
tear sheets.
Comment: One commenter asked
when all nonimmigrants arriving in the
United States by air or sea will be
processed electronically.
Response: CBP rolled out the Form I–
94 automation over the weeks following
the effective date of the IFR, April 26,
2013. The Form I–94 automation for air
and sea passengers is now complete.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
91655
Comment: One commenter asked if
the 11 digit admission number from the
Form I–94 will continue to be used in
the electronic Form I–94 format and
whether it will be provided to the
traveler at the time of admission.
Response: The 11 digit number has
not changed and will continue to be
issued electronically to travelers.
Travelers can use the I–94 Web site to
find their Form I–94 number.
Comment: One commenter was
concerned about travelers having notice
of the option to request a paper Form I–
94 from CBP. The commenter stated that
requesting a paper form is not in the
regulations and it is not clear if the
traveler should make the request on the
plane or at the POE.
Response: Travelers may request the
paper form at the POE from the CBP
officer. CBP has updated information on
the Web site, www.cbp.gov/I94, to
indicate that a paper form may be
requested at the time of inspection. If
someone requests a paper form, the
person will be given the card stock
form, properly annotated, with their
electronic Form I–94 number written on
the card. Due to the extra time this
process takes, issuance of a paper Form
I–94 will be completed in the secondary
inspection area. Conclusion
Based on the analysis of the
comments received, DHS is adopting the
interim regulations as a final rule. In
response to the comments, CBP has
made some operational changes
regarding the issuance of the Form I–94
that are described below.
Operational Changes to the Form I–94
Process
In response to some public comments
received, and after studying usage and
common problems of the I–94 Web site,
CBP has made some changes to the I–
94 Web site since the initial rollout of
the Form I–94 automation, including the
addition of new features. These changes
and new features are summarized
below. As described in several of the
comment responses, CBP believes these
changes make the Web site a better
resource for the public and address user
concerns.
First, the Web site now allows a
traveler to retrieve his or her most
recent Form I–94 even if he or she has
departed the United States. A traveler
may retrieve a Form I–94 issued up to
five years prior to the request date.
Second, a traveler may now retrieve
his or her five-year United States border
crossing history from the Web site. The
border crossing history information is
drawn from Form I–94 records. If a
traveler has entered and departed the
United States with more than one travel
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
91656
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
document during the five years, for
example an old and new passport, he or
she will need to query each document
to retrieve the complete five-year
history. CBP expects that this update to
the Web site will provide a convenient
alternative to the filing of a FOIA
request when a traveler needs his or her
five-year border crossing history when
applying for certain benefits.
Third, the date and class of admission
are no longer required to retrieve a Form
I–94, as these data points were
commonly problematic for travelers
attempting to retrieve their Form I–94.
This change also allows travelers to
input the same information to retrieve
both the Form I–94 and the travel
history.
Additional operational changes
include a new security consent page
that addresses both privacy and security
issues, an endorsement added to the
Form I–94 printout indicating that the
Form I–94 has been automated, and
updates to the FAQs page of the I–94
Web site to reflect these changes and to
address additional common questions.
Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
Executive Order 13563 and Executive
Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) and (Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review)
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule is
an ‘‘economically significant regulatory
action’’ under section 3(f)(1) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the Office of Management and Budget
has reviewed this regulation.
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
1. Purpose of the Rule
This rule amends the definition of the
Form I–94, Arrival/Departure Record, to
include an electronic format. This
revision enables DHS to transition to an
automated process for air and sea ports
of entry whereby DHS creates a Form I–
94 in an electronic format based on
passenger, passport, and visa
information DHS obtains electronically
from air and sea carriers and the
Department of State as well as through
the inspection process. This rule also is
consistent with CBP’s transition to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
accepting I–94 submissions online for
use at the land border.
This rule results in substantial cost
savings (benefits) for travelers, carriers,
and CBP. CBP estimates the total net
benefits to both domestic and foreign
entities in 2013 ranged from $57.9
million to $82.7 million.8 Separately,
CBP estimates a net benefit in 2013 of
between $41.1 million and $65.9
million for foreign travelers, $1.3
million for carriers, and $15.5 million
for CBP. Net benefits to U.S. entities
(carriers and CBP) in 2013 totaled $16.8
million. In the following regulatory
assessment, we present the costs and
benefits to CBP, carriers, and travelers
from Form I–94 automation using a sixyear period of analysis beginning in year
2012.
2. Baseline Condition and Affected
Parties
a. Automation at the Air and Sea Ports
of Entry
Prior to the implementation of the
interim final rule CBP published on
March 27, 2013 in the Federal Register
(78 FR 18457), CBP required any alien
traveling to the United States, other than
under the Visa Waiver Program, to
complete a paper Form I–94 prior to
arrival. When arriving by air and sea,
the carrier provided the form to the
alien while en route to the United
States. The alien typically completed
the form while en route to the United
States, spending approximately 8
minutes filling out the form.9 Upon
arrival at the U.S. airport or seaport, the
alien presented the completed Form I–
94 to the CBP officer for inspection. If
permitted to enter the United States, the
officer tore the form at the perforation,
stamped the lower portion, and returned
it to the alien. The officer sent the top
portion of the form to a centralized
facility where all Forms I–94 were
entered into CBP’s data systems.
Generally, the alien later returned the
lower portion of the Form I–94 to the
carrier upon departure from the United
States, who in turn returned it to CBP.
In addition to acting as an arrival and
departure record, the Form I–94 also
serves as evidence of admission or
parole into the United States for
nonimmigrants. Some third parties,
8 OMB Circular A–4 states regulatory analyses
should focus on benefits and costs that accrue to
citizens and residents of the United States (https://
www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/
regulatory_matters_pdf/a-4.pdf; see ‘‘Scope of
Analysis’’ section on page 15). In order to make this
distinction clear, CBP has shown the costs and
benefits to foreign travelers as well as impacts to
U.S. entities.
9 See 78 FR 70570 (November 26, 2013) for the
latest burden estimate for the Form I–94’s
information collection.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
such as universities or local or state
government benefit-granting agencies,
may require an alien to present evidence
of admission or parole to the United
States. Prior to the interim final rule, in
these cases, the alien could present the
bottom portion of the Form I–94, which
was returned to them when they were
admitted, paroled, or adjusted to an
immigration status. Aliens could also
choose to present Form I–94 to establish
employment eligibility and identity or
eligibility for certain public benefits.
If an alien loses the bottom portion of
the Form I–94, he or she may file Form
I–102, Application for Replacement/
Initial Nonimmigrant Arrival-Departure
Document, with USCIS to request a
replacement. The form has a Paperwork
Reduction Act burden of 25 minutes per
form and a fee of $330. According to the
USCIS, prior to the implementation of
this rule, 17,700 Forms I–102 were filed
each year. At the time the interim final
rule was published, USCIS estimated
that the rule would result in a decrease
in the number of Forms I–102 filed to
8,804 in 2013 and 5,771 in later years.10
Following the implementation of the
rule in April 2013, the total number of
Forms I–102 filed in 2013 was 13,715.
USCIS now expects 6,782 Forms I–102
to be filed each year.11 This is a
reduction of 10,918 each year due to
this rule.
According to the Office of
Immigration Statistics (OIS),12 about
53.9 million aliens entered the United
States using a Form I–94 or equivalent
(i.e. using a Form I–94W or obtaining an
electronic travel authorization when
entering under the Visa Waiver
Program) in 2012. Of these, about 20.3
million entered under the Visa Waiver
Program (VWP). These aliens do not use
a Form I–94 and are therefore unaffected
by this rule,13 so we exclude them from
this analysis. Additionally, OIS figures
include all modes of transportation. I–
94 automation affects only aliens
10 Communication with USCIS on February 8,
2013.
11 Supporting Statement for Form I–102.
Available at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAViewDocument?ref_nbr=201402-1615-001.
Accessed September 28, 2016.
12 2012 Yearbook of Immigration Statistics. Table
28. https://www.dhs.gov/yearbook-immigrationstatistics. Accessed October 26, 2016.
13 In addition to automating the Form I–94, this
final rule adds a valid, unexpired nonimmigrant
DHS admission or parole stamp to the list of
documents that constitute evidence of registration.
Thus, such a stamp can serve as evidence of
registration for Visa Waiver Program travelers and
for travelers arriving by land who would otherwise
be required to comply with any registration
requirement under the INA. However, the addition
of the passport stamp to the list of documents that
constitute evidence of registration does not have an
economic impact on travelers. Therefore, this
analysis focuses on the changes to the Form I–94.
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
arriving by air and sea, so we must
exclude those arriving by land. We
therefore subtract the number of aliens
entering the U.S. at land border ports
using a Form I–94 in 2012. According to
CBP’s Office of Field Operations, about
15.4 million aliens arriving from Mexico
and 1.2 million arriving from Canada
entered the United States at the land
border using a Form I–94 in 2012. We
subtract these from the admission total,
leaving 16,952,996 non-VWP aliens who
arrived in the U.S. by air or sea using
a Form I–94 in 2012.
We next estimate the number of Form
I–94 travelers to the United States in the
rest of the period of analysis.14 For 2013
and 2014, we again use actual data from
the Office of Immigration statistics. For
2015 through 2017, we use the traveler
projections developed by the Office of
Travel and Tourism Industries (OTTI)
within the U.S. Department of
Commerce.15 The OTTI forecasts travel
growth through 2020 for the 20
countries with the highest 2014 travel
volume. Since the vast majority of
travelers from most countries arrive in
the United States by air and sea, we
assume that OTTI’s travel growth rates
best reflect air and sea travel growth.
For Mexico and Canada, we subtract the
number of Form I–94 travelers arriving
by land in 2012 before applying the
OTTI growth rates.16 We apply the OTTI
projected growth rates to the number of
Forms I–94 by country we obtained
from OIS. For countries not separately
forecasted by OTTI, we use OTTI’s
average growth rate for overseas travel
for each year to determine overseas
travel from these countries. We present
the total number of projected Forms I–
94 for each year from 2012–2017 absent
the rule in Exhibit 1 below.
EXHIBIT 1—PROJECTED FORM I–94
RESPONDENTS TRAVELING BY AIR
AND SEA
[*denotes projection]
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
2012
2013
2014
2015
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
16,952,996
16,832,602
20,680,611
21,700,329
14 2013 and 2014 Yearbook of Immigration
Statistics. Table 28. https://www.dhs.gov/yearbookimmigration-statistics. Accessed October 26, 2016.
15 U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Travel
and Tourism Industries ‘‘Forecast of International
Travelers to the United States by Top Origin
Countries.’’ October 2015. Available at https://
travel.trade.gov/view/f-2000-99-001/forecast/
Forecast-COUNTRIES.pdf.
16 For the purposes of these projections, we
assume that aliens arriving from Mexico and
Canada at land borders are Mexican and Canadian
citizens. There are a small number of citizens of
other countries who enter the U.S. at land borders.
Because the number for each country is small, the
effect on the projections is minimal.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
91657
The costs of this rule are borne by
EXHIBIT 1—PROJECTED FORM I–94
RESPONDENTS TRAVELING BY AIR both CBP and aliens traveling to the
United States.
AND SEA—Continued
[*denotes projection]
b. Electronic Implementation at the
Land Border
This rule affects the process of
obtaining a Form I–94 for travelers
arriving by air and sea and is consistent
with CBP’s transition to accepting I–94
submissions online for use at the land
border. In addition to the automation at
air and sea ports of entry, CBP modified
the process by which a traveler arriving
at the land border can provide Form I–
94 information and pay the related fee
by adding an electronic option. The
enhanced I–94 Web site launched on
September 29, 2016.
Due to the differences in documentary
requirements for land border entries, the
Form I–94 issuance process varies
slightly at a land border port of entry
than at an air or sea port of entry.
Currently when a traveler requiring a
Form I–94 arrives at the land border, he/
she goes to secondary inspection where
he/she provides the I–94 information to
a CBP officer who inputs the data into
a computer. The process takes
approximately 8 minutes in addition to
the time of the actual inspection. After
determining the traveler’s admissibility,
the CBP officer then prints a Form I–94
for the traveler and refers him/her to the
cashier to pay the associated $6 fee.17 It
takes approximately 20 minutes to wait
in line to pay the fee and approximately
2 minutes to pay the fee.
a. Costs to CBP of Automation at the Air
and Sea Ports of Entry
This rule allows for the automation of
the paper Form I–94 in the air and sea
environments.18 Almost all of the
traveler information collected on the
Form I–94 prior to the implementation
of this rule was redundant in the air and
sea environments because CBP already
obtained the same information
electronically from other sources. In
advance of the implementation of this
rule, CBP linked its data systems to use
the information from these alternate
sources to create an electronic Form I–
94 during the admission process. CBP
creates the electronic Form I–94 by
pulling information from the traveler’s
Advance Passenger Information System
(APIS) record and any Consular
Consolidated Database (CCD) record and
then by entering any additional data
obtained during the inspection process.
This electronic process allows
stakeholders that have access to CBP’s
databases to continue to have access to
traveler information electronically.
CBP’s Office of Information Technology
estimates the cost to link data systems
and to fully automate the Form I–94 was
about $1 million in calendar year 2012.
In addition, it estimates the cost to
develop the secure Web site was about
$321,000 in 2012. CBP anticipates
spending $92,000 per year in operations
and maintenance costs for these
systems. In total, CBP incurred costs of
$1,321,000 in 2012 and will incur costs
of $92,000 in following years.
3. Costs
We next estimate the costs and
benefits of this rule for all affected
parties. For the interim final rule, we
assumed that the rule would go into
effect on January 1, 2013. The rule
actually went into effect on April 22,
2013. Because certain key data on
arrivals by class of admission is only
available publicly on an annual basis,
we incorporate some prorated arrivals
estimates into this analysis. For the
purpose of this analysis, we assume that
the rule went into effect on May 1, 2013
and we prorate the 2013 estimates to
reflect that the rule was in effect for 8
months of the year. To the extent that
travel among various classes of
admission is not consistent throughout
the year, the 2013 estimates may be
overstated or understated.
b. Costs of Electronic Implementation at
the Land Border
CBP’s Office of Information
Technology estimates that it cost
approximately $540,000 in 2016 to
develop the Web site and create the
online payment capabilities. CBP will
not bear any additional costs to process
travelers as a result of this process.
Travelers will not face new costs or
time burdens under the new optional
process at the land border. Under this
process, travelers will have the option to
use a new CBP Web site to answer the
Form I–94 questions and to pay the $6
fee in advance of travel. As the Form I–
94 questions are not changing, the time
burden to submit the information is not
changing. Similarly, we estimate that it
will take the traveler 2 minutes to pay
the fee online, which is the same as the
17 The amount of fee for the issuance of the Form
I–94 at a land border port of entry is provided for
in 8 CFR 103.7(b)(1)(ii)(D).
18 A small number of paper Forms I–94 are still
being used for certain aliens such as aslyees, certain
parolees, and those who request a paper Form I–94.
2016 ................................................
2017 ................................................
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22,628,579
23,871,524
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
91658
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
time it takes if the traveler pays at the
border, and the fee itself is not
changing.
c. Costs Borne by Travelers to the
United States From Automation at Air
and Sea Ports of Entry
Although most travelers do not use
the Form I–94 for any reason once they
are admitted or paroled to the United
States, some aliens do make use of the
form to demonstrate lawful admission
or parole to the United States to the
Social Security Administration,
universities, state agencies such as
Departments of Motor Vehicles, public
assistance agencies and organizations,
or some other party.
Aliens may also choose to present a
Form I–94 to establish employment
eligibility and identity, or eligibility for
certain public benefits. To accommodate
this need for the Form I–94, CBP has
made an electronic Form I–94 available
to aliens on the secure I–94 Web site.
Travelers receive written information on
how to access the Web site upon their
arrival to the United States. Aliens may
log into the Web site using 5 pieces of
basic identifying information that is
either known to the traveler (e.g. their
first name, last/surname, and date of
birth) or readily available on their
passport (e.g. passport number, country
of issuance). CBP estimates that it takes
the traveler 4 minutes to log into the
Web site using identifying information
and to print the electronic form. This is
less time than the paper Form I–94’s 8
minute time burden for entering 17 data
elements. This 4 minute estimate does
not include the time it takes to travel to
a location with computer and internet
access; that cost is treated separately
later in this section.
In addition, CBP makes the paper
Form I–94 available to certain classes of
aliens and upon request at the
secondary inspection station at ports of
entry and at CBP Deferred Inspection
Sites (DIS), which are located at most
ports of entry and are largely open
during regular business hours. Since the
interim final rule went into effect, very
few travelers have requested the paper
form.
To estimate the costs to travelers to
access their Form I–94 electronically,
we must first determine the number of
aliens who access the Web site, the
number who do not have ready access
to the internet, the distance they have to
travel to access the internet, and the
average wage rate for all aliens entering
the United States by air or sea. First, we
assess the number of aliens who access
the Web site. Exhibit 2 shows the
number of travelers who entered the
United States by air or sea in 2012
sorted by various categories of
admission.19 The majority of Form I–94
visitors to the United States—about 76
percent—are tourists and business
travelers entering on B–1/B–2 visas. In
most cases, these travelers do not have
a need for their Form I–94 now that the
passport stamp serves as evidence of
alien registration. While in the U.S.,
these B–1/B–2 visa travelers may use
their foreign driver’s license, so there is
generally no need for them to apply for
a U.S. driver’s license. They are
ineligible for employment or enrollment
in a university while traveling on a B–
1/B–2 visa. They are generally not
eligible for public benefits without a
change in status. For these reasons, for
the analysis for the interim final rule,
we assumed that no B–1/B–2 visa
holders would need to access the Web
site to obtain their electronic Form I–94.
However, public comments stated that
some B–1/B–2 travelers do in fact need
their Form I–94. According to the Web
site’s query history, approximately 1
percent of B–1/B–2 travelers access the
Web site.20 Therefore, for this analysis,
we assume that 1 percent of these
travelers will continue to access the
Web site in the future.
EXHIBIT 2—2012 AIR AND SEA FORM I–94 RESPONDENTS BY CLASS OF ADMISSION *
Number
Percentage
Tourists and Business Travelers (B–1/B–2) ............................................................................................................
Temporary workers ..................................................................................................................................................
Students ...................................................................................................................................................................
Other/Unknown ........................................................................................................................................................
Diplomats .................................................................................................................................................................
12,938,329
1,631,683
1,594,816
461,935
326,233
76.3
9.6
9.4
2.7
1.9
Total ..................................................................................................................................................................
16,952,996
........................
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Because so many parties at various
levels of government and outside of the
government use the Form I–94, prior to
the implementation of the interim final
rule CBP could not estimate the number
of non-B–1/B–2 travelers that would
access the Web site. For the analysis of
the interim final rule, we assumed that
all travelers, other than B–1/B–2
travelers, who previously received a
paper Form I–94 would log into the Web
site to print off their electronic Form I–
94. According to the Web site’s query
history since the implementation of the
interim final rule, approximately 75
percent of non-B–1/B–2 travelers access
the Web site. Exhibit 3 shows the
number of travelers we estimate will
access their electronic Form I–94 via the
CBP Web site during the period of
analysis. We note that those with a need
for a Form I–94 who face obstacles to
accessing their Form I–94 electronically
may request a paper Form I–94 at the
secondary inspection station upon their
arrival at the port or at a DIS during
their stay in the United States. However,
according to CBP subject matter experts,
very few aliens have requested paper
Forms I–94 at the ports of entry and
those who have requested them at DIS
have done so primarily to correct
erroneous information on their
electronic Form I–94.
EXHIBIT 3—ESTIMATED TRAVELERS NEEDING TO ACCESS ELECTRONIC FORM I–94
B–1/B–2
2012 .............................................................................................................................................
19 CBP analysis of data from 2012 Yearbook of
Immigration Statistics. Table 28. https://
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
www.dhs.gov/files/statistics/publications/
yearbook.shtm. Accessed June 4, 2014.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Other *
0
Total
0
20 Communication with CBP’s Office of Field
Operations on June 10, 2014.
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
0
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
91659
EXHIBIT 3—ESTIMATED TRAVELERS NEEDING TO ACCESS ELECTRONIC FORM I–94—Continued
B–1/B–2
2013 ** ..........................................................................................................................................
2014 .............................................................................................................................................
2015 .............................................................................................................................................
2016 .............................................................................................................................................
2017 .............................................................................................................................................
85,622
157,793
165,574
172,656
182,140
Other *
1,994,663
3,675,979
3,857,233
4,022,230
4,243,163
Total
2,080,285
3,833,772
4,022,807
4,194,886
4,425,303
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
* Other includes temporary workers, students, diplomats, and others/unknowns.
** 2013 travelers are estimated based on the rule being in effect for two thirds (8 months) of the year.
We next estimate the number of aliens
who do not have ready access to the
internet while in the United States and
would need to travel to access their
electronic Form I–94. We assume that
students and diplomats have ready
access to the internet at their schools or
places of business respectively. The 1
percent of B–1/B–2 travelers who access
their electronic Form I–94 typically
need it when staying in the United
States for over 6 months. These people
likely have other uses for the internet
during their stay and could access their
electronic Form I–94 when using the
internet for another purpose. Therefore,
we assume they do not need to travel to
access their electronic Form I–94. Also,
as noted above, CBP will continue to
make the paper Form I–94 available
upon request at the secondary
inspection station at ports of entry or at
DIS to those with a need for a Form I–
94 and who face obstacles to accessing
their electronic Form I–94.
Temporary workers come to the
United States for varying lengths of time
to fill positions where there is a shortage
of labor in the United States. These
positions can be in very highly technical
occupations, such as computer
programming, but they can also be in
less technical occupations such as
agricultural labor.
Because this category of admission
includes such a wide range of workers,
we cannot say with certainty that all
temporary workers have ready access to
the internet while in the United States.
Similarly, we do not know how
accessible the internet is for those in the
‘‘Other/Unknown’’ category. The aliens
least likely to have internet access are
those working as temporary agricultural
laborers.
According to the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA), approximately 67
percent of farms have internet access.21
The primary use for the electronic Form
I–94 for these temporary workers is to
21 United States Department of Agriculture
National Agricultural Statistics Service. ‘‘Farm
Computer Usage and Ownership.’’ August 2013.
Available at: https://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/
current/FarmComp/FarmComp-08-20-2013.pdf.
Accessed June 4, 2014.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
demonstrate employment eligibility to
their employers. Generally, this
document will be the only acceptable
evidence of employment authorization
that such workers will have to satisfy
the Employment Eligibility Verification
(Form I–9) requirements. Because of the
Form I–9 requirements, many employers
do not allow their employees to begin
working for pay until the workers have
presented them with the print-out of
their electronic Form I–94. The
employers have spent a considerable
amount of money bringing these foreign
workers to the United States to work. By
offering internet access to employees,
employees and employers can complete
the employment eligibility verification
process timely, which allows the
employee to begin working sooner.
Because this incremental use of the
internet is virtually costless to the
employer and the employer would
benefit from their employee’s prompt
access to their electronic Form I–94, we
assume that employers with internet
access allow their employees to use
their internet connection to access their
electronic Forms I–94.22 As stated
previously, 67 percent of farms have
internet access. For the purposes of this
analysis, we assume that 33 percent
(100 percent–67 percent) of travelers in
the ‘‘Temporary Workers’’ and ‘‘Other/
Unknown’’ categories (for example,
690,894 in 2012) would need to travel
to access their electronic Form I–94.
CBP received several public
comments regarding the ability of
travelers to obtain their printed
electronic Form I–94 before they need it.
One employer of temporary workers
commented that according to their
company policy, employees cannot use
company computers to access the
22 It is also possible that some employers without
internet access help transport their employees to a
location with internet access. Employers have
expended considerable effort to sponsor temporary
workers and they may view this as part of the cost
of using foreign temporary workers. However, as the
burden of demonstrating employment eligibility is
on the worker, we assume that the worker must bear
any travel costs to obtain their electronic Form I–
94. To the extent that the employer is able to
provide more efficient access to the internet, costs
to workers will be lower.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
internet until they have demonstrated
their legal admission to the United
States by presenting a copy of their
Form I–94.
While CBP believes that most
employers with internet access allow
their employees to use a company
computer to access their Form I–94, we
acknowledge that a small number of
employers may choose not to do so, or
company policy may prohibit nonemployees from accessing company
equipment. These travelers are included
in the 33 percent of temporary workers
who we assume have to travel to access
the internet.
One commenter noted that employees
sometimes need to start work very soon
after arrival and do not have time to
travel to a location where they can print
their electronic Form I–94. Once again,
CBP notes that any traveler, but
particularly travelers with an immediate
need for their Form I–94 may request a
paper Form I–94 at the secondary
inspection station at ports of entry or at
CBP DIS. Another commenter said that
travelers often do not know they need
a Form I–94 until after they have left the
airport, so requesting a paper Form I–94
at the port is not a practical option. CBP
acknowledges that many people may
not know that they need their Form I–
94 until it is asked of them. As such,
CBP has made access to the I–94 Web
site as easy as possible and will
continue to provide paper Forms I–94
upon request at CBP DIS. Another
commenter suggested that CBP provide
kiosks at the ports of entry where
travelers could print their electronic
Form I–94 prior to leaving the airport.
CBP has explored the possibility of
placing kiosks at the largest airports and
seaports to give travelers the
opportunity to print their Form I–94
prior to leaving the port of entry. CBP
has determined that the benefits to the
public do not outweigh the cost to CBP,
so it is not proceeding with kiosks at
this time. See the Regulatory
Alternatives section for more
information.
Now that we have estimated the
number of aliens who do not have ready
access to the internet, we need to
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
91660
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
develop an assumption for how long it
takes to travel to a location where they
can access the internet. Based on our
online review of internet services
provided by public libraries, we found
that virtually all public libraries provide
public access to computers and the
internet, though many charge a nominal
fee for printing. There are 16,766 public
libraries in the United States.23
According to the Department of
Education, 94 percent of households
live within 10 miles of a public library
and 83 percent live within 5 miles of
one.24 Given the large number of library
locations nationwide that provide
access to the internet and the fact that
CBP makes the paper Form I–94
available upon request at ports and DIS,
we believe most aliens who travel to
access the internet to print their
electronic Form I–94 only need to travel
a short distance to do so. We estimate
that round-trip distance required to
access a computer terminal and printing
station at a public library is 20 miles.
