Proposed Settlement Agreement, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit, 91931-91932 [2016-30058]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Notices
V. Use of the Values as Swimming
Advisories
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
EPA is also publishing these values
for consideration by States and
authorized Tribes for use as swimming
advisories for notification purposes in
recreational waters to protect the public.
States and authorized Tribes could
consider using the values as swimming
advisories in making decisions whether
to close, open, warn about concerns in
recreational waters in a manner
consistent or similar to their current
recreational water advisory programs.
The values in this 304(a) recommended
criteria, even if used as swimming
advisories, are not regulations, and thus,
do not constitute legally binding
requirements.
[EPA–HQ–OGC–2016–0642; FRL 9956–69–
OGC]
VI. Solicitation of Scientific Views
EPA is soliciting additional scientific
views, data, and information regarding
the science and technical approach used
in the derivation of the draft Human
Health Recreational Ambient Water
Quality Criteria and/or Swimming
Advisories for Microcystins and
Cylindrospermopsin document. EPA is
proposing that these recommended
criteria, if adopted by States or
authorized Tribes as CWA section
303(c) WQS, be used for CWA section
303(d) assessment and listing purposes
where the magnitude is not exceeded for
more than 10 percent of days during a
recreational season up to one calendar
year as an indicator of long-term
impairment from multiple short-term
blooms. EPA is soliciting public
comment on this 10 percent exceedance
frequency as well as alternative
exceedance frequencies. For swimming
advisories, EPA is proposing that these
recommended values could be used to
trigger public notification whenever
values are exceeded for one day. EPA is
soliciting public comment on this
recommended single day exceedance as
well as alternative exceedance
frequencies.
Dated: December 9, 2016.
Joel Beauvais,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of
Water.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2016–30464 Filed 12–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:55 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
Proposed Settlement Agreement,
Clean Air Act Citizen Suit
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement
agreement; request for public comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with section
113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended
(‘‘CAA’’), notice is hereby given of a
proposed settlement agreement to settle
a lawsuit filed by American Chemistry
Council (‘‘Petitioner’’), in the United
States Court of Appeals for the D.C.
Circuit: American Chemistry Council v.
EPA (Case Number 15–1146). On May
18, 2015, Petitioner and Eastman
Chemical Company (‘‘Eastman’’) filed
petitions for review of an EPA rule titled
‘‘National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major
Sources: Off-Site Waste Recovery
Operations,’’ published in the Federal
Register on March 18, 2015 (the ‘‘Final
Rule’’). The proposed settlement
agreement would establish deadlines for
EPA to take specified actions.
DATES: Written comments on the
proposed settlement agreement must be
received by January 18, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID number EPA–
HQ–OGC–2016–0642, online at
www.regulations.gov. For comments
submitted at www.regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
from www.regulations.gov. The EPA
may publish any comment received to
its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (‘‘CBI’’) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
91931
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emily Seidman, Air and Radiation Law
Office (2344A), Office of General
Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone: (202)
564–0906; fax number (202) 564–5603;
email address: seidman.emily@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Additional Information About the
Proposed Settlement Agreement
On May 18, 2015, Petitioner and
Eastman filed petitions for review of an
EPA rule titled ‘‘National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Major Sources: Off-Site Waste
Recovery Operations,’’ published at 80
FR 14,248 (March 18, 2015) (the ‘‘Final
Rule’’). In addition, Petitioner and
Eastman submitted to the EPA a Petition
for Reconsideration of the Final Rule of
two issues: (1) equipment leak detection
provisions for connectors; and (2)
monitoring requirements for pressure
relief devices (‘‘PRD’’) on portable
containers. The EPA granted the request
for reconsideration of the Final Rule on
the issue of PRD monitoring
requirements for portable containers but
denied the request for reconsideration of
the equipment leak detection provisions
for connectors. The EPA provided
public notice of this denial through a
Federal Register notice published on
May 16, 2016 at 81 FR 30,182. On
September 26, 2016, Eastman filed an
unopposed motion for voluntary
dismissal which the court granted.
