Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Part 9 Miscellaneous Rules, 91898-91899 [2016-30199]

Download as PDF 91898 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) This action does not impose an information collection burden under the PRA because this action does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This action will not impose any requirements on small entities beyond those imposed by state law. D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This action does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, will result from this action. E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175, because the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction, and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action. G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory action’’ in section 2–202 of the VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:29 Dec 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs the EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. The EPA believes that this action is not subject to the requirements of section 12(d) of the NTTAA because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA. J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Population The EPA lacks the discretionary authority to address environmental justice in this rulemaking. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, New Source Review, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: December 8, 2016. Alexis Strauss, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 2016–30327 Filed 12–16–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R05–OAR–2015–0845; FRL–9956–61– Region 5] Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Part 9 Miscellaneous Rules Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve administrative revisions for incorporation into the Michigan’s State SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Implementation Plan (SIP). The submittal, by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) on December 21, 2015, makes minor corrections to Michigan’s Air Pollution Control Rules entitled ‘‘Emission Limitations and Prohibitions— Miscellaneous.’’ DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 18, 2017. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– OAR–2015–0845 at https:// www.regulations.gov or via email to blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the ‘‘For Further Information Contact’’ section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Hatten, Environmental Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6031, hatten.charles@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving Michigan’s SIP submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If EPA does not receive adverse comments in response to this rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, EPA will withdraw the direct final rule and will E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM 19DEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules address all public comments received in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule, and if that provision can be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For additional information, see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register. Dated: December 2, 2016. Robert A. Kaplan, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. [FR Doc. 2016–30199 Filed 12–16–16; 8:45 am] sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS BILLING CODE 6560–50–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:29 Dec 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 91899 December 8, 2016. The full text of the Petition is available for viewing and copying at the FCC Reference 47 CFR Parts 10 and 11 Information Center, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. [PS Docket No. 15–91, PS Docket No. 15– It also may be accessed online via the 94; Report No. 3061] Commission’s Electronic Comment Petition for Reconsideration of Action Filing System at: https://www.fcc.gov/ in Rulemaking Proceeding ecfs/filing/10919110011734/document/ 10919110011734e7d2. The Commission AGENCY: Federal Communications will not send a copy of this document Commission. pursuant to the Congressional Review ACTION: Petition for reconsideration. Act, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because this SUMMARY: A Petition for Reconsideration document does not have an impact on any rules of particular applicability. (Petition) has been filed in the Commission’s rulemaking proceeding Subject: Wireless Emergency Alerts; by Brian M. Josef, on behalf of CTIA. Amendments to part 11 of the DATES: Oppositions to the Petition must Commission’s Rules Regarding the be filed on or before January 3, 2017. Emergency Alert System, FCC 16–127, Replies to an opposition must be filed Report and Order, in PS Docket Nos. on or before January 13, 2017. 15–91 and 15–94, published at 81 FR ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 75710, November 1, 2016. This Commission, 445 12th Street SW., document is being published pursuant Washington, DC 20554. to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 47 CFR 1.4(b)(1) and 1.429(f), (g). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Wiley, Public Safety and Number of Petitions Filed: 1. Homeland Security Bureau, phone: Federal Communications Commission. (202) 418–1678; email: James.Wiley@ Marlene H. Dortch, fcc.gov. Secretary. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a [FR Doc. 2016–30168 Filed 12–16–16; 8:45 am] summary of the Commission’s document, Report No. 3061, released BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM 19DEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 243 (Monday, December 19, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 91898-91899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30199]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2015-0845; FRL-9956-61-Region 5]


Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Part 9 Miscellaneous Rules

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve administrative revisions for incorporation into the Michigan's 
State Implementation Plan (SIP). The submittal, by the Michigan 
Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) on December 21, 2015, makes 
minor corrections to Michigan's Air Pollution Control Rules entitled 
``Emission Limitations and Prohibitions--Miscellaneous.''

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 18, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2015-0845 at https://www.regulations.gov or via email to 
blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, 
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, 
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either 
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its 
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you 
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia 
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written 
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and 
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will 
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of 
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing 
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person 
identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section. For the 
full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia 
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please 
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Hatten, Environmental 
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6031, hatten.charles@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules section of this Federal 
Register, EPA is approving Michigan's SIP submittal as a direct final 
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a 
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A 
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final 
rule. If EPA does not receive adverse comments in response to this 
rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse 
comments, EPA will withdraw the direct final rule and will

[[Page 91899]]

address all public comments received in a subsequent final rule based 
on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. 
Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at 
this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an 
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule, and if that provision 
can be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final 
those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse 
comment. For additional information, see the direct final rule which is 
located in the Rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: December 2, 2016.
Robert A. Kaplan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2016-30199 Filed 12-16-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.