We also assume that traveling to and
from a library takes 60 minutes of an
aliens’ time, which includes travel time
and the time to enter the library, locate
an available computer, wait to access
the computer and print a Form I–94. In
this analysis, we assume that users pay
$0.25 to print their electronic Form I–
94 based on a review of available online
printing fees charged at public libraries.
We next estimate the value of time for
those travelers affected by this rule.
Federal agencies typically estimate a
monetary value of time used or saved as
a result of their regulatory actions. This
allows agencies to estimate the
additional costs and benefits of their
regulatory actions on affected parties.
The U.S. Department of Transportation
(DOT) provides guidance on the value of
time to use for economic analysis.25
This guidance provides point estimates
as well as ranges for values of time for
travelers based on average wage rate
analysis for different categories of travel.
According to DOT estimates, the
value of travel time is more than twice
as high for air travelers than for those
traveling by surface modes, which can
23 American Library Association. ‘‘Quotable Facts
about America’s Libraries.’’ September 2012. https://
www.ala.org/offices/ola/quotablefacts/
quotablefacts/. Accessed Jun 13, 2014.
24 Department of Education: Households’ Use of
Public and Other Types of Libraries: 2002. Derived
from Table 19. Available at https://
harvester.census.gov/imls/pubs/Publications/
2007327.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2014.
25 U.S. Department of Transportation: ‘‘Revised
Departmental Guidance on Valuation of Travel
Time in Economic Analysis.’’ September 28, 2011.
Table 5. Available at https://www.dot.gov/sites/
dot.dev/files/docs/vot_guidance_092811c.pdf.
Accessed June 4, 2014.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
be explained by the relatively high cost
of air travel. We note that the DOT
estimates are intended to be used to
analyze actions that will reduce the time
spent traveling. A person’s value of time
while traveling may differ from their
value of reducing travel time. In most
instances, this rule does not reduce the
time spent traveling because an alien
typically completes the Form I–94 while
en route to the United States, but rather
reduces the time spent on paperwork
while traveling. The traveler is now able
to spend this time on leisure or business
activities such as reading or drafting
documents. CBP believes that using the
DOT values of travel time in this
situation is the most appropriate
estimate because it reflects the higher
values of time for air travelers. Further,
we note that to the extent a person’s
value of time while traveling is different
than their value of reducing travel time,
this difference is likely encompassed in
the DOT plausible range for the value of
travel time. The DOT estimates are in
2009 dollars, but the DOT provides a
methodology to inflate its estimates for
future years. We have inflated the
estimates to 2012 dollars, which is the
first year of our period of analysis.26
As a primary estimate, we use the
DOT’s point estimate for the value of
time for all-purpose air travel, which
includes both personal and business
travel. This point estimate is $44.15,
when inflated to 2012 dollars. We also
use the DOT’s range for all-purpose
travel to show a range of low and high
estimates. This range is from $36.50 to
$54.75 when inflated to 2012 dollars.
We apply these low, primary, and high
values of time to the travelers in our
analysis. We use this travel value of
time framework to estimate the costs
and savings of this rule, since affected
aliens previously completed the paper
Form I–94 while traveling.
We recognize that those who must
travel to access the internet are a special
case of travelers and probably have
different values of time than the average
air traveler. As previously discussed,
the aliens least likely to have internet
access are those working as temporary
agricultural laborers. To estimate the
value of time for these aliens, we use the
wage rate for H–2A seasonal (temporary)
agricultural workers.
According to the Department of Labor,
H–2A temporary agricultural workers
have an average wage rate of 9.79 per
hour.27 We recognize that there are
26 To determine the hourly value of travel time
savings in 2012 U.S. dollars, we applied the DOT’s
suggested growth rate of 1.6 percent per year to the
hourly time values listed in 2009 U.S. dollars.
27 Calculated from the Office of Foreign Labor
Certification’s FY 2012 Annual Report using the
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
other classes of temporary workers,
notably H–1B visa holders, who likely
have higher wage rates; however, these
workers are predominantly in
specialized occupations such as
medicine and computer programming
and are likely to have ready access to
the internet. Employers of these
employees have an incentive to provide
this access as it is virtually costless and
would allow workers to start working
earlier. We note that, notwithstanding
the benefits to the employer of
providing this access, we received
public comments indicating that some
employers of H–1B employees may not
allow their workers to access computers
to print their electronic Form I–94. CBP
does not believe this represents a large
number of employers.
Further, workers in occupations such
as medicine and computer programming
are likely to have internet access from
other sources, such as their hotel or
other place of lodging. Finally, as
discussed above, we have assumed that
all temporary workers would access
their electronic Form I–94 and that 33
percent of them would have to travel to
do so. Any H–1B worker who must
travel to access their electronic Form I–
94 is included in these estimates. But
because we do not believe the H–1B
workers make up a large portion of the
temporary workers who must travel to
access their electronic Form I–94, we
use the estimated wage of H–2A workers
as our estimate for the value of time for
those who must travel to access their
electronic Form I–94.
Now that we have estimated the
number of aliens who log into CBP’s
Web site to print their electronic Form
I–94, the time it takes to access that Web
site, the number of people who need to
travel to access the internet, the time it
takes to travel to and from an internet
access site, and the values of time for
these groups, we can calculate this
rule’s cost to these travelers. We first
address the cost to log into CBP’s
electronic Form I–94 Web site. Once
again, CBP estimates that it takes
travelers 4 minutes to access and print
their electronic Form I–94, and that it
costs them $0.25 per page to print their
electronic Form I–94. Exhibit 4 shows
the 2013 to 2017 travelers’ costs for
accessing and printing their electronic
Forms I–94.28 As shown, in 2013,
weighted average of state average wage rates.
Available at: https://
www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/OFLC-2012_
Annual_Report-11-29-2013-Final%20Clean.pdf.
Accessed on June 16, 2014.
28 The annual estimates of Forms I–94 in Exhibit
4 are based on projections for all visa categories
using growth rate estimates developed OTTI. We
adjust these estimates using our assumptions that
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
traveler costs of time to access
electronic Forms I–94 and their cost to
print them ranged from $5.5 million to
91661
$8.1 million with a primary estimate of
$6.6 million.
EXHIBIT 4—TRAVELER COSTS OF TIME TO ACCESS AND COST TO PRINT ELECTRONIC FORM I–94
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Forms I–94 .............................................
DOT—Low ($) ........................................
DOT—Primary ($) ..................................
DOT—High ($) .......................................
Time Cost—Low ($) ...............................
Time Cost—Primary ($) .........................
Time Cost—High ($) ..............................
Printing Cost ($) .....................................
2,080,285
36.50
44.15
54.75
5,061,648
4,730,513
4,914,222
520,071
3,833,772
36.50
44.15
54.75
9,328,146
8,147,564
8,792,673
958,443
4,022,807
36.50
44.15
54.75
9,788,098
7,990,003
8,957,496
1,005,702
4,194,886
36.50
44.15
54.75
10,206,792
7,786,713
9,068,603
1,048,722
4,425,303
36.50
44.15
54.75
10,767,432
7,677,030
9,288,081
1,106,326
Total Cost—Low ($) ........................
Total Cost—Primary ($) ..................
Total Cost—High ($) .......................
5,581,720
6,643,502
8,112,544
10,286,589
12,243,356
14,950,663
10,793,800
12,847,050
15,687,848
11,255,514
13,396,594
16,358,910
11,873,758
14,132,443
17,257,474
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
We next address the travel costs for
those aliens who do not have ready
access to the internet. Once again, we
assume that 33 percent of travelers in
the ‘‘Temporary Workers’’ and ‘‘Other/
Unknown’’ categories (approximately 12
percent of the total, see exhibit 2) would
need to travel 20 miles roundtrip and
spend 60 minutes of time to access their
electronic Form I–94. We also assume
that these travelers have a value of time
best characterized by the average H–2A
wage rate of $9.79 per hour. For the cost
of travel, we use the 2012 IRS standard
mileage rate for business travel of
$0.555 per mile.29 Exhibit 5 shows the
2013 to 2017 aliens’ travel costs to
access the internet. As shown we
estimate that the total travel costs were
$9.3 million in 2013.
EXHIBIT 5—TRAVEL COSTS *
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Affected Aliens .....................................................................
H2A Wage Rate ($) .............................................................
Time Cost ($) .......................................................................
Mileage Cost ($) ..................................................................
444,381
9.79
4,350,487
4,932,626
818,952
9.79
8,017,542
9,090,369
859,333
9.79
8,412,870
9,538,597
896,092
9.79
8,772,738
9,946,618
945,312
9.79
9,254,608
10,492,967
Total Travel Cost ($) ............................................................
9,283,113
17,107,912
17,951,467
18,719,357
19,747,575
* Estimates may not total due to rounding. Undiscounted dollars.
To summarize, both CBP and aliens
bear costs as a result of this rule. CBP
bore the costs to link its data systems
and to build a Web site so aliens can
access their electronic Forms I–94. CBP
continues to incur annual costs to
operate and maintain the I–94 Web site.
Temporary workers and aliens in the
‘‘Other/Unknown category (see Exhibit
2) bear costs when logging into the Web
site, traveling to a location with public
internet access and printing a paper
copy of their electronic Form I–94. The
costs averaged $24.08 per traveler in
2013 for those in the temporary worker
and ‘‘Other/Unknown’’ categories who
have to travel to access their electronic
Form I–94. Aliens arriving as B–1/B–2
travelers, diplomats, students, and those
temporary workers and aliens in the
‘‘Other/Unknown’’ category who do not
need to travel to access their Form I–94
bear costs when logging into the Web
site and printing electronic Forms I–94.
Using the primary estimate for a
traveler’s value of time, these costs for
these groups averaged $3.19 per person.
Exhibit 6 summarizes the 2012–2017
costs of this rule. As shown, costs for
this rule in 2013 ranged from $15.0
million to $17.5 million. In our primary
estimate, costs for this rule are $16.0
million in 2013. Less than one percent
of these costs are incurred by the U.S.
entities. These are CBP’s costs for
automating the electronic Form I–94
and developing the Web site travelers
use to access their electronic Form I–94.
In 2013, CBP’s costs were $92,000.
EXHIBIT 6—COST SUMMARY
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
2012
CBP Costs
I–94 Air/Sea Systems Costs ....................
1 percent of B–1/B–2 travelers and 75 percent of
non-B–1/B–2 travelers access the I–94 Web site.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
2013
1,321,000
2014
92,000
92,000
2015
2016
92,000
29 Internal Revenue Service. IR–2011–116,
December 9, 2011. Available at https://www.irs.gov/
newsroom/article/0,,id=250882,00.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
92,000
2017
92,000
91662
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
EXHIBIT 6—COST SUMMARY—Continued
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
I–94 Land Systems Costs ........................
Total CBP Costs ......................................
Traveler Costs
Website Access Costs—Low ...................
Website Access Costs—Primary .............
Website Access Costs—High ..................
Travel Time Costs ....................................
Mileage Costs ..........................................
Printing Costs ...........................................
Total Traveler Costs—Low ...............
........................
1,321,000
........................
92,000
........................
92,000
........................
92,000
540,000
632,000
0
92,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,061,648
6,123,431
7,592,473
4,350,487
4,932,626
520,071
14,864,832
9,328,146
11,284,913
13,992,220
8,017,542
9,090,369
958,443
27,394,501
9,788,098
11,841,348
14,682,147
8,412,870
9,538,597
1,005,702
28,745,266
10,206,792
12,347,872
15,310,188
8,772,738
9,946,618
1,048,722
29,974,870
10,767,432
13,026,117
16,151,148
9,254,608
10,492,967
1,106,326
31,621,333
Total Traveler Costs—Primary .........
Total Traveler Costs—High ..............
0
0
15,926,615
17,395,656
29,351,267
32,058,574
30,798,517
33,639,315
32,115,950
35,078,266
33,880,018
37,005,049
Grand Total Costs—Low ...........
Grand Total Costs—Primary .....
Grand Total Costs—High ..........
1,321,000
1,321,000
1,321,000
14,956,832
16,018,615
17,487,656
27,486,501
29,443,267
32,150,574
28,837,266
30,890,517
33,731,315
30,606,870
32,747,950
35,710,266
31,713,333
33,972,018
37,097,049
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
4. Benefits
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
a. Benefits of Automation at Air and Sea
Ports of Entry
This rule has benefits for CBP,
carriers, and travelers to the United
States. Prior to the implementation of
the interim final rule, CBP returned the
bottom portion of the Form I–94 to the
traveler and retained the top portion of
the form. The information on the top
portion of the form was entered into
CBP systems for use by CBP and other
agencies. CBP also received this
information electronically from other
sources. In 2012, CBP linked its data
systems to create an electronic Form I–
94, thus eliminating the need to
continue entering the data from the
paper Form I–94 for air and sea travelers
into CBP systems. Prior to the
implementation of the interim final rule,
CBP spent approximately $17.8 million
per year on contract support for manual
Form I–94 data entry. CBP still must
spend approximately $2.4 million in
contract expenses to enter data from the
paper Forms I–94 collected at the land
border and the few that continue to be
collected at airports and seaports. We
therefore estimate that this rule saves
CBP $15.4 million each year in contract
costs. It is possible that these savings
could grow in future years if large
numbers of travelers at the land border
opt for the voluntary electronic option.
CBP processing has also become more
efficient as a result of this rule. Prior to
the implementation of the interim final
rule, when the traveler gave the
completed Form I–94 to the CBP officer
during the inspection, the officer
reviewed the form for errors and made
corrections as needed. The officer then
stamped the top and bottom portions of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
the form with the admission or parole
stamp, notated the alien’s classification
and duration of admission or parole and
stapled it to the traveler’s passport. The
interim final rule eliminated this
process.
A study of the processing times at
three major U.S. airports immediately
following the implementation of the
interim final rule yielded mixed results;
one airport showed a decrease in
processing time following the change in
process, another showed an increase,
and the third showed no statistically
significant difference in processing
times. We note that CBP has since
resolved some technical issues with the
user interface design of the system used
by CBP officers during primary
inspection that arose with the
automated process. CBP has anecdotal
evidence that processing times have
now dropped nationwide as a result of
the transition to the automated Form I–
94 process.
CBP is conducting a more
comprehensive time study that will
examine the entire time period
following the implementation of the
automated process, but results of this
study are not yet available. Accordingly,
for the purposes of this analysis, we
assume that this rule will not affect CBP
processing times. To the extent that
eliminating the paper Form I–94
reduced processing times, CBP was able
to focus its resources on other areas,
improving security and expediting the
processing of passengers.
We next examine the printing savings
this rule generates for CBP and carriers.
Prior to the implementation of the
interim final rule, both CBP and carriers
printed and stored Forms I–94. CBP
printed forms for use in primary and
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
secondary passenger inspections when
the traveler did not fill out a form in
advance or when the traveler made an
error in filling out the form. Prior to this
rule, CBP spent $153,360 each year
printing the Form I–94 for air and sea
travelers. Since the interim final rule’s
implementation, CBP no longer needs to
print the Form I–94 for most of these
travelers,30 which eliminates this
expense.
Before the implementation of the
interim final rule, carriers printed the
Forms I–94 for their passengers to
complete before their arrival in the
United States. To estimate printing costs
for carriers, CBP obtained an estimate of
total Form I–94 printing and storage
costs from a major airline. We increased
this cost proportionally based on annual
international inbound passenger
volumes to estimate the entire
industry’s cost to print and store paper
Forms I–94. Based on this methodology,
CBP estimates that carriers spent
$1,344,450 annually to print and store
the Form I–94. Since the interim final
rule’s implementation, carriers no
longer need to print or store the Form
I–94, which eliminates these expenses.
We next estimate the value of air and
sea travelers’ time savings resulting
from the elimination of the paper Form
I–94. Prior to the implementation of the
interim final rule, travelers spent 8
minutes filling out the Form I–94 while
in transit to the United States. This rule
eliminates the paper Form I–94 for air
and sea travelers and, with it, the 830 CBP still prints a small number of forms for use
at airports and seaports for certain aliens such as
asylees, certain parolees, and those who request a
paper Form I–94.
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
minute time burden.31 We again apply
the DOT range of plausible values of
time for air travelers, as well as their
point estimate for this value, to these
aliens to determine the time savings
from the Form I–94 automation. Exhibit
7 shows the 2013 to 2017 travelers’
reduction in time burden resulting from
no longer needing to fill out the paper
Form I–94. As shown, in 2013, the value
91663
of the reduction in time burden ranged
from $54.6 million to $81.9 million. In
our primary estimate, the reduction in
time burden was $66.1 million in 2013.
EXHIBIT 7—REDUCTION IN TIME BURDEN*
2013
Forms I–94 .............................................
DOT—Low ($) ........................................
DOT—Primary ($) ..................................
DOT—High ($) .......................................
Benefit—Low ($) ....................................
Benefit—Primary ($) ..............................
Benefit—High ($) ...................................
2014
2016
2017
20,680,611
36.50
44.15
54.75
100,638,110
121,748,978
150,957,166
11,221,734
36.50
44.15
54.75
54,608,355
66,063,556
81,912,532
2015
21,700,329
36.50
44.15
54.75
105,600,365
127,752,166
158,400,547
22,628,579
36.50
44.15
54.75
110,117,513
133,216,876
165,176,269
23,871,524
36.50
44.15
54.75
116,166,058
140,534,225
174,249,087
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
We next examine the savings to aliens
who need a replacement Form I–94.
Prior to the implementation of the
interim final rule, if aliens lost the
bottom portion of their Form I–94, they
could file Form I–102, Application for
Replacement/Initial Nonimmigrant
Arrival-Departure Document, with
USCIS to request a replacement. The
form has a Paperwork Reduction Act
burden of 25 minutes per response and
a fee of $330. As stated earlier, prior to
the implementation of the interim final
rule, 17,700 Forms I–102 were filed
annually. In 2013, 13,715 Forms I–102
were filed and USCIS expects 6,782 to
be filed each year starting in 2014, a
reduction of 10,918 each year due to
this rule. Now these travelers are able to
access their electronic Form I–94, which
saves these individuals 25 minutes and
$330.32 We calculate the value of this
time savings using USCIS’s hourly wage
estimate for Form I–102 filers of
$30.74.33 Exhibit 8 shows the time and
fee cost savings for those who would
otherwise have needed to file a Form I–
102 from 2013 to 2017. As shown, in
2013 the value of this time and fee
savings was $1.4 million.
EXHIBIT 8—I–102 COST SAVINGS *
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
I–102 Reduction .....................................
Time Burden ..........................................
USCIS hourly wage ($) ..........................
Time Savings ($) ....................................
Fee Savings ($) .....................................
3,985
25
30.44
51,041
1,315,050
10,918
25
30.44
139,841
3,602,940
10,918
25
30.44
139,841
3,602,940
10,918
25
30.44
139,841
3,602,940
10,918
25
30.44
139,841
3,602,940
Total Savings ($) ............................
1,366,091
3,742,781
3,742,781
3,742,781
3,742,781
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
* Estimates may not total due to rounding. Undiscounted dollars.
Following the enactment of the
interim final rule, travelers could only
access their current electronic Form I–
94 until they departed the United States.
In response to public comments on the
interim final rule, CBP has enhanced the
Web site to allow travelers to access
their most recent Form I–94 for 5 years
from the date of issuance. In addition,
the Web site now provides foreign
travelers with a 5 year record of their
travel history. Doing so has reduced
Freedom of Information Act requests
received by CBP by approximately 2
percent.
Accessing the information via the
Web site can be done within minutes
rather than the months it can take to
receive information from a FOIA
request, which is a benefit to the
traveler. In addition, this saves the CBP
FOIA office time, which it can spend
processing other FOIA requests. CBP is
exploring whether it can expand the
Web site to include travel history dating
back farther than 5 years. CBP is also
considering whether the Web site can be
set up to include travel history for nonForm I–94 users such as U.S. citizens
and legal permanent residents. CBP
estimates that expanding the travel
history past 5 years has reduced the
number of FOIA requests received by
approximately 6 percent and expanding
it to include travel history for U.S.
citizens and legal permanent residents
will reduce FOIA requests by an
additional 20 percent.
In summary, CBP, carriers, and aliens
accrue benefits as a result of this rule.
CBP saves on contract and printing costs
as well as FOIA processing burdens.
Carriers save on printing costs. All
aliens save the 8 minute time burden for
filling out the paper Form I–94 and
certain aliens who lose their Form I–94
save the $330 fee and 25 minute time
burden for filling out the Form I–102;
and, certain aliens save processing time
from the elimination of the FOIA
process. Because we only expect one
percent of B–1/B–2 travelers to use the
Web site to access their electronic Form
I–94, the benefits associated with the
31 For those with a need to access their electronic
Form I–94, this burden relief is partially offset by
the 4 minute time burden to access the Web site.
The costs for this access are discussed in the costs
section above.
32 As discussed in the costs section, we estimate
a 4 minute time burden for travelers who need to
access their electronic Form I–94. See the cost
section for a complete discussion of the costs of
accessing the Web site as well as the cost to travel
to a location where they can access the Web site,
where necessary.
33 USCIS estimates are based on U.S. Bureau of
Labor data for occupational employment statistics.
The latest supporting statement for the I–102 is
available at: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAViewDocument?ref_nbr=201206-1615-003.
Accessed June 4, 2014. This supporting statement
uses a wage estimate of $30.74.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
91664
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Form I–102 accrue primarily to non-B–
1/B–2 travelers. Using the primary
estimate for a traveler’s value of time,
the time burden savings for all travelers
is $5.89 per traveler. In addition, those
non-B–1/B–2 travelers who no longer
need to use a Form I–102 would achieve
an additional time and fee savings of
$343.81 per traveler. Exhibit 9
summarizes the benefits of air and sea
automation to each party. As shown,
total benefits for this rule ranged from
$72.9 million to $100.2 million in 2013.
In our primary estimate, the benefits of
this rule were $84.3 million in 2013.
EXHIBIT 9—BENEFIT SUMMARY
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
2013
CBP Benefits:
CBP Contract Savings ..................................................
CBP Printing Savings ...................................................
Total CBP Benefits ..............................................................
Carrier Printing Savings .......................................................
Traveler Benefits:
Form I–94 Time Savings—Low ....................................
Form I–94 Time Savings—Primary ..............................
I–94 Time Savings—High .............................................
Form I–102 Time Savings ............................................
Form I–102 Fee Savings ..............................................
Total Traveler Benefits—Low ..............................................
Total Traveler Benefits—Primary .........................................
Total Traveler Benefits—High ..............................................
Grand Total Benefits—Low ..................................................
Grand Total Benefits—Primary ............................................
Grand Total Benefits—High .................................................
2014
2015
2016
2017
15,400,000
153,360
15,553,360
1,344,450
15,400,000
153,360
15,553,360
1,344,450
15,400,000
153,360
15,553,360
1,344,450
15,400,000
153,360
15,553,360
1,344,450
15,400,000
153,360
15,553,360
1,344,450
54,608,355
66,063,556
81,912,532
51,041
1,315,050
55,974,446
67,429,647
83,278,624
72,872,256
84,327,457
100,176,434
100,638,110
121,748,978
150,957,166
139,841
3,602,940
104,380,892
125,491,760
154,699,947
121,278,702
142,389,570
171,597,757
105,600,365
127,752,166
158,400,547
139,841
3,602,940
109,343,146
131,494,947
162,143,329
126,240,956
148,392,757
179,041,139
110,117,513
133,216,876
165,176,269
139,841
3,602,940
113,860,294
136,959,658
168,919,051
130,758,104
153,857,468
185,816,861
116,166,058
140,534,225
174,249,087
139,841
3,602,940
119,908,839
144,277,007
177,991,868
136,806,649
161,174,817
194,889,678
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
b. Benefits From Electronic
Implementation at the Land Border
Under the new voluntary electronic
I–94 submission process at the land
border, once the traveler arrives at the
port, he/she will go through secondary
inspection, as they do under the paper
process, where the CBP officer will
locate the traveler’s information through
a document swipe in CBP’s database.
This will indicate that the fee was paid
and pre-populate the data fields from
the document swipe and the
information provided by the traveler in
the Web site. Once the CBP officer has
determined the traveler’s admissibility,
the CBP officer will print out a paper
I–94 to give to the traveler. The traveler
will already have paid the fee, so once
he/she has cleared the secondary
inspection he/she will be able to enter
the United States.
This voluntary process is purely
beneficial to any traveler who opts into
it. By paying the fee online, the traveler
avoids an average 20 minute wait to do
so at the port of entry. Using our
primary estimate for the value of travel
time of $44.15, the value of this time
savings is $14.72 per traveler. As this
process is just a few months old, CBP
does not have data on how many
travelers will opt to answer the Form
I–94 questions and pay the fee online.
CBP is engaging in public outreach to
notify the public of the option, but only
travelers who have access to a computer
or other device with internet
connectivity will be able to participate.
In 2015, nearly 7 million travelers
arrived in the United States at the land
border using a Form I–94. CBP does not
yet have sufficient data on how many
travelers will opt for the online fee
payment option. For the purposes of
this analysis, CBP estimates that 5
percent of these travelers, or
approximately 350,000, will opt for the
advance I–94 information submission
and payment process, for a total savings
to travelers of $5,152,000. To the extent
that the reduction in CBP officer time
inputting data and processing fees
results in shorter wait times, travelers
would have additional time savings
benefits.
This process would save CBP 8
minutes of data input time and 2
minutes of fee processing time, a total
of 10 minutes of CBP officer time per
traveler. Based on the estimate that
350,000 travelers will opt for the
advance I–94 information submission
and payment, and using the fully loaded
wage rate of a CBP Officer of $85.47 per
hour,34 we estimate that this process
would save CBP officers 58,333 hours
and $4,985,750. We note that this is a
time savings that is monetized for
analytical purposes and not a budgetary
savings. This time savings could be
spent on other priorities including
reducing wait times. In addition, this
rule would reduce the amount of cash
being handled at ports of entry, which
would simplify port of entry oversight
and auditing.
c. Aggregate Benefits
Exhibit 10 shows the total benefits of
the rule—both the benefits of air and sea
automation and the land border
implementation.