The proposed settlement agreement
would settle Petitioner’s lawsuit. Under
the terms of the proposed settlement
agreement, the EPA will reconsider the
Final Rule’s provisions relating to PRDs
and take an initial action no later than
July 20, 2017 and a final action no later
than January 18, 2018, as long as
Petitioner provides the EPA with the
requested data on PRDs identified in
Appendix A of the settlement agreement
by no later than October 28, 2016, or a
later date, as provided for in the
settlement agreement. Please review the
settlement agreement for additional
details, available in the public docket at
EPA–HQ–OGC–2016–0642.
For a period of 30 days following the
date of publication of this notice, the
Agency will receive written comments
relating to the proposed settlement
agreement from persons who were not
named as parties or intervenors to the
litigation in question. EPA or the
Department of Justice may withdraw or
withhold consent to the proposed
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
91932
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Notices
settlement agreement if the comments
disclose facts or considerations that
indicate that such consent is
inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or
inconsistent with the requirements of
the Act. Unless EPA or the Department
of Justice determines that consent to the
agreement should be withdrawn or
withheld, the terms of the agreement
will be affirmed.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
II. Additional Information About
Commenting on the Proposed
Settlement Agreement
A. How can I get a copy of the proposed
settlement agreement?
The official public docket for this
action under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OGC–2016- 0642 contains a copy of the
proposed settlement agreement. The
official public docket is available for
public viewing at the Office of
Environmental Information (OEI) Docket
in the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket
Center Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OEI
Docket is (202) 566–1752.
An electronic version of the public
docket is available through
www.regulations.gov. You may use the
www.regulations.gov to submit or view
public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the official
public docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are
available electronically. Once in the
system, key in the appropriate docket
identification number then select
‘‘search’’.
It is important to note that EPA’s
policy is that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public
viewing online at www.regulations.gov
without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information
claimed as CBI and other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute
is not included in the official public
docket or in the electronic public
docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted
material, including copyrighted material
contained in a public comment, will not
be placed in EPA’s electronic public
docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public
docket. Although not all docket
materials may be available
electronically, you may still access any
of the publicly available docket
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:55 Dec 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
materials through the EPA Docket
Center.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
B. How and to whom do I submit
comments?
[DA 16–1321]
You may submit comments as
provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are
submitted within the specified comment
period. Comments received after the
close of the comment period will be
marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to
consider these late comments.
If you submit an electronic comment,
EPA recommends that you include your
name, mailing address, and an email
address or other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD ROM you submit. This
ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows
EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical
difficulties or needs further information
on the substance of your comment. Any
identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will
be included as part of the comment that
is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA’s electronic
public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Use of the www.regulations.gov Web
site to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA’s preferred method
for receiving comments. The electronic
public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, which means EPA will
not know your identity, email address,
or other contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA’s electronic public
docket, EPA’s electronic mail (email)
system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system. If you send an email comment
directly to the Docket without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address is automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA’s
electronic public docket.
Dated: December 7, 2016.
Lorie J. Schmidt,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2016–30058 Filed 12–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Order Declares Redes Modernas de la
Frontera SA de CV Section 214
Authorization Terminated
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
International Bureau of the Federal
Communications Commission
(Commission) declares the international
section 214 authorization granted to
Redes Modernas de la Frontera SA de
CV (Redes) terminated given Redes’
inability to comply with an express
condition for holding the authorization.
It also concludes that Redes failed to
comply with those requirements of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended (the Act) and the
Commission’s rules that ensure that the
Commission can contact and
communicate with the authorization
holder and verify Redes is still
providing service, which failures have
prevented any way of addressing Redes’
inability to comply with the condition
of its authorization.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Veronica Garcia-Ulloa,
Telecommunications and Analysis
Division, International Bureau at (202)
418–0481 or Veronica.GarciaUlloa@fcc.gov.
SUMMARY:
This is a
summary of the Commission’s Order,
DA 16–1321, adopted and released
November 30, 2016.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 214(a) of the Act prohibits
any carrier from constructing,
extending, acquiring, or operating any
line, and from engaging in transmission
through any such line, without first
obtaining a certificate of authorization
from the Commission. Under section
214(c) of the Act, the Commission ‘‘may
attach to the issuance of the certificate
such terms and conditions as in its
judgment the public convenience and
necessity may require.’’ On July 27,
2007, the International Bureau granted
Redes an international section 214
authorization to provide international
global or limited global facilities-based
authority, and global or limited global
resale authority, in accordance with
section 63.18(e)(1) and 63.18(e)(2) of the
Commission’s rules. The International
Bureau granted the application on the
express condition that Redes abide by
the commitments and undertakings
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 243 (Monday, December 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 91931-91932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30058]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OGC-2016-0642; FRL 9956-69-OGC]
Proposed Settlement Agreement, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement agreement; request for public
comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as
amended (``CAA''), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement
agreement to settle a lawsuit filed by American Chemistry Council
(``Petitioner''), in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C.
Circuit: American Chemistry Council v. EPA (Case Number 15-1146). On
May 18, 2015, Petitioner and Eastman Chemical Company (``Eastman'')
filed petitions for review of an EPA rule titled ``National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Off-Site
Waste Recovery Operations,'' published in the Federal Register on March
18, 2015 (the ``Final Rule''). The proposed settlement agreement would
establish deadlines for EPA to take specified actions.
DATES: Written comments on the proposed settlement agreement must be
received by January 18, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OGC-2016-0642, online at www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at
www.regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
www.regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (``CBI'') or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Seidman, Air and Radiation Law
Office (2344A), Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone: (202) 564-0906; fax number (202) 564-5603; email address:
seidman.emily@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Additional Information About the Proposed Settlement Agreement
On May 18, 2015, Petitioner and Eastman filed petitions for review
of an EPA rule titled ``National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Major Sources: Off-Site Waste Recovery Operations,''
published at 80 FR 14,248 (March 18, 2015) (the ``Final Rule''). In
addition, Petitioner and Eastman submitted to the EPA a Petition for
Reconsideration of the Final Rule of two issues: (1) equipment leak
detection provisions for connectors; and (2) monitoring requirements
for pressure relief devices (``PRD'') on portable containers. The EPA
granted the request for reconsideration of the Final Rule on the issue
of PRD monitoring requirements for portable containers but denied the
request for reconsideration of the equipment leak detection provisions
for connectors. The EPA provided public notice of this denial through a
Federal Register notice published on May 16, 2016 at 81 FR 30,182. On
September 26, 2016, Eastman filed an unopposed motion for voluntary
dismissal which the court granted.
The proposed settlement agreement would settle Petitioner's
lawsuit. Under the terms of the proposed settlement agreement, the EPA
will reconsider the Final Rule's provisions relating to PRDs and take
an initial action no later than July 20, 2017 and a final action no
later than January 18, 2018, as long as Petitioner provides the EPA
with the requested data on PRDs identified in Appendix A of the
settlement agreement by no later than October 28, 2016, or a later
date, as provided for in the settlement agreement. Please review the
settlement agreement for additional details, available in the public
docket at EPA-HQ-OGC-2016-0642.
For a period of 30 days following the date of publication of this
notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to the
proposed settlement agreement from persons who were not named as
parties or intervenors to the litigation in question. EPA or the
Department of Justice may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed
[[Page 91932]]
settlement agreement if the comments disclose facts or considerations
that indicate that such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate,
or inconsistent with the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the
Department of Justice determines that consent to the agreement should
be withdrawn or withheld, the terms of the agreement will be affirmed.
II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Settlement
Agreement
A. How can I get a copy of the proposed settlement agreement?
The official public docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA-
HQ-OGC-2016- 0642 contains a copy of the proposed settlement agreement.
The official public docket is available for public viewing at the
Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket
Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the
telephone number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566-1752.
An electronic version of the public docket is available through
www.regulations.gov. You may use the www.regulations.gov to submit or
view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the
official public docket, and to access those documents in the public
docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, key in
the appropriate docket identification number then select ``search''.
It is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments,
whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available
for public viewing online at www.regulations.gov without change, unless
the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information claimed as CBI
and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute is not
included in the official public docket or in the electronic public
docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material, including
copyrighted material contained in a public comment, will not be placed
in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public docket. Although not all
docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access
any of the publicly available docket materials through the EPA Docket
Center.
B. How and to whom do I submit comments?
You may submit comments as provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late
comments.
If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD
ROM you submit. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. Any identifying or
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you
for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
Use of the www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. The
electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, email address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's electronic mail
(email) system is not an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send an
email comment directly to the Docket without going through
www.regulations.gov, your email address is automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket.
Dated: December 7, 2016.
Lorie J. Schmidt,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2016-30058 Filed 12-16-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P