EXHIBIT 10—BENEFIT SUMMARY
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
2013
CBP Benefits:
CBP Contract Savings ..................................................
CBP Printing Savings ...................................................
34 Source:
2014
15,400,000
153,360
15,400,000
153,360
2015
2016
15,400,000
153,360
CBP Position Model.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
15,400,000
153,360
2017
15,400,000
153,360
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
91665
EXHIBIT 10—BENEFIT SUMMARY—Continued
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
2013
CBP Time Savings .......................................................
Total CBP Benefits ..............................................................
Carrier Printing Savings .......................................................
Traveler Benefits:
Form I–94 Time Savings—Low ....................................
Form I–94 Time Savings—Primary ..............................
I–94 Time Savings—High .............................................
Form I–102 Time Savings ............................................
Form I–102 Fee Savings ..............................................
Land Process Time Savings .........................................
Total Traveler Benefits—Low ..............................................
Total Traveler Benefits—Primary .........................................
Total Traveler Benefits—High ..............................................
Grand Total Benefits—Low ..................................................
Grand Total Benefits—Primary ............................................
Grand Total Benefits—High .................................................
2014
2015
2016
2017
0
15,553,360
1,344,450
0
15,553,360
1,344,450
0
15,553,360
1,344,450
1,246,438
16,799,798
1,344,450
4,985,750
20,539,110
1,344,450
54,608,355
66,063,556
81,912,532
51,041
1,315,050
0
55,974,446
67,429,647
83,278,624
72,872,256
84,327,457
100,176,434
100,638,110
121,748,978
150,957,166
139,841
3,602,940
0
104,380,892
125,491,760
154,699,947
121,278,702
142,389,570
171,597,757
105,600,365
127,752,166
158,400,547
139,841
3,602,940
0
109,343,146
131,494,947
162,143,329
126,240,956
148,392,757
179,041,139
110,117,513
133,216,876
165,176,269
139,841
3,602,940
1,288,000
115,148,294
138,247,658
170,207,051
133,292,542
156,391,905
188,351,298
116,166,058
140,534,225
174,249,087
139,841
3,602,940
5,152,000
125,060,839
149,429,007
183,143,868
146,944,399
171,312,567
205,027,428
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
5. Net Benefits
Exhibit 11 compares the costs of this
rule to the benefits, both in total and for
each party affected. As shown, in 2013,
CBP had a net benefit of $15.5 million,
carriers had a net benefit of $1.3
million, and travelers had a net benefit
of between $41.1 and $65.9 million. In
our primary analysis, the net benefit to
travelers was $51.3 million in 2013.
Total 2013 net benefits ranged from
$57.9 million to $82.7 million. In our
primary analysis, the total net benefits
were $68.3 million in 2013.
EXHIBIT 11—NET BENEFITS
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
2012
2013
¥1,321,000
0
0
0
0
¥1,321,000
¥1,321,000
¥1,321,000
CBP ..........................................................
Carriers ....................................................
Travelers—Low ........................................
Travelers—Primary ..................................
Travelers—High .......................................
Grand Total—Low ....................................
Grand Total—Primary ..............................
Grand Total—High ...................................
2014
15,461,360
1,344,450
41,109,614
51,503,032
65,882,967
57,915,424
68,308,842
82,688,777
15,461,360
1,344,450
76,986,391
96,140,493
122,641,373
93,792,201
112,946,303
139,447,183
2015
2016
15,461,360
1,344,450
80,597,880
100,696,430
128,504,014
97,403,690
117,502,240
145,309,824
16,167,798
1,344,450
85,173,424
106,131,707
135,128,784
102,685,671
123,643,955
152,641,032
2017
20,447,110
1,344,450
93,439,507
115,548,989
146,138,820
115,231,067
137,340,549
167,930,380
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
Exhibits 12 and 13 present the present
value net benefits of this rule,
discounted at the 3 and 7 percent
discount rates. Exhibit 14 presents
annualized net benefits at the 3 and 7
percent discount rates. Total annualized
net benefits range from $73.4 million to
$111.8 million. In the primary analysis,
annualized net benefits range from
$88.1 million to $90.9 million,
depending on the discount rate used.
EXHIBIT 12—NET BENEFITS DISCOUNTED AT A 3 PERCENT RATE
[2012 $] *
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
2012
2013
¥1,321,000
0
0
0
0
¥1,321,000
¥1,321,000
¥1,321,000
CBP ..........................................................
Carriers ....................................................
Travelers—Low ........................................
Travelers—Primary ..................................
Travelers—High .......................................
Grand Total—Low ....................................
Grand Total—Primary ..............................
Grand Total—High ...................................
2014
15,011,029
1,305,291
39,912,246
50,002,944
63,964,046
56,228,567
66,319,264
80,280,366
14,573,815
1,267,273
72,567,057
90,621,635
115,601,256
88,408,145
106,462,723
131,442,344
2015
2016
14,149,335
1,230,362
73,758,478
92,151,498
117,599,376
89,138,174
107,531,195
132,979,073
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
14,364,879
1,194,526
75,675,484
94,296,647
120,060,175
91,234,889
109,856,052
135,619,580
2017
17,637,857
1,159,734
80,601,739
99,673,573
126,060,630
99,399,330
118,471,164
144,858,221
91666
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
EXHIBIT 13—NET BENEFITS DISCOUNTED AT A 7 PERCENT RATE
[2012 $] *
2012
2013
¥1,321,000
0
0
0
0
¥1,321,000
¥1,321,000
¥1,321,000
CBP ..........................................................
Carriers ....................................................
Travelers—Low ........................................
Travelers—Primary ..................................
Travelers—High .......................................
Grand Total—Low ....................................
Grand Total—Primary ..............................
Grand Total—High ...................................
2014
14,449,869
1,256,495
38,420,200
48,133,675
61,572,866
54,126,564
63,840,039
77,279,231
2015
13,504,551
1,174,295
67,242,895
83,972,830
107,119,725
81,921,741
98,651,675
121,798,570
2016
12,621,075
1,097,472
65,791,878
82,198,282
104,897,553
79,510,425
95,916,829
118,616,100
12,334,335
1,025,674
64,978,397
80,967,371
103,089,103
78,338,407
94,327,381
116,449,112
2017
14,578,507
958,574
66,621,077
82,384,832
104,194,959
82,158,158
97,921,913
119,732,040
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
EXHIBIT 14—ANNUALIZED NET BENEFITS DISCOUNTED AT 3 PERCENT AND 7 PERCENT
[2012 $] *
3 Percent
CBP ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Carriers ....................................................................................................................................................................
Travelers—Low ........................................................................................................................................................
Travelers—Primary ..................................................................................................................................................
Travelers—High .......................................................................................................................................................
Grand Total—Low ....................................................................................................................................................
Grand Total—Primary ..............................................................................................................................................
Grand Total—High ...................................................................................................................................................
7 Percent
13,336,885
1,103,496
61,385,839
76,481,844
97,368,099
75,826,220
90,922,226
111,808,481
12,973,485
1,080,843
59,420,140
74,047,524
94,285,410
73,474,468
88,101,852
108,339,738
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
While this rule has a large net benefit
to travelers as a whole, it is important
to note that the net benefits do not
accrue uniformly across all travelers.
We next examine the effect of this rule
on each type of traveler. Exhibit 14
summarizes the costs and benefits per
traveler for each class of alien discussed
in this analysis. With this rule, no
traveler needs to fill out the paper Form
I–94 while en route to the United States,
saving all travelers 8 minutes, an
estimated $5.89 per traveler. The 1
percent of B–1/B–2 travelers and 75
percent of other foreign travelers who
need to access the Web site experience
a cost of $2.95 per person because of the
4 minute time burden to access the Web
site. In addition, those who need to
print their Form I–94 incur a $0.25
printing cost. Those temporary workers
and aliens in the ‘‘Other/Unknown’’
category who need to travel to access
the Web site and print their Form I–94
have an additional travel cost. They
need to travel an estimated 20 miles and
60 minutes round-trip to reach a
location with internet access, at a cost
of $20.89 per traveler. We reiterate that
those with obstacles to accessing their
electronic Forms I–94 may request a
paper Form I–94 at secondary
inspection stations at ports of entry or
at CBP DIS. In addition, any travelers
who would otherwise need to file a
Form I–102 and pay the $330 fee to
obtain a replacement Form I–94 receive
an additional benefit of $342.81 as a
result of this rule. Travelers who opt for
the electronic filing option receive an
additional benefit of $14.72.
EXHIBIT 15—ANNUAL EFFECT OF RULE BY CLASS OF ALIEN
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
8 minute time
cost savings
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Travelers who do not Access Website ............................................................
1 percent of Tourists and Business Travelers (B–1/B–2) ...............................
75 percent of Students ....................................................................................
75 percent of Temporary workers ...................................................................
75 percent of Other/Unknown .........................................................................
75 percent of Diplomats ..................................................................................
5.89
5.89
5.89
5.89
5.89
5.89
Cost of time to
access & cost
to print
electronic
Form I–94
0
¥3.19
¥3.19
¥3.19
¥3.19
¥3.19
Travel costs
0
0
0
¥20.89
¥20.89
0
Net impact **
5.89
2.70
2.70
¥18.21
¥18.21
2.70
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
** In addition to this net impact, a small number of travelers experience savings resulting from no longer needing to file a Form I–102. The primary estimate of Form I–102 cost savings to travelers is $342.81 per traveler. We do not include the Form I–102 cost savings in the net impact
column of Exhibit 14 because few travelers benefit from this compared to the overall population of travelers impacted by the rule. Based on data
from USCIS, we estimate that 10,918 Form I–102s per year are no longer need to be filed as a result of this rule. This is far less than one percent of the annual population of travelers affected by the rule (10,918 Form I–102s ÷ 20,815,527 travelers in 2014 <1%).
Annualized costs and benefits to all
entities affected by the rule, whether
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
domestic or foreign, are presented in the
following accounting statement.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
91667
ACCOUNTING STATEMENT: CLASSIFICATION OF EXPENDITURES FOR U.S. ENTITIES, 2012–2017
[2012 $]
3% Discount rate
U.S. Costs:
Annualized monetized costs ......................
Annualized quantified, but non-monetized
costs.
Qualitative (non-quantified) costs ...............
U.S. Benefits:
Annualized monetized benefits ..................
Annualized quantified, but non-monetized
benefits.
Qualitative (non-quantified) benefits ..........
We estimate annualized costs to all
entities affected by this rule to range
from $21.0 million to $23.5 million.
Monetized benefits of this rule range
from $101.9 million to $104.1 million to
7% Discount rate
$23.5 million .....................................................
None .................................................................
$21.0 million.
None.
None .................................................................
None.
$104.1 million ...................................................
None .................................................................
$101.1 million.
None.
Reduced primary inspection processing times
Reduced primary inspection processing times.
all entities. Non-quantified benefits of
this rule include the reduced processing
time that could result because of the
automation of the Form I–94.
Annualized costs and benefits to U.S.
entities are presented in the following
accounting statement, as required by
OMB Circular A–4.
ACCOUNTING STATEMENT: CLASSIFICATION OF EXPENDITURES FOR U.S. ENTITIES, 2012–2017
[2012 $]
3% Discount rate
U.S. Costs:
Annualized monetized costs ......................
Annualized quantified, but non-monetized
costs.
Qualitative (non-quantified) costs ...............
U.S. Benefits:
Annualized monetized benefits ..................
Annualized quantified, but non-monetized
benefits.
Qualitative (non-quantified) benefits ..........
We estimate annualized costs to U.S.
entities as a result of this rule to range
from $0.454 million to $0.466 million.
These are CBP’s costs for automating the
electronic Form I–94 and developing the
Web site travelers use to access their
electronic Form I–94. Monetized
benefits of this rule of $13.3 million to
$13.5 million to U.S. entities (CBP and
carriers) represent reduced Form I–94
printing and storage costs, reduced data
entry contract costs, and reduced time
costs for CBP officers. Non-quantified
benefits of this rule include the reduced
processing time that could result
because of the automation of the Form
I–94.
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
6. Regulatory Alternatives
In the analysis for the interim final
rule, we considered two alternatives to
the rule: (1) Eliminating the paper Form
I–94 in the air and sea environments
entirely and (2) providing the paper
Form I–94 to all travelers who are not
B–1/B–2 travelers. As a result of public
comments on the interim final rule, we
add a third alternative to our analysis:
(3) Providing kiosks at major ports of
entry where travelers have the option to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
7% Discount rate
$0.454 million ...................................................
None .................................................................
$0.466 million.
None.
None .................................................................
None.
$13.5 million .....................................................
None .................................................................
$13.3 million.
None.
Reduced primary inspection processing times
Reduced primary inspection processing times.
print their electronic Form I–94 prior to
leaving the airport.
Under alternative one, if CBP were to
eliminate the paper Form I–94 entirely
in the air and sea environments, there
are certain classes of vulnerable aliens
who would be harmed. Under the rule,
asylees and certain parolees are
provided a paper Form I–94. These
aliens have an immediate need for the
Form I–94 and cannot wait to access
their electronic Form I–94 from the Web
site. These aliens represent a very small
portion of overall international travel
and providing them with a paper Form
I–94 and entering the information into
CBP data systems is not a significant
cost to CBP. In addition, under this rule,
CBP has continued to make the paper
Form I–94 available to those travelers
who request it at secondary inspection
stations and at DIS. CBP provides this
flexibility as a way to minimize the
effect on those who face obstacles to
accessing their electronic Form I–94.
CBP does not have statistics on the
number of travelers who request a paper
Form I–94. Anecdotal evidence suggests
that few, if any, travelers go to a
secondary inspection station or a DIS for
the purpose of obtaining a paper Form
I–94. This may be because the travelers
who need a paper Form I–94 do not
know they need it when at the airport
or because they find it more efficient to
access the I–94 Web site and print the
form than to go to secondary inspection
or a DIS. Requesting a paper Form I–94
at one of these locations can take longer
than the 4 minutes we estimate it takes
to access the I–94 Web site and the 60
minutes in travel time we estimate that
those with obstacles to internet access
spend to obtain their Form I–94. As few
aliens request a paper Form I–94 at
secondary inspection stations or DIS,
the cost to CBP for printing and data
entry for these forms is minimal.
Eliminating the paper Form I–94 option
for asylees, certain parolees, and those
travelers who request one would not
result in a significant cost savings to
CBP and would burden travelers who
have an immediate need for an
electronic Form I–94 or who face
obstacles to accessing their electronic
Form I–94.
Under alternative two, all non-B–1/B–
2 travelers required to complete a Form
I–94 would receive and complete the
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
91668
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
paper Form I–94 during their inspection
when they arrive in the United States.
The electronic Form I–94 would still be
automatically created during inspection,
but the CBP officer would need to verify
that the information appearing on the
form matches the information in CBP’s
data systems. In addition, CBP would
need to write the Form I–94 number on
each paper Form I–94 so that their paper
form matches the electronic record. As
noted earlier, over four million, or 23.7
percent, aliens were non-B–1/B–2
travelers in 2012. Filling out and
processing this many paper Forms I–94
at airports and seaports would increase
processing times considerably and it
would only provide at best small
savings to the individual traveler. As
noted in the ‘‘Net Benefits’’ section, the
net cost of this rule to the 75 percent of
temporary workers and those in the
‘‘Other/Unknown’’ category of aliens
who need a printed Form I–94 is only
$18.20 per traveler. Conversely, this rule
provides net benefits to travelers who
do not need a printed Form I–94 and
those arriving as students or diplomats.
CBP received several public
comments related to the obstacles
travelers face in accessing a computer to
print their electronic Form I–94.
Commenters said that many travelers
need their Form I–94 very soon after
arrival, sometimes within hours of
arrival, and they may have difficulty
learning that public libraries offer
internet access, where public libraries
are, and how to travel to a public
library. An employer submitted a
comment stating that company privacy
standards prevent it from allowing new
hires to access the internet in order to
access the I–94 Web site. Separately,
commenters pointed out problems with
the accuracy of the Form I–94
information that prevent them from
logging into the Web site. Others noted
that there is no way to check their Form
I–94 for accuracy at time of entry into
the United States. One commenter
suggested a solution to these problems:
That CBP provide kiosks at the airports
where foreign nationals can inspect and
print their electronic Form I–94. CBP
considered this suggestion and made it
an additional alternative to the rule.
Under alternative three, we consider
the costs and benefits of placing kiosks
at the busiest U.S. airports and seaports
to allow travelers to inspect and print
their electronic Form I–94 before
leaving the port of entry. For the
purposes of this alternative analysis, we
examine the impact of placing dedicated
kiosks at the busiest 20 airports and the
busiest 20 seaports. These locations
account for 92 percent of international
air travelers and 95 percent of
international sea travelers.35
CBP uses kiosks at many major
airports for the Global Entry program.
These kiosks are dedicated for use by
members of that program, but similar
kiosks could be purchased to allow
travelers to access the I–94 Web site and
print their Form I–94. According to
CBP’s Office of Field Operations, kiosks
would cost $20,000 each and have an
annual operations and maintenance cost
of $8,732. Placing a kiosk at each of the
busiest 20 airports and the busiest 20
seaports would cost $800,000 the first
year and $349,280 in each subsequent
years.
The benefit of placing kiosks at the
busiest airports and seaports depends
on the number of people who would use
the kiosks if they were available. CBP
has no data on the extent to which
travelers would choose to use the kiosks
if they were available to them. As stated
previously, few travelers request paper
Forms I–94 upon their arrival in the
United States, but that might be because
doing so means going to the secondary
inspection station, which can take a
considerable amount of time. We also
do not know how many people find
errors on their electronic Forms I–94
that they could correct immediately if
they were already at an airport or
seaport rather than visiting a Deferred
Inspection Site at a later time, though
data suggests this could be a large
number. In 2013, according to an
analysis of data provided by CBP’s
Office of Field Operations, about 14
percent of unique visitors to the I–94
Web site were not able to locate their
electronic Form I–94. This may have
been because of erroneous data on their
Form I–94, but it could also be because
they did not actually have an Form I–
94 on the Web site (for example, if they
are a U.S. citizen or if they already
departed the country prior to accessing
the Web site).
Accessing the Web site via a kiosk
would take 4 minutes of a traveler’s
time, the same amount of time as via a
personal computer. Therefore, we do
not believe that those who do not
currently access their electronic Forms
I–94 (as stated earlier, this includes the
99 percent of B–1/B–2 travelers and 25
percent of non-B–1/B–2 travelers)
would now access them via the kiosks.
Similarly, those with easy computer
access would experience no time
savings by accessing their Form I–94 via
the kiosk instead of via the Web site, so
we do not include their benefits in the
analysis. The travelers who would
benefit from the availability of kiosks to
access their electronic Form I–94 are
those who would otherwise need to
travel to access the internet. These
travelers would no longer incur the
opportunity cost of traveling 60 minutes
or the mileage cost of driving 20 miles
roundtrip. In our analysis above, we
have estimated that 33 percent of
travelers in the ‘‘Temporary Workers’’
and ‘‘Other/Unknown’’ categories of
travelers would need to travel to access
the internet. In 2014 (the first full year
the interim final rule is in effect) this
represents approximately 819,000
travelers. Since we do not know how
many of these travelers would choose to
use the kiosks, we present the costs and
benefits (using the primary estimates for
travel and mileage costs) that would
accrue to these travelers under a wide
range of assumptions of their kiosk use.
The benefits reflect the total travel costs,
including travel time and mileage,
derived earlier in the analysis (See
Exhibit 5). We present the reduction in
travel costs (which is a benefit) that
would result if different percentages of
travelers use a kiosk rather than travel
to a location where they can access the
internet. The results of our analysis are
presented in Exhibit 16.
EXHIBIT 16—COMPARISON OF KIOSK COSTS AND POTENTIAL BENEFITS
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
Kiosk use
rate *
(%)
Benefits ....................................................
100
75
50
2013
2014
9,283,113
6,962,334
4,641,556
17,107,912
12,830,934
8,553,956
2015
2016
17,951,467
13,463,600
8,975,733
35 CBP’s Operations Management Reporting
database. Accessed June 30, 2014.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
18,719,357
14,039,517
9,359,678
2017
19,747,575
14,810,681
9,873,788
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
91669
EXHIBIT 16—COMPARISON OF KIOSK COSTS AND POTENTIAL BENEFITS—Continued
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
Kiosk use
rate *
(%)
2014
2015
2016
2017
25
10
5
1
CBP Costs ...............................................
2013
2,320,778
928,311
464,156
92,831
4,276,978
1,710,791
855,396
171,079
4,487,867
1,795,147
897,573
179,515
4,679,839
1,871,936
935,968
187,194
4,936,894
1,974,758
987,379
197,476
........................
........................
800,000
329,280
329,280
329,280
* Note that Kiosk Use Rate represents the percentage of those who would otherwise need to travel to access a computer, not total Form I–94
travelers. Only approximately 4 percent of total Form I–94 travelers need to travel to access the Web site (12 percent of travelers in the ‘‘Temporary Worker’’ or ‘‘Other/Unknown’’ categories times 33 percent of those categories who would need to travel to access the internet = 4
percent).
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
As shown in Exhibit 15, kiosks have
a large potential for benefits if they are
used by a substantial number of
travelers. If 100 percent of travelers who
would otherwise need to travel to access
a computer used the kiosks instead,
benefits would outpace the costs of the
kiosks by a margin of $17.2 million to
$0.8 million in 2014 and by more in
later years. Even if only 5 percent of
travelers who would otherwise need to
travel to access a computer use the
kiosks, benefits would exceed costs.
However, based on CBP’s experience
with travelers requesting paper Forms I–
94 at the ports of entry, CBP does not
believe enough travelers would use the
kiosks to merit the expense. Further,
due to budget constraints, CBP does not
have funds to acquire these kiosks at
this time.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
and Fairness Act of 1996, requires an
agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis that describes the effect of a
proposed rule on small entities when
the agency is required to publish a
general notice of proposed rulemaking.
A small entity may be a small business
(defined as any independently owned
and operated business not dominant in
its field that qualifies as a small
business per the Small Business Act); a
small not-for-profit organization; or a
small governmental jurisdiction
(locality with fewer than 50,000 people).
Since a notice of proposed rulemaking
was not necessary, a regulatory
flexibility analysis was not required.
Nonetheless, DHS has considered the
impact of this rule on small entities.
This rule primarily regulates
individuals and individuals are not
considered small entities. In addition,
the individual travelers may obtain a
paper Form I–94 upon request, which
would eliminate the impacts of this rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
for those travelers. Employers who have
internet access may choose to allow
their employees to use their internet
connection to access the employee’s
electronic Form I–94, but they are not
required to do so and are therefore not
directly regulated by this rule. To the
extent an employer chooses to assist an
employee with accessing the internet
and printing a Form I–94, this impact
would not rise to being an economically
significant impact under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
This rule also regulates air and sea
carriers by eliminating the need for
them to provide the paper Form I–94 to
their passengers. This rule would
impact all small carriers that transport
passengers to the United States. We
therefore conclude that this rule has an
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
As stated in the economic impact
analysis above, we estimate that carriers
spend $1.3 million a year printing and
storing forms for their passengers, based
on 2011 passenger volumes. In 2011,
16,586,753 Forms I–94 provided by
carriers were filed at airports and
seaports. Dividing these figures, we
estimate that carriers spent 8 cents per
form on printing and storage costs.
Under this rule, carriers would no
longer need to print and store the Forms
I–94, thus eliminating these costs.
According to a 2013 study by the
Department of Commerce’s Office of
Travel and Tourism Industries,36 the
average airline ticket price for an
international traveler traveling to the
United States is $1,588. The cost to the
carrier of printing a Form I–94 is less
than one hundredth of one percent of
the revenue a carrier receives from the
36 Department of Commerce, National Travel and
Tourism Office. ‘‘Profile of Overseas Travelers to
the United States: 2013 Inbound.’’ Available at
https://travel.trade.gov/outreachpages/
download_data_table/
2013_Overseas_Visitor_Profile.pdf. Accessed July
10, 2014.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
average passenger. We therefore do not
believe that this rule has a significant
economic impact on small entities. We
also note that any impact to small
carriers would be purely beneficial.
Privacy
CBP will ensure that all Privacy Act
requirements and policies are adhered
to in the implementation of this rule,
and will be updating the Privacy Impact
Assessment (PIA) for the I–94 Web site.
CBP will outline in the updated PIA
how CBP will ensure compliance with
Privacy Act protections. In the updated
PIA, CBP will explain the privacy risks
and mitigations CBP has implemented
during this phase of the Form I–94
automation process. DHS/CBP will post
the updated PIA online at: https://
www.dhs.gov/privacy-documents-uscustoms-and-border-protection. The PIA
that covers the earlier phase of Form I–
94 automation, and describes how CBP
complies with the Privacy Act, is
available at: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/
default/files/publications/privacy/PIAs/
pia-cbp-16-I-94-automation20130227.pdf.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information
regarding the CBP Form I–94 (Arrival/
Departure Record) was previously
reviewed and approved by OMB in
accordance with the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3507) under OMB Control
Number 1651–0111. This OMB Control
Number also includes the Electronic
System for Travel Authorization
(ESTA), ESTA fee, and Form I–94W, all
of which are unaffected by this rule. In
addition, information for the electronic
Form I–94 is comprised of information
already collected for APIS under
approval 1651–0088. An agency may
not conduct, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless the collection of
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
91670
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
information displays a valid control
number assigned by OMB.
The burden hours associated with the
collections of information contained in
this Final Rule were previously
reviewed and approved by OMB. The
automation of the paper Form I–94 for
commercial aircraft and vessel
passengers in accordance with this Final
Rule results in a reduction of 1,278,456
annual burden hours under OMB
control number 1651–0111.
Also in accordance with this Final
Rule, the electronic Form I–94 is
available to aliens on a secure Web site.
Passengers may log into the Web site
using 7 pieces of basic identifying
information that is either known to the
traveler (their first name, last name and
date of birth) or readily available on
their passport (passport number,
country of issuance, date of entry, and
class of admission). The estimated
annual burden associated with this Web
site, is 254,680 hours under OMB
control number 1651–0111.
The automation of the paper Form
I–94 for commercial aircraft and vessel
passengers in accordance with this Final
Rule results in an estimated reduction of
10,918 Forms I–102, Application for
Replacement/Initial Nonimmigrant
Arrival-Departure Document, filed, and
an estimated reduction of 4,541.89
burden hours under OMB control
number 1615–0079.
Exhibit 16 summarizes the difference
in the burden for the previous process
and the process under this rule. As
OMB Control Number 1651–0111
includes ESTA and Form I–94W, we
include those burden hours for
informational purposes. We note that
these burden hours are unaffected by
this rule.
EXHIBIT 16—PRA BURDEN EFFECTS OF THE RULE
Collection
Pre-IFR ........................................................................................
Final Rule ....................................................................................
Difference ....................................................................................
Amendments to the Regulations
For the reasons set forth above, the
interim final rule amending 8 CFR parts
1, 210, 212, 214, 215, 231, 235, 245,
245a, 247, 253, 264, 274a, and 286,
published at 78 FR 18457 on March 27,
2013, is adopted as a final rule without
change.
Jeh Charles Johnson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–30459 Filed 12–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
9 CFR Parts 317 and 381
[Docket No. FSIS–2016–0048]
RIN 0583–AD05
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Uniform Compliance Date for Food
Labeling Regulations
Food Safety and Inspection
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Food Safety and
Inspection Service (FSIS) is establishing
January 1, 2020, as the uniform
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
I–94 ....................................................
Website ..............................................
I–102 ..................................................
ESTA ..................................................
I–94W .................................................
I–94 ....................................................
Website ..............................................
I–102 ..................................................
ESTA ..................................................
I–94W .................................................
I–94 ....................................................
Website ..............................................
I–102 ..................................................
ESTA ..................................................
I–94W .................................................
compliance date for new meat and
poultry product labeling regulations that
are issued between January 1, 2017, and
December 31, 2018. FSIS periodically
announces uniform compliance dates
for new meat and poultry product
labeling regulations to minimize the
economic impact of label changes.
DATES: This rule is effective December
19, 2016. Comments on this final rule
must be received on or before January
18, 2017.
ADDRESSES: FSIS invites interested
persons to submit relevant comments on
this final rule. Comments may be
submitted by the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: This
Web site provides the ability to type
short comments directly into the
comment field on this Web page or
attach a file for lengthier comments. Go
to https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow
the online instructions at that site for
submitting comments.
• Mail, including CD–ROMs: Send to
Docket Clerk, U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA), FSIS, OPPD,
Patriots Plaza 3, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., Mailstop 3782, Room 8–
163A, Washington, DC 20250–3700.
• Hand- or courier-delivered items:
Send to Docket Clerk, U.S. Department
of Agriculture (USDA), FSIS, OPPD,
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Respondents
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14,000,000
0
17,700
19,140,000
100,000
4,387,550
3,858,782
6,782
19,140,000
100,000
¥9,612,450
3,858,782
¥10,918
0
0
Burden Hours
1,862,000
0
7,363
4,785,000
333,147
583,544
254,680
2,821
4,785,000
13,333
¥1,278,456
254,680
¥4,542
0
0
Patriots Plaza 3, 355 E Street SW., Room
8–163A, Washington, DC 20250–3700.
Instructions: All items submitted by
mail or electronic mail must include the
Agency name and docket number FSIS–
2016–0048. Comments received in
response to this docket will be made
available for public inspection and
posted without change, including any
personal information, to https://
www.regulations.gov/.
Docket: For access to background
documents or comments received, go to
the FSIS Docket Room at Patriots Plaza
3, 355 E Street SW., Room 8–164,
Washington, DC 20250–3700 between
8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rosalyn Murphy-Jenkins, Director,
Labeling and Program Delivery Division,
Office of Policy and Program
Development, Food Safety and
Inspection Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Telephone: 301–504–0879.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
FSIS periodically issues regulations
that require changes in the labeling of
meat and poultry food products. Many
meat and poultry establishments also
produce non-meat and non-poultry food
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 243 (Monday, December 19, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 91646-91670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30459]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
8 CFR PARTS 1, 210, 212, 214, 215, 231, 235, 245, 245a, 247, 253,
264, 274a, and 286
[Docket No. USCBP-2013-0011; CBP Dec. No. 16-27]
RIN 1651-AA96
Definition of Form I-94 To Include Electronic Format
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule adopts, without change, interim amendments to
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) regulations which were
published in the Federal Register on March 27, 2013, as CBP Dec. No.
13-06. These amendments enabled DHS to transition the issuance of the
Form I-94 (Arrival/Departure Record) to an automated process. In the
automated process, DHS creates a Form I-94 in an electronic format
based on passenger, passport and visa information DHS obtains
electronically from air and sea carriers and the Department of State
(DOS) as well as through the inspection process. This document
addresses the comments received in response to the interim rule and
discusses some operational modifications to the Form I-94 process that
were implemented after publication of the interim rule.
DATES: This final rule is effective January 18, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne Shepherd, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection Office of Field Operations by telephone (202) 344-
2073 or by email, Suzanne.M.Shepherd@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Abbreviations and Terms Used in This Document
ACI-A Airports Council International-North America
ACIP American Council on International Personnel
ADIS Arrival and Departure Information System
AILA American Immigration Lawyers Association
APA Administrative Procedure Act
APIS Advance Passenger Information Systems
CBP U.S. Customs and Border Protection
CBSA Canadian Border Services Agency
CCD Consular Consolidated Database
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
DIS Deferred Inspection Site
DMV Departments of Motor Vehicles
DOS Department of State
DOT Department of Transportation
ESTA Electronic System of Travel Authorization
FAQ Frequently Asked Question
FNU First Name Unknown
FOIA Freedom of Information Act
ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization
ICE U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
IFR Interim Final Rule
INA Immigration and Nationality Act
INM Instituto Nacional de Migraci[oacute]n
INS Immigration and Naturalization Service
LNU Last Name Unknown
MRZ Machine Readable Zone
NAFSA NAFSA: Association of International Educators
OIS Office of Immigration Statistics
OMB Office of Management and Budget
OTTI Office of Travel and Tourism Industries
PIA Privacy Impact Assessment
PII Personally Identifiable Information
POE Port of Entry
SAVE USCIS's Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements program
SEVIS Student and Exchange Visitor Information System
SEVP Student and Exchange Visitor Information Program
SHRM Society for Human Resource Management
SSA Social Security Administration
USCIS U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture
VWP Visa Waiver Program
Executive Summary
The Form I-94 (Arrival/Departure Record) is issued by DHS to
certain nonimmigrant foreign nationals upon arrival in the United
States or when they change status in the United States.
[[Page 91647]]
The Form I-94 is used to document arrival and departure and provides
evidence of the terms of admission or parole. The Form I-94 is also
used by individuals granted asylum in the United States as a proof of
their grant of asylum and by refugees as proof of their refugee status.
CBP, a component of DHS, generally issues the Form I-94 to
nonimmigrants at the time they lawfully enter the United States.
Nonimmigrant travelers use the Form I-94 for various purposes such as
completing the Form I-9 to verify employment eligibility, applying for
immigration benefits, or presenting to a university to verify
eligibility for enrollment.
On March 27, 2013, CBP published an interim final rule (IFR) in the
Federal Register (78 FR 18457) that added to the regulations a
definition of ``Form I-94'' to allow the Form I-94 to be in either
paper or electronic format. Prior to the effective date of the IFR, the
Form I-94 was a paper form only. The IFR made necessary changes to the
regulations to enable CBP to transition from only paper to allow for an
electronic form. In the case of air and sea ports of entry, the
regulation allowed CBP to transition to an automated process whereby
CBP creates an electronic Form I-94 based on information collected via
the Advance Passenger Information System (APIS) along with visa
information transmitted to CBP by the Department of State. The
automated process applies only to nonimmigrants arriving at air and sea
ports of entry because APIS data is currently collected only for air
and sea. The automation of the Form I-94 process for nonimmigrants
arriving by air or sea eliminates duplicative information collections
and saves time and money for the traveling public, carriers, and CBP.
CBP makes the electronic Form I-94 available through a Web site. To
access the Form I-94 through the Web site the traveler inputs
information from his/her passport. If needed, nonimmigrants may print
out a copy of the Form I-94 from the Web site and present it to third
parties in lieu of the paper form. CBP continues to provide a paper
Form I-94 to certain classes of aliens, such as asylees, certain
parolees, and others upon request or whenever CBP determines the
issuance of a paper form is appropriate.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ As of September 2015, CBP has automated the Form I-94
process for refugees. Refugees can now access their Form I-94 from
the I-94 Web site. CBP no longer provides a paper Form I-94 to
refugees unless one is requested or CBP determines that it is
appropriate to issue one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This regulation also is consistent with CBP's enhancements to the
I-94 Web site to enable travelers arriving at a land port of entry to
submit the Form I-94 information to CBP and pay the required fee prior
to arrival. Unlike the automated process for air and sea where CBP
creates an electronic Form I-94 based on information collected via APIS
and other sources, this I-94 land border process enables travelers to
provide the Form I-94 information to CBP electronically prior to
arrival to facilitate the land border issuance process. The enhanced I-
94 Web site launched on September 29, 2016.
DHS received eighteen submissions in response to the IFR. Most of
these submissions contained comments providing support, voicing
concerns, highlighting issues, or offering suggestions for
modifications to the automation process. After review of the comments,
CBP has decided to finalize the interim final rule without change.
However, CBP has made some operational changes, primarily to the I-94
Web site, in response to the comments. These changes, which are
described in the comment responses, are intended to help travelers
retrieve their Form I-94 information and travel history more easily.
CBP has completed an updated economic assessment analyzing the
effects of the automation of the Form I-94. This rule affects CBP, air
and sea carriers that transport foreign nationals to the United States,
and the foreign nationals themselves. CBP will incur costs associated
with linking its data systems and building and maintaining the I-94 Web
site. CBP benefits through lower printing, storage, and contract costs.
CBP estimated a net benefit of $15.5 million for CBP in 2013. Carriers
benefit as a result of lower printing and storage costs. CBP estimated
a net benefit of $1.3 million for carriers in 2013. Foreign nationals
traveling to the United States incur opportunity costs associated with
logging onto the Web site to access their electronic Form I-94,
printing their Form I-94, and, for some travelers, the cost to drive to
a location with internet access so they can access and print their
electronic Form I-94. Foreign nationals benefit from a reduced
opportunity cost associated with filling out a paper Form I-94 and
reduced opportunity and fee costs associated with filing a Form I-102
to replace a lost Form I-94. CBP estimates a net benefit of between
$4141.1 million and $6565.9 million in 2013 for foreign travelers. In
total, CBP estimates that net benefits to all parties ranged from
$5757.9 million to $8282.7 million in 2013. Net benefits to U.S.
entities (carriers and CBP) totaled $16.8 million in 2013. Net benefits
are summarized in table ES-1 below.
Exhibit ES-1--Net Benefits
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP..................................................... -1,321,000 15,461,360 15,461,360 15,461,360 16,167,798 20,447,110
Carriers................................................ 0 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450
Travelers--Low.......................................... 0 41,109,614 76,986,391 80,597,880 85,173,424 93,439,507
Travelers--Primary...................................... 0 51,503,032 96,140,493 100,696,430 106,131,707 115,548,989
Travelers--High......................................... 0 65,882,967 122,641,373 128,504,014 135,128,784 146,138,820
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grand Total--Low.................................... -1,321,000 57,915,424 93,792,201 97,403,690 102,685,671 115,231,067
Grand Total--Primary................................ -1,321,000 68,308,842 112,946,303 117,502,240 123,643,955 137,340,549
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grand Total--High............................... -1,321,000 82,688,777 139,447,183 145,309,824 152,641,032 167,930,380
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
[[Page 91648]]
Background
The Form I-94
Prior to the implementation of the IFR, the Form I-94 was generally
issued to foreign nationals at ports of entry (POEs) at the time they
lawfully enter the United States. See 8 CFR 235.1(h). The Form I-94 is
also issued when a foreign national changes immigration status within
the United States. The Form I-94 is used to document status in the
United States, the authorized length of stay, and departure. The Form
I-94 collects biographical information, visa and passport information,
and the address and phone number where the traveler can be reached
while in the United States.
The Form I-94 has been used for approximately 50 years by DHS, its
predecessor agencies, and external stakeholders for a variety of
purposes. CBP and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE),
components of DHS, use the form to document arrival and departure, as
well as class of admission or duration of parole. U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS), also a component of DHS, issues Forms I-
94 to foreign nationals extending their authorized length of stay or
changing their immigration status while in the United States and to
individuals granted asylum or refugee status in the United States as
proof of their grant of asylum or refugee status. USCIS also uses Form
I-94 information to verify lawful admission or parole when adjudicating
immigration benefit requests, confirming employment authorization for
employers participating in USCIS's E-Verify program, or verifying
immigration status for benefit granting state and federal government
agencies participating in USCIS's Systematic Alien Verification for
Entitlements (SAVE) program. The Form I-94 is also used by the Social
Security Administration (SSA), state agencies, such as Departments of
Motor Vehicles (DMV), and public assistance agencies and organizations,
to verify eligibility for benefits. The form is used by certain foreign
nationals for evidence of lawful admission or parole, as well as, where
applicable, employment eligibility and eligibility for public benefits.
For more complete information on the Form I-94, its uses, and the
automation, please refer to the background section of the IFR.
Automation of the Form I-94 at Airports and Seaports
Nearly all of the traveler information collected on the Form I-94
is also collected by CBP in advance of the traveler's arrival via the
Advance Passenger Information System (APIS). Using information
collected via APIS along with visa information transmitted to CBP by
DOS, CBP is now able to generate Forms I-94 electronically, which
reduces paperwork burdens for travelers and reduces costs for air and
sea carriers and CBP.
On March 27, 2013, CBP published an IFR in the Federal Register (78
FR 18457) amending the DHS regulations to include new definitions at 8
CFR 1.4 for the term ``Form I-94'' and other terms when used in
relation to the Form I-94. The IFR became effective on April 26, 2013,
and on that date, CBP began the transition to an automated Form I-94
process whereby CBP creates an electronic Form I-94 for travelers
arriving by air or sea based on the information in its databases. CBP
continues to provide a paper Form I-94 to those who request such form,
as well as to certain classes of aliens, such as asylees, certain
parolees, and whenever CBP determines the issuance of a paper form is
appropriate. For these individuals arriving by air and sea carriers, an
electronic Form I-94 is also created.
Travelers are able to access and print their electronic Form I-94
via the Web site CBP has established for this purpose: www.cbp.gov/I94.\2\ Travelers to whom an electronic Form I-94 has been issued may
log on to the Web site using identifying information and print a copy
of the electronic Form I-94. In order to access the Form I-94 from the
Web site, the traveler is required to enter information from his or her
passport; thus, a third party without access to the traveler's passport
is not able to access the Form I-94 from the Web site. The printout
from the Web site is the equivalent of the departure portion of the
paper form and contains the same information as the departure portion
of the paper form. CBP continues to stamp the traveler's passport at
the time of inspection and will annotate the stamp with the class of
admission or parole and duration of admission or parole.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The direct link is: https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/I94/request.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enhanced Form I-94 Land Border Process
In addition to the automation of the Form I-94 at air and sea ports
of entry, on September 29, 2016, CBP modified the process by which a
traveler arriving at the land border can provide Form I-94 information
and pay the related fee by adding an electronic option. Specifically,
CBP enhanced the I-94 Web site to enable travelers arriving at a land
port of entry to submit the Form I-94 information to CBP and pay the
required fee prior to arrival. CBP expects that these enhancements will
result in time savings to travelers who choose this option.
Before September 29, 2016, when a traveler requiring a Form I-94
arrived at the land border, he/she provided the I-94 information to a
CBP officer who input the data into a CBP computer system. After
determining the traveler's admissibility, the CBP officer printed a
Form I-94A \3\ for the traveler and referred him/her to the cashier to
pay the $6 fee.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Form I-94A is the version of the Form I-94 that CBP
issues at land ports of entry.
\4\ The amount of fee for the issuance of the Form I-94 at a
land border port of entry is provided for in 8 CFR
103.7(b)(1)(ii)(D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the new process, a traveler who requires an I-94 and intends
to enter the United States at a land port of entry will have the option
to either follow the above process or to apply for an I-94 and pay the
$6 fee up to seven days in advance of arrival. Using the I-94 Web site,
the traveler enters all of the necessary data for I-94 processing that
would be collected by CBP at the port of entry. Upon paying the fee,
the traveler will receive a ``provisional I-94''. This ``provisional I-
94'' will become effective after the traveler presents it to a CBP
officer at a land port of entry and completes the issuance process with
a CBP officer. If the ``provisional I-94'' is not processed within 7
days of submitting the application, it will expire and the fee will be
forfeited.
The I-94 Web site will instruct the traveler to appear at the land
port of entry for an interview and biometric collection. When the
traveler arrives at the port of entry, he/she completes the issuance
process with a CBP officer. The CBP officer will locate the traveler's
information by swiping the traveler's passport or other travel document
in CBP's database. This will verify that the fee was paid and pre-
populate the data fields from the document swipe and the information
provided by the traveler in the Web site. If the CBP officer determines
that the traveler is admissible, the CBP officer will print out a Form
I-94A to give to the traveler.
Discussion of Comments
Overview
Although CBP promulgated the IFR without first soliciting public
comment, CBP provided a thirty-day post-promulgation comment period
soliciting public comments that CBP would consider before adopting the
interim regulations as final. CBP received
[[Page 91649]]
eighteen submissions in response to the IFR. Commenters included
individuals, the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), the
American Council on International Personnel (ACIP), the Society for
Human Resource Management (SHRM), Feld Entertainment, Inc., the Intel
Corporation, NAFSA: Association of International Educators (NAFSA), and
the Airports Council International-North America (ACI-NA). Many
commenters raised multiple issues, and several issues were raised by
numerous commenters. Of the eighteen submissions, most included
comments seeking clarification of specific issues, highlighting
concerns or issues with the Form I-94 automation, or offering solutions
to issues or alternatives. Several of the operational issues raised by
commenters have already been addressed by CBP, which our responses
reflect. CBP has grouped the issues by topic and provides responses
below.
Benefits of Automation
Comment: Many commenters were supportive of the change to an
electronic Form I-94, saying that it will provide increased efficiency
for passengers, airlines, and CBP. Commenters said that no longer
requiring passengers to fill out the paper form on the plane while en
route to the United States would not only save passengers time, but
would also save air carriers time and money and would free up airline
staff to perform other duties. Commenters also anticipated reduced wait
times at the POEs, and increased officer efficiency.
Response: CBP appreciates this feedback and agrees that the
automation of the Form I-94 benefits the traveling public, air and sea
carriers, and CBP.
Comment: One commenter requested that the Form I-94 be automated
for the land ports as well as air and sea, as this will help reduce
wait times and improve commerce at the land border.
Response: CBP agrees that automating the Form I-94 at land POEs
would provide benefits to travelers and is exploring expanding
automation to include land border POEs. However, the electronic Form I-
94 relies in large part on information collected via APIS, and APIS
data is currently collected only for air and sea. Therefore, CBP cannot
fully automate the Form I-94 process at land border POE's at this time.
CBP's enhanced Form I-94 land border process, however, is expected to
increase the efficiency of the entry process and reduce administrative
duties for CBP officers, ultimately resulting in shorter wait times for
travelers requiring a Form I-94.
Regulatory Amendments
Comment: One commenter requested that the Form I-94 printout from
the I-94 Web site be added to the list of evidence of registration for
purposes of Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) section 264(e).
Response: The list of acceptable registration documents for
purposes of INA 264(e) is found in 8 CFR 264.1(b). The Form I-94,
Arrival-Departure Record, is already included in the list of evidence
of registration in 8 CFR 264.1(b). The IFR added a new provision to the
regulations to define ``Form I-94'' and related terms. The new
definition makes clear that the Form I-94 now includes information
collected electronically, and also defines ``original Form I-94'' to
include the printout from the I-94 Web site. Due to the new definition
provided for the Form I-94, CBP believes it is clear that the printout
constitutes evidence of registration and no further change is needed.
Comment: One commenter requested that the definition of ``original
document'' in 8 CFR 274a.2(b)(1)(v) be amended to include a Form I-94
printout.
Response: CBP believes that the definition of ``original Form I-
94'' included in the IFR accomplishes the desired result, and,
therefore, it is not necessary to amend 8 CFR 274a.2(b)(1)(v). That
definition provides that the term `original Form I-94' includes, but is
not limited to, any printout or electronic transmission of information
from DHS systems containing the electronic record of admission or
arrival/departure. See 8 CFR 1.4(d). 8 CFR 274a.2 concerns the Form I-
9, which is a USCIS form. USCIS agrees that a printout of the Form I-94
from the Web site constitutes an ``original document'' under this
regulation.
Comment: One commenter, NAFSA, requested that paragraph (e) of
section 1.4 be amended to add ``or electronic transmission'' after the
word ``printout.'' The commenter states that the revision would clarify
that a traveler may present an electronic version of the Form I-94,
such as a PDF or image scan.
Response: CBP believes that such amendment is unnecessary and could
cause confusion as to what can be presented or submitted in various
situations. For example, at this time, a printout of the Form I-94 is
still necessary in a number of situations, including the completion of
the USCIS Form I-9. However, the current definition specifically states
that the terms in question ``are not limited to'' providing a printout,
and thus, could be applied more broadly as appropriate by stakeholders.
Although CBP is hopeful that the Form I-94 in electronic form will be
accepted in the future by all stakeholders to whom these regulations
apply and that a printout will not always be required, that is not the
case now.
Administrative Procedure Act
Comment: One commenter, Feld Entertainment, Inc., disagreed that
the rulemaking is procedural. The commenter states that because the
rule was promulgated without prior notice and comment, it violates the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The commenter was also concerned
that the comments received in response to the IFR would be disregarded.
Response: The IFR enabled CBP to transition to an automated process
whereby CBP creates a Form I-94 in an electronic format. CBP has not
changed the substantive regulations relating to the Form I-94, but only
the operational means by which CBP issues the form. Thus, the rule is a
procedural rule exempt from prior notice-and-comment requirements under
the APA. CBP already has adopted a number of the commenters'
operational suggestions, which are described in many of the responses
below. Many of the commenters' questions have been addressed on the
FAQs page of the I-94 Web site for easy reference.
Web Site and Printouts
Comment: One commenter noted that the Web site option is helpful
for those who lose or misplace their Forms I-94, or when the paper form
becomes so worn that it is no longer accepted by agencies.
Response: CBP appreciates this feedback, and agrees that the Web
site makes it easier for travelers to obtain copies of their Forms I-94
when necessary. Since the implementation of the Form I-94 automation,
CBP has expanded the Web site to provide additional benefits, including
allowing nonimmigrants to access their five-year travel history.
Comment: A few commenters requested that the Web site be updated to
reflect changes in status granted by USCIS. Commenters said that, if
this is done, nonimmigrants who have had a change of status will not
have to file a Form I-102 for a replacement Form I-94 if needed.
Response: CBP agrees that providing this information through the
Web site would be helpful and would reduce the number of Forms I-102
that would be filed. The Form I-102 is the USCIS form
[[Page 91650]]
nonimmigrants use to apply for a new or replacement Form I-94. Adding
information about changes of status granted by USCIS to the Web site is
not currently possible. However, CBP is looking into whether USCIS
information can be reliably added to the Web site in the future. Any
updates on this issue will be included in the FAQs page of the I-94 Web
site.
Comment: A few commenters, including AILA, disagreed with the
assumption in the economic analysis that B-1/B-2 visa holders would not
access the Web site. Commenters said that these visa holders,
especially those in the United States for at least six months, would
have reason to obtain their Form I-94 records or may wish to obtain a
record of their admission for future use.
Response: CBP agrees that some B-1/B-2 visa holders, including
those who are given a year to stay as a B-1/B-2 visa holder, may have a
need to access the I-94 Web site. Accordingly, CBP has revised the
assumption in the economic analysis. Based on Web site query history
since the interim rule went into effect, we now assume that one percent
of B-1/B-2 visa holders will access the I-94 Web site. In addition, CBP
agrees that some travelers may wish to obtain a record of their
admission for future use. CBP has made changes to the I-94 Web site to
allow travelers to access their most recent Form I-94 record as well as
a five-year travel history. This can now be accessed by travelers who
have already left the United States in addition to those present in the
United States.
Comment: Some commenters noted that CBP is assuming all travelers
will have access to a printer. The commenters stated that it is not as
easy as CBP assumes for a foreign national to access public libraries
soon after arrival in the United States. They would have to learn that
public libraries offer internet, that one can print from them, that
there is a library nearby, that public transportation is available, how
to navigate public transportation, and explain what library resources
are needed.
One commenter, the Intel Corporation, was concerned that employees
would not be able to access the Web site before they must start work in
the United States, which is problematic because the Form I-94 is
required to complete the Form I-9. The commenter stated that it has a
company policy to complete the Form I-9 during new employee
orientation, which requires the employee to have his or her Form I-94
in hand. The company does not allow new hires access to company
computers until after the new employee orientation, and due to data
privacy protection protocol, the company cannot allow employees to
access Personally Identifiable Information (PII) on a computer assigned
to someone else. The commenter suggests CBP provide a way for the
employer to access the new hire's Form I-94 number directly.
Several commenters suggested that CBP print a copy of the departure
portion for the traveler and include instructions on how to print more
copies, or alternatively, that CBP provide kiosks at the airports where
foreign nationals can inspect and print the Form I-94.
Response: CBP recognizes that access to the internet and printers
is a barrier to many travelers who need their electronic Form I-94,
including those who need to present their Form I-94 when completing the
Form I-9. For this reason employers, or third parties, may access Form
I-94 records when consent is obtained from the record holder. For more
information on third party consent visit: https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/I94/request.html.
In the regulatory assessment for the interim final rule, CBP
discussed the difficulties some foreign nationals face when they need
to access the I-94 Web site to print their electronic Form I-94. The
analysis estimated that approximately 1,028,876 travelers would need to
drive 20 miles and that it would take 60 minutes of a traveler's time
to access and print their electronic Form I-94. CBP estimated that this
cost aliens about $21 million in 2013. We have updated these estimates
for this final rule in the economic assessment. For more information,
see the below section entitled Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review) and Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review). CBP now estimates that it cost $17 million in
2014 (the first full year the rule is in effect). CBP acknowledges that
this represents a significant negative impact to these travelers and
strives to minimize this burden to the extent possible. To that end,
CBP continues to provide paper Forms I-94 upon request when the
individual arrives in the United States at the port's secondary
inspection station and at Deferred Inspection Sites (DISs) once the
traveler is in the United States.
CBP recognizes the potential usefulness of placing kiosks at ports
where foreign nationals could inspect and print their Forms I-94 and
has evaluated the merits of placing such kiosks at the busiest 20
airports and the busiest 20 seaports. Based on this analysis, for
travelers' benefits to exceed the kiosks costs, greater than one
percent of the subset of travelers who would otherwise need to travel
to access and print their electronic Form I-94 would instead need to
use a kiosk. Based on the few travelers who currently request paper
Forms I-94, CBP does not believe there are enough foreign nationals who
would take advantage of the kiosks to offset CBP's costs of installing
them. In addition, due to budget constraints, CBP does not have the
funds to acquire these kiosks at this time. See the Regulatory
Alternatives section of the economic assessment below for more
information.
Comment: One commenter had concerns about what a traveler would do
if he or she loses his or her passport and cannot access the necessary
information to retrieve the Form I-94 from the Web site.
Response: CBP believes that making the Form I-94 available on the
Web site will not put travelers who lose their passports in a worse
position than they were in prior to the automation of the Form I-94.
Paper Forms I-94 were typically stored or stapled into a traveler's
passport; thus, prior to automation, loss of a passport would have
required the traveler to obtain a new Form I-94 as well. With
automation, if the traveler loses his or her passport, but has the
passport information documented elsewhere, he or she will be able to
obtain the Form I-94 from the Web site. CBP has made various updates to
the I-94 Web site to address some of the comments. One of these updates
is that a traveler no longer needs to enter the date and class of
admission, which will make accessing the Form I-94 record easier for
travelers.
Comment: Many commenters encouraged CBP to make archival records of
Form I-94 records available indefinitely, as this will reduce the
administrative burden placed on CBP to respond to Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) requests.
Response: CBP has made changes to the I-94 Web site to allow
travelers to access their most recent Form I-94 record, even if the
traveler has already departed the United States. Although CBP is not
able to make the Form I-94 records available on the Web site
indefinitely, CBP has updated the Web site so that Form I-94 records
are available dating back five years. The Web site also now allows
travelers to request their five-year U.S. border crossing history.
Travelers frequently request their five-year travel history from DHS,
as this history is often required when they apply for certain benefits.
CBP agrees that providing this information through the Web site will
[[Page 91651]]
help reduce FOIA requests regarding travel history. More details about
the benefits CBP anticipates from this change can be found in the
economic assessment below, entitled ``Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review) and Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review).''
Comment: One commenter asked whether nonimmigrants who received
paper Forms I-94 would be able to get replacements from the Web site.
Response: The Web site now provides access to Forms I-94 issued up
to five years prior to the query date. Currently, nonimmigrants who
have received paper Forms I-94 since 2009 are able to access their Form
I-94 information via the Web site.
Comment: Several commenters were concerned that foreign nationals
may not be able to access their records on the Web site due to
typographical or biographical errors that occur during the creation of
the electronic Form I-94 record. In particular, a few commenters noted
that information is frequently entered incorrectly on visas, especially
incorrect name spellings. Information drawn from visas would then be
incorrect, and travelers would not be successful when querying their
Form I-94 record.
Response: Most of the biographical information CBP uses in creating
the electronic Form I-94 is drawn from the traveler's passport. The
only information drawn from the visa for the Form I-94 is the visa
classification and issuance date. The exact format of the name used in
the electronic Form I-94 is found in the Machine Readable Zone (MRZ) of
the passport, found at the bottom of the biographical page of the
passport. A traveler having trouble finding his or her Form I-94 record
should look at the way his or her name is formatted in the passport
MRZ. The MRZ shows the traveler's name immediately following the three
letter country code, as last/surname and given name separated by
chevrons (<<<<). A traveler should not include the country code when
querying his or her Form I-94 record. The MRZ does not use punctuation
such as hyphens or apostrophes. In some cases, a traveler's name might
be truncated in the MRZ; in such cases, the traveler should query the
truncated version of the name. CBP has included guidance on this issue
on the FAQs page of the I-94 Web site, along with an example passport
page for reference.
Comment: A few commenters requested that CBP ensure that the Web
site is accessible on a variety of platforms and browsers, including
mobile devices. Commenters also requested that both www.cbp.gov/I-94
and www.cbp.gov/I-94 [note the hyphen in I-94] direct users to the
proper Web site.
Response: Although CBP does not have the resources to conduct
testing on multiple platforms, CBP has not received any feedback
concerning a lack of functionality on any platform. Due to updates that
CBP has made to www.cbp.gov as a whole, the full address for the Form
I-94 retrieval Web site is now: https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/I-94/request.html. Both web addresses www.cbp.gov/I-94 and www.cbp.gov/I-94
direct users to a Web site with information about the Form I-94, and
includes a link to the Form I-94 retrieval page.
Comment: Several commenters, including AILA, ACIP, SHRM, and Feld
Entertainment, suggested adding an endorsement or other information on
the printout to help educate those stakeholders who are not accustomed
to seeing Form I-94 printouts from the Web site, and might be reluctant
to accept the printout. Some commenters also suggested including a
phone number or email address on the printout.
Response: CBP agrees that additional language on the printout would
help educate stakeholders, and has added language to the printout
indicating that the Form I-94 has now been automated for most
nonimmigrants. While CBP has decided not to add a phone number or email
to the printout, there is a link on the I-94 retrieval Web site that
directs users to the CBP help desk.
Comment: A few commenters stated that it was unclear how CBP would
prevent fraudulent printouts.
Response: CBP does not believe that the printout creates a greater
risk of fraud than the paper Forms I-94, which did not contain any
security features. CBP continues to encourage stakeholders to verify a
traveler's information through SAVE or E-Verify, when registered or
enrolled, respectively, in these services, and only as authorized.
The SAVE program is a USCIS service that helps federal, state, and
local benefit-issuing agencies, institutions, and licensing agencies
determine the immigration status of benefit applicants so only those
entitled to benefits receive them. More information on SAVE can be
found at: https://www.uscis.gov/save.
E-Verify is a web-based system that allows businesses to confirm
the eligibility of their employees to work in the United States. More
information on E-Verify can be found at: https://www.uscis.gov/e-verify.
Comment: A few commenters had privacy concerns related to the Web
site. One commenter was concerned that CBP will automatically collect
information on those persons attempting to access the Form I-94
information from the Web site. Another commenter was concerned that the
personal information available on the Web site could be accessed by
unauthorized parties, which put refugees or those seeking asylum in the
United States at risk.
Response: DHS/CBP has issued a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA),
which describes the I-94 Web site, and posted it online at: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/privacy/PIAs/pia-cbp-16-I-94-automation-20130227.pdf. DHS/CBP has also updated and reissued the
System of Records Notice (SORN) for the Nonimmigrant and Immigrant
Information System (NIIS) at 80 FR 13398, a system for maintaining the
arrival and departure records of nonimmigrants, and for APIS at 80 FR
13407. CBP is in the process of updating the PIA, which will discuss
how the I-94 Web site will retain information about attempts to access
the I-94 Web site (i.e. the search history) for only three months and
as part of the Web site's audit log. The search history, as part of the
audit log, is part of the Web site's infrastructure. The audit log is
only maintained in the Web site's infrastructure, and the search
history is retained for only three months, to reduce the risk of
improper use or disclosure of the search history. The benefits of
keeping an audit log of searches conducted on the I-94 Web site include
preventing improper and unauthorized use of the Web site, and holding
accountable anyone who uses the I-94 Web site improperly or without
authorization.
CBP believes that the benefits of having an audit log outweigh the
small and limited risks of improper use and disclosure of search
histories. The log of search histories allows CBP to conduct audits and
uncover when an unauthorized party is attempting to obtain information
from the I-94 Web site. For example, if a single access point conducts
multiple searches for different individuals, CBP will investigate
whether someone or something is conducting searches without the
travelers' consent. CBP has included a new security consent page to the
Form I-94 retrieval Web site that users must read and accept before
querying an Form I-94 record. The security page requires users to
affirm that they are authorized to obtain that traveler's history, and
to understand
[[Page 91652]]
that unauthorized or improper use could result in criminal and civil
penalties. With respect to information pertaining to persons whose
asylee status is prohibited from public disclosure pursuant to 8 CFR
208.6, CBP is taking the added precaution of requiring asylees to
manually submit verifiable identity information before they may access
their Form I-94 information. Asylees will continue to receive a paper
Form I-94. Refugees and certain parolees may access their Form I-94 via
the Web site.
Automatic Revalidation
Comment: Numerous commenters were concerned about how the
automation of the Form I-94 would affect automatic revalidation.\5\
Commenters noted that nonimmigrants seeking to use the automatic
revalidation provisions will have to demonstrate to carriers that they
are legally allowed to board the plane or vessel with an expired visa
and a passport stamp that reflects a change or extension of status.
Thus, commenters encourage CBP to require air and sea carriers to
provide instructions to their personnel regarding the documentation for
such persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Automatic revalidation allows certain persons to seek
readmission to the United States for the duration of an unexpired
period of a previous admission. Pursuant to 8 CFR 214.1 and 22 CFR
41.112, automatic revalidation allows readmittance of certain aliens
who have been out of the United States for thirty days or less in a
contiguous territory and who have an unexpired nonimmigrant visa.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, commenters suggested that CBP officers would need to
override a nonimmigrant's automated departure record when a
nonimmigrant seeks readmission under 22 CFR 41.112(d). Commenters also
recommended that CBP emphasize in training that CBP officers will be
expected to reactivate previously closed Form I-94 records for
automatic revalidation.
Commenters were concerned that admission errors are common in
automatic revalidation and that nonimmigrants without a paper Form I-94
may experience challenges during the inspection process. Commenters
additionally noted that for nonimmigrants to print Forms I-94 to retain
in the event they go to Canada or Mexico and wish to use the automatic
revalidation provisions upon return to the United States would be very
burdensome on those with limited internet and printing capabilities.
Response: The IFR expanded the definition of a Form I-94 to include
electronic means. It did not change the requirements for the issuance
and use of the Form I-94. Automatic revalidation requirements are
outlined in 8 CFR 214.1(b) and 22 CFR 41.112(d). Under the automatic
revalidation provisions, certain temporary visitors holding expired
nonimmigrant visas who seek to return to the United States may be
admitted at a U.S. port of entry by CBP if they meet certain
requirements including, but not limited to certain nonimmigrants with a
valid, unexpired admission stamp on the Form I-94 or an electronic Form
I-94. CBP maintains the electronic Form I-94 record in CBP systems and
will use the electronic format to revalidate a previous, unexpired
admission or extension of stay if all other revalidation requirements
are met.
CBP has provided guidance to CBP officers at POEs regarding
automatic revalidation. The primary processing system allows a CBP
officer to re-use an existing Form I-94 when automatic revalidation
requirements are met. CBP has also conducted outreach with the travel
industry about the new documentary requirements. CBP has updated the
Carrier Information Guide to assist carriers in recognizing acceptable
documents and to ensure that carriers are informed of the Form I-94
automation. The Carrier Information Guide now includes an example of
the electronic Form I-94 Web site printout and guidance to carriers on
automatic revalidation.
An air carrier or vessel may require evidence of an unexpired
admission by a traveler prior to embarkation. The Form I-94 Web site
printout is evidence of that admission and can be presented to a
carrier if requested. CBP has made changes to the I-94 Web site to
allow travelers to access their Form I-94 records after departure. This
allows travelers who have already departed the United States, but who
may need the printout for automatic revalidation purposes to obtain the
printout to present to a carrier.
CBP has included guidance on automatic revalidation in the FAQs on
the I-94 Web site.
Departure
Comment: Some commenters stated that it was unclear what procedures
were to be followed at the time of departure. Commenters were
particularly concerned about the procedures that should be followed in
the case of a nonimmigrant arriving by air or sea but departing by
land. The commenters were concerned that CBP's database would record
the arrival information, but would not record the departure, which
could create difficulties for nonimmigrants seeking to travel to the
United States in the future. Commenters wanted to know whether
nonimmigrants departing by land have any affirmative duties to ensure
that departures by land are recorded correctly.
Response: CBP has added information concerning departure by land to
the FAQs page of the I-94 Web site. CBP and the Canadian Border
Services Agency (CBSA) have partnered to create an entry/exit system
that exchanges entry information at land border ports of entry for
certain individuals. Information collected on entry to one country is
shared in order to electronically record as exit from the other. Thus,
entry into Canada from the United States now creates a departure record
for the United States.
CBP does not currently have a system for automatically recording
departures by land to Mexico. If a traveler departs the United States
by land to Mexico, the traveler may wish to retain evidence of
departure to Mexico. Evidence of departure can include, but is not
limited to, entry stamps in a passport, transportation tickets, pay
stubs and/or other receipts. A traveler can request an entry stamp from
the Instituto Nacional de Migraci[oacute]n (INM) when entering Mexico.
CBP is not, however, placing any affirmative duty on the travelers to
carry such evidence.
Travelers departing the United States by air or sea will have their
departures recorded automatically when the air or sea carrier sends CBP
departure manifests.
Comment: One commenter was concerned that airlines do not always
timely update their departure manifests when travelers cancel and
rebook flights. Where CBP relies on carrier data, CBP might document
inaccurate departure data, which could result in denial of benefits.
The traveler would have no means to seek redress.
Response: APIS reports whether a person is ``on board'' or ``not on
board'' in order to accurately reflect changes in reservations. CBP
relies on confirmed departure information, and has updated the I-94 Web
site to ensure that only confirmed departures are reflected. DHS is
able to independently verify departures through DHS law enforcement
databases, and overstay records are reviewed before any adverse action
is taken.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ According to confirmation studies conducted by CBP and
outside studies conducted by contractors and GAO, CBP estimates that
99% of APIS departure data is accurate. CBP also confirms departure
data independently by using information travelers send from outside
the U.S., visa information from the State Department, or subsequent
arrival data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 91653]]
The DHS TRIP program is an established means for a traveler to
inquire to seek resolution to any difficulties experienced during
travel into or departure from the United States. A traveler can submit
evidence of a timely departure in DHS TRIP. If a traveler believes that
CBP maintains incorrect departure information, the traveler can apply
for redress at https://www.dhs.gov/dhs-trip.
Visa Classification
Comment: A number of commenters requested clarification on how visa
classification data will populate an automated Form I-94 when a
nonimmigrant has more than one visa.
Response: CBP receives visa information from DOS. There may be
instances where a traveler has multiple eligible visa classifications.
In these cases, the CBP officer determines at the time of entry which
visa classification the traveler qualifies for and admits the traveler
under that class of admission. The electronic Form I-94 record will
reflect the class of admission chosen by the CBP officer at the time of
entry. This process is substantially the same as the process followed
during issuance of a paper Form I-94.
Comment: Commenters asked how nonimmigrants seeking to enter the
United States from Visa Waiver Program (VWP) countries would be handled
in view of the Form I-94 automation.
Response: Travelers entering the United States under the VWP used
to receive a Form I-94W, which is different than the Form I-94. The
Form I-94W was automated by the Electronic System for Traveler
Authorization (ESTA) in August 2010. VWP visitors no longer receive a
Form I-94W when arriving in the United States by air or sea, but rather
must apply for and receive an ESTA prior to travel to the United
States. For further information about ESTA, see 8 CFR 217.5 and
www.cbp.gov/esta/. Upon arrival in the United States, VWP visitors
receive an annotated stamp in their passports. This process is not
affected by the automation of the Form I-94.
Errors and CBP Officer Training
Comment: A few commenters were concerned that frequently there are
errors in admission records due to CBP officer error or misapplication
of periods of stay for the various nonimmigrant visa categories.
Commenters believe that more training is necessary for CBP officers on
visa categories, automatic revalidation, and creation of the automated
Form I-94.
Response: CBP officers are trained in all aspects of the inspection
process. CBP conducts ongoing training in the form of field guidance,
musters, on-the-job training, and online training modules. CBP has
provided field guidance and musters to CBP officers at the Ports of
Entry (POEs) regarding the Form I-94 automation process. CBP has issued
additional guidance to CBP officers to help the officers properly
create the electronic Form I-94. CBP continues to instruct officers to
verify information and make any needed corrections prior to creating
the electronic Form I-94.
Comment: Some commenters were concerned that the regulations do not
require CBP to stamp the passport, and state that CBP does not
currently stamp passports consistently. Thus, there is no way for some
travelers to review their admission information at the time of entry.
Response: It is CBP's policy to stamp the passport of visitors to
the United States, or provide them a receipt, as in the case of Global
Entry members.\7\ CBP has provided extensive guidance and training to
CBP officers at POEs regarding the documentation of a lawful admission
into the United States with a CBP admission stamp. CBP will continue to
provide guidance and training to CBP officers at the POEs to ensure
that officers are stamping passports consistently. CBP notes, however,
that a traveler will be able to find his or her admission record on the
I-94 retrieval Web site regardless of whether the passport contains an
admission stamp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Nonimmigrant Global Entry members receive a printed Form I-
94 from the Global Entry kiosk, and can also retrieve the Form I-94
from the I-94 Web site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment: Some commenters noted that variations on naming
conventions and other data occur in travel documents and records. These
commenters stated that there are often variations due to inconsistent
rules for transliterating non-Latin alphabets, and inconsistent rules
for non-standard characters or naming conventions. The systems must be
configured so that travelers are not harmed by variations in names and
systems. Commenters prefer that CBP use information from the
biographical page of the passport rather than information from the
visa, as the visa name is often incorrect. The commenters indicated
that DOS naming conventions are often not compatible with the
conventions of other agencies. In particular, the First Name Unknown
(FNU) or Last Name Unknown (LNU) designations create problems for
nonimmigrants when the U.S. visa is used as the primary source for an
official name.
Response: CBP has met with USCIS, DOS, and representatives from
ICE's Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) to discuss naming
conventions and to attempt to resolve inconsistencies. Currently, CBP
creates the Form I-94 admission record using the name found in the MRZ
of the passport, not the visa. APIS and CBP use standard International
Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) naming conventions. CBP will use FNU
or LNU only when a traveler does not have both a given and surname.
Comment: A few commenters suggested that CBP establish additional
resources to help address questions and correct errors. Specific
suggestions included creating an ombudsman for the electronic Form I-
94, creating a Web site with guidance, and establishing dedicated help
lines and email addresses for use by travelers, employers, and other
government agencies. Commenters were concerned that there was not a
mechanism established for correcting errors in the electronic records
and no access to the Web site at the time of entry into the United
States.
Response: Although CBP does not have the resources to create a
dedicated helpline or ombudsman, CBP has included additional guidance
on the I-94 Web site under the FAQs tab. Travelers can check the
passport admission stamp obtained at the time of entry into the United
States to verify the correct date and class of admission, and ask the
CBP officer to make corrections if needed.
CBP will correct any errors in Form I-94 records that originated
with CBP at CBP's Deferred Inspection Sites (DISs). DISs, located at
most major airports, will provide assistance to travelers requiring
Form I-94 corrections or modifications. In many cases, corrections can
be completed through a telephone call to a DIS. However, in some cases,
the traveler may be required to appear in person in order to verify
identity or to provide additional documentation to CBP. CBP has
provided guidance and training to the CBP officers at the DISs about
Form I-94 corrections. A list of all DISs can be found at https://www.cbp.gov/document/forms/deferred-inspection-sites.
Travelers may also visit the CBP INFO Center at https://help.cbp.gov for assistance. The INFO Center has staff dedicated to
responding to Form I-94 issues. CBP has included a link to the CBP INFO
Center on the Form I-94 retrieval Web site.
[[Page 91654]]
Coordination With Other Agencies
Comment: Some commenters complained of disparate guidance from
various government agencies concerning the automated Form I-94. For
example, some commenters stated that the SSA published guidance
indicating that either an unexpired admission stamp or a printout from
the Form I-94 Web site will be accepted as proof of nonimmigrant
status. USCIS, however, has published guidance on its Web site stating
that USCIS and state DMVs will require a printout of the Form I-94.
Further, one commenter noted that at least one DMV office still
required a stamp on the Form I-94 and had not heard of the change to
the automated Form I-94.
Response: CBP has conducted extensive outreach to other agencies
and to DMVs regarding the automation of the Form I-94. The requirements
of various federal and state agencies may differ for practical or legal
reasons, resulting in some agencies being able to accept the admission
stamp while others may still require a printout of the Form I-94. Per
commenters' suggestions, CBP has added the following language on the
Form I-94 printout to aid in educating stakeholders not familiar with
the electronic Form I-94:
Effective April 26, 2013, DHS began automating the admission
process. An alien lawfully admitted or paroled into the United
States is no longer required to be in possession of a preprinted
Form I-94. A record of admission printed from the CBP Web site
constitutes a lawful record of admission. See 8 CFR 1.4(d).
Comment: Some commenters had particular concerns about completing
USCIS's Form I-9, as that form requests the Form I-94 number.
Commenters suggested that either the period of admission or the
passport number and country of issuance serve as the required data
fields on the Form I-9. Otherwise, workers without internet access will
have trouble completing the Form I-9.
Response: USCIS, the owner of the Form I-9 (Employment Eligibility
Verification), is reviewing its forms and applicable regulations and
policies, but at this time, it is not able to change the required
information on Section 1 of the Form I-9. For completion of Section 2
of Form I-9, employees who are aliens authorized for employment with a
specific employer incident to their nonimmigrant status may choose to
present their foreign passport together with Form I-94 in paper format
(which includes a printout from the Web site); admission stamps are not
acceptable for Form I-9 purposes. Refugees and asylees may also choose
to present Forms I-94 for completion of Section 2 and Section 3 of the
Form I-9, although they also have the option to present other documents
instead. Refugees may choose to present a Form I-94 printout or a paper
Form I-94 with a refugee stamp as an acceptable receipt for Form I-9
purposes that does not need to be paired with any other document.
Asylees who wish to show a Form I-94 may present their paper Form I-94
as a List C document in combination with a valid List B document.
Comment: A few commenters, including AILA and the Intel
Corporation, were concerned that inconsistent rules regarding when a
Form I-94 printout is acceptable will materially affect foreign
nationals' access to employment and benefits, such as Social Security
cards, driver's licenses and extensions or changes of nonimmigrant
status. Commenters also said that inconsistent rules could adversely
affect U.S. businesses; for example, if DHS continues to require
printouts bearing an admission number, employers could be fined by DHS
for failure to record this number on the Form I-9. A delay or grace
period in any enforcement actions related to the I-9 regarding the
entry of admission numbers is encouraged.
Response: The requirements to record document numbers on Section 2
of the Form I-9 have not changed. DHS regulations require employers to
record the necessary information from documents the employee presents
to complete Form I-9 within three days from the date of hire. Section 1
of Form I-9 requires employees who attest to being aliens authorized to
work in the United States to record either their alien number (or USCIS
number) or Form I-94 admission number. Section 1 of Form I-9 must be
completed by the employee at the time of hire (i.e., first day of work
for pay). The Form I-94 number can be found on the Form I-94 printout;
there is no requirement that the number must come from the Form I-94
itself. The timing requirements for Form I-9 completion are regulatory.
DHS may provide more flexibility in the timing requirements in a future
rulemaking.
Employees are still required to present documents of their choice
from the Lists of Acceptable Documents specified in the Form I-9 to
show identity and employment authorization on Form I-9. To satisfy 8
CFR 274a.2, original documents must be presented to employers, which
employers must examine to make a determination regarding whether the
documents appear to be genuine and to reasonably relate to the person
presenting them. According to USCIS, which issues the Form I-9, if an
employee chooses to present a Form I-94 along with their foreign
passport to show identity and employment authorization in Section 2 of
the Form I-9, he or she will need to present to his or her employer a
Form I-94 in paper format, which includes a Form I-94 printed out from
the CBP Web site. If an employee provides the Form I-94 he or she
obtained from the CBP Web site with his or her foreign passport as a
List A document, the employer should accept these documents if they
appear to be genuine and reasonably relate to the person presenting
them. Form I-9 rules permit employees to present certain receipts in
lieu of the original document(s): 1. A receipt for a replacement of a
lost, stolen, or damaged document; 2. the arrival portion of the Form
I-94 or Form I-94A containing a Temporary I-551 stamp and photograph;
and 3. the departure portion of Form I-94 or I-94A with an unexpired
refugee admission stamp. 8 CFR 274a.2(b). USCIS has determined that a
Form I-94 printed out from the CBP Web site by a refugee is acceptable
for Form I-9 purposes without an unexpired refugee admission stamp as
long as the printout provides the class of admission as ``RE'' and
duration of admission as ``D/S [duration of status].''
In the benefits-granting context, DHS will continue its outreach to
other federal, State, and local agencies to indicate that when a Form
I-94 is required as proof of valid admission to the United States, a
Form I-94 in either paper or print-out format is acceptable.
Comment: Commenters encouraged CBP to continue education outreach
to agencies, employers, and other stakeholders that might remain
unaware of the change to electronic Forms I-94. Commenters specifically
urged education to improve access to and use of DHS verification tools,
such as SAVE and E-Verify.
Response: CBP has conducted extensive outreach to local, state, and
federal agencies, scholarly organizations, and other non-governmental
entities both before and after automation. CBP involved all DHS
components, DOS, SSA, and the Department of Commerce in the automation
process through working groups. CBP in conjunction with USCIS provided
guidance and support to all major DMVs that participate in the SAVE
program. CBP coordinated with NAFSA and other student organizations to
inform academic institutions. CBP has met with the U.S. Chamber of
Commerce, the travel and tourism
[[Page 91655]]
industry, refugee and asylum groups, local law enforcement
representatives, and other interested organizations during planning and
development of the electronic Form I-94.
Employers seeking employment eligibility verification can do so
through the E-Verify program offered by USCIS. Government agencies have
access to status verification or other inquiries through a variety of
sources, including law enforcement channels and the SAVE program
offered by USCIS.
SEVIS
Comment: One commenter, NAFSA, suggested that CBP should include
the SEVIS number in the electronic Form I-94 record for nonimmigrants
who are monitored through SEVIS. The commenter stated that this would
further DHS's fulfillment of its responsibility to notify educational
institutions and exchange program sponsors that the student has been
properly admitted into the United States. The commenter noted that CBP
officers often write the SEVIS number on the paper Form I-94 of F and M
students and J exchange visitors, and that this notation is used by
Designated School Officials and Responsible Officers to ensure that the
POE information is associated with the correct SEVIS record.
Another commenter asked how the admission record will be tied to
the proper SEVIS number, if a student has more than one SEVIS record.
The commenter stated that this is of particular concern because CBP is
no longer stamping the Form I-20 or DS-2019 upon entry in the United
States, and there is no way that the student can make sure the correct
SEVIS I-20 is getting mapped to the admission number.
Response: The Student and Exchange Visitor Information System
(SEVIS) is utilized to track and monitor schools, exchange visitor
programs, and F, M and J nonimmigrants while they visit the United
States and participate in the U.S. education system. The SEVIS number
is the number generated when a Form I-20 or Form DS-2019 is issued to
an individual to participate in a specific educational or cultural
exchange program at a specific institution. CBP currently verifies
SEVIS numbers prior to admission into the United States. CBP now
requires officers to document SEVIS numbers, if applicable, in the
electronic Form I-94 record, but these numbers are not accessible to
the public or academic institution. The SEVIS number is not currently
documented on the Form I-94 Web site or printout, as it is not a data
element required or collected on the paper version of the Form I-94.
CBP will explore the feasibility of including the SEVIS number on the
Web site and printout. CBP has provided guidance to the field to
include the SEVIS number on the foreign travel document with the CBP
admission stamp when practical.
CBP has updated its systems to help ensure that the correct SEVIS
record is mapped to the proper arrival/departure record. The SEVIS
information is stored in CBP systems, and the Arrival and Departure
Information System (ADIS) feeds information to SEVP for each student.
CBP is continuing to work to enhance its systems to do a real-time
query of the SEVIS number to prevent admission on an invalid SEVIS
number.
Comment: One commenter requested that CBP establish a mechanism for
Designated School Officials to request a review when there is a problem
with a SEVIS record.
Response: If there is a problem with the SEVIS record, the
Designated School Official should contact SEVP, which oversees SEVIS.
SEVP would then work with CBP if SEVP determines that the problem
relates to the electronic Form I-94 or is otherwise CBP-related. More
information about SEVIS can be found on the SEVIS Web site:
www.ice.gov/sevis/.
Additional Comments
Comment: A few commenters requested that CBP include additional
information on the tear sheet that is handed out to travelers at the
POEs to include the purposes of the Form I-94 and a help line phone
number or email address. Commenters stated that not all foreign
nationals understand the importance of the Form I-94 or how soon they
might need to print one.
Response: CBP designed the tear sheet to fit into the traveler's
passport and inform travelers, in 12 languages, how to access their
Form I-94 records. Due to the size of the tear sheet and the
desirability of including any information in multiple languages, CBP is
not able to add additional information. Additionally, as the traveling
public becomes more familiar with the Form I-94 automation, CBP plans
to phase out distribution of the tear sheets.
Comment: One commenter asked when all nonimmigrants arriving in the
United States by air or sea will be processed electronically.
Response: CBP rolled out the Form I-94 automation over the weeks
following the effective date of the IFR, April 26, 2013. The Form I-94
automation for air and sea passengers is now complete.
Comment: One commenter asked if the 11 digit admission number from
the Form I-94 will continue to be used in the electronic Form I-94
format and whether it will be provided to the traveler at the time of
admission.
Response: The 11 digit number has not changed and will continue to
be issued electronically to travelers. Travelers can use the I-94 Web
site to find their Form I-94 number.
Comment: One commenter was concerned about travelers having notice
of the option to request a paper Form I-94 from CBP. The commenter
stated that requesting a paper form is not in the regulations and it is
not clear if the traveler should make the request on the plane or at
the POE.
Response: Travelers may request the paper form at the POE from the
CBP officer. CBP has updated information on the Web site, www.cbp.gov/I94, to indicate that a paper form may be requested at the time of
inspection. If someone requests a paper form, the person will be given
the card stock form, properly annotated, with their electronic Form I-
94 number written on the card. Due to the extra time this process
takes, issuance of a paper Form I-94 will be completed in the secondary
inspection area. Conclusion
Based on the analysis of the comments received, DHS is adopting the
interim regulations as a final rule. In response to the comments, CBP
has made some operational changes regarding the issuance of the Form I-
94 that are described below.
Operational Changes to the Form I-94 Process
In response to some public comments received, and after studying
usage and common problems of the I-94 Web site, CBP has made some
changes to the I-94 Web site since the initial rollout of the Form I-94
automation, including the addition of new features. These changes and
new features are summarized below. As described in several of the
comment responses, CBP believes these changes make the Web site a
better resource for the public and address user concerns.
First, the Web site now allows a traveler to retrieve his or her
most recent Form I-94 even if he or she has departed the United States.
A traveler may retrieve a Form I-94 issued up to five years prior to
the request date.
Second, a traveler may now retrieve his or her five-year United
States border crossing history from the Web site. The border crossing
history information is drawn from Form I-94 records. If a traveler has
entered and departed the United States with more than one travel
[[Page 91656]]
document during the five years, for example an old and new passport, he
or she will need to query each document to retrieve the complete five-
year history. CBP expects that this update to the Web site will provide
a convenient alternative to the filing of a FOIA request when a
traveler needs his or her five-year border crossing history when
applying for certain benefits.
Third, the date and class of admission are no longer required to
retrieve a Form I-94, as these data points were commonly problematic
for travelers attempting to retrieve their Form I-94. This change also
allows travelers to input the same information to retrieve both the
Form I-94 and the travel history.
Additional operational changes include a new security consent page
that addresses both privacy and security issues, an endorsement added
to the Form I-94 printout indicating that the Form I-94 has been
automated, and updates to the FAQs page of the I-94 Web site to reflect
these changes and to address additional common questions.
Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
Executive Order 13563 and Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning
and Review) and (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review)
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule is an ``economically significant regulatory
action'' under section 3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the Office of Management and Budget has reviewed this regulation.
1. Purpose of the Rule
This rule amends the definition of the Form I-94, Arrival/Departure
Record, to include an electronic format. This revision enables DHS to
transition to an automated process for air and sea ports of entry
whereby DHS creates a Form I-94 in an electronic format based on
passenger, passport, and visa information DHS obtains electronically
from air and sea carriers and the Department of State as well as
through the inspection process. This rule also is consistent with CBP's
transition to accepting I-94 submissions online for use at the land
border.
This rule results in substantial cost savings (benefits) for
travelers, carriers, and CBP. CBP estimates the total net benefits to
both domestic and foreign entities in 2013 ranged from $57.9 million to
$82.7 million.\8\ Separately, CBP estimates a net benefit in 2013 of
between $41.1 million and $65.9 million for foreign travelers, $1.3
million for carriers, and $15.5 million for CBP. Net benefits to U.S.
entities (carriers and CBP) in 2013 totaled $16.8 million. In the
following regulatory assessment, we present the costs and benefits to
CBP, carriers, and travelers from Form I-94 automation using a six-year
period of analysis beginning in year 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ OMB Circular A-4 states regulatory analyses should focus on
benefits and costs that accrue to citizens and residents of the
United States (https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/regulatory_matters_pdf/a-4.pdf; see ``Scope of Analysis''
section on page 15). In order to make this distinction clear, CBP
has shown the costs and benefits to foreign travelers as well as
impacts to U.S. entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Baseline Condition and Affected Parties
a. Automation at the Air and Sea Ports of Entry
Prior to the implementation of the interim final rule CBP published
on March 27, 2013 in the Federal Register (78 FR 18457), CBP required
any alien traveling to the United States, other than under the Visa
Waiver Program, to complete a paper Form I-94 prior to arrival. When
arriving by air and sea, the carrier provided the form to the alien
while en route to the United States. The alien typically completed the
form while en route to the United States, spending approximately 8
minutes filling out the form.\9\ Upon arrival at the U.S. airport or
seaport, the alien presented the completed Form I-94 to the CBP officer
for inspection. If permitted to enter the United States, the officer
tore the form at the perforation, stamped the lower portion, and
returned it to the alien. The officer sent the top portion of the form
to a centralized facility where all Forms I-94 were entered into CBP's
data systems. Generally, the alien later returned the lower portion of
the Form I-94 to the carrier upon departure from the United States, who
in turn returned it to CBP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See 78 FR 70570 (November 26, 2013) for the latest burden
estimate for the Form I-94's information collection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to acting as an arrival and departure record, the Form
I-94 also serves as evidence of admission or parole into the United
States for nonimmigrants. Some third parties, such as universities or
local or state government benefit-granting agencies, may require an
alien to present evidence of admission or parole to the United States.
Prior to the interim final rule, in these cases, the alien could
present the bottom portion of the Form I-94, which was returned to them
when they were admitted, paroled, or adjusted to an immigration status.
Aliens could also choose to present Form I-94 to establish employment
eligibility and identity or eligibility for certain public benefits.
If an alien loses the bottom portion of the Form I-94, he or she
may file Form I-102, Application for Replacement/Initial Nonimmigrant
Arrival-Departure Document, with USCIS to request a replacement. The
form has a Paperwork Reduction Act burden of 25 minutes per form and a
fee of $330. According to the USCIS, prior to the implementation of
this rule, 17,700 Forms I-102 were filed each year. At the time the
interim final rule was published, USCIS estimated that the rule would
result in a decrease in the number of Forms I-102 filed to 8,804 in
2013 and 5,771 in later years.\10\ Following the implementation of the
rule in April 2013, the total number of Forms I-102 filed in 2013 was
13,715. USCIS now expects 6,782 Forms I-102 to be filed each year.\11\
This is a reduction of 10,918 each year due to this rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Communication with USCIS on February 8, 2013.
\11\ Supporting Statement for Form I-102. Available at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewDocument?ref_nbr=201402-1615-001.
Accessed September 28, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the Office of Immigration Statistics (OIS),\12\ about
53.9 million aliens entered the United States using a Form I-94 or
equivalent (i.e. using a Form I-94W or obtaining an electronic travel
authorization when entering under the Visa Waiver Program) in 2012. Of
these, about 20.3 million entered under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP).
These aliens do not use a Form I-94 and are therefore unaffected by
this rule,\13\ so we exclude them from this analysis. Additionally, OIS
figures include all modes of transportation. I-94 automation affects
only aliens
[[Page 91657]]
arriving by air and sea, so we must exclude those arriving by land. We
therefore subtract the number of aliens entering the U.S. at land
border ports using a Form I-94 in 2012. According to CBP's Office of
Field Operations, about 15.4 million aliens arriving from Mexico and
1.2 million arriving from Canada entered the United States at the land
border using a Form I-94 in 2012. We subtract these from the admission
total, leaving 16,952,996 non-VWP aliens who arrived in the U.S. by air
or sea using a Form I-94 in 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 2012 Yearbook of Immigration Statistics. Table 28. https://www.dhs.gov/yearbook-immigration-statistics. Accessed October 26,
2016.
\13\ In addition to automating the Form I-94, this final rule
adds a valid, unexpired nonimmigrant DHS admission or parole stamp
to the list of documents that constitute evidence of registration.
Thus, such a stamp can serve as evidence of registration for Visa
Waiver Program travelers and for travelers arriving by land who
would otherwise be required to comply with any registration
requirement under the INA. However, the addition of the passport
stamp to the list of documents that constitute evidence of
registration does not have an economic impact on travelers.
Therefore, this analysis focuses on the changes to the Form I-94.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We next estimate the number of Form I-94 travelers to the United
States in the rest of the period of analysis.\14\ For 2013 and 2014, we
again use actual data from the Office of Immigration statistics. For
2015 through 2017, we use the traveler projections developed by the
Office of Travel and Tourism Industries (OTTI) within the U.S.
Department of Commerce.\15\ The OTTI forecasts travel growth through
2020 for the 20 countries with the highest 2014 travel volume. Since
the vast majority of travelers from most countries arrive in the United
States by air and sea, we assume that OTTI's travel growth rates best
reflect air and sea travel growth. For Mexico and Canada, we subtract
the number of Form I-94 travelers arriving by land in 2012 before
applying the OTTI growth rates.\16\ We apply the OTTI projected growth
rates to the number of Forms I-94 by country we obtained from OIS. For
countries not separately forecasted by OTTI, we use OTTI's average
growth rate for overseas travel for each year to determine overseas
travel from these countries. We present the total number of projected
Forms I-94 for each year from 2012-2017 absent the rule in Exhibit 1
below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 2013 and 2014 Yearbook of Immigration Statistics. Table 28.
https://www.dhs.gov/yearbook-immigration-statistics. Accessed
October 26, 2016.
\15\ U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Travel and Tourism
Industries ``Forecast of International Travelers to the United
States by Top Origin Countries.'' October 2015. Available at https://travel.trade.gov/view/f-2000-99-001/forecast/Forecast-COUNTRIES.pdf.
\16\ For the purposes of these projections, we assume that
aliens arriving from Mexico and Canada at land borders are Mexican
and Canadian citizens. There are a small number of citizens of other
countries who enter the U.S. at land borders. Because the number for
each country is small, the effect on the projections is minimal.
Exhibit 1--Projected Form I-94 Respondents Traveling by Air and Sea
[*denotes projection]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012.................................................... 16,952,996
2013.................................................... 16,832,602
2014.................................................... 20,680,611
2015.................................................... 21,700,329
2016.................................................... 22,628,579
2017.................................................... 23,871,524
------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Electronic Implementation at the Land Border
This rule affects the process of obtaining a Form I-94 for
travelers arriving by air and sea and is consistent with CBP's
transition to accepting I-94 submissions online for use at the land
border. In addition to the automation at air and sea ports of entry,
CBP modified the process by which a traveler arriving at the land
border can provide Form I-94 information and pay the related fee by
adding an electronic option. The enhanced I-94 Web site launched on
September 29, 2016.
Due to the differences in documentary requirements for land border
entries, the Form I-94 issuance process varies slightly at a land
border port of entry than at an air or sea port of entry. Currently
when a traveler requiring a Form I-94 arrives at the land border, he/
she goes to secondary inspection where he/she provides the I-94
information to a CBP officer who inputs the data into a computer. The
process takes approximately 8 minutes in addition to the time of the
actual inspection. After determining the traveler's admissibility, the
CBP officer then prints a Form I-94 for the traveler and refers him/her
to the cashier to pay the associated $6 fee.\17\ It takes approximately
20 minutes to wait in line to pay the fee and approximately 2 minutes
to pay the fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The amount of fee for the issuance of the Form I-94 at a
land border port of entry is provided for in 8 CFR
103.7(b)(1)(ii)(D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Costs
We next estimate the costs and benefits of this rule for all
affected parties. For the interim final rule, we assumed that the rule
would go into effect on January 1, 2013. The rule actually went into
effect on April 22, 2013. Because certain key data on arrivals by class
of admission is only available publicly on an annual basis, we
incorporate some prorated arrivals estimates into this analysis. For
the purpose of this analysis, we assume that the rule went into effect
on May 1, 2013 and we prorate the 2013 estimates to reflect that the
rule was in effect for 8 months of the year. To the extent that travel
among various classes of admission is not consistent throughout the
year, the 2013 estimates may be overstated or understated.
The costs of this rule are borne by both CBP and aliens traveling
to the United States.
a. Costs to CBP of Automation at the Air and Sea Ports of Entry
This rule allows for the automation of the paper Form I-94 in the
air and sea environments.\18\ Almost all of the traveler information
collected on the Form I-94 prior to the implementation of this rule was
redundant in the air and sea environments because CBP already obtained
the same information electronically from other sources. In advance of
the implementation of this rule, CBP linked its data systems to use the
information from these alternate sources to create an electronic Form
I-94 during the admission process. CBP creates the electronic Form I-94
by pulling information from the traveler's Advance Passenger
Information System (APIS) record and any Consular Consolidated Database
(CCD) record and then by entering any additional data obtained during
the inspection process. This electronic process allows stakeholders
that have access to CBP's databases to continue to have access to
traveler information electronically. CBP's Office of Information
Technology estimates the cost to link data systems and to fully
automate the Form I-94 was about $1 million in calendar year 2012. In
addition, it estimates the cost to develop the secure Web site was
about $321,000 in 2012. CBP anticipates spending $92,000 per year in
operations and maintenance costs for these systems. In total, CBP
incurred costs of $1,321,000 in 2012 and will incur costs of $92,000 in
following years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ A small number of paper Forms I-94 are still being used for
certain aliens such as aslyees, certain parolees, and those who
request a paper Form I-94.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Costs of Electronic Implementation at the Land Border
CBP's Office of Information Technology estimates that it cost
approximately $540,000 in 2016 to develop the Web site and create the
online payment capabilities. CBP will not bear any additional costs to
process travelers as a result of this process.
Travelers will not face new costs or time burdens under the new
optional process at the land border. Under this process, travelers will
have the option to use a new CBP Web site to answer the Form I-94
questions and to pay the $6 fee in advance of travel. As the Form I-94
questions are not changing, the time burden to submit the information
is not changing. Similarly, we estimate that it will take the traveler
2 minutes to pay the fee online, which is the same as the
[[Page 91658]]
time it takes if the traveler pays at the border, and the fee itself is
not changing.
c. Costs Borne by Travelers to the United States From Automation at Air
and Sea Ports of Entry
Although most travelers do not use the Form I-94 for any reason
once they are admitted or paroled to the United States, some aliens do
make use of the form to demonstrate lawful admission or parole to the
United States to the Social Security Administration, universities,
state agencies such as Departments of Motor Vehicles, public assistance
agencies and organizations, or some other party.
Aliens may also choose to present a Form I-94 to establish
employment eligibility and identity, or eligibility for certain public
benefits. To accommodate this need for the Form I-94, CBP has made an
electronic Form I-94 available to aliens on the secure I-94 Web site.
Travelers receive written information on how to access the Web site
upon their arrival to the United States. Aliens may log into the Web
site using 5 pieces of basic identifying information that is either
known to the traveler (e.g. their first name, last/surname, and date of
birth) or readily available on their passport (e.g. passport number,
country of issuance). CBP estimates that it takes the traveler 4
minutes to log into the Web site using identifying information and to
print the electronic form. This is less time than the paper Form I-94's
8 minute time burden for entering 17 data elements. This 4 minute
estimate does not include the time it takes to travel to a location
with computer and internet access; that cost is treated separately
later in this section.
In addition, CBP makes the paper Form I-94 available to certain
classes of aliens and upon request at the secondary inspection station
at ports of entry and at CBP Deferred Inspection Sites (DIS), which are
located at most ports of entry and are largely open during regular
business hours. Since the interim final rule went into effect, very few
travelers have requested the paper form.
To estimate the costs to travelers to access their Form I-94
electronically, we must first determine the number of aliens who access
the Web site, the number who do not have ready access to the internet,
the distance they have to travel to access the internet, and the
average wage rate for all aliens entering the United States by air or
sea. First, we assess the number of aliens who access the Web site.
Exhibit 2 shows the number of travelers who entered the United States
by air or sea in 2012 sorted by various categories of admission.\19\
The majority of Form I-94 visitors to the United States--about 76
percent--are tourists and business travelers entering on B-1/B-2 visas.
In most cases, these travelers do not have a need for their Form I-94
now that the passport stamp serves as evidence of alien registration.
While in the U.S., these B-1/B-2 visa travelers may use their foreign
driver's license, so there is generally no need for them to apply for a
U.S. driver's license. They are ineligible for employment or enrollment
in a university while traveling on a B-1/B-2 visa. They are generally
not eligible for public benefits without a change in status. For these
reasons, for the analysis for the interim final rule, we assumed that
no B-1/B-2 visa holders would need to access the Web site to obtain
their electronic Form I-94. However, public comments stated that some
B-1/B-2 travelers do in fact need their Form I-94. According to the Web
site's query history, approximately 1 percent of B-1/B-2 travelers
access the Web site.\20\ Therefore, for this analysis, we assume that 1
percent of these travelers will continue to access the Web site in the
future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ CBP analysis of data from 2012 Yearbook of Immigration
Statistics. Table 28. https://www.dhs.gov/files/statistics/publications/yearbook.shtm. Accessed June 4, 2014.
\20\ Communication with CBP's Office of Field Operations on June
10, 2014.
Exhibit 2--2012 Air and Sea Form I-94 Respondents by Class of Admission
*
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number Percentage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tourists and Business Travelers (B-1/B- 12,938,329 76.3
2).....................................
Temporary workers....................... 1,631,683 9.6
Students................................ 1,594,816 9.4
Other/Unknown........................... 461,935 2.7
Diplomats............................... 326,233 1.9
-------------------------------
Total............................... 16,952,996 ..............
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
Because so many parties at various levels of government and outside
of the government use the Form I-94, prior to the implementation of the
interim final rule CBP could not estimate the number of non-B-1/B-2
travelers that would access the Web site. For the analysis of the
interim final rule, we assumed that all travelers, other than B-1/B-2
travelers, who previously received a paper Form I-94 would log into the
Web site to print off their electronic Form I-94. According to the Web
site's query history since the implementation of the interim final
rule, approximately 75 percent of non-B-1/B-2 travelers access the Web
site. Exhibit 3 shows the number of travelers we estimate will access
their electronic Form I-94 via the CBP Web site during the period of
analysis. We note that those with a need for a Form I-94 who face
obstacles to accessing their Form I-94 electronically may request a
paper Form I-94 at the secondary inspection station upon their arrival
at the port or at a DIS during their stay in the United States.
However, according to CBP subject matter experts, very few aliens have
requested paper Forms I-94 at the ports of entry and those who have
requested them at DIS have done so primarily to correct erroneous
information on their electronic Form I-94.
Exhibit 3--Estimated Travelers Needing to Access Electronic Form I-94
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B-1/B-2 Other * Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012............................................................ 0 0 0
[[Page 91659]]
2013 **......................................................... 85,622 1,994,663 2,080,285
2014............................................................ 157,793 3,675,979 3,833,772
2015............................................................ 165,574 3,857,233 4,022,807
2016............................................................ 172,656 4,022,230 4,194,886
2017............................................................ 182,140 4,243,163 4,425,303
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Other includes temporary workers, students, diplomats, and others/unknowns.
** 2013 travelers are estimated based on the rule being in effect for two thirds (8 months) of the year.
We next estimate the number of aliens who do not have ready access
to the internet while in the United States and would need to travel to
access their electronic Form I-94. We assume that students and
diplomats have ready access to the internet at their schools or places
of business respectively. The 1 percent of B-1/B-2 travelers who access
their electronic Form I-94 typically need it when staying in the United
States for over 6 months. These people likely have other uses for the
internet during their stay and could access their electronic Form I-94
when using the internet for another purpose. Therefore, we assume they
do not need to travel to access their electronic Form I-94. Also, as
noted above, CBP will continue to make the paper Form I-94 available
upon request at the secondary inspection station at ports of entry or
at DIS to those with a need for a Form I-94 and who face obstacles to
accessing their electronic Form I-94.
Temporary workers come to the United States for varying lengths of
time to fill positions where there is a shortage of labor in the United
States. These positions can be in very highly technical occupations,
such as computer programming, but they can also be in less technical
occupations such as agricultural labor.
Because this category of admission includes such a wide range of
workers, we cannot say with certainty that all temporary workers have
ready access to the internet while in the United States. Similarly, we
do not know how accessible the internet is for those in the ``Other/
Unknown'' category. The aliens least likely to have internet access are
those working as temporary agricultural laborers.
According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA),
approximately 67 percent of farms have internet access.\21\ The primary
use for the electronic Form I-94 for these temporary workers is to
demonstrate employment eligibility to their employers. Generally, this
document will be the only acceptable evidence of employment
authorization that such workers will have to satisfy the Employment
Eligibility Verification (Form I-9) requirements. Because of the Form
I-9 requirements, many employers do not allow their employees to begin
working for pay until the workers have presented them with the print-
out of their electronic Form I-94. The employers have spent a
considerable amount of money bringing these foreign workers to the
United States to work. By offering internet access to employees,
employees and employers can complete the employment eligibility
verification process timely, which allows the employee to begin working
sooner. Because this incremental use of the internet is virtually
costless to the employer and the employer would benefit from their
employee's prompt access to their electronic Form I-94, we assume that
employers with internet access allow their employees to use their
internet connection to access their electronic Forms I-94.\22\ As
stated previously, 67 percent of farms have internet access. For the
purposes of this analysis, we assume that 33 percent (100 percent-67
percent) of travelers in the ``Temporary Workers'' and ``Other/
Unknown'' categories (for example, 690,894 in 2012) would need to
travel to access their electronic Form I-94.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ United States Department of Agriculture National
Agricultural Statistics Service. ``Farm Computer Usage and
Ownership.'' August 2013. Available at: https://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/FarmComp/FarmComp-08-20-2013.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2014.
\22\ It is also possible that some employers without internet
access help transport their employees to a location with internet
access. Employers have expended considerable effort to sponsor
temporary workers and they may view this as part of the cost of
using foreign temporary workers. However, as the burden of
demonstrating employment eligibility is on the worker, we assume
that the worker must bear any travel costs to obtain their
electronic Form I-94. To the extent that the employer is able to
provide more efficient access to the internet, costs to workers will
be lower.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP received several public comments regarding the ability of
travelers to obtain their printed electronic Form I-94 before they need
it. One employer of temporary workers commented that according to their
company policy, employees cannot use company computers to access the
internet until they have demonstrated their legal admission to the
United States by presenting a copy of their Form I-94.
While CBP believes that most employers with internet access allow
their employees to use a company computer to access their Form I-94, we
acknowledge that a small number of employers may choose not to do so,
or company policy may prohibit non-employees from accessing company
equipment. These travelers are included in the 33 percent of temporary
workers who we assume have to travel to access the internet.
One commenter noted that employees sometimes need to start work
very soon after arrival and do not have time to travel to a location
where they can print their electronic Form I-94. Once again, CBP notes
that any traveler, but particularly travelers with an immediate need
for their Form I-94 may request a paper Form I-94 at the secondary
inspection station at ports of entry or at CBP DIS. Another commenter
said that travelers often do not know they need a Form I-94 until after
they have left the airport, so requesting a paper Form I-94 at the port
is not a practical option. CBP acknowledges that many people may not
know that they need their Form I-94 until it is asked of them. As such,
CBP has made access to the I-94 Web site as easy as possible and will
continue to provide paper Forms I-94 upon request at CBP DIS. Another
commenter suggested that CBP provide kiosks at the ports of entry where
travelers could print their electronic Form I-94 prior to leaving the
airport. CBP has explored the possibility of placing kiosks at the
largest airports and seaports to give travelers the opportunity to
print their Form I-94 prior to leaving the port of entry. CBP has
determined that the benefits to the public do not outweigh the cost to
CBP, so it is not proceeding with kiosks at this time. See the
Regulatory Alternatives section for more information.
Now that we have estimated the number of aliens who do not have
ready access to the internet, we need to
[[Page 91660]]
develop an assumption for how long it takes to travel to a location
where they can access the internet. Based on our online review of
internet services provided by public libraries, we found that virtually
all public libraries provide public access to computers and the
internet, though many charge a nominal fee for printing. There are
16,766 public libraries in the United States.\23\ According to the
Department of Education, 94 percent of households live within 10 miles
of a public library and 83 percent live within 5 miles of one.\24\
Given the large number of library locations nationwide that provide
access to the internet and the fact that CBP makes the paper Form I-94
available upon request at ports and DIS, we believe most aliens who
travel to access the internet to print their electronic Form I-94 only
need to travel a short distance to do so. We estimate that round-trip
distance required to access a computer terminal and printing station at
a public library is 20 miles. We also assume that traveling to and from
a library takes 60 minutes of an aliens' time, which includes travel
time and the time to enter the library, locate an available computer,
wait to access the computer and print a Form I-94. In this analysis, we
assume that users pay $0.25 to print their electronic Form I-94 based
on a review of available online printing fees charged at public
libraries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ American Library Association. ``Quotable Facts about
America's Libraries.'' September 2012. https://www.ala.org/offices/ola/quotablefacts/quotablefacts/. Accessed Jun 13, 2014.
\24\ Department of Education: Households' Use of Public and
Other Types of Libraries: 2002. Derived from Table 19. Available at
https://harvester.census.gov/imls/pubs/Publications/2007327.pdf.
Accessed June 4, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We next estimate the value of time for those travelers affected by
this rule. Federal agencies typically estimate a monetary value of time
used or saved as a result of their regulatory actions. This allows
agencies to estimate the additional costs and benefits of their
regulatory actions on affected parties. The U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT) provides guidance on the value of time to use for
economic analysis.\25\ This guidance provides point estimates as well
as ranges for values of time for travelers based on average wage rate
analysis for different categories of travel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ U.S. Department of Transportation: ``Revised Departmental
Guidance on Valuation of Travel Time in Economic Analysis.''
September 28, 2011. Table 5. Available at https://www.dot.gov/sites/dot.dev/files/docs/vot_guidance_092811c.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to DOT estimates, the value of travel time is more than
twice as high for air travelers than for those traveling by surface
modes, which can be explained by the relatively high cost of air
travel. We note that the DOT estimates are intended to be used to
analyze actions that will reduce the time spent traveling. A person's
value of time while traveling may differ from their value of reducing
travel time. In most instances, this rule does not reduce the time
spent traveling because an alien typically completes the Form I-94
while en route to the United States, but rather reduces the time spent
on paperwork while traveling. The traveler is now able to spend this
time on leisure or business activities such as reading or drafting
documents. CBP believes that using the DOT values of travel time in
this situation is the most appropriate estimate because it reflects the
higher values of time for air travelers. Further, we note that to the
extent a person's value of time while traveling is different than their
value of reducing travel time, this difference is likely encompassed in
the DOT plausible range for the value of travel time. The DOT estimates
are in 2009 dollars, but the DOT provides a methodology to inflate its
estimates for future years. We have inflated the estimates to 2012
dollars, which is the first year of our period of analysis.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ To determine the hourly value of travel time savings in
2012 U.S. dollars, we applied the DOT's suggested growth rate of 1.6
percent per year to the hourly time values listed in 2009 U.S.
dollars.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a primary estimate, we use the DOT's point estimate for the
value of time for all-purpose air travel, which includes both personal
and business travel. This point estimate is $44.15, when inflated to
2012 dollars. We also use the DOT's range for all-purpose travel to
show a range of low and high estimates. This range is from $36.50 to
$54.75 when inflated to 2012 dollars. We apply these low, primary, and
high values of time to the travelers in our analysis. We use this
travel value of time framework to estimate the costs and savings of
this rule, since affected aliens previously completed the paper Form I-
94 while traveling.
We recognize that those who must travel to access the internet are
a special case of travelers and probably have different values of time
than the average air traveler. As previously discussed, the aliens
least likely to have internet access are those working as temporary
agricultural laborers. To estimate the value of time for these aliens,
we use the wage rate for H-2A seasonal (temporary) agricultural
workers.
According to the Department of Labor, H-2A temporary agricultural
workers have an average wage rate of 9.79 per hour.\27\ We recognize
that there are other classes of temporary workers, notably H-1B visa
holders, who likely have higher wage rates; however, these workers are
predominantly in specialized occupations such as medicine and computer
programming and are likely to have ready access to the internet.
Employers of these employees have an incentive to provide this access
as it is virtually costless and would allow workers to start working
earlier. We note that, notwithstanding the benefits to the employer of
providing this access, we received public comments indicating that some
employers of H-1B employees may not allow their workers to access
computers to print their electronic Form I-94. CBP does not believe
this represents a large number of employers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ Calculated from the Office of Foreign Labor Certification's
FY 2012 Annual Report using the weighted average of state average
wage rates. Available at: https://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/OFLC-2012_Annual_Report-11-29-2013-Final%20Clean.pdf. Accessed
on June 16, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, workers in occupations such as medicine and computer
programming are likely to have internet access from other sources, such
as their hotel or other place of lodging. Finally, as discussed above,
we have assumed that all temporary workers would access their
electronic Form I-94 and that 33 percent of them would have to travel
to do so. Any H-1B worker who must travel to access their electronic
Form I-94 is included in these estimates. But because we do not believe
the H-1B workers make up a large portion of the temporary workers who
must travel to access their electronic Form I-94, we use the estimated
wage of H-2A workers as our estimate for the value of time for those
who must travel to access their electronic Form I-94.
Now that we have estimated the number of aliens who log into CBP's
Web site to print their electronic Form I-94, the time it takes to
access that Web site, the number of people who need to travel to access
the internet, the time it takes to travel to and from an internet
access site, and the values of time for these groups, we can calculate
this rule's cost to these travelers. We first address the cost to log
into CBP's electronic Form I-94 Web site. Once again, CBP estimates
that it takes travelers 4 minutes to access and print their electronic
Form I-94, and that it costs them $0.25 per page to print their
electronic Form I-94. Exhibit 4 shows the 2013 to 2017 travelers' costs
for accessing and printing their electronic Forms I-94.\28\ As shown,
in 2013,
[[Page 91661]]
traveler costs of time to access electronic Forms I-94 and their cost
to print them ranged from $5.5 million to $8.1 million with a primary
estimate of $6.6 million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ The annual estimates of Forms I-94 in Exhibit 4 are based
on projections for all visa categories using growth rate estimates
developed OTTI. We adjust these estimates using our assumptions that
1 percent of B-1/B-2 travelers and 75 percent of non-B-1/B-2
travelers access the I-94 Web site.
Exhibit 4--Traveler Costs of Time to Access and Cost to Print Electronic Form I-94
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forms I-94............................................... 2,080,285 3,833,772 4,022,807 4,194,886 4,425,303
DOT--Low ($)............................................. 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50
DOT--Primary ($)......................................... 44.15 44.15 44.15 44.15 44.15
DOT--High ($)............................................ 54.75 54.75 54.75 54.75 54.75
Time Cost--Low ($)....................................... 5,061,648 9,328,146 9,788,098 10,206,792 10,767,432
Time Cost--Primary ($)................................... 4,730,513 8,147,564 7,990,003 7,786,713 7,677,030
Time Cost--High ($)...................................... 4,914,222 8,792,673 8,957,496 9,068,603 9,288,081
Printing Cost ($)........................................ 520,071 958,443 1,005,702 1,048,722 1,106,326
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Cost--Low ($).................................. 5,581,720 10,286,589 10,793,800 11,255,514 11,873,758
Total Cost--Primary ($).............................. 6,643,502 12,243,356 12,847,050 13,396,594 14,132,443
Total Cost--High ($)................................. 8,112,544 14,950,663 15,687,848 16,358,910 17,257,474
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
We next address the travel costs for those aliens who do not have
ready access to the internet. Once again, we assume that 33 percent of
travelers in the ``Temporary Workers'' and ``Other/Unknown'' categories
(approximately 12 percent of the total, see exhibit 2) would need to
travel 20 miles roundtrip and spend 60 minutes of time to access their
electronic Form I-94. We also assume that these travelers have a value
of time best characterized by the average H-2A wage rate of $9.79 per
hour. For the cost of travel, we use the 2012 IRS standard mileage rate
for business travel of $0.555 per mile.\29\ Exhibit 5 shows the 2013 to
2017 aliens' travel costs to access the internet. As shown we estimate
that the total travel costs were $9.3 million in 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ Internal Revenue Service. IR-2011-116, December 9, 2011.
Available at https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=250882,00.html.
Exhibit 5--Travel Costs *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Affected Aliens................. 444,381 818,952 859,333 896,092 945,312
H2A Wage Rate ($)............... 9.79 9.79 9.79 9.79 9.79
Time Cost ($)................... 4,350,487 8,017,542 8,412,870 8,772,738 9,254,608
Mileage Cost ($)................ 4,932,626 9,090,369 9,538,597 9,946,618 10,492,967
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Travel Cost ($)........... 9,283,113 17,107,912 17,951,467 18,719,357 19,747,575
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Estimates may not total due to rounding. Undiscounted dollars.
To summarize, both CBP and aliens bear costs as a result of this
rule. CBP bore the costs to link its data systems and to build a Web
site so aliens can access their electronic Forms I-94. CBP continues to
incur annual costs to operate and maintain the I-94 Web site. Temporary
workers and aliens in the ``Other/Unknown category (see Exhibit 2) bear
costs when logging into the Web site, traveling to a location with
public internet access and printing a paper copy of their electronic
Form I-94. The costs averaged $24.08 per traveler in 2013 for those in
the temporary worker and ``Other/Unknown'' categories who have to
travel to access their electronic Form I-94. Aliens arriving as B-1/B-2
travelers, diplomats, students, and those temporary workers and aliens
in the ``Other/Unknown'' category who do not need to travel to access
their Form I-94 bear costs when logging into the Web site and printing
electronic Forms I-94. Using the primary estimate for a traveler's
value of time, these costs for these groups averaged $3.19 per person.
Exhibit 6 summarizes the 2012-2017 costs of this rule. As shown,
costs for this rule in 2013 ranged from $15.0 million to $17.5 million.
In our primary estimate, costs for this rule are $16.0 million in 2013.
Less than one percent of these costs are incurred by the U.S. entities.
These are CBP's costs for automating the electronic Form I-94 and
developing the Web site travelers use to access their electronic Form
I-94. In 2013, CBP's costs were $92,000.
Exhibit 6--Cost Summary
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP Costs
I-94 Air/Sea Systems Costs.............................. 1,321,000 92,000 92,000 92,000 92,000 92,000
[[Page 91662]]
I-94 Land Systems Costs................................. .............. .............. .............. .............. 540,000 0
Total CBP Costs......................................... 1,321,000 92,000 92,000 92,000 632,000 92,000
Traveler Costs
Website Access Costs--Low............................... 0 5,061,648 9,328,146 9,788,098 10,206,792 10,767,432
Website Access Costs--Primary........................... 0 6,123,431 11,284,913 11,841,348 12,347,872 13,026,117
Website Access Costs--High.............................. 0 7,592,473 13,992,220 14,682,147 15,310,188 16,151,148
Travel Time Costs....................................... 0 4,350,487 8,017,542 8,412,870 8,772,738 9,254,608
Mileage Costs........................................... 0 4,932,626 9,090,369 9,538,597 9,946,618 10,492,967
Printing Costs.......................................... 0 520,071 958,443 1,005,702 1,048,722 1,106,326
Total Traveler Costs--Low........................... 0 14,864,832 27,394,501 28,745,266 29,974,870 31,621,333
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Traveler Costs--Primary....................... 0 15,926,615 29,351,267 30,798,517 32,115,950 33,880,018
Total Traveler Costs--High.......................... 0 17,395,656 32,058,574 33,639,315 35,078,266 37,005,049
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grand Total Costs--Low.......................... 1,321,000 14,956,832 27,486,501 28,837,266 30,606,870 31,713,333
Grand Total Costs--Primary...................... 1,321,000 16,018,615 29,443,267 30,890,517 32,747,950 33,972,018
Grand Total Costs--High......................... 1,321,000 17,487,656 32,150,574 33,731,315 35,710,266 37,097,049
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
4. Benefits
a. Benefits of Automation at Air and Sea Ports of Entry
This rule has benefits for CBP, carriers, and travelers to the
United States. Prior to the implementation of the interim final rule,
CBP returned the bottom portion of the Form I-94 to the traveler and
retained the top portion of the form. The information on the top
portion of the form was entered into CBP systems for use by CBP and
other agencies. CBP also received this information electronically from
other sources. In 2012, CBP linked its data systems to create an
electronic Form I-94, thus eliminating the need to continue entering
the data from the paper Form I-94 for air and sea travelers into CBP
systems. Prior to the implementation of the interim final rule, CBP
spent approximately $17.8 million per year on contract support for
manual Form I-94 data entry. CBP still must spend approximately $2.4
million in contract expenses to enter data from the paper Forms I-94
collected at the land border and the few that continue to be collected
at airports and seaports. We therefore estimate that this rule saves
CBP $15.4 million each year in contract costs. It is possible that
these savings could grow in future years if large numbers of travelers
at the land border opt for the voluntary electronic option.
CBP processing has also become more efficient as a result of this
rule. Prior to the implementation of the interim final rule, when the
traveler gave the completed Form I-94 to the CBP officer during the
inspection, the officer reviewed the form for errors and made
corrections as needed. The officer then stamped the top and bottom
portions of the form with the admission or parole stamp, notated the
alien's classification and duration of admission or parole and stapled
it to the traveler's passport. The interim final rule eliminated this
process.
A study of the processing times at three major U.S. airports
immediately following the implementation of the interim final rule
yielded mixed results; one airport showed a decrease in processing time
following the change in process, another showed an increase, and the
third showed no statistically significant difference in processing
times. We note that CBP has since resolved some technical issues with
the user interface design of the system used by CBP officers during
primary inspection that arose with the automated process. CBP has
anecdotal evidence that processing times have now dropped nationwide as
a result of the transition to the automated Form I-94 process.
CBP is conducting a more comprehensive time study that will examine
the entire time period following the implementation of the automated
process, but results of this study are not yet available. Accordingly,
for the purposes of this analysis, we assume that this rule will not
affect CBP processing times. To the extent that eliminating the paper
Form I-94 reduced processing times, CBP was able to focus its resources
on other areas, improving security and expediting the processing of
passengers.
We next examine the printing savings this rule generates for CBP
and carriers. Prior to the implementation of the interim final rule,
both CBP and carriers printed and stored Forms I-94. CBP printed forms
for use in primary and secondary passenger inspections when the
traveler did not fill out a form in advance or when the traveler made
an error in filling out the form. Prior to this rule, CBP spent
$153,360 each year printing the Form I-94 for air and sea travelers.
Since the interim final rule's implementation, CBP no longer needs to
print the Form I-94 for most of these travelers,\30\ which eliminates
this expense.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ CBP still prints a small number of forms for use at
airports and seaports for certain aliens such as asylees, certain
parolees, and those who request a paper Form I-94.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before the implementation of the interim final rule, carriers
printed the Forms I-94 for their passengers to complete before their
arrival in the United States. To estimate printing costs for carriers,
CBP obtained an estimate of total Form I-94 printing and storage costs
from a major airline. We increased this cost proportionally based on
annual international inbound passenger volumes to estimate the entire
industry's cost to print and store paper Forms I-94. Based on this
methodology, CBP estimates that carriers spent $1,344,450 annually to
print and store the Form I-94. Since the interim final rule's
implementation, carriers no longer need to print or store the Form I-
94, which eliminates these expenses.
We next estimate the value of air and sea travelers' time savings
resulting from the elimination of the paper Form I-94. Prior to the
implementation of the interim final rule, travelers spent 8 minutes
filling out the Form I-94 while in transit to the United States. This
rule eliminates the paper Form I-94 for air and sea travelers and, with
it, the 8-
[[Page 91663]]
minute time burden.\31\ We again apply the DOT range of plausible
values of time for air travelers, as well as their point estimate for
this value, to these aliens to determine the time savings from the Form
I-94 automation. Exhibit 7 shows the 2013 to 2017 travelers' reduction
in time burden resulting from no longer needing to fill out the paper
Form I-94. As shown, in 2013, the value of the reduction in time burden
ranged from $54.6 million to $81.9 million. In our primary estimate,
the reduction in time burden was $66.1 million in 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ For those with a need to access their electronic Form I-94,
this burden relief is partially offset by the 4 minute time burden
to access the Web site. The costs for this access are discussed in
the costs section above.
Exhibit 7--Reduction in Time Burden*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forms I-94............................................... 11,221,734 20,680,611 21,700,329 22,628,579 23,871,524
DOT--Low ($)............................................. 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50
DOT--Primary ($)......................................... 44.15 44.15 44.15 44.15 44.15
DOT--High ($)............................................ 54.75 54.75 54.75 54.75 54.75
Benefit--Low ($)......................................... 54,608,355 100,638,110 105,600,365 110,117,513 116,166,058
Benefit--Primary ($)..................................... 66,063,556 121,748,978 127,752,166 133,216,876 140,534,225
Benefit--High ($)........................................ 81,912,532 150,957,166 158,400,547 165,176,269 174,249,087
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
We next examine the savings to aliens who need a replacement Form
I-94. Prior to the implementation of the interim final rule, if aliens
lost the bottom portion of their Form I-94, they could file Form I-102,
Application for Replacement/Initial Nonimmigrant Arrival-Departure
Document, with USCIS to request a replacement. The form has a Paperwork
Reduction Act burden of 25 minutes per response and a fee of $330. As
stated earlier, prior to the implementation of the interim final rule,
17,700 Forms I-102 were filed annually. In 2013, 13,715 Forms I-102
were filed and USCIS expects 6,782 to be filed each year starting in
2014, a reduction of 10,918 each year due to this rule. Now these
travelers are able to access their electronic Form I-94, which saves
these individuals 25 minutes and $330.\32\ We calculate the value of
this time savings using USCIS's hourly wage estimate for Form I-102
filers of $30.74.\33\ Exhibit 8 shows the time and fee cost savings for
those who would otherwise have needed to file a Form I-102 from 2013 to
2017. As shown, in 2013 the value of this time and fee savings was $1.4
million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ As discussed in the costs section, we estimate a 4 minute
time burden for travelers who need to access their electronic Form
I-94. See the cost section for a complete discussion of the costs of
accessing the Web site as well as the cost to travel to a location
where they can access the Web site, where necessary.
\33\ USCIS estimates are based on U.S. Bureau of Labor data for
occupational employment statistics. The latest supporting statement
for the I-102 is available at: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewDocument?ref_nbr=201206-1615-003. Accessed June 4, 2014. This
supporting statement uses a wage estimate of $30.74.
Exhibit 8--I-102 Cost Savings *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I-102 Reduction.......................................... 3,985 10,918 10,918 10,918 10,918
Time Burden.............................................. 25 25 25 25 25
USCIS hourly wage ($).................................... 30.44 30.44 30.44 30.44 30.44
Time Savings ($)......................................... 51,041 139,841 139,841 139,841 139,841
Fee Savings ($).......................................... 1,315,050 3,602,940 3,602,940 3,602,940 3,602,940
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Savings ($).................................... 1,366,091 3,742,781 3,742,781 3,742,781 3,742,781
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Estimates may not total due to rounding. Undiscounted dollars.
Following the enactment of the interim final rule, travelers could
only access their current electronic Form I-94 until they departed the
United States. In response to public comments on the interim final
rule, CBP has enhanced the Web site to allow travelers to access their
most recent Form I-94 for 5 years from the date of issuance. In
addition, the Web site now provides foreign travelers with a 5 year
record of their travel history. Doing so has reduced Freedom of
Information Act requests received by CBP by approximately 2 percent.
Accessing the information via the Web site can be done within
minutes rather than the months it can take to receive information from
a FOIA request, which is a benefit to the traveler. In addition, this
saves the CBP FOIA office time, which it can spend processing other
FOIA requests. CBP is exploring whether it can expand the Web site to
include travel history dating back farther than 5 years. CBP is also
considering whether the Web site can be set up to include travel
history for non-Form I-94 users such as U.S. citizens and legal
permanent residents. CBP estimates that expanding the travel history
past 5 years has reduced the number of FOIA requests received by
approximately 6 percent and expanding it to include travel history for
U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents will reduce FOIA requests
by an additional 20 percent.
In summary, CBP, carriers, and aliens accrue benefits as a result
of this rule. CBP saves on contract and printing costs as well as FOIA
processing burdens. Carriers save on printing costs. All aliens save
the 8 minute time burden for filling out the paper Form I-94 and
certain aliens who lose their Form I-94 save the $330 fee and 25 minute
time burden for filling out the Form I-102; and, certain aliens save
processing time from the elimination of the FOIA process. Because we
only expect one percent of B-1/B-2 travelers to use the Web site to
access their electronic Form I-94, the benefits associated with the
[[Page 91664]]
Form I-102 accrue primarily to non-B-1/B-2 travelers. Using the primary
estimate for a traveler's value of time, the time burden savings for
all travelers is $5.89 per traveler. In addition, those non-B-1/B-2
travelers who no longer need to use a Form I-102 would achieve an
additional time and fee savings of $343.81 per traveler. Exhibit 9
summarizes the benefits of air and sea automation to each party. As
shown, total benefits for this rule ranged from $72.9 million to $100.2
million in 2013. In our primary estimate, the benefits of this rule
were $84.3 million in 2013.
Exhibit 9--Benefit Summary
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP Benefits:
CBP Contract Savings........ 15,400,000 15,400,000 15,400,000 15,400,000 15,400,000
CBP Printing Savings........ 153,360 153,360 153,360 153,360 153,360
Total CBP Benefits.............. 15,553,360 15,553,360 15,553,360 15,553,360 15,553,360
Carrier Printing Savings........ 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450
Traveler Benefits:
Form I-94 Time Savings--Low. 54,608,355 100,638,110 105,600,365 110,117,513 116,166,058
Form I-94 Time Savings-- 66,063,556 121,748,978 127,752,166 133,216,876 140,534,225
Primary....................
I-94 Time Savings--High..... 81,912,532 150,957,166 158,400,547 165,176,269 174,249,087
Form I-102 Time Savings..... 51,041 139,841 139,841 139,841 139,841
Form I-102 Fee Savings...... 1,315,050 3,602,940 3,602,940 3,602,940 3,602,940
Total Traveler Benefits--Low.... 55,974,446 104,380,892 109,343,146 113,860,294 119,908,839
Total Traveler Benefits--Primary 67,429,647 125,491,760 131,494,947 136,959,658 144,277,007
Total Traveler Benefits--High... 83,278,624 154,699,947 162,143,329 168,919,051 177,991,868
Grand Total Benefits--Low....... 72,872,256 121,278,702 126,240,956 130,758,104 136,806,649
Grand Total Benefits--Primary... 84,327,457 142,389,570 148,392,757 153,857,468 161,174,817
Grand Total Benefits--High...... 100,176,434 171,597,757 179,041,139 185,816,861 194,889,678
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
b. Benefits From Electronic Implementation at the Land Border
Under the new voluntary electronic I-94 submission process at the
land border, once the traveler arrives at the port, he/she will go
through secondary inspection, as they do under the paper process, where
the CBP officer will locate the traveler's information through a
document swipe in CBP's database. This will indicate that the fee was
paid and pre-populate the data fields from the document swipe and the
information provided by the traveler in the Web site. Once the CBP
officer has determined the traveler's admissibility, the CBP officer
will print out a paper I-94 to give to the traveler. The traveler will
already have paid the fee, so once he/she has cleared the secondary
inspection he/she will be able to enter the United States.
This voluntary process is purely beneficial to any traveler who
opts into it. By paying the fee online, the traveler avoids an average
20 minute wait to do so at the port of entry. Using our primary
estimate for the value of travel time of $44.15, the value of this time
savings is $14.72 per traveler. As this process is just a few months
old, CBP does not have data on how many travelers will opt to answer
the Form I-94 questions and pay the fee online. CBP is engaging in
public outreach to notify the public of the option, but only travelers
who have access to a computer or other device with internet
connectivity will be able to participate. In 2015, nearly 7 million
travelers arrived in the United States at the land border using a Form
I-94. CBP does not yet have sufficient data on how many travelers will
opt for the online fee payment option. For the purposes of this
analysis, CBP estimates that 5 percent of these travelers, or
approximately 350,000, will opt for the advance I-94 information
submission and payment process, for a total savings to travelers of
$5,152,000. To the extent that the reduction in CBP officer time
inputting data and processing fees results in shorter wait times,
travelers would have additional time savings benefits.
This process would save CBP 8 minutes of data input time and 2
minutes of fee processing time, a total of 10 minutes of CBP officer
time per traveler. Based on the estimate that 350,000 travelers will
opt for the advance I-94 information submission and payment, and using
the fully loaded wage rate of a CBP Officer of $85.47 per hour,\34\ we
estimate that this process would save CBP officers 58,333 hours and
$4,985,750. We note that this is a time savings that is monetized for
analytical purposes and not a budgetary savings. This time savings
could be spent on other priorities including reducing wait times. In
addition, this rule would reduce the amount of cash being handled at
ports of entry, which would simplify port of entry oversight and
auditing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ Source: CBP Position Model.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
c. Aggregate Benefits
Exhibit 10 shows the total benefits of the rule--both the benefits
of air and sea automation and the land border implementation.
Exhibit 10--Benefit Summary
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP Benefits:
CBP Contract Savings........ 15,400,000 15,400,000 15,400,000 15,400,000 15,400,000
CBP Printing Savings........ 153,360 153,360 153,360 153,360 153,360
[[Page 91665]]
CBP Time Savings............ 0 0 0 1,246,438 4,985,750
Total CBP Benefits.............. 15,553,360 15,553,360 15,553,360 16,799,798 20,539,110
Carrier Printing Savings........ 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450
Traveler Benefits:
Form I-94 Time Savings--Low. 54,608,355 100,638,110 105,600,365 110,117,513 116,166,058
Form I-94 Time Savings-- 66,063,556 121,748,978 127,752,166 133,216,876 140,534,225
Primary....................
I-94 Time Savings--High..... 81,912,532 150,957,166 158,400,547 165,176,269 174,249,087
Form I-102 Time Savings..... 51,041 139,841 139,841 139,841 139,841
Form I-102 Fee Savings...... 1,315,050 3,602,940 3,602,940 3,602,940 3,602,940
Land Process Time Savings... 0 0 0 1,288,000 5,152,000
Total Traveler Benefits--Low.... 55,974,446 104,380,892 109,343,146 115,148,294 125,060,839
Total Traveler Benefits--Primary 67,429,647 125,491,760 131,494,947 138,247,658 149,429,007
Total Traveler Benefits--High... 83,278,624 154,699,947 162,143,329 170,207,051 183,143,868
Grand Total Benefits--Low....... 72,872,256 121,278,702 126,240,956 133,292,542 146,944,399
Grand Total Benefits--Primary... 84,327,457 142,389,570 148,392,757 156,391,905 171,312,567
Grand Total Benefits--High...... 100,176,434 171,597,757 179,041,139 188,351,298 205,027,428
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
5. Net Benefits
Exhibit 11 compares the costs of this rule to the benefits, both in
total and for each party affected. As shown, in 2013, CBP had a net
benefit of $15.5 million, carriers had a net benefit of $1.3 million,
and travelers had a net benefit of between $41.1 and $65.9 million. In
our primary analysis, the net benefit to travelers was $51.3 million in
2013. Total 2013 net benefits ranged from $57.9 million to $82.7
million. In our primary analysis, the total net benefits were $68.3
million in 2013.
Exhibit 11--Net Benefits
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP..................................................... -1,321,000 15,461,360 15,461,360 15,461,360 16,167,798 20,447,110
Carriers................................................ 0 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450
Travelers--Low.......................................... 0 41,109,614 76,986,391 80,597,880 85,173,424 93,439,507
Travelers--Primary...................................... 0 51,503,032 96,140,493 100,696,430 106,131,707 115,548,989
Travelers--High......................................... 0 65,882,967 122,641,373 128,504,014 135,128,784 146,138,820
Grand Total--Low........................................ -1,321,000 57,915,424 93,792,201 97,403,690 102,685,671 115,231,067
Grand Total--Primary.................................... -1,321,000 68,308,842 112,946,303 117,502,240 123,643,955 137,340,549
Grand Total--High....................................... -1,321,000 82,688,777 139,447,183 145,309,824 152,641,032 167,930,380
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
Exhibits 12 and 13 present the present value net benefits of this
rule, discounted at the 3 and 7 percent discount rates. Exhibit 14
presents annualized net benefits at the 3 and 7 percent discount rates.
Total annualized net benefits range from $73.4 million to $111.8
million. In the primary analysis, annualized net benefits range from
$88.1 million to $90.9 million, depending on the discount rate used.
Exhibit 12--Net Benefits Discounted at a 3 Percent Rate
[2012 $] *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP..................................................... -1,321,000 15,011,029 14,573,815 14,149,335 14,364,879 17,637,857
Carriers................................................ 0 1,305,291 1,267,273 1,230,362 1,194,526 1,159,734
Travelers--Low.......................................... 0 39,912,246 72,567,057 73,758,478 75,675,484 80,601,739
Travelers--Primary...................................... 0 50,002,944 90,621,635 92,151,498 94,296,647 99,673,573
Travelers--High......................................... 0 63,964,046 115,601,256 117,599,376 120,060,175 126,060,630
Grand Total--Low........................................ -1,321,000 56,228,567 88,408,145 89,138,174 91,234,889 99,399,330
Grand Total--Primary.................................... -1,321,000 66,319,264 106,462,723 107,531,195 109,856,052 118,471,164
Grand Total--High....................................... -1,321,000 80,280,366 131,442,344 132,979,073 135,619,580 144,858,221
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
[[Page 91666]]
Exhibit 13--Net Benefits Discounted at a 7 Percent Rate
[2012 $] *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP..................................................... -1,321,000 14,449,869 13,504,551 12,621,075 12,334,335 14,578,507
Carriers................................................ 0 1,256,495 1,174,295 1,097,472 1,025,674 958,574
Travelers--Low.......................................... 0 38,420,200 67,242,895 65,791,878 64,978,397 66,621,077
Travelers--Primary...................................... 0 48,133,675 83,972,830 82,198,282 80,967,371 82,384,832
Travelers--High......................................... 0 61,572,866 107,119,725 104,897,553 103,089,103 104,194,959
Grand Total--Low........................................ -1,321,000 54,126,564 81,921,741 79,510,425 78,338,407 82,158,158
Grand Total--Primary.................................... -1,321,000 63,840,039 98,651,675 95,916,829 94,327,381 97,921,913
Grand Total--High....................................... -1,321,000 77,279,231 121,798,570 118,616,100 116,449,112 119,732,040
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
Exhibit 14--Annualized Net Benefits Discounted at 3 Percent and 7
Percent
[2012 $] *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Percent 7 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP..................................... 13,336,885 12,973,485
Carriers................................ 1,103,496 1,080,843
Travelers--Low.......................... 61,385,839 59,420,140
Travelers--Primary...................... 76,481,844 74,047,524
Travelers--High......................... 97,368,099 94,285,410
Grand Total--Low........................ 75,826,220 73,474,468
Grand Total--Primary.................... 90,922,226 88,101,852
Grand Total--High....................... 111,808,481 108,339,738
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
While this rule has a large net benefit to travelers as a whole, it
is important to note that the net benefits do not accrue uniformly
across all travelers. We next examine the effect of this rule on each
type of traveler. Exhibit 14 summarizes the costs and benefits per
traveler for each class of alien discussed in this analysis. With this
rule, no traveler needs to fill out the paper Form I-94 while en route
to the United States, saving all travelers 8 minutes, an estimated
$5.89 per traveler. The 1 percent of B-1/B-2 travelers and 75 percent
of other foreign travelers who need to access the Web site experience a
cost of $2.95 per person because of the 4 minute time burden to access
the Web site. In addition, those who need to print their Form I-94
incur a $0.25 printing cost. Those temporary workers and aliens in the
``Other/Unknown'' category who need to travel to access the Web site
and print their Form I-94 have an additional travel cost. They need to
travel an estimated 20 miles and 60 minutes round-trip to reach a
location with internet access, at a cost of $20.89 per traveler. We
reiterate that those with obstacles to accessing their electronic Forms
I-94 may request a paper Form I-94 at secondary inspection stations at
ports of entry or at CBP DIS. In addition, any travelers who would
otherwise need to file a Form I-102 and pay the $330 fee to obtain a
replacement Form I-94 receive an additional benefit of $342.81 as a
result of this rule. Travelers who opt for the electronic filing option
receive an additional benefit of $14.72.
Exhibit 15--Annual Effect of Rule by Class of Alien
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost of time
to access &
8 minute time cost to print Travel costs Net impact **
cost savings electronic
Form I-94
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Travelers who do not Access Website............. 5.89 0 0 5.89
1 percent of Tourists and Business Travelers (B- 5.89 -3.19 0 2.70
1/B-2).........................................
75 percent of Students.......................... 5.89 -3.19 0 2.70
75 percent of Temporary workers................. 5.89 -3.19 -20.89 -18.21
75 percent of Other/Unknown..................... 5.89 -3.19 -20.89 -18.21
75 percent of Diplomats......................... 5.89 -3.19 0 2.70
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
** In addition to this net impact, a small number of travelers experience savings resulting from no longer
needing to file a Form I-102. The primary estimate of Form I-102 cost savings to travelers is $342.81 per
traveler. We do not include the Form I-102 cost savings in the net impact column of Exhibit 14 because few
travelers benefit from this compared to the overall population of travelers impacted by the rule. Based on
data from USCIS, we estimate that 10,918 Form I-102s per year are no longer need to be filed as a result of
this rule. This is far less than one percent of the annual population of travelers affected by the rule
(10,918 Form I-102s / 20,815,527 travelers in 2014 <1%).
Annualized costs and benefits to all entities affected by the rule,
whether domestic or foreign, are presented in the following accounting
statement.
[[Page 91667]]
Accounting Statement: Classification of Expenditures for U.S. Entities,
2012-2017
[2012 $]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3% Discount rate 7% Discount rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Costs:
Annualized monetized costs.. $23.5 million..... $21.0 million.
Annualized quantified, but None.............. None.
non-monetized costs.
Qualitative (non-quantified) None.............. None.
costs.
U.S. Benefits:
Annualized monetized $104.1 million.... $101.1 million.
benefits.
Annualized quantified, but None.............. None.
non-monetized benefits.
Qualitative (non-quantified) Reduced primary Reduced primary
benefits. inspection inspection
processing times. processing times.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate annualized costs to all entities affected by this rule
to range from $21.0 million to $23.5 million. Monetized benefits of
this rule range from $101.9 million to $104.1 million to all entities.
Non-quantified benefits of this rule include the reduced processing
time that could result because of the automation of the Form I-94.
Annualized costs and benefits to U.S. entities are presented in the
following accounting statement, as required by OMB Circular A-4.
Accounting Statement: Classification of Expenditures for U.S. Entities,
2012-2017
[2012 $]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3% Discount rate 7% Discount rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Costs:
Annualized monetized costs.. $0.454 million.... $0.466 million.
Annualized quantified, but None.............. None.
non-monetized costs.
Qualitative (non-quantified) None.............. None.
costs.
U.S. Benefits:
Annualized monetized $13.5 million..... $13.3 million.
benefits.
Annualized quantified, but None.............. None.
non-monetized benefits.
Qualitative (non-quantified) Reduced primary Reduced primary
benefits. inspection inspection
processing times. processing times.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate annualized costs to U.S. entities as a result of this
rule to range from $0.454 million to $0.466 million. These are CBP's
costs for automating the electronic Form I-94 and developing the Web
site travelers use to access their electronic Form I-94. Monetized
benefits of this rule of $13.3 million to $13.5 million to U.S.
entities (CBP and carriers) represent reduced Form I-94 printing and
storage costs, reduced data entry contract costs, and reduced time
costs for CBP officers. Non-quantified benefits of this rule include
the reduced processing time that could result because of the automation
of the Form I-94.
6. Regulatory Alternatives
In the analysis for the interim final rule, we considered two
alternatives to the rule: (1) Eliminating the paper Form I-94 in the
air and sea environments entirely and (2) providing the paper Form I-94
to all travelers who are not B-1/B-2 travelers. As a result of public
comments on the interim final rule, we add a third alternative to our
analysis: (3) Providing kiosks at major ports of entry where travelers
have the option to print their electronic Form I-94 prior to leaving
the airport.
Under alternative one, if CBP were to eliminate the paper Form I-94
entirely in the air and sea environments, there are certain classes of
vulnerable aliens who would be harmed. Under the rule, asylees and
certain parolees are provided a paper Form I-94. These aliens have an
immediate need for the Form I-94 and cannot wait to access their
electronic Form I-94 from the Web site. These aliens represent a very
small portion of overall international travel and providing them with a
paper Form I-94 and entering the information into CBP data systems is
not a significant cost to CBP. In addition, under this rule, CBP has
continued to make the paper Form I-94 available to those travelers who
request it at secondary inspection stations and at DIS. CBP provides
this flexibility as a way to minimize the effect on those who face
obstacles to accessing their electronic Form I-94.
CBP does not have statistics on the number of travelers who request
a paper Form I-94. Anecdotal evidence suggests that few, if any,
travelers go to a secondary inspection station or a DIS for the purpose
of obtaining a paper Form I-94. This may be because the travelers who
need a paper Form I-94 do not know they need it when at the airport or
because they find it more efficient to access the I-94 Web site and
print the form than to go to secondary inspection or a DIS. Requesting
a paper Form I-94 at one of these locations can take longer than the 4
minutes we estimate it takes to access the I-94 Web site and the 60
minutes in travel time we estimate that those with obstacles to
internet access spend to obtain their Form I-94. As few aliens request
a paper Form I-94 at secondary inspection stations or DIS, the cost to
CBP for printing and data entry for these forms is minimal. Eliminating
the paper Form I-94 option for asylees, certain parolees, and those
travelers who request one would not result in a significant cost
savings to CBP and would burden travelers who have an immediate need
for an electronic Form I-94 or who face obstacles to accessing their
electronic Form I-94.
Under alternative two, all non-B-1/B-2 travelers required to
complete a Form I-94 would receive and complete the
[[Page 91668]]
paper Form I-94 during their inspection when they arrive in the United
States. The electronic Form I-94 would still be automatically created
during inspection, but the CBP officer would need to verify that the
information appearing on the form matches the information in CBP's data
systems. In addition, CBP would need to write the Form I-94 number on
each paper Form I-94 so that their paper form matches the electronic
record. As noted earlier, over four million, or 23.7 percent, aliens
were non-B-1/B-2 travelers in 2012. Filling out and processing this
many paper Forms I-94 at airports and seaports would increase
processing times considerably and it would only provide at best small
savings to the individual traveler. As noted in the ``Net Benefits''
section, the net cost of this rule to the 75 percent of temporary
workers and those in the ``Other/Unknown'' category of aliens who need
a printed Form I-94 is only $18.20 per traveler. Conversely, this rule
provides net benefits to travelers who do not need a printed Form I-94
and those arriving as students or diplomats.
CBP received several public comments related to the obstacles
travelers face in accessing a computer to print their electronic Form
I-94. Commenters said that many travelers need their Form I-94 very
soon after arrival, sometimes within hours of arrival, and they may
have difficulty learning that public libraries offer internet access,
where public libraries are, and how to travel to a public library. An
employer submitted a comment stating that company privacy standards
prevent it from allowing new hires to access the internet in order to
access the I-94 Web site. Separately, commenters pointed out problems
with the accuracy of the Form I-94 information that prevent them from
logging into the Web site. Others noted that there is no way to check
their Form I-94 for accuracy at time of entry into the United States.
One commenter suggested a solution to these problems: That CBP provide
kiosks at the airports where foreign nationals can inspect and print
their electronic Form I-94. CBP considered this suggestion and made it
an additional alternative to the rule.
Under alternative three, we consider the costs and benefits of
placing kiosks at the busiest U.S. airports and seaports to allow
travelers to inspect and print their electronic Form I-94 before
leaving the port of entry. For the purposes of this alternative
analysis, we examine the impact of placing dedicated kiosks at the
busiest 20 airports and the busiest 20 seaports. These locations
account for 92 percent of international air travelers and 95 percent of
international sea travelers.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ CBP's Operations Management Reporting database. Accessed
June 30, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP uses kiosks at many major airports for the Global Entry
program. These kiosks are dedicated for use by members of that program,
but similar kiosks could be purchased to allow travelers to access the
I-94 Web site and print their Form I-94. According to CBP's Office of
Field Operations, kiosks would cost $20,000 each and have an annual
operations and maintenance cost of $8,732. Placing a kiosk at each of
the busiest 20 airports and the busiest 20 seaports would cost $800,000
the first year and $349,280 in each subsequent years.
The benefit of placing kiosks at the busiest airports and seaports
depends on the number of people who would use the kiosks if they were
available. CBP has no data on the extent to which travelers would
choose to use the kiosks if they were available to them. As stated
previously, few travelers request paper Forms I-94 upon their arrival
in the United States, but that might be because doing so means going to
the secondary inspection station, which can take a considerable amount
of time. We also do not know how many people find errors on their
electronic Forms I-94 that they could correct immediately if they were
already at an airport or seaport rather than visiting a Deferred
Inspection Site at a later time, though data suggests this could be a
large number. In 2013, according to an analysis of data provided by
CBP's Office of Field Operations, about 14 percent of unique visitors
to the I-94 Web site were not able to locate their electronic Form I-
94. This may have been because of erroneous data on their Form I-94,
but it could also be because they did not actually have an Form I-94 on
the Web site (for example, if they are a U.S. citizen or if they
already departed the country prior to accessing the Web site).
Accessing the Web site via a kiosk would take 4 minutes of a
traveler's time, the same amount of time as via a personal computer.
Therefore, we do not believe that those who do not currently access
their electronic Forms I-94 (as stated earlier, this includes the 99
percent of B-1/B-2 travelers and 25 percent of non-B-1/B-2 travelers)
would now access them via the kiosks. Similarly, those with easy
computer access would experience no time savings by accessing their
Form I-94 via the kiosk instead of via the Web site, so we do not
include their benefits in the analysis. The travelers who would benefit
from the availability of kiosks to access their electronic Form I-94
are those who would otherwise need to travel to access the internet.
These travelers would no longer incur the opportunity cost of traveling
60 minutes or the mileage cost of driving 20 miles roundtrip. In our
analysis above, we have estimated that 33 percent of travelers in the
``Temporary Workers'' and ``Other/Unknown'' categories of travelers
would need to travel to access the internet. In 2014 (the first full
year the interim final rule is in effect) this represents approximately
819,000 travelers. Since we do not know how many of these travelers
would choose to use the kiosks, we present the costs and benefits
(using the primary estimates for travel and mileage costs) that would
accrue to these travelers under a wide range of assumptions of their
kiosk use. The benefits reflect the total travel costs, including
travel time and mileage, derived earlier in the analysis (See Exhibit
5). We present the reduction in travel costs (which is a benefit) that
would result if different percentages of travelers use a kiosk rather
than travel to a location where they can access the internet. The
results of our analysis are presented in Exhibit 16.
Exhibit 16--Comparison of Kiosk Costs and Potential Benefits
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kiosk use rate
* (%) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefits................................................ 100 9,283,113 17,107,912 17,951,467 18,719,357 19,747,575
75 6,962,334 12,830,934 13,463,600 14,039,517 14,810,681
50 4,641,556 8,553,956 8,975,733 9,359,678 9,873,788
[[Page 91669]]
25 2,320,778 4,276,978 4,487,867 4,679,839 4,936,894
10 928,311 1,710,791 1,795,147 1,871,936 1,974,758
5 464,156 855,396 897,573 935,968 987,379
1 92,831 171,079 179,515 187,194 197,476
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP Costs............................................... .............. .............. 800,000 329,280 329,280 329,280
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Note that Kiosk Use Rate represents the percentage of those who would otherwise need to travel to access a computer, not total Form I-94 travelers.
Only approximately 4 percent of total Form I-94 travelers need to travel to access the Web site (12 percent of travelers in the ``Temporary Worker''
or ``Other/Unknown'' categories times 33 percent of those categories who would need to travel to access the internet = 4 percent).
As shown in Exhibit 15, kiosks have a large potential for benefits
if they are used by a substantial number of travelers. If 100 percent
of travelers who would otherwise need to travel to access a computer
used the kiosks instead, benefits would outpace the costs of the kiosks
by a margin of $17.2 million to $0.8 million in 2014 and by more in
later years. Even if only 5 percent of travelers who would otherwise
need to travel to access a computer use the kiosks, benefits would
exceed costs. However, based on CBP's experience with travelers
requesting paper Forms I-94 at the ports of entry, CBP does not believe
enough travelers would use the kiosks to merit the expense. Further,
due to budget constraints, CBP does not have funds to acquire these
kiosks at this time.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), as amended
by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement and Fairness Act of 1996,
requires an agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis that
describes the effect of a proposed rule on small entities when the
agency is required to publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking.
A small entity may be a small business (defined as any independently
owned and operated business not dominant in its field that qualifies as
a small business per the Small Business Act); a small not-for-profit
organization; or a small governmental jurisdiction (locality with fewer
than 50,000 people). Since a notice of proposed rulemaking was not
necessary, a regulatory flexibility analysis was not required.
Nonetheless, DHS has considered the impact of this rule on small
entities.
This rule primarily regulates individuals and individuals are not
considered small entities. In addition, the individual travelers may
obtain a paper Form I-94 upon request, which would eliminate the
impacts of this rule for those travelers. Employers who have internet
access may choose to allow their employees to use their internet
connection to access the employee's electronic Form I-94, but they are
not required to do so and are therefore not directly regulated by this
rule. To the extent an employer chooses to assist an employee with
accessing the internet and printing a Form I-94, this impact would not
rise to being an economically significant impact under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
This rule also regulates air and sea carriers by eliminating the
need for them to provide the paper Form I-94 to their passengers. This
rule would impact all small carriers that transport passengers to the
United States. We therefore conclude that this rule has an impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
As stated in the economic impact analysis above, we estimate that
carriers spend $1.3 million a year printing and storing forms for their
passengers, based on 2011 passenger volumes. In 2011, 16,586,753 Forms
I-94 provided by carriers were filed at airports and seaports. Dividing
these figures, we estimate that carriers spent 8 cents per form on
printing and storage costs.
Under this rule, carriers would no longer need to print and store
the Forms I-94, thus eliminating these costs. According to a 2013 study
by the Department of Commerce's Office of Travel and Tourism
Industries,\36\ the average airline ticket price for an international
traveler traveling to the United States is $1,588. The cost to the
carrier of printing a Form I-94 is less than one hundredth of one
percent of the revenue a carrier receives from the average passenger.
We therefore do not believe that this rule has a significant economic
impact on small entities. We also note that any impact to small
carriers would be purely beneficial.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ Department of Commerce, National Travel and Tourism Office.
``Profile of Overseas Travelers to the United States: 2013
Inbound.'' Available at https://travel.trade.gov/outreachpages/download_data_table/2013_Overseas_Visitor_Profile.pdf. Accessed July
10, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Privacy
CBP will ensure that all Privacy Act requirements and policies are
adhered to in the implementation of this rule, and will be updating the
Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for the I-94 Web site. CBP will outline
in the updated PIA how CBP will ensure compliance with Privacy Act
protections. In the updated PIA, CBP will explain the privacy risks and
mitigations CBP has implemented during this phase of the Form I-94
automation process. DHS/CBP will post the updated PIA online at: https://www.dhs.gov/privacy-documents-us-customs-and-border-protection. The
PIA that covers the earlier phase of Form I-94 automation, and
describes how CBP complies with the Privacy Act, is available at:
https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/privacy/PIAs/pia-cbp-16-I-94-automation-20130227.pdf.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information regarding the CBP Form I-94 (Arrival/
Departure Record) was previously reviewed and approved by OMB in
accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507) under OMB Control Number 1651-0111. This OMB Control
Number also includes the Electronic System for Travel Authorization
(ESTA), ESTA fee, and Form I-94W, all of which are unaffected by this
rule. In addition, information for the electronic Form I-94 is
comprised of information already collected for APIS under approval
1651-0088. An agency may not conduct, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of
[[Page 91670]]
information displays a valid control number assigned by OMB.
The burden hours associated with the collections of information
contained in this Final Rule were previously reviewed and approved by
OMB. The automation of the paper Form I-94 for commercial aircraft and
vessel passengers in accordance with this Final Rule results in a
reduction of 1,278,456 annual burden hours under OMB control number
1651-0111.
Also in accordance with this Final Rule, the electronic Form I-94
is available to aliens on a secure Web site. Passengers may log into
the Web site using 7 pieces of basic identifying information that is
either known to the traveler (their first name, last name and date of
birth) or readily available on their passport (passport number, country
of issuance, date of entry, and class of admission). The estimated
annual burden associated with this Web site, is 254,680 hours under OMB
control number 1651-0111.
The automation of the paper Form I-94 for commercial aircraft and
vessel passengers in accordance with this Final Rule results in an
estimated reduction of 10,918 Forms I-102, Application for Replacement/
Initial Nonimmigrant Arrival-Departure Document, filed, and an
estimated reduction of 4,541.89 burden hours under OMB control number
1615-0079.
Exhibit 16 summarizes the difference in the burden for the previous
process and the process under this rule. As OMB Control Number 1651-
0111 includes ESTA and Form I-94W, we include those burden hours for
informational purposes. We note that these burden hours are unaffected
by this rule.
Exhibit 16--PRA Burden Effects of the Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Collection Respondents Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-IFR.................................... I-94......................... 14,000,000 1,862,000
Website...................... 0 0
I-102........................ 17,700 7,363
ESTA......................... 19,140,000 4,785,000
I-94W........................ 100,000 333,147
Final Rule................................. I-94......................... 4,387,550 583,544
Website...................... 3,858,782 254,680
I-102........................ 6,782 2,821
ESTA......................... 19,140,000 4,785,000
I-94W........................ 100,000 13,333
Difference................................. I-94......................... -9,612,450 -1,278,456
Website...................... 3,858,782 254,680
I-102........................ -10,918 -4,542
ESTA......................... 0 0
I-94W........................ 0 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amendments to the Regulations
For the reasons set forth above, the interim final rule amending 8
CFR parts 1, 210, 212, 214, 215, 231, 235, 245, 245a, 247, 253, 264,
274a, and 286, published at 78 FR 18457 on March 27, 2013, is adopted
as a final rule without change.
Jeh Charles Johnson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-30459 Filed 12-16-